Senate approves deal to avert fiscal cliff; vote goes to House

Updated at 2:15 a.m. ET -- An agreement in principle to avert broad tax increases and spending cuts passed in the Senate early Tuesday morning, with an overwhelming vote of 89-8.

The House of Representatives is expected to vote before Wednesday.

The interim New Year's Eve tax deal negotiated by Biden and Senate Republican Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky would raise income taxes on single earners with annual incomes above $400,000 and married couples with incomes above $450,000.

It also blocks spending cuts for two months, extends unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless, prevents a 27 percent cut in fees for doctors who treat Medicare patients and prevents a spike in milk prices.

MSNBC's Milissa Rehberger talks with contributor Ezra Klein and outlines the potential Senate deal that avert the Fiscal Cliff.

As of mid-afternoon Monday, the sticking point involved the "sequester," the cuts to spending – about $100 billion to start in 2013 -- that were mandated by the Budget Control Act which President Barack Obama signed into law last year. Republicans have signaled they might let the sequester take effect unless it was offset by other spending cuts; the GOP has also said it might accept a delay, but only for a few months.

The Obama administration, however, was pushing for a longer delay in implementing the sequester. Otherwise, the president said, replacing those automatic cuts must be "balanced" — shorthand for a combination of new taxes and other spending cuts.

Obama tried to push talks over the finish line earlier in the afternoon with a statement from the White House.

"Today, it appears that an agreement to prevent this New Year's tax hike is within sight," the president said at the White House on Monday. "But it's not done."

In the absence of a broader agreement to resolve the sequester, McConnell appeared in the Senate floor to request a vote only on the tax element of the fiscal cliff.

"Let's pass the tax relief portion now," he said. "Let's take what's been agreed to and keep moving."

NBC's Chuck Todd explains that a fiscal cliff deal has been difficult to reach because President Obama and Speaker Boehner don't want to appear to be caving to the other.

But it's not clear that Democrats, who were led in negotiations by Vice President Joe Biden, would agree to de-link the tax debate from other fights over the sequester and extending expiring unemployment benefits past Dec. 31.

House Republicans were careful to note that it was still possible for them to add votes late on New Year's Eve. But they also argued that there was no Senate-passed legislation on which they could schedule a vote, making the prospect of avoiding the cliff all the less likely.

Democratic and Republican sources in the House told NBC News that a final vote on any deal would now most likely wait until afternoon on New Year's Day, or even on Jan. 2.

Though Congress could still conceivably act after New Year's to preserve existing tax rates — thereby limiting any lasting effect on consumers — their inability to reach an agreement until the very last minute could still threaten to rattle the economy and markets.

Vice President Joe Biden has reached a deal with Senate Republicans to avoid the massive tax hikes and spending cuts set to begin on January 1st. NBC's Kelly O'Donnell reports.

The House did act late Sunday, though, to clear the way for emergency consideration of Senate legislation if leaders are able to reach an agreement. The House Rules Committee convened with the purpose of dispensing with a rule instilled by Republicans in the early days of 2011 to require that legislation be posted online for a full 72 hours before a vote in the House. GOP leaders had sought that rule to showcase their own transparency, and in reaction to actions by the previous Democratic majority to quickly pass legislation during the health care reform battles of 2010.

Republicans' move to sidestep their own rule underscores the urgency of fiscal cliff talks in the final hours of 2012. There were few ironclad assurances, though, that any Senate agreement would necessarily win the support of the House.

The lurching nature of legislating has been characteristic of the Congress during the last two years, and that's a phenomenon that may well continue into the next Congress, when Democrats will continue to retain control of the Senate, and Republicans will hold a slightly slimmer grasp on the House.

"We're about to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory," says CNBC's Steve Liesman, who warns that higher unemployment may be ahead.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 88
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Like sand through an hourglass...

This whole "dog & pony" show is ridiculous!

Why don't they just put the Presidents plan on the floor for a vote?

"I've said no deal is better than a bad deal, and this looks like a very bad deal, the way it's shaping up," he said

One more reason I have always admired Senator Harkin...

  • 156 votes
#1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:24 AM EST
Comment author avatarBeverly in ChicagoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

Like sand through an hourglass...

This whole "dog & pony" show is ridiculous!

It's a darn shame these recalirant republicans & tea potty people want tax break for theit rich donors and themselves taken from the blood, sweat & tears of the middle & poor classes.



  • 242 votes
#1.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:34 AM EST
Comment author avatarJob1Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Do not cave on the tax cuts. Seen a message to Grover d!ck weed that his days are over.

  • 224 votes
#1.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:35 AM EST
Comment author avatarPat Boston MA.Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I watched Sen. Harkin on the Senate floor and I agree with him on everything he said. He said those making over $250,000 were part of the 2% wage earners in this country. If that's the case, then the figure should stay at $250,000, not $400,000 or $500,000. If there is a problem with higher cost of living expenses these days compared to the Clinton days, then that should be considered of course.

I like Sen. Reid, I like VP Biden, but it sounds like they're giving up too much in these negotations.

The nation wants the democrats to stick to their principles.

I would rather no deal and wait for a saner Congress to be sworn in in a few days. Just let the tax cuts expire.

At midnight.

  • 201 votes
#1.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:50 AM EST
Comment author avatarBackhouseExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

We have had enough of GOP/Koch:

Setting the wealthiest 1.2% of Americans ---

Against 98.2% of Americans.

House GOP - look out for your constituents and vote so that taxes on ordinary Americans does not go out. Vote Today! It will only take an hour of your over-paid time.

  • 163 votes
#1.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:59 AM EST
Comment author avatarchilledExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Looks like elderly, unemployed, poor, disabled, veterans who are TeaPeople constituents voted for the idiot obstructionists.......

They should be proud that they support the 2%... You, personally, will not come out very well.

Be Proud of your votes TeaPeople Constituents!

  • 134 votes
#1.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:17 PM EST

I was astounded to hear someone yesterday say that in many urban areas, $250,000 really isn't rich. Well, try telling that to someone who makes $25,000 at the Wal Mart in that urban area and is on food stamps. This person went on to say how the 250,000 person might have kids in college at 60K and help out parents--didn't mention the McMansion and vacations, etc. So those people need a tax break but the unemployed don't need any more help and goodbye to the payroll tax reduction.

  • 209 votes
#1.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:20 PM EST
Comment author avatar1funnygirlExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Hi ho, hi ho, it's over the cliff we go!

Obama wants a deal? So where is the "Angry black man" as the red one calls him? Why isn't he sitting down and leading this annual crisis forward? All I have seen is delegation of useless resources to put this to bed.

Would this have been as issue if the Senate didn't table the House bill and negotiate several months ago?

How can Harry complain about the House when he himself does nothing? When was the last budget passed?

But the "Angry black man" should come up riding his white horse to make it happen during the eleventh hour. Our savior, huh?

  • 100 votes
#1.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:24 PM EST
Comment author avatarAmerican Girl-724855Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I can't help but believe that Republicans are just trying to do as much damage to our economy as they possibly can.

Republicans forcing instability and uncertainty into our Economy to continue to hold us all back by creating an atmosphere of uncertainty.

The reason why Republicans are doing everything in their power to stall and hurt our economic recover is because Republicans don't want to have 2 highly successful Democratic Presidents in office one after the other, meaning Democrat President Bill Clinton, and Democrat President Barack Obama.

Republicans never seem to want to do anything really good or great for this country in order to make their "mark" in history, Republicans seem to only be able to come up with plans to create one disaster after another!

  • 235 votes
#1.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:39 PM EST
Comment author avatarjokerjoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

1funnydirl-People with teabags hanging out of heir hair obviously are independent thinkers and could never be led anywhere

  • 58 votes
#1.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:41 PM EST
Comment author avatarsoazDanExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

American Girl: Republicans forcing instability and uncertainty into our Economy to continue to hold us all back by creating an atmosphere of uncertainty.

Wrong!! The dems and Obama have created the instability with their ineffectiveness to get anything worthwhile done and the most uncertainty has been caused by Obamacare. Dems & liberals are nothing but malcontent jealous haters!

  • 90 votes
#1.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:46 PM EST

No one (media included) is talking about Cuts in Defense... I say lets go over the cliff.

My Gen X/Y peers do not let the direction of the conversation be dictated to you.

  • 71 votes
#1.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:47 PM EST
Comment author avataroskar-1391552Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Harry "Dirty " Reid play politics, putting any bill lead to resolve our budgetary and financial trouble coming from the House , under his desk , why .... because it comes fro the Republicans . The dysfunctional Democrat controlled Senate had not pass any budget for the last 3 years , and this lead to the Fiscal Cliff consequences. Now blame Republicans, be my guest.

  • 88 votes
#1.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:47 PM EST
Comment author avatarroybokhadeExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Not a single word, much less a detailed plan on where these additional revenues will go. All I hear is that President Obama wants, "the wealthiest among us to pay a little more". That amount of money is a pittance compared with our yearly deficits and overall debt, so again, what are you going to do with the additional revenues?

Everything else just gets lip service, the debt, entitlements, jobs, etc. We'll deal with all that later? Like Hell you will. He campaigned on this tax increase, so what, he's campaigned twice on debt and deficit, so where is all the passion, and action, and pressers on those specific issues?

This is nothing more than a political stunt that will only divide this country further.

  • 93 votes
#1.13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:48 PM EST
Comment author avatarWallStFatCatExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

America's addiction to borrow-and-spend is bankrutpting the nation. Last year, Congress raised the national debt ceiling and kicked the can down the road, again. As a condition to the passage of a new debt ceiling, Congress created an automatic debt reduction tool, coined the 'fiscal cliff." The idea was that if the new Congress can't agree on a budget that will reduce the national debt, cuts in federal spending will be automatic.

But once again, the corrupt politicans are going back on their words. They want to increase the debt ceiling again to fund the borrow-and-spend addiction. Like a drug addict junkie, Congress can't give up the 'high.' It is apparent that the debt ceiling is a deliberate illusion created to fool the gullible people because Congress raises the debt ceiling whenever spending breach the previous debt ceiling. And this ruse has been going on for at least 50 years. Essentially, America has no debt ceiling, what so ever. The entire debt ceiling is a charade to fool the naive American people who are as stupid as sheeps that eat whatever Congress place in front of their face.

  • 69 votes
#1.14 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:49 PM EST
Comment author avatardrpaultylerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

YOu libbies are clueless. What happened to Barry's balanced approach. Bunch of smoke and mirrors, just say what it takes to get elected. HELL IT WORKED.

  • 86 votes
#1.15 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:52 PM EST

The Fiscal Cliff Illusion

Once you study the history of banking and finance; you will understand that the current US government consists mostly of self serving puppet lap dogs who kowtow to their international banker masters rather than serve the majority of citizens “We The People”. After financing both sides of every war since the conception of the United States, bastardizing commerce with their monetary system monopoly, benefiting only their greed and lust, the international banker cartel says we owe them a national debt. Now they figure they are entitled to take away benefits we worked for like slave laborers, to pay back FIAT money they created from nowhere by slight of hand mystical boga boo. The fiscal cliff is a crock, we owe them less than nothing. In realty those banksters owe us for centuries of illegal immoral unconstitutional monetary system monopolization by war profiteering bean counters; it's historical fact. For keeping our nation in perpetual utter moral default; it is they that are ethically bankrupt, we don't owe them, they owe us. It is time we follow our Constitution, Codes 18 USC § 242 and 42 USC § 1983 demanding a people's monetary system managed by our elected representatives based on the value of work and being humane rather than on corruption, usury and infinite greed.

Under Article 1 Section 8, assigning various powers to Congress, Clause 2 gives our Congress the authority to regulate commerce; impossible once they gave away the control of the monetary system to private international interests. In Clause 4 of this Section, Congress, elected officials, replaceable every two years, are to regulate the value of money, not a private for-profit banker cabal. On to Article 1, Section 9, clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published...” Under the criminal Federal Reserve, there is no public money, just public debt. Coincidentally on the day before the 9/11/01 attacks, Donald Rumsfeld said the Pentagon lost over a trillion dollars. Monetary system monopolizers and war profiteers are the same 'klan'; if not, wouldn't the bankers find out where that money went? The next Clause begins, “ No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States:”. Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Chairman is also on the board of the Bank for International Settlements, the national debt is a fleecing of slavery. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional just like the First Bank charter to the Rothschilds. December 23, 1913 was not the first time we were sold out by our de facto lap dog government. Study Abe Lincoln and greenback interest free US dollars used to finance the Union Civil War effort. Study John F. Kennedy executive order 11110. For a short time, the US Treasury printed money independent of the bankster Reserve. Money is for fair exchange of goods and services. We shall be free at last.

  • 56 votes
#1.16 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:53 PM EST

They'll end up pushing almost all of it further out, 6 months or so. Then when we hit it again, they'll be running around like chickens with their heads cut of, AGAIN.

I wonder how much of this mess is so they can push the stock market around, and buy/sell accordingly.

  • 37 votes
#1.17 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:54 PM EST
Comment author avatarRepublicansForObama-6186389Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Praise the Lord! Halleluliah! God Bless America!

Thank God! and I mean Thank God!

that Mr. OBAMA is PRESIDENT of our United States of America for the NEXT FOUR YEARS

and NOT Mitt ROMNEY and his QUEEN ANNE.

Ain't Life Grand? all you Republicans and Teabaggers?

and in just a couple of Hours, Mr. Obama will have RAISED the TAXES

on All you NON-PAYING WHITE RICH REPUBLICANS that have AVOIDED

PAYING your FAIR SHARE of TAXES for the LAST TEN (10) YEARS!

You know who you are!

Does it GET ANY BETTER than this?

I don't think so!

ps. and for all you Crazy-Wacko TEABAGGERS,

OBAMA really was BORN in KENYA.

TRUMP was RIGHT about that One.

Too LATE NOW!

OBAMA gets RE-SWORN in as MASTER, RULER, and OVERLORD

of all you REPUBLICANS and TEABAGGERS in just the Next couple of Days!

LET the PARTY BEGIN !!!

  • 54 votes
#1.18 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:59 PM EST

Like sand through an hourglass...

Just like the Soap Opera....these are the "Days of our Lives"!

Actors pretending to be legislators!

  • 65 votes
#1.19 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:00 PM EST

Ermmm...taxes will go up on almost all people...did you know that?

  • 24 votes
#1.20 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:06 PM EST

Democrats want to kick the can down the road and continue borrowing, printing money to increase spending instead to fix the economy , why..... because it will require unpopular measures, so what they do , let Republicans bring the unpopular solutions and use them has a punching ball and accuse them to go against the poor, the elderly and others, selling the phony idea that increasing the taxes to small business , high meddle class, and millionaires are the solution to our financial problems . This is the dirty game of Democrats , taking hostage our future generations with more and more debt . Shame of them.

  • 58 votes
#1.21 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:06 PM EST
Comment author avatarLarry Robinson-1323081Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

there is unfortunately no cure for liberal idiocy like that of "RepublicansforObama".

There is a special sickness involved in some people actually loving being enslaved to a totalitarian govt.

Even more sick is the love of stealing from others as marxist liberalism is founded upon

  • 74 votes
#1.22 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:07 PM EST
Comment author avatarGeorgeL-2420748Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Where is our President, why he is leading. You know, leading from behind everyone else where it is safe. He has what he wants, 4 more years. Let everyone else fend and figure it out for themselves.

Won't find him rolling up his sleeves and getting dirty!

  • 62 votes
#1.23 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:07 PM EST
Comment author avatar3thirty3Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL "Like sand through an hourglass...

This whole "dog & pony" show is ridiculous!

Why don't they just put the Presidents plan on the floor for a vote?"

Because your boy, dirty Harry, will not bring it to the floor. This is what he has been doing for 2 years.

  • 76 votes
#1.24 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:08 PM EST

"Actors pretending to be legislators!"

I'm not a legislator, but I play one on TV.

  • 11 votes
#1.25 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:08 PM EST

There you go again crazy Larry,

enslaved to a totalitarian govt.

Even more sick is the love of stealing from others as marxist liberalism is founded upon

Who is enslaved? How are taxes marxism?

Hyperbole is entertaining to a point, but.....

We have a representative democracy, "we" as a people elected our Representatives who passes laws to collect taxes. You, by law, have to pay taxes based on your income, among other factors.

NOT paying said taxes is a crime. Since when is crime freedom?

Since when is obeying the laws enacted through representative democracy Communist?

  • 58 votes
#1.26 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:13 PM EST

@American Girl-724855#1.8: Your belief is historical fact. Conservative republicans have always wished to exact legislative punishment upon the poor, infirm, disabled, and general working class people. They never miss any opportunity to pile as much harshness upon them as they can think of. In fact, these conservatives base this on the known economic failure of "Austrian" economic discipline, that is the direct opposite of a variety of known workable monetarists models, which incorporate relief and fairness to the aforementioned. I have always found it quite ironic when conservatives call "progressives" communistic because they wish to take care of such people, while at the same time, communist governments have histories of treating their classes of such people in the very same way as the republican conservatives wish to do. Regards

  • 63 votes
#1.27 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:15 PM EST
Comment author avatarTalk to the HandExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Funny I saw one MSM reporter on the noon news that said that Obama was the one making it difficult, NOT the GOP.

Announcement at 1:30 today from the WH with Obama and some "middle class folks" in attendance. Tell me, where do you get middle class folks on a holiday on an hour or two notice?

  • 48 votes
#1.28 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:16 PM EST
Comment author avatarLar-345817Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The problem with the Democrats plan is the definition of rich. First they define it as $250K and above. Then they have equated rich to bad. They need to first define the number properly, more like $500K per year. And second they have to stop class warfare.

And by the way, letting taxes rise on those making $250K and above only solves the deficit by 2%. They need to accept cost cuts.

  • 45 votes
#1.29 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:16 PM EST

As I watch this painful exercise continue, it is very obvious to me the underlying problem is that the Republicans will not agree to much the President proposes and would rather let the country suffer in so many ways. Even after a good victory in November for the President, nothing has changed for Republicans...they are still hell bent on doing everything within their caucus to make sure he will not succeed.

We are still back where we were on the night of Jan 20, 2009 when 15 members of the GOP met to plot and plan how to ruin the Presidency of the first African American President and the country he was duly elected by, to make him a one term and ruin the financial health of the country and many of its citizens....what cowards and traitors Republicans have representing them.

  • 90 votes
#1.30 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:16 PM EST

LAr

The problem with the Democrats plan is the definition of rich. First they define it as $250K and above. Then they have equated rich to bad.

What Democrat has ever done that?

It's just not true.

Democrats want all Americans to do well. Some will do very well. Those that have done very well, have done well enough to afford a slightly higher tax rate.

That's not "equating the rich to be bad", that's expecting the wealthy to pay more in tax, that's it.

  • 70 votes
#1.31 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:22 PM EST
Comment author avatarfuzzy44Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Tick Tock Tick Tock! Speaker Boehner! Time is running out! You'll get to explain to the good hard working people of Ohio why you failed them and the rest of the country so miserably!

Watch your back! little Eric is going to try to slip it between your ribs!

He already slipped it between your cheeks!

  • 51 votes
#1.32 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:23 PM EST

Who is enslaved?

The only enslavement happening right now comes from the tea party - and it is more akin to hostage taking. Watching the Tea Party Express vomit bag Amy Kremer on Up with Chris this weekend was simply astounding. If you gave her everything she wanted in exchange for a 1% tax increase, her final offer is to kill the hostage. In fact, every possible offer would entail killing the hostage - which begs the question, why negotiate with the Tea Party terrorists? They are bent on destroying the country for ideology, and just like a jihadist, are more than willing to kill the hostage, just for fun.

  • 53 votes
#1.33 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:23 PM EST

" Then they have equated rich to bad.."

For the gazillionth time- NO they have not. iIch doesn't = bad, it's HOW a lot of that wealth was obtained that is the issue. As in- "if I can send YOUR job to China, I get to keep MORE for ME".

Get it yet?

(and 1funny girl- pls bring back the cleavage. Fox will never hire you on account of Whylie Cyote falling off a cliff for the 'gazillionth' time.

  • 40 votes
#1.34 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:24 PM EST

Feisty, Senator Harkin is a good one! Had a terrific conversation with him during the campaign regarding the filibuster. Senator Harkin's words this morning are a warning to democrats and republicans.

While I give credit to Reid, McConnell, VP Biden and the others for trying to find middle ground, my guess is that Reid and VP Biden know that no deal will suit these recalcitrant republicans who are stuck on stupid and oblivious to what the American people want. It is better for democrats to keep pushing and trying even if they know this isn't likely to be resolved by midnight tonight. Too many GOPers were willing to allow the Government to default on the debt THEY built, why should we think they'll vote to increase taxes on a small percentage of rich people when they've pledged their loyalty and their honor to some yahoo who couldn't be elected to be dogcatcher?

  • 50 votes
#1.35 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:25 PM EST

Talk,

Tell me, where do you get middle class folks on a holiday on an hour or two notice?

Duh, 80-90% of the population is middle class. You open the door and shout. It's not like you have to find a millionaire with AB+ blood, Taysachs disease, taller than 6 foot 4, and blind in one eye.

  • 42 votes
#1.36 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:26 PM EST

The problem with the Democrats plan is the definition of rich. First they define it as $250K and above. Then they have equated rich to bad.

Being asked to pay slightly more in taxes so that it can help fix our deficit problems isn't the same as stringing you up from a tree. Get some perspective.

  • 41 votes
#1.37 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:27 PM EST
Comment author avatarBeverly in ChicagoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

1funnygirl

Hi ho, hi ho, it's over the cliff we go!

Obama wants a deal? So where is the "Angry black man" as the red one calls him? Why isn't he sitting down and leading this annual crisis forward? All I have seen is delegation of useless resources to put this to bed.

1funnygirl,

Here is one "Angry Black Lady'" wishing you break your damn neck whether you go over the cliff or not. Your hateful ass needs a functional brain. It's people like you have eat the @!$%# coming out the elephant asses have truly affected your thinking.

Would this have been as issue if the Senate didn't table the House bill and negotiate several months ago?

How can Harry complain about the House when he himself does nothing? When was the last budget passed?

You know perfectly well why they are in the Senate . Why should we Americans accept the same old dumb @!$%# that caused the "Great Recession"? Harry does nothing??? Thanks for letting everyone know just how much bull@!$%# you consume. John Bonehead does nothing apart from pulling stunts and sending his caucus home which, by the way, also does nothing when they are in the Chamber except act like clowns. They obstruct and conjure up some of the most vile conspiracy theories. When they are not doing that, Bonehead allows his caucus to attack American with outlandish divisive legislation.



  • 47 votes
#1.38 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:27 PM EST

Small business -

Any other time to get close to the Pres at the WH it takes hours and hours of screening and background checks goof ball. You telling me that all got done this quickly? I think it was a planned staging and they have been ready for days.

Once again another "impromptu" get together by the Wizard of OB

  • 23 votes
#1.39 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:31 PM EST

Gingerbread

".........ruin the Presidency of the first African American President and the country he was duly elected"

It has nothing to do with race, this is about politics. Prove what your remarks or move on.

  • 19 votes
#1.40 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:31 PM EST

Senator Harkin is a good one!

Jody,

He sure is! Him and Dick Durbin are two of the good guys! ;o)

At this point, I'm inclined to agree with Pat, let's go over the "curb" and take our chances with a saner Congress in a couple of days...

My New Years Eve is complete, not only did the lunatic pastor Larry show up, but he has bat @!$%# crazy Cheryl in tow! lol

SWEET!

  • 34 votes
#1.41 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:32 PM EST

Democrats want to kick the can down the road and continue borrowing, printing money to increase spending instead to fix the economy

"Continuing borrowing" IS what is fixing the economy. If we had started to pay down the debt exactly when the markets were in crisis, the way you people advocate, we would be in another Great Depression, not on the way to recovery. As it is, your badmouthing and obstructionism has kept us from being as far along on the recovery as we should be. The deficit is down, and that is because we had better tax receipts - and we have better tax receipts because Obama's policies are working - exactly the same policies that he is hated for and derided by you.

, why..... because it will require unpopular measures, so what they do , let Republicans bring the unpopular solutions and use them has a punching ball and accuse them to go against the poor, the elderly and others, selling the phony idea that increasing the taxes to small business , high meddle class, and millionaires are the solution to our financial problems . This is the dirty game of Democrats , taking hostage our future generations with more and more debt . Shame of them.

Right. Shame on them that Democrats are trying to leave future generations with a thriving economy. How terrible.

You know, Republicans have, so far, managed to get away scotfree for repeated attempts at destroying the country and the economic damage they have already caused.

  • 40 votes
#1.42 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:32 PM EST

With no action at all today, even the poor will see an increase in taxes. This appears to be ok for your Democrat leaders as they are unwilling to meet in the middle regarding cost reductions. Blame the R's all you want, but the D's are going to let this tax increase hit everyone. They all suck and you partisan idiots in here do too.

  • 25 votes
#1.43 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:33 PM EST

At this point, I'm inclined to agree with Pat, let's go over the "curb" and take our chances with a saner Congress in a couple of days...

It's what is going to happen anyway, and it was pretty obvious a month ago. Yet, it would have been irresponsible for the Democrats, including Obama to not make the best effort they could muster in order to avoid it.

Basically, Obama is going to get 100% of what the country needs. The Republicans could have used their leverage to extract some concessions from him, but they chose all or nothing. "Nothing" is better for the country, so really, this is all working out the best for all of us, idiotic as it all looks.

  • 24 votes
#1.44 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:35 PM EST

But the officials said the White House and Republicans were at an impasse over what to do about automatic, across-the-board spending cuts set to start taking effect Tuesday. Democrats want to put off the cuts for one year and offset them with unspecified revenue.

Last sentence says it all. Typical. And if left this way and to the Dems, they will never happen. Just like the past. You libs kill me.

  • 27 votes
#1.45 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:39 PM EST

Some good news:

Sam Stein:Obama is getting lots of stimulative tax policy extensions in exchange for giving in on individual rates huff.to/12TuLrR

No entitlement cuts either.

Not all bad.

  • 21 votes
#1.46 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:40 PM EST

Come on, Mr. President; stick to your guns on the tax issue. If not, I'm actually begging the GOP to filibuster this thing in the Senate or oppose it in the House. If they do, we automatically go back to the $250,000 threshold, higher estate taxes, and more revenue; we can negotiate everything else retroactively. I don't give a damn about what the markets and the GOP would say; I highly doubt that those making over $250,000 cannot handle a $46 dollar tax increase for every $1,000 over $250,000. In fact, they ought to be lucky that the Democrats nowadays have little to no spine or are very willing to compromise; I'd simply let the fiscal cliff happen and stay off (but reduce its immediate effect with $1.2 trillion in spending over 3 years and $450 billion in tax cuts for those making less than $100,000 a year).

  • 18 votes
#1.47 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:41 PM EST

You know, Republicans have, so far, managed to get away scotfree for repeated attempts at destroying the country and the economic damage they have already caused.

Don't be so sure, Byron. This current generation is as dumb as soup (no offense to you), but my generation won't be so forgiving over these brainless bastards and traitors. At least that's what I think.

  • 23 votes
#1.48 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:44 PM EST

Feisty-

If King Obama had a clue his party would take a vote on his "plan" but even they know he doesn't have any idea what to do with the mess he's making.

  • 26 votes
#1.49 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:48 PM EST

Basically, Obama is going to get 100% of what the country needs

Obama is going to get 100% of nothing, this is another can down the road. This is not wath the country needs. The Country need real solutions and this is not happening under the lead of Obama.

  • 25 votes
#1.50 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:49 PM EST

Wrong!! The dems and Obama have created the instability with their ineffectiveness to get anything worthwhile done and the most uncertainty has been caused by Obamacare ...

You've got this so twisted. The Democrats (and even the House leadership) can't get anything done because the TP Republicans would rather destroy this country than vote for anything that isn't exactly in accord with their own wishes.

  • 41 votes
#1.51 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:52 PM EST

1. The top 1% pay 36.7% of the income taxes while earning 16.9% of the income

2. Those in the 25-50% quintile paid 11% of the income taxes while earning 20.7% of the income (25-50% group AGI between 33,396-66,193)

When you add in Social Security & Medicare taxes paid:

Top 1%-27.6% of ALL Federal Tax Revenue with an effective tax rate of 31.2%

In contrast, the bottom 60% pay 14.2% of all Federal Tax Revenue including SS/Medicare Taxes

The EFFECTIVE tax rate for the bottom 20% is 4.3%

Refundable tax credits actually narrow the total tax liability and tax share to nearly ZERO for the bottom 40% of tax payers

http://tinyurl.com/3jbvb2t

In 1980 the top 1% paid 19% of the income taxes

In 2007 at the height of the receipts of income taxes, the top 1% paid 40% of the income taxes.

Tax cuts have shifted the burden from the middle class to the wealthy who pay most of the taxes (including Payroll Taxes)

http://taxfoundation.org/article/summary-latest-federal-individual-income-tax-data-0

  • 18 votes
#1.52 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:53 PM EST

Republicans also wanted retirement age raised.

President Obama said - nope.

  • 32 votes
#1.53 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:06 PM EST

Where is the "balanced approach" Obama promised ? Where are his proposed spending cuts ??

  • 31 votes
#1.54 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:08 PM EST

Can't solve the budget problems.... but has the audacity to give Congress a RAISE?

When an EMPLOYEE fails to do thier job.... you FIRE THEM.......

Congress is our EMPLOYEES... they are NOT our masters..... they work for us......

Time to CLEAN the HOUSE.................. FIRE THEM ALL.................

  • 38 votes
#1.55 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:10 PM EST
Comment author avatarPaul-401431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Oskar and Larry,

You are wasting your time argueing with these deadhead Democrats. After all Roselle has always admired Sen. Harkin even though his plan is to be an obstructionist. Isn't that the word they use about Repulicans? Hmm, I guess it doesn't apply to Democrats. Giving the facts to any of them will never make a difference. They ar on the Obama train and if it goes over a cliff ---well that would be the Repulicans fault. You need to remember that it's always the Republicans fault. Even when it's not. They tend to ignore the truth because it seems it get in the way of they're cheering.. Perhaps they can't do the pyramid when they are balancing on unfamiliar truth. to paraphrase a movie I actually like

Democrats ---good

Republicans --- BAD

Mongo like beans

  • 20 votes
#1.56 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:12 PM EST

Oskar.........If you don't think race plays a factor in all these political shenanigans, you don't want to see it.

It's the biggest elephant in the room since he was elected in 2008, read some of the posts in the archives here and elsewhere. Read some of the current posts here and elsewhere......you'll find it.

  • 32 votes
#1.57 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:15 PM EST

THIS IS THE BARRACK HUSSEIN, “MAKE-AMERICA-MORE-LIKE-FRANCE” FISCAL PLAN.

This is made up of two parts, the good part and the bad part.

The good part is the so-called sequester, which is the inside-the-beltway term for automatic spending cuts. Actually they’re not really spending cuts, our criminal government is too cowardly to demand real cuts. They’re just reductions in the growth of spending. If sequester takes place, total federal spending will climb by $2 trillion over the next 10 years instead of $2.1 trillion.

Anything that restrains the burden that government spending is a good idea, so a small step is better than nothing.

The bad part is the automatic tax hike. This means higher tax rates for all taxpayers, as well as increased double taxation of dividends and capital gains.

This would be very bad for the economy, not to mention terrible fiscal policy. This is because politicians would have very little incentive to control budgetary waste, fraud, abuse and corruption.

To show the world how dysfunctional this has become Barrack Hussein has decided to make this a class-warfare plan that would repeal the sequester and maintain—and exacerbate—the tax hikes on the newly defined “rich”.

We give up the only bit of spending restraint that was included in the 2011 debt limit agreement and we get a bunch of tax increases that undermine growth and competitiveness.

But it gets worse. Obama wants to double the size of the soak-the-rich tax hikes, thus maximizing the potential harm to job creation. In other words, not just the automatic tax increases, but then additional tax hikes on top of that—all designed to penalize success and innovation.

Rich is no longer defined as a millionaire or even a billionaire. It doesn’t even really define it by a value, now it’s simply a percentage. The mean, nasty, rich top 1% or 2% are now the new bogeymen in our Republic.

According to Barrack Hussein no one in America should become rich, only the Ivy League faculty-lounge elitists should have that privilege. The rest of American’s can only obtain the lofty goal of being middle-class. And obviously many, especially those on the Left of the aisle, are submitting to that. They have lost all their ambition to be more than middle-class. They are willing to just kneel and succumb to the government.

Real Americans refuse this insult to our integrity. If you become rich, God Bless you. If all you want to be is mediocre, God Bless you. Either way it should be YOUR choice and neither of those aspirations should be demonized. Being rich, middle class and rich is what all societies are made up of. To think you can just eliminate ambition with legislation is idiotic.

If Barrack Hussein succeeds, he’ll be rewarded for dogmatism, but he won’t find a pot of gold at the end of the class-war rainbow. Successful taxpayers will just adjust their behavior in ways that reduce taxable income, which means the government won’t get much money even though it will impose a lot of damage.

But damage is exactly what the Barrack Hussein administration wants

  • 28 votes
#1.58 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:18 PM EST

At 12:01 AM the taxes go up an Grover will go off the cliff.

  • 29 votes
#1.59 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:18 PM EST

Larry, what you fail to mention is that the top 2% paying the higher income tax rates also take home 51% of the income earned nationally meaning the other 98% divide the remaining 49%. Now, to a thinking person that should register that 98% of the population's incomes are stagnant and/or declining so it is little wonder that the 98% earning less and less would be paying less and less in income taxes. And don't forget, the 98% are paying a greater share of their annual income in payroll taxes, state income and sales taxes, local option sales taxes as well as gasoline taxes. In other words, Larry, your comment is only partially correct because it only considers a very small portion of the facts.

  • 36 votes
#1.60 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:19 PM EST

Hello folks, let me preface my comments by saying I’m a political atheist, I don’t care what political religion you attach yourself to. While the Republican Democrat blame gamers contribute to the monomaniacal dysfunctional government, it’s always the middle class and poor who pay for this intransigence. They have the blame gamers battling for what type of austerity is to be imposed.

The US economy is caught in a no-win feedback loop.

Corporate wealth translates into political power through campaign financing, corporate lobbying and the revolving door of jobs between government and industry; and political power translates into further wealth through tax cuts, deregulation and sweetheart contracts between government and industry. Wealth begets power, and power begets wealth.

There are four key sectors of US business and their control mechanism that exemplify this feedback loop and the takeover of political power in America by the ”corporatocracy”.

First is the well-known military-industrial complex. As President Eisenhower famously warned in his farewell address in January 1961, the linkage of the military and private industry created a political power so pervasive that America has been condemned to militarization, useless wars and fiscal waste on a scale of many tens of trillions of dollars since then. If you don’t think those in power won’t start useless wars to maintain the military economy you have been sleeping.

Second is the Wall Street- Federal Reserve - Washington complex, which has steered the financial system towards control by a few politically powerful Wall Street firms, notably Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and a handful of other financial firms. We have a two headed one party system serving their masters the banksters/Federal Reserve and Wall Street.

These days, almost every US Treasury secretary, Republican or Democrat, comes from Wall Street and goes back there when his term ends. The close ties between Wall Street and Washington paved the way for the 2008 financial crisis and the mega-bailouts that followed, through reckless deregulation followed by an almost complete lack of oversight by government.

Third is the Big Oil-transport-military complex, which has put the US on the trajectory of heavy oil-imports dependence and a deepening military trap in the Middle East.

Since the days of John D. Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Trust a century ago, Big Oil has loomed large in American politics and foreign policy. Big Oil teamed up with the automobile industry to steer America away from mass transit and towards gas-guzzling vehicles driving on a nationally financed highway system.

Big Oil has consistently and successfully fought the intrusion of competition from non-oil energy sources, including wind, solar power, fusion and Magrav technologies.

It has been at the side of the Pentagon in making sure that America defends the sea-lanes to the Persian Gulf, in effect ensuring a $US100 billion-plus annual subsidy for a fuel that is otherwise dangerous for national security. That is why we attack, kill, overthrow regimes and displace millions of people in countries around the world such as Yemen, Oman, Libya, Somalia, Egypt, Iraq, etc.

And Big Oil has played a notorious role in the fight to keep climate change off the US agenda. Exxon-Mobil, Koch Industries and others in the sector have underwritten a generation of anti-scientific propaganda to confuse the American people.

Fourth is the healthcare industry, America’s largest industry, absorbing no less than 17 per cent of US gross domestic product.

The key to understanding this sector is to note that the government partners with industry to reimburse costs with little systematic oversight and control. Pharmaceutical firms set sky-high prices protected by patent rights (there is no money in the cure only in treating the disease), Medicare (for the aged) and Medicaid (for the poor) and private insurers reimburse doctors and hospitals on a cost-plus basis, and the American Medical Association restricts the supply of new doctors through the control of placements at medical schools.

The result of this pseudo-market system is sky-high costs, large profits for the private healthcare sector, and no political will to reform. While health care remains a privilege in the US wealth remains a birthright for the elite.

There is absolutely no economic crisis in corporate America because to maintain these behemoths, austerity is imposed on the middle class and poor through some form of taxation. Unfortunately the sheeple contribute to this psychopathy by blaming themselves through the propaganda of the bloodsucking leeches that caused this mess to begin with.

Consider the pulse of the corporate sector as opposed to the pulse of the employees working in it: corporate profits in 2010 were at an all-time high, chief executive salaries in 2010 rebounded strongly from the financial crisis, Wall Street compensation in 2010 was at an all-time high, several Wall Street firms paid civil penalties for financial abuses, but no senior banker faced any criminal charges, and there were no adverse regulatory measures that would lead to a loss of profits in finance, health care, military supplies and energy. These same groups perpetrate irrecoverable atrocities on the global community and are immune to the laws that govern the rest of us.

All the while the most vial corporation ever imagined and created, the Federal Reserve which is neither Federal nor a reserve is bankrolling these industries through near zero percent loans, subsidies or outright taxpayer bail outs through their central planning role that has been granted to them via our government’s abdication of control of the creation of our countries currency.

Unless we remove the tentacles of the Military Industrial Complex, Wall Street, Big Oil, and Big Pharma and cut the head off of this monster that is the Federal Reserve we will all be pulled under only to suffer egregious taxation through the underhanded chicanery called austerity.

  • 31 votes
#1.61 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:22 PM EST

The EFFECTIVE tax rate for the bottom 20% is 4.3%

Acctualy it is much less

here are the averages

0-30K on average pays 0% income taxes and 20% of that group gets a larger return than they paid. that is 3/5ths of the country

40-50K pays an average of 3.2% income taxes.

50-75K pays and average of 5.7% income taxes when we made 72K a few years ago we paid 4.7%

75-100K paid an average of 7.2% Last year we made 91K and paid 6.13% income taxes and no mortgage deduction. This is now over 4/5ths of the country

in-fact the average income taxes don't reach 9.9% until 200K.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/18/news/economy/Romney_effective_tax_rate/index.htm

I say Americans need a good tax increase and we also need to increase the fuel tax to average European levels. Think about it we made 72K a few years ago and paid 4.6% income taxes. and last year we made 91K and paid 6%

  • 5 votes
#1.62 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:31 PM EST

Howdy Feisty and Peep's, good job of nailing it down (usual writers) ... the Republicans have to show real movement above and beyond what they are going to lose automatically in a matter of hours. If all they want to do is obstruct and threaten to harm hostages - then "No Deal" is the way I feel.

  • 22 votes
#1.63 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:31 PM EST

Blah blah blah. Face it folks (even though you get great joy in bashing Republicans only), this whole thing is a charade. To tax the 2% at a higher rate will only deal with less than 8% of the deficit over a ten year period (look it up if you want to make an educated comment rather than a litany). The middle class MUST take its lumps also if anyone is even half way serious about solving the deficit mess; and the less than middle class also. WE have put ourselves into this mess AND we all are going to pay. Get your head out of the sand. To say other wise is simply a lie

  • 14 votes
#1.64 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:43 PM EST

Bev the racist is fumming LOL...

Gingerbread Mamma

Oskar.........If you don't think race plays a factor in all these political shenanigans, you don't want to see it.

Proof or is this just more Liberal conjecture.

As in- "if I can send YOUR job to China, I get to keep MORE for ME".

ah an enviroment that is encouraged by our government and politicians both D and R, left and right. One where Imperator Obama has been quick to fix right? Get it?

It explains why most FR lefty posters support the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.

  • 18 votes
#1.65 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:50 PM EST

Real American's voted for President Obama.

Real Americans are behind our great President 100%.

Real Amreican's know Republican economic policies have bankrupted this great country over the last 30 years and its the Republicans who created class warfare from Bush's Tax cuts back in 2001 and 2003.

Yep, the Republican's stole our hard-earned working American's money and gave it to the rich under the guise of the Bush Tax cuts.

That is what class warefare truly is.

And that's what Republicans are. Stick it to the little guy; stick it to the hard working, REAL American's.

Then you got the Blow-hards like Rush and Faux Newzzzzz who keep lying to their kool-aid-kooks because they are too un-educated to know they are they are the chumps of Right Wing media.

The Majority of Real Americans are sick of the Tea Nuts, sick of the Propaganda Kool-aid peddlers like Drudge, Rush, and Faux Newzzzz, and they are sick of Obstructionism that keeps the little guy down.

Shame on this House of Representatives for killing jobs and preventing hard working Americans from moving up and trying to live the American dream.

Come November 2014, REAL Americans will boot all the Boehner's and McConnells out of office and we will finally be able to restore American to it's greatness once again.

Salud

  • 34 votes
#1.66 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:51 PM EST

Jody- evidently you have a reading disability

the top 1% earn 16.9% of the income, not 51% as you falsely claimed.

in fact those in the 25-50% group 20.7% of the income, which is more than 16.9% according to my grade school arithmetic

  • 11 votes
#1.67 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:52 PM EST

Auto 101

Conveniently you ignore: Payroll Taxes, Sales Taxes, Excise Taxes, Property Taxes, State income taxes, School taxes and a bunch more that low income people pay from dollar #1.

That's why Mitt Romney's meager 14% rung so soundly with the American people. With all the other taxes, his rate maybe hit 15%.

I made what I think is a LOT of money last year, made a bit under $250K, and paid 19% in Federal income taxes.

Explain to me how that's right, that's OK? Someone making well under $1M pays a lower rate than someone making $20M?

  • 22 votes
#1.68 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:53 PM EST

My guess, some "watered down" version of KICKING THE FISCAL CAN DOWN THE ROAD ONCE AGAIN, will be passed at the last minute, or shortly there after by this Congress, failing to address the REAL ISSUES America needs to address.

Extending unemployment, no tax raises on the "middle class" (whatever that is) and some spending cuts, to be implemented down the road to be cut, will be passed at the last minute.

In other words, get ready for the NEXT CONGRESSIONAL MESS which is raising the FEDERAL DEBT CEILING ONCE AGAIN in a month or so.

To be continued.....

  • 5 votes
#1.69 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:54 PM EST

Real American's voted for President Obama.

Real Americans are behind our great President 100%.

sure Comrade. lets do away with Democracy then we all can be 'Americans'.

seems like Libs try to overcompensate for their patriotism and being American by telling everyone they are more than the next. right COMRADE?

  • 20 votes
#1.70 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:56 PM EST
Comment author avatarSmBusOwnerinNYExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

LArry,

Since 1980 incomes of the upper 1% have increased 300% while incomes of the bottom 90% have increased 10%. It stands to reason that the share of taxes they pay should have gone up.

Your numbers say proportion of taxes paid went up from 19% to 36%. That's less than 2x.

Given the 3x change in income relative to the bottom taxpayers, why not 3x more in tax? only 2x? Why's that?

  • 22 votes
#1.71 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:57 PM EST

Larry, what you fail to mention is that the top 2% paying the higher income tax rates also take home 51% of the income earned nationally

I call utter bull @!$%# on this one. Care to back this up with ANY credible source?

The table also tells us a number of things about equality or inequality, namely that the top 1% of tax payers pay 38% of all income taxes yet only have a 20% share of total AGI. Furthermore, the top 50% of tax payers pay practically all of the nation’s federal taxes (97.3%) while commanding 87.25% of total AGI. This table from the IRS is the source for the often politically bantered argument that 47% of American income earners pay zero federal income taxes.

http://www.financialsamurai.com/2011/04/12/how-much-money-do-the-top-income-earners-make-percent/

I will accept that the top 5% earn 35% of income earned nationally. (they do pay 59% of all income tax just for fairness).

Further the top 2% actually earn around 13% of income and pay 17% of the total federal income tax (2009 figures).

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/12/cbo-report-confirms-rich-already-pay-their-fair-share/

  • 7 votes
#1.72 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:59 PM EST

Obama gave all federal workers a raise, by excutive order releasing freeze on wages. in effect giving congress more of our money, to screw with our economy!

  • 20 votes
#1.73 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:00 PM EST

RepublicansforObama - Rich people not paying their taxes...? You mean John Kerry, Tim Geitner, and Charlie Rangle.?

I swear....You liberals are too stupid to even breathe. Romney didn't cheat on his taxes. He used tax law and paid what the law requires. Your Democrats are the ones cheating on their taxes.

What part of this do you not understand? They vote to raise your taxes while cheating on theirs. Why would you support someone that does this?

  • 19 votes
#1.74 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:00 PM EST

@nonamericangirl-you got that all backwards, it's the other way around. You need to be reeducated-don't where you were educated at. You can't keep spending money you don't have and when you don't have it and your debt is more than you have coming in, you need to stop spending-it doesn't get any simpler than that. DUH!!!

  • 12 votes
#1.75 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:01 PM EST

Real Amreican's know Republican economic policies have bankrupted this great country over the last 30 years and its the Republicans who created class warfare from Bush's Tax cuts back in 2001 and 2003.

If Republicans created class warfare from the Bush Tax cuts why is every Democrat who can get in front of a microphone wanting 98% of them extended?

You make no sense.

  • 21 votes
#1.76 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:11 PM EST

You libs are amazing...only in Demo-world is a group of legislators who want the federal government to spend no more than it takes in and stop the generational theft of our kids (who now owe over $50k compared to less than $25k before Obama and the Dems took over spending less than 6 years ago) as radical crazies....

Quick question...how much is one's "fair share"? No one on the left that I know of has actually said...here is the tax rates I want for a solid economy.

Speaking of an up or down vote on Obozo's plan, well he did the impossible the past two years...he got both houses of Congress to totally agree on something...that his budget's stunk....zero votes...ZERO!!! And you want us to use his plan? Please...

And to those who think Obozo has the American people behind him...nope...less than 51% of the voters voted for him...in other words, over 49% think he has the wrong vision for America!!! So, raise taxes like Boehner offered, but CUT SPENDING!!!!!

  • 16 votes
#1.77 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:12 PM EST
Comment author avatarGOPisextinctExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

mr. president,

don't cave

and don't come back without boehner's head on a pike!!

  • 22 votes
#1.78 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:13 PM EST

Paws,

You can always find somebody who doesn't pay their taxes. Republicans aren't pious on this subject either. One guy on here called me a Communist because I said he has to pay his taxes.

Whether Romney cheated is irrelevant (it is now anyway). What we've always complained about is that somebody making $20M shouldn't be paying less than somebody making $200K.

I'll stand by that any day of the week. How can YOU stand by the opposite?

  • 28 votes
#1.79 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:14 PM EST

Gingerbread Mamma

Oskar.........If you don't think race plays a factor in all these political shenanigans, you don't want to see it.

It's the biggest elephant in the room since he was elected in 2008, read some of the posts in the archives here and elsewhere. Read some of the current posts here and elsewhere......you'll find it

Is that the best you can get to prove that 15 Republicans plot against Obama, " read some post" , you are ridiculous. Too much ginger mama.

  • 10 votes
#1.80 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:16 PM EST

You make no sense.

Alan, Comrade Grandesky has his trusty Manifesto next to the computer, with a RSS feed straight from Pravda.

That is what class warefare truly is.

and Lenin Loves you. For the motherland Comrade!

  • 11 votes
#1.81 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:16 PM EST

Iconoclast - You nailed it on the head. The problem of this forum is that you still have people thinking that no spending problem exists.

Sure, taxes will have to go up on everyone to get out of the hole, but until the spending side is actually addressed, nothing will ever improve.

Unfortunately, not many people are bright enough in this forum to get it. They're stuck on sound bites and jealous of people who are more successful than they are. They are not even bright enough to understand that the "tax the rich" is not even a substantial dent on the deficit....but, it may soothe their jealousy for a little while...until they realize that their taxes went up on Jan 1 anyway.

  • 12 votes
#1.82 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:19 PM EST

No matter what happens tomorrow the payroll tax cut will not be extended. Never part of the current negotiations.

re: CBS News

  • 6 votes
#1.83 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:23 PM EST

smallbusinessownerinny - It's about how you make the income. Investments are taxed cheaper in the tax code. So, next year, Romney will still earn money on investments and still be taxed at 14%.

The higher income tax rate will not bother him at all. So, essentially, you've done nothing to him. And, these millionaires supporting tax increases have already sheltered their money and would not be touched anyway.

You could raise taxes on investments and the old people who are pulling out for retirement will highly upset.

Personally, everyone should have a set income tax rate without all the deductions, loopholes, and vote buying in the tax code....Now, that will really offend some people top to bottom and people will be paying their "fair share" because they won't have the ways to avoid it.

Sorry, but your tax increase is ineffective on the guys you are targeting because the tax code and loopholes are still there.

  • 8 votes
#1.84 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:28 PM EST

$400,000 individual and $450,000 for a couple....... time to sign the divorce papers...........

Barry never has been partial to marriage.............

  • 7 votes
#1.85 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:30 PM EST

Sure, taxes will have to go up on everyone to get out of the hole, but until the spending side is actually addressed, nothing will ever improve.

And did you notice this was missing from the President's interview yesterday? He talked about protecting the poor, the old and the students, but just like George W Bush called for no sacrifice by the middle class. He simply offered more of the same. Government at a 40% discount.

It cannot last.

  • 9 votes
#1.86 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:33 PM EST

@Caesar Augustus: Down in the valley, valley so low. Hang your head over. Hear the wind blow? Kinda pretty, if you listen. Alan, poor fellow, doesn't understand the relation of feet to shoes.

Suggest you take that "comrade sh^t" and shove it where the Sun never shines. You'll at least feel fuller.

  • 22 votes
#1.87 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:35 PM EST

Caesar Augustus-

seems like Libs try to overcompensate for their patriotism and being American by telling everyone they are more than the next. right COMRADE?

Monsieur Caesar, you should know by now, that as long as I'm on-line, I'm going to write a column to counter-point, in the same genre and style, as Mr. Spence's flaming bag of dog-doody.

Courtesy of Wikipedia

Comrade means "friend", "colleague", or "ally". The word comes from French camarade and this French word has it roots in the Spanish term camarada.

I am very pleased to hear you refer to me as "comrade". On one hand its a show of friendship, and on the other hand, it solidifies your un-denying believe that I am a French Beret wearing, croissant eating socialist revolutionary.

May you and your family be safe this New Years Eve, and have much health and prosperity in the New Year.

Salud

  • 22 votes
#1.88 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:36 PM EST

Why don't they just put the Presidents plan on the floor for a vote?

Probably like his 2012 and 2013 FY budgets even the Dems won't vote for it.

  • 12 votes
#1.89 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:45 PM EST

Alan - Yes, spending cuts are being avoided like the flu. SmallbusinessownerinNY is worried about how much people pay in. I'm more concerned about how the govt wastes the money they take from us.

If the govt was actually doing what govt is for...aka roads, bridges, etc...taxes could be cut for everyone and we'd probably have a surplus.

  • 10 votes
#1.90 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:47 PM EST

Paws,

Loopholes (deductions) aren't inherently bad, they're only bad when they don't help the economy. A loophole with no economic purpose is useless. Unfortunately, you end up throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

I don't like there being a difference between earned and unearned income. Why is unearned income preferred? Don't bother explaining it to me, it's a rhetorical question. All income should be progressively taxed at higher rates. The only argument is what those rates should be.

I actually think the Cap gain and Div interest rates do go up too, as they were part of the Bush tax cuts.

  • 15 votes
#1.91 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:47 PM EST

I still can't understand the Democrats thinking, they felt the tax rates under President Clinton was fair and they voted for the Bush tax cuts only after they were assured that they would be TEMPORARY for 10 yrs, at which time they were revert to the rates in 2000. Then Obama, after saying he would VETO any extension of the Bush tax cuts, agrees and signs a law extending Bush's tax cuts for two more years, after which they would revert to the 2000 rates. The Democrats continue to say that the Bush tax cuts were mostly responsible for our financial woes, yet, instead of going back to the rates under Clinton, they cry and whine that only the so called "wealthy" should have to pay more taxes.

President Obama admits that the revenue raised by his proposal would have little or no effect on the deficit and really not about revenue, but is only about a matter of principle and fairness.

It appears the Republicans will CAVE this time, and there will be tax increases for those over $400/$450K, sequestration and spending cuts will be kicked down the road. Isn't this the same thing that the Democrats promised Reagan and Bush 1, just give us a tax increase and we will cut spending down the road? It never happened and it won't happen again.

I hope that the Republicans in the House will let us go over the so called "cliff", and if Boehner relies on a majority of Democratic votes, I hope he is voted out as House Leader.

Hope everyone has a HAPPY NEW YEAR, regardless of political leanings.

  • 11 votes
#1.92 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:51 PM EST

From reading your comments you would not understand the answer anyway.

  • 3 votes
#1.94 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:53 PM EST

Because of Obamacare the taxes on aspirin are going up over 500%.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, one Senator explained the increase; because they're white and they work.

  • 10 votes
#1.95 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:54 PM EST

TomasGrande

Real American's voted for President Obama.

Real Americans are behind our great President 100%.

Where is the 100% Obama won with only 51 % of the popular vote .78 % of Latino that represent 8% of the electorate vote for Obama just enough to win the election. Andale ,andale si se puede, Vote for Amnesty.

  • 10 votes
#1.96 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:58 PM EST

Suggest you take that "comrade sh^t" and shove it where the Sun never shines. You'll at least feel fuller.

you first Mac-sky. But Yuri if it bothers you so much perhaps you shouldnt support the hammer and sickle approach to life.

and on the other hand, it solidifies your un-denying believe that I am a French Beret wearing, croissant eating socialist revolutionary

i dont know about the croissant eating thing but yeah we all cant be 'Real Americans' there COMRADE!

Vale

  • 9 votes
#1.97 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:58 PM EST

Musician by Night,

This is the guy who said the following about Hillary Clinton and her blood clot:

May a large chunk of plaque get stuck in one of her pial arteries and shut that bjtch down for good.

Evil, deserves no other response from any of us.

  • 20 votes
#1.98 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:02 PM EST

Oskar........read Robert Draper's book, "Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives. For starters, here's the list of attendees:

According to Draper, the guest list that night (which was just over 15 people in total) included Republican Reps. Eric Cantor (Va.), Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), Paul Ryan (Wis.), Pete Sessions (Texas), Jeb Hensarling (Texas), Pete Hoekstra (Mich.) and Dan Lungren (Calif.), along with Republican Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Jon Kyl (Ariz.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), John Ensign (Nev.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.). The non-lawmakers present included Newt Gingrich, several years removed from his presidential campaign, and Frank Luntz, the long-time Republican wordsmith. Notably absent were Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) -- who, Draper writes, had an acrimonious relationship with Luntz.

As you deny that there is no racism in how the GOP treat President Obama, I doubt you'd believe any of this story. But please note, it has never been denied by any member of the upstanding 'family values' GOP, in fact, Newt Gingrich admits to the conspiracy. http://youtu.be/yd0fVf5CsCc and when questioned about it Paul Ryan, your party's 'stellar' VP nominee, never denied it either.

Perhaps if you'd admit to yourself, you do not like our President the man and not just his policies, you would be better able to deal with realities.

  • 22 votes
#1.99 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:04 PM EST

Nobody's a FN communist here CA. Get a grip.

I told somebody yesterday he had to pay his taxes, because that's the law your representatives voted for, and guy yelled COMMUNIST!!!!

  • 22 votes
#1.100 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:06 PM EST

Gingerbread,

Case in point, only 5 posts up 1.95

JH-479998

Because of Obamacare the taxes on aspirin are going up over 500%.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, one Senator explained the increase; because they're white and they work.

No, no racism. Not us. It's you guys.

  • 21 votes
#1.101 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:08 PM EST

Tax revenue.................................$2,170,000,000,000

Federal budget.............................$3,820,000,000,000

New debt.....................................$1,650,000,000,000

National debt..............................$16,200,000,000,000

Proposed budget cuts........................$40,000,000,000

Now lets remove 8 zeros and pretend this is a household budget...

Annual income..............................................$21,700.00

Money the family spent..................................$38,200.00

New debt on the credit card............................$16,000.00

Outstanding balance of the credit card............$142,710.00

Total budget cuts so far propossed.........................$40.00

Lets look at this a different way

You come home from work and find that sewer is backing up in your house and is 6 inches from the ceiling.

What should you do?

Raise the ceilings or remove the $h!t?

  • 14 votes
#1.102 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:09 PM EST

Dave from Dana Point and Musician by night can copy from the same place! Awesome!

You're in good company with the man who wishes death on Hillary.

Dana Point, Ha! Figures. Who are you Dave? Dave Hester? YUUUUP!

  • 22 votes
#1.103 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:12 PM EST

Nobody's a FN communist here CA. Get a grip.

never said they were. but see inNY, I notice a lot of you hard left leaning posters have a penchant for using 'American or Patriotic' in their monikers, have this desire for proletariat dictatorship(occupy supported by the left), call anyone right of Che Nazi's (although its the left that abhors guns and capitalism ironic eh?), and feel if you speak out against Imp. Obama, they should be jailed ( or labeled a racist). Perhaps i should call you guys NEOCOMS

I told somebody yesterday he had to pay his taxes

Me too and I was called a Facist.

  • 8 votes
#1.104 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:13 PM EST

I'm willing to bet there will be two new additions to the 2013 New Year's confetti: Shredded copies of Grover Norquist's so-called "Taxpayer Protection Pledge" and thousands upon thousands of Americans for Tax Reform membership cards.

Let the celebration begin!

  • 14 votes
#1.105 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:14 PM EST

Smallbusinessownerny - I understand where you are coming from, but look at the spending side (the real elephant in the room). Your tax increases are irrelevent to resolving the real problem. The spending is so much higher than the taxes that everyone's tax rates could go up 20% and still not pay the deficit....much less actually reduce the debt and improve the finances of America.

Deficit reduction is not even improvement, but only slightly slowing down the train headed for the cliff.

Based on this reality....I truly find this tax issue a meaningless red herring to keep people distracted from the spending.

  • 6 votes
#1.106 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:17 PM EST

Just heard on the news that the Senate is refusing to vote on the bill tonight. Harry Reid just said NO!

  • 7 votes
#1.107 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:18 PM EST

from 1.103

Dana Point, Ha! Figures. Who are you Dave Hester? YUUUUP!

nope no class warfare here, nope, none at all. Because Dana Point is hardly the Projects in NY see. wait can I say projects or is that racist and taboo?

  • 7 votes
#1.108 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:19 PM EST

Gingerbread Mamma

Oskar........read Robert Draper's book, "Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives. For starters, here's the list of attendees:

Another conspiracy theory, like many around the book shelves.

  • 8 votes
#1.109 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:21 PM EST

SmdickholderNY,

At least 2 of us here get it. Too bad you don't.

@ Muscian,

Looks like we were both posting this at the same time.

  • 3 votes
#1.110 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:23 PM EST

they will vote tonight at 8pm est; the house vote is to close to call; spending cuts are promised but not set out,it may die in the house.

    #1.111 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:23 PM EST

    Because of Obamacare the taxes on aspirin are going up over 500%

    Good lord.

    Rush speaks his crappola, and his listeners think its gospel.

    Oy vey!

    Salud

    • 21 votes
    #1.112 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:25 PM EST

    Ceasar,

    Don't try to talk sense to the likes of smdickholderny or nastyredhead. They will just call you a racist if you try

    • 8 votes
    #1.113 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:27 PM EST

    PAws,

    We need economic growth. All of this fiscal cliff crap is hindering that, along with every other obfuscation and obstruction that Congress is throwing up. And throwing up is a perfect explanation. The media keep feeding the doom and gloom, meanwhile GDP was 3% last quarter and pending home sales are the highest in 3 years. If you'd just stop cheerleading failure, get over how much you hate this president, we might start in the right direction for all of us. Let America succeed.

    Dave Hester,

    I read it was the House that won't be calling a vote tonight.

    RWNJ from Dana Point? That's not surprising at all. That's called stereotyping. Sometimes it's true. Apparently for Dave, it is. Dave Hester is an A-hole from the show "Storage Wars." I think he's actually from Newport Beach, but whatever, behind the Orange curtain. I used to live in LA.

    • 16 votes
    #1.114 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:28 PM EST

    Dave Hester,

    I didn't call you racist, I said it figured you were from Dana Point.

    • 11 votes
    #1.115 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:29 PM EST

    Ah Oskar you never disappoint, conspiracy theories, the stuff the right thrives on....you'd know more about that in your state of denial.

    Let's hope your New Year will be filled with the realities of life, you know, like the coming inauguration of our wonderful real President. Happy New Year!!!

    • 19 votes
    #1.116 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:29 PM EST

    Obama wants a deal? So where is the "Angry black man" as the red one calls him? Why isn't he sitting down and leading this annual crisis forward? All I have seen is delegation of useless resources to put this to bed.

    Where have you been? He's been negotiating with Boehner for weeks, he cut his Christmas vacation short to negotiate, he's called Biden in to try and broker the talks...meanwhile Boehner didn't recall the House until yesterday!

    This is what happens when you get your news only from Fox. They spew a lie and repeat it over and over and over again until the right wingnuts take it as fact. And it's the House that now refuses to vote on any resolution, so it's the House -- with it's Republican majority -- that will take us over the cliff. Obama is there negotiating, the Senate is in line...it's just the House holding things up...

    • 14 votes
    #1.117 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:30 PM EST

    The president lied on tv again today. He states the tax on the rich will generate hundreds of billions of dollars in tax revenue but in reality it will only create about $80 billion total. enough to run the federal gov for around 10 days.

    • 7 votes
    #1.118 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:31 PM EST

    Dave Hester,

    Permanent, higher tax rates, forever will generate "hundreds of billions" over the years. Maybe not just next year, but with the PERMANENT change, it WILL.

    Permanent higher tax rates, music.....music..... Enjoy that music, Dave.

    • 12 votes
    #1.119 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:35 PM EST

    SmBusOwnerinNY

    No, no racism. Not us. It's you guys.

    Hmmmm, really?

    REALLY Small?

    All you secularist Liberals/Progressives belittle all the religious, especially Christians, yet you don’t realize how dramatically you expose your racism, especially black racism.

    You do realize that blacks are predominantly (79%) very religious.

    So, with your blind hatred for religion, by extension, you expose your hatred for blacks.

    Blacks are also more likely (64%) than whites (48%) or Hispanics (43%) to say homosexuality is morally wrong.

    These are data from the PEW Research Center.

    Racism?

    Yes, it is you guys.

    • 6 votes
    #1.120 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:36 PM EST

    Political Suicide Hot-line:

    Hello I am a House Republican and I notified lawmakers that the chamber will vote Monday evening on other bills, not on the Fiscal Cliff, that will be our only votes of the day.

    Ok then, make sure you get your whole head in front of the shotgun, thank you for calling!

    • 17 votes
    #1.121 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:40 PM EST

    davefromdanapointca

    The president lied on tv again today.

    No he didn't.

    My guess is you were too busy looking at Megyn Kelly's breasts again and you just heard what you wanted to hear.

    But it sure looks like you just lied on First Read again today!

    Turn off the Faux Newzzzzz. It's turned you into a vegetable lasagna.

    Salud

    • 24 votes
    #1.122 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:41 PM EST

    A smdickholderNY,

    Now you showed you are not living in the real world when you start using characters from tv shows. Then you can't even remember if you are responding to these characters or me as you addressed your post to Dave Hester (still not sure who you are referring to). One thing is for certain is that you have no idea what you are talking about. And BTW, Dana Point is definitely not Newport Beach.

    • 3 votes
    #1.123 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:41 PM EST

    Spence,

    What did I say that was racist or anti-religion?

    JH said:

    Because of Obamacare the taxes on aspirin are going up over 500%.

    Speaking on condition of anonymity, one Senator explained the increase; because they're white and they work.

    That's racist, no two ways around it.


    • 16 votes
    #1.124 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:42 PM EST

    And BTW, Dana Point is definitely not Newport Beach.

    You bet, I know.

    Dave Hester is my joke, I know that's not you. He is some dork on "Storage Wars." You started talking about my dick, so all's fair (although a little mysterious why you went there).

    • 13 votes
    #1.125 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:45 PM EST

    "According to an email from McConell to colleagues, McConnell said he thought the 'entier deal was sealed' by early Monday. But he claime the Whie House called in the morning 'demanding' to avert the automatic spending cuts, $110 billion of which is set to take e4ffect in 2013."

    So, if this is true, then it looks like the GOP caved on some of the tax rates only to have Obama once again move the goal posts and demand that their be no accompanying spending cuts. Only a promoise to postpone them until later. Yeah, we've heard that one before.

    • 6 votes
    #1.126 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:48 PM EST

    Thomas,

    I was watching CNN when the pres spoke. Yes you are right it will produce hundreds of billions over the years and this is the same smoke and mirrors he uses when he talks about any cuts he proposes as he likes to say it will save a trillion dollars over 10 years but when we are dealing with yearly budgets we need to stick to yearly projections and when you raise spending by 1.6 trillion a year yet only cut spending by 100 billion a year you are spending 16 times more than you are cutting. GET IT?

    • 5 votes
    #1.127 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:49 PM EST

    BREAKING NEWS - No vote tonight...

    This is the funniest thread I've read all year. (Okay, so my memory ain't too good - ha).

    soazDan

    ...The dems and Obama have created the instability with their ineffectiveness to get anything worthwhile done and the most uncertainty has been caused by Obamacare. Dems & liberals are nothing but malcontent jealous haters!

    Let's take the first sentence (be it as it may)... Aside from the GOP/TP breaking historic records for their abuse of the filibuster, SmokeUpURAzDan is also unaware that Pelosi passed over 400 bills in her first term, many of which were heavy-lifts. Boehner the Teabag cat herder has passed maybe 40 bills for commemorative coins and naming buildings. Do Nothing Congress = Teapublican House.

    RE the ACA (Obamacare), though long since upheld by the Supreme Court as the law of the land, the Death Panel type of fear-mongering continues. Supposedly all our taxes are going up because of Obamacare (Lions, Tigers and Bears, Oh My).

    Though all the rich states are blue, like California and New York, supposedly liberals are jealous of rich folk. And liberals think the rich are bad, and liberals want to take all the rich folk's money. Limbaugh, is that you?

    Lar-345817 -- For those of you who may not know... In the South "Lar" is how they say "liar." Lolz, what a classic Swoop and Poop troll. Enough replies have been posted on that one, so moving on...

    roybokhade

    ...That amount of money is a pittance compared with our yearly deficits and overall debt...

    To quote our friend Forest, if the tax increase on the richest 2% it's such a small amount, why are you so upset about it? And if "ear marks" are an even smaller drop in the bucket, why are you so upset about that? The truth is one is tax revenues, and the other is spending cuts -- All you rightwingers can't do the math, or more likely, aren't really interested in reducing the deficit. We need BOTH to balance the budget. Speaking of which...

    drpaultyler -- Yeah, yeah, yeah, we get it -- A balanced approach is spending cuts only, right?

    GeorgeL-2420748

    Where is our President, why he is leading. You know, leading from behind everyone else where it is safe. He has what he wants, 4 more years. Let everyone else fend and figure it out for themselves.

    Won't find him rolling up his sleeves and getting dirty!

    George, calm down. The president who won't roll up his sleeves and get dirty is in the alternative universe where you live. The one who is here in the real world returned early on Wednesday from his holiday break, while the Teapublicans waited until the 11th hour straggling in on Sunday.

    Commentary to be continued...

    • 20 votes
    #1.128 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:50 PM EST

    @auto 101 and the rest of you posters that says 50000 wage earners pay 3.2% in taxes I am single no deductions and reading my print out from my tax consulant my effective rate is 15.95% so maybe you need to do a little more research before you post such nonsense.

    • 6 votes
    #1.129 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:51 PM EST

    davidfromda,

    If the tax were on what he wanted people earning $250,000 or more it would be a lot more. The change in the estate-inheritance tax will bring in billions more. No going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan just to lose both wars would have save $4,000,000,000,000 and 7,200 American lives wasted!

    • 12 votes
    #1.130 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:53 PM EST

    Spence is racist? No! He's a lot more than that!

    • 10 votes
    #1.131 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:55 PM EST

    All you secularist Liberals/Progressives belittle all the religious, especially Christians...

    Wrong again, amigo.

    I know you love it when Hannity, Bill-O and the rest of the Murdoch/Ailes propaganda whores tell you what Democrats are and what Democrats believe.

    You practically drool all over yourself with seething, self-righteous hatred, because you want to believe they are telling you the truth. You feel vindicated that if Rush says it, then it has to be true.

    And that's exactly what they are hoping for.

    They know a sucker when they see one, and you are at the front of the line everyday getting your 72 ounce-daily dose of Drudge/Rush/Faux kool-aid.

    If you truly knew what Democrats stand for, and who Democrats really are, there wouldn't be any petty bickering and fingerpointing between the two parties.

    But that would be bad for Faux and their ratings.

    Try and put two and two together, and you might be able to free yourself from the shackles of Faux propaganda.

    Salud

    • 21 votes
    #1.132 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:58 PM EST

    My, my, my. So once again we find that the Media has been misleading the American people and carrying the water of Obama and the Democrats.

    And now, 0nce again, we see that the truth is not that the GOP cannot agree to tax increase that has been the problem all along,

    but rather it is the fact that Obama and the Democrats can never agree to actually cut spending that is what may send the Country over the fiscal cliff.

    • 7 votes
    #1.133 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:59 PM EST

    2833 you are single. According to the smarter than you or me, they don't need all that, so you are taxed to take away more.

    • 2 votes
    #1.134 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:00 PM EST

    maybe SmBizinNY is jealous that Dave Hester's small biz is bigger than his?

    • 5 votes
    #1.135 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:01 PM EST

    Smallbusinessownerny - Where do you get that I "hate this president" and "cheerlead failure".

    Asking for govt to cut spending is neither of your accusation and a financial reality.

    I will agree with you on the doom & gloom promoted by Congress & the media is hurting everything. The debt ceiling argument just around the corner isn't going to help that either. This should have been handled last January and the economy has suffered as they avoided addressing it in an election year.

    I don't care who the president is....Dem or Rep....neither side truly works for America anymore. Neither does Congress. I think they're all bought & paid for and pander to certain bases to get what they want. If it were about America, then this would not even be debated right now and congress wouldn't be full of millionaires. There would be some middle classers in there.

      #1.136 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:04 PM EST

      Tomas,

      So we are instead suppose to believe the drivel that comes from this site, as well as Huffinton Post, right? It's just one extreme from the other. If you believe everything that is on these two websites you are no better than those you belittle.

      • 2 votes
      #1.137 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:04 PM EST

      CA,

      Why do you guys always go to "jealous"

      Dave said something about my dick. Now you're taking about "bigger than his."

      What's wrong with you people?

      • 15 votes
      #1.138 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:05 PM EST

      Does anyone expect that our Congressmen will be kept out of the bars on New Year's Eve by a vote?

      According to the Tea Party, they want the government to shut down. Not voting is what they do best.

      • 14 votes
      #1.139 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:07 PM EST

      It more than obvious that the dems want taxes to rise for everyone in the country. They have been out of control on their spending from day one and the only way to get the money for all their spending is to stall and have the country fall off the fiscal cliff. That is what they want because then everyones taxes will go up and they can feel free to spend more money like a bunch of drunken sailors. But the big difference between them and drunken sailors is that the sailors will stop spending money when they are out of it. The dems will keep spending money even though there isn't any.

      • 6 votes
      #1.140 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:07 PM EST

      DB and 2833,

      At $50K in income, you don't get taxed 15.85%

      The rates are 10% for income up to $17,400; and 15% from there up to about $70K. Even with no deductions, you paid 10% on that first 17K and 15% on the rest. Not possible that adds up to over 15%.

      • 10 votes
      #1.141 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:09 PM EST

      daveform.... that is absolutely hilarious.

      Spending increased MORE under President G. W. Bush and decreased under President Obama.

      You are correct, Democrats are Tax & Spend, while Republicans are spend, spend and Spend and borrow.

      • 15 votes
      #1.142 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:10 PM EST

      gcooper8 -- I think it was you who posted the movie promo for Fiscal Cliff -- LMAO! Though Lee Atwater would have said something racist, no? A request for a re-post please.

      • 10 votes
      #1.143 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:11 PM EST

      4:09 PM central time; looks as if we're celebrating New Year's Eve by going over the cliff or at least sliding down the slope for a few days.

      "In masks outrageous and austere/the years go by in single file;/But none has merited my fear,/and none has quite escaped my smile." Elinor Wylie, 1885-1928.

      Watching this year in politics, we certainly saw the "masks outrageous and austere", the ever present filibusters, the nonstop partisan bickering, the GOP legislators efforts to inflict unnecessary wounds on our country to defeat one man who happens to be President; the unwillingness of GOP and their Tea Party comrades to move an inch to help in the name of rigid ideology while claiming to be patriots.

      The year slipped passed day by day in single file yet none of it was cause for fear--unless you watch FOX News or hear Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck sell you fear for their own profit.

      The masked ones passed by in single file from town to town, state to state, and primary to primary. We watched debates where "Oops", $10K bets, "pious baloney", "severely conservative", "I created more jobs than you; no you didn't; yes, I did", "9-9-9"; wild cheers for the death penalty in Texas, cheers and applause for the idea of letting the uninsured to die, and loud boos aimed at a gay military man serving in Iraq asked a question--all gave us pause when the "outrageous and austere" sprang forth from the GOP presidential wannabees: Herman Cain, Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, Jon Huntsman, Mitt Romney. We recognized that most of these particular wannabees extremist views were cause for fear yet could not help but smile as each ones star rose before it quickly imploded and fell to earth.

      When asked about his rise to the top, Rick Santorum declared that "sometimes, the best is not that great but it's the best." Santorum was the one who thinks birth control should be outlawed and gave us this, "One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country...it's not okay. It's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be." Ahh, yes, another reason to first fear and then smile as his star fell to earth.

      The best photo taken after the Iowa caucus was that of a lone Tea Party guy in an empty room, wearing his 3-corner hat, knickers--looking the part of Paul Revere--slumped in a chair beneath a Bachmann poster. All is lost! Ahh, yes, fear slipped further away and then we smiled and look toward heaven to say thanks, Iowa, for sending batcrap crazy Michele home.

      Oh, so many, many reasons to fear as Donald Trump, Foster Friese, John Sununu, Rush Limbaugh, and the folks on FOX continued to march down that "outrageous" road until Clint Eastwood talked to an empty chair and we again could smile at the absurd.

      Mitt Romney broke a record during the campaign; he lied 73% of the time. How ironic that Mitt, Ann, their family, FOX were so positive Romney would win the election. FOX, for years, has told its viewers mostly lies, trumped up conspiracy theories, distorted truth and told viewers to disregard other media sources. In 2012, FOX finally came full circle--it successfully convinced itself, its viewers, the Romney Campaign staff and supporters that Romney would win because they believed their own hype and ignored all those other media sources and polls--no wonder FOX, Morris, Rove, the Romneys were shocked. Touche'! "And none has quite escaped my smile" like that one.

      • 20 votes
      #1.144 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:11 PM EST

      Paws,

      I apologize if I lumped you into the hate the president and cheerlead failure bunch. They are here, and normally the righty's are that way. You tend to post right, and if I was wrong to over generalize, sorry.

      The circus doesn't help the economy, but like a lot of people, I get wrapped up in it. It's not good. I'm looking forward to Wednesday when I have real work to do to keep my attention in the right place.

      • 11 votes
      #1.145 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:13 PM EST

      The sun'll come out
      Tomorrow
      Bet your bottom dollar
      That tomorrow
      There'll be sun!
      Just thinkin' about
      Tomorrow
      Clears away the cobwebs,
      And the sorrow
      'Til there's none!
      When I'm stuck with a day
      That's gray,
      And lonely,
      I just stick out my chin
      And Grin,
      And Say,
      Oh
      The sun'll come out
      Tomorrow
      So ya gotta hang on
      'Til tomorrow
      Come what may
      Tomorrow!
      Tomorrow!
      I love ya
      Tomorrow!
      You're always
      A day
      A way!

      I welcome the most non-partisan bill to come out of Congress in decades: "The fiscal correct". Everyone pays, everything gets cut.

      It is about time America pays it's credit cards off without a particular segment of society getting @!$%#ed.

      • 5 votes
      #1.146 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:18 PM EST

      Dave said something about my dick. Now you're taking about "bigger than his."

      i was talking Businesses.. you claim to own one, Dave Hester (storage wars) owns one (consignment right?)? not too quick on the uptake are we? Im not jealous of your cyber appendage, go give that tootsie roll a tug yourself.

      • 7 votes
      #1.147 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:23 PM EST

      Well, now Washington has really done it.

      No wonder they all want guns to disappear........

      With what they have done they would deserve it if the population of "little people" march on Washington and pull them out into the streets and pummel them all.

      Why should they control the population when it is clear they cannot even control a simple budget that most Americans have to on a monthly basis.

      Washington should stop ALL foreign aid, no giveaways to the UN, no help to our allies, and fix the friggin mess that they have created. This is all before the TURD of a bill called OBAMACARE is launched----get ready for another tax hike.

      Washington is broke and really needs to be replaced starting with both parties that are in power.

      • 5 votes
      #1.149 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:25 PM EST

      This is no fiscal cliff. It's a molehill compared to what's going to happen when our government finishes pushing the economy off the the REAL debt cliff - when we can't pay the interest on our loans. We will become third world overnight. Neither you people on the right or the left have a clue.

      • 7 votes
      #1.150 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:31 PM EST

      Heck of a job, Party of No.

      • 16 votes
      #1.151 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:31 PM EST

      If all these guys deciding the fate of our country weren't all wealthy, then maybe they would be able to get their jobs done instead of worrying about protecting their own pockets. Straight out tax breaks just because you are wealthy do nothing to help the economy because most of these people send jobs overseas for cheap labor so they can pocket more of the profits for themselves. What makes sense is to write a bill that gives maximum tax incentives to those companies and people who create jobs here in the USA, place a high fee on wealthy who move their money to offshore accounts to avoid taxes and severely tax imports of items from countries that exploit workers for cheap labor so that US made item prices are competitive. But, our Congress won't do that because, well, they are in this exploiting others for their own profits so deep. They'd rather cut programs that assist Americans instead!

      • 9 votes
      #1.152 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:33 PM EST

      Paws the problem isn't spending cuts, it is lack of revenue. Yes, the government waste money, money for guns and war ships and air planes and spending on wars that are not called for. If you want spending cuts go after the waste in the military and we can find compromise. But when you take a bottle away from a baby, or shelter away from a mother and her children or if they anyone goes to bed hungry you are the failure. Do you understand I hate conservatives and their approach to coddling the rich as much as you hate poor people. So some where between you and me is the middle and I suggest you look for yours over seas as America is not a fascist state as you would hope for. We take care of ours. Obama, stick to your guns, America is not Grover Norquist, it is the people of this country who well over half elected you to stick for them.

      • 6 votes
      #1.153 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:35 PM EST

      Ok DB if I can pay more then so can every one else I see no problem.

      • 3 votes
      #1.154 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:36 PM EST

      Paul-546284

      Quick question...how much is one's "fair share"? No one on the left that I know of has actually said...

      I have said many times I support Jan Schakowsky's Fairness in Taxation Act.

      What is fair are progressive income tax rates. Personally, I do not like tax credits of any kind other than charitable contribution, and even this has been abused (Romney is a prime example). However, this is not the same as a flat tax, which is regressive like sales tax. Sales and property taxes force tax evaders to pay something, but user taxes or a flat tax are regressive (only simple-minded people can't figure that out).

      The bottom line is we need revenue of at least 20% of GDP. We are WAY below that right now, clearly indicating we have a revenue problem as well as a spending problem.

      We should also learn from Europe that austerity would cause us to slip back into recession (as already noted by someone above in regard to Clinton).

      • 8 votes
      #1.155 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:36 PM EST

      @d-loominator - Maybe that is exactly what our government and the wealthy want - a third world work force right here in America, ready for them to exploit, ready for them to pay pennies a day so they can become more wealthy!

      • 6 votes
      #1.156 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:38 PM EST

      The Speaker's name is no longer John Boehner - it is John Lympedyck. I guess that we all have to wait and see if on January 3rd Lympedyck keeps his job as Speaker. That has always been the principal reason for constipation in the House. It is time THAT turd was eliminated.

      • 5 votes
      #1.157 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:38 PM EST

      Jody, Iowa

      The year slipped passed day by day in single file yet none of it was cause for fear--unless you watch FOX News or hear Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck sell you fear for their own profit.

      Thank you Ms. Lovely Jody.

      I came on to First Read around Labor Day, and have enjoyed your weekly wrap-ups immensely.

      I wish you would take over for my loopy cousin who writes these horrifically boring Yearly newsletters of how great their family is.

      I hope and pray in the new year that the viewership of the RW media goes down considerably, back to the days before Rupert Murdoch. Then this nation can work together once again.

      In the meantime, I'm using the term Faux Newzzzzz, with 5 Z's to express how blatantly biased and predictably stale they have become.

      Happy New Year, and may you and your family be blessed in 2013.

      Salud

      • 10 votes
      #1.158 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:39 PM EST

      Get back to work, you lazy SOBs! You've had your vacation. Now WORK--just like the rest of us. I don't care if you ever get a break--get to work.

      WE, the people, should fire every last one of them, top to bottom. We should take their pay and their benefits, too. Let THEM eat cake.

      I've got a bucket of tar and some feathers, as well. I'm sure someone will come with rail to run the lazy elected out-of-town on.

      • 4 votes
      #1.159 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:41 PM EST

      @ TruePatriot-445959 re post 1.143. Happy to oblige. And Happy New Year!

      From the producers of "The Credit Rating Downgrade of 2011," comes the Republican/Tea party co-production of a holiday blockbuster action movie for the whole family: "Fiscal Cliff!"

      You'll laugh! You'll cry!! You'll scratch your head and think "WTF were they thinking???"

      See what others are saying about "Fiscal Cliff!":
      "Brilliant... insightful..." - Karl Rove
      "Chock full of plain, honest truth..." - Lee Atwater
      "I laughed 'til I stopped..." - Newt Gingrich
      "...cheese... bunnies... ironing board..." - Ronald Reagan

      "Fiscal Cliff!" See it now, while you can still afford the price of a ticket!

      • 6 votes
      #1.160 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:43 PM EST

      This is a liberal blog it is evident since it is almost always started by fiesty. No one could be first to comment all the time. More political games.

      • 5 votes
      #1.161 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:44 PM EST

      ORB 1943

      Be careful what you wish for. Boehner has whether you believe it or not been trying to find solutions. They could elect someone much harder to deal with. Picking a villain is easy. Picking someone who will do a better job is hard. If you don't believe me, look at all of Congress, both left and right. There is a quote I hate. "If you can't do, teach" but I believe it applies more to congress. "If you can't think, represent"

      • 4 votes
      #1.162 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:44 PM EST

      I never thought I would see the day that Americans would be so sorry and so jealous of someone that is successful that they would try to destroy their own country to take their money away so they could spend it on people that are not willing to work and make it on their own.

      And dont say it isnt true because I see it everyday, people at my work that say they make more money on welfare and food stamps and all the freebies so they quit their job in less than a week to sit and play video games all day and live off of the government and laugh at all the idiots that say it isnt true. You people need to wake up and get real. i grew up in an america where people worked for what they had and nothing was a freebie, if you wanted success you got a job and worked or even two my mother worked 3 jobs to feed my brother and I and never once complained and never took one single hand out.

      You idiot liberals that think you should take from those that are successful and give it to the poor are totally destroying this nation. and before you start on me I live on less than 20 thousand a year and i am disabled and still grow my own food to live and work my farm to live and feed my family and never took a hand out from anyone ever nor would I.

      How stupid that you people have bought into this crap from people like obama and other socialist set on destroying our nation, you should all be ashamed and your children and grand children will hate you for what you have done to their future in this country because it will be only a story in the history books before very long and you are speeding it up as fast as possible supporting this crap.

      we should help our neighbors but not offer a free ride to anyone ever, teach them to work and support their family not depend on government and make the government follow the constitution exactly as written, they are supposed to provide a military to protect this nation and over sight on very fee hings and let each state govern their own people without controlling their lives and as the people demand through elections.

      America has lost her way and her morals and will soon perish into the history books and you people are all wanting freebies from a government that don't have to nickles to rub together and you are the cause of the total destruction of the united states of america congrats and happy new year

      • 7 votes
      #1.163 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:45 PM EST

      WHAT IS THE PROBLEM BOYS AND GIRLS WE'RE GOING BACK TO THE CLINTON DAYS.

      You know the , the greatest times in resent history acording to the Democratic party. That why you used Slick Willy to get obama re-elected. so why are you all crying. We must be ready to have prosperity again Right? Well....... Right ? Exactly Clinton had several things fall in his lap and let some things go that hit in the bush years after but you Democrats ignor them. The Tech boom ran in the Clinton years. Clinton allowed Bin Laden to go free, Clinton artificially boosted the houseing market with mortgage reform that allowed people to buy more home than they could afford. Then i as his second term was winding down he ssigns NAFTA AND GAFT and other poor trade agreemnets. The tech jobs left like water through a faucet adn our good manufacturing jobs followed. The economy began to tank because of unemployment caused by job exports and then the housing industry collapsed because people could no longer buy a new home and those that had lost them for lack of work. Bin Laden took care of business on 9-11 and the market crashed becasue of it.

      ut other than that the Clinton years were great and we should be happy to be going back to those days.

      • 3 votes
      #1.164 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:46 PM EST

      DaveM-877764

      ...This is all before the TURD of a bill called OBAMACARE is launched----get ready for another tax hike.

      Washington is broke and really needs to be replaced starting with both parties that are in power.

      Please explain why we should get ready for another tax hike because of Obamacare. Explain how Obamacare is funded, what the cost is (ROI) with Obamacare versus the cost without Obamacare. Please, we really want to know what FAUX Noise and Hate Radio have been spewing to all you rightwingers.

      And please tell us how Washington would be better with a bunch of inexperienced yahoos. These newbies would not be influenced by money from Karl Rove's SuperPac, not scared of being "primaried" by Norquist, or listening to someone like you at a Town Squall?

      And stop with the false equivalency. The Teapublicans, and only the Teapublicans started 2009 with a premeditated plan to obstruct (per their record fillibusters). Only the Teapublicans have resorted to hostage-taking over the debt ceiling, over the debts THEY incurred with their mismanagement, causing our credit rating to go down and deficit to increase. Only the Teapublicans are unwilling to compromise to protect the rich at the expense of the 98%.

      If you really want to fix Washington, just vote out any member of the Tea Party caucus. Things were never this bad until the Tea Party hijacked the GOP.

      • 12 votes
      #1.165 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:49 PM EST

      Awww, too bad, TomasGrande, Fox News' viewership continues to increase, as does Limbaugh's. Then again, those who tune into them are intellectually capable of examing and understanding an issue, rather than simply swallowing the DNC engineered crap force fed to them by the MSM and giant frauds like the Huffington-Puffington Post.

      • 4 votes
      #1.166 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:51 PM EST

      As always, the libbie leg-humpers blame it all on the gop. The gop is not in charge; voters spoke and got what they wanted- an administration that still cannot get the job done after four years of out of control spending.

      Now here we are. Happy New Year! Taxes are gonna go up, up, and away and you voters have no one else to blame but yourselves

      • 5 votes
      #1.167 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:53 PM EST

      proudnavyvet

      I never thought I would see the day that Americans would be so sorry and so jealous of someone that is successful that they would try to destroy their own country to take their money away so they could spend it on people that are not willing to work and make it on their own.

      I never thought I'd see the day when so many Americans would say such stupid stuff like this. Really, seriously?

      spider-737231

      ...Fox News' viewership continues to increase, as does Limbaugh's.

      Well that explains it.

      gcooper8 -- Thanks for the re-post, and Happy New Year to you too!

      • 8 votes
      #1.168 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:53 PM EST

      If King Obama had a clue his party would take a vote on his "plan" but even they know he doesn't have any idea what to do with the mess he's making.

      Unlike the House, which loves to vote repeatedly on meaningless legislation that they know has no chance of becoming law (i.e. repealing healthcare reform), Reid is holding over voting until he has assurances that he has Republican support in the Senate and, together, they can force the House to finally do SOMETHING of substance.

      • 6 votes
      #1.169 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:57 PM EST

      WOOOOOHOOOOOO!!!!!!!

      United States will go over the 'fiscal cliff'

      Nice job Democrats, the real PARTY OF NO.

      No budget for 1,391 days.

      No comprehensive plan for the economy.

      No jobs.

      No hope.

      No change.

      But hey, Barrack Hussein et al have added more than $6 TRILLION to our massive unsustainable Debt.

      Not to mention the $122 trillion in Unfunded Liabilities has been growing by billions everyday.

      1960’s “Ask not what your country can do for you”
      2000’s “Give us free stuff and make the rich taxpayers foot the bill”
      You’ve come a long way Libbies.

      Remember, America promotes equal opportunity, NOT equal outcomes.

      Greed isn’t someone wanting to keep more of what they earn, its people demanding a greater share of money that someone else has earned.

      • 6 votes
      #1.170 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:58 PM EST

      Hey MSM I am really sick of you! You hype without any journalistic integrity what-so-ever! You play the hype and enflame the masses for your personal gain, not ours! You tell false truths, and half lies to make money, and divide our great nation!

      This goes for ALL MSM!

      50 years ago, nobody would have even known about their taxes going up for a couple of months, if ever. I am absolutely sick of the media dividing our nation! WE are in this together, right?

      Considering that they were silent on NDAA, the Patriot ACT, and many others, limiting the rights of single citizens, I hope the next bill that goes through Congress limits the rights of free press. It would serve them right.

      • 3 votes
      #1.171 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:00 PM EST

      Paul-546284

      Quick question...how much is one's "fair share"? No one on the left that I know of has actually said...here is the tax rates I want for a solid economy.

      Here you go:

      8%=>$25k; 12%=>$40k; 18%=>$75; 24%=>$120k; 27%=>$180k; 33%=>$225k; 39.6%=>$280k; 45%=>$350k; 51%=>$500k; 54%=>$750k; 58%=>$1 million; 63%=>$5 million; 70%=>$10 million.

      Capital gains: 10%=>$50k; 15%=>$100k; 20%=>$150k; 25%=>$250k; 33%=>$400k. Dividends: 36%=Everyone. Estate tax: 55%=>$2.5 million. Gift tax=42%=>$15,000.

      Corporate: Industrial Manufacturers: 7.5%=>$1.5 million; 9%=>$5 million; 10.5%=>$25 million. Clean Energy: 8%=>$1.25 million; 10%=>$4.5 million; 12%=>$18 million. Everybody else: 11%=>$500k; 12.5%=>$15 million; 14%=>$50 million; 15%=>$125 million. Domestic Investment : 0%. Bond Investments: 0%. Global Profits=18%=>$2.5 million; 25%=>$15 million. Outsource Tax: 24%=>$7.5 million; 28%=>$15 million; 33%=>$25 million; 39.6%=>$50 million.

      VAT: 7%=consumer products (toys, furniture, cooking ware, electronics, etc); 9%=luxury products (yachts, china, carpets, etc); 2.5%=taxable necessities (coffee, soft drinks, restaurant food, most store-bought food, etc); 0%=non-taxable necessities (bread, milk, clothing, household products, etc); 4.5%=industrial machinery/equipment (motor vehicles, printers, cranes, engines, factory/construction/farming equipment, etc); 3%=utility (telephone, Internet, cable services,electricity, etc).

      Speaking of an up or down vote on Obozo's plan, well he did the impossible the past two years...he got both houses of Congress to totally agree on something...that his budget's stunk....zero votes...ZERO!!! And you want us to use his plan? Please...

      Yes; his most recent proposal is a tax increase for those making over $450,000 (up from $250,000), an estate tax increase to 40% for +$5 million, deduction reform at $250,000 and above, and total revenues of roughly $600-700 billion over 10 years. Considering that's well over half of what his initial offer was ($1.6 trillion) and has many concessions on the estate and income tax, you guys ought to accept this plan or have all the concessions go bye-bye. This is too much of a compromise in my opinion, but you guys ought to be lapping this up.

      And to those who think Obozo has the American people behind him...nope...less than 51% of the voters voted for him...in other words, over 49% think he has the wrong vision for America!!! So, raise taxes like Boehner offered, but CUT SPENDING!!!!!

      We already have by nearly $1 trillion due to the debt ceiling fight in 2011; later in 2013 we are going to negotiate more spending cuts and entitlement reform, but you're gonna have to add revenues into the mix via tax reform, maybe even a 1:1 ratio. $600-700 billion in revenues is pitiful; hell, that's under the $800 billion Boehner offered in 2011 and WAY under what most bipartisan debt commissions have proposed. I say that you're gonna have to get revenues up to at least $1.2 trillion, which will get you perhaps another $500-600 billion in spending cuts if revenues to cuts is 1:1. Boys, you're gonna have to give and give hard to get what you want; if you want to cut entitlements, you're gonna have to negotiate and accept FAR more revenues than you want. Either that or you don't get any spending cuts PERIOD. You're choice; it's time you man up and deal with it and get a taste of your own obstructionist medicine, right wing bastards.

      • 4 votes
      #1.172 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:01 PM EST

      TruePatriot-445959

      another Moniker with Patriot in it. As if somehow that makes you more patriotic? Truepatriot of what is a better question?

      Funny how the left hates Fox News yet think the 'real news' comes from First Read and NBC (Photoshop specialists). Just admit it Liberals, you're jealous of China and Saudi Arabia, you covet their ability to spoon feed you 'news'.

      Remember, America promotes equal opportunity, NOT equal outcomes.

      no no no, Remember FORWARD.... PROGRESS. You are now on the road to hell paved with 'good' intentions

      • 3 votes
      #1.173 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:05 PM EST

      I have a question where in the hell is harry at? If you have Biden and McConnell negotiating is Harry getting the coffee for them. You only see this on Saturday Nigh Live, it's to funny. Give the democrats a job and the run around like the Keystone Cops. Even McConnell got a smile on his face while on the senate floor.

      • 1 vote
      #1.174 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:05 PM EST

      Caesar Augustus- The Moniker was established during the Teabagger Hay Days to poke fun at how they think they are the only true Americans, wanting to take their country back and all. But maybe I will change it to Comrade. Sweet Jebus, rightwingers think socialism and communism are the same thing, and haven't figured out they are all a bunch of fascists.

      TomasGrande -- I like the Faux Newzzzzz. Mr. Spence's flaming bag of dog-doody was good too -- That's right up there with Mac Forrester. But not to leave anyone out,

      Happy New Year to all FR Friends!

      • 7 votes
      #1.175 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:06 PM EST

      spider-737231

      Awww, too bad, TomasGrande, Fox News' viewership continues to increase, as does Limbaugh's

      Spider - My guess is you have never researched how and why Faux Newzzzzz started.

      As long as they blur the "news" with "opinion" and have lots of blonde bimbos then it's good enough for you.

      Well that explains it

      I'm with you, TruePatriot.

      Happy New Year!!!

      Salud

      • 6 votes
      #1.176 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:06 PM EST

      UnMerry Cliff-mas...... to GOP ???????????

      Happy New Year....to all of you trolls here !!!!!!!!!!

      • 3 votes
      #1.177 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:10 PM EST

      "POLITICS, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage."
      -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary," 1911.

      And still applicable 101 years later. Go figure.

      • 2 votes
      #1.178 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:13 PM EST

      the house has just adjourned for 2012; no deal, the proposal from the administration contained no, zero, nada, spending reductions; the administration tried to bluff, the Congress called their bluff; Obama and his group blew any chance of a deal.

      • 4 votes
      #1.179 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:13 PM EST

      Sweet Jebus, rightwingers think socialism and communism are the same thing, and haven't figured out they are all a bunch of fascists.

      yep, now who wants to remove guns and capitalism again? Im sure you're name was just a mock of 'teabaggers'. I guess that makes you the teabagee eh? Yep you enjoy your Photoshop news network in NBC. You know you get the 'full' picture. LOL.

      Time to lace up the old boots and practice that bellamy salute. See ya Ivan

      Remember LEFTIES, this was your 'MANDATE'.

      • 5 votes
      #1.180 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:16 PM EST

      Obama holds a campaign event at the WH today, spiking the football on the 20 yard line. This guy couldn't negotiate free floor mats on a new Chevy Volt. Will somebody tell this clown he's over his head. He holds the campaign rally and the deal goes down the tubes.

      This is the weakest and most arrogant POTUS in the age of electric lights.

      • 4 votes
      #1.181 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:17 PM EST

      I never expected any other result. Whoever owns the pictures of the GOP/TP with their favorite farm animal will continue to turn the screws.

      If certain rule changes in the Senate come about and with the narrower margin in the house, you might see some progress in the new Congress, but I'm not holding my breath. One possible compromise would be to make the entitlement cuts the GOP asks for, but only for the GOP states. This should please their constituents (if only temporarily), and bring the disparity in the amount of federal taxes paid vs amount of federal money received in these states back into balance. A win-win for everyone....

      .... except of course the poor white trash that voted these morons into office, but it might finally get their attention.

      Happy New Year to all!!!

      • 6 votes
      #1.182 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:35 PM EST

      Paws93

      Smallbusinessownerny - I understand where you are coming from, but look at the spending side (the real elephant in the room). Your tax increases are irrelevent to resolving the real problem. The spending is so much higher than the taxes that everyone's tax rates could go up 20% and still not pay the deficit....much less actually reduce the debt and improve the finances of America.

      Actually, if you take the cost estimates of Mitt Romney's tax plan and turn them into gains (simplistic, but better than nothing), we'd gain approximately $5 trillion in extra revenue over 10 years; while that would only cut the current deficit to roughly $600 billion, it would reduce the cumulative deficit over the next decade (which is more important than the annual balance) by over 70% if the deficit is $7 trillion over 10 years and by nearly 63% if the deficit is $8 trillion. Either way, it's well over half of the deficit erased, and the rest can be eliminated via spending cuts and entitlement reform. Hell, if we just let the Bush tax cuts expire, you get something close to that. So taxes are a MAJOR part of the equation, since they are at least 40-50% of the problem.

      Deficit reduction is not even improvement, but only slightly slowing down the train headed for the cliff.

      If you mean that the current proposals are not improvements, you are mostly right; while the deal would eliminate the tax hike threat, there are major spending cuts that we have to deal with as well.

      Based on this reality....I truly find this tax issue a meaningless red herring to keep people distracted from the spending.

      The problem is that many people have a false notion about the deficit; many people (particularly Republicans) either say or believe that spending is the root of the problem, with expenses going way up under Obama or (in a more "moderate" perspective) going up under Bush and then way up under Obama. They fail to realize that (A) deficits began under Bush due to the dot-com recession and persisted due to his fiscal policies, (B) that when Obama entered office we were in a recession and spending went up because of unemployment, (C) revenues also went down because fewer people were employed and paid taxes, and (D) at least a third of the deficits that Bush ran and gave to Obama were because of his expensive tax cuts, ergo we also have a revenue problem as well as a spending problem. At the very least, you ought to see that since revenues are way below 18% of GDP (the 50 year average), we need to raise revenues via tax increases in order to help plug the gap. And you need to remember that while tax hikes do hurt a struggling economy, spending cuts do so as well.

      • 3 votes
      #1.183 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:43 PM EST

      Freshieee You're choice; it's time you man up and deal with it and get a taste of your own obstructionist medicine, right wing bastards.

      how can anyone listen to people like this? your tax dream is very oppressive and basically theft of wealth, you will drain any incentives and push investors away, you will create a larger black market which will result in a decrease in revenues long term, this is historical fact. you want short term gratification in exchange long term suffering. i liked that you actually have some numbers down in response to a question asked but when you use profane insults to end your retort, you lose. do away with all income tax and have a VAT tax, consumption/use tax is the only fair taxation. do not be envious of others gains or you will have none yourself.

      what right do you have to someones elses income? did you earn it? did you do anything to help earn it? so why do you think others should pay more because our government cant play by the rules? we have the US constitution for a reason, read it. http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.htm

      SmBusOwnerinNY

      speaking of the US constitution i see you either never read it or refreshed your fading memory of it, let me do that for you.

      Article. IV.

      Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened),against domestic Violence.

      hmm seems the US constitution disagrees with your interpretation of us being a representative democracy. maybe you need to read this document that is suppose to limit the power of the federal government, not grant it whatever it wants.

      as for all the rest of the citizens who have no understanding of anything around them:

      define "fair share"?

      when will we start reducing our deficits and paying down our debts?

      you do understand checks and balances right?

      do you know what a leader is?

      what qualifies obama (or anyone) to be president?

      why dont you hold the dems as responsible as the repubs for doing the same crap?

      do you read and understand history (not party propaganda history)?

      did you know taxing the rich 100% will not even make a dent because of how bad these politicians screwed us?

      do you even comprehend 16 trillion in debt, 20+ trillion by end of obamas term?

      do you even know how much our current unfunded liabilities are?

      do not let the government tell you what is best when they have sheltered themselves with our money and played dangerous games at our expense, history repeats itself because we allow it.

      The following prophetic Quote about democracy is from Sir Alex Fraser Tytler (1742-1813). He was a Scottish jurist and historian and a Professor of History at Edinburgh University in the late 18th century. This quote is from an 1801 lecture series, and it still rings with great truth:
      "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters
      discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on the
      majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a
      dictatorship." "The average age of the world's great civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence:"
      * From bondage to spiritual faith;
      * From spiritual faith to great courage;
      * From courage to liberty;
      * From liberty to abundance;
      * From abundance to selfishness;
      * From selfishness to complacency;
      * From complacency to apathy;
      * From apathy to dependency;
      * From dependency back again to bondage."
      "Perhaps this is why the Founding Fathers did not want a democracy and, therefore, established our representative Republic instead."

      • 3 votes
      #1.184 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:46 PM EST

      Truepatriot:

      It is simple math..... Obamacare is like the budget. revenue and spending.....

      If all Americans who work pay into a fund to help keep obamacare going it should be a perpetual moneymaker.

      In this case, we have alot of poor people, who have no job, no means of income, and do not and will never contribute to their "fair share".

      the outcome will be that me- person with job will have to pay more in "taxes" to keep this turd of legislation going- so you can have "free" healthcare. Now multiply the people in work- minus the people out of work and that is the number you get. assuming that everyone just gets checkups.

      NOW THE ILLEGAL alien problem comes in with I don't know 30 million to 40 million ILLEGALS (NOT ALL PAYING INTO THE TAX SYSTEM) Who pays for this??????

      That is right----INCREASE TO YOU AND I.

      get the picture now?

      This OBAMACARE is certainly will be more expensive than what I had 2 years ago through my company.

      • 1 vote
      #1.185 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:48 PM EST

      The United States was set to go over the "fiscal cliff" at midnight

      All according to Barrys plan!!

      • 4 votes
      #1.186 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:50 PM EST

      Beverly in Chicago Comment collapsed by the community

      1funnygirl,

      Here is one "Angry Black Lady'" wishing you break your damn neck whether you go over the cliff or not. Your hateful ass needs a functional brain. It's people like you have eat the @!$%# coming out the elephant asses have truly affected your thinking.

      My goodness, the racist, bigoted, union loving, "ANGRY BLACK LADY" Bev from Chicago must be losing it. I am hateful and lacking a functional brain? Your comment about falling off the cliff and breaking my dam& neck was funny. Your last statement above this comment is really offensive deary. Perhaps you need to re-evaluate your statements. But then again, you will never be removed from the blog and you know it.

      You know perfectly well why they are in the Senate . Why should we Americans accept the same old dumb @!$%# that caused the "Great Recession"?

      Yep, they are in the Senate due to informed voters keeping them there - for now. And Bev, the "angry black lady from chicago" when the talk about the Great Recession comes around in your libbie talks, remember who extended the event, and the war that was necessary to end the recession. FDR needed that one to move forward.

      Harry does nothing??? Thanks for letting everyone know just how much bull@!$%# you consume. John Bonehead does nothing apart from pulling stunts and sending his caucus home which, by the way, also does nothing when they are in the Chamber except act like clowns. They obstruct and conjure up some of the most vile conspiracy theories. When they are not doing that, Bonehead allows his caucus to attack American with outlandish divisive legislation.

      bev, don't you find it funny that your Progressive Senate Leader is only doing what his leader, the "Angry Black Man" wants him to do. Barry needs the money to spend on his policie., The country can't keep on borrowing or printing money.

      So Bev, the "angry black woman from Chicago", where has the "Angry Black Man" been during this crisis? Sitting in a hotel room with Biden awaiting an outcome he could announce to the public that he solved the issue?

      The "Angry Black Man" hasn't led - he has delegated. Can't blame him for this now, can you?

      It's frightening that only two people, Harry "do nothing" Reid and Mitch are the only ones in the room when the rest of the clowns in the House and Senate are absent. Only TWO people represent us?

      For the rest of your posts bev, the "Angry Black Woman" from Chicago: keep your racist comments coming......you're good for a laugh.

      • 4 votes
      #1.187 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:54 PM EST

      If we make the rich richer they will help our economy by spending their money..... ahhahahaha......hahahaha....hahaha......ha! Also I think someone stole my profile pic. Probably a republican! Can't leave the poor man alone.

      • 3 votes
      #1.188 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:55 PM EST

      Just like last time in 2008 mostly congressional republiCons refused to vote for TARP (bailing out banks), then stock (DOW) dropped 777 points the next day, then sponsors of the bill added more pork to more members of congress. In the end, TARP not only turned around major banks and auto companies, but also made profits for US government, but most important - saved the country from going into a worse recession.

      .

      This time, it's the same sausage making process...hard to watch.

      .

      But there is still time ... to avoid the cliff.

      • 3 votes
      #1.189 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:56 PM EST

      And whyare they taking a break? To celebrate the New Year with their families? Because that's more important to them than what will happen to the country?? What total Jack asses. We should vote every stinking one of them out of office....but they know in two years we won't!!! Will we????

      • 1 vote
      #1.191 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:05 PM EST

      Practically the same crew of obstructionists 13, McConnell, Cantor, Ryan, Boehner, who toke oath on 20 January 2009 to undermine anything President Obama attempts, take control of the Congress, are at it again, and it's not even inauguration day.

      What we have going on is part 2 of their plans from January 20, 2009.

      Remember people, American Capitalism at work here........nothing more than BIG-BUSINESS corporations, their lobbyists, white collar criminals, and their politician friends, all working together to screw me and you to death.

      • 9 votes
      #1.192 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:06 PM EST

      I bought stock in KY Jelly before this, knowing that the average American would need some, because we would all be taking it up the A...., while our elected officials decide to play the US against THEM mentality!Wake up people, we need to start thinking third party representatives! I can only hope that people will see the necessity to elect other parties, to create a situation for more compromise in our government! These representatives forget that they are there for the betterment of our country, not for what is best for their Party!

      • 3 votes
      #1.193 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:11 PM EST

      Been Telling ya Bev, you're a racist. It's a fallacy to believe if you have dark skin (black, brown, etc) you cant be racist.

      How can one party that is a minority be so strong? And you lefties scream MANDATE, MANDATE!

      • 5 votes
      #1.194 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:12 PM EST

      CNN POLL: GOP IS TOO EXTREME

      Excerpts:

      A CNN/ORC survey released Thursday once again emphasizes Republicans’ weak position in the “fiscal cliff” debate, as public opinion is decidedly tilted in Democrats’ favor.

      Fifty-three percent of Americans called GOP policies “too extreme,” according to the survey

      The CNN poll is only the latest of several to find that the Republican brand is badly damaged and that the GOP would take most of the blame if austerity measures kick in. That means the party needs a deal with Obama, and will likely try to push most contentious battles into the future when their position is stronger.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2012/12/20/cnn-poll-gop-is-too-extreme/

      • 6 votes
      #1.195 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:14 PM EST

      There appears to be some kind of a deal...with President Obama winning more than the GOP side. But even briefly going off the cliff might hurt the GOP much more.

      • 4 votes
      #1.196 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:21 PM EST

      Good. Now we will return to the Clinton tax rates and spending levels. All you libs keep telling us how great that time was......nows your chance to prove it. Put you money where your mouth is and jump off the cliff!!

      • 4 votes
      #1.197 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:26 PM EST

      Breaking news update - there is some deal done...delaying the cliff for a brief time, renewing unemployment benefit for another year.

      .

      Obama is winning...keep our fingers crossed...

      This has been a breaking news update from PNN (Pigotry News Network), a nun-partisan news source.

      • 4 votes
      #1.198 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:32 PM EST

      last year during the annual "cliff" problem, wasn't it the Progressives who complained when the "Angry Black Man" caved in and passed the Bush extension?

      Didn't the "Angry Black Man" want the revenues from the elimination of the bill?

      So why are all the libbies now going ape about the situation? You should be happy!

      Our spending is at 42% GDP; revenues at 24%. WOW - tax the 2% and the other taxes associated with ObamaCare and perhaps we can take the intake from 24% to 26%!

      Changed my avatar from "ME" to Wild E. going over the cliff......it's 2030 hours on the East Coast, do you know where the "Angry Black Man" is tonight? Is he leading during this crisis, like he did during Benghazi, or is it time to Party?

      Love my going over the cliff avatar! Wild E. Obama moving forward!!!!!!!!

      • 3 votes
      #1.199 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:32 PM EST

      "REPRESENTATIVE, n. In national politics, a member of the Lower House in this world, and without discernible hope of promotion in the next."

      -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary," 1911.

      And still applicable 101 years later. Go figure.

      • 2 votes
      #1.200 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:40 PM EST

      JH-479998

      Because of Obamacare the taxes on aspirin are going up over 500%.

      Speaking on condition of anonymity, one Senator explained the increase; because they're white and they work.

      No, no racism. Not us. It's you guys.

      SmallBiz,

      I am going to sit back and wait for one of these right wing bigots to condemn JH's comment and these other ones...

      Like THAT will EVUH happen, they eat this @!$%# up like mushrooms growing in the dark comfort of their basements!

      So easy for these keyboard warriors to hide behide anonymonity, they don't even have to put on the white sheets any more!

      I will, however, not hold my breath as not only do they LOVE it, they ENCOURAGE it;

      ROBERT-1824614

      Kill the @!$%#

      #71 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:14 PM CST

      By the way, I'm not waiting for useless @!$%#ing Newsvine to do something, I have already reported this threat to the proper authorities...

      And would suggest like minded individuals to do the same!

      ROBERT-1824614

      or @!$%# news media

      #73 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:18 PM CST

      • 5 votes
      #1.201 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:45 PM EST

      Feisty redhead from ill. is always the first to post a meaningless, insulting comment and american girl thinks that Obama* should be as good as Bill "Impeached" Clinton. face it, the paid posters are imposters.

      Obama* thinks that americans who earn Between $250,000 and 1 million dollars per year are the Middleclass.

      Everyone who earns less gets a tax increase. Everyone who gets more is fighting a capitol gains tax increase which Obama* and the democrats do not want to raise.

      You liberals can criticise the tea party democrats and the republicans, but it is the socialistdemocrats who are the majority in the house, and Obama* are the problem.

      Harry Reid has a stack of bills on his desk that are 3 years thick. and not a budget in sight.

      there needs to be a balance for this to work for the people and it is still lopsided by socialistdemocrats.

      Be in Denial all you want, but that is the truth.

      • 3 votes
      #1.202 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:45 PM EST

      Obama is winning...keep our fingers crossed...

      didnt realize this was about Obama winning.

      This has been a breaking news update from PNN (Pigotry News Network), a nun-partisan news source.

      breaking news or wishful thinking? You live to serve Thulsa Doom huh?

      Obama: "Come to me child"

      Pigotry then does a gainer into the rocks below

      • 2 votes
      #1.203 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:45 PM EST

      E-MAIL your Senators and Representatives, whether Republican or Democrat, and let them know you expect them to compromise and to get to WORK on fixing this issue! I know I am paying attention to my representatives and what they are doing! They have known this was going to happen for a year at least, and decided that they would wait until after election to see who would have more power to sway their political party beliefs! It amazes me that I see ploys on both sides that are being done to the detriment of our country!!!

      • 2 votes
      #1.204 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:46 PM EST

      The first sentance says it all.

      they have untill Midnight and the house of representatives adjourned untill New Years Day at noon.

      so liberals always blame the other party. They still had time TODAY, but the democratic majority in the house stopped working. ( which they are famous for)

      I remember when the Democratic black caucus could not get their way, so they just walked out.

      this is like that.

      • 2 votes
      #1.205 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:57 PM EST

      So easy for these keyboard warriors to hide behide anonymonity, they don't even have to put on the white sheets any more!

      This is what Fisty has said of others...see if you can spot the hypocrite

      Nah!

      Leave the pussy-boy on ignore, you can follow the gist of his bull@!$%# by what others copy & paste in their responses... save the brain cells! ;o)"

      Get back to us, when you manage to find your balls... little man...

      NO!!! Dumb@!$%#!

      My power is at the voting booth!

      It is only going to get worse for you & your ilk... Mark my words... LMAO@U.. loser!

      Gonna be a long 4 years for asswipes like yourself, tell me what are YOU going to do when Hillary is elected in 2016?

      Now back on our knees... BOY!

      Best part is a delusional, impotent, little @!$%# like YOU, has NO power to do anything!

      Ain't democracy grand, dumb@!$%#?

      The upside is, at least YOU are not impregnating anyone with your defective sperm...

      And Feisty speaks of reporting people to the proper authorities. Talk about unhinged and a 'keyboard' warrior. Oh wait, her other favorite, VICTIM.... LMAO

      • 6 votes
      #1.206 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:58 PM EST

      Conveniently you ignore: Payroll Taxes, Sales Taxes, Excise Taxes, Property Taxes, State income taxes, School taxes and a bunch more that low income people pay from dollar #1.

      Pay roll taxes are for the big three and they are not that much for the past few years. S.S. is rely just a forced retirement plan that you get jail time for not participating in. sails taxes are mostly state taxes and that is up to your state. I don't have a property and almost 40% of Americans don't have one. and state income taxes are based on state not federal. overall the middle class hardly pays any income taxes and contributes almost nothing for the budget.

      • 2 votes
      #1.207 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:02 PM EST

      HAPPY FISCAL CLIFF YEAR!

      Well done, non-negotiating Congress! I approve of you making us pay for our inability to vote good politicians into office. It is high time voters actually felt some punishment for their bad choices. Directly, this time.

        #1.208 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:11 PM EST

        Looks like the only people who are complaining are the Democrats. I guess they are what we would call recipients of discretionary spending.

        • 2 votes
        #1.209 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:11 PM EST

        As long as the Democrats do not want to do anymore Work, They can use their tax payer paid healthcare and have Psychotherapy which they need so much. Harry reid and what's her name, Pelosi.

        Unless they are afraid that Obama*care will have them all comitted.

        Hillary "Mrs. Impeached" Clinton, has used it for an excuse to avoid questions about Benghazi so far.

        • 2 votes
        #1.210 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:17 PM EST

        One of great things about democracy and freedom is that even morons such as Boehner are allowed to freely show their moronic side. And we are not disappointed by this Boner show.

        • 2 votes
        #1.211 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:32 PM EST

        I am not you,

        [they have untill Midnight and the house of representatives adjourned untill New Years Day at noon so liberals always blame the other party. They still had time TODAY, but the democratic majority in the house stopped working.]

        Do you understand that Republicans are the majority in the House and that Speaker John Boehner is who adjourned the House ?

        • 5 votes
        #1.212 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:41 PM EST

        The failure of Barrack Hussein continues.

        Today our Incompetent in Chief held a campaign event instead of a leadership event.

        The childish background of handpicked “everyday Americans” to give the illusion, again, of his being in touch with Americans.

        More typical Liberal/Progressive symbolism over substance.

        Then he began his latest insult of Americans.

        He started talking.

        And once again, he embarrassed himself and every rational thinking American. He totally removed any spending cuts to anything, even the Social Security COLA chained CPI indexing didn’t help.

        We have a statist gone totalitarian. This is your fundamental transformation of America.

        No plan. No compromise. No debate.

        No clue.

        This is the epitome of the Keynesian anti-American psychosis that consumes poor little Barrack Hussein. His indoctrination by his criminal communist father, socialist mother and then his Leftist-to-the-core grandparents was apparent. He was enrolled in the private, Punahou School, a hotbed of anti-colonialism and anti-Americanism in Hawaii. Then his grandfather introduced him to the avowed Communist Frank Marshall Davis. His years-long association with Marxists, socialists and anti-Americans can only appeal to the Liberal/Progressive cabal that truly hates America and wants to create their wet-dream of social and economic justice for the collective.

        Barrack Hussein was voted into office by the unwashed masses, who feel guilty about their ingrained racism, and use it as a badge of honor that they elected him in. Sort of a “cleansing” of their own hatred for what they propose to be tolerant of. They voted into office a man who resents and distrusts them, their culture, their traditions and their government. Despite all the evidence, his support from the New Party, The Socialist Party USA (Workers of the World Unite), the Communist Party USA and of course the de-facto socialist party of America, the Democratic Party the Left embraces him. Finally his devotion to Saul Alinsky and his “Rules for Radicals” that he uses rapaciously to promote his radical agenda and ideology is blindly accepted by the useful idiots. Of course his fulminant love of Rev. Jeremiah Wright has been documented as his famous “God damn America” is embraced by the Progressive ideology.

        All real Americans have seen the regression of the Democratic Party into the Liberal/Progressive cabal that condemns capitalism and free-markets in favor of a statist driven collective of elitists from academia. Of course none of these need have any experience in governance or experience in government. They’re academia, and the Leftists worship that rather than any experience from their own absolute indoctrination by their incompetent parents, peers and other intelligentsia.

        Today we saw Barrack Hussein take his biggest step towards finally driving the nail in the coffin of a free America. His intransigence to promote any compromise on the fiscal cliff is blatant proof of his disdain for our great Republic. His rejection of a Constitutionally limited government is complete. Anyone who abdicates his responsibility for so long, to create a functional economy, can only be described as criminal if not unpatriotic.

        The fiscal cliff is the least of our Republics problems.

        • 3 votes
        #1.213 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:44 PM EST

        fedupwithfed: Of course it's been Obama's plan from the beginning. It was absurd for the repubs to agree to such a deal in the first place. The repub leadership is truly clueless as they still don't understand that what the dems love is higher taxes and lower defense spending. What fiscal cliff? So far, there has been no discussion about addressing anything "fiscal."

        So, the economy should start booming. The dems have been arguing for 4 years that higher taxes will help the economy. So, let's all kick in our "fair" share and do it!

        • 1 vote
        #1.214 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:44 PM EST

        Thank you President George W Bush for the tax cut if not MORE Americans will suffer under President Obama administration.

        • 1 vote
        #1.215 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:06 PM EST

        And thank you America for re-electing Obama, or we would be in a bigger mess than the A-hole Bush put us in!

        • 5 votes
        #1.216 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:25 PM EST

        gcooper8 @ 1.16 now that gave me a belly laugh.

        I went to my republican psychic "Taxcutta the All Knowing" to conjure the spirit of Ronald Reagan, to see what advice he might have on the Fiscal Cliff. The image in her crystal ball kept fading in and out, I said what's wrong with your crystal ball, she said nothing, he is still senile.

        • 6 votes
        #1.217 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:31 PM EST

        Small Business

        In 2011, A single person not itemizing in the taxable income range of 50,000 - 60,000 is has an effective tax rate between 14.47% and 15.98%.

        Most people itemize and pay a whole lot less.

        Single people have a tendency to not have a mortgage or not pay enough in Health Care to get above the standard deduction.

          #1.218 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:53 PM EST

          Iamnotyou.

          They can use their tax payer paid healthcare and have Psychotherapy

          Improve your credibility. All Federal employees and politicians get their health insurance through the same federal agency and play by the same rules. The Federal program offers dozens of plans, but only pays "up to 72% of the weighted average of the health insurance premiums offered.

          That works out to less than half on the best plans.

          • 1 vote
          #1.219 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:09 PM EST

          What a total sellout by Obama and the Democratic Party!!!!!!!!!

          I am a democrat, and it is absolutely shameful what we have given up in order to avoid this fiscal cliff.

          There will not be enough revenue generated and the 1% will not be forced to reinvest their money in the economy. This means we will be crippled for years. This is a horrible deal for middle class americans. Yet it saves face for the Republican and Democratic legislators. Neither is deserving of any credit on this one - all they did was save their own hides. It's disgusting. I pray that the legislators vote this down and we have no agreement. Absolutely horrible!

          • 1 vote
          #1.220 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:16 PM EST

          President Bill Clinton left office with money in the bank, it's called a surplus. Does anyone know what happened after that?

          • 5 votes
          #1.221 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:17 PM EST

          Obamalicense to,

          Yes, illegals hired by rich greedy corporations and offering them jobs knowing they are illegal and at a rate of pay below that of the American workers. I've already mentioned a foundry near us where there are 5 illegals with the same name and Social Security Number and the owners are fully aware of it. I don't say anything as the foundry would have to close as most Americans won't work for that low of a wage and in such risky jobs.

            #1.222 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:22 PM EST

            The wealthiest own the Senate

            The wealthiest own the House

            The wealthiest own the lobbyists

            The wealthiest own us.

            We are here to make life easier for the wealthiest.

            • 7 votes
            #1.223 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:22 PM EST

            strmz,

            Along came bush and two wasted lost wars. Then the teabuggers and demands to honor Norquist their God!

            • 3 votes
            #1.224 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:27 PM EST

            As for those yahoos who are carping about spending cuts! BS!! For the third time in this nation's history, we are approaching the point where 90% of American will lose their ability to own their own homes. Shame on you!!! Your defense of the 1% will result in your children and grandchildren becoming wage slaves.

            You don't have 10 million to give to your kids - they will be the only one's taxed you dimwitted ninnies!! All your carping is going to result in your own poverty! Geez what a bunch of dumb$&!#s. The saddest thing is your doing this to your neighbors, and you think you have a brain.

            You defend a party that talks about getting government out of your lives, and then wants government to intrude into your healthcare, women's health issues, your bedrooms and now your schools. There are no words to describe how f@(%!#& ridiculous this is.

            You deserve what you are about to get. Sadly, the rest of us don't.

            • 6 votes
            #1.225 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:32 PM EST

            Hello folks, it is absolutely hilarious reading the posts of the Republican Democrat blame gamers. They create this artificial contrived "fiscal cliff" so that they can enact austerity on Americans and not only do they have the sheeple duped, they have them fighting over which type of austerity to have imposed on themselves. WOW!

            America, it is official, we have hit rock bottom, they can't dumb us down any further!

            • 4 votes
            #1.226 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:04 PM EST

            Looks to me like they raised the $ numbers on tax rate increases, kept unemployment insurance extensions paying for another year, and pushed back the sequestration and debt ceiling 'debate'. I'm not too crazy about the first, knew they had to do the second, and don't worry about the last... so this is the best deal they could put together and send to the House.

            McConnell to Boehner: "Pass the Deal."

            Boehner to McConnell: "In case you didn't notice, the House fell on me and my ruby slippers are missing."

            McConnell: "Go to Nancy and get the Democratic votes counted."

            Boehner: "Can't you make it so she comes to me?"

            McConnell: "Good luck with that, they aren't exactly thrilled either. You're the Speaker."

            Boehner: "Thanks, Pal."

            • 2 votes
            #1.227 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:12 PM EST

            clwyd-2621393

            I am not republican, but where in this does it say protect the rich? It says Increase marginal rates for individuals and/or businesses. It is about accountability when their was none, and it protects all Americans. Or, is it in your delusional mind that it reads protect the rich?

            http://www.atr.org/userfiles/Congressional_pledge(1).pdf

            And if anyone treats anyone like a god it is the left not willing to understand that the President is wrong. The country should be looking 2 generations ahead, not what pain it might cause now with all the partisan crap.

            • 2 votes
            #1.228 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:26 PM EST

            No, I see all this BS and I know that it is BS...

            When Dubya started, the federal spending was $1.8T. Duibya's last budget, Oct1, 2008 to Sept 31, 2009, was $3.5T...

            Let's just look at the numbers. Find the numbers (2010 numbers - latest available) here.

            Now, note 2 things:

            Out of ~ $8T earned in this country, the top 50% make 88% of the total income.

            Out of ~ $8T earned in this country, the bottom 50% make 12% of the total income.

            Now, given idiot Romney's discussion of the 47%, does any of this make sense?

            I really don't care anymore. The top 50% of this society is taking 90% of the wealth! What makes that OK?

            • 4 votes
            #1.229 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:37 PM EST

            Yippee, the fiscal cliff is averted. We can now pay off our 16 plus trillion deficit and can now run a surplus in our budget this year. Yippee, we can stop printing 85 billion dollars a month to prop up our economy. We can move interests rates back up from near 0% and stop penalizing the seniors and savers. Our banks can now pay off their liability in the 1.4 quadrillion casino derivatives heist. Yippee we don't have to go to war anymore to support the Military Industrial Complex. We're living the dream. May we all take a moment of silence and thank him on high because frankly you have to be high to think this does one bit of good other than to get the sheeple used to austerity. Wake up folks, the "fiscal cliff" is child's play, when the debt and bond bubbles burst and all bubbles burst you will be begging for the good ole "fiscal cliff" days as the rich will insist we pay for these problems as well.

            You know the rich's adage, privatize the profits and socialize the losses.

            • 3 votes
            #1.230 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:41 PM EST

            Is this ANOTHER piece of legislation that we must pass so we can learn what is in it?

            Last minute, back from the brink, save us all from going over the edge...........

            And just what have we given up?

            • 2 votes
            #1.231 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 12:02 AM EST

            America’s Deceptive Fiscal Cliff

            The Financial War Against the Economy at Large

            by MICHAEL HUDSON

            Today’s economic warfare is not the kind waged a century ago between labor and its industrial employers. Finance has moved to capture the economy at large, industry and mining, public infrastructure (via privatization) and now even the educational system. (At over $1 trillion, U.S. student loan debt came to exceed credit-card debt in 2012.) The weapon in this financial warfare is no longer military force. The tactic is to load economies (governments, companies and families) with debt, siphon off their income as debt service and then foreclose when debtors lack the means to pay. Indebting government gives creditors a lever to pry away land, public infrastructure and other property in the public domain. Indebting companies enables creditors to seize employee pension savings. And Indebting labor means that it no longer is necessary to hire strikebreakers to attack union organizers and strikers.

            Workers have become so deeply indebted on their home mortgages, credit cards and other bank debt that they fear to strike or even to complain about working conditions. Losing work means missing payments on their monthly bills, enabling banks to jack up interest rates to levels that used to be deemed usurious. So debt peonage and unemployment loom on top of the wage slavery that was the main focus of class warfare a century ago. And to cap matters, credit-card bank lobbyists have rewritten the bankruptcy laws to curtail debtor rights, and the referees appointed to adjudicate disputes brought by debtors and consumers are subject to veto from the banks and businesses that are mainly responsible for inflicting injury.

            The aim of financial warfare is not merely to acquire land, natural resources and key infrastructure rents as in military warfare; it is to centralize creditor control over society. In contrast to the promise of democratic reform nurturing a middle class a century ago, we are witnessing a regression to a world of special privilege in which one must inherit wealth in order to avoid debt and job dependency…

            http://www.counterpunch.org

            • 6 votes
            #1.232 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 12:44 AM EST

            ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!

            I guess the executive ordered pay raise Barrack Hussein gave all government employees must have been the catalyst for our criminal government to do something finally.

            In a matter of 3 days they found a way to "avoid" the fiscal cliff whereas they couldn't take a piss alone for the past 16 months since they created this mess last August.

            You can all be happy and back slap each other, I think this is a pathetic exhibition of government criminality. And of course now the media will analyze this from every perspective possible and we'll find our nothing was accomplished.

            Again.

            • 3 votes
            #1.233 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 12:53 AM EST

            The Fiscal Cliff Illusion

            Do these Congress folks have Actor Equity cards? They should.

            Now they can give themselves a raise...

              #1.234 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 1:04 AM EST

              Why all the back slapping when this bill adds more DEBT to AMERICA'S CHILDREN?

                #1.235 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 2:46 AM EST

                Who gives a sh*t what deal the crooked Senate made?! The House controls the purse strings. Hopefully, the Republicans will do what they were elected to do and tell Obama and the Senate to shove the deal up their collective *sses!!

                  #1.236 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 2:59 AM EST

                  As I predicted on this thread earlier (late last evening on New Year's Eve)...there was a deal struck....

                  see comments #1.196 & 1.198 (The senate has acted - time for Speaker Boehner to deliver - I still have my doubts about his leadership ability).

                  .

                  Happy New Year, everyone.

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.237 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 3:03 AM EST

                  Just a lot of smoke to get a raise. There are none so blind as those who will not see. and just think we can do this again in two months. Think they will get another raise then too??

                    #1.238 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 3:34 AM EST

                    Swagganaut

                    Freshieee You're choice; it's time you man up and deal with it and get a taste of your own obstructionist medicine, right wing bastards.

                    how can anyone listen to people like this? your tax dream is very oppressive and basically theft of wealth, you will drain any incentives and push investors away, you will create a larger black market which will result in a decrease in revenues long term, this is historical fact. you want short term gratification in exchange long term suffering. i liked that you actually have some numbers down in response to a question asked but when you use profane insults to end your retort, you lose. do away with all income tax and have a VAT tax, consumption/use tax is the only fair taxation. do not be envious of others gains or you will have none yourself.

                    First of all, my tax goal was to raise revenue and make it more efficient and progressive: I obviously accomplished two out of those three. I am not an economist in any official sense; I do take interest in political economics and public policy, but do not possess (unlike you, I presume) the tools or mathematical models to test such proposals. Secondly, most countries use both consumption and income as a tax base because neither raises enough revenue to support civil society. Thirdly, consumption is not fair taxation because it puts most of the burden on the poor, who spend most of their income on basic necessities and will pay higher taxes than those who make 5 or 10 times their salary.

                    what right do you have to someones elses income? did you earn it? did you do anything to help earn it? so why do you think others should pay more because our government cant play by the rules? we have the US constitution for a reason, read it. http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.htm

                    I'm not claiming a right to someone else's income; no individual has that right. But government is not an individual institution; it is a collective institution, one where the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. And the people who make money owe a debt to the nation; Americans are the natural beneficiaries of this land's great abundance. It is boneheaded conservatives like yourself that are ruining this country by saying that people do not have to pay for the social/economic benefits that they receive.

                    SmBusOwnerinNY

                    speaking of the US constitution i see you either never read it or refreshed your fading memory of it, let me do that for you.

                    That's what you say to every lefty liberal you come into contact with. Classic right-wing insult.

                    Article. IV.

                    Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened),against domestic Violence.

                    hmm seems the US constitution disagrees with your interpretation of us being a representative democracy. maybe you need to read this document that is suppose to limit the power of the federal government, not grant it whatever it wants.

                    In case you weren't paying attention in Civics 101, a republic IS a democracy. It's the form of democracy where the masses possess and exercise their political power by electing representatives to vote on their behalf, otherwise known as an indirect democracy. Republics and democracies are very similar; only very technical details make them distinct. And fyi, the Constitution was not designed to restrict the power of the federal government; it designed to EXPAND it after the chaotic fiasco that was the Articles of Confederation while restraining it within respectable limits.

                    as for all the rest of the citizens who have no understanding of anything around them:

                    define "fair share"?

                    "Fair share" is, quite simply, an amount of money that society deems necessary for one to pay back to society. In my opinion, a person's "fair share" of taxes depends on their economic status and, to quote Jesus Christ: "to whomever much is given, of him will much be required." Or, as Karl Marx made in his translation: "From each according to his ability." I've already stated my definition of fair share, now you demonstrate yours.

                    when will we start reducing our deficits and paying down our debts?

                    Right when we start admitting that we cannot ask seniors, the poor, and the disabled to sacrifice while coddling the wealthy and refusing to demand sacrifice from them as well.

                    you do understand checks and balances right?

                    Yes; do you realize that they are two sides to every door??

                    do you know what a leader is?

                    Do you know that leadership requires compromise and rational-thinking?

                    what qualifies obama (or anyone) to be president?

                    The fact that the American people have deemed him worthy and up to the task of handling the presidency.

                    why dont you hold the dems as responsible as the repubs for doing the same crap?

                    Because while the Democrats have their flaws, the fault lies in the uncompromising attitudes of the GOP. The Democrats have made numerous concessions: on chained CPI (which would be allowed under a larger deal), on more spending cuts, on increasing the income tax threshold, and the decreasing the estate tax hike. The GOP can't even agree on raising tax rates (more revenues were always part of the equation).

                    do you read and understand history (not party propaganda history)?

                    Indeed I do.

                    did you know taxing the rich 100% will not even make a dent because of how bad these politicians screwed us?

                    Actually, taxing the rich by 100% (assuming that you are referring to the top 1%) would go a long way to reduce the deficit; you might want to check your math.

                    do you even comprehend 16 trillion in debt, 20+ trillion by end of obamas term?

                    Yes I do; in fact, some might say I have comprehended it too much.

                    do you even know how much our current unfunded liabilities are?

                    Yes; between $60-$100 trillion, although it is extended over 75 years.

                    The following prophetic Quote about democracy is from Sir Alex Fraser Tytler (1742-1813). He was a Scottish jurist and historian and a Professor of History at Edinburgh University in the late 18th century. This quote is from an 1801 lecture series, and it still rings with great truth:
                    "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters
                    discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on the
                    majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a
                    dictatorship." "The average age of the world's great civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence:"
                    * From bondage to spiritual faith;
                    * From spiritual faith to great courage;
                    * From courage to liberty;
                    * From liberty to abundance;
                    * From abundance to selfishness;
                    * From selfishness to complacency;
                    * From complacency to apathy;
                    * From apathy to dependency;
                    * From dependency back again to bondage."
                    "Perhaps this is why the Founding Fathers did not want a democracy and, therefore, established our representative Republic instead."

                    That cycle is because of imperfect nature of mankind; when we reach the top, we naturally become over-confident and allow ourselves to stagnate back to square one, where we begin our journey anew. And societies do not have stagnate and decline rapidly or even gradually; they can simply lose their edges in certain fields, fall behind, and later catch up and resume their domination. We have lost our keen edge, but not because we spend too much on the wrong things (minus unnecessary wars) or give too few goodies to the wealthy; we have lost our keen edge because we became complacent and fell behind right when we should have worked harder. We gave massive tax cuts to the rich and spent trillions on new entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan when we should have strengthened our already-sound fiscal state and sought to restore faith and respect in America at home and abroad. We stopped innovating in science, math, and education and favored service companies and financial institutions when we should have stepped up efforts to improve education and restore manufacturing as a major economic base. And finally, we let the far right demonize healthcare reform and persuade us that the rich guy helps the economy and the poor guy just mooches off it when we should have fixed our inefficient and obsolete healthcare system and focus on REDUCING poverty and economic inequality via progressive taxation (high rates for top earners) and a stronger yet also modern welfare state (universal healthcare, low-cost higher education, more funding for economic development, and a better labor system).

                    • 4 votes
                    #1.239 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 3:45 AM EST

                    Is Congress and President proud of adding MORE DEBT to AMERICA's CHILDREN?

                      #1.240 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 4:31 AM EST

                      What? over 5,000 comments? You'd think there would be something sensible. I gave up after the first 100.

                      Only #1.16 and #1.61 have given you the only relevant information. This is not one of your sickeningly relentless political rant issues, this is when, why, and how the US became beyond repair: the entire monetary system.

                      The Fed Reserve and other central world banks must be the only legal terrorists. They have carefully, slowly made us all dependent on them and no one with power has the balls or intelligence to examine what they have done to us and to try to free us from their grip.

                      All this bickering is meaningless. The old days of civil wars and revolutions are gone. The weapons and force have been centralised and one complaining move from any of us will be crushed.

                      At least we have the privilege of witnessing the collapse of our country from 300 million souls to a few thousand Machiavellian money/war/ manipulators.

                      Of course, you noticed the clever way Big Pharma and the gun industry have played the Connecticut tragedy into a massive call for arms for everyone and a need to clamp down on 'mental illness' with involuntary commitment to asylums and pharmaceutical neurological control drugs.

                      These are a warning to keep our mouths shut and a green light to blast each other to pieces. We're going to need a storm of documentaries to expose what's happening. We need more than a "Happy New Year", we need a future and, as it stands now, we don't.

                        #1.241 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 5:28 AM EST

                        strmz

                        President Bill Clinton left office with money in the bank, it's called a surplus. Does anyone know what happened after that?

                        you didn't read the posts before your own did you. There are several posts that address your question. The blame for our demise is primarily at the hands of Democrats. Your favorite son as a matter of fact started us on the path to the fical collapse not just this little cliff we are talking about here. Check post #1.164. and read with an open mind. The Republicans many of you call "obstructionists" are actuall fighting for America's future not impeeding Obama. Our governmet to stop the spending more than is available. Right now they are spending revenue that they won't get for over a year and even then it is more than is coming in. Many millions of families have lost thier homes and cars adn even thier jobs because of wreckless spending habits Not living within your means will bite you sometime. Right now if we don't take a very hard line against liberal spending we are all going to be bitten. One or two more years of this and the fiscal cliff will be a minor thing. We will become third world over night we our total income is spent on interest on our debt. Can't you people see it ? The time to fix it is nearly past. It will be too late very soon.

                        • 1 vote
                        #1.242 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 6:27 AM EST

                        The Republicans must be the heroes on this deal. When the word was that no deal was getting done i saw all these posters who said the Republicans were completely and solely responsible for the failures.
                        Now that the deal is done I must assume the Republicans stepped up to make it happen. Agree?

                        • 2 votes
                        #1.243 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 7:17 AM EST

                        Fiesty, do they deliver govment cheese? You know, its ok not to be first all the time on First Read articles at the expense of the rest of your life. I'm picturing you just staring at your monitor, freckles fading from lack of sun, mashing the refresh button just to make sure you post first. Get outside and live a little! I'm worried about you.

                        • 3 votes
                        #1.244 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 8:54 AM EST

                        Backhouse

                        your math skills match your drivel

                        • 2 votes
                        #1.245 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:23 AM EST

                        ...Kornfed..... me thinks Fiesty is a 47%er

                        • 1 vote
                        #1.246 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:39 AM EST

                        Steeler Fan-380417 I was astounded to hear someone yesterday say that in many urban areas, $250,000 really isn't rich. Well, try telling that to someone who makes $25,000 at the Wal Mart in that urban area and is on food stamps.

                        If someone is working at Walmart full time then that means they have no skill and/or education. That isn't anyone's fault but their own. Most people working at Walmart do so to help fund their college education, supplement their income received from a full time job or SS. Or they just want to work part-time with no stress. In this country certain individuals are always going to be poor, they are always going to be unemployed and they are always going to be on food stamps no matter how many taxes the other 47% of the people in this country pay.

                        This person went on to say how the 250,000 person might have kids in college at 60K and help out parents--didn't mention the McMansion and vacations, etc. So those people need a tax break but the unemployed don't need any more help and goodbye to the payroll tax reduction.

                        Actually they need to change the unemployment rules. Far to many people today are taking advantage of staying at home and doing nothing while collecting on our dime. They should make it that in order to collect you "have" to go back and get training, education and a new skill set. Sitting on your behind on facebook and or these boards isn't going to get you back working again.

                        Taxes being raised isn't going to help the mess this country is in. This government needs to cut their spending. In this tax hike, the democrats were also asking for a new "spending" bill to attach to it. If you ask anyone of those people whom you are ditching on that make over $250,000 they will tell you they don't mind paying more, IF and ONLY when the government stops spending it on waste and starts fixing the big issues this government & country have.

                          #1.247 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:00 AM EST

                          John.Gault

                          The Republicans must be the heroes on this deal. When the word was that no deal was getting done i saw all these posters who said the Republicans were completely and solely responsible for the failures.
                          Now that the deal is done I must assume the Republicans stepped up to make it happen. Agree?

                          No. What a great example of Glenn Beck Chalkboard reasoning.

                          The Republicans are stupid for not making a deal a long time ago with many opportunities to do so, and would be even more stupid to go over the fiscal curb now. If this is a bad deal, I hope the Republicans are stupid enough not to vote for it.

                            #1.248 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 4:14 PM EST

                            Avenger-2464988

                            "WHAT IS THE PROBLEM BOYS AND GIRLS WE'RE GOING BACK TO THE CLINTON DAYS."

                            I read your post and must say you brought up some interesting points. Also If you could please answer some questions?

                            What is liberal spending and how is it different from previous administrations?

                            In your mind, what is the ultimate fix for our deficit?

                            Is new money or old money supporting the current economy?

                            Are the current tax laws fair?

                            Will our children have the spending power that we have enjoyed in the past?

                            Should every worthy child have a chance to get a college education at reasonable costs?

                            Are you planning on collecting SS when you become of age? Will you collect SS even if you don't need it?

                            I could go on, but with such confusion I admit. I'm hoping you can clear it up and teach me something.

                              #1.249 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 8:53 PM EST

                              TruePatriot-445959

                              The Republicans are stupid for not making a deal a long time ago with many opportunities to do so, and would be even more stupid to go over the fiscal curb now.

                              Hmmmmm, so, using your own logic would you say the Democrats are stupid for not passing a feasible budget a long time ago?
                              Or, are you one of the indoctrinated bobble-heads which don't believe the largest most complex economy in the history of man needs a budget?

                                #1.250 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 8:59 PM EST
                                Reply

                                I agree,enough of this .

                                All these tax cuts where temporary anyway

                                • 31 votes
                                #2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:28 AM EST

                                I agree and all of this is going to have to happen eventually. They're just stalling! Its going to have to happen!

                                • 7 votes
                                #2.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:52 PM EST

                                Hey Pat from Beantown, lets say you are president and you want

                                those making over $250,000 were part of the 2% wage earners in this country. If that's the case, then the figure should stay at $250,000, not $400,000 or $500,000.

                                Then lets say I am a republican legislature and I ask you where are the spending cuts? None? OK? I guess we will take the Obama tax increase and we can deal again when we hit the debt limits in 2 months.

                                Lets face it the tax increase is just symbolic and punitive to those that the president hates the most. It is like pissing in the ocean and claiming that it raising the water level. Lets at least be honest about it.

                                I am sure that the people that voting in their republician legislatures did it know that that is one check against a government that has gone insane.

                                • 13 votes
                                #2.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:15 PM EST

                                And he inked a pay raise for the VP, congress, and judges -- he knows how to spend, too bad he doesn't understand the value of the taxpayers money. He's worthless!

                                • 21 votes
                                #2.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:24 PM EST

                                It is really not about the taxes slick. It is about reckless spending. How much is enough. You a-holes don't have an answer.

                                • 13 votes
                                #2.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:54 PM EST

                                Where did those numbers appear from Dennis. Liberals are us?

                                • 5 votes
                                #2.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:56 PM EST

                                The angry black man you are looking for is a failure.

                                • 9 votes
                                #2.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:57 PM EST

                                Senate and House, and the President are all poised again. It's bi-partisan.

                                They were poised in August 2011 so they could take the 6 week midsummer vacation, they were poised in November 2011 (super-committee) so they could take the Thanksgiving vacation, they were poised December 22 2012 so they could take a Christmas break, and now they are poised for their favorite bowl game on TV.

                                They poise themselves every single week for a long weekend, often Thursday through Tuesday.

                                You can't say they are not poised.

                                • 6 votes
                                #2.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:16 PM EST

                                This is no fiscal cliff. It's a molehill compared to what's going to happen when our government finishes pushing the economy off the the REAL debt cliff - when we can't pay the interest on our loans. We will become third world overnight. Neither you people on the right or the left have a clue.

                                • 17 votes
                                #2.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:30 PM EST

                                Yeah, reckless spending on Defense. That's the bloated budget that needs to be trimmed! Swords into plow shares - how about turning those F35's into Interstate highway and bridge construction?

                                • 3 votes
                                #2.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:42 PM EST

                                It's disgusting how Boehner looks soooo proud of his idiocy.

                                Obviously, he's so comfy financially he doesn't have to worry about anyone but himself. Oops. I take that back. He cares strictly for the Republicans and "maintaining" the the status of the rich, who obviously rule the country.

                                What a pathetic piece of work he is.

                                • 5 votes
                                #2.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:50 PM EST

                                Both parties are ruthless in their attacks and witch hunts. Do you honestly believe any are innocent of the continuous insolence? There are just as many Democrats as Republicans that would cheat, lie, and sell their mothers and children for power, fame and fortune. Neither party has the right to throw the first stone because they have no fault. If you honestly want to see this country heal, both parties need to learn to forgive and be better examples for our children and grandchildren. Rather, let us elect candidates that demonstrate stewardship abilities to manage and lead with "compassion for all". We haven't taught that ideology in our schools or homes for several generations. We rarely even try. We have taught our children condescension, distrust and how to kill. Our colleges teach reward for confronting the opposition at their weakest points rather than demonstrating and teaching students how to help the opposition in repairing and strengthening the opposition's weak points. A healthy bottom line at all cost and at someone else's expense, seems to be the only mantra. That's why we falter and fail today. When we teach and reward our children (both at home and in the classroom) for creating and maintaining healthy relationships we will then be able to teach our children how to grow a healthy nation and share it with others. I think we have lost our way, don't you?

                                • 7 votes
                                #2.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:55 PM EST

                                In the absence of a broader agreement to resolve the sequester, McConnell appeared in the Senate floor to request a vote only on the tax element of the fiscal cliff.

                                "Let's pass the tax relief portion now," he said. "Let's take what's been agreed to and keep moving."

                                But it's not clear that Democrats, who were led in negotiations by Vice President Joe Biden, would agree to de-link the tax debate from other fights over the sequester and extending expiring unemployment benefits past Dec. 31.

                                Well it looks like "bite me" Biden and the senate democrats have decided to throw the middle class under the bus! Shocking!

                                • 12 votes
                                #2.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:59 PM EST

                                Boehner, shnahner: He is not the president. The one you voted for is the one you're expecting results from. Where are they?

                                • 8 votes
                                #2.13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:03 PM EST

                                Merry Cliff-Mess ????????????

                                .

                                RepubliCONs are so afraid of their being punished by their rich donors in November 2014 that they decided to go off the precipice. Cowards.

                                • 6 votes
                                #2.14 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:11 PM EST

                                If we make the rich richer they will help our economy by spending their money..... ahhahahaha......hahahaha....hahaha......ha! Also I think someone stole my profile pic. Probably a republican! Can't leave the poor man alone.

                                • 3 votes
                                #2.15 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:48 PM EST

                                Meant to post this ^^^^ on first feed

                                • 1 vote
                                #2.16 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:54 PM EST

                                Pigotry,

                                Agreed, one hell of a place for one to find oneself. Damned if you dare give an inch because the Tea Party and Christian right will crucify you in the next Republican primaries. Damned if you fail to make an honest effort at compromise because the 2014 American electorate will throw all such Republican nominees out on their butts that turn their backs on all but the wealthy today.

                                That marriage of convenience to all of the crazies in years gone by doesn't look so convenient today, does it? The creeps that use every dirty trick in the book and haplessly trample innocent others to hurry their way up the ladder always face a rapid fall back to the bottom when they least expect it. Their only expectations can be swift kick in the a$$. Not a single sympathetic soul in the crowd.

                                The last 20 year banishment from power for Republican leadership (following the Great Depression) seems easily forgotten. The coming banishment may very well spell their demise without a single tear being shed.

                                • 4 votes
                                #2.17 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:06 PM EST

                                Miss Piggy

                                DEMOCRATES are so afraid of their own shadows. They hide behind the bush until the big boys have gone in for dinner.

                                YOur president is leading from behind again. Does know how to run a card game let alone a country.

                                THis is his failure and another broken promise.

                                • 8 votes
                                #2.18 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:10 PM EST

                                miss piggy needs a boar! Oink, oink!!!!!!

                                • 6 votes
                                #2.19 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:53 PM EST

                                Someday, every student in America will mispronounce John Boehner's last name without ever being corrected.

                                • 5 votes
                                #2.20 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:17 PM EST

                                This might actually be good to go over the 'cliff'. Since the Dems refuse to budge an inch in their spending cuts, hemming and hawing and refusing to specify any kind of reduction, it is better that both sides win. We can have both cuts, and tax increases. The other way, only the Dems win, and of course, they love tax increases so they can spend them (and then some, only to repeat the process very quickly), and they will never ever reduce their spending.

                                Asking a Dem to reduce spending is like asking a meth addict to give up meth, it just isn't going to happen.

                                • 3 votes
                                #2.22 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:50 PM EST

                                drpaultyler

                                YOur president is leading from behind again. Does know how to run a card game let alone a country.

                                Apparently card games were all the "leaders" in your party were able to muster during this last pathetic session of congress, because they sure as hell weren't creating any new legislation. I realize it cannot be easy for these legislators to recognize a leader, let alone follow one, while their heads are wedged so firmly up their asses.

                                • 4 votes
                                #2.23 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:52 PM EST

                                I can’t believe how many people still defend the Republicans. Have any of these right wing zealots even taken the time to do basic research on ANYTHING?

                                I saw one guy stating that the deficit under Obama is 1.2 trillion dollars higher than under Bush…. Another blatant lie, the deficit has been cut by over 200 billion dollars under Obama.

                                Most of these so called facts come from right wing blogs and Fox lies so they are absolute hog wash. Why these people continue to pass on lies and twisted TRUTH is not just disturbing it’s also damaging to the country.

                                If there was ever a time that we needed the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth, it’s now. The right wing nut bags and the Republican Party are diseases we must rid ourselves of before we can even begin to heal this country.

                                Many years ago President Kennedy said “Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country”…….. Now there’s a thought that is so far from right wing thinking and ideology that it’s not even a tiny blip on their radar.

                                The so called “conservatives” have become so corrupted by greed and self interest that they have forgotten the basics of what it means to be and American. They hate everybody are afraid of everything and have adopted a philosophy of “my way or the highway”. Their paranoia causes them to look at compromise as evil because somehow people are out to get them. I truly pity these people, their act like scared children lost in their own little make believe world of lies and ignorance.

                                • 2 votes
                                #2.25 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:14 PM EST

                                They came to a deal - showed on the internet at 9:14 pm. McConnell called Biden and they made it happen. Will vote tomorrow or Tuesday, but looks good.

                                  #2.26 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:34 PM EST

                                  Income taxes were never meant to be permanent.... only after DC got a taste did they concoct a method to fleece the American citizen....... it has now been turned into a FREE-RIDE in return for the Democrat vote.....

                                    #2.27 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 12:05 AM EST

                                    Yep, those dreaded income taxes. We should all enjoy the mightiest military in the world, the very best infrastructure and a life of ease without paying a penny in taxes. Who exactly expects a free ride?

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #2.28 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 2:14 AM EST

                                    As I predicted on this thread earlier (late last evening on New Year's Eve)...there was a deal struck....

                                    see comments #1.196 & 1.198 (The senate has acted - time for Speaker Boehner to deliver - I still have my doubts about his leadership ability).

                                    .

                                    Happy New Year, everyone.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #2.29 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 3:06 AM EST

                                    I find it interesting that it wasn't until Biden got involved (stepping over Reid the Geezer) that progress was made...

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #2.30 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 6:22 AM EST

                                    Fellow Americans,

                                    A deal may have been struck, but Congress failed to act in the interests of American before their self-imposed deadline. We didn't avert the cliff. We went over it! All they can do now is backpedal. Write your rep and senators and let them know that you think they're idiots.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #2.31 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 6:54 AM EST

                                    It was nice to see a few things got done here. among them: The Farm Bill.

                                    They also saw the wisdom in not giving themselves a pay raise of 900 dollars per month. (That wouldn't go over very well doesn't matter who's side your on).

                                    Now to keep the pressure on the new congress to do what is right by the American People.

                                    The warning has been put out there (even by Fox news) Republican party get it together or you'll be voted out come mid terms.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #2.32 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 8:37 AM EST

                                    Kick, Kick, Kick.........

                                    Did the Senate pass a bill!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMAO ;o)

                                    When will America's downgrade happen???????????????

                                    USA = Account Overdrawn:o(

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #2.33 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 8:37 AM EST

                                    Pigotry

                                    you condemn the Republicans for there rich donors why not condemn the not so rich at first democrats that got rich while in office like Pelosi ???Or Obama both went from just over a million in assets to over 10 million, oh I forgot Obama sold books, to whom john Q ??/ give me a break

                                      #2.34 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:32 AM EST

                                      Looks like they saved the Bush Tax Breaks to the poor and raised the taxes on the people that create jobs.So he just raised 40 billion form the new taxes but the sandy baillout is 60 billion lolol

                                      this President is a joke throwing cheese to the poor while they all get rich.

                                        #2.35 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:02 AM EST

                                        2014 is coming and it will look just like 2010 we will take the senate.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #2.36 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:05 AM EST

                                        BigAl Las Vegas I can’t believe how many people still defend the Republicans. Have any of these right wing zealots even taken the time to do basic research on ANYTHING?

                                        If you are defending any party or only condemning one party then you haven't done your basic research on anything. Its taken both parties to get us to this point in one way or another.

                                        I saw one guy stating that the deficit under Obama is 1.2 trillion dollars higher than under Bush…. Another blatant lie, the deficit has been cut by over 200 billion dollars under Obama.

                                        There is no disputing that GWB was president for 8 fiscal years and holds more responsibility for the deficit than Obama for the last 11 years of deficits. But Obama bears more responsibility than he is willing to accept, and misrepresents any analysis of the situation to minimize his responsibility. When a deficit is in the trillion's a few billions (one trillion is 1000 times one billion) isn't a cut, is it.

                                        The finger pointing from both sides does not solve what most everyone recognizes is a huge problem. The point is where do we go from where we are, and who has a plan to reduce the deficits over the long term. As far as I can see, neither party has a plan.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #2.37 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:33 AM EST
                                        Reply

                                        Pres Obama's Job Approval: 53% / 42% [+11]
                                        Speaker Boehner's job approval is 31% / 51% [-20]
                                        Congressional Approval: 18%
                                        Debt ceiling negotiations Approval / Disapproval
                                        Republicans: 17% / 69% [-52]
                                        Pres Obama: 38% / 50% [-12]

                                        • 34 votes
                                        #3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:29 AM EST

                                        Hi Dennis,

                                        Hopefully in 2014, the American People will get rid of at least 35 members of this republican do nothing Congress.

                                        • 40 votes
                                        #3.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:33 AM EST

                                        Dennis---I want to know who are the 18% who approve of Congress? Really? What can they like about what is going on in Washington?

                                        • 36 votes
                                        #3.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:24 PM EST
                                        Comment author avatar1funnygirlExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                        approval ratings? Still doesn't get the job done in this worthless Congress.

                                        Where is the "Angry black man" when leadership is needed? He delegates?

                                        • 10 votes
                                        #3.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:25 PM EST

                                        @1funnygirl- I assume when you are referring to the "angry black man" you are referring to the President of the United States, correct?

                                        Obama is leading, Boehner is not. It is the House's job to deal with these issues. Obama has submitted 4 plans to deal with the spending/ lack of revenue issue, Boehner only put his plan (B) to vote and it failed miserably. If you want to criticize anyone for lack of leadership, take a look at the House Republicans which have consistently failed the Americans when it comes to budgeting.

                                        • 33 votes
                                        #3.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:39 PM EST

                                        Congress has had over 550 days to avoid this "panic deadline" and they have done nothing. That is more than understandable when half of congress saw their primary duty being the prevention of an Obama re-election. They failed in that effort and are now trying to blame Obama for the approaching deadline which congress itself imposed in late 2011. Good luck in trying to sell that to the American people. As it stands, the GOP warrants the lion's share of the blame but both sides are culpable. Now they want to cobble together a deal by cherry picking previous concessions made by Obama but rejected by Republicans. I hope he has the gonads to parrot back their clarion cry ~ "My way or the highway" ~ but I doubt he will.

                                        • 31 votes
                                        #3.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:43 PM EST

                                        Barack just allowed a pay increase for congress... all while saying we need to tax some Americans more... you support that?!

                                        • 22 votes
                                        #3.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:45 PM EST

                                        reya,

                                        Compared to "what" budget has Obama ever presented and passed? Exactly WHEN was the last time we had a budget? How in the world do have any faith in the President or Congress to stick with a budget??

                                        Job,

                                        So you would rather have all Democrats?? That would be a receipe for a quicker demise of our country than anything else.

                                        • 22 votes
                                        #3.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:47 PM EST

                                        So you would rather have all Democrats?? That would be a receipe for a quicker demise of our country than anything else.

                                        Please do tell me who was in power when the economy, jobs and housing went up in smoke? Just who was it that voted for tax cuts during war time that created our debt?

                                        Republicans want to act all concerned about the deficit as they demand tax cuts for the rich while they maintain it is alright to take care away from our returning wounded veterans to pay down the debt.

                                        To top it off, who ran on jobs, jobs, jobs in 2010 and have voted against every jobs bill, including one for jobs for our returning veterans?

                                        But lets all pretend that the democrats are the problem.

                                        Vote for any republican at your own peril.

                                        • 25 votes
                                        #3.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:07 PM EST

                                        Job,

                                        So you would rather have all Democrats?? That would be a receipe for a quicker demise of our country than anything else.

                                        JK yes he would. a lot of FR posters in here would love one party DPRK style rule. They'll come out and say they dont and will act apalled by such accusations but in the same breath state how great it us under Obama rule when reality speaks to the contrary. Let them eat gruel.

                                        • 12 votes
                                        #3.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:09 PM EST

                                        The EO it requires that Congress pass a budget … something they haven't done in over 3 years.

                                        If you make $16 an hour and you have not had a pay raise in the last 2 years and now if you wait just another 3 months you MIGHT get pay raise of 8¢ per hour or for a 40 hour work week you will get an additional $3.20 weekly. If you make $70,000 a year it will be an increase of only $350.00 per year after having no pay increase for over 2 years.
                                        Wow, just wow!!

                                        On Thursday (12-27-2012), Obama issued an executive order that would lift the freeze and implement a 0.5% across-the-board increase starting the first pay period after March 27, 2013.

                                        President Obama and Congress agreed in the fall to maintain the freeze that began in January 2011 through the end of the current continuing resolution. Obama recommended a 0.5% pay increase next year for feds when Congress passes a budget. It remains unclear when or if that will happen.

                                        • 12 votes
                                        #3.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:15 PM EST

                                        UNION and LIBERTY (liberal) are mentioned several times in the US Constitution. Ayn Rand, ZioNazi shills, infinite greed, Mammon worship, rights of monetary system manipulators, speculators and war profiteers, hating the president because he is half African American, are never mentioned once in the Constitution. So all you neo-capitalist, pompous pigs masquerading as republicans go to China where you belong.

                                        • 13 votes
                                        #3.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:15 PM EST

                                        Funny girl. That is funny. You have never seen the President angry, yet. but you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. Congress would rather let us go over the cliff then to do anything that makes the President look good. There puppet masters tell them what to do and when to do it. I have always said let us go over the cliff. On the Third we have a new congress and then we can give the tax brakes and unemployment back to the people that need it. Then we can also make the Defense cuts that are needed to protect Medicare, Medacade, SS. That will not heart the Military, but it will heart the Rich, that make much money from those contracts.

                                        • 15 votes
                                        #3.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:19 PM EST

                                        @jk1963

                                        2014- due to be submitted by Feb 2013

                                        2013 US federal budget- submitted by Obama in Feb 2012, not yet passed

                                        2012- US federal budget- submitted by Obama in Feb 2011, passed November 8 2011 and December 23, 2011

                                        2011- US federal budget- submitted by Obama in Feb 2010, passed April 2010

                                        2010 US federal budget- submitted by Obama in Feb 2009, passed in July 2009

                                        2009 US Federal Budget was submitted by Bush in Feb 2008, passed unknown

                                        The President submits a budget and Congress passes (or doesn't pass it)

                                        • 12 votes
                                        #3.13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:29 PM EST

                                        MNslim,

                                        Why don't you put aside your racial bias for 2 seconds...

                                        Dennis,

                                        If you work for a company that LOSES money year after year, would you really expect a raise? I have worked for several companies and if they lost money, guess what, no raises. Is that such a hard thing to understand? This is why governments spend more than they receive. This is why working class Americans, don't like when they hear government workers getting a raise when they don't. And guess, what? IF they don't like it, I'm SURE that of the 23 million people still unemployed they would find someone willing to work.

                                        American,

                                        You seem blinded as always...Republicans AND Democrats voted for the the tax cuts. Republicans AND Democrats voted for the war. (nice that you didn't bother to reply to question about why we are still at war under a Democratic president). And if you are using the simplistic notion that you blame who ever was in office at the time, then WHO was in office that we will have 23 million people unemployed??

                                        • 9 votes
                                        #3.14 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:35 PM EST

                                        Please do tell me who was in power when the economy, jobs and housing went up in smoke? Just who was it that voted for tax cuts during war time that created our debt?

                                        So let's really look at who is the problem. We have been sliding down this hill for quite sometime. Since 1945 the democrats have held the majority in the house 26 times and the republicans only 6. The Democrats have controlled the senate 22 time and the Republicans only 10. So when you look at the overall failing of this country it is not the republicans looking out for their rich investor friends. It is truely the Democrats. And once again we sit at a time when the Democrats are making it look like the Republicans are the bad guys. When in fact, all the Democrats want to do, is take care of the Insurance industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the banking industry, the labor unions and Wall Street. Keep drinking the Kool aid Democrats.

                                        • 12 votes
                                        #3.15 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:38 PM EST

                                        JK1963,

                                        Executives and top level managers that work for failing companies and banks get huge bonuses and pay raises even when they are losing money. Some CEO's walk away with $50 million golden parachutes after a year or two on the job as the company fails.

                                        However Government is not a company and while they are currently spending more than they take in any government can not be look at or treated as a business, company or corporation.

                                        If you own a home then you may well be in debt for 3 or 4 times your net worth which is worse that our government is in debt.

                                        • 18 votes
                                        #3.16 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:56 PM EST

                                        If you work for a company that LOSES money year after year, would you really expect a raise?

                                        Proving once again how out of touch JK1963 really is with reality. In the past 3 years, corporations and CEOs have netted historical all time high profits and pay increases, and have more cash on hand than ever in the history of commerce. And how do they compensate employees for this massive wealth generation - by lowering pay and withholding salary increases. And to boot, the little bit*ches whine over a small tax increase. It is simply astounding.

                                        • 22 votes
                                        #3.17 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:02 PM EST

                                        Congressional pay raises should be tied to the INCREASE or DECREASE in the average income of Americans......

                                        It OUR income goes up, Congressional pay goes up.......

                                        When ours goes down, Congress has to take a PAY CUT just like the rest of us............

                                        • 13 votes
                                        #3.18 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:16 PM EST

                                        What a pathetic excuse for a president this country not only elected but re-elected. This non-leader couldn't run the night shift at a Burger King. The obvious problem is spending. The genius community organizer president's answer, more taxes plus additional spending to drive the deficit even higher.

                                        • 13 votes
                                        #3.19 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:23 PM EST

                                        JK1963, the CEO and 19 executives were given $100K in bonuses for bankrupting Hostess while denying a pay increase to the workers who were also demanding the firm invest in modern equipment to keep up with the competition. Go ahead, JK, defend that while deriding a 0.5% pay increase for federal workers whose pay has been frozen for two years.

                                        • 19 votes
                                        #3.20 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:31 PM EST

                                        Jody,

                                        You pick just one example of the thousands. Sure we can play that game...Did you also bother to understand that the bakery union was the ONLY union NOT to agree to the concessions? So not only did they bankrupt themselves out of a job, they also bankrupted their fellow rank and file brothers from the other unions that were willing to take the cuts. You also seem to forget that federal employees enjoy much greater benefits than private workers. AND like I said before...if they are that unhappy, there are 23 million other folks that would be more than willing to work.

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #3.21 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:59 PM EST

                                        pgulrich - what a pathetic group of Repubicans in Congress you little righties elected. Still not doing a damned thing but obstructing. Thank heaven the majority of Americans had the good sense to re-elect President Obama to keep a handle on things!

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #3.22 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:03 PM EST

                                        Thank heaven the majority of Americans had the good sense to re-elect President Obama to keep a handle on things!

                                        and he's doing a fine job of pointing the finger. damn fine leadership

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #3.23 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:12 PM EST

                                        Jody, those companies are privately owned, so if they choose to pay bonuses to CEOs when they are in the red so be it.............not a smart thing to do, and THEY are being irresponsible on how they run their companies. they should know better....................whats worse is the government bailing them out, knowing exactly why they are failing and giving them the money anyways. makes no sense to me, maybe they should let them fail, that way they will run their companies better tell the unions no thanks and run their businesses better. WITHOUT the help of the government.

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #3.24 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:17 PM EST

                                        Caesar,

                                        I'm just waiting to see what "an angry black man looks like"....

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #3.25 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:23 PM EST

                                        Jody, Iowa...your comment is correct as is RedDevPS. If only RWNJ who come to this website to promote their own wares were only as well informed as you. Anyone who belongs to the 99% group could sit down and get this done with far less drama. They do it every day of their lives with the limited resources available to them. They are far more capable of understanding the real consequences of reductions or impact on sources of revenue. This congress has chosen to go out the same way it began with a whole lot of drama contesting for an Academy Award. I might add those who keep demonizing the president (name calling, lack of leadership) reflect how little they know about Social Studies. Here's a little help to increase their understanding on how a bill is passed. I could have used the link for Schoohouse Rock's version but I'll be kind.

                                        http://www.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=4702

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #3.26 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:37 PM EST

                                        "Tick Tock Tick Tock! Speaker Boehner! Time is running out! You'll get to explain to the good hard working people of Ohio why you failed them and the rest of the country so miserably!"

                                        This is all worth the price of admission. Gravy bowl lickers freaking out as it goes down to the wire, worrying that they'll have to pay something and freebies might dry up....not to mention another multi-month extension of jobless benefits that might evaporate if the moral and good republican legislators decide to call it quits on all the free fill-ups of the gravy bowls.

                                          #3.27 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:59 PM EST

                                          I'm just waiting to see what "an angry black man looks like"....

                                          JK1963, I take it the 'angry black man' line is a Fisty et al special? why am i not suprised FR lefty lib reverse racism.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #3.28 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:05 PM EST

                                          Dennis

                                          The senate hasn't passed a budget in 5 years. YES 5 years. The House has passed a budget for the past 2 years, Plus one for the previous year that the Pelosi was speaker.

                                          And you think the Republicans are the problem?

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #3.29 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:16 PM EST

                                          Caesar,

                                          Yes, she pulled that out a few days ago and of course her band of nitwit supporters all claimed that wasn't a racist remark... Go figure...

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #3.30 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:19 PM EST

                                          Yes, she pulled that out a few days ago and of course her band of nitwit supporters all claimed that wasn't a racist remark... Go figure...

                                          well i save Fisty Red Dawn the suspense, an angry black man is probably the same as an angry white man. Just a hunch. unless Fisty is getting all 'ghetto' on us. Perhaps someone can catch Fisty on da rebound on da med side.

                                          remember kids, Fisty is the reason drugs are bad mmmkay

                                          • 8 votes
                                          #3.31 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:31 PM EST

                                          DB,

                                          I said “over 3 years” but no it is not 5 years either.

                                          Just where did I say that Republicans are the problem ?

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #3.32 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:50 PM EST

                                          reya

                                          @1funnygirl- I assume when you are referring to the "angry black man" you are referring to the President of the United States, correct?

                                          Yep - just using Feisty's quote! Why, if you believe it is bad to use that descriptive phrase, blame Red.

                                          Obama is leading, Boehner is not. It is the House's job to deal with these issues.

                                          Nope, the Pres. submitted budgets, and every time all members voted his down, even his Dems. The House has submitted to the Senate proposals which Harry Reid tabled, no introducing them for a vote.

                                          Now the balance of the crisis is being fought between Harry and Mitch? Two people only who believe they know best for the rest of us? And where is Barry - spending the night with Joe Biden. What the heck where those two doing while the other two negotiated?

                                          And this morning Barry surrounds himself with people to announce a "no deal"? Did he think those two and Joe could hammer out what he is stuck on? The "angry Black Man" doesn't lead, he delegates! Can't blame Barry when we all go over the cliff!

                                          Obama has submitted 4 plans to deal with the spend ing/ lack of revenue issue, Boehner only put his plan (B) to vote and it failed miserably.

                                          What four plans? It's a rehash of his original plan! Barry needs the money - he doesn't want to reduce potential revenues! Our outgo for the nation is 42% of GDP and the income is 24%! We be out of money folks!

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #3.33 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:57 PM EST

                                          deleted

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #3.34 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:12 PM EST

                                          Congressman Boehner and the rest of his Greedy Obstructionist Party cohorts should be tried for treason.

                                          They are deliberately tanking the economy for no other reason than partisan politics. Way to go, RepubliCONs. You have just sold your nation out for an outdated promise to Grover. We, the 98% thank you for making our lives harder.

                                          I would like to say that we will remember this come 2014, but I know how stupid American voters are, and how easily they fall for the Right Wing Nutjob Propaganda. You'll tell them that Democrats want to take their guns away, you'll tell them that you like praying, you'll tell them that you're a moral, upstanding, family-values oriented leader, you'll tell them that you want to protect their rights against the "socialists", and you'll tell them that they're unpatriotic if they don't support you. That has always worked in the past.

                                          I for one will remember. I will remind everyone I know that you sold us all out, to protect the richest 2% of people in this country. You did nothing for us. You should all be stripped of your citizenship, and deported. You're not an American. You're an Oligarch.

                                          How can you claim to love America, when you clearly hate the average American so much that you sell us out to the richest fat cats?

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #3.35 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:25 PM EST

                                          Congressman Boehner and the rest of his Greedy Obstructionist Party cohorts should be tried for treason.

                                          Good Luck. Why dont you grab pitchfork and torch and go do the good little mob thing and march on the GOP.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #3.36 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:30 PM EST

                                          All hail Caesar...well stated. Fisting Redheads racism is apparent in her posts, but the moment anyone says anything from the right, she throws the card on the table. If it wasn't so apparent that she is employed by First Read to seed their articles, I would believe she was the wife of one of the slave owners in D'Jango.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #3.37 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:33 PM EST

                                          red.curry.chicken.yummm

                                          Barack just allowed a pay increase for congress... all while saying we need to tax some Americans more... you support that?!

                                          You know, Boehner and his crew can turn this raise down, which would be the right thing to do, but I doubt they will.

                                          I think this is a good play on President Obama, to show you how greedy Boehner and his rich friends are.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #3.38 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:08 PM EST

                                          If it wasn't so apparent that she is employed by First Read to seed their articles

                                          then its NBC's fault for pissing money away.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #3.39 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:17 PM EST

                                          Looks like the only people who are complaining are the Democrats. I guess they are what we would call recipients of discretionary spending. We all know there are some frivolous spending within our government. It is time to tighten that belt.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #3.40 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:16 PM EST

                                          This is Obama's folly- it was his failed "super committee" that brought this on to begin with, and then Obama and Reid have put it off until after the election, so here we are. He didn't take the advice from Simpson/Bowles, he is such an arrogant @ss who just blames everyone else for his miserable failure. Of course the kool aid drinking obama leg humpers refuse to see it.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #3.41 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:03 PM EST

                                          Jodi

                                          CEO and 19 executives were given $100K in bonuses for bankrupting Hostess

                                          What a hideous mangling of what happened. This is something Karl Marx would have been honored to say himself.

                                          These bonuses were court approved, meaning the creditors were aware and in agreement. This is done to to keep the company from falling apart because all the management left for new jobs. If you lose the management, there is no chance to save the company and the company will be worth less to the creditors.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #3.42 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:25 PM EST

                                          DB,

                                          Thank you...it's refreshing to have the facts laid out for those that either chose to not research the facts or has too limited an intelligence to understand the truth.

                                            #3.43 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 2:31 AM EST
                                            Reply

                                            these guys have been shooting their mouth off about holding the line because the prez is folding. attempting to create dialogue is not folding and if the prez holds his position he will rec his results.

                                            • 12 votes
                                            Reply#4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:30 AM EST

                                            I wish the President could stop the congresses pay until they do there job. On the first, there pay should stop until they get something done. Now some are not coming back, but if you want things to change then hit them where they live like they do to us. These over paid do nothing Scum should not be paid. I also think the AG should go after all the People that signed the Pledge not to ever raise taxes. That Pledge is in direct violation, of there pledge they took when they took there office. Talk about traders, they all should be jailed. But they have been taking bribes openly sense 2000 at least. That has to be stopped.

                                            • 7 votes
                                            #4.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:28 PM EST

                                            Chuck, you have no clue how our government works, or why it is designed the way it is. You wish for things that are just unamerican. Do you really want a president to have that power? Will you still want it the next time a Republican is elected? You need to educate yourself, or stop exposing your ignorance in public.

                                            • 6 votes
                                            #4.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:38 PM EST

                                            "Chuck, you have no clue how our government works, or why it is designed the way it is. You wish for things that are just unamerican. Do you really want a president to have that power? Will you still want it the next time a Republican is elected? You need to educate yourself, or stop exposing your ignorance in public."

                                            In the Middle, thanks. It was painful to read Chuck's post, but once you start it's hard to stop as you marvel at the lack of any understanding of the issues. Many of these nitwits actually believe the government would serve the people better if 1 party controlled Congress and the WH. This thinking is so shallow and irrational. I assume, though, it's based on plain ignorance.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #4.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:18 PM EST

                                            The Nazi "Charter of Labor" gave employers complete power over their workers. It established the employer as the "leader of the enterprise," and read: "The leader of the enterprise makes the decisions for the employees and laborers in all matters concerning the enterprise."

                                            exactly what the current set of teabag republicans want

                                              #4.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:41 PM EST

                                              kr,

                                              Both parties are pandering to their base. They're going to make some very uncomfortable decisions. They have to go back to their base and say "See? We held the line and the other guys wouldn't flinch." It's just posturing.

                                                #4.5 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 6:58 AM EST
                                                Reply

                                                Don't let them waste the revenue from the expiring tax cuts. We need to use it to reduce the deficit, not increase spending. Please sign my petition now: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/use-all-revenues-expiring-tax-cuts-reduce-deficit/my8LLGLy

                                                • 4 votes
                                                #5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:34 AM EST

                                                Really? How dare we spend money on jobs or the people in our country when the republicans think we should starve the people to pay down the deficit to pay for the incompetence of the republicans when they for the first time in history gave tax cuts during war time and created the huge deficit.

                                                Even though the republicans lied us to war, lied us to the deficit (remember deficits didn't matter, only tax cuts for the rich mattered) and this im possible petition says lets destroy America instead of a stimulus to create jobs for a better America.

                                                Anyone who truly cares about the deficit would have never voted for a republican in the first place. How dumb do you have to be to believe the same party that lied America to war and lied about the deficits are now the ones to believe and the ones to save us from the original republicans incompetence?

                                                The republicans set this whole cliff debauchal up on purpose and now wants us to trust republicans who want now to sent America into another recession for tax cuts for the rich. Or at least punish the rest of us with a stupid petition that any new revenue can't be used to take care of our wounded veterans or create jobs, no all that money should go to pay for the republicans past incompetence.

                                                I think we should tax the rich who can afford it now and get Americans back to work, get our economy growing and only then should we raise taxes on the rest of us to pay down the deficit when we won't harm the America economy doing it.

                                                • 34 votes
                                                #5.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:15 PM EST

                                                Americans First-3238795 -
                                                Do you believe that your beloved democrats care anymore then the knuckle head republicans? Barack just allowed a pay increase for congress. He says we must raise taxes on some Americans to ease the pain. Apparently also to fund their lives. These politicians are pitting simple minded Americans against each other while they all get rich off money pulled from our paychecks. The democrats and republicans have shared the power and should share the blame. But no... republicans call democrats morons and democrats call republicans retarded. This is exactly what our elected crooks want so they may continue to do as they please.

                                                • 12 votes
                                                #5.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:52 PM EST

                                                American,

                                                I see you are still with the same old tired rantings from the left. Lied to war? Then why are we still at war with a Democratic president? Lied to us about the deficit? Then why did Democrats from both houses vote for the tax cuts? The simple fact is that these were supposed to be temporary tax cuts, now the left wants to make them literally permenant. Exactly what part of "temporary" don't yo understand?? As for spending cuts, saying that you won't incur future expenses for funding the war does not count as a spending cut.

                                                And who is to say that we haven't ALREADY been taxing the rich?? Why don't we make the tax code more fair for everyone? Do you think it's fair that homeowners are entitled to a mortgage interest and property tax deduction while that chose to rent don't get that same deduction? You on the left scream about all these supposed loopholes that the rich take advantage of, but then would scream bloody murder if we took away YOUR deduction, right? It's always easier to point the finger at those that have been more successful financially than you to have them pay. Stop for a minute to think that they HAVE been paying taxes...

                                                • 12 votes
                                                #5.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:57 PM EST

                                                "As of March 27, 2013, federal employees will see a half-percent to one percent pay increase, marking the end of a pay freeze that has been in place since late 2010. "

                                                So please stop with this crap, R-wingers. Rs spent millions on stupid sh*t for years now and no one is blinking an eye.

                                                • 10 votes
                                                #5.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:59 PM EST

                                                Steve,

                                                Democrats spend just as much on "stupid @!$%#" as does Republicans...

                                                • 10 votes
                                                #5.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:11 PM EST

                                                Kim. We need to spend some money to get people back to work. That will snowball into more taxes, less money spent on unemployment. Clinton knew this and it worked.

                                                • 15 votes
                                                #5.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:31 PM EST

                                                Fine, I like Clinton, but Clinton spurred the economy, he did not take it over. Obama is, was and will always be less than Clinton.

                                                • 5 votes
                                                #5.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:40 PM EST

                                                chuck,

                                                What do you think the stimulus bill back in 2009 was for?

                                                • 4 votes
                                                #5.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:50 PM EST

                                                Federal employees already earn far more than their private sector counterparts.

                                                The private sector has to follow the rules..... the federal government does not.............

                                                • 9 votes
                                                #5.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:21 PM EST

                                                chuck - you're absolutely right but the far right will never understand. Clinton spent to spur the economy - which you do during a recession. Republicans don't get it - never will.

                                                • 12 votes
                                                #5.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:32 PM EST

                                                The private sector has to follow the rules..... the federal government does not.............

                                                Nikita is that you?

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #5.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:52 PM EST

                                                Excellent post, Americans First-3238795 (5.1).

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #5.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:56 PM EST

                                                Your president.

                                                Has no plan.

                                                And, that,.. is his plan.

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #5.13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:17 PM EST

                                                Reposting factual comments made by:
                                                "ItsAboutTime-3704531"

                                                "The numbers:

                                                Republicans have introduced 44 bills on abortion,

                                                99 on religion,

                                                71 on family relationships,

                                                36 on marriage,

                                                67 on firearms/gun control,

                                                522 on taxation,

                                                445 on 'government investigations,'

                                                and zero on job creation."

                                                http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/oct/25/facebook-posts/blog-post-says-gop-has-sponsored-zero-job-creation/

                                                #1.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:28 AM PST

                                                • 9 votes
                                                #5.14 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:24 PM EST

                                                Oh and Steve, government employees do NOT earn more than counterparts.

                                                That is why I was an ART for so many years.

                                                I was an aircraft mechanic.

                                                I pays a HELL of a lot better in the private sector.

                                                The ART program was designed to lure in aircraft maintenance people at far lower pay.

                                                It still goes on to this day in ALL aspects of federal government.

                                                I know.

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #5.15 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:32 PM EST

                                                I don't know why everyone is excited about not going off the fiscal cliff. Just not this time. We might as well, because congress(D or R) will continue to do this until countries finally ask for their money back. Which will happen within the next 10 to 15 years, because they will have their own bills to pay. The "Fair share" thing is bull. The top 10% of the higher income pay for more than 45% of all taxes collected by the IRS. More than that don't even pay income taxes. So what's their fair share? As for the Federal Reserve. It is a fake bank. What it is a bank that is owned by the US and headed by a person introduced by the president and approved by the Senate. It was created back in the 60s to replace the Gold Standard because the US was borrowing and spending so much that they couldn't find enough gold to back up the amount borrowed to hold the value of the dollar. That is why before then, all gold had to be sold to the government, like China, at a low rate so they could afford it. So they created the Federal Reserve, a bank that is owned but not operated by the US government and the value of the dollar is based on faith and trust.

                                                Chuck, the longer Congress continues unemployment benefits the longer unemployment will be high. This has been proven by cases in other countries. A country in Europe continued their unemployment for four years and when that four years was up, unemployment went down. So they shortened it to two years and the same thing happened. Why would somebody want to work if they can get free money for applying for a job. If you get offered a job that pays less than what you get every month for just filling out applications, would you really take the job.

                                                Being on these government programs and getting free food, free college and free gas to go to school is nice, this is from experience. But there is ALWAYS a catch. What do you do when you graduate? If you go to get a job in what you studied, you get kicked off these programs that you've depended on. That is what these programs do. They make you become a dependant. People say Canada is a very liberal country, because their government counts as 41% of their ecconomy, our's only counts for 40%. Land of the free?

                                                It is no lie, there WILL be a fiscal cliff. The thing that matters is when. Because the further Congress kicks it, that higher it becomes. Because soon these countries we are barrowing from(China, Japan, Brazil, etc) will stop buying bonds and start cashing them in. After the next decade, these countries will have the same retiring generation problems as we are having today.

                                                Now I know people are going to disagree with this, but let me put this in another way. How many of you can turn to your kids and grand kids and ask them for money? Because that is what will happen in the future. They will be paying your Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Substidized Healthcare, etc. It is ALREADY SAID by researchers that the "Children live one and a half times better than me" has ended. Future generations will now have to pay for our credit card spending. So again, how many of you can turn around and ask your kids and grand kids for money?

                                                  #5.16 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 4:45 AM EST

                                                  and zero on job creation."

                                                  Yet with them in we have created more jobs that the previous 2 years (before they were elected) so doing nothing creates jobs.

                                                    #5.17 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 5:03 AM EST

                                                    Auto 101

                                                    and zero on job creation."

                                                    Yet with them in we have created more jobs that the previous 2 years (before they were elected) so doing nothing creates jobs.

                                                    ---------------------------------------

                                                    "Auto 101",

                                                    Despite endless filibusters by the GOP to block everything that Congressional non-conservatives proposed, and no job bills coming from the GOP, on the contrary for nothing happening, we were able to recover because a lot has happened in the economy that made it possible in the States, and initiatives by the Federal Reserve Bank, as well as stimulus packages and government industry loans (for example, to the Auto Industry) that all helped to reboot this economy out of the Great Depression doldrums that the conservatives created under their watch in the last Administration.

                                                    ------------------

                                                    Economic Recovery - Federation of American Scientists

                                                    www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41332.pdf

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #5.18 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:07 PM EST

                                                    Auto Industry

                                                    yes the Auto industry going bankrupt saved it. I wonder who said they should go bankrupt?

                                                      #5.19 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:15 PM EST

                                                      Auto 101

                                                      Auto Industry

                                                      yes the Auto industry going bankrupt saved it. I wonder who said they should go bankrupt?

                                                      ---------------------

                                                      Going bankrupt? Not how economists described it.

                                                      And obviously, Willard didn't get elected, among other things, for saying stupid things like that, yes?

                                                      Jindal: Republicans need to stop saying ‘stupid things’

                                                      http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/268633-jindal-republicans-need-to-stop-saying-stupid-things

                                                      The Auto Industry Bailout

                                                      http://useconomy.about.com/od/criticalssues/a/auto_bailout.htm

                                                      • 2 votes
                                                      #5.20 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:31 PM EST

                                                      W Bush started Auto and Financial TARP, but with no repayment requirements. Obama continued it WITH payback conditions, but little in the way of restrictions on bonuses/payouts for the Bosses.

                                                      We have received the majority of funds back from ALL TARP infusions where repayment was tied to the disbursement of funds.

                                                      Next.

                                                        #5.21 - Wed Jan 2, 2013 2:19 AM EST

                                                        Going bankrupt? Not how economists described it.

                                                        Tell me how do they describe it? it is still bankruptcy it is the same bankruptcy that all the air transportation industry has gone through. Look at American Airlines they are still in bankruptcy and are on their way out of it.

                                                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_2008%E2%80%932010_automotive_industry_crisis_on_the_United_States

                                                        Chapter 11 bankruptcy is bankruptcy no mater how you want to put it.

                                                          #5.22 - Wed Jan 2, 2013 9:32 AM EST

                                                          From Auto101's Link:

                                                          Bush approves bailout

                                                          On December 19, George W. Bush announced that he had approved the bailout plan, which would give loans of $17.4 billion to U.S. automakers GM and Chrysler, stating that under present economic conditions, "allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action."[82] Bush provided $13.4 billion now, with another $4 billion available in February 2009. Funds would be made available from the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.[83] General Motors would get $9.4 billion, and Chrysler $4 billion.[84]

                                                          However, it had been argued that the Treasury lacked the statutory authority to direct TARP funds to the automakers, since TARP is limited to “financial institutions" under Section 102 of the TARP. It was also argued that providing TARP funds to automaker's financing operations, such as GMAC, runs counter to the intent of Congress for limiting TARP funds to true "financial institutions".[85] On December 19, 2008, President Bush used his executive authority to declare that TARP funds may be spent on any program he personally deems necessary to avert the financial crisis, and declared Section 102 to be nonbinding.[citation needed]

                                                          The federal loan would prevent General Motors from going into immediate bankruptcy. The bailout required both companies to dramatically restructure their operations to demonstrate long-term viability.[83] In February 2009, the Obama administration would determine the automakers' progress in meeting the conditions of the loans, and then decide whether to supply more government aid or to force automakers to repay the loans and face bankruptcy.[84] The loans would carry an interest rate of 5 percent but may rise to 10 percent if the auto manufacturers default on them.[86]

                                                          So in the end, they filed for bankruptcy, but never actually went into bankruptcy, due to Obama continuing Bush TARP and those auto manufacturing companies not defaulting on their deals with Obama's TARP.

                                                            #5.23 - Wed Jan 2, 2013 6:28 PM EST

                                                            Obama continued it WITH payback conditions, but little in the way of restrictions on bonuses/payouts for the Bosses.

                                                            Correction: It DID have strong restrictions regarding bonuses, payouts, and golden parachutes, as well as restrictions on company jet ownership/usage.

                                                            Sorry for the mistake posted by me previously.

                                                              #5.24 - Wed Jan 2, 2013 6:38 PM EST

                                                              So in the end, they filed for bankruptcy, but never actually went into bankruptcy, due to Obama continuing Bush TARP and those auto manufacturing companies not defaulting on their deals with Obama's TARP.

                                                              No they went through bankruptcy here in this link they emerged from bankruptcy from by selling a number of companies no inorder to emerge from bankruptcy you have to go through it.http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2009/07/gm_emerges_from_bankruptcy.html

                                                                #5.25 - Thu Jan 3, 2013 2:28 AM EST

                                                                Thanks, Auto!

                                                                Did also find this, as well.

                                                              • General Motors Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization Complete ...

                                                              • General Motors Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization Overview and Details

                                                                Biggest Retail Industry Bankruptcy in 2009 Is Fourth Largest in U.S. History

                                                                By , About.com Guide

                                                                See More About:

                                                                General Motors took the top spot on the 2009 store closing list in May, 2009 when it announced that it was closing more than 2,600 of its retail outlets in an effort to keep itself out of bankruptcy court. The total number of jobs that will be lost when all the stores are finally closed is estimated to be 130,000, which also puts GM at the top of the retail job cuts list for 2009.

                                                                GM wasn't able to keep itself out of bankruptcy court, and when the company filed for Chapter 11 on June 1, 2009, it wasn't only the largest bankruptcy of the year for the U.S. retail industry, it was also the fourth largest bankruptcy reorganization in the history of United States business. It may have been one of the biggest, but it was also one of the shortest bankruptcy reorganizations processes in history, lasting just 40 days.

                                                                What follows is an overview of GM's Chapter 11 proceedings, and the transactions that allowed the brand to survive, and a new government-owned company to emerge with a fresh start in the U.S. auto industry.

                                                                • #5.26 - Thu Jan 3, 2013 9:15 PM EST
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  I originally posted this on Dec 14, in response to a republican defending low taxes for the rich, we are still waiting to see how it turns out.

                                                                  let's tax the rich another 15% so they pay what I pay, another 2% would put them at 17% and still leaves me at 30%, or hey why don't you republicans demand that my taxes be lowered to 15% I don't hear any of you sticking up for me, I pay a much bigger percentage on my comparatively modest income than any rich person does. Low taxes or high taxes either way, but it should not be so disproportionate. But don't worry republicans won't raise taxes on the rich alone, they will blow the negoiations and Sequestration will kick in and that will raise everybodys taxes (that is the deal they agreed to, it was their idea) and I'm fine with that. Republicans can raise the taxes on 2% or on 100% of taxpayers it's their move, lets see if they keep your taxes low or sacrifice you for their campaign donors.

                                                                  • 26 votes
                                                                  #6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:43 AM EST

                                                                  Why does a portion of the 47% that voted for Willard, work so hard to protect the top 1 to 2% that could care less for them.

                                                                  • 32 votes
                                                                  #6.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:48 AM EST

                                                                  Forrest Grump 2.0

                                                                  lets see if they keep your taxes low or sacrifice you for their campaign donors.


                                                                  Forrest,

                                                                  They will sacrifice us because that's the kind of blood suckers they are.

                                                                  • 29 votes
                                                                  #6.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:52 AM EST

                                                                  I have no idea Job 1, I have had more of those people pitch a bitch about me making 50 bucks an hour as a union man, even though I paid plenty of taxes, always had my family covered with health insurance so those costs were never a burden to the government or anyone else, and have a nice pension fund so I won't be a burden to society when I am old and sick. They tell me I am sucking the system dry with my union negotiated wages and benefits even though my employers all signed off on those contracts and always made a nice profit from my labor, and all the while they defend a guy like Romney to the death as he makes $57,000 a day, has not worked in years, pays a lower percentage of tax than me, and keeps his money in offshore accounts. I can't explain it Job 1, I have met more dirt poor republicans that will rant against unions and praise the rich as they live in a trailer home and work non union for 12 bucks an hour. I don't get it Job 1, I really don't. Funny thing is now I am management Job 1, I make more than I ever did to do less than I ever did and they have no problem with that. I don't get that either.

                                                                  • 32 votes
                                                                  #6.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:31 PM EST

                                                                  GRUMP, you are a freaking genius.

                                                                  • 12 votes
                                                                  #6.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:55 PM EST

                                                                  Ha, well thank you very much drpaultyler, I am going to tell my wife that my new doctor says I am a genius!My guess is that she will say I should get a second opinion.

                                                                  • 13 votes
                                                                  #6.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:13 PM EST

                                                                  Job1: Poor people don't create jobs. If Obama gets his wish to destroy those with money, then no one will be working, there won't be any tax revenue, and finally the country collapses.

                                                                  That's why I support allowing wealthy people to keep their money: they create jobs, which creates income, which creates tax revenues, which keeps the country growing. Liberals must be drowning in the kool-ade if they can't understand this simple principle.

                                                                  • 5 votes
                                                                  #6.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:32 PM EST

                                                                  Oblama, the great divider-in-chief, continues his quest to split the country.

                                                                  Black-white, hispanic-white, union-nonunion, rich-poor.

                                                                  • 10 votes
                                                                  #6.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:38 PM EST

                                                                  Contracts signed under pressure to walk off the job....and you are blaming who? Look past your own selfish needs for a second and you might figure it out. Unions are a wart on society, and so are those selfish, greedy brats who support them.

                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                  #6.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:44 PM EST

                                                                  Say Veteran55 they have had those low taxes for 12 years now where are those jobs. Romney has not even created a job for himself in the last 8 years.

                                                                  Rich people don't just create jobs because they have a pile of cash. If a business has more customers than they can handle with their current level of employees they hire, if they have more employees than needed to service their customers they lay off, it has nothing to do with cash on hand or tax rates. You need millions of people with a few bucks to spend not a few people with millions to spend to have a good economy. Who do you think supports the small businessmen in your community? Who goes to their pizza parlors or beauty shops, you see a lot of millionaires shopping in your town, your town have a Rolls Royce dealership, or maybe a yacht builder? Rich people don't create jobs out of the kindness of their hearts, rich people only employ other people if they need them to collect or extract profit from other working people. Like I said Romney is rich and he hasn't even created a job for himself.

                                                                  • 15 votes
                                                                  #6.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:54 PM EST

                                                                  I been a member of my union for over 35 years and we have never a strike, walkout or lockout, in that time, I do not know anybody that even knows when our local last had a strike. Even though I am management now I still and will always maintain my union membership. You think any employer that I negotiated with ever agreed to more than he could afford to, like I said they make a nice living off the labor of our members. Unions Rock, good pay Rocks, health benefits Rock, my personal pension fund Rocks, making a decent living for my family Rocks.

                                                                  • 15 votes
                                                                  #6.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:06 PM EST

                                                                  Liberals must be drowning in the kool-ade if they can't understand this simple principle.

                                                                  Except this myth you believe is flat out false. Decreasing taxes and increasing wealth for corporations and the wealthiest Americans has not resulted in comparable job growth. The only thing that has been increased is wealth. When will conservatives understand this super-simple principle?

                                                                  • 14 votes
                                                                  #6.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:09 PM EST

                                                                  veteran55

                                                                  You are living in lala land.

                                                                  • 9 votes
                                                                  #6.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:25 PM EST

                                                                  Job1 - no lala land kicked veteran55 out!

                                                                  • 9 votes
                                                                  #6.13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:33 PM EST

                                                                  If the President agrees on the rise on individual income over $400,000 per year, and household income of $450,000 per year, I can live with that. However, I would like to see the difference made up by setting the $1,000,000 per year rate to 41%, which would give us more revenue.

                                                                  • 8 votes
                                                                  #6.14 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:46 PM EST

                                                                  Except this myth you believe is flat out false. Decreasing taxes and increasing wealth for corporations and the wealthiest Americans has not resulted in comparable job growth

                                                                  Actually it has, Clinton success was not a success, He benefitted from the dot com bubble while cutting our military to bare bones,It was only the dot com bubble that allowed Clinto to downsize our military and close all the bases That bubble burst as GWB took office , After Bush passed the tax cuts federal income rose to above Clinton levels and has basically stayed there since, Clintons highest year had a 2.025 trillion dollar revenue, 2012 estimated revenues with the Bush tax cuts in place are 2.468 trillion dollars worth of revenue, Prior to the Bush tax cuts and during the burst of the dot com bubble income dropped slightly from Clintons highest year, after the Bush tax cuts Government revenue climbed steadily and even in the recession of 2008 the government recorded 2.534 trillion dollars of revenue

                                                                  • 4 votes
                                                                  #6.15 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:57 PM EST

                                                                  You people are real good at taking money from people that have more than you, are you jelous? If you made your money off of investments instead of working 40 or so hours a week, than you would pay the same low rate they do, why is that wrong? My daughter makes mid to high 6 figures and pays more in taxes than probably 90% of the people posting on here, yet you say she is not paying her fair share. Please, take your jelous, pety, class warfare and stick it straight up your a$$.....

                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  #6.16 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:16 PM EST

                                                                  after the Bush tax cuts Government revenue climbed steadily and even in the recession of 2008 the government recorded 2.534 trillion dollars of revenue

                                                                  However, we spent in 2008 3.168 trillion. We also spent more every year of the Bush tax cuts than we took in revenue. For 2002 through today we have spent more each year than we took in.

                                                                  • 4 votes
                                                                  #6.17 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:24 PM EST

                                                                  Rich-1104538

                                                                  Well Rich, If your daughter make more than $450,000, tell her to get ready because her taxes are going up. Period!

                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  #6.18 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:27 PM EST

                                                                  Oh yeah hjack Obama spilt the country, " Black-white, hispanic-white, union-nonunion, rich-poor" before he was elected it was just one big love-fest between all these groups, and you forgot men and women he split them too right.

                                                                  Truth is he united blacks, Latinos, women, young people, and union members, he got their votes in astounding numbers and totally lopsided percentages compared to Romney he even took a good number of white males along with them, he won every single swing state that supposedly could go either way, truth is he united a hell of a lot of people. Now how in the hell could he win every single swing state if he divided people instead of uniting them. He is a democrat and he took the Oval office, democrats gained seats in the senate, and they gained seats in the house, so make no mistake about it, he united people. Your rants have no basis in fact, if you want to claim he divided something then just say he divided the winners from the losers.

                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  #6.19 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:37 PM EST

                                                                  So In the Middle, if you were offered a union job with a $54.00 an hour wage and fringe package that included health insurance and a defined contribution pension plan, would you turn it down?

                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  #6.20 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:43 PM EST

                                                                  Well Gee LostinthePineBarrens, I never realized Clinton's success was not a success I was fooled by that huge surplus he left Bush, I guess I was also fooled about all that increasing revenue that was collected after the Bush tax cuts because he left us broke on our ass and with the whole economy on the verge of collapse. I was also fooled by all the people working overtime and making lots of cash under Clinton, and then losing half a million+ jobs a month in Bush's second term, now I understand Clinton's success was not really success and Bush's failure was not really failure, thanks for clearing that up for me. Hey one last question, I know what Clinton did with his increased revenue he left a big pile of it for Bush, what the hell happened to all that climbing revenue collected under Bush plus the surplus left by Clinton?

                                                                  • 7 votes
                                                                  #6.21 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:00 PM EST

                                                                  Forrest Did you even look at the post election results? Obama won in the cities of EVERY swing state u putz! Now how in the hell did he unite all these people u say?

                                                                  The BLAME game MUST stop! I could care less if their black white blue or green! Reb. or Dem OR just a bum. They are PAID thats right PAID by YOU AND ME TO DO THE JOB! if you dont do your job your fired. I say FIRE THEM ALL!

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #6.22 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:07 PM EST

                                                                  Oh and "HE" united us?????? Ahh just read the posts and the papers and the rest of the garb. If you think "he" united us u must be smokin that sht in was. or col. I live in pa and EVERY county except 5 he lost. Guess where the counties were that he won? CITIES! Now why is that? FREEBIES thats why PERIOD! Oh and by the way I've been in the union for 31 yrs but I believe that you earn your pay. Not freeload off the public or mooch your way into everyones wallet!

                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                  #6.23 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:24 PM EST

                                                                  CITIES!

                                                                  OH NOES!

                                                                  How DARE those evil cities get a vote... Why should those damn city folks get a vote when us bottom feeders continue to vote against our own best interest! ;o)))

                                                                  Does it say in your bible Constitution that those damn cities are NOT allowed to vote? LMAO@U dumb-@!$%#!

                                                                  Go inflate the tires on your double wide & clean out your septic tank, you and YOUR ilk are health hazards to your neighbors, not to mention this country!

                                                                  • 4 votes
                                                                  #6.24 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:57 PM EST

                                                                  Jeff people in cities or rural areas have all the same rights privileges responsibilities and choices the only difference is that large concentrations of the population and therefore large concentrations of votes reside in cities that's all there is to it. You want to act like every body in a city is on the dole which is just ridiculous so don't accuse me of smoking something the cities are filled with people that work, business owners, cops fireman, teachers and all manner of people that earn their living, the majority of the people live in the cities and he got the majority of the vote it's that simple. I got news for you Jeff nobody is ever elected to any national office or wins any statewide election if they don't get the votes in the large cities of their state you act like this is a new phenomenon, it's just math Jeff, that where the votes are.

                                                                  I will whole heartedly agree that you better get out there and earn your union pay and benefits, the man pays you a decent wage and benefits and by golly you owe that man a decent days work for a decent days pay, I have never told my members any different. You want to be paid like a professional then you got to perform as a professional. You want that man to give you a raise, well he can't give you what he don't have, so you better go out there and make a buck for him, on that matter we are in agreement.

                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  #6.25 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:34 PM EST

                                                                  jeff Where do I sign up for the freebies? Sounds like you know tell me. I can't find them.

                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  #6.26 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:48 PM EST

                                                                  Yes I would Forrest, as I am paid more than that now. Second, unions want defined benefits, not contributions. Hell, for that matter, the entire Democrat party wants defined benefits, not defined contributions.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #6.27 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:11 PM EST

                                                                  Yeah, my husband and would like to know wher our "free stuff is" because he's STILL workinf 6 nights a week on graveyard shift busting his ass and my 9 rx medications and doctor bills still have to meet that rotten deductible and coinsurance that kills us every year so nothing "free here" and we have to pay all our taxes like we do EVERY YEAR. Nope. Nothing free just like it has been all along for us as taxpayers. The only thing that HAS changed is my state taxes are going to Walker's rich corporate pals instead of my children's education and state services that I USED to pay for and that pisses me off no end.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #6.28 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:34 PM EST

                                                                  Good for you in the middle you have a very good job then.

                                                                  The pension I am referring to is definitely a defined contribution, not a defined benefit, the benefit is 9.5% of your gross, that money is deposited into a completely vested from day one retirement account where you can choose from many different investment options. The contribution is clearly defined, it is 9.5% percent of your gross, the benefit is not defined that will depend on how much you earn, if you work overtime ect, because obviously that will affect the amount of your deposits, and of course the big factor is how well the investments you choose do over time. It is a defined contribution individual retirement fund, not a defined benefit retirement payout. I think it has served our members and our employers quite well. I am convinced it is better for me, that money is there for my wife even if I was to die before I retired, instead of just getting so much a month after I retire. What a screw job if you have a defined benefit, work all your life then retire and drop dead a month later. It works well for our employers because they know exactly what their liability is, they owe 9.5% of their payroll each week and have no further obligation past that. They don't have to worry about me living to I am 99 years old or some unknown future obligation for retirees based on a defined monthly benefit. I have a nice sum amassed, and it is there, it does not matter if an employer goes out of business, it does not depend on their future financial status, my money is there for me in my own personal account. The employers have no future worries either, they pay as they go, they make the deposits as each employee works, the minute the employee is no longer working they have no future obligation to pay into any retirement fund. They pay 9.5% of your gross into a personal retirement account, each employee gets an instantly vested retirement fund and each employer instantly fulfills and knows exactly what their retirement liability is. It is a defined contribution plan. Like I said, my union rocks!

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #6.29 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:25 PM EST

                                                                  Evidently you have to go to the city Smitty, that is where the freebies are, there must be some sort of yellow brick road you can follow, I hear a lot about it, but I have never found it either.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #6.30 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:44 PM EST

                                                                  let's tax the rich another 15% so they pay what I pay, another 2% would put them at 17% and still leaves me at 30%, or hey why don't you republicans demand that my taxes be lowered to 15%

                                                                  You do know if they lower your taxes to 15% from 30% I will be paying 0% since I pay 6% on 91,000. FO you think that is fair?

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #6.31 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 5:06 AM EST
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  Libs still thinking the nation agrees with them. You are only 50% folks. You have to negotiate. If Obama has a mandate so do all those GOP elected officials. Guess the system is working just the way it should. Checks and balances. Thank goodness neither side gets a blank check.

                                                                  • 9 votes
                                                                  Reply#7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:10 PM EST

                                                                  Hey, inSane-#'s, go the numbers from the November 6, 2012 election. You will find that among those who voted the percentage at the end was 53% Democrat vs 47% Republican. (Presidential numbers).

                                                                  As for Liberal's being 50%, it does not automatically mean the remaining 50% is Conservative. You have a great number of Independents, Libertarians, and other assorted ideological groups in America.

                                                                  So, if Liberals are 50% and the remaining 50% is others guess who has the majority.

                                                                  Face it, the GOP is only interested in two things: 1) Never voting for a tax increase, and 2) Getting themselves re-elected in 2014, or at least not being primaried by some bat-@!$%# crazy Tea Party candidate in 2014.

                                                                  Only a simpleton thinks Liberals are looking for a blank check.

                                                                  • 21 votes
                                                                  #7.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:32 PM EST

                                                                  We voted 53% for President Obama. This makes us the majority and we are in a majority rule country.

                                                                  The party that loses the election usually has to give up a little more in negotiations.

                                                                  You know as well as I do that if the republicans had won the election, they would have steamrolled ahead with their plans no matter what the rest of us think. The republicans are doing that anyway and they lost.

                                                                  Why should only one party care about the health of our economy? We can't get tax cuts for 98% of Americans because the republicans only care for tax cuts for the rich, no matter what it does or has done to our economy. But somehow the lied to, think the democrats need to negotiate with the republicans in the republicans traitorous need to destroy America for the rich?

                                                                  What republicans always seem to forget is that the same people who lied them to war in Iraq are still lying to them today. Sadly even doing more damage to our country. Rove even admitted that if not for all the lies he was telling the elections would have been even an bigger blowout for the president.

                                                                  Vote for any republican at your own peril.

                                                                  • 22 votes
                                                                  #7.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:38 PM EST

                                                                  Totally agree with you about the the blessing of checks and balances in our country.

                                                                  But the $250,000 question is: Why are 49% of you so gung-ho to pay for the luxuries of the 1% at your own expense? Please explain.

                                                                  (Seriously, what am I missing here?)

                                                                  • 16 votes
                                                                  #7.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:39 PM EST

                                                                  This is why we are at this gridlock. Spending is out of control

                                                                  Senator Mark Begich, a Democrat from Alaska, is “pleased” to include more than $200 million in pork spending in the Sandy legislation, a bill meant to help those affected by Hurricane Sandy.

                                                                  President Barack Obama has ended the pay freeze on federal employees

                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  #7.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:58 PM EST

                                                                  Americans First-3238795

                                                                  When did we become a majority rule country? At what time did this republic...with its representative democracy...become a mob rules/majority rules nation? My representatives better do as I ask them, not what you ask them.

                                                                  I love that winning with 53% is a blowout...jeez 53-47 is hardly a blowout by anyones standards.

                                                                  Why is the only arguement people have that it's all about taxing the rich? Why can't it be that maybe the republicans are trying to hold down spending? Is that not possible? Maybe republicans are against tax and spend thinking...could that be it?

                                                                  • 8 votes
                                                                  #7.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:19 PM EST

                                                                  QX2smith: Yes, it could be. But then why were they so willing to spend so much during the Rove/Cheney administration?

                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  #7.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:45 PM EST

                                                                  To correct some idiot above, our constitution was designed to protect the voice of the minority. We all matter in this country, not just you.

                                                                  • 5 votes
                                                                  #7.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:03 PM EST

                                                                  I can't say for sure. What did 9/11 cost us? Maybe trillions by some estimates? Was that needed? Hurricane Katrina cost how much? I don't know the answers myself. Wars....definitely expensive...approved by congress and not just the republicans.

                                                                  I do know that our current debt/deficit is outrageous and minimal revenue increases without control of spending will not touch it.

                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  #7.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:17 PM EST

                                                                  drpaultyler,

                                                                  We are at this gridlock because we have elected officials that no longer try to compromise. It has been that way for several decades, but there was a time when the opposing parties actually worked together (before Vietnam). Something happened since that war and that generational period which changed the way our government officials work with one another and for the voters. We now spend more, we waste more and we are lazier about setting and accomplishing goals for the good of all. It's a much more ME ME ME world.

                                                                    #7.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:24 PM EST

                                                                    True, they need to find their common ground once again. Until then, we will suffer because they are so insulated that they don't care. I think the President truly cares, and is so frustrated because the GOP has been out and out rude and disrespectful. November showed that. I have emailed Speaker Boehner and the White House. I am keeping track of all the congressmen/woman of my state and will hold them accountable. Do we need disasters to "keep us together"? We need to start looking at the greater good for all of us. Rich, poor, young, old, black, white, hispanic....we all bleed the same color. We need to start acting like it again.

                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    #7.10 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 1:25 AM EST
                                                                    Reply

                                                                    This whole CLOWN SHOW is reflective of HOW utterly STUPID and UNEDUCATED Americans are at decision making. The lack of doing the homework on voting for a representative that PROVES HIS OR HER SKILLS at being a MIDDE OF THE ROAD INDIVIDUAL. Look at the results SHEER RADICALS AND EXTREMIST PEOPLE making decisions that have NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WHOLE NATION.

                                                                    We the people HAVE TO BLAME. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE LOST SITE OF WE THE PEOPLE !!!!!!!! It is replaced with WE THE TOP MONEY!!!!!

                                                                    • 7 votes
                                                                    Reply#8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:17 PM EST

                                                                    Maybe not on topic but , S.S. revenue is capped at 105 thou , is there a cap on S.S. payments as it is tied to earnings. that is , what would someone earning ,say, 1 million a year receive in payments. I don't know, would like an answer.

                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                    Reply#9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:18 PM EST

                                                                    Around $2515/month, assuming you earned the maximum income from the age of 21 until 66.

                                                                    • 5 votes
                                                                    #9.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:37 PM EST

                                                                    stone6 -- Thank you , if that is the ,reasonalby, correct answer then there is a cut off point.

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #9.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:51 PM EST

                                                                    Yes there is a cut off point........Also, I believe that the amount you get is calculated from the last 10 years of your maximum income and not all the way back to when you started contributing

                                                                      #9.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:39 PM EST

                                                                      stone6 is correct, there is a cutoff in taxing the income because there is a cutoff in the amount a person can collect, However the amount you collect is only affected by your highest/last 40 quarters(10 years) So basically a person could pay in little to nothing for the first 30 years and pay in the max for their last 10 years and they would collect the max payout.

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #9.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:06 PM EST

                                                                      The capital gains tax rate should be allowed to expire and revert back to 20%. I want to see Mitt Romney pay for his lies and mud slinging. Its time to punish the wealthy for the recession and for taking 40% of the middle class' wealth. Keeping assault rifles legal is the only way we'll ever take back our government from the GOP. Go NRA!

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #9.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:59 PM EST

                                                                      The capital gains tax doesn't just affect the 'weathly' Alot of seniors depend on capital gains to maintain their standard of living in retirement. Nah, screw 'em, they don't deserve their hard earned money. They must have earned it by walking on the backs of the poor.

                                                                      • 4 votes
                                                                      #9.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:50 PM EST

                                                                      billbodine So now its ok to stand up for seniors after all they are some of the slackers in the 47% you republican/tea party people like to bash.

                                                                        #9.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:53 PM EST

                                                                        What? Most seniors that are getting capital gains are definately not slackers. That means they had the good sense to invest and plan for their retirement rather than depend on just SS. BTW, I'm neither republican nor do I have anything to do with the tea party. I just believe in hard work and personal responsibility. That doesn't seem to be part of any political party nowadays.

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #9.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:37 PM EST
                                                                        Reply
                                                                        Comment author avatardont mess with texsasExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                        MOUGLI and his cabinet are a three ring circus..

                                                                        the longer obama holds office,,the better bush looks,,,,

                                                                        obama just took the worst prez spot from bush and carter...now thats an accomplishment....

                                                                        • 11 votes
                                                                        #10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:29 PM EST

                                                                        OK ClownBoy we are taking you very seriously. NOT

                                                                        • 6 votes
                                                                        #10.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:32 PM EST

                                                                        Oh really? I suppose I have to inform you that George W. and Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld and Tenet, among others,including Condoleeza Rice are all wanted for War Crimes by the International Court, Interpol, and several independent countries, including Canada. For torture and the sudden disappearance of hundreds of people. If they catch them they will put them on trial at the Hague. This usually results in hanging. Put that in your pipe and smoke it! Why do you think they all hide? Dumb ass. Great President he was. Pfft.

                                                                        • 8 votes
                                                                        #10.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:15 PM EST

                                                                        Kassie, you're full of crap.

                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                        #10.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:05 PM EST

                                                                        dont mess with texas - clearly you're from Texas. President Obama will be listed in the top 10 Presidents while George Bush will always be the absolute worst!

                                                                        in the middle - unfortunately Kassie is right. Bush and Cheney are wanted for War Crimes by the International Court and cannot travel to other countries for fear of being arrested. (They gave Bush a pass when he worked with Clinton for Haiti but not again.) I wasn't aware of Rice, Rumnsfield or Tenet but that could easily be fact.

                                                                        • 5 votes
                                                                        #10.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:37 PM EST

                                                                        There are no warrants for anyone from the Bush administration, That is a made up lie that you idiots keep repeating, Bush just recently came back from a humanitarian trip to Africa.

                                                                        Liberals...you just make things up as you go along and think that no one will call you on your lies.

                                                                        • 6 votes
                                                                        #10.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:11 PM EST

                                                                        Lost - you're wrong. The International Court DOES have warrants out on Bush and Cheney and no, Bush DID NOT just get back from Africa. The only trip out of the country he has taken was to Haiti with President Clinton and they got a pass because it was for humanitarian reasons.

                                                                        No one has to make up stuff about Bush/Cheney - it's all there unfortunately. Make the country look bad - but of course THEY made the country look bad for 8 years.

                                                                        You Republicans can't handle the truth! But if you google it you will find it's true. I'm sure you won't because you can't handle the truth.

                                                                        • 5 votes
                                                                        #10.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:17 PM EST

                                                                        Seeking Sanity, GW Bush and his wife were in Zambia Africa on July 6,2012, There are no warrants for them from the World Court.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #10.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:01 PM EST

                                                                        When has anything a Texan has said make sense? Bush was an idiot and he was the cream of the Texan crop. I want to see Cheney get his heart pumping electronics smashed against a federal prison wall by a big black convict called Bubba. I would love to see Bush waterboarded every day in a Guantanamo cell by Muslim extremists. I would love to see Wall Street bankers and traders be convicted on criminal charges and be carted off to federal prison for 10 year terms at hard labor. Yes, justice would be nice - but Texans need to be castrated so they cannot reproduce. The US is full of defectives, we don't need any more

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #10.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:04 PM EST

                                                                        George and Laura Bush spent a week in Africa in July of 2012. They were in both Zambia and Botswana.

                                                                        They were in Africa promoting Pink Ribbon Red Ribbon, a partnership between the George W. Bush Institute, the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, UNAIDS and Susan G. Komen for the Cure that supports efforts to fight cervical and breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa.

                                                                        Early in the week, they helped to renovate a women's cancer screening center in Zambia.

                                                                        The Bushes also met Peace Corps members in Botswana, and visiting a home for ill, orphaned and vulnerable children.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #10.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:22 PM EST

                                                                        The International Court does not have warrants out on Presidents Bush. This story first got legs all the way back in 2004 when a satirical article reported that President Bush had been arrested for war crimes in of all places...Canada. That's right Canada. This story has bounced around for quite some time, and at one time was the top story on Google News.

                                                                        Another site, set up to look like the official CNN web site (www.world-cnn.com) also fooled a lot of people with this story. People...when you read these things...regardless of where you think you read them...stand back and ask yourself...Does it sound right to me that a US President has been...or will be arrested in Canada for war crimes???

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #10.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:34 PM EST

                                                                        Aw, gees, LostInThePineBarrens (10.5). I guess you think THAT some how makes up for the 8 years it took for GWB to take the economy and as a result, the working class in this country down ?

                                                                        You're pathetic and quite ignorant.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #10.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:59 PM EST

                                                                        Kassie, congratulations!!! You win the award for the dumbest comment on here!

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #10.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:03 PM EST

                                                                        Lost in the Pine,

                                                                        It was a Kuala Lumpur tribunal in Malaysia that held a kangaroo court in May. They were pro Al-Qaida and there was no validity to the proceedings. The International Court (that Kassie spoke of) refused to be a part of those proceedings because the U.S. is not a member of the International Court (nor does the U.S. recognize the Court). Therefore, the Court has no jurisdiction in prosecuting a U.S. official or citizen. Kassie and SeekingInsanity are only trying to stir the pot with mis-information. Something they and their small minded posting klan do here on a daily basis it seems.

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #10.13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:21 PM EST

                                                                        Kassie,

                                                                        What is your response to this warrant in April, 2011. I can stir the pot with factual information.

                                                                        HONOLULU - At a press conference today, Honolulu Police Chief Louis M. Kealoha revealed a warrant issued for the arrest of President Barack Obama on charges of cocaine and marijuana distribution.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #10.14 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:54 PM EST

                                                                        Well lets just see if GB goes to any European countries soon.Germany especially..........

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #10.15 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:00 PM EST
                                                                        Reply

                                                                        We the people, know that more money given to government fixes nothing. No matter who you take it from. Rich people's money is not mine to take. I am not rich, but I don't want everybody who makes less than me to decide when to take it from my family to feed another. I have trouble thinking anybody that has to work for a living would see this as right. We take plenty enough from people now to feed our poor. The same people you propose giving control of RICH people's money are those that have failed to administer the funds in the first place.

                                                                        Lets put off talking about increasing revenue, to after we can say Good Job with the money they take now.

                                                                        • 6 votes
                                                                        Reply#11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:32 PM EST

                                                                        Sane ? Its ironic that you call yourself "sane" cause you havnt a clue of what you speak.

                                                                        President Obama has cut spending and is working on plans to cut the deficit.

                                                                        The last Rep president didnt give a rats arse about the deficit.

                                                                        Theres your trouble.

                                                                        • 14 votes
                                                                        #11.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:33 PM EST

                                                                        Sane? Let say out of choice you decided on purpose to cut your income by 30%. Well of course you couldn't pay all your bills and then decided to buy two new cars too and then drove up a huge credit card debt.

                                                                        So do you decide to increase your income that you gave up?

                                                                        Or do you continue to struggle and get further behind trying to live on less money than you need?

                                                                        a. Do you decide it is alright to starve the children?

                                                                        b. Or do you decide that your son who just came home from the war wounded can be thrown in the streets like the rest of the returning veterans?

                                                                        c. Or do you take your sick grandmother and throw her in the streets.

                                                                        So being Sane, what would you do, make your family suffer or increase your revenue you gave up voluntary?

                                                                        • 14 votes
                                                                        #11.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:55 PM EST

                                                                        Sane, Stop talking sense to these idiots, they don't get it. In their narrow minds, they really do believe that increasing taxes on the top 2% will be the fix all, this in itself shows how educated they are!!!!!

                                                                        • 5 votes
                                                                        #11.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:55 PM EST

                                                                        Sane-2794278, problem is liberals don't think that way. YOu know how they say that you are born gay (it is not a choice of life style). Same with Libbbies, they are born with their brains wire in a dependency state.

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #11.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:02 PM EST

                                                                        Sane-You are trying to talk sense to those who don't want to hear it.

                                                                        According to Americans First-3238795, we can't fix anything on the spending side so why try. Minor new revenue will solve it all. Talk about a pipe-dream.

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #11.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:25 PM EST

                                                                        Sane: I agree!

                                                                        Johnny: Obama has cut spending and is working on plans to cut the deficit???? Really? Adding $6 trillion to the deficit and wanting even more negates your kool-aid-logic.

                                                                        First: The responsible thing to do is CUT spending. Something you, and obviously Obama, can't grasp. But as long as the government keeps feeding you kool-aid, you will blindly follow along into oblivion.

                                                                        Please reread (or perhaps read for the first time) the history of WWII - the similarities between Hitler and Obama are STAGGERING!

                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                        #11.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:41 PM EST

                                                                        Agreed. I'm not rich either, but it's not my money. I'm working towards my own success and hope no one takes it from me when I get there.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #11.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:07 PM EST

                                                                        Please list all the spending cuts...I will save you the time..there are none

                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                        #11.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:16 PM EST

                                                                        Sane - How about you sell the two new cars and buy something you can afford rather than the stupidity of buy two new cars on credit when you have:

                                                                        Children to feed

                                                                        A brother to take care of

                                                                        and a sick grandmother

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #11.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:50 PM EST

                                                                        sorry my previous post was to Americans First - not Sane. And I realize the scenario indicated a wounded son, not brother. That withstanding the point is you need to choose wisely where you spend your money not just demand more money. Yes revenue needs to increase but that is the lesser part of what is needed to fix the problem.

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #11.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:56 PM EST

                                                                        Johnny- you have to be the biggest Obama tool that I have ever seen....

                                                                        How old are you 15?

                                                                        IT really shows how little the teens and college age kids know these days. They know nothing and vote the way MTV tells them to.

                                                                        Sad, really sad.................

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #11.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:29 PM EST

                                                                        I find it hilarious that americans first left out choice d - SELL THE CARS AND GET A SECOND JOB! Wow! I guess he/she didn't mention that because that would be a cut to the spending side of the equation and would have rendered what they had posted moot.

                                                                        @billyd- I'm thinking they left that out what you posted as well because that would require personal responsibility.

                                                                          #11.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:58 PM EST

                                                                          Of course you realized the cars were a metaphor for the two wars that the republicans got us into as they cut even more taxes for the rich. So couldn't just sell the car and a second job would have been to raise taxes.

                                                                          Every other time in our history our responsible leaders raised taxes during wartime to pay for the war. Instead the republicans put it all on the credit card.

                                                                          For some reason republicans always think the poor should bear the brunt of the republicans incompetence now that it is time to pay the piper. Most of the rest of us have sacrificed in one way or another already, but the republicans want to protect the ultra-wealthy from any sacrifice at all.

                                                                          Vote for any republican at your own peril.

                                                                            #11.13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:45 PM EST
                                                                            Reply

                                                                            Sounds like the proposed agreement is nothing more than a stop gap effort that kicks the issue of debt reduction down the road.

                                                                            Has anyone else noticed this continuing trend of "stop gap" legislation tied up in last minute drama that really doesn't accomplish anything?

                                                                            • 6 votes
                                                                            Reply#12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:33 PM EST

                                                                            Yeah. Maybe they can kick it down the road and tie it in with the new debt ceiling debate and make it a super-stop-gap disaster.

                                                                              #12.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:27 PM EST

                                                                              They'll do with it what Clinton did with HIS housing fiasco. Kick it on down to the next Republican to deal with, then blame him/her for subpar results. It's all just a big cycle.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #12.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:09 PM EST
                                                                              Reply

                                                                              OK. The Republicans want to cut entitlements. What are they? Simple. Things that you are entitled to for a lifetime being under the capitalist thumb. You pay taxes, you worked for it, you are middle class and need this backup plan to protect yourself and your family.

                                                                              The Republicans want to eliminate your safety net, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. They claim that it's too expensive to maintain. BUT. They have no problem giving billions of $ in subsidies to big oil every year. They have no problem funding a trillion dollar bloated military budget, buying things that the military don't want.

                                                                              The Republicans want to Kill the Federal government and put your life in the hands of the States and Corporations. The Corporations run things with the States being their pawns.

                                                                              The Republicans want to kill the unions, which unlike private sector, pay well, have great benefits and don’t send jobs overseas. The Unions have the better path to the “American Dream”.

                                                                              Republicans want a Plutocracy, you know, like Russia.

                                                                              The Republicans are communists and can go straight to h e l l..

                                                                              • 16 votes
                                                                              Reply#13 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:34 PM EST

                                                                              Social Security & Medicare benefits are not guaranteed.

                                                                              They are not guaranteed legally because workers have no contractual or property rights to any benefits whatsoever. In two landmark cases, Flemming v. Nestor and Helvering v. Davis, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are not contributions or savings, but simply taxes, and that Social Security benefits are simply a government spending program, no different than, say, farm price supports. Congress and the president may change, reduce, or even eliminate benefits at any time.

                                                                              http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html

                                                                              Entitlement is a legal definition in government terms

                                                                              Entitlement authority has been defined as “authority to make payments (including loans and grants) for which budget authority is not provided in advance by appropriation acts to any person or government if, under the provisions of the law containing such authority, the government is obligated to make the payments to persons or governments who meet the requirements established by law.”

                                                                              Budget authority is the authority provided by law to enter into obligations that will result in immediate or future outlays involving federal government funds.

                                                                              Sections 202 and 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 402 and 423, state that every individual who meets the eligibility requirements set forth therein “shall be entitled” to an old age benefit and disability benefit, respectively

                                                                              Social Security is a statutory entitlement program.

                                                                              Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid expenditures are funded by more permanent Congressional appropriations and so are considered mandatory spending. Social Security and Medicare are sometimes called "entitlements," because people meeting relevant eligibility requirements are legally entitled to benefits, although most pay taxes into these programs throughout their working lives. Some programs, such as Food Stamps, are appropriated entitlements

                                                                              James Madison who wrote most of the Constitution stated in Federalist #45:

                                                                              "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."

                                                                              • 4 votes
                                                                              #13.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:42 PM EST

                                                                              Larry Robinson- Bravo---a well laid out discourse..terrific..maybe the Larry from NC will actually listen to what you said

                                                                              • 5 votes
                                                                              #13.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:52 PM EST

                                                                              Madison and Jefferson did a helluva lot of writing between 1790-1804. Conditions present at that time were the influences that drove their often differing opinions. If we as a nation had remained static for the past 200+ years then the opinions of that time frame would irrevocably bind us to that stated philosophy. But we have evolved and the world today is in no way reflective of the world in the late 1700s. All nations evolve or they die. That evolution does not guarantee permanency but refusing to adjust in an ever-changing world is the fastest and clearest path to demise.

                                                                              • 8 votes
                                                                              #13.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:00 PM EST

                                                                              if you don't like our Constitution Jim- we have Article 5 for amending the Constitution. Instead since FDR, Democrats just spit at it.

                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                              #13.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:10 PM EST

                                                                              Jim in Texas: If Madison and Jefferson worked together to form this great union; why can our leaders of today not do the same?

                                                                              • 9 votes
                                                                              #13.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:16 PM EST

                                                                              If the oil companies are getting the subsidies you say then thank Democrats. They controlled government entirely from 2009 thru 2010. I suspect the subsidies you are talking about are the same ones offered all business for years, the ability to write off new equipment purchases immediately instead of over a number of depreciable years. I highly doubt if they are getting any CASH subsidies as did the UAW or GREEN ENERGY companies.

                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #13.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:20 PM EST

                                                                              Interesting, Larry. Wrong, but interesting. Do you know what a communist would want? Just curious, because you put a lot of effort into describing Republicans as not being communist, then call them communist. As I said, wrong, but super interesting. Now, back to your coloring book.

                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #13.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:13 PM EST

                                                                              Larry Robinson, you make too much sense, no one on the left is goin to believe you!

                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                              #13.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:15 PM EST

                                                                              Brad - AGAIN with the LIE about Democratic control. The Democrats had a filibuster proof majority for 44 days - after that the Republicans filibustered anything and everything - more than any other time in history. This has been explained over and over. Either your comprehension skills are sorely lacking or you lie intentionally!

                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                              #13.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:07 PM EST

                                                                              Larry of nc, Republicans doesnt want to cut all entitlement for SS, medicare, etc. What they DO want to cut, it the lifetime of entitlements to the lazy that won't work, never have, never will! And i agree with them 100%. Its time for the deadbeats to contribute something or starve. If you are able bodied and wont work, you don't deserve squat!

                                                                                #13.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:12 PM EST

                                                                                Appears to me that the GOP Tea Party / Libertarians and ultra-conservative owners and operators of businesses and corporations in this country, want to be the only recipients of help from the government ...at the same time, they rationalize and lobby for continual cutbacks and/or denial of those essential public services and safety nets to everyone else in this country.

                                                                                Now why is that?

                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                #13.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:33 PM EST

                                                                                Essential public services...a woman in Pennsylvania makes $29,000, single, 2 kids, gets $40,000 in entitlements, 3x 5,500 for medicare, 4,300 in foodstamps, 9,600 in rent subsidy, welfare, etc, total $40,000 added on to her salary.....you dems are deluded and do not understand numbers. Remember, the rich you hate so much, that fill you with rage is the same stuff that racism and sexism is made of...pure hate for hates sake. You love Michael Moore, worth $50,000,000 that he made, planning, manufacturing, marketing and selling you....yes you individually...socialistic slop, and he did it is a perfect capitalistic way. so go ask him to give that woman that gets $29,000 plus $40,000 more, and you too. You talk, so put up, send her a check

                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #13.12 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:58 PM EST

                                                                                Okay Bonneville, lets see you get by without, 'Essential public services," like roads, schools, bridges, fire departments, police, hospitals, emergency rescue, postal services, garbage pickup, military defense, public utilities like water, electricity, gas, etc.

                                                                                You talk, so either pay your fair share for these things you take for granted, or don't live here. Coming up with negative welfare hyperbole like that, reveals how hatefully limited your belief systems are. I pity people like you, for you earn enough bad Karma to eventually become what you hate. So I hope you get better, for your sake and for the sake of the people that have to put up with your Rush Limbaugh trash talk.

                                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                                #13.13 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:20 PM EST
                                                                                Reply

                                                                                If the clock strikes midnight without this being resolved EVERY ONE of the narcissistic slackers in Washington...INCLUDING THAT THING THAT CALLS HIMSELF OUR "PRESIDENT"...should be dragged into the streets and their a** kicked back to their "district".

                                                                                ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

                                                                                Oh but wait! They ALL get raises instead! Nothing about that on this worthless rag!

                                                                                • 11 votes
                                                                                Reply#14 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:36 PM EST

                                                                                The Orange Boner can get a job as some town's "town drunk"..

                                                                                • 10 votes
                                                                                #14.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:38 PM EST

                                                                                Herron...

                                                                                And the booger eating Reid should go back to Vegas. The towns as dried up as he is.

                                                                                • 7 votes
                                                                                #14.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:40 PM EST

                                                                                And Putrid Pelosi can return to San Francisco and finally read her leader's Obamacare Abomination......

                                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                                #14.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:24 PM EST

                                                                                Blonde - we don't have a THING in the White House. We have President Obama. Jealousy is not pretty and you prove it!

                                                                                • 5 votes
                                                                                #14.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:08 PM EST

                                                                                Blonde does not the coyote hunt and prey on the weak and helpless, just like the republicans?

                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #14.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:31 PM EST

                                                                                2833 and SeekingSanity, you have a complete idiot in the White House. And the Republicans are the only mature, grownups in office. Democrats are like whiny kids that can't understand the concept of not having enough to have everything you want, can't spend more than you make, and can't take things from people that work for it and give it to nonworkers for life as a form of government. If some of you people would study economics it might help you to know how things work (please don't be offended by the word, work).

                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #14.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:08 PM EST

                                                                                Wrong g.gable the idiot was bush.

                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #14.7 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 3:38 PM EST
                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #14.8 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:16 PM EST
                                                                                Reply

                                                                                Why is it that all you libs think that raising taxes is the "simple answer" to all the problems?

                                                                                Don't you get that it's our deficit spending and DEBT that's killing us? Or do you even care?

                                                                                While half of this nation (of which 80% are ABOVE the poverty line) pay absolutely NO taxes and usually get back more than they pay in, the other half pays EVERYTHING and it's not enough to you.

                                                                                This is what Obama calls "everyone putting some skin in the game" and you libs go along with these lies.

                                                                                A TRILLION dollars on welfare/food stamps/subsidies/entitlements for the past TWO years that do NOT include Social Security and Medicare. I guess that's putting even more "skin in the game" to you on the left.

                                                                                25 MILLION Americans under/unemployed as a DIRECT result of Democrat protected and condoned practices that put us into this economy we're in. (CRA, Fannie and Freddie, the housing "bubble", the HIGHEST corporate tax in the world, expensive job killing regulations, and even income tax rates that for the so called "rich" are higher than most of the developed nations of the world, with demands that they go even HIGHER)

                                                                                Out and out IDIOCY like commercials being run in MEXICO telling illegals there how to get food stamps when they invade our country. Commercials that YOU paid for to go along with the food stamps that YOU pay for.

                                                                                And what do we get from the Democrats?

                                                                                Why we get demands for even MORE taxes, MORE spending, MORE debt and NO cuts to any spending whatsoever.

                                                                                And what to we get from the left? Why massive support of this out and out job killing, economy destroying STUPIDITY!!!

                                                                                • 8 votes
                                                                                Reply#15 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:37 PM EST

                                                                                Cheryl -Right on.. the increase taxes, increase spending game has been tried in Europe and has failed..Germany is the one exception..they work hard..spend within their means.. But no one on the left wants to talk about economic growth..they don't have a clue. Simspon-Bowles with further spending cuts would have been the right answer..we need structural change and a permanent fix not a band aid with no adhesive that merelyexacerbates the problem and digs a deeper hole.

                                                                                • 6 votes
                                                                                #15.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:44 PM EST

                                                                                You're talking too much sense Cheryl, they don't understand, they are blind!

                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                #15.2 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:04 PM EST

                                                                                CherylLM

                                                                                even income tax rates that for the so called "rich" are higher than most of the developed nations ...

                                                                                Bull@!$%#.

                                                                                www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/background/numbers/international.cfm

                                                                                • 9 votes
                                                                                #15.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:08 PM EST

                                                                                You cons must have a big ass. That is where you get your "Facts".

                                                                                • 9 votes
                                                                                #15.4 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:15 PM EST

                                                                                Blackcat:

                                                                                your right that is BS that fact is we pay less in ats than most nations on the world

                                                                                0-30K on average pays 0% income taxes and 20% of that group gets a larger return than they paid. that is 3/5ths of the country

                                                                                40-50K pays an average of 3.2% income taxes.

                                                                                50-75K pays and average of 5.7% income taxes when we made 72K a few years ago we paid 4.7%

                                                                                75-100K paid an average of 7.2% Last year we made 91K and paid 6.13% income taxes and no mortgage deduction. This is now over 4/5ths of the country

                                                                                in-fact the average income taxes don't reach 9.9% until 200K.

                                                                                  #15.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:41 PM EST

                                                                                  bcwc - all CheryLlM ever posts is bulls**t. She has nothing else. She is so consumed by hatred and total ignorance it is pathetic. But, she's a great Republican- meets their criteria!

                                                                                  BCWC - Happy New Year!

                                                                                  • 4 votes
                                                                                  #15.6 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:10 PM EST

                                                                                  Auto your tax rates are flawed

                                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                                  #15.7 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:28 PM EST

                                                                                  Sorry you cant handle the truth Clark the fact is we paid 6.13% income taxes on 91K in 2011.

                                                                                    #15.8 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:07 PM EST

                                                                                    Taxes have not been raised in ELEVEN years and have only been lowered so cut the crap already.

                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                    #15.9 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:40 PM EST

                                                                                    I received this text message from my friend that's majoring in Law, in Eau Clair, Wisconsin:

                                                                                    "If the government was a corporation, the GOP Tea Party have proven they would run it by stopping sales, ending incoming revenues, withering away its workforce, and cutting the business so that it wouldn't grow -- preventing it from meeting the needs of all of its customers. Stockholders would surely respond in their company's annual meeting by voting these guys out of management."

                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                    #15.10 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:18 PM EST
                                                                                    Reply

                                                                                    ah..here we go again.. Obama plan = 140 Billion in new revenue on deficits of 1.2 Trillion..all a political ploy and not a solution. But you on the left have bought into to the whole..save my tax cut..confiscate from some one else Obama bob and weave...

                                                                                    • 5 votes
                                                                                    Reply#16 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:38 PM EST

                                                                                    Texas,

                                                                                    You sound like an ignorant idiot!

                                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                                    Reply#17 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:40 PM EST

                                                                                    Soooo, would that be an idiot who does not know they are an idiot, or is it more of an oxymoron, in that Texas is actually brilliant? Your confusing me.

                                                                                      #17.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:17 PM EST
                                                                                      Reply

                                                                                      Federal spending for the last 4 years of the Clinton Administration was just over 7 Trillion dollars. Since then the U.S. citizenry has elected 2 administrations twice each that have no spending restraint or basic balance budget sense (Bush spent just over 20 Trillion in 8 years while Obama has spent just under 15 Trillion in 4). America has decided they want BIG government and now need to go over the cliff to help pay for it. The taxes on the "rich" making the news is about bringing in 1 Trillion dollars over 10 years. The CBO estimates spending to be around 46 Trillion dollars over those 10 years. This size of Federal government can't be paid for by the "rich" alone.

                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                      Reply#18 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:40 PM EST

                                                                                      You are correct, Brad! Increase revenue, reduce spending, and grow the economy. Here is something that might actually work ... purpleintervention.wordpress.com/

                                                                                        #18.1 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:45 PM EST
                                                                                        Reply

                                                                                        Thank you senator McConnell.