Obama agenda: Skip to my Lew

The New York Times: “With his choice of Jacob J. Lew to be the secretary of Treasury, President Obama on Thursday will complete the transformation of his economic team from the big-name economists and financial firefighters hired four years ago to budget negotiators ready for the next fiscal fights in Congress. If confirmed by the Senate, the 57-year-old Mr. Lew — Mr. Obama’s current chief of staff and former budget director — would become the president’s second Treasury secretary, succeeding Timothy F. Geithner, who was the last remaining principal from the original economic team that took office at the height of the global crisis in January 2009.”

“The White House is working with its allies on a well-financed campaign in Washington and around the country to shift public opinion toward stricter gun laws and provide political cover to lawmakers who end up voting for an assault-weapons ban or other restrictions on firearms,” the Washington Post writes.

The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent: “The powerful Financial Services Roundtable — which is headed by former GOP presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty and represents nearly 100 of the largest financial service firms in the country — is set to increase pressure on Congress to raise the debt limit, warning that failure to do so will make the markets go ‘haywire.’ ‘We are in favor of raising it, and we will be encouraging policy makers to increase it,’ Scott Talbott, the senior vice president for public policy for the Financial Services Roundtable, told me today. He added that the group was gearing up to communicate the demand for action to Congress, an effort that could include sending letters to every member. ‘We will communicate with the entire Congress,’ he said.”

And in the New Republic, Noam Scheiber argues that Obama – potentially – could have gotten a better deal from Republicans in the fiscal-cliff talks. “Because it turns out Obama made a critical if underappreciated mistake in the final hours of the back and forth: sending Joe Biden to haggle with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell once McConnell's talks with his Democratic counterpart, Harry Reid, had broken down.”

More: “From my after-the-fact discussions with Democratic aides in the House and Senate leadership, it’s clear that Reid had a plan for resolving the cliff and considered the breakdown of his talks with McConnell very much a part of it. By involving Biden, Obama undercut Reid and signaled that he wanted a deal so badly he was unwilling to leave anything to chance, even when the odds overwhelmingly favored him. It suggested that even if Obama plays his cards exceedingly well in the run-up to the debt-limit showdown, he could still come away with a worse deal than he deserves because of his willingness to make concessions in the closing moments.”

Discuss this post

"he could still come away with a worse deal than he deserves because of his willingness to make concessions in the closing moments.”

Oh, please. Like what?

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:32 AM EST

" he could still come away with a worse deal than he deserves" -- obama does not deserve any more or less in these negotiations than every other American.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:06 PM EST

exactly billy bob. For the life of me, I don't understand how doing what is right for America can put the House and the President on opposite sides - shouldn't they all be focused on helping the economy recover? How can doing what is best have opposite sides?

    #1.2 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:43 PM EST
    Reply

    With everything that's at stake, in the coming debt-limit talks as well as in the just- completed 'fiscal cliff' nontroversy, it simply boggles my mind that there isn't a rising groundswell of recall movements directed at the most extreme Tealiban representatives.

    Who, one asks the skies in vain, are the utter lunatics who elect these saboteurs? Who are these voters who seem to be convinced that their best path to freedom from taxation lies in wrecking the "full faith and credit" of the Federal Government, and in stalling any and every effort to stimulate the economy and create more jobs for Americans?

    When did burning one's bed to catch a flea become a plank in the Republican platform?

    • 6 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:55 AM EST

    Remember the Presidential debate in front of an audience of undecided voters? There was a point when one of the candidates (I think it was Obama) mentioned the danger of sliding back into a recession and you saw a whole row of voters stiffen with alarm. I can't believe Republicans risk damaging our recovery to play their little games. It's as if they are so protected from poverty they don't feel what most Americans feel - a fear of having our credit rating downsized again. Republicans seem foolishly unafraid of destroying their own brand, not to mention our country's good name.

    • 5 votes
    #2.1 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:11 AM EST
    Reply

    Republicans are convinced that when the country fails they will all be caught by the rich and taken care of. They totally believe only Democrats will be effected by a failing country. Just like republican politicians, they believe it doesn't matter what they say or what they do to the country or the voters, the rich will get them reelected and take care of them. Republicans are relying on corporations and the rich to make everything good for them.

    NOTE TO REPUBLICANS: Corporations and the rich are like you, they only care about themselves.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:07 AM EST

    mo -- do you truly believe that only republicans are rich? do you agree that john kerry is rich, or nancy pelosi, or harry reid, or bill clinton, or barry obama, or george clooney, or or or..

    it is such a silly obsession to condemn all of the rich as being republicans.

    your gross generalizations are simply childish.

      #3.1 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:47 AM EST

      Nowhere in my post did I say only republicans are rich billybob. What I said was by catering to the rich (Democratic or Republican) the GOP think they will be taken care of by Corporations and the rich. See billybob you need to read with an open mind, not your republican slant.

        #3.2 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:48 PM EST
        Reply

        Let's see if this criminal paid his taxes before or after he was nominated.... Barry' s thugs abound.

          Reply#4 - Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:22 PM EST
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.