First Thoughts: Obama's promises kept and promises broken

Obama’s promises kept… And promises broken… President pins the debt-ceiling responsibility on Congress… Executive recommendations on guns… Keeping track of the cabinet shuffle… Boxer backs Hagel… And a deeper look at Hagel’s “openly aggressive gay” comment.

Alex Wong / Getty Images

President Barack Obama speaks during his final news conference of his first term at the East Room of the White House Jan. 14, 2013.

*** Promises kept… : With President Obama’s second inaugural address now less than a week away, we took a look at his biggest three speeches over the past five years -- the 2007 presidential announcement speech in Springfield, IL, the 2008 convention acceptance speech in Denver, and the 2009 inaugural -- to checklist what he promised. And, by and large, he accomplished many of his big objectives. Or he mostly accomplished them. He promised ending the war in Iraq. (“America, it's time to start bringing our troops home,” he said in his ’07 announcement speech.) He promised health care reform. (“Let's be the generation that says right here, right now, that we will have universal health care in America by the end of the next president's first term,” he said in that same ’07 address.) And he promised quick action in dealing with the financial collapse of 2008. (“The state of our economy calls for action: bold and swift. And we will act not only to create new jobs but to lay a new foundation for growth,” he said in his ’09 inaugural.) Of course, there is still debate about whether his fixes will work, but the point is: He made a promise and got his vision of a fix.

Chuck takes a deep dive look into the promises President Obama made before his first term – during his campaign speeches and first inaugural address – and compares them to the things the President did accomplish in his first term.

*** … and promises broken: But he also didn’t accomplish some of his other goals -- like changing the country’s politics, a huge recurring theme in all three speeches. (“On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics,” he said in his ’09 inaugural.) Or recruiting more teachers when it turns out that about 212,000 teacher jobs have been cut between 2009 and 2011. (“Let's recruit a new army of teachers, and give them better pay and more support in exchange for more accountability,” he said in that ’07 speech.) And then there are the issues that barely got mentioned in those three big speeches, issues that ironically will make up the bulk of Obama’s second term agenda. Guns only received one mention. (“Don't tell me we can't uphold the 2nd Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals,” he said in ’08 acceptance speech.) Ditto immigration. (“Passions fly on immigration, but I don't know anyone who benefits when a mother is separated from her infant child or an employer undercuts American wages by hiring illegal workers.”) And if you believe the increased burden on the government for natural disaster cleanup is related to climate change and global warming, you’ll also be disappointed. Looking back at those most important Obama speeches from ’07, ’08 and ’09, the issue BARELY got a mention. Indeed, it’s remarkable what was in those speeches and what wasn’t.

*** Pinning the debt-ceiling responsibility on Congress: It appears that the chief goal of Obama’s press conference yesterday was to pin the responsibility -- and potential blame -- on Congress for raising (or not raising) the debt ceiling. “There's one way to get around this. There's one way to deal with it. And that is for Congress to authorize me to pay for those items of spending that they have already authorized,” Obama said. And there’s also a reason why the White House decided to abandon the idea of any Plan B (like the $1 trillion platinum coin or the 14th Amendment): They will own part of the chaos if they pursue a Plan B. But by having no Plan B, the Obama White House is trying to ensure that raising the debt ceiling is all on Congress. What’s more, Obama seemed to accept that a government shutdown -- and not the debt ceiling -- is the better place to have a fiscal fight. “Well, ultimately, Congress makes the decisions about whether or not we spend money and whether or not we keep this government open… I think [a government shutdown] would be a mistake. I think it would be profoundly damaging to our economy… But they’re elected representatives, and folks put them into those positions and they’re going to have to make a decision about that.”

*** Executive recommendations on guns: Per NBC’s Frank Thorp, House Democrats were told yesterday that Vice President Joe Biden and his task force have developed 19 areas where President Obama could use executive orders to institute new gun control policy. The New York Times has more: “Actions the president could take on his own are likely to include imposing new limits on guns imported from overseas, compelling federal agencies to improve sharing of mental health records and directing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct research on gun violence, according to those briefed on the effort.”

*** The cabinet shuffle: Yesterday, we learned that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack will remain in their jobs during President Obama's second term. So to recap, here are the cabinet secretaries who are remaining:

Napolitano (DHS)
Duncan (Education)
Vilsack (Agriculture)
Holder (Justice)
Sebelius (HHS)
Shinseki (Veterans Affairs)

And here are the cabinet members leaving, plus their nominated replacements if applicable:

Clinton at State (John Kerry nominated)
Panetta at Defense (Chuck Hagel nominated)
Geithner at Treasury (Jack Lew nominated)
Solis at Labor
Jackson at EPA

*** Boxer backs Hagel: Yesterday, Sen. Barbara Boxer -- who is Jewish -- came out in support of Hagel. “After speaking extensively with Sen. Hagel by phone last week and after receiving a detailed written response to my questions late today, I will support Senator Hagel’s nomination as Secretary of Defense,” Boxer said. “First and foremost, he has pledged without reservation to support President Obama’s polices – policies that I believe have made our world safer and our alliances stronger.” More: “I asked him about a number of issues – including America’s special relationship with Israel, the threats posed by Iran to the world and the treatment of women and gay and lesbian members of our military – and his answers were reassuring and show a sensitivity and understanding of these issues. In addition, Sen. Hagel has pledged to meet with me once he has been confirmed for a more detailed discussion about the Defense Department’s efforts to combat sexual assault in the military.”

*** “Openly aggressive gay”: Yesterday, we took an in-depth look at Chuck Hagel’s controversial “Jewish lobby” remark. Today, we examine his nearly 15-year-old description of James Hormel, nominated to be ambassador to Luxembourg, as an “openly aggressive gay.” Explaining his opposition to Hormel in a 1998 interview with the Omaha World-Herald, Hagel said: “They are representing America. They are representing our lifestyle, our values, our standards. And I think it is an inhibiting factor to be gay -- openly aggressive gay like Mr. Hormel -- to do an effective job.” Later, the Omaha World-Herald noted that Hagel said “he has seen another video clip that showed Hormel at what Hagel called an anti-Catholic event in San Francisco, featuring the ‘Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence,’ a group of male drag queens.” Luxembourg is mostly Catholic.

*** Apology accepted -- but not by all: Hagel has apologized for the 1998 remarks on Hormel. "They do not reflect my views or the totality of my public record, and I apologize to Ambassador Hormel and any LGBT Americans who may question my commitment to their civil rights. I am fully supportive of ‘open service’ and committed to LGBT military families.” Hormel accepted the apology, and so did the Human Rights Campaign. "Sen. Hagel's apology and his statement of support for LGBT equality is appreciated and shows just how far as a country we have come when a conservative former senator from Nebraska can have a change of heart on LGBT issues,” the organization said. But the Log Cabin Republicans took out a full-page ad in the Washington Post hitting Hagel’s record on gay rights. “Chuck Hagel’s Apology: Too Little, Too Late,” the ad said

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @DomenicoNBC, @brookebrower

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 14
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Ann Romney was approached by Dancing With the Stars but turned the show down.

Maybe Queen Annie could send Rafalca in her place...

After listening to the Presidents press conference yesterday, I was embarrassed for what is passing as "professional" journalists these days!

Do you all seriously thing asking the same question over and over and over again will result in a different answer?

Sad day in America when the President is the one who has to explain to the "press" the difference between debt & deficit!

  • 65 votes
#1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:14 AM EST
Comment author avatarBackhouseExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

RAISING THE DEBT CEILING: Is not about new or future spending.
RAISING THE DEBT CEILING: Does not authorize new spending.
RAISING THE DEBT CEILING: Is about paying bills that Congress itself has already approved.

Of all the wealthy industrialized nations, America is on track for the strongest recovery.

And immeasurable thanks go to our President, because GOP spent four years obstructing job creation & pushing for the same austerities measures that are creating Europe's double dip recession. Unemployment rates are at 26% in Spain and Greece.

To reactionary House GOP benefactors & strategists who continue to sabotage the US economy for political, ideological reasons and monetary gain: We're done playing Crash, Shutdown, Downgrade, and Risk Global Economic Meltdown.

To GOP Congress making threats about bills it has already approved: You know how much the American people love their country, and they expect you to pay the bills on time.

  • 74 votes
#1.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:14 AM EST
Comment author avatarBill, Fairfax VAExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The Big Lie about "Default"

OMG, the sky is falling. The shameless alarmists from the army of slime on the left would have us believe the U.S. might actually "default" on its debt and push the global economy into chaos. And it's those yahoos on the right led by the brain dead Tea Party who are dragging us down this dangerous road, straight into a sea of doom. Yes indeed, the world as we know it will end unless Congress raises the debt ceiling. Scary stuff to be sure, but just like all that Mayan calendar nonsense reality tells us a far different tale.

The U.S. borrows about 40 cents of every dollar it spends. That means 60 cents of every dollar in spending is financed with hard cash. The U.S. also spends about 6 cents of every dollar on servicing the debt. That means there is PLENTY of cash available to prevent stiffing our bondholders, which is the true metric for default. So contrary to what the left and their partners in the MSM have been breathlessly preaching, there is no credible danger of the U.S. defaulting on its debt in the event Congress does not raise the debt ceiling.

That means U.S. and global markets need not go into panic mode because from the perspective of our bondholders there would be nothing to panic about. Indeed, all Obama would have to do is issue an unambiguous statement that the U.S. is in no danger of defaulting because we have ample cash available to service our debt. Of course, that would require our president to actually tell the truth for a change and not be party to the fear mongering lies his administration and the left have been pushing on this issue – including during yesterday's presser. But with his back to the wall, even Obama will have little choice other than to come clean.

Instead, the real result of a prospective congressional refusal to increase the debt ceiling would be the mother of all government spending cuts. In that brave new world the government would be forced to do two things: 1) prioritize how it will spend the 54 cents in cash left over after servicing the debt; and 2) spend not a penny more than that 54 cents.

This is precisely the outcome conservatives have been seeking for years. But today we have the leverage to make it happen because true "default" can occur only if the president chooses to allow it to occur by specifically deciding not to use the government's available cash to service the debt. And while Obama may be many things he's not a stupid man, so it's unlikely he will want to go down in history as the guy who could have prevented a calamity but didn't. Instead, the president can seize the moment and take a major step towards repairing his scandalous fiscal legacy by working with Congress to manage an orderly downsizing of the welfare state. In the final analysis, he will have no other realistic choice.

That's why when Obama uses his bully pulpit to demonize the opposition and boast he will not negotiate over raising the debt ceiling, Republicans should not hesitate to call his bluff.

  • 96 votes
#1.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:18 AM EST
Comment author avatarBackhouseExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Re-negotiating the debt ceiling every 3 months is dangerous to investor confidence, costs us jobs, thousands of tax-payer funded hours to play more gop games, has already cost us an S & P downgrade, and is bad precedent for future Presidents.

What part of the words 'domestic', 'global', 'responsibility' and 'consequences' does Koch-House-GOP not understand?

  • 66 votes
#1.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:19 AM EST
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Will you look at that?

Mr. Broccoli Bill has made his grand return... did the "sting" of your resounding LOSS finally wear off? Or did the RNC's check finally clear? LOL

Stuff it Bill! You were wrong about everything prior to the election what makes you think anyone would believe you now?

Say it with me, 4 MORE years of President Obama and there isn't a damn thing YOU can do about it!

As the Idiot from Albany like to say; BWHAHAHAHAHA!

  • 59 votes
#1.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:20 AM EST

It should be obvious there is a vast difference between communication and noise, but it is not obvious. It should be obvious that the success of a debate is not measured in decibels, but in a preponderance of evidence that supports a position, but it is not obvious.

So it is with our various media, from simple meetings to a mass broadcasting network like television or the one we're using right here - the Internet. Noise overwhelms these media from ultra-wealthy and corporate interests whose sole purpose is to channel money to their pockets, to the reporter who cherry-picks sound bites to support his pet narrative. It is clear there is an agenda to push a point that benefits not the public at large, but very small special interest groups.

Those small special interest groups enlist from the ranks of the ignorant, noisemakers. They arm them with talking points and megaphones and send them forth to make noise. They make no logical arguments. They make noise. Success is based on framing a position in a short sound bite that rolls off the tongue and seems to make sense: Guns don't kill people. Job creators. The problem is spending. Fiscal cliff. Typical liberals. Protecting our freedom.

None of that makes any sense. Guns were never designed for target practice. They were designed to kill. As far as job creators, weren't our parents the ultimate in that arena? Go do this. Go do that. Did you do the job I gave you? If spending is the problem, wouldn't we solve that problem by never going to a store again? And so the noise continues.

Three horrific problems continue to fester because of this noise: Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW), a nation whose legislators are actually are arguing about whether they should pay their bills, and firearms that fall into the wrong hands with a frequency so great we should be outraged.

Statistics and overwhelming consensus in the scientific community say that AGW is a fact beyond dispute. Yet, screeching noise says, "Duh, it snowed where I live." We have run up a national debt of inconceivable size. Yet, the same people who ran up that debt, now say we must learn our lesson by hitting those least able to defend themselves. Those legislators raise their pay as they do this. Streets, schools, homes, and workplaces are the sites of routines gun-related violence and murder. And the screeching noisemakers will solve this by adding more guns to this deadly mix. The teachers, who yesterday were union thugs and incompetent educators, will be tomorrow's expert marksmen in kindergarten classrooms across the country.

That is dictionary definition "stupid". While such stupidity is blindingly obvious, there is an even more dangerous brand of stupidity. That is the quiet stupidity of those who pretend to be tolerant, who pretend that everyone has a valuable point of view. That is deadly stupidity.

The noisemakers from both extremes contribute nothing of value. When the planet has heated to the point that starvation and dislocation is rampant, when our own children catch a round that destroys his or her life, when no one will offer us credit when we need it, will we find comfort by looking at ourselves and saying, "I was stupid to listen to stupid people." It is not possible to overestimate the power of stupidity.

  • 57 votes
#1.5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:22 AM EST

What, nothing about Rep.Huelskamp voting NO, on Sandy Relef, while he knows that His OWN Family, Mother, Father & Brother, have lived off the Government Trough for most of thier LifeTime!

You Betcha!

Occupy SoggyBottom!

  • 40 votes
#1.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:22 AM EST
Comment author avatarWhite Collar AutoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The country is coming apart at the seams and the Libbies lead off worrying about Anne Romney and Dancing with the Stars.

So pathetic. Sad and Pathetic.

Talk about low information voters...........

  • 109 votes
#1.7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:27 AM EST
Comment author avatarblackcatwhitecatExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Instead, the real result of a prospective congressional refusal to increase the debt ceiling would be the mother of all government spending cuts. In that brave new world the government would be forced to do two things: 1) prioritize how it will spend the 54 cents in cash left over after servicing the debt; and 2) spend not a penny more than that 54 cents.

Go for it ... the Republican party would be annihilated. It is a fantasy to think that all welfare recipients and food stamp recipients are Democrats.

The country is coming apart at the seams and the Libbies lead off worrying about Anne Romney and Dancing with the Stars.

I find sniping at a bit of opening humor sad and pathetic.

  • 54 votes
#1.8 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:27 AM EST
Comment author avatarCalifornia TomExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Congress, pay your damn bills, especially Republicans. YOU racked them up, now stop playing like little children and quit embarrassing yourselves and the United States. Grow Up.

Also, ban all assault weapons. IF YOU WANT TO PLAY TOUGH GUY, JOIN THE ARMY AND SHOOT AT THINGS THAT SHOOT BACK. COWARDS.

  • 61 votes
#1.9 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:28 AM EST
Comment author avatarAuntie FascistExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Hey, Bill, where ya been? I thought you died! Of course, reading your post, I'm not sure your brain made it back!

  • 42 votes
#1.10 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:29 AM EST

Ann Romney was approached by Dancing With the Stars but turned the show down.

I guess it wasn't "her turn".

  • 36 votes
#1.11 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:29 AM EST
Comment author avatarBackhouseExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The choices are simple and straight forward:

GOP Congressionals can join Congress in raising the debt ceiling, as they are authorized to do.

Or if that is too hard, they can give that authority to the President. And he will pay the bills that Congress already approved and racked up.

  • 47 votes
#1.12 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:29 AM EST

Wow newsvine! You are all of the sudden going to post this? You guys must like keeping things continually spun into the dark abyss.

How about they stop writing checks their ass can't cash?

How about putting in stiffer guidelines for the people that solely live off the government dole/handouts? They need to be putting in 40 hours of community service a week.

It is absolutely sickening that folks to reap in the benefits of a government that has no checkpoints in place or can simply lie in order rake in even more money!

  • 63 votes
#1.13 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:31 AM EST

Does he even know?

    #1.14 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:33 AM EST
    Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    The country is coming apart at the seams and the Libbies lead off worrying about Anne Romney and Dancing with the Stars.

    Good to see my WCA dog whistle still works! Here BOY... play dead!

    Lighten up Francis!

    It was a joke, then again RWNJ's don't have a sense of humor, so I wouldn't expect a low info voter like you to "get it"!

    Carry on with your miserable day!

    • 39 votes
    #1.15 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:34 AM EST

    Go for it ... the Republican party would be annihilated.

    Republicans are being annihilated regardless of what they do by the Left and the Press. Exhibit A is Obama's Press Conference yesterday.

    They may as well go down trying to save the country.

    I find sniping at a bit of opening humor sad and pathetic.

    Sure, let me try making a joke about Michelle Obama as an opening thread and see how much grief it gets. Why can't you folks "Move Forward"? The election is over, why do you keep living in the past?

    • 62 votes
    #1.16 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:34 AM EST
    Comment author avatarDavid WalkerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    Fairfax Bill:

    I don't know how it is possible to write a post that is more inaccurate than the one above. I'll take it apart and smash it tomorrow.

    However, for the moment, I'm going to take your quote:

    The shameless alarmists from the army of slime on the left would have us believe the U.S. might actually "default" on its debt and push the global economy into chaos.

    and expose it as pure deception and warped interpretation. Not one single Democrat has suggested defaulting on the debt. Not one. It is Republicans and Republicans alone who have raised the prospect of refusing to pay the very bills they incurred.

    It is an absolute fact that at the turn of the millennium, when the economy was generating surplus revenues, FRB Chairman Alan Greenspan advised against using surplus revenues for reducing the debt. Unfortunately, President Clinton took that advice. To compound the problem, when President Bush took office, he not only didn't pay down debt, he - along with a Republican-controlled Congress - cut taxes, started two wars, and gave the nation an unfunded drug benefit.

    Those are facts, Bill. I don't think many of us missed your drivel while you were gone.

    • 56 votes
    #1.17 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:37 AM EST

    White Collar Auto

    Did you vote for or against the new Detroit-Windsor bridge? Show me some wisdom.

    • 19 votes
    #1.18 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:39 AM EST

    Say it with me, 4 MORE years of President Obama and there isn't a damn thing YOU can do about it!

    Hi Feisty,

    Yes Indeed! 4 more for 44.

    • 31 votes
    #1.19 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:40 AM EST

    If the rethuglicans don't raise the debt ceiling that's fine. Two things will happen. The markets will freak and our interest on the debt will go up. The Red welfare states will see just how much they are the people that they've been complaining about when the checks stop coming in. Then we can all watch the GNOP implode!

    • 35 votes
    #1.20 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:40 AM EST

    Republicans like to play the game, if it were my household budget. So lets play that game. If it was my household and I didn't pay my bills the bank would repossess my house, everything in it and my car. If it was my household budget I would cut back on spending. So where do I cut, I can't cut back on food, shelter, health care, I guess I give up the luxuries, movies, the bar, etc.

    So the federal budget, if you cut back on seniors (Medicare, Social Security, etc.) We hurt our own. Welfare, is not a luxury as these triple digit people think it is. I got it, we can do without such a big military presence all over the world.

    Bottom line, the president didn't run this debt up congress did. The gift of the republican congress and a republican president that just keeps on giving. Boner step up to the plate ol' buddy or you will really crying in your beer when even your safe district turns on you for not paying the bills and throwing the country and the world into a tailspin. You want to cut spending, so do I, but that is a different issue.

    • 42 votes
    #1.21 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:41 AM EST

    Feisty, I didn't see the press conference, but I have read the transcript, and, in defense of the journalists, at least their questions gave the President a chance to make his points:

    1) In previous debt-ceiling negotiations, there was the possibility of compromise. This is the first Congress that has actually threatened to default on America's debt if it doesn't get everything the extreme right wants. How can the President negotiate with people who refuse to compromise?

    2) Raising the debt ceiling does not give government the opportunity to increase spending, it simply makes it possible to pay for what Congress has already spent.

    • 32 votes
    #1.22 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:45 AM EST

    Instead, the real result of a prospective congressional refusal to increase the debt ceiling would be the mother of all government spending cuts. In that brave new world the government would be forced to do two things: 1) prioritize how it will spend the 54 cents in cash left over after servicing the debt; and 2) spend not a penny more than that 54 cents.

    So the guy from Fairfax is perfectly happy telling social security recipients we can only afford to pay those with last names starting with A through F. Those of you with last names starting with G through Z, well, good luck surviving without a check this month, and the next, and the next. And for those on Medicare, sorry, but only those of you with last names starting with U through Z will be covered this month.

    I guess that is one way to solve the debt ceiling problem; get rid of the senior population drawing those benefits. Deny them food and medical coverage. And while we are at it, pull back that pesky SS death payment. After all, burning bodies en masse is so much cheaper than individual funerals. Why, I would bet in no time, we wouldn't even need a debt ceiling debate, since we killed off 40% of those pesky entitlement takers.

    Well Bill, we can at least give you credit for thinking outside the pine box. You have solved the Medicare funds shortage, Social Security deficit projection problem, and the debt ceiling in one fell swoop. Wouldn't it be easier to just release a genetically altered flu strain that targets our fellow citizens over 68?

    • 38 votes
    #1.23 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:45 AM EST

    Congress already wrote and mailed the checks to our creditors and the creditors have deposited the checks and are now waiting for the check to clear so they can pay their employees and creditors.

    Please don't bounce our National checks the penalty is too large.

    • 35 votes
    #1.24 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:47 AM EST

    GreatlyEntitled, If you think that living on a bare existence is a great life you should try it. No one wants to be on welfare, no one. Bill Clinton proved that when he and his policies that he forced on a republican congress by shutting the government down created the greatest boom in my lifetime and perhaps in history and we enjoyed full employment. Simply put, under the democrats there were jobs. It didn't take George W. Bush long to end that. By the way, this creates the need for welfare. We take care of our own as we should take care of our own. You want to make draconian cuts to anything, cut the military, we no longer can afford to be the worlds cop.

    • 35 votes
    #1.25 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:48 AM EST
    Less than a week away before President Obama's 2nd Inauguration:
    William Henry Harrison- He spent his time in the army fighting Indians on the frontier. He was the first president to receive over one million votes.
    James Polk – It was during his presidency in which gaslights were first installed in The White House. He was President when the US won the Mexican-American War.
    Zachary Taylor  - Was a hero during the Mexican War. Gold discovered in California during his presidency. Enter the Gold Rush. Began to take a strong stand against appeasing the south on the subject of slavery but died during the fight over the Compromise of 1850. He was the second president to die in office. He spent July 4, 1850, eating cherries and milk at a ceremony at the Washington Monument. 
    He got sick from the heat and died five days later. Abraham Lincoln gave the eulogy at his funeral.
    Millard Fillmore – Appointed Daniel Webster his Secretary of State. He was the last president born in the 18th Century. Born in NY, he is best known for his lack of strong opposition to slavery. As VP under Taylor, he presided for months over the debate in Congress on the controversial Compromise of 1850, which ultimately led to the Civil War. He opposed the policies of Abraham Lincoln throughout the Civil War.
    Franklin Pierce – He was a terrible student and at one point had the lowest grades in his class. He decided to become more dedicated to his studies and graduated third in his class. His classmates were Nathaniel Hawthorne and Longfellow. Only president to say “I promise” in place of “I swear”.  He was a very heavy drinker and died as a result of his drinking.
    James Buchanan – Wrote the now famous note to Abraham Lincoln: “If you are as happy entering the White House as I on leaving, you are a happy man indeed.”
    Abraham Lincoln: He was the first president to be born outside of the original 13 colonies. He was born in Kentucky. 
    Andrew Johnson – The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was passed in Congress during Johnson’s Administration, even though he himself did not believe former slaves should have the same legal rights as white people.
    • 24 votes
    #1.26 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:51 AM EST

    In 2006 Obama voted against the debt ceiling increase. Obama called it a failure of leadership, irresponsible, and unpatriotic. Now Obama says raising the debt ceiling is the right thing to do. No shortage of hypocrisy from Obama. Obama has done absolutely nothing to address this countries fiscal condition, and all his claims of spending cuts are nothing but Washington accounting gimmicks and spin. Obama broke is single most needed promise of his first term, and that was cutting the deficit in half. Instead Obama more then doubled it, and he will leave office after his second term having added more to our national debt then all previous presidents combined. The Obama legacy will be he came, he spent, and he left future generations owing more then 20 trillion with nothing to show for it.

    • 73 votes
    #1.27 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:52 AM EST

    developed 19 areas where President Obama could use executive orders to institute new gun control policy.

    So we live in a dictatorship now?

    • 49 votes
    #1.28 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:53 AM EST

    Hey Johntho

    When I hear reports of so-called ' bare existence ' pulling in anywhere from 2 to 3 grand a month, how is sensible?? It creates a stronger need for welfare given all the BS going on doesn't it? The numbers on that DO continue to rise. Where is the incentive to work IF they have the choice NOT to and can get paid MORE money simply by staying home. Oh by the way, that does happen to. It is happening all around the country.

    p.s. soooo make necessary cuts to the military. I said that a long time ago. Bring them home NOW. Why wait??? *smiles*

    • 13 votes
    #1.29 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:53 AM EST
    Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    and, in defense of the journalists, at least their questions gave the President a chance to make his points:

    Sorry Ames, I have to disagree. The President explained the debt ceiling in his opening statement, then he answered basically the same question on more than 3 occasions. I got the answer the first time, not sure why the Chuck Todd's and such didn't.

    What happened to immigration, the filibuster rule, education, climate change etc?

    Instead they focused on the shiny object...

    First they bitch about the President not holding enough PC's, then when he has one they waste their time parroting each other...

    Just my 0.02

    • 32 votes
    #1.30 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:57 AM EST

    Pat Boston, MA-

    James Polk – It was during his presidency in which gaslights were first installed in The White House. He was President when the US won the Mexican-American War.
    Nice list, Pat.
    Polk served one term.
    Salud
    • 17 votes
    #1.31 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:59 AM EST

    It appears that the chief goal of Obama’s press conference yesterday was to pin the responsibility -- and potential blame -- on Congress for raising (or not raising) the debt ceiling

    Yes, so easy to point fingers to make up for his own inability to get this under control.

    Meanwhile, they seek to spend, spend, spend in an effort to get out of debt. What an amazing philosophy is that?

    • 32 votes
    #1.32 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:00 AM EST

    @GreatlyEntitled, because bringing the troops home from established bases overseas (not in the war zones) costs more than it ever saves.

    • 7 votes
    #1.33 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:00 AM EST

    Obama the flip flopper.

    This is the idiocy of the left

    Obama want to continue increasing the debt limit until the whole debt is pay-off. Obama is pointing the gun on Americans heads.

    The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. … Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that 'the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.....Barack Hussein Obama

    • 45 votes
    #1.34 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:00 AM EST

    amy said: "Feisty, I didn't see the press conference, but I have read the transcript, and, in defense of the journalists, at least their questions gave the President a chance to make his points"

    is that really what you want the press to do? ask questions designed to allow a president to get his talking points out?

    that is what official state run media does for leaders -- a free press is challenging but respectful

    • 36 votes
    #1.35 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:02 AM EST

    GreatlyEntitled, If you think that living on a bare existence is a great life you should try it. No one wants to be on welfare, no one.

    If you believe that I have bridge you may be interested in.

    Still, the company with 128 employees has 5 to 7 job openings it can't fill. "We get really frustrated when we have a job and we can't get anyone to work it," said Randy Lovelace a production manager at Metal Technologies.

    Even more incredible, Lovelace said some applicants have told him they'd rather stay unemployed instead of taking a job starting at $10.00 -to- $12.00 an hour.

    "We have actually had people who we have hired for jobs. We have had them sit in front of us, set to start the next day, and then they call in and say, "I'm not gonna take that job, they just extended unemployment benefits,'" said a frustrated Lovelace. "At that point we've called the state of Indiana and turned 'em in. But yeah, we've had people say, 'I'm not taking that job.'"

    At Aphelion Precision Technologies outside Chicago, Bill Black has jobs starting at $12.00 an hour he's been unable to fill for years.

    "I ran an ad and I said, 'No experience necessary, apprentices willing to hire, willing to train.' No one showed up. Not a single applicant," said Black, whose parents founded Aphelion in 1981.

    "In the blink of an eye, I'd hire [10 to 15 people] right now. That's the reality," said Black.

    With more American manufacturers moving their plants to three shifts, the lack of applicants and inability to fill jobs is weighing on companies. At Metal Technologies there are work stations that sit empty because the company has openings.

    "Even though you pay shift premiums and things like that to entice them to work those off-shifts, it's double hard to get them to work that," explained Conrad.

    When Aphelion could not staff an overnight shift it joined a growing list of companies turning to lights out manufacturing. It now programs a machine to build parts overnight when no one is on the shop floor.

    "I'm still running (want) ads," said Black. "Unfortunately, not many are showing up, but I'm still looking to hire."

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/100289795/Plenty_of_Manufacturing_Jobs_but_Too_Few_Applicants

    • 15 votes
    #1.36 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:03 AM EST

    I see that Fairfax Bill is back. I still remember when he exposed the Big Lie about the "skewed polls" that were covering up Mitt Whatzisface's big victory in November. This time he's exposing the Big Lie about the consequences of defaulting on the nation's debt. Ben Bernanke and all those economists are the Big Liars who are telling it. I'm sure Bill's explanation about debt default are as accurate as his revelations about the presidential polls.

    As for the press conference, the intrepid beltway reporters have pinpointed the real reason for the debt ceiling crisis: President Obama doesn't schmooze enough with Republicans. He's hurt their fee-fees so bad it's understandable that they're going to wreck the economy. They need some way to express how unloved Obama makes them feel, so how could they NOT wreck the economy?

    • 26 votes
    #1.37 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:03 AM EST

    @serious

    Those numbers should have been decreased even greater by now. The call to make cuts to the military are harped on consistently. So where do We The People make those cuts everyone keeps hollaring about?

    • 2 votes
    #1.38 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:05 AM EST

    Feisty, They lay down for Bush, so now they stand up to Obama. Doesn't make a lot of sense, but no worries, this President is a pretty patient guy and just uses their dumb questions to enlarge his points. I don't think anybody feels we are living in the golden age of journalism these days.

    • 26 votes
    #1.39 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:06 AM EST

    Go for it ... the Republican party would be annihilated.

    Yes the republican politicians did this to themselves. The power and greed over took them and they forgot about the people. This is the same exact path the democrat politicians are on. Your party is headed to ruin. It isn't going to be soon, but it is happening. The republican party lost citizens due to them straying from what is best for the country, I am one of those citizens. The same thing is going to happen to the democrat party since it's citizens have given the politicians a blank check and will not hold them responsible for any of their mistakes. You'll wake up one morning (like I did) and wonder what the hell happened to your politicians.

    It is a fantasy to think that all welfare recipients and food stamp recipients are Democrats.

    I could give an absolute @!$%# which party welfare recipients belong to. All I know is there is a @!$%#load of people on welfare and foodstamps that do not need them and do not deserve them. Those programs are meant to help people that absolutely need the help. It is not there to purchase votes. Just this last weekend, when I was returning a couple of Redbox movies, I saw a young couple using their EBT card to rent movies. I don't pay my taxes so that lazy people can be entertained.

    And now obama is going to try and push through amnesty once again. Yes, it's amnesty. I don't give a @!$%# what spin obama puts on it. If you don't have to go through the current legal processes to become a citizen, it's amnesty. I can guarantee that he's not going to enforce the welfare stipulation that immigrants going through the legal system have to obey either. Since we're talking millions and millions of low income, uneducated workers, our welfare system is going to get flooded. You think we have too many on foodstamps now? Just wait until he forces amnesty through. Toss another 10 or 11 million on there.

    They lay down for Bush, so now they stand up to Obama. Doesn't make a lot of sense. I don't think anybody feels we are living in the golden age of journalism these days.

    Are you @!$%#ing kidding me? The left wing media (i.e. 80% of the total media) totally hammered bush through his terms. Hell, most of the time he deserved it. They definitely didn't lay down for him. As far as standing up to obama? Lol, you're off your rocker lady. They've been in bed with obama from the start. Hell, at least he's giving them lube unlike the middle class.

    @!$%#ing libs.

    • 20 votes
    #1.40 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:06 AM EST

    So I see the President has now admitted that he was "irresponsible" and "absurd" as a Senator.

    President Obama on Monday slammed Republicans who are resisting an increase to the nation's debt ceiling without further deficit reductions and vowed he won't negotiate on the issue.

    Obama called the GOP stance "irresponsible" and "absurd" and warned it would set off an economic crisis. He said the United States was not a "deadbeat nation" that fails to pay its bills.

    So if Republicans go ahead and vote against raising the debt ceiling exactly how are they different from Senator Obama in 2006?

    “The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. government can’t pay its own bills. ... I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit.”

    — Then-Sen. Barack Obama, floor speech in the Senate, March 16, 2006

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/annotating-obamas-2006-speech-against-boosting-the-debt-limit/2013/01/14/aa8cf8c4-5e9b-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_blog.html

    From what I can see he was irresponsible as a Senator, or made a vote for political purposes (remembers all the present votes in Illinois?) knowing it would go down to defeat, a very cynical action.

    • 30 votes
    #1.41 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:07 AM EST

    What a load of crap! What does the Spewer In Chief have for an answer on either the Debt or the Deficit? He doesn't! All he is interested in is blaming the Republicans. What a leader. One bad year under GW, 4 bad years under Obama. He is a joke of a leader.

    • 44 votes
    #1.42 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:09 AM EST

    Geo,

    Yeah sure buddy, and what are republicans interested in. Please do tell..

    • 17 votes
    #1.43 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:15 AM EST

    @Houston

    As for the press conference, the intrepid beltway reporters have pinpointed the real reason for the debt ceiling crisis: President Obama doesn't schmooze enough with Republicans. He's hurt their fee-fees so bad it's understandable that they're going to wreck the economy. They need some way to express how unloved Obama makes them feel, so how could they NOT wreck the economy?

    So why exactly did Senator Obama vote to wreck the economy in 2006?

    • 24 votes
    #1.44 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:17 AM EST

    Alan NJ:

    So if Republicans go ahead and vote against raising the debt ceiling exactly how are they different from Senator Obama in 2006?

    Senator Obama was making a protest against Bush's irresponsible spending when he voted against raising the debt ceiling, and he wouldn't have done it if his vote were really needed to avert default on the debt. He wasn't holding the US economy hostage to get his demands met. The Republicans are doing exactly that. Next question?

    • 26 votes
    #1.45 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:18 AM EST

    A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand. – Lucius Annaeus Seneca, c. 4BC - 65AD.

    Surprise......Surprise, Obama has lied to US!

    Wow like that is News? He has used the Unconstitutional Power of Executive Order as if he was Caesar to rob honest Americans of their Rights all the while using it to protect and defend his Corporate Masters on Wall Street like Goldman Sachs.

    Write you Congress Person and demand that Obama's Legacy be the end of the Unconstitutional Power of Executive Order. Congress has that Power if not the Will!

    All of these Corporate Presidents since Regan have used the assumed Power of Executive Order to become Lying Murdering Dictators to US!

    Always remember Obama's New Presidential Kill List is a EXECUTIVE ORDER!

    The Constitution shall never be construed … to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. – Samuel Adams

    • 20 votes
    #1.46 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:18 AM EST

    Watching President Obama deal with the press yesterday reminded me what great patience it takes to be president. Some of those questions really were "eye rolling" ones. It is troubling to think we have legislators and the WH press corps who do not know the difference between the deficit, debt, spending bills and the debt ceiling. I don't doubt that it is difficult to think up a question different from all the others--we tend to think in narrow bands of focus whether fiscal cliff or debt ceiling crisis. While repeating the same questions over and over gave President Obama the opportunity to make his points over and over, I could not help wondering why some so-called journalists were repeating GOP talking points as questions.

    No offense to the lady who asked if President Obama socialized more with republicans, wouldn't that make it easier to get things done but....seriously, lady, where the heck were you when President Obama invited Congress to a weekly cocktail hour after first taking office in an effort to promote bi-partisanship and getting to know each other? Where the heck were you when he invited Congress to a SuperBowl party? Where the heck were you when he invited Congress to attend the screening of "Lincoln"? Did you miss him playing golf with Speaker Boehner? Speaker Boehner has turned down six (6) state dinner invitations and yet that journalist seemed willing to blame President Obama for the lack of "socialization". We have serious problems in this country, there were dozens of issues to question. It was offensive to see a journalist ask an ignorant question about whether socializing more would help solve those problems. By the way, President Obama's answer to the "socializing" question was pitch perfect and pointed out the hypocrisy of the question as well as the lack of preparation by the journalist asking it.

    • 26 votes
    #1.47 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:19 AM EST

    @jackass obimbo supporters; enjoy the tax HIKE!!! ` I KNOW I WILL!!! (jackass`es) more dept no prob, we`s blame`s Bush!!! did i say jackass?

    • 17 votes
    #1.48 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:20 AM EST

    Stuff it Bill!

    Nice to see you again too, Miss Feisty. I notice you haven't lost your touch.

    • 16 votes
    #1.49 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:21 AM EST

    this idiot in the white house is a joke.. you can tell he is lying because his lips are moving.. what's sad is half of America actually believes him .. the other half has a brain

    • 30 votes
    #1.50 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:21 AM EST

    So if Republicans go ahead and vote against raising the debt ceiling exactly how are they different from Senator Obama in 2006?

    in short, they're not. In lefty liberal FR world, Obama is the Savior of America and times were 'different' way back in 2006 (he wasnt Emper...President).

    • 29 votes
    #1.51 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:23 AM EST

    So Houston, then it was Bush's irresponsible spending and now it's Congress's irresponsible spending?

    Which is it? The President or the Congress who is reponsible for all the Irresponsible spending?

    • 27 votes
    #1.52 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:25 AM EST

    Wow, Jody, I didn't see the President press conference, I just read the transcript FR provided, so I missed this exchange.

    I will never understand why Republican leaders didn't use their opportunity to condemn the whole birther nonesense. They could have looked like champions of equality if they had pushed back on goofy old Donald Trump. It was a gift from the political Gods, and they missed it. What were they afraid of? Losing the bubba vote?

    • 14 votes
    #1.53 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:26 AM EST

    Senator Obama was making a protest against Bush's irresponsible spending when he voted against raising the debt ceiling, and he wouldn't have done it if his vote were really needed to avert default on the debt. He wasn't holding the US economy hostage to get his demands met. The Republicans are doing exactly that. Next question?

    So he was posturing? Now how do we know he wouldn't have voted for the Iraq war if it was politically expedient? How can we know what any of his votes mean for if he would change them if affected the result?

    I guess it's not surprising from the candidate who claimed that he would never force people to pay for health insurance and then as President signed into law the individual mandate.

    Is there anything he said on the last campaign that we can trust?

    And you guys called Romney a flip-flopper.

    • 25 votes
    #1.54 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:26 AM EST

    So I ask the left, shouldn't we just raise the debt ceiling to around 100 trillion dollars, that is about the total of unfunded liabilities.

    And FYI there is a difference between debt and bills to pay.

    • 8 votes
    #1.55 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:35 AM EST

    I am so glad the president and congress don't have as much impact as the partisans who routinely post here believe. This is nothing but theater, blaming the other side for doing what they both do best, nothing! The reason things are the way they are is because both sides want it that way, they both created it and both perpetuate it and the partisan buffoons justify it and the beat goes on.

    • 4 votes
    #1.56 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:37 AM EST

    Houston - "Senator Obama was making a protest against Bush's irresponsible spending when he voted against raising the debt ceiling, and he wouldn't have done it if his vote were really needed to avert default on the debt. He wasn't holding the US economy hostage to get his demands met. The Republicans are doing exactly that. Next question?"

    Is that sarcasm? Because no rational person can possibly believe that.

    • 12 votes
    #1.57 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:38 AM EST

    I will never understand why Republican leaders

    Is it because you're too much of a genius to understand a bunch of gun toting, bible thumping pale male and stale rednecks? Wait, isnt Obama's cabinet pale male and stale? *GASP*

    • 14 votes
    #1.58 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:39 AM EST

    Jody, Iowa-

    By the way, President Obama's answer to the "socializing" question was pitch perfect and pointed out the hypocrisy of the question as well as the lack of preparation by the journalist asking it.

    I think that jounalist got their degree at FU!

    (Faux University).

    Salud

    • 13 votes
    #1.59 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:39 AM EST

    They say United We Stand, Divided We Fall... and for that reason President Obama is the worst president we have ever seen. Through his class warfare he has effectively lead to the polarization of our country. At no time in history has our country been so divided, and it is extremely sad. Now he goes one step further and divides the country yet again by attacking individuals RIGHTS. Congrats President Obama - Your legacy will forever be the following: 1) Record Spending, so much in fact that you have spent more than presidents 1 - 43 combined. 2) Dividing the citizens of the United States - polarization like no one in this country has ever seen. Once again Congrats - you have done things other presidents never have - but are any of them good?

    • 19 votes
    #1.60 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:40 AM EST

    To the conservatively impaired, a quick check of historical debt ceiling votes will show that both parties when they are in the minority cast "protest votes". However, both the majority and the minority always ensured there were enough votes to increase the debt ceiling because back then, those same parties recognized the catastrophic impact that failing to raise the debt ceiling would have.

    Now, we have republicans legislators (Marsha Blackburn was one yesterday) who do not grasp the simple fact that government shut downs in the past have been the result of the failure to pass "spending bills" not a failure to increase the debt ceiling. They are not the same thing. These idiots, yes they are idiots, lack the basic understanding that the debt is money THEY ALREADY SPENT.

    The suggestion I have for President Obama and Treasury is IF these republicans fools decide to opt for declaring the US in bankruptcy, they and their families should be the first ones to NOT receive a paycheck, the first ones to NOT have the government subsidized portion of their health insurance paid.

    I have followed politics for many years and never, ever have I seen so many incompetent, ignorant, selfish people in either party as are in the republican legislative caucus today.

    • 16 votes
    #1.61 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:40 AM EST
    Comment author avatarjoe-2849984Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    Feisty, you are the most disgusting PIG on this site. You probably weigh 300 lbs and never worked a day in your life. What a pathetic POS

    • 29 votes
    #1.62 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:41 AM EST

    Looks like Bill from the vaginal probe capital of this country is an easy target today. When reading his post, it almost feels like it was Oct 2012 all over again... Oh how time flies but things just stay the same for some people lol

    • 10 votes
    #1.63 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:41 AM EST

    Rick3416939- THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE.

      #1.64 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:42 AM EST

      Carlos - "This is nothing but theater, blaming the other side for doing what they both do best, nothing! The reason things are the way they are is because both sides want it that way, they both created it and both perpetuate it and the partisan buffoons justify it and the beat goes on."

      Actually we are were we are (16+ trillion in debt) because both sides sold out their beliefs. We have a complex system of checks and balances so nothing does it gun especially irrational and in a hurry.

      • 3 votes
      #1.65 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:42 AM EST

      Backhouse,

      You state that are having the strongest recovery so I ask you to submit your source for this. Here is the link for the Economist Magazine which publishes that data and we are no where near the strongest:

      http://www.economist.com/news/economic-and-financial-indicators/21569409-output-prices-and-jobs

      Forgetting China we are behind Norway, Russia, Turkey, Australia, India, plus many more countries.

      • 10 votes
      #1.66 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:46 AM EST

      The debt ceiling was raised 18 times under Reagan, 7 times under Bush and 3 times so far for Obama. Raising the debt ceiling when a republicans president is to be done without fanfare. When it's a democrat it's a catastrophe even though much of the cause was the Bush collapse, his wars, drug plan and tax cuts.

      • 19 votes
      #1.67 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:48 AM EST

      The only argument to be made about flip-floppers is whose flipper flopped. Mitt come most readily to mind.

      • 10 votes
      #1.69 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:52 AM EST

      If you support and listen to the BIG 0 you start to lie too.

      Me scotch tape himself........

      • 8 votes
      #1.70 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:55 AM EST

      MUW, Obama has used the power of executive order about half as many times as George Jr.

      Less than some POTUS, more than others.

      I think it's been unde-rused in this administration. A lot of things would be much better if the GOP couldn't block or filibuster everything the Prez has submitted and many things the GOP itself submitted.

      • 8 votes
      #1.71 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:58 AM EST

      Larry - "When it's a democrat it's a catastrophe even though much of the cause was the Bush collapse, his wars, drug plan and tax cuts."

      You do understand why that is, the dems/libs love spending other peoples money. Of course the Dems vote to raise the debt ceiling (unless you believe that crap above about PBO and some moral stand) how else can they possibly pay for their promises to get elected?

      Even if Mit won, how could the dems vote against it? I mean they want to continue unemployment for life, increase spending, built new bridges, invest in green energy, union benefits, pay teachers more, and on and on and on. How in their right mind could they ever vote NO.

      • 6 votes
      #1.72 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:00 AM EST
      Comment author avatarjoe-2849984Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      JODY AND AMY, Please take your heads out of Obama's ass and breathe some fresh air. How pathetic!

      • 17 votes
      #1.73 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:01 AM EST

      They say United We Stand, Divided We Fall... and for that reason President Obama is the worst president we have ever seen. Through his class warfare he has effectively lead to the polarization of our country

      FreedomOverSympathy: You have the effect correct but apparently aren't smart enough to determine the cause. Dividing the country? Wasn't it Romney talking about the 47% while Obama spoke of the 100%? Isn't criticism of the working poor and elderly divisive? Both republican presidents and democrats have implemented tax increases during times of war or when deficits got too big. Only current republicans point to withdrawing a small part of the Bush tax cuts from those who could most afford it and call that class warfare. If raising taxes that mostly affects one segment of the population then every president since Washington's probably guilty.

      Why was Ryans original plan to eliminate the home mortgage deduction and employer health exemption responsible governing because they fell mostly on the middle class but a small tax increase on the wealthy is class warfare? The truth is because most on the radical right listen to those like Limbaugh worth 100 million or so tell them low taxes on the rich create jobs so it's better to tax the poor and they're stupid enough to believe it. If that were true wouldn't Bushs 400 billion a year tax cut not have resulted in the lowest job creation record since Eisenhower? Wasn't it supposed to create jobs?

      • 16 votes
      #1.74 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:01 AM EST

      Hey gang!

      A reminder that Feisty, David Walker, Pigotry, and Beverley are all the same poster. They all post from the same IP address.

      I know, very sad! LMFAO!!

      • 17 votes
      #1.75 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:03 AM EST

      Well, now you've gone and done it RedDev -

      Wouldn't it be easier to just release a genetically altered flu strain that targets our fellow citizens over 68?

      When Captain Tripps (Senior) get released, I'm blaming you. ;-) (Sorry - I was reading The Stand recently...it was too good to pass up.)

      • 3 votes
      #1.76 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 AM EST

      The only argument to be made about flip-floppers is whose flipper flopped. Mitt come most readily to mind.

      pretty disingenious. Mitt never owned a dolphin

      • 8 votes
      #1.77 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:06 AM EST

      The USA becomes the eastern precinct of China as Obama sells us to them to pay the debt.

      Ooooh, scary - because according to the right, all the debt is owned by China.

      • 8 votes
      #1.78 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:06 AM EST

      Really? This is what passes for journalism? Broken promises that were left out were creation of new jobs(anyone remember shovel ready jobs not so shovel ready?), fixing the debt(2008 speech),end to the rhetoric after Arizona/Giffords shooting( The Rhetoric never stops with him), Address the housing market (millions still foreclosing 5 years after) guns (fast and furious arming criminals in Mexico) and that is just the first 2 years of a Presidency that upon initiating Universal Healthcare was despised by the majority of Americans the way it was rammed through Congress ( We have to pass it to know what is in it?) give me a break. We cannot keep electing people who lack moral fiber and intestinal fortitude ( aka career politicians who have accomplished nothing in the real world).

      • 11 votes
      #1.79 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:08 AM EST

      Larry - Short Memory much?

      Obama spoke of the 100% - Wasn't it actually the Rich vs. the 98%?

      Forget the little made up war on women?

      Since the trillion dollar Obama-Pelosi stimulus was passed the labor force participation rate has dropped to a 29 year low. (RSC)

      Since Obama took office the labor force has shrunk from 66% to 63% as almost 5 million American adults stopped looking for work.

      The words to pay attention to are: labor force participation rate

      because they fell mostly on the middle class but a small tax increase on the wealthy is class warfare?

      Because actually raising tax on the rich wasn't for any other reason then class warfare, it isn't helping our deficit or recreating jobs, what other reason would you do that?

      1) After the Bush administration tax cuts, there were 52 months of continuous job creation – TRUE

      2) 52 months of job creation is the largest such period in American history - TRUE

      • 16 votes
      #1.80 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:09 AM EST

      pretty disingenuous. Mitt never owned a dolphin

      Did I pretend not to have the ability to type a capital F?

      • 6 votes
      #1.81 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:15 AM EST

      I think approaching Ann Romney with a DWTS invitation was disrespectful, period.

      That's a bit like asking Pelosi, Feinstein, Michelle or Hillary to appear on The Price is Right.

      • 8 votes
      #1.82 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:17 AM EST

      You left out a few.

      Eliminate all oil and gas tax loopholes, Allow five days of public comment before signing bills, Tougher rules against revolving door for lobbyists and former officials, closing Gitmo and Require 25 percent renewable energy by 2025.

      • 8 votes
      #1.83 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:18 AM EST

      President: "If we default, the Social Security checks won't be written, or the veterans benefit checks, or maybe even our military won't get their checks"!

      Question (that should have been asked): "How about welfare checks and food stamps, you didn't mention them, will those also stop"?

      • 13 votes
      #1.84 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:21 AM EST

      Tom, shut your radio off, it wasn't the democrats that put us 16 trillion in debt, it was the republicans cutting taxes, starting two wars, providing an drug benefit for seniors, etc. Tax and spend democrats is a myth, but borrow and spend republicans are a fact.

      • 7 votes
      #1.85 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:24 AM EST

      Larry - How long has the FASFA program been running? About 40 years correct? Its interesting that FASFA only helps low income individuals and the lower spectrum of Middle class individuals ... yet only 27.2% of our Nation has a Bachelors degree. The interesting thing is the vast majority of that 27.2% also have parents that obtained a bachelors degree or better. Why is it that the majority of our nations poor have not taken advantage of the FASFA program, at least in any meaningful manner that ended with a degree? Ah - that's right, because you have to work to obtain a four year degree - you cannot just steal from someone else who already has earned success. No University will hear the "give me a degree because its fair" line.

      Do you have a bachelors degree or better? If not why don't you? Are you well off enough that a bachelors degree would not lead to higher pay?

      • 5 votes
      #1.86 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:31 AM EST

      Bobster - are you still spouting your imbecillic idiotcy? OMG you are such a dolt!

      inMYDAY - it is nothing like approaching any of the women you listed and asking them to be on The Price is Right. Each of the women you listed is someone of importance who has a specific public role to fill - First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State. Ann Romney is no one!

      • 8 votes
      #1.87 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:32 AM EST

      I stand on the fact nobody wants to be on welfare, the vast majority would take a job if they have the ability and knowledge to do it. However with lies like some of you right wonders tell you would think that welfare is a great living. Triple digits. If you believe that call in and quit your jobs, you will see it is less then a bare existence, and is nothing anyone strives for. We take care of our own and we should. You SOBs want to call this a Christian nation but want to stave the very children that you force into the world by making decisions for woman. Shame on you even though you know no shame. Scumbag, greedy @!$%#s and I am not sure I haven't raised your value with that.

      • 8 votes
      #1.88 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:33 AM EST

      Johntho - I have a friend who works construction for one reason and one reason only - Winter.... He is willing to sit and be a flagger 1/2 of the year just because he can collect unemployment the other 1/2. He is willing to accept a laughable $250 a week just so he doesn't have to work. Its sad really. The crazy thing is - where I reside finding work isn't hard. In fact our Bank Tellers make more money per hour than he does, even when he is working, but alas Bank Tellers work during the winter - So he isn't a bank teller. Moreover this season he was offered a job in a Kitchen - making $10 an hour - he told me about this job while laughing - saying eh - I will just take my $250 a week and not have to work.

      • 10 votes
      #1.89 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:39 AM EST

      johnnyboy, The "started two wars" BS from you is quite stale ... both wars were approved by Congress !

      All you are doing, AS USUAL, is making excuses for Obama's financial incompetence !!

      • 15 votes
      #1.90 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:41 AM EST

      Tax and spend democrats is a myth, but borrow and spend republicans are a fact.

      That's pretty damn funny as we (the middle class) sit here with an expired payroll tax cut, at the same time GE, Citigroup and other corps get their tax breaks extended so they don't have to even pay taxes, at the same time, obama and his butt buddies in congress refuse to do any actual spending cuts.

      You were saying?

      • 12 votes
      #1.91 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:42 AM EST

      The media yesterday finally grew some and though they did not give B.O. the tough questions he deserves to be asked and Americans deserve to have answer, they did point out some of the lies B.O. has said during the last 4 years which made the dictator extremely hostile. I am predicting this will be the last news conference B.O. will participate in for the next 4 years. The only time we will hear his ramblings is when he gives NBC reporters a private interview in which he types of the questions and has ample time to come up with an answer that he believes will appease the small minded Americans who voted for him.

      • 14 votes
      #1.92 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:43 AM EST

      Johntho - you are right. The vast majority of people receiving government assistance would do anything for a job that pays a decent living. The exceptions are relatively few. I've seen jobs posted and lines around the block of people who would do anything to get the job. Those who constantly harp on people being on welfare by choice don't want to face the truth. They simply don't care about people.

      Barb210 - your predictions are about as good as the rest of your post - totally worthless and a waste of time!

      • 9 votes
      #1.93 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:43 AM EST

      I stand on the fact nobody wants to be on welfare

      As ignorant and blind as you are, you HAVE to be living a blissful life.

      Those who constantly harp on people being on welfare by choice don't want to face the truth.

      I've seen and lived with the truth. Get the @!$%# out of your glass house and see the real world lib.

      • 9 votes
      #1.94 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:49 AM EST

      Tom, shut your radio off, it wasn't the democrats that put us 16 trillion in debt, it was the republicans cutting taxes, starting two wars, providing an drug benefit for seniors, etc. Tax and spend democrats is a myth, but borrow and spend republicans are a fact.

      But this Administration extended those same tax cuts in 2010, extended them for 98% in 2012, cut the payroll tax by 2% for two years, expanded the drug benefit for seniors and sent a further 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. But somehow no Democrats are responsible?

      Why don't you at least admit that BOTH parties are responsible for the debt.

      • 10 votes
      #1.95 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:50 AM EST

      Sanity,

      "idiotcy"

      LMFAO!!!! You are calling me names and yet you cannot spell idiocy. LOLOLOLOL!

      Liberals. God love em! LOL!

      • 11 votes
      #1.96 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:54 AM EST
      Comment author avatarstopfreeloadersExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      As usual Feisty Redhead, the fat bon bon eating liberal is quick to point out what is actually wrong with most liberals, they think like her, pathiec.

      • 11 votes
      #1.97 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:57 AM EST

      All Obama did to Wall St. was make them the Alfred E. Newman of all political promises.

      Sadly, Mr. President, that reform you promised us scored a big fat 'F' grade. Now you know who really runs this country...

      • 6 votes
      #1.98 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:57 AM EST

      LOL, Bobster

      Down here we say, "bless her (or his) heart."

      • 1 vote
      #1.99 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:59 AM EST

      Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

      Ann Romney was approached by Dancing With the Stars but turned the show down.

      oh, how sad for Queen Ann - she goes from being a potential First Lady to this? Now Sarah 'Failin" Palin's daughter and Ann Romney have something in common.

      • 8 votes
      #1.100 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:02 PM EST

      @seeking sanity,

      The only thing Michelle is filling very well is the back side of her skirt.

      Outside of the U. S. (and for many inside the U. S.) she is regarded as a pathetic, ungraceful, naive jerk.

      • 9 votes
      #1.101 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:03 PM EST

      LOL!

      Yeah, liberals post on here how great shape mrs obama is in. LOL! She has that huge booty! LOL! But I guess compared to Hilary, they are right. LMFAO!

      I'm spoiled though since my girlfriend is a former Miami Heat dance team gal and works out everyday. Now she is in great shape!

      I own a company and I have offices in several European cities. Obama is a joke in Europe. Europe is becoming more conservative everyday. It's amazing what has happened in the last 10 years over there. They now realize that socialism has failed much like it's cousin communism failed before it

      • 7 votes
      #1.102 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:17 PM EST

      I get so gwaddamned tired of hearing about the great republican "strawman" "the national debt" and the "debt ceiling". The Country has always had some debt. Our debt is so high right now, simply because our economy has been so weak. As we strengthen our employment situation we will significantly lower our deficits. Actually, if we were to sell 6 trillion in treasuries today, at an interest yield of 2.5 percent, then be able to gain full employment during the next two years, we could then, after 3 years of full employment, which would bring interest rates back up to about 6.5 %, buy back those notes for approximately 2.75 trillion. Japan presently holds a national debt that is about 240 % of its GDP, yet continues to buy US treasuries, and in fact has just announced an economic stimulus of some 20 trillion Yen, or some 140 billion dollars. This is how it's done. What the gwaddamned hell are we doing, continuing to "Dick" around with such gwaddamned claptrap as put forth by "pea brained" tea partyites, and the likes of bloggers, representative of the indomitably stupid "Bill Fairfax, Va.? Wanna fix the debt? Apply policy that brings "full Employment".

      • 8 votes
      #1.103 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:22 PM EST

      inMYday

      I live in Canada and am often in Europe. I have yet to hear anyone call the First Lady a "pathetic, naive jerk." I can assure you that those outsiders will consider your post to be written by one.

      • 10 votes
      #1.104 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:24 PM EST

      @seeking sanity, you wrote "ann romney is no one!"

      She's certainly a lot more important than you are, and contrary to what you said, she is important.

      @blackcatwhitecat, they didn't say it in English (duh). They used expressions like "nicht recht gescheit," and "pathétique enfantin."

      • 6 votes
      #1.105 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:28 PM EST

      inMYday

      Ann Romney (the Romneys) are proof that cash cannot turn trash into class. She truly is in touch with middle class America by having 2 dishwashers in her kitchen, 4 or 5 washer/dryers, and the hidden illegal immigrant that is actually the one using them. Shouldn't the Romney's be on their world wide tour visiting their money on some tropical island? Remember, PIRATES are the ones who hide their money...

      As for you republicants that blame Obama for the debt, a fly farting in the middle of the atlantic, or any other obtuse reason.. watch this little CLIP... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyeJ55o3El0 Please GET A BASIC UNDERstanding of what CONGRESS is responsible for....

      • 8 votes
      #1.107 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:35 PM EST

      As for you republicants that blame Obama for the debt, a fly farting in the middle of the atlantic, or any other obtuse reason.. watch this little CLIP... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyeJ55o3El0 Please GET A BASIC UNDERstanding of what CONGRESS is responsible for....

      So, will you accept that Bill Clinton did not balance the budget? Using your logic Newt Gingrich and the Republican congress were responsible?

      • 9 votes
      #1.108 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:39 PM EST

      BlackCatWhiteCat - If you live in Canada - why are you posting on American policies and principals as if you lived in America? I have yet to ever log onto another nations news and spew my opinions .... Maybe you should follow in my lead and focus on your country - not ours.

      • 8 votes
      #1.110 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:41 PM EST

      Dean in 3rd world Wisconsin....Really.... REALLY? Is that clueless statement really the best you can do by still "Blaming Bush" 5 years later? George Bush Jr was a DICTATOR TOO but he only had people Tortured Obama has the KILLED! Anyone else remember Obama's Executive Order Presidential Kill List?

      Now Bailout Barry wants to disarm US by Dictatorial Decree for his Masters of Wall Street without even bothering with Congressional Approval?

      What a Crock of Nonsense this isn't about an Unconstitutional Executive Order to close Federal Offices on Christmas Eve this is about Raping the Constitution itself!

      Yet once again the only excuse you Anti Gun People got is "Bush" signed an Executive over or about "Some Petty Thing" once upon a time while Obama uses them to attack America with TODAY!

      Once again demand Congress strip the Office of President and Wannabe Dictator of the self assumed Power of Executive Orders for violation of OUR Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United States and let that be Barrack Obama's Legacy and Gift to America!

      The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, bows, spears, firearms or other types of arms. The possession of these elements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues, and tends to permit uprising. – Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Japanese Shogun, August 29, 1558

      • 4 votes
      #1.112 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:49 PM EST

      itsabouttime,

      Thank you for the virtual tour of the Romney's household and for itemizing their appliances.

      I'm confident that you were a welcome guest in their home when you had the opportunity to take notes on what they own.

      I infer that you speak of yourself as well in your cash/trash/class postulate, as revealed by your metaphor using "a fart."

      Just so you'll know, "good taste" and "class" are two different things.

      • 5 votes
      #1.113 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:52 PM EST

      She truly is in touch with middle class America by having 2 dishwashers in her kitchen, 4 or 5 washer/dryers, and the hidden illegal immigrant that is actually the one using them

      Shall we then go through the list of how the obamas are in touch with the middle class by their vacations, and personal property/wealth? Neither family is in touch with the middle class and I find it extremely offensive for obama to even think he 'knows what the middle class goes through' and that 'he was one of us'. He had a very privileged upbringing in our country, to say otherwise is to lie.

      • 9 votes
      #1.114 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:52 PM EST

      Bobster#1.101

      Bullsh^t futures looking good eh? Aye Gwad, least you hope so. You've had to take delivery of so much of the stuff the EPA's gonna shut you down if you can't soon move it. As you can see, this thread won't bear more than two pokes of your turds. Can't hope to strew it all here.

      • 5 votes
      #1.116 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:54 PM EST

      FreedomOverSympathy

      BlackCatWhiteCat - If you live in Canada - why are you posting on American policies and principals as if you lived in America? I have yet to ever log onto another nations news and spew my opinions .... Maybe you should follow in my lead and focus on your country - not ours.

      This is the internet, it does not have a country of residence.

      As America has the ability to destroy the world, it is everyone's business.

      I pay US taxes when I reside there ... taxed without representation.

      When I login to this site I get Canadian ads ... MSNBC likes the money. There are at least 1000 Canadians posting on this site and many more just reading ... go ask management if they want us to go away.

      So far only a handful of people have complained. Most seem to enjoy my posts.

      You are more than welcome to comment on Canada in all of her media. Many Americans do, and we politely listen to what they have to say ... we do not fear opinions from the outside.

      • 9 votes
      #1.117 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:55 PM EST

      Erm, so exactly how many of you are from Canada? Just curious.

      • 2 votes
      #1.119 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:01 PM EST

      Tom - Plymouth-3672298

      Houston - "Senator Obama was making a protest against Bush's irresponsible spending when he voted against raising the debt ceiling, and he wouldn't have done it if his vote were really needed to avert default on the debt. He wasn't holding the US economy hostage to get his demands met. The Republicans are doing exactly that. Next question?"

      Is that sarcasm? Because no rational person can possibly believe that.

      I doubt you know any rational people, so your opinion is highly suspect.

      • 7 votes
      #1.120 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:06 PM EST

      Something to look
      forward to…….

      In the coming New Year, 2013, both Groundhog Day and the State of the Union address will occur on the same day. This is an ironic juxtaposition of events. One involves a meaningless ritual in which we look to
      an insignificant creature of little intelligence for prognostication.

      The other involves a groundhog.

      • 8 votes
      #1.121 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:07 PM EST

      John - "Tom, shut your radio off, it wasn't the democrats that put us 16 trillion in debt, it was the republicans cutting taxes, starting two wars, providing an drug benefit for seniors, etc."

      All things passed by both parties. yet the blame goes to Bush, Obama extended Afghan, passed Obamacare, and continued the tax cuts for two years and made the rest permanent?

      How the @!$%# to differentiate these two things in your small mind?

      • 6 votes
      #1.122 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:08 PM EST

      The King is heading towards impeachment. Give it a little more time.

      • 7 votes
      #1.123 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:13 PM EST

      BlackCatWhiteCat - I have enough respect for the Canadian people to not interfere and meddle in their politics. So you do not have to worry - I will mind my own business, which is America's business... not Canada's.

      • 5 votes
      #1.125 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:14 PM EST

      White Collar Auto

      So Houston, then it was Bush's irresponsible spending and now it's Congress's irresponsible spending?

      Which is it? The President or the Congress who is reponsible for all the Irresponsible spending?

      Bush had a Republican Congress that for whatever Bush wanted, including his irresponsible tax cuts, his two unfunded wars, and the drug benefits that were a giveaway to the big pharmaceuticals the costs of which the Bush administration lied about. Obama does not exactly have a cooperative Congress.

      But that, of course, is beside the point that I answered Alan N.J. question even though he won't admit it: Obama voted against the debt ceiling increase once as a protest. The Republicans are holding the US economy hostage with the threat that if their demands are not met, they will kill the hostage.

      • 7 votes
      #1.126 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:16 PM EST

      American Taliban because that will make us citizens safer? Or because you are a hypocrite your freedom compared to others?

      • 3 votes
      #1.127 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:16 PM EST

      Houston, so you forgot the first two years of PBO? You know where he passed a trillion dollar stimulus, Obamacare, and extended the Bush tax cuts, expanded Afghan.

      Houston - Bush spend way, way too much and now PBO is at least spending the same at worst WAY more, and you think somehow it is different.

      And FYI, the repubs have absolutely said they will raise the debt ceiling with cuts.

      (Again that is PBO's protest vote was for, how can you not understand they are doing exactly what he was saying as a Senator)

      and to you deaf libs, PBO ran on a balance approach to the deficit, taxes have been raised, where the @!$%# the balance?

      • 5 votes
      #1.129 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:19 PM EST

      First Read:

      It appears that the chief goal of Obama’s press conference yesterday was to pin the responsibility -- and potential blame -- on Congress for raising (or not raising) the debt ceiling.

      Obama doesn't have the power to raise the debt ceiling. Only Congress can do it. So how are the beltway media folks going to figure out a way to assign blame to anyone BUT Congress? Maintaining the False Equivalency is such a tough jobs sometimes that it's no wonder journalists get paid the big bucks for doing it.

      • 5 votes
      #1.130 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:23 PM EST

      American, you are correct the earth didn't grind to a halt, but there are millions more relying on the Government for food then ever and the work force has actually gotten smaller, but go on and continue to make fun and belittle those people, because you are doing fine.

      Did you learn that a lib 101?

      • 4 votes
      #1.132 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:24 PM EST

      Tom - Plymouth-3672298

      Houston, so you forgot the first two years of PBO? You know where he passed a trillion dollar stimulus, Obamacare, and extended the Bush tax cuts, expanded Afghan.

      I also know Obama prevented the Bush Recession from turning into the Bush Depression with the stimulus. And the CBO says that "Obamacare" is going to DECREASE the deficit.

      • 5 votes
      #1.133 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:26 PM EST

      But American, we are not a democracy, so I am not sure what point you are trying to make. Because 60% didn't want Obamacare but it passed.

      and finally were is your proof of 60%?

      • 2 votes
      #1.134 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:27 PM EST

      American Taliban - Do you know and understand the difference between a democracy and a republic? Once you figure out the difference - can you differentiate which American is?

      • 3 votes
      #1.135 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:28 PM EST

      "And the CBO says that "Obamacare" is going to DECREASE the deficit."

      isn't that what the CBO said about Med D (Which I hated back then), and hasn't the price of Obamacare tripled since the first score.

      Basically you have said over and over PBO can do no wrong, and if somebody that has a R next to there name can do no right.

      (and I say both suck, both spend too much and both are hypocrites)

      • 5 votes
      #1.136 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:30 PM EST

      “The fact that we're here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. Leadership means 'The buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit.”

      “And the cost of our debt is one of the fastest growing expenses in the Federal budget. This rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy, robbing our cities and States of critical investments in infrastructure like bridges, ports, and levees; robbing our families and our children of critical investments in education and health care reform; robbing our seniors of the retirement and health security they have counted on.

      Every dollar we pay in interest is a dollar that is not going to investment in America’s priorities.” - Senator Barack Obama, D-Ill, Senate Floor Speech on Public Debt, March 16, 2006

      ...."failure of leadership"...right out of the horses mouth.

      • 5 votes
      #1.137 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:30 PM EST

      America is not a democracy, we do not have mob rule.

      We protect the minority. Do some research!

      • 3 votes
      #1.139 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:33 PM EST

      Feisty and Company, biggest hypocrites in these here parts. It's ok to call others names, but once someone who disagrees with your position does it, it's not OK. Must feel good to have such power on an internet message board...all for likes, little green stars, and pats on the back. I'd be scared to see what you're like away from your keyboards. Yuck.

      Seeking - still projecting? Still calling others dumb, and idiots? Wow.

      As you were though - this daily dose of comedy is outstanding!!! Remember, we're the ones laughing at you Internet wackos!

      • 6 votes
      #1.140 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:33 PM EST

      American, So the last two years of Bush who controlled the house and senate?

      they didn't have anything to do with anything and that was 4 years ago and still the work force continues to get smaller and more people continue to go on welfare. At what point does he get at least 1% of the blame in your mind?

      Just a few short years ago and maybe today well over 50% of the population didn't want abortions, let me guess you are not demanding the an abortions.

      • 4 votes
      #1.141 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:36 PM EST

      A prospective candidate for the job of P.O.T.U.S.usually attempts to inform the voters of where he stands and where his attempts to advance the welfare of his hopefully employers will be.Our present holder of that post did and has honestly done so .His defeated opponent advanced the ridiculous I can do better than he claim ,with no formed policy and no platform what so ever, except I am a rich and successful business owner. We the voters rejected that premise,but his sycophants still insist that he was right. The only thing right was his political philosophy. Now get over his defeat and support this country. The present P.O.T.U.S. is the first minority to be chosen, but I doubt if he will be the last. We white middle class citizens are becoming of lesser importance as voters,so start to understand that support for our betterment is also a support for your own.Most of you have understood the comment No Man Is An Island ,It should read no person is,but that is being more agreed on so come into the twenty first century.

      • 1 vote
      #1.142 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:41 PM EST

      FreedomOverSympathy

      BlackCatWhiteCat - I have enough respect for the Canadian people to not interfere and meddle in their politics. So you do not have to worry - I will mind my own business, which is America's business... not Canada's.

      Once again, this is the internet. When you rail against Iran's leadership are you not interfering to use your definition?

      BTW ... a foreign politician as in Netanyahu can interfere. A foreign power such as yours can and does interfere. To illegally vote would interfere. To provided funds to another country for electoral purposes would be to interfere. To flood another culture with one's own would be to interfere. A single voice powerless to do any of that is so feared by you? How sad. Perhaps my keyboard is mightier than I thought. Wow, thanks, you made my day.

      • 4 votes
      #1.144 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:44 PM EST

      Feisty and Company, biggest hypocrites in these here parts

      What UP with the name change there RosieOlDonnellsMustache?

      You re-regs are dumber than dirt! lol

      • 6 votes
      #1.145 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:46 PM EST

      @Fiesty, when Ronald Reagan got 528 out of a possible 535 electoral college votes, now that was a resounding defeat. Got 49 out of 50 states. But I guess getting around 300 is a big deal to you. You can boast all you want, but you are backing a candidate who may not be eligible to even be president. Waiting for the day when we are told it was all a ruse. And if you think the Republicans are the only ones to have brought about the "birther" movement , Hilliary was one of the first to bring it up and even went as far as to get a lawyer about it. Obama himself, even described himself as the man from Kenya back when his being Kenyan did not matter so much. Look at his debate with Keyes. If he were to release his college transcripts all would probably be revealed, what is he hiding?

      @Backhouse, why do you blame, blame, blame Republicans for everything. They did not want Obamacare, yet, somehow, it is law. So much for Republicans being able to stop Obama at all stops. And as for the so called jobs bill, Obama had the votes. It did not pass. Why blame the Republicans when if the Democrats actually liked the bill and voted for it, it would have passed. And maybe if Obama had spent more time on the economy and Obamacare, then maybe we would be further along.

      Good thing your public education was free, because if not, you would be due a refund.

      • 5 votes
      #1.146 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:46 PM EST

      Bycrackee,

      Fisty and InSanity are typical libs. They insult everyone that disagrees with them and their grab for power. They feel they can dictate to the rest of the country what they think is right instead of just minding their own business. Notice they never post anything to support a certain view? They just insult when they dont agree. They are commies and should move to China or Russia if they think the government controling everything is so great.

      • 8 votes
      #1.147 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:46 PM EST

      @ Bobster

      You do realize that by posts like that below you completely destroy any argument that you have, right? Unless you are so extremely left wing, then I'll tip my hat. Perfect strategy. Completely polarizing, but from a strategic point, perfectly played by a left winger.

      Unless you lean right. Then plain idiotic.

      Hey gang!

      A reminder that Feisty, David Walker, Pigotry, and Beverley are all the same poster. They all post from the same IP address.

      I know, very sad! LMFAO!!

      • 4 votes
      #1.149 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:59 PM EST

      You can boast all you want, but you are backing a candidate who may not be eligible to even be president.

      Lookee here folks!

      We got ourselves are bat @!$%# crazy birther who believes it's relevant to the conversation!

      Sweet heart, find your way back to NewsforDumbFux, a Ditto-Head like yourself fits in perfectly over there!

      PS: Here's a cracker for you my little pet parrot! ;o)

      • 11 votes
      #1.150 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:03 PM EST

      Feisty Redhead - Since you seem to love running around calling everyone an idiot - I am curious, what is your education level?

      • 4 votes
      #1.151 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:09 PM EST

      To be clear, we've been told that this is the worst depression since the great depression. WE've been told that going over the cliff will be devastating. We are being told that not raising the debt ceiling will be world ending. And the NRA and Repubs get the "Fear-monger" label?

      Fact: The Iraq withdrawl was a Bush plan

      Fact: most successful alternate fuel/oil projects were Bush projects

      Fact: spending under the Bush administration doubled following the 2006 election

      Fact: "war criminal" Bush had full support for Iraq/Afghanistan, while drones today continue to bomb countries and targets without authorization and troops that came "home from Iraq" are continually deployed to Africa and Afghanistan.

      Some of you on here are arguing that the debt is still the republicans fault because now they are in congress. but where was the democrats fault in 06/07 for doubling the deficit. O wait, it was easier to blame Bush the republican. Because he "started" a war based on Al Quida presence in Iraq and WMD reports previoiusly given to Clinton in his lame duck months.

      While we have seen our own paychecks decrease and our money not stretch as far, the President still campaigns as if there is an election to be won. There has been no change.

      • 6 votes
      #1.152 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:09 PM EST

      Rick-3416939

      In 2006 Obama voted against the debt ceiling increase. Obama called it a failure of leadership, irresponsible, and unpatriotic. Now Obama says raising the debt ceiling is the right thing to do

      and what do you say about McConnell, Boehner, and Cantor who actually have something to do with raising (or not) of the debt ceiling?

      2002 -YES!

      2003 -YES!

      2004 -YES!

      2006 - YES!

      2007 - YES!

      How about this from Bohner?

      "That would be a financial disaster, not only for our country but for the worldwide economy. Remember, the American people on election day said, 'we want to cut spending and we want to create jobs.' And you can't create jobs if you default on the federal debt."

      but in 2013, the Republicans all of a sudden claim it will be no big deal if we default? HYPOCRITES!

      • 6 votes
      #1.153 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:17 PM EST

      inMYday

      The only thing Michelle is filling very well is the back side of her skirt.

      Outside of the U. S. (and for many inside the U. S.) she is regarded as a pathetic, ungraceful, naive jerk.

      looks like inMYday's only source of information is Fox News and National Enquirer - 2 excellent sources of tabloid "news" and made up content.

      • 5 votes
      #1.154 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:23 PM EST
      Comment author avatarsteve-1962Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      I see fiesty the ignorant bitch is still on here. When is that ignorant bitch gonna learn that her name calling is just a reason for me to call her names. Ignorant bitch. what are you going to do when someone else that does NOT have your point of view is in charge. I know give them the power that you IGNORANT LIBERALS want to give to OBLAMER.

      You already have the FAILURE you wanted in office. So QUIT YOUR BITHCING and shut up, nobody cares what you have to say anyway.

      • 5 votes
      #1.155 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:26 PM EST

      @American Taliban, how does a party rooted in slavery and had an ex Klansmans, within the last five years, Robert Byrd W-Va., democrat, have the nerve to rant like that. It must be nice. If ignorance is bliss, you must be ecstatic.

      • 3 votes
      #1.156 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:33 PM EST

      Bored with the name. Rosie was so yesterday- what's the problem with that? And what the hell is a rereg? See? Obsessed, on an Internet message board. Quite sad, Feisty. Good luck with that! Lordy, Dr. Phil would have a field day with you! Projecting, just like your imaginary Internet friends.

      I feel sorry for you, and will pray for you, that you find happiness in life.

      • 4 votes
      #1.158 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:38 PM EST

      steve-1962

      ... fiesty the ignorant bitch ... nobody cares what you have to say anyway.

      As compared to the number of posters who care what you have to say? If your statement is factual that would put you in the minus column.

      • 4 votes
      #1.159 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:44 PM EST

      @Fiesty, glad I struck a nerve. And I will go where I please. Since it is still land of the free. And in case you can not read too clearly I stated that Hilliary was one of the first to bring it up. She is a Democrat. And as for staying on script, why do you have to call names. What does have to do with the debate.

      And as for being a so-called birther, I am also black. Take that. Not all of us are drinking the kool aid. The Republicans have their issues, but I do not want government condoning the killing of the innocent. People like you are scary, which you prove everyday with you posts. The so called compassionate liberal, really?

      Communism bit the dust in Russia, socialism in Europe. It is not self-sustaining. But yet you keep trying.

      My people were released from slavery over a hundred years ago, but seems, some people still want to control us through welfare and telling us where to go. I go where I want. And vote for who I want. Thanks for concern though.

      • 7 votes
      #1.160 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:47 PM EST

      @Fiesty, this is still America and I will go/post where I want. How is name calling relevant to the discussion. I am a birther, just like the "President". Go figure.

      • 5 votes
      #1.161 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:00 PM EST

      The only promise that I know bozo kept was to fundamentally screw America! SORRY, I meant fundamentally "change" America. My bad.

      american taliban...at least THAT part is correct! The P.O.S. in (i'm sorry is that suppose to be potus?) office is the enemy of the state and you socialist lefties are no different. Cancers on the AMERICAN way.

      • 2 votes
      #1.162 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:03 PM EST

      thats because Fisty is a Class A POS loser. This is her territory according to her. they even have a club on newsvine for a 'circle of friendship'. Very similar to another circle of friends that burn T's on front lawns and wear white robes..hmmm

      such compassionate and tolerant people on FR eh FISTY? :o)

      • 2 votes
      #1.163 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:20 PM EST

      glad I struck a nerve.

      Not on your best day darling! Please don't flatter yourself!

      I stated that Hilliary was one of the first to bring it up.

      She brought it up, it was debunked and she hasn't mentioned it since. Unlike birthers like you who chew on it like a dog on a ham bone!

      I am also black.

      To quote Dick Cheney - SOOO??? I care what color you are... WHY?? lol

      Don't be so grumpy and enjoy the cracker, my little pet! ;o)

      • 7 votes
      #1.165 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:23 PM EST

      Feisty, why the hate? Be honest...man troubles? Angry divorcee? Can't squeeze into that size 19 any more? There has to be a reason. Tell us, maybe we can help...

      • 3 votes
      #1.167 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:33 PM EST

      Parker, as a member of that fraternity I can assure you that your (T)oga is safe from all but your flames. Perhaps I will start calling you Johnny Storm.

      • 4 votes
      #1.168 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:35 PM EST

      The liberals are out in force again.

      Why do you continue to post your thoughtless, partisan drivel? Do any of you have an itemized list of what Obama spends all the money on? Of course not. It's called a budget, but he has never had an approved budget to restrain his spending, and you have no idea where your tax dollars go.Tell me, what is wrong with trying to spend within the guidelines of a budget? If you people think everyone trusts Obama's word, think again. He has yet to prove to be trustworthy.

      • 3 votes
      #1.169 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:37 PM EST

      In 2006 Obama voted against the debt ceiling increase. Obama called it a failure of leadership, irresponsible, and unpatriotic. Now Obama says raising the debt ceiling is the right thing to do,because he knows he is a failure.

      • 2 votes
      #1.170 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:39 PM EST

      h engbers

      Tell me all about Obama's line item veto powers. Feel free to bring up Clinton vs City of New York.

      • 1 vote
      #1.172 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:45 PM EST

      thats all you have for me taliban? Really? IF and I say IF you have ever been to TEXAS you probably left out of fear of FREEDOM! Never seen that have ya? Always had the dems to feed you and wipe your a$$. Get over your self serving self.

      And its STILL bushes fault. OH MY GOD!!! You looooonitics have no where else to turn do ya!

      • 2 votes
      #1.173 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:47 PM EST

      Come on Fiesty, really!!!!!! I think everyone knows you work for MSNBC or Obama. You are always one of the first to post. You only hear what you want to hear. Obama has done almost nothing of what he said he would do and still blames it all on the other side. Obama Care will lower your healthcare premiums by $2500.00...nope! Mine just went up another $500.00 a year and all of my copays also went up. Transparencey,deficit,unemployement and the lists go on and on.

      • 4 votes
      #1.175 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:00 PM EST

      Ah I see Feisty ignored my question about education level. Must be high school only huh darling? I kind of figured with your typical rants on here.

      As for all the parrot talk - Feisty you say the same things every time... All I ever hear out of you is Libtard - Libtard - Libtard .... Libtard - Libtard - Libtard. Are you sure you are not the parrot?

      • 5 votes
      #1.176 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:06 PM EST

      Typical Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL, Dean in 3rd world Wisconsin, workingpoor-2370498, California Tom, David Walker, RedDevPS, Amy B. Portland, ME, Larry-367607, Backhouse, bayllie, listoire, American Taliban = GOP/TeaParty. et al, Newsvine Posts, your Further Dumbing Down of America.

      Politicians manipulate voters every day with half-truths -- or outright lies -- about taxes, spending and many other issues that directly affect the nation's prosperity.

      Too many voters embrace feel-good propaganda that they want to hear instead of learning the basic facts about issues they care about. They should do a better job of calling out dishonest politicians -- and shunning media outlets that stoke political food fights.

      http://money.msn.com/investing/11-things-wrong-with-congress

      Iraq: President Obama's FAILED Foreign Policies as seen by the Ayatollahs of Iran as the US negotiating from a position of US Defeat, the Ayatollahs of Iran increased their Overt and Covert Activities against the US and US Allies with the RESULTS of:

      Pressure on the Islamic Shia Government of Iraq to get the US out of Iraq. No more Negotiations with President Obama nor SOS Clinton. The US Gets Kicked out of Iraq. The Allies of the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran, the Chinese and Russian Federation, get the Iraqis Oil that could have paid for the US And US Allies Liberation of Iraq with Decades to Centuries of Iraqis Oil. This Strategic Loss of Iraq RESULTS in: Making the Libyan Oil of Strategic Importance to the US European Allies (President Obama already outsmarted as the Holy Warriors of Islam are already at former US Ally Egypt attacking US Ally Libya.). The Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran is no longer stuck between the US and US Allies Military Forces at Iraq and Afghanistan and can concentrate on Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran's Special Forces, Quds, training, arming, funding millions of Holy Warriors of Islam at the Fundamentalist Islamic Autonomous Kurdistanis Region of Northern Iraq no longer has to worry about US nor US Allies Military interruptions nor interventions.

      President Obama's Failed Foreign Policies RESULTED in the Permanent US And US Allies Losses of Strategic Resources Worldwide, US And US Allies Losses of Strategic Locations Worldwide, US And US Allies Losses of Strategic Vital US Allies Worldwide. President Obama's "Level the Playing Field" as bringing everyone down to the lowest common denominator as easier to do; instead of the more difficult bringing everyone else UP to the US Standard of Living; Welcome to President Obama's United Somalia of America.

      The President Obama ACA, does not solve anything, in fact was so that President Obama could get Unlimited Corporate Campaign Contributions to keep his 2008 Presidential Campaign Offices open until his 2012 Reelection Campaign as quid pro quo since his ACA gave the Insurance Corporations $67 Billion, the Medical Device Corporations $23 Billion, and the Pharmaceuticals Corporations $20 Billion. During the 2008 Presidential Campaign Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton filed against Presidential Candidate Obama's Violating US Law, McCain Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.

      PBS Documentary "Obama's Deal".

      It was President Obama on Face the Nation, September 22, 2009 that stated the problem with US Health Care was the Insurance Corporations, that manage mismanage Medicare, by Overcharging the US Citizens by 14%, to make profits of $17 Billion to $18 Billion per year. President Obama's ACA did NOTHING about this known Fraud against the US Citizens by the Insurance Corporations; but, instead rewarded the Insurance Corporations with $67 Billion.

      The Debt Ceiliing. Your sewer overflows filling your house with sh!t, so you raise the ceiling.

      The "Debt Ceiling" and "Fiscal Cliff" occurred due to President Obama demanding in his previous President's Proposal to US Congress the spending of $2.1 Trillion that was previously not budgeted for. In another President's Proposal to US Congress, President Obama demanded "Across the Board" Budget Cuts (Automatic Sequestration) to all previously Budgeted for Programs (like Medicare, etc.), Projects (like US Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Projects within the US, etc.), Agencies (like FEMA, Department of Education, Veteran's Affairs, etc.), chopping the Benefits and Entitlements of the "47%" (actual 49%, update 51%) to pay for his previous spending of $2.1 Trillion that was previously not budgeted for.

      Before any of you post something uneducated a President's Proposal is a Demand, that if not considered, the President can threaten to Veto anything from the US Senate and US House of Representatives regardless of what it pertains to.

      HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW WHAT PRESIDENT OBAMA DEMANDED IN HIS PRESIDENT'S PROPOSAL TO US CONGRESS THE SPENDING OF $2.1 TRILLION THAT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY BUDGETED WAS FOR.

      Federal Spending:

      60% Entitlements

      20% Defense

      13% Discretionary Spending

      7% Interest on Loans (like loans from the Chinese)

      Regarding Defense Budget Cuts, President Obama, 2012, "A 10% Defense Budget Cut will result in a Million (US) Civilians becoming Unemployed". I told all of you before that US Defense employs directly and indirectly almost a hundred million overpaid too expensive "Fair and Living Wage" US Civilians. While the US Military is currently only 1% of US Citizens, not paid a "Fair and Living Wage".

      Houston! - I also know Obama prevented the Bush Recession from turning into the Bush Depression with the stimulus.

      Nice attempt at the typical Demoncrap Demonizing Deflection of Blame Game. It was NOT President Bush (43) that eliminated those US Laws that made Illegal the Causes of previous Depressions, and with the elimination of those US Laws the resulting current $60 Trillion to $100 Trillion Global Economic Crisis consisting of the Mortgage Crisis, Wall Street Crisis, Financial Crisis, Banking Crisis, Credit Crisis, etc..

      And it was NOT President Bush (43) that demanded that Loans (Mortgages) be made to those that had no viable means to repay the Loans (Mortgages).

      But you don't know do you Houston!, so you don't know how to fix the problem; well, evidently based on previous actions President Obama does not know either.

      American Taliban = DEMONCRAPTIC Party. The same Demoncraptic Party that opposed the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution as accurately portrayed in the 2012 movie Lincoln.

      The same Demoncraptic Party that demands the killing of anyone that disagrees with them:

      Union Leader Jimmy Hoffa Junior during President Obama Campaign Rally, "President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let's take these son of b!tches out and give America back to an America where we belong."

      If this sounds like the Chancellor Hitler's Brown Shirts or Mussolini's Blackshirts, it is, as that is what the current US Labor Unions were modelled after.

      DingleB - So we live in a dictatorship now?

      Gee only figured that out now? I kept warning all of you before about:

      President Obama's January 21, 2009 Patriot Acts (Plural US Laws). Expanded Presidential Powers. US Military Use of Deadly Force Against US Citizens. Preemptive Detentions of US Citizens. Monitoring and Censorship of All US Communications. Without Warrant Mandatory Cooperation of US Communications Providers. US Military Tribunals renamed by the Obama Administration as US Military Commissions (Legal Defense no access to "classified" witnesses nor "classified" evidence used by Prosecution). (No) Support to Terrorist Organizations (No Legal Representation as "Expert Advise" per 2010 US Supreme Court Ruling, currently being fought by ACLU). Inclusion of the previously defeated as Unconstitutional US Senate S.1959 and US House of Representatives H.R.1955 aka the George Orwell 1984 Thought Crimes Laws, in that the written or witnessed verbal thought is the Felony Crime, not the Act, example: the definition from S.1959 and H.R.1955, "Anyone stating a radical change to (US) Government is a Homegrown Domestic Terrorist".

      During a staged news media event, January 22, 2009 President Obama signs into US Laws his Patriot Acts, 04:38 minutes of 11:55 minutes:

      Naomi Wolf: 'Obama can lock any US citizen up without trial'

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLSeD19m3UE&feature=fvst

      President Obama's NDAA, US Military Indefinite Detentions of US Citizens:

      Obama Signs NDAA, ACLU Disgusted

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IeuE16LLDY

      Feds' electronic snooping of Americans up sharply, says ACLU

      http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/technolog/feds-electronic-snooping-americans-sharply-says-aclu-6170914

      President Obama to circumvent US Congress,"The Will of the People", keep clicking "Next", see anything Unconstitutional, TOUGH that is what you Voted you wanted:

      http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions

      Where have you been, DingleB, this sh!t (Obama Dictatorship) has been going on since before Candidate Obama became President; as the same tactics as Candidate Hitler for the Office of Chancellor of Germany.

      To all of you Anti Gun Nuts that never Served in the US Military (pull out your gun (penis) so that I can chop it off, no gun for you):

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kU0XCVey_U

      • 3 votes
      #1.177 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:06 PM EST

      In 2006 the total national debt was going up up up. It peaked in 2008 and has been going down ever since. The total national debt is now about where it was in 2006. America is getting our house in order again and Obama was right to complain about what you republicons were doing to our country.

      Remember, cheney is the one who said deficits don't matter.

      U.S. Downgrade Seen as Upgrade as U.S. Debt Dissolved - Bloomberg

      • 1 vote
      #1.179 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:16 PM EST

      Ah I see Feisty ignored my question about education level.

      I'm not sure where you got the impression that I answer to you..?

      Sadly, you couldn't be more mistaken! ;o)

      Go find someone elses ankle to hump, you're dismissed little troll!

      • 4 votes
      #1.180 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:19 PM EST

      TROLLOLOLOL - Like i said - Still don't wanna answer the question? -

      As for humping your leg... I would't even consider it. I believe beastiality has been illegal for quite some time.

      • 4 votes
      #1.181 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:27 PM EST

      Wow Miklkit....Did Fiesty give you that info? Heres a National Debt chart. It has gone up 32% since 2008.

      National Debt by Year Since 1929 Compared to GDP and Major Events

      End of Fiscal Year
      Debt (in billions)
      GDP (in billions)
      Debt/GDP Ratio
      Event

      2012
      $16,066
      $15,776
      102%

      2011
      $14,790
      $15,163
      102%
      Obama Stimulus Act (ARRA) spent $120 billion.

      2010
      $13,562
      $14,736
      92%
      ARRA budgeted $400 billion.

      2009
      $11,910
      $13,952
      85%
      Economy contracted 8.9% in Q4 '08, 6.7% in Q1 '09. ARRA spent $241.9 billion. War on Terror cost $79 billion. Fed funds rate lowered to 0%.

      2008
      $10,025
      $14,395
      70%
      Economy contracted 3.7% in Q3 '08, 1.8% in Q1 '08. War on Terror cost $197.6 billion, Bank Bailout Bill cost $350 billion.

      2007
      $9,008
      $14,126
      64%
      War on Terror cost $173.6 billion.

      2006
      $8,507
      $13,433
      63%
      Katrina clean-up was $24.7 billion, swine flu added $6 billion, War on Terror cost $120.4 billion.

      2005
      $7,933
      $12,729
      62%
      War on Terror cost $107.6 billion.

      2004
      $7,379
      $11,936
      62%
      War on Terror was $94 billion.

      2003
      $6,783
      $11,255
      60%
      Unemployment still at 6%. War on Terror cost $53 billion.

      2002
      $6,228
      $10,702
      58%
      War on Terror added $33.8 billion.

      2001
      $5,807
      $10,305
      56%
      2001 recession and 9/11 Attack

      2000
      $5,674
      $10,018
      57%

      1999
      $5,656
      $9,405
      60%

      1998
      $5,526
      $8,847
      62%

      1997
      $5,413
      $8,410
      66%

      • 1 vote
      #1.182 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:31 PM EST

      American Taliban = GOP/TeaParty. - Tin Foil Hat wearer above.......... Go to the bathroom open the medicine cabinet and take out those big yellow pills the doctor gave you, turn off Fux NOOSE and get into a quiet room...... Now dont you feel better

      Like I stated before YOUR FURTHER DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA, American Taliban = DEMONCRAPTIC Party.

      Typical Demoncraptic Party Name Calling; instead of doing your own Research to get Educated.

      • 3 votes
      #1.183 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:35 PM EST

      instead of doing your own Research to get Educated.

      Is that what you call an education? What would be educational about it is handing it out to any High School Junior debate classroom and ask them to identify the top 10 glaring holes in the claims you make.

      • 3 votes
      #1.185 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:04 PM EST

      American Taliban - the only person who seems to be racist is you .... as you are the only person who has commented about race multiple times in this thread.

      • 1 vote
      #1.186 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:05 PM EST

      @Backhouse, why do you blame, blame, blame Republicans for everything.

      Because most of our current fiscal and economic problems were directly or indirectly caused by Republicans.

      They did not want Obamacare, yet, somehow, it is law.

      They didn't want healthcare reform, period. Unless by reforming healthcare you mean privatizing Medicare and block granting Medicaid. Obamacare is simply an old conservative plan footed by the Heritage Foundation in the 90s and adopted by numerous Republicans, including Newt Gingrich in 2010 and Mitt Romney (your boy). He just dressed it up in liberal clothes (increased Medicaid coverage, taxes on the rich, subsidies for healthcare, etc), but he took away its single liberal (well, technically centrist; liberals want full single-payer) limb: the public option, just so he could get a few conservatives into the fold. Apparently compromise counts for nothing with Republicans...

      So much for Republicans being able to stop Obama at all stops. And as for the so called jobs bill, Obama had the votes. It did not pass. Why blame the Republicans when if the Democrats actually liked the bill and voted for it, it would have passed.

      Republicans control the filibuster; ergo they are able to handcuff the Senate by demanding a supermajority for key legislation (or most legislation, actually) and then voting in lockstep against the bill while the Democrats muster up as many votes as possible and still come short. The Jobs Bill did have the votes to pass-if it wasn't filibustered. Democrats could have mustered about 53 votes to pass the bill, but the GOP filibustered it and they fell way short because every Republican and a couple Blue Dog Democrat senators voted against it. So don't give me that Orwellian bull@!$%# that Republicans couldn't block Obama because that has been EXACTLY what they have been doing for the past 2 years and that is EXACTLY why we have gridlock in Congress.

      And maybe if Obama had spent more time on the economy and Obamacare, then maybe we would be further along.

      The Jobs Bill WAS for the economy you idiot!!!! The Jobs Bill would have created millions of jobs but your fascist boys in the Senate voted against it!!!! The stimulus package that Republicans like you love to criticize WAS FOR the economy; even John McCain's economic analysts said it worked to save the economy. But every time Obama tries to help the economy via spending (which works better than tax cuts) and tax breaks the GOP sabotages him to deny him a political victory.

      • 1 vote
      #1.188 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:42 PM EST

      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”~Plato

      If a Tyrant can remove the Second Amendment by Decree why not any and all of the rest of our Right? Always remember it is Obama who has taken Unilateral Action against the Constitution of the United States without the approval of Congress or the majority vote of the people as required by the Constitution!

      Today is the most shameful day of the Republic since FDR interned the Japanese Americans and just as Unconstitutional!

      At least FDR had a WAR as an excuse....Obama just makes Excuses! Demand President Obama's Impeachment for violating his Oath of Office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and to protect OUR Bill of Rights!

      To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them. – George Mason

        #1.189 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:36 PM EST

        @American Taliban, you must have ignored the crosses of the Democratic Party. You all invented it after all. And why did you allow Senator Byrd of West Virginia, an ex klansman to remain in your party all those years until his demise a few years ago? Yet have the gall to post about crosses. Deflection, deflection, deflection.

          #1.190 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:07 PM EST

          Republicon promises made and kept.

          1.With their pledge to their King Norquist not to raise taxes on the rich...They kept their promise. Obstructing and holding the nation hostage , causing poor credit rating for the nation. $$$$$$$$$

          2. With the pledge they made the night President Obama took office 4 years ago, to vote and obstruct every bill to try and make Obama appear a bad president...they kept their promise, voting against and using record number of filibusters to prevent anything good for the nation, slowing recovery, voting against our vets and 911 responders, obstructing bringing jobs back toAmerica, obstructing and voting against disaster relief for our nation......etc etc

          Yup....repubs pledged to make America more miserable...and they did their best, but President Obama succeded against all odds......

            #1.191 - Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:10 AM EST
            Reply

            RAISING THE DEBT CEILING: Is not about new or future spending.
            RAISING THE DEBT CEILING: Does not authorize new spending.
            RAISING THE DEBT CEILING: Is about paying bills that Congress itself has already approved.

            Of all the wealthy industrialized nations, America is on track for the strongest recovery.

            And immeasurable thanks go to our President, because GOP spent four years obstructing job creation & pushing for the same austerities measures that are creating Europe's double dip recession. Unemployment rates are at 26% in Spain and Greece.

            To reactionary House GOP benefactors & strategists who continue to sabotage the US economy for political, ideological reasons and monetary gain: We're done playing Crash, Shutdown, Downgrade, and Risk Global Economic Meltdown.

            To GOP Congress making threats about bills it has already approved: You know how much the American people love their country, and they expect you to pay the bills on time.

            • 27 votes
            #2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:14 AM EST

            You mean paying the bills in the budget Obama signed into law? Oh that's right, Obama has never signed a budget into law because Democrats find no need for one. Obama and the Democrats have found it much easier to just borrow whenever the need arises.

            • 31 votes
            #2.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:55 AM EST

            Rick,

            Budgets are “resolutions” not laws and Presidents do NOT sign them.

            It is a Congressional budget not a Federal Government budget

            • 22 votes
            #2.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:03 AM EST
            Comment author avatarJason797Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

            Good job Dennis, I'm glad you pointed the facts out to that lame idiot "Rick".

            Hey rick, why don't come next time with FACTS instead RANT..

            That dissy idiot don't know the difference between Congressional Budgets and Federal one's. I bet rick believe the president can sign anything into law without Congress approval. This is a prime example of someone who don't know sh!t about Politics or how the goverment works. Just rant on about something they heard on Right wing radio, newspaper, blog, etc...

            • 14 votes
            #2.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:20 AM EST

            Not according to this Dennis & OOPS Jason you spoke too soon maybe:

            President May Sign or Veto Any or All of the Appropriations Bills
            As spelled out in the Constitution, the President has ten days in which to decide: (1) to sign the bill, thereby making it law; (2) to veto the bill, thereby sending it back to Congress and requiring much of the process to begin again with respect the programs covered by that bill; or (3) to allow the bill to become law without his signature, thereby making it law but doing so without his express approval.

            http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/federalbudgetprocess/a/budget_page4.htm

            • 17 votes
            #2.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:24 AM EST

            How convenient, the article skips over Obama's State of the Union speeches and his central campaign promise in 2008 to make the government live within its means.Wouldn't want to highlight those failures. Not to mention that Obamacare was touted, by Mr. Obama, as the remedy to fix our economy.

            The following is what Obama said in his previous speeches before Congress. obviously he didn't mean a word of it, otherwise he would not be submitting budgets to Congress that call for continued massive deficit spending and the creation of a $26 Trillion debt..

            To kick these problems down the road for another four years or another eight years would be to continue the same irresponsibility that led us to this point. That's not why I ran for this office. I didn't come here to pass on our problems to the next President or the next generation

            We are living with a legacy of deficit spending that began almost a decade ago. And in the wake of the financial crisis, some of that was necessary to keep credit flowing, save jobs, and put money in people's pockets.

            But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in. That is not sustainable. Every day, families sacrifice to live within their means. They deserve a government that does the same.

            Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch{cough, cough}, we will still face the massive deficit we had when I took office. More importantly, the cost of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will continue to skyrocket. That's why I've called for a bipartisan, Fiscal Commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can't be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The Commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline

            Yet, despite all of his promises and rhetoric, he has failed to propose any significant cuts or reforms, in any of those programs, that will eliminate defict spending, pay down the debt and balance of the budget. Choosing instead to demagogue and fear monger the issue, in an attempt to score cheap political points against his opposition, while knowing full well that failing to bite the bullet, and do what he himself has recognized needs to be done, will lead country into financial ruin. He appointed a Commission, on his own, and then ignored what they told him needed to be done. Yes, it was a gimmick to make Obama look serious about cutting the deficit, but the bills he has proposed continue massive deficit spending and make no meaningful cuts. And despite the language quoted above, he has failed to propose cuts in Medicare, Medicaid and Soc Sec. Choosing instead to act like a child by chiding those adults that are willing to bite the bullet and do what's neded so to save the country from financial ruin.

            Yes we can,............. blame Mr. Obama for his failure to lead!

            • 21 votes
            #2.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:27 AM EST

            @ jason797; facts are the debt will be 20 trillion in 4 years DOUCHEBAG!!! bring your fu(king facts with you!!! everyting obimbo`s doing isn`t (aint 4 u) going to reduce zero (0 4 you) read the writing on the wall or blame Bush (jackass!!!!!)

            • 9 votes
            #2.7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:30 AM EST

            It's easy to blame Bush. Right wingers like to blame Obama for the first trillion plus budget but know that honor fell to Bush. Bush's last budget was enacted before Obama was elected and ran from October 2008 until October 2009 with a deficit of 1.2 trillion bringing Bush's final debt total to 12.1 trillion. The first nine months for a first term president is ran under the previous president. Had Obama simply ran Bush's last budget his first term the debt would still be 15.7 trillion and still hit 20 trillion after his second term. So your gripe is Obama's no better than Bush?

            • 13 votes
            #2.8 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:11 AM EST

            It's almost as hypocritical as Obama trying to ban guns while he murders children in Pakistan with drone strikes. Almost.

            • 15 votes
            #2.9 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:11 AM EST

            Below is Bushs 2009 budget. The one the right screams about having a 1.2 trillion defict. This was the proposed budget before announced in February 2008 before Obama was even the democratic nominee.

            President Bush on Monday released a $3.1 trillion budget plan for fiscal 2009 that, if approved, would raise military spending to inflation-adjusted levels not seen since World War II.

            The blueprint — President Bush's last and most expensive to date — would also extend the tax cuts enacted in his first term. Increases for the military budget and big tax cuts have been hallmarks of Bush's presidency.

            The plan includes $11.4 billion to run the State Department. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice wants to hire close to 1,100 more people, a big jump for an agency with about 8,000 Foreign Service Officers.

            The budget would nearly freeze the total amount of discretionary spending on domestic programs and significantly cut the growth of Medicare.

            But even with the spending restraints, the five-year plan would generate near-record budget deficits over the next two years, due in part to the cost of a roughly $146 billion economic stimulus plan.

            The budget proposal was immediately rebuffed by congressional Democrats, who said it is in stark contrast to the budget they will offer in the coming weeks.

            House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) promised that congressional Democrats will propose a budget that "takes America in a new direction" by strengthening the economy and creating jobs, helping Americans who struggle with the high costs of things such as health care, energy and groceries and restoring fiscal responsibility.

            Here, a look at President Bush's proposals and the reaction to them on Capitol Hill and on the presidential campaign trail.

            Defense and War

            By Guy Raz

            President's Budget: The administration seeks $515 billion for the Pentagon's day-to-day operations. That figure alone is more than the total combined military spending by every other country in the world. But it doesn't include supplemental requests to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

            world.Right now, the White House is asking Congress for $70 billion in supplemental war funding. Judging by past spending, that $70 billion will last about four months. Add up all projected defense-related spending for fiscal 2009 and $515 billion balloons to $750 billion — almost a third of all U.S. federal spending today. To put it another way, if the Pentagon were an independent country, it would be the 10th richest in the

            Congressional Reaction: In recent years, lawmakers from both parties have approved the Pentagon's baseline budget and then bulked it up further. Congressional pet projects — known informally as "pork" —typically boost the Defense Department's funding by an additional $30 billion.

            Last year, Congress demanded that the administration ask for all war-related funding projects upfront. But this year, the administration balked — perhaps realizing that a request for $750 billion in defense-related spending might attract too much attention. This way, the White House can ask for war funding in installments.

            Campaign Trail: Broadly speaking, all the leading presidential front-runners support defense spending increases. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Former Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-AR) have been most vocal on the issue. But the candidates differ over supplemental war funding. Democrats are pushing for a rapid drawdown of U.S. troops in Iraq — a plan that could save nearly $100 billion by 2010. Republicans, including Sen. John McCain of Arizona, support the maintenance of a large U.S. military contingent in Iraq for the time being. But no matter which candidate is elected, most budget analysts expect overall defense spending to fall over the coming years as the military eventually begins to pare down its operations in Iraq.

            Education

            • 8 votes
            #2.10 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:18 AM EST

            It's almost as hypocritical as Obama trying to ban guns while he murders children in Pakistan with drone strikes. Almost.

            Yep, Bush's tactic that killed over 100,000 civilians in Iraq and Afganistan with almost half being women and children is much kinder. Obama finishes Bushs war by limiting most attacks that can verify taking out Al'Queda leadership with maybe a handfull of civilian casualities and the right acts like he's the war monger. Most Americans know which party is the war mongers. No way you can spin it or sell it.

            • 12 votes
            #2.11 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:26 AM EST

            In his own words....

            The fact that we are here today to debate
            raising America’s
            debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S.
            Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing
            financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s
            reckless fiscal policies. … Increasing America’s debt weakens us
            domestically and internationally. Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here.
            Instead, Washington
            is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and
            grandchildren. America
            has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.

            Barack Obama - 2006

            If he really feels that way, then why are today legislators any different?

            • 11 votes
            #2.12 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:37 AM EST

            Lincoln united the nation and ended slavery.

            Obama has been dividing the nation and making us slaves to the welfare state.

            • 12 votes
            #2.13 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:39 AM EST

            Ben,

            That is an approbation BILL not a budget RESOLUTION you are talking about

            • 11 votes
            #2.14 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:42 AM EST

            Obama's words contradicting Obama's actions ... this is all too funny ! What is even more funny is that liberals will never even try to explain Obama's MANY self-contradictions ! They will play the blame game and point the finger at Bush, or even blame Reagan who has been dead for quite some time now !

            I guess we'll need to dig up Ronnie so he can answer the asinine questions of liberals everywhere ... those who REFUSE to question Obama's failed leasdership !

            • 10 votes
            #2.15 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:46 AM EST

            The headline says, Promises kept and broken.

            First promise Obama broke, and this goes back to his first term, was the oath of office. Thumbs his nose at the constitution and our laws every day. And it doesn't stop with him. Others have done it over the years. He and any other politician that breaks their oath, their promise to the American people, regardless of their party affiliation, should be thrown out of office.

            I had to take an oath for my job. And the rules were made very clear. Dozens of pages printed in black and white. At the end it basically said: "Break any of these rules setforth in this handbook and you are fired".

            Period.

            It kinda kept us in line. If only the people we hire to represent us lived by these rules.

            • 8 votes
            #2.16 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:48 AM EST

            Tired of having the budget fight for now, so I'll just say this.

            Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, should ever listen to the Log Cabin Republicans on Gay Rights. @!$%# those guys. They spend two years following a snivelly little @!$%# like Romney, who is an openly anti-gay bigot, support morons like Bachmann who believe in "reversion therapy," and do their damndest to get officials elected who would make life even more miserable for gay people than before, and they have the balls to call down Hagel for remarks made 15 years ago?

            I'm not a fan of those remarks, but the guy has apologized, and he has sworn to uphold the repeal of DADT and support equal rights for our LGBT service men and women. And they have the chutzpah to say "Too little, too late"? Yeah, no, those guys aren't even trying to look out for the LGBT interests, they're just trying to power-grab. They're a beard for the Republican Party, only they don't cover those nasty scars for @!$%#.

            • 3 votes
            #2.17 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:57 AM EST

            Bush, 4.8 Trillion in 8 years. Obama 5.8 Trillion in 4 years.......Bush made a big mistake not controlling the spending but looks like an angel compared to Obama....nuff said about debt, and deficits. This is the hard data.

            • 8 votes
            #2.18 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:00 PM EST

            Yeah but 67BonnevilleGuy all liberals believe that the entire 5.8 trillion added to the national debt during Obama's first term was Bush's fault. Likewise Obama has been powerless to stop the spending or the massive deficits. There is simply nothing Obama can do it was all Bush's fault. Obama is the blame and excuse president, and his supporters thrive on the division and hatred he espouses.

            • 7 votes
            #2.19 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:29 PM EST

            The gutless press needs to place Obamas vote on the Debt ceiling alongside his speech, then fat bon bon eating liberals like Feisty Redhead might actually see the true picture.

            • 3 votes
            #2.20 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:41 PM EST

            stop,

            The only legitimate purpose for a Debt Ceiling in the current process is to create a discussion that allows politicians make points about te size of our debt but since the money has already been spent it should not be an excuse to deny an increase of the debt ceiling.

            This is what then Senator Obama did in 2006, nothing more nothing less {period}.

            Solution: Change the process so the authority to borrow is part of every spending bill. Using that method will force Congress to address the amount of spending for each and every spending bill. Or use a less full-proof method by voting to increase the debt ceiling at the same time as final passage of the budget.

            • 8 votes
            #2.21 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:46 PM EST

            Dennis -- From usgov.info

            The meat of the annual federal budget is, in fact, a set of “appropriations,” or spending bills distributing the funds allocated in the Budget Resolution among the various government functions.

            Roughly one-third of the spending authorized by any annual federal budget is “discretionary” spending, meaning it is optional, as approved by Congress. The annual spending bills approve discretionary spending. Spending for “entitlement” programs, like Social Security and Medicare is referred to as “mandatory” spending.

            A spending bill must be created, debated and passed to fund the programs and operations of each Cabinet-level agency. Per the Constitution, each spending bill must originate in the House. Since the House and Senate versions of each spending bill must be identical, this always become the most time-consuming step in the budget process.

            Congress and the President Approve the Spending Bills

            Once Congress has passed all of the annual spending bills, the president must sign them into law, and there is no guarantee that will happen.

            • 4 votes
            #2.22 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:50 PM EST

            Liberal trash are quick to forget that Obama voted against raising the debt ceiling, liberals the cancer thats killing America.

            • 3 votes
            #2.23 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:56 PM EST

            Ben,

            Not once in that does it say that a president signs or
            approves a budget. That is because he does not.

            Show me where it clearly says that the president must
            sign a budget, not a spending bill.

            • 7 votes
            #2.24 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:02 PM EST

            It's a little shell game being played by the Republicans concerning the budget. Here are the facts.

            Hey Jobs1,

            Why don't you find a nuetral site to link your garbage instead of a bunch of radical left wing sites.

            • 4 votes
            #2.25 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:37 PM EST

            Dennis you are the epitome of that depends on the what the meaning of the word "is" is type of person. Everything about what Obama said and did regarding the debt ceiling as a senator you can spin. Doesn't matter what he actually said or actually did you know the real meaning of his comments and actions. Just as you are now trying to blur the line between an appropriation and a budget. Congress is the body required by law to pass a budget annually and to submit the budget passed by both houses to the President for signature. You want to spin the process fine knock yourself out. But no amount of spin changes the fact that the Harry Reid lead senate has failed to do their job for years, and instead have funded the government through appropriation bills. Stop gap measures with far less accountability. Not a fiscally responsible way to run the government, since there is no starting point and no ending point, just more borrowing and spending when deemed necessary. Is it simply impossible for you liberals to ever hold anyone in your own party accountable? But then again you are not alone, Obama has never called upon Harry Reid to do his job either.

            • 3 votes
            #2.26 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:50 PM EST

            S***F****L****/ This Liberal Values Your ipinyun! Have a Nice Umm Hatred!

              #2.27 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:56 PM EST

              Rick,

              Like I said … Presidents neither sign nor approve budgets
              … budgets are not law

              [Congress is the
              body required by law to pass a budget annually and to submit the budget passed
              by both houses to the President for
              signature
              ]

              Factually incorrect … you cannot prove me wrong !!

              • 4 votes
              #2.28 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:01 PM EST

              Rick,

              Like I said … Presidents neither sign nor approve budgets … budgets are not law

              [Congress is the body required by law to pass a budget annually and to submit the budget passed
              by both houses to the President for signature
              ]

              Factually incorrect … you cannot prove me wrong !!

              • 5 votes
              #2.29 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:03 PM EST

              Actually Dennis I can prove you wrong as my quote you say is factually wrong came from a government website. But your argument is totally lame. This country has operated without a budget for years, simply fiscally irresponsible no matter how you try and spin it. So either hold your party to some standard, or quit complaining about the other party. I know this is totally foreign to you Dennis, but both party's are to blame.

              • 4 votes
              #2.30 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:15 PM EST

              Rick,

              If those exact words came from an official “.gov” web site then please provide the link otherwise you are not being factual.

              • 6 votes
              #2.31 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:21 PM EST

              Obama's words contradicting Obama's actions

              Not even a democrat can immediately turn a 1.2 trillion deficit into a surplus and still pay the bills which include Afganistan and a 100 billion drug plan Bush didn't bother to fund with 400 billion less revenue.

              • 5 votes
              #2.32 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:17 PM EST

              Dennis, take off the blinders for a change. No one really cares about your relentless pursuit to spin everything Obama and the Democrats do in Washington as somehow above reproach. Least of all me. But no surprise you ignore all aspects of irresponsible behavior from your party, and fixate on meaningless drivel because in your mind a budget does not need to be signed by the president. Besides Dennis since you are the master at parsing words, where in the quote that I posted, "Congress is the body required by law to pass a budget annually and to submit the budget passed by both houses to the President for signature" does it state to become law? Budgets as you continue to rant are not law, but there is a process expected, and Democrats have ignored that process for years. Getting everyone to agree to a budget signed by the president is the first step toward fiscal responsibility, something that is desperately needed.

              • 3 votes
              #2.33 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:26 PM EST

              Rick,

              So you could not find anywhere that our presidents are required to sign a budget … because they are not.

              Actually if you read what I have said about the Senate you would know that I have said it is irresponsible for the Senate to not work with the House and come to a compromise on an annual budget. It is their duty !

              • 2 votes
              #2.34 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:48 PM EST

              So everyone is complaining about the deficit. Where did it come from? Republicon economic policies. The last Presidents to pay down on the national debt were Presidents Clinton and Carter. They also produced more jobs than Ronnie Raygun! If republicons could balanc a budget we would now have almost no debt at all.

              U.S. National Debt Graph + Voodoo-Economics Slides

              • 1 vote
              #2.35 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:23 PM EST

              It wasn't Obama that refused to support any budget proposal that included 1 penny in tax increases it was republicans. Obamas grand bargain offered 2 trillion in cuts for 2 trillion in new revenue. Republicans stated they wouldn't accept $100 in cuts for $1 in new revenue it all had to be cuts with the military exempt. For compromise to work it requires both sides to give. After the election Obama didn't have to be as generous. They should have taken his previous offer. Now they whine.

              • 2 votes
              #2.36 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:09 PM EST

              @Larry #2.32, What a wuss response from you, you don't even know what in the hell I am talking about, yet you attempt to reply.

              Obama promised to close Gitmo .... it is still open genius, (probably one of Obama's brighter moves) !

              Obama criticized in his now famous 2006 speech the concept of raising the debt ceiling as an example of "failed leadership". Under Obama, it is a yearly demand to substantially RAISE THE CEILING as our nation plunges deeper in debt !

              Obama once declared the U.S. should never enter a war where our national security interests were not at risk ... without Congressional approval. Obama as President ordered an attack on Libya who was no threat to the U.S. with about $1 billion in Cruise missiles ..... WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL !

              Obama also promised a balanced approach to debt reduction .... only it has all been an increase in taxes, with no spending cuts as promised.

              Oh, and milking it .... neither Clinton nor Carter paid down the national deficit. That's merely a lie from you.

              • 1 vote
              #2.37 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:24 PM EST

              Jim,

              As for Gitmo he couldn’t get the Congressional support
              needed to close it.

              There has already been $1.4 Trillion in spending cuts with another $1.2 to be incorporated with the Sequester on March 1st to the $400 Billion in tax revenue increases. So that is $2.6T to $0.4T, sounds like a 6.5 to 1 ratio!!

              • 3 votes
              #2.38 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:35 PM EST

              America....A Tyrant and Dictator is judged by his actions and not his words. By that standard Obama is a Tyrant and Dictator!

              And yes Obama signed the NDAA 2012 & now 2013 both of which have the Unconstitutional Clauses of Indefinite Detention without Trial of American in America and he has also murdered at least 3 Americans that they admit and that we know of!

              That sounds like a Tyrant and Dictator to me and more than enough to qualify Obama under the High Crimes and Misdemeanor Clause for Impeachment under Constitution of the United States!

              Obama's Demand for the Power of Indefinite Detention, Presidential Kill List, and Ceaseless attacks on the 2nd Amendment Warrants his Imprisonment not just his Impeachment!

              "What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." Thomas Jefferson

                #2.39 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:08 AM EST

                Larry-367607,

                Obama has not only continued Bush's policies, he has expanded them. Obama is waging war with Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia Pakistan and Libya. And now they want to go into 35 countries in Africa!

                Obama, Bush and Romney are all the same. Wake up!

                  #2.40 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 7:04 AM EST
                  Reply

                  Hope you all got your new child friendly shoot a coffin App from the NRA.

                  I have noticed over the past few weeks that the pro-gun crowd has brought the level of their conversation down to ‘from my cold dead hands’ or ‘come and take them’ … the me and mine argument. The real cold dead hands are those of the parents who can no longer hold their child and the children themselves. You need to open your hearts and minds; those cold dead hands are talking to you and none more loudly than those of the children who died.

                  Those NRA coffins are so cute you can imagine a child within. Coming from the NRA it must be fun … and educational too.

                  • 26 votes
                  #3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:14 AM EST

                  The NRA's first comments after Sandy Hook were to blame Hollywood and video games for exalting violence. So how do the celebrate the 1 month anniversary? Distribute a violent video game. Nice job, NRA.

                  • 21 votes
                  #3.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:10 AM EST

                  Steeler

                  You are wrong and by proclamation a liar. Those were not the NRA's first comments. Your liar in chief is proud of you though.

                  • 14 votes
                  #3.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:21 AM EST

                  I knew there was a reason I didn't like Pittsburgh. If you think a target shooting game is a violent video game you are the densest person I know. Look up some of the graphic games that are on the market now and get back to me about how violent shooting some wood is. And blackcat, why aren't you advocating for the ban of cars, knives, swimming pools and everything else in this country that kills little kids? I'm all for safety, but you people live in an unrealistic dream world.

                  • 11 votes
                  #3.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:34 AM EST

                  Nightwalker2890

                  Where in my post did I advocate the banning of guns? As to your dirtying the argument with other ways in which people may lose their lives, the gun has but one purpose, to fire a projectile at high velocity at a target. The car, knife and swimming pool you mention have many other purposes and the least of which in all of them is to cause harm.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:07 AM EST

                  There will be the 2nd Civil War before they take away our guns. It's not going to happen.

                  Liberals have no clue about guns anyway. I have a Glock 17 that comes standard with a 17 round magazine. I bought 4 additional magazines that hold 33 rounds each. My Glock is not an assault rifle. But I could shoot a whole mess of frightened 6 year-olds hiding under their desk. But if there was a trained, armed guard at that school, I would not be able to kill any kids. I'd be the one and only casualty if a retired cop is guarding the school.

                  And you liberals must know that a magazine is the easiest component of a gun to reproduce. It's just a piece of fabricated metal with a spring in it. Not to mention all the high-capacity magazines already out there. Ban these all you want. It stops nothing. And it takes me about 1.5 seconds to remove / replace a magazine. So will you libbies tell me how banning these magazines and rifles keeps the kids alive in gun-free zone?

                  • 7 votes
                  #3.5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:14 AM EST

                  So will you libbies tell me how banning these magazines and rifles keeps the kids alive?

                  Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

                  • 6 votes
                  #3.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:18 AM EST

                  I cannot believe that the two of you have now decided it is OK to use the death of 20 innocent children as a talking point to advance your political goals. Talking about children's dead cold hands. Is that really what an open discussion of politics has now become? Is this the legacy you wish to leave to your children? Hopefully their hands are warm and comfortable for a long time.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:27 AM EST

                  BlackCat,

                  You did not provide an solution.

                  So let's say all magazines holding more than 10 rounds are outlawed. Now I decide to go on a rampage and kill little kids. I buy 25, 10 round magazines. I buy or make a belt to hold these magazines. I pick out an elementary school that has no guards and no armed teachers. I break a window or kick in the door to get in. I now start shooting little kids. My first 10 rounds are over. I take the 1.5 seconds to put in the next magazine. I kill a bunch of more kids. I then do this over and over until the police get here. I have nothing to fear. I know it's a gun-free zone. And I know the little kids are no danger to me.

                  So I ask again: How does an assault rifle and high-capacity magazine ban prevent the next school shooting?

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.8 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:28 AM EST

                  Bobster......methinks you need to dial down your overreactions. Steeler is correct, the NRA used that claim when crazy Wayne LePierre made his first bizarre statement ........covered on by the national media.

                  I would like to see your big ammo clips be taxed to the hilt and use the money to pay down the national debt. But before all that, I'd like to see everyone who wants to buy a gun be required to proved they are mentally competent to own any gun and the responsibilities that go with that right.

                  • 7 votes
                  #3.9 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:39 AM EST

                  mamma,

                  I live in Florida where we have some of the most lax gun-buying requirements. And it takes 5 days to buy a gun due to all the checks they run on a person. If they want to check for mental illness, fine with me. How they would that is beyond me.

                  And taxing magazines does nothing. People will buy them on the black market. These are incredibly easy to make. I know dozens of people who actually make their own guns!

                  And tell me how banning assault rifles and high-capacity magazines prevents massacres in gun-free zones like elementary schools?

                  PS. I live in Palm Beach County Florida. One of the most liberal areas in the US. We already have armed guards in schools. How come that is never reported by the liberal media?

                  • 6 votes
                  #3.10 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:45 AM EST

                  Bobster,

                  The solution is long term as it is a cultural problem. Many steps will have to be tried and those that fail discarded. Both sides will need to give ground. The ability of modern firearms has become party to the culture of violence.

                  JC in GI

                  I cannot believe that the two of you have now decided it is OK to use the death of 20 innocent children as a talking point to advance your political goals

                  If you are talking to me I do not have a political agenda. I am just sick and tired of children being murdered in a so-called advanced society.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.11 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:52 AM EST

                  Uh, the semi-automatic handgun is not modern. It has been around a long time. Unless you want to ban these weapons as well? Good luck with that one! LOL!

                  " The ability of modern firearms has become party to the culture of violence."

                  The ability of modern firearms has saved thousands of lives in Florida over the years. This is not coming from me. It's from the liberal police force here in south Florida where I live. They said that since Florida has the most armed and trained citizens in the US, criminals decided not to do too many home invasions and armed robberies as they did years ago. Many innocent lives have been saved due to law-abiding citizens arming themselves.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.12 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:02 PM EST

                  Bobster-1557895

                  Hey gang!

                  A reminder that Feisty, David Walker, Pigotry, and Beverley are all the same poster. They all post from the same IP address.

                  And with that crap, all communication between us comes to a well deserved end.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.13 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:07 PM EST

                  BlackCat,

                  So you condone one person creating 4 (at least) names?!?!?

                  Liberals never cease to amaze me. LOL!

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.14 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:12 PM EST

                  Bobster-1557895

                  OK ... just one more time, what is it that you do not understand about writing styles? None of the 4 is remotely the same.

                  BTW ... Sally who rules the roost would never let that happen were she aware of it ... perhaps you should address your concerns to her and see what response you get. I will wait with bated breath.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.15 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:39 PM EST

                  Black Cat,

                  Hope you all got your new child friendly shoot a coffin App from the NRA.

                  This sounds like a political agenda to me. It is pretty clear that both parties abhor the death of innocent children. It is also clear that each party has a different opinion on ways to reduce the chance of this happening again. You demonized the NRA with your statement. You did not demonize the group that feels the correct response is to limit one particular kind of gun. You have made it pretty clear through prior posts which side you belong to. Having the discussion and on how to reduce gun violence is a good thing. Demonizing the side you do not belong to by suggesting or through inueno that they don't mind that childred are killed is disgusting.

                  Just because the president has set an agenda of attacking the opposition instead of promoting solutions, does not mean that we as civilized people should conduct all debates in the same fashion. Try making you point on the merits of your choice:

                  Guns that look like army rifles may promote people killing more often.

                  Magazines that hold lots of bullets allow people to kill more people before being disarmed or neutralized.

                  In other words, try attacking the problem or the issue; instead of the person or group that holds a different view.

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.16 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:50 PM EST

                  @Bobster-1557895

                  Like "Fast Hands" Lindsey Graham, you claim that you can reload so quickly that banning high-capacity ammunition clips would do no good. WRONG. The murderer in the Tuscon massacre was wrestled down and disarmed only when he was forced to stop and reload. If he hadn't had so many bullets in the clip he was using, the toll of dead and wounded would probably have been smaller. Maybe you and Fast Hands Graham are so good it wouldn't make any difference, but the typical deranged killer may not have your amazing hand-eye coordination.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.17 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:52 PM EST

                  blackcatwhitecat:

                  You are quite correct. Sally is aware of Bobster's lie about the IP address. You will find the full text of her response at this site - post 1.3 to be specific:

                  http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/10/16447508-first-thoughts-the-disorganized-cabinet-shuffle?commentId=73259346#c73259346

                  You'll find a couple of his posts above. Now, he tells us that he is married to a former Miami Heat dancer, and in addition to his software company, it turns out he has offices in European cities. Thus, his constant lying now takes on a world-class aspect. When you've been exposed as a blatant liar and then return to the very site where you've been exposed, you aren't any kind of bright.

                  Look, my friends, you lend credibility to this liar when you engage him. Starve this troll.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.18 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:54 PM EST

                  Bobster-

                  You are an extremist, and have a narrow view. If you pay attention, you might learn something here.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.19 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:57 PM EST

                  JC in G

                  I cannot believe that the two of you have now decided it is OK to use the death of 20 innocent children as a talking point to advance your political goals

                  I cannot believe how shamelessly the 9/11 attacks were exploited by people demanding that the doors separating the cockpit and the passenger area on airliners be kept locked at all times during flight. People with a sinister agenda of public safety also immediately demanded other common-sense security measures using the 9/11 attacks as an excuse without waiting the required period of mourning for the dead of indeterminate length.

                  And seriously, the 3000 deaths on 9/11 really were exploited by Bush to advance his agenda of war with Iraq. I'll bet you weren't so outraged about that.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.20 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:02 PM EST

                  JC in G

                  Black Cat,

                  Hope you all got your new child friendly shoot a coffin App from the NRA.

                  No, it was sarcasm directed at the leadership of the NRA and the shrinking number of members who support said leadership who post on this board. Perhaps you fail to you see the hypocrisy?

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.21 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:18 PM EST

                  Wow Houston,

                  Sorry, I was not ready to jump back more than 10 years to debate the need for locking of cockpit doors. But I think it is a good idea.

                  You have pointed out that Bush exploited the 911 attacks and that I apparently agree with Bush. As my statement above points out, I am against exploiting a tragedy to promote a political idea or ideal. Bush, Obama, Black Cat, JC - G, or yours.

                  Apparently you are outraged that Bush exploited the "recent tragedy", but it seems that Black cat is doing the same thing and you seem to be condoning his actions.

                  It will be interesting to see what the future holds. I think the sale of new guns that look like army guns will be restricted by new laws and/or presidential decree. I think we will also see new restrictions on selling magazines that hold lots of bullets. I also think there are plenty of existing army guns and big clips that will not be taken away from their owners. Unfortunately, I think we will experience more heartache in the future by a mass murderer regardless of these new restrictions.

                  Here in Atlanta, the regional transportation system has decided that adding more cameras is a good deterrent to crime. This is based on some pretty hard facts. They are saying that a deterrent is a solution to reducing crime. I have yet to see any facts that show that restricting the kind of gun a person can buy or the amount of bullets it can hold has any impact on mass murderers. Keep in mind, I said that I have not seen the facts, if you can provide them, I will keep my mind open to any solution that can save people's lives.

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.22 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:27 PM EST

                  BlackCat,

                  I didn't get the IP address from Newsvine. That would be against the rules I suspect. Yeah wow! Someone makes up 4 names (maybe more) and they write in different styles. LMFAO!! Of course each personailty is going to write in a different tone! LOLOL!

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.23 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:33 PM EST

                  Bobster-1557895

                  Time to man up there fella ... show the proof and how you got there. If you do, I promise to disappear from this board.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.24 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:58 PM EST

                  Nice try! As soon as I post the IP address then I'm banned. I would think that would break their rules. Like I said, there is no way to do this in newsvine that I know of. I got it outside of newsvine.

                  I guess you didn't know that I started and own a software company in Boca Raton, FL with 88 highly-skilled, highly-paid employees. These guys could hack into the pentagon if they wish. Of course I'd never allow such behavior. My skills are on the software development side.

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.25 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:50 PM EST

                  JC in G

                  I am against exploiting a tragedy to promote a political idea or ideal.

                  Well, I am all FOR exploiting a tragedy in order to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future. And that's exactly why people are promoting common-sense regulation of guns and ammunition and universal background checks. There's no difference between that and the demands for heightened security for airplanes that followed immediately after 9/11.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.26 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:56 PM EST

                  Bobster-1557895

                  Nice try! As soon as I post the IP address then I'm banned. I would think that would break their rules. Like I said, there is no way to do this in newsvine that I know of. I got it outside of newsvine.

                  Oh am I going to love playing with you. Tell you what, you have my permission to post mine. Hey, ya never know, I may be personality #5.

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.27 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:05 PM EST

                  Ha ha! I can't get your IP address from Newsvine Toots. You libbies need to improve your reading skills. LMFAO!!

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.28 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:18 PM EST

                  OK, I got it Houston.

                  So you supported Bush's knee jerk reaction to go to war after 911. In retrospect, I think we (America) and Bush could have done a better job with this had all the facts been taken into account. Time will tell if outlawing sales of new army looking guns with big clips really stops madmen from committing atrocities. At least you are honest about your desire to exploit the 20 murdered children. I respect your honesty while disagreeing with you. I will join you on making the case for better background checks. I think that should include periodic re-checks, and limiting the styles of the stock of automatic guns, limit the clips on rifles and then review the statistics on effectiveness every 5 years. If it hasn't worked, like Chicago's ban on handguns, the law should be reviewed and open to change.

                  • 1 vote
                  #3.29 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:33 PM EST

                  Bobster-1557895

                  Well Bob, if you got theirs you can get mine. Come on, show me the money. But then you can't because it is all just bull@!$%#, an accusation without merit. You lose pal. Enjoy the anonymity of it.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.30 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:03 PM EST

                  Thousands of people die every year in cars. Thousands of people die every year with guns.

                  Guns and cars should be well regulated the same amount.

                    #3.31 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:27 PM EST

                    Bobster-1557895,

                    Stop being so secretive, just tell blackcatwhitecat about IP Address capture software (programs). Anyone with a basic knowledge of computers knows (knew):

                    http://www.bing.com/search?q=ip+address+capture+software&form=MSNH14&pq=ip+address+capture+sof&sc=1-22&sp=1&qs=AS&sk=

                    • 2 votes
                    #3.32 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:11 PM EST

                    "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."~Ben Franklin

                    America.....As I told a State Trooper during the Occupation who told me "I agree in Principle with everything you've said"....Officers either You have "Principles" or You Don't!

                    Barrack H Obama has by Executive Order and Dictatorial Decree he has No Principles!

                    Write your Congress Man or Woman and Demand that Barrack H Obama be Impeached for Violating his Oath of Office and that ANY elected Official or Government Agent that attempts to enforce these Unconstitutional Decree's either be Arrested or Impeached themselves!

                    "Our main agenda is to have all guns banned. We must use whatever means
                    possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort the facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed."~ Sara Brady

                      #3.33 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:20 AM EST

                      David,

                      Not sure how to get an IP address myself. I developed software years ago that I sell around the world thru my company. It's web-based software. But I have some folks on my staff that could break into the pentagon if they wanted to. They got the the IP address of Feisty elsewhere, not on newsvine. That would be breaking the rules.

                      BlackCat,

                      LMAFO!! Man, you are now like my little puppet. I can make you do anything. Dance puppet. Dance! LOLOL!!

                      Liberals. God love em! LOL!

                        #3.34 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:01 AM EST

                        @blackcatwhitecat,

                        Unless Bobster Gates hacked into Newsvines network and can then retreive individual IP addresses all he will see is the IP address from Newsvines computers.

                        IP sniffer programs such as SmartSniff v2.00 - Capture TCP/IP packets on your network adapter Copyright (c) 2004 - 2012 Nir Sofer require you to actually enter the network that the program is located on.

                        With that said all you have to do is create a list of tasty looking links aimed at an individuals tastes choose the links that you think they would like and imbed it in your post or emails. Once clicked on it would take you to their site where there may be something but usually you just find HTTP 404 - Not Found......In big bold letters. Then they can grab your IP address from your packet data info. Not a huge amount of use other than to determine if one IP address has multiple accounts attached (by itself anyway - some mischief can be had though) That alone does not meen that ONE person is doing it. At our house we have 4 workstations and if a certain family friend shows up(or more) with laptops we can have many more if everyone was to sign in at once............Well you can see where I'm going with this :) Sally and Tyler might umm........Frown upon our doing this though and it's easy for them to check. Instead we often gather around and go Multi screen to watch the show each with our own agenda but always sharing the popcorn:)

                        Grandpa looks at things from a Marine Vet. and Retired civilian judge perspective, Mom as a recovering Lawyer now a Psychologist has a Freudian Field Day psychoanalyzing the unusual ones (oh so many) and giving us all a play by play :), Retired Law Enforcement / Ex-Military / Private Security guys laugh at and question common sense plus whether they know Miranda or not:), Kids get lots of entertainment and new knowledge thanks to the endless barrage of info flying around and think this is better than Honey Boo Boo, Moonshiners and Punked all in one. All of the ex or current Law Enforcement/Ex-Military/Private Security guys (basically all Army, Marines and Air Force) laugh their a$$es off that the only branch of the Military that seems to totally discount low tech or no tech is the current or former Navy personel. There is plenty more but I'm gonna save some for later.

                        Regards,

                        Brandon - The Liberal LOLZZZZ (just for Bobster)

                        BTW- There are ways to block your "True" IP address from pryin' eyes............let me know :)

                          #3.35 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:26 AM EST

                          2Fast,

                          Man, you libbies don't read! LOL! I did not get the IP address from Newsvine. It's against the rules. I also did not slip in a link to an unauthorized web site. Look at my old messages and you will see. There are other ways outside of newsvine to get someone's IP address. One hint: It's actually a rather low-tech trick that works on incredibly dumb posters.

                            #3.36 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:51 AM EST

                            @blackcatwhitecat,

                            how to find a blogger's ip address - h-ttp://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=how+to+find+a+blogger%27s+ip+address+&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4RNQN_enUS489US489&q=how+to+find+a+blogger%27s+ip+address+&gs_l=hp..0.0i22.0.0.0.34609...........0.gF7nuHJm08s

                            How to determine IP address of website or blog domain - h-ttp://www.tothepc.com/archives/check-ip-address-of-url-online-tools/

                            Obviously the moral of the story is "Be careful what you click on" ya never know just how shady some really are :)

                              #3.37 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:54 AM EST

                              @bobster,

                              I read perfectly. As stated CLEARLY and Succinctly I explained WHY you did not get IP addresses from Newsvine (Not that it would be terribly hard). Against the Rules???? - LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

                              Whats a few rules amongst adversaries anyway. Don't be a pansy..............ReThuglicans - "Ya just gotta feel sorry for them" LOLZZZZZZZZZ

                                #3.38 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:02 PM EST

                                2Fast,

                                Nah, I abide by newsvine rules. I guess you don't. Have fun in your criminal endeavors!! LMFAO!!

                                • 1 vote
                                #3.39 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:26 PM EST

                                Bobster,

                                "Nah, I abide by newsvine rules" -

                                Yeah Right!!! Which ones? Conduct maybe........not likely;)

                                "I guess you don't. Have fun in your criminal endeavors!!"

                                Coming from a ReTHUGlican such as yourself...........Now THATS Funny as I'm not the one claiming to have member's IP addresses - LOLZZZZ

                                Now get back to work and make more money..................That way you can feel good about paying more taxes. The more you make the more you pay and as a liberal I truly thank you from the bottom of my heart.

                                ReThuglicans - "Ya just gotta feel sorry for them" LOLZZZZZZZZZ

                                BTW- In a sick and perverse way you actually are kinda likeable......... at least you have fun being a ReThuglican!!! :)

                                  #3.40 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:00 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  Guns

                                  The two most passionately argued issues in my lifetime have been guns and abortion. Being as how I’m not of the female gender I really don’t have much standing to discuss that second one but seeing as how I have had a firearm of some sort either in hand or close since I was about 5 or 6 I guess I’m pretty well qualified to speak to the first. I have been holding off on it because quite frankly most all of us have been so busy yammering at each other and I’ve been so heartbroke that I didn’t think that it would do a lick of good. ‘Most cases I ‘spect it still won’t but I got to get it off my chest sooner or later so here goes.

                                  Guns have been an issue in America for so long that all the folks on both sides of the issue have to do is go to the footlocker and drag out their copies of the Mythology and viola we have something that doesn’t need thinking about just reacted to and the reaction is pretty well predictable. That is exactly what it is you know? Mythology. Funny thing is that just like Mom, Apple Pie and Baseball it is a distinctively American Mythology. Norwegians and Danes have Thor and Odin. Greeks have Zeus and Apollo. Brits have King Arthur and Camelot. We have the Deerslayer, Doc Holiday and Wyatt Earp, Butch and Sundance and John Wayne.

                                  Let’s look at the left hand side of the equation first. Many on the extreme left think that guns should just not be allowed to exist and certainly only under careful control. Sorry folks ain’t happening. You need look no further than the failed experiment with Prohibition to see why not. I know that in urban and inner-city environments they are a problem and I’ll get back to that in a while.

                                  For 99% of the more rural population they are simply a tool like a hammer or chainsaw. Many of the folks I know are right now using them to put food on the table for their families. Many of the fees are used for conservation and wildlife management and most of the activities are under controlled circumstances and regulation. Many of the organizations such as Ducks Unlimited etc. have gotten together with folks like the Sierra Club and a lot has been done to preserve the countries wildlife habitat and wide open spaces. The rural folks also have a law enforcement problem that our more urban cousins don’t have. Taken into consideration that most of the folks I am describing have spent a lifetime around guns with all the adherent safety issues, ethical questions, etc. drummed into their head since birth then those of you on the left should be able to see why I say that they aren’t the problem and believe me don’t want to be. Hell they are just as heartbroke as I am.

                                  Now let’s look at the pry them out of my cold dead hands side of things. You’ll need to start using your heads for something to besides to hold your ears apart and start to realize that you are being used and abused and it’s not by the folks that you think are doing it.

                                  I’ll just bet that most of the folks on this site can look at the argument that that I just made for you and say “Yep I can live with that” What they can’t live with is a bunch of danged fools that just cannot live unless they can go down to the park amongst the women and children and wave your gun around next some families picnic. Tools generally need to be used on the job set aside for them and ought to be kept in the toolbox otherwise so they don’t get lost. Why go so far out of your way to create a problem where one doesn’t exist? Hell I’d almost think that you’ll wanted to act like one of them Atheist fellows when somebody mentions Christmas and a Manger Scene at the Courthouse

                                  Just personally Folks I think that if you want to claim Gun ownership as a Right then you better be willing to take Responsibility as to how you discharge that right. If you want to make a damn fool of yourself then that Right deserves to be revoked for a time. Take for instance walking around a Political Event with an AR strapped over your shoulder. Now I know it makes you feel all big and bad ‘bout like taking two or three drinks of White Lightin’ and it ought to carry to same consequences of Drunk Driving. Take your license for a while till you see the error of your ways.

                                  As far as the concealed carry mythology goes you’ll need to recognize it for the silliness that it is. This ain’t Dodge City and you ain’t Wyatt Earp. Realize this. If you somehow feel that you need a 30 round clip or a 100 round drum to accomplish the mission you have chosen to involve yourself in a firefight not a surgical strike for which you are woefully unprepared and the chances are with all those bullets flying around your going to add not subtract to the carnage. Also in their Maniacal Cowardice the perpetrators of this madness are targeting areas where Folks like yourself have the least chance of being. They are taking great pains in their Madness to be where the victims are the most innocent and defenseless.

                                  Please come off this entire arm the Teacher’s and Administrator’s Bushra. It’s silly. There are places that Guns have no place for any reason. Schools, Universities, Houses of Worship and Other of what should be Safe Places are just that. Safe places. My wife is an ex-school teacher and still takes great pleasure in substituting and being with “her” Kids if only for a day or two. While her husband may at times be the most terrible enemy that one could have please don’t involve her in your desire for vengeance at any cost. If you have to bring it, bring it to me but I would prefer that you would allow her what shreds of Innocence and Dignity that she has left.

                                  Quit striving for instant Gratification. I don’t see any overwhelming evidence of something that you’ll need a Gun for that can’t wait long enough for a good Background Check including Mental Health. Look at as protecting yourself from an Impulse Purchase that’s going to get you in trouble when your wife finds out that you bought another expensive object that now you’re gonna have to get her something equally nice but non-lethal for to make up for.

                                  While we are on the subject of Mental Health I say that it must at this point enter into the conversation. If our Congress and Local Legislators won’t at the least raise enough money to make a Mental Health evaluation part and parcel of a Background Check then I might suggest that we charge a small fee with the Purchase of Guns and Ammunition to make it so. We already do this with Hunting Licenses and such like and accept the Responsibility readily if not happily. Same with Games. Some say that Violent Games have a role to play in this. I don’t know since my days for playing games has long past. I will say that something seems to have got young people far from the concept of when a gun goes off in most cases something Dies. Forever. Put a small fee on Games so we can do the research to at least find out.

                                  Quit conflagrating the Weapons and Appertances of War with the Tools and Implements of Sport. Ask any Vet that has returned from a faraway place and has had to witness the terrible sights of that destruction and mayhem and they will tell you several things. If it can be imagined the potential there is for much worse than even what has been seen in Newtown, Aurora and other places. They fought and were willing to die so that it would not be visited upon our Innocents. And it is their fervent hope that the Unthinkable doesn’t happen here. And they will go to any length to make it so.

                                  It is simply time for the Rural folks and the legitimate shooters to put down their Mythology that is being used to further another darker agenda to realize that Guns and gun ownership is a real problem in areas of our country where they are being misused and set down at the table and work out some reasonable accommodation within limits that we both can agree on. Quit insisting on pushing a right without taking the responsibility that comes with that right. Or have that right taken away from you. I’m tired of reading in the paper every day about one gang of kids shooting up another gang of kids because they didn’t like the way they wore their hair or something. And I’m long since tired and heart broke of having to watch Folks go thru what they are going thru in Newtown. These are your Friends and Neighbors and they’re Children for God’s Sake. Suddenly a little extra care don’t seem so onerous now does it.

                                  Folks we are all sickened and heartbroke over this. It knows no party or ideology for most of us. It’s not a Right thing or a Left thing. It’s to me a Human thing. Yet I’m sure that there are some and we need to realize that they are a distinct minority that is going to take advantage to drag out their Mythology and demonize away. And you know that’s going to be alright. Because if that’s the price that I or anyone else has to pay to keep this issue front and center and it results in some positive results then demonize away. ‘Cause I would pay about any price that it takes so that even one child doesn’t have to live in fear. And if you think about it you probably would too. The Demonizer’s are simply irrelevant to the conversation.

                                  • 37 votes
                                  #4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:14 AM EST

                                  Amen!

                                  • 20 votes
                                  #4.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:20 AM EST

                                  Floyd,

                                  That has to be your finest! ☺

                                  • 24 votes
                                  #4.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:25 AM EST

                                  A Well Regulated Sales Pitch

                                  From the article above:

                                  The New York Times has more: “Actions the president could take on his own are likely to include imposing new limits on guns imported from overseas, compelling federal agencies to improve sharing of mental health records and directing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct research on gun violence, according to those briefed on the effort.”

                                  Those of you who want to brush up on what constitutes a “well-regulated militia”; you should take a gander into the history books at the following laws.

                                  Courtesy of Wikipedia:

                                  First Militia Act of 1792; Second Militia Act of 1972; Militia Act of 1795; Militia Act of 1862

                                  The Militia Act of 1903 also known as the Dick Act, was initiated by United States Secretary of War Elihu Root following the Spanish–American War of 1898, after the war demonstrated weaknesses in the militia, and in the entire U.S. military. The act formulated the concept of the National Guard and also ensured that all state military forces were simultaneously dual reservists under the authority of the Army Reserve.

                                  Please read more on this subject.

                                  This writer is perplexed as to why an individual thinks they need a military-type of weapon such as the “Bushmaster Ar-15” for personal use.

                                  We have the greatest armed forces in the world to provide National Defense. We have a National Guard, Army Reserve and Coast Guard to protect our borders and shores. We have State, Sheriff, and Local law enforcement to protect our cities and towns.

                                  We have satellites that can see the dimples on a golf ball from outer space. We have un-manned, Star Wars-like, flying robot drones that can track and attack an enemy from hundreds of miles away. We have enough intercontinental ballistic missiles to destroy the world ten times over.

                                  We all pay taxes for this world-class protection.

                                  So what is it that you are afraid of? Do you really think Russian paratroopers are going to plop down onto your humble abode during half-time of the Super Bowl? Do you REALLY think the armed forces of the United States of America are going to come rolling over the hill in M-1 Abrams tanks just to say “Howdy-Do”?

                                  In my humble opinion, the gun manufacturers know a chump when they see one, and a lot of people are sprinting to the gun shows and on-line stores to eagerly hand over their hard-earned money to stock up on weapons and ammo that they will never use.

                                  You may think all this talk about regulation and limiting certain types of firearms is going to prevent YOUR “right to bear arms”. I think it’s more about THEIR right to SELL arms in what has to be the biggest marketing scam to hit America since the Cabbage Patch Doll.

                                  We now interrupt this program to bring you the following message:

                                  The guns and the bombs, the rockets and the warships, are all symbols of human failure.
                                  Lyndon B. Johnson

                                  P.S. Thank you Randi Rhodes for the Militia Act info.

                                  Salud

                                  • 27 votes
                                  #4.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:32 AM EST

                                  Bravo IR......brilliant absolutely brilliant. You said it all, thank you.

                                  Anyone who yesterday, watched the press conference of the parents and families of the victims of Newtown, announce their Sandy Hook Promise, to work to ensure that what happened to them will hopefully never happen to others. It is as you say heartbreaking, to listen to those voices talk about their lost angels and family members they need our voices and support to help their efforts.

                                  Again IR....beautifully stated. Bless you my friend!

                                  • 26 votes
                                  #4.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:34 AM EST

                                  This writer is perplexed as to why an individual thinks they need a military-type of weapon such as the “Bushmaster Ar-15” for personal use.

                                  Same reason one needs to drive a Mercedes instead of a Volt. Because they can.

                                  • 13 votes
                                  #4.5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:35 AM EST

                                  Well said... Seems everyone wants the 'right', but no one wants the 'responsibility'...

                                  • 16 votes
                                  #4.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:40 AM EST

                                  Same reason one needs to drive a Mercedes instead of a Volt. Because they can.

                                  Sarcasm notwithstanding, what an utterly vapid argument. Need to do is not based on ability to do.

                                  • 17 votes
                                  #4.7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:48 AM EST

                                  What is your point bcwc? Both instances involve ability to do.

                                  • 8 votes
                                  #4.8 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:55 AM EST

                                  Hi Floyd,

                                  Your best ever. Thanks

                                  There we have it. We need to have a "well regulated militia." So the NRA needs to get out of the way, in order that we can regulate the militia. If Congress won't get this done, then the President needs to use his executive powers to order such actions.

                                  • 16 votes
                                  #4.9 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:02 AM EST

                                  Thanks Friends and Neighbors especially to you Tomas Salud indeed. I know that some of you'll are getting tired of this. Seems to me that the Only way we can get thru to some of you'll Yahoo's is to repeat something over and over till the clear light of understanding comes up in your eyes if that is possible for some of you. Maybe you'll will realize that some form of this is going to happen. Now you can chose to Demonize the Messenger or you can set down at the table in a good faith effort to work something out. Because I can assure you if you don't your subject to getting something that you won't like. And you know something you won't have anybody to blame but yourselves. Obstinacy only goes so far in the face of public opinion. Then it becomes Stupidity.

                                  • 19 votes
                                  #4.10 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:03 AM EST

                                  Hi Floyd,

                                  Your best ever. Thanks

                                  There we have it. We need to have a "well regulated militia." So the NRA needs to get out of the way, in order that we can regulate the militia. If Congress won't get this done, then the President needs to use his executive powers to order such actions.

                                  • 15 votes
                                  #4.11 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:05 AM EST

                                  Independent Redneck, That is the best and most rational thing I have read on the guns issue. Thank you and may your words bring some sanity to an issue fraught with insanity.

                                  • 13 votes
                                  #4.12 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:06 AM EST

                                  Independent Redneck Va.

                                  Beautifully written, mi amigo.

                                  Salud

                                  • 11 votes
                                  #4.13 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:08 AM EST

                                  Bravo, IR----wonderful points.

                                  I saw some of the press conference from the Sandy Hook parents and also the interview 2 of them did with Rachel Maddow. I thought I had cried all the tears I had but seeing those brave people trying to make something positive come from senseless tragedy was too much.

                                  There has to be room for compromise.

                                  • 16 votes
                                  #4.14 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:15 AM EST

                                  IR:

                                  Damn, how I'd like to think that is the last word in this argument. There is no counterpoint to your excellent post.

                                  Unfortunately, you are also correct that we must continue to push for action based on rational and logical arguments. No more noise.

                                  • 13 votes
                                  #4.15 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:19 AM EST

                                  You should re-read the Militia Act and the Dick Act of 1903. Both of which speak of the Unorganzied Militia which consist of every male of atleast 18 years old, who was to have a rifle suitable for military interaction.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #4.16 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:51 AM EST

                                  David Walker -

                                  And how do you propose we have a "rational and logical argument" with the kind of people who are over on another NBC thread this morning claiming that the whole Sandy Hook tragedy was just a mass conspiracy staged by the Obama administration in order to ramp up support for gun control measures? Honest to God, there are websites by the dozens already claiming they have PROOF that, for example, little Emile Parker was NOT killed in the massacre - because, why there she is, smiling and sitting on the President's lap in a photo taken when he visited the grieving families two days later. And these people believe this with all their hearts and souls and every ounce of tin foil in their hats. They make the birther crowd seem tame by comparison. And these are the same people who are lining up even as we speak to stockpile even more guns before the evil government comes to take them away.

                                  We have barely scratched the surface of the insanity pervading our country today. And I dread finding out just how much worse things are going to get before we someday come back out on the sane and civilized side of the discussion.

                                  • 13 votes
                                  #4.17 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:59 AM EST

                                  Bravo, IR! Indeed, this one is your finest of many fine ones. You summed up the issues perfectly. It is not about taking away all guns, no one is suggesting that. It is about implementing sensible laws that will reduce the violence and as President Obama said, "if it saves one child's life", then it is worth it.

                                  • 14 votes
                                  #4.18 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 AM EST

                                  You may wish to join me in taking the Sandy Hook Promise

                                  Sandy Hook Promise
                                  http://www.sandyhookpromise.org/

                                  Here's the full petition:

                                  Make the Promise

                                  I Promise to honor the 26 lives lost at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

                                  I Promise to do everything I can to encourage and support common sense solutions that make my community and our country safer from similar acts of violence.

                                  • 13 votes
                                  #4.19 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:09 AM EST

                                  Tomas, terrific post as well. Salud

                                  JoAnne, the very people you describe are the ones who should never be allowed near a gun.

                                  • 13 votes
                                  #4.20 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:12 AM EST

                                  IR - beautifully written and it SHOULD touch every one of us. Clearly some are beyond comprehension as Talk to the Hand proved immediately.

                                  • 9 votes
                                  #4.21 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:41 AM EST

                                  JoAnne in PA, you asked:

                                  "And how do you propose we have a "rational and logical argument" with the kind of people who are over on another NBC thread this morning claiming that the whole Sandy Hook tragedy was just a mass conspiracy staged by the Obama administration in order to ramp up support for gun control measures?"

                                  Your question goes to the heart of my post at 1.5. You cannot and do not have a rational and logical argument/discussion with those people.

                                  You couch this in terms of insanity. I tell you without reservation, this is not insanity. It is stupidity so profound, you cannot grasp it. Neither can you grasp the incredible ramifications of their stupidity. Stupidity explains why these people continue to repeat the same utterly false and discredited dogma without question. You can present mountains of evidence that crush their dogma, but they are unable to process that information. JoAnne, they are stupid.

                                  At first it sounds ridiculous, but I urge you to sit down and think about this. You hurt yourself immeasurably when you cannot bring yourself to use the proper descriptor. There is a proverb that says, "The beginning of wisdom is to call a thing by its proper name." In this case, the word is stupid. Stupidity precludes reason. Stupidity precludes critical thinking.

                                  We are under no obligation to pretend stupid people understand what we are saying. We are under no obligation to explain the rationale behind the laws that govern us. When your dog poops on the floor, you train him to go outside, you don't explain why it is undesirable that he not use the kitchen as his bathroom. It is very difficult to accept the fact that people who are allowed to drive cars, own guns, and yes, even teach in our schools are stupid. They have merely been trained. Yes, stupid people can recite dogma.

                                  Consider the teacher who takes a degree in Biology, yet continues to insist Creationism/Intelligent Design has equal scientific validity. The fact is the teacher was able to repeat information for his classes, for his tests, and receive a degree. That does not mean the teacher understands what he was fed as a student. I joke when I speak of dogma food and fool ade, but that is precisely the diet of these drones. Again JoAnne, they are stupid.

                                  You know in your heart and in your mind, they are not your peers. Why do you engage them?

                                  • 8 votes
                                  #4.22 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:51 AM EST

                                  I haven't had time to read everything here but I hope someone other than myself has noticed that the most vocal opponents of registration and control are many times the same "pry it from my cold, dead hands" spewers. What I can't figure out is why not register your guns if your going to tell everyone you have guns? Is it because if someone actually came for them, most of you would plead for your lives and give up your first born in place of a sk?

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #4.23 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:53 AM EST

                                  Job once swallowed by the whale, We don’t need a militia we have the UN watching our back!

                                    #4.24 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:00 PM EST
                                    Reply

                                    I am really tired of the media pundits blaming President Obama for not being more bi-partisan. And especially for the lack of socializing/glad-handing he was supposed to have done. Let's start with the fact that on the NIGHT OF HIS INAUGURATION, a group of GOP met secretly to plot how they could defeat him. At a time when the nation was in economic free fall (thanks to GOP policies of the past 8 years), they vowed to obstruct the President at every turn. And he's supposed to socialize with these people and make them get along? Really? The GOP didn't live up to their oath of office to the people who elected them, people who were suffering, and we're supposed to believe that they would have changed if only the President had had nachos with them? And how about Boehner turning down invitations to SIX state dinners? He was afraid there would be a cash bar I guess.

                                    • 24 votes
                                    Reply#5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:28 AM EST

                                    And how about Boehner turning down invitations to SIX state dinners? He was afraid there would be a cash bar I guess.

                                    Too funny, but OH so true, Steeler Fan!

                                    How many times is the President expected to extend his hand only to have it bit, will the MSM consider acceptable?

                                    I loathe the MSM more with each passing day...

                                    • 18 votes
                                    #5.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:39 AM EST

                                    I agree with Steeler. I remember when America was attacked on 9/11 and Americans, including Democrats, rallied around the President, to the point that, even four years later, any dissenting opinion was met with "Don't you love your country?" But when America hit the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, Republicans took it as an opportunity to hurt the charismatic Democratic President instead of working with him. I've been astounded by their brazen obstruction since Obama was elected. It's like they don't even use the rhetoric of doing what is best for the country - they are acting like pure political animals, not statesmen.

                                    • 16 votes
                                    #5.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:53 AM EST

                                    SF....well said. From that night in 2009 all GOP tactics originated, and they haven't stopped. They have been invited many times to the WH but are in no way going to be seen in the company of the President. Ever notice how conservatives accuse others of doing things that they themselves do? They are masters at it.....voter fraud would be a current example.

                                    When President Obama first came to the WH it was announced there would be a series of cocktail parties for members of Congress to socialize and develop connections and bipartisanship......they were quietly dropped soon after as no republicans would show up. Recently, the President invited members of both Houses and both parties to a screening of Lincoln and again no republicans showed.

                                    Part of this may be politics, but to my mind, what they are doing is trying to ensure, an African American President wont succeed. The old thinking of they are not as good as the white guy is engrained in some of these neanderthals and shows in the appalling lack of respect for everything this President attempts to do is disgraceful and yet he gracefully goes on with the job and tries to work with them.

                                    In time, history will not be kind to the Republicans/conservatives for their attempts to undermine the President but in the meantime, a good majority of voters re-elected him and we will support his efforts to guide and steer the ship of states.

                                    • 19 votes
                                    #5.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:54 AM EST

                                    Feisty 100% right, How many times can he reach out his hand and put it in Chuck Todd's pants

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #5.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:57 AM EST

                                    Feisty has discovered the Loathe Stream Media. Reporters should sign up for ducking classes now.

                                    • 15 votes
                                    #5.5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:58 AM EST

                                    Steeler, good one. More nachos shared and in the eyes of the media, all our problems would have disappeared.

                                    I am so tired of the false equivalency so many in the media make. Saw an op ed by Cokie Roberts and her husband in yesterday's paper (which is a step up from the crazy Diana West ones we're forced to endure) which did point out how radical and far right extreme the GOP has become but in the next paragraph took the opportunity to claim that the liberals in Congress were equally to blame for failing to compromise. Lordy, Cokie, how do you expect democrats to compromise with a bunch of yahoos who refuse to utter the word least of all understand the meaning of the word and that governing has always meant compromising by all sides?

                                    • 9 votes
                                    #5.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:24 AM EST
                                    Reply

                                    Steeler Fan-

                                    And how about Boehner turning down invitations to SIX state dinners? He was afraid there would be a cash bar I guess.

                                    Too funny.

                                    Salud

                                    • 18 votes
                                    Reply#6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:29 AM EST

                                    FRR, do you really think blowing smoke up Obama's butt over and over will make him bigger than life?

                                    • 21 votes
                                    Reply#7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:32 AM EST

                                    When a person applies for a loan, the lending institution looks at he debt vs income... If the income does not support the debt, the loan is denied. We have a spending issue....period.

                                    • 17 votes
                                    Reply#8 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:32 AM EST

                                    If you are going to use simple analogies to make a point, at least ensure they prove your point. Government finances are not as simple as balancing a check book. Ya see, Congress already gave themselves the loan, and now they have to make the payment on that loan. The issue of spending was at the time Congress appropriated the funds. Using the example above, the poster supports allowing Congress to spend, but like Donald Trump, walk away from the obligation. If the GOP are so fiscally responsible, why do they advocate leaving the bills unpaid?

                                    • 16 votes
                                    #8.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:04 AM EST

                                    citecer-

                                    When the weasles (in this case congress), BORROWS money from other countries (the mob) and blows it on booze and pork, then says to the lender, "oops, sorry but we can't pay you back", then you have a "cement shoes" in the Hudson problem.

                                    Funny, but did you say we had a spending problem when Bushy was President?

                                    Did you?

                                    Salud

                                    • 14 votes
                                    #8.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:18 AM EST

                                    citecer, well, the time to cut spending is in the "spending bills" which Congress must pass to keep the country running. The debt ceiling is money ALREADY SPENT BY CONGRESS. You don't argue over spilt milk after it splashes on the floor.

                                    Annualized growth of federal spending during presidential terms of office: Reagan, 8.7% and 4.9%; Bush 41, 5.4%; Clinton, 3.2% and 3.9%; Bush 43, 7.8% and 8.1%; Obama, 1.4% (and this during a near depression). Now let's see that would mean that the largest growth in federal spending occurred while Republicans were President. Those numbers also correlate to which presidents increased the debt the most as well--republican presidents win at increasing government spending as well as adding the most to the national debt.

                                    • 10 votes
                                    #8.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:37 AM EST
                                    Reply

                                    The article makes several references to speeches from '07. These reporters must know something I don't because if my memory serves me correctly President Obama was not in office at that time. I also find it interesting when they list the promises broken not once did any of these reporters mention the constant road-blocks put in place by the repubs. Was this a Faux news article originally? LOL!!!!

                                    • 15 votes
                                    Reply#9 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:33 AM EST

                                    Rick, go back to sleep ! Obama was a U.S. Senator at the time and his speeches are a matter of public record. Obama gave lots and lots and lots of speeches in 2007 ... remember, he was elected in 2008 ?

                                    Again, all you do is provide a "crutch" for his failures.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #9.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:52 AM EST

                                    A roadblock like Obamacare. How did he manage to get this passed since he had all these "impediments". Clinton could not even do this and he called Obama an amateur.

                                      #9.2 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:20 PM EST
                                      Reply

                                      The War on American Soil. We express sadness at the over 4000 dead and over 30,000 wounded military personnel who fought or are fighting wars on foreign soil in Afghanistan and Iraq. We accept those numbers as the price of war. Yet for too long we have accepted the staggering number of an estimated 98,000 gun-related dead and wounded yearly on American soil as the new normal, the way things are, a sign of the times--nothing we can do to prevent it or reduce it.

                                      The NRA's Wayne LaPierre says we just need more good guys with guns to take care of the bad guys with guns. Seriously. What if the good guy accidentally shoots and kills another good guy with a gun when both were pursuing that bad guy? The bad guy doesn't wear a sign.

                                      44% of the guns purchased in this country are purchased without background checks. It would be a good assumption to presume that a majority of that 44% are criminals because good guys have nothing to hide. Logic says we need universal background checks. It might not stop all the criminals but it would certainly put a big dent in it. No one needs 20, 30, 50 or 100-round magazine clips. No one needs weapons of war in their closet. The 2nd amendment was about muskets and pistols not assault rifles and weapons of mass killing. Freedom? How much freedom do we have if the public is under attack daily?

                                      Republicans tell us about "American exceptional-ism" at every opportunity. How "exceptional" are we if America accepts 900 incidents of gun-related deaths and violence in the month since Sandy Hook as the price of freedom to own guns? How "exceptional" are we if America closes its eyes and does nothing to reduce the massacre of thousands of Americans every year because of easy access to weapons of mass destruction, to killing machines, to gang violence, to suicides, to accidental shootings? How "exceptional" are we if our legislators are rendered incapable of implementing even the most rudimentary of common sense gun laws because those legislators fear the NRA or some other special-interest group? How "exceptional" is the United States of America when too many of its legislators are too cowards?

                                      Since the tragic deaths of twenty little, smiling 6 and 7 year old first graders and the six adults who tried to protect them, America seems to have finally realized that accepting such massacres as the new normal, as a sign of changing times can no longer be the option. The majority want sensible gun laws. The question is will our legislators have the courage to finally pass laws that will at least reduce, at least put a dent in the daily gun war being waged in this country by the right to bear arms?

                                      • 24 votes
                                      Reply#10 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:33 AM EST

                                      You're a moron.

                                      A.) It will never happen

                                      B.) Even if it did, THE BAD GUYS WOULD STILL GET GUNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                      C.) Let's focus on Mental health and ALL OF THE PHARMACEUTICALS these Mass shooters are pumped full of by DOCTORS!

                                      • 7 votes
                                      #10.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:40 AM EST

                                      Edit, next to last paragraph, last sentence: that should be when too many of its legislators are cowards?

                                      • 13 votes
                                      #10.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:47 AM EST

                                      Hollywood12345

                                      You're a moron.

                                      Now there is an almost well thought out argument ... might I suggest a few more CAPS to take it to the next level?

                                      • 16 votes
                                      #10.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:03 AM EST

                                      @ Rick-3416939,

                                      I hate to bust your bubble, Pal. President Obama has a valid argument why the deficit ceiling should be increased, now, at this time, in comparison to the time he voted against it (2005). You see, we had this little problem in 2008-2009. It was called the sub prime mortgage melt down crisis and AIG-Goldman Sachs bail outs. As the result of these expenditures, the American economy went into a deep recession/near depression. In this type of scenario, the economy is extremely weak. So weak, the additional impact of any other further negative econimic policy could've possibly been the act thrusting us into a deep depression.

                                      However, John Boehner voted for a deficit ceiling increases 7 times before the economic crisis. Why ???

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #10.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:31 PM EST
                                      Reply

                                      BSer, bait and switch, narcissist and hypocrite all self interest

                                      BIG O AKA: ZERO, Obama Slammer

                                      Default it all adds up to, ZERO

                                      • 2 votes
                                      Reply#11 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:33 AM EST

                                      Start saying 'no' to war-mongers and eventually you will resolve the debt problem.

                                      Hopefully Chuck Hagel will help the president turn the Department of Defense into what its name describes.

                                      • 11 votes
                                      Reply#13 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:37 AM EST

                                      Excellent idea!

                                      A truly "defensive posture" by our military would save an enormous amount of money and do a lot of good for our standing in the world. Americas financial problems cannot be solved with the waving of a pen in an afternoon of political maneuvering. Long term solutions to long term problems should be the way Americans solve America's problems. The withdrawal of a largely "offensive" military to a "defensive" military would be a great start. Focus our foreign aid on countries that appreciate our charity and start monitoring American Corporations to ensure they represent American interests across the borders and do not use taxpayer funds to exploit the people of underdeveloped nations.

                                      By taking responsibilty both corporate and private.. America could once again become the Great Nation and World Leader it once was... It is by virtue of a focus on the moral fabric of our country that Americans could once again walk the earth without fear of a violent end.

                                      • 2 votes
                                      #13.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:02 AM EST
                                      Reply

                                      he promised not to raise taxes on the middle class ...he did many times. he promised to reduce the debt he will double it...and on and on

                                      • 16 votes
                                      Reply#14 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:38 AM EST

                                      Careful truebro, the libtards do not want to hear how their pony boy f*cked up countless times. Damn its a needle in a haystack trying to find common sense on this newsvine.

                                      • 2 votes
                                      #14.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:52 PM EST

                                      Acyually he cut taxes. In fact this last FICA increase is not a tax incrase, but a donation increase to your retirement plan. It is called Social Security.

                                        #14.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:44 PM EST
                                        Reply

                                        I have yet to see anybody ask him why he voted against the debt ceiling in 2006 when he was Senator.

                                        • 16 votes
                                        Reply#15 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:39 AM EST

                                        dont hold your breath

                                        • 8 votes
                                        #15.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:41 AM EST

                                        I guess you missed the President's press conference, when a journalist asked him that very question. The President responded that, the debt-ceiling being raised has always come with debate and negotiation with-in Congress, but this is the first time Congress has been unwilling to look at compromise, and it is willing to default on the nation's debt.

                                        In other words, worst Congress ever.

                                        • 14 votes
                                        #15.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:59 AM EST

                                        At that time, the country's economy appeared healthy. Obama was arguing against the tax cuts being given and 2 wars being waged. At every other time in our history, when we have gone to war we have raised the taxes to pay for it. Bush reduced taxes and put the wars on a credit card. That is what Obama was arguing against.

                                        When Obama took office, the economy was in free fall. It was no longer possible to raise taxes, as that would have compounded the economic problems. Bush should have paid for his wars. He chose not to. We are still paying for those wars and they have continued to add to the debt. Current spending has been cut, but our economy is still fragile. Many spending cuts would only result in more job losses and push even more people into poverty. That would severely damage our recovery. When we can bring more jobs back to the US and raise wages, we will be generating more revenue, which will further reduce the deficit. The slash and burn spending cuts advocated by the Tea Party would destroy the safety net, eliminate hundreds and thousands of jobs, and plunge our country into a double dip recession with catastrophic consequences for millions of our citizens.

                                        • 10 votes
                                        #15.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:28 AM EST

                                        Now Amy---it is too soon to call this the worst Congress ever---the one that just ended has such a lead that I'm not sure this one could ever catch up. But I'm going to sit back with some **popcorn** and watch them try!

                                        • 12 votes
                                        #15.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:29 AM EST

                                        Amy,

                                        I read your response, twice and it still didn't answer why he voted against raising the debt ceiling. Now another question. When you say worst congress ever, hold on, have to do this liberal syle worst congress ever, did you mean the one Obama was in?

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #15.5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:46 AM EST

                                        Amy in Portland said: "but this is the first time Congress has been unwilling to look at compromise"

                                        I believe it was Barry himself who said he refuses to negotiate on the debt ceiling! Amy, you may want to come up for air sometime....or at least give your knees a break!

                                        • 4 votes
                                        #15.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:50 AM EST

                                        Now that for sure is the truth!!!

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #15.7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:03 AM EST

                                        jwilson1234

                                        Were you asleep diring the first debt ceiling debacle? The one where Republicans walked away from the grand bargain of social program spending cuts the President offered, in order to refuse raising taxes?

                                        The President does what smart people do, he learned from experience. He's not using the debt ceiling action, that is required, to open a debate over spending cuts. That ship has sailed because Republicans refused to step on board.

                                        • 6 votes
                                        #15.8 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:19 AM EST

                                        BS same story just politics, just several years later fast Forward,

                                        NO CHANGE in government includes the BIG 0.

                                        Just another piece to the problem puzzle.

                                        Press media love and kisses

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #15.9 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:28 AM EST

                                        Hey Rj it is because Bush did it not him..

                                        Come on man wake up Bush did it all don't you know that.

                                        Heck I bet when his 2 term is up everything he screwed up in his 8 years will still be blamed on Bush.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #15.10 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:44 PM EST

                                        Laser,

                                        Agreed. It's always Bush, or deflecting and blaming others. It is absolutely amazing that the left thinks this guy does NOTHING wrong, and has not flip flopped or made any mistakes. Hell, he were the guy I voted for, I'd be manning up a bit and taking ownership. We're all in this together.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #15.11 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:54 PM EST

                                        Our total national debt is now about where it was in 2006. It peaked in 2008 and has been going down ever since. Who was the leader in 2006 and 2008 who failed to do anything about the debt?

                                        It seems to me Obama knew what he was talking about in 2006.

                                        U.S. Downgrade Seen as Upgrade as U.S. Debt Dissolved - Bloomberg

                                          #15.12 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:47 PM EST

                                          "milking it" would be a better name for you .... your lies are getting bolder ! Have you no shame ?

                                          It is public record the national debt is at an all time high and has increased from $10.8 trillion when Obama took office to a point where it is now exceeding $16.4 trillion !!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                          LIE MUCH ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #15.13 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:34 PM EST

                                          Well when it is something to take credit for, like Osama, then it is all about him. When it is bad, it is Bush's fault. Mind you if Bush had not messed up so badly, Obama probably would not have been elected. 53% against the backdrop of a recession was not impressive.

                                            #15.14 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:40 PM EST
                                            Reply

                                            The only thing that this bastard of a president has not broken is that he did in 2007 and again in 2009 said that he would raise the gas prises and raise our economic prices. That he has done and is doing by making it more difficult to buy bread, milk, meats, and everything else that we would need to survive. This bastard has nothing to do to help the economy or even to make America better. The only thing that this bastard will do is to drive us further into debt and destroy us as a nation.... Thanks to those of you that were blindly re-electing him. I hop that you get what you deserve...................................................

                                            • 17 votes
                                            Reply#16 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:39 AM EST

                                            Of course citing quotes where he promised to raise gas prices and 'economic' prices abound, I'm sure. Care to provide a citation, or are you simply happy spreading deceit.

                                            • 14 votes
                                            #16.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:15 AM EST

                                            Outdoorsman you sure are not as smart as you think youare. I just finished tem minutes ago about what promises he kept and what promises he didn't. Was only a couple thatat he wasn't able to keep and many many more that he kept and could have kept more of if the right wing didn't block them You are just a person that loves to Hate others Apparently you don';t believe the bible when it tells you love thy neighbor so you surely aren't a REAL christian. HATE HATE THATS WHAT THE TEA BAGGERS live to do

                                            • 7 votes
                                            #16.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:22 AM EST

                                            Clayton, are you saying that if you keep more promises than you break, then that is somehow admirable? Well, now I know how this imbecilic idiot was re-elected. Just expect low standards - or no standards; don't hold him to account; and call everybody else liars, whether it's true or not. You and that one posting above you aren't very discriminating, are you? Betcha you're not writing from work either, are you, 47%er?

                                            And why are you talking about the Bible, anyway? You have no respect for it; or what's written in it. Obama is the most prolific baby killer in presidential history, and you and all those that voted him in are complicit. Talk about "Hate" and you hypocrites sit by while he not only enacted the most pro-death legislation for unborn babies in his first few days in office of his first term, he continues to try to force those who hate abortion to have to pay for it in the guise of healthcare.

                                            Oh, you can talk all you like, but there will come a time you'll get to see how God feels about the taking of innocent lives. It IS covered in the Bible; care to tell God how wrong HE is? Argue with Him; tell Him how wrong He is..... He said He was the same; and He changed not. Do you think that just because any many says something is right now that it is going to sway almighty God? Like I said, you don't know what is in the Bible - or the author. Killing unborn babies is never alright; and should be the litmus test for any president.

                                              #16.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:07 PM EST

                                              What about the transparency promise? Didn't hear that mentioned...

                                                #16.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:36 PM EST

                                                arslp,

                                                Man did you hit it on the nail. There is one thing your forgot though and that it most liberals do not believe in God so that is how they justify murder, sloth, greed, blashphemy. This way they can still murder children, be lazy and sponge off the government and demand the wealthiest pay for it, and blame God for anything wrong with this country after they have chased him out of every aspect.

                                                Liberals are truly an interesting creature. Simply amazing.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #16.5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:16 PM EST

                                                Hey bible-thumping arslp - perhaps you could give us a full citation in the bible where God commands it is against his will to abort a fetus. Now he does seem to have some expertise in killing babies and kids, such as killing the first born in every non-Hebrew family. Oh, and how many children died in Sodom and Gomorrah? Surely, they were innocents, right, you right-wing screwball?

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #16.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:49 PM EST

                                                Compare this administration to the last one on the truthometer. How about 935 verified lies going into the Iraq Abortion?

                                                And then there are all of the criminals in the bush/cheney administration. It is a long and dishonored list that includes outing a CIA agent.

                                                Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN

                                                Criminals In The Bush Administration « Suzie-Q's Truth and Justice Blog

                                                  #16.7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:52 PM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  what a difference a few short years makes. not that long ago we had a democrat junior senator excoriating a sitting republican president about all of the president's failures surrounding the calamitous debt ceiling request that had been made. Here are a few snippets to refresh the memory:

                                                  “The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. government can’t pay its own bills. ... I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit.”

                                                  i believe his words are as true today as when he spoke them, was lying then to get some attention or is he is lying now to distract us from his own leadership failure.

                                                  “It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our government’s reckless fiscal policies. Over the past five years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to $8.6 trillion. That is ‘‘trillion’’ with a ‘‘T.’’ That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers.”

                                                  i believe his words are as true today as when he spoke them, was he lying then to get some attention or is he is lying now to distract us from his own failures leading to the continuation of everything he said was wrong.

                                                  why anyone believes what this man says anymore is beyond reason.

                                                  • 22 votes
                                                  Reply#17 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:40 AM EST

                                                  Perhaps if they had listened to him back then, we wouldn't be in this conundrum now. Obviously, he was a visionary, seeing that we could have taken action back in 2005 to avoid the massive numbers we face today.

                                                  • 10 votes
                                                  #17.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:19 AM EST

                                                  Are you insane? I mean truthfully, do you actually believe what you write? It is mind boggling how some of you people - especially on MSNBC (imagine that, Jeffrey?) literally worship this lying, muslim brotherhood backing thief. Like Billyboy said in the post above yours, it is absolutely beyond all reason how anyone with any sense can believe any thing this man says.

                                                  Obama is raising taxes and paying for 200 tanks and fighter planes for the muslim brotherhood in Egypt. I suppose you think that's necessary for this country, as well? I believe all those that follow this man are blind; and it's the kind of blindness where you have scales over your eyes.

                                                  http://www.examiner.com/article/egypt-obama-sends-muslim-brotherhood-rulers-more-tanks-and-fighter-jets

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #17.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:23 PM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  given that a majority of obozo's votes come from the welfare/crime centers philly, detroit, cleveland, detroit. I can see why obozo is trying to turn america into a giant detroit

                                                  • 13 votes
                                                  Reply#18 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:41 AM EST

                                                  Why'd you mention Detroit twice? Do Detroiters get two votes each? I voted for Obama twice and I haven't collected so much as a dime in unemployment. But, keep up the positive attitude toward your fellow countrymen. I mean, it did ROMNEY so much good!

                                                  • 12 votes
                                                  #18.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:52 AM EST

                                                  You forgot Chicago. You know, the city with the most strict gun laws and the highest crime rate? They love Obama! And why wouldnt they? They get free food, housing, obamaphones, abortions, and a monthly allowance.

                                                  I refuse to think liberals are dumb people. They are smart. Why wouldnt you vote for someone who will give you whatever you want because he has a credit card with no limit. Suck this government dry while you can liberals!!!!!! Get that piece of the pie you didnt work towards!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #18.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:29 PM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  I like his "promise" to "cut the national debt in half by the end of his first term".

                                                  Exactly how doubling the amount of annual deficit does that is BEYOND me. I think what he meant was "quadruple the national debt and crush the economy".

                                                  This guy is a liar and a joke. His staff is mostly male leftist political hacks and they are white, he pays women on his staff far less than men and for some reason socialists worship him. The only african-american senator is a republican and he was abused by the media at the swearing in. He leads the most racist and devisive party on earth.

                                                  God forbid you believe in God, have money in savings or earn a decent income. Heaven help you if you own a gun or think you have rights. One can only hope to be treated as well as the DNC treats rapists and murderers on death row.

                                                  Democrats as a party, scream to protect any criminal at the expense of the victim. Illegal immigrant(criminal foreign invader)? they love you. Death row inmate,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,they love you. Drug dealer? They love you. Murderer,,,,,,,,,,,,,,they love you.

                                                  Tax payer,,despised.

                                                  Gun owner,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,blamed for criminal acts of actual criminals.

                                                  Land owner,,,,,,,,,,,,,,you cause environmental problems.

                                                  Business owner,,,,,,,,,,,,,you are despised.

                                                  He was right when he said, "help me change/ruin the greatest country on earth".

                                                  • 17 votes
                                                  Reply#19 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:43 AM EST

                                                  You hit the nail on the head paidmyfee...... The problem we have today is we have a welfare society that will vote for the candidate that promises the most free stuff. That is why Romney should have never mentioned "hard work can make you successful in America".... Instead he should have promised free junk for illegals, welfare duds, non workers, and he may have won the election... The one thing the democrat party will never mention is working for anything, especially welfare...... Just what is the problem with welfare reform anyway, that obama will not touch that? Frigging Marxist... class warfare is his shout out to rile up his voting base of thugs.... it works for him...... and is one of the highlights of Marxism along with his agenda of disenfranchising the republican party to create a one party system.... which is another highlight of Marxism...

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #19.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:03 PM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  Obama is the biggest snake oil salesman I have ever seen!

                                                  • 14 votes
                                                  Reply#20 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:44 AM EST

                                                  That is so rude that you would say that.

                                                  Your comment was extremely insulting to snake oil salesmen.

                                                  • 10 votes
                                                  #20.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:43 AM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  This President is a little dictator in the making, he has never done anything wrong and continues to blame every problem on someone else in the Galaxy but himself. If you managed your household budget like he manages the Government you would be living in a cardboard box under the freeway....THe lies keep coming non-stop

                                                  • 12 votes
                                                  Reply#21 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:45 AM EST

                                                  Edit, next to last paragraph, last sentence: that should be when too many of its legislators are cowards?

                                                  • 8 votes
                                                  Reply#22 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:45 AM EST

                                                  From this point forward Obama has no incentive to keep any of his promises...

                                                  He's on the honor system now. Either he will suck it up and do whats right for the country or he will jet set around the world with Michelle on the tax payer's dime for 4 years.

                                                  Time will tell.

                                                  • 9 votes
                                                  Reply#23 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:47 AM EST

                                                  Let's see, he promised to cut the deficit in HALF by the end of his first term. He promised to close Gitmo. He promised to sign NO bill until after five days of public scrutiny. He promised to DOUBLE funding for Charter school funding. He promised to reduce earmarks. He promised to go "line by line" through EVERY bill and eliminate wasteful spending. He promised the health insurance premiums would go DOWN $2500. He promised we could keep our current health insurance. He promised we could keep our current doctor. He promised the importation of prescription drugs. He promised immigration reform. He promised to create a "foreclosure fund" to keep people from losing their homes. He promised to end "no bid" contracting.

                                                  What did we get? Out of Iraq based on a treaty that BUSH and Iraq signed that Obama takes credit for. DOUBLING of our deficit. Record borrowing, record spending, and record debt and pretty well nothing that has created REAL job growth or any kind of recovery in our economy.

                                                  Meanwhile, as Obama promises things like a "balanced approach" and then demands tax hikes with no spending cuts, and raising the debt ceiling again with no spending cuts, he continues to denigrate and demonize anyone and everyone that doesn't agree with his "social justice" agenda of punishing the successful, giving payoffs and paybacks to his backers, and quite literally bankrupting the nation.

                                                  While 25 MILLION Americans are under/unemployed, and the economy drags along, we get this shoe licking piece of garbage from MSDNC about how wonderful Obama is.

                                                  • 21 votes
                                                  #24 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:51 AM EST

                                                  So Cheryl, I take it that you didn't vote for President Obama? However, look at all of the GREAT things he got done, and we as a Nation have the honor of having this President for four more years!!!

                                                  • 11 votes
                                                  #24.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:17 AM EST

                                                  Yawn - this is the same recycled post the right wing nut jobs used 9 months ago, debunked over and over again. Same effect as a hooker getting a body lift and boob job and re-branding herself as a newer, only slightly used model.

                                                  • 9 votes
                                                  #24.2 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:29 AM EST

                                                  Cheryl, try to take it easy on the facts. Libs can not comprehend truth.

                                                  • 5 votes
                                                  #24.3 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:34 AM EST

                                                  Cheryl,

                                                  Your only real problem is that you have a memory. You remember what Obama promised. All of what he promised. Now if you listen to jobs 1 we have the "honor" of being lied to, deceived, and taken advantage of. Ok, I'll buy that but my bet would be that he has been told at least a million times "Oh, you're cute but I'm busy Saturday night." And reddev says all that has been debunked over and over again. I can only assume that he is confusing the word debunked with the word ignored. This is a common liberal mistake. Perhaps it was the school they went to. Instead of Webster's Dictionary they used Westlers. Completely understandable

                                                  • 6 votes
                                                  #24.4 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:05 AM EST

                                                  To quote Feisty,

                                                  "Say it with me, 4 MORE years of President Obama and there isn't a damn thing YOU can do about it!"

                                                  • 6 votes
                                                  #24.5 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:12 AM EST

                                                  Aw shucks, Paul - the eternal victim, always taken advantage of until the poor thing can barely walk. Second item on Cheryl's list, close Gitmo - Obama tried and Congress stopped him. Now he could have issued an executive order, but we all know how you eternal victims react to those, you run around squealing like a stuck pig. Now, who is ignoring what?

                                                  • 8 votes
                                                  #24.6 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:22 AM EST

                                                  Obama's personal presstitutes perform their magic again. With this administration and its fans, there is no truth, only spin (see Benghazi, budgets, deficit, debt, employment stats, Fast and Furious, Solyndra and non stimulating stimulus, immigration, taxes, foreign policy, gun control, willingness to compromise, transparency in government, usurping constitution by executive decree, personal accountability).

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #24.7 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:36 AM EST

                                                  Jobs1,

                                                  Your response to critisism is to quote an idiot? I don't see how that helps your case a whole lot. But you're not quite right because there is plenty we can do about it.. We could start by electing more Republicans. We could do what several states did and challenge his policies in court like Obamacare. Wait, the government has the power to TAX the people. "I will not raise taxes on the middle class." Now was that debunked or ignored. I can't seem to get this liberal language down. Or we could just wait to watch him step in it again and we might get to watch while he's impeached. Although I think he's pretty safe there because congress knows that if they impeach him they would get stuck with Joe Biden.

                                                  I do have a question for you though. It's about your name, Jobs1. Did you pick that because you don't have one, or you're looking for one, or everyone else should have one? You do realize don't you that the welfare check you get from Obama is the same welfare check you got from Bush. Only the names have changed.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #24.8 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:37 AM EST

                                                  Reddev,

                                                  You are wrong about one thing.We are not the eternal victims. It will only be for the next four years. What I do find amusing though is that you will also be a victim for the next four years and you don't even know it.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #24.9 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:47 AM EST

                                                  I'm a Progressive and therefore I have a Good Job. However, I know that many of the 47% that voted for Willard and the rest of the republicans are on well fare and live in red states. You people always vote against your own self interest.

                                                  • 5 votes
                                                  #24.10 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:49 AM EST

                                                  Would you be willing to bet on who the section 8 housed inhabitants voted for big mouth. Liberal trash the cancer thats killing America.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #24.11 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:00 PM EST

                                                  You know what Jobs1. I have been waiting forever for one of you liberal fools to tell me they actually have a job. So instead of sucking of the government teat you are sucking off the corporate teat. I worked for over 50 years and am now retired. You say you have a job yet I see your name plastered all over these comment boards at all hours of the day. So you may have a job but apparently you just choose not to actually do it. It is so much easier to just play on the computer all day, isn't it. So you have a job and your productivity is zero. I'll bet your boss is so proud of you. When I was working I didn't have time to play all day on the computer. Keep up the good non-work Jobs1. Or perhaps change your screen name to --- I don't do my Jobs1.

                                                    #24.12 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:07 PM EST

                                                    Ahhhhh the gift that keeps on giving...... Everywhere I look are ghettos around Chicago.... Guess who live in them, and guess how many work...... then guess who they vote for...... I dont know a single republican that is on welfare.... not a one.... but.... I dont know an obama voter that isnt on some kind of public assistance. Not a single one...... Why do you think Barack Hussein Obama uses class warfare (look up definition of communism and marxism, as Obama is both) to further his agenda?

                                                      #24.13 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:13 PM EST

                                                      The assessment of whether any President has kept promise is done at the end of their 8 year term. Not 4 years into their Presidency. There are most likelly more of his promises to be fulfilled yet.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #24.14 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:24 PM EST

                                                      Tony,

                                                      try again. A president is only elected for four years. By your logic no president who ever served 1 term can be counted as relevant at all. When he made all those promises he was elected for a four year term. Nowhere in his first campaign for president did I ever hear him say "I promise that I will do all this if you elect me and then RE-ELECT me." Sorry pal, but he made those promises to be elected for a four year term and then didn't keep most of them.

                                                        #24.15 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:37 PM EST

                                                        CherylLM,

                                                        If you weren't so busy running your mouth without knowledge of current events. I wouldn't have to comment about what you missed. Obama cut $716 billion from Medicare Advantage waste and fraud. Wow...I guess $716 billion is a whole lot of cutting line by line. By the way, when Obama cut this $716 billion from Medicare. It was a cut in spending....hello? Even the losing vice presidential candidate (Paul Ryan) had the $716 billion amount listed within his rejected budget as a savings......Oops....The GOP called it a cut before the 2012 elections. Afterwards, the GOP stated Obama has refused a balanced approach because he hasn't offeried any cuts. They acn't even get their lies straight !!! Hilarious!!! Since the passage of Obamacare, Health Care inflation has been under 4% for the first time in 50 years. Before that (the last 20 years) health care inflation has been averaging about 15%. Refer to Clinton's speech at the DNC convention on 9-6-12. Google it, Ms. "no kowledge of current events". He promised we could keep our Doctors and we have. Obamacare has nothing to do with requiring change of health care plan within it's 2409 pages you haven't bothered to read....out of your sheer laziness.

                                                        • 6 votes
                                                        #24.16 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:37 PM EST

                                                        Paul,

                                                        No...you try again, Pal. If a President has only served 4 years. You would assess his acheivements at the end of his single term. If they have served two terms. His acheivements would be assessed at the end of the second term. The President never promised to do anything within a single 4 year term before the 2008 election, Bozo.

                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        #24.17 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:45 PM EST

                                                        Tony.

                                                        Are you really that dumb or are you just drinking too much of the Obama Kool-Aid. When Obama campaigned the first time he made promises. And yes they were really promises, Like to never raise taxes on the middle class. But when HIS Justice Department went to the Supreme Court their argument was that the government has the right to TAX it's citizens. He made his promises for his first four year term. His re-election campaign was all about "Well, I didn't do it in my first term but give me another four years. I PROMISE i'm on the right track." And you believed him! i find that amazing. You also remind me of Obama's re-election campaign. Attack -Cheryl, no knowledge, lazy. Attack - Paul, what I said isn't what I said, Bozo. Attack! Attack! Attack! It doesn't matter if it's true or not. Just ATTACK!

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #24.18 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:05 PM EST

                                                        Tony,

                                                        I kind of have to agree with Paul on this one and say you are an idiot. For you to assume that Obama held true to every promise he has ever made in 2008 explains a lot about you.

                                                        I can assume about you the following:

                                                        1) Since you are an idiot im guessing you have a hard time getting and holding down a good job, which would make you part of the 47%

                                                        2) Since you are part of the 47% you do not know what I am talking about when I say that you are part of the 47%

                                                        3) Its ok. Math hurt me head too. Go take a nap then we will get back to work.

                                                        4) Now that you are done with your nap we can continue assuming stuff such as you need government assistance because you have no job.

                                                        5) You most definately voted for Obama because he promised you this assistance. This must be the promise you are referring to when you speak of Obama keeping true to all his promises.

                                                        6) Last but not least we can assume that since you are a liberal, you blindly follow liberal agenda without any real authentic thought of your own. You believe in murdering children is ok, there is no God, and no one should ever speak of him, God is to blame when something goes wrong, you love smoking pot, you dont like the U.S. military, you want to take care of illegal immigrants with someone elses money, you want to take someone elses money and call them greedy when they dont want to give it to you.

                                                        You liberals are a joke. An absolute joke.

                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        #24.19 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:51 PM EST

                                                        Tony - the 716 billion was taken out of medicare to help fund Obamacare....so is it really a savings? Nope....just a transfer from one pot to another.

                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        #24.20 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:14 PM EST

                                                        Now where did all of that debt come from? Reagan, bush, bush/cheney. Why were you alleged people not saying anything about the debt then? If they could have balanced their budgets we would have almost no debt today.

                                                        U.S. National Debt Graph + Voodoo-Economics Slides

                                                          #24.21 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:57 PM EST

                                                          "Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit."

                                                          -- Then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in a March 16, 2006 floor speech explaining his decision to oppose a request to increase the federal debt limit, then set at $8.2 trillion.

                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          #24.22 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:32 PM EST

                                                          Obama was one of the biggest opponents of raising the debt when he was a senator.... Why all of a sudden has he now changed his tune? Just why does the Communist State Controlled Media refuse to print the truth about Obama, and why does it not print the truth about anything.... We dont have news anymore, we have a media that only prints what is favorable to Obama, what is defamatory to republicans. Just what has happened to this country? We are a welfare state that rewards increases in welfare and unemployment by our government.... I cant understand why our government praises not working.... Liberalism has destroyed this country

                                                            #24.23 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:55 PM EST
                                                            Reply

                                                            Nowhere is the President's statement that;

                                                            "I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views. As such, I am bound to disappoint some, if not all, of them."

                                                            -----------------------------------------------

                                                            more evident or true than here, where he is seen as the devil incarnate by some and a cross between Jesus and Judy Garland by others.

                                                            The President is just a man doing the best job he can as he sees it, nothing more, nothing less.

                                                            The devils and the angels are all projections of individual fears, hopes, and emotions.

                                                            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                            Gun control legislation will pass...and another tragedy will happen anyway, and the cycle will begin anew.

                                                            Debt ceiling will be a deja vu experience, with the exception of the difference between a President thinking about reelection and a President thinking about his legacy.

                                                            All cabinet choices will be approved, but the media will gin up the "controversy" anyway...

                                                            • 7 votes
                                                            Reply#25 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:52 AM EST

                                                            Well, if comedians bothered to vote we could blame it all on them. They are, if the truth be told and it is they that do, both angel and devil incarnate.

                                                            • 3 votes
                                                            #25.1 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:37 AM EST
                                                            Reply

                                                            Hey Chuck! Hey Mark! What about the promise of transparency? You left that one out on purpose didn't you? You will never be sucessful at deflecting the people who watch you. Those fallen (and falling) leaders in the middle east should have hired you guys as their press agents.

                                                            • 8 votes
                                                            Reply#26 - Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:52 AM EST
                                                            Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 14
                                                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.