Congress: Droning on

Rand Paul: “I have a message from the Tea Party” Paul talked and talked last night and finally ended his filibuster on drones after midnight. Mitch McConnell, who is facing reelection next year in Paul’s state of Kentucky, even joined in. And the NRSC even was raising money off it.

It all ended because he had to finally go the bathroom… “I would go for another 12 hours to try to break Strom Thurmond’s record, but I’ve discovered that there are some limits to filibustering and I’m going to have to go take care of one of those in a few minutes here,” Paul said, per the New York Times. (Maybe Kirk’s team shouldn’t have offered him that thermos of green tea.)

“The House approved a six-month stopgap spending bill Wednesday to keep the government operating past March 27 and shift billions of dollars to military operations to help the Army and Navy cope with automatic spending cuts ordered last week,” David Rogers reports. “The 267-151 vote sends the measure to the Senate, where a bipartisan coalition hopes to expand on the package next week and give other Cabinet departments the same relief promised to the Pentagon.” (Some conservatives are upset, by the way, that the CR doesn’t defund… Obamacare.)

But Roll Call notes: The continuing resolution that will come out of the Senate will almost certainly be a larger and more complicated measure than the stopgap funding measure the House coped with this week. How far Democrats in the Senate hope to take the bill remains an open question, however, with lawmakers trying to balance concerns over the effects of the sequester on federal agencies and spending on major regulatory initiatives with the fundamental need to fund the government through the rest of the fiscal year.”

So much for that… ”Sen. Chuck Schumer is ending the bipartisan gun control talks with Sen. Tom Coburn without a deal, a major setback to President Barack Obama’s effort to pass universal background checks,” Politico reports.

“In the absence of a bipartisan deal, Schumer will introduce an updated version of the Fix Guns Checks Act of 2011,” The Hill writes. “It’s similar to the legislation Schumer was discussing with Coburn, Kirk and Manchin, but without the latest modifications, such as improvements to get state records into the background check database.”

And here might be why… “The National Rifle Association and its allies are kicking their lobbying forces into high gear as the Senate heads toward a vote that could remake key pieces of the country’s gun laws,” Politico reports. “The gun lobby is taking its fight to Capitol Hill — stepping up meetings with old friends and trying to make inroads with a handful of swing Democrats in the Senate. They’re also blanketing the airwaves, winding up their grass-roots machines, taking to social media and even, in the NRA’s case — sponsoring a NASCAR race at the Texas Motor Speedway and putting up new TV ads targeting black voters. Their goal: thwart any move by the Senate to pass gun control legislation, with a special focus on universal background checks — an idea that has picked up steam.”

“Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) is pressing GOP centrists to accept a budget that would cut Medicare benefits for recipients who are now 56 years old,” The Hill writes. “The House Budget Committee chairman and 2012 GOP vice presidential candidate argues the change is necessary to help him produce a budget next week that balances within 10 years. He also says that the change must be made and that it is better to adopt it now than next year, when Republicans will face voters in the midterm elections. The problem for Ryan is that many Republicans have said his budget would not touch Medicare benefits for anyone who is already 55 years old. Members may have trouble supporting a measure that goes back on that commitment. “

Bloomberg: “While some evangelical leaders have long favored an immigration revision, it’s only now -- in the wake of the 2012 elections that spotlighted Republicans’ weakness with Hispanic voters -- that they are stepping up their activism. It remains a difficult goal, even with a new sense of political urgency among Republicans who warn their party must do better with the fastest growing minority voting bloc. A large swath of the party base opposes loosening immigration rules, and their advocacy group are also engaged in the debate.”

Discuss this post

Rand Paul is afraid of drones; but not assault weapons killing citizens daily? How asinine.

  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:10 AM EST

In the nut bowl are cashews, filberts, almonds, Brazil nuts, peanuts and Rand Paul & father.

Unrealistic, unacceptable ideas seem to permiate their every being. Good people of Kentucky, turn that nut out and get common sense in the chair.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:47 PM EST
Reply

Much to do about nothing. Weapons of war, must be used against our enemies both foreign and domestic. Whats the problem, is Paul afraid he is considered an enemy. Not much of an American if he wants to take away an important weapon that means one of our hero's won't be killed or maimed while our enemies are soundly defeated. Remote control war, embrace it.

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:13 AM EST

Johntho,

As with most of your comments on you have NO idea what you are talking about!!

This filibuster is about "due process" under the Constitution!! The right of being innocent until proven guilty in a court of law...

But I would not expect for you to know anything about that because your the type of low information voter that this administration is depending on to spread the message of hope and change!!

Unfortunately for the rest of us, your IQ is just barely above moron level so we have to try and deceipher what the h-ll you are thinking and it's not easy, but one thing is clear...

You are a perfect example of the low information voter... an ignorant moron who unfortunately has the right to vote and even more distrubing is able to breed!!

    #2.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:38 AM EST

    So when you don't have anything to say Moocher you just call names and try to denigrate other posters. When you call someone else a low information voter, you need only look in the mirror.

    • 2 votes
    #2.2 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:50 AM EST
    Reply

    Love or hate Senator Rand Paul, at least he did a PROPER filibuster.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:14 AM EST

    I agree. Love him or hate him he did a proper filibuster. He wasn't lazy like the others. As loony as his ideas may be if he is willing to stand on the Senate floor and talk ad nauseum about a topic than he must be admired at least for that.

      #3.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 12:51 PM EST
      Reply

      Wow daily killings now? At least you don't make stuff up huh? And drones are great. A memo from the White House stating they have determined internally they have the right to kill Americans without trial or recourse, is very disturbing. The method does not matter. It is the declaration that they alone believe they can pick an American for assassination, and answer to no other authority than themselves. How did you miss that and focus on the weapon of choice? Have somebody else read you stuff and explain it to you next time. But not Bev. She makes stuff up for dramatic emphasis.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#4 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:21 AM EST

      Do we have any reservations about a police officer who shoots and kills the man who opened fire on him? There were no charges and no trial...so where was that person's due process?

      • 3 votes
      #4.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 9:39 AM EST
      Reply

      sane @ #4 If a American is working with a terrorist group foreign or domestic plotting to kill other Americans here or in another country that person should be taken out with extreme prejudice. Sorry working with foreign or domestic terrorists to kill other Americans is plain wrong. Thats treason like some people on here would say why spend the money to keep them alive to have a trial only to kill them later for treason.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#5 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:26 AM EST

      Noid, what a stupid comparison. Yes if obama sees someone pointing a weapon ar him he should make that choice. But it has nothing to do with the circumstances of the drone hit determination. And no Smitty, if someone in America is suspected of a plot it must be backed by evidence and given due process to enter and arrest or kill the suspect if needed. They can get a warrent and go in, if the suspect fights he can be subdued with all force needed. But not simply killed on a hunch. If there is treason a citizen is given due process in court. Like you wanted to give enemy combatants from Guantanamo. The cop in noids silly story is protecting himself from an assault, he does not predetermine that he will kill the suspect, then hope to be shot at to make it look better.

        Reply#6 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 10:42 AM EST

        sane Like you wanted to give enemy combatants from Guantanamo.

        Now where did you get that from my post to take someone out on a hunch? Just because we went into Iraq on a hunch doesn't mean that we would kill a domestic terrorist on a hunch. A full investigation should made before the target is hit to be sure no mistakes were made.

        Now where did you get Guantanamo from my post? Don't put words in my post that were never posted.

        • 1 vote
        #6.1 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:09 AM EST
        Reply

        Rand Paul's real message for the TEA Party---" face it, I ain't worth a crap"

        • 2 votes
        Reply#7 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:16 AM EST

        Now, just who is this Phil Buster that Rand Paul was talking to? Is he another one of those Tea Beggers? He sure talked a lot, but about nonsense tho. Any time we can take out a terrorist, foreign or domestic, we should, period!!! And if it needs to be by drone, more power to em!!!

        The TGOP continue to drone on, and on, and on, and on........

        • 1 vote
        Reply#8 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:35 AM EST

        What do conservaturds call it when they start turning the toilet bowl water brown?

        A tea party.

          Reply#9 - Thu Mar 7, 2013 1:59 PM EST
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.