• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Reid appears to back away from 'nuclear option' on filibusters
  • Recommended: First Read Minute: IRS, immigration moves forward, and Weiner's back
  • Recommended: Lawmakers grill IRS officials, Lerner denies wrongdoing
  • Recommended: First Thoughts: The White House's PR mess

The first place for news and analysis from the NBC News Political Unit. Follow us on Twitter.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 3
    Feb
    2011
    12:41pm, EST

    How the House GOP promise to cut $100b became $32b

    From NBC's Luke Russert
    On Capitol Hill today, House Budget Committee staffers briefed reporters about Chairman Paul Ryan's plans for the nation's budget for the rest of fiscal year 2011.

    The current continuing resolution -- the bill that funds the government -- runs out on March 4, 2011. That leaves seven more months for fiscal year 2011, which ends on Sept. 30, 2011.

    In their "Pledge to America" unveiled during the 2010 midterms, Republicans promised that in their first year, they would cut $100 billion from the nation's budget.

    With common-sense exceptions for seniors, veterans, and our troops, we will roll back government spending to prestimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone and putting us on a path to begin paying down the debt, balancing the budget, and ending the spending spree in Washington that threatens our children’s future.

    Due to the fact that the current continuing resolution, that was written by Democrats, runs out on March 4, they plan on pro-rating that $100 billion dollar number to $58 billion in non-security savings from the money President Obama asked for in the 2011 fiscal year budget. (In other words, the $58 billion in savings applies equals 7/12 of the fiscal year that they say the GOP is in charge of, and it doesn't include money for security/military needs.)

    However, when taking a closer look at the budget numbers, the actual savings found in the GOP plan equals $32 billion.

    The math
    The Obama administration did not get its desired budget in the current continuing resolution that is funding the government through fiscal year 2011.

    If the current continuing resolution is extended, the amount of money used to fund the government for fiscal year 2011 is $1.087 trillion. The House GOP proposed budget is for $1.055 trillion dollars. $1.087 minus $1.055 equals $32 billion.

    Ryan has responded that the House GOP will find $74 billion in discretionary savings "relative to President Obama's budget request." But the problem with that is that Obama's request is not the actual budget.

    The politics
    Many conservative House Republicans have asked that the $100 billion dollars in savings promised in the "Pledge to America" happen in fiscal year 2011. The GOP Leadership essentially conceded today that that is unlikely to occur, given the fact that the GOP had no control over the budget for the first five months of fiscal year 2011.

    GOP leadership aides are quick to point out that that budget will go to the floor under an open rule, in which members may have a chance to add amendments that would cut more.

    The fact that the savings only amount to $32 billion -- and not $100 billion -- is going to surely upset many conservative Tea Party members.

    The Republican Study Committee, the ideological conservative faction of the House GOP conference, has been adamant that there be $100 billion dollars in cuts for fiscal year 2011.

    What happens now?
    The fight over the continuing resolution will happen in the House next week. It is unlikely that the GOP will be able to enact the $32 billion dollars in savings by March 4, as any budget bill must pass the Democratic-controlled Senate.

    There will most likely be more temporary continuing resolutions to keep the government funded and operating. Then the House GOP will have to strike some sort of compromise with the Democratic Senate in order to pass through the savings they desire.

    Where do the $32 billion in cuts come from?
    The $32 billion in cuts will come from non-defense spending. House Republicans are quick to tell you that in the two years of the Obama administration, non-security spending has gone up 24%. When pressed for where exactly the cuts would be made, Republican Budget Committee staffers punted and said those decisions would be made by the House Appropriations Committee, the committee that ultimately allocates where the nation's treasure is spent.

    When asked where might the Appropriations Committee look to find savings, House Republican Budget Committee staffers were quick to say that under the Obama administration, the Environmental Protection Agency has seen its budget triple, and Republicans would "examine" that agency.

    The future
    The week of February 14, it is expected that Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) will unveil the House GOP budget for the entire fiscal year 2012. This will happen directly after President Obama unveils his budget for fiscal year 2012. Ryan's budget is expected to contain even more billions in cuts, specifically cuts that will appease the GOP base.

    ****UPDATE**** GOP aides tell NBC News that comparing Republicans’ campaign pledge of $100 billion dollars to the actual cuts of $32 billion dollars is like comparing “apples to oranges.”

    Aides say that on Sept. 30, 2010, House Republicans pledged that, if they gained the majority, they would cut $100 billion from President Obama’s requested fiscal year 2011 budget. Today, the GOP announced $74 billion in savings from Obama’s requested 2011 fiscal year budget. The aides say that House Republicans are not breaking their pledge because they’re pro-rating the savings as being relative to the seven out of 12 fiscal months that they are in control of the House.

    Thus, in the aides’ opinion, the House GOP pledged to cut $100 billion dollars and are honoring that in their proposal, given how long they have been in power. The aides continue that the House GOP never promised to cut $100 billion from the current federal spending levels for fiscal year 2011, which is being funded by a continuing resolution first enacted by Democrats. They claim their $32 billion in cuts will “spend out” the current fiscal year 2011 at fiscal year 2008 levels. Part of the “Pledge to America” was to return government non-security spending to fiscal year 2008 levels.

    GOP leadership aides also tell NBC News that the Republican Study Committee has continuously called for $100 billion in cuts from President Obama’s request fiscal year 2011 budget, not the actual federal spending levels that the government is currently operating under at the present time.

    According to House Budget Committee aides, if the GOP were to revert back to 2008 fiscal year levels under the current Federal spending level structure, $59 billion in cuts would be needed. That $59 billion would take into account all 12 months of fiscal year 2011. The House GOP Budget Committee currently does not see that as feasible and proposed today to simply spend out the rest of fiscal year 2011 at fiscal year 2008 levels.

    GOP aides expect some pushback from more conservative members of the GOP Conference in regards to the $32 billion in savings, as they fall $17 billion short of what ideologically conservative faction of the conference, the Republican Study Committee is calling for -- $59 billion.

    *** UPDATE 2 *** House Budget Committee Ranking Member Chris Van Hollen's response: “Federal spending is currently $46 billion less than what President Obama requested for this year. Now House Republicans want to cut non-security spending by 9% more, with all of the cuts targeted over the final seven months of the fiscal year. The President’s bipartisan Fiscal Commission cautioned against such immediate spending cuts, and economists like Mark Zandi have made the point that deep and immediate spending cuts proposed by Republicans could raise the unemployment rate back into double digits."

    561 comments

    First broken promise.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, luke-russert
  • 26
    Jan
    2011
    12:43pm, EST

    Boehner's review: 'It was okay.'

    AP

    House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill Wednesday while giving his assessment of President Obama's State of the Union address.

    From NBC’s Luke Russert and Carrie Dann
    The State of the Union reviews are in from House Speaker John Boehner.

    “It was okay.”

    Boehner offered the lukewarm assessment of the president’s speech while speaking at a press conference on a D.C. education program.

     The Ohio congressman did add that he “appreciated” Obama’s mention of Boehner’s working-class background. (He’s one of 12 children of a Cincinnati bar owner and became the first college graduate in his family after paying his way through Xavier University by working as a janitor.)

    “There are a lot of us here who have had a chance at the American dream. I think the point we're making today is every person ought to have that shot,” Boehner said.

    The House Speaker also said that he "had other obligations" and was unable to watch an unofficial Tea Party-sponsored response to the speech given by Rep. Michele Bachmann.

    “I think all members, House and Senate, Democrat and Republicans, respond in their own ways,” he added, echoing the sentiment of some other Republican leaders who downplayed Bachmann’s response earlier this week.  “The more the merrier."

    256 comments

    It couldn't have been TOO good, old John only welled up twice, that I could tell.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: luke-russert, carrie-dann
  • 25
    Jan
    2011
    11:16am, EST

    Cantor invites Pelosi to sit together at SOTU

    From NBC’s Luke Russert
    *** UPDATE ***
    Pelosi has declined Cantor's invitation to sit together at the State of the Union Address, saying that she has already arranged to sit with Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md.

    In a tweet, Pelosi said, "I thank @GOPLeader for his #SOTU offer, but I invited my friend Rep. Bartlett from MD yesterday & am pleased he accepted."
    ------------------------------
    *** UPDATE TWO *** Cantor will now sit with Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., tonight.

    From Cantor spokesman Brad Dayspring:

    "Minority Leader Pelosi declined Eric's offer, which would have resulted in the two party leaders sitting together. Eric will be sitting at the traditional spot on the House floor reserved for the Majority Leader and will be joined by Rep. Bobby Scott, his friend and colleague from Richmond."

    GOP aides tell NBC News that Rep. Eric Cantor's chief of staff has asked Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's office if she would like to sit next to the Republican Majority Leader for tonight's State of the Union.

    When asked by NBC News about the offer, Cantor said, "I've not heard a response back from her office."

    It is unclear whether or not she will accept the invite. As Democratic leader, she does have an assigned table in the room.

    Yesterday, Cantor said that he wasn’t sure which Democratic colleague he would join for the address but noted that he would be happy to sit – as yesterday’s rumors hinted - next to Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

    Cantor’s invitation to Pelosi comes on the heels of some harsh words for the former speaker. On Monday, Cantor praised Hoyer for his willingness to work productively across the aisle, a collegiality that Cantor said lay in “stark contrast” to his relationship with Pelosi.

    “I would love to have the opportunity for her to engage in some type of working relationship so that we can actually deliver results,” he said.  “Thus far it seems she is continuing to drive the ideological agenda just the same as she did over the last four years.”

    NBC’s Shawna Thomas and Carrie Dann contributed.

    112 comments

    Beware of 'weasels' in sheep's clothing! Nancy! I guess all this kumbaya crap means that one side of the aisle won't look like the undertakers convention it did last time! lol

    Show more
    Explore related topics: luke-russert
  • 13
    Jan
    2011
    1:14pm, EST

    House to resume debate over repealing health law

    From NBC's Kelly O'Donnell and Luke Russert
    GOP aides tell NBC News that floor debate, on Tuesday, will resume on the House Republican efforts to repeal the health-care law.

    Aides add the official detailed schedule will be released tomorrow.

    “As the White House noted, it is important for Congress to get back to work, and to that end we will resume thoughtful consideration of the health care bill next week," said a spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. "Americans have legitimate concerns about the cost of the new health care law and its effect on the ability to grow jobs in our country. It is our expectation that the debate will continue to focus on those substantive policy differences surrounding the new law.”

    295 comments

    Yes, lets get rid of this monster of a bill.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, politics, republicans, featured, luke-russert, kelly-odonnell
  • 11
    Jan
    2011
    1:35pm, EST

    House unveils resolution honoring Giffords, others

    From NBC's Luke Russert and Shawna Thomas
    The text of the resolution honoring Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D) and others who were killed or injured in Tucson, AZ on Saturday has been released. The resolution also honors those who acted bravely to subdue the gunman.

    GOP aides say the resolution was constructed in a bipartisan manner with special input from Giffords' office. The expectation is that Speaker John Boehner will bring the resolution to the floor on Wednesday soon after the House is gaveled into session at 10:00 am ET. The resolution condemns the "horrific attack" and honors a democracy "in which intimidation and threats of violence cannot silence the voices of any American."

    Here's the full text of the resolution:

    Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the tragic shooting in Tucson, Arizona, on January 8, 2011.

    Whereas on January 8, 2011, an armed gunman opened fire at a ''Congress on your Corner'' event hosted by Representative Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Arizona, killing 6 and wounding at least 14 others;

    Whereas Christina Taylor Green, Dorothy Morris, John Roll, Phyllis Schneck, Dorwan Stoddard, and Gabriel Zimmerman
    lost their lives in this attack;

    Whereas Christina Taylor Green, the 9-year-old daughter of John and Roxanna Green, was born on September 11,
    2001, and was a third grader with an avid interest in government who was recently elected to the student council
    at Mesa Verde Elementary School;

    Whereas Dorothy Morris, who was 76 years old, attended the January 8 event with George, her husband of over 50
    years with whom she had 2 daughters, and who was also critically injured as he tried to shield her from the shooting;

    Whereas John Roll, a Pennsylvania native who was 63 years old, began his professional career as a bailiff in 1972,
    was appointed to the Federal bench in 1991, and became chief judge for the District of Arizona in 2006, and was
    a devoted husband to his wife Maureen, father to his 3 sons, and grandfather to his 5 grandchildren;

    Whereas Phyllis Schneck, a proud mother of 3, grandmother of 7, and great-grandmother from New Jersey, was
    spending the winter in Arizona, and was a 79-year-old church volunteer and New York Giants fan;

    Whereas Dorwan Stoddard, a 76-year-old retired construction worker and volunteer at the Mountain Avenue Church of
    Christ, is credited with shielding his wife Mavy, a longtime friend whom he married while they were in their 60s, who was also injured in the shooting;

    Whereas Gabriel Matthew Zimmerman, who was 30 years old and engaged to be married, served as Director of Community
    Outreach to Representative Gabrielle Giffords, and was a social worker before serving with Representative
    Giffords;

    Whereas Representative Gabrielle Giffords was a target of this attack, and remains in critical condition at an Arizona hospital;

    Whereas 13 others were also wounded in the shooting, including Ron Barber and Pamela Simon, both staffers to Representative Giffords; and

    Whereas several of those in attendance at this event, including Patricia Maisch, Roger Sulzgeber, Joseph Zimudie,
    and Daniel Hernandez, Jr., helped apprehend the gunman and assist the injured, thereby risking their lives for
    the safety of others, and should be commended for their bravery: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives-
    (1) condemns in the strongest possible terms the horrific attack which occurred at the ''Congress on your Corner'' event hosted by Representative Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Arizona, on January 8, 2011;

    (2) offers its heartfelt condolences to the families, friends, and loved ones of those who were killed in that attack;

    (3) expresses its hope for the rapid and complete recovery of those wounded in the shooting;

    (4) honors the memory of Christina Taylor Green, Dorothy Morris, John Roll, Phyllis Schneck,Dorwan Stoddard, and Gabriel Zimmerman;

    (5) applauds the bravery and quick thinking exhibited by those individuals who prevented the gunman from potentially taking more lives and helped to save those who had been wounded;

    (6) recognizes the service of the first responders who raced to the scene and the health care professionals who tended to the victims once they reached the hospital, whose service and skill saved lives;

    (7) reaffirms the bedrock principle of American democracy and representative government, which is memorialized in the First Amendment of the Constitution and which Representative Gabrielle Giffords herself read in the Hall of the House of Representatives on January 6, 2011, of ''the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances'';

    (8) stands firm in its belief in a democracy in which all can participate and in which intimidation and threats of violence cannot silence the voices of any American;

    (9) honors the service and leadership of Representative Gabrielle Giffords, a distinguished member of this House, as she courageously fights to recover; and

    (10) when adjourning today, shall do so out of respect to the victims of this attack.

    27 comments

    Well done, Speaker Boehner. Well done, House of Representatives.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, politics, luke-russert, shawna-thomas
  • 11
    Jan
    2011
    11:54am, EST

    N.Y. Republican wants to outlaw guns near officials, judges

    From NBC’s Michael Isikoff and Luke Russert
    New York Rep. Peter King, chairman of House Homeland Security Committee, will introduce a bill to ban carrying a gun within 1,000 feet of a member of Congress and federal judges. The measure will also apply to carrying weapons near the president or vice president.

    King announced the measure at a press conference today with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who heads a gun control group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns and who is backing the bill. King's move may indicate there may be gaining momentum for some sort of gun-control measures in the wake of the Tucson shooting.

    King's spokesman was unable to immediately say whether the congressman, who has been generally supportive of gun control measures, would back a separate bill being pushed by New York Democrat Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and New Jersey Democrat Sen. Frank Lautenberg to ban the kind of high capacity magazines that alleged Tucson shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, used during Saturday's attack.

    Here is part of King's statement:

    “Congressman Peter King today also announced that he will introduce legislation that will make it illegal to knowingly carry a gun within 1,000 feet of the President, Vice President, Members of Congress or judges of the Federal Judiciary. In the United States, it is illegal to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a school. Passing a similar law for government officials would give federal, state, and local law enforcement a better chance to intercept would-be shooters before they pull the trigger.”

    King is a moderate Republican from a state with some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. He has often worked with Bloomberg on gun issues. It remains to be seen whether any of his fellow Republicans would sign on to such a bill. Remember, the new GOP-led House is composed of many members that have strong pro-gun ratings from the National Rifle Association.

    105 comments

    What utter bilge; everyone that dislikes guns is going to use this atrocity to further their anti-gun agenda. It's sickening to watch.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, politics, featured, michael-isikoff, luke-russert
  • 5
    Jan
    2011
    2:34pm, EST

    Who didn't vote for Pelosi as minority leader?

    From NBC's Shawna Thomas and Luke Russert; msnbc.com's Carrie Dann:

    As her party enters the minority in the U.S. House, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been once again elected to the chamber’s top Democratic leadership spot. But Pelosi’s party wasn’t unanimous in backing her for the job, with almost one in ten members of the caucus voting for a different candidate.

    A total of 19 Democrats broke with their party to vote for someone other than Pelosi, whose low approval ratings have been frequently cited as one reason for heavy Democratic losses in the November election.

    Eleven voted for Pelosi rival and Blue Dog Rep. Health Shuler of North Carolina.

    Here’s a full list of the defectors:

    For Shuler (11):
    Altmire (PA)
    Boren (OK)
    Cooper (TN)
    Donnelly (IN)
    Holden (PA)
    Kissell (NC)
    McIntyre (NC)
    Matheson (UT)
    Michaud (ME)
    Ross (AR)
    Shuler (NC)

    For Rep. John Lewis of Georgia (2)
    Barrow (GA)
    Giffords (AZ)

    For Rep. Jim Costa of California (1)
    Cardoza (CA)

    For Rep. Dennis Cardoza of California (1)
    Costa (CA)

    For Rep. Jim Cooper of Tennessee (1)
    Kind (WI)

    For Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio (1)
    Lipinski (IL)

    For Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland (1)
    Schrader (OR)

    Voting “present” (1)
    Bishop (GA)

    163 comments

    The Bluedogs were the reason for the defeat of the Democratic Party in Nov 2010. You have to work with Democratic Party's agenda and not a Republican Party within the Democratic Party. Good riddance to those!!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, luke-russert, shawna-thomas
  • 16
    Dec
    2010
    3:41pm, EST

    House Democrats try to figure out way forward on tax bill

    From NBC's Luke Russert
    Sources tell NBC News the Democratic leadership will be meeting in the next hour to try and figure out the best way forward for the president's compromise tax bill.

    All indications are that they are going to try and pass this out of the House by tonight.

    It is not known whether an entirely new Rule will be constructed or the previous one will be amended.

    Something to remember: the previous Rule set the length of debate at three hours. So once the Rule is actually agreed to and passed, there would then be three hours of debate and final voting tacked onto that time.

    47 comments

    If it weren't for the working class blue collar workers of this country that give their lives everyday to support the lifestyle of the rich, and not making hardly anything for it, you wouldn't be anything The people who are unemployed at no fault of their own deserve to have their unemploymen …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, politics, featured, luke-russert
  • 16
    Dec
    2010
    1:41pm, EST

    Tax bill hits speed bump in the House

    From NBC's Luke Russert and Shawna Thomas
    The Rule for President Obama's tax cut compromise has been pulled from the House floor temporarily. This is a temporary setback and senior leadership aides say there will likely be a vote on final passage tonight. It's unclear, however, if the bill will be amended.

    If the bill changes, it would have to be kicked back up to the Senate for final approval before it can be signed into law by the president -- and the Senate has signaled it would not welcome any changes.

    The reason for this setback? Sources tell NBC News that the Democratic Leadership did not have the votes to pass the Rule, i.e., approve the rules for debating the tax compromise.

    Why were the votes not there?
    1. The Rule could have passed with GOP support, however, the minority party pretty much always votes against the Rule, because it's created solely by the leadership of the majority party. It's considered heresy by minority leadership to vote for the Rule if you're in the minority party.

    2. The main reason why the bill is delayed is that House liberal Democrats wanted more opportunities to publicly display their anger with the compromise.

    As the Rule is currently constructed, there would be a vote on one amendment, the estate-tax language. Liberals were not being offered a chance to vote against other things they did not like in the bill.

    For example: Rep. David Wu, D-Ore., offered an amendment that would allow unemployment benefits to be extended from 13 months to 24 months.

    There is something in there about pension reform that House liberals do not like.

    Bottom line: House Democrats want more of an opportunity to publicly voice their displeasure and have a record of that displeasure.

    Also, with the Senate being in most of next week, House liberal Democrats did not see their delaying the final passage of the bill as that big a deal.

    What happens going forward?
    The House Rules Committee is meeting right now to construct a different Rule that will give House liberal Democrats a chance to vote on more amendments that can show their anger with the bill. This will happen later tonight.

    If the bill is sent back to the Senate, final passage on the tax bill likely might not happen until the middle of next week.

    The likelihood on all this is that House liberals come around and say something like, "I fought it as long as I could, but I wanted to preserve unemployment benefits before Christmas, etc."

    Quite simply: This is liberal House Democrats taking their last loud and boisterous stand.

    808 comments

    Well the problem is that we still WILL NOT get a check before X-mas if they do not pass it until next week. Quit playing around with our lives!!!!!!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, politics, featured, luke-russert, shawna-thomas
  • 18
    Jun
    2010
    1:17pm, EDT

    DNC solicits $$$ to air TV ad aimed at Barton

    DNC Web site

    The above image appears on the Democratic National Committee's Web site.

    From NBC's Luke Russert
    It hasn’t taken long for Democrats to use Rep. Joe Barton’s (R) political blunder to try and solicit donations to the party and keep the heat on Republicans.

    In an email to supporters, the DNC asks for money to begin airing a TV ad targeting Barton's remarks. "We're whipping together an ad as fast as possible to make sure voters know exactly whose side Barton and the GOP are on and to demand they stop apologizing to big oil, but we need your help to get it on the air," the email says. "If you're as furious as I am, will you chip in $5 to help us fight back?"

    The DNC tells NBC News that the ad will be completely funded through direct donations and that it will run “the first of next week on national cable (CNN and MSNBC).”

    Democrats are actively trying to keep Barton’s gaffe a national story as the news cycle slows down heading into the weekend. One GOP aide tells NBC that Barton’s comment and subsequent awkward apologies were, “beyond moronic.” Hence why the weekend can’t come soon enough for Republicans.

    *** UPDATE *** NBC has obtained the script of the ad:
    VO: BP caused the worst oil spill in American history.
    Images or video of spill
    VO: Now, at President Obama's direction, BP's set aside 20 billion for recovery on the Gulf coast.
    Photo from WH of POTUS w/BP from this week, images of video of spill
    VO: But if Republicans were in charge, this is the guy who'd be overseeing BP Blurred/grainy video of Barton
    VIDEO BARTON: "...I apologize"
    VO: He apologized to BP and called the recovery fund a "tragedy"
    VIDEO BARTON: "So I apologize"
    VO: Republicans apologizing to BP? Tell Republicans: Stop apologizing to big oil.
    VO: The Democratic National Committee is responsible for the content of this advertising.

    14 comments

    Thanks Black Bart Jerky Joe Barton for giving us Democrats the perfect campaign pitch to tie you repugnant ones to the corrupt big business, whether it be big dirty oil or dirty coal or corrupt thieving bankers. Better go find the website (not mentioned here at First Read hint hint you missed the mo …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: democrats, politics, republicans, luke-russert
  • 8
    Jun
    2010
    1:16pm, EDT

    BP chief to testify next week before Congress

    From NBC's Luke Russert
    BP CEO Tony Hayward will testify June 17th before the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations within the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The subcommittee is chaired by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) with ranking GOP member Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR).

    Here's the committee's release:


    Energy and Commerce Subcommittee Hearing on "The Role of BP in the Deepwater Horizon Explosion and Oil Spill"

    WASHINGTON, DC - The Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold a hearing entitled "The Role of BP in the Deepwater Horizon Explosion and Oil Spill" on Thursday, June 17, 2010, in 2123 Rayburn House Office Building. The hearing will examine what caused the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and the oil spill that continues to spread across the Gulf of Mexico.

    INVITED WITNESS:

    · Tony Hayward, Chief Executive Officer, BP PLC

    WHEN: 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, June 17

    WHERE: 2123 Rayburn House Office Building

    34 comments

    How long before we see Tony 'Baloney" appearing of Fox. You know- to explain the absence of 'plumes' or how he's now pulling half a million gallons out of that broken pipe a day, when the total flow volume is (supposedly) nowhere near that.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, politics, featured, luke-russert, gulf-spill
  • 13
    Apr
    2010
    3:47pm, EDT

    New Massa details

    From NBC's Luke Russert
    There are new details out regarding a disturbing pattern of behavior from former Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY), including an allegation that Massa solicited sex from a young bartender at the wake of a U.S. soldier killed in action.

    Apparently that incident lead to Massa's own staff to take the matter to the House Democratic Leadership, the Washington Post reports.

    A member of the New York delegation tells NBC News he heard about the bartender story and that it was the "straw the broke the camel's back."

    Here's that incident from the Post:

    The incident that eventually lead to Massa's resignation occurred at a funeral reception on Feb. 2 in Hornel, N.Y., for Lance Cpl. Zack Smith. The 19-year-old Marine had died in an explosion in Afghanistan. Massa struck up a conversation with a young bartender serving at the informal wake.

    Four days later, a local blogger alerted the congressman's office that someone had posted an anonymous comment on his site accusing Massa of soliciting sex from the bartender, according to an e-mail obtained by The Post.

    Racalto said he also received a voicemail message from the bartender asking why Massa wanted to meet him in Buffalo, 85 miles away, for dinner. Racalto said he confronted Massa, and the congressman said he was trying to give the man a law school reference.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, democrats, luke-russert
Newer postsOlder posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • decision-2012,
  • first-read,
  • barack-obama,
  • politics,
  • mitt-romney,
  • 2012,
  • white-house,
  • congress,
  • appfeatured,
  • capitol-hill,
  • first-thoughts,
  • obama,
  • republicans,
  • 2010,
  • economy,
  • programming-notes,
  • romney-embed,
  • video,
  • newt-gingrich,
  • democrats,
  • paul-ryan,
  • romney,
  • first-read-minute,
  • updated,
  • rick-santorum,
  • alex-moe,
  • veepstakes,
  • garrett-haake,
  • gingrich-embed,
  • joe-biden,
  • boiler-room,
  • week-ahead,
  • perry,
  • senate,
  • carrie-dann
Also
Advertise | AdChoices
Upload an avatar and edit your bio
Please edit your bio and upload an avatar. Click the pencil icon above to edit.
Edit your blogroll, facebook and twitter links.

Blogroll

Please edit your blogroll by adding entries to the "Blogs" section. Use the "Follow Links" section to add links to Twitter and Facebook. Click the pencil icon above to edit.

Chuck Todd

Chuck Todd became NBC News’ political director in March 2007. He also serves as NBC News' on-air political analyst for "NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams," "Today," "Meet the Press and MSNBC, including "Hardball with Chris Matthews."

Mark Murray

Mark Murray is NBC News' Senior Political Editor. Since joining the network in 2003, he has reported on and written about political races, trends, and issues -- including the 2003 California recall, the 2004 Bush-Kerry presidential race, the 2006 midterm elections, the 2008 presidential contest, the 2010 midterms, and the 2012 presidential race.

Domenico Montanaro

Domenico Montanaro is NBC News' Deputy Political Editor. He writes, reports and edits for First Read, the network's political blog, provides editorial guidance for NBC's broadcast shows and online content, and appears on air. He has covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections for NBC and has reported from Capitol Hill.

Ali Weinberg

Will Springer

Natalie Cucchiara

Carrie Dann

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (182)
    • April (233)
    • March (272)
    • February (232)
    • January (254)
  • 2012
    • December (213)
    • November (237)
    • October (344)
    • September (330)
    • August (362)
    • July (268)
    • June (308)
    • May (342)
    • April (291)
    • March (387)
    • February (329)
    • January (446)
  • 2011
    • December (383)
    • November (371)
    • October (341)
    • September (258)
    • August (303)
    • July (232)
    • June (293)
    • May (262)
    • April (277)
    • March (295)
    • February (239)
    • January (277)
  • 2010
    • December (261)
    • November (297)
    • October (267)
    • September (244)
    • August (262)
    • July (285)
    • June (296)
    • May (262)
    • April (300)
    • March (315)
    • February (256)
    • January (242)
  • 2009
    • December (234)
    • November (277)
    • October (312)
    • September (277)
    • August (209)
    • July (325)
    • June (343)
    • May (302)
    • April (316)
    • March (283)
    • February (285)
    • January (362)
  • 2008
    • December (285)
    • November (313)
    • October (514)
    • September (476)
    • August (385)
    • July (372)
    • June (408)
    • May (482)
    • April (510)
    • March (446)
    • February (543)
    • January (946)
  • 2007
    • December (578)
    • November (519)
    • October (607)
    • September (419)
    • August (423)
    • July (387)
    • June (467)
    • May (343)
    • April (254)
    • March (179)
    • February (163)
    • January (203)
  • 2006
    • December (110)
    • November (256)
    • October (224)
    • September (199)
    • August (9)

Most Commented

  • White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation' (5635)
  • Lawmakers grill IRS officials, Lerner denies wrongdoing (3865)
  • White House aides learned of IRS details in April, but didn't tell Obama (2779)
  • Obama names acting IRS chief, denies knowledge of IRS report (2925)
  • IRS official to invoke Fifth Amendment at hearing (2149)
  • Acting IRS head apologizes, blames 'foolish mistakes' for targeting of conservative groups (3483)
  • First Thoughts: Scandal or bureaucratic incompetency? (2149)

Other blogs

  • Daily Nightly
  • The Maddow Blog
  • The Last Word
  • Hardblogger
  • First Read
  • World Blog
  • Field Notes
  • Inside Dateline
  • Behind the Wall
  • The Ed Show
  • Morning Joe
  • Daily Rundown

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Politics on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise