Senate renews Violence Against Women Act, sending to House for action

 

The Senate approved legislation to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act on Tuesday over the objections of a handful of Republicans.

Democrats were joined by several Republican senators in voting to renew the landmark gender and domestic violence law, which lapsed at the end of 2012 after lawmakers in the last Congress failed to reach agreement on a new extension.

Senators voted 78-22 to send their version of the bill to the Republican-controlled House, where it faces uncertain prospects.

Republicans have objected to elements of the reauthorization, most specifically a technical dispute over jurisdiction for Native American tribal authorities in the instances of certain crimes.

Still, proposals like the Violence Against Women Act have become a lightning rod in the realm of gender politics, especially as Democrats cast Republicans during last year’s election as leading a “war on women.” Democrats were all too eager to seize on GOP opposition to a contraception mandate, or controversial statements by Senate candidates Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock about rape.

Perhaps as that political pressure weighs upon Republicans, a group of 17 House GOP lawmakers wrote the party’s leadership on Tuesday urging them to take up the Senate bill passed this afternoon. If those Republicans were to join with every House Democrat in support of the bill, it would be enough to pass the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization in the House.

"Especially in communities like West Virginia where victims of domestic violence and sexual assault in rural and remote communities face unique obstacles in their efforts to escape abusive and dangerous relationships, support provided by VAWA can literally be lifesaving," said West Virginia Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, a relatively moderate Republican who's running for Senate in 2014. "I am urging House leaders to immediately reauthorize this essential Act."

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

People, this needs to be voted back in. Some states are using the funds accordingly for all domestic abuse, providing shelters for women, men and children who are victims. If you commit a crime on a reservation and you are not a Native American, you should be arrested and prosecuted. It is still a crime and needs to be treated as such. No one should be made into a victim. Eveyone should have the same protection and safe places to go, and counseling to make them whole again, assistance and training for better jobs and to be productive members of society so that they can pay back into the system.

    Reply#52 - Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:55 PM EST

    Under the equal justice clause, this act is void. (Note: Violence is not supported in any fashion. But all bad law must eradicated.) By failing to follow that clause, lawmakers prove themselves as criminal. ©2013

      Reply#53 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:36 AM EST

      blue n gold, john silver

      Why don't you read the act. It in no way violates the equal justice clause. I will help abit though. This act provides funding for such things as safe havens for abused women and children. But, hay, go read it.

        #53.1 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:44 PM EST
        Reply

        War on Women??? There is no war on women. And besides why do women need their own laws. It doesn't matter if you are male or female, black or white there are laws in place against violence. All these special little laws just divide people and make us fight one another even more. We need equal justice for all!!!

          Reply#54 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:29 PM EST

          John, of course there isn't...

          They get equal justice under current laws - Not.

          There pay equal that of their male counterparts. - Not.

          There is no glass ceiling in the corporate or military. - Not

          Etc...

          If we need justice for all why isn't it a reality in this country?

            #54.1 - Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:40 PM EST
            Reply
            Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.