GOP congressman: Akin's rape comments were 'partly right'

 

A Georgia Republican congressman said that former Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin, R, was "partly right" in asserting that victims of "legitimate rape" rarely become pregnant.

Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., a former obstetrician-gynecologist, said at a town hall meeting that Akin was “partly right” in his controversial suggestion, which was widely cited as a factor in his loss to Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill, D, this past November.

Gingrey said, according to the Marietta Daily Journal:

“And in Missouri, Todd Akin … was asked by a local news source about rape and he said, ‘Look, in a legitimate rape situation’ — and what he meant by legitimate rape was just look, someone can say I was raped: a scared-to-death 15-year-old that becomes impregnated by her boyfriend and then has to tell her parents, that’s pretty tough and might on some occasion say, ‘Hey, I was raped.’ That’s what he meant when he said legitimate rape versus non-legitimate rape. I don’t find anything so horrible about that. But then he went on and said that in a situation of rape, of a legitimate rape, a woman’s body has a way of shutting down so the pregnancy would not occur. He’s partly right on that.”

[...]

“And I’ve delivered lots of babies, and I know about these things. It is true. We tell infertile couples all the time that are having trouble conceiving because of the woman not ovulating, ‘Just relax. Drink a glass of wine. And don’t be so tense and uptight because all that adrenaline can cause you not to ovulate.’ So he was partially right wasn’t he? But the fact that a woman may have already ovulated 12 hours before she is raped, you’re not going to prevent a pregnancy there by a woman’s body shutting anything down because the horse has already left the barn, so to speak. And yet the media took that and tore it apart.”

Akin originally told KTVI-TV in August: “First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

Republicans quickly distanced themselves from Akin, urging him to end his bid for Senate to allow another GOP candidate to step forward. Mitt Romney, then the party’s presidential nominee, publicly said that Akin should end his campaign.

However, Akin, a congressman, resisted the calls for him to drop out, giving Democrats fodder to paint Republicans as out-of-touch with women voters. Another GOP Senate candidate, Indiana’s Richard Mourdock, also gave fodder to Democrats when he suggested that pregnancies by rape were “something God intended.” (Mourdock, like Akin, lost a Senate race on which Republicans had been counting to win.)

Gingrey addressed the cost of those controversies before making his own assessment of the science behind Akin’s remarks:

“Part of the reason the Dems still control the Senate is because of comments made in Missouri by Todd Akin and Indiana by Mourdock were considered a little bit over the top ... Mourdock basically said ‘Look, if there is conception in the aftermath of a rape, that’s still a child, and it’s a child of God, essentially.’ Now, in Indiana, that cost him the election.”

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 31 32 33

Yeah right... And God intended for women to be sexually harassed and bullied in the workplace because of the way she votes and about other personal decisions that she makes. God says it's o.k. to stalk people and harass them about their sex lives. God doesn't want anyone who doesn't wear an armband and a white sheet to be working. Let's talk about what caused the fiscal cliff. Hint... I think it may have something to do with discrimination against women, gays, and minorities in the workplace and lying and backstabbing tyrants. Part of a fraud is still a fraud.

    Reply#843 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:02 PM EST

    I'm not going to chime in on the subject or the quotes. What I am chiming in on a reaction to a part while ignoring the whole. Several years ago a professor was running for congress as a Republican. He had wrote a paper on history of Germany under Hitler. In one paragraph he had wrote "At that time to the German people Hitler was like God". His political opponents quoted him as saying "Hitler was god" therefore implying he was a Nazi. It didn't matter how he tried to defend himself. His opponents choose to believe the lie because they wanted to no matter what the truth was and the proof.

    To bring that closer to home, in our country you are innocent until proven guilty even though that concept goes against human nature. Once accused you are always considered guilty even when proven not guilty. When you are found not guilty the police, the courts, the media and most citizens think and act like you got away with it.

    The problem we have is that hardly anyone has the time to listen carefully or read carefully what is written. We delegate that to the media which has it's own agenda whether it's on the right or left. I gather this whole argument is over government funded abortion. That is just a smoke screen for the real truth which is apparently a lot of women (and families) don't have the resources to afford it on their own. That is the real issue which we need to focus our energy on.

      Reply#844 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:38 PM EST

      This isn't a soap opera !! What was ever legitimate about rape ???? Do you know what they call a person who graduated at the bottom of his medical class ?? The News Media has to sell News to exist. Do you actually think that MD behind your name means that you are intelligent ?

        Reply#845 - Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:21 PM EST

        I guess the Democrats do not have a lock on idiots

          Reply#846 - Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:07 AM EST

          This whole thing is really a matter of people not using the English language correctly. The word legitimate does not convey the meaning that Akin was trying to express in his statement. Legitimate rape would be any act which is considered rape under the legal definition which includes consentual sex with someone under the age of consent i.e. statutory rape. The meaning he was trying to express is better described as genuine rape as opposed to a false accusation of rape. If you substitute genuine for legitimate the statement is much more viable.

            Reply#847 - Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:42 AM EST

            perhaps he wouldn't have been so demonized if he would have said violent rape

              Reply#848 - Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:46 AM EST

              Does it seem like the more they bring this issue up, the less it goes away? Gotta love it if your a dem.

                Reply#849 - Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:51 AM EST
                Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 31 32 33
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.