• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Reid appears to back away from 'nuclear option' on filibusters
  • Recommended: First Read Minute: IRS, immigration moves forward, and Weiner's back
  • Recommended: Lawmakers grill IRS officials, Lerner denies wrongdoing
  • Recommended: First Thoughts: The White House's PR mess

The first place for news and analysis from the NBC News Political Unit. Follow us on Twitter.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 7
    Apr
    2011
    1:09pm, EDT

    In case of shutdown, military will report, but paid later

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    If the U.S. government shuts down, all of the approximate 2.5 million active duty forces will be required to report for duty.

    The men and women in uniform will not be paid immediately for each day of service, but will be paid retroactively once the government is back up and running.


    Department of Defense civilian workers considered essential will also be required to work, and, like the military, would be paid rectroactively once the shutdown is over.

    The remaining Department of Defense civilians would be furloughed, which means by law they cannot report to their job, would not be paid for days missed, and not paid retroactively unless Congress approves the back pay.

    During a shutdown Defense officials and the military are required to provide for "safety, protection of human life, and defense of national security."

    That's a very broad definition which means deployed military forces, and all military  and civilians working in health care, child care, food services education, training, legal and finances are required to report to work.

    51 comments

    A lot of military families live from paycheck to paycheck. Most cannot afford to be paid later.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: national-security, jim-miklaszewski
  • 29
    Mar
    2011
    3:03pm, EDT

    How Libya costs compare to Iraq and Afghanistan

    From msnbc.com's Tom Curry:  According to NBC's Jim Miklaszewski, the Defense Department puts the cost of the U.S. military operation against Libya’s Gadhafi regime at $550 million through March 28. On a per diem basis, that would average out to about $55 million a day.

    Defense Department officials also said that with non-U.S. NATO forces now assuming most of the burden of the Libya mission, the U.S. military cost should be approximately $40 million over the next three weeks. That would equate to less $2 million a day.

    Obama has stressed the cost reduction argument in his speeches on Libya, saying Monday night, “Because of this transition to a broader, NATO-based coalition, the risk and cost of this operation -- to our military and to American taxpayers -- will be reduced significantly.”

    Obama added that “if we tried to overthrow Qaddafi by force” the dangers to U.S. forces “would be far greater. So would the costs and our share of the responsibility for what comes next. To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq.”

    Welcome to the era of what political scientist Michael Mandelbaum calls “the Frugal Superpower.”

    How does the cost so far of the Libya intervention compare to the U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq?

    According to an estimate by the Congressional Budget Office, the Afghanistan operation in the current fiscal year will cost $110 billion, which would average out to more than $300 million per day.

    At the height of the Iraq conflict – at least in terms of cost, if not in terms of intensity of combat – it cost $140 billion in fiscal year 2008. That would equate to about $383 million a day.

    CBO cautions that most appropriations for Afghanistan and Iraq and for related activities "appear in the same budget accounts as appropriations for DoD’s other functions," so it's not possible "to determine precisely how much has been spent" on those two wars, but CBO's is probably the best estimate we have.

    Defense Secretary Robert Gates testified to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees last month that by the end of calendar year 2011, he expects there to be fewer than 100,000 troops deployed in both Iraq and Afghanistan with “virtually all of those forces in Afghanistan.”

    This will allow him to “begin reducing Army active duty end strength by 27,000 and the Marine Corps by somewhere between 15,000 and 20,000,” Gates said. That will mean reduced future payroll, health care, and other costs.

    But maintaining 100,000 troops in the field remains a very expensive proposition.

    The larger picture is that the Defense Department this fiscal year will spend about $712 billion (or 19 percent of total federal spending), according to the CBO. That works out to about $1.95 billion a day.

    If there were no Iraq and Afghanistan operations in the current fiscal year, Pentagon spending would be about 20 percent less – assuming the money now being spent in Iraq and Afghanistan weren’t used for some other military purposes.

    124 comments

    Thank you, Tom Curry and Jim Miklaszewski. We appreciate your efforts. Comparatively speaking, Libya is a drop in the bucket.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: tom-curry, jim-miklaszewski
  • 29
    Mar
    2011
    10:15am, EDT

    Libya war cost

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    The Pentagon reports that through March 28, the U.S. military operation has cost $550 million. The bulk of that is for munitions. The cost for the 199 Tomahawk missiles fired alone is somewhere between $220 to $298 million.

    Pentagon officials say once NATO forces takeover the bulk of the mission, the U.S. military cost should be approximately $40 million over the next three weeks.

    36 comments

    ……… Barack Obama 2002...against war Now let me be clear. I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: white-house, security, jim-miklaszewski
  • 24
    Feb
    2011
    12:03pm, EST

    Petraeus orders investigation into psy-ops allegations

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski and Ken Strickland
    Gen. David Petraeus has ordered an investigation into the Rolling Stone report alleging that Lt. Gen. William Caldwell improperly used "Psychological Operations" forces to target visiting dignitaries, including Sens. John McCain, Carl Levin, and even Joint Chiefs Chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen.

    Meanwhile, Levin -- chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee -- issued this statement:

    For years, I have strongly and repeatedly advocated for building up Afghan military capability because I believe only the Afghans can truly secure their nation's future. I have never needed any convincing on this point. Quite the opposite, my efforts have been aimed at convincing others of the need for larger, more capable Afghan security forces, and that we and NATO should send more trainers to Afghanistan, rather than more combat troops. I am confident that the chain of command will review any allegation that information operations have been improperly used in Afghanistan.

    30 comments

    While he's at it, he might as well investigate those involved with torture and waterboarding. No, we haven't forgotten.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, security, jim-miklaszewski, ken-strickland
  • 10
    Feb
    2011
    5:10pm, EST

    U.S. reaction to Mubarak's decision not to step down

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    U.S. sources who have been closely involved in the Egyptian crisis tell us that "Mubarak is going nowhere," at least for now, and that they were "taken by surprise," by tonight's announcement.

    They, too, are concerned about Mubarak's statement (according to the translator) that to restore confidence in the economy Mubarak would "federalize the streets." (U.S. presidents have "federalized" military forces to confront segregationists, anti-war protestors, etc.).

    According to one official however, "We have assurances, both PRIVATE and public that the [Egyptian] military would not fire on the people."

    Intelligence officials are also scrambling to try to determine exactly what this all means. According to one official, "We didn't know exactly what Mubarak was going to do tonight. There was an assumption he would step down, but it looks like he's got other ideas."

    94 comments

    You are surprised that the White House was clueless about what Mubarak was planning? Do you guys EVER wake up? Clapper does not know that the Muslim Brotherhood, which spawned Hamas, Hezbollah, and Al Queda, is an Islamofascist organization.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: security, jim-miklaszewski
  • 8
    Feb
    2011
    3:26pm, EST

    Medal of Honor recipient leaving the Army

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski and Courtney Kube
    A U.S. Army spokesperson confirms that Staff Sgt. Sal Giunta is not going to re-enlist when his tour is up in mid-June.

    Giunta, the first living recipient of the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam War, had hinted for several months that he was keeping his options open and considering going to school. But he decided last week to use his GI benefits and get his undergraduate degree.

    Giunta and his wife, Jenny, will move to Fort Carson, CO, later this year. No word yet on which school he will attend, but he will be close to Colorado State University.

    9 comments

    Who can blame him Stf Sargeant Giunta - they keep sending them back over and over again and sooner or later their 'ticket' is bound to get punched! Thank you Sargeant Giunta for your sacrifice for this county. May you find much peace joy & happiness spending time with your familiy!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: security, jim-miklaszewski, courtney-kube
  • 19
    Jan
    2011
    5:36pm, EST

    But Hu's counting?

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    While much was made of the Chinese military's test flight of its latest prototype of the J-20 Stealth Fighter jet during Secretary Gates' visit to Beijing last week, the U.S. is prepared to offer President Hu a little fireworks of its own.

    Tomorrow, the U.S. military will launch a Delta-4 rocket at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California to put a new, classified spy satellite into orbit for the highly-secretive National Reconnaissance Office. The NRO network of satellites provides the CIA and Defense Department with overhead imagery and audio intercepts from the world's hot spots, and "places of interest," like China for example.

    U.S. officials tell NBC News that this launch had been previously scheduled and the timing which coincides with President Hu's visit is "only a coincidence."

    While there's no indication otherwise, that's just what the Chinese said about the J-20 test flight during the Gates visit.

    13 comments

    If you guys want to see some cool photos from today, go over to The Obama Diary

    Show more
    Explore related topics: security, featured, jim-miklaszewski
  • 24
    Aug
    2010
    11:16am, EDT

    Pentagon official criticizes timeline; cites 'moral concerns' over gays

    Marines Commandant Gen. James Conway.

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Conway predicted today that significant number of U.S. Marines and combat forces will be in Afghanistan "hammering" the enemy well past the July 2011 deadline to begin withdrawal of American forces.

    In a Pentagon briefing, Conway claimed President Obama's timeline to begin withdrawal is "giving the enemy sustenance," telling the insurgent forces all they have to do is wait for the Americans to leave to takeover control of Afghanistan. But Conway said in some respect the deadline could work in favor of U.S. forces. Conway explained the Marines will be there well after July 2011, and what will the enemy leadership say then "when we're still there hammering them."

    "President Obama was speaking to several audiences at the same time," Conway said.


    Conway also acknowledged that Americans are "growing tired of the war" in Afghanistan. Pointing out that 60% of Americans polled recently are against the war, Conway said America's "leadership has to do a better job of explaining the last chapter" of the war, and the consequences should the U.S. abruptly pull out of Afghanistan.

    Don't Ask, Don't Tell
    On "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," Conway suggested that if the law is repealed, the Marines may consider allowing Marines not to share quarters with gay servicemembers.

    Conway said the Marines may make such arrangements "voluntary" to accommodate any "moral concerns." The general noted many Marines are "very religious," he said, and because of their moral concerns "don't want to room" with gay servicemembers.

    But Conway stressed that if the law is repealed, the Marines would take the lead in implementing it. "We cannot be seen as dragging our feet," Conway said. "We've got two wars to fight. We'll implement it and move on."

    56 comments

    "Conway said the Marines may make such arrangements "voluntary" to accommodate any "moral concerns." The general noted many Marines are "very religious," he said, and because of their moral concerns "don't want to room" with gay servicemembers." Excuse me? "Moral concerns"??? What moral concerns? T …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, national-security, jim-miklaszewski
  • 19
    Aug
    2010
    11:16am, EDT

    U.S. brigades out of Iraq, but not necessarily out of combat

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    As of this morning, there are about 56,000 American forces in Iraq. That number will be drawn down to about 50,000 by Aug. 31. As of last night, all American combat brigades are out of Iraq. About 6,000 combat forces, disparate elements of combat brigades remain in Iraq temporarily, but are not currently organized to conduct combat operations.

    When combat operations officially end Aug 31, that does not mean that some of the 50,000 American forces that remain in Iraq will never see combat. Senior military official tell NBC News that the so-called advise and assist brigades that do not have a formal combat mission will, however, be combat capable. Some of those forces that will be embedded with Iraqi forces could indeed be drawn into combat.

    About 4,500 American Special Operations forces will also continue to conduct counter-terrorism operations, hunting down and capturing or killing al Qadea members. While these operations are not considered formal combat mission, they often do result in combat tactics. Then there's the deadline to withdraw all American forces from Iraq by the end of 2011. The chief of the Iraqi military warned last week that Iraqi forces won't be fully capable of providing security for all of Iraq until 2020.

    While senior military officials scoff at that timeline, some do acknowledge that, at this point, it appears the withdrawal agreement with the Iraqis may have to be renegotiated next year to permit some smaller numbers of American forces to remain in Iraq -- not in a formal role -- but to continue to work with Iraq forces.

    35 comments

    As a staunch Republican, allow me to say the following: Nothing infuriates me more than someone questioning my patriotism and support for our troops. I retired from the military in 2004 after 26 years of service and 8 deployments to the Middle East and Afghanistan, including two to Iraq.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, national-security, jim-miklaszewski
  • 9
    Jul
    2010
    6:16pm, EDT

    Homophobic 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' survey questions?

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    Gay rights organizations are up in arms over a Pentagon survey on the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," claiming that some of the questions put to U.S. servicemembers are "homophobic."

    The surveys, emailed to 400-thousand active duty, national guard and reserve forces includes questions like;

    "IF A WARTIME SITUATION MADE IT NECESSARY FOR YOU TO SHARE A ROOM, BERTH OR FIELD TENT WITH SOMEONE YOU BELIEVE TO BE A GAY OR LESBIAN SERVICEMEMBER, WHICH ARE YOU MOST LIKELY TO DO?

    • TAKE NO ACTION
    • DISCUSS HOW WE EXPECTED EACH OTHER TO BEHAVE
    • TALK TO A CHAPLAIN OR MENTOR
    • TALK TO A LEADER TO SEE IF I HAVE OTHER OPTIONS
    • OTHER

    "IF DONT ASK DONT TELL IS REPEALED AND YOU ARE ASSIGNED TO BATHROOM FACILITIES WITH OPEN BAY SHOWER WITH A GAY OR LESBIAN SERVICE MEMBER...?_

    • TAKE NO ACTION
    • USE SHOWER AT DIFFERENT TIME

    There's also a question asking servicemembers if a gay or lesbian member moved into military housing with a same-sex partner, would they pick up their family and move out.

    Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell will hold an on-the-record, but off-camera brief shortly to answer the homophobe charge. Stay tuned.

    40 comments

    I've served in the U.S. Army for over 15 years. These questions are realistic and frankly more of these type should have been asked. Gay Rights Activists will never be satisfied on anything. I doubt very much if any of these Activist have ever served and would be familiar with military lifestyle. T …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, national-security, jim-miklaszewski
  • 7
    Jul
    2010
    4:46pm, EDT

    'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' surveys sent out to 400,000 service members

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    The Pentagon today sent out 400,000 surveys to service members for their opinions on the repeal of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy barring gay and lesbian personnel from serving openly. The survey includes questions about the impact the repeal might have on morale and readiness, and a service member's willingness to share quarters, bathrooms, and shower facilities with gay or lesbian service members.

    The 200,000 active duty and 200,000 guard and reserve forces were chosen at random for the surveys, which were e-mailed and must be completed and returned by Aug. 15. A similar survey will be sent to the family members of service members around the first week in August.

    Although the identity of all those who respond will remain confidential, there is a separate link within the survey for those gay or lesbian service members, who wish to provide additional comment without fear of being singled out and separated from the service as required by the existing law.

    Once the surveys are completed and analyzed, the Pentagon has until Dec. 1 to come up with an implementation plan for the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the open service of gay and lesbian service members.

    54 comments

    I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officer …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, national-security, jim-miklaszewski
  • 6
    Jul
    2010
    12:37pm, EDT

    Charges filed against Army Wiki-leaker

    From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
    Criminal charges have been filed against a 22-year old Army private accused of leaking a classified video of an Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed a number of civilians to the WikiLeaks Web site.

    Private First Class Bradley Manning faces two charges and 12 counts of illegally providing classified information to an unauthorized source.

    The charge sheet claims that Manning unlawfully accessed the gun camera video of an Apache helicopter attack on July 12, 2007 against suspected insurgents killing an undetermined number of civilians, including two Reuters employees and passed that video onto WikiLeaks. Manning is also charged with unlawfully tapping into the military's Secret Internet Protocol Router Network to obtain the video and more than 200,000 classified State Department cables.

    Manning remains in custody in Kuwait, but will be returned to Baghdad shortly to face an Article 32 hearing, the military's equivalent of a grand jury hearing.

    22 comments

    A real shame that President Obama is worse than War Criminals Bush and Cheney at attacking whistleblowers who give us truthful information the government won't. This is definitely not the change I believe in or voted for, in making the rightwing nuts happy he's losing his base.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, national-security, jim-miklaszewski
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • decision-2012,
  • first-read,
  • barack-obama,
  • politics,
  • mitt-romney,
  • 2012,
  • white-house,
  • congress,
  • appfeatured,
  • capitol-hill,
  • first-thoughts,
  • obama,
  • republicans,
  • 2010,
  • economy,
  • programming-notes,
  • romney-embed,
  • video,
  • newt-gingrich,
  • democrats,
  • paul-ryan,
  • romney,
  • first-read-minute,
  • updated,
  • rick-santorum,
  • alex-moe,
  • veepstakes,
  • garrett-haake,
  • gingrich-embed,
  • joe-biden,
  • boiler-room,
  • week-ahead,
  • perry,
  • senate,
  • carrie-dann
Also
Advertise | AdChoices
Upload an avatar and edit your bio
Please edit your bio and upload an avatar. Click the pencil icon above to edit.
Edit your blogroll, facebook and twitter links.

Blogroll

Please edit your blogroll by adding entries to the "Blogs" section. Use the "Follow Links" section to add links to Twitter and Facebook. Click the pencil icon above to edit.

Chuck Todd

Chuck Todd became NBC News’ political director in March 2007. He also serves as NBC News' on-air political analyst for "NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams," "Today," "Meet the Press and MSNBC, including "Hardball with Chris Matthews."

Mark Murray

Mark Murray is NBC News' Senior Political Editor. Since joining the network in 2003, he has reported on and written about political races, trends, and issues -- including the 2003 California recall, the 2004 Bush-Kerry presidential race, the 2006 midterm elections, the 2008 presidential contest, the 2010 midterms, and the 2012 presidential race.

Domenico Montanaro

Domenico Montanaro is NBC News' Deputy Political Editor. He writes, reports and edits for First Read, the network's political blog, provides editorial guidance for NBC's broadcast shows and online content, and appears on air. He has covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections for NBC and has reported from Capitol Hill.

Ali Weinberg

Will Springer

Natalie Cucchiara

Carrie Dann

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (182)
    • April (233)
    • March (272)
    • February (232)
    • January (254)
  • 2012
    • December (213)
    • November (237)
    • October (344)
    • September (330)
    • August (362)
    • July (268)
    • June (308)
    • May (342)
    • April (291)
    • March (387)
    • February (329)
    • January (446)
  • 2011
    • December (383)
    • November (371)
    • October (341)
    • September (258)
    • August (303)
    • July (232)
    • June (293)
    • May (262)
    • April (277)
    • March (295)
    • February (239)
    • January (277)
  • 2010
    • December (261)
    • November (297)
    • October (267)
    • September (244)
    • August (262)
    • July (285)
    • June (296)
    • May (262)
    • April (300)
    • March (315)
    • February (256)
    • January (242)
  • 2009
    • December (234)
    • November (277)
    • October (312)
    • September (277)
    • August (209)
    • July (325)
    • June (343)
    • May (302)
    • April (316)
    • March (283)
    • February (285)
    • January (362)
  • 2008
    • December (285)
    • November (313)
    • October (514)
    • September (476)
    • August (385)
    • July (372)
    • June (408)
    • May (482)
    • April (510)
    • March (446)
    • February (543)
    • January (946)
  • 2007
    • December (578)
    • November (519)
    • October (607)
    • September (419)
    • August (423)
    • July (387)
    • June (467)
    • May (343)
    • April (254)
    • March (179)
    • February (163)
    • January (203)
  • 2006
    • December (110)
    • November (256)
    • October (224)
    • September (199)
    • August (9)

Most Commented

  • White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation' (5635)
  • Lawmakers grill IRS officials, Lerner denies wrongdoing (3923)
  • White House aides learned of IRS details in April, but didn't tell Obama (2779)
  • Obama names acting IRS chief, denies knowledge of IRS report (2925)
  • IRS official to invoke Fifth Amendment at hearing (2150)
  • Acting IRS head apologizes, blames 'foolish mistakes' for targeting of conservative groups (3483)
  • First Thoughts: Scandal or bureaucratic incompetency? (2149)

Other blogs

  • Daily Nightly
  • The Maddow Blog
  • The Last Word
  • Hardblogger
  • First Read
  • World Blog
  • Field Notes
  • Inside Dateline
  • Behind the Wall
  • The Ed Show
  • Morning Joe
  • Daily Rundown

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Politics on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise