The White House is hitting back at the National Rifle Association for its web video, which refers to President Obama's children.
"Most Americans agree that a president's children should not be used as pawns in a political fight," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said in a statement. "But to go so far as to make the safety of the president's children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly."
Here's the transcript of the NRA's ad:
"Are the president’s kids more important than yours? Then why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their school? Mr. Obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes. But he’s just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security. Protection for their kids. And gun-free zones for ours.”


I see this as no different than the 'Obamacare' law that does not apply to polititions. As it is now, everyone in congress and the whitehouse are above the law and as such, can do whatever they please. It is time to replace our entire government and start from scratch.
And pray tell who would you vote for to make this a better America. They turn into succabuses as soon as they are elected. You know why because we have given them the ability to self govern themselves. They Vote laws into place that baracade themselves so we can't even change the law that they made to keep us out. WE scream out the constitution while allowing them to vote right in our faces laws that are determintal to our own survival as they build their own power base. WE are the stupid ones for giving them that much power in the first place. So now we are stuck with them and we vote them in over and over again.
So simple question to you gun crazies. Let's say we ban assault rifles and high-capacity mags. When you finally come face to face with that imaginary armed perpetrator you have long prepared for, wouldn't it be nice to go mano-a- mano with them, both of you armed with "one-bullet-per-trigger-pull" pistols or rifles? Isn't that the classic wild west scenario you've always dreamed of? Coz otherwise it will be a very bad day for you if he has an AK and you had a 6-shooter. Do you feel lucky, punk ?
I guess watching your wife get raped isnt such a big deal to you. My wife sleeps alot better knowing her man can and will defend her.
miggy -
Written like a zealot who has "NO" idea what you're talking about...the only way you could defend yourself would be by sh*tting your drawers so full the perp would be gagging while he went around you...
Written like a true liberal elite with his head up his a$$. I guess, miggy, you'd call your own wife a paranoid coward if she voiced any reluctance about taking on a rapist "mano-a-mano."
Please play am I smarter than a 8th Grader?
The category is causes of the Revolutionary War?
One tell me why Obama kids deserve armed protection when my children and my students don't?
Second why "The Shot heard around the world" got fired at Lexington and Concord? I mean our forefathers used peaceful protests, petitions and yes destruction of property (Boston Rea Party) but what was different at these two locations that lead to open warfare?
Last if the second amendment is only for hunters then why did Thomas Jefferson say “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government”.
My 8th graders also wonder about the first question and can answer the other two, what I am wondering is why so many adults cant?
WE can't protect ourselves from the government because as you evolved from a one shot musket into an assault rifle our government evolved from a one shot musket to bunker bombs, viruses that can wipe out a whole community while holding hostage the antidote. THe only people that we are killing with the assault rifles are the movie goers, the school babies, the mall shoppers should I continue. Have you held up a deer for a picture holding your 20 shot semi trying to show where he used to have a body. NOT. The only time we hear about the reality of these weapons is when a nut job has killed dozens of people. How many bullets does a trained shooter need? A good one only one or two shots will get your man. Go get some training and buy a regular gun to protect your family just in case it is your daughter coming in late and you get a itchy finger.
Go tell the Syrian rebels that because they are out-gunned they are defenseless against their tyrannical government; they're not buying your argument. They are putting up a pretty good fight, if you ask me, despite having no heavy weaponry. Yes our government has weapons of mass destruction. Our leaders are very reluctant to ever use those weapons even on our worst enemies. If any president ever authorized them to be used against his own people, I have no doubt that the vast majority of our military leaders would simply refuse to do so. They would know that if they did use them for that purpose, they would inevitably be tried as war criminals.
You bring Syria into this discussion. We do not care about the Syrian Civil War. They are all fun Loving Muslims, let them Kill each other.
I fully agree with you on that, I have no love for either the Syrian rebels or the ruling regime. I'm only using Syria to make the case that just because a rebel faction might be badly outgunned, it doesn't necessarily follow that they are doomed to fail, as watchingbothsides would have us all believe.
Obama is a braying jackass...the only people listening to Obama are the other jackasses in the government free lunch programs...Obama's "executive orders" outside his administration isn't worth the paper they're printed on...the British couldn't take our guns, the Japanese couldn't take our guns, the Germans couldn't take our guns...and some skinny little nitwit of a prez can't take our guns...if the prez wants our guns then come and get em...
OH Dee Ten you may call our POTUS a skinny little nitwit but he is the one sitting in the Oval Office signing decrees while you sit at a desk whining about him as if you count in his world. you aren't even enough to get him to blink twice at the thought of what you think about him. He got voted into office by a large number of people who over ruled your vote. I laugh when I read the little blurps about him from the smallness from the bottom. He doesn't want your little itty bitty gun but he will stop nut jobs from walking around with weapons that kill babies, teenagers and innocents. But of course you could care less since in your mind they are just the casualties of your own personal freedom to bear arms. You are another one that needs on the prayer list. Wonder what you are going to say to God when you meet him.
Well if I ever meet Obama or god and I am asked I'll tell both of them their really f*cked up in the head...and if god's really god then he's already got his answer...
And then since they ask me a question I'll ask god if he can or cannot make another god equal to himself...
And I'll ask Obama if he thinks getting voted into office by the hairy unwashed was worth his time in office...
Whats fair for the goose is fair for the gander. Obama surrounded himself with children to announce his radical agenda, so I don't see why this ad is out of bounds. GO NRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeap go down NRA way down to hell. Take with you the profits made from the gun manufacturers and the sellers of weapons to criminals. Remember to tell the rest of those you meet in the heated place that you only wanted your second amendment rights to be honored before Satan turns up the fire for eternity.
Teachers unions make sure the children write letters to the white house... Then we have the Hollywood show today...
Truly pathetic!
Parents who loved their children helped them to write these letters. Parents who want their children world to be a place where they can walk without gun toting guards everywhere they go. A world free of the ability for nuts and right wingers to decide to make a statement by pulling a trigger and shotting dozens in less than 30 seconds. THese are the teachers remember that you want to carry those guns, I wouldn't piss them off to much if I was you. They might go over the edge and use those guns on the very children they are suppose to be protecting. Now wouldn't you just fell bad. Probably not you would try to make another excuse about teachers being paid to much and just did it to get a bigger paycheck instead of striking.
Can we finally have that background check On Obama... He has his finger on that Nuclear trigger.
Ben Franklin...
I'm no liberal ,I believe that the Nancy Pelosi's ,Harry Reid's, Barney Franks etc of this world have done more damage to the USA then 10 Obamas or 10 George W could ever do . Having said that probably for the first time ever I have to support our president to try to do something about these crazy mass murders that we seem to face more and more frequent.Many friends of mine are hunters and I have absolutely nothing against that but I support a) All guns to be registered, no sales or trades without a paper trail b) ban assault rifles and high powered stuff that could kill an elefant as we don't have elephants in the US C) a limit on the amount of ammo one can have in his possession ( Why do you need the amount of ammo to commit genocide ?) D) Mandatory gun safety courses and mental assessment for all gun owners ( try to keep them out of the hand of the mentally unstable). E) When not in use all rifles and shot guns should have trigger locks and be locked away in cases or cabinets ( so they're not easily accessible to kids or nutcases) F) limit on the amount of handguns and ammo that you want to have readily available to protect your family.I honestly don't understand why any responsible gun owner would have any problem with any of these " restrictions" . If it could save one kids life wouldn't it be worth it?
And if it costs 3 or 4 lives in the process? No gun-control activist stops at just those. Just like they didn't in Great Britain and Australia. Both started off with so-called "reasonable" laws, and used those to accomplish the rest. Now both countries violent crime rates are spiraling out of control.
I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist myself but just doing nothing and just wait for the next mass shooting is not an option that makes much sense to me.
The NRA hit the nail on the head, and they've got Obama TWICE on hypocracy. The first on armed protection for his kids while ridiculing armed protection for schools. The second on calling the NRA's response "cowardly" when President Obama and all other gun-control supporters routinely for decades have paraded the proverbial bloody clothes of people murdered through the use of firearms, especially children, to garner support for gun-control laws long since proven useless in preventing such crimes.
And you got it no times for spelling. Pathetic
The president never ridiculed armed protection for schools. He is well aware that many schools already have that. Columbine for instance. I hate stupid people.
Typical of this administration--level some bogus charge that the president's kids are being used as "pawns" in order to distract the simple-minded among us from the real issue. Why don't they just answer the question? Why are armed guards the best solution at his kids' school, but are a terrible idea at all other kids' schools? They won't address that question simply because if they did give us an answer, they would be revealed for the elitist hypocrites they are.
His children are protected because of the power he welds at a signature or a phone call. So how about we all ask for secret service for our children because we have to decide if we want to go to our neighboors party or not. He is not the one who has determined that his children have protection it is the law of the land and has been for as long as I can remember. How about protecting the homeless children by opening up your home to keep them safe and sound from the outside elements. How about taking the secret service from all our political personnel. Let them walk around making decisions that effect you without coverage from those that don't agree with that decisions. Those that don't think the NRA is off limits once your POTUS gets in office (if ever) they too will be unprotected. Each time I hear that I just shake my head in symphathy for those who just spout off with little thought to what they say. How about putting armed guards inside the Churches to protect the kids from the CLergy. How about just hiring a trained armed guard to stand outside you house while you sleep and than you won't need an automatic weapon yourself.
So in reading through all your sarcasm, it looks like you're not denying that armed guards are an effective deterrent. You seem to be admitting that they do provide good protection. So what's the problem with putting them in every school? Is it a cost issue? A practicality issue? It would be a big undertaking, for sure, but it could be done. If Obama's kids are worth the cost and effort, aren't other people's kids worth it too?
Obama is the very sob that used his daughters in politics...M&S do their homework ahead of time blah blah blah...so spare me the affectations of martyrdom...Obama dragged his kids on stage...if they get rotten tomatoes and shoes thrown at them...fair enough...they're going to need mental health treatment anyway with Obama as a father...
I pray for you once again. You probably go to church every Sunday and take communion on the first Sunday of each month. You really do hate our POTUS don't you? Don't worry only 4 more years and than you can stop crying and sobbing about how he has destroyed your world. But until than you will just have to be patient and understand that he is the PRESIDENT even if you don't like it you can't do a damn thing about it. Sorry.
You can take your pray and shove it up your ass where the rest of your intelligence resides...
The NRA is totally despicable and cowardly. Watch their behavior in the time to come.
The NRA is a threat to national security and should be regarded as a terrorist organization. If a foreign entity would condone or advocate such harm against Americans, the Seventh Fleet would be breaking down the door.
NRA = Merchants of Death
FifthyCur I agree with you whole heartedly.
filthycur - appropriately named
You haven't earned the right to be a citizen of the US...that right was given to you...and like all things that are given to people you hold the rights of a US citizen as of no value...a pox on your house...
Obviously you nothing of the Second Amendment, the court cases that support it.
You know nothing of this country's history.
Go back to school and get educated, why don't you!
You can't yell fire in a theater. You can't traffic in child pornography, felons can't buy guns even after they have "paid their debt to society". Why is that? None of those restrictions are stated in the constitution. There are already REASONABLE restrictions on your constitutional rights. Common sense trumps bravado here.
I can honestly say that guns don't kill. I have left mine unlocked, alone to their own devices, and not even one has crawed out of the closet, crawled out from under the bed, or even took off in the truck to the local liqour store to commit any crime, shoot any one, intimidate anyone. Either they are defective or guns just don't kill. Oh, and this, my kids are a hell of alot more important to me than obumas are to him. I would pay additional taxes if my children recieved armed protection while at school. I was allowed to vote for obumas secret service protection, but if my taxes can pay for his, they can pay for mine. I am a member of the NRA and like all the members don't go looking for someone to shoot. I don't tell you what coffee you can drink, what car you can drive, and I really don't care what you think about my guns. If the constitution is something you don't support, leave, I bet we can get you help packing. Its a package deal, get over it.
How do we know that you don't go looking for someone to shoot. You seem to have the disposition for it.
No ibsleepy guns all alone don't kill but if the person who owns that object that does no harm decided to go to the liquor store, get mad at someone or want to be manly they go get that object and turn it into a killing object. A person cannot point a finger and out comes a hail of bullets, they can't open their mouths and kill 20 kids (although some breathes that come out might make you wanna die) If a person doesn't have access to a gun when they decide to go kill 20 kids and 6 teachers at once all they can do is think about it. AH but if they have a weapon of mass destruction than that object becomes attached to the hand of the killer and is used to make a human die. Now however you want to say it, Guns kill when they are turned on. A car doesn't drive itself so why can't alcholics get behind the wheel legally and drive it . Oh it becomes a killing machine when humans handle it. It also gets taken away from that person along with in many cases jail time. It isn't in the constitution that you can't drive under the influence so who decided to make it against the law (oh by the way thank God it is against the law to drive a vehicle and turn it into a weapon)
upstate -
"How do we know that you don't go looking for someone to shoot. You seem to have the disposition for it."
What business is it of yours if he does...are you suddenly the thought police...are you the morals cop...take a look at your own life and figure out how to solve your own f*ckups...
Not really Dee Ten, I don't give a crap. But don't think I'm going to believe ANYTHING that comes out of your hole. Oh, and my life is good. I hope your troubles are amazing!
Newtown is a government school with government teachers...why isn't Obama being brought to trial as an accessory to murder for failing to keep the children safe that the government forced to be in a government school under care of government employees...
Oh my God please help Dee Ten because he needs some intervention.
you can take your god and shove that up your ass with all the other sh*t you're so full of...
Wow, and he types too.
Dee Ten: So, you're on the side of murdering children and innocent people with your demand that your shooters have their choice of weapons, are you? What is left to say to you? You've said it all about yourself and your ilk!
Liberals say they care about children, why is it they support abortions that kill more in one day than all of the mass shootings combined?
So massmurder with guns is ok and we should do nothing just because the casualty rate is lower than that of abortions?
Excuse Mike, he is slow.
fons that is why we will never get these people to go past the craziness of their thinking. We can only pray that we stay the majority that continues to fight against the mental decay of some. Can you imagine once everyone has the big guns, the weapons of mass destruction, these nut jobs will than be on the hunt for the bunker bombs, the hand grenades, and on and on and on. Now that is what is frightening. THe government will be driving around for real than Just heard the word Trolling as what the right wing is now doing. To frighten you and make you scared of not only the dark but all corners, and the basement of your own homes. Big Brother is everywhere and the criminal is under every rock, can come into the key hole in your door to take your freedom. Scary Scary Scary jumping at everything, anything and even scared of their own thoughts. Fear is what gobbles up the sanity of the mindless. Fear feeds on Fear and the NRA sure knows how to put out the tenacles of fear that goes into the ear and eats into the brains of those who cannot think for themselves. Lock your doors put the machine gun in the window and push your children under the bed. The boogey is coming. I can't stand it
Obama is an inept elitist!
He has anti-American values. And that includes his hatred for the traditional family unit of one man, one woman.
He is too afraid to stand up to the racists, Sharpton and Jackson.
He is too cowardly to tell the black community to pull up their pants, quit fornicating, take responsibility, get a life and get a J-O-B.
hahaha, Who removed your ball gag? You are just mad because he isn't a snake handler, aren't you?
It isn't that he's afraid to stand up to Sharpton and Jackson, and the f..ked-up mentality of some in the black community, it's that he wholeheartedly agrees with and promotes that mentality himself. That's the way to get votes.
Wow, what vituperation (look it up). First of Both the President and the NRA are guilty of using children as political pawns. This issue needs to be decided on logic not emotion as Mr Spock would say. I agree that some of the steps the Administration wants are logical, such as a background check for every firearms transaction and stricter enforcement of firearms purchase violation at the Federal level. Now a so called assault weapon ban is not logical as such a weapon is rarely used in the commission of a crime plus the fact that there are hundreds of thousands of these firearms already owned by the public. A ban will not eliminate the possibility that one of these could be used in a future attack. Now the State of New York has passed a law that you cannot have more than 7 rounds loaded in a magazine of more than 7 capacity. Let me ask you what criminal or mental case is going to obey this law?? All it will do is reduce the abiliity of the LAW ABIDING citizen in NY to defend himself and family because only the law abiding citizens are going to comply with this new regulation, do you see the lack of logic here? Lastly there are over 30 million firearms owners in the US the huge majority of which will never be involved in any kind of shooting incident, so why do we punish these persons with laws which will not affect criminal behavior in any way, shape or form? Let's quit calling each other names and start thinking about what will really work to curb firearms violence.
Seeing as illegal owners get there guns from legal owners, the supply of greater than 7 round mags will eventually become very sparse. I don't see how anyone is being "punished". Too much drama for me.
The laws must be working! Chicago has VERY strict laws and you never hear
about a murder there do you??? Hell if the get some silly law passed by the
SCOTUS the thugs will be in lines for hours waiting to comply.......
<sarc-off>
So let me get this right...........
The spawn of Sambo and MOOchelle are important and they get armed
protection at school from whacko's but my kids don't need protection?
What will I get? Clowns on site 10 minutes after it's over with a holster
full of chalk to draw the outlines with?
judging from your post, you get exactly what you deserve.
Desoto you are so angry because OBama is in the White House. You are the dinosaur of America and unless you pass on the hatred to your children you will soon be history written in the books of yesterday. Your kind are on the diminishing end of our society and the new era is about to begin. You see your hatred hasn't done a thing to keep Obama from two terms or Michelle from having dinner in the White House every day for the last 48 months and for the next 48 months. Now the only reason they will leave is when their second yes I said second term is completed. Your hatred has done nother to decrease the power that they both hold. You waste so much of your time being negative and it is eating your soul up. It's in the words that you write and in the hatred that only harms yourself. What you think of the President and his lovely wife has no effect on their lives at all while it is affecting you down to your very core. So who is it that is losing this fight, Sorry it is you. Sweetheart there is so much more out there to see and do than sit around festering with the envy and hatred for someone you could never emulate. You will never be in the White House unless you go as a visitor but once they get hold of your writtings I think not. Oh by the way he can't be SAMBO because SAMBO was all black and Moochelle has grade AAAA beef on her behind. She lays it in the Presidential Bed with the most highest ranking person in the WORLD OBAMA, Shhh don't blow a stack, calm down take a deep breath and know that in 2016 it will all be over until Hillary or Biden stroll in.
Hahaha, or Cuomo!
watchingbothsides, now you want to take away their festerings?
Upstate you have a point about the festering, they love it so much kinda like those that cut themselves, or want to be beat everyday. I should just leave them be and allow them to go into a fungus like state where they just grow into a big ole festering pool of hate. But my heart just can't without at least trying to save their tortured souls. I am so at peace inside even with all the things going around out there and those that wish to make us all just miserable bags of slime. I piss off those like DeSoto who come at me with a sweet smile and a blessing for them all. They hate that I speak so kindly of their poor Congress wishing them nothing but that they get whatever it is they are seeking and deserve. hehehehhe. I refuse to allow mysel to become a hate magnet. So I have pulled DeSoto under my prayer list hoping that she will find her own peace and not FESTER so much. Upstate isn't it grand to have peace within?. I feel sorry for those that are so angry and unhappy don't you?
wbs, I am a cancer survivor. To me, all of this political posturing is so inconsequential. I don't see gun advocates as wanting anything but the status quo. They bring nothing to the table. Arm teachers? I'm sure all of the troubled kids will know the whereabouts of those guns at every moment. I see no need to demolish the 2nd amendment, however, the constitution is a framework for our laws. It is not the law.
Anna Molly - here is one case where an armed individual stopped someone who entered a school with a firearm.
Incidents where someone successfully defends him or her self with a firearm don't usually get much media attention - particularly when no shot is fired. I personally know of three individuals (friends of my parents) who successfully defended themselves using a firearm....in two cases the would be attacker left and no shot had to be fired. But if you look for them, you will find other examples where people have successfully defended themselves with a firearm.
Obama already stated last fall his intent to bring back a ban - although I noted he worked in mention of machine guns (which are separately regulated under federal NFA laws, not just any "gun nut" can buy them) which can only have been a ploy to scare people into backing his agenda. I believe he was only looking for an event to get the ball rolling.
What about the other incidents in which an assault weapon was not used? I don't believe the VA Tech or Columbine involved assault weapons......and didn't Columbine occur at a time when we had an assault weapons ban? Seems to me it did not work....but let's waste more time implementing something that didn't work the first time around while using the victims of recent tragedies as an excuse to push a political agenda. Chicago, NY, and DC have some of the strictest gun laws in the country and some of the highest crime rates).....and I don't foresee criminals turning over their firearms.....and I wonder what the outcomes will be for those who may have to use a gun to defend him/her self in the future (maybe we will just be trading one victim for another).
Despite the claims I hear that folks only want to ban "assault weapons", that is not the legislation that I see being proposed (my state anyway). The proposed bans of late have been much wider reaching...and would require the gun owners to surrender the firearms to the state (if I understood the proposals correctly - no grandfather clause and no compensation either - which is why I view the supporters of such legislation with the same disdain I hold for lowlife thieves.....it is theft of property in my book). These proposals, to me, are evidence that assault weapons bans will only be the first domino....
And Why is Obama putting forth a gun ban before his task force has had a chance to study the issue and try to determine the underlying causes? If he is convinced a gun ban will work, there is no need to waste money studying the issue (although spending money and piling on more debt is kinda his thing).
Site did not post my link...just google Carolyn Gudger.
Wow, here's one case. Guess our troubles are over!
Her point was that armed guards did not seem to make a difference......it is one case I happened to know where to find the link. Wasn't it Obama who claims that if the gun ban can save even a few lives, it should be considered? Well, this one case did save some lives.....so should it not also be considered (by Obamas own words)......but you flippantly blow it off like it is nothing. Seems saving lives is unimportant to you....kinda reinforces my thoughts you are just pushing an agenda...
I did not flipantly blow it off. There can be answers from both sides of this issue. The president did not blow of the idea of armed security in schools as many here are seeming to rant. You can bet that if a teacher has a gun, the students will know about it. Even the troubled ones. There is no perfect solution. I am truly sick of the "oh well, that's just the way it is" we need MORE guns attitude coming from most. I have no agenda. I drive a school bus. We have a sheriff on campus. Is that enough? Maybe, I also live in NY, I think we are headed in the right direction here.
Agreed - I don't care for the "more guns" will solve the problem either. A firearm in the hands of the inexperienced or untrained is not an improvement. But I don't see any evidence of gun bans working either. Personally, I don't oppose background checks....maybe rethink the design of our buildings with some safety and security considerations - some measures do seem common sense.
Any "assault weapons" ban has the first hurdle of defining that term. And once you put down a definition, it changes (technology only goes forward). When a new firearm is developed that no longer meets the technical definition, what good is the ban? Consider California banned .50 caliber rifles...shortly after a .460 was developed, which shoots further and is more accurate anyway (as I understand it).
In my state, their proposals intend to confiscate the firearms that would be banned (various pistols, rifles, shotguns..not just assault weapons) - and no compensation. How is that fair? It may not be the intent of the citizens who supported the measure, but it is the proposed outcome that is being leveraged with their support.....and I don't intend to let someone walk off with my property (a few of my pistols are quite expensive).
But part of the problem is also the failure to deal with the disturbed children you mention. In some of these cases, individuals who knew the perpetrator did not seem all that surprised.
too f-ing bad king OSAMA, you cant have it both ways, using a bunch of brainwashed zombie kids, to use as props to try to force your STUPID WORTHLESS decrees. your god damn kids ARE NOT MORE IMPORTANT THAN MINE!
soltangriss: The President, of course, never said such a thing. You did! Did you listen to the President's speech? Doesn't sound like it at all. If you did hear and see it, then you know exactly what you and your ilk are! Go to sleep tonight knowing you're on the side of those who want to give murders a choice of weapons to kill innocent children in schools and innocent people in malls and theaters. What goes around comes around. You and your ilk may find yourselves in the same situation as all of the innocent people have who looked at a madman as he killed them. Sleep well tonight, soltangriss. I'm sure you will! Your hate for a black President is what drives you.
Exactly, TJ. The comments from these people dumbfound me. A hundred years from now, perhaps this wider social movement will be called the Idiot's Rebellion, and will be defined as the (hopefully) brief period of time when the angry, uninformed and unfocused united as one to spew ignorant rage against those perceived to be their enemies.
well jack your apparently the idiot because YOU will be dissarmed, I WONT! sorry you lose.
Jack: You are exactly correct! Anyone who watched the President's speech knows this debate is not about gun control. That speech was one of the most presidential speeches I have ever heard or read. It was pure common sense. The far right wing has no interest at all in the murder of innocent children and adults. They couldn't care less how many innocent people die, nor do they care about the welfare of the American Republic. They're driven only by their hatred of a black President and nothing else.
Jack: You can bet the farm that soltangriss never passed a background check! He bought his guns underground.
I lose, huh? Studies show that gun violence is twice as likely to occur in a household with a gun. I lose? How?
Also, did I say ANYTHING about disarming? I'm concerned about military style weapons that have no business on civilian streets.
I'm not a paranoid delusional gun nut, and I'd say I win.
and T jefferson,, do a little reading, by the great man whose name you soil. He wrote that each citizen should be allowed "EVERY TERRIBLE WEAPON OF WAR," that the government owns to prevent that government from opressing its citizens. (not the direct quote, but close) change your name to chattle man!
keep trying T jefferson,, Ive been in law enforcement for 22 years. where do you live so we can let everyone know you live in a "GUN FREE" home. the first person you would call is a guy like me with a gun.
What did Jefferson have to say about machine guns? Did you get his take on the brutal slaying of 20 children? Oh. Right. He's been dead for a while.
Let's not deify 18th century men. The man kept slaves, for God's sake. You think he's a saint?
you two will be very cozy together in the cattle cars, off to camp. if you dont think it can happen, just open a history book, or ask a Jew.
Not a direct quote but close? Is that like close but no cigar?
You need professional help and/or a history lesson from someone other than Glenn Beck. The problem we're facing today is rampant ignorance combined with paranoia. You know so little about history and yet you think you know so much. We are so far from the horrors of 1930's Germany that it is remarkable that anybody could draw such an idiotic parallel. You are evidence that our education system has failed us. God help us all from epidemic ignorance.
soltangriss: For the love of God, don't tell me you're allowed to carry a badge and a gun!! That is an absolutely frightening thought. Honestly, do you live in Texas? I'm serious about that. Texas is the one state I've read about whose small town police are often absolutely notorious. I wouldn't call you on a bet. I have a house full of guns--shotguns of all gauges, pistols from .22 through 9mm, and rifles from .17 caliber on up. Call you??? I'm afraid you'd shoot anything that moved.
jakoff "EVERY TERRIBLE WEAPON OF WAR" but you are pretty stupid because "MACHINEGUNS" are already heavily regulated, and as far as those 20 kids, no one would ever say that was a good thing, but in our country your not supposed to punish the innocent, but yet we keep "handycapping" the honest, responsible, people in our society. you need to realize that as Law enforcement,, NONE of these laws will effect me, but WE have rules we need to follow, that put the criminals on a higher pedistal than us. criminals dont worry about us cops, because they KNOW that we have procedures to follow, and they dont care about the laws anyway. but if you ask ANY burglar, robber/ home invader who they DO fear,, they will tell you its a homeowner with a gun.
I would NEVER call you soltangriss. I don't like pukes anywhere near my space.
soltangriss: Jefferson was talking about 18th century England. Jefferson helped set up a state government in Virginia and a government of the United States elected by the people for limited amounts of time. This BS about the American government being a tyrannical government is crazy. If you don't like the current government of your state or nation, then encourage the people to elect others to positions of political power. The way you're thinking you want to overthrow a government elected by the people and then what? You'll have to have a totalitarian police force to rule them. You couldn't allow them to vote they'd vote your ass out. So, ultimately, your ideal government is a fascist state.
t you have a house full of guns? wow, so tomorrow do the resposible thing and take them ALL to your local police station and surrender them. put up or shut up.
well upbutt john remember that when someone WITH a gun kicks in your door, in the middle of the night. We will still come and TRY to save you while your crying like a little girl in a closet talking to 911. because its our JOB.
Uh, I mentioned machine guns not because I thought they were unregulated. I mentioned them because Jefferson had never heard of them nor imagined them. What Jefferson said was said without knowledge of machine guns. I suppose you think that wouldn't change his opinion? Of course you wouldn't.
And yeah. Criminals don't follow laws. By definition. I get it. Then why do we have laws? Let's just get rid of them all since criminals don't follow laws anyway. Hmm...
well time to go to work, trying to take guns away from criminals who DONT CARE if NEW laws are passed or not. enjoy your coolaid guys! goodnight and I truly HOPE your ALL safe!
soltangriss: Did you watch and hear the President's speech??!!?? If you didn't, then watch the entire thing. Anyone who watched that speech could not disagree with his proposal unless his proposal was not the issue at all. The issue is not about gun control of military style assault weapons. It has absolutely nothing to do with the insane murder of innocent little children. It has to do only with the hatred for a black President. Nothing else make any sense at all.
As if it isn't incredibly obvious, the difference between YOUR kids and the PRESIDENT'S kids is that there are countless people and organizations who have a very strong incentive/motive to inflict harm on (or kidnap) his kids. I can't believe something so basic needs to be explained to so many people. I guess this is what happens when extremist politics clouds our common sense!
Damn vacation taking POTUS. And what is with his wife buying nice clothes? And why do they have all of those limos? And can't they fly coach like the rest of us? Uppity elitists!
I can't tell if you're a troll or if you're sincere. There's not much of a difference these days.
No worries Jack. I hate to keep you wondering but I'm having so much fun. Think of me as a hobbit or a wookie.
you want to talk "common sense"? how about any sense whatsoever? dont punish EVERYONE for the insane actions of 1 or 2. if you want common sense, then make a law to prevent ALL cars to have a breathalizer installed, so that YOU MUST blow into it before you can start your vehicle. more people were KILLED by drunk drivers last year than were killed by guns. and while your at it BAN any car that is able to exceed the national average speed limit. why should anyone be allowed to own a car like the new 2013 Corvette that can go 200 mph? sorry but "common sense" is not so common anymore and your proof. and for your information, MY kids are 1000% more likely to become the victims of a violent crime than KING Obamas kids. keep drinking the coolaid Jackoff!
Still not narrowing it down ;]
Oh yes, so punishing. Maybe you should visit a war torn country for the definition of punishment. The money you spend on ammo could probably feed a child in a poor country for a year. You live in the freest nation on earth. Poverty here means living like a king in many other places. And owning anything, let alone a gun? Punishment? Friggin' drama queen!
that help Jack?
Yeah. The Koolaid comment can be better applied to you.
Conservatives are big fans of apples and oranges comparisons. Like comparing drunk driving to shootings. As if a car's only purpose is to crash into and kill people. And banning cars that can exceed the speed limit? Talk about a straw man argument. That's NOT common sense. I'm sorry you think it is.
It's about risk and return. I think the balance of risk and return of unregulated AR-15s is just a tad different than unregulated 2013 Corvettes.
Calling him KING Obama just makes you sound like a fool. And how on Earth are your kids at a greater risk than his kids? I'd love to hear you try and explain that. You need to come back to reality now.
Hah. It's clear now John! I couldn't have said it better.
And similarly, there are other people out there who have a strong incentive to indiscriminately inflict harm on other innocent school kids, which is why we are having this debate in the first place. If it's only Obama's kids who are in danger and need protection, while others do not, then why all the calls for more gun control? Obviously, other people's kids are in danger too and could benefit from armed guards, just as Obama's kids do. THAT is common sense. Or are you one of those liberals who like to suggest that these school kids are just suffering from small-penis syndrome and need to show some courage and take on their armed attackers "mano-a-mano?"
And many schools have armed guards, as did Columbine. The president knows that and does not reject that idea. The NRA are just being their usual asinine selves.
Small-penis syndrome? WTF? I guess you have to change my argument into something ridiculous so that yours sounds less ridiculous?
If you think for a minute that the president's kids are as threatened as those of a random citizen, you need to start thinking inside the box for a change. The president's kids are actively targeted because of who they are and what they could be ransomed for. If they went unguarded for an hour, they might be snatched. Average Joe's kids aren't subjected to anything even close to that.
And you really think an armed rent-a-cop is going to stop this? He'll be the first one killed when he goes up against a significantly better armed assailant. Unless we want these rent-a-cops to have M16s?
Calm down. Just a rhetorical question, it wasn't directed at you personally. But in case you're unaware of it, there are many liberal posters out there who do often make the claim that gun owners are people with small penises trying to "prove their manhood," and are cowards for not being willing to take on armed assailants with their bare hands, etc, etc. In their very enlightened opinion any senior citizen, woman, school kid unable or unwilling to beat the crap out of an armed attacker and emerge victorious suffers from small penis syndrome. That's what I was referring to with that line; nothing in your post specifically.
Judging by the events at Newtown, Columbine, VA Tech, I'd say ordinary school kids are in just as much danger as Obama's daughters. Nobody has made an attempt on either of their lives. And as for a school shooter targeting the armed guard first. I wasn't suggesting we should have only one armed guard in each school. Several would be more appropriate. And if they were plain-clothes rather than in uniform, the attacker would not have an easy time identifying them.
So, like the 2nd amendment says, "The right to bear arms". Americans are entitled to own a gun or guns. If that's the case where were the parents of those innocent kids gunned down at the elementary school? I could bet that 99% of those kids parents own guns. How come they were not there to defend their loved ones?
Okay so let's get this right, the NRA are so bad for bringing up the obvious with obama's kids and their right to protection and armed guards. But it's okay for him to use kids in his rhetoric speech. He is a hypocrit in chief and always has been, still doesn't get it that some rules apply to him like they do to us regular folk. He is an elitist and their actions and spending laviously on themselves while in office and us in economic turmoil prove it. I don't care if they are green or purple, I expect our leaders to lead with integrity and common sense.
Agreed, there needs to be stricter enforcement with mental health patients and violence with guns. But to create yet another task force with Center for Disease and Control is just so stupid. We know what the problem is and why people do bad things, because they want to, evil is all around and people have choices to make in this life. Another task force will not address the obvious, it is a moral breakdown of our society. No fear of God whatsoever anymore. No love for our neighbors.
If not a semi automatic, then another type of gun. People who are hell bent, will find whatever they can to do evil. Next it will be a shoot out with a regular six shooter or pistol and the whole garbage will start again about banning another form of gun, until we have no gun rights and 2nd ammendment left.
What fools to think we can live in a cume-by-yah peaceful world by anything a corrupt and wicked government devises. Evil trying to make good. What a delusion and idiots ready to swallow it.
When we are ready to turn back to our Creator and humble ourselves, love Him, love each other and fear eternal consequences, then maybe things will change. Until then, I love in scorn at all this nonsense.
Why Linda, I don't know why you aren't the president by now. You got the smarts and seem to have it all figured!
How is Obama using kids as rhetoric?? He was addressing a tragic shooting of children! The steps being taken are to protect children! What twisted logic to suggest that children are somehow being "used". The only way he's using them is as a justification, and I think it's a VERY valid justification.
And Linda, I remember the song from 4-H camp and it's kumbya. And it is a religious song. I loved kool ade as a kid, I didn't like the kumbya song. Why do you people have to f**k with the memories like that?
And that's exactly how the NRA was using Obama's daughters, as justification. Justification for armed guards in schools, in this case. It's the liberals who first made the claim that someone's kids are somehow being used as pawns.
The NRA was using them in an apples to oranges comparison. As if my kids are in as much danger as Obama's kids. Please. Respect my intelligence.
Well, the parents of the kids killed in Newtown would probably disagree with your apples-to-oranges theory.