First Thoughts: Hillary's honeymoon with GOP ends

Hillary’s “honeymoon” with GOP ends… Yet she departs her job stronger today than she was four years ago… Kerry gets his Senate confirmation hearing at 10:00 am ET… Boehner: Obama wants to “annihilate” the GOP… Pentagon to allow women to serve in direct combat… DiFi introduces her assault-weapons ban… And Jindal addresses the RNC meeting in Charlotte, NC.

*** Hillary’s honeymoon with the GOP ends: Say what you will about yesterday’s theatrics at the Senate Foreign Relations and House Foreign Affairs committees, about the testy exchanges, and about the questions asked and questions dodged. But politically, what struck us about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s appearance was that it marked the end of her four-year honeymoon with Republicans, especially as we begin to turn to 2016. Yes, the word “honeymoon” might be a stretch. But consider how Republicans have either embraced her -- or been indifferent to her -- over the past four years as they’ve focused their energies on President Obama. In fact, Republicans praising her (or her husband) has been a way to criticize Obama. “I just wanted to say that I wish you’d have won the Democratic primary in 2008,” freshman GOP Rep. Tom Cotton said yesterday to Clinton. Just look at our most recent NBC/WSJ poll: 41% of Republicans approve of Clinton’s job as secretary of state (compared with just 10% who approve of Obama’s job as president). Yet whether it was the tough questions from conservatives or how Matt Drudge covered the hearings, Republicans treated Clinton as a partisan Democrat yesterday. And that was something we hadn’t seen these past four years. Madame Secretary, hope you enjoyed the Republican honeymoon while it lasted, because the bipartisan overtures are now over, assuming you do decide run in 2016. 

Saul Loeb / AFP - Getty Images

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the Sept.11, 2012 attack on the US mission in Benghazi, Libya, during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on Jan. 23, 2013.

*** But she’s stronger today than she was four years ago: Speaking of Clinton’s performance, all of her political strengths were on display. She was prepared. She was tough when she needed to be. She was deferential when she wanted to be. And she displayed both raw emotion and a sense of humor. It’s also worth noting that she’s stronger today -- politically -- than she was four years ago. Part of it, as we said above, is that Republicans have embraced her. But another part is that, since becoming secretary of state, she no longer owns some of her husband’s baggage. She is her own political entity now, which wasn’t always the case during her 2008 presidential bid; she was still “Mrs. Clinton” in 2008. But here’s one additional point to make: When the Clintons leave office, there’s always some kind of drama. As Bill Clinton departed the White House in 2001, there was the Marc Rich pardon. And as Hillary leaves her post as secretary of state, it ended with her testimony on Benghazi. But politically, her performance yesterday is enough to quiet any nervous nellies in the Democratic Party that she isn’t ready for what will inevitably be a rough and tumble campaign should she embark on it.  

*** Kerry gets his confirmation hearing: Hillary Clinton makes another appearance on Capitol Hill today -- but it’s to introduce John Kerry at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to succeed Clinton as secretary of state. The hearing takes place at 10:00 am ET. Here’s some trivia via the Boston Globe: If confirmed, Kerry would become the eighth secretary of state from Massachusetts, but only the second in the past 100 years. He also would be the fifth chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee to be appointed, but the only sitting chairman. And if Kerry steps down from his Senate seat on Monday, the primary to replace him would have to take place between Saturday, May 11 and Sunday, May 26. And the general would be between Saturday, June 22 and Sunday, July 7. State law requires the general to take place 145 to 160 days after a vacancy is created. The primary is required to occur six weeks before that.

*** Boehner: Obama wants to “annihilate” the GOP: Outside of Capitol Hill, House Speaker John Boehner made news after the Ripon Society, a moderate GOP organization, released a transcript of the speaker’s address to the group on Tuesday. In his remarks, Boehner charged that the Obama administration wants to “annihilate” the Republican Party and “shove” it “into the dustbin of history.” Said Boehner: “[G]iven what we heard [Monday] about the president's vision for his second term, it's pretty clear to me that he knows he can't do any of that as long as the House is controlled by Republicans. So we're expecting over the next 22 months to be the focus of this administration as they attempt to annihilate the Republican Party. And let me just tell you, I do believe that is their goal - to just shove us into the dustbin of history.” It’s interesting what Boehner said – but also where he said it. The Ripon Society is a group where moderate GOPers are allowed to flourish. Was Boehner sending a message to Democrats? Or to his own base? And don’t miss Paul Ryan’s statement to the Wall Street Journal: “I think we need to do a better job of applying our principles to the problems of today, to show solutions to the country's biggest problems and how they relate in people's everyday lives.”

*** Pentagon to allow women to serve in direct combat: Perhaps the biggest news of the day is the Pentagon’s announcement of ending the U.S. military’s exclusion of women as combat soldiers on the ground. Per NBC’s Courtney Kube, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will announce today he’s eliminating the direct ground combat exclusion for women. The current DoD policy is that women are to be excluded from assignment to units below the brigade level if they would be engaging in direct combat. "We are moving in the direction of women as infantry soldiers," one senior defense official to NBC’s Kube. Panetta's decision mandates that the studies and reviews on women as infantry soldiers must be completed by Oct. 2015 -- women soldiers will NOT be permanently assigned to infantry any sooner than that, the official explained. In the meantime, officials will examine whether any changes are necessary for physical requirements for women to serve as infantry soldiers. This announcement, Kube adds, will open approximately 237,000 positions to women across the services (positions being individual jobs, not job categories). This will include 5,000 positions for female marines in ground combat elements (this includes female corpsmen or medics serving at the battalion or company level). Our take: Intellectually, this shouldn’t be a big deal; women are already serving in combat (see Tammy Duckworth). But the real test is where public opinion might be, especially if more and more women come home in flag-draped coffins.

*** DiFi introduces her assault-weapons ban: Also today, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduces her assault-weapons ban in Congress. There’s also a Senate hearing on mental health and gun violence at 10:00 am ET before the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. And yesterday, the White House announced that Vice President Biden and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) will travel to Richmond, VA to discuss gun violence.

*** Jindal addresses the RNC: Finally today, the real action at the RNC’s winter meeting in Charlotte, NC begins. And today’s highlight there is Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s speech at an evening dinner. Per the Washington Post’s Cillizza, Jindal’s speech will call for Republicans to focus less on the political battles in Washington, DC. “A debate about which party can better manage the federal government is a very small and short-sighted debate,” he is expected to say. “If our vision is not bigger than that, we do not deserve to win.” More Jindal: “Instead of worrying about managing government, it’s time for us to address how we can lead America… to a place where it can once again become the land of opportunity, where it can once again become a place of growth and opportunity.  We should put all our eggs in that basket.” If you take the recent comments by Boehner, Ryan, and Jindal together, you’re seeing a pragmatic argument from these three Republicans. They are trying to defend conservative principles, but remain a modern party. It’s no longer about stopping Obama; it’s becoming a governing party after Obama. And speaking of Jindal, maybe no Republican has done a better job -- right now -- of positioning his voice for 2016 than the Louisiana governor has.  

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @DomenicoNBC, @brookebrower

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 18
Comment author avatarGingerbread MammaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

GOP’s latest strategy to win back White House

joyannreid@gmail.com

Having failed to settle on a strategy to win over nonwhite, young, female and urban voters without putting off the Archie Bunker crowd, Republicans are toying with a novel strategy to get back into the White House.

In swing states that Republicans took over in 2010, GOP state houses and governors may soon use the remaining window of opportunity created by the perennial failure of Democrats to turn out in sufficient numbers during midterms, to rig future presidential elections in their favor.

This is how Katrina Trinko of the conservative National Review, described the plan:

“If states stop awarding votes on a winner-take-all basis, Republicans could also win — and without necessarily getting more votes,” Trinko writes. “Determining Electoral College voting by congressional districts represents one obvious opportunity for Republicans: In that scenario, the effect of urban Democratic strongholds (such as those Philadelphia precincts where Obama was supported by 99 percent of voters) would be isolated. Instead of shifting the entire state’s electoral votes, those precincts would only influence their congressional districts.”

Read more directly, Republicans can reduce the power of large urban centers — with their sizable black and brown populations — by literally giving those undesirable voters less than a full vote apiece. Talk about constitutional originalism! It seems the three-fifths compromise survives.

There is, of course, precedent for gaining the White House without winning the national popular vote. Three American presidents, all of whom happened to have been Republicans: Rutherford Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison (the president sandwiched between Grover Cleveland’s non-consecutive terms) in 1888, and of course, George W. Bush in 2000, got to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue that way. So you might call the concept of minority rule a Grand Old Party tradition.

And two states, Maine and Nebraska, already award their presidential delegates by congressional district.

But the idea of applying the kind of gerrymandering that locks Republicans into state legislative and congressional power in purple states like Florida, to presidential elections, is something that’s frighteningly new.

It’s also entirely feasible, if Republican governors are willing to risk the wrath of voters in their states’ largest population centers, who would find their votes literally nullified by the decisions of more conservative rural counties. Then again, I suppose they could fix that by awarding the governorships by district apportionment, too.

Republicans in Michigan, Virginia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are reportedly considering jamming through presidential gerrymandering while there’s still time; before voters can potentially punish the anti-majority rulers in 2014. Backed by ALEC, the conservative legislation factory that gave us Stand Your Ground and voter ID laws, they’ve got their eyes on Ohio and Florida, too.

The idea has met with the enthusiastic support of Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus, who took the scheme out for a test drive during the 2012 Republican National Convention by using it to set aside Ron Paul delegates, and to prevent future primary election inconveniences from annoying the party bosses’ preferred candidate going forward.

Recently, FairVote — an organization that advocates replacing the arcane Electoral College with a national popular vote — ran six scenarios based on presidential gerrymandering, and in two of them, Mitt Romney won the Electoral College vote by margins of 274-264 and 280-258, while still losing the national popular vote to Barack Obama by 5 million votes, and the popular votes in each of the six target states.

That, my friends, is called results.

Republicans will present the concept as one of simple fairness. Why should the residents of small counties be out-voted by big cities, simply because those cities contain more people? Wait . . .

Look, voter persuasion is hard. Witness the recent House Republican “reaching out to minorities panel at a former Virginia plantation” debacle. Changing the party’s conservative platform is untenable — how to explain to all those AM radio listeners and Fox News devotees that the party has suddenly changed its mind on abortion, immigration reform, gay marriage or war armament stockpiling to back-burner a second civil war?

Better to just dilute the opposition and give Republicans their man in the White House, will of the voters be damned.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/23/3197220/gops-latest-strategy-to-win-back.html#storylink=cpy

So being still unhappy at losing the White House, we know these unprincipled, lying snakes will try to usurp your vote to try to grab power. Coming to a State you live in, already in the works for several states with GOP Governors and State Legislatures. From the 2010 Census, they’ve already gerrymandered numerous Congressional Districts to ensure they will be more or less in GOP hands permanently. The 2014 elections are coming up fast, we have to work to get the same turnout as we did this past November. The Party of No is hard at work to steal any election, they know their ideas are not working, they have no intention of changing except as window dressing to ‘win’ elections.

  • 96 votes
#1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:10 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I didn’t waste any of my time yesterday watching the live coverage of Hillary’s Benghazi testimony. From the clips Shemp Mathews chose to show on last night’s Wiffleball, she seemed to be in a full lefty liberal meltdown during parts of the testimony. In particular, her response to the question from the WI Senator about whether or not it should have been obvious to anyone paying attention that this was not a movie protest gone bad and was actually terrorism, was way out of control. From Politico:

When Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pressed her on who knew what when, she slapped him down with a raised voice: “With all due respect, four Americans were dead. What difference at this point does it make?”

Today’s WSJ editorial has the appropriate response to Hillary’s question:

Sorry, Ma’am. At this point, or at any point, it matters when Administrations mislead Americans.

Sen. Johnson had the common sense to let the matter drop, knowing nothing good ever comes from pursuing a discussion with a woman having a hissy fit, especially in a public forum.

BTW, what’s with the Coke bottle glasses? Did she think she would get some sympathy if she showed up looking like a nerd-girl??

  • 68 votes
#1.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:12 AM EST

That was it? That was Republicans laying open the Benghazi cover-up, the conspiracy of silence, the tangled web of lies? If the terrorists who attacked the diplomatic quarters in Benghazi were as inept as the Republican inquisitors, there would have been no inquiry. They would have shot themselves instead of the Ambassador and three other Americans. It was as though McCain, Johnson, and Paul were vying for the gold medal in buffoonery.

Rand Paul, in what must have been a lame attempt at humor, allowed as how if he had been President, he'd have dismissed Secretary Clinton. Rand Paul and the Presidency go together like eggs and steamrollers. This clueless punk with delusions of grandeur speaks of war zones. Does Paul imagine host countries allow massive military escorts to accompany Americans any where and any time they choose?

Ron Johnson put on full display the abject ignorance of the Tea Party adherents. This dolt looks at the destruction in Benghazi and then tells the Secretary that a mere phone call would have cleared up all these nagging questions. Did this blithering idiot imagine that there's a full report that's been prepared, even as the facility was under attack? "Sure Senator, let me get back to you with a full report in a few minutes. It's only small arms fire we're facing at the moment. If they come at us with RPG's, we may need a teensy-weensy bit more time."

McCain, a dottering fool who alternates between PTSD and senility was screaming at clouds. He just wasn't satisfied with the answers of the Secretary. No matter that anyone who has followed this right-wing circus knows that McCain has every bit of information he needs. Maybe he needs to be reminded that he was part of the Keating Five that managed to ignore the S & L meltdown. Maybe he needs to be reminded of his connection to Jack Abramoff. Maybe he needs to be reminded he couldn't be bothered to go to a briefing on the specifics of what happened at Benghazi. Maybe we need to understand that being locked up as a P.O.W. does NOT make one an expert on foreign policy.

The right-wing has already begun its daily hate fest. "Did you hear the Secretary say, 'What does it matter?' I'm outraged that she could be so cavalier."

Let's put that in context. What does it matter that these fools put their ignorance on display out of spite or out of partisan hatred? It doesn't matter. They did it. It happened. Now we have to find a solution, just like we need a solution to meeting the dangers our diplomatic corps faces in high-tension areas. Fortunately, we have the luxury of solving our problem with the likes of Paul, McCain, and Johnson at the polls. The Secretary's job isn't so simple.

It is this kind of embarrassing public display that shows the moral bankruptcy of the Republican Party. Boehner complains that the White House is trying to annihilate his party. Speaker Boehner, that's outright BS. You and your fellow hacks are annihilating yourselves.

  • 149 votes
#1.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:13 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

In light of Hillary’s appearance yesterday, I am renewing my challenge to the wise and learned FR lefty liberals to list some of Hillary’s greatest accomplishments in four years as SoS. And I’m even lowering the bar by 40% to make it easier for them to get over it. Instead of five accomplishments I’m now only asking for three. That’s an average of only 0.75 great accomplishments per year. Again, the ground rules are that you must cite specific dates, times, locations and verifiable results, in order to count towards the goal of three GREAT accomplishments. Generalized platitudes like “increased respect for America” don’t count.

C’mon lefty liberals show me that your adoration of Hillary isn’t just mindless Clinton worshipping.

And, in renewing my challenge, I do not meet the criteria of Einstein’s definition of insanity: “Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. I fully expect the FR lefty liberals to come up with the SAME results as last time:

Zip, Zero, Nada, Nothing.

  • 65 votes
#1.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:16 AM EST
Comment author avatarJohnthoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I find it to be somewhat amazing that the democratic party is ignoring the fact of Benghazi, the fact is traitorous people in the congress are trying to make political hay out of a tragic event and they probably should be brought up on charges of treason, Rand Paul, John McCain and the others do not have American interest at heart but instead what to play politics with the deaths of four American hero's. May they rot in hell, it is where they belong.

  • 109 votes
#1.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:17 AM EST
Comment author avatarJack in PortsmouthExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I didn’t waste any of my time yesterday watching the live coverage of Hillary’s Benghazi testimony.

And I won't waste any of my time responding to your drivel.

Boehner's whining that Obama is trying to annihilate the GOP would be funny if it weren't so pathetic. Instead of taking responsibility for his own actions, he blames someone else for his failures. Talk about a sniveling little kid on the playground . . . .

  • 123 votes
#1.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:17 AM EST

First time unemployment claims drop 5,000 to a 5 year low (Jan 2008)

DOW closes at the highest level since October 2007

  • 110 votes
#1.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:18 AM EST

In a diary this morning on DailyKos, the author pointed out this BS from Politico:

In this light, it's worth pondering: How will Barack Obama's supremely self-confident second inaugural address — with its high quotient of self-regard and minimally concealed contempt for opponents — be remembered 10 years from now?

And in answer, DKos wrote:

It was an inaugural address and a second one at that. It was not a concession speech, as much as Politico tried to frame it as such.

I would like to add to what DKos wrote:

The president's concealed contempt, Politico?

Getting things done is hard because the southern white republicans hate any kind of progress. They don't like America. They want their own country and laws. They want to go back to another time and place; do they not care that slaves were beaten? Do they not care that slaves were SOLD, by our Founding Fathers so that they could continue living the high life? We now have people in power who want voter suppression because it's the only way they can win. They want to see black Americans standing in line for 8-10 hours on voting day. They don't want anyone to take away their excessive high living.

We have those in Congress who are literally afraid of their tea party. With no regard to honest hard working Americans. Sell out democrats are no better.

People were beyond pleased with the president's inaugural address. It was a very special day. It is very important for all of the country to witness events like this and see the crowds – not just the number of people, but the many different types of people. It is so easy for the uninformed and the uninvolved to get pulled in by the haters and charlatans who twist and misrepresent the President's positions and the policies he espouses. However, when you see how he reflects the best hopes of so many Americans – and you really can see that in the faces in the crowd – it is much harder to dismiss him.

We the people will continue to dismiss the inside the beltway crowd, who we hold in open contempt, particularly Politico. Where all the white guys hang out who obviously support the president's opponents, who are incompetent, dishonest; who stomp on our democracy and are incapable of working together with President Obama.

  • 86 votes
#1.7 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:18 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

And I won't waste any of my time responding to your drivel.

___________________________________________

Um, Jack-off, you just did.

LMFAO@U!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 33 votes
#1.8 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:25 AM EST

knowing nothing good ever comes from pursuing a discussion with a woman having a hissy fit, especially in a public forum.

Ah, sexism at it finest. Rather like that uppity president or that lazy LA mayor. But, but, you say, the GOP hasn't declared a War on Women. How can you have a 'real' war against a bunch of women armed hissy fits?

Now on to eyeglass-gate!! When in doubt, show up as four-eyes, to confuse and addle your opponent.

  • 72 votes
#1.9 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:27 AM EST

Joe in Albany

Zip, Zero, Nada, Nothing.

Now why would one respond to someone who eats canned salmon? Keta clue yet?

  • 43 votes
#1.10 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:27 AM EST

McCain came off as a crazy old man... Clinton held up well....

if the honeymoon is over it's because the GOP should fear her.... she's a slam dunk to win in 2016 unless they find some type of really well qualified candidate... cause she'll kill Jeb Bush, Ryan, and the like

  • 98 votes
#1.11 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:27 AM EST

What I learned yesterday is, the Greedy Old Perverts have reinstated "witch hunts" under the guise of "Senate Hearings"...

It was fun to watch Hillary turn around and roast more then a few of them at the stake!

She doesn't suffer fools lightly - the look on McNasty's face after she handed him his ass was worth the price of admission alone! lol

  • 118 votes
#1.12 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:27 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Now why would one respond to someone who eats canned salmon?

_____________________________

Hey hoser, deflection when you don't have a good answer to the challenge will only get you laughed at, eh?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 22 votes
#1.13 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:30 AM EST
Comment author avatarRick-3416939Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The latest Pew Research shows that liberals are less tolerant of opposing points of view. The study finds liberals are far more sensitive about criticism. Liberal columnist Kirsten Powers noted that "Liberals, because they are used to controlling all the media, pretty much, academia, that for them, when they hear things that don't jibe with what they want to hear, it's very disconcerting and unsettling to them." Powers explained that after getting out of her own "Democratic bubble," she noticed that conservatives tend to be more open to hearing opposing viewpoints than liberals."

Seems the results of that polling is pretty much right on when you read threads on this blog. Endless name calling and insults are standard liberal responses.

  • 45 votes
#1.14 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:36 AM EST

Gingerbread Mama-

This blatant attempt to suppress the power of the majority in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin is close to becoming a reality in Virginia, where legislation has already been introduced.

Hopefully the public outcry will prevent this nightmare from becoming a reality.

While listening yesterday to Rep. Rand Paul claim that Benghazi was the "greatest tragedy since 9/11", I was struck by how little the current crop of Republicans and Republican posters seem to know about history.

To say that "Benghazi was the greatest tragedy since 9/11" blatantly ignores such events as the Iraq War, the War in Afghanistan, Hurricane Katrina, Superstorm Sandy, and the Sandy Hook murders.

The Republicans yesterday also seemed to forget the other tragedies that have occured in recent memory - the Iran hostage crisis, the bombing of embassy in Beirut, the attacks on our embassies in Africa, the 9/11 assault on the World Trade Center.

Then again, Republicans including GW Bush used 9/11 for political gain before the dust even settled, so why am I surpised that they would try and use Benghazi to score political points?

The Republican president of Ohio's education board compared Obama to Hitler on her Facebook page, and posted a picture of Hitler and a quote: “Never forget what this tyrant said: ‘To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.’ -- Adolf Hitler.”

Although this quote is widely repeated by Republicans, there is no actual record of Hitler ever saying or writing these words. Also contrary to popular Republican belief, Hitler and the Nazis DID NOT pass restrictive gun control laws or confiscate guns to consolidate their power and rule Germany.

The average German citizen was allowed to own firearms under Hitler, and the restrictions placed on Jews and other political enemies ogf the Nazis were not passed until after they had already been in power for years.

It seems that Republicans not only struggle with math, they also have problems with history. Then again, judging by their statements on "legitimate rape" and other women's issues maybe they just have an issue with facts in general.

  • 92 votes
#1.15 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:45 AM EST

My Father’s Hunting Trip

From the article above:

Also today, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduces her assault-weapons ban in Congress. There’s also a Senate hearing on mental health and gun violence at 10:00 am ET before the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. And yesterday, the White House announced that Vice President Biden and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) will travel to Richmond, VA to discuss gun violence.

I have fired a gun once in my life. It was a target rifle. I was thirteen years old. I hit the target and earned a merit badge which allowed me to become a Tenderfoot in the Boy Scouts of America.

Tenderfoot was the highest rank I achieved. I knew what my limitations were and America’s better off for it (think Bill Murray in ‘Stripes’). Anyways, it was ok because by age fourteen my sister had introduced me to pot (mid-70’s, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Johnny Carson, etc.)

I love the story my father use to tell me about his one-day hunting trip with his father. When he was thirteen (1938), my dad’s dad took him and a couple other dads’ and their son’s on a hunting trip.

They were hunting duck, or geese, or whatever was flying that day, I can’t remember. But they were all walking in a straight line, step by step, four dad’s and four sons, across a field, with rifles ready, trying to flush out the birds nibbling on seeds.

Then suddenly, the birds took to the sky in a thunderous flurry. My grandfather says, “Ok son, follow a bird with your site. Ready, Ready, Ready, No, NO, NOOO!!!

No one got hurt.

My father was at the end of the line. His dad, and the other dads and sons were stretched out down the line. When my dad first lined up a bird, his aim was perpendicular to the line. As the birds flew away, my dad focused on the birds, and in doing so, slowly pivoted 90 degrees until his gun barrel was pointing down the line.

That’s when my grandfather, my dad’s dad, yelled No, No, No, and saved the day. My dad never went hunting again. He was fine with that. He knew his limitations.

Even though we have the freedom, my dad and I are living examples of two hard working Middle Class Americans, who should never own a gun.

We now interrupt this program to bring you the following message:

To me, it's a good idea to always carry two sacks of something when you walk around. That way, if anybody says, "Hey, can you give me a hand?" - You can say, "Sorry, got these sacks."

Jack Handey – Deep Thoughts

Salud

  • 51 votes
#1.16 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:47 AM EST

Oh look! Journalism! Where are the journalists?

America, please pay attention. Someone quoted this from an author yesterday:

real journalism is now considered civil disobedience. It's true.

Our democracy is being stolen. STOLEN.

Think Progress:

Yesterday, Virginia Republicans took the first step to move a GOP plan to rig the Electoral College forward in that state. Similar plans are under consideration in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.

The Republican election rigging plan targets blue states that President Obama won in 2008 and 2012, and changes the way they allocate electoral votes to give many of these votes away for free to the Republican candidate for president. Under the Republican Plan, most electoral votes will be allocated to the winner of individual Congressional districts, rather than to the winner of the state as a whole. Because the Republican Plan would be implemented in states that are heavily gerrymandered to favor Republicans, the resulting maps would all but guarantee that the Republican would win a majority of each state’s electoral votes, even if the Democratic candidate wins the state as a whole.

Today, the Center for American Progress Action Fund released a white paper detailing how this Republican election-rigging plan works — including this rather striking visual demonstration of just how effectively Republicans gerrymandered six states that are likely targets of their plan:

  • 53 votes
#1.17 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:49 AM EST

GBM, great article and comments by you. Republicans motto should be: Can't beat 'em, cheat 'em. Apparently the GOPTPers do not realize that IF the popular vote far exceeds the opposite electoral results, they would be flirting with voter insurrection; there would be millions in the streets in towns and capitals all over this country. The American people would not stand for it and any GOP President who won by undermining the democratic principles established by our founders, would never, ever be recognized by the people as President. That is a risk the GOPTPers seem willing to take but they do so at their own peril. Reince Priebus, the RNC and ALEC's proposal is nothing short of establishing a perpetual republican dictatorship in every state and in DC; odd that the GOP claims to love the Constitution yet it does everything to destroy the very fabric contained in it. That will not be accepted by the people.

  • 68 votes
#1.18 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:51 AM EST

First Read: If confirmed, Kerry would become the eighth secretary of state from Massachusetts . . .

I did not know that.

  • 23 votes
#1.19 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:51 AM EST

The Obama dministration claimed that the whole incident was simply a demonstration over an anti-Islamic Youtube video gone wrong. That's what Obama and Hillary told us for nearly two weeks.

We then find out that the entire attack had nothing whatsoever to do with some stupid video that nobody saw. Rather, it was a planned terrorist assault on American personnel and sovereign property. The Obama administration knew exactly what had happened within the next couple of days, yet continued to lie to the American people for another week and a half.

The Navy Seals on location made repeated requests for military support, but were denied and told to stand down. They were murdered on Obama's watch. Obama noted that the result was "not optimal".

The election was too close to tell the truth. The narrative was that terrorism was no longer a problem, and Obama had it under control. They didn't want the voters to see that he was so wrong......so they lied. Simple.

  • 36 votes
#1.20 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:51 AM EST

Kirsten Powers is anything but a Liberal Journalist, she is a regular on Fox News and is known for her conservative views and opinions.

She must be in fantasy land to make a claim "Liberals, because they are used to controlling all the media, pretty much, academia, that for them, when they hear things that don't jibe with what they want to hear, it's very disconcerting and unsettling to them" is this her rebuttal, to a recent study that found Fox viewers are the most uninformed? I can see why, when she, Riley, Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh are leading the parade along with all the loud lying microphones from right wing talk radio. I wish we had a better control over some of those airwaves.

  • 54 votes
#1.21 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:52 AM EST

The latest Pew Research shows that liberals are less tolerant of opposing points of view.

If you are going to reference a poll, at least tell the entire story vs. the partial picture you paint. This poll looked at the segment of the population that use facebook and other social networking sites to for the purpose of expressing political viewpoints.

So yes, in that context, it is possible that liberals are more likely to unfriend. After all, when a conservative friend posted a picture of an aborted fetus on my facebook page, for all my facebook friends, co-workers, and family to see, I quickly unfriended their sorry ass. Who wants a God damn picture of a bloody aborted fetus next to pictures of my sisters family skiing vacation.

  • 59 votes
#1.22 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:54 AM EST

Joe, you are pathetic. You have waited and waited, especially with your obnoxious bated breath, for Hillary to go before Congress and explain herself. Then when she gets there, and slaps the heck out of your boy from Wisconsin and Kentucky, you play the duck and cover games and do not really want to respond. Again, you are pathetic, just like your party. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

  • 62 votes
#1.23 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:55 AM EST

Joe in Albany:

You're an idiot with nothing intelligent or funny to say. I know you like to just pretend you are having fun at our expense but really you just look like a sad little adolescent seeking attention from adults. It really is pathetic. I suppose you like to believe that you are really clever but you are only fooling yourself.

  • 59 votes
#1.24 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:56 AM EST

Joe in Albany

I'll site one and a big one....Okay two.

Video tape of the praises from Republicans on what a fine job she has done over her tenure. Even McCain sang out like a song bird in it....Did nothing....Yes, Cutting a trip to the Pacific Rim and running to Israel to stop an escalation of fighting is nothing.....Something you could have done I'm sure.

  • 56 votes
#1.25 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:57 AM EST

If the "honeymoon" is over, so be it. Is there ANYONE who still cares about the republican party? Anyone who considers them even remotely relevant? They are pissants now, thankfully, relegated to the occasional statement. Those idiots doubled down on their short-sighted policies and now they have gotten what they have long deserved......to be ignored. The American public has brushed the collective republican dirt off their shoulders. Keel over republicans. You are officially fossils!

  • 53 votes
#1.26 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:01 AM EST

TNSVOL, please expand on your statement about Virginia introducing legislation "suppressing" the majority? I follow the Va. General Assembly and haven't seen such legislation. Many bills are submitted, so I don't pretend to know all of them, but having been a lifelong Virginia native, I don't see anything like what you say. Our two Senators are both Democratic and while most of the House members are Republican, I think the senate candidates are an indication on how the state votes. I'm proud of Virginia for voting for the person rather than the party. It's what I do. And if more people would do the same, partisan politics would play less of a role in decisions in Washington.

  • 5 votes
#1.27 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:05 AM EST

Is Joe saying something again? Since I put him on ignore it has been a little more peaceful.

  • 27 votes
#1.28 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:07 AM EST

Sandie, I care about the Republican Party, just as I care about the Democratic Party. One party is what happens in Communist countries. We have a two party system because different ideas is where innovation comes from. And anyone who votes party and not the person is only fooling themselves.

  • 25 votes
#1.29 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:08 AM EST

Oh look little Joey still thinks he's funny. Don't look now Albany Joe, but you're the one being laughed at.

  • 37 votes
#1.30 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:08 AM EST

So yes, in that context, it is possible that liberals are more likely to unfriend.

Red,

Weird... because it was my conservative friends who "unfriended" me.

I liked to keep them around to decimate their BS and re-share! lol

  • 42 votes
#1.31 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:09 AM EST

I don't agree with everything Joe says, but I don't ignore him either. Innovation comes from different ideas. We need to listen to everyone. It's what has made our country great. Heck, I even read Feisty and have yet to find much agreement with her.

  • 13 votes
#1.32 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:10 AM EST

Now why would one respond to someone who eats canned salmon? Keta clue yet?

BCWC - Apparently, Joe suffers from the same grandiose delusions as The Trump and thinks any challenge he makes is worthy of a response. How'd that last five-million dollar challenge work out for Trump - it didn't. No takers; zip, zero, nada, nothing, ZILCH!!

  • 31 votes
#1.33 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:10 AM EST

I have a question for the Neocons.....Why has your party not asked Powell to become a Presidential nominee?

You all held him in such high regard under Bush. Is it because he quit after learning of the deception of the American public on WMDs? (too much truth).

Tell us exactly why.

He (Powell) would have been better than any other joker the GOP put up and could put up and would have stood a great chance of winning.

  • 40 votes
#1.34 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:11 AM EST

she noticed that conservatives tend to be more open to hearing opposing viewpoints than liberals."

An open mind to different opinons is a must to solve problems. I disagree with Powers, too often it is the conservative mind that is closed, unwilling to listen to arguments because of their sad devotion to their dogmatic beliefs.

Pity that very few conservatives here at first read keep an open mind. Oft times the majority of them spend their posts demonizing liberal policies by calling them socialism, fascism, communism etc.

  • 33 votes
#1.35 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:12 AM EST

Gingerbread Mama, I just now got a chance to read your post. Thank you! Looks like you and I were on the same page this morning.

I plan to support OFA as we move forward. I am beyond furious that these things are happening and as President Obama pointed out in his Inaugural Address, it is we the people who have to step up to the plate and do something about it so they do not succeed in stomping on our democracy.

  • 34 votes
#1.36 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:12 AM EST

After Clinton's grilling,

Where do they get these thought from, Madame Secretary Clinton, "grilled?" It's more like "she" didn't take any prisoners, she left skull and bones all over that hearing floor, and it was mostly a bunch of old GOPer's skull and bones!!! LOL!

Jindal addresses the RNC:

And speaking of Jindal, maybe no Republican has done a better job -- right now -- of positioning his voice for 2016 than the Louisiana governor has.

Another joke, if they believe he is their answer in 2016, we'll have us another Democratic President in 2016!!!

  • 39 votes
#1.37 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:12 AM EST

@Tomas, from your description it sounds like they were hunting pheasant or similar upland game. Pheasant will hold their ground or run through tall grass, and they will scare the begezzeus out of you when they are finally flushed by a Springer Spaniel ("spring" means to flush) or by a line of humans.

Ducks and geese are normally hunted when they are already "on the wing," in the sky as they approach water or feeding grounds and where the hunters sit quietly in wait, hiddedn in some manner, and usually with decoy birds out on the water or in the field.

  • 4 votes
#1.38 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:13 AM EST

Weird... because it was my conservative friends who "unfriended" me.

They weren't included in the poll because they didn't get that free Obamaphone.

  • 15 votes
#1.39 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:14 AM EST

Joe, other then berate good people and stand in the way, what have you or your party ever done FOR america? tick tock tick tock.bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz times up. answer= not a damn thing, so take your troll behind and go find some old lady and kick her off the stairs, i'm sure you will feel better.

  • 27 votes
#1.40 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:15 AM EST

David W, Pat Boston, TNSEVOL, and TomasGrande, excellent posts.

TomasG, that is a great story and lesson. I would qualify as an unsuitable candidate for owning a gun as well not because I've ever shot one but because just being in the same room with one makes me uncomfortable, nervous. I figure I'd shake so much, I'd hurt myself or anyone around me just trying to hold it.

  • 18 votes
#1.41 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:17 AM EST

yellowdog, my observation is the opposite. the so-called "liberals" I know personally are very defensive about their opinions and are not usually open to discussion.

many conservatives, like myself, are in fact "liberal" on many issues, such as the preserving the environment and endangered species, climate change and equal opportunity.

  • 9 votes
#1.42 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:18 AM EST

Rick -

The latest Pew Research shows that liberals are less tolerant of opposing points of view. The study finds liberals are far more sensitive about criticism. Liberal columnist Kirsten Powers noted that "Liberals, because they are used to controlling all the media, pretty much, academia, that for them, when they hear things that don't jibe with what they want to hear, it's very disconcerting and unsettling to them."

Liberals controll all media? Really? What do you call Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, and talk radio - aren't they "mainstream media"?

From the Pew findings:

The new research found that instead of engaging in civil discourse or debate, fully 16% of liberals admitted to blocking, unfriending or overtly hiding someone on a social networking site because that person expressed views they disagreed with. That’s double the percentage of conservatives and more than twice the percentage of political moderates who behaved like that.

Maybe the root cause is that the "opposing" views expressed by Conservative Republicans are more likely to be disrespectful, dishonest, racist, misogynist, or factually inaccurate - just look at some of the Conservative posters on this site!

Oddly enough, another study from Harvard, Yale and Berkely found just the opposite - that Liberal blogs and websites are much more open to opposing views than Conservative blogs and websites.

New Study: Liberals More Open Than Conservatives Online

http://www.thenation.com/article/new-study-liberals-more-open-conservatives-online#

  • 27 votes
#1.43 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:19 AM EST

Hillary Clinton, you have my vote if you decide to run in 2016. You have proven your metal in the last few days and I for one will back you 100 percent.

  • 35 votes
#1.44 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:19 AM EST

Waaaa,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. "Joe in Albany" best exemplifies the republicans mess. They're all howling about what the President is doing to 'em. Ain't necessarily the President alone. Finally, the majority of Americans have uncovered the true substance of today's republicanism. Chicken Piss! Gwaddamn chicken piss. Nuff said. Waaaa,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha.

  • 28 votes
#1.45 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:21 AM EST

RedDevPS--sorry, but my son and I got into an argument just last night, where he tried to claim that facebook was NEWS coverage. The fact is, it is MOSTLY opinion coverage. For the most part,NO attempt is made to do actual bipartisan research to determine the validity of anything that is posted on it.

Sadly--that is also becoming the truth about the MSM.

PS--I have seen pictures of tumors posted after they are removed, and also things like an appendix (in a jar!) bloody teeth, etc.

A fetus is ONLY disgusting if you find it so. And that is YOUR opinion.

But I DO agree that if someone posts things YOU find repugnant, onto YOUR page, you have every reason to 'un friend' them. But my guess in this case is that you are anti abortion, and that your disgust is related to THAT rather than the appearance of a bloody fetus. I've seen grosser things in the meat counter of the grocery store.

    #1.46 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:21 AM EST

    I'll site one and a big one....Okay two.

    Video tape of the praises from Republicans on what a fine job she has done over her tenure. Even McCain sang out like a song bird in it....Did nothing....Yes, Cutting a trip to the Pacific Rim and running to Israel to stop an escalation of fighting is nothing.....Something you could have done I'm sure.

    _______________________________

    So, when Republicans criticize Hillary they are lying misogynist pigs, but, if they politely say generalized platitudes about a former Senator, it’s one of her “great achievements”?? Sorry Marlboro Man, that doesn’t meet the ground rule that you must cite specific dates, times, locations and verifiable results, in order to count towards the goal of three GREAT accomplishments. And neither does you other example.

    Hillary’s great accomplishment score so far: Zip, Zero, Nada, Nothing.

    • 13 votes
    #1.47 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:22 AM EST

    Steve, Condi Rice would be my first choice.

    • 6 votes
    #1.48 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:23 AM EST

    Could Boehner become any more pathetic? The GOP is hurting themselves daily with their outrageous statements and behavior. Example - Rand Paul saying Benghazi was the worst event since 9-11? Tell that to the families who have lost loved ones in 2 wars, shootings, and other disasters that have happened. Nearly everyday the show themselves totally out of touch with the American people. But Boehner blames Obama? How nice to be able to put all your failings onto another person. He is the weakest person in Congress - not respected by either side.

    • 24 votes
    #1.49 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:23 AM EST

    Weird... because it was my conservative friends who "unfriended" me.

    Feisty - one other very interesting finding in that poll. Liberals are more likely to avoid posting political viewpoints to avoid offending others vs. conservatives. In fact, that number would be 59%. On the other hand, only 51% of conservatives are concerned their viewpoints will offend. Obviously, that is why we have pictures floating around facebook showing babies holding AK-47s, vs. a liberal post showing a baby holding a teddy bear. What could possibly be offensive about a 2 year old sporting an RPG?

    http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Social-networking-and-politics/Main-findings/Social-networking-sites-and-politics.aspx

    • 18 votes
    #1.50 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:24 AM EST

    Hillary's great accomplishment score so far: Zip, Zero, Nada, Nothing.

    Well, if that is the case, which it isn't, she was in the same type company at the hearing with all those LOSER republicans she tore a new @!$%# into!!!

    • 19 votes
    #1.51 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:25 AM EST

    It was funny how nonplussed Hillary Clinton looked when Rand Paul asked her that question about shipping weapons from Libya to Turkey. I guess she needs to keep up with the latest conspiracy theories on wingnut web sites. Rand Paul sure keeps up with them. So does whichever buffoon asked her about the nonexistent live video of the Benghazi attack that Clinton did NOT watch in the White House Situation Room.

    • 24 votes
    #1.52 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:26 AM EST

    Think about it-

    TNSVOL, please expand on your statement about Virginia introducing legislation "suppressing" the majority? I follow the Va. General Assembly and haven't seen such legislation.

    Here is just one link to the story:

    RICHMOND, Va. — A Republican-backed bill that would end Virginia’s winner-takes-all method of apportioning its 13 electoral votes in presidential elections cleared its first legislative hurdle Wednesday....

    The bill would apportion electors by congressional district to the candidate who wins each of the state’s 11 districts. The candidate who carries a majority of the districts would also win the two electors not tied to congressional districts....

    Under Carrico’s revision, Obama would have received only four Virginia electoral votes last year while Republican Mitt Romney would have received nine. Romney carried conservative rural areas while Obama dominated Virginia’s cities and fast-growing suburbs

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/virginia-lawmakers-move-to-change-states-system-for-apportioning-presidential-electoral-votes/2013/01/23/40ee530c-65c3-11e2-889b-f23c246aa446_story.html

    • 13 votes
    #1.53 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:26 AM EST

    Brenda, I think you meant "mettle," not "metal."

    It's disquieting to see so many uninformed voters express their opinions illiterally.

    • 9 votes
    #1.54 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:26 AM EST

    Haven't seen the story online yet about the Virginia Senate Republicans move to redraw Senate districts, quickly gerrymandering when Senate Democrat Henry Marsh left to attend the inauguration. Talk about sleazy, their treatment of Hillary was foreplay compared to both this and possible attempts to break up electoral votes in key midwest and eastern states.

    • 17 votes
    #1.55 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:27 AM EST

    Ricky-Pew....The poll should have focused on Rt wingers are so EXTREME they should be tolerated less!

    Rt wingers use Fox fake news for their mis-information views...so when studies were done....they found that people who watched Fox news were actually dumber for watching Fox news......Do search on ...Fox news dumber...and see these actual studies.....

    SO Ricky...we liberals should just sit idly by and let the lies and mis information spew out of Fox news and rt wingers huh? Just tolerate liars some more..?...Just to satisfy the skewed poll?........

    NOT ANYMORE!!!!

    • 17 votes
    #1.56 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:31 AM EST

    Feisty and Red ....

    Weird... because it was my conservative friends who "unfriended" me.

    I will say the last political season defintely assisted me in cleaning up my friends list! I also agree with your post above, Red regarding how we avoid posting to slam our points home. Unfortunately, it also affected my church "family" as I guess a lot of those I attend church with felt that I should no longer attend due to my political beliefs.

    The RWConservative crazies have been very unkind to me and my family. I truly hope that somewhere out there are some that can move forward without all of the animosity.

    • 17 votes
    #1.57 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:31 AM EST

    Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, and John McCain ie.............. Curly, Moe, and Larry

    • 25 votes
    #1.58 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:32 AM EST

    RedDevPS

    Feisty - one other very interesting finding in that poll. Liberals are more likely to avoid posting political viewpoints to avoid offending others vs. conservatives.

    In my neighborhood, predominately white republicans, if you display any political sign showing a democratic/liberal stance, you are shunned by your neighbors, and in some cases they quit talking to you. At night they were going around removing the few Obama/Biden yard signs that were in the subdivision. In one case across the street, a neighbor, white republican, in December 2008, he not only removed his American Flag he had been flying for 15+ years, but he went as far as removing the elaborate pole and cement base that was holding it, he hasn't replaced it yet, and has become very cold towards me.

    Life is great!!!! Well, for me it is.

    • 21 votes
    #1.59 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:33 AM EST

    Clearly......Hillary Clinton should never be allowed to own weapons of any sort!

    • 9 votes
    #1.60 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:33 AM EST

    many conservatives, like myself, are in fact "liberal" on many issues, such as the preserving the environment and endangered species, climate change and equal opportunity. - In my day that was called having the "good sense" to formulate your own thoughts and views, prior to the absolutism of the tea party and science naysayers.

    Good to hear. This place could use someone with your views. FYI, I believe that not all good ideas / policies come from one party. Neither do I claim my party or my President does no wrong.

    Reddev - Good point, typically unless I know someone is a democrat I will not talk to them about politics. Maybe it is a PC thing liberals have. The normal GOPer I run into has no problem bringing up their antigov, Obama blaming views during meetings or normal conversation. Yesterday a whole gaggle of them were walking down the hall, rejoicing that Congress was "taking it to Clinton."

    • 20 votes
    #1.61 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:38 AM EST

    John McCain or Old Man Winter as I like to call him is such an embarrassment. No other Senator had so much to say or questions he needed "answers" to then him about Benghazi. And rather than asking all his questions, he essentially took the 5min he was given at the hearing to just give an old man rant. He asked a lot of questions but never paused to have any of his questions answered which is classic politics... waste time just saying a lot of word but don't really say anything. When is Arizona going to stop this man from embarrassing them so much and get another old white guy in there? Cuz this is one person that has stayed way to long in congress and is the model making the argument of term limits. And is the whole Benghazi thing over now... Hell no, this is the Republican conspiracy machine. As terrible as they are at finding actual scandals and conspiracy that are outside their party, this will not deter them from having something else blow up in there face like another fast and furious, over sampling of polls, or voter fraud...

    Our future president looked like she was just that... The future leader of this country! Hillary 2016!!

    • 19 votes
    #1.62 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:40 AM EST

    And that is all the more reason why every one of you should have gotten involved in the Popular Amendment Movement back in August 2010. It's not too late to get involved. Here is a repeat of my many postings on the issue. ONLY YOU can change our election/campaign finance structure by helping to get the two amendments at www.faircampaignreform.us passed. GET INVOLVED NOW.

    There is only one way to end the "money buying elections" issue and I've been trying to get everyone of you involved for over two years. If you haven't gone to www.faircampaignreform.us yet and gotten involved in the Popular Amendment Movement, why not? This is the ONLY way that the American citizens can ever take back the power of our electoral system. Congress will never do anything that will get past the current activist conservative SCOTUS to correct the problem. It is time to take the implied method that our founding fathers gave us, per James Wilson: http://www.usconstitution.net/constam.html

    Popular Amendment

    One other way of amendment is also not mentioned in the Constitution, and, because it has never been used, is lost on many students of the Constitution. Framer James Wilson, however, endorsed popular amendment, and the topic is examined at some length in Akhil Reed Amar's book, The Constitution: A Biography.

    The notion of popular amendment comes from the conceptual framework of the Constitution. Its power derives from the people; it was adopted by the people; it functions at the behest of and for the benefit of the people. Given all this, if the people, as a whole, somehow demanded a change to the Constitution, should not the people be allowed to make such a change? As Wilson noted in 1787, "... the people may change the constitutions whenever and however they please. This is a right of which no positive institution can ever deprive them."

    It makes sense - if the people demand a change, it should be made. The change may not be the will of the Congress, nor of the states, so the two enumerated methods of amendment might not be practical, for they rely on these institutions. The real issue is not in the conceptual. It is a reality that if the people do not support the Constitution in its present form, it cannot survive. The real issue is in the practical. Since there is no process specified, what would the process be? There are no national elections today - even elections for the presidency are local. There is no precedent for a national referendum. It is easy to say that the Constitution can be changed by the people in any way the people wish. Actually making the change is another story altogether.

    Suffice it to say, for now, that the notion of popular amendment makes perfect sense in the constitutional framework, even though the details of effecting popular amendment could be impossible to resolve.

    It was upon this basis that I and a group of other Newsvine posters developed these two amendment proposals in July/August 2010 when we saw what Citizens United was leading to in the Congressional and state-wide races. I then paid to host the website for promoting the Popular Amendment Movement effort. Keeping the website running is my contribution to the cause, since I live in the US Virgin Islands where we have NO vote for president, NO representation in the Senate, and NO VOTE on the floor of the House (only a vote in whatever committee(s) our Delegate to Congress can be assigned to.) Yet our entire governance is determined by Congress through the Organic Act. We are basically second class citizens in the US territories. I lost my voice in government when I chose to move from OH to St. Croix in 1995 (for better weather.) PAM is a totally grassroots organization. We do not solicit any contributions and we have no formal organization. The website is the basic "organization." Download the petitions below from the site, sign them, circulate them among family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers. Email to everyone you know. Help form a local grassroots movement to collect the signatures and petitions, then work with other communities to form county/regional groups and a state-wide movement. Check with your Secretary of State to determine how many valid signatures would be required for YOUR state to call for the constitutional convention that would be required to pass these amendments. BE SURE TO MAKE COPIES OF EVERY PETITION AND HAVE THEM "DATE STAMPED" when you file the original petitions so that you have a record of what signatures were filed and when. That is your protection to make sure that your Secretary of State can't deny you your rights under the Constitution. OFA and all other grassroots groups should have been assisting in this effort for the past two years. It is not too late to get this done before the 2014/16 election cycle.

    Petition for US Constitutional Amendment For Election Reform


    We, the undersigned US citizens, duly registered voters in our respective states/territories, do hereby petition for our state to approve the following amendment to the United States Constitution by the method noted below.

    Election Reform:
    1. Abolish the Electoral College (Repeal Amendment 12)
    2. ONE NATIONAL primary date to be held on the Tuesday eight (8) weeks prior to the General Election day for Congressional offices and for the President. Candidate petitions must be filed with the local/state elections boards 60 days prior to the Primary Election date. Federal election petitions shall be uniform in every state and shall include a “contract with the voters” that spells out clearly what that candidate stands for on all issues that they may have to address in elected office. They shall be held accountable in court for breach of that contract if elected and any/all terms are not met.
    3. NO campaigning allowed for any elective federal office more than 60 days prior to the National Primary Date.
    4. NO campaign contribution shall be donated to any candidate of more than $200 from an individual or $500 maximum from a family (spouses/children living in the same household.) No donations shall be made to a candidate more than sixty days prior to the primary date. No candidate shall contribute from their own funds more than 60% of the total donations from other private individuals.
    5. NO campaign contribution from any PAC, corporation, union, non-profit organization, special interest group, etc. shall be allowed for any elected federal office.
    6. NO third party campaigning (separate PAC ads, corporate ads, etc.) for/against any candidate shall be allowed at any time during or before the election season.
    7. NO party conventions shall be held to select the presidential candidates. The selection must be done at the ballot box in the primary election.
    8. The One Man/One Vote Supreme Court ruling shall be enforced by this Amendment, namely that NO federal candidate selection shall be by any means other than the ballot box on Primary/General Election Dates.
    9. National Party Organizations shall NOT raise money for or donate to specific candidates of their party prior to the dates outlined above.
    10. PAC’s shall NOT be granted tax-exempt status by the IRS, and any non-profit organization who uses their funding for political purposes shall lose their tax-exempt status.
    11. All lobbyists shall be outlawed from influencing Congress at all times.

    This amendment shall be approved ONLY by State Constitutional Conventions to be called within 90 days of this petition being submmitted to a state’s Secretary of State. A minimum of 25% of the registered voters in each state shall be required to further this petition to the respective Secretary of State.

    Name Signature State Address

    Petition for US Constitutional Amendment For Congressional Term Limits


    We, the undersigned US citizens, duly registered voters in our respective states/territories, do hereby petition for our state to approve the following amendment to the United States Constitution by the method noted below.

    Term Limits for Congress:
    1. Representatives to Congress shall serve no more than two two-year terms in the House.
    2. Senators shall be elected to no more than two six year terms in the Senate.
    3. No elected official shall serve more than six terms in office in any combined elected offices (House/Senate/Presidency.)

    This amendment shall be approved ONLY by State Constitutional Conventions to be called within 90 days of this petition being submmitted to a state’s Secretary of State. A minimum of 25% of the registered voters in each state shall be required to further this petition to the respective Secretary of State.

    Name Signature State Address

    • 6 votes
    #1.63 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:41 AM EST

    I "unfriend" anyone who posts questionable or objectionable political views on Facebook - Republican or Democrat.

    It is not that I don't want to engage in political discourse, I just don't think engaging my friends and family on Facebook is the proper venue.

    That's why I come here!

    • 15 votes
    #1.64 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:42 AM EST

    "Ron Johnson put on full display the abject ignorance of the Tea Party adherents. This dolt looks at the destruction in Benghazi and then tells the Secretary that a mere phone call would have cleared up all these nagging questions. Did this blithering idiot imagine that there's a full report that's been prepared, even as the facility was under attack?"

    I have numerous friends, relatives, and business associates in Wisconsin. Almost without exception, unless one is a card carrying Tea Partier, they are embarrassed by Ron Johnson. This is a guy who until 6 months before the 2010 election, no one had ever heard of. A plastics manufacturer who married the daughter of a billionaire, whose father-in-law was the primary customer of his plastics manufacturing firm. Many of his employees qualify for Badger Care, the state's version of Medicaid. This is the guy who believes that climate change and global warming are cause by sunspots. He has, not so affectionately, been nicknamed (Mo)Ron Johnson. And to think, that the state that gave us Gaylord Nelson, Bill Promise and the LaFollettes, fired Russ Feingold and elected this dimwit. I guess those cheesehead hats were cutting off oxygen to the voters' brains back in 2010.

    • 23 votes
    #1.65 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:43 AM EST

    So a Negligent Democrat with the blood of innocent people on her hands, is stronger? (what a spin)

    And Obama* and Feinstein Standing in the blood of children, is a reason to make more innocent American Citizens Defensless? And Obama* and Holder selling assault weapons to Insurgent Career Criminal Drug Cartels and Gangs,causing the murder of a Border Patrol Agent and hundreds of innocent citizens of our southern neighbor, is a reason to make innocent american citizens defensless?

    What a Spin. they lie so much.

    Hillary knew that there were requests for more security and she says,"So What".

    Mrs. Impeached is as bad as her husband.

    • 12 votes
    #1.66 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:44 AM EST

    Another panel of White Males trying to grandstand for the cameras and disrespect the woman testifying. If she had been a "he", everyone would just have said he was being "forceful". Only one of the GOPers made really good comments - a new guy from the Midwest....

    I thought the comment made reminding the GOP types like MCain and others about the lies and distortions regarding "weapons of mass destruction" that didn't exist in Iraq but were sold to everyone in the press by everyone in the Bush administration - THAT was good.

    Reminded everyone in the room how they had no grilling comments during the run-up to that unwarranted war the neo-cons wanted so badly. It reminded us about how much of this process is just political theater with no substance. What a waste of time.

    • 17 votes
    #1.67 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:48 AM EST

    Republicans great accomplishment score so far: Zip, Zero, Nada, Nothing. Thanks, Joe in Albany, for making this sooo easy. Now go to your room.

    • 16 votes
    #1.68 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:49 AM EST

    ThinkaboutIt, since you said you were unaware of any such legislation, I'd suggest you check out what the Virginia State Senate did Monday, Inauguration Day. The VA State Senate is tied with 20 Republicans and 20 Democrats. State Senator Henry Marsh (D), who in addition to serving in various state government positions, has spent 50 years working as a civil rights attorney and was the first black Mayor of Richmond attended the Historic 2nd term Inauguration of President Obama. The VA Senate republicans noting his absence then quickly passed, 20-19, a gerrymandered redistricting State Senate map without any warning, without any discussion, without any public input. Now those GOPers did not just pull that map out of their hats; they had to have prepared it with the intent to pass it when any democrat was absent. Governor McDonnell said he had no idea (yeah, right) that such an unfair thing would be done; pretty much his public response to mandatory vaginal probes.

    I don't doubt you are proud of your state but if you really are as concerned as you appear to be, then you better start paying closer attention to what is being done in the State of Virginia by republicans. It is hardly representative of democracy.

    • 24 votes
    #1.69 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:50 AM EST

    I don't think Rand Paul is operating with a full deck, his behavior goes beyond weird !!!

    • 23 votes
    #1.70 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:54 AM EST

    Why is it that nobody appears to answer Joe's question, other than to slam him about eating salmon and the like and call him names? Not picking sides, but we really do need to get this budget under control and stop printing more money. Our "leaders"....and I use that term lightly, need to get there heads out and do their job. ALL OF THEM. That would mean working together for solutions instead of just slamming on each other as most of the folks on these threads seem to do. Can't Dems and Repubs get along and work together, either in Washington, or here???

    It's a travesty.

    • 6 votes
    #1.71 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:54 AM EST

    inMYday, I think you meant "illiterately," not "illiterally."

    Perhaps you should make sure your own posts are written correctly before trying to correct someone else. Otherwise, you look like a fool, as you did there.

    • 6 votes
    #1.72 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:58 AM EST

    starsailing - Rt wingers use Fox fake news for their mis-information views...

    Let's have some specific examples of just what these lies are we always hear about. If you're going to make accusations, you need to back them up.

    SO Ricky...we liberals should just sit idly by and let the lies and mis information spew out of Fox news and rt wingers huh? Just tolerate liars some more..?...

    The left has mastered propaganda and the art of shaping public opinion by...whatever means necessary, and low-information voters believe it. They never bother to check facts, and to make sure they don't try, we state over and over that "FOX news lies". That way, people get one version...ours!

    BTW, I am liberal in the sense I believe in liberty and freedom. I am NOT a neo-communist "progressive".

    • 5 votes
    #1.73 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:01 AM EST

    From my experience, progressives are open to opposing views, sometimes to a fault. But it gets tiresome to hear the same garbage from Fox News or the Drudge Report over and over again. How many times should a person be subjected to fact-free birther conspiracy theories or claims of climate change "hoaxes" before blocking the idiots that keep repeating them?

    • 16 votes
    #1.74 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:03 AM EST

    indigo4, you are correct. I made a typographical error and I thank you for bringing it to my attention. To show my appreciation and to demonstrate humble admission of my own error, I have given you an "up" vote.

    • 1 vote
    #1.75 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:03 AM EST

    TNSEVOL - both the states Maine & Nebraska split their electoral votes using the Congressional District Method, where electoral votes are distributed according to the state’s congressional districts instead of the state as a whole.
    The 'winner-take-all' method disenfranchises the minority in the state who voted for the other Presidential candidate.
    Why is it democrats only care about the minority when they are it?

    ...and Hillary lied and people died.

    • 5 votes
    #1.76 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:04 AM EST

    ...what difference does it make?

    Well, Hillary, four people are needlessly dead due to you incompetence; that makes a huge difference to their families. But never fear, as this thread demonstrates, there are plenty of mindless progressive lemmings out there who will defend you, as they do Obama and the rest of this totally inept administration.

    By the way, Albany Joe is not only clever and humorous, he's also correct! Keep it up, Joe.

    • 7 votes
    #1.77 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:06 AM EST

    GOP : This was WRONG Mrs. Clinton

    Mrs. Clinton: I take full responsibility

    GOP: We're not through with our snit fit

    • 15 votes
    #1.78 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:06 AM EST

    Think about it: It was a Washington Post editorial saying how the Virginia house introduced a bill to change the system for apportioning votes , while one Democrat attended THE PRESIDENTS second inauguration giving the representative one vote more than the attending Democrats. The post is above.

    • 2 votes
    #1.79 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:07 AM EST

    I expect since McCain and the rest of his Grumpy old white men are so indignant about Americans dying in embassies and related places...they will immediately start investigating why 64 were killed under Bush/Cheney team of calculated blunders...no?

    I guess since republicons are so interested in Americans dying...they will investigate Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeldt/Rove/and cabinet for lying the nation and the WORLD into the Iraq war just to give war profits to Cheney and to make Bush known as a "War President, because War presidents are remembered."

    No...? they won't be investigating their own party..?....Damn I thought they said they were Americans.

    • 11 votes
    #1.80 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:08 AM EST

    Here is why thinking people ignore Joe in Albany's posts and his question, 31yearsofservice:

    He does not want an answer. His immediate response will be to denigrate the response, and attack his betters.

    He is a misogynist who cannot stand that Mrs. Clinton has done this country great service for years, not just as Secretary of State.

    The only acceptable answer to him regarding Mrs. Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State would be a lie, that she has done nothing.

    Anything else will cause him to squirm, turn red faced and stammer "No, no NO! I said she did nothing, I demand you agree with me...."

    Thinking people are not facile, and do not agree with poor Joey.

    • 18 votes
    #1.81 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:09 AM EST

    Close your eyes.

    Imagine you live in a world were the american people were told 10 minutes later that this was a terrorist attack and not a spontaneous demonstration.

    Now.... why is this world better?

    • 8 votes
    #1.82 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:14 AM EST

    Joe in Albany

    2010 January 16 -- US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrives in Haiti to help with disaster relief

    2010 May 21 -- Warns of Consequences for North Korea following sinking of South Korean warship -- "We cannot allow this attack on South Korea to go unanswered by the international community."

    Here are two you can hang your noodle on from the past....There are many more that are more current.

    You didn't address the leaving of her trip with the President in the Pacific Rim to go to Israel.

    Your statement doesn't hold up.....Sorry would you like another roll of the dice.

    • 16 votes
    #1.83 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:14 AM EST

    But my guess in this case is that you are anti abortion, and that your disgust is related to THAT rather than the appearance of a bloody fetus.

    Actually, Momaid, this illustrates the problem with facebook and other social media postings. You drew a conclusion on my abortion stance based upon an action I took. Perhaps I am anti-abortion. Perhaps I am pro-choice. Perhaps I dislike abortion but fully believe it is a decision between a woman and her doctor. Maybe I don't want pictures of a bloody fetus' posted on my facebook page because it will upset the 6 year old child of my best friend's daughter. Perhaps I work at an abortion clinic and simply don't want to bring my work home with me. Perhaps my boss is anti-abortion, and because I deleted the facebook post, he reads it as my stance is pro-choice and fires me.

    The original point of the original poster is that, according to the Pew Poll, liberals are less tolerant than conservatives and moderates. Putting aside the fact he cherry picked the poll to fit his needs, my point is perhaps there is a valid reason reason liberals are more likely to unfriend on facebook. A deeper look at the poll certainly tells quite a different story.

    By the way, I do agree with your assessment that facebook is often and simply an accumulation of biased opinions.

    • 11 votes
    #1.84 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:16 AM EST

    Proud 2B Liberal

    The left has mastered propaganda and the art of shaping public opinion by...whatever means necessary, and low-information voters believe it. They never bother to check facts, and to make sure they don't try, we state over and over that "FOX news lies". That way, people get one version...ours!

    Oh, that's only the left, is that correct? It can't possibly be both sides taking advantage of slanting a story to sell negative perceptions of the opposing party.

    And what exactly is a "low information voter"? Would that be described as someone who has forgotten everything that they learned when they took government or a basic civics class? I've seen this term bandied about repeatedly and figure it's time to step up and ask for an actual definition.

    • 6 votes
    #1.85 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:18 AM EST

    Comrade,

    Actually it gives a distorted advantage to less populated areas. That would not be equal representation. In Ohio President Obama won the popular vote by over 4% yet he only won 31% of the districts.

    If this is done there will be a constitution amendment to eliminate the Electoral College in favor of a straight popular vote which will give an even greater advantage to Democrats for at least 2 generations. I will be all for that change !!

    • 19 votes
    #1.86 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:20 AM EST

    My two cents, for what its worth:

    The Senate GOP have been gunning for Hillary Clinton since the middle of last year. They REALLY don't want to face her as a presidential candidate in 2016. She was very strong in 2008, after four years as Secretary of State, she will be formidable.

    The entire issue of what was initially told to the press shortly after the incident (i.e. the demonstrators rioting over the movie) truly is irrelevant now. There was no "coverup" as the GOP would like to have happened.

    The Senators would have loved to state exactly what went wrong, and drop each and every issue, in the open, right on Sec. Clinton before the cameras. Unfortunately, many of the problems deal with confidential, national security issues which can only be discussed outside of the purview of the enemies being discussed.

    The dog and pony show the irrelevant GOP would have liked to have just wouldn't work. They wanted to bring up the same old story, but Sec. Clinton just wouldn't cooperate.

    Paul Ryan and John Boehner are correct, President Obama does want to consign the current GOP to the dust bin of history, WHERE IT BELONGS.

    • 17 votes
    #1.87 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:21 AM EST

    Everyone should pay attention to what is going on in Virginia... This kind of gerrymandering crap while a congressman is away should not stand and could be coming to a state legislation near you! The people of Virginia should not stand for this like they did not stand to have women mandated to have trans vaginal ultrasounds. I believe this is worst. They are attempting to silence the majority of voters. To only value the votes of the few over those on the other side that out number them almost 2:1 and to do so for at least a generation.We all saw what Republican majority leads to... more poverty, less informed population, more federal govt assistance, lower wages, and a whole lot of medically mandated procedures not based on medical facts!

    • 17 votes
    #1.88 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:21 AM EST

    I admire Mrs. Clinton for her accomplishments, but she always comes across as an anti-Republican beotch.

    • 1 vote
    #1.89 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:22 AM EST

    “There is no question we all relied on flawed intelligence. But, there is a
    fundamental difference between relying on incorrect intelligence and
    deliberately painting a picture to the American people that you know is not
    fully accurate."

    Senator John D. Rockefeller IV - Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence - 5 June 2008 - (Final Phase II Reports on Prewar Iraq Intelligence)

    Isn't it funny how history keeps repeating itself?

    • 3 votes
    #1.90 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:23 AM EST

    inMyday - Condi Rice CAN'T run. She would be destroyed because of her ignoring the repeated warnings about 9/11/2001 as well as ignoring information that disproved the Bush administration's claims of Iraq having WMD's. She should stay where she is - we DON'T EVER need anyone from Bush's group running for ANYTHING!

    • 16 votes
    #1.92 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:27 AM EST

    Joe in Albany

    So, when Republicans criticize Hillary they are lying misogynist pigs

    no, they are not misogynist pigs -they are simply HYPOCRITES. I am still waiting for the Republican outrage for the lies, cover ups, manipulation, and distortion of facts to the American people and the US Congress by the Bush Administration when it comes to the Iraqi War. I thought the big, Republican talking point was that the American people have the right to know...I guess it's only when the POTUS is a Democrat, right?

    • 15 votes
    #1.93 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:32 AM EST

    SeekingSanity -

    You're obviously not finding it.

    • 4 votes
    #1.94 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:32 AM EST

    It was amazing to me to watch these hearings. I am a white, well off male, who was raised as a Republican, like my father, grandfather and great-grandfather were. In 2008, I thought the worst thing that could happen was to have Hilary elected president -- especially on the heels of the disasterous Bush 43 administration that destroyed everything in sight (and, yes, allowed 3000 Americans be killed in our homeland b ignoring intelligence reports they had, and failing to kill or capture the architect of that attack during the entire remainder of their nine year flop). As of that time, her only real experience was that she had been the wife of a president. However, since her defeat in the Democratic primary process, she has been working hard, applying her intelligence and connections, dedicating herself to good and useful service to our country at the highest level, and has been honing her skills as a diplomat and as a politician. Meanwhile, all those Republican representatives and senators who tried so hard to make her life difficult only, in reality, embarrassed themselves -- showing that they have spent the time since 2008 just whining about not having power, complaining about the guy in the White House who, surely and steadily, is getting us out of the nuclear winter brought on by his predecessor and his boss VP. Isn't the Republican mantra related to self determination and hard work? Why do all Republicans everywhere tolerate these bozos and n'er do-wells, who live off the public trough and think that their job is to whine about how they wish they had the keys to daddy's car? What ever happened to real Republicans like Reagan, James Baker, George HW Bush, Jerry Ford, et al? Can't we get rid of these whiners and crybabies?

    • 13 votes
    #1.95 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:32 AM EST

    Joe in Albany

    Just in case....Most recently

    Sec. Clinton adopts all recommendations made by Senate committee to streamline protocol & information. She makes a under secretary position to deal with all urgent matters (Hot Spots) for information to go to for possible immediate action (This has never been done under any Sec of State). January 2013

    • 11 votes
    #1.96 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:33 AM EST

    Proud to be ..stuff....you want examples?..........Do search on ....Fox news Dumber...it is that simple...to see the studies......

    Fox news dumber.....Canada does not allow them to call themselves news....they are entertainment....Too funny!................Dear Lord I hope you are not serious thinking Fox news is for real?.....One of my favorite stories was when they were reporting on a union story out east then showing video from a riot of some sorts on west coast with palm trees, as if there was rioting going on. Yeah...lots of palm trees in New York.

    • 8 votes
    #1.97 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:35 AM EST

    Does anyone else think that Marco Rubio looked like a sweaty school boy in the principal's office? He looked like fish out of water during the hearing.

    • 14 votes
    #1.98 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:37 AM EST

    Apparently NOT tough enough.

    Mrs. Clinton will be allowed to EXIT the door and resign, and her "subordinates" will continue to work for the Federal government. NOT ONE person in the State Department will be held accountable.

    Taking responsibility is not enough. Reiterating the same old story is not the TRUTH. Hiding behind an investigation is outrageous. There should be TOUGH repercussions for her lack of leadership which resulted in the deaths of an American Ambassador and three other Americans.

    The Progressives at the Congressional hearing make me want to throw up after hearing all their love and affection. She has NOT done a "superb job" as Secretary of the State.....she has been a total failure.

    • 1 vote
    #1.99 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:40 AM EST

    LosMan123 -

    Everyone should pay attention to what is going on in Virginia...

    No kidding. Yesterday was a HUGE news day and I hope that people keep this in mind as much of it was buried under the headline of Hillary's testimony. Virgina is slowly turning into one crazy state which saddens me as I've many clients and friends there!

    • 11 votes
    #1.100 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:40 AM EST

    BearDown-3307297 wrote" The right loves Reagan's election. They can look to that and claim ultimate victory. But that was 23 years ago. You've controlled a single branch of congress for a total of 8 years since then. You've lost 5 of the last 6 POTUS elections by popular vote."

    Yet they still want to blame the economy on Bush. How pathetic can the IGNORANT LEFT get to not realize that.

      #1.101 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:41 AM EST

      Gingerbread Mamma

      Thank You for the post 1.91.....We have to keep our eyes wide open for this where ever it happens, and not allow it. Where it does we the people need to urge the Dept. Of Justice to take action against those that would corrupt our voter rights.

      • 12 votes
      #1.102 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:42 AM EST

      We really do need to vote for the person, and not the party. Everyone on here is like voting for a football team, regardless of the job the party does. The republicans attempt to give the rural areas as much clout as the urban areas iks no different than Barack Obama buying all the Urban votes with free entitlement giveaways.

      • 1 vote
      #1.103 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:44 AM EST

      ldo

      More Elephant @!$%#....You and Rand Paul (If I where the King.....Blah,Blah,Blah).

      Bush is still wanted in the Hague for war crimes.

      • 14 votes
      #1.104 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:46 AM EST

      joel,

      In this country it has always been “majority rule” regardless of how rich, what color, religion, where they live, etc.

      Why do you object to our founding fathers’ ideals?

      • 16 votes
      #1.105 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:50 AM EST

      Comrade Chaos,

      You are seriously making the argument that the opinions of a minority are worth more or the same as a majority. Saying nothing of the fact that it is the policies that you pursue as a legislature that make you a minority. If most people disagree with your political view over and over again as it has happened in the last two elections, dont you feel like it is the responsibility of that legislative body to tailor policies to be more inclusive of the masses rather than to stand in the way of progress? The job of politicians should be to win over as many votes as possible. Not to figure out a way where only the votes of those who like you matter. But the republicans are not interested in that. They rather work hard to try to exclude as many voices as possible that disagree with their opinions. That is not governing!

      • 7 votes
      #1.106 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:50 AM EST

      inMYday,

      your post # 1.54

      Don't you mean illiterately? Ironic much?

      • 7 votes
      #1.107 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:52 AM EST

      YD Mark, Hope you had a good holiday.

      First, I don't think this forum is a very good place to form a sweeping opinion of either party. Many take it way to seriously and many come in to just "tweak" (Many times that is me).

      Sadly, the tone is most often set at the top of the thread by the same "usual Suspects" and it goes downhill from there.

      You and I don't agree on many issues, but I believe we have had several exchanges that were civilized and had me at least understanding your views. Doesn't necessarily mean I agree, but I listened.

      Now if you bounce that off the vitriol that I receive from most of the other so-called "Liberals" here, it is night and day.

      I feel sorry for anyone who thinks that either point of view represented here is the broad brush generalization of either parties ideology.

      • 3 votes
      #1.108 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:55 AM EST

      Powers explained that after getting out of her own "Democratic bubble," she noticed that conservatives tend to be more open to hearing opposing viewpoints than liberals."

      Sure. That's why conservatives are anti-abortion, because they are open to hearing opposing viewpoints.

      That's why conservatives deny climate change.

      That's why conservatives are gerrymandering political districts in states accross the country.

      That's why conservatives are so concerned about non-existent voter fraud.

      That's why conservatives think being gay is an abomination.

      That's why conservatives are shutting down Planned Parenthood.

      That's why conservatives continue to try and de-fund Obamacare.

      That's why conservatives, having demanded accounting from Hillary Clinton, denigrate her in public and choose not to watch the proceedings.

      That's why conservatives refuse to negotiate on the budget.

      Conservatives are open to hearing opposing viewpoints?! Please!

      • 19 votes
      #1.109 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:57 AM EST

      Layton,

      I hear you bro! I have family there as well... Mostly in the military and it just saddens me to see where the republicans are taking this now. They cant win with votes so they gotta do something else to stay in power... Forget what the people want!

      • 17 votes
      #1.110 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:58 AM EST

      The middle east is burning. Al Qaeda is stronger than ever and NOT decimated. Embassy staffs getting killed. And yesterday, N Korea did missile tests which it stated that the US was the intended target. Europe is in economic chaos. And Russia has our prez in their pocket.

      Great job Hilary!! LMFAO!!! Thank God you are retiring! Another 4 years of this and we will be Cuba. LOL!

      PS. Hey kiddos! A friendly reminder that Fisty, Beverly, David Walker and Pigotry are all the same poster and have been exposed. Sad? You bet! LOLOL!

      • 1 vote
      #1.111 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:03 PM EST

      Bobster-1557895

      N Korea did missile tests which it stated that the US was the intended target.

      Mistatement. NK only stated yesterday they are going to do tests, not that they had.

      • 12 votes
      #1.112 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:07 PM EST

      Bobster,

      More lies ...

      Yawn

      • 15 votes
      #1.113 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:09 PM EST

      Rather than socking it to Hillary these republicans again look the fools they are. They voted down funding for greater security at our Embassies. We also are protected by the government of the country that we have our embassies and a handful of our security.

      Four people died sadly, but what about bush ignoring the CIA reports and the National Security reports about 9/11? Four lives lost is tragic, but what about 3,200? Fools!

      • 13 votes
      #1.114 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:14 PM EST

      Dennis, as a former Buckeye, I have to ask you what you have done so far to help pass the constitutional amendment posted above that would do just what you want...eliminate the Electoral College, along with many other much needed changes in our electoral system and campaign financing.

        #1.115 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:15 PM EST

        inMYday

        Brenda, I think you meant "mettle," not "metal."

        It's disquieting to see so many uninformed voters express their opinions illiterally.

        Look out everyone, the hall monitor is here to point out every mistake you make while you are posting. Next you will be graded for your mistakes. It's a blog not a class on spelling. Get a life.

        • 10 votes
        #1.116 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:16 PM EST

        Red -- You wrote:

        Now on to eyeglass-gate!!

        Let's give Joe in Albany credit for something he knows a lot about. SPECTACLES.

        • 14 votes
        #1.117 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:20 PM EST

        joel,

        How idiotic of you to say those things. I have a sister who had a stroke and she had to get help or she would die. It is not free give always as she funded many of the programs before, while she was working. I guess the haves don't know what it is like to be a have not for whatever reason! That is why the republican will die! People like you who are misguided and don't know about the real America!

        • 10 votes
        #1.118 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:21 PM EST

        ComradeChaos: "The 'winner-take-all' method disenfranchises the minority in the state who voted for the other Presidential candidate."

        The minority is supposed to be disenfranchised you big dummy.

        Red states, blue states, ring a bell? What if I voted for the other guy in my congressional district? Am I disenfranchised? Should we then allocate votes on zip code? Maybe on the street you live on? I hereby allocate the votes of billybob drive to…. Maybe we should allocate the votes based on household? But wait a minute what if mom votes for the other guy? Oh no, we’ve disenfranchised mom in her own house. What if the family dog blocks mom from getting to the voting booth and mom takes it upon herself to blow away the family dog under the stand your ground laws? Then we have a family dog engaging in voter suppression that was legally killed by a family member who was electorally disenfranchised. Dear god that sounds terrible. I just blew my own mind dude.

        • 3 votes
        #1.119 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:22 PM EST

        Iamnotyou

        So a Negligent Democrat with the blood of innocent people on her hands, is stronger? (what a spin)

        So, negligent repbulicanS (Bush/Cheney/Rice/Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/Powell) with the blood of innocent SOLDIERS and civilians (Iraq, Afghanistan) on THEIR hands are stronger?

        ^ There, I fixed it for you since it seems you believe this is better.

        • 8 votes
        #1.120 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:28 PM EST

        LosMan123 . . .

        I hear you bro!

        I'll forgive you on that one ... ;-) (would be a sis to you!)

        Don't Carry It All . . .

        Let's give Joe in Albany credit for something he knows a lot about. SPECTACLES.

        He could write a book about creating them!

        • 6 votes
        #1.121 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:29 PM EST

        Funny to watch how the hair stood up on every liberals neck after reading that the Pew Research found them to be less tolerant of opposing viewpoints. Or that liberal columnist Kirsten Powers says she finds conservatives more open to hearing opposing viewpoints. In reaction to Powers comments about a mostly liberal media, all you read over and over is Fox bashing. Never mind the very liberal CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, or MSNBC which seems to be an immediate 5 to 1 advantage liberal networks to one conservative. Which of course only scratches the surface of liberal bias in the media. I would have to say that anyone reviewing the comments on this site about the Pew Research would surmise they pretty much confirm the accuracy of the polling data.

        • 2 votes
        #1.122 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:31 PM EST

        ComradeIdiot,

        You imply that Secretary of State Clinton caused the deaths of the individuals in the compound. Nothing could be further from the truth.

        • 10 votes
        #1.123 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:35 PM EST

        anti-trust,

        I’m not an activist and will not get directly involved in politics and rarely sign petitions.

        I can live with the Electoral College however if it ever shows up on the Ohio ballot as a US Constitutional Amendment I would vote for it because in the strictest of mathematical terms it is possible to elect a President with about 26% of the popular vote.

        • 6 votes
        #1.124 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:37 PM EST

        Rick-3416939

        Funny to watch how the hair stood up on every liberals neck

        It's even funnier....LOL....to watch people like you, who are so loss, grasp at anything that gives you a miniscule edge, before it disappears!!

        • 9 votes
        #1.125 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:37 PM EST

        Hey Brenda... An alert pupil noted that the hall monitor meant to say "illiterately" when it became so disquieted, and was humbly awarded with an up-vote as a mea culpa... Apparently the up-vote of the hall monitor is a precious thing doled out only as a means of assuaging guilt. Aren't people preposterous sometimes?

        On a lighter note, I've observed a point in our political process wherein bi-partisan support is assured!!

        As we all know, most republican politicians that run out of rope and "retire" end up with either consulting gigs related to subjects they know nothing about (like pharmaceuticals) or in some non-producing financially leaching venture extracting money from the works and accounts of others... Well I'm proud to say that the illustrious Rand Paul, junior bot-fly of the Paul Klan, has a different plan... It became clear to me that his post-political sights are firmly fixed on stand-up comedy as soon as he said "If I were President of the United States I'd have fired you"... I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm still chuckling over the dead-pan delivery of that one-liner. He may have a future after all!!

        • 7 votes
        #1.126 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:41 PM EST

        Rick-3416939

        Whats really funny is that during the campaign you all rejected the pew reports and called them fake and trumped up. Now they are okay? Hmmm.

        Maybe the shift is that we're tired of having this crap shoved at us from the Neocons, and we've become less tolerant of hearing the same droning on from you guys. Your party has less to offer the broader base, and what you do have to offer can be placed on the head of a needle.

        • 7 votes
        #1.127 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:49 PM EST

        Joe in Albany

        2010 January 16 -- US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrives in Haiti to help with disaster relief

        2010 May 21 -- Warns of Consequences for North Korea following sinking of South Korean warship -- "We cannot allow this attack on South Korea to go unanswered by the international community."

        Here are two you can hang your noodle on from the past....There are many more that are more current.

        You didn't address the leaving of her trip with the President in the Pacific Rim to go to Israel.

        ___________________________________________

        Marlboro Man: Everything you have cited (not "sited"), including #1.96, are part of the normal basic job duties of any SoS. For all the lefty liberal adoration heaped on Hillary to be more than mindless Clinton worshipping, you/they need to cite just three accomplishments that would be generally considered to be "GREAT" accomplishments.

        Here's a link to Hillary's recent discussion of her accomplishments as SoS. Nothing "great" in this link:

        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/hillary-clinton-reflects-on-accomplishments-challenges-as-secretary-of-state/

        • 2 votes
        #1.128 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:51 PM EST

        bubblegum

          #1.129 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:51 PM EST

          Rick-3416939

          "Funny to watch how the hair stood up on every liberals neck after reading that the Pew Research found them to be less tolerant of opposing viewpoints."

          I stopped looking at or referring to poll results right after they were clearly used to milk the cash cow created by the citizens united ruling in the last election... Surely it's way too early for a right-winger to go referencing poll results again, right? But then again, I'm considered a "learner" and was blessed with a memory longer than 90 days or so.

          Sorry about your luck.

          • 4 votes
          #1.130 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:53 PM EST

          I was and will be heading for the end of this forum but just reading some of the posts from these people defending Clinton makes me shudder at the depths of ignorance, deceit and partisanship these (I suppose) professional contributers have sank to in defending her attempt to lie to us and then justify it by bullying. If some of you are so against right, morality and truth, what happens if and when you win?

            #1.131 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:59 PM EST

            As expected this well-rehearsed, smoke & mirrors sideshow game of charades unfolded with nothing of any value being accomplished. The truth of the matter remains elusive because any attempt to inquire about it is met with resistance, though she clearly stated she took 'full responsibility' for it. Then it's wrapped up and throw in the faces of the republicans as if it were their fault- go figure, typical libbie reaction.

            • 1 vote
            #1.132 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:01 PM EST

            Joe in Albany

            Your a bag of wind to put it politely

            I gave you very recent dates and things that she has done but you have yet to recognize them or address them.

            Nice try.....You really need to lay off huffing super glue.

            • 11 votes
            #1.133 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:03 PM EST

            tom,

            No matter who says what, there are those that will accuse them of not telling the truth unless it matches what they (YOU) believe. They are called “TRUTHERS” !!

            • 7 votes
            #1.134 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:05 PM EST

            Bobster

            Time to change the channel.

            The middle east is moving towards democracy, a very messy business. France failed at creating a lasting democratic government numerous times after the French revolution before finally succeeding after WW II. Americans frequently praise democracy as the way every country should be ruled without realizing that it has many pitfalls. Hitler rose from the ashes of the Weimar Republic.

            We must be patient when watching countries experiment with democracy. Not everything will go our way, but to interfere with the democratic process is not only selling our ideal of democracy short, but also alienates those people we interfere with. The situation in Iran today results partly from our interference with their attempts at democracy in 1954. The situation in Israel and the Gaza Strip today results partly from our rejection of the Hamas election victory there 5 or 6 years ago.

            If we are to promote our ideal of democracy around the world, then we must tolerate some of the problems associated with it. To exaggerate the threat new democracies pose (as you do in the middle East) is not helpful to this process of democratization.

            Patience, Bobster, patience.

            • 5 votes
            #1.135 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:05 PM EST

            Hey WCA, how's it going. Long time.

            I appreciate honest debate, see a lot of it from posters who try to do it. Someone else said it above there are some posters that post such inane, untrue, thoughts that it is useless to reply to. In the days after the Newton shooting it seems a train load of crazies entered the fray.

            Always have liked first read, better than many other sites but good posters able to dialogue come few and far between. Do you have a suggestion for another site? I've browsed reddit politics, it is more serious but doesn't have the same comradely appeal as here. The site links to topics posted by a myriad of sources then you can comment.

            By the way, I liked the holidays, especially the MLK holiday. It allowed me to watch the inauguration! Had to get a tweak in with some friendly ribbing! :}

            • 8 votes
            #1.136 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:07 PM EST

            ProFreedom-5130956

            If there was anything in any of the reports (Classified or Unclassified) worthy of charges, don't think for one minute that the Neocons wouldn't have jumped at the chance to hang her out to dry.

            CIA reports and other intel are what the Sec. of State, House, Senate, & White House got....They all got the same information. No cover up...no smoke & mirrors.

            The fault of the Republicans was that they gutted the request for funding under your VP candidate Paul Ryan. As recent as the vote for Sandy relief, contained in that bill was an increase for funding for increased security at our embassies. It was cut...By who again?

            • 10 votes
            #1.137 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:15 PM EST

            I might also add that if there is any responsibility here it would lay with the D.o.D, as they are the ones charged with military actions or rescue operations. That is not the function of the Sec. of State.

            • 9 votes
            #1.138 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:24 PM EST

            Well, let's see now. It's been four hours and twenty minutes since Joe in Albany threw the challenge out there to list a mere three of Hillary's landmark accomplishments and no responders save Steve @ #1.96, which is nothing, because there's NOTHING OUT THERE!!!!!

            Brenda @ 1.64: I don't usually correct spelling errors (I make 'em too) or incomplete words, but when you use the wrong word it changes the conjecture. You meant to say mettle not metal. Big difference.

            • 2 votes
            #1.139 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:57 PM EST

            Steve... is this your Brokeback Mountain look ??

            • 1 vote
            #1.140 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:58 PM EST

            Funny to watch how the hair stood up on every liberals neck after reading that the Pew Research found them to be less tolerant of opposing viewpoints.

            Now little Ricky, what is truly funny is to watch your pathetic attempt to cherry pick the results of a poll to support your broad claim. Sorry bucko, the poll doesn't support your claim. But here is a poll you can chew on that basically fits an equally ridiculous broad claim that conservatives have low IQs. See how that works - or does it overreach your IQ level?

            http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

            Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found.

            • 3 votes
            #1.141 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:58 PM EST

            Joe in Albany

            Your a bag of wind to put it politely

            I gave you very recent dates and things that she has done but you have yet to recognize them or address them.

            _________________________________

            Marlboro Man: Did you check the link out? The great Hillary herself couldn't even come up with three "great" accomplishments. According to you, that makes her a windbag. Although I prefer thinking of her as an empty pants suit.

            • 2 votes
            #1.142 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:59 PM EST

            starsailing

            Proud to be ..stuff....you want examples?..........Do search on ....Fox news Dumber...it is that simple...to see the studies......

            I KNEW you had NO EXAMPLES of ANY of these supposed LIES.

            I know all about being a leftist. I know the modus operandi for mass indoctrination. I know that any news outlet that favors a conservative view is far outnumbered, in fact dwarfed by left-leaning sources. But it's not only news outlets that the left holds, it is the university education system, the secondary education system, film, television and advertising all work to inject left-wing ideology into society, sometimes subtly, sometimes boldly.

              #1.143 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:08 PM EST

              Steve you are way to kind...that Joe in Albany is a douche bag...plain an simple...I'd like to see him list some GREAT things his useless GOP congress has done...meeting all the same criteria he expects...I wonder what they will call the new party that replaces the republican party...hmmmm...the Independent's? lol

              • 5 votes
              #1.144 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:10 PM EST

              Some of Hillary's accomplishments: Iran sanctions, democracy in Burma, restoration of respect for USA in the world, and progress on women's rights around the world. No new wars is two better than her predecessors in the previous 8 years.

              • 7 votes
              #1.145 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:10 PM EST

              Steve... is this your Brokeback Mountain look ??

              Ah lookie there - that low IQ/conservatism poll cited in post 1.41 has a portion dedicated to the ilk of of BaliBob.

              They found that what applies to racism may also apply to homophobia. People who were poorer at abstract reasoning were more likely to exhibit prejudice against gays.

              • 5 votes
              #1.146 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:15 PM EST

              We've become a nation of drama quenns and Monday morning quarterbacks. There is a lot more information that we, the American citizen, can't see , for a multitude of reasons. Madame Secretary took responsibility, rightfully so, can we move on now?

              • 2 votes
              #1.147 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:20 PM EST

              At least I'm not affraid to show my face.....yes I am gay...what of it.

              Here is an FYI for all you neocons

              The Sec. of State. does not have the authority to order action by our military. The only thing that that office can do at anytime of an attack against one of our embassies is to inform the Dept. Of Defense. Who in turn will assess to see if in fact any action can take place. The D.o.D needs approval & input from the Senate intel committee, National Security Council & the President to name a few to take action.

              We have international treaty laws that have to be followed and treaties with most of our host countries.

              Our host countries in most cases do not allow a large military presents at our embassies, as they (the host country) are charged by treaty to keep secure those embassies within their country.

              So, in looking at this mess...the cable for help and notice that the embassy was under attack should have gone to the D.o.D, as there was a CIA operation going on at the time of the incident, and a very small embassy personnel foot print.

              • 8 votes
              #1.148 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:22 PM EST

              i would say that hillary WAS responsible,and she says she takes full responsibility, seems to me that any questions ask by democrats were ok, and how dare the republicans ask any questions that may actually get to the point of the matter, which is WHY was security so lax and WHY was it not brought up to speed? a matter of money she says, so why did she not use her status to fix THAT problem? or were her hands tied and was told not to bring it up? lots of blame to go around here and hillary is not the only fox in the hen coop. as much as i disagree with her policies , i think there are bigger fish that are not gonna be fried, and hillery is taking all the blame .

              also when a fellow american calls for assistance and is allowed to be killed because our government does not want to (anger) the host country. would you not say that there is something seriously wrong here?

                #1.149 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:23 PM EST

                Joe in Albany

                The great Hillary herself couldn't even come up with three "great" accomplishments.

                No you idiot that makes her humble....had she did that you guys would have gone on about how full of herself she is.....You can't have it both ways.

                • 9 votes
                #1.150 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:44 PM EST

                Hillary's honeymoon with GOP ends.

                Well, at least there was a honeymoon for Hillary with the GOP. I wonder if Bill ever gave Hillary a honeymoon, because Bill has always been out looking for the next romantic object.

                • 2 votes
                #1.151 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:15 PM EST

                Albany Joe,

                Let's wait 4 more years before we discuss Hilary Clinton's accomplishments.

                We know you want to have another Presidential election right away because Republicans got their collective arses handed to them but let's get around to stomping butt again in a few more years.

                • 3 votes
                #1.152 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:36 PM EST

                I wrote to my Senator, Ron Johnson, and told him what an embarrassment he was to our state. Two years of doing absolutely nothing, like a typical teabugger, and then his rant. What an idiot! I really mean it too as he has done nothing and his e-mails back to the voters always say that he has 100,000's of e-mails to respond to. Well, if he did some something rather than smoke his cigars we would have a Senator representing our state of Wisconsin! Since he is a republican just put him in the same category as Wacko Walker who had his former top aide in Milwaukee sentenced to 2 years in prison and 5 other aide pleaded guilty to other charges. That is the republican party today here in Wisconsin and Nationally!

                • 4 votes
                #1.153 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:39 PM EST

                I doubt many of us on this vine have any real understanding of the duties of the S.o.S. I think anyone calling Hillary a failure or the rest of the drivel I read from the right is absolutely depressing. What I cannot stand is you seemed so much more interested in hating Obama and his cabinet; that I wonder if you hate them more then the actual murderer's and cowards who were involved in this attack.

                You act like the only diplomat that ever faced any danger is the ones working for the current administration. There have been murders and bombings under every administration but I have never seen it like this before. When the marines were killed in Libiya during Reagan, did you hate Reagan? That was over 200 Marines killed. Did you blame him? Did you call him a liar?

                NO YOU DID NOT!

                • 4 votes
                #1.154 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:48 PM EST

                Steve- we may not agree entirely on everything. But if that's your thumbnail pic I say you're a fine looking man.

                  #1.155 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:59 PM EST

                  Right on Bill 314065

                  These guys hate the President so much that they won't see anything but hate, no matter what.

                  They took serious the McConnell call for failure of this administration at any cost...So they will make sure it costs us all on every level they can.....A life...someones benefits....the economy...any cost.

                  clwyd-2621393 WTG.....Keep sending them.

                  • 3 votes
                  #1.156 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:02 PM EST

                  ProFreedom-5130956

                  Thank You and yes that is me...or should I say that is I

                  • 2 votes
                  #1.157 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:05 PM EST

                  imnotlost

                  Brenda @ 1.64: I don't usually correct spelling errors (I make 'em too) or incomplete words, but when you use the wrong word it changes the conjecture. You meant to say mettle not metal. Big difference.

                  Um.... OK. I em soooo sry fer knot usin da write werds n spellen wene poastin n dis sight. wil werk n da fewter ta dew ma besttest ta knot F upp agin.

                  • 4 votes
                  #1.158 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:11 PM EST

                  brenda1964

                  ROLFAO........GOOD ONE!!!!!!

                  • 3 votes
                  #1.159 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:15 PM EST

                  LMAO..brave GOP..she only has a few days to stay in office, now they attack her. They were scared chit of her for FOUR YEARS!

                  Hillary 2016

                  • 4 votes
                  #1.160 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:39 PM EST

                  Joseph/There is not much point in disputing with you.Anyone in disagreement in your opinion is wrong,mistaken ,lying or an idiot,So I consider you to be a waste of time to disagree with.This of course doesn't mean that I consider you right but only consider that it is unprofitable to waste further time on you.Good bye!

                    #1.161 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:04 PM EST

                    Comrade,

                    How can Democrats be in the minority when they won the presidential vote and a majority of the popular vote for the Congress as well? It was gerrymandering that won the republicans the House. presidential vote Obama won by 5,000,000+ votes. Congress Democrats won by 2,000,000 votes. Tell me that an approval rating for republicans of 26% puts them in majority! Turn off FOX propaganda and watch real news!

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.162 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:47 PM EST

                    clwyd-2621393

                    They are not going to admit anything.....Delusion is all they have to hold onto now, and because according to them all other news media are "liberal" they can not trust the ethics of journalism in the "real news media".

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.163 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:58 PM EST

                    Brenda @ 1.158: If you don't know the difference in metal and mettle or your and you're and those many other criminal grammar gaffes, perhaps you should stay off Newsvine and take an online course in grammar.

                    Don't play me for an idiot till you've cleaned your own kitchen. In the famous words of Vinnie Barbarino, UP YOUR NOSE WITH A RUBBER HOSE!!!!!!!!

                      #1.164 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:41 PM EST

                      imnotlost

                      Brenda @ 1.158: If you don't know the difference in metal and mettle or your and you're and those many other criminal grammar gaffes, perhaps you should stay off Newsvine and take an online course in grammar.

                      Don't play me for an idiot till you've cleaned your own kitchen. In the famous words of Vinnie Barbarino, UP YOUR NOSE WITH A RUBBER HOSE!!!!!!!!

                      U sher shewd upp me. eye feal soo shepesh. Wouw, kent evr remembor fealen sooo ambearassd.

                      Nerd squad back in town. Make sure you have your hall pass.

                      • 2 votes
                      #1.165 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:53 AM EST

                      I was wondering if someone could help me? Can someone tell me what Hillary accomplished during her tenure is Secretary of State other than racking up the frequent flyer miles? I can't honestly think of one thing. Iran is still pursuing nukes. North Korea is still a threat. Egypt is developing into a theocracy. Syria is slaughtering its own people. A murdered Ambassador in Libya who might have been saved along with three other Americans if some, hell any, action had been taken. I hope for the Country's sake and those who serve her overseas that we've seen the last of Cankles Clinton. That's why it matters you piece of human excrement!

                      • 2 votes
                      #1.166 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:36 PM EST

                      That is the problem with too many of the Newsvine posters, Dennis. You take the time to sit in front of your computers and post your political comments (which really is a form of activism) but won't get involved where it really counts. All you have to do is cut and paste the two amendments, print them out, sign them, and pass them on to family, friends, neighbors, co-workers, and try to get people in your community to organize a local grassroots group to circulate and collect the petitions. Get one person in your community to verify with your Secretary of State how many state-wide valid signatures would be required to force your state to call for the constitutional convention to pass these amendments (and any other that you might want to propose and circulate.) That is the only way that "We the People" can really take back the power of their government.

                        #1.167 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:58 PM EST

                        Joe in Albany

                        Sen. Johnson had the common sense to let the matter drop, knowing nothing good ever comes from pursuing a discussion with a woman having a hissy fit, especially in a public forum.

                        BTW, what’s with the Coke bottle glasses? Did she think she would get some sympathy if she showed up looking like a nerd-girl??

                        God I hope she runs in 2016. I want to see REAL fear in the faces of Republicans.

                        • 1 vote
                        #1.168 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:06 PM EST
                        Reply

                        The Secret World of Extreme Militias

                        By Barton Gellman Thursday, Sept. 30, 2010

                        Camouflaged and silent, the assault team inched toward a walled stone compound for more than five hours, belly-crawling the last 200 yards. The target was an old state prison in eastern Ohio, and every handpicked member of Red Team 2 knew what was at stake: The year is 2014, and a new breed of neo-Islamic terrorism is rampant in Michigan, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio... The current White House Administration is pro-Muslim and has ordered a stand-down against Islamic groups. The mission: Destroy the terrorist command post — or die trying. The fighters must go in "sterile"—without name tags or other identifying insignia—as a deniable covert force. "Anyone who is caught or captured cannot expect extraction," the briefing officer said.

                        This August weekend of grueling mock combat, which left some of the men prostrate and bloody-booted, capped a yearlong training regimen of the Ohio Defense Force, a private militia that claims 300 active members statewide. The fighters shot blanks, the better to learn to maneuver in squads, but they buy live ammunition in bulk. Their training—no game, they stress—expends thousands of rounds a year from a bring-your-own armory of deer rifles, assault weapons and, when the owner turns up, a belt-fed M-60 machine gun. The militia trains for ambushes, sniper missions, close-quarters battle and other infantry staples
                        Or it could be, as it was for this year's exercise, an Islamic army marauding unchecked because a hypothetical pro-Muslim President has ordered U.S. forces to leave them alone. But as the drill played out, the designated opponents bore little resemblance to terrorists. The scenario described them as a platoon-size unit, in uniform, with "military-grade hardware, communications, encryption capability and vehicle support." The militia was training for combat against the spitting image of a tactical force from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), FBI or National Guard. "Whoever they are," Vandersall says, "we have to be ready."

                        Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2022636,00.html#ixzz2Itd1Zjdh

                        ______________________________________________________

                        On one level ‘Ol LaPiere is crazy as a Peach Orchard Borer.

                        On another level He and his Minions are crazy like a Fox.

                        For Him and several Gun Manufacturers this is they’re Cash Cow and it needs to keep on giving milk at all costs. Even at the cost of what is for them “collateral” damage.

                        Why do you think there’s been no Director for the ATF for six long years?

                        Why do you think they are so vehement about even a cursory background check and waiting period?

                        They don’t want anybody even getting close to putting 2 and 2 together and getting anywhere close to their Cash Cow.

                        They don’t want even their membership to realize what’s really going on here because if questioned about 90% of their membership would tell you that they don’t want to be involved in this madness in any way, shape or form.

                        A lot of hell has been raised by you’ll Yahoo’s in this forum about” Fast and Furious” Way to focus on the Sapling while studiously ignoring the Forest that your walking through there Bunky.

                        Where do you think the Business Model of “Fast and Furuios” came from? Thin Air maybe?

                        • 34 votes
                        #2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:11 AM EST

                        IR:

                        Don't you wonder why these "tough guys", these "camo cowboys" didn't play these games when they were little boys? That's the best time for "Let's Pretend". Don't you wonder why they didn't join the service so they could see blood, guts, gore, wounded and lifeless bodies?

                        Don't you wonder why the vast majority of Americans don't realize that these stunted, mental dwarfs are terrorists? If anyone should be disarmed, it is idiots like this who think they are going to take to the streets with massive firepower to save us from the government.

                        Whether they are stupid and/or insane is not important. They are dangerous. That's what matters.

                        • 38 votes
                        #2.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:26 AM EST

                        Whether they are stupid and/or insane is not important. They are dangerous. That's what matters.

                        Couldn't agree more Floyd & David.

                        The American Taliban is alive and kicking!

                        • 31 votes
                        #2.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:33 AM EST

                        Many of the so called militia members are not what our Founding Fathers envisioned. Most of them just hate, while many more just cling to their big screen TV's and guns.

                        Still many of them are uneducated white men who think that carrying an assault rifle will make them bigger men. However, they would be no match against our Nation's Federal Agents and Military

                        • 31 votes
                        #2.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:43 AM EST

                        IR,

                        I wouldn't go so far as to say all members of militia groups are racists, but when you do some digging on what they truly believe most of these groups have an underlying "white supremacist" philosophy that drives their actions.

                        Racism, Fear and lots of Guns - not a good combination.

                        • 32 votes
                        #2.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:00 AM EST

                        What's funny is all these so called militia members with all those guns and fire power would cower and hide if confronted by the boy scouts. They are paranoid cowards, vary few if any served in the military.

                        • 21 votes
                        #2.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:12 AM EST

                        Wow, it's always interesting to come to see what kind of trash is being spoken here. And, I must say there are a few here that have no clue of what's really going on in the world. One person for sure is the (Feisty redhead) ANd, she is always here. You can always tell someone who has one life. They come to sites and spit out crap just to get a reaction, cause they have no life. I bet there are a bunch of you that are some ugly people. Not just by from what I read, but probably what you wake up to every morning alone by yourselves. So, I'll leave you to your banter, and say only this Hillary is an idiot. And, this administration is nothing but a bunch of coverups for their mistakes. If you don't want to have a gun. Just don't go into the liberal hot spots at night. Like the big cities where they dwell. And, I'm going to the beach to have a wonderful day. And, be sure to pay your taxes. Oh, that's right you collect welfare. Nevermind....

                        • 8 votes
                        #2.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:29 AM EST

                        Mo -

                        What's funny is all these so called militia members with all those guns and fire power would cower and hide if confronted by the boy scouts

                        The sad truth is they would probably mistake a troop of Boy Scouts for an invading islamic army and open fire.

                        • 17 votes
                        #2.7 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:31 AM EST

                        And, be sure to pay your taxes. Oh, that's right you collect welfare. Nevermind....

                        Statements such as this prove our point. Stupid is as Stupid does!!!

                        • 17 votes
                        #2.8 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:35 AM EST

                        HMM--my guess on Fast and Furious would be that the so-called 'business model' came from GANGS and the related drug trade/cartels. I'm not a survivalist, so I really couldn't say, but I have NEVER seen any articles where 'rival' survivalists have drive by shootings, or vow to wipe out the existance of the rival gangs because they are interfering with the other group's criminal activities. PS--I too am from MU, my daugher, in 2001, became the 5th generation in the family to graduate from there, and we have ALL owned guns. I don't any more, but I used to enjoy target shooting, just as anybody who likes to go to the local HS gym and shoot baskets, and folks at the local pub like to shoot darts.

                        Now, I think the actual survivalists ARE paranoid. I don't necessarily think you or I can call them cowards.

                        One of the bravest things a person can do is stand up for what they believe is right, in the face of opposition.

                        And PS--don't know how old you are, but I am in my 60's, and can still remember doing 'nuclear bomb attack drills'--we had a shelter in our basement, with canned foods and other staples that my dad rotated out once a year to ensure freshness, and we had flash lights, lanterns, bedding, etc. My job, when we held a family drill (we also did tornado drills!) was to fill the washing machine, the two wash tub sinks, and all the bottles with water.

                        Were we paranoid? Probably. would our efforts have insured our survival in the event of a nuclear attack--probably not, since we lived withing a half hour of Whiteman AFB (can you SAY 'ground Zero?'). But it made my family feel more secure that we had done all WE could do to survive, and we WERE better prepared than most. And yep--we had GUNS down there. As History has shown, the splendor of human kind reaches a new low in the event of disasters, with looting and mobbing running rampant.

                        • 7 votes
                        #2.9 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:37 AM EST

                        Ah the liberals are out this morning with resounding potss about how wondreful hilary did and how she humbled the republican old white nasty men. Apparently they watched a different hearing. Perhaps a second one acted out by the muppets . Maybe that's the one they were watching because I hear grover gave a stellar perforfance. Well have to ask Roselle about that though. Back to the real hearings.Probably the stupidest comment made by Ms.Clinton was when she said at this point what difference does it make?Well Ms. Clinton, to you it probably makes no difference at all, which is an excellent reason for keeping you out of public office from here on out. But to some of us it DOES make a difference. 4 Americans died needlessly and we would like to find out why. Was there an order to stand down as has been reported and if so who gave it? Was there a request for more security and if so who denied it? Were the SOS and the POTUS in fact watching this on a live feed for 7 hours and if so why was there no help? Who was breifed, when were they breifed and why were we lied to? All of these are I think mvalid questions that you didn't answer. Now I know Roselle will come back with her usual insult. That seems to be her function on this board. No dicussion, no facts, just insults. Go ahead, It won't bother me at all. your posts became immaterial to me long ago And some others will come on and cheer for Ms. Clinton. That's ok too. But NONE of them will come back with answers to the questions I asked. It is much easier to cheer and insult than think.

                        • 5 votes
                        #2.10 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:46 AM EST

                        MO maid. As far as the Business Model goes I would suggest that you look at it with reality not some prerecorded fiction in mind. As far as your paranoid delusions go I'm a great believer in doing whatever floats your boat. If you want to spend your money preparing for Armageddon ain't no skin off my butt either way. When You Take it to the extreme of stockpiling weapons and get into practicing using deadly force against Fellow Americans just because you don't know any other way to express your displeasure then it does concern me. Sedition always effects me that way. Sorry you don't agree

                        • 17 votes
                        #2.11 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:56 AM EST

                        Speaking of Paranoid Fantasies MOmaid I would suggest that you get up with Paul up there. Looks like to me you and he have the same tendency toward Paranoid Fantasies and Delusions of Grandeur.

                        • 16 votes
                        #2.12 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:07 AM EST

                        Like I said ---insults. It is now a paranoid Fantasy to ask questions. Is it that we shouldn't ask questions of the democrats or should we just ask questions of the republicans. I am actually a registered Democrat. I'm just not a dumb registered Democrat.

                        • 5 votes
                        #2.13 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:10 AM EST

                        Another great article and comment, IR.

                        I agree, if most of the NRA membership knew they were funding these anti-American militias, they would quit the NRA. Trouble is LaPierre preaches the 2nd amendment, makes them fear losing their guns and sells that fear as patriotism, sells it as their right. LaPierre is anti-American by association; he helps fund the weapons and ammunition stock piles these treasonous, un-American militias obtain; he aids their efforts to over throw this country while waving our flag and claiming to defend the Constitution.

                        • 18 votes
                        #2.14 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:12 AM EST

                        Independent:the Muppets were there: Mc Cain, Paul and the rest of the GOP! (apologies to Kermit, Miss Piggy, et.al.)

                        • 9 votes
                        #2.15 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:13 AM EST

                        Yeh I know Paul Next we're going to get at the Truth Behind 911 aren't we

                        • 15 votes
                        #2.16 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:19 AM EST

                        You can thank the NRA and the lack of Arizona gun laws for the Fast and Furious.

                        • 12 votes
                        #2.17 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:32 AM EST

                        Sorry redneck, you and Gilboagirl remind me of the clique in high school who tried to bully everyone into doing it their way. I'm over 60 and still 6'4" and I haven't been bullied in a long, long time. And yes we should be asking questions about 9/11. We should be asking questions about a lot of things. Just maybe a little more than just the topics you choose. When I go into a voting booth I look for the candidates I have already looked at and I vote. I could care less if they are democrat or republican. Can you say the same or do you look for their party affiliation first and then pick the democrat? I actually voted forObama the first time because I bought into his hope and change BS. Afterwards I learned that what he really meant was if I hoped hard enough he might let me keep some spare change. So I voted for Romney last time. I didn'y necessarily like him but as usual it was the lesser of two evils.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.18 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:35 AM EST

                        David, well said.

                        MOmaid, the nuclear drills were for attacks on this country by another country unlike the right-wing militias (and yes, there are a few left-wing militias equally delusional) who are preparing to attack our government. Don't kid yourself, they aren't practicing in case the Govt comes after them, they're practicing for revolution. Many of these militias are Neo-Nazi and skin-head groups, White Supremacists, and most just plain hate our government.

                        Jeff, you don't have to read what you don't want to but your refusal to even consider the danger these militias pose is simply sticking your head in the sand. For all you know, there's a house in your neighborhood, maybe next door, with a basement full of ammunition and military weaponry; that house could catch fire and the ammo explode--sleep well.

                        Paul got his talking point from FOX--oh the faux outrage over "what difference does it make" while ignoring the rest of Mrs. Clinton's comment which was "what difference does it make, AT THIS POINT...." Which is exactly the same point I have made here often. It was a horrific tragedy but the truth is this, and her point is this--we cannot change the outcome that four Americans are dead by arguing over whether or not a video was involved; our goal should be to figure out what went wrong and fix it in the hopes of preventing any similar tragedies. It was obvious to anyone with the ability to reason that it was a terrorist attack (President Obama said so that very first day in the Rose Garden); the first blush assumption was that attack could have been triggered by a video (there were millions of protesters all over the Middle East that day reacting to the video). UN Ambassador Susan Rice said repeatedly that weekend that it appeared to be related to the video but that as the information became available, that could change.

                        • 18 votes
                        #2.19 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:42 AM EST

                        Jody I did not ignore her comment "at this point" because it makes no diiference at ANY point. the truth is the truth now or in a year from now. It makes no difference. The democratic way seems to be if we screw up and give it enough time it will become irrelivent, but if a republican screws up we can use that forever. I would love to stay and agrue with you but your immaturity makes it really tough and I have to get to the gym and work on rehabing my leg. Godd luck with your fantasies and don't forget to keep those cheerleading panties by your side at all times.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.20 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:52 AM EST

                        Ah Yes, The attack of the liberals.. You do know that the composers of the Constitution all but demanded that American citizens form Militia and be prepared,armed and proficient in survival and war tactics to protect themselves from a government that was overstepping its charge.. You and your liberal leaders have made Militia a bad word through propaganda and the above social bashing.. Sure their are a few people that get carried away but calling them Taliban is one of the most ignorant attempts at subterfuge that I have heard lately.. Just because you choose to be helpless if there was a disaster does not mean everyone else should as well.. Thinking a controlling police state is a warm and cozy blanket of protection for you just because they say it is?? Wow you must have failed history or fallen under the spell of those are outdated ideas propaganda..

                        Hillary did the Potomac two step like the pro she is.. The fact that there was a deliberate attempt at a cover up over the attacks is a serious matter.. The fact that this was not an embassy but a CIA compound set up to distribute high tech untraceable weapons like man portable anti aircraft rockets is scary and classified.. We await the false flag downing of commercial or military aircraft by extremists to usher in another war for our military.. Ohio is a perfect example of a state that is controlled by the liberal population centers.. Just 5 out of the total counties voted a majority for liberal/Obama and the rest did not..

                        • 1 vote
                        #2.21 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:10 PM EST

                        Paul, you ask a lot of questions, but you don't really want to hear the answers.

                        It's easy to be critical now, after the fact. The real fact is that we do not have all of the facts. That's also the reason why things happened the way they did. Terrorism succeeds because it is spontaneous. A rush to assign facts or blame often obscures the real events.

                        You seem more intent on assigning blame than discovering facts. And you accuse others of being immature?

                        • 11 votes
                        #2.22 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:15 PM EST

                        Paul I ain't trying to bully you into anything. I find it very interesting that you choose to post on one on my threads and then accuse me of bullying you. Paranoid much. Let me make this perfectly clear to you . I didn't do anything but put up my thoughts. Folks are free to put up theirs or not. Some do Some don't. So before you accuse me of anything I suggest that you take the time to start a thread of your own about anything you want. I've heard just about enough of folks accusing me of this or that when all you'll do is wait of a morning for somebody like me to put something up so you'll can bitch about. You don't like the way things are going or the way your being treated feel free to start your own. In the meantime you can kiss my Old Rusty Crusty Ass.

                        • 12 votes
                        #2.23 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:49 PM EST

                        Sounds as if these people are doing what could be called a nobel and necessary thing. Why would anyone fault them for acting in the scenario described? Should anyone put up with such a scenario? Would you? And wasn't this 'forum' about the perfidious Secretary of State and her blustering, lying and such? If you don;t like guns, don't buy one. If the NRA bites your buns, don't join. If you can defend Hillary, give it a shot without just bad-mouthing people.

                          #2.24 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:05 PM EST

                          Our government owes you and I the belief it is acting on our behalf. Our government has to earn and keep our trust. Individuals trump the government. We owe one another good citizenship. The government has made itself into an intrusive pain. All that is happening in our government's relation with us lately is its continuous attempts to increase its powers and diminish our rights.

                            #2.25 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:10 PM EST

                            feldon,

                            I ask a loy of questions because answers are exactly what I want. They also seem to be the one thing that is not forthcoming. You siad terrorism succeds because it is spontaneous when the exact opposite is true. 9/11 was anything but spontaneous as was bengazei. In fact if you take most of the acts of terrorism they are well planned attacks. That applies to both foriegn and domestic. Do you really think Timothy McVey just got up one morning and siad I think I'll bomb something. I seriously doubt it. And your absolutely right in that we do not have all the facts. Wasn't that was this investigation all about? I actually want evry one of the participants in this investigation to get on the stand and tell the damn truth. But it doesn't seem like that is going to happen.

                            And Rednaeck, bullying is exactly what you are trying to do to anyone who doesn't agree with you. You sound like Biden thinking that if he says the same thing louder and louder itr becomes the truth. And as far as being on YOUR thread, please get a grip. I had not heard that NBC had been sold, especially to you. Like I said, Bullying. And I'm very sorry but I wouldn't kiss your crusty ass with Roselles lips. You posted

                            "Let me make this perfectly clear to you . I didn't do anything but put up my thoughts. Folks are free to put up theirs or not". But if they don't agree with you you insult, deride and denigrate them. That is textbook bullying. Did I hit a nerve or are you just overly sensitive?

                              #2.26 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:33 PM EST

                              Tom

                              I have lived my life free from government intrusion. I pay my taxes and make my mortgage payment. My taxes provide funds to protect us from hostile forces in the world and allow me to drive on generally pothole free roadways. If ever the government invades my space, I can hire a lawyer and fight for my rights.

                              Our government is the government of the people and by the people. We vote for our representatives who pass our laws. To take up arms against our government is essentially treason.

                              One's intrusive pain of government regulation is another's clean air, clean water, or better working conditions. Democracy demands that the public interest is served even if some individuals are inconvenienced by some of the rules. The greater good is what good government serves.

                              When profiteers scam us with fraudulent mortgage schemes, it is the government's role to protect us. Bankers may complain, but I think they deserve the regulations they operate under.

                              Almost every rule and regulation is the result of addressing some wrong perpetrated on citizens of these United States by people or companies pursuing their self-interest.

                              Pursuit of the greater good sometimes demands sacrifices from individuals. A democracy cannot serve everyone's specific self interest. But, the greater good is generally served.

                              • 6 votes
                              #2.27 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:39 PM EST

                              MOmaid

                              HMM--my guess on Fast and Furious would be that the so-called 'business model' came from GANGS and the related drug trade/cartels. I'm not a survivalist, so I really couldn't say, but I have NEVER seen any articles where 'rival' survivalists have drive by shootings, or vow to wipe out the existance of the rival gangs because they are interfering with the other group's criminal activities. PS--I too am from MU, my daugher, in 2001, became the 5th generation in the family to graduate from there, and we have ALL owned guns. I don't any more, but I used to enjoy target shooting, just as anybody who likes to go to the local HS gym and shoot baskets, and folks at the local pub like to shoot darts.

                              Now, I think the actual survivalists ARE paranoid. I don't necessarily think you or I can call them cowards.

                              One of the bravest things a person can do is stand up for what they believe is right, in the face of opposition

                              MOmaid

                              It's good to finally see someone who can say what needs to be said without showing the ignorance of seeing how low they can stoop to cut others down without even knowing those they try to hurt. It sounds like we are basically from the same generation since I am also in my 60s, was raised around guns and an avid hunter and love to fish as well. My husband and I are neither republicans or democrats....before each election we toss a coin and the winner chooses one of the parties to study their candidates, the loser gets the other and we split on the other candidates as well. I have missed on some of my actual votes. We did not vote for Carter or Clinton on his second term & I didn't vote for Obama either time but I'm glad I didn't vote for them since our research was right on! Both of us put a great amount of time into finding as much out about the candidates and have so far been pretty accurate on our decisions and have voted democrat, republican and, independent over the years! Guess we are a little strange but we like to know all we can about people who are making important decisions that affect us!

                              I usually glance through some of these things a few times a week just to see if there is any intelligent people with something to say and so far you're one of the few I've come across!!

                                #2.28 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:53 PM EST

                                Paul - Would you please use spell check. I am no grammar genius but your laziness with it is shameful. You do not even capitalize the nouns. If you are such a hard working man of intelligence, then why do you look so lazy at communication?

                                • 1 vote
                                #2.29 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:13 PM EST

                                Paul, you make a lot of sense. The majority of dems on this post have quite thin skin. Let 'em have it!

                                  #2.30 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:59 PM EST

                                  Thanks Anniegh but I think I'm about done with this post. After the attempt to correct my typing (by the way I am a terrible typist) it's time to let the liberals rant and rave till their blue in the face. I am over 60 and when I was in school you took shop or typing. I took shop. My mind tends to move faster then my fingers can hunt and peck. AFTER ALL, i THOUGHT IT WAS THE THOUGHTS THAAT WERE IMPORTANT. aPPARENTLY IT'S HOW WELL YOU TYPE. And yes Bill, that was on porpose.

                                    #2.31 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:02 PM EST

                                    jeff-1945027

                                    And, be sure to pay your taxes. Oh, that's right you collect welfare. Nevermind....

                                    Spoken like a true Red Stater, I'm on the guvmnt dole, teabagg'in patriot.

                                      #2.32 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:21 PM EST
                                      Reply

                                      I wish that Obama actually wanted to get rid of the GOP, like Boehner states. Imagine if he took office and put the Bush administration on trail for their war crimes and lying to the American people, all so that they could make millions while thousands of our young men and women died! The Republicans are freaking out over one American death brought on by a terrorist attack while they were the ones responsible for thousands of American deaths, along with hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths!

                                      • 32 votes
                                      #3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:16 AM EST

                                      Actually, the GOP is freaking out over the FACT that the Obama administration deliberatly MISLED the American people because the storyline of a terrorist attack was not consistent with their political story that "Al Qaida is decimated and on the run".

                                      LYING IS LYING

                                      • 9 votes
                                      #3.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:22 AM EST

                                      Not to mention their cut spending regardless if the money is needed or not so their rich buddies, which many are in that club could enjoy a whopping $7500 more dollars in their off shore banking accounts. Sick bastards ought to be exterminated and the old republican party that was relevant and American put in their place. They have cut taxes for the very rich over and over again, giving loopholes to the point where we have a revenue problem, not a spending problem. The end of fascism in America is very, very near.

                                      • 21 votes
                                      #3.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:26 AM EST

                                      I understand the story. I just find it odd that they are having hearings about the potential cover up of one death, when the same party was responsible for the deaths of thousands. Their lies were not used to cover up killing, but to initiate the killing. On top of the lies to get us to war, they also broke international rules of war.

                                      • 25 votes
                                      #3.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:29 AM EST

                                      Hey Steveo I know you are in a drug induced haze but it is four murders, not one.

                                      Try to figure out what everyone is talking about before showing what an ignoramus you are ok?

                                      • 5 votes
                                      #3.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:01 AM EST

                                      Keep raving GOP, according to Boehner President Obama's going to get rid of the GOP, you'll just disappear never to be seen or heard from again.

                                      • 13 votes
                                      #3.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:19 AM EST

                                      Give him a break "The Dev"" ..... liberals/"progressives" and basic math do not mix together very well !

                                      Besides, liberals still want to make the conversation about the 4 deaths per se, when the real issue is the lies and the CAMAPIGN OF MISINFORMATION which emanated in the aftermath of this tragedy .... all designed to cover up the truth ! When will we know who created the whopper, the BIG LIE of blaming it on "spontaneous demonstrations" that got out of control ? Which government official thought up that massive lie ?? Was it Obama himself ??

                                      • 6 votes
                                      #3.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:19 AM EST

                                      I remember the days of the 'Red Scare'. You know, a 'commie' behind every bush. Well, that threat really never materialized. But here now, in 2013 (and before), we have an openly malicious group, mascarading as 'patriots', trying to cheat in every way possible. Their hunger for power, their hatred for anything or anyone that doesn't represent their ideology is anything but discreet.

                                      It is a scary thing to see a traitorous group such as this (and I'm talking about the Tea Party) able to so brazenly display their disregard of justice or truth. These are the real enemy. I hope for the safety of us all, they become a thing of the past.

                                      • 16 votes
                                      #3.7 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:27 AM EST

                                      Boy, and I thought Joe was pathetic. Reading The Dev's quick-witted, intelligent response (and childish berating) of Steveo, and Jim's (and all Repubs) infatuation with a trivial talking-point, pathetic behaviour must be the common thread that holds the Republican Party together. I am not sure if we should continue to let you die your slow death, of if we should just exercise our 2nd Amendment Rights and take you out back of the woodshed and get it over with quickly. Spontaneous demonstration, a bunch of guys pissed off who wanted revenge, our a designed assault on the US, it doesn't matter to me why, just that they DID and something needs to be done! As for cover-ups, you guys own the Playbook with Nixon, Reagan, and Dubya .... paaaaaaleeeeeeease.

                                      • 11 votes
                                      #3.8 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:41 AM EST

                                      "War Crimes" like Obama* and Holder selling assault weapons to foreign insurgents

                                      • 6 votes
                                      #3.9 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:50 AM EST

                                      Get rid of the GOP and repeal everything that they did.

                                      So re-enact Slavery and repeal the Equal rights Amendments and just undo everything the Republicans did.

                                      not smart of you is it? Socialistdemocratic party Liberals?

                                      • 6 votes
                                      #3.10 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:54 AM EST

                                      Antha--several years ago I saw an article in Time Magazine (hardly a right wing rag!) which stated that in 2040, Europe would be TOTALLY dominated (majority population, due to immigration, legal and illegal, plus their much larger reproductive rate than the native populations in Europe) by MUSLIMS. Fundamentalist Muslims. And that the whole of Europe would be under Sharia law.

                                      Now, in the US, we have one party that wants the "majority" to be able to dictate to the 'minority',

                                      (dems, and pubs, respectively) and that really scares me, because at some point in the future, the Majority may not be a POLITICAL party but rather a party of RELIGIOUS Zealots.

                                      It's why I want the PUBs to get OFF pushing THEIR religious beliefs (especially on civil issues such as abortion and gay rights) but I EQUALLY want the Dems to get over the belief that 'the majority rules' absolutely. The constitution of the US says the majority RULES ONLY when it does not take rights away from the minority to do so.

                                      And included in those rights is the right to make money if you are good at something (or even just LUCKY) and to be able to KEEP most of it. I'm ALL for 'helping out' the helpless, for maintaining programs like Medicare and Medicaid, for those who truly need it, but when you start pushing an agenda where the Wealthy OWE the non wealthy some of their money, the greed runs pretty strongly on BOTH the part of the one who HAS the money, and those who want to take it (by legalized stealing thru taxes) away from them.

                                      And PS, no, I'm NOT in the 1%, NOT a Republican, but I DO, by virtue of having done all things right (and I will admit some of it was luck!) A) I live in a PAID OFF home (which means no mortgage interest deductions), B) I RAISED my kids to be independent, and to be out on their OWN (No dependents for deductions)C) and I'm reasonably healthy (no medical deductions). and so I PERSONALLY pay a full 15% in income tax on income of less than $50K.

                                      And you know what? I'd be HAPPY to pay more, if that increase would SOLELY be used to pay DOWN the debt. But NOT to increase so-called 'entitlement' spending. I've watched, for 45 years (since I was in HS) the advent of the Welfare State, and can only point out that while short term, welfare recipients are marginally better off, LONG term, they are not--only dependent.

                                      • 5 votes
                                      #3.11 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:58 AM EST

                                      Iamnotyou--you DO know the Equal Rights amendment NEVER passed the number of states it needed, and therefore never took affect?

                                      • 4 votes
                                      #3.12 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:01 AM EST

                                      Iamnotyou - you are right, you are not. Thank God.

                                        #3.13 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:12 AM EST

                                        It is about time somebody step up, and put a stop to the political rhetoric the republicans are attempting to gain...Where were these morons when thousands of troops were killed in Iraq? Thanks to Hillary for finally having enough of their @!$%#. One advice to the silent members of the democratic party. Find your back bone or balls to throw the @!$%# back at the republicans. They don't seems to having any problems doing it. Or get off the pot, and let the next person step in. Why not ask the republican members of congress, who is the party denying the funding for increase protection of the embassies?

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #3.14 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:29 AM EST

                                        Ironically, President Obama doesn't have to lift a finger to cause the GOP to implode, they self-destructed all by themselves.

                                        • 14 votes
                                        #3.15 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:49 AM EST

                                        @MO - I think Imanoyou was referring to the CIVIL Rights Act.

                                          #3.16 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:14 PM EST

                                          I thought the whole hearing was about decieving us. The four deaths matter for all time. If the Dems keep on pulling off such poor showings, the GOP will rule in spite of themselves.

                                            #3.17 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:13 PM EST

                                            Ah, the claim that Republicans are responsible for freeing slaves....that Republican party doesn't exist.....they changed to the Democratic party you know. Equal rights does not exist for women FYI. It was not passed. The Republican Party of Abe Lincoln (part of the Whig party that fell before the civil war) wanted equal rights, civil liberties, and government to help pursue happiness and modernize the economy. (stay with me now). Today's Republicans seem to not want to pay attention to that. They still want to claim that they are Lincoln's party and throw out things about the Democratic party (old Democrat-Republican party) did during our early times and growth of our country. Yes, the Democratic party wanted to follow the southern philosophy and allow themselves slaves, women read the bible and had no business doing anything else. Also stood by the urban workers, farmers and immigrants (still does), Manifest Destiny (sounds more current Republican), opposed a national bank, and better equality to all WHITE MEN. They ran the Native Americans almost to extinction because of land and expansions of farms and the war in Mexico. They dominated the South, opposed a civil rights movement and supported the disenfranchisement of the blacks. During Cleveland, The Democrates supported "hands free government", capitalism, banking, business interests, and overseas expansion. ( you guys getting it yet?). After the prohibition was passed (which the democrates opposed. why? because of religion. oh yeah. Catholics, yup, Catholics, wanted government to stay of the others business and not dictate......Wait for it......MORALITY!!! Holy crap. So the great depression is approaching. William Bryan comes in and says, "hey lets have silver coins." Or the free-silver movement, which was to flood cash in through the government to help the economy. Democrats (the conservatives) freaked out and formed the National Democratic Party. Although he lost, he gained control of the media and started gaining attention from the lower class. Then we now have the progressive era. Republicans gained control over most of the US. Teddy was in control. Bryan then started to push for a more progressive movement: income taxes and direct election of Senators, reduced tariffs, hour and pay benefits, outlawing child labor. All passed under Wilson. But then many Democrates started leaving the party and joining the Republicans and the same for the Republicans joining Democrats. Then around FDR the party started pushing liberalism: equal rights to everyone, help those that can not fend for themselves, and denouncing the KKK. FDR changed things for the party. Moved away from lassie-faire and conservative capitalism. He moved more towards government against hardship and more regulation on the economy and support for labor unions. And got the US out of the great depression. And thus the new meaning of the Republican and Democratic party. Liberal vs conservatives. Under Truman unions were more prominent and pushed the dixie-crats such as Thurmond out of the party. Started NATO. Hollywood got involved in politics and ran by your favorite Republican Ronald Reagan (started the Reagancrats). And had the anti-communist movement, which caused him to lose some support from his party. Then by JFK it completely morphed into the party it is mostly known for today. He pushed for civil rights and racial integration. Then the Catholics started voting Republican for the most part. Blacks who normally voted Republican started voting Democrat. And the Southern Democrats left the party completely. This concludes your Republican/Democratic Party history lesson.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #3.18 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:52 PM EST

                                            Imanoyou: The Equal Rights Amendment was passed by the 92nd congress (both houses were democrat) and signed by Richard Nixon. It has not yet found support in enough states to have become a true amendment.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #3.19 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:55 PM EST

                                            Jen/That was interesting.Thank you!

                                              #3.20 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:15 PM EST
                                              Reply

                                              Great Post IR......Domestic Terrorists is another name for them, they are working at undermining the government, and whatever comes from that. Typical conservative strategy, accuse others of what they themselves work at to become a reality.

                                              • 25 votes
                                              Reply#4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:20 AM EST

                                              Bull$hit ! Who created the campaign of misinformation after this tragedy ? Why all the lies ??

                                              • 9 votes
                                              #4.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:21 AM EST

                                              Why is the Democratic party controlling the media?

                                              Are they afraid of the truth?

                                              Like the true fact that Obama* got a $375,000 fine from the FEC for the campaign violations during the 2008 election. why was that information held back untill after the 2012 election?

                                              I can only wonder how much the payoff will be for the 2012 election violations by Obama*

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #4.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:00 AM EST

                                              BearDown-3307297 wrote" The right loves Reagan's election. They can look to that and claim ultimate victory. But that was 23 years ago. You've controlled a single branch of congress for a total of 8 years since then. You've lost 5 of the last 6 POTUS elections by popular vote."

                                              Yet they still want to blame the economy on Bush. How pathetic can the IGNORANT LEFT get to not realize that.

                                                #4.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:43 AM EST

                                                jim, the campaign of misinformation and lies was done by the GOP, and aided by the likes of FOX, Drudge, Breitbart and the other buffoons who aren't interested in the truth and never have been.

                                                • 11 votes
                                                #4.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:54 AM EST
                                                Reply

                                                Grandstanding, GOP Style. Yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified before both the Senate and the House. Nothing new about that since Congress loves them some hearings; most are good and worthwhile, some are not. Yesterday's was mostly grandstanding by GOPTPers who refuse to accept the truth even if provided to them etched in stone. One thing the GOPTP forgot, Hillary Clinton takes no guff from grandstanding yahoos, Senator or Representatives; she never did and she never will. They also forgot that Hillary Clinton is a stickler for details, does her homework, and is one who digs down deep into the weeds to get to the truth. Woe be to those who forgot that yesterday.

                                                There were quite a few grandstanding GOPTPers yesterday. Most ignored the role they played in the Benghazi tragedy, they refuse to accept their share of responsibility for the four dead Americans and instead look for a scapegoat. It was Congress that cut $296-300 million from State Department embassy security budgets before Benghazi despite the fact that during the Bush years alone, there were 11 terrorist attacks on US Embassies world wide; not all involved fatalities but they were clear warnings of the dangers our Embassies and Staffs face every single day. Congress also turned down the pre-Benghazi special request for additional funding for embassy security. There have been several requests for money since Benghazi; those requests sit in the House without any action....but that didn't stop Houe republicans from behaving outrageously yesterday. Recently, the Senate passed Hurricane Sandy relief aid which included the transfer of $1.3 million from Iraqi security to the State Department for embassy security. The HOUSE STRIPPED THAT FUNDING from the bill.

                                                Senator Rand Paul made a complete fool of himself in addition to displaying to all how highly he thinks of himself. Sorry, Senator, you aren't worthy of using a presidential pen let alone every being President. Bet Paul doesn't read all the emails or letters his office receives. Turkey?

                                                Senator McCain rambled on about having so many questions he wanted answered yet his alloted time was spent--not in asking those questions he claims to have--but rather in giving his worn-out, multiple press conferences speech about US Ambassador Rice. McCain knows he is wrong but that doesn't matter. He gave the same little speech he has been presenting since 9/11/2012 and asked almost no questions. Later when asked, McCain said he still didn't have the answers--too bad he didn't ask them. McCain then added that he wondered why no one responded to the cables expressing security concerns received from our Libyan Embassy as well as Ambassador Stevens; he then added that he had also received a cable from Amb Stevens. Perhaps the media should be asking Senator McCain exactly WHY HE FAILED to do something if he was so concerned. Could it be that McCain's concern only became a concern after the tragedy.

                                                Yesterday, Hillary Clinton spent five hours answering questions, providing specifics and details, reasoned thinking and factual evidence. She responded, often to the ridiculous, with grace, dignity and self-confidence. Over and over, we viewers and those in Congress were reminded of the truth but truth is not what the GOPTPers seek--it never was.

                                                • 35 votes
                                                Reply#5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:21 AM EST

                                                Hi Jody,

                                                Senator McCain showed the Nation how bad his judgement is when he picked Sarah Palin as his Vice-President running mate in 2008. That move in itself should have sealed his fate as a Senator, and he is no longer fit to serve.

                                                Just try to imagine the danger we would be facing as a Nation if those two were in command.

                                                • 33 votes
                                                #5.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:29 AM EST

                                                Well said Jody,

                                                Hillary Clinton was spectacular yesterday against a set of conservatives, who don't have a tenth of her brain power and it showed. Rand Paul, that little man with delusional dreams of being the most powerful man in the world, was an embarrassment. Yes, Turkey.....Hillary is still scratching her head on that one. Most of these men are not elected because of their intellect, that was proven time and again yesterday, they are there because of their ability to lie, to deceive their gullible constituents through their ideology.

                                                Well I would say they came up empty in their zeal for a political scalp.

                                                • 31 votes
                                                #5.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:38 AM EST

                                                Job 1, so true, Palin was a terrible choice. The most important decision a candidate can make is their VP pick and he failed miserably. McCain has become a bitter, angry man who sees everything as a means to get revenge for his own bad judgement. Really sad to watch him. Once in a blue moon, we see a flash of the old McCain but it is rare.

                                                I see the Edit gremlins didn't even post my spell edit in the right place. Ahh, well.

                                                • 26 votes
                                                #5.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:39 AM EST

                                                With Rand Paul leading the parade, oblivion is just down the road. The quality of Ron Paul's DNA seems to be in steep decline ... perhaps his sperm used flotation devices.

                                                • 21 votes
                                                #5.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:41 AM EST

                                                Excellent post Jody. Secretary Clinton was masterful. I wonder how many of us, who conduct our lives outside of that insane atmosphere in Washington, wouldn't have heard Paul's talk of being President and said, "You're kidding, right? You? President?"

                                                Would you have been able to listen to Ron Johnson's talk about a "simple phone call" and not say, "You can't possibly be that damned stupid."?

                                                Would you have been able to listen to that condescending, insipid, senile bastard McCain without asking how he managed to get out of his straitjacket?

                                                Secretary Clinton has learned diplomacy well. She smacked the hell out of those lightweights as only a diplomat can.

                                                • 28 votes
                                                #5.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:43 AM EST

                                                David Walker--sorry, I'm a big Hillary fan, preferred her to Obama in '08, think she has done a decent job as SoS, but when I watched the hearings yesterday (nearly half of the time of which was taken up by various Dems repeating ad nauseum effulsive glowing praise for Clinton's service, when all they needed to do after the 1st one was say "ditto'') but I thought Hillary's little snit-fit ("What DIFFERENCE does it make?") was definitely planned, and intentionally done, to obscure the facts that someone dropped the ball on the Benghazi killings, and then tried to cover it up until after the election (successfully, I might add) so that Obama could still be campaigning on defeating al Quada and thus being strong on foreign policy.

                                                And in my 60 some odd years, I can remember another 'angry snit' (I am NOT a CROOK) that was said for the same reason--to cover up one of the speaker's underlings doing something STUPID.)

                                                Secretary Clinton HAS learned Diplomacy well. And part of diplomacy is being able to LIE to someone's face and make them feel like THEY were doing the wrong thing.

                                                Hillary SHOULD, on Sept. 12th, have just said, "we screwed up, and I am immediately implementing changes in policy to prevent it from happening again. Obama should have praised her, and otherwise, kept his people OUT of the media.

                                                He, and she, and Rice, were guilty of assuming that Americans were STUPID. Unfortunately, they were right.

                                                  #5.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:14 AM EST

                                                  MOmaid:

                                                  I specifically addressed the "What difference does it make," poutrage comment of the day above. You focus on the praise from Democrats. That's standard Washington Senatorial toga talk.

                                                  What you don't seem to notice is the incredibly insipid comments/questions of Paul, McCain, and Johnson, which displayed not only their shocking ignorance, but amounted to outright attacks on Secretary Clinton's credibility.

                                                  No one, right up to this moment, has shown that the Secretary lied. No one. That wasn't a "snit-fit". That was anger, and she had every right to be angry.

                                                  You want a mea culpa? She began her testimony with a mea culpa, and she has never backed away from that. Indeed, she has accepted full responsibility virtually from day one.

                                                  But no, the Republicans want to strip the flesh from her bones. They acted as bullies, but as someone who has actually learned something in my 60+ years, I know you find a coward when you strip a bully.

                                                  You are embarrassingly ignorant.

                                                  • 14 votes
                                                  #5.7 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:36 AM EST

                                                  Thanks, friends; glad you added to my thoughts.

                                                  MOmaid, why do you ignore the rest of Clinton's comment, "what difference does it make, AT THIS POINT...."? She wasn't talking about the four dead Americans, she was addressing the lunacy of debating whether or not a video was the cause. If you had actually been watching, you would have heard the entire comment and why it was made. My guess is you heard only one small portion of it by listening to right-wing media.

                                                  • 11 votes
                                                  #5.8 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:20 PM EST

                                                  I kept thinking how penny-wise and pound-foolish the GOP was yesterday---they gave her a platform to showcase her considerable skills and she used it to her advantage. Did they think she would wilt? Be unprepared? Once again they underestimated their opponent and it showed.

                                                  • 7 votes
                                                  #5.9 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:42 PM EST

                                                  Biden is a good choice? Yuk!

                                                    #5.10 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:15 PM EST

                                                    "It doesn't matter, now"

                                                    The way I look at this statement is, if it fits the end game, that is all that matters. Both parties have been doing this for many, many, many years. The last 2 POTUS have taken it over the top.

                                                    You are all extremists. On both sides! You have nothing to offer.

                                                    Just reading a half a page of comments, and the fire & brimstone from both sides, is beyond hilarious.

                                                    For the sake of all, I hope you pull your heads out, and open your eyes. I doubt it will happen though as your single minded(my side) has blinded you all.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #5.11 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:48 PM EST

                                                    I start by saying that in my opinion Mrs. Clinton was the true brains in the Clinton Presidency.I am contemptuous of the T.P./Rep. attacks,often without foundation,but usually with hatred from the far right of their party. I consider that a former G.O.P. has become the entrenched home of all of the dangerous right wing groups of this country.I am not in favour of un-American investigation groups.I think that they are greater UN-American than the groups whom they investigate,but this alleged T.P. within the G.O.P. could get my vote to be investigated.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #5.12 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:39 PM EST
                                                    Reply

                                                    President Obama does not want to “annihilate” the Republican Party. However, today's Republican Party is out of order and too extreme. They as a party need to start cleaning house in order to restore themselves back to a party that can be respected once again. It would be great if they as a whole could become more of a moderate party.

                                                    We have to remember conservatism is dying in our Nation, and this old brand is seeing itself shrink and disappear.

                                                    • 23 votes
                                                    Reply#6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:21 AM EST

                                                    Boehner"s analysis:

                                                    "And let me just tell you, I do believe that is their goal - to just shove us into the dustbin of history."

                                                    Self reflection is not the strong suit of Boehner or the rest of the GOP leadership.

                                                    This is the best he can do, after standing on the steps of the Capital on Monday, seeing the sea of people cheering our President, hearing Obama's call to action to work for the common good of all the people.

                                                    Boehner has been leading the party of no for so long, all he can see is the many dead ends his party have set up for themselves. He has no way to lead his party in the House to act on behalf of the American people. No new ideas or ways to compromise on any issue.

                                                    • 21 votes
                                                    #6.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:47 AM EST

                                                    Orange man is no more a leader than a lemming. If his party disappears it's because they did it to themselves. When you start messing with a person's right to vote, especially in minority areas, you have "awakened a sleeping dragon." The GOP cannot win fairly, so they cheat at every and any level, local, state and they tried nationally but lost big time. If they go, perhaps a better GOP will emerge from the ashes, the party of Eisenhower and Gen. Powell.

                                                    • 11 votes
                                                    #6.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:24 AM EST

                                                    If the loyal opposition becomes as you what difference is there between them and you? And if you use phoney hype to describe the differences between their philosophy and yours with empty value words like 'extreme' who will pay you attention?

                                                      #6.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:17 PM EST
                                                      Reply

                                                      Ran Paul, the narcissistic idiot from Kentucky, says he would SACK Hillary if he were President. What a jerk. Well, he's not President, nor will he EVER be President. I'm sure his father is embarrassed by his son. As for Hillary, as usual like the true professional she is, she made the Repugs look like children. Not even in the same league. And John Mc Cain. Can he get any more senile? Do him, and us a favor and put him out to pasture.

                                                      • 29 votes
                                                      Reply#7 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:26 AM EST

                                                      I would rather see that buck toothed pant suit wearing goober Hillary put out to pasture. Oh yea, "What difference does it make."

                                                      • 7 votes
                                                      #7.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:32 AM EST

                                                      Chris Rhodes... Oh, what a scholarly reply. NOT!

                                                      • 15 votes
                                                      #7.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:00 AM EST

                                                      Hilldog is no scholar so no need to treat the dog like one.

                                                      • 5 votes
                                                      #7.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:05 AM EST

                                                      Hillary did not make the Republicans look like children except in your liberal "brain" which is unable to recognize she was merely "deflecting".

                                                      After this tragedy, Susan Rice, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton ALL gave out false "reasons" for the attack. Why the need to create the fairy tale about what happened ? Oh yeah ... there was this election "thingy" and Obama wanted U.S. citizens to actually believe Al Qaeda was on the run !!

                                                      Thus, the campaign of lies and misinformation was created ... all for political purposes to aid re-election !

                                                      • 6 votes
                                                      #7.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:26 AM EST

                                                      Hillary was an out of control, extremely defensive, over emotional pussy riot if I ever saw one.

                                                        #7.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:45 AM EST

                                                        CaliforniaTom, well said.

                                                        Chris who will never be a Rhodes Scholar except in his dreams: four Americans are dead, "What difference does it make AT THIS POINT..." to argue over whether or not a video was the cause. Oh, never mind, why let the truth and the full comment interfere with your right-wing talking point.

                                                        As for me, I'm glad Bush/Cheney and his masters of lies, death and destruction are out to pasture.

                                                        • 8 votes
                                                        #7.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:38 PM EST

                                                        Any criticism of a former First Lady, former US Senator, and current US Sec. of State that focuses on her appearance, really is just like saying nothing at all. We are all born with a DNA that determines our appearance and innate intelligence.

                                                        Some, such as those who choose to poke fun at a person's appearance, were apparently shortchanged on the innate intelligence part of their DNA.

                                                        Sec. of State Hillary Clinton has exceptional intellect, a world view that is as informed as anyone's, and a sincerity that her critics cannot even begin to comprehend.

                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        #7.7 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:39 PM EST

                                                        yes i dont give a rats ass about her appearance, why are you bringing THAT up again? what about hers and the powers that be really bad decision making? is THAT not what we need to focus on?

                                                          #7.8 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:27 PM EST

                                                          Have we all forgotten that the intelligence community is responsible for providing the talking points to the admin based on their intelligence reports, not on a journalists opinion of what might be happening?

                                                          Once again, the TPRepubs are steering the conversation by using shoulda' coulda' woulda' logic instead of depending on the professionals to tell them what IS happening, or what really happened in retrospect. We should all trust Fox News over General Patraeus and the intelligence community? I think not.

                                                          You wonder why police typically don't comment on an active investigation? It's because journalists tend to publish rumours and unsubstantiated facts before all leads have been pursued and verified. Sometimes, it turns out the initial reports are true. Sometimes, they are not. When they are not, the unintended consequences of jumping to conclusions can be more harmful than waiting for more information before taking action.

                                                          What would the fallout have been if it really was a demonstration and we had gone in with drones or attack helicopters and wiped out a hundred civilians? What questions would the TPRepubs be asking now?

                                                            #7.9 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:32 PM EST

                                                            here's one for you hillary folks, if she is so dang smart as you say she is, WHY ? is she still married to bill? seems to me she should have dumped his womanizing ass a long time ago, right? or does that give her brownie points and sympathy from the minions? the , she is so strong statement is confusing me, this coming from women, because if i had done to my wife what bill did to his she would have dropped me like a hot potato and all her girlfriends would be saying, that scum, you go girl! but i guess if you are seeking political office and power, a little thing like your husbands infidelity can be overlooked ...............................interesting, but hell it's just an observation, dont wanna ruin anyone's squeaky clean image of her .

                                                              #7.10 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:36 PM EST

                                                              why? does the left keep referring to everyone watching fox news? is that the only stupid excuse you can bring up for people thinking for themselves and not wanting to jump on the we know whats best for you wagon? for christs sakes find a new excuse you have beat that dead horse too damn long

                                                                #7.11 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:40 PM EST
                                                                Reply

                                                                Paul Ryan: I don't see this as a rejection of our principles. [Because clearly we have no principles. We've spent the last four years shooting down our own ideas and proposals in a political effort to oppose the president on every single thing he's tried to do. The fact that he just won re-election therefore only proves that our ideas were right all along.] I think we need to do a better job of applying our principles to the problems of today, to show solutions to the country's biggest problems and how they relate in people's everyday lives. [We need to go back and show people how President Obama was actually using our ideas all along. Then the country will love us, because they sure seem to love him. It'll be just like how we shut down the government and impeached Bill Clinton, and now we can't stop talking about how much we like him and how well he worked with us and how his economic ideas were really all ours.]

                                                                • 21 votes
                                                                Reply#8 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:28 AM EST

                                                                It's too bad, Nathan, that the Reich wing has proven themselves over and over to be completely proof against irony, satire, or sarcasm. Were that not the case, your comment above would have brought many of them to their knees.

                                                                Love ya, man. Keep 'em coming!

                                                                • 16 votes
                                                                #8.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:54 AM EST

                                                                Nathan and FoxTrotsky, you're my favorite posters so far today!

                                                                • 11 votes
                                                                #8.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:17 AM EST

                                                                Nathan, FoxTrotsky, cheers. Paul Ryan wouldn't know a principle if it bit him in the.....

                                                                • 6 votes
                                                                #8.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:43 PM EST

                                                                Jody,

                                                                "If it bit him in the....." I can supply the rest, since you're looking for a substitute for the word "a$$"

                                                                Here goes......."If it bit him in the Feisty Redhead/Amerian Girl/Pigotry/Starsailing/Jody"

                                                                Just for starters.

                                                                  #8.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:08 PM EST
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  Edit gremlins; couldn't get my spelling corrections to post. That's allotted not alloted.

                                                                  • 11 votes
                                                                  Reply#9 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:30 AM EST

                                                                  They are really bad this morning.

                                                                  • 11 votes
                                                                  #9.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:41 AM EST
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  All laughable posts above. What do you expect from an MSNBC sponsored site to allow the truly delusional to post their view of the USA. If the "American People" as you call them really felt the GOP was too extreme, the the House would of moved back in Democratic control. If you look at the latest Janauray 11 Gallop Pole, the point difference between GOP and Democratic membersof Congress is not the great. Overall, Congress has an appoval of 14%. But please, keep deflecting and believing everything is fine. Its great entertainment.

                                                                  • 5 votes
                                                                  Reply#10 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:30 AM EST

                                                                  The only reason the House is still run by the good ol boys is because the gerrymandered districts. The good ol boys from the House lost the last election by 1.1 million votes.

                                                                  In fact since the 2010 mideterms we have had 3 sets of elections and the teaparty nuts have lost every one. How about you pay attention to what's going on?

                                                                  The nation sees the teabaggers for what ignorant bigotted nuts they are and is fixing its 2010 mistake.

                                                                  • 11 votes
                                                                  #10.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:00 AM EST

                                                                  Chris...

                                                                  What do you expect from an MSNBC sponsored site to allow the truly delusional to post their view of the USA.

                                                                  Now isn't it nice for MSNBC to allow you to post here?

                                                                  • 10 votes
                                                                  #10.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:08 AM EST

                                                                  The Gallop Pole? Isn't that used in horse racing?Apparently your Rhodes Scholarship-ness doesn' include knowledge!

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #10.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:48 AM EST

                                                                  If it's so demeaning Rhodes Scholar ( and I question that) what are you doing here???????

                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                  #10.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:29 AM EST

                                                                  Maybe Chris is misspelling that he once 'rode a scholar'?

                                                                  • 5 votes
                                                                  #10.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:11 PM EST

                                                                  Gallop(up) Poll? That was the poll that showed Mitt Romney leading by a big margin. Hey, scholar, we'll be sure to pay attention to that one.

                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  #10.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:49 PM EST
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  Obama does not want her to be the DNC candidate. He threw her under the bus along with S. Rice, but Libya is Hillary's BABY! she sponsored it, promoted it, defended it, bomb it(thru Obama), and it was her boy who was there and got killed, You mean to tell me, he could not pick up the phone and call her? do you mean to tell me, she was looking for terrorists under her skirts, and missed this one, you mean to tell me she did not GET the MEMO! OMG! her baby died and she was inside drinking at the bar, while the baby sat in a HOT car!!! that is negligence and incompetence.

                                                                  • 7 votes
                                                                  Reply#11 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:33 AM EST

                                                                  Obama does not want her to be the DNC candidate. He threw her under the bus along with S. Rice, but Libya is Hillary's BABY! she sponsored it, promoted it, defended it, bomb it(thru Obama), and it was her boy who was there and got killed, You mean to tell me, he could not pick up the phone and call her? do you mean to tell me, she was looking for terrorists under her skirts, and missed this one, you mean to tell me she did not GET the MEMO! OMG! her baby died and she was inside drinking at the bar, while the baby sat in a HOT car!!! that is negligence and incompetence.

                                                                  • 5 votes
                                                                  Reply#12 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:34 AM EST

                                                                  One idiotic posting is quite enough.

                                                                    #12.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:36 PM EST
                                                                    Reply

                                                                    First Read: "DiFi"? Really? In connection with such a serious and important issue as gun control legislation, Senator Feinstein deserves full NAME recognition for her actions.

                                                                    Such an effort to 'tag' everyone with short digital nicknames is offensive. President Bush diminished the stature of those who worked for him in a similar manner. I thought FR would seek higher ground.

                                                                    • 7 votes
                                                                    Reply#13 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:35 AM EST

                                                                    DiFi is a complete b!tch that deserves to be kicked out of the counrty.

                                                                    • 7 votes
                                                                    #13.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:56 AM EST
                                                                    Reply

                                                                    I'm here to SHOUT about my righteous indignation towards all of those socialist, fascist, communist, Nazi, un-American, welfare-getting, off-shore investing, liberal, neo-conservative, racist, sexist, illegal imigrant, rich 1 percenter posters here that do not agree totally with me! How anyone could have a different point of view makes my head explode. And why would anyone want to have a civil discussion when name-calling and cursing can solve problems so much quicker?

                                                                    Don't tread on my 1st Amendment right to free speeches, my 2nd Amendment right to arm bears, and my other amendment rights that I'm a little fuzzy on because I didn't pay attention in Social Studies class but I know they are there. I'm an American and I can be as stupid and foolish as I want - I think that's one of those other Amendments.

                                                                    • 15 votes
                                                                    Reply#14 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:45 AM EST

                                                                    Hey Flaming, what about the one that nobody ever mentions? Howzabout some love for the Third Amendment?

                                                                    Don't know about the rest of y'all, but I am plumb fed up with having soldiers quartered in my home! They won't take their boots off at the door, they hog the remote, and they put the milk away with about 1/2-oz in the bottom of the carton... ecchh!

                                                                    Support your right to arm bears (we take that one seriously here in Washington State, where bears are about as common as crows), and send those foreign soldiers home! Back to Canada with you rascals!

                                                                    • 13 votes
                                                                    #14.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:05 AM EST

                                                                    Love the humor!

                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                    #14.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:18 AM EST

                                                                    Shar - That's why I'm here. It's like teasing a cat with a laser pointer when you start yanking the chains of some of these posters. They take this stuff SO seriously. Like Sergeant Hukla said, "Lighten up, Francis!"

                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                    #14.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:43 PM EST

                                                                    back and fourth back and fourth, nothing ever gets debated here it seems, just hacked to death..sigh

                                                                      #14.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:45 PM EST
                                                                      Reply

                                                                      Never forget it was so called conservatives who ran up the dept in the first place.

                                                                      • 13 votes
                                                                      Reply#15 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:53 AM EST
                                                                      Comment author avatarThe DevExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                      Never forget Obutthole has run up 10+ Trillion new debt in....gulp....4 years.

                                                                      • 13 votes
                                                                      #15.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:57 AM EST

                                                                      Actually, it was more like $5.7 trillion so far, but by the time Obama's second term is ending .... it will be more like $21.6 trillion in debt, meaning Obama will have doubled the national debt of ALL HIS PREDECESSORS COMBINED !!!

                                                                      Of course, John B is merely playing the "blame game" liberals are so good at .... they are never responsible for anything bad ! LOL !!

                                                                      • 7 votes
                                                                      #15.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:30 AM EST

                                                                      jim Trolling again. Speaking of the "blame game". Your doing a good job of playing that same game. Your blaming the "liberals" for not being responsible. You know thats not true "liberals" are just as responsible as conservatives!

                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                      #15.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:58 AM EST

                                                                      @Dev...why so disrespectful. We got it that you don't like the current President, but to go out your way and make an insult like that is so uncalled for.

                                                                      • 4 votes
                                                                      #15.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:44 AM EST

                                                                      Smitty - if republicans, democrats and liberals were actually as fiscally responsible as conservatives, we would not have the fiscal issues we have. Conservatives are resonsible, republicans may or may not be.

                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                      #15.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:07 PM EST

                                                                      Dev, from your post I take it you're somewhere around 13 years old. Hopefully as you mature your intellect will expand.

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #15.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:38 PM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      Comment author avatarThe DevExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                      If there was a "honeymoon" then now the American people want a divorce from Hilldog, killer of Americans.

                                                                      • 8 votes
                                                                      Reply#16 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:54 AM EST

                                                                      What would you know about divorce? You are just resentful that a woman can kick grown men's asses

                                                                        #16.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:45 PM EST
                                                                        Reply
                                                                        Comment author avatarlyingleftExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                        Hillary Rotten Clinton is a lying POS.

                                                                        Typical leftwing nutcase, as are most of the idiot crazy leftnuts on here. Lie to save face and then have all the sheeple stooges on here agree.

                                                                        Pathetic.

                                                                        • 11 votes
                                                                        Reply#17 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:56 AM EST

                                                                        Very cool. A kindered soul.

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #17.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:58 AM EST

                                                                        I thought Hiliary would have been a good candidate in 2008. I would never vote for her now after she said, "What difference does it make?" Hiliary and Obama and his ENTIRE administration lied to the taxpayers for weeks. How could ANYONE vote for that?

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #17.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:37 AM EST

                                                                        CoCo, who do you think your kidding--you wouldn't vote for Hillary or any other democrat for President.

                                                                        • 8 votes
                                                                        #17.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:58 PM EST

                                                                        CoCo -

                                                                        The leeches will vote for anybody that promises them more freebies.

                                                                          #17.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:40 PM EST

                                                                          Funny, Lying left, she is more popular than EVRYONE in Congress. She has also been praised by a healthy share of the 'non-Teahadist' Republicans. So basically, you have nothing.

                                                                          Shes smart, successful and professional and she put the mysoginist duo Johnson and John 'I was at a TV show and couldnt be bothered' McCAin back in their respective cages.

                                                                          You got beat, lying Left, your candidate, your party and your silly austerity ideas. I know, Lying Left, LOSING an election is hard. And I know its hard for you to accept that a Black Man and a strong Woman have power in this country.

                                                                          I am enjoying your petty insults and whimpering though. Youir attitude may taste like sh$%, but it goes real well with wine (burp)

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #17.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:02 PM EST
                                                                          Reply

                                                                          This story presupposes that there is still some relevance to Republicans, which is absurd. Any hope they did have against Clinton was lost when she absolutely schooled them at the Benghazi hearing. She drove that wooden stake straight through the heart of the bloodsucking Republican party.

                                                                          • 14 votes
                                                                          Reply#18 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:57 AM EST

                                                                          Clinton answered nothing of substance. We know you liberals are hung up on the cutesy little soundbites like "schooled them" .... but her response that it "does not matter" belongs back in kindergarten with you !!

                                                                          The campaign of misinformation to try and lay blame for the 4 deaths on "spontaneous demonstrations that got out of a hand" was a total FABRICATION of this administration ! Why did they all ... Hillary, Susan Rice, and Barack Obama, feel compelled to tell the FAIRY TALE about what happened ????????

                                                                          • 7 votes
                                                                          #18.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:36 AM EST

                                                                          Who did Clinton "school"? She had her fat ass handed to her so bad her boxers fell down around her cankles. Meaningless though since nothing will happen because of it. She probably went out for drinks with that jerk off McCain after the show was over. people still don't get it. It's not the left vs. the right....it's the state vs. you!

                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                          #18.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:56 AM EST

                                                                          Second the motion. Put @!$%# back where it belongs. Good for Hillary. She is not one to be mess with.

                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                          #18.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:49 AM EST

                                                                          A woman hater. I feel sorry for your mom/wife/sister/daughter/friends.

                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #18.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:41 PM EST
                                                                          Reply

                                                                          Geez Louise we are barely into 2014 cant they give it a rest for awhile!!! And Rand Paul put a sock in it!!!

                                                                          • 5 votes
                                                                          Reply#19 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:57 AM EST

                                                                          Think your remark @ 1.29 should be read and remembered by all. These next 2 elections, city, county, state, and federal will shaped our lives forever. Forget all the party nonsense. Watch carefully how your representatives, sentors, council people and county commisssioners vote. Vote PERSON not party. Vote for who is best for YOU and your family. Party loyalty must be a thing of the past.

                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #19.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:34 AM EST

                                                                          CoCo, you do realize that a vote for the person IS a vote for THAT party's policies?

                                                                          Years ago, I did vote for the person I thought the best candidate until I realized that if I wasn't paying attention to the political ideology underneath that candidate, then I was not helping myself. I voted for Reagan the first time because he seemed to be the better candidate; then I realized exactly what his policies were doing to this country. As long as the republican party remains so extreme, anti-government, anti-women, anti-gay, anti-minority, anti-you-name-it and so unwilling to compromise and do what is best for the country; so long as its so-called principles are only applied when the other party is in the White House--I will never cast another vote for a republican period.

                                                                          • 6 votes
                                                                          #19.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:09 PM EST

                                                                          You CAN vote for the person at the local level.

                                                                          At the national level (and probably the state level), all politics is driven by campaign money. They will tell you anything you want to hear, but they are beholden to the campaign contributors who pay great sums of money for advertising either for or against you. And the under the table money from lobbyists is too lucrative to vote your principles instead of your wallet.

                                                                          You want the lobbyists money, you gots to get elected, and if you want to be elected, you need campaign money from those who are telling you how to vote on everything. So in that respect, the Party Chairman has great power and can dictate how you vote because he does performance reviews on everyone and tells the contributors where to spend their campaign money. You do what the Party Chair tells you or you will not be back.

                                                                            #19.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:00 PM EST
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            Comment author avatarThe DevExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                            Hilldog- Killing erections for 40+ years!

                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                            Reply#20 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:58 AM EST

                                                                            Grow up Dev, you're what my father used to refer to as a "Punk".

                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            #20.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:41 PM EST
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            Ashley-69Deleted

                                                                            Just a side note....................

                                                                            Los Angeles-area school teacher accused of sexually abusing up to 20 kids vs Gun Control
                                                                            Former Los Angeles elementary school teacher who taught for more than 35 years has been arrested on accusations he sexually abused 20 students and one adult.

                                                                            Police say Robert Pimentel has been charged with 15 felonies, and he is expected to be charged with misdemeanors for the remaining incidents at George De La Torre Jr. Elementary in the Wilmington area of Los Angeles.

                                                                            With this creep Destroying 20 + children physiological for the remainder of their life and the life of their future children seems to get no political value vs a few sickos who go out and kill innocent children. Should we impose self castration to all school teachers and have a ball less zone around schools? See its not the balls that rape and molest children its the sickos. The real issue in both cases of guns vs sexual abuse is sickos.. If we eradicate the sickos in society we eradicate most of all social and economic issues in society.. Thank you.....

                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                            Reply#22 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:00 AM EST

                                                                            Just castrate the teachers union members.

                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                            #22.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:04 AM EST

                                                                            I figured to start there as a test, any teacher union employee since they owe it to society more...

                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            #22.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:13 AM EST

                                                                            Just castrate the teachers union members.

                                                                            Wow, castration, gun threats, hate, murder, bitch, etc etc etc. Finestein's a bitch , Hillary's a bitch...hate hate hate

                                                                            Maybe, just maybe The DEv, your just an irrelevant, impotent whiner who has a mental problem with smart women in power. Or maybe its that your whitebread promise-keeper world is coming to an end and your party is imploding and deperately gasping for air..

                                                                            Or maybe these women are more of a man than you?

                                                                              #22.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:52 PM EST
                                                                              Reply

                                                                              The only thing the GOP got tough on was reality.

                                                                              • 8 votes
                                                                              Reply#23 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:02 AM EST

                                                                              I'm just curious as to how many of the 'type' badgering Hillary were outraged when all those Marines were killed in Beirut under Reagan's watch. Were dimwits like Paul screaming for HIM to be impeached?

                                                                              • 16 votes
                                                                              Reply#24 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:02 AM EST

                                                                              Yeah, and when Ronzo quietly folded his tent and stole out of Lebanon under cover of the night, because Baker, Deaver and Regan (yes, there was a staffer by that name, only one A) told him it would be bad for his poll numbers to have more Marines uselessly slaughtered on his watch- did any of the Reich- wingers on this page accuse him of cowardice or incompetence?

                                                                              "The Republican Party- your home for double standards and double dealing since 1856!"

                                                                              • 13 votes
                                                                              #24.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:12 AM EST

                                                                              fox, how do u justify using that's what the Republicans did earlier, so it's ok if we do it now. The democrats, ruled the kkk, murdered countless blacks and tried ot secede for the united states. Does that mean it would be ok for the republicans to do it now? What a piece of crab you are.

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #24.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:19 AM EST

                                                                              unreal: Just to be clear - the stuff you mentioned had nothing to do with a party but everything to do with the state the congresscritter represented. And it still remains true today. The states have changed party's.

                                                                              Look it up instead of being a (piece of) crab.

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #24.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:07 PM EST
                                                                              Reply
                                                                              Comment author avatarThe DevExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                              Hilldog- Killing erections for 40+ years!

                                                                              • 6 votes
                                                                              Reply#25 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:03 AM EST

                                                                              good for her; a lot of worthless sperm out there!!!

                                                                              • 4 votes
                                                                              #25.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:37 AM EST

                                                                              oh shut up - you sound like a little boy without manners - does calling any woman a dog make you feel like a man - hey if that does not do it for you go buy an assault weapon - oh right - you already have one of those right? that should help you compensate for your inadequacies -

                                                                              • 6 votes
                                                                              #25.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:41 AM EST

                                                                              the dev...I think you've got your omnipotence confused with your impotence. If you have to post something twice to get attention, maybe Daycare isn't the right place to show your intelligence.

                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                              #25.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:46 AM EST

                                                                              for ever dem: ... Honey, you sound like a "little girl" without manners. I have never thought of Hillary as a dog but I do see her as an "Old Cow."

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #25.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:53 AM EST

                                                                              Now that's funny - because it has been revealed that sales of viagra for white conservative men has gone through the roof recently since they discovered there's a good chance they soon will be losing their other cure for their erectile dysfunction: their high-powered assault rifle and 100-round ammunition clip.

                                                                              Note to Speaker Boehner: President Obama isn't trying to annihilate the GOP - you guys are doing a good job of that yourselves, based on your misogyny and xenophobia

                                                                              • 5 votes
                                                                              #25.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:01 PM EST

                                                                              Diane, white conservative men dont need viagra as long as we stay away from ugly liberal women. FYI, there are many liberals own ar15s, but none own assult rifles unless they have the proper permits. Learn what an assult rifle is then come back and make a smart statement.

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #25.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:04 PM EST

                                                                              Very ignorant comment.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #25.7 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:09 PM EST

                                                                              Gee Gary .... what an ugly little post at 25.6.

                                                                              Loved this however . . .

                                                                              Learn what an assult rifle is then come back and make a smart statement.

                                                                              I'm not sure any of us know what assult rifles are. If you're going to insult Diane I'd suggest you work on being a little smarter yourself. In the meantime, no worries about liberal women - we can smell you a mile away and cross the street to make sure we don't step in anything you might have left behind.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #25.8 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:44 PM EST

                                                                              Looks The Dev has a 'woman' problem. It appears Hilllary is a bigger man than him.....and his little impotent gun thingy.

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #25.9 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:45 PM EST
                                                                              Reply

                                                                              The GOP recognizes they are in trouble and obviously desperate. Hillary will likely be their opposition in 2016. They have no choice but to attack her.

                                                                              I am impressed by Hillary's performance as Secretary of State. No question to tens of millions of Americans that she has gained a lot of political statue by her performance the past 4 years. Bright woman, solid leader, and savvy politician. And Obama is stepping up to the plate and turning up the heat.

                                                                              Meanwhile the GOP keeps picking their nose, flicking political boogers to see what sticks. Its going to get really hot on the stove top for the GOP slackers who are sitting on their asses and doing nothing. I believe a large part of the American public would agree.

                                                                              It's apparent that the GOP has not learned a thing from the past two elections.

                                                                              • 5 votes
                                                                              Reply#26 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:03 AM EST

                                                                              hillary is a faker. Her sniffling and screaming just adds to the fact that she is unstable and should not be allowed any where near the White House. She has ben treated with teflon but when her shady deeds the last time she lived in the White House are exposed anew, people will reject her.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #26.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:09 AM EST

                                                                              Bonnie, you're just pissed off...

                                                                              People will reject her? I don't think so... She has gained a LOT of respect the past four years. She isn't the first lady any more. No one would dare suggest any reference to when she was first lady... even if there is nothing to report. How is that relevant? You would sound like a fool to make that reference today when considering her run as secretary of state.

                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                              #26.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:16 AM EST

                                                                              Yea it was a GOP secret society terrorist plot in Benghazi just to attack Hilary baby... Oh my your on to something...snort that other line while your at it...

                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                              #26.3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:17 AM EST

                                                                              LG...

                                                                              Meanwhile the GOP keeps picking their nose, flicking political boogers to see what sticks.

                                                                              Love it!

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #26.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:18 AM EST

                                                                              Hillary's not running for anything, except the door. We've had more than enough of the lying Clintons.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #26.5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:20 AM EST

                                                                              Common... America has had enough of the GOP... Get it?

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #26.6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:27 AM EST
                                                                              Reply
                                                                              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 18
                                                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.