Senators signal tough fight for Hagel

Former Nebraska lawmaker, Chuck Hagel, is reportedly in line to be nominated for U.S. secretary of defense. NBC's Peter Alexander reports.

Senators on Sunday indicated a tough confirmation fight for former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel, President Barack Obama's reported pick to be the next Secretary of Defense.

On NBC's "Meet the Press," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said that Republicans in the upper chamber would treat Hagel "fairly" but that his past statements on Israel and Iran will be subject to tough scrutiny. 

"I think he'll be subjected to the same kind of oversight hearings that any nominee for such an important position would expect," McConnell said. "And his views with regard to Israel, for example, and Iran and all the other positions that he's taken over the years will be very much a matter of discussion in the confirmation process."

Sen. Angus King, who sits on the Armed Services Committee, previews the upcoming nomination of former Sen. Chuck Hagel to become secretary of state.

"I think there will be a lot of tough questions for Sen. Hagel, but he will be treated fairly by Republicans in the Senate," he added. 

That statement fell short of McConnell's past praise for his fellow Republican, a Vietnam War veteran and Purple Heart recipient who served in the Senate for three terms.  When Hagel left the Senate, McConnell called him "a clear voice on foreign policy and national security."

During a pre-taped appearance on ABC's "This Week," McConnell appeared to back off that view, saying only that Hagel has been "outspoken" on foreign policy issues. "The question we will be answering if he's the nominee is 'do his views make sense for that particular job?'" he said.

Hagel has earned foes on both sides of the aisle for past statements about Israel -- notably his comment about how the "Jewish lobby" tries to influence lawmakers in D.C. -- as well as for his calls for direct negotiations with Palestinian group Hamas. He has also voted against some Iran sanctions and was heavily critical of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell discusses the goals his party is aiming toward in the upcoming Congress.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., called the reported pick an "in your face nomination" by the president, while new Sen. Ted Cruz blasted Obama for ignoring bipartisan criticism of his reported pick for the Pentagon job. 

"This is a president who has drunk the tea," Cruz said on Fox News Sunday "He's high on re-election right now."

Cruz said that he is "concerned" about Hagel's past statements. 

Newly-elected independent Sen. Angus King of Maine said on "Meet the Press" that he would "reserve judgement" until the confirmation process begins, saying he believes generally that the president should be given considerable leeway to fill his cabinet as he sees fit. 

"But I'm going to want to ask some serious questions and hear from Senator Hagel about the issues," he added. "He's a guy with a distinguished record and I'm going to listen to the answers." 

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, a freshman Democrat from North Dakota, said that the looming fight over the expected nomination merely highlights the Washington gridlock disliked by the American public.

"Chuck Hagel is a tremendous patriot and statesman," she said on ABC. "He hasn't had a chance to speak for himself, so why all the prejudging? I don't know." 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 19

One of these days I will finally learn NOT to tune into MTP!

Approximately 20 minutes of listening to Mitch McTurtle who did nothing but WHINE like a little bitch!

Poor Mitch either couldn't or wouldn't answer a single question asked of him other then the Hagle one...

The Republican Party is not a political party... it's a mental condition - Richard Belzer

  • 147 votes
#1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:43 AM EST

LOL It's like a train wreck. You don't want to look, but you have to.

Good morning Feisty :)

  • 73 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:50 AM EST

What's MTP?

  • 8 votes
#1.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:53 AM EST

It's like a train wreck. You don't want to look, but you have to.

Good Morning to you Fuzzy & YOU BETCHA! LOL

I almost fell off my chair when Gotcha actually asked old Mitch about his "one term" President comment!

Of course, he refused to answer...

  • 91 votes
#1.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:53 AM EST
Comment author avatarelliot-3020456Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The guys an anti semite. The dems wouldn't want a member of the KKK on their team so why would they want an anti semite. Oh wait the dems love racists and bigots, just a couple of years ago they had the KKK grand cycloptic wizard Robert Byrd.

  • 21 votes
#1.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:06 AM EST

Yep, Mitch wasn't too happy about that. He'll be choking on that crow for another 4 years!

And THAT will always give me a chuckle! :)

  • 78 votes
#1.5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:08 AM EST

According to McConnell, the wealthy don't deserve Medicare after a lifetime of paying into the system. Question to McConnell, Why do you despise and why are you waging war against the wealthy?

  • 35 votes
#1.6 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:18 AM EST

Get real red, It needs to be possible for people to earn their way out of their safety net. Its called means testing, there is no reason a millionaire or a person receiving huge dividends needs the safety net. Think of it as an insurance incase you don't make it to financial security before you are retired or unable to work.

Time to be pragmatic.

  • 24 votes
#1.7 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:25 AM EST

Does it matter what Hagel's views on Israel and Iran are? He's being hired to do a job and the job involves taking orders from the President. It's not like he suddenly gets a free hand to do anything he wants.

  • 80 votes
#1.8 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:26 AM EST

He is with us until he is against us. Republicans found another loosing issue.

  • 52 votes
#1.9 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:29 AM EST
Comment author avatarRoy far on the RightExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

No Fisty, you're the one whining, as usual. Try pulling your head out of your a$$ because you Can't Understand Normal Thinking.

  • 21 votes
#1.10 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:32 AM EST

his opinions on Israel, will bring out the Jewish lobby in force, it will be a tough road for him from Rep and Dem; since the very large Jewish-Israel lobby has donated very large sums to both party's, it is going to be a real donnybrook.

  • 28 votes
#1.11 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:35 AM EST

There must be equally competent candidates that aren´t so controversial.Susan Rice withdrew her name..so with Hagel either the president or Hagel himself shoud withdraw it.Even if it´s mainly an administrative postition ,he will advise the president and be a spokesman for the defense department. Put someone else up Mr. President!

  • 13 votes
#1.12 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:38 AM EST

It's interesting how they (Republicans) always get things backwards---you are drunk on the bitter tea of getting annihilated in the election. Instead of learning from it you are behaving in a manner that will insure your dissolution. GROW UP!!! Your embarrassing the American People and exposing yourselves in public.

  • 71 votes
#1.13 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:40 AM EST

Meet the Press

  • 6 votes
#1.14 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:42 AM EST
Comment author avatarMUWExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel??? Here's further proof to you Obama / Romney Supporters that Obama = Bush!

Now honestly....Don't you Democrats / Republicans feel like a "Fool"? You thought you had a "Choice" between these "Corrupt Corporate Tools" when actually there was "No Choice At All"!

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and hence clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."~Henry Louis Mencken

  • 12 votes
#1.15 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:48 AM EST

From the article above:

"I think there will be a lot of tough questions for Sen. Hagel, but he will be treated fairly by Republicans in the Senate," he added.

That depends on what your definition of "fairly" is.

If Mother Teresa was nominated for Secretary of Peace and Love, the Republicans in Congress would roast her over open coals.

Salud

  • 82 votes
#1.16 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:49 AM EST

Maybe Obama should just ask the GOP leaders who he can pick... This is getting ridiculous. The GOP is looking for fights with the White House.

  • 94 votes
#1.17 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:49 AM EST

What else would you expect from the TP/GOP but more obstruction against anything the President would suggest.

  • 77 votes
#1.18 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:50 AM EST
Comment author avatarWet WillyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Let's see now. Hagal is a known anti-Semite and expresses favorable opinions about Iran and even Hamas. He's been consistent about this over the years, just go back through the years and into to the 80's and read many of his statements.

As usual, the Huffington post asserts any anti-Semitism in his statements over the years are being taken out of context or interpreted incorrectly, exactly what one could expect from Huffington.

Obama conned the Jewish people in this country with rhetoric about his support for the Jewish state to get their votes but now he no longer needs or cares about them.

In any event, an anti-Semite and pro Muslim individual, in the eyes of Obama, is the perfect candidate for this position.

  • 11 votes
#1.19 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:51 AM EST

@Feisty, then spend the next 30 minutes listening to the whiners Newt and Carly bitch was just disgusting Next time I want to observe a GOP orgy, I'll stop by the mens restroom at the Minn. airport.

  • 41 votes
#1.20 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:59 AM EST

Yep...ANY item they can argue about rather than do the business they were elected to do...please people, let's dump every one of these self centered weasels and get some folks that care about the USA... and NOT themselves!

  • 42 votes
#1.21 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:02 PM EST
Comment author avatarTiredoflosersExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Way to many anti-semitism bigots working for MS/NBC as bloggers posting here.

  • 7 votes
#1.22 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:03 PM EST

Here they go again... The Greedy Obstructionist Party at its worst.

A former REPUBLICON Senator is being fought against BY the REPUBLICONS? Just because the President (whom they all hate) nominated him? They can't even support their own when the other party is the one doing the nominating! If this isn't obstructionism at its finest, I can't imagine what is!

Why do the Greedy Obstructionist Party hacks hate America so much ? They are willing to see this country backwards, weak, financially unsound, unemployed, and broke, before they'll support the President!

That, my fellow citizens, is TREASON.

What kind of wake-up call will it take for them to understand that their continued and rabid opposition of the President is NOT what the American People want? Why do they hate the average American so much, and how can they claim to love America when they keep doing things like this?

Mark my words... 2013 will be all about the Greedy Obstructionist Party fighting against the President every chance they get.

I would bet that if the President submitted a bill that these Treasonous RepubliCONS had submitted in recent years, the entire Greedy Obstructionist Party would rise up against it, and fight to defeat it, just because the President was the one who submitted it.

Wait, they've already done that!

What other evidence do we need to run these arrogant, unpatriotic, treasonous criminals out of office?

  • 81 votes
#1.23 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:05 PM EST
Comment author avatarDuquExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Let's see... he hates gays. He hates Jews.

Defends Hamas. Defends Hezbollah. Defends Iran.

I can see why Hagel would be Obama's choice...

...

Oh, yeah, and he also voted against abortions! Chuck Hagel voted against a measure in the Senate expressing support for Roe vs Wade, and a bunch of other bills on abortion as well. Not that it matters to me, or that this makes him unfit to be Sec. Def., but this last election Democrats made a really big deal about Republican views on abortions, calling some Republican conservatives all sorts of names, like Neanderthals, and much worse...

...

Here's a question for all my liberal friends:

Since when do you support Jew-hating homophobe, Neanderthal bigots for positions in the president's cabinet? Is this the new 'cool' over there in New York and San Francisco? So before the election Republicans who spoke against Roe vs Wade were called backward ignorant Neanderthals, but after the election, it's perfectly cool...?

So do you support a Jew-hating homophobe Neanderthal for the position of Secretary of Defense?

Who's Obama going to nominate for secretary of the treasury, Jeremiah Wright?

  • 14 votes
#1.24 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:11 PM EST

Chuck Hegel for Sec. of DEFENSE, not State! I don't have a problem with republicans playing with their tanks and stuff, in a sand box! (Except for Rumsfeld!) They still take orders from the President.

  • 24 votes
#1.25 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:14 PM EST

I'm with you Mitch and all lets make sure Obama is a two=term only president thank you

  • 18 votes
#1.26 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:16 PM EST

I would bet that if the President submitted a bill that these Treasonous RepubliCONS had submitted in recent years, the entire Greedy Obstructionist Party would rise up against it, and fight to defeat it, just because the President was the one who submitted it.

He has and they did.

  • 31 votes
#1.27 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:19 PM EST

can he do the job?looks like it.will he institute policies consistent with what the president dictates?yes.who cares what his personal views are.he answers to the president.the president tells him what to do.im a democrat.my boss is a republican.doesnt mean we cant work together

  • 29 votes
#1.28 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:21 PM EST

The GOP is just crazy. I mean, they bring us to the edge of unnecessary economic crisis for no good reason other than they don't like Obama. Now they oppose their own ex-GOP senator for no good reason. Soon they'll be threatening our credit over the debt ceiling fight for no good reason.

I urge people to go to a website called ontheissues.org and look up senate/chuck_Hagel.htm. Most conservatives, if they were capable of thinking for themselves, would discover they they like this guy.

I have more reason to dislike Hagel than the conservative posters here. Hagel gets an "A" from the NRA and a 0% from SANF, a 90% conservative voting record, a 95% "with Bush" voting record. If conservative posters weren't so quick to do as they are told, they might say, "hey! This guy is far better than we could have imaged Obama would pick!"

  • 37 votes
#1.29 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:21 PM EST

They hate Hagel because he told the truth about the war in Iraq. Because he could see that it was little more than a war of commercial conquest, a war that would cost trillions of dollars that we did not have and inevitably turn into a disaster for the US. He refused to march in lockstep with a group of lying cowards, men who had never served in the military and were more than willing to send YOUR children off to fight and die in a war built on lies and deceit.

Mc Connell's military service? Enlisted in the military reserves, never saw active service and received an early discharge for a vision disorder. Yeah, that's the kind of man to judge Chuck Hagel. McConnell is scum, his career in the Senate is happily just about over.

  • 64 votes
#1.30 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:23 PM EST

Hagel: "Hagel has earned foes on both sides of the aisle for past statements about Israel -- notably his comment about how the "Jewish lobby" tries to influence lawmakers in D.C. -"

Whether your pro Israel or not. Where exactly is he inaccurate ???? Someone denying that there are lobbying efforts???

  • 51 votes
#1.31 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:31 PM EST

@noncom -- Please explain then why the left should like Hagel?

  • 1 vote
#1.32 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:35 PM EST

The goosesteppers obstructing progress?

Gee, that's new and different.

  • 21 votes
#1.33 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:40 PM EST

I guess the repugs have now decided that the POTUS no longer gets to decide his own cabinet.

  • 24 votes
#1.34 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:40 PM EST

Elliot, define millionaire for me. One, two or 100. Some of us have accumulated some money because we saved. Do you expect us to give up our SS and Medicare that we have paid into for 40 years?

  • 13 votes
#1.35 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:41 PM EST

It would not matter if Hagel had a spotless, unblemished, Sunday School boy past with no controversial comments and the honorable, trustworthy reputation of George Washington or Abraham Lincoln. The GOP/TP would still descend on him like a pack of ravenous vultures to tear him apart.

There is not a man or woman living who President Obama could nominate that the Republican Party would approve without a fight.

  • 45 votes
#1.36 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:48 PM EST

I thought that Hagel was an ex Republican Senator? Ok, thats right the current Republicans are eating their young now.

What a Joke the Republican party has become.

We will obstruct just be a horses ass party.

  • 40 votes
#1.37 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:54 PM EST

The only reason the Republicans didn't fight (even suggested) John Kerry's nomination is because they think it will give them a shot at getting Scott Brown back into the Senate and a chance to regain a seat that they lost last time. I'm not saying that nominees shouldn't be thoroughly reviewed, they absolutely should. But this is their own guy, a strong conservative whom they've praised in the past. As soon as he's nominated by Obama, they suddenly have "concerns"...

  • 35 votes
#1.38 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:56 PM EST

LOL Expect a big fight from the right. LMAO. What the hell is new about that? If Obama picked anyone, even the crying man himself, the right would fight. The Right, is VERY wrong for this country of We the People. Works very well for the 1-2% who want our last dime before closing the lid on the middle classes coffin. Actually, they will need servants.(Slaves) So every one line up for those jobs the wealthy are going to create, but just remember, when the work day is over, check back into your cell, and don't be late.

Y'all come back now, ya hear?

It's a sad world for the majority of the people that the right wish to create, yet the very ones who will be hit the hardest are here fighting, for their own enslavement. It always amazes me the ease it is to blind the mind to reason, even to advocating their own extinction.

Wake up People, It's your neck in the noose, and the monster just sits there watching....

Anyway, Spread Love, not Hate. Give Happiness, not sorrow.....Praise Peace, denounce war...Yes, it's ideology, but no less, and I might say much more worthy that theirs on the Right.

Much Love N Peace for All,

Da Pup

>:o):

(Good morning Feisty, hoping you're well >:o): PurrrRRrRrrr)

  • 25 votes
#1.39 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:10 PM EST

WHY MUST CONGRESS CONTINUE TO FIGHT OVER THAT OF WORKING? They don't work just battle among each other. What Failures!

I heard someone say on Meet the flub this morning that Congress will only meet for 5 days in Jan and 11 days in Feb. SO WHAT THEY DOING ON ALL THOSE DAYS OFF beside golfing, finangling and why did they deserve a raise while perpetrating fights over that of actually working for the people who hired them to work for them!

Again Congress values vacations over that of working for WE the People! Pathetically asll they do during their breaks is generate more BS!

  • 26 votes
#1.40 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:21 PM EST
Comment author avataroskar-1391552Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Barack Hussein Obama is not interested in to bring a good Secretary of Defense, he want to bring a Secretary of Defense he can use like a puppet, someone that has the same radical ideas about the Meddle East than the radical left , with his approach to the Jews Nation and the axes of evil lead for the Mullahs in Iran , followed by the Muslim Brotherhood. Even Panneta was too far right for Obama.

Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

Approximately 20 minutes of listening to Mitch McTurtle who did nothing but WHINE like a little bitch!

Poor Mitch ...

Feisty do you have something better to say , other than "WHINE and name calling like a little bitch!" from a cheap brothel from Chicago .

  • 7 votes
#1.41 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:28 PM EST

MUW

Bush never considered Hagel. Hagel has always been a rogue Republican. He is one of the 14 Republican Senators that voted the most for democrat bills. He was only tolerated because he was registered Republican.

As for why Obama has chosen Hagel. Well, there just aren't very many democrats that actually have a believable background of being pro-defense.

  • 4 votes
#1.42 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:37 PM EST

McConnell said, Hagel's past statements on Israel was not good, I agree with Hagel, time has come to stop supporting Israel, we need that money here, not that blood sucking war monger state of Israel !!!

  • 27 votes
#1.43 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:51 PM EST

You Communist Republicans Just don't want anyone that might actually try to keep us out of a war. God forbid someone would stand up to Israel who wants us to go to war in Iran. That is there war now ours. Let them spend moneys and people. Opps I forgot there Jews. Let the Americans spend there money and young people. There is nothing wrong with a Senator saying he is an American Senator Not a Jewish senator. His Obligation is to America not to Israel. I call him a real American. I say what John Boner said to Harry, F you. F you. to any Rep that don't want Chuck Hegel or anyone else the President wants in his cabinet.

  • 29 votes
#1.44 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:52 PM EST

What would any Congressman or Senator, Dem. or GOP say when asked the same question as McConnel. Hagel will be interviewed, vetted by both House and Senate, and then and only then, will both groups, Dems. too, if they take the duties of thier job seriously, and responsibly,...wil vote either yea or nay to his appointment. Anybody who makes a decision BEFORE they have all the facts, is not doing his/her job or being responsible. Seemed Stephanopolis wanted to steer McConnell away from taking about the need to do something about the debt, deficit and spending, so he kept badgering him for a definitive answer as to what his vote will be. Too bad Obama wasn't more thoroughly vetted, if he was at all before the Dems. put him up to "make history". He's making history alright...but not the kind that will be a stellar legacy.

  • 3 votes
#1.45 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:01 PM EST

Even with all of the contempt I feel for the repugnican party today, one must admit that they are stunningly successful at persuading people to vote against their own best interests. My guess is that this is why they are so opposed to funding education. A well educated and well informed electorate would not only fire them but would want many, like the Inauguration 16, to hang from a rope.

  • 29 votes
#1.46 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:04 PM EST

elliot-3020456 #1.4

The guys an anti semite.

ARE YOU ANTIAMERICAN? Is your loyalty to Israel, to the Zionists is all that matters?

Israel is a tiny, insignificant state, created by the careless British and the stupid Americans. It has no power except what its american protector provides. Yet, despite Israel's insignificance, it rules Washington.When a resolution introduced by the Israel Lobby is delivered to Congress, it passes unanimously.

If Israel wants war, Israel gets its wish. When Israel commits war crimes against Palestinians and Lebanon and is damned by the hundred plus UN resolutions passed against Israel's criminal actions, the US bails Israel out of trouble with its veto.The power that tiny Israel exercises over the "world's only superpower" is unique in history.

Tens of millions of "christians" bow down to this power, reinforcing it, moved by the exhortations of their "christian" ministers.

WOW! There is a lot of truth in this article, hyperbole too and definitely need to read. I wonder, how many of Americans' lawmakers are dual citizens with Israel--that can't be good. Talk about a conflict of interest(s). And, anyone that brings out the truth of Israeli bad deeds is labeled anti semite--B.S. Eliot.

http://www.thedailybell.com/4189/Paul-Craig-Roberts-Is-Washington-Deaf-As-Well-as-Criminal

  • 21 votes
#1.47 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:07 PM EST

Are republicans locked in denial, or what? Cannot believe they are still determined to make the black man a one term president. HELLO, anybody home, guess not.

  • 20 votes
#1.48 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:21 PM EST

If you don't praise Jews, or even worse, if you point out the Jewish lobby, you're antisemitic. Nothing about being anti-American, or anything that would truly effect his ability to do the job, just misrepresented views about Jews. That in and of itself proves just how slanted the media/Washington is toward Israel.

Just when I think I cant lose any more respect for Republicans... You can almost feel the hate boiling out of all those 70 something year old white guys. They just cant stand that a black man is preferred over them.

Frightening! IMO

  • 22 votes
#1.49 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:24 PM EST

Hahahaha....A Republican for SOD? And they still continue to pretend that there is any difference between Bush & Obama!

Bush = Obama and in 2013 only a Wall Street Corporate Corrupted "Fool" would believe otherwise!

Psst and now they want to "Disarm" Americans for their Corporate Masters?

You Sheople had better wake up quick before you find yourselves going further up the Corporate Slaughter Chute of Tyranny!

Viva La Madam Guillotine and down with Corporate Tyrants!

  • 4 votes
#1.50 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:24 PM EST

Remember the days when presidents used to get to pick their own team to work with during their term? whether the opposition liked it or not? The legislative branch has assumed too much power over the executive branch. This isn't checks-and-balances, it's tyranny. I'd give McTurtle's left nut for a government that worked!

  • 14 votes
#1.51 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:33 PM EST

f you don't praise Jews,

youre clearly exaggerating here

or even worse, if you point out the Jewish lobby, you're antisemitic.

The question you have to ask yourself is why them? Why point out the "Jewish lobby"? Certainly they are only one of hundreds of lobbying agencies in D.C.

When you view that fact in the context of his previous statements, most notably calls to negotiate with an internationally recognized terrorist organization with a stated goal of the destruction of Israel, you'll see why most people have their doubts about him

Nothing about being anti-American, or anything that would truly effect his ability to do the job, just misrepresented views about Jews.

No one misrepresented anything. I have stated above his exact positoins

  • 5 votes
#1.52 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:43 PM EST

I'm glad the rest of the country got to see what a real Senator looks like, when Angus King went on MTP. Hey, red states, this is what a reasonable politican looks like! Try electing one yourself,would ya?

  • 14 votes
#1.53 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:46 PM EST

Roy Far Out... what positive did you have to add to the conversation? All you did was put down Feisty. Try something like this...

I don't agree with what X said, and I think we should ...

It goes a long way in having you be a more credible poster, rather than a whacked-out right wing loon!

  • 16 votes
#1.54 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:53 PM EST

I'm Jewish all the way to the end of my....oops, it's gone. Blasting the 'Jewish lobby' is no more anti-Semitic than blasting corporate lobbyists is anti-American. Our government should be making decisions that are best for the US and oftentimes the US and Israel have different interests (real or perceived), just as the US and industry oftentimes have different interests (would we really be better off with no environmental regulations?). That said, I'd enjoy watching Mitch the Bitch and the Republic Party block the nomination...another nail in their coffin. Let them explain how they blocked a Republican war vet, but they're not 'the party of no.'

  • 19 votes
#1.55 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:26 PM EST

Boy Amy, couldn't agree more, Angus King was really impressive. Of course the G.O.P. probably don't think so since he has decided to caucus with the dems. You know, the way the repubnuts are acting it won't be long before we have a one party system. Even the dimwits in the south will have to see how ineffective it is to have a republican congress.

  • 15 votes
#1.56 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:31 PM EST

When Hagel left the Senate, McConnell called him "a clear voice on foreign policy and national security."

During a pre-taped appearance on ABC's "This Week," McConnell appeared to back off that view. "The question we will be answering if he's the nominee is 'do his views make sense for that particular job?'" he said.

These hypocrites are so nasty, they eat their own. These republicans in office in the last 4 years have really shown their TRUE colors, I wonder why! I'm glad they never had me fooled....LOL!!!!!

On another note, I love the way the Gulf Coast republican senators/congress people, are turning against the fine folks of NJ/NY on their needed Super storm Sandy relief. Gulf Coast republicans, who suffer hurricane losses every time you turn around, are turning their backs on East Coast folks. How hypocritical is that?

What a bunch of hypocrites, do I see a republican "swift boat" against a fellow republican in the makings?

  • 15 votes
#1.57 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:48 PM EST

Ya, it doesn't make sense to appoint someone who's been in the military and been in a war into the Secretary of Defense position. The Republicans would rather have a businessman in that job. Look at the great job businessmen have done on our last two wars. Of course, I think it is likely the goal wasn't to win those wars but to make a few people more wealthy and only at the cost of thousands of lives. For every contract Haliburton had in those wars, and they had several, they made over $250,000 for each US soldier killed and they were even the cause of some of those deaths - so say several million dollars for every American soldier who died in those wars. Not bad, and the CEO's didn't even break a sweat!

  • 17 votes
#1.58 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:52 PM EST

Congratulations, and thanks, to Chuck Hagel for 'assuming the position'.

    #1.59 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:00 PM EST

    Anyone who equates communist with republicans is really lost.

    • 1 vote
    #1.60 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:00 PM EST

    The Republicans would rather have a businessman

    Another really lost statement.

    Surprisingly, BOTH parties normally take care to find someone related history to the post. Even Hillary was on a sub-committee on assessing threats before she was nominated for secretary of state.

    • 1 vote
    #1.61 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:07 PM EST

    You right wingers are really funny. Look, don't you think we all know that you will blame everything Obama does on him. So he knows you will have a fit when he appoints a Republican, done deal, he is in the back room laughing while you are having a fit. You think he cares? It is just one more nail in your cofin as observed by the American (and world) public. Just keep it up dudes, we all love to see just how bad you are. Not to mention that YOU can't get a darn thing done in congress.

    • 9 votes
    #1.62 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:11 PM EST

    jrae

    The process is supposed to be about ensuring the person the president chooses is qualified. Rice was unqualified based on her lax attendance to UN meetings that the UN ambassador should have been to protect US interests. Back in her history she also was involved in another security breach of an embassy where fortunately no one was killed.

    I think Hagel will get grilled for the Anti-sematic attitude, and he should. I'm certain doing so is intended to let him know to drop it during his tenure.

    • 1 vote
    #1.63 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:15 PM EST

    So now even other REPUBLICANS are smeared if they dare work for President Obama's administration? The anti-semite smear is totally unproven and something the GOPTP had no problem with when he was working alongside them...now it's a deal breaker? Look at the history, it's clear these are nothing but efforts to destroy the duly elected President of these United States.

    -- John Kerry, decorated war hero and longstanding member of the Senate with distinction, was actually a dirty coward whose lack of valor resulted in the deaths of fellow soldiers...until Republicans saw an opportunity to perhaps move Scott Brown back into the Senate. Suddenly Kerry is the ONLY person qualified to be Secretary of State.

    -- Susan Rice had to be destroyed personally and professionally for daring to be ambassador to the UN on the date of the Benghazi attack...ignoring the fact that such attacks occurred repeatedly during the GW Bush Administration with the deaths of quite a few people.

    -- The President finds Chuck Hagel, former Senator and man of considerable foreign policy expertise...and out of the blue he's an anti-semite simply because he isn't John Bolton.

    The pattern here is obvious...the GOPTP remains on the same course that "served them so well" in the 2012 elections. The people have spoken...DO SOMETHING USEFUL OR GET OUT OF THE WAY!

    • 14 votes
    #1.64 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:50 PM EST

    Amy, I have heard other interviews with Angus King and am very impressed by him. We need more like him to get the real work done.

    • 2 votes
    #1.65 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:04 PM EST

    Chuck Hagels comments and ideas on the middle east are far from out of the blue he's been outspoken on this issue for years. But I fail to see how these opinions should prevent him from being a competent SOD.

    • 8 votes
    #1.66 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:21 PM EST

    wetwilly-Let's see now. Hagal is a known anti-Semite and expresses favorable opinions about Iran and even Hamas. He's been consistent about this over the years, just go back through the years and into to the 80's and read many of his statements.

    Hagel,said the Jewish lobby for Israel has a lot of power here. A statement that is absolutely true,and everyone knows it.Since when does that make him an anti-Semite. If I said the Christian conservatives had a lot of power in the Republican Party.Does that make me anti-Christian. Since when is stating fact on anything inherently taking a side.

    Saying that we should try to negotiate with our opponents (Iran and Hamas).Isn't the same as "expresses favorable opinions" about them. What is wrong with common sense for a change. We have already negotiated secretly with them on limited issues for years.

    The fact is,my only concern about Hagel,would be that he's a conservative,and a Republican.But I'm not the President,and I don't get to pick who I want as SOD. That's his choice to make. If he thinks Hagel would do a good job for him,so be it.

    • 9 votes
    #1.67 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:25 PM EST

    Michèle Flournoy for Secretary of Defense - the first female to take this job.

    She is VERY VERY qualified.

    • 5 votes
    #1.68 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:40 PM EST

    @Marion, an annihilation is getting 49 of 50 states in electoral college votes. Ronald Reagan got over 525 electoral votes to Mondale's 13, now that America, is a landslide. But thanks for playing.

    • 3 votes
    #1.69 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:47 PM EST

    Actually, Hagel is exactly who I would want, someone who won't kiss up to, or kiss Israel's ass.

    Ronald Reagan got over 525 electoral votes to Mondale's 13, now that America, is a landslide.

    Yep, and ya'll turning on Reagan too, your self confessed savior, even though he said:

    “Social Security, let’s lay it to rest once and for all… Social security has nothing to do with the deficit. Social Security is totally funded by the payroll tax levied on employer and employee. If you reduce the outgo of Social Security, that money would not go into the general fund or reduce the deficit. It would go into the Social Security Trust Fund. So Social Security has nothing to do with balancing a budget or raising or lowering the deficit.”

    Ronald Reagan

    October 7, 1984

    • 14 votes
    #1.70 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:51 PM EST

    i told my boss i wanted to be a true american and do my part to fund the government and social security.he says what?i said i need a raise.he just laughed and told me i was destined to be a moocher.if i had a million id be a republican too

    • 5 votes
    #1.71 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 6:44 PM EST

    The dramatic flip in Republican opinion toward Hagel proves it once and for all;

    Hypocrisy, thy name is Conservative.

    • 9 votes
    #1.72 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 6:59 PM EST

    Still wondering what part of Jewish Lobbyists is an inaccurate or biased statement. Example: http://www.aipac.org/ , among many others.

    • 1 vote
    #1.73 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:00 PM EST

    matthew,

    see my post above

      #1.74 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:07 PM EST

      Only the low information baggers and cons would not know that the SOD does and says what the President tells him to do and say. You clowns act like he is going to be deciding policy. Ahhhh, no he won't. He's not big on the Jewish Lobby, so what, a lot of people aren't.

      You guys on the right(wrong) are just showing the rest of the country what low life idiots you've become and given them another reason to not vote for any candidate you put up for election. 2014 is going to be a very tough year for the Republicans. It doesn't have to be but they just can't help themselves. The baggers have them on this hate everything Obama trajectory and they refuse to veer off of it. Oh well, so be it. We'll all wave as they leave the halls of the capital.

      • 8 votes
      #1.75 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:50 PM EST

      @Dennis; your post is a as lopsided as a two way street.

      So the S.O.D. takes his orders from the POTUS. Who in his cabinet doesn't? Just look at Rice she was sent out by the POTUS and told to deliver those lies for three weeks until the truth came out.

      Sounds to me like the libbies are the ones picking and choosing when to pick and when to follow. OH Wait! That's what the mindless libbies do. Follow without question.

        #1.76 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 8:28 PM EST

        Republicans are like Parana (Sp.?) They eat their won just to be at opposites with the powers that be!

        • 4 votes
        #1.77 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 8:55 PM EST

        So, garcher,

        Your saying that it was acceptable for McCain, C. Rice, and McConnel to lie point blank for weeks to the American public about wmd's in Iraq. But S. Rice reading from a statement supplied and approved by the intelligence community was a bad thing. Refresh my memory, which lie was more costly to this country?

        • 8 votes
        #1.78 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 9:17 PM EST

        So many people are too willing to immediately play the anti-semite card the minute someone says anything negative about or dares to even question the actions of the state of Israel.

        "Why should the Arabs make peace? If I were an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? Our God is not theirs. We come from Israel, it's true, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been antisemitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept that? They may perhaps forget in one or two generations' time, but for the moment there is no chance." David Ben-Gurion, first prime minister of Israel

        "For eight years now, they have sat in the refugee camps of Gaza and have watched how, before their very eyes, we have turned their lands and villages, where they and their forefathers previously dwelled, into our home." General Moshe Dayan, Israeli military hero - 1956

        • 3 votes
        #1.80 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:42 PM EST

        Roy far on the Right

        Typical right wing non-argument. Why is that when you fellas have a chance to really offer an opinion, you instead choose to attack someone with whom you disagree? You would be better off and offer more support to your position if you would just close you trap, since all you can do is offer an argumentative ad hominem fallacy as response. Instead if lending any semblance of import to a discussion you detract from anything of value that may be proposed by an intelligent speaker on your side of the issue. You are exactly what is wrong with the American discourse in today's world and why the rest of the world guffaws at our country.

        • 3 votes
        #1.81 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 3:04 AM EST

        Just look at Rice she was sent out by the POTUS and told to deliver those lies for three weeks until the truth came out.

        Yeah, that's why Condoleeza had nothing but my deepest contempt.

        • 2 votes
        #1.82 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 6:42 AM EST

        Watch very closely which pro-Israel traitors will come out of the woodwork to attack Hagel's nomination. Mark their names in your memory and never vote for them.

        • 5 votes
        #1.83 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 7:55 AM EST

        I have said it before and I will say it again:

        The only people Republicans hate worse than Democrats is their fellow Republicans!

        Sheesh! Do you think Republicans will actually let anything get done?

        • 3 votes
        #1.84 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 9:01 AM EST

        Hagel would put the USA first and Likud could go home and cry.

        • 4 votes
        #1.85 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 9:04 AM EST

        Yes Mike, American Likudnik traitors in US Congress will be foaming at the mouth trying to derail this nomination. They know that if they attack Iran Hagel will tell them to go f..k themselves.

        • 4 votes
        #1.86 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 9:25 AM EST

        elliot-3020456

        The guys an anti semite. The dems wouldn't want a member of the KKK on their team so why would they want an anti semite. Oh wait the dems love racists and bigots, just a couple of years ago they had the KKK grand cycloptic wizard Robert Byrd.

        Wow, you guys really do throw each other under the bus when one of you quits foaming at the mouth don't you? Really bizarre. You really aren't a party you're a circular firing squad waiting for one of your own to flinch.

        • 2 votes
        #1.88 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 1:30 PM EST

        Most of GOP Congressmen believe that 'getting anything done' = 'big government'. And because they supposedly don't like big government, they will not allow anything to actually get done.

        • 3 votes
        #1.89 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 4:02 PM EST

        This is a fairly long thread. Yet, it seems there is not a single reference (link) to statements made or actions taken by Hagel regarding his alledged anti-Israel and/or pro-Iran statements...or, anything else for that matter.

        Apparently, all Hagel's Newsvine foes are satisfied with only the word of the MSM for Hagel's supposed sins.

        In any case, it seems the GOPeaParty is about to fall into yet another trap expertly laid by the Obama administration.

        • 3 votes
        #1.90 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 4:33 PM EST
        • This is The United States of America, not the united states of Israel. Senators take an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the constitution of Israel.
        • 3 votes
        #1.91 - Tue Jan 8, 2013 8:08 AM EST

        Spoken like a true Nazi believer.

          #1.92 - Tue Jan 8, 2013 12:11 PM EST

          Lindsey Graham is just being a partisan Idiot. Like it or not, Chuck Hagel had the sense to understand a US $1 trillion venture in Iraq was unwinnable. And Hagel had the courage to say truth when it wasn't popular during a period everyone wanted to search the dark for WMD's that weren't in Iraq. They may have not adored how Hagel said the truth. But....looking back at the validity of his statements. We can now see Hagel had it right and those GOP Senators now willing to vote against him were wrong on the issues when casting their votes with lack of insight. This isn't about Hagel's judgement. It's about the GOP's political vendetta...

          • 4 votes
          #1.93 - Tue Jan 8, 2013 12:37 PM EST

          That's right Tttt. The media focus is being framed as "a lot of people in Congress don't like Hagel." All well and good but the really important thing is WHY a lot of people in Congress don't like Hagel. They don't like him because he was RIGHT when the people who don't like him were WRONG.

          • 2 votes
          #1.94 - Tue Jan 8, 2013 1:41 PM EST

          Who are they kidding? The freaking communist republicans that want to control any and everything are so predictable. Must be why they have never won a war without the democrats coming in later and cleaning up their mess both domestic and abroad. Hell, if Obama nominated McCain, the republicans would attack him and accusing him of working with the enemy and being a turncoat.

          • 1 vote
          #1.95 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:07 PM EST
          Reply

          .

          • 9 votes
          #2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:51 AM EST

          §

          • 1 vote
          #2.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:02 AM EST
          Comment author avatarelliot-3020456Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

          This has got to be the most insightful thing Fisty has ever written. Keep up the great work.

          • 17 votes
          #2.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:10 AM EST

          piss off, zionist

          • 6 votes
          #2.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:36 AM EST

          elliot - Hagel is not an anti semite. He is more likely sick and tired of the influence Israel has had in our government policies. He probably feels that it is long past time for Israel to start carrying their own weight and stop relying on handouts from the American taxpayer.

          He realizes that Iran would be far more useful as a trading partner for the US, than as an enemy, because of Israel's paranoid delusions thgat Iran is some kind of threat.

          Netanyahu and his colleagues have been claiming that Iran willl have a nuclear bomb since 1992 and still no bomb. Read quotes below:

          1992: Israeli
          parliamentarian Benjamin Netanyahu tells his colleagues that Iran is 3 to 5
          years from being able to produce a nuclear weapon – and that the threat
          had to be "uprooted by an international front headed by the US."

          1992:
          Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres tells French TV that Iran was set to have
          nuclear warheads by 1999. "Iran is the greatest threat and greatest
          problem in the Middle East," Peres warned, "because it seeks the
          nuclear option while holding a highly dangerous stance of extreme religious
          militancy."

          1992:
          Joseph Alpher, a former official of Israel's Mossad spy agency, says "Iran
          has to be identified as Enemy No. 1." Iran's nascent nuclear program, he
          told The New York Times, "really gives Israel the jitters."

          Hagel was smart enough to oppose the war in Iraq for Israel, which by itself, makes him the right man for the job of Secretary of Defense. The war in Iraq was planned and sold by Zionists, led by Paul Wolfowitz, while working for Sharon in 1996. They plan they authored was called - “A Clean Break: A new Strategy For Securing The Realm”. Look it up.

          Hagel recognized the fact and does not want a repeat in Iran. Do you?

          The Bush Administration stocked the Pentagon with dual citizen Zionists, who cherry picked and manipulated intelligence to make their case for the Iraq war. Read below:

          Zionist
          warmongers like Ken Adelman and the Zionist Washington Post pushed the war in
          an editorial titled, “Cakewalk in Iraq.” Jewish supremacists Richard Perle and
          Paul Wolfowitz told you that Iraq would “Welcome us as liberators.” Iraq became
          the longest war in American history. Here is a report from USA Today: “Pentagon
          officials estimated for the first time Wednesday that up to 360,000 Iraq and
          Afghanistan veterans may have suffered traumatic brain injuries.” Now that’s
          not counting tens of thousands who have suffered maiming, amputations, or death
          in this war based on lies.

          They said the war would be a "cakewalk", instead it will cost the US over 3.5 trillion dollars, all borrowed from China. Do you think we should thank Wolfowitz and his cabal of neocons for their splendid efforts? Why must we keep sending Israel billions, each and every year, which on a per caqpita basis amounts to over $500.00 for each man, woman and child in Israel.

          “To learn who rules over you simply find out who are not
          allowed to criticize”

          —–Voltaire

          • 41 votes
          #2.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:48 AM EST

          agree wholeheartedly with ".Voltaitre". Those are close to my same points of view:

          Besides, there is nothing wrong if the guys speaks against any Country or group if he has the interest of the USA first and foremost.

          We are tired of us making policies for the benefit of the Israelis...America first!!

          We won't let the dialogue be kidnapped by the minority and obsolete warmongering GOP right.

          Netanyu, even wanted to influence the last election..we'll vote him out too in the next election!!

          • 28 votes
          #2.5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:07 PM EST

          you idiot if we don't give them billions 500$ each they will come here to get it

          Israel is the 51 state of the union why do you think they call themselves "The State of Israel""

          better prepare my computrer for the hacks and angry "Birds now that I said that

          • 8 votes
          #2.6 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:09 PM EST

          That's a pretty silly argument. They're a sovereign state, so what should they call themselves?

          • 8 votes
          #2.7 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:31 PM EST

          Does anyone of these intelligent posters on newsvine have a good example of HOW the United States changed its policy because of Israel.

          I suspect not because we have always been in favor of a Democracy in the Middle east among the Muslem radical states.

          If you mess with Israel the United States will kick your ass and the other countries that border Israel know that to be a FACT.

            #2.8 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:59 PM EST

            "This is a president who has drunk the tea," Cruz said on Fox News Sunday "He's high on re-election right now."

            Here's hoping he drinks the Kool Aid!

            • 1 vote
            #2.9 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:08 PM EST
            Comment author avatarAggie-345886Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

            I would recommend Jim Jones Special blend.

            • 3 votes
            #2.10 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:09 PM EST

            @Carl Lafoon

            "Does anyone of these intelligent posters on newsvine have a good example of HOW the United States changed its policy because of Israel.

            I suspect not because we have always been in favor of a Democracy in the Middle east among the Muslem radical states.

            If you mess with Israel the United States will kick your ass and the other countries that border Israel know that to be a FACT."

            You ask how the U.S. has changed its policy, one sentence later you declare protection for Israel from any of it's neighbors...

            Unless unconditional protection for Israel and hatred of Palestine was written into our constitution, SHAZAM!!! You answered your own question. That's like newsvine masturbation!

            P.S. (it's MUSLIM)

            • 7 votes
            #2.11 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:46 PM EST

            feisty needs to take a 10 year sabbatical to death valley with no electricity or food and water just live off the land America would be a better place Take reid maddow pelosi and obama with her for her listening pleasure

            • 2 votes
            #2.12 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:22 PM EST

            What does it taste like Aggie-345886?

            • 2 votes
            #2.13 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:28 PM EST

            Carl Lafoon

            Does anyone of these intelligent posters on newsvine have a good example of HOW the United States changed its policy because of Israel.

            How about the attack on the USS Liberty? If any other nation did that, it would have been viewed as an act of war. But Israel kills over 2 dozen of our finest and Washington says,"That's okay. Mistakes happen."We should have bombed Tel Aviv over that. And before you defend this overt act of war, let's make clear that it occurred during broad daylight over a period of several hours in a moderate wind that had our flag flying. This was not an accident. It was a deliberate attack on us. With friends like these...

            No wonder everyone hates them except misguided people who claim to be Christian but don't know their Bible and don't understand that Jesus already disowned these losers.

            • 4 votes
            #2.14 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:27 PM EST

            just want to say fiesty you must be a paid troll. Your always on these boards like white on rice.

            • 3 votes
            #2.15 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:56 PM EST

            Chuck Hagle is more than qualified for the job of Defence Secretary..... so of course every Republican jerk will object to his nomination.... that's what they do.

            As far as Hagle being an anti-Semite, that's just an other steaming pile of phony right wing Bull S@#$.

            Anybody that wants to know what’s poisoning America’s political system all they have to do is take a good look at the “Grand Obstructionist Party” and they’ll find the answer.

            • 7 votes
            #2.16 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 6:49 PM EST

            It appears the "Carl Bafoon" is more interested in the safety of Israel than the lives of American soldiers.

              #2.17 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 6:59 PM EST

              As far as Hagle being an anti-Semite, that's just an other steaming pile of phony right wing Bull S@#$.

              Well said. It's worth noting that even the term "anti-Semite" has been corrupted by Conservatives. In their world it means someone who won't do everything in his power to back the most virulent elements of Israeli politics. The Religious Right DO NOT want what's best for Israel...they want to make sure America is "on the side of Israel" when Armageddon begins. In the perverse logic normal in today's Conservative Movement "being on the side of Israel" means helping in its destruction so the Second Coming of Christ can occur as prophesized. It has nothing to do with trying to create peace in the Middle East and an environment in which Israel AND its neighbors can be long term, stable institutions.

              • 4 votes
              #2.18 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:12 PM EST

              Time to start breathing, Thomas.

              • 2 votes
              #2.19 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 8:11 PM EST

              While the right hand moves, you can't see what the left hand is doing.!! It's all an illusion.

              "H.J. Res. 15"

              Bye bye term limits. Hello Dictator.!!

              • 1 vote
              #2.20 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:03 PM EST

              ""This is a president who has drunk the tea,"? Maybe his detractors should lay off the scotch. I've come to appreciate the term "reactionary" in its full meaning. Anything the President suggests is instantly, without any pretense of consideration, rejected by the Republican House. We pay these people to think, not to hate.

              • 2 votes
              #2.21 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 12:52 AM EST

              If President Obama nominated John McCain for the position, the GOP right would do all in their power to destroy him, too. It has nothing to do with the nominee's qualifications and everything to do with obsessively obstructing our democratically elected President who is not a far right extremist slave to the Koch brothers and the military-industrial complex.

              • 3 votes
              #2.22 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 3:13 AM EST

              Why then, Carl, did the United States overthrow the democratically elected prime minister Mosaddegh in favor of the Shah (a fascist king) in 1954? The United States cares nothing about democracy anywhere in the world. The nation is and has been (since the end of the second world war) driven by the need to form a empire based on strict adherence to their form of capitalism, which is not true capitalism but rather laissez faire pandering to the corporate regimes. We also did thid to the Greeks, Italians, the Congo, Chile, Bolivia, Granada, Honduras, and the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. And before you attempt to use your clouded version of history, the Sandinista built hospitals and schools for the people of Nicaragua and in doing so, took the infant death count fro nearly 60 % to around 10% (better then the U.S.) and raised their literacy rate from 10% to 90% (again, better than the U.S.) all while raising half of their populace out of poverty. The Reagan administration backed the contras to destroy this simply because the Sandinista were a socialist government.

              You should learn some history before you attempt to support your insupportable position with it.

              • 1 vote
              #2.23 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 3:24 AM EST

              gw-684624

              feisty needs to take a 10 year sabbatical to death valley with no electricity or food and water just live off the land America would be a better place Take reid maddow pelosi and obama with her for her listening pleasure

              What an intelligent comment relating directly to the issue at hand. You teabaggers cannot raise a legitimate argument in support of the far-right senators cited in the article, so you do what the teabaggers do best...attack Democrats. You prove yourselves to be mindless ideologues time and time again. You will loose the next election and continue to loose elections for the Republican party because they cannot or will not divorce themselves from your insanity. You have proven to the American People that you lust power at any price and have no inclination to govern what so ever. You threaten to secede if things don't go your way...please do. This time we won't lift a finger to bring you back, much less bleed.

              • 3 votes
              #2.24 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 2:11 PM EST

              Hagel can't pass the 'republican' litmus test. The fact that he would help Obama proves that he is not a true republican. It is a color issue. Hagel has proved that he is not white enough.

              • 1 vote
              #2.25 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 8:42 PM EST

              I would bet all these GOP bashers know next to nothing about Hagle. Many of these posters would confirm him, or anyone, even Chavez if Obama nominated him.

              milklit....You've already tasted the Kool-aid, you tell me. ..

              • 1 vote
              #2.26 - Tue Jan 8, 2013 8:27 AM EST
              Reply

              in the last line of the article this newly elected senator says:

              "Chuck Hagel is a tremendous patriot and statesman," she said on ABC. "He hasn't had a chance to speak for himself, so why all the prejudging? I don't know."

              in the first part she prejudges and in the second part complains about prejudging.

              is this the best we can expect?

              • 4 votes
              Reply#3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:01 AM EST

              What are you talking about?

              • 15 votes
              #3.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:38 AM EST

              Calling someone a tremendous patriot and statesman is judging? Wow. No words, just, Wow.

              • 13 votes
              #3.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:07 PM EST

              What are the Senators afraid of is it because he is a Veteran....????

              • 13 votes
              #3.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:55 PM EST

              BillyBob...how many purple hearts do you need to be awarded to be called a tremendous patriot?

              • 8 votes
              #3.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:26 PM EST

              From Fiesty, yes, that is as good as it gets. To avoid daine bramage, put on IGNORE.

              • 1 vote
              #3.5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:17 PM EST

              Billy Bob, thats not judging, his enlistment in the military when there were little to no incentives to join says PATRIOT, his first purple heart says TREMENDOUS, and the second says STATESMAN. A man whose accomplishments speak for themselves. Goodnight

              • 3 votes
              #3.6 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 2:01 AM EST

              "Chuck Hagel is a tremendous patriot and statesman,"...

              in the first part she prejudges and in the second part complains about prejudging.

              Prejudgement? WTF are you objecting to?

              patriot? the man served in Viet Nam and earned a Purple Heart. Of course, we saw how much Republicans respect that when they "swift-boated" John Kerry, didn't we?

              statesman? In the article itself, it says When Hagel left the Senate, McConnell called him "a clear voice on foreign policy and national security." Oh, I guess we can't take any recommendations from Hagel's own party, Republicans, either, can we? And the fact that a Democratic president nominated him, a Republican? Well, that is certain proof that he has no statemanship, eh?

              I have said it before and I will say it again: The only people Republicans hate worse than Democrats is their fellow Republicans!

              • 2 votes
              #3.7 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 9:11 AM EST

              Exactly...and the Right is depending on our lap dog, equivocating MSM to pretend none of those facts exist. Every issue is treated as "some people say," ignoring the rank hypocrisy and blatant lying from the Conservative Movement.

              I've got news for the media...if they stop treating the correct solution as something midway between what is demonstrable by fact and "death panels" or "balance the budget by reducing deductions", or "Chuck Hagel is an anti-Semite" all this goes away...and perhapse in the bargain people start reading newspapers and watching the news again.

                #3.8 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 1:24 PM EST
                Reply

                Does McConnell really want to start public discussions about the Israel Lobby during a Senate hearing?

                • 18 votes
                Reply#4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:01 AM EST

                squirrels

                • 6 votes
                Reply#5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:01 AM EST

                It's not Senator Hagel that rankles Republicans, it's who is nominating him, as usual. It doesn't matter who President Obama nominates, they're opposed. Typical small ball from the Party of No.

                • 48 votes
                Reply#6 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:04 AM EST

                from friday on this site: "There are as many as 10 Democratic senators who could vote no, Capitol Hill sources say."

                will these 10 be allowed to vote against hagel and not be called racists as you imply in your post?

                • 10 votes
                #6.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:15 AM EST

                @billybob-6210632

                I see nothing in his post that shows an ounce of racism. The past 4 years have shown the reluctance of the Rep to approve anyone that Obama nominates, regardless of post.

                • 27 votes
                #6.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:31 AM EST

                Excuse me billybob but there is not a single thing racist about DeMerl's post.

                The fact that the GNOP will simply vote against something just because Obama wants it is NOT racist just accurate.

                • 20 votes
                #6.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:34 AM EST

                chris, cg -- you need to come here more often. disagreeing with the president is considered racist by many folks on this site.

                it is not possible to disagree with his policies here without being called racist.

                • 4 votes
                #6.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:35 AM EST

                What we're seeing here is the truth about all the "bipartisanship" cr-p the Rs keep spewing. No matter how often Obama reaches across the aisle, no matter how much he compromises, no matter how many Republican policies he implements, no matter how many Republicans he nominates to cabinet positions, it will never be enough.

                • 24 votes
                #6.5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:46 AM EST

                Billybob you have it half right. The Dems disagree on principle, race not a factor. The GNOP is also on pricnciple but with a great deal of racism thrown in.

                • 10 votes
                #6.6 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:11 PM EST

                Talk about casting stones....

                "I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting you believe what you just said."

                Bill Buckley, Jr. on hypocrisy

                • 3 votes
                #6.7 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:25 PM EST

                DeMerl quote:

                It's not Senator Hagel that rankles Republicans, it's who is nominating him, as usual. It doesn't matter who President Obama nominates, they're opposed. Typical small ball from the Party of No.

                Dear De Merl: You are right on target. The GOP is out to lunch and stupidly shooting theemselves in all their little feet. And other parts North. They are demonstrating that they would destroy our nation economically if it would destroy our legally elected -- by a large margin -- biracial president. A sure way to keep Democrats in the Oval Office Ad infinitum. Arrogant Fools.

                • 12 votes
                #6.8 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:53 PM EST

                Only cowards play the race card.

                • 2 votes
                #6.9 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:07 PM EST

                Hows this for a race card? ---I hate that NASCAR got their pork attatched to the tax bill. I guess I am just a coward.

                • 2 votes
                #6.10 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:02 PM EST

                billybob-6210632

                from friday on this site: "There are as many as 10 Democratic senators who could vote no, Capitol Hill sources say."

                will these 10 be allowed to vote against hagel and not be called racists as you imply in your post?

                Billybob...no doubt. Chuck Hagel is Republican. It speaks well for the Democratic Party that not only is he being nominated by a Democratic President but that only 10 Democratic Senators have voiced opposition so far...absolutely remarkable. But you see Billybob, that's the difference between the Republican/Tea Party and the Democratic Party. We are interested in governing this Country and don't care what a qualified American's political affiliation are. Perhaps you should stop criticizing something truly remarkable and take notes!

                • 2 votes
                #6.11 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 2:26 PM EST
                Reply

                Why do GOP members of congress waste so much of the time we pay them to work for our country, being butt holes?

                • 25 votes
                Reply#7 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:08 AM EST

                upstate -- are you so blind as to believe that republicans have a lock on being butt holes?

                amazing if so. how about when a senator in 2006 made some derogatory remarks about the president and the debt he was running up? now that senator was truly a butt hole.

                • 5 votes
                #7.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:27 AM EST

                Yeah but being butt holes is something the GNOP has really mastered.

                • 18 votes
                #7.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:35 AM EST

                @billybob-6210632

                upstate -- are you so blind as to believe that republicans have a lock on being butt holes?

                amazing if so. how about when a senator in 2006 made some derogatory remarks about the president and the debt he was running up? now that senator was truly a butt hole.

                How about that @ssclown Republican Joe Wilson and his "You lie" Or Boehner's recent "Go f*ck yourself" Both done very publicly.

                Dems have some jerks, there is no doubt about that, but the Rep Party sure produces them in larger quantity.

                • 27 votes
                #7.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:36 AM EST

                Look at the republican/tea party now our their eating their own older members of their party. Who says their not in disarray.

                • 16 votes
                #7.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:50 AM EST

                Chris from Yucaipa......You mention gaffs made by Boehner etc...what about this, Biden, to a newly elected female Senator, "Spread your legs, your going to be frisked' or his comment to a very large black audience, 'He wants to put you back in chains' so it's not just one side it cover all sides.

                • 3 votes
                #7.5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:56 PM EST

                I'm with Boehner on the Reid thing...I've often said it myself...

                • 2 votes
                #7.6 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:27 PM EST

                Why do the Dems spend so much of our tax money on buying votes? eh upstate porta john.

                • 2 votes
                #7.7 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:11 PM EST

                stopfreeloaders Hey where do I go to sign up for the free stuff that big oil gets in their corporate welfare package.

                • 3 votes
                #7.8 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 8:27 PM EST

                stan-3871705

                Chris from Yucaipa......You mention gaffs made by Boehner etc...what about this, Biden, to a newly elected female Senator, "Spread your legs, your going to be frisked' or his comment to a very large black audience, 'He wants to put you back in chains' so it's not just one side it cover all sides.

                Maybe if you got your facts straight, I might not have to embarrass you in front of everyone. Biden made that comment to the Senator's HUSBAND.

                When a photographer told the husband of Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) to drop his hands to his sides, Biden added, “Spread your legs: You’re going to be frisked.” He added, “You say that to somebody in North Dakota, they think it’s a frisk.”

                “They think you’re in trouble, right?” he asked Heitkamp’s husband, a doctor. He shrugged.

                Here, how about you watch it for yourself.

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NO2I61S-3lM#!

                As for your other comment about the chains, why not include the entire quote and the context of it's use.

                “We got a real clear picture of what they all value,” Biden said. “Every Republican’s voted for it. Look at what they value and look at their budget and what they’re proposing. Romney wants to let the — he said in the first hundred days he’s going to let the big banks once again write their own rules, ‘unchain Wall Street.’ They’re going to put y’all back in chains.”

                I don't care if the audience was black, white, yellow or green. The quote had absolutely nothing to do with race as any normal sane person could see.

                Care to respond?

                • 4 votes
                #7.9 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 9:08 PM EST

                And don't forget VP Cheney's "f*** you" to Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy while VP C was testifiying on the Hill. Really classy folk there. Said it right out loud, on the capitol steps, with many newsmen and other citizens watching, listening. Talk about arrogance!

                  #7.10 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 10:17 PM EST

                  @publia

                  Actually he said the same thing Boehner said, "Go F*ck yourself".

                  I guess Boehner just likes to keep things consistent...

                  • 1 vote
                  #7.11 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:29 PM EST

                  Well I guess you can call both sides this word since there happens to be bipartisan opposition, lol. And ask the same question as to why we pay the democrats as well, to do nothing.

                  • 1 vote
                  #7.12 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 12:11 AM EST

                  Because they are "Republi-constipated". You can tell by what overflows from their lying, greedy mouths. We would be better served if they would just STFU and do the job the PEOPLE of AMERICA pay them way too much to do, rather than doing whatever "Poopy-Head" Grover wants.

                  44 years ago I was taught that treason during time of war was punishable by death, but that was when boys were drafted to fight an unpopular war and had to fight for their lives while drawing an average paycheck of less than $300 per month. What do we pay these 'traitors in the GOP' these days... $14,000 per month? And they don't live in foxholes, nor do they eat cold food out of green tin cans while standing in the rain.

                  At least Chuck Hagel had the stones to volunteer when his colleagues were dodging military service. When asked by reporters, Mr. Rumsfeld said "It was not in MY BEST INTERESTS to go into the service". It probably wasn't in Mr. Hagel's nor mine, but we went! We went, we fought, we were wounded...all in the best interest of our country. Now the GOPTP wants to cut our benefits. CHICKENSH*T CHICKENHAWKS

                  • 1 vote
                  #7.13 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 6:25 AM EST
                  Reply
                  Comment author avatarNamVet68-70Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                  DeMerl: For good reason too; the HMIC has positioned individuals who will better him, and not the country that he works for!, and your either a union member, welfare receipient, voted the race, and have an unhealthy intrest in other peoples balls!

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#8 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:11 AM EST

                  Of course the Republicans in the party don't want Hagel in. He disgrace their party. He actually worked with President Obama and they can't have that. Afterall they vowed that President Obama would be a one term President. Well they fell on their asses on that one and will continue to as long as they hold onto their mindset of refusing to work with President Obama. Republican Party's Republitanic continues to sink.......

                  • 37 votes
                  Reply#9 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:12 AM EST

                  You have disgrace John Wayne, he's dead, but was a life long Republican

                  • 5 votes
                  #9.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:51 AM EST

                  60's veteran - This fight is not about disgracing the party or comments about gays. It is about Israel's wishes that Hagel not be the Sec. of Defense. The fight is entirely about Hagel's stand on Israel and Iran. The Israelis want a war monger in the post, who will be more likely to attack Iran. They are afraid Hagel will not act without proof there is an actual threat.

                  No more wars for Israel. Stop aid to Israel and spend the money to reduce our debt.

                  • 21 votes
                  #9.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:54 AM EST

                  Hardcoffeeat6am:

                  You have disgrace John Wayne, he's dead, but was a life long Republican

                  So was President/General Dwight Eisenhower, one of our finest military officers and presidents.

                  The honorable republican party of Eisenhower & Wayne's day bears no resemblance whatsoever to today's party by the same name.

                  • 18 votes
                  #9.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:51 PM EST

                  So you think the today democratic party is the same?, My Grand father was a member of the KKK and was a big time member of the democratic party back in the 20's 30's 40's & 50's he told me some sad story of what the democratic party did to black people back then. Back in 1976 I voted for Jimmy Carter, why, he was from Georgia that's all, just like people voted for Obama only do that he is black. I feel we need to vote for who's going to help American, And Obama & Romney was not the one I wanted. When we are young we vote for who's cool and not who will really help us get America back on track.

                  • 2 votes
                  #9.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 6:52 PM EST

                  On nearly every thread Conservatives explain their conclusion regarding the 2012 elections. They believe Barack Obama and Democrats won because "the wrong people" voted.

                  • 5 votes
                  #9.5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:17 PM EST
                  Reply

                  Does everything have to be a fight with you Republicans????? This is what the country hates about Congress and in 2 years your party will have insignificant influence in this country. Keep it up and suffer the consequences !

                  • 24 votes
                  Reply#10 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:12 AM EST

                  A tough fight promised by the GOP? Bring it on fat boys! Looks to me like they haven't won too many fights recently they've started. The real entertainment from the Grumpy Old Party comes from their infighting!

                  Keep up the great work GOP and tea baggers....it's a long way back up from where you're at right now.

                  • 24 votes
                  Reply#11 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:14 AM EST

                  This fight will be a test of who controls our government. Will the winner be AIPAC or the American people. Our Congress has a choice. The votes will be recorded and hopefully, every one of the ones who vote the AIPAC line will be voted out of Congress, regardless if Hagel is confirmed or not. We cannot allow Israel to control America. Wasn't the Iraq war enough?

                  That smarmy Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Joe Lieberman make me want to puke. They have been serving the interests of Israel since the day they were sworn in. Now they are hot for action against Syria and a war against Iran. A Hagel appointment would at least give us a sane voice in our government.

                  The Republicans and the Israel supporters who oppose Hagel will throw up smokescreens to obscure their real reasons for fighting against him, but as usual, it is all about Israel.

                  • 5 votes
                  #11.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:55 PM EST

                  Repubs will argue, Obama will criticize, Repubs will fold.

                    #11.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 8:18 PM EST

                    Arrogant lately, Barack got about the same percentage of the vote, where is this grand revolution you all want us to see, because I , for one, do not see it.

                    I know that once the Hispanics realize that voting democratic goes against their religious values, and when the blacks, like myself, wake up and realize that ever since they have begun voting democratic, unwed births are at 2 out of 3 the births, that the marriage rate has declined, then maybe you all will not be so smug. I thought slavery had been defeated but leave it to the democrats to revive it. It worked for them back in the day, and it is apparently working now.

                    • 1 vote
                    #11.3 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 12:19 AM EST

                    Luscha you are a fool. I don't even know where to end or begin on your ignorance exhibit

                    • 2 votes
                    #11.4 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 2:07 AM EST
                    Reply

                    It's an interesting choice, but I doubt the right has the clout at this point to actually prevent his confirmation.

                    Regardless, they'll try to turn this hearing into a distraction because they desperately need any opportunity at all to recoup political capitol.

                    Their epic and destructive failure to make Obama a one-term president was a suicidal lapse of judgement- a defining moment in history which may yet define the beginning of the end for the GOP.

                    • 30 votes
                    Reply#12 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:14 AM EST

                    The President, regardless of Party, should be able to assemble his own cabinet and not have major opposition, unless a choice has very serious concerns, or is truly incompetent. This fighting over various minor points and personalities only creates more divid and more gridlock.

                    • 5 votes
                    #12.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:16 PM EST

                    "I think he'll be subjected to the same kind of oversight hearings that any nominee for such an important position would expect," McConnell said.

                    Reminds me of the time that little Donny Rumsfeld rose to the rank of White House Chief of Staff for the last two years of Gerald Ford... Then Gerald tapped him for Secretary of Defense but lost the race and old Donny went back into private business, right after he replaced himself as White House Chief of Staff with one of his own staffers... Dick Cheney. Fast forward 20 some-odd years and V.P. Dick Cheney Invites 'ol Rummy back as Secretary of Defense... Two miss-run wars and a token resignation later, you've got the makings for a real republican benchmark... Do keep flapping you republican miscreant infidels.

                    • 1 vote
                    #12.2 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 7:49 PM EST
                    Reply

                    NamVet68-70 says

                    your either a union member, welfare receipient, or voted the race!

                    And YOU are???????????

                    BTW, what does HMIC stand for?

                    • 12 votes
                    Reply#13 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:15 AM EST

                    Hi fuzzy! I noticed that , too. He is a re-reg that was finally banned a few months ago. It was my pleasure to have helped contribute to the demise of another bigot and I will take great pleasure in doing so again and again! ;-) Now he is substituting his usual HNIC for HMIC...his ignorant observance of thinking that(HMIC) is more polically correct than HNIC! ....sigh

                    • 9 votes
                    #13.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:49 AM EST
                    Reply
                    Comment author avatartim-580939Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    Romneys 1040 please, by the time obama and his race baiting friends get done with this country there won't be anything left!!!!!! Obama has set racial relations back in this country. Either you haven't been listening for the last 4 years or your'e just plain ignorant. He has stuck his nose in stuff where he didn't even know what was going on just to make a point about race. He has taught his congressional members to use the race card for everything. If they couldn't get thier way the opposition were racists. Biggest bunch of sh!t Iv'e ever seen in my life!!! Obama is just a dumbazz community advisor with no skills whatsoever. He should be in prison for all the laws he has broken in washington. The latest holding all the new regulations back until after xmas when they were supposed to come out the first of the year. IT IS LAW!!! Do you know how many businesses closed. How many businesses didn't know what kind of decisions to make. He held them back until after election for his own greed and votes!!!

                    • 14 votes
                    Reply#14 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:16 AM EST

                    What has Obama done to set racial relations back? Was it getting elected?

                    • 33 votes
                    #14.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:24 AM EST

                    He should be in prison for all the laws he has broken in washington.

                    Which laws? please inform us. If there was ever a president that should have went to prison, He would be in cell # 43.

                    • 23 votes
                    #14.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:28 AM EST

                    WOW...get a new tin foil hat for Christmas? What utter nonsense!

                    • 18 votes
                    #14.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:30 AM EST

                    This Namvet is a retired Union man who never was on welfare and have always voted for the best American, not the aristocrat.

                    And by the way, 27 of the 32 states that take more than the get from Uncle Sam are republicon states.

                    And 14 of the 18 states that give more than they receive are Democrat states.

                    It isd us hard working tax paying Democrats that are supporting you lazy welfare queen republicons.

                    And you do not want to help those Democrats who need help after Sandy.........

                    Red State Socialism | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

                    • 22 votes
                    #14.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:34 AM EST

                    Would you like the US to split up? I keep on seeing these post about the hard working Democrat's paying the way for all states.......................Do you want to see the United States to be split up? Just asking

                      #14.5 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:17 PM EST

                      Come to the South if you want to talk about a place set back in time. They still think it is 1850. They don't even think they lost the Civil War because they keep playing it over and over again each year.

                      • 14 votes
                      #14.6 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:36 PM EST

                      Nancy-305998: No.

                      I want you delusional republicons to face the truth and start working together as Americans. You don't pay taxes for things like firefighters, so we get to give you our tax dollars when places like Texas, Colorado, and Oklahoma burn. The midwest and south get federal money every year for things like floods, drought, and tornadoes and yet you are against helping the victims of hurricane Sandy.

                      Do you know that taxes are so in some states that they can't even afford to maintain their roads and need federal money for that?

                      • 5 votes
                      #14.7 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:40 PM EST

                      This "dumbazz community organizer" out organized your boy, didn't he?

                      • 2 votes
                      #14.8 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 6:48 PM EST

                      Yo Tim-580939, I think voter suppression by the GOP showed how little they think about race relations. Is it just me or does Sen Lyndsey Graham looks like he enjoyed his time in the Navy a little to much. Being around men in tight quarters must have mad him very happy?

                      • 1 vote
                      #14.9 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:06 PM EST
                      Reply

                      NamVet68-70:

                      Wrong on all counts. Stick to the content of the news article rather than questioning another's credentials to post an opinion.

                      • 12 votes
                      Reply#15 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:16 AM EST

                      many of you posting here have seemingly forgotten that msnbc reported this on friday:

                      There are as many as 10 Democratic senators who could vote no, Capitol Hill sources say.

                      so what will you say if he is rejected which will only happen with a bipartisan vote to not confirm?

                      • 5 votes
                      Reply#16 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:17 AM EST

                      Hey billybob, the key word in that is could.

                      • 8 votes
                      #16.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:42 AM EST

                      Well I, for one, would say....OK, Hagel's history. Now who?

                      How about you? What would you say?

                      • 2 votes
                      #16.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:56 PM EST
                      Reply

                      Hagel is by far the best Republican for the job, but there are dozens of better Democratic people who could do the job better. Putting a Republicaan in the Pentagon is carrying bipartisanship much too far.

                      • 7 votes
                      Reply#17 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:26 AM EST

                      Hagel is by far not the Best. Hillary would do a better job and we all know how well she handled Libya. My God even McCain would be a better choice. The president just put up is name to try to split the Republican party. I just wish he would run for president of Iran, now that would help us.

                        #17.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:07 PM EST
                        Reply

                        What a surprise.... The party that can't think or make proper decisions for all but the limited few, are again starting off the year with "Wait a minute, a month, a year, dahhh... just waut, we can't think that fast and need instructions from Rupert, the Australian and his boys."

                        • 14 votes
                        Reply#18 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:27 AM EST

                        To the guy who asked, HMIC is military speak for Head Mother====== In Charge.

                        • 3 votes
                        Reply#19 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:28 AM EST

                        Can we please remove McTurtle from the Senate? Ashley, please run.

                        • 13 votes
                        Reply#20 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:28 AM EST

                        Yeah, we should push for regime change in Iran. Maybe even launch an invasion. I'm sure it would all work out really, really well.

                        Lots of slow learners in the Senate.

                        • 15 votes
                        Reply#21 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:29 AM EST

                        Wow. So, Dems nominate a Republican, potentially helping give their rivals some measure of influence after an election that basically locked them out of power, and so they try to kill it? wow. What's the psychiatric term for self-destructive tendencies?

                        • 21 votes
                        Reply#22 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:30 AM EST

                        Hagel is a republican in "R" only. My pet goldfish is more of a republican then him. Obama wants a so called republican in the defence department so when he chops the defence budget they can say a Republican did it. In all the things mentioned in the article he is about as much of a republican as Arlin Spector was.

                        • 2 votes
                        #22.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:07 PM EST

                        The word for for self-destructive political tendencies is "Republican." Let's see if it catches on in other fields.

                        • 9 votes
                        #22.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:53 PM EST

                        If Republican is the self-destructive tendencies, then I guess Democrat is the work for total distruction of the human race.

                          #22.3 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:02 PM EST

                          300Michael, please educate your goldfish!

                          • 1 vote
                          #22.4 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 7:18 PM EST

                          Wow 300Michael is a dumb@!$%#.

                            #22.5 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 12:43 AM EST

                            300Michael

                            Hagel is a republican in "R" only. My pet goldfish is more of a republican then him. Obama wants a so called republican in the defence department so when he chops the defence budget they can say a Republican did it. In all the things mentioned in the article he is about as much of a republican as Arlin Spector was.

                            Actually 300Michael, your pet goldfish is probably more of a conservative than the entire Republican Party. Regarding your comment about "chops to the defense budget", the defense budget is going to be cut...period! It's already started. It's called RIF (Reduction in Force) and it happens at the end of every major conflict. In addition, the Tea Party members of the 112th Congress refused to approve increasing the debt ceiling without an agreement to the sequester (20% across the board cut to the Federal Government), which includes the DOD. So you can blame Obama till your face turns blue but the true fault lies with the Tea Party members of the 112th Congress.

                            As to your comment about Hagel and Spector not being Republicans, they didn't leave the party, the party left them. Look at the way the Republicans in Congress treated Bob Dole just a month ago. Bob Dole is a life long Republican, a former Senator and a WWII hero. I anticipate by the end of this year the Republican Party will publicly denounce Ronald Reagan. After all he raised taxes 8 times and granted Amnesty to Illegal Aliens.

                              #22.6 - Tue Jan 8, 2013 12:13 PM EST
                              Reply

                              The Jewish lobby is notorious regarding its influence in Washington. It buys Congressional support all the time. Israel routinely spies on our military and corporate interests. It has not kept one promise regarding settlements. Why does anyone think candidates routinely go out of their way to speak to Jewish groups...$$. Just look at Adelson and the last election.

                              • 20 votes
                              Reply#23 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:31 AM EST

                              yea, what's up with Israel, they are some racist hate filled people

                              • 1 vote
                              #23.1 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:13 PM EST

                              Israel's dislike is for only one country right now...Iran. They want to attack them with out warning the US. Netanyahu doesn't trust Obama and Obama with a good many of the western leaders don't like Netanyahu. Hagel would be an opponent to war with Iran. He wouldn't rubber stamp wars as has Obama and previous presidents have. We need a man that respects the blood of the American who puts his boots on the ground in harms way for this country. Do you want 10 more years of war? Do you want a perpetual war mindset? Israel can fight its own wars that doesn't make you a anti-semite. I would say at worst his nationalistic and thats the right thing we need now.

                              • 1 vote
                              #23.2 - Mon Jan 7, 2013 1:14 AM EST
                              Reply

                              Heidi Heitkamp a freshman Democrat from North Dakota. By the statement she makes it apparent that she is indeed a freshman and wet behind the ears.Yeah, ya really gotta watch out for that "Jewish lobby".

                              • 2 votes
                              Reply#24 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:35 AM EST

                              Afghanistan needs to be abandoned. The original mission was distracted by the invasion of Iraq.

                              • 9 votes
                              Reply#25 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:36 AM EST

                              they are staying longer to make it look like some kind of victory, letting our soldiers die like dogs

                                #25.2 - Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:15 PM EST
                                Reply
                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 19
                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.