• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Immigration bill clears hurdle with 13-5 approval by Senate committee
  • Recommended: IRS official to invoke Fifth Amendment at hearing
  • Recommended: With high-tech visa compromise, immigration reform proponents win GOP ally
  • Recommended: VIDEO: First Read Minute: Disaster relief politics lurks in tragedy's shadow

The first place for news and analysis from the NBC News Political Unit. Follow us on Twitter.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 24
    Jul
    2012
    6:30pm, EDT

    NBC/WSJ poll: Negative campaign takes toll on candidates; Obama up six points

    According to a new NBC-WSJ poll the negative campaigning has taken its toll on both candidates but more people said they didn't like Romney personally. President Obama was viewed negatively by 43 percent of voters and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney had a negative rating of 40 percent. NBC's Chuck Todd reports.

    By Mark Murray, Senior Political Editor, NBC News

    After weeks of furious attacks on the campaign trail, as well as millions of dollars in hard-hitting television ads, the increasingly negative tone of the election has taken a toll on President Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney, according to the new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

    Both presidential candidates have seen their “very negative” ratings increase to all-time highs in the poll. And Romney’s overall favorable/unfavorable score remains a net negative – a trait no other modern presumptive GOP presidential nominee (whether Bob Dole, George W. Bush or John McCain) has shared.

    What’s more, pluralities say that what they’ve seen, heard and read about the two candidates in recent weeks has given them less favorable impressions of each man.


    Indeed, the percentages signaling a less favorable impression about these candidates – especially at this point in the race – are greater than what the NBC/WSJ poll showed in the 2004 and 2008 presidential contests.

    “This is not characteristic … for July,” says Republican pollster Bill McInturff, who conducted this survey with Democratic pollster Peter D. Hart. “These are numbers you usually see in October.”

    “It does speak to the growing polarization of the campaign,” McInturff adds.

    A composite image of President Barack Obama, left, and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Photos taken July 24, 2012.

    The horserace remains tight
    In the presidential horserace, Obama leads Romney by six percentage points among registered voters, 49 percent to 43 percent.

    That’s a slight change – within the margin of error – from last month’s poll, which showed Obama ahead by three points, 47 percent to 44 percent.

    Read the full poll here (.pdf)

    In a smaller sample of registered voters living in 12 battleground states (Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin), the incumbent president’s lead over Romney is eight points, 49 to 41, which is essentially unchanged from June.

    But among high-interest voters across the country – those indicating a “9” or “10” in interest on a 10-point scale – Romney edges Obama by two points, 48 percent to 46 percent.

    What remains remarkable about this presidential contest, according to the NBC/WSJ pollsters, is how stable it has been, despite everything that has occurred in the past month.

    For example: The U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding Obama’s health care overhaul; the June jobs report, which showed that just 80,000 jobs were created last month; and the daily campaign attacks and counterattacks (including snipes over Obama’s business views, Romney’s unreleased tax returns, and the Republican’s time at Bain Capital).

    “So much has happened, and so little has changed,” says Hart, the Democratic pollster.

    Negative views on the rise
    But what did change was an increase in negative views about both Obama and Romney. The president’s favorable/unfavorable score in the poll is 49 percent to 43 percent, a slight change from June when it was 47 percent to 38 percent.

    Moreover, 33 percent view Obama very positively, while 32 percent view him very negatively – which is his highest “very negative” number in poll.

    By comparison, Romney’s overall favorable/unfavorable score is 35 percent to 40 percent, with 24 percent viewing him “very” negatively – also his highest mark here.

    Read the full poll here (.pdf)

    In fact, Romney would be the first GOP presumptive presidential nominee since 1996 to head into his nominating convention with a net-negative favorable/unfavorable score.

    In 1996, Bob Dole’s score was 39 percent to 36 percent; in 2000, George W. Bush’s was 52 percent to 32 percent; and in 2008, John McCain’s was 42 percent to 30 percent.

    Also in the poll, 43 percent say that what they have seen, heard or read about Romney gives them a less favorable impression of the candidate, versus 28 percent who have a more favorable opinion.

    For Obama on this same question, 44 percent have a less favorable impression about him, while 27 percent have a more favorable opinion.

    This is a noticeable shift for Obama from the summer of 2008, when it was 34 percent less favorable versus 30 percent more favorable.

    Asked which candidate is conducting a more negative campaign, 22 percent pick Obama, 12 percent choose Romney, and 34 percent say both are running negative campaigns. 

    And asked about Romney’s tax returns – which the Republican candidate says he won’t release prior to 2010 – 32 percent believe that what they’ve heard about the returns give them a more negative opinion of Romney. That’s compared with 4 percent who have a more positive view, and four in 10 who say the returns don’t make a difference.

    Economic pessimism vs. economic messaging
    Here’s another change from June: growing pessimism about the economy.

    According to the new poll, just 27 percent think the U.S. economy will improve in the next year, which is down eight points from last month.

    What’s more, a majority of respondents – 55 percent – say they are less optimistic about the economy after what they have seen, read and heard in the last few weeks. That’s up six points from June.

    Just 44 percent approve of the president’s handling on the economy, which is a two-point increase from last month. And his overall job-approval rating stands at 49 percent, also up two points from June.

    This economic pessimism has given Romney more than an opening in this presidential contest.

    The former Massachusetts governor holds a seven-point lead over Obama (43 percent to 36 percent) on which candidate has better ideas to improve the economy, and he holds a nearly identical edge (43 percent to 37 percent) in dealing with the economy.

    Read the full poll here (.pdf)

    But when it comes to economic messaging, it’s the president who has the advantage.

    A whopping 80 percent of respondents say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who “will fight for balance and fairness and encourage the investments needed to grow our economy and strengthen the middle class” – which happens to be Obama’s message on the campaign trail.

    By contrast, 68 percent say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who “wants to restore the values of economic freedom, opportunity and small government” – which is essentially Romney’s message.

    In addition, Obama leads Romney by 16 points (49 percent to 33 percent) on which candidate better looks out for the middle class.

    Romney’s likeability and values deficits
    While pessimism about the economy is Obama’s vulnerability, Romney’s is a likeability deficit.

    A combined 47 percent say they like Romney personally, including 19 who disapprove of his policies. But that’s compared with 67 percent who say the same about Obama.

    Another shortcoming for Romney is that voters don’t necessarily relate to him. Just 42 percent say that he has a background and set of values that they can identify with, while 50 percent say that about the president.

    The NBC/WSJ poll was conducted of 1,000 registered voters (including 300 by cell phone) from July 18-22, and it has an overall margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points.   

    3035 comments

    Is NBC outsourcing its polling techniques to 3rd graders in Bombay? That is the wackiest poll ever done. Stop Obama's war on Capitalism, his war on America, and his war on Family Values. The corrupt Obama administration must go!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: barack-obama, decision-2012, polls, first-read, mark-murray, mitt-obama
  • 5
    Jul
    2012
    6:07pm, EDT

    Team Romney rakes in $100 million in June

    By NBC's Garrett Haake and Mark Murray

    WOLFEBORO, NH -- Mitt Romney's campaign, the Republican National Committee, and the Romney Victory Fund raised more than $100 million in June, the campaign confirmed to NBC News.

    That fundraising milestone is likely to best President Obama's total cash haul (for his campaign, the DNC, and competing victory fund) for the second straight month. The campaigns have until July 20 to file June's fundraising reports with the Federal Election Commission.

    Last month, Romney's fundraising was buoyed by his single-best fundraising day of between $6 million and $8 million in Michigan, and by a three-day swing through Texas that netted the presumptive GOP nominee $15 million. Big-ticket events in Washington DC and in the New York City area also helped fill campaign coffers.

    In May, which was Romney's first full month fundraising as the GOPs' presumptive nominee, his combined total was $76.8 million, compared with Team Obama's $60 million haul.

    But when totals for just the campaigns were tallied for May -- where donations are limited to just $5,000 per person for both the primaries and general election -- Obama outraised Romney, $39 million to $23 million.

    Obama campaign officials had predicted Romney would outraise them in June -- and possibly for the election cycle -- when his campaign and party funds were lumped in with pro-Republican Super PACs. Today, Obama campaign spokesperson Ben LaBolt accused the Romney campaign of releasing their fundraising totals today to divert attention from a string of negative stories bedeviling Romney this week.

    “Mitt Romney is trying to distract from a week when he took contradictory positions on the freeloader penalty in the Affordable Care Act and we learned more about his offshored finances in Switzerland, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands," he said in a statement. "Americans are less concerned about how much money he raised to get himself elected and more interested in what he would do after repealing health reform, which he has refused to share, and why he won’t disclose the necessary tax returns that prove whether or not he paid any U.S. taxes on his shell corporation in Bermuda.”

    Romney spent significant time and effort in fundraising in June, limiting public campaign events to focus on criss-crossing the country to build the warchest necessary to hire more staff and buy airtime in swing state television markets. 

    His July will begin in much the same way, when Romney returns to the campaign trail from his New Hampshire vacation on Sunday with a series of fundraisers in the Hamptons, on New York's Long Island. On Monday, he'll attend a fundraiser at a bundler's home in Aspen, Colorado, and on Thursday he'll be joined at a Wyoming fundraiser by former Vice President Dick Cheney. 

    102 comments

    Well, GOODEE for them! Are we supposed to be impressed? If so, I hate to tell you it's just not working for me... Now, if someone could find out how much Willard has stashed in the Cayman & Swiss bank accounts, that would be noteworthy... Poor Willard, all that cash and it still can't buy him so …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: decision-2012, mitt-romney, first-read, garrett-haake, mark-murray
  • 26
    Jun
    2012
    5:00pm, EDT

    NBC/WSJ poll: Six in 10 say Obama inherited current economy

    By NBC's Mark Murray
    Follow @mmurraypolitics

     

    Another set of numbers from our new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll: 60 percent say President Obama inherited the current economic conditions, compared with 26 percent who blame his policies for the state of the economy.

    That's a slight change from Aug. 2011, when 56 percent said the president inherited the economy, versus 33 percent who singled out his policies.

    Yet when asked in a separate question whether the president’s policies have helped or hurt the economy, 33 percent say they’ve hurt; 32 percent say they’ve helped; and another 32 percent answer that they haven’t made much of a difference.

    The full NBC/WSJ poll -- which was conducted of 1,000 adults and which has a margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points -- is released at 6:30 pm ET.

    1129 comments

    Stop Obama's war on America!!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: barack-obama, economy, decision-2012, polls, first-read, mark-murray
  • 26
    Jun
    2012
    1:00pm, EDT

    NBC/WSJ poll: More would be pleased if health law ruled unconstitutional

    By NBC's Mark Murray

    With the U.S. Supreme Court set to decide on President Obama's health-care law on Thursday, more Americans say they would be pleased if the law is ruled unconstitutional than constitutional, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

    In the survey, 37 percent say they would be pleased if the Supreme Court finds the law unconstitutional, versus 22 percent who say they would be disappointed with that outcome.

    Yuri Gripas / Reuters

    A group of doctors protest against individual mandate in President Obama's health care reform in front of U.S. Supreme Court in Washington June 25.

    On the flip side, 28 percent say they would be pleased if the court rules the law is constitutional, compared with 35 percent who say they would be disappointed.

    But pluralities on both questions maintain they would have mixed feelings with either outcome, suggesting that opinion could change depending on how the Supreme Court ultimately decides on Thursday.

    What's more, if the law's individual mandate is found to be unconstitutional, 25 percent say that would hurt them and their families; 18 percent say it would help; and 55 percent say it wouldn't make a difference.

    Overall, 35 percent think the health-care law is a good idea, versus 41 percent who believe it's a bad idea -- numbers that have been essentially unchanged in the survey since it was signed into law in March 2010.

    The full NBC/WSJ poll -- which was conducted June 20-24 of 1,000 adults, and which has a margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points -- will be released today at 6:30 p.m.ET.

    2565 comments

    We shall see... On the other hand, 77% of Americans think we need some sort of HCR! Maybe now would be a good time for the GNOP to tell us what their plan contains on replacing it with - other then to DIE QUICKLY! American exceptional-ism my ass!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: health-care, featured, decision-2012, supreme-court, polls, appfeatured, mark-murray
  • 22
    Jun
    2012
    5:35pm, EDT

    Obama hits Romney over outsourcing

    By NBC's Mark Murray and Shawna Thomas

    TAMPA, FL -- Not only did President Obama today take a jab at Mitt Romney in his speech before the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials in Orlando, FL.

    He took another here at a later campaign event in Tampa, hitting the former Massachusetts governor for today's Washington Post article, which reported that Bain Capital -- under Romney's leadership -- invested in companies that outsourced jobs to India and China.

    "Today, it was reported in the Washington Post that the companies his firm owned were pioneers in outsourcing jobs to China and India," Obama said. "We do not need an outsourcing pioneer in the Oval Office. We need a president that will fight for American jobs, for American manufacturing."

    "That’s what my plan will do. That’s why I’m running for a second term as president of the United States,” he finished to thunderous applause.

    The weather cooperated with that storyline. A large thunderclap dramatically shook the building as the president said of Republicans, “They figure that if we simply eliminate regulations and cut taxes by trillions of dollars then the market will solve all of our problems.”

    The Romney camp responded to Obama's attack with this statement: “President Obama continues to use false and discredited attacks to divert attention from his abysmal economic record... He has a decades-long record of job creation, both in the private sector and as governor, when the unemployment rate in Massachusetts fell to 4.7% on his watch. If President Obama had even half of Mitt Romney’s record on jobs, he’d be running on it."

    164 comments

    "Today, it was reported in the Washington Post that the companies his firm owned were pioneers in outsourcing jobs to China and India," Obama said. "We do not need an outsourcing pioneer in the Oval Office. We need a president that will fight for American jobs, for American manufacturing." Let's "Ou …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: barack-obama, decision-2012, mitt-romney, first-read, shawna-thomas, mark-murray
  • 21
    Jun
    2012
    3:24pm, EDT

    Romney accuses Obama of taking Latino vote 'for granted'

    By NBC's Andrew Rafferty and Mark Murray

    ORLANDO, FL -- Speaking to a crowd of hundreds at the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials conference here, Mitt Romney criticized President Obama for putting immigration reform on the backburner and for taking the Latino vote "for granted."

    Obama addresses the conference tomorrow.

    "For two years, this president had huge majorities in the House and Senate -- he was free to pursue any policy he pleased," Romney said. "But he did nothing to advance a permanent fix for our broken immigration system. Instead, he failed to act until facing a tough re-election and trying to secure your vote."

    Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaks to the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials in Orlando, Fla., on Thursday.

    What Romney didn't say is that a Republican filibuster, in late 2010, stopped Democratic efforts to pass a DREAM Act -- previously supported by some GOP senators -- granting a path to citizenship to young illegal immigrants pursuing a college degree or serving in the U.S. military. The measure received 55 Senate votes, short of the 60 needed to clear the filibuster.

    Also left unsaid is that, due to congressional opposition, both George W. Bush and Barack Obama have been unable to achieve comprehensive immigration reform.

    In his remarks today, Romney also argued that Obama is taking the Latino vote for granted. (In the May NBC/WSJ/Telemundo oversample of Latino voters, Obama led Romney among this demographic, 61%-27%.)

    "Tomorrow, President Obama will speak here. Of course, that's the first time he's spoken here since his last campaign. He may admit that he hasn't kept every promise. And he'll probably say that, even though you aren't better off today than you were four years ago, things could be worse. He'll imply that you really don't have an alternative."

    Romney added, "I believe he's taking your vote for granted."

    Furthermore, the former Massachusetts governor added more details to his immigration plans, saying that he would work to reallocate green cards to ensure that spouses and children of legal permanent residents get to stay with their families, and that he would grant green cards to those who get advanced degrees in the U.S.

    "We can find common ground here, and we must," Romney said. "We owe it to ourselves as Americans to ensure that our country remains a land of opportunity –- both for those who were born here and for those who share our values, respect our laws, and want to come to our shores. 

    This tone was a striking departure from the rhetoric that Romney has used in the Republican primaries -- in both 2007-2008 and 2011-2012.

    Indeed, the issue was a clear way for the former Massachusetts governor to prove his conservative credentials. And it was a weapon he used -- often with success -- against John McCain, Rick Perry, and Newt Gingrich, all of whom had supported some liberal policies toward illegal immigrants.

    For instance, before the New Hampshire primary in Jan. 2008, Romney's campaign blasted McCain on immigration. "McCain pushed to let every illegal immigrant stay here permanently -- even voted to allow illegals to collect Social Security," went one Romney TV ad. "And Mitt Romney?... He opposes amnesty for illegals."

    1077 comments

    How do you belong to a party that actively fought against the reform, and then point out that the other party didn't get it done as some kind of failing?!?! I've said it before and I'll say it again, how do righties not just laugh at themselves?!?!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: decision-2012, mitt-romney, first-read, andrew-rafferty, mark-murray
  • 21
    Jun
    2012
    1:55pm, EDT

    Romney still doesn't answer if he'd overturn Obama's immigration action

    By NBC's Mark Murray

    In remarks he delivered in Florida before Latino political leaders, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney once again declined to answer if he would overturn President Obama's executive action to no longer deport qualified young illegal immigrants.

    Instead, Romney explained that he would work to craft a long-term solution dealing with illegal immigration.

    "Some people have asked if I will let stand the president's executive action," Romney said at the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials' conference. "The answer is that I will put in place my own long-term solution that will replace and supersede the president's temporary measure."

    Left unsaid, of course, is what Romney -- if elected president -- would do before signing long-term legislation into law, or if the legislation couldn't be passed. Remember: Due to congressional opposition, both George W. Bush and Barack Obama have been unable to pass comprehensive legislation dealing with illegal immigration.

    Today wasn't the first time Romney has declined to say if he would overturn Obama's policy to no longer deport young illegal immigrants who have graduated from high school, who are serving in the military, and who have a clean criminal record.

    Mitt Romney criticized the action after the president announced it last Friday. The reason: because it is temporary.

    “I think the action that the president took today makes it more difficult to reach that long-term solution, because an executive order is, of course, just a short-term matter.”

    He added that Obama's executive action can be “reversed by subsequent presidents.”

    But that begged the question: Would a President Romney reverse it? 

    It was exactly the question CBS' Bob Schieffer asked him last weekend.

    BOB SCHIEFFER: Sure, but would you repeal this?

    MITT ROMNEY: Well, it would be overtaken by events, if you will, by virtue of my putting in place a long-term solution with-- with legislation which creates law that relates to these individuals, such that they know what their-- their stat-- setting is going to be

    BOB SCHIEFFER: I-- I won't keep on about this but just to-- to make sure I understand, would you leave this in place while you worked out a long-term solution or would you just repeal it?

    MITT ROMNEY: We'll-- we'll look at that-- we'll look at that setting as we-- as we reach that. But my anticipation is, I'd come into office and say we need to get this done on a long-term basis, not this kind of a stopgap measure. What-- what the president did, he-- he should have worked on this years ago. If he felt seriously about this, he should have taken action when he had a Democrat House and Senate, but he didn't. He saves these sort of things until four and a half months before the general election.

    The Obama campaign issued this response to Romney's speech: “Today, Mitt Romney told the largest national gathering of Hispanic elected officials: ‘When I make a promise to you - I will keep it.’ But in front of an audience of Republican primary voters, he called the DREAM Act a ‘handout’ and promised to veto it. Now, after seven days of refusing to say whether or not he’d repeal the Obama administration’s immigration action that prevents young people who were brought here through no fault of their own as children from being deported, we should take him at his word that he will veto the DREAM Act as president.”

    324 comments

    Were anyone seriously expecting him to? Man though, I sure have to give Willard some credit, the dude really knows how to work a crowd! lmao! Did they pass out No-Doze in the swag bags?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: featured, decision-2012, mitt-romney, first-read, mark-murray
  • 20
    Jun
    2012
    3:56pm, EDT

    Obama camp: We're going to be outspent

    By NBC's Mark Murray
    Follow @mmurraypolitics

     

    Top Obama campaign officials today said they would be outspent by Mitt Romney and allies, especially when you include all the various outside groups.

    Jason Reed / Reuters

    President Barack Obama speaks at a news conference at the conclusion of the G20 Summit in Los Cabos June 19, 2012.

    "We are going to be the first incumbent [president] outspent," said one of these officials at a pen-and-pad session with reporters in DC.

    The ad-spending numbers for the general election show the two sides to be even right now. According to data from NBC/SMG Delta, the Obama campaign has spent nearly $61 million on advertising, versus $14 million for the Romney camp.

    But when you factor in all the outside groups -- including the Super PACs (which have to disclose their donors) and 501c4s (which don't) -- Romney and his allies reach parity with Obama and his allies, $73 million to $73 million.

    The same Obama campaign official predicted that Romney, the Republican National Committee, and the Romney Victory Fund would raise $100 million in June -- more than Team Obama would. In May, Team Romney outraised Team Obama, $77 million to $60 million.

    When a reporter mentioned that the Obama campaign had a clear financial advantage over John McCain in 2008, another top official shot back that all of that money was transparent and disclosed, and much of it came from small donors. But this time, the official added, there are a slew of GOP-leaning 501c4 groups -- like the Karl Rove-backed Crossroads GPS and the Koch Brothers' Americans for Prosperity -- that don't have to disclose their donors and are being funded by seven-figure and even eight-figure checks.

    The purpose of this pen-and-pad meeting was for the Obama campaign to discuss the state of the race, and these officials maintained that the Obama-Romney contest was close as expected. "We've got the race we anticipated," said one official.

    And what's especially striking, these officials continued, is how stable the contest has been, despite all the polls and the various ups and downs. "The reality is there hasn't been a great deal of change in the last few months," the same official added.

    That said, the campaign discussed all of its different paths to 270 electoral votes, its strength with minority voters (predicting they would represent 28% of all voters, up from 26% in 2008), its appeal with female voters, and its organizational advantage over Romney.

    The campaign also said it wouldn't be backing away from its attacks on Romney's business background at Bain Capital, contending that they're working and they highlight Romney's economic values.

    Meanwhile, it said, the advertising attacks on Romney's record as Massachusetts governor are intended to point to his competence -- or lack thereof. "Most Americans don't know he was the governor of Massachusetts because he's trying to put that behind him," argued one official.

    The campaign officials emphasized another point to the assembled reporters: Romney has yet to receive scrutiny for his policies and plans, and they hope that scrutiny comes.

    In fact, they pointed to five issues -- the Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction plan, how to pay for Romney's $5 trillion tax cut, immigration, foreign policy, and the Romney jobs plan -- where the former Massachusetts governor has been vague or unspecific.

    If Romney wants to be president, one of the officials said, "he ought to answer single, direct questions about his positions... If there is one consistent quality he has shown, it is evasiveness. They don't want to be scrutinized."

    And another official charged that Romney "is the most secretive presidential candidate in our lifetime," noting that he hasn't released the names of his campaign bundlers, his income tax returns (beyond one for 2010 and an estimate for 2011), or many of his records as Massachusetts governor.

    853 comments

    Outspent may in fact be the "new reality" for the POTUS'S campaign....I am almost sure that President Obama will exert "Executive Privilege on how much he has currently collected compared to what he collected in 2008 just 140 days before that election! I suspect the number is much lower this year an …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: barack-obama, featured, decision-2012, mitt-romney, appfeatured, mark-murray
  • 18
    Jun
    2012
    4:09pm, EDT

    Kerry to play Romney in mock Obama debates

    By NBC's Mark Murray and Kelly O'Donnell

    The Obama campaign has tapped Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) -- the party's presidential nominee in 2004 -- to play Mitt Romney in the mock debate preparations, according to officials in the campaign and in the senator's office.

    Kerry is a logical choice here, having both home-state experience with Romney and being in the spotlight himself with debates against George W. Bush in 2004, as well as a series of high-profile debates against Republican Bill Weld in 1996.

    The Romney campaign hasn't announced who will play Obama in its mock debates. But Sen. Rob Portman, who is one of Romney's VP possibilities, played Barack Obama for John McCain in 2008. 

    68 comments

    Not a bad choice! I like Kerry but, to be honest he's about as electrifying as Willard! You can't force charisma!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: barack-obama, decision-2012, mitt-romney, first-read, mark-murray
  • 18
    Jun
    2012
    11:45am, EDT

    Romney also has played politics with immigration

    By NBC's Mark Murray
    Follow @mmurraypolitics

     

    In his interview with CBS over the weekend, Mitt Romney joined the chorus of GOP critics arguing that President Obama played politics with his immigration announcement on Friday.

    Romney: I think the timing is pretty clear, if he really wanted to make a solution that dealt with these kids or with illegal immigration in America, than this is something he would have taken up in his first three and a half years, not in his last few months. 

    Schieffer: So he did it for politics. 

    Romney: Well, that's certainly a big part of the equation.

    But when it comes to immigration, perhaps no presidential candidate has politicized the issue more than Romney has over the past five years -- during his 2007-2008 bid and during his current one.

    Indeed, the issue was a clear way for the former Massachusetts governor to prove his conservative credentials. And it was a weapon he used -- often with success -- against John McCain, Rick Perry, and Newt Gingrich, all of whom had supported some liberal policies toward illegal immigrants.

    For instance, before the New Hampshire primary in Jan. 2008, Romney's campaign blasted McCain on immigration. "McCain pushed to let every illegal immigrant stay here permanently -- even voted to allow illegals to collect Social Security," went one Romney TV ad. "And Mitt Romney?... He opposes amnesty for illegals."

    Here's another Romney ad, which aired in Nov. 2007 and which used Romney's own words: "We all know Hillary Clinton and the Democrats have it wrong on illegal immigration. Our party should not make that mistake. As governor, I authorized the state police to enforce immigration laws. I opposed driver's licenses and in-state tuition for illegal aliens."

    Romney added in the ad, "As president, I'll oppose amnesty, cut funding for sanctuary cities and secure our borders. Legal immigration is great, but illegal immigration -- that's got to stop."

    And during this cycle's GOP presidential primary, Romney hammered Perry on the fact that young illegal immigrants in Texas qualify for in-state college tuition rates.

    "With regards to illegal immigration, of course we build a fence. And of course we do not give instate tuition credits to people who come here illegally," Romney said at a Sept. 12, 2011 debate in Florida. "That only attracts people to come here and take advantage of America's great beneficence."

    At a following debate, Romney stated, "I've got be honest with you, I don't see how it is that a state like Texas -- to go to the University of Texas, if you're an illegal alien, you get an in-state tuition discount. You know how much that is? That's $22,000 a year."

    More from Romney: "That kind of magnet draws people into this country to get that education, to get the $100,000 break. It makes no sense."

    And after Gingrich began to see his poll numbers climb in the fall of 2011, Romney knocked Gingrich's call to give illegal immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for years a chance to gain residency status.

    "To say that we're going to say to the people who have come here illegally that now you're all going to get to stay or some large number are going to get to stay and become permanent residents of the United States, that will only encourage more people to do the same thing," Romney said at a Nov. 2011 debate.

    "People respond to incentives. And if you can become a permanent resident of the United States by coming here illegally, you'll do so. What I want to do is bring people into this country legally, particularly those that have education and skill that allows us to compete globally."

    116 comments

    You have to love it! Willard flopping around harder then a guppy who escaped it's fish bowl! This guy wants to be leader of the free world? You have GOT to be kidding! When is some intrepid reporter going to ask him why he doesn't just tell the GNOP to pass the Dream Act? Will the real Willard Romn …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: featured, mitt-romney, first-read, mark-murray
  • 14
    Jun
    2012
    4:11pm, EDT

    Who snubbed whom?

    By NBC's Mark Murray

    In an exchange with the Capitol Hill publication The Hill, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said that he wanted to work with the Obama White House -- on immigration and the line-item veto -- but President Obama and his team never reached out.

    “Let’s get real here,” McCain told The Hill. “There was never any outreach from President Obama or anyone in his administration to me.”

    McCain disputes the notion that he has rejected entreaties to cooperate with the White House because he is bitter from his defeat four years ago.

    He said he expressed eagerness to work with the president on immigration reform and the line-item veto, but has been left out in the cold.

    McCain, the ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee, also said Obama failed to consult with him on national-security issues.“He never asked for advice on national-security nominees,” McCain said.

    But when looking at the major Senate votes over the past three years, it's hard to find a Democratic-sponsored measure that McCain supported, even ones backed by other GOP senators (including McCain ally Lindsey Graham).

    Consider:

    On the most significant piece of legislation on immigration -- the topic on which he said he wanted to work with the White House -- McCain voted against the DREAM Act, which would give young illegal immigrants who are pursuing a college degree or serving in the military a chance for citizenship. Three Republicans (Bob Bennett, Dick Lugar and Lisa Murkowski) voted for the legislation that failed to get 60 Senate votes.

    Despite voting for every other Supreme Court nominee since joining the Senate, McCain voted against both of Obama's picks, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Notably, Grahman and eight other Republicans voted for Sotomayor, and Graham and four other Republicans voted for Kagan.

    McCain also voted against the New START treaty with Russia, even though that was supported by 12 Republican senators; he voted against the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which was backed by eight GOPers; and he voted against the financial-reform legislation, supported by three Republicans.

    (And as far as the claim that Obama never reached out to McCain, remember there was that inaugural dinner that the then-president-elect hosted in McCain's honor.)

    A McCain spokesman tells First Read that McCain didn't vote for those measures because they went against his principles.

    "Everyone knows that the president failed to fulfill his promise to reach across the aisle and bridge the partisan divide," spokesman Brian Rogers said. "Sen. McCain was never going to sacrifice his principles to support legislation he fundamentally opposes, but he was willing to work with the president on areas of common concern."

    Rogers added, "The president’s outreach has been non-existent –- not just to Sen. McCain, but many Democrats in Congress say the exact same thing."

    81 comments

    You can say what ever you want about McCain, however he is know fro reaching across the isle but not able to do that with President Obama and his Kingdom.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: capitol-hill, barack-obama, john-mccain, first-read, mark-murray
  • 11
    Jun
    2012
    1:03pm, EDT

    Team Obama enjoys ad-spending edge this week

    By NBC's Mark Murray and Steven Lovern

    The Obama campaign and its allies hold a nearly 2-to-1 ad-spending advantage this week over the Romney campaign and its supporters, $8.8 million to $4.7 million according to ad-spending data from NBC/SMG Delta.

    But over the course of the early general election, Romney and GOP-leaning outside groups have outspent Obama and his supporters.

    Here's ad-spending breakdown for this week:

    Colorado: Obama $531K, Romney $90K, Crossroads GPS $169K, Priorities USA $179K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $710K
    Romney/Pro-Romney $259K

    Florida: Obama $1.2M, Crossroads GPS $794K, Priorities USA $289, Planned Parenthood Action Fund $149K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $1.638M
    Romney/Pro-Romney $794K

    Iowa: Obama $592K, Romney $103K, Crossroads GPS $185K, Planned Parenthood Action Fund $103K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $695K
    Romney/Pro-Romney $288K

    Michigan: Crossroads GPS $223K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $0
    Romney/Pro-Romney $223K

    Nevada: Obama $516K, Romney $30K, Crossroads GPS $172K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $516K
    Romney/Pro-Romney $202K

    New Hampshire: Obama $482K, Romney $33K, Crossroads GPS $310K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $482K
    Romney/Pro-Romney $343K

    New Mexico: Obama $18K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $18K
    Romney/Pro-Romney $0

    North Carolina: Obama $1.1M, Romney $193K, Crossroads GPS $449K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $1.1M
    Romney/Pro-Romney $6.42M

    Ohio: Obama $1.7M, Romney $277K, Crossroads GPS $514K, Priorities USA $166K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $1.866M
    Romney/Pro-Romney $791K

    Pennsylvania: Obama $474K, Crossroads GPS $427K, Priorities USA $214K
    Obama/Pro-Obama $688K
    Romney/Pro-Romney $427K

    Virginia: Obama $772K, Romney $128K, Crossroads GPS $615K, Priorities USA $145K, Planned Parenthood Action Fund $193K
    Obama/Pro-Obama - $1.11M
    Romney/Pro-Romney - $743K

    Total:
    Obama/Pro-Obama $8.823M
    Romney/Pro-Romney $4.712M

    137 comments

    So, is this the only snipet of 'good news' that can be stated about President Obamas Campaign? Guess FR had to look long and hard for it after pushing positive Willard all last week nothing positive was posted about President Obama.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: barack-obama, decision-2012, mitt-romney, mark-murray, ad-spending
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • decision-2012,
  • first-read,
  • barack-obama,
  • politics,
  • mitt-romney,
  • 2012,
  • white-house,
  • congress,
  • appfeatured,
  • capitol-hill,
  • first-thoughts,
  • obama,
  • republicans,
  • 2010,
  • economy,
  • programming-notes,
  • romney-embed,
  • video,
  • newt-gingrich,
  • democrats,
  • paul-ryan,
  • romney,
  • first-read-minute,
  • rick-santorum,
  • updated,
  • alex-moe,
  • veepstakes,
  • garrett-haake,
  • gingrich-embed,
  • joe-biden,
  • boiler-room,
  • week-ahead,
  • perry,
  • senate,
  • carrie-dann
Also
Advertise | AdChoices
Upload an avatar and edit your bio
Please edit your bio and upload an avatar. Click the pencil icon above to edit.
Edit your blogroll, facebook and twitter links.

Blogroll

Please edit your blogroll by adding entries to the "Blogs" section. Use the "Follow Links" section to add links to Twitter and Facebook. Click the pencil icon above to edit.

Chuck Todd

Chuck Todd became NBC News’ political director in March 2007. He also serves as NBC News' on-air political analyst for "NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams," "Today," "Meet the Press and MSNBC, including "Hardball with Chris Matthews."

Mark Murray

Mark Murray is NBC News' Senior Political Editor. Since joining the network in 2003, he has reported on and written about political races, trends, and issues -- including the 2003 California recall, the 2004 Bush-Kerry presidential race, the 2006 midterm elections, the 2008 presidential contest, the 2010 midterms, and the 2012 presidential race.

Domenico Montanaro

Domenico Montanaro is NBC News' Deputy Political Editor. He writes, reports and edits for First Read, the network's political blog, provides editorial guidance for NBC's broadcast shows and online content, and appears on air. He has covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections for NBC and has reported from Capitol Hill.

Ali Weinberg

Will Springer

Natalie Cucchiara

Carrie Dann

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (173)
    • April (233)
    • March (272)
    • February (232)
    • January (254)
  • 2012
    • December (213)
    • November (237)
    • October (344)
    • September (330)
    • August (362)
    • July (268)
    • June (308)
    • May (342)
    • April (291)
    • March (387)
    • February (329)
    • January (446)
  • 2011
    • December (383)
    • November (371)
    • October (341)
    • September (258)
    • August (303)
    • July (232)
    • June (293)
    • May (262)
    • April (277)
    • March (295)
    • February (239)
    • January (277)
  • 2010
    • December (261)
    • November (297)
    • October (267)
    • September (244)
    • August (262)
    • July (285)
    • June (296)
    • May (262)
    • April (300)
    • March (315)
    • February (256)
    • January (242)
  • 2009
    • December (234)
    • November (277)
    • October (312)
    • September (277)
    • August (209)
    • July (325)
    • June (343)
    • May (302)
    • April (316)
    • March (283)
    • February (285)
    • January (362)
  • 2008
    • December (285)
    • November (313)
    • October (514)
    • September (476)
    • August (385)
    • July (372)
    • June (408)
    • May (482)
    • April (510)
    • March (446)
    • February (543)
    • January (946)
  • 2007
    • December (578)
    • November (519)
    • October (607)
    • September (419)
    • August (423)
    • July (387)
    • June (467)
    • May (343)
    • April (254)
    • March (179)
    • February (163)
    • January (203)
  • 2006
    • December (110)
    • November (256)
    • October (224)
    • September (199)
    • August (9)

Most Commented

  • Obama calls IRS flap 'inexcusable,' announces resignation of acting IRS chief (3714)
  • Holder scolds Issa for 'shameful' demeanor (2473)
  • White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation' (6034)
  • White House aides learned of IRS details in April, but didn't tell Obama (2772)
  • Obama names acting IRS chief, denies knowledge of IRS report (2925)
  • Acting IRS head apologizes, blames 'foolish mistakes' for targeting of conservative groups (3522)
  • IRS official to invoke Fifth Amendment at hearing (2056)

Other blogs

  • Daily Nightly
  • The Maddow Blog
  • The Last Word
  • Hardblogger
  • First Read
  • World Blog
  • Field Notes
  • Inside Dateline
  • Behind the Wall
  • The Ed Show
  • Morning Joe
  • Daily Rundown

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Politics on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise