The AP: “The president’s sweeping, $500 million plan, coming one month after the school massacre in Connecticut, marks the most comprehensive effort to tighten gun laws in nearly two decades. But his proposals, most of which are opposed by the National Rifle Association, face a doubtful future in a divided Congress where Republicans control the House.”
USA Today: “President Obama unveiled the most sweeping set of gun-control proposals in two decades on Wednesday, a package that includes universal background checks on all gun buyers and a renewed ban on ‘military-style’ assault weapons.”
And USA Today makes this point: “The beauty of a second term presidency, at least for the man in the Oval Office, is that political calculations become less important as he considers policies he wants to pursue. President Obama's sweeping gun-safety agenda laid out Wednesday reflects just that reality as he called on Americans to get behind a dramatic plan that he believes can help stem gun violence.”
Politico makes a similar point: “For one of the few instances in his presidency, he now appears willing to burn political capital by pressuring Senate Democrats to vote for a measure that is likely to die in the House, a symbolic victory that sets the stage, he hopes, for more meaningful ones. Along with his tough stances on the debt ceiling, it’s part of a second-term strategy of calculated confrontation: Republicans won’t negotiate with him, so he plans to marshal popular opinion to force them into action.”
So does Ron Brownstein: “The wide-ranging proposals on gun control that Barack Obama is expected to announce tomorrow (Jan. 16) symbolize the change in attitude accompanying his second presidential term. Rapidly accelerating a process that began during his campaign, Obama since November has confidently picked fights with Republicans—and challenged the most conservative members of his own party—on a broad range of foreign-policy and domestic social issues. Besides gun control these include immigration, the pace of withdrawal from Afghanistan and the nomination of Republican senator Chuck Hagel as Defense secretary, a red flag for the GOP’s neo-conservative wing.”
More: Many see Obama’s newfound aggression as a sign that he feels liberated by knowing that he will never again face the voters. … But it also reflects the changing demographics that got Obama re-elected. Since the 1970s Democrats have often been paralyzed by the fear of losing culturally conservative white voters if they moved too far left, particularly on social and foreign-policy issues. And in fact, those voters did stampede away from Obama last November in even larger numbers than in 2008: Exit polls conducted on election day found that Republican Mitt Romney carried over three-fifths of both whites older than 45 and whites without a four-year college degree. Yet Obama not only won without them, but won convincingly.”
Not the facts, ma’am… USA Today: “President Obama's demand Wednesday for research into gun violence could usher in a flood of data on the nation's 32,000 annual gun deaths after decades of an information blackout. Scientists and policy makers say they have little scientific data about gun violence after Congress prohibited federal agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), from offering research grants to study anything that could be used to promote gun control.”
The Hill notes that Obama’s initiating a fight with the NRA and Congress.
As we wrote yesterday, despite how relatively weak Obama’s executive actions are on guns, Republicans are reacting caustically. Here was Rand Paul on Fox accusing Obama of having a “king complex”: “I’m afraid that President Obama may have this ‘king complex’ sort of developing, and we’re going to make sure it doesn’t happen.”
AP: “Despite a relentless workload ahead, President Barack Obama is lighter on his feet in one sense as he opens his second term. Gone are the hundreds of promises of the past. He’s toting carry-ons instead of heavy cargo this time. Obama’s first presidential campaign and the years that followed were distinguished by an overflowing ambition, converted into a checklist of things he swore to do. The list was striking not only for its length but its breadth, ranging from tidbits in forgotten corners of public policy to grand — even grandiose — pronouncements worthy of Moses.”
John Kerry’s confirmation hearing is set for Jan. 24.
“As many as 20 foreign hostages, including an unknown number of Americans, being held at a natural-gas facility in the Algerian desert have escaped their captors, an Algerian official told the Associated Press on Thursday,” USA Today writes.


So, to everyone who thought the President's Executive Orders yesterday were going to completely undermine the Second Amendment, please enlighten me as to which ones accomplished that task.
All of them. Next.
Thank you ozzie for admitting you haven't read them.
How does making all relevant data available to the background check system undermine the Second Amendment?
How does improving the system by which states place data into the background check system undermine the Second Amendment?
The NRA says "dangerous people" should be prevented from having guns. How does the President's agreement with this undermine the Second Amendment?
How does running a background check before handing a seized gun back to someone who may not be legally entitled to it undermine the Second Amendment?
How does a gun safety campaign undermine the Second Amendment?
How does analyzing the origin and flow of guns used to commit crimes undermine the Second Amendment?
How does nominating a director of the ATF undermine the Second Amendment?
How does training police, first responders, and school personnel in handling active shooter situations undermine the Second Amendment?
How do emergency response plans for locations where people gather in large numbers violate the Second Amendment?
How does NOT coming to get your guns as the NRA and fear-mongering Conservatives everywhere predicted violate the Second Amendment?
This is common sense. The only reason to NOT be in favor of this entire proposal is that common sense is particularly uncommon on the Right.
None of them. Next.
OK John in Iowa,
The Prez's legislation isn't as strong as what we have in California. We limit more than what his bill proposes. So does CA now follow the Fed Bill or follow the CA states bill?
Loved trotting out the young ones for political gain.
Doesn't your statement prove that CA is able to be more restrictive than federal law?
Then nothing has changed.
The photo op yesterday certainly worked out better than when GW Bush read "The Pet Goat" in an elementary school class.
While I agree that getting strong legislation passed through the GOP controlled House will be difficult, it gives me pause as to why so much of the media takes such a pessimistic attitude. Thought this country was the most "can do" one in the world. What about all that "American Exceptional-ism", that ability to focus and do what is right for our children and grandchildren. We used to have that "we can do big things" attitude but the negativity of the radical right seems to have replaced even the media's optimism with fear, gloom and doom.
That is their agenda, Jody! To push everyone into believeing we are all gonna die because the President wants a gun ban, not to take any away, just not allow Assault weapons, thats all! Its the way of the right, to spread gloom and doom at all costs!!!!
Hopefully, we will be saying goodbye to the right wing majority in the house come 2014? That, is the only good thing for America right now, get rid of the right wing nut jobs!!!!
Jody,
We still do great things. You have confused that with reluctance to do stupid things. And you are the one being gloomy, I am very happy to see us pause and ask questions about infringement of rights. This conversation is a good thing. I wish Obama had thought to talk to the country instead of acting as a king or dictator. His actions alone removed civility from the process.
Americans have short attention spans and shorter planning spans. We want instant gratification. If something is broke, fix it. If someone talks smack to us, send in the Marines. But a wise man knows that the world doesn't work that way. The issue of gun violence has been with us for decades and it won't go away in the next six weeks. But it's clear the time has come to begin the discussion. And if the discussion turns into an argument, then it's important to reveal who is on which side so we can see them for what they are. The NRA is not about gun owners. It's about gun manufacturers. If the GOP falls into the same obstructionist hole that it did during the last session of Congress (least productive in our history), they will, you will excuse the metaphor, shoot themselves in the foot. It's time for conservatives to start telling us what they can accomplish, instead of only what they can oppose. Clearly, they've lost their ability to govern. If that's the case, they will have lost their reason to be elected.
Brilliantly said, Henry.
Where is this 500 million coming from? I know 47% of us don't care, my great-great grandchildren will thank me when they are paying 85% of their government money rations for taxes.
Mickey,
Details, details. He doesn't have a clue yet. They are still writing the ObamaCare law - in six to twelve months you may know what's in this piece of legislation.
As for money, it will either be borrowed or printed.
Henry,
The GOP is not there to govern at this time. That is supposed to be Obama right now. Opposing is the role of the GOP right now. It's called checks and balances, it is how we keep Obama from destroying the constitution. Everything is as it should be. I do understand why you did not view Obama as responsible for the past 4 years, Appearently Bush got more done than the president in that time. Those GOP just seem to be in control of everything huh?