Senate panel votes to move Brennan's CIA nomination forward

The Senate Intelligence Committee voted on Tuesday in favor of John O. Brennan's nomination to become the next director of the CIA, clearing the way for his confirmation before the whole Senate.

The intelligence panel voted 12-3 in a closed-door session to favorably report Brennan, the Homeland Security adviser to President Barack Obama. Tuesday's vote could clear the way for Brennan's confirmation as soon as this week.

The three senators voting against Brennan's nomination in committee, all Republicans, were Sens. Jim Risch (Idaho), Saxby Chambliss (Ga.) and Tom Coburn (Okla.). Chambliss is the committee vice chairman and said he would be explaining his "no" vote on the Senate floor in the coming days.

Brennan faces some measure of rare, bipartisan resistance from Republicans who wish for more information from Obama about the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi and liberals who want more details about Brennan's role in advising covert drone strikes against terrorist targets.

If any of those senators object to moving forward with Brennan's nomination before the whole Senate, it would trigger the same 60-vote threshold -- a de-facto filibuster -- to which now-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel's nomination was subjected.

This story was originally published on

Discuss this post

I wish we could have a real investigation instead. But I guess this will have to do.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 3:58 PM EST

Don't go inSANE, and torture Brennan. Just get him on to CIA. He is all right.

He is the right person, qualified, good, excellent. The president should have his own people in running the executive departments...a long-honored tradition.

But some of these Senate Republican jerks have always had this knee-jerk reaction...anything the President does they will oppose. Please put the nation's interest first.

  • 20 votes
#1.1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:10 PM EST

Yep, Mr. "Pocket Veto" Reid makes sure these type things gets a Senate floor vote.

Mr. Brennan is great for the job......slap down Israel, back Palestine/Egypt/Syria/Libya/Mali, hold more talks with Iran and North Korea, make sure Mr. Obama's comments to the Russians that the Iron Dome in Europe will be decimated (whisper, whisper), and make sure ALL nations nuclear capabilities are limited.

Yep, Mr. Obama.....put the American people FIRST before your political campaign contributors and special interest Chicago friends. Don't politicize EVERYTHING.

At least Mrs. Obama has something different.....now she is talking about HEALTHY PETS. LOL...LOL.

Great team out there....Hagel, Brennan, Kerry, and Rice. Maybe the 'Worm" will get an ambassador appointment.

  • 7 votes
#1.2 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:27 PM EST

Do it quickly...when McCane is changing his adult diaper in the bathroom. If he finishes changing his diaper, this McBuster will start his filibuster.

  • 16 votes
#1.3 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:37 PM EST

@Sane,

I wish we could have a real investigation instead.

We did have a real investigation.

The Benghazi boogeyman has been debunked.

Move along.

  • 21 votes
#1.4 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:41 PM EST

OH GOD! The Flock of GOP fools gathering again to look stupid, irresponsible, wounded and reckless, while weighting the world down for maybe being slow learners’, a quick prime time comic interview, maybe showing their true colors or just delight themselves with acts of terror because they can hold Americans down while risking citizen’s financial security, physical, mental security and safety for our nation, with no end game other than to vote them out!

  • 12 votes
#1.5 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:46 PM EST

When is Congress going to call me in and ask me what happened in Benghazi? They seem to like asking anyone who has no knowledge of anything.

  • 6 votes
#1.6 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:54 PM EST

I heard that if Rice had said, after the fact, that TERORISTS did the dirty deed, the 4 Americans would still be alive.

Is that true?

Is it, Sean? Is it Lindsey?? Is it, Mr McCain???

  • 6 votes
#1.7 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 7:27 PM EST
  • 2 votes
#1.8 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 10:58 PM EST

I guess soon drones will be coming to your neighborhood....

I think those who wish the CIA to be seen as villains will get their wish. I will like more what they were than what they are becoming. There was a time when they were real spies and not video gamers hiding behind a console. Bye bye humint....

Hello drone assassins brought to you by Darth Brennan and Emperor Obama....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNv5sPu0C1E

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 11:54 PM EST

The first Muslim to head the CIA.

  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 7:48 AM EST

I think I heard on the news last night that Eric Holder, Attorney General did not rule out the use of drones in the United States. I'm not sure if the said they were "Arm Drones" as I missed most of the segment, but I'm scanning the news wires and can't seem to find anything on it.

Surprise, surprise.

    #1.11 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 8:17 AM EST

    Brennan is a lying incompetent bordering on treasonous. It's no wonder at all that the the most incompetent administration full of liars would wish to see him as head of our intelligence gathering operation.

    http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/10/did-obama-administration-and-john-brennan-lie-and-allow-release-of-a-benghazi-suspect/

    http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/01/09/john-brennans-lie-about-civilian-casualties/

    Even the whacked out liberals at Mother Jones calls the man a liar:

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/02/john-brennan-senate-confirmation-hearing-drone

    The Obama administration lies to the American people on a daily basis.

    • 1 vote
    #1.12 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 8:52 AM EST

    Here ya go thinkaboutit

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/eric-holder-drone-strikes-against-americans-on-u.s.-soil-are-legal/article/2523319

    Holder replied in a letter yesterday to Paul’s question about whether Obama “has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial.”

    The whole Administration should be impeached and imprisoned

    • 1 vote
    #1.13 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 9:01 AM EST

    Senate Intelligence Committee:

    Now THAT defines an Oxymoron.

    • 1 vote
    #1.14 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 9:25 AM EST
    Reply

    This is a major mistake ... this mans actions could have quite well have been the catalyst for the Bengazi attacks ...

    The ouster of David Petraeus was planned by upper echelon officials at the CIA with John Brennan s knowledge ... and tacit approval. Davis Petraeus discovered that he and Ambassador Stevens were being left out of important decisions concerning CIA's covert military actions in Libya being directed by National Security advisor John Brennan. These Secret raids enraged rebel forces and resulted with the attack on The Benghazi consulate and the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and others.

    " Senior CIA officers targeted Petraeus because they didn't like the way he was running the agency - focusing more on paramilitary operations than intelligence analysis"

    Petraeus, a highly regard military general, was being left out of the loop, while John Brennan, the former CIA analyst, was clandestinely running covert military actions in Libya that proved counterproductive to and lead to the attack on the American Consulate and death of Ambassador Stevens.

    The question that is left is ...... Did John Brennan use David Petraeus as a scapegoat to cover up his ultimate nexus as a causation factor of the raid on the Benghazi Consulate and the death of the American ambassador and others by orchestrating the CIA (palace coup?)

    There is substantial evidence that he did ... read the book ....Brennan is a dangerous man to head the company ...

    • 6 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:09 PM EST

    Moonbeamracer's a good name for you since you're chasing after beams of light with nothing but star dust for a vehicle. Good grief, conservatives think up one conspiracy theory after another. There is NO Benghazi coverup. David Petraeus destroyed his own career by having an affair and being a tool for a "groupie"; he should have resigned without being told to--his arrogance on that issue alone was justification enough. Brennan worked at the CIA for about 25 years prior to accepting the position in the White House. And by the way, the CIA is not a "company".

    • 24 votes
    #2.1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:33 PM EST

    "Brennan is a dangerous man to head the company CIA..."

    Not to the Progressives. They love everything Mr. Obama is doing to "control" everyone and everything.

    The "madam" was just a deflection from Benghazi. Notice these turkeys always say they are resigning because of family problems.

    BTW: Mr. Obama is treating AMERICA like a company. Wait a minute...he is a community organizer and certainly is not a LEADER.

    • 4 votes
    #2.2 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:33 PM EST

    There is nothing else on Benghazi. Move on!!!

    • 19 votes
    #2.3 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:41 PM EST

    Job1 - Ido has NOTHING but Benghazi to hang her tattered hat on. She's got nothing else - NADA, ZILCH. She'll hang onto it because she knows nothing else.

    She will never recognize leadership - remember she voted for Bush - twice!

    • 21 votes
    #2.4 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:44 PM EST

    She will never recognize leadership - remember she voted for Bush - twice!

    And the WT Queen Sarah Palin!

    • 16 votes
    #2.5 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:54 PM EST

    Conspiracy is a key trick of the trade of conspirates (short for 'conservative pirates')

    Conspirates = conservative pirates who commit conservative piracy (or conspiracy)

    • 14 votes
    #2.6 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:00 PM EST

    pigotry = loud mouth ignorant disgusting liberal

    • 2 votes
    #2.7 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:24 PM EST

    @Pig,

    PirateCons?

    ARRepublicans!?

    Avast there, me hearties!

    'Ware the boarders!

    • 3 votes
    #2.8 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:29 PM EST

    joe - jealous, ignorant, sad little Republican!

    • 11 votes
    #2.9 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:51 PM EST

    Seeking, right libtard

      #2.10 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:54 PM EST

      joe - that's the BEST you've got? So sad little joe!

      • 11 votes
      #2.11 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:57 PM EST

      Hey, joe-2849984 (#2.7)

      pigotry = loud mouth ignorant disgusting liberal

      So unfair to me, joe

      ignorant, I am NOT;

      Pignorant, I AM.

      and ...

      Joe, you have fallen off the scale on this, though.

      • 8 votes
      #2.12 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 7:18 PM EST

      I heard the Benghazi attackers got their instructions from a........Tele-Promp-Ter!!

      • 7 votes
      #2.13 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 7:29 PM EST
      Reply

      Good. It's about time. Now it shouldn't be long before McCain and his hip attachment, Lindsay Graham, hit the microphones to yell and then decide they need to filibuster.

      • 19 votes
      Reply#3 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:26 PM EST

      Jody - oh please. Can't we just get McCain and Graham to take a permanent vacation?

      • 17 votes
      #3.1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:34 PM EST

      What I want to know does Lindsay's wife know he is a homosexual?

      • 12 votes
      #3.2 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:22 PM EST

      Stonepipe2, I thought Linsay and his wife were brother and sister?

      • 12 votes
      #3.3 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:17 PM EST

      Does Moochelle know that Obama is a homo?

        #3.4 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:29 PM EST

        @joe-2849984

        Who/what is "Moochelle"?

        Projecting? It is alright for you to be gay ... I certainly do not care.

        • 10 votes
        #3.5 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:36 PM EST

        Bertrand, try to make some sense.

          #3.6 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:44 PM EST

          @joe,

          Does Moochelle know that Obama is a homo?

          Try to make some sense yourself, will ya?

          • 8 votes
          #3.7 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:51 PM EST

          Bali - That IS sense for poor Joe. You have to realize anyone who is posting nonsense like "Moochelle" is not a rocket scientist - or anything close!!!!

          • 7 votes
          #3.8 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:53 PM EST

          so you are all satisfied that he would not declare water boarding torture? if barry says he is ok the lemmings here follow.

          • 1 vote
          #3.9 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 7:56 AM EST

          stonepipe, Lindsay Graham isn't married.

            #3.10 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 8:21 AM EST
            Reply

            The republican'ts are so tired of hassling with hagel, they have no energy left to fight others...

            • 9 votes
            Reply#4 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:27 PM EST

            Oh goody...the GOP senators get to throw another tantrum...

            • 11 votes
            Reply#5 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:37 PM EST

            Hi All, sorry to go off topic but I just learned that the NRA is announced as the title sponsor for the NASCAR race at TX Motor Speedway in April.

            Please join me in letting the folks over at TX Motor Speedway know how you feel about this. I am a NASCAR fan but will not be buying tickets for this race anymore nor will I watch on TV.

            TX Motor Speedway ticket office 8172158500

            • 13 votes
            Reply#6 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:38 PM EST

            The NRA is the biggest sponsors of death!!!

            • 15 votes
            #6.1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:43 PM EST

            Grow up. Booze, crappy food and tobacco kill more people a day than a month of shootings.

            • 1 vote
            #6.2 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:24 PM EST

            stonepipe2- big difference. People make the conscious decision to smoke and eat what they do. The 26 people at Sandy Hook made no such choice. GROW UP!

            • 14 votes
            #6.3 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:13 PM EST

            Job1, and where did you get your facts from.

            • 1 vote
            #6.4 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:25 PM EST

            Chucky,nobody will miss you loserrrrr.

            • 1 vote
            #6.5 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:33 PM EST

            joe - you really should stop deflecting. You just look pathetic each time you do!

            • 6 votes
            #6.6 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:54 PM EST

            I watch a lot of races. I watch a lot of NASCAR races. I'm a race fan.

            But- I will notify the (other) sponsors that I will NOT watch this race. Who's in??

            • 5 votes
            #6.7 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 7:31 PM EST

            drive - count me in!

            • 5 votes
            #6.8 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 7:39 PM EST
            Reply

            Moonbeamracer sounds like a Communist. First order of business for Brennan should be to investigate him

            • 4 votes
            Reply#7 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:47 PM EST

            After Kerry and Hagel, anyone is an upgrade.

              Reply#8 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 4:55 PM EST

              Risch is a teabilly idiot. No one should pay any attention to him at all.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#9 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:24 PM EST

              OH GOD! The Flock of GOP fools gathering again to look stupid, irresponsible, wounded and reckless, while weighting the world down for maybe being slow learners’, a quick prime time comic interview, maybe showing their true colors or just delight themselves with acts of terror because they can hold Americans down while risking citizen’s financial security, physical, mental security and safety for our nation, with no end game other than to vote them out!

              • 9 votes
              Reply#10 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:30 PM EST

              Great comment Celeste.

              I want to know where McCain and Graham were when Bush/Cheney (the twins who cannot leave the country for fear of the international courts) ran the show.

              • 11 votes
              Reply#11 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:42 PM EST

              Not quail hunting obviously.

              • 8 votes
              #11.1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 5:54 PM EST

              Perry - no one hunts with Cheney - not by choice anyway!

              • 9 votes
              #11.2 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:14 PM EST
              Reply

              Breaking news:

              Hugo Chavez dead...

              The torturer, mass murderer and hater of America will be sorely missed by clueless leftists...the NY Times is blubbering.

              Joe Kennedy will now get free oil from another thug dictator ....maybe Iran.

              • 4 votes
              Reply#12 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:10 PM EST

              GOP - THAT was the best you could post? REALLY?????

              • 8 votes
              #12.1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:14 PM EST

              Chavez didn't like George W. Bush, that in itself made him ok with me.

              • 9 votes
              #12.2 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:21 PM EST

              Johntho, that's because the scum bag ran his country the way you and all the deranged liberals would like to see this country run

              • 3 votes
              #12.3 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:26 PM EST

              joe, joe, joe - you truly sound deranged. Seen a doctor lately?

              • 8 votes
              #12.4 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:55 PM EST

              chavez deserves credit for amassing a $2B personal fortune since becoming his country's leader.

              • 1 vote
              #12.5 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 7:58 AM EST
              Reply

              .

              • 1 vote
              Reply#13 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 6:28 PM EST

              What, we can't harp on about perceived misconduct by the White house. We listened to drummed up bogus accusations for 16 years from the left. Nothing has held up in court against an administration since slick Willy lied under oath.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#14 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 7:04 PM EST

              Sane (you're not) - please cite the "trumped up accusations" from the left. We'd LOVE to see what you're talking about.

              • 3 votes
              #14.1 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 7:15 PM EST
              Reply

              were you at

              Mccain and graham,you was so dead set against him going in just sunday

              till all the pages of the attack was given in full not blacked out

              i guess your mouth was just running! didnt catch up with your mind

              now we all know your both full of hot air!neither one of you held up to your words

              • 2 votes
              Reply#15 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 8:30 PM EST

              They do not deserve to live in the White House for these infantile actions. It is a 2.5% reduction in the GROWTH of spending. Nothing in the se-castration warrants this action. They are lying (as usual) over this whole thing. A pox upon their house.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#16 - Tue Mar 5, 2013 10:45 PM EST

              The Senate should never reject a president's choice to head up an executive branch department, unless there is an overwhelming reason so obvious that it has bipartisan support. The Republicans have simply been playing politics in holding up confirmations for nothing more than ideological grandstanding. The stupid Republicans think they're making the administration look bad, while in reality they are cementing their own reputation as bat-crazy ideologues.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#17 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 4:58 AM EST

              This person is worse than Hitler himself. You people really need to dig for background on him and you will find out how bad he really is. For those of you that say he is OK, you don't know Jack !

                Reply#18 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 6:48 AM EST

                LG : you sir are an idiot and very stupid and ignorant moron who should be deprived of oxygen !

                • 1 vote
                #18.1 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 12:42 PM EST
                Reply

                Can't be a "Good Guy" and be director of the CIA, Brennan obviously not a softy, he's for America first and foremost--good choice, lets hope that CIA Intelligence/operations are run on a more competent level than they have in the past. We don't need another Iraq and the bs of WMDs or a big time botched Benghazi operation. We need a bad guy in that position.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#19 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 9:15 AM EST

                Now Brennan will be able to run not only the foreign drone program but the domestic one as well. Let the Drone Wars begin!

                  Reply#20 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 10:22 AM EST

                  I am so tired of hear about Benghazi and the death of the Americans i could scream ! I don't care any longer about whar happened or did'nt Happened in Benghazi this is a dead issue just as dead as those killed in any service to this country ! I am also sick of the republicans and tea-party filibustering every single appointment this president makes to HIS cabinet ! This continued delay and filibustering of cabinet members has never happened ever before in history and republicans should remember that if they ever gain the white house again ( i doubt that will happen anytime soon) the democrats will most certainly do the same to there appointments ! It is no wonder that the people of this country refer to the Republican party as out of touch with America !

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#21 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 12:39 PM EST

                  Rand Paul quote re his fillibuster, "I will speak until I can no longer speak". Not nice to say but maybe that would be a desireable p[ermanent result.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#22 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 3:41 PM EST

                  We can argue to death (death) the hypothetical, remote possibility that law enforcement would use whatever means (drone) to end a criminal or terrorist situation. Once we follow the laws we have, and the proceedings needed, as we hope to always consistently do, the law enforcement can take whatever means available to terminate the situation. There are no if, and, or, or buts about it.

                  Thus to engage in false debate, a debate that has but one side, is an act against civilization. Why? It not just a matter of wasting time, it is wasting time, the intention is only to waste time, because the one sided debate cannot preempt such an action! The hypothetical question answers itself, yes we can end a situation, and everyone accepts that the deed had to be done. It is no different than any other law enforcement activity.

                  This is always the nature of one sided arguments, one side states an absurd, unrealistic, unachievable position and the rest of world can argue the issue to eternity, just to waste time.

                  If you choose biblical restrictions, or humanitarian restrictions, or morally superior positions, but none of those meets the needs of enforcement apprehension. So the argument against killing varies against that of murder, no difference between fists, clubs, knifes, and firearms or any other means available (drone).

                  So what is your position? The constitution has rules reflected in criminal law enforcement, do you really expect that any details in law could be created that would anticipate every situation? If so then I am pleased to inform you that laws have never been written this form of open-end-ness.

                  So this drone debate is false, and can never even be considered useful, but is there another constitutional debate that occurs constantly that might, just might save a few thousands of real lives, that is not so very far is beyond reason?

                  Yes, it perfectly reasonable to have restrictions and reregulation on fire arms, and the same (anarchical) crowd that rises falsely against drone armaments for law enforcement allows, encourages and proves the means of killing, mayhem and murder in false defense of the same constitution. The blood is everywhere, innocents, infants, grandparents sleeping in bed?

                  So far we have the hypothetical case of a natural (technological) extension to law enforcement with no current examples, and the case of tens of thousands of dead or maimed people, without the slightest chance of being addressed, while it is on the congressional plate before us.

                  We will now illustrate the two issues together. We have another perennial debate in this country, again it is the "one sided" argument, where there is a position on one side and an endless resolved, indeterminate, discussion on the other that does not show any sign of being satisfied. This debate goes even beyond its own bounds because; if the wishes of the proponents would win the day; the argument would resume the very next day without one bit of progress.

                  Let's be gentile in a rough sort of way. It has been said that having wide spread availability of guns without restrictions, without registrations, without notice of conditions and without limits is just version of legal post birth abortion or death panels for the aged? This is classical one sided debate that rages and will never ever be resolved. The protagonist and the antagonist will simple exploit the situation, for political gain and never ever advance a solution that addressed the problem.

                  Exploiting a perennial unresolved situation just for political gain, this is corruption of politics far beyond the usefulness of politics.

                  Advancing the abortion argument, would require the possibility of personhood not just during embryogenesis, but include the unfertilized. Hardly approach of maturity or sanity.

                  So at the center is this spectacle is Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, John Cornyn, Jerry Moran, Saxby Chambliss, Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio, and fellow traveler Ron Wyden of Oregon.

                  Who have more interest in this issue than perpetuate their existence? They should fight their own demons and windmills while we have better things to do.

                  When the media gets out of juvenile detention, they might see the trap that has been lain on these three one side issues.

                    Reply#23 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 5:58 PM EST

                    AFRL was involved in the psychological aspects of one of the most sadistic and bizzare illegal experimentation/torture programs in U.S. History: Chet Maciag, Colonel Lamar Parker, Lt. Col Bill Gregory:

                      Reply#24 - Wed Mar 6, 2013 6:24 PM EST
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.