The New York Times: President Obama is expected to sign executive orders Thursday directing the Central Intelligence Agency to shut what remains of its network of secret prisons and ordering the closing of the Guantánamo detention camp within a year, government officials said."
The Washington Post on yesterday's activity… "President Obama moved swiftly yesterday to begin rolling back eight years of his predecessor's policies, ordering tough new ethics rules and preparing to issue an order closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which has been at the center of the debate over the treatment of U.S. prisoners in the battle against terrorism. Acting to address several promises he made during his campaign, Obama met with top generals about speeding the withdrawal from Iraq and gathered his senior economic advisers as he continued to push for a massive spending bill to create jobs."
"The burst of activity gave Obama a running start on his foreign and domestic policy agendas and fulfilled several campaign pledges that were crucial to the support he received from core Democratic constituencies," the Boston Globe writes. "But his first actions also seemed explicitly designed to sweep away lingering policies of former President Bush, who left office Tuesday as one of the most unpopular chief executives in US history."
This hasn't gotten enough attention… The Los Angeles Times writes, "Obama also issued a trio of decrees intended to make government more transparent. The moves were applauded by historians, political scientists and lawyers who took their battle for access to executive branch records to court during the Bush presidency. The first order effectively undid a Bush administration policy that had restricted the release of presidential documents -- a rule that had been challenged in court by the National Security Archives and by historians."
"Bush's rule allowed former presidents, vice presidents and their heirs to cite executive privilege to block the release of documents after they have left office. With his order, Obama essentially threw out that rule, allowing only the current president to block the release of documents and depriving heirs of that right."
Obama "plunged into the Mideast conflict with a series of phone calls from the Oval Office, and immediately caused a flap over who he called first." Palestinian officials boasted that Obama called Abbas first; Israel brushed it off. "Diplomatic sources said who a President phones first when he makes a flurry of calls is more often a matter of scheduling and availability, not favoritism."
Lost in much of the drama around Caroline and the new oath was the CBO report questioning how quickly Obama's stimulus plan could help the economy. Congressional Republicans jumped all over the criticism, noting it may take longer than the administration has been claiming. Obama has agreed, by the way, to meet with House GOP leaders about their stimulus plans, sometime next week.
Just how much time will Americans give Obama on the economy? The latest Ispos/McClatchy poll is further evidence suggesting a pretty patient public: 45% say they wouldn't expect to see results from an economic stimulus package for more than a year. (53% said they would expect to see results within a year -- 23% within six months, 26% within a year and even 4% within just a month). 56% said they would WANT to see results within six months, however.
The Daily News' DeFrank: "The honeymoon begins in unadulterated swoon. It will end; they always do. Staff missteps, rookie mistakes and legislative rebuffs go with the exalted turf of every Oval Office. A year from now, his numbers won't be so lofty. But Obama's honeymoon is apt to last longer than most."




