SOTU: Rubio and 'Water-gate'

USA Today: Twitter “blew up when the Florida Republican reached for a bottle of Poland Spring water as he was outlining the GOP's vision to help the middle class. His speech text ran for five pages, about half the length of Obama's remarks.”

Rubio paused mid-speech, leaned over out of frame, grabbed a small Poland Spring bottle, took a swig of water, swished it, put it back down, and continued.

More: “Twitter said there were about 9,200 tweets per minute at about 10:43 p.m. ET, after Rubio's sip of water. For a short time, #watergate and Poland Spring were trending on the micro-blogging site.”

Politico’s provocative headline: “Marco Rubio’s drinking problem.” From the story: “[T]he Florida senator appeared a little sweaty and dry-mouthed at mid-speech, taking an awkward swig from a bottle of water that had been placed off-camera. Rubio handled the hullabaloo with some humor, later tweeting a picture of the water bottle.”

The New York Daily News: “Thirsty Sen. Marco Rubio makes waves with awkward grab for water.” From the story: “Thirsty for attention? Or just thirsty? Sen. Marco Rubio made headlines for all the wrong reasons Tuesday night as he delivered the Republican response to President Obama's State of the Union address. It was supposed to be the moment that propelled Rubio into the top tier of potential presidential candidates. Instead, social media exploded with jokes after Rubio awkwardly paused, reached for a bottle of Poland Spring water and took a swig to douse a case of dry mouth.”

For Rubio and his team’s part, they seem to be rolling with it. Rubio went on ABC this morning and made light of it, taking a drink again. “I needed water; what am I going to do, you know? It happens. God has a funny way of reminding us we’re human.”

On CBS, he said: “I'm just glad the water was nearby. I don't know what I would have done without it."

Rubio brought a bottle of water with him on another appearance, too. This one on FOX. “My mouth got dry and I had to get some water,” he said, noting that he’d rather “take the hit” for getting water than not be able to say the rest of the words in his speech. "My mouth got dry, what can I say ... I brought some with me now." He then took a swig.

Aside from “water-gate,” Politico notes: “Sen. Marco Rubio got a turn on the national stage opposite President Barack Obama Tuesday night, but some of the facts the likely 2016 presidential contender marshaled to make his case played loose with the truth” on the sequester, climate change, Medicare, and Obamacare.

As Matt Yglesias noted on Twitter, Rubio’s “middle-class” neighborhood may also be fiction. As the Huffington Post and the Daily Caller reported last month Rubio put his house on the market for $675,000.

On substance, Roll Call says the contrast between Obama and Rubio was “a stark display of the ideological divide between the parties.” Noting “water-gate,” Roll Call writes, “Regardless of his uneven performance, Rubio offered a clear contrast to the president’s call for enhanced government services and programs, such as an expansion of pre-kindergarten programs and money for new infrastructure improvements.”

AP: “Republicans say President Barack Obama’s second-term agenda will bring more tax increases and increase deficit spending. They’re vowing to promote economic growth to help middle-class families find good jobs. Republicans are responding to Obama’s State of the Union address with fresh appeals to voters on the economy and promises to rein in federal spending with a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.”

And Beth Reinhard notes this overlooked bit from Rubio: “By delivering the Republican response to the State of the Union speech in Spanish, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., on Tuesday broke through an increasingly powerful language barrier between the political establishment and the nation’s fastest-growing demographic. Rubio pretaped his remarks in Spanish and was the first opposition leader whose official response was broadcast on English and Spanish television networks.”

Politico: “Rand Paul tackled gun control, drone strikes, immigration and — first and foremost — spending cuts in a blistering ‘tea party’ response to the President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address.”

Reuters: “U.S. Senator Rand Paul blamed Republicans and Democrats for heavy government spending on Tuesday in an address responding to President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech on behalf of the small-government, fiscally conservative Tea Party movement. … Paul's remarks under the Tea Party banner prompted talk of division within the Republican Party. But Paul's speech echoed many themes in the official Republican response to Obama's remarks by Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, who like Paul was elected in 2010 with strong Tea Party support.”

And this is why inviting Ted Nugent is a problem. He slammed Rhode Island Rep. Jim Langevin, who was critical of the decision to invite Nugent. Langevin is in a wheelchair from a gunshot as a teenager. Nugent: “He probably has s**t for brains. … “I couldn't be more proud of myself, what I stand for, and for this pompous ass to claim that he cares more about a family that lost a child than I do is a perfect example of the brain dead critics of Ted Nugent.”

Discuss this post

Marco Rubio showed us yesterday that he doesn't have what it takes to be President of the United States!

  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:11 AM EST

Rubio's water bottle incident so reminded me of a sketch you would see on SNL (Saturday Night Live.) Obviously an up and coming loser. Couldn't stop laughing (had to get a glass of water). And this guy thinks he's going to be President in 2016? I don't think so.

  • 8 votes
#1.1 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:22 AM EST

Lying causes the mouth and throat to dry out...just ask Bobby Jindal.

  • 9 votes
#1.2 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:30 AM EST

Water...please!

Sen. Rubio is thirsty...for power

  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:31 AM EST

2016 presidential contender marshaled to make his case played loose with the truth”

Heck, call it what it really is......Lil Marco LIED!

A true TeaPeople, truth doesn't count....just lie!

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:57 AM EST

Well I imagine his mouth was a bit dry. Prior to filming this response he had just done the Spanish version. That to me is BS to begin with. This is the US of A. Learn the language.

    #1.5 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:10 AM EST
    Reply

    Product placement perhaps? Poland Spring is bottled in Maine! LOL, they probably paid him to take a drink from their bottle on camera!

    • 4 votes
    Reply#2 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:19 AM EST

    And just what did Rubio present as the Repub "vision" of good government? Nothing. Their whole message is "Obama bad - us good" and it looks like they've still got nothing. Once again, you can "rebrand" your message with different language (although it sounded like the same old BS to me), trot out the minority spokesmodel, and denigrate the President. And why? Because their core principles are abhorrent to most Americans and no amount of stagecraft can change that. And they know it deep in their tiny little hearts.

    • 9 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:27 AM EST

    You can put all the lipstick you want on a pig. But at the end of the day, it's still a pig.

    • 6 votes
    Reply#4 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:52 AM EST

    What is it about giving the response to the State of the Union speech that causes Republicans to become completely undone? I've seen Rubio on Meet The Press, and I thought he was a bright, attractive, politician but last night he really he lost it. Same thing when Bobby Jindal gave his SOTU response.

    Paul Ryan didn't lose it during his speech, but he came across as an adherent of the mono-thought process. Apparently, Ryan thinks everything comes down to reducing the deficit, conveniently shutting out everything else we have to think about, such as the aging boomer population and how we will protect ourselves in a dangerous world. I don't have confidence in a leader who operates by imposing a set of rules on his view of the world, instead of responding to what is.

    • 3 votes
    #4.1 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:27 AM EST

    Paul and Marco also both share the disconnect that they and their families benefited from govt programs and they don't want people "like their Moms" to lose said benefits, but screw everyone else.

      #4.2 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:22 PM EST
      Reply

      As is usual with the GOP they appoint someone who is not ready for prime time.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#5 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:14 AM EST

      Surely the once grand old party could have selected someone with a better ability to speak before TV cameras to represent their brand. The kid was nervous and I literally howled when he reached for the water bottle. I know anyone would be nervous but this kid was visably nervous and he didn't come across well at all. With the same old lies and talking points he had nothing new to offer. What a waste of breath and valuable TV time.

        Reply#6 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:58 AM EST

        I don't agree with the substance of Rubio's speech. But it would be better that the "media" stick to that and ignore the water. It belittles the media to even mention this and plays into the FOX/Right Wing trap that all media is partisan and mostly just for entertainment. Cheap shots only cheapen the integrity of the legitimate media. The media shouldn't be competing with the Congress to see who can get lower trustworthiness numbers. Leave that race to lawyers and stock brokers.

          Reply#7 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:30 PM EST

          There sure are a lot of bigots commenting here.

            Reply#8 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:13 PM EST

            Pat, get used to it. Fox shut down the Comments capability on their website since they didn't want all the hate-mongering racist rants to show the world the ilk of their viewers. So, now all the Fox viewers come here to unleash their garbage.

              #8.1 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:24 PM EST
              Reply

              Where's Gunga Din when you need him?

                Reply#9 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:19 PM EST

                I think you libs watched a different speech. I'll grant you that the water reach was awkward and he was a bit nervous at the end, but for the first ten minutes he was excellent. His tone, pitch and cadence were spot on. He doesn't have that annoying tick that Obama uses where he drops his pitch at the end of every sentence. Plus the content was great. It lays out the contrast between the left and the right.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#10 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:51 PM EST

                Leftists, keep snickering, you vastly underestimate the passion and intellect of Marco Rubio or are you guys racists like you guys like to say to us conservatives about Obozo. Well are you Libs racists to Rubio, I think so.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#11 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:55 PM EST

                Finally, a Republican on the national stage said the truth about the 2008 recession. It was the result of a housing crisis caused by misplaced government polices, not because of too little government.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#12 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:56 PM EST

                Rubio doesn't use a teleprompter, and so what if he reached for a glass of water? It was only a speech, which is usually pre-recorded. Obama stutters and stammers like an idiot when he tries to speak without a teleprompter. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill Liberals but what else is new with you guys. EWWW, he reached for a bottle of water. OMG! He drinks water!
                It's really pathetic when the worst thing that a lib can say about the man is that he drinks water. Oh, and he accuse Obama of supporting Big Government, which is undeniable, since all Obama talked about was the collective.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#13 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:07 PM EST

                I like that he seemed a little uncomfortable. Way better than arrogant, pompous and self aggrandizing like Obama. It takes a certain level of mental illness to think you should not have to have legal review to assassinate your own citizens. This from the same man that argued that enemy combatants should have access to constitutional rights, in our courts, at our expense. How do you sheep keep giving him a pass on this stuff. This is so beyond Patriot act that it borders on blind worship.

                  Reply#14 - Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:42 AM EST
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.