Fiscal talks hit major setback as GOP appeals to Biden

 

Updated 3:10 p.m. — Senate Democrats said talks toward resolving the so-called fiscal cliff before the end-of-year deadline had hit a "major setback" on Sunday afternoon due to a standoff over proposed changes to Social Security. 

Democrats said that Republicans, led by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Ky., are insisting that a deal to resolve the fiscal cliff include what is known as "chained CPI" -- a change in how Social Security benefits are calculated to increase over time. 

Just before a self-imposed deadline at which Senate leaders were set to brief their respective caucuses about a prospective deal, negotiations toward a scaled-back agreement to avoid the onset of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts on Jan. 1 appeared on the verge of breakdown.

Related:Obama: GOP's insistence on halting tax hikes for the wealthy is stopping fiscal cliff deal

McConnell said that he had even reached out to Vice President Joe Biden, a former senator who's helped hammer out previous deals, in hopes of jump-starting the talks. 

"He and the vice president, I wish them well," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said on the Senate floor. 

NBC's Kelly O'Donnell reports Democratic sources say that there has been a major setback in negotiation of a fiscal cliff deal.  

"In the meantime, I will try to come up with something," Reid added of Republicans' latest proposal, "but at this stage I don’t have a counter-offer to make."

Obama had offered chained CPI — which would essentially reduce the rate of growth in Social Security benefits over time — as part of a broader "grand bargain" he had previously proposed to Republicans. The GOP rejected that proposal, and moved from there onto House Speaker John Boehner's "Plan B," an ultimately unsuccessful effort. 

In his interview earlier today on NBC's "Meet the Press," the president pointed to his offer on chained CPI as evidence of his willingness to compromise in pursuit of a broad fiscal deal. 

In an exclusive interview with Meet the Press, President Barack Obama tells David Gregory he's optimistic the fiscal cliff can be averted, lays out the goals for his second term, and also discusses the Benghazi attack and how it was handled by the administration and those on Capitol Hill.

"One of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security," Obama said. "Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions."

A Senate Democratic aide said that Democrats had thought such a proposal was off the table, though, as part of the talks toward parried-down agreement. 

"It’s basically a poison pill," the aide said of Republicans' demand for chained CPI.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., expressed bewilderment at the breakdown, suggesting that there were more than enough votes for a compromise measure that didn't include chained CPI.

"I don't know what caused this but there's a critical mass of 80 senators who would vote to fix the [alternative minimum tax], the doc fix, extend unemployment insurance, protect everybody 500 thousand and below from a tax increase," he told reporters at the Capitol. "There's 80 senators who will do that without CPI."

McConnell, who spoke briefly on the Senate floor around 2 p.m., struck an ever-so-slightly sunnier note.

"There is no single issue that remains an impossible sticking point," the top Senate Republican said.  "I want everyone to know I'm willing to get this done. But I need a dance partner."

Senators are set to huddle with members of their respective parties this afternoon amid votes to discuss the latest as it relates to the fiscal cliff.

As House members return to town this evening for votes this evening, they'll also caucus with fellow party members to discuss what, if any, way forward there is on the fiscal cliff.

NBC's Frank Thorp contributed reporting.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 34
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The rabid righties are backed into a corner right where they belong!

You cannot compromise with obstructionists...

Kudos to the President for calling them out this morning on MTP while setting Gotcha Gregory straight with the false equivalencies;

The only thing I would caution against, David, is I think this notion of, "Well, both sides are just kind of unwilling to cooperate." And that's just not true. I mean if you look at the facts, what you have is a situation here where the Democratic Party, warts and all, and certainly me, warts and all, have consistently done our best to try to put country first.

Appears the President learned from the last time the GNOP played the "hostage" game...

  • 212 votes
#1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:39 PM EST
Comment author avatarBackhouseExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Don't hundreds of thousands of ordinary Republicans need Unemployment Insurance?

Or do they and their families live on fresh air?

New GOP Poison Pill: NOW, GOP/Koch wants major cuts to SS, in exchange for emergency UI extensions.

GOP is also asking for Defense cuts to be canceled.

  • 149 votes
#1.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:40 PM EST
Comment author avatarNever Stop Asking QuestionsExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The reincarnated, ignorant, racist, Nativist, anti-American, Know-Nothing, Party of No is absolutely worthless...

Heck of a Job, pathetic Party of No.

  • 189 votes
#1.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:57 PM EST

Maybe December 21st actually was Armageddon - at least for some. A new age indeed, Mayans! The Silent Film Republicans have finally run smack-dab into the middle of the new age of the Talkies.

  • 67 votes
#1.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:05 PM EST
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The plight of the GNOP reminds me of one of my favorite lines from Sancho Panza in "Man of La Mancha";

"Whether the rock hits the pitcher or the pitcher hits the rock, it's generally bad for the pitcher?

These right wing idiots self-inflicted their wounds... let them figure out how to stop the hemorrhaging! lol

  • 136 votes
#1.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:05 PM EST
Comment author avatarDavid NoahExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Is it just me or does everyone else realize the first couple of Posts by Fiesty and her minions are nothing more than Pro Obama, anti Republican propaganda without any substance?

I guess that's why we all ignore the first couple of posts anymore because we know they are usually from Obama's Propaganda Ministers.

I see they fail to mention that it was Obama that put the SS rate increase tweek on the table a few days ago and now it is Obama's Dems that say NO.

  • 88 votes
#1.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:06 PM EST

It's about time we started driving that point home.

  • 26 votes
#1.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:07 PM EST
Comment author avatarGboy-3109136Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Congrats on being first to comment .... again Feisty!

  • 27 votes
#1.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:07 PM EST
Comment author avatarHeartlight3Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I hope the Dems hold fast on this one. The slimy Republicans want to sacrifice the elderly as hostages so the wealthy can keep a couple of percentage points of tax cuts. They think negotiation means they get more of what they want and the Dems get less of what they want. They lost the election.

  • 158 votes
#1.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:09 PM EST
Comment author avatarNever Stop Asking QuestionsExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Even though going over "the cliff" would cost average Middle Class families $2000+ in tax increases, I would actually like to see us go over the cliff....simply because it would mandate cuts in Military spending without cutting social welfare programs.

Then, re-negotiation can occur to cut taxes for families below the $200,000 when Congress reconvenes...as we have a revenue crisis, not a debt crisis.

Remember, Boehner's Plan B would actually cut taxes for the top 2% while raising taxes for the 98%...which is why the Senate balked at his retardation.

The real issue though, is that the Party of No manufactured this crisis in the first place. This entire period of Brinkmanship was an invention of Reichwing extremists and could have been ameliorated by bi-partisan diplomacy...which is how the System is supposed to work.

Therefore, Heck of a Job, Party of No.

  • 152 votes
#1.9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:09 PM EST

We are GOING OFF THE CLIFF courtesy of BOTH the Democrats and the GOP because the cliff was put in place because neither the GOP or the Dems in congress could do their job over a year ago and both sides played politics to see who they would get in office instead of voting what was best for the country they stuck with party lines. As Feisty Redhead Herself said: It is the job of a congressman to vote according to their constituencies' wishes that elected them in in the first place. Not to vote freely with their own intelligence or free thought what is best for the country.

That is exactly what the GOP is doing, and exactly what the Dems are doing, and is exactly why we are in this mess in the first place.

We need a MODERATE THIRD PARTY BADLY

And I am not a Republican. I am an Independent who happens to see it this way.

  • 59 votes
#1.10 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:10 PM EST
  • 43 votes
#1.11 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:10 PM EST

This is really just all theater. The 'end of the year' for something of this magnitude was at least a few weeks back. Consider that companies have already calculated the next paycheck for their employees. They had to know how much to withhold.

We'll push into the new year without a deal, and then congressmen can have the political cover of voting to lower taxes from levels to which they will artificially increase for a few weeks. That's always the way this was going to play out, I believe.

  • 16 votes
#1.12 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:13 PM EST
Comment author avatarHeartland25-1932636Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The GOP "followers" have been trained to vote against their own best interest by listening to lie after lie on Fox and being scared of the black man in the white house. He has to be a Muslim or Kenyan etc.. They talk about lazy trash on welfare when such a huge amount of white trailer trash in the south is milking for all it's worth. (They tend to be the most rabid god & guns Republicans out there).

  • 114 votes
#1.13 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:13 PM EST
Comment author avatarSmBusOwnerinNYExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Chained CPI is already o the table by Obama. Dems shouldn't fight it. It's all a game. They want to be able to blame Democrats. That's it.

Leave it in and you don't have to cut SS ever again. This is 0.3% on COLA. It doesn't cut payouts until you start collecting. It's fair for current retirees to pay just as well as all of us who have 20 years to go. It's only 0.3%, then it's off the table for the debt ceiling talks.

  • 26 votes
#1.14 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:14 PM EST
Comment author avatarRobert Warner-3092405Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

DavidNoah, did you ever notice how RepuolicanTPs always say "everyone" when they only mean themselves and a few others, or "the American People want" instead of "my constituents want"? I ALWAY read feisty's comments and always miss them when they're not there. The problem you can't get around is that the President is just about always right, and the election shows that the majority of Americans agree. So instead of using words like "we all", you should stick to just talking about yourself and your fellow Koch-brothers-minions.

  • 111 votes
#1.15 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:14 PM EST

Excellent comment and spot on about Gregory, if he makes MTP host another 6 months everyone will be shocked...Boehner/McConnell have played the American people yet again..this is just a set up to give them cover when they/GOP drive the bus over the cliff..thinking these worthless far right fools will keep them in office, this will not work..overwhelming evidence the GOP is to blame and they could care less who they hurt..Imagine McConnell wants the bloated defense budget left alone but cut Grandma's $1200 monthly benefit...Clean "house" in 2014, sweep all the GOP out with the trash..

  • 92 votes
#1.16 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:14 PM EST
Comment author avatarBackhouseExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

DO ORDINARY REPUBLICANS NEED & WANT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE,

WHEN THEY ARE LAID OFF?

OR NOT.

  • 67 votes
#1.17 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:16 PM EST

Coz,

I'm on your side, but 0.3% is squat. That's less than $4 on $1200.

TAKE IT, and hold them to everything else. It's off the table from here forward.

  • 22 votes
#1.18 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:21 PM EST

Senate Democrats said talks toward resolving the so-called fiscal cliff before the end-of-year deadline had hit a "major setback" on Sunday afternoon due to a standoff over proposed changes to Social Security.

Typical of the Republicans. We all knew the real target was Social Security and Medicare, the ones that would hurt the middle class the most. Don't dare go after the rich ba$tards that can afford to pay more because that would be totally against their best interests. They make me sick and I hope they all get booted to the curb in 2014. If all of you liberal hating rwnj's still think the Republicans give a damn about you, you've been sold a bill of goods.

  • 101 votes
#1.19 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:22 PM EST

The concessions for trust funds -- It's the same damn protection of the small percent rich in this country, always the desire to end the social contract and return to the Gilded Age of the Robber Barons, always the same damn thing with these Republicans.

Aside from the IOU in the Social Security trust fund "box," and the only legitimate debate being an end to stealing from the trust fund... Everyone with half a brain knows Social Security has NOTHING to do with the deficit.

And once again, it's the same damn thing with the rightwing to give lip service to the deficit, but in reality the GOP doesn't give a sh!t about deficits. They only care about themselves and protecting their Plutocrat donors. The Tea Party are only ignorant lemmings who have been brainwashed to believe that Plutocrats are "special," and the government is evil, and that their record-low tax rates are outrageous.

If there's to be ANY change to Social Security, raise the cap on FICA withholding, currently at $110K (the cut-off for the richest 5%) up to what ever is agreed to on the income tax rate. If everyone gets to keep the Bush tax cuts on their first $250K of income, then raise the payroll tax withholding to $250k. Fair is fair -- If folks earning $250K are "struggling" and will collect Social Security when they retire, then why aren't they paying into the system on ALL of their income?

This issue of fairness is at the basis of the tax debate, and the simple change of raising the contribution cap would make Social Security strong until all the baby boomers have left the system. I don't know why the "sane" Republicans, or even Teabag supporters aren't out having one of their protests about "their" tax dollars being used as a handout to the richest 2%.

  • 100 votes
#1.20 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:23 PM EST
Comment author avatarThings need to change...Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Heartland - Talk about a trained follower... got a mirror?

  • 4 votes
#1.21 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:23 PM EST
Comment author avatarGlen-1484791Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community



David Noah>>>

Is it just me or does everyone else realize the first couple of Posts by Fiesty and her minions are nothing more than Pro Obama, anti Republican propaganda without any substance?

>>>
You are not the only one, Noah. They are the first to post and are working at it full time, and mostly throw insults around. On one board, the moderator even collapsed any comments not pro article (even if they blamed both parties) and left all the rest. It was very shameful and obvious attempt at censorship and a discredit to newsvine and msnbc.

  • 21 votes
#1.22 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:24 PM EST
Comment author avatarAdler-273784Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Is it just me or does everyone else realize the first couple of Posts by Fiesty and her minions are nothing more than Pro Obama, anti Republican propaganda without any substance?

It is just you.

  • 65 votes
#1.23 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:29 PM EST
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

On one board, the moderator even collapsed any comments not pro article (even if they blamed both parties) and left all the rest. It was very shameful and obvious attempt at censorship and a discredit to newsvine and msnbc.

What type of cheese do you prefer with your WHINE?

It always amazes me when people like you & crybaby Davy come here and do nothing other than complain...

Tell us again who is FORCING you to participate...?

Sorry NewsforDumbFux shut down their litter box for you to play in!

  • 78 votes
#1.24 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:29 PM EST

"and are working at it full time".

= DELUSIONAL FABRICATION.

THE DATA DOES NOT BACK UP YOUR MYTH.

  • 28 votes
#1.25 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:30 PM EST
Comment author avatarGlen-1484791Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

BTW: I do agree that some of the "demands" of the GOP are just plain unrealistic and crazy. Then again, as a small businessman with 35 years experience and familiar with insurance business and premiums and the general nature of "people" I believe that Obama Care is unrealistic and the way it was passed to try to circumvent the system is unrealistic

  • 14 votes
#1.26 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:30 PM EST

Not only do these so-called elected officials need to be unelected, they should be ARRESTED for inflicting PAIN & SUFFERING on we the people. Not one of those leaders will have to depend on social security or medicare or fight for excised pension benefits. This is criminal how they can laugh while millions and millions of people have suffered since the Great Criminal Banking Activity in which we the people were FORCED TO SACRIFICE while Congressional members for some strange reason actually INCREASED THEIR WEALTH!

  • 64 votes
#1.27 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:34 PM EST

Once again the Republican party shows their cold, rigid hearts in insisting that the nation's most vulnerable; our elderly and disabled on fixed social security incomes suffer for the fiscal budget fiasco that the politicians all share blame in allowing to happen. Please...remove the cap on FICA withholdings to fix social security, and increase revenue from the wealthiest sector whose life style will not be affected by loosing a few tax cut loop holes or paying an extra 2% in federal taxes.

Helping to create more poverty in this country's lowest and "middle" income families is not the answer to our problems ...the effects and problems generated by families in poverty affects EVERYONE in negative ways, and we need to look for solutions that build a larger, stronger middle class that offers upward mobility opportunities for all, including the lowest income level families, if we are really to look for a stronger future for our country...for everyone. Keeping people in poverty through further burdening their already strained budgets is not going to help anyone. Look back at the fifties and sixties when our country was prospering...those in the highest income brackets were paying over 45% in federal taxes, unions were strong in fighting for laborers rights and fair incomes, and our nation was prospering. As government regulations were removed from financial institutions and corporate giants, taxes for the wealthy and corporations shrunk and even disappeared for some like GE, unions were weakened and eliminated, and greed took over, we fell to our present situation. REPUBLICANS...PLEASE...Maybe just look back at what worked in prior years...and find the wisdom to really work for the good of ALL Americans. Stop looking to the poorest folks to give up a little more to solve your problems. Look to the Words of Christ for inspiration on the right way to go.

And if Social Security benefits are on the table for cuts in order to solve the financial problems our country faces, I ASK ONLY THAT ALL OF OUR GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS PARTICIPATE IN THE SAME SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT FUND AND BENEFITS THAT THEY CREATE FOR THE REST OF US. WHY WOULDN'T THEY WANT TO???

  • 75 votes
#1.28 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:38 PM EST

Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests the executive power of the United States in the president and charges him with the execution of federal law, alongside the responsibility of appointing federal executive, diplomatic, regulatory, and judicial officers, and concluding treaties with foreign powers, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The president is further empowered to grant federal pardons and reprieves, and to convene and adjourn either or both houses of Congress under extraordinary circumstances.[8] Since the founding of the United States, the power of the president and the federal government have grown substantially[9] and each modern president, despite possessing no formal legislative powers beyond signing or vetoing congressionally passed bills, is largely responsible for dictating the legislative agenda of his party and the foreign and domestic policy of the United States.[10] The president is frequently described as the most powerful person in the world.

Where is "negotiate senate and house battles" or 'babysit lawmakers who can't stop pandering" anywhere in that statement? I keep hearing republicans talk about how he's not submitting anything or he's not deciding everything and it blows my mind. Not only is none of this his job, but it specifically is not within his power. Ontop of that, if he had come in and decided everything for these morons they'd be yelling about seperation of powers.

I echo the comments that what the republicans keep asking for is ridiculous, the democrats don't want to cut spending but some to the table with spending cuts. The republicans don't want taxes but come to the table with... spending cuts? It's like when they tried to reverse the fiscal cliff from a suicide pact with democrats into a murder pact...

  • 34 votes
#1.29 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:38 PM EST
Comment author avatartonybeeermExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

You are not the only one, Noah. They are the first to post and are working at it full time, and mostly throw insults around. On one board, the moderator even collapsed any comments not pro article (even if they blamed both parties) and left all the rest. It was very shameful and obvious attempt at censorship and a discredit to newsvine and msnbc.

Oh cry me a river, will ya' You rwnj re regs infest this place like an army of roaches and we put up with it. So quit with your free speech crap.

  • 52 votes
#1.30 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:39 PM EST
Comment author avatarJohn jetExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Feisty.... YOUR AN IDIOT... go away

  • 24 votes
#1.31 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:41 PM EST
Comment author avatarCharlie-1915998Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community
  • Typical Republican bulls-ht --- protect millionaires, screw over the everybody else.
  • 64 votes
#1.32 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:43 PM EST

I had to laugh when I read about the setback. How can there be a setback when there hasn't been any progress in the first place? Has it really gotten so bad that they consider it forward progress just having all parties in Washington?

  • 44 votes
#1.33 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:43 PM EST

Backhouse

DO ORDINARY REPUBLICANS NEED & WANT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE,

WHEN THEY ARE LAID OFF?

OR NOT.

Here's how the lack of logic goes... If it means shooting their foot off to stand by their "principles" then by golly they will shoot their foot off. Their "principles" are the same vague idealism as "family values" or other simplistic Manichean litmus test, which of course they will turn around and commit the most mind-bending hypocrisy soon thereafter.

I have Teapublican family currently on Social Security/Medicare, benefiting from SS disability, and food stamps, right now as I type. In the past they have also benefited from unemployment insurance, Pell grants, and survivor benefits, yet they were SO disappointed when Romney, the Plutocrat who despises the 47%, lost the election.

WTF do they think the GOP agenda is? Perhaps they don't know because they live in the alternative universe of FAUX Noise, Hate Radio, WoldNetDaily, viral Emails... and church. Or perhaps they know but figure they'll get theirs while the getting is good? It's the same idiocy of shopping at Walmart, knowing it is a destructive business model, but hey I need those low prices.

My mother thinks that if Medicaid goes away, her kids will take care of her instead of going into a nursing home or using Hospice. That's how she reasons, with no thought of whether any of us are in a position to do that.

But the bottom line is, we pay into these trust funds all our lives with the expectation that we too will enjoy what our parents and their parents have enjoyed. If there are to be ANY cuts in benefits, it has to be made at the beginning of a person's career. The cut-off at age 55 is the most f'd up concept I've ever heard -- "Hey, you have 10 years to get a nest egg together middle-age folks! And you better save up for health care too, because that's next on the chopping block."

The rightwing just wants to privatize everything so that the richest 1% can have even more wealth. Been there, done that, it doesn't work. If only Teapublicans had some sense of history and the Rule of Reason...

  • 81 votes
#1.34 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:47 PM EST

let me start by saying i have never voted for a democrat. the answer to the ss problem is so simple i am suppresed than no one has ever suggested it. either do away or raise the cap in f.i.c.a. granted it may be tax on the rich but in the long run they will recoup some of their money.

  • 14 votes
#1.35 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:49 PM EST

Fiesty

Sorry NewsforDumbFux shut down their litter box for you to play in!

The turtle play too, McConell just said he needs some one to dance with.



Republican cliffhanger

http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/53/2012/12/06/123572_600.jpg

http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/53/2012/12/06/123572_600.jpg

  • 16 votes
#1.36 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:50 PM EST

I ALWAY read feisty's comments and always miss them when they're not there.

Robert Warner,

Thanks for the kind words! ☺

Excellent comment and spot on about Gregory, if he makes MTP host another 6 months everyone will be shocked...

cozumeldeb,

I cannot believe Gotcha has lasted as long as he has...

I absolutely despise the guy!

McConell just said he needs some one to dance with.

Hi Bev!

How can you dance with someone who has two right feet? lol

Are you watching da Bears? Talk about a nail-biter!

  • 32 votes
#1.37 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:54 PM EST

Feisty, I was in the process of editing my mail to say that you throw insults but to also to give you credit in that you never moderated a board to my knowledge in which you suppressed free speech (separate the two), but now I cannot even give praise where it was due. I hope you are not actually doing this as a job (but I believe you are based on your profile), because you have the tendency to bury yourself almost immediately.

>>>>

On one board, the moderator even collapsed any comments not pro article (even if they blamed both parties) and left all the rest. It was very shameful and obvious attempt at censorship and a discredit to newsvine and msnbc.

What type of cheese do you prefer with your WHINE?

It always amazes me when people like you & crybaby Davy come here and do nothing other than complain...

Tell us again who is FORCING you to participate...?

Sorry NewsforDumbFux shut down their litter box for you to play in!

  • 10 votes
#1.38 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:54 PM EST

@TruePatriot...

Very Well Said!!! I can so relate to your family scenario. We also have several members who stopped thinking for themselves long ago as they were indoctrinated into the "FAUX Noise and Hate" alternative universe that you mention and left all reason somewhere in the dust..

  • 49 votes
#1.39 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:56 PM EST
Comment author avatarT-REX-847863Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Typical Obama/Democratic BS of moving goal posts.

Start with one proposal, discuss it with Republicans, float it to the public...then once behind close doors after the election- demand more.

Then offer chained CPI, then reneg on it.

Never seen anyone ever negotiate in bad faith so much. Clearly the dems do not want a deal. Hope their minions enjoy the higher taxes, they deserve it.

  • 20 votes
#1.40 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:59 PM EST

Heartlands: I've have been completely puzzled by this situation all along. "Middle and lower middle class Republicans"? Is there really such a constituency? Refusing to increase taxes on the very wealthy - why would they vote against that? A CEO making $40 million/year takes the equivalent of 900 potential jobs out of the corporate bottom line. Job creators - for whom?

No, these people will not be invited to join the "1%" - ever. No, they don't need to listen to Rachael Maddow - they just need to stop listening to the FOX disinformation network and think for themselves for a change.

  • 40 votes
#1.41 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:00 PM EST

Why is it that congress deserves a big pay increase when retirees only get a 3% raise at most. Looks to me like we are counted as expendable while they are sitting on the top of the heap and living on the taxpayers pot. Really pisses me off!!!!

  • 40 votes
#1.42 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:00 PM EST

Obama gets EVERYTHING he wants by doing NOTHING.... higher taxes all around, spending cuts for the military, end of unemployment benefits..... and he'll be able to BLAME the Republicans........

Why would he have Reid & the rest of the Obamites make any concessions?

  • 14 votes
#1.43 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:02 PM EST

I dont understand what all the fuss is about anyway. let the temporary tax cuts go back to where they were before they were temporay cut. The word temporay means that these tax cuts were not going to last forever anyway. People we will just be going back to where we were under Clinton.

  • 21 votes
#1.44 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:04 PM EST

When will the Republican Congress & Senate members stop caring more for lobbyist and big business,(Wall Street & Insurance companies) and start representing the people who elected them for representation rather than lining their own pockets. None of the issues, (Higher Taxes for the wealthy, Social Security raises, Unemployment insurance), they are using to stonewall the simple procedure of calling for a vote on the REAL ISSUES.

  • 26 votes
#1.45 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:07 PM EST

@Steve...

"Why would he (Obama) have Reid & the rest of the Obamites make any concessions?

I think, because he really is trying to look out for the good of our Country, and is willing to make concessions he would rather not make, in order to attempt to unify Congress in support of some sort of solution to avoid the economic hardships that inaction will reportedly cause. Truthfully, we should throw all Republicans who are refusing to increase taxes on the wealthiest 1% out of office. They are obviously out of touch with the majority of those they supposedly represent.

  • 37 votes
#1.46 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:08 PM EST

Everyone of these government officials get an "F" for leadership. I've never seen a bunch of grownups act so childish in my life. The finger pointing has to end. If these people can't get the job done - "F"ing resign.

  • 17 votes
#1.47 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:10 PM EST

Obama gets EVERYTHING he wants by doing NOTHING.... higher taxes all around, spending cuts for the military..... and he'll be able to BLAME the Republicans........

Yeah, right. The last two times we've had negotiations like these, Obama got absolutely nothing. Republicans have become used to getting all they want – which is why they're being so childish right now, because they know it ain't going to happen this time around. And even after roundly losing an election, Republicans are set to get at least 50% of their demands on this deal. That's right. After having won an election and having the backing of 65% of Americans, the best Obama can hope for is get 50% of what he wants.

Also, don't misinterpret Obama's stance. He doesn't want higher taxes all around. He's never said that and you don't know him, so you have absolutely no reason to believe he wants higher taxes "all around." Stop being such a typical Republican liar.

Obama has made it clear that he wants to return to the Clinton-era tax rates (which didn't impede growth, which didn't bleed the rich dry, which didn't turn us into a communist state) for those making $250,000 a year. That's not all around. Already, he's compromised and said that he wants to end tax cuts only for those making $400,000 a year or more. That alone proves Obama doesn't get everything. Don't be so disingenuous, Steve.

Also, what Obama wants (less military spending, more revenue) is exactly what upwards of 65% of Americans want. So if he gets what he wants, well, that's democracy for you, buddy. If you hate democracy, they say North Korea is awful nice this time of year.

  • 44 votes
#1.48 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:11 PM EST

Feisty

Hi Bev!

How can you dance with someone who has two right feet? lol

Are you watching da Bears? Talk about a nail-biter!


Happy Holidays; GF. I meant to text you that during Christmas time.

Da bear won Woot Woot what a nail biter!!!

Play off next ; never thought I would root for Green Bay.

  • 8 votes
#1.49 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:13 PM EST
Comment author avatarGabriel-1934044Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

why is redhead always first? bc she works for nbs...

  • 10 votes
#1.50 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:13 PM EST

The gop and the dems together represent the upper 2% - you don't think they're already working together? Seems it's working out well for them. As for the rest, get ready for Recession! Part II

  • 5 votes
#1.51 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:17 PM EST

It is quite obvious to most folks that the GOP are not good faith negotiators, they are still playing the our way or the highway game and it looks like we will go over the cliff. Congrats to the GOP, you screwed us again.

  • 38 votes
#1.52 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:17 PM EST

Democrats unlike republicans wont all tow the party line, they vote their conscience. Many democrats will not accept a chained CPI which assumes when the cost of beef rises seniors will simply eat more chicken because it doesn't address the millions of seniors who already can't afford beef and are lucky to afford chicken. Republicans beholden to Norquist will fight for the 1% tooth and nail even though mainstream republicans support Obamas small tax increase on the 2% by a margin of 2 to 1 because they believe they owe their seats to corporations and lobbyists and not those that elected them. It isn't concern for those making $250,000 republicans are worried about it's those making 250 million.

  • 32 votes
#1.53 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:20 PM EST

One thing is becoming clearer every day, the Russians, Chinese. North Korea's, Muslims and any other country with aspirations to take over the USA is, all they have to do is have patients and wait, as the US A's greedy will self destruct the nation. The constant struggle for power is only weakening the whole country, as to many are in there only for their own good, rather then whats good for the general public. This alternating left and right is only good if you are walking.

  • 7 votes
#1.54 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:22 PM EST

This, has got to be, the stupidest, most ignorent,republican/tea party move EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I guess, that what in their teabags, are not realy tea!!!!!!! (cocain baybe? or glue? or paint?) where is their head? better yet, do they even have a head? When this, was on the table, they REJECTED IT, now they want it back????????? This is NOT a playground, nore is it funny!!!!!!!!!!!!! TO THE REPUBLICANS, I SAY, GET OFF YOUR DAD ASSES AND DO WHAT YOU WERE ELECTED TO DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 29 votes
#1.55 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:23 PM EST
Comment author avatarGimmeabreakoradrinkExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Cut the bullsh*t, people.

The Democrat-led Senate is just as impotent (if not more so since it's not had a passed budget for several years now) as the Republican-led House.

Moreover, where is the leadership from this president? Pompous, smug prick. He'd gladly let us go over the cliff (yet say the Republican 'obstructionists' are the ones who can't compromise.

As for Social Security -- who's the a**hole who cut taxes (F.I.C.A.)? In pulling the wool over the eyes of most droid-voters...the President gives us all "a break" on paying into Social Security -- thereby making it solvent that much sooner.

Everyone in Washington, including our president, needs to get kicked out immediately. Unfortunately, our constitution doesn't permit such an impromptu, immediate flushing.

  • 10 votes
#1.56 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:25 PM EST

AndresTM

Obama gets EVERYTHING he wants by doing NOTHING.... higher taxes all around, spending cuts for the military..... and he'll be able to BLAME the Republicans........

AndresTM,

Only because the President can't negotiate with stupid aka the GOP/Tea Potty. He has a MANDATE


President Obama isn't the only one blaming the RepubliCons

FYI:More people want the rich to pay their taxes. Notice I said "MORE PEOPLE" unlike the brain-dead pundits over @ the FOX NATION who invariably use the generic words some people 24/7 for dumb folk like you.

19 different polls taken since January that demonstrate that Americans support increasing taxes in order to reduce the deficit and inequality. Americans may not love tax increases, but they understand their necessity for deficit reduction.


http://www.politicususa.com/polls-taxes-deficit.html

learn something!!!


  • 26 votes
#1.57 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:25 PM EST

Appealing to Biden??? Isn't HE the one they are always putting down?? Good luck with THAT!

  • 12 votes
#1.58 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:26 PM EST

Please Republicans do not turn my old body into Soylent Green!

  • 19 votes
#1.59 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:26 PM EST
Comment author avatarJohn jetExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Boy if that aint the pot calling the kettle black... obama went to the bargaining table with a chip on his shoulder, and had no intention of compromising. I think there is plenty of blame to go around, republicans and liberals. obama is in no way blamelss in this whole situation though.

  • 7 votes
#1.60 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:27 PM EST

The Dems are the problem and refusing to face reality.

Raising taxes on the "wealthy" solves absolutely nothing, nothing!

America has a SPENDING PROBLEM, which the Dems and Obama refuse to acknowledge.

You are not ENTITLED TO THE JOB OF YOUR CHOICE, nor are YOU ENTITLED TO THE TOYS America offers just because you live in America.

Get out and compete!

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work, because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation!

Let's all hold hands, "rich and poor" and jump of the fiscal cliff! That is the answer!

  • 17 votes
#1.61 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:27 PM EST

Blah blah drama drama blah blah..I have a feeling that the world will continue to spin even after the dreaded cliff we're all diving over come the first of the year.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

  • 9 votes
#1.62 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:34 PM EST

David Noah,

Chained CPI's were offered as a method of getting the House to have a face saver on raising taxes. Adjusting COLA's has been a part of SS negotiations since the budget negotiations proposed by Boehner and House republicans in the spending cap fight. Obama agreed to put them on the table if an agreement included raising taxes on incomes over 250k and then gave in an agreed to 400k. You are defending a group who cost the economy billions in the debt ceiling mess and are prepared to do it again until they destroy the economy and the middle class leaving all wealth and power in the hands of their enablers.

jkh

  • 33 votes
#1.63 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:39 PM EST

Quit bellyaching MtMike.

It's not that bad.

Our debt is 100% of GDP. I'll be your household income is less than your mortgage and other debts. You can pay your bills, right?

We'll manage. This is all periphery. a few percent here or there isn't going to sink the nation.

Have a little faith. The politicians can't ruin it.

  • 13 votes
#1.64 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:40 PM EST

@MtMike...

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

So, 2% of a yearly income of $500,000 is $10,000. You really think that 2% is "legislating the wealthy out of prosperity??? My college daughter who made $7000 yearly income paid federal income taxes, as she worked two jobs and took out student loans to complete her Master's Degree. If she can afford to pay taxes on a $7000 yearly income, somehow I don't think 2% of $500,000 is going to end anyone's prosperity. And those retirees who depend on social security benefits as their sole source of income will definitely feel every penny that is cut (or added in their own cost for medicare, etc.) in their yearly budget. For some, it will mean adverse living conditions. Is that really what you support?

  • 41 votes
#1.65 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:43 PM EST
Comment author avatarNicodemus1946Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Feisty Redhead;

Clearly, you can see only one side of the equation through your blue hued liberal glasses. What part of the obstructionist left game can you or WILL you not see? My guess is all of it. The left refuses common sense cuts to spending, entitlements and yes, since LBJ converted it to a tax, S.S. has become an entitlement. Tax money supports it as with ALL entitlements, not like the last Democrat with the mental wear with all F.D.R. set it up, as a private volunteer system that ALWAYS had a surplus. Until LBJ and the rest of the politically corrupt "borrowed" it into bankruptcy. They insist on expanding spending, not even on the NON-entitlement discretionary spending, i.e. the blank checks they like to write to friends and family for absolutely nothing. in the face of the worst recession in modern times. The left's hands are as dirty as anyone Else's.

Because the country, believing in the party horse crap put out by both sides and the idiots in Washington that can not or lack the backbone and intestinal fortitude to do the work, take the risk and make the unpopular choices to get this economy back on track, I doubt nothing will stop the "cliff". It starts at the white house and goes out from there, all sides are to blame. All sides are responsible for the current state of things. They all profited from the sub-prime fiasco, most of your leftist hero's were heavily invested in the housing market before the collapse and with their inside knowledge, I'd be willing to bet they continued to profit as people lost their homes and jobs.

I have observed the political crime syndicate for 60 years, each election cycle the crimes become worse and more brazen and the electorate more and more brainwashed. Never did I believe a time would come in America when the people believed out of hand everything fed them by the criminals in D.C. But then, I never thought I would see the day when American believed everything in life was owed them for free. What a bunch of welfare dregs Americans are becoming. I learned at an early age there's no such thing as a free lunch, one way or the other it going to cost you. And the number who thinks it's governments place to take care of your pitiful life's affairs boggles the mind. What happened to self reliance?, Self respect?, pride in achievement? don't graduate and become a CEO unless you start your own company, oh wait, that would require effort on your part, and it's clear few are willing to do so.

No Feisty, You lack the longevity to see them for what the ALL truly are, lying, cheating, stealing con men. These are the same people who had the gall to put Bernie Madoff in prison for running a Ponzi scheme, really? They preside over the largest Ponzi scheme the world has ever known or is likely to ever know. You forget the scandals involving Murtha and Pelosi in the 90's or are you not old enough even for that? Party means nothing, they are about money and power and keeping hold of both. Our mere lives mean nothing to the, it is our income they seek and control of everything we do.. One thing they ALL have in common is simply this, If they're mouth is moving, they ARE lying to you. It really is that simple. Perhaps,,,, when you lived a bit longer, you will come to see the truth, I just hope it's before they change government to a European styled socialist Nanny state. As we said in the sixties, Wake up and smell the s**t, it is later than you think. Then again, you probably think government run everything utopia.

Take off the blinders Brahmin, Politician is a polite term for thief, liar, scoundrel and con man, party only means something when they are entertaining, at our expense, of course. Talk about welfare queens.

  • 16 votes
#1.66 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:46 PM EST

The democrats would like nothing better than an across the board tax increase on all wage earners, to put us back to the Clinton era tax rates. Gop wants the taxes held where they are until the economy improves, and they are the problem?

  • 9 votes
#1.67 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:50 PM EST

Nidodemus

I never thought I would see the day when American believed everything in life was owed them for free. What a bunch of welfare dregs Americans are becoming. I learned at an early age there's no such thing as a free lunch, one way or the other it going to cost you. And the number who thinks it's governments place to take care of your pitiful life's affairs boggles the mind.

I don't know ANYBODY like that. Do YOU? It's a MYTH you know.

Have a little more faith in your fellow American.

This too shall pass. There is nothing wrong with America that Americans working together can't fix. And even when our politicians can't work together, the rest of the country keeps moving forward without them.

Don't worry, the sky is not falling.

  • 23 votes
#1.68 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:52 PM EST

Yes Ken.

  • 4 votes
#1.69 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:53 PM EST

Ken,

Gop wants the taxes held where they are until the economy improves

That's the funniest thing I've seen all day.

Now, there's a contrast in opinions. Famous Amos, says "yes" I say "that's funny"

But don't the Republicans want to fix the deficit? Little quandary there. Everybody's trying to stop the cliff, but the cliff is the thing that would actually fix the deficit.

Which is it guys?

  • 15 votes
#1.70 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:53 PM EST

The Fiscal Cliff Illusion

Once you study the history of banking and finance; you will understand that the current US government consists mostly of self serving puppet lap dogs who kowtow to their international banker masters rather than serve the majority of citizens “We The People”. After financing both sides of every war since the conception of the United States, bastardizing commerce with their monetary system monopoly, benefiting only their greed and lust, the international banker cartel says we owe them a national debt. Now they figure they are entitled to take away benefits we worked for like slave laborers, to pay back FIAT money they created from nowhere by slight of hand mystical boga boo. The fiscal cliff is a crock, we owe them less than nothing. In realty those banksters owe us for centuries of illegal immoral unconstitutional monetary system monopolization by war profiteering bean counters; it's historical fact. For keeping our nation in perpetual utter moral default; it is they that are ethically bankrupt, we don't owe them, they owe us. It is time we follow our Constitution, Codes 18 USC § 242 and 42 USC § 1983 demanding a people's monetary system managed by our elected representatives based on the value of work and being humane rather than on corruption, usury and infinite greed.

Under Article 1 Section 8, assigning various powers to Congress, Clause 2 gives our Congress the authority to regulate commerce; impossible once they gave away the control of the monetary system to private international interests. In Clause 4 of this Section, Congress, elected officials, replaceable every two years, are to regulate the value of money, not a private for-profit banker cabal. On to Article 1, Section 9, clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published...” Under the criminal Federal Reserve, there is no public money, just public debt. Coincidentally on the day before the 9/11/01 attacks, Donald Rumsfeld said the Pentagon lost over a trillion dollars. Monetary system monopolizers and war profiteers are the same 'klan'; if not, wouldn't the bankers find out where that money went? The next Clause begins, “ No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States:”. Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Chairman is also on the board of the Bank for International Settlements, the national debt is a fleecing of slavery. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional just like the First Bank charter to the Rothschilds. December 23, 1913 was not the first time we were sold out by our de facto lap dog government. Study Abe Lincoln and greenback interest free US dollars used to finance the Union Civil War effort. Study John F. Kennedy executive order 11110. For a short time, the US Treasury printed money independent of the bankster Reserve. Fair exchange of goods and services. We shall be free at last.

  • 10 votes
#1.71 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:54 PM EST

Republicons have been obstructing and voting against America as they pledged they would 4 YRS AGO. Numerous times holding out to pay off their rich friends with laws to benefit them instead of America. President Obama finally quits negotiating with himself and the republicons get pissed because President Obama is doing what he was elected to do...represent All OF AMERICA.

  • 34 votes
#1.72 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:54 PM EST

Chained CPI...has anyone thought about what this actually means? Time to talk to your parents or grandparents. Basically, it means that the retirees checks do not keep pace with the real inflation. Eventually it means they cannot afford the basics of life. For a year or two, they may get by. Longer than that, they will have to depend on increases in food stamps, etc. But what if those are cut back? Eventually it means homelessness and destitution....All this so people over $250,000 a year don't have to pay a little more in taxes. How sick is this? I do not like the fact that Obama put that on the table in the horse trade. It makes me not trust him. I won't believe him until he wins this hand of cards without hurting vulnerable people. At that point I will rejoice and congratulate him.

  • 19 votes
#1.73 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:55 PM EST

It seems to me that in an emergency situation, when the Senate is stalemated, and can't get the job done, then the POTUS should be able to override the partisan bickering and make the decision for them; otherwise, it seems that the President is little more than a figurehead (like the Queen of England).

Politically, this country is split down the middle, and no amount of haggling is going to produce a solution to any of our problems, be they petty, or emergencies. Maybe it's time for a new form of government, because the system we have now sure as hell isn't working. We now have the equivalent of the Hatfields and the McCoys playing Political Power Feud, and frankly, very few of them are worth a damn.

  • 3 votes
#1.74 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:00 PM EST

Once again the republicans are showing that they are the do nothing party and can't even work together for America and Americans. Only for their selfish selves! The Executive Branch should execute the Legislative Branch!

  • 12 votes
#1.75 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:01 PM EST

It is time to fire all house and senate members and start over with half of the ones we have now. They all should represent twice as many people and cut our government in half. It is time to trim the government at the top.

  • 2 votes
#1.76 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:04 PM EST

"In his interview earlier today on NBC's "Meet the Press," the president pointed to his offer on chained CPI as evidence of his willingness to compromise in pursuit of a broad fiscal deal."

So now something that Obama agreed to has been rejected by his own Democratic Party.

So who's the REAL Party of No?

  • 11 votes
#1.77 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:04 PM EST

Both sides are arguing about nothing substancial, watch what they're doing behind the scene! Repubs are bad and Dems are worse. I wasted my vote on Romney, a McCain clone who passively said nothing about the Benghasi murders Obama allowed when he could have. I can't vote for the communists we elected and the Tea Party just isn't big enough to win yet, but I will vote to grow, not vote to fall. Government, left and right, are bought and corrupt. The don't care about the debt, the country, the citizens, entitlements, the states, justice, freedom or America. They only care about money, winning, power, government and votes for re-election. They will do anything for their own personal greed. I will vote for American ideals from now on, not for the numbers I think could win. The lesser of 2 evils does not make a right. Ron and Rand! Ryan and Gentry. Individuals that are good, the parties are corrupt. We have to fall off the cliff, we have to hit bottom and lose even more because the threat over us is ignored. Untill we are kicked in the face, losing our buts we can't understand reality. we're surrounded by false realities saying we're OK or we're doomed constantly and don't realize we're repeating history by ignoring it. Vote for what's right for America and stop voting for yourselves. Look, government gave themselves raises for doing such a good job! Wake up!

  • 4 votes
#1.78 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:05 PM EST

GOP need to let go and give way to the WILL of the Average American (statistically a fact, not to metion the most recent election).

This is what we voted for. This is who it will benefit. And NO, the top 1 percent does not win every time.

Speaking to the individual GOP, if you can't see that all you are doing is protecting the top 1 percent now, you really are nothing but a sheep. Really, very sad for you and your children. Please open your eyes.

  • 15 votes
#1.79 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:08 PM EST

@Empress...

I agree...I don't like that he put that on the table either. Unless all of our representatives in Congress want to participate in the same Social Security fund and benefits plan...and thus live by the same Chained CPI restrictions on their retirement benefits (that currently cap out around $2,600/month, I believe), their consciences should lead them to leave Social Security out of any cuts or concessions. People worked for many years putting into Social Security, with a promise that it will be there for them. Anything other than increasing SS revenue to help it's solvency, should remain off the table.

  • 14 votes
#1.80 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:09 PM EST

WOW.... well said commonsense

  • 3 votes
#1.81 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:11 PM EST

Feisty.... YOUR AN IDIOT... go away

Says the person who doesn't know the difference between your and you're. At least you use caps to point out your ignorance.

Also, several periods don't replace a simple comma.

  • 13 votes
#1.82 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:13 PM EST

Hey Melvin-that needs to be said the Democrats as well. This isn't a one way street. BOTH parties are to blame for the shape our country has gotten. It's time BOTH PARTIES got off their collective rear-ends and did what they are paid to do for the good of the American people. Politics be hanged.

  • 3 votes
#1.83 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:14 PM EST

WOW, what a bunch of crap, common sense. And the GOP sheep 'BhAAAAAAAAA" as instructed by the top 1 percent.

LET GO GOP, AND GIVE 98 PERCENT WHAT IT NEEDS... trifle that it is. Jesus. STOP HOLDING AMERICA HOSTAGE!!!!

  • 10 votes
#1.84 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:16 PM EST

Smal busownerin NY;

You wouldn't know it from the whining and entitlement comments on this board. I'm not worried about, I will survive, always have, without government handouts, thank you very much. I had the advantage of and listened to a father who lived through the depression. I learned early on you can't spend you way OUT of debt, and there is no such thing as a free lunch, (unless your a politician) something clearly lost on the morons in D.C., ALL of them.

As a side note, Empress, at what point did S.S. cost of living increases keep pace with real inflation? Get the facts instead of relying on those who lie to you every time they're mouth opens.

Hell, I should be thanking the left for their idiocy, that last four years have been the best my businesses have ever seen, even surpassing those of the Clinton "ban everything" era. Unlike those who seem to think a college degree should get them the CEO slot, I knew I would have to build my businesses from the ground up. And no I didn't take out a single government loan or grant to do it. Clearly this tax increase looming on new years day will have to be adjusted for, but I lived through Clintonian tax era in a quite profitable fashion. It will mean the customer will pay more, it always does. As business taxes increase, so do the prices of all consumer goods, accounting 101.

Will it hurt big ticket sales?, you know it will. But then, so does uncontrolled spending and ballooning national debt. I've heard nothing in any of the proposals that address any of the larger items that need to be worked out. Left, right, matters not, NONE of them have the stones to make the unpopular choices it will take to bring all this under control. Instead our great grand children will be paying for their ineptitude, cowardice, greed and blind adherence to ideology.

  • 5 votes
#1.85 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:18 PM EST

Says the person who doesn't know the difference between your and you're. At least you use caps to point out your ignorance.

Also, several periods don't replace a simple comma.

Look past the grammar and look at the comment, this isn't English class it's a discussion board. Everything said still stands.

  • 2 votes
#1.86 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:20 PM EST

The Fiscal Cliff: WIN WIN

S T O C K - M A R K E T - E N I M A

Most Mom & Pop Investors lose tons of money, if not all of it, before they understand the words of Ben Bernanke, the Mister Playwright.

The stock market was following a predetermined rise for several years of FED Quantitative Easing (QE) before the plot on how to trigger a correction was introduced by Ben Bernanke in late February 2012. It was then, when Mr. Bernanke first uttered the phrase "Fiscal Cliff".

Savvy Big Money was tipped by the words "Fiscal Cliff', on the breadth of how to invest Long, before the High Frequency Trading computers could no longer exact their toll on new money. Some old market wisdom states that HFT brings no value to the market, it only drains it.

It is the belief of Mom & Pop, that the market will go over the Fiscal Cliff as suggested, so that sidelined funds will get the opportunity, to come in for the next leg up. We expect the DOW to retest a low that can be seen in the DJIA CHART.

WE NOW RETURN YOU TO THE POLITICAL SUBPLOT...

ALL READY IN PROGRESS>>>

MARKET MELTDOWN WIN WIN: GOP campaigns on lowering taxes. DNC campaigns against partisanship.

  • 1 vote
#1.87 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:20 PM EST

NYMike - yours is standard GOP practice. you have NOTHING to say here that can possibly be defended so you attack someone else without any argumentative merit whatsoever.

Really, who's the greater fool? Someone who misplaces a grammatical element or the clown who ignores the subject matter???

Nicodemus1946 -

Your personal ARROGANCE sickens me almost as much as your ignorance. I own my own business. I have NO debt and my net worth exceeds a million... Something you'll NEVER understand - this is about the general economy and not individual give or take! The middle class is dying and the rich are only getting richer. Resources are finite and growth will not turn things around anytime soon. Who'll be around to buy anything if supply-side politic is left standing???

  • 10 votes
#1.88 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:22 PM EST

So here is the deal - I read someone's question regarding whether or not the people who are arguing this so called cliff have social security benefits or not? They do not. What we fail to realize is that the hold up is because most of the people crying foul to the suggestion of people who make over $250k do make that much money. However, that is not all, they don't have to worry about social security benefits, welfare, or anyother government sponsored programs, because THEY ARE sponsored by the government even after they no longer hold office. Former Presidents, Congressman and Senators and their families are all supported by the government even after their terms are up. So what do they give a care about the rest of us?

  • 6 votes
#1.89 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:25 PM EST

No Feisty, You lack the longevity to see them for what the ALL truly are, lying, cheating, stealing con men. These are the same people who had the gall to put Bernie Madoff in prison for running a Ponzi scheme, really? They preside over the largest Ponzi scheme the world has ever known or is likely to ever know.

If Social Security is a Ponzi scheme, then so is having children. And that's worked OK for hundreds of thousands of years now, so if it is a Ponzi scheme, then it's in no danger of collapsing any time in the next few millenia. All Social Security does is formalize the relationship.

The fact that you are trying to equate the two, and the general language you use of trying to equate Bernie Madoff and Barack Obama basically leaves you with no credibility. Unfortunately, this is pretty much the current mindset of the average Republican supporter.

  • 11 votes
#1.90 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:26 PM EST

Is it just me or does everyone else realize the first couple of Posts by Fiesty and her minions are nothing more than Pro Obama, anti Republican propaganda without any substance?

It's just you.

  • 10 votes
#1.91 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:27 PM EST

StoptheliesNOW;

Clearly you haven't done a seconds research on the leftist saviors you parrot. It might interest you to know that as many on the left are in the top 1% as the right. Bill Gates is not poor, neither is Warren Buffet, and a host of other stellar leftists. There's blame enough to go around, including that man of the people in the white house, he isn't exactly living hand to mouth either. Check his tax return from 2011 and see if you think his 13.5% tax on $3.9 million adds up to what he expects us to pay. Left or Right, they have only one thing in common, "If they're mouth is moving, they ARE lying to you". He expects everyone to pay more, but he will be exempt, you can count on that. Just as the house and senate "opted out" of Obamacare in favor of their all inclusive free for life health care plan. Again both sides, made it the law of the land, except for them, of course.

  • 5 votes
#1.92 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:27 PM EST

Nicodemus1946 -- If you start with the 2011 spending cuts in the continuing resolution -- without any increase in revenue -- and considering it included a boost in defense funding...

And then consider the increase in deficits thanks to the Teapublican debt ceiling debacle...

And read this article "Boehner Outlines Demands on Debt Limit Fight" (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/10/us/politics/10boehner.html?_r=0) and see how his position hasn't budged one iota from where he was before the 2012 election shellacking...

Then you can restart you diatribe.

The rich in Hollywood and Silicon Valley support higher taxes, but not the rich on Wall Street and in Big Oil. Or as the president always says, he is rich. But not Romney rich. Are you not able to distinguish between these things? Or like other rightwingers, do you see everything in a simplistic black-and-white way?

  • 14 votes
#1.93 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:28 PM EST

Nicodemus1946 -- Clearly you haven't done a seconds research on the leftist saviors you parrot. It might interest you to know that as many on the left are in the top 1% as the right

clearly, someone can't construct a rational or fact based argument. i always stop reading when the first sentence is flat out WRONG - the wealthy overwhelmingly vote GOP. however, this has little to do with the argumentative basis in debate here as anyone with an education will tell you...

GOP, who are these people and how are they able to spell their own name when they are clearly so stupid? LOL

  • 11 votes
#1.94 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:34 PM EST
Dinky_DauDeleted

It is very obvious that feisty is NOT a business person here in the real world. What you seem to be failing to understand is that the Repubs don't need to make any deal right now to the Dems. They can wait until January if they want while they hold out for a better deal. That's what any good business person would do. This is what negotiating is all about. The Repubs are not going to move on the rich and Dems are not moving on SSI. Either way, neither will effect the national debt on bringing it down. Getting a few bucks more from the rich will not help the middle class people, and chained CPI only hurts the seniors who have earned their entitlement. Waiting until January for the new elected group to come in with new fresh ideas would be a better gamble then to rush to bad decissions now. By the way, if you think the cliff taxes are a big deal now, you haven't seen anything yet because you won't feel the pinch until 2014 when you file. Thats when you can expect Obama care to be in full effect and thats a tax in itself. So let these fool's drive this three wheeled junkpile off the cliff and let's see who's really going to be holding the bag when the next great depression starts.

    #1.96 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:38 PM EST

    The GOP is really impotent now under the leadership of Speaker Boner and McChicken.

    • 14 votes
    #1.97 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:40 PM EST

    Byron Raum -- Rightwingers love pyramid schemes like Amway so go figure, but a better example is not Bernie Maddoff, rather insurance premiums. Here's an interesting fact... The rich live a lot longer, because they live the good life. The working class, especially those who do manual labor, die young so don't collect very many years of Social Security (if at all). This means the working class are the ones paying premiums but never filing a claim.

    • 17 votes
    #1.98 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:42 PM EST

    Byron;

    Unlike you, I remember when your social security number was your S.S."ACCOUNT" number. NOT a tax payer I.D. number as it is now. It was totally volunteer system and NOT supported by tax money. These accounts were also interest bearing at the prime rate. If you paid into it at the max, 6% and your employer "matched" it to say 3% over a thirty year working life, retiree's had no problem getting along. As only those who paid into the system could draw from it. Sound like the "privatizing" proposal of a few years ago?, go figure. Funny how FDR set it up that way and it was always flush with cash until later day liberal "borrowed" it into oblivion. Enter LBJ, the great borrower of social security funds to pay for his social programs. Realizing the money for retiree's was being depleted, HE and his liberal cronies converted it to a tax. Since it was now a tax every working person HAD to pay, everyone was then "entitled" to draw from it, it became a social program no different than welfare.

    Government spending depends upon more and more people paying taxes to pay for more and more government spending, exactly the same premiss as any Ponzi scheme. Socialism is the great example of a Ponzi scheme, trouble is, you run out of other peoples money to steal eventually. So the comparison is a fair one and completely true, LBJ and company STOLE S.S. money that was not tax money to use for social programs. None faces charges for this grandest of thefts. Madoff went to prison for his crimes, I've yet to see any national politician to be held accountable for their crimes from either side of the aisle.

    • 4 votes
    #1.99 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:43 PM EST

    speakthetruth-2459907

    It is very obvious that feisty is NOT a business person here in the real world. What you seem to be failing to understand is that the Repubs don't need to make any deal right now to the Dems. They can wait until January if they want while they hold out for a better deal.

    As long as you -- and more importantly America -- understands WHO'S interest the GOP are advocating! Which you clearly do! And which to polls show America clearly does...

    The wants of the top 1 percent over the needs of everyone else!

    Not a very smart business, political, or any other kind of decision if you ask me. Short-term thinking at best. Moronic at worst.

    :)

    • 8 votes
    #1.100 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:45 PM EST

    Miss Piggy, Fire Crotch,

    Where is your Messiah now? Where is Obama?

    Delegating to others and giving up on discussions(after a vacation taken during talks). What a sorry excuse for a "leader".

    • 4 votes
    #1.101 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:45 PM EST

    I'm curious, Beverly: why did you address your reply to me? None of those excerpts are mine -- I was responding to them :)

    T-Rex: Obama came back to D.C. on the 26th. Boehner and his cronies are only coming back tonight. If you support Republicans, you're in absolutely no position to chastise Obama for vacationing during the talks.

    • 10 votes
    #1.102 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:49 PM EST

    What Pres. Obama has done is moving to the center, but what the Republicans want is for the DEMs to totally surrender to the GOP position which was already roundly rejected by the voters...only last month!!!!

    .

    Why? The GOP is on a course toward total self-destruction. Majority of voters have already said they are going to blame the GOP for going over the cliff.

    • 16 votes
    #1.103 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:52 PM EST

    It boggles the minds why the right wing lemmings continue to support their ReTHUGlican elected officials, who are a WASTE of SPACE, USELESS, CALLOUS lackeys of the 1 percenters. Majority of you right wing trolls here and teabaggers are nowhere near the uber wealthy's level. YOU will suffer the consequences of the unpatriotic antics of your Party of NO.

    Obama/Biden were re-elected for a reason, and by golly Democrat officials better not let the GREEDY OBSTRUCTIONIST PARTY get in the way this time. IF we fell off the FISCAL CLIFF - so be it! The teabags ans all these hardcore Repugs are going to suffer the same fate! Yep, we are all in this together.

    • 10 votes
    #1.104 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:53 PM EST

    I think starting 15 days prior to a budget deadline, all Congressmen should begin being fined $100,000 a day for each day that passes and no budget is produced. Let's see if the loss of $1.5 million out of their own pockets sets a fire under their asses to do their jobs.

    All of us who work for a living doing real jobs and not la la land jobs like those in Washington are penalized if we fail to perform, they should be too!

    So the Republicans want to take money from the poor and middle class while they are fighting to protect the incomes of the wealthy - why doesn't everyone who makes $70,000 or less just give half of our pay checks to the top 1% income earners of the US, would they be happy with that?!

    • 9 votes
    #1.105 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:54 PM EST

    Just remember Fiesty and friends that when you point that finger there are three pointing at you. Enjoy the cliff and when the taxes go up for Obama care enjoy more of your money going out the door also. You bitch about SS taking a hit have you ever talked to anyone on SS?? they will tell you most of what they get is ate up by other government expenditures like Medicare . So what they get is maybe a couple of $. I would think also you would be happy about the Cliff as it was Bush who put the tax cuts into effect and I do believe he is a republican.

    • 2 votes
    #1.106 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:54 PM EST

    T-REX-847863 - I'm not trying to be mean here but it's people like you who are responsible for the problems we face as a country. All you are doing is repeating Faux News talking points - and total hypocrisy at that (as ATM points out).

    Why won't you open you mind and start gettign informed? For instance, are you aware of ANY of the following. I promise, almost all of this is outside the boundaries of subjectivce option and simply flat FACT.

    YOU'LL NEVER HEAR ON FOX NEWS:
    FACT: Roger Ailes is president of
    Fox News Channel, chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group. Ailes was a
    media consultant for Republican presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and
    George H. W. Bush.

    JOBS -- Under Obama, 4.5 Million
    private sector jobs have been created in just the past 3 years - this after Bush
    losing 750K per month at the end of his term. Labor Force
    Statistics from the Current Population Survey (Source: BLS Rpt.
    LNU02000000)

    GOP MISLEAD WITH:
    "LESS PEOPLE WORKING NOW THAN 2009" - These job losses occurred during Obama's
    first year. It took time to turn things around after Bush's 750K jobs lost per
    month. If you read the graph at bottom you can clearly see that under Obama job
    losses were turned around.

    DEBT - - per Congressional Budget
    Office -- BUSH LEFT Obama $1.2 Trillion DEFICIT, and 3 Trillion in DEBT
    projected into Obama's term. Add to this the worst economic crisis in 80
    years. GOP 2006 Senate, 49/49/2. Who's to blame for our
    debt?

    STOCK MARKET- Under Bush, DOW closed at around 8000. Under
    Obama, we're now at 13000! Obama's policies have benefited "ALL our retirements
    and 401K" with stock market recovery!

    ECONOMIC GROWTH - Positive Growth
    now AFTER BEING HANDED Negative by Bush.

    TARP - with the threat of
    further regulation, most of TARP has been paid back w/ interest! Under Bush,
    this $$$ was loaned unconditionally amounting to corporate
    welfare.

    TAXES, taxes are lower for all but the richest, despite GOP
    obstruction! GOP recently fought tooth-and-nail to increase the burden on the
    middle class via the payroll tax. Thank You Mr. Obama. Furthermore, Tax Policy
    Center -- taking a close look at Romney's proposed tax and economic plan ---
    concluded that it would cut taxes for the richest Americans and actually raise
    them on the poor.

    OBAMACARE: Nixon, McCain, Romney and Gingrich, all FOR
    mandate before they were against it! Romney implemented the ORIGINAL Obamacare
    and mandate was originally a GOP idea!

    TERRORISM - under Obama's
    leadership and renewed focus he promised during the 2008 election - we got
    Bin!!!

    • 14 votes
    #1.107 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:55 PM EST

    Just remember Fiesty and friends that when you point that finger there are three pointing at you. Enjoy the cliff and when the taxes go up for Obama care enjoy more of your money going out the door also. You bitch about SS taking a hit have you ever talked to anyone on SS?? they will tell you most of what they get is ate up by other government expenditures like Medicare . So what they get is maybe a couple of $. I would think also you would be happy about the Cliff as it was Bush who put the tax cuts into effect and I do believe he is a republican.

    So nice to hear a Republican being honest about their motives. They WANT America to fail because THEY have failed. The most substantive sentence here is the last and even there it is totally out of context.... I do believe the wealthy benefited much greater than he middle-class and I do believe that we are talking about macroeconomic issues in the "here and now." But people like this do not care. They are too ignorant and too filled with hate. Enjoying being YOU. lol.

    • 11 votes
    #1.108 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:00 PM EST

    I have been retired since February 2010. This is the first increase in social security since then. Have you heard me whine about it?

    No, you haven't because it should not be attached to anything that automatically increases it. The same is true for minimum wage and employees of the government's wages, including the president and congressmen. Any increases should be voted on by whichever congress is current. They made them automatic, so that they won't be held accountable. Have you noticed that they do not want to be held accountable for anything, especially the progressive liberals.

    When you automatically increase these things, you automatically cause us to be less competitive in the world's market, with no advantage to us, monetarily, because inflation eats up the imaginary gains.

    • 1 vote
    #1.109 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:01 PM EST

    if hitting the cliff gets rid of the pigs at the trough im all for it full speed ahead. balance the damn budget and dont raise the debt ceiling!

    • 1 vote
    #1.110 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:02 PM EST

    Sounds like the Dems have slammed the door on the Presidents offer to use the chained CPI. I guess the President has no more influence over the radical Dems than the Speaker has over the Tea Party Republicans!

    • 1 vote
    #1.111 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:04 PM EST

    @IWonder - But Congress only gets a measly $5400 pay raise each year!

    • 4 votes
    #1.112 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:04 PM EST

    Appear to me that the GOP Tea Party / Libertarians and ultra-conservative owners and operators of businesses and corporations in this country, want to be the only recipients of help from the government, at the same time they rationalize and lobby for continual cutbacks and/or denial of those essential public services and safety nets to everyone else in this country.

    Now why is that?

    • 12 votes
    #1.113 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:06 PM EST

    Commonsense, you have none, you vote your shot to the foot every single time. The repubs offer nothing and are willing to push Grandma and Grandma off of the cliff in order to save the very richest in the land a few bucks. Vote for that and see a shrink about your self destructive behavior.

    • 8 votes
    #1.114 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:07 PM EST

    Hey roy. good to see your post. I was afraid that you would lose interest, once you left this titanic. Keep on posting. I'll bet it's funnier when you're not on board!

      #1.115 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:08 PM EST

      Hey, anybody remember this quote from Mitch McConnell:

      I think some of our members may have thought the default issue was a hostage you might take a chance at shooting,” he said. “Most of us didn’t think that. What we did learn is this — it’s a hostage that’s worth ransoming. And it focuses the Congress on something that must be done.”

      Proof positive that all the smirking jackasses on the right (GOP) want is to destroy the security and empowerment of the working class by ransoming short-term benefits in exchange for long term destruction of earned benefits programs. They don't give a damn who the hell they gore,....as long as it ain't rich people.

      Don't fall for it Mr. President. Wait for the automatic sequestration, defense cuts, then use your CIC authority to redeploy our troops back stateside to cover a potential Afghan counter-attack (smirks up sleeve).

      Wait'll the defense firms and Pubbie heads start exploding. Tee Hee. All you gotta do is sit and wait,.......and enjoy the show.

      • 11 votes
      #1.116 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:09 PM EST

      Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., expressed bewilderment at the breakdown, suggesting that there were more than enough votes for a compromise measure that didn't include chained CPI.

      "I don't know what caused this ... butt... there's 80 senators who will do that without CPI."

      So inside the GOP party itself, there is so much division. Last week, the GOP-controlled House of Scrooges refused to support Boner - their own House Speaker. Today, Mitch McChicken refused to work with majority of GOP senators.

      The GOP has collectively gone mad. It's self-destruction

      • 16 votes
      #1.117 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:10 PM EST

      Empress

      it means that the retirees checks do not keep pace with the real inflation

      It does not have to mean this. The current method of COLA is increasing the checks beyond the inflation rate. it is using one system one year and another the next, whichever gives the better boost in benefits. Using the correct CPI geared specifically to senior citizens needs/lifestyles and not floating to which system is the most favorable would be a reasonble change to make and pay the correct amount instead.

      • 1 vote
      #1.118 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:11 PM EST

      Ken-848629

      The democrats would like nothing better than an across the board tax increase on all wage earners, to put us back to the Clinton era tax rates. Gop wants the taxes held where they are until the economy improves, and they are the problem?

      SmBusOwnerinNY -- I laughed at this too. But my first thought was, where do folks get their information and how do they draw such twisted conclusions?

      Ken, the Dems and the President have made if clear, time and again, that they want to keep the low tax rates for the 98% earning incomes of less than $250K because it is the middle class who has not prospered for the last 30-40 years. In fact, the president's proposal would allow EVERYONE to keep the Bush tax cuts on their first $250K of income earned -- In other words, the Dems are advocating a permanent tax cut!

      The Teapublicans, on the other hand want to make all the Bush tax cuts permanent for all income, and they want to do so by cutting programs for the working class and poor. You know, like unemployment insurance, food stamps, and of course trust fund programs like Social Security and Medicare. If they gave a sh!t about not hurting the economy, why would they attack the middle class in these ways? In reality, these cuts only shift costs elsewhere and most importantly nothing they propose does a damn thing to reduce deficits.

      Here's a good example of corporate welfare, and getting back to Walmart. The taxpayers subsidize Walmart by providing programs like food stamps to Walmart employees because Walmart pays them poverty-level pay. (Save by shopping at Costco and stop giving your money to the Walton family.)And this in turn brings us to the topic of indexing anything to inflation -- Most notably the minimum wage.

      People, if I have to pull out Glenn Beck's chalkboard to connect the dots for you... Republicans are notorious for many things, one of which is the bait and switch.

      It was the Republicans who negotiated tax credits for the middle class and working poor like mortgage interest and the child tax credits. They came up with these tax credits in lieu of indexing the minimum wage to inflation (which would make the minimum wage around $11/hour right now). Then after time has passed and Americans can't remember what was done, they propose to end both the tax credits and minimum wage. See how it works?

      Another great example and more recent one was the 2001 Bush tax cuts. Republicans passed these under the guise of cutting everyone's federal income tax rates. But the truth is these tax benefited the richest 2% far more than the 98%. The real kicker was the follow-up Bush tax cuts in 2003 on capital gains, dividends, etc. that only benefits the richest 2%.

      Come on people, who do you believe supports the middle class, the Republicans or the Democrats? Who do you believe supports trust fund programs like Social Security and Medicare, the Republicans or Democrats?

      The Republicans are always the ones responsible for deficit spending on things like the military industrial complex, bailing out Wall Street, and subsidizing Big Oil. And when it comes time to pay the piper (per Reagan, Bush Sr., etc.) they will raise your damn taxes -- you the middle and working class -- Get a damn clue.

      • 15 votes
      #1.119 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:13 PM EST

      I wonder if someone like Mitt Romney would be the millionaire he is if there was no welfare which his father collected and helped to boost him out of poverty. I wonder if Mitt Romney's father would have become friends with the Marriott family if he remained a poor man and if Mitt would have still become a CEO of Marriott. Yep, I find it highly unlikely. So it is interesting how the Republicans find it so easy to take from programs like welfare and Social Security while they protect tax breaks for the wealthy!

      • 13 votes
      #1.120 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:14 PM EST

      Stopthelies....

      They won't listen, their brains are constipated because they have a great big Grover, Boehner, McConnell, Ryan, Cantor, Rush, Beck, Hannity, Fox News, etc. stuck up their colons, so let's go over the cliff, and yes, my wife and I will pay more in taxes, but not as much as the wealthy friends of the Tea Party, so I am willing to make that trade knowing that. Besides, if this really gets the deficit down, I'm okay with it, we all sacrifice for a while, get the deficit down to a manageable number, and then go on from there, is that all so bad? Of course, this will probably negatively impact the NRA's plan for funding armed guards in our schools, but perhaps the NRA's own members can volunteer for that, I would pay to see LaPierre in an inner city Chicago public school confronting an intruder armed with an AR-15 loaded with a 30-round magazine..

      • 11 votes
      #1.121 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:19 PM EST

      Day after day a certain individual's comment miraculously appears as the first posted comment. In an unrigged world this would be near impossible and about as likely as sitting with template open to check in online for an airline boarding position on SWAir, only to find that you were two nanoseconds into checking time and yet already the 59th person to board. Central propagandists and censorship in what passes as news these days are disturbing sides of the same coin. When will real and uncompensated Americans get an equal chance to have their say, and in the order of actual posting, rather than this jimmyrigged and biased system? I'm thinking never. This is sad. Wow the America we grew up in is certainly long gone and in its place only this Kafkaesque Amerika remains. Real Americans are simply shut out of having any voice in this out of control central machinery. Amerika was driven over the edge of this so-called cliff the day that a certain dipstick got the keys to the car four years ago and had already spent more in two and a half years than all the prior Presidents combined had spent in two hundred years. This month we've seen the central drama kings and queens on both sides of the aisle and in our symbol house show much ego but little common sense because at the end of the day they secretly want the tax cuts to expire and the seqestration to take place, especially junior with the keys to the car. No where in this political theatre are the actual best interests of everyday Americans even a top consideration. We all knew this central drama is just the latest garbage from a totally dysfunctional central apparatus. Thank goodness this is a divided government and many states have better quality people at the state level than we have at the federal level. Hopefully the states' leaders can find a way to minimize the damage that the central dipstick and the duo-aisle drama-players are doing with their dysfunction inside the Beltway. America's global reputation is sinking fast and it is every anti-leader inside the Beltway from both major parties who is to blame.

      • 4 votes
      #1.122 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:21 PM EST

      "we all ignore the first couple of posts anymore...."

      He said, after 'ignoring' the first post, 27 minutes into the thread.....

      • 3 votes
      #1.123 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:22 PM EST

      Biden? HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      What the F'k is he gonna do? I see another 4 more years of misery for this country........ hey, all the terrorists need to do now is sit back an watch this country fall apart.

      You can all thank the buffoons that you put in there ..... good luck!

      • 2 votes
      #1.124 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:22 PM EST

      StopTheLiesNOW

      Thank you for your input, I believe you have good intent it is just hard to see the whole picture with those big blinders on. The only sheep are you and your fellow liberals who only follow blindly the imperial leader of the liberal cause Obama. You blame Fox news for all the ills of our country which shows the extent of your illogical illusion. If I recall the Dem dominated Congress took nearly two years to pass health care, you say Republicans at fault, now an agreed upon fiscal cliff to end Republican tax breaks is the dominating cry of the Dems, yet it is not the tax cuts the Dems want, it is the tax raise. Even in the event they get it, it will not go to the middle class as you preach, it will go towards funding more Dem projects. So with that in mind I would have to conclude your cause is neither to support the middle class nor the taxpayer but your illustrious leader and the revenge of the Dems over the Repubs. Neither is in the best interests of the nation but in the liberal terror machine that has been built over the last thirty years. You think you take the high road but you only position yourself to attack in your own interests. Surely Fox news does not even know who you are so how do they attack you.

      • 4 votes
      #1.125 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:23 PM EST

      The only thing I would caution against, David, is I think this notion of, "Well, both sides are just kind of unwilling to cooperate." And that's just not true. I mean if you look at the facts, what you have is a situation here where the Democratic Party, warts and all, and certainly me, warts and all, have consistently done our best to try to put country first.

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

      WHAT A PILE OF $HIT!

      Go away statist. Your lies are done here Barrack. How have you put country first when for 4 long years we've been told how focused you are, "like a laser", on the economy and jobs and nothing has improved.

      For the first 2 years you were preoccupied with your Keynesian nonsense and then you began your assault on nationalizing health care, 2 auto companies (one which was sold to Italy, another still owes us more than $34 billion) and the financial sector.

      Then you began your statist promotion of class warfare and envy of the successful and producers. You have demanded that the best Americans can become is middle-class.

      We real Americans reject your convoluted restriction on American exceptionalism. You can blather your nonsense to your useful idiots that don't know any better because they have no shame or ambition.

      You can claim your mythical "mandate", we refuse it.

      Real Americans will never submit to your social and economic justice nonsense for the collective. We know America can be much better than that.

      • 4 votes
      #1.126 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:32 PM EST

      "...Blah blah drama drama blah blah..I have a feeling that the world will continue to spin even after the dreaded cliff we're all diving over come the first of the year..."

      But you DON'T understand! "feisty" got to post FIRST again!!! Woe is we!

      "....and yes, my wife and I will pay more in taxes, but not as much as the wealthy friends of the Tea Party, so I am willing to make that trade knowing that. Besides, if this really gets the deficit down, I'm okay with it,..."

      AMEN, Wil. A-Freaking-MEN.

      • 2 votes
      #1.127 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:32 PM EST

      "Biden? HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"

      Yes- I see your point. God, how better off we would be if Joe were Sarah right now!

      (how's that go again...." HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"??

      Ah, yes, I thought so.

      • 2 votes
      #1.128 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:35 PM EST

      Nothing - Just More Obama Drama

      What's Obama's and Harry's excuse for knowing the Bush tax cuts were scheduled to expire in 2013 and not doing something sooner?

      They're the deceivers - Taxes for Everyone!

      History will show the Obama Legacy to be sumed up in one phrase "It was not my fault"

      Pathetic and sad

      • 1 vote
      #1.129 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:38 PM EST

      Don't worry there Drive-By, Joe will be busy with the gun control bullsh!t Obammie delegated him to do, I'm sure he'll do a fine, fine job as always .......... You and I both know that nothing will get done there either.

      So, how does it go? BOO-YAH! Say it anyway you want, it's another 4 more years of nott'a f'kin' thing but bullsh!t!

        #1.130 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:43 PM EST

        rocky-2318920

        ...Enjoy the cliff and when the taxes go up for Obama care enjoy more of your money going out the door also...

        Sweet Jebus, I keep seeing this BS posted by rightwingers repeatedly. Prove it! No, you can't just parrot this rightwing lie -- You have to provide facts, data, statistics to support it.

        The truth is you and your ilk don't have a clue how Obamacare is being funded, or how in fact it will help small businesses, or how it helps reduce the deficit, not to mention making health more accessible to more people. You should all be so humiliated and embarrassed for posting this drivel.

        I can't wait until the fiscal curb and debt ceiling are behind us, and the new congress ends the GOP/TP obstruction by putting rules back in place for the filibuster (just to start with), and then with uncertainty removed, the economy will continue to improve at a faster pace. Already unemployment claims are going down, which means employers will have to start offering better pay and benefits, which will create more demand, which will create more jobs... And if they don't, we will see more strikes and labor organizing.

        And most of all, I can't wait until 2014 when Obamacare goes into full force. Even now no more discrimination for preexisting conditions, and insurance companies having to refund 80% of premiums not used for actual health care is going to mean a lot to many citizens out there.

        And all this, my fellow Americans, is why Teapublicans in Washington are soiling themselves. Prepare to meet the voters in 2014...

        • 10 votes
        #1.131 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:43 PM EST

        "...your cause is neither to support the middle class nor the taxpayer but your illustrious leader..."

        Mmmm Hmm. And what's in it for us fellow citizens and residents of this country and it's economy?? How would supporting'our 'illustrious' leader NOT be a vote to support the middle class, exactly?

        And for the 'class warfare' post- No, we don't get that. Neither do we get why, exactly, the wealthy have waged it against the majority of the country. We didn't get it when St. Reagan declared it, nor to we get it now.

        • 4 votes
        #1.132 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:44 PM EST

        Compassion seems sadly lacking these days in the halls of congress. Failure to act will result in 2 million people loosing un-employment benefits immediately. This is the cliff and will affect a small percentage of people but many will die.

        Taxes, an apparent sticking point in negotiations, will go up for everyone. But this is a slope. Merle Haggard refered to it, and us as the snowball rolling down that hill heading for Hell. EVERYTHING will become more expensive and more will die .

        Death and taxes, the two certaintees of life, political and idealogical persuasions notwithstanding.

        • 1 vote
        #1.133 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:46 PM EST

        Ken-848629

        The democrats would like nothing better than an across the board tax increase on all wage earners, to put us back to the Clinton era tax rates. Gop wants the taxes held where they are until the economy improves, and they are the problem?

        Well, most Democrats are proposing to keep rates the same for most Americans (those that don't want to keep the low rates until the economy improves, like myself). Secondly, the GOP doesn't want to keep the taxes rates constant until the economy improves; they want to keep the tax rates low for a few years and then CUT taxes the next time they get the White House and at least one-half of Congress. At best they want to extend the tax cuts permanently.

        This is all a bunch of bull@!$%#; we could have had a deal a few weeks ago had Boehner not balked forcing a tax hike down his childish caucus' throat. Democrats would have lost a lot of stuff and received barely anything, but even then the GOP couldn't agree on that.

        Ladies and gentlemen, we are at the precipice of the fiscal cliff, waiting to see whether our congressmen and women have any sense of maturity whatsoever. A simple solution is out there; everybody knows what could be done; everybody knows what should be done; they just can't do it for political reasons. Just let the top-end tax rates increase right now and let the rest of the rates remain low until 2014 or 15; modify the sequester to focus on defense cuts yet decrease the amount and potential damage; raise the payroll tax cap and chain CPI formula for SS; reform Medigap insurance, raise the Medicare payroll tax to 4.2%; increase Part B premiums to 35%; get a rebate from drug manufacturers; and bundle all Medicare provider payments by 2025. Simple as that. Unfortunately, our leaders cannot do achieve this crap thanks to the Tea Party, which dragged everybody to the right and turned the GOP into a far-right party that wouldn't ever compromise.

        • 4 votes
        #1.134 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:46 PM EST

        The Republicans aren't going to give in until they get to ream the middle class and the unemployed again but good! All that they care about is themselves and about stealing as much money from all the rest of us as they can. If Boehner and his friends like doing business in China so much why don't they just move there instead so that the rest of us can get back to the job of making this country great again?

        • 6 votes
        #1.135 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:46 PM EST

        Joe will be busy with the gun control bullsh!t"

        Sometimes, I just don't find time to keep up. 'splain to me what gun control legislation is pending right now, and who sponsered it?

        • 3 votes
        #1.136 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:47 PM EST

        But you DON'T understand! "feisty" got to post FIRST again!!! Woe is we!

        Hey Buzz,

        I see the night shift third string trolls have arrived... ;o)

        Bless their cold, black ♥'s, WHAT would we do for entertainment without them?

        I can't believe I'm sayin this, but GO PACKERS! lol

        • 9 votes
        #1.137 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:49 PM EST

        Fiesty you are a pocket full of M-80's,keep up the fight.Happy NEW YEAR TO MY LIBERAL VINERS.Hopefully they get a deal done?

        • 4 votes
        #1.138 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:53 PM EST

        Old Timer-88224

        The Republicans aren't going to give in until they get to ream the middle class again but good!"

        Take comfort, OldTimer- in that they may never get the chance again.

        See- the whole country was watching, and voted, during the last election cycle. And- the whole country spoke with a majority voice.

        Shoot- why do you think all the righties are so PO'd- as their posts seem to confirm each day?

        • 4 votes
        #1.139 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:54 PM EST

        The President has proposed an extremely fair and non-partisan deal that even the Democrats in Congress are complaining about. Now the GOP needs to realize that any deal on spending and revenue needs to include some tax increases on the very wealthy. It is basically the only requirement for a negotiation. Most Americans cannot see a problem with the principle, though some extremists like the ones posting here do.

        Lets go ahead and do it, or not.

        I said this a few times before, I do not see a solution because our Congress is unable to negotiate for Americans. In my opinion, we will not have a deal. Some of us who hire employees for certain tasks do realize that some are unable to do their job, and need to be replaced.

        • 6 votes
        #1.140 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:58 PM EST

        ALL 50 states need to call for a constitutional convention and take matters into our own hands. That way we can solve our nations problems by the people,for the people, and of the people. NOT the lobbyists,billionaires,corporations and other special interests. Any decisions made CANNOT be vetoed nor overthrown. It is vividly clear that ALL of the clowns in Washington D.C. need to be ran out of town at gun point, never to return. I have met murderers and theives that have more morals and more common sense that those lowlife sonsofbitches and sluts in D.C.

        • 1 vote
        #1.141 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:00 PM EST

        "I can't believe I'm sayin this, but GO PACKERS! lol"

        You one sick woman, 'Red'.

        But you knew that.

        Which is why I loves me some of that 'old maid' style stuff. (say, speakin' of style, isn't 'old style' some kind of "beer" up your way? and yes- the quote marks were intentional...)

          #1.142 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:01 PM EST

          Fiesty you are a pocket full of M-80's,keep up the fight.Happy NEW YEAR TO MY LIBERAL VINERS.

          Mike,

          Boom! lol

          I hope 2013 brings you much joy, peace & laughter! We have much work to do still ahead in the coming years to eradicate the GNOP scum!

          • 8 votes
          #1.143 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:06 PM EST

          Ah thekahnkubla, the problem with ifs is that there is no real answer, no one knows whether Romney would have gotten rich, or not. My guess is that he would have.

          The only rich man that I am personally acquainted with, made a fortune, while I worked for him, then lost all of it and then some, a few years later was rich again, then blew it all, now he is rich again and living in Nicaragua! Some people have the knack and the smarts, most do not.

          A sociologist once said that if you took all the wealth in the world and divided it up equally among every person, that within two years, the previously rich would be rich, the middle class would be middle class and the poor would be poor. I suspect that the fellow is correct.

          • 1 vote
          #1.144 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:07 PM EST

          " I have met murderers and theives that have more morals and more common sense that those lowlife sonsofbitches and sluts in D.C...."

          Hard to disagree with you. Do this: get out on the streets, mail, internet- whatever, and get some new blood elected. It's how our country and it's political system (still) works. Especially if your name is Koch or Adelson....

          • 1 vote
          #1.145 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:11 PM EST

          " no one knows whether Romney would have gotten rich, or not.."

          ER, no one knows whether Romney woud have gotten rich-ER, or not.

          Acually, that woudln't be a bad thing, depending on how he DID it....

          • 1 vote
          #1.146 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:13 PM EST

          You one sick woman, 'Red'

          It's all part of my unique charm, Buzz! lol Why else would the right wing nitwits stalk my ankles looking for something to "hump"?

          Which is why I loves me some of that 'old maid' style stuff. (say, speakin' of style, isn't 'old style' some kind of "beer" up your way? and yes- the quote marks were intentional...)

          Speaking of "old maids"... have you gotten over your loss of JS1 & her "adams apple" & size 15EEE's?

          I remember how much you enjoyed "poking" at her behind the malt shop? ;o)

          • 8 votes
          #1.147 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:13 PM EST

          mcbarker

          Politically, this country is split down the middle...

          There's a lot of fallacy going around.

          First is the false equivalency of the two Parties. The Dems are not pure as the driven snow, but the Teapublicans are clearly to blame for premeditated obstruction (e.g., record abuse of the filibuster), hostage-taking, nearly defaulting on our debt causing the deficit to increase, etc. Stop with the equal blame BS as a way to excuse the rightwing.

          ...As well as throwing out all incumbents, as if bringing in a bunch of inexperienced yahoos would make congress work better. Just get rid of gerrymandering to create safe seats, make Citizen's United contributions transparent, and put in place a federal standardized election process.

          Just as with the Gilded Age of the Robber Barons and the more modern version of supply-side voodoo economics, the founding fathers tried states rights and it failed. What's with rightwingers and going backward?

          This nation is NOT Right of center (how ever that is measured by rightwingers to begin with) and is not split 50/50. Aside from Republicans losing the popular vote in five (5) of the last six (6) elections, look at polls on topics such as the rich paying a fairer share in taxes -- Overwhelmingly a majority supports raising taxes on the richest 2%.

          Demographics indicate the nation is at the real center (and possibly moving Left of that), so start getting used to it.

          • 10 votes
          #1.148 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:16 PM EST

          The reincarnated, ignorant, racist, Nativist, anti-American, Know-Nothing, Party of No is absolutely worthless...

          Heck of a Job, pathetic Party of No.

          YOU SAID IT MAN!!!!!........ wait ........ which party was that again?

            #1.149 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:20 PM EST

            Republicans have been asked to vote on 0.5 million plus. Already up from 0.4 million plus. Quite frankly, if I were a republican in congress, I would demand more, too. The democrats are repeatedly caving in. In 24+ hours they have increases on 0.25 million plus, complete with major spending cuts. They can then re-pass tax cuts on the middle class. Now this article says they've already waffled back to 0.5 million? They will hardly generate enough revenue to stop the rising debt. Not without crippling spending cuts, which shockingly, we hear almost nothing about because there isn't much at all to talk about in this "scaled down" plan. In other words, very little new taxes and almost zero in cuts. Republicans may be corrupt, protecting rich interests over country need, but democrats are spineless cowards. Even when they have all the leverage, they keep back pedaling begging for help!! Half a million? Really? Wow. Who to vote for in two years. Corruption or cowardice?

            • 2 votes
            #1.150 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:20 PM EST

            @IWonder - don't forget, it was Mitt Romney's father who made the millions, not Mitt. It's easy to turn millions of dollars into more millions, just ask Donald Trump who for years took a $20 million inheritance and kept it at $20 million until a dozen or so years later he finally got lucky. Had Mitt grown up poor, do you really think he would have become wealthy? Do you really think that the Marriott family would have become best friends with Mitt's father if he was a poor man, maybe working as a bell boy at one of their hotels and then hired Mitt as a CEO of their company? I do find that a bit hard to swallow.

            • 5 votes
            #1.151 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:24 PM EST

            Thank you for your input, I believe you have good intent it is just hard to see the whole picture with those big blinders on. The only sheep are you and your fellow liberals who only follow blindly the imperial leader of the liberal cause Obama. You blame Fox news for all the ills of our country which shows the extent of your illogical illusion. If I recall the Dem dominated Congress took nearly two years to pass health care, you say Republicans at fault, now an agreed upon fiscal cliff to end Republican tax breaks is the dominating cry of the Dems, yet it is not the tax cuts the Dems want, it is the tax raise. Even in the event they get it, it will not go to the middle class as you preach, it will go towards funding more Dem projects. So with that in mind I would have to conclude your cause is neither to support the middle class nor the taxpayer but your illustrious leader and the revenge of the Dems over the Repubs. Neither is in the best interests of the nation but in the liberal terror machine that has been built over the last thirty years. You think you take the high road but you only position yourself to attack in your own interests. Surely Fox news does not even know who you are so how do they attack you.

            Was this meant to be taken seriously or simply to be preached high atop a soap box??? lol Thing is, no where here do you even begin to present a FACT. Just your opinion. Nothing more. Do you understand?

            GOP, do you understand the difference between opinion and FACT? Here is where you must start, grasshopper. :)

            • 6 votes
            #1.152 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:25 PM EST

            lilirocks

            Now the GOP needs to realize that any deal on spending and revenue needs to include some tax increases on the very wealthy.

            Why?

            Tell me how this will help on Jan. 1st 2013 and March 21st 2018 or any other random date?

            What will it do to our Deficit? Our debt? What rate of growth will that be at? How will it impact unemployment?

            • 2 votes
            #1.153 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:28 PM EST

            On the Edge said:

            Compassion seems sadly lacking these days in the halls of congress. Failure to act will result in 2 million people loosing un-employment benefits immediately. This is the cliff and will affect a small percentage of people but many will die.

            Taxes, an apparent sticking point in negotiations, will go up for everyone. But this is a slope. Merle Haggard refered to it, and us as the snowball rolling down that hill heading for Hell. EVERYTHING will become more expensive and more will die .

            Death and taxes, the two certaintees of life, political and idealogical persuasions notwithstanding.

            I am glad you mentioned this. Hardly anyone mentions this. People will die. I guess in this day and age, it is not fashionable to bring this up. So many are just crunching numbers and not noticing the people behind the numbers. I guess it is sort of like the people who fire the triggers on the drones from a thousand or so miles away, feeling it is like a video game, something unreal; but there are actually people dying when that trigger is pulled. We live in a time when people cut off their emotions from their actions. Would the Republicans want to do this if the people who would die as a result of the cuts they wish to make were lined up in a row outside the capitol building, Boehner given an assault rifle and told to shoot the lineup of people to save money on the budget? I'd bet it would not be so easy if he had to have the blood on his hands personally.

            • 3 votes
            #1.154 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:33 PM EST

            Poor poor Fisty and the minions. Had to come out on a Sunday to defend their messiah. Bet the hangover wasn't quite gone yet and it had to hurt.

            • 3 votes
            #1.155 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:34 PM EST

            miss piggy you are wrong on the majority of voters blame repubs,i saw that poll and participated in it also,there are factors you do not consider at all with the numbers... i saw that ALL dems blamed repubs for going over the cliff...but here's the catch,i'm a repub and guess what i clicked on....NOT DEMS like a sheep following the pack,i checked ALL THE ABOVE..like a lot of other sensible people,so you are ultimately wrong,you see i know it is ALL the fools in office you follow the other sheep

            • 1 vote
            #1.156 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:47 PM EST

            The republicans in office now are nothing more than maggots. Now they are crying, they would have had passed a "milk deal" by now it they were allowed to cut food-stamps to poor people.

            Why do republicans hate poor people so much? Aren't those the people who do all the work the republicans think they are too good to do, or too rich to do?

            • 7 votes
            #1.157 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:47 PM EST

            The first spending cut should be to all those in Congress, that would save us millions, cut their pay, health care, pensions, and yes all that free money they are given so their kids can go to college for free.

            They can't do their job, they should not be paid.

            THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF YOU NOT BEING ABLE TO COMPROMISE, SO YOUR FIRED!!!

            • 2 votes
            #1.158 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:05 PM EST

            Why do you think Feisty Redhead is almost always the first to comment? Because he/she is paid commentator with an inside scoop to the newsvine. Sure makes sense now.

              #1.159 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:05 PM EST

              TheKhanKubla

              Had Mitt grown up poor, do you really think he would have become wealthy?

              This is the convoluted delusion about the rich bogeyman the Liberals/Progressives fear so much.

              They feel that millionaires are just grown on some Conservative Farm in one of the fly-over states, injected with “Hate-The–Middle-Class” serum and then unleashed on the world to wreak havoc.

              This is what happens when the Libbies allow themselves to be manipulated so easily all their life and become so complacent to success and ambition. This is the result of submissive parents, peers and educators who fear the government.

              Yes, Mitt, “The Donald” and MOST other millionaires started out poor or middle class. But they understood that THEY had to do it. The government or Liberals won’t do it.

              YOU DO BUILD THAT!

              If you want a more comprehensive explanation of the wealthy I recommend you read “The Millionaire Next Door”. This was written by the (GULP!) New York Times.

              It not only explains how the wealthy get that way they expose how they don’t expect the government to do everything for them.

              It shows how the wealthy don’t just sit around all day and all of a sudden a few million dollars fall in their lap. They’re usually NOT lucky and there is no secret handshake you need to know to become rich.

              Here is the link:

              http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/s/stanley-millionaire.html

              Good luck and enjoy.

              • 2 votes
              #1.160 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:09 PM EST

              Moshulu asked:

              Why do republicans hate poor people so much?

              I wish I knew. I can only guess based on observation. Isn't it funny how the Republicans when it comes to choosing cuts pick the most painful ones. They would cut food stamps or COLA's, the types of things that would hurt the poorset people. These sort of cuts would not even gain much as far as reducing the deficit. They are only a few dollars per recipient, but to that person, it could make all the difference as to whether they can cover their barest needs. When taxing wealthier people, one can get more dollars (therefore actually affecting the deficit) without seriously hurting them. It would seem the desire to make the most painful cuts shows that the Republicans are more about being sadistic than practical. If one takes from a rich man, one wants the money. If one takes from a poor man, one wants death. Republicans resent the poor. They have negative feelings towards them as people. I have heard Republicans talk about poor people, and I can hear the venom in their voice. This whole fiscal cliff thing is not just about money but about who some people want off the planet. If they were truly worried about the deficit, they would curb America's excess. Why not end a few wars, close a few foreign bases. We could be less of the world's policeman. We could end a few subsidies to corporations. We could stop giving foreign aid to countries that hate us. There are a lot of cuts that could be made that do not hurt people, but I don't hear about them wanting to cut those. I think it is time we questioned their true motives.

              • 3 votes
              #1.161 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:36 PM EST

              I see the republican obstructionists are at it again. Guess what, guys? The majority of Americans support raising taxes on the wealthy and cutting defense spending. I thought you were elected to represent the American people, NOT Grover Norquist and Halliburton. Time to do what you're paid to do, learn the art of compromise and get to work, or you can bet the majority of Americans will vote you out in 2014.

              • 4 votes
              #1.162 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:42 PM EST

              TheKhanKubla

              @IWonder - don't forget, it was Mitt Romney's father who made the millions, not Mitt. It's easy to turn millions of dollars into more millions, just ask Donald Trump who for years took a $20 million inheritance and kept it at $20 million until a dozen or so years later he finally got lucky. Had Mitt grown up poor, do you really think he would have become wealthy? Do you really think that the Marriott family would have become best friends with Mitt's father if he was a poor man, maybe working as a bell boy at one of their hotels and then hired Mitt as a CEO of their company? I do find that a bit hard to swallow.

              Agreed, and the same can be said of many others such as Paul Ryan who collected Survivor Benefits while he went to college. But there is one caveat, which is that the Marriots are Mormon, and that is one reason Mitt's family has been friends with the Marriots (look up Son of Boss scandal). But poor Mormons do not hang out with the rich Mormons, so technically you are still right.

              Another tidbit is that Mitt's grandfather and others who went to Mexico to practice polygamy received government assistance when they returned to the US -- An odd thing this break, along with deferments for missions, and that wonderful tax write-off Romney has used for charitable contributions to the LDS church. The Jehovah's Witnesses should be pissed. Anywho, this is why Reid knew Romney was paying less taxes than he claimed.

              Let's just be very grateful we missed that bullet, a nasty hit on many levels that would have been...

              • 6 votes
              #1.163 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:45 PM EST

              SPense,

              more specious logic

              This is what happens when the Libbies allow themselves to be manipulated so easily all their life and become so complacent to success and ambition. This is the result of submissive parents, peers and educators who fear the government.

              Submissive parents? Educators who fear government? Teachers are part of the government. It's you that fears government. And you have no reason to. Why are you afraid? 3% in taxes on somebody else? Even if it's you. That's nothing to fear. 3%? come on.

              Yes, Mitt, “The Donald” and MOST other millionaires started out poor or middle class. But they understood that THEY had to do it. The government or Liberals won’t do it.

              Mitt and Trump started out poor? ....right along with George W. Bush....right out of the poor house. Right.

              • 4 votes
              #1.164 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:47 PM EST

              BackHouse, re- post 1.1, "Aren't there millions of Republican's on unemployment"? As opposed to millions of Obama voters who were,are, and will remain on welfare? Who will not be affected by this financial nightmare because their votes have been bought and paid for. So,BackHouse, the Republican's should back anything the President proposes in order to stay on unemployment,right? The problem with that is unemployment runs out,welfare does not! People on unemployment had a job and were laid off,they paid a matched percentage along with their employer for the unemployment.If WE were all to quit working would be on your team? I just want to know?

                #1.165 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:00 PM EST

                America is on a downward spiral resulting from a continuation of policy failures and bad decisions, just like we are about to witness in the so-call "fiscal cliff." Obama and the Democrats will reign supreme once again under a failed leader that has the backing of the liberal media and most working people that are only concerned about lower taxes.

                The Republican's attempt to curtail the spending, ensure the future of entitlements, protect small businesses and create new jobs will be offset with higher taxes on the rich which is the one AND ONLY goal of Obama. BTW, this will run the government for one week if approved.

                One can only imagine what the next 4 years of this administration and the Democrates will bring to our struggling country, the people and the economy.

                • 1 vote
                #1.166 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:06 PM EST

                Empress, I agree with all three of your posts. You hit the nail on the head ranging from how the CPI eventually leads to homeless poor old people to why Republicans hate the poor. I will add just one more reason why Republicans and Obama wants to cut or make Social Security checks smaller and that is the disability people are on it. Obama and the Republicans know that the disabled do not have the "Mark of the beast" spoken of in Revelation Chapter 13 Vs 15 through 18.

                http://youtu.be/mhqCFVKnorg

                The above link shows a Christian made movie that went out in 1981 about how the people who are not all there in the head "nuts" do not have the "Mark" so in order to kill them the Republicans want to cut Social Security for filling the scripture saying that Both rich and poor free and slave are to receive a mark and those that do not have this mark are CAUSED to be killed. Note the word CAUSED that means put in a position that one can not survive. Cut the checks and people die CAUSING them to be killed. Notice this is not a direct killing like in usual dictatorships where people are lined up and shot into ditches. These people are CAUSED to be killed. This shows that the regime of the Beast is cowardly not wanting to take direct responsibility for their Murders. They want to put people in positions where they can not possibly survive and say they were not strong enough so they died. Boy what a shame knowing full well they CAUSED it. But God sees it as Murder just the same since it is in Revelation Chapter 13.

                • 2 votes
                #1.167 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:27 PM EST

                TruePatriot, Mitt Romney in 2011 paid the IRS 14% when it should have been 13% in taxes. The Romney's also contributed 30% to charity while Obama-Robinson ponied up 22%. If this is a lie,then the IRS should have no problem since Mitt's a$$ in in the air. If Harry Reid smell's a rat, maybe he should check his shoes! And,I'd rather take the bullet,TruePatriot, than endure this President's inability! Put that in your syringe and shoot it.

                • 2 votes
                #1.168 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:39 PM EST

                The problem of SS Disability is that folks start collecting it at a young age without paying into the system first. True, Social Security is not designed for this. We need a separate way to help those who can't help themselves, which is funded properly. And it needs to be only for those who truly can't help themselves (per private insurance criteria).

                What do you think about people like Michele Bachmann who collected a shi!tload of government money being a foster parent? This is a racket in many ways too, but how to deal with it?

                The issue with Welfare and forcing single mothers to work for poverty wages has had many unintended consequences, but the main complaint was women having more kids to keep collecting. What is the difference between this and the child tax credit that allows folks with a lot of children to pay zero income tax?

                Good paying jobs are the main solution. When people have proper income, they don't need tax credits -- or having to subsidize douchebag companies like Walmart with food stamps because they are so crappy to their employees while the Waltons live in outrageous luxury.

                fenderbluesjr

                TruePatriot, Mitt Romney in 2011 paid the IRS 14% when it should have been 13% in taxes...

                2011? Where is he proof of what Romney paid in the years before that? I'd say you're the one smoking crack.

                • 6 votes
                #1.169 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:57 PM EST

                TruePatriot, I would not like people like Michele Bachmann because people like her ruin things for the truly needy. As to who is on the disability roster. I know most of them are Veterans who suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome. These people earned it by going to war for us. Another large part of recipients receive it after working years but something happens in their life to make them disabled like illness or snapping suddenly. The smallest number of them get it younger during child hood. These children usually get it because of something that happened during their childhood. Most of these people need it because what ever happened to them I would not want on my enemy never mind an innocent child in America. Only very low numbers would be cheats because the money given is so small it is not worth hustling for. There are better more profitable cons out there that if someone is on disability than they probably need it. I have met many people who are on it for one reason or another and I would NEVER want to be in their shoes. So I believe they really need it so I have Mercy on them.

                • 2 votes
                #1.170 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:10 AM EST

                How many times do I have to say RECALL VOTE before someone listens and takes action? RECALL EVERYONE!

                  #1.171 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:12 AM EST

                  Just as with the Gilded Age of the Robber Barons and the more modern version of supply-side voodoo economics, the founding fathers tried states rights and it failed. What's with rightwingers and going backward?

                  Actually, the founding fathers didn't really try with states rights' (unless you include the Articles of Confederation), at least not with historical clarity. The real states' rights experiment was the Confederacy during the Civil War; it failed miserably. And the right is naturally inclined to go backward; their entire philosophy (a mutation of traditional conservatism) is to take the country BACK to the early 20th century. Liberals like me and you only want to return to the 1950s, and only economically (strong middle class leads to stability; good ol' Aristotle, and even then we have to realize that blue-collar jobs have to become more skilled and are gonna be more competitive.

                  • 3 votes
                  #1.172 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:16 AM EST

                  Romneys 14% tax statement came from HIS own words and published with HIS permission. READ people.

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.173 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:20 AM EST

                  Our future is in the hands of fools.

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.174 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:30 AM EST

                  IWonder,

                  The empty words of a sociologist mean nothing! All I know is that two years ago the top 5% owned 40% of the wealth, one year ago 42% and this past year 45%. Since they pay on average 14% income taxes and most of the middle class I know pays more, when will you be satisfied with creating a new Aristocracy? Will 50% be enough for you?

                  • 3 votes
                  #1.175 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:06 AM EST

                  Since the Republicans won 54% of the House seats in the 2012 elections on their promise to cut spending and keep taxes low, I guess the 'Will of the people' must be to stand firm in their negotiations with Obama and the Democrats.

                  I contrast, Obama only got 51% of the vote - hardly a 'mandate' to have things his way.

                    #1.176 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:50 AM EST

                    Since the Republicans won 54% of the House seats in the 2012 elections on their promise to cut spending and keep taxes low, I guess the 'Will of the people' must be to stand firm in their negotiations with Obama and the Democrats.

                    What really amazing is they did it with over a million fewer popular votes than the Republicans got.

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.177 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:05 AM EST

                    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    OK, this is just sad. I have to call you both on this one...

                    Roy Wilson

                    I could have sworn the GOP "---- LOST ---- seats in the house this time around/2012!

                    Swan (song)

                    I really could have sworn that Obama got 2.7 percent more of the popular vote than Romney!

                    WOW - I'm correct both times! And that makes the GOP WRONG on both counts above. Kind of pathetic, right?

                    :)

                      #1.178 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:51 PM EST

                      The empty words of a sociologist mean nothing!

                      This is what the monkey thinks when he places his hands over his ears... can't win an argument so just pretend it doesn't exist. LOL

                      What is left of a man when he no longer will listen to anything but his own views --- no matter how strong or irrefutable the argument?

                      • 1 vote
                      #1.179 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:58 PM EST

                      I could have sworn the GOP "---- LOST ---- seats in the house this time around/2012!

                      Swan (song)

                      Actually it was a typo I meant to say Democrats (they are so similar I get confused sometimes). The Republicans won more seats with a million less votes than the Democrats. I personally think the districts should be drawn by a computer program that only takes population and geography into account.

                        #1.180 - Wed Jan 2, 2013 1:25 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Did anybody actually expect last minute negotiations in the Senate to go anywhere? This is the US Senate we're talking about. Boehner knew exactly what he was doing when he said the Senate had to work out a deal. He was killing negotiations, kicking us over the cliff, and hoping to lay all of the blame at the feet of President Obama and Harry Reid.

                        • 39 votes
                        #2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:41 PM EST

                        OBAMA said the Senate needed to come up with a proposal in that meeting on Friday. Obama put it on the senate. Not Boehner.

                        • 12 votes
                        #2.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:10 PM EST

                        csm9,

                        Yes our President said that after Speaker Boehner said it was up to the Senate when he couldn’t get enough votes for his Plan B and adjourned for Christmas.

                        • 31 votes
                        #2.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:19 PM EST

                        Think of all the wasted tax payer money bringing the House back in session today and tomorrow for nothing.

                        • 8 votes
                        #2.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:22 PM EST

                        If the thieves from the republican party would have kept their hands off SS in the nixon era, SS would not even be in the fight right now.

                        • 39 votes
                        #2.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:22 PM EST

                        heard some talking head on one of the Sunday morning political talk-fests talking about how Obama needs to remember that the Repugs need to "save face" -- great, Samuri rules!!! Boner, how 'bout you and a few of the tea-baggers who are leading you around by your nose commit political hari-kiri and vote to save the population you swore to represent?

                        • 21 votes
                        #2.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:50 PM EST

                        In the meantime, I will try to come up with something," Reid added of Republicans' latest proposal, "but at this stage I don’t have a counter-offer to make."

                        At this stage you should know every available resource to get this deal done... REID is a complete IDIOT. HE IS THE OBSTRUCTIONIST.

                        AFTER the above quote in this very opinionated piece, everything else printed is rehashed old talking points.

                        I am still wondering how Fiesty Redhead, who I have had on ignore for a longtime, still is able to be the VERY FIRST poster on almost EVERY NBC article that's in the headlines??? Then the whole thread turns into a troll fest?

                        REID is sitting right there stalling and every liberal is blaming the GOP. I am an independent voter who can THINK FOR HIMSELF and is not blinded by partisan rhetoric, but these days I lean heavily to the right. This above is exactly why.

                        • 11 votes
                        #2.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:43 PM EST

                        Shosyn

                        REID is sitting right there stalling and every liberal is blaming the GOP. I am an independent voter who can THINK FOR HIMSELF and is not blinded by partisan rhetoric, but these days I lean heavily to the right. This above is exactly why.

                        What do you think of the Boner more interested in votes for becoming Speaker again in January than his constutients and this country; Shosyn?

                        How 'bout that fool McConnell filibustering his own bill?

                        • 12 votes
                        #2.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:06 PM EST

                        They don't care about deadlines, that's an implanted idea. There is no fiscal cliff. That's a crisis invented to be cured so they can look good to voters. The printing machines making money are ruining the economy while the governors vote themselves raises to cover the devaluation. The middle class will mainly lose more ground. Taxing the rich won't cover much at all and spending will increase because the government is the main thing that matters now. The cost of everything will rise, the taxes will be made to look rising slower than reality and you will lose your country, that is the real government plan. Did you get a raise? Do you think the government deserves a raise? Do you like the way things are going, or are you bought and sold based on the money you are given by the government, just like they are?

                        • 5 votes
                        #2.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:23 PM EST

                        "Loser." Congress. The President.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:30 PM EST

                        The system does not work. You lose.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.10 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:31 PM EST

                        The GOP doesn't appeal to Biden. Biden finds the GOP unappealing.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.11 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:34 PM EST

                        Well I guess Obama wants to be a LAME DUCK President during his last 2 years. Because if he continues with this stupid talk of Chaining the CPI come 2014 the Democrats will suffer massive losses in both Senate & House elections to where the Republicans just might get a Super Majority.

                        If President Obama does not want this happening, He needs to keep his hands off Social Security, Disability, Medicare & Medicaid... Otherwise he WILL be a Lame Duck come 2015.

                        We Disabled Citizens and Seniors VOTE! and if Obama votes to cut Social Security (Which is basically what a Chained CPI would do to Social Security) We will vote out everyone who voted for this... INCLUDING DEMOCRATS!!!

                        And thats my opinion.

                        • 3 votes
                        #2.12 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:42 PM EST

                        Mitch McConnell, Ky. ... insisting that a deal to resolve the fiscal cliff include what is known as "chained CPI

                        So Biden was right when he said the GOP tried to put people "back in chains". Mr. Biden should wonder about the intentions of Mitch McChicken who even filibustered his own bill.

                        • 9 votes
                        #2.13 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:46 PM EST

                        Seriously Miss Piggy? People "back in chains" is hardly a remark that Biden should be proud of. It, and his families hedge fund scam are low points of his career. Nether have any bearing on current discussions.

                        Why is Biden being summoned anyway? Oh yeah, thats right...Obama quit. Time for a vote of No Confidence in Obama.

                        • 6 votes
                        #2.14 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:00 PM EST

                        Most of you on here are pathetic. All of Washington D. C. is screwing the h3)) out of us and all you can do is sit on a web site and point fingers at each other. All of the politicians are doing is to protect what they have (personally) and want all of us to pay for it (which we are). One term in office and they have a lifetime of insurance and salary. How many years are the rest of us having to work to get that type of deal and we find out when we retire we get far less than the politicians. So when all of you figure that out and quit fighting with each other maybe, just maybe we can come together and take our country back. The current members of Washington spend so much time dividing us up that they have no time to do their jobs other than protecting their own interests. Try growing up and work with each other to protect what little we have left.

                        • 3 votes
                        #2.15 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:20 PM EST

                        I see the libtards are blind as always .. quit drinking the koolaid

                        • 3 votes
                        #2.16 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:47 PM EST

                        "I see the libtards are blind as always .. quit drinking the koolaid"

                        ...he said, as he used the term "libtard."

                        Again.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.17 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:04 PM EST

                        StopTheLIes.

                        I don't watch Fox News. Way to make assumptions about people. I make no apologies for not buying into Obama and his BS. I do not blame Fox for this. I blame Barack and his record. How he divides a country like no other, and them blames Wall St, or Business, or Republicans....whatever his whipping boy of the moment is. Then well meaning, but either uneducated, unintelligent, or misled minions follow this man and his BS. Get a clue.

                        Everyone will pay higher taxes within 3 years. Everyone. Don't let this BS about the 2% fool you. And deal to avoid the fiscal cliff is BS. It does not avoid the cliff...it merely postpones it. even an Obama devotee should be able to do that math.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.18 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:40 PM EST

                        Way to make assumptions about people

                        This coming from a self-proclaimed extinct dinosaur is too freakin funny...

                        Live a little, go find yourself a brontosaurus and have some fun! Instead of spreading your manure around here! lol

                        Pal, YOU are so far out of your league it is no longer funny...

                        • 5 votes
                        #2.19 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:46 PM EST

                        Really Fire Crotch?

                        I am out of my league...with you?

                        Please, that's the funniest thing you have ever posted. And given your drivel, that is saying a lot.

                        • 1 vote
                        #2.20 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:50 PM EST

                        So the Senate actually did pass something over the opposition of its Tea Party members and a few Democrats. It cuts taxes for most Americans, extends unemployment insurance and sets us up for the same showdown over the sequester in a couple months.

                        I do believe this was, quite literally, the least they could do. And sadly, also the most.

                          #2.21 - Tue Jan 1, 2013 10:26 AM EST
                          Reply

                          Chained CPI = no deal. Leave our SS alone, find your cuts starting with the military, all corporate welfare, medicaid and first and foremost federal retirement benefits. You people in the govt are no better than the rest of us and deserve no better benes than we do.

                          • 58 votes
                          #3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:46 PM EST

                          Tom Brokaw made the point, it doesn't make sense he and his less wealthy brother get the same Social Security benefits, although the former news anchor doesn't need his.

                          • 33 votes
                          #3.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:52 PM EST

                          My take after reading another thread about pay increases for Joe B., our pathetic Congress, & Federal Workers is this: President Obama has issued an Executive Order to increase pay for Federal Workers, Joe Biden, and the worst performing Congress in my memory.

                          After Americans have been treated to "boogeyman" stories that stretch the imagination; really an imaginary monster in the closet to scare the bejesus out of the populace, they get a raise? I say order a raise for Federal WORKERS and nix the Executive Branch, (sorry, Joe) and most of all, our do-nothing Congress! I'm extremely disappointed in the POTUS w/the news about the Executive Order + another 'golden parachute!'.

                          A 'Chained CPI?' Never!!

                          • 16 votes
                          #3.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:59 PM EST

                          If Republicans insist, then make it apply to how THEIR COLA's are calculated!

                          • 23 votes
                          #3.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:07 PM EST

                          Noelle 1552367 --

                          The President can recommend pay raises for Federal employees and the Vice President, but the Congress must approve any changes the President recommends. Members of Congress, by law, must approve raises for themselves. The President has no say so in Congressional pay. You should stop getting your information from right-wing bloggers. And, by the way, the President heads the Executive Branch of the government (one of the 3 branches of the Federal government). The federal workers you refer to are employees of the Executive Branch.

                          • 23 votes
                          #3.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:19 PM EST

                          Well, we know the do nothing House will vote for THIER raise, BUT the Democrats control the Senate, so that 1 % raise is a non-starter.

                          • 7 votes
                          #3.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:25 PM EST

                          Sally in FL - they never let facts get in the way of a good FOX News spin. If you don't know it by now, Obama is to blame for everything that has ever gone wrong anytime in history. To understand the rwnj's, you have to close off 3/4 of your brain.

                          • 25 votes
                          #3.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:29 PM EST

                          I like it!

                          • 1 vote
                          #3.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:01 PM EST

                          Amy, when I saw who the round table pundits were going to be, I decided to skip MTP, even though I like Doris. But I did see people this morning tweeting all over the place that Brokaw actually said that he paid more into SS than his working class brother, yet receives the same SS?

                          Not surprised. It's why I turn him off whenever I see him on tv.

                          I bet the ratings were good for MTP. People who don't ordinarily watch that show did, because of President Obama only.

                          • 6 votes
                          #3.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:26 PM EST

                          Please Republicans do not turn my old body into Soylent Green!

                          • 6 votes
                          #3.9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:27 PM EST

                          i have been saying that all along. why have we not heard one thing about cutting the politicians "entitlements"??? they sit on their thrones on capital hill and force cuts for some of the poorest Americans who have worked hard all their lives and paid into social security and medicare just to have these clowns talk about reducing them. They have huge retirement and medical benefits (entitlements) that have been paid for by us the same American taxpayers they are taking away from. They continue to have "unlimited expense accounts "that, are again, paid for by the middle class and use those charge cards to buy lunch etc for their rich croonies. To take a cut in social security and medicare for some is making them choose between much needed medical or buying groceries. To tax the rich, their fair share, is only making them decide whether to buy a new boat, take a vacation or have booze parties and drive drunk. I am not completely against all rich as there are a lot of them that have worked hard to get where they are but then again almost all of them have extra deductions that keep them from paying the amount of taxes they really owe. Boehner and his fellow republicans need to get a grip and realize they do not have a home on capital hill. We, the people, voted to put Obama back in office because of his stand on getting the amount people pay more in line and to protect the middle class. Give me a break Boehner and work harder to understand where we are coming from...oh I forgot you don't have a clue what it is like to "work for a living" you have always lived off of the backs of the hard working people here in America.

                          • 10 votes
                          #3.10 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:17 PM EST

                          If you notice, no mention of congress curtailing their own cola's that are set at 4% annually. Not to mention that most public employee's get cola's plus annual increases or step increases as they call it. yet they want to reduce increases for the poorest of us even though medicare increases will put them into a yearly deficit. We're talking about people who worked all their lives not making any where near what people are making now & have paid into the system for years. Try asking men who worked all their lives making less than $30,000 a year or the wife's who stayed home raising kids & never had a job. The average person on social security makes less than $12,000 a year yet these people who make more than that in a month want to send them further into poverty. There's something terribly wrong with that picture. Watch them scream if some of their personal projects or earmarks for their lobbyist get put up for reduction or elimination.

                          • 7 votes
                          #3.11 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:43 PM EST

                          Pat--I watched MTP because the President was on--I usually can't take Gregory. I think what Brokaw was referring to was Medicare---how he could afford to pay more than his brother but they both get the same benefits. I've heard other wealthier seniors say the same thing---they wouldn't mind paying a little more.

                          • 12 votes
                          #3.12 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:46 PM EST

                          Thanks for the clarificaton Steeler Fan. Your interpretation is much different from what I was reading. Glad you corrected me. Happy NewYear to you SFan.

                          • 3 votes
                          #3.13 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:06 PM EST

                          @Steeler Fan...And the Steelers beat the Browns 24-10....whoohoo!

                          • 2 votes
                          #3.14 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:16 PM EST
                          Reply

                          The President looks like the only adult in the room. Congress should have resolved this months ago, but they insisted on playing games. Did they think Romney would win and the wealthiest keep their tax cuts while seniors and students paid for the Mistakes made during the Bush years? Probably.

                          • 53 votes
                          #4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:49 PM EST

                          But I'd willing the bet that Mr. Brokaw neither declines his SS benefit nor shares it with his brother...

                          • 11 votes
                          #4.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:02 PM EST

                          You are exactly right Amy. Boner said that the president (though it's not really up to him) should have been working out the details before the election.....But we ALL know that the house and ALL republicans in the country expected Mittens to win so they could get everything they wanted. They even were delusional enough to think they would take over the senate. No chance they were going to negotiate one second before they absolutely had to and for 4 years all they can say to the Pres is no... They are like broken records now with no ability to say yes to ANYTHING.

                          • 34 votes
                          #4.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:06 PM EST

                          Cactus Jack

                          What a silly statement. You have no idea about how Mr. Brokaw shares his wealth with his family, but when you speculate as you do, you reveal a great deal about yourself. Brokaw would support people in his income bracket getting less Social Security. Bet on it.

                          • 19 votes
                          #4.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:13 PM EST
                          Comment author avatartoyhuntExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Time to end the no compromise liberal bs. We have compromised our way for 100yrs. Go to hell liberal azzwipes.

                          • 4 votes
                          #4.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:35 PM EST

                          toy

                          There is no doubt that the Republican plan will lead us back into recession. You are following the wrong leaders.

                          • 19 votes
                          #4.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:45 PM EST

                          You're right Amy. Seems to me he's the only one willing to negotiate anything.

                          • 11 votes
                          #4.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:48 PM EST

                          Time to end the no compromise liberal bs. We have compromised our way for 100yrs. Go to hell liberal azzwipes

                          Real intelligent response, cowboy. You should be the one worried about federal cuts. Especially disability benefits.

                          • 20 votes
                          #4.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:48 PM EST

                          toy: Thanks for you carefully conceived conclusions. This is why we are is such a mess - mental processes such as your own. You are the problem, you don't know it, and wouldn't acknowledge it if you did.

                          • 7 votes
                          #4.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:05 PM EST
                          Comment author avatarThe Evil TessmacherExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Here we go again...

                          Why do you right wing nut jobs continuously use the word "liberal" as if it were a slur?

                          You clearly and obviously to not understand that it means:

                          1. Favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
                          2. Advocating measures of progressive political reform.
                          3. Favorable to concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
                          4. Favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression.

                          Do you not realize that to be a "Liberal" means that one has the best interests of one's nation in mind, apart from those who wish a "return to the past, those who wish for regression or return to previous conditions, and opposition to innovation, advancement, and progressive policy"?

                          Do you even care how stupid, selfish, and arrogant it makes you sound?

                          The thing that amazes me is that anyone can relegate this to a name-calling contest. It's all about bribing the citizens with their own money.

                          The GOP doesn't want anything but a class of wealthy who can buy their offices for them, and the rest of the people being poor, disenfranchised, unable to effect change, and incapable of standing up against the moneyed wealthy. They want a return to the early 19th Century, when only the wealthy could do everything and anything. They are today's "Robber Barons" They want a Plutocracy. Why you Right Wing Nut Jobs don't see this, and further, why you refuse to grasp the implications, is frightening. Do you not know your own history? Do you not care about the economic health of your nation? You love to spout off about being "Patriotic!" but you are willfully blind to the fact that it is the Middle Class that is the economic engine of this nation. And that, my fellow Americans, is treasonous.

                          When you have to break your back from sunup to sundown, you have no time whatsoever to do anything except worry about feeding your family. You can't protest the wealthy elite who are keeping you in poverty, and you certainly can't group together to vote them out of office. You're powerless... That's what the Greed Only Party wants! They want the power to do whatever they feel like, and to hell with the average American. Alexis de Tocqueville said it best: "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money." And if an entire class of people have no extra money at all to buy things other than the barest necessities, that impacts the economy far more than one billionaire buying or not buying a new yacht or jet, or mansion.

                          Over the last 30 years, we have seen an immense shift of wealth from the middle class to a class of only the top few incomes. One fact: take the ratio of the richest in America compared to the average of the middle class and you find that the wealthy have over 25 times more wealth than do the average of the middle class. They are 2,500% wealthier than they were in 1980. The middle class has remained stagnant. This is what the Greed Only Party does. They enact policies that empower and enable only those who are able to afford it. The rest of us are the drones, the workers, the minions who are nothing.

                          Here's another fact for you: For the third consecutive year, the rich got richer. In the 24th annual edition of The Forbes 400, the collective net worth of the nation's wealthiest climbed $125 billion, to $1.13 trillion. All but 26 people on that roster are billionaires. Surging real estate and oil prices drove up several fortunes and helped pave the way for 33 new names on the list. Think the economy is poor? Look around you. There are new buildings going up, there are new cars being sold, and there are plenty of fortunes being made in the stock market. The only people who are whining about a "poor economy" are the wealthy who don't want to pay a decent wage, provide healthcare benefits, and who refuse to take good care of their workers. They want to profiteer.

                          Our government is no longer of the people, by the people, for the people. It is of the rich, by the rich, for the rich. And their tools are blatant manipulation, misleading propaganda, and influential conservative talk show hosts. We see it in a comment above that "what's wrong with people who know economics saying the truth?" No - they are people who know manipulation and greed. What's wrong is letting them run the economy for their personal gain by intentionally destroying unions, eliminating pensions, offshoring jobs, lowering wages, and do everything they can to suck more for themselves with no regard for the long term harm that they do to America. Here's what's wrong with it: When the vast majority of the population cannot afford basic services, cannot afford basic health care, and cannot afford decent housing, you end up with a third-world country.

                          That, my fellow citizens, is what the GOP wants to do to you. Bribe you with your own money, separate you from one another by blaming someone else for your problems that they created, and dis-empower you by making you irrelevant. You think that they care a bit about who gets a tax break, if that person can’t donate to their campaign coffers? They’re making a POLITICAL issue out of NOT continuing a tax break to AVERAGE CITIZENS. Who do you think will suffer if they get their way? Certainly not the fat cats who wouldn’t miss that little tax. If you honestly believe that your fellow citizens don’t deserve your help, then you are living in the wrong country.

                          You think Democrats are Socialists? You don't have a clue what Socialism really is. Democracy and Socialism are not remotely the same thing. Did you get that? They are two different things. The GOP is the party that took your Constitutional rights away with the Patriot Act, and forced everyone to go along in lockstep under the false label of patriotism. They made you WANT to give up your rights when they told you it was Un-American to not want the Government have that much power. How can you RepubliCONS claim to love America, when you clearly hate the average American?

                          The Teabaggers and RepubliCONS want you to blindly believe that "Socialism" equates to what the former Soviet Union used to be. They don't want you to question them. Anyone with any knowledge at all of history and political science knows that the former USSR wasn't a Socialist country. They were a centrally-controlled dictatorship. They weren't Socialists. And everyone knew it. Except the Greed Only Party. Those RepubliCONS don't know what Socialism is, except that it sounds like the old USSR, so they just use that label to scare people. And people of lesser intelligence, those who cannot think for themselves, or those who have not enough life experience are the first ones to fall for it.

                          Just so you know what we’re talking about, here is the definition of Socialism, along with some examples that should be simple enough that the right-wing nutjob zealots can understand them.

                          Socialism: [so-shull-izm], 1. An economic theory or system in which the means of production, distribution, and exchange are owned by the community collectively. It is characterized by production for use rather than profit, and by equality of individual wealth rather than an unequal distribution of wealth with a small percentage of individuals controlling almost all of the money supply. 2. Any of various social or political theories or movements in which the common well-being is to be achieved through the establishment of an economic system where the financial security and benefit of fellow citizens is placed ahead of the accumulation of individual wealth.

                          Socialist: The government owning and operating all petroleum industry, distribution, and retail.

                          Not Socialist: The government mandating that health care be provided and available to all citizens, regardless of income, employment, or pre-existing conditions.

                          Socialist: The government owning and operating all communications systems, including equipment retail, and service provision.

                          Not Socialist: The government mandating that all college students have low-interest, available, and affordable loans to attend institutions of higher-education.

                          In other words, when the government requires fairness, it is not, repeat NOT Socialism. When the government owns and operates completely, without competition, it is Socialism. Why can’t you republiCONs get that? Why don’t you stop twisting the meanings of words to suit your agenda of making the wealthy even more wealthy by tanking the US Economy over partisan politics, at the expense of the average American? How can you claim to love America, when you clearly hate the average American?

                          Tax breaks for the rich? Please. The claim that those tax breaks create jobs is a patent lie, and has been repeatedly shown to be false since Reagan was in office. Why don’t you give tax breaks to the people who really can boost the economy? Give them to the middle class. The rich don’t do anything with those tax breaks except buy another yacht or private jet. Those rich folks live off their investments, and the money they have stashed overseas. It’s the middle class that is the economic engine of this nation. The problem is, your war on the middle class is having the effect on shrinking your voting base. Oooops! You sit there, blaming everyone else, while blithely ignoring the fact that you have created a system where only the wealthiest people can take advantage of any of the benefits of citizenship! You repeatedly and continually insist on "taking away entitlements" when you clearly do not understand that the people who get that help are the ones that fuel the entire economy of the nation! People like Mittens Robme don't. They put their money in the Caymans so it can't be taxed.

                          Ever notice that all the Red states are the ones with the highest levels of welfare, the lowest levels of education, and the least amount of wealth? There's a reason for that. The Greedy Obstructionist Party isn't smart enough to figure out what that reason is.

                          Wait, there’s a better one. Pick a country that can’t do you any real harm, and invade them on the premise of a lie. Tell the people that this nation has weapons of mass destruction, and are planning to use them, and you have to go in there to save America! Tell them that they are anti-American, unpatriotic, and treasonous if they don't support you. Doesn’t matter that there aren’t any WMD, doesn’t matter that the American People are so stupid that they don’t have the temerity to stand up and demand the truth, no, it only matters that you can cow those people by telling them that opposing you is treasonous, un-patriotic, and anti-American. Sound familiar? How can you claim to love America, when you clearly hate the average American?

                          Fourteen points to consider:

                          1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism -

                          Certain political groups tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays. To oppose the political power that utilizes these symbols is to be labeled subversive, unpatriotic, and treasonous. Did you watch any of the Republican National Convention in Tampa this year?

                          2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights -

                          Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc. Dubya Shrub's RepubliCON Texas speeded up the process by which executions take place, and all of the right-wing cheerleaders jumped for joy.

                          3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause -

                          The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc. Sounds a lot like Boehner and McCain, doesn't it?

                          4. Supremacy of the Military -

                          Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda i s neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized. Speaks for itself.

                          5. Rampant Sexism -

                          Governments consisting of certain political groups tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under these types of governments, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy to strip the civil rights of homosexuals. Reproductive choice, female pay-equality, women's rights, and other issues important to women are frequently opposed, such as abortion in the case of rape or incest. Only one woman in the RepubliCON caucus holding a chair of a committee, and then only after it was pointed out that they were all rich, old, white men. Look at the leadership in Congress, and it looks like a banker's convention.

                          6. Controlled Mass Media -

                          Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in wartime, is very common. Media outlets controlled by these certain groups are often misleading in their publications or broadcasts, with a slant that is intentionally designed to propagandize and manipulate the population. Lush Rimbaugh, Glen Beck, Liddy, all of Fox, need I go on?

                          7. Obsession with National Security -

                          Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses. "If you oppose this, you are committing treason, and inviting terrorists from all over the world to strike at a weakened America!" - George W. Bush speaking on behalf of the Patriot Act.

                          8. Religion and Government are Intertwined -

                          Governments in nations led by these certain ideologies tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions. The Greed Only Party painting itself as religious, moral, family value oriented, and the only party that puts God first. The Baptist and Fundamentalist churches in this country are full of RepubliCONs...

                          9. Corporate Power is Protected -

                          The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite. Taxes for corporations are frequently reduced or in some cases eliminated, and corporations are often granted rights that individual citizens were intended to enjoy. In other cases, the right of Eminent Domain is abused, disguised as being intended for the "public good" Bain. That should say it all.

                          10. Labor Power is Suppressed -

                          Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed. Wisconsin, Michigan, all of the Southern Red States being "Right to Work" (which means they can fire you for no reason, and you have no recourse)... Hmmm... I'm seeing a pattern here.

                          11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts -

                          Nations dominated by certain political ideologies tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts. The National Endowment for the Arts and National Arts Council have suffered the biggest budget cuts in their collective histories under RepubliCON administrations, and are practically at the top of the list of Boehner and Ryan's "let's stick it to the poor folks" budget agenda. Do you even know what they want to cut?

                          12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment -

                          Under the leadership of certain political ideologies, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in these nations. Hmmm... There's that pesky Patriot Act again. Department of Homeland Security anyone?

                          13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption -

                          Certain political ideologies that are in power, almost always consist of groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders. Well, this one ought to be obvious.

                          14. Fraudulent Elections -

                          Sometimes elections are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even media assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Certain political ideologies also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections. Florida, 2004. Ohio, 2000. The four manufacturers of "electronic voting machines" were all huge contributors to Bush, McCain and Romney over the last three presidential election cycles. If that doesn't scare you, then you need to move to another country.

                          Any of this sound familiar?

                          The Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition, defines fascism as :

                          "a system of government characterized by rigid one-party dictatorship, forcible suppression of the opposition (unions, other, especially leftist, parties, minority groups, etc), the retention of private ownership of the means of production under centralized governmental control, belligerent nationalism, sexism, and racism, the glorification and perpetuation of war, etc."

                          All fourteen of these are examples of the principles of Fascist governments.

                          Note the eerie similarities to the principles of the Greedy Obstructionist Party.

                          How any of you Right Wing Nut Jobs can claim to love America is a mystery to anyone who has critical thinking skills, education, a reasonable understanding of history, and a modicum of knowledge of political science. Especially since you clearly hate the average American.

                          • 33 votes
                          #4.9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:16 PM EST
                          Comment author avatarGimmeabreakoradrinkExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Please edit your response in future. No one wants to swim through 3,000 words, fool.

                          • 4 votes
                          #4.10 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:26 PM EST

                          Dear Evil Tessmacher: Did you write Gone With The Wind?

                          • 3 votes
                          #4.11 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:31 PM EST

                          I've been preaching your first four lines for years. A nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse. Save your breath, stupid and stubborn are terminal ailments.

                          You will notice that respondents that are totally mystified by reality predictably, and reflexively toss out a "fool", "libtard", "progressive", "commie", "socialist", "k(K)enyan", m(M)arxist", or whatever, in a painfully vain attempt to disguise whatever it is they are attempting to disguise.

                          • 12 votes
                          #4.12 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:31 PM EST

                          Screw you, gimmeabreakoradrink, outtolunch is more like it. I absolutely enjoyed each and every one of his three thousand words. Thanks, Evil...

                          • 3 votes
                          #4.13 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:43 PM EST

                          I'm not a repub. but I certainly don't think Obama is my friend everytime he is told the constitution restricts you from doing this, he attempts to destroy a lil bit more of our heritage.I say heritage because the constitution was left to us by our forefathers, China hates our constitution so does Russia,N.koria many in the middle-East, and apparently the federal government hates it also.You got to be crazy to believe in Washington DC anymore.Bring on the fiscal cliff!! guess my garden is gonna be a bit bigger this year think i'll pick up a couple pigs to raise this year to.Don't worrie country boys can survive just fine.

                          • 4 votes
                          #4.14 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:00 PM EST

                          Evil Tessmacher;

                          Wonderful piece, probably wasted effort, but spot on.

                          Like you, I have always been amazed at the vilification of the terms liberal and progressive, and you piece, though lengthy, is well done.

                          Thanks for taking the time, and happy new year to you.

                          • 12 votes
                          #4.15 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:13 PM EST

                          When you write a novel on this site, do you REALLY expect anyone to read all of it?

                          • 3 votes
                          #4.16 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:19 PM EST

                          Clearly you are one of BO's unemployed followers since you have so much time on your hands. Typical.

                          • 3 votes
                          #4.17 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:26 PM EST

                          gimmeabreakoradrink: suffering from ADD? Too complicated, too many words for the small minded?

                          • 12 votes
                          #4.18 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:28 PM EST

                          Hey SDN, The "respondents" find humor is your post and the post made by the evil tessmacher! One would assume you are one the many BO followers on unemployment/welfare since the two of you have so much time to to sit and quote the dictionary. Cut up your credit cards, GET A JOB and save some money so the rest of us do not have to pay for you!!!

                          • 1 vote
                          #4.19 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:35 PM EST

                          JT: I rest my case.

                          • 7 votes
                          #4.20 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:43 PM EST

                          Evil, you obviously have no job. And from the looks of your treatise, you don't have much of an education. Don't expose your 'I voted for Oblama' IQ.

                          Education and hard work might do major things for you. Try it, you may like it. All of us non-libs do.

                          • 2 votes
                          #4.21 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:48 PM EST

                          hjack - what's the matter with Evil's post. Is it too many words for you to comprehend? Maybe you should be the one to get an education.

                          Education and hard work might do major things for you. Try it, you may like it. All of us non-libs do.

                          Does that include toyhunt too?

                          • 2 votes
                          #4.22 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:04 PM EST

                          The surest way to destroy people is to "help" them. This has been shown to be true since the beginning of recorded history.

                          Adversity strengthens, assistance weakens.

                          You may quote me!

                          Do you think that lbj liked blacks?

                            #4.23 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:47 PM EST

                            Tessmacher, although that was a very long read (and I am sure the Faux Noise soundbite folks wont bother to read it all) It was 100% Truth. Thank you!

                            • 3 votes
                            #4.24 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:57 PM EST

                            The Evil Tessmacher: Elaborate post, but well worth the time to read. Unfortunately, the many repub/tparty have no interest in the present or even their future. Their interest reads like a one hour TV show, quick and easy, throw in guns and killing, a couple bosoms. car chases and they're happy.

                            Fox admitted in court, under oath, that they are an "entertainment" media, and not a news organization. Therefore, they are not bound by FCC rules to have factual information, or unbiased reporting. I wonder how Fox viewers would feel if they knew the staff at Fox make jokes about their viewers, reporting on viewers' lack of common sense, their stupidity. They wager on what dreamt up story will get the most responses. That's Fox, slime.

                            • 3 votes
                            #4.25 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:57 PM EST

                            The surest way to destroy people is to "help" them.

                            We'll be sure to remember that if your house ever catches on fire or you need the EMT's! After all, it's all of us who pay for them.

                            • 2 votes
                            #4.26 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:06 PM EST

                            Well tony, who pays the most? Doesn't the top 10% pay 90% of the taxes? Who needs "help" the least? Who is getting richer? Who is getting poorer?

                            Actually try to think for a change.

                            And earthgirl, isn't it strange that the Pew foundation's research found that fox is the least biased of american news sources? Who do you watch?

                              #4.27 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:17 PM EST

                              The evil Tessmacher,

                              Thanks for taking the time to write a well thought out piece. Yes, I read it all. It was a lot better read than some of the other misinformed, get their opinions from what the masses think responders here.

                              It should be noted that the Republicans aren't the only ones that deserve a bashing. The Liberals have their deeds that have eroded the Constitution and Bill of Rights also. Fact is America is being governed by a one party system masquerading as two. They both are perpetuating a collectivist society. The difference between the two are only the methods used. If it were being done intentionally (by the world banking/industrial cartel for example) it would be considered a divide and conquer strategy. Judging by the opinions on this board it appears to be working very well.

                              The reason so many Americans are mostly ignorant of the difference between a Democracy and a Constitutional Republic is because Rockefeller (banker/industrialist) invested money through his foundation (read that: a place to put money and not pay taxes) to take over the education system. Long story short is we now have government controlled education. Since then the kids are not taught the truth and in some cases lies. Most Americans don't know where democracy ALWAYS leads. They don't know that America is supposed to be a Constitutional Republic. Based on law. And the supreme law of the land is the Constitution.

                              The Americans own this country. The Constitution protects us from runaway Government. But if we don't care enough to defend it, or lose track of what it means, the tyrants and sociopaths will step in and take over. Can't blame them, that's what sociopaths do.

                              We started as individuals with law protecting the individual. That must be understood before we can know whether decisions made in Congress are good or bad. Sadly Americans have allowed themselves to accept a nanny state with no good education or idea what the eventual outcome will be.

                              Dear fellow Americans, The country is ours. Don't blame government, don't blame greedy manipulative bankers, Rebublicans, Democrats or anyone else. Look in the mirror. It's "we the people" that let them steal our country and it's "we the people" that need to return it to the Constitutional Republic it was intended to be. Unless you prefer this government that takes your dollars and decides who gets them.

                              • 1 vote
                              #4.28 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:40 PM EST

                              Uh.....IWonder932455....dosen't the top 10% control 98% of the nations wealth? Either you forgot that or maybe you intend to mislead. Sounds familiar. Seems to me they don't pay their fair share after all.

                              • 1 vote
                              #4.29 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:57 PM EST

                              I am not misleading anything, my point is that the ones paying $9 out of every $10 are not getting any "help", yet they are getting richer but the ones needing "help" are getting poorer.

                              Why can't you understand that since 1932, when the liberals really got started "helping" the poor, they have been getting poorer and the percentage of them has increased. Why can you not take facts and reach a logical conclusion? Have liberals been "helping"? Are the poor getting fewer and richer? In case you don't believe what I am telling you, then look it up. With friends like the liberals, the poor sure don't need any enemies.

                              For 70 years the ussr tried to make socialism work, for 80 years the liberals have been trying to help the poor. What's wrong with this picture?

                                #4.30 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:35 PM EST

                                You should wonder more. It isn't liberals helping the poor that creates more it's the right wing agenda that fights minimum wage, unions and opposes any federal programs that protect workers as being anti business. The right wing philosophy which I'm sure you support believes that workers who wish to earn more than which ever country has the lowest wages are greedy. They fight laws that impose tariffs they say because it restricts free trade yet ignore when other countries impose their own on us. They aren't concerned because it doesn't affect their profit. They cry about handouters receiving food stamps or medicaid while they pay their workers so little that even those working full time qualify. Thirty years ago the 1% owned 10% of the nations wealth today it's 24%. The 400 richest Americans have a net worth that exceeds the total net worth of the bottom 65% or 185 million people yet they fight to lower taxes on themselves to raise it on the middle class. When they gamble with our money and lose they know republicans will bail them out with loans and then allow them to borrow trillions in free money to invest so they can pretend they actually paid the loans back themselves. Now they can resume 100 million dollar CEO paydays, ship jobs over seas to save a buck and cry about over paid minimum wagte workers. How sad.

                                Before liberals began helping the poor millions lived in shanties surrounding cities being paid $1 a day. Liberals are why we have paid holidays, time and a half over time and paid vacations not the generousity of the so called job creators. Not many would want to go back to a time the middle class didn't exist and the robber barons paid almost nothing and when a worker died they simply pushed them in a hole and hired another.

                                • 2 votes
                                #4.31 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:11 AM EST

                                IWonder

                                The wealthy have been setting the rules for many years, basically owning both the politicians and the election process, in addition to the corporations. One of their great "accomplishments" is to increase the value of their own labor while decreasing the relative value of working class labor.

                                During the 1980's the typical CEO earned about 50 times what was earned by his average employee; today they earn about 500 times the average worker's wage. In recent years the Republicans has supported the efforts of large Republican supporters like the Koch brothers in breaking up unions, passing right to work legislation and other measures that further devalue working class labor.

                                People like you like to use terms like "socialism" as a stink bomb in your efforts to win an argument. The "poor" would be happy to have their labor fairly valued and have access to an education system that does not favor the wealthy [If you believe I am exaggerating, compare the quality of public schools in the rich areas of any state compared to the areas of poverty]

                                • 1 vote
                                #4.32 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:15 AM EST
                                Reply

                                We go off the cliff, congress and the rich have golden parachutes.

                                • 22 votes
                                Reply#5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:50 PM EST

                                Comedy! Dance partner, Mitchie??? This time, you dance alone! Schmuck! Get the deal done, you have people counting on your dumbass!

                                Good job, Mr. Pres.! Stick it to Gregory, and the GOP/TP!!! You have put more than enough forward for this deal to get done! Yet once again, its those same GOP members refusal to dance with you!!!!! Stay firm, Mr. President!

                                • 42 votes
                                Reply#6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:53 PM EST

                                What? Did you read this? Reid said that "maybe I can come up with something"??? Um, that's not negotiating, and McConnell only added something the PRESIDENT said he would do! Who is truly blocking progress here?

                                • 5 votes
                                #6.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:15 PM EST

                                The President said he would go for chained CPI as part of a grand bargain. This is not a grand bargain. And it would be a poor strategy at this point to keep it as part of the mini-deal. He should throw that in when they negotiate a bigger deal that also includes cuts to defense, capital gains, etc.

                                • 6 votes
                                #6.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:47 PM EST

                                csm, and Boehner couldn't even get his party to back his idea and then let them leave for a long Christmas break. Right now it seems as if the President is negotiating with himself. Neither the Senate or the House is bending at all. They won't get anywhere that way.

                                • 6 votes
                                #6.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:52 PM EST
                                Reply

                                what i have learned is ,that the last time bush started the tax cuts to the rich

                                we got into a big mess the rich didnot create jobs or if the did it was somewere else

                                but not here in the usa gop must we are dum they going to learned their lesson

                                when they loose congress i was a conservative republican changing to be ieather democrat

                                ir independent im tire the circus of the tea baggers and the extream right of the republicans

                                • 22 votes
                                Reply#7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:54 PM EST

                                Keep buiolding the multi billion dollar toys but cut SSI??? that makes sense. Military budgets could be cut in half.

                                • 30 votes
                                Reply#8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:57 PM EST

                                It doesn't CUT anything...just restructures future increases. Kind of like Obama's reduced spending plan. Actually, Obama already offered it.

                                  #8.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:16 PM EST

                                  Yes and Boehner caucus rejected it. Wanted a MILLION dollar threshold on income! President Obama then said the original deal is on the table. NOT chained CPI!!!!

                                  • 8 votes
                                  #8.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:30 PM EST

                                  csm9

                                  Please try to keep up. Read All the news..stay tuned in. Your lack of sense is getting real old.

                                  Sorry....

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #8.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:26 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  Will somebody please tell those friggin' Republicans that they LOST the election in good part due to their economic proposals.

                                  • 42 votes
                                  Reply#9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:00 PM EST

                                  Have any of the most vociferous Republican Party supporters read the post - election polls? They all clearly indicated the American electorate is clear on whom is causing this national embarrassment. Bringing Congress and this nation to a screeching halt only further illustrates the causes and the recognition.

                                  • 11 votes
                                  #9.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:11 PM EST

                                  Yeah, Rick, I'll tell them that they didn't give enough money away to the slaggards of this country. Therefore, the slugs voted for Oblama.

                                  Where do you fit there?

                                    #9.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:51 PM EST
                                    Reply

                                    So now after the GOP says no, no, no for weeks for the deal Obama offered they want another bite at the apple? Gimme a break. The republicans keep saying that the plan offered by the President won't "fix" our problem; it's like bleeding to death and the Republicans saying that direct pressure or stitches won't heal the wound immediately so let's just continue to bleed. Are they THAT stupid? What do they gain by tanking (or continuing to tank) our economy. It's bordering on treason!

                                    • 33 votes
                                    Reply#10 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:01 PM EST

                                    Really? Anyone with even half a brain (I guess it's not that many people) knows that the Democrats would pull the same crap. Both Democrats and Republicans are continuing to destroy this country.

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #10.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:04 PM EST

                                    thisguy

                                    Spoken like a true Libertarian ..... an idealist with no solution for anyone.

                                    • 19 votes
                                    #10.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:08 PM EST

                                    Don. He has a point. This arguing over the budget is a bunch of B.S. NONE of it really addresses the underlining issues and problems that we have. The Simpson-Bowles plan addressed fair and balanced increases and deficit cutting but no one in the government wants to touch it. We need a good dose of courage either by our representitives or the American People.

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #10.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:24 PM EST

                                    If you do your research Don boy, you will see that it was your party that has caused this whole mess. Repubs steal from social security, cowboy bush drained the budget surplus in record time giving the bulk to his rich oil cronies and you speak badly of the dems?

                                    • 15 votes
                                    #10.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:27 PM EST

                                    Heartland, I couldn't agree with you more!

                                    "...direct pressure or stitches won't heal the wound immediately so let's just continue to bleed.Are they THAT stupid?"

                                    Well, stupid is as stupid does. I think it's a pretty safe bet that the 'bitter-enders' amongst the GOP holdouts are all guys with cushy jobs waiting for them at Halliburton, Shell, Bechtel; or for the ones with intellectual pretensions, Heritage, Hoover or Cato.

                                    It's plain to see that they're no longer considering the well-being of their constituents at all; they're only concerned with proving their loyalty to their corporate paymasters, the voters' best interests be damned.

                                    • 20 votes
                                    #10.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:30 PM EST

                                    fox: As much as it frightens and disgusts me, I think you hit it on the head. We are now a fully integrated government of the lobbyists, by the lobbyists and for the lobbyists. Legislation to the highest bidder, and so very little effort to conceal the fact.

                                    • 16 votes
                                    #10.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:16 PM EST
                                    Reply

                                    How can you get a compromise when you pit one narcissist against another narcissist. It is a total loose,loose situation.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#11 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:01 PM EST

                                    Dick

                                    The President offers spending cuts along with a tax increase on a small number of people. The Republicans want only tax cuts, tax cuts that hurt poor and older Americans more than any others.

                                    The mistake the President continually makes is that he starts out with a balanced offer rather than something extreme, as the Republicans have done.

                                    • 18 votes
                                    #11.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:06 PM EST

                                    its "lose"...not loose...dont they teach spelling or grammar anymore..

                                    • 9 votes
                                    #11.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:13 PM EST

                                    James, thanks. You are correct.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #11.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:28 PM EST

                                    Some people are much more interested in picking nits than in any substance. People make mistakes sometimes ..... it really does not mean that the subject is no longer taught.

                                    • 4 votes
                                    #11.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:42 PM EST

                                    ...and don't has an apostrophe. Don't pick on others unless you have all your ducks in a row.

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #11.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:56 PM EST

                                    But that is the sanctimonious, pseudo-intellectual posturing the well schooled liberals are so fond of doing...

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #11.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:13 PM EST

                                    reality: Not at all. It's a bit like team jersey's.

                                      #11.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:17 PM EST

                                      As long as we all agree we need to fall off the fiscal cliff, learn to live within our means, quit spending more money than we have and not cut back on Social Security which we have all paid into, than e don't need Harry Reid.

                                        #11.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:47 PM EST
                                        Reply

                                        It's not like this money we're spending even existed anyways, so we might as well continue to spend the Monopoly money.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#12 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:03 PM EST

                                        The Republican want to cherry pick the "grand bargain" as part of their faux "compromise" to get what they want while giving up very little. The Democrats should recognize this for what it is and stick to the balanced and fair offer from the President. Tweak it a little if necessary, but get it done. It is time for the Tea Party branch of the Republican Party to understand that they represent a very small part of America and, as such, should have a very small voice in whatever agreement is reached.

                                        The Tea Party Republicans want to pay no taxes. Little children want to eat cake for dinner. Neither should get their way.

                                        • 19 votes
                                        Reply#13 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:03 PM EST

                                        Leave them in a room until they get it worked out, if they behave like children treat
                                        them like kids.

                                        I cant believe that this just keeps dragging out for months on months, I wouldn’t
                                        be allowed to do this at work, why should they.

                                        I think we should suspend their pay (from our taxes) until they perform, mind you
                                        that would take an act of congress… don’t see that happening anytime soon
                                        either…

                                        GET IT DONE, NOW !

                                        • 16 votes
                                        Reply#14 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:04 PM EST

                                        Do your job, or empty your desk - just like in real life.

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #14.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:19 PM EST

                                        Politicians are all drama queens.It's like watching a bad soap opera.

                                          #14.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:47 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          These guys aren't stupid. They know they can't let the rates go up, without looking like fools, so they do what they do best and it all happens. The rates go up and they aren't to blame! Wrong, they have had months to do this and instead of trying to do something good for the country, they dance and lie, to fool the stupid. This is the T Publicans fault. They could have compromised months ago and fixed this. This whole mess is congresses fault from all of the congresses from the last 50 years. This mess was caused by give aways, taking money from ss, and not pating it back, not raising the funding for ss years ago, and the financial colaps. Congress, both houses have not wanted to do their jobs, and now its the Presidents fault. Its your long term politicians fault. These do nothing jerks are screwing us up.

                                          That head jerk in the senate, McConnel, says he wants to cut money for the old and poor instead of a small raise in wealthy tax rates. Nice!!!! Lets just shoot all the old and sick so the rich can have more money.

                                          I'm so sick of these extremist. Do their jobs or quit. We'd be better off with a king. At least something would get done.

                                          • 16 votes
                                          Reply#15 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:05 PM EST

                                          Actually, it Obama's fault as it is part of his job description to be a facilitator to Congress. He's been even more polarizing than Reid or Boehner with his 'my way or the highway' attitude and trying to pit the poor against the rich.

                                          By the way, even the liberals admit that the raise in taxes on just the 'rich' won't be enough to make any dent in the deficits or debt.

                                          As it is merely class warfare, it would end up being challenged in the courts as being unfair to a particular group of people - and the challengers would win, as it is even more unfair that the current progressive tax rates are. This would open up the doors to additional lawsuits against the tax code and force a tax system that is spread evenly across the board - which needs to be done anyway as anything else is patently 'unfair'.

                                          I look at it this way, if you vote you should have skin in the game in that you pay some sort of income or capital gains taxes.

                                            #15.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:54 PM EST

                                            Tammy.... class warfare my substantial butt!

                                            GOP= anti worker, anti union, anti medical care for the poor, anti medical care for the elderly, pro cutting medicare and social security pro even more tax cuts to upper income people, pro elimination of the capital gains and interest income tax.

                                            Who is waging class warfare... tell us all!

                                            • 3 votes
                                            #15.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:01 PM EST

                                            I'm just waiting for the word to come down from the White HOuse...

                                            that it is time to seize the conservatives money, ammo & guns

                                            and redistribute their wealth to the 47% .

                                            Am I the only one surprised that they are buying guns & not locks for their doors ?

                                              #15.3 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:23 PM EST
                                              Reply

                                              The GOP has a fantastic opportunity here. Join with democrats to make a big, grand bargain encompassing tax increases on the rich and entitlement reforms, such as the CPI. In doing so, they can completely shutout the TeaParty, removing ALL TeaPartiers from ALL committees and shutting them out of all legislation. When the primaries roll around, the GOP can deny ALL funds to ALL TeaParty candidates rendering them a fringe third party. Doing this, in the present economic and political climate, can position the GOP to secure unprecedented concessions from the Democratic Party and allow the REAL Republican candidates to return to their districts as victors of the conservative cause, having reined in entitlements. This will DESTROY the TeaParty- since they can't support their own campaigns without Republican establishment support- and will rebrand the Republicans as the responsible conservatives they were pre-TeaParty.

                                              • 11 votes
                                              Reply#16 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:05 PM EST

                                              The term responsible conservative is an oxymoron.

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #16.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:41 PM EST
                                              Reply

                                              can someone just tell the GOP that in NOV they LOST the Wh, LOST seats in the Senate, and LOST a double digit number of seats in the House?

                                              They seem quite confused.

                                              • 21 votes
                                              Reply#17 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:05 PM EST

                                              I know what you mean Herron. Why don't they all go home? I mean the President already has a law ready to take effect and finally everyone will be paying their fair share. Happy Holidays!

                                              • 9 votes
                                              #17.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:09 PM EST

                                              The biggest problem we have is trying to tell these goons Boehner and his clowns anything as it just goes in one ear and out the other. There is nothing in between to make them stop and listen.

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #17.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:29 PM EST

                                              Gboy, can you define 'fair share'. Or do you mean, make someone else pay instead of 'me'.

                                                #17.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:56 PM EST
                                                Reply

                                                Remember.... after all this is done the extreme right wing is going to ask for more spending cuts when the debt limit gets negotiated.

                                                If they don't include that in this agreement the right wing will go after other social programs.

                                                • 11 votes
                                                Reply#18 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:06 PM EST

                                                As it is the spending on 'social programs' that is so out of control that is where the cuts need to be made.

                                                What is so hard to understand about this?

                                                  #18.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:58 PM EST

                                                  Medicare and social security is totally funded by employee and employer contributions. They are fully funded year after year and the excess funds have been taken by YOUR Representatives in DC to pay for tax cuts and way too much defense spending.

                                                  Your only complaint is that in a couple of decades you just might have to pay back the money YOUR Representatives have taken to spend on their phony wars and excessive tax cuts. So tell me why you are so hot on cutting those programs NOW!

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #18.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:06 PM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  The Dem's need to stand firm on what we voted for.. middle class tax cut, rates expire for top 2%, college loan rate stays low, unemployment benefits extended and a jobs bill. Everyone wants this including the GOP so get this done without any attachments. Kay Hagan and David Price should not vote for anything else

                                                  • 11 votes
                                                  Reply#19 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:07 PM EST

                                                  Gosh, I thought we voted for a president and members of Congress? I'd better go check my ballot again.

                                                  where was it that we voted to bankrupt our children and grandchildren because we couldn't stand a little bit of pain?

                                                  • 5 votes
                                                  #19.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:10 PM EST

                                                  The right wing never cared about the deficit.... the Ryan plan AND the Romney plan would have increased the deficit and the righties all cheered it!

                                                  Stop lying about your concern for our children and grandchildren.

                                                  • 21 votes
                                                  #19.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:13 PM EST

                                                  I find it amusing that the people who are so concerned about their children and grandchildren are the ones who aren't concerned about pollution, global warming, arming everyone with little or no regulations, equal rights, etc. We're so concerned about leaving a debt but we're not concerned about leaving a liveable planet.

                                                  • 13 votes
                                                  #19.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:01 PM EST

                                                  LA99999...very astute observation that shows the GOP as phonies

                                                  • 11 votes
                                                  #19.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:23 PM EST

                                                  Wow! Didipa, LA and Rich: I must apologize! I assumed that we comment on things we feel strongly about and we can discuss that. But obviously I was oblivious to each of your extra-sensory abilities to see that (Didipa) that I'm lying when I'm concerned about sending all of this extra debt to our children/grandchildren, or (LA) that secretly I am not concerned about pollution, global warming or (Rich) that I'm a phonie.

                                                  I wonder why I comment at all, why don't I just hand over my password and you can comment for me?

                                                  Thanks for saving me all of this time so I can do whatever you want me to do???

                                                  You three are amazing! Truly the bloggers hall of fame!

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #19.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:41 PM EST

                                                  Gboy.... I'm sorry you won't accept the truth. Enjoy your life in the bubble!

                                                  • 5 votes
                                                  #19.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:49 PM EST

                                                  LA99999, you read my mind!!

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #19.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:54 PM EST

                                                  Thanks to all - you prove my point. Facts make you angry, so you attack. I did not attack you, but since you had no response to my facts, you make things up. Enjoy your fiscal cliff!

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #19.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:21 PM EST

                                                  You know what the fiscal cliff will consist of, Gboy? Us hanging on the edge for dear life and when neither party grabs our hands to pull us up, we'll go screaming over the edge only to find out the bottom was only a couple feet down. However, the media will still try to convince you that you fell hundreds of feet to your death and you'll believe it.

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #19.9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:31 PM EST

                                                  Gboy... facts? I don't recall you posting one!

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #19.10 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:44 PM EST

                                                  did -

                                                  And you did?

                                                  Geez, when did they change the definition of what a fact is?

                                                    #19.11 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:01 PM EST

                                                    For the uninformed such as Tammy I shall re-post the FACT i posted previously:

                                                    The right wing never cared about the deficit.... the Ryan plan AND the Romney plan would have increased the deficit and the righties all cheered it!

                                                    Have you a fact to post or are you just pretending to debate?

                                                    • 6 votes
                                                    #19.12 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:09 PM EST

                                                    Why doesn't the article say..." hit a "major setback" on Sunday afternoon due to a standoff over proposed changes to Social Security that were put forward by President Obama"? It's the Democrats that are obstructing here. GOP has certainly done it's part in this debacle but the article is very disingenuos (sp). And everyone should also remember that it is the Senate under Harry Reid that has failed to even bring a budget up for 4 years. That man is every bit a bad as any GOP member. He has allowed next to nothing to happen in the Senate but had time to watch "Lincoln" in the senate chambers. There needs to be a fundamental change in the political system and an overturning of both these parties to get back to the peoples business and both honest fiscal and social responsibility.

                                                      #19.13 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:20 PM EST
                                                      Reply

                                                      "I want everyone to know I'm willing to get this done. But I need a dance partner."

                                                      Nobody wants to "dance" with a hypcritical, lying, deceiving, obstructionist bastard such as yourself Bitch . . . err, I meant Mitch.

                                                      We ALL see what's going on here and we can't wait until 2014 so we can demonstrate how we feel about it by tossing you and the rest of your teabagging, worthless, destructive friends out into the cold void of irrelevancy . . . it will happen.

                                                      • 26 votes
                                                      Reply#20 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:07 PM EST

                                                      PTByrd, you remind me of a distant relative of mine, the redoubtable Alice Roosevelt Longworth, who said:

                                                      "If you can't say something nice about a person, come and sit next to me."

                                                      You get a twenty-one-gun, star-spangled "HELL YEAH!" for calling out the most loathsome creature to defile the halls of Congress with his corruption since Phil Gramm.

                                                      Next time you're in the Evergreen State, let me buy you a microbrew.

                                                      • 14 votes
                                                      #20.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:37 PM EST

                                                      PTByrd, i'll second that motion!!! HELL YEAH!!! I will even buy you two, next time you're in IOWA!!!

                                                      • 9 votes
                                                      #20.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:11 PM EST

                                                      I knew I was right about Phil Gramm. His picture is next to the word "loathsome" in the dictionary along with Dick Armey for now

                                                      • 9 votes
                                                      #20.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:26 PM EST

                                                      Something like the chained CPI is just a diversion by republicans. The president has made it clear he wont accept any deal that doesn't include putting the top rate back to pre Bush levels on the 2% and republicans wont bend despite most republican voters supporting Obama on this issue. Any side issue is simply so republicans can pretend their holding this up wasn't due to them defying the people electing them on behalf of their corporate and lobbyist sponsors when that's exactly what it's all about.

                                                      • 5 votes
                                                      #20.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:45 PM EST
                                                      Reply

                                                      President Reagan dissolved PADCO by executive order and claimed it was for the good of the country. Because it would have caused economic hardship to the nation at a vulnerable time. Just do it O. Get out your pen and do an executive order to save the American economy. Let the GOP have something to whine about and save America. This is for the economic good of America. The middle class which is America. 98% being held hostage by the GOP/2%. GOP has drug this country down long enough. Kick the GOP can in the garbage heap of obstruction. Happy New Year.

                                                      • 16 votes
                                                      Reply#21 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:07 PM EST

                                                      Unconstitutional. Next.

                                                      • 5 votes
                                                      #21.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:22 PM EST

                                                      Lets see now how do you spell dictator. D....I...C...K No That was supposed to be a T. Come on people, get a brain and use it.

                                                      • 3 votes
                                                      #21.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:50 PM EST

                                                      So now, he's going to save the American economy. So funny. The biggest spender of tax dollars since the country, and he is going to save America.

                                                      Rusa, you should be on the Comedy Club.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #21.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:00 PM EST
                                                      Reply

                                                      Hey GOP: the answer to your recent MAJOR poison pill offer is : no freakin way!! There is NO REASON for those who played NO part in this debt crisis to pay a DIME to fix what was a deliberate GOP decision!

                                                      • 17 votes
                                                      Reply#22 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:08 PM EST

                                                      Compromise is between the left and the right, not the far right and space aliens.

                                                      For everyone who thinks politics in America is just right...a few notes from the Real Middle Path. Since over 90% of all new wealth in America over the past two years has gone to the top 400 families, it does not matter how they did this. If they did, it could only be a "mistake" and severe clawbacks are required. A tenth of a per cent fee on all stocks trades, capital gains taxed at the same rate as people who sweat for a living and eliminating the cap on FICA and we would be able to rebuild our infrasructure, rehire teachers. police and firepeople, save social security, medicare and medicaid, continue to feed the poor, teach our children, support research, NASA, public television...etc., and still probably lower our federal income taxes. We just have to remember that fighting terrorists is a better job for Interpol than our military; we should bring most of our troops home to protect our homeland, instead of occupying the world...and, thereby, earning the enmity of most of this planet. But I know its never all, "my way or the highway", so I am ready to negotiate...in the REAL WORLD!
                                                      REMEMBER, a government that is fixed, is broken! (FREE THE VOTE)

                                                      • 14 votes
                                                      Reply#23 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:08 PM EST

                                                      arthur ...right on !!

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #23.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:38 PM EST

                                                      Ever work, Arthur? Ever start anything or take a risk?

                                                      Your gravy-train is over. Your big spender pres has taken us over the cliff. Your taxes are going up. Enjoy your vote. You deserve it, unfortunately, those of us who had sense enough not to vote for Mr. Divide and Spend have to pay for your ignorance.

                                                        #23.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:04 PM EST

                                                        So, Arthur, you are all for raiding everyone's retirement savings and throwing your grandparents over the cliff so that you can have your freebies today?

                                                        Because that is what raising capital gains taxes will do to retirements. It's not enough that Social Security will not be there when people retire as the federal government will never be able to repay what they have 'borrowed' over the years, you want to make sure that parents and grandparents have to work until they die just to make sure that you get yours tod

                                                        Perhaps mommy and daddy should have told youngsters no more often instead of pandering to their every whim.

                                                          #23.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:07 PM EST

                                                          no matter what side of the aisle you are ....GET THE DAMN THING DONE!!!!!...We pay you people to comprimise...so do it!!!!

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #23.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:29 PM EST

                                                          If you want more tax revenue then you need more taxpayers. With the unemployment rate where it is, there are millions of americans that would love to become tax payers again. Keystone, drilling for oil and gas, give companies an incentive to hire by lowering tax rates not raising them. Here is a simple example. Let's say you have 100.00 for groceries. The government says you must give them 10.00 in taxes. That leaves you 90.00. You have to buy fewer groceries, right? Apply that same thing to corporations, etc. They have 1,000,000.00 and the government takes 100,000.00. You will not be able to create the new jobs you wanted because of the tax increase. Companies are sitting on cash right now because they know taxes are going up and they are not going to create new jobs and expand due to the new taxes. It is that simply. Corporations ARE people...don't kid yourself.

                                                            #23.5 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:38 AM EST
                                                            Reply

                                                            When will people understand that many of these old school politicians whether consciously or unconsciously hate the fact that there's a black man in the Whitehouse and they simply do not want to work with him and do not want him to succeed. Look at the facts and you'll find that the so-called fiscal conservative Republicans have spend more money than anyone but they've spent it on unnecessary wars, tax loopholes, subsidies for oil companies, tax perks for CEOs and the list goes on and on. People have short term memories, under Clinton we were looking at no deficits and a huge surplus. Republican administrations created this mess and they want to make it look like Democrats (who are not completely innocent either) did the whole thing. Ultimately, it seems there are many closet racists in the House and Senate. There's really no other explanation for this and sadly I don't even think most are aware of it.

                                                            • 27 votes
                                                            Reply#24 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:08 PM EST

                                                            Race Card.

                                                            We have broken all records running deficits the last three years and they are projected to be $1 trillion each year.

                                                            once we hit $20 trillion then what?

                                                            Keep sticking your heads in the sand. The tax increases on the rich are fine, but they don't solve the problem.

                                                            • 5 votes
                                                            #24.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:24 PM EST

                                                            No, davsie, it won't solve the problem- but it is an indispensable part of the solution. You can't ask college students and the elderly to help solve the problem but tell the rich that they don't have to help.

                                                            • 15 votes
                                                            #24.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:30 PM EST

                                                            Ferd: It's the dinosaur in the dollhouse. So bloody obvious it hurts. All you have to do is listen to the hysteria in the denials. Hysteria isn't convincing - it's revealing.

                                                            • 4 votes
                                                            #24.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:27 PM EST

                                                            Ferdinand..you are so correct.

                                                            • 5 votes
                                                            #24.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:36 PM EST

                                                            We have broken all records running deficits the last three years and they are projected to be $1 trillion each year.

                                                            Davsie: I hate to bust your bubble but the 2009 budget that hit 1.2 trillion was Bushs. Bush's last budget ran from Oct. 2008 until Oct. 2009 with a 1.2 trillion deficit and was enacted one month before Obama was elected. Clearly Obama didn't create the trillion dollar deficit Bush did. Eliminate Bushs 400 billion tax cut, his wars and his drug plan and we have deficits around 500 billion, about what Bush ran the first 7 years.

                                                            • 8 votes
                                                            #24.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:54 PM EST

                                                            Have a single one of you ever had to make payroll? Or have any understanding of accounts receivable vs. accounts payable? You all think the government can just keep writing checks? Get real!!! We're already so indebted to China my great-great-grandkids will be paying for it. If any of us spent weeks and months accomplishing absolutely nothing at our jobs, we'd be fired. I think that's what should happen to everyone in D.C., can all their butts with no life-long golden pension. They've done nothing to earn their wages, and certainly cannot be trusted with our financial future.

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #24.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:45 PM EST

                                                            BS! Nothing to do with race what so ever.

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #24.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:49 PM EST

                                                            Oh yeah - I have been waiting for that one - why is it when anyone doesn't agree with a liberal, they scream racist???? What a crock!

                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            #24.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:57 PM EST

                                                            Hate to burst your bubble, Larry, but the 2009 budget was passed by your brilliant Dem congress.

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #24.9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:06 PM EST

                                                            ...but the 2009 budget was passed by your brilliant Dem congress.

                                                            George W. Bush held the veto pen.

                                                            But he was a little rusty using it. Turns out, he only issued 12 vetos during his two terms - all of them from 2006 to 2008. And then he reserved the veto for things like stem cell research (twice) and US Farm Bill (twice).

                                                            Let's just look at the debt record, shall we? Let's NOT look at George W. Bush's budgets - he was a master at hiding government spending off the budget - let's just look at how the national debt grew:

                                                            2001 +$421B
                                                            2002 +$555B
                                                            2003 +$596B
                                                            2004 +$553B
                                                            2005 +$574B
                                                            2006 +$501B
                                                            2007 +1.02T
                                                            2008 +1.02T
                                                            2009 +1.89T

                                                            Dubya never met a spending bill he didn't like! He was adding $1T a year to our national debt long before Obama was sworn in!

                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            #24.10 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:20 AM EST

                                                            EENGINEER....

                                                            you forget one thing there......

                                                            Conservatives have been told that LOGIC & FACTS are JUST tools

                                                            that Liberals will use to stall & win arguements with Republicans .

                                                            Your facts are just a TACTIC to those who cannot reason for themselves !

                                                              #24.11 - Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:36 PM EST
                                                              Reply

                                                              We have had record setting deficit spending of $1.2+ trillion dollars for the last four years.

                                                              Why don't you spend $50,000 a year when you only make $40,000 a year and come back and let us know how long it took before yo had to declare bankruptcy and couldn't pay your bills.

                                                              • 7 votes
                                                              Reply#25 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:10 PM EST

                                                              Bad analogy. I have a balance on my credit card, as you (probably) also do. I spent more than I had, as do million of Americans. No problem. Then you pay it back. No problem. But Bush put two wars on our credit card and told his rich friends that they didn't have to help pay the card off, he'd cut their taxes instead. THAT is the problem. Now that our bill collector, President Obama and the Democratic Party, is finally knocking on the rich's door for their overdue payment, their trying to duck out the back door. Luckily, President Obama is having none of their nonsense. The bill has arrived, time to pay!!

                                                              • 20 votes
                                                              #25.1 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:28 PM EST

                                                              That's really simplistic David, but let's not forget that the initial budgeting was not done by this President. He arrived to a much larger budget deficit if you remember and our economy was on the brink of collapse. It may sound like a good idea to cut all spending immediately but past history has shown that is often a recipe for greater disaster. The swelling of entitlement spending has largely been caused by the huge rise in unemployment and under employment that is going on. If the GOP spent half as much time on trying to create jobs as they do on political grandstanding (like voting 31 times to repeal Obamacare) perhaps more people could find work and need less help. Public sector employment is also down (Bloated government spending) but of course that doesn't count either right?

                                                              • 12 votes
                                                              #25.2 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:34 PM EST

                                                              David, we've had a major deficit since Reagan. Don't you remember Ross Perot running on that? That was in '92 which was right after Reagan and Bush Sr ran up the debt.

                                                              • 11 votes
                                                              #25.3 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:07 PM EST

                                                              Please Republicans do not turn my old body into Soylent Green!

                                                              • 4 votes
                                                              #25.4 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:28 PM EST

                                                              David Noah: I'm sure you don't know but I'll enlighten you. Budgets are passed in October for the next year which means the 2009 budget you blame on Obama was passed in October 2008 by Bush which was one month before Obama was elected and had a 1.2 trillion deficit. Had Obama simply ran Bushs last budget the debt would still be 15.7 trillion. You blame Obama for not fixing the problem but ignore who broke it. Bush.

                                                              • 10 votes
                                                              #25.5 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:57 PM EST

                                                              They need to budget that is for sure! Most people I know support a family of four or five on $ 40,000 or less without welfare and they can't balance a budget. Get rid of the garbage and welfare and make people take care of themselves. Very few actually need it. My Pop had a saying "If one job isn't enough, get another and if you need three you need to rethink your spending". We are a country filled with the "I want this and I want that" instead of what we actually need. Same with the government. Too much waste on the sweating mans dollar

                                                              • 4 votes
                                                              #25.6 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:16 PM EST

                                                              It's interesting to me how everyone is assumed to be either a Democrat or Republican. I have no interest in organized politics and I wouldn't be surprised if most others don't either. I hear both sides saying they have offered compromise yet both sides say the other is unbending. Most of what I read here is people making up facts, and engaging in rhetorical duels based on who can launch the cleverest comeback. The people who govern us are just that...people...just like us. If you want to understand why they can't agree on things, just look the comments here and in other articles. We're no different. It's the kettle calling the pot black.

                                                              • 2 votes
                                                              #25.7 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:23 PM EST

                                                              And yet we spend three times as much on defense as welfare programs if you can call 900+ foreign military bases defense. FYI social security nd medicare are self funded and have nothing to do with income taxes. Why can we not afford 70 billion a year on food stamps as Romney claimed yet could afford an additional 200 billion for the military that no military leaders had asked for? Neither party wants to spend less they just want to direct where it's spent.

                                                              • 7 votes
                                                              #25.8 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:32 PM EST

                                                              One of the things also lacking in this debate is the damn farm bill. Seems to me that most of the bread belt (IE red states) would have that passed by their respective reps. However, that is something they are not willing to do too. So it's not just one thing that the republican party is doing to hurt Americans, it's on several fronts. Hope everyone is ready for 9.00 a gallon for milk.

                                                              Going to our VP for what? Go back to the sand box and play nice.

                                                              • 2 votes
                                                              #25.9 - Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:02 PM EST
                                                              Reply
                                                              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 34
                                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.