articles.courant.com/2006-03-14/features/0603140092_1_irish-hooligan-malarkey

Malarkey -- This term, meaning insincere or foolish talk, blarney, seems to have an Irish lilt about it, yet it appeared first in California during the late 1920s. The Oxford English Dictionary cites its first appearance as ``malaky'' in J.P. McEvoy's 1929 novel ``Hollywood Girl'': ```That's a lot of malaky,' says he.''

Scholar William Sayers, who reported his extensive research on ``malarkey'' in the Summer 2002 issue of the journal Western Folklore, offers four possible theories for its origin: 1. the modern Greek word ``malakia'' (softness); 2. the Cockney slang term ``Madam Misharty'' (nonsense), supposedly based on a fortuneteller with that name; 3. a morgue keeper named Mullarkey; 4. ``a socially visible oyster shucker from the 1870s who took this name in preference to `Mallorca' (his Portuguese father's name) under the mistaken impression that he was Irish.'' Whew!

But a skeptical Sayers offers his own persuasive explanation. Irish-Gaelic, he notes, has a word ``meallaireacht,'' meaning ``deception, allurement, amusement.'' ``Meallaireacht'' may have been imported by Irish immigrants to the U.S., where American ears heard it as ``melarcht'' (with a ``ch'' sound as in the Scots ``loch''). ``Melarcht'' may then have become confused with the Irish surname ``Malarkey.''

Bull@!$%# works.

bull@!$%# (n.) www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=bull@!$%#

"eloquent and insincere rhetoric," 1915, American English slang. Bull in the sense of "trivial or false statements" (1914) is usually associated with this, but the word existed since Middle English in the sense of "false talk, fraud," apparently from O.Fr. bole "deception, trick, scheming, intrigue," and perhaps connected to modern Icel. bull "nonsense."

Sais christ to ypocrites ... yee ar ... all ful with wickednes, tresun and bull. ["Cursor Mundi," early 14c.]

There also was a verb bull meaning "to mock, cheat," which dates from 1530s.

Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

Uncle Joe may call it "malarkey", I prefer to call it bull@!$%#!

That's a good one GF.

As for "socialism", a non-scientific poll of right wing First Read users results show 99.9% have NO idea of the correct definition...lol

A scientific Poll taken three times says Fox Viewers no less than people who watch any news at all

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/11/poll-fox-news-viewers-less-informed-than-those-who-read-no-news.php

-------------------------------------------------------------

Haaa, with those slick mislabeled graphics and the dumb bleached blonds why do the pale stall, ole white need news

Fox mislabeled Vermont as New Hampshire

http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/fnc-sr-20111213-newhampshirefail.jpg

Fox aired this confused map of the Middle East

http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/live-20090727.jpg

The right wingers love it bullsh!t though

Bull@!$%# - eloquent and insincere rhetoric! What malarkey!

Capitalism: (noun) an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market

Socialism: (noun)

1. any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2. a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property

b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

_______________________________________________

Merriam-Webster has pretty much laid out the basic difference between conservative economic theory and lefty liberal economic theory. The lefty liberal Dems don't yet have America fully under socialist control, but, they are well on their way there.

Joe in Agony

Democrats are liberal socialists at worst ... from wiki-

Liberal socialism is a variant of socialism that includes liberal principles within it. It supports a mixed economy that includes both public and private property. It identifies legalistic and artificial monopolies as the fault of capitalism. Liberal socialism opposes laissez-faire economic liberalism and state socialism. It considers both liberty and equality as compatible with each other and mutually needed to achieve greater economic equality that is necessary to achieve greater economic liberty.

It might work if markets were actually free. They haven't been for years. You can't have capitalism when corporations all merge into one. Capitalism relies on having competition and when big guys crush little guys, it is no longer capitalism nor does it have any chance of working for anyone's betterment but the big guys doing the crushing. The failure of people like the loon from Albany to understand these simple facts is why the Republican party will soon become like Whigs and other parties throughout history who failed to see their own faults.

Bev,

A scientific Poll taken three times says Fox Viewers no less than people who watch any news at all

Did you not want to say "know" rather than "no?" Just trying to save you being accused of putting forth malarkey.

Joe in Albany -

You have pretty much demonstrated the fundamental Republican reading and comprehension problem.

Very few of us "lefty liberals" advocate government ownership and control of the private sector, or the elimination of "private property".

Joe in Albany - you insist on showing your absolute and total stupidity. The continued socialism nonsense shows exactly who you are. And, if you're that stupid - you are not even close to making the money you claim! But, you are a good little, moronic Republican!

Joe in Albany

Merriam-Webster has pretty much laid out the basic difference between conservative economic theory and lefty liberal economic theory. The lefty liberal Dems don't yet have America fully under socialist control, but, they are well on their way there.

Joey,

The problem for you though is you don't what to discern. Every thing you posts is so damn funny to you; regardless of whether or not it's true. Those hysterical outbreaks of yours are the signs of an idiot.

Amused in the Midwest

The free market is alive and well. It is easy to point at the "evil corporations" but free market means just that, free market. The consumer bears great responsibility if the success of the competitive free market. Nobody forces anyone to go to Super Mega Mart to buy all their shiny bits, but if they do decide it is more beneficial to the economic health of their community to save a few bucks at Super Mega Mart than to buy the same things from local suppliers, that is hardly the corporation's fault. Simplistic, I grant you, but I think many people forget their personal responsibility to a successful economic system.

One thing I know for certain is the GOP is full of "malarkey". That truth is proven daily on FR with the ramblings of another Joe.

Socialism is public education and schools, the interstate highway system, regular highways, public streets, sewer systems, water mains, garbage collection, snow removal, fire departments, police and sheriff departments, the highway patrol, city sidewalks, street lights...... None of these things makes us communist; they do, however, along with capitalism make us the United States of America.

It seems to me, knowing that you didn't build that alone, that Joe in Albany fails to compensate or even acknowledge the money he has made was made by other people not him. He is just the recipient of the fruits of their labor. Speaking as a lefty liberal, and a person that has made lots of others rich, Joe I sincerely feel you need to be screwed without a kiss. I hope you lose your wealth either by government intervention or your own stupidity so you can feel the pain. You need pain boy.

Bev - I believe Joe's problem is he isn't capable of discerning.

Mark in SoCal

Bev,

Did you not want to say "know" rather than "no?" Just trying to save you being accused of putting forth malarkey.

Thanks Mark

I meant know.

Bev,

I no!

SeekingSanity

Bev - I believe Joe's problem is he isn't capable of discerning.

Yes, it's obvious. Joey is an imbecile. Ironically, he doesn't know it.

Mark in SoCal

Bev,

I no!

Oh those homonyms. Eye see now!!!

☺

BCWC!

Thanks to you, I learn something new everyday around here! ☺

Easy, Bev. I am a Republican and you no we don't look kindly upon homonyms.........

BCWC, ditto what Feisty said.

"Sockeye Joe" is completely indicative of the larger problem the republican party has, they base their campaigning on falsehoods, they continually preach them over and over again to no avail, even when the majority of the electorate has determined it is "malarky". By the Romney campaigns own admission they lost all the swing states where guys like Joe (their last dependable voting bloc) just could no longer buy into the malarky and either did not show up to vote, or voted for Obama. We are in no way a socialist counrtry, at least no more or no less than we have ever been, the silly rhetoric on the right is failing republicans badly, it did not stop the democrats from taking the Oval office, the senate, and gaining seats in the house inspite of gerrymandering and the fact that house seats are not statewide elections. The electoral college has doomed them from ever seeing the Oval office again if they persist in trying to campaign on things that the majority of the country know is not true but people like Joe can't help themselves from insisting are true. Joe and people like Joe do democrats and liberals a great service by sticking with the malarky to the bitter end and beyond.

John in Battle Creek, at the risk of sounding preachy I would ask you not to wish harm to Joe, I like your posts and feel you are a decent guy, so I find it unbecoming that you would wish Joe bad luck, it may have something to do with my feelings of the arguably silly notion of Karma, but in any event it seems uncharacteristic of you and I feel you may have just lost your temper for the moment. If you feel I should mind my own business, I perfectly understand.

I am sure Joe will set me straight if I am wrong, but I believe Joe's investments are largely the result of him working under union contracts and being the beneficiary of the very kind of system he now inexplicably rails against. As I said before that is a losing attitude and strategy and that leads to it's own form of punishment in and of itself politically and otherwise. In any event I am glad Joe is financially stable and I know he will be glad if republicans put an end to this "socialism" he hates and means test him for any government benefits he has paid into over the years. If you want to wish something for Joe just wish he gets what he says he wants.

Forrest, It would seem that we are more Socialist than before. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. We must change as the world changes or perish. So as the world has generally moved from the feudal systems and absolute theocracy of the past we have become more and more liberal and thus more Socialist. I don't believe we should be totally Socialist or will we ever be that way but, by the same token, neither should we be totally Capitalist. Capitalism is a good thing and we should embrace it. I am a Capitalist and you probably are too. We invest in the stock market through IRA and 401K accounts or directly through a broker.

So Capitalism in and of itself is not the problem but those who are greedy and happen to be using Capitalism to feed their greed. It has happened before and we had to regulate the Capitalists punishing those who play fair because of those who are greedy and want more than they should have.

There are Democrats, Republicans, Independants and a bunch of others who are Capitalists and who believe in a degree of Socialism. A good balance between Socialism and Capitalism not only makes a better life for ordinary people but the wealthy and businesses too. If enables us to strive for a more perfect union, ensure justice, provide for domestic tranquility, provide for common defence and promote the general welfare of all who have the good fortune to live free as Americans and those who, while not Americans, are afforded the same under our Constitution.

You sound like a fair and reasonable person, with a fair and reasonable assessment Adler.

'Biden' (Noun), Drooling idiot with sleep disorders. EX. Don't pull a Biden at the wedding or else. A fan of the Pres but not his bafoon sidekick.

This "socialism" thing is particularly funny when I look at my home state. Voted something like 70% for Romney. One of our two US Senators is a former GOP governor who before that was CEO of one of the few socialist businesses in the US--the state-owned Bank of North Dakota. (There is also a state-owned grain mill and elevator which markets flour under the brand name Dakota Maid). BND got a lot of attention in 2009 because, as a state-owned business, it was well-managed and one of the most solvent banks in the US.

Your right F. Grump, I did lose my temper, I just can't stand it sometimes. I worked for my money, I made many people richer because of my talents and my work ethic. I made mistakes, I made bad decisions, I also paid for them. I have had health problems in my life, however I have turned out to be some what lucky and some what successful and I know that I didn't do it alone. Its funny to me, I paid my taxes and when I made more money I paid more taxes. I never in my life felt it was a punishment. Fines are a punishment but taxes are my contribution to pay for the things I use and to help others. I find I am agreement with John Fugelsang said.

"If you don't want tax dollars helping the sick and the poor then its time to stop saying you want a government based on Christian values."

Now I am not even a believer, but I feel it is everyone duty that can, to extend their hand to help those that need it.

A great deal of the conflict between Capitalism and Socialism is based upon nothing more than semantic hair- splitting, and dictionary definitions don't even begin to describe the realities of living under these different systems.

Too many people have conflated Capitalism and "free enterprise", acting as though the two terms were synonymous and interchangeable. This is far from true. Free enterprise simply means that anybody is free to start and operate a business endeavour with minimal involvement by the state. Capitalism assumes the existence of a very small class of capitalists, also variously known as the 'ruling class' or 'nomenklatura', who are the ones to make all of the decisions and who collect the vast majority of the profits; and a far larger class of workers, who perform all of the neccessary work but are paid the bare minimum possible by law, in order to maximize the profits of the masters. Other means by which the master class wring the most money possible from their enterprises include: Not paying workers for extra-long hours; not providing a safe or healthy workplace; not obeying laws regarding the safe handling and disposal of hazardous materials; decreasing the amount or quality of the good or service provided to customers while jacking up the price (especially prevalent when government services are let out to private contractors);and combining to create cartels in order to crush competition and fix (high) prices.

A system of socialized democracy involves the means of neccessary production being held in common by the citizens (or 'the state', but most democracies recognize the government as being the property of the people and not the other way around), as with medical care, power generation, highways and other infrastructure, higher education, and military hardware. In these types of businesses, every employee is motivated to do their very best because they are owners, as well as customers, unlike in a capitalist business, where all but a very tiny 'manager' class know that they have no realistic hope of ever advancing, and the resentment and despair unavoidably depresses worker efficiency.

Americans, including your humble scribe, have been indoctrinated for decades to believe that Socialism is always, invariably and unavoidably an evil, destructive system, in which everybody is a police informer and attending church will get you fired and/or sent to Siberia for a hundred years. The examples of Romania and Cuba, which were/are military dictatorships, are played up, while the examples of Canada, Germany, Scandinavia and the Netherlands are studiously and determinedly ignored.

Lastly, it should be observed that in the recent economic collapse (which was indisputably caused by the very same laissez- faire policies that the Republican Party continues to champion), the countries that came through the best and suffered the least were those with the most socialized economies and the highest percentage of unionized workers- those states named above, which also continue to kick our asses in pretty much every meaningful measure of life quality.

Like I said John you seem like a decent guy, and I could not agree more with the phony claims of wanting a government based on Christians values and then proposing policies that do everything but represent those values.

For all you morons who are critical of Joe from Albany, there is no doubt that two of the three definitions of socialism (#1 and #3 for those who can't discern them) do fit the liberal Democratic agenda.

Republicans just love making fun of VP Joe but he's been kicking their asses for more than 35 years.

He certainly didn't learn how to kick any ass in the military. Perhaps his case of "Vietnam Draft Asthma" has been cured.

I love this, "the most looked up words were Socialism and Capitalism".

Hmmm, obviously the American public is too stupid to understand what socialism is and does to a country and her folks. Otherwise, they would not have voted for what they now call their president.

"He certainly didn't learn how to kick any ass in the military. Perhaps his case of "Vietnam Draft Asthma" has been cured."

• You mean he's like Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, Jeb Bush, Tom DeLay, Rick Santorum, Karl Rove, Bill O'Reiley, Don Rumsfeld, John Bolton, Ted Nugent, Bill Krostol, Ralph Reed, and a bunch of other Republican chicken-hawks??

Yes, And Phil Bredesen, Howard Dean, Brian J. Donnelly, Roy P. Dyson, Al Franken, Dick Gephardt, Dennis Kucinich, Chris Matthews, Robert Reich, Bill Richardson, Marc Udall, Henry Waxman and a bunch of other Democrats

But not as despicable as the draft dodger-in-chief "Slick Willy" Clinton who evaded and reneged on serving in the military so he could go to London, lead anti-war protests, and start his career as a sexual predator.

Obviously you are part of the 99.9% that stil don't understand what Socialism means, despite quoting it's definitionin your post!

collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

I don't recall President Obama running on a platform of government ownership of the manufactruing and distribution sectors of our economy.

TNSEVOL - ZMAN2012 is part of the Republican party that is too dumb to understand reality. I thought they might actually progress to some form of intelligent conversation after having their heads handed to them but, no chance! They are as dumb as ever - maybe even dumber!

3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

According to this definition, the one I suppose the Republicans are referring to, I already live in a socialist society, since I work harder than most people but make less money. This was true under Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, and every president during my lifetime. It is now true for many salaried people who are expected to work longer hours with no more pay. But that is not Obama's fault. Look to the corporations that will do anything to squeeze another penny into their pockets.

............I guess the GM bailout, and the cell phone give aways came from private sources, then. Oh yeah, and where is all that money going to be redistributed, that comes out of the pockets of successful Americans, and who decides where it goes?

Sorry.....pure socialism

Sorry.....pure socialism

Thanks for proving Feisty's point - right wing posters have no idea what Socialism is. But hey, it you want to define socialism as distributing tax payer paid cell phones to .0001 percent of the population, by all means, try to get the definition approved.

Now what is really funny about the right wing posters on this site - they will next try to convince us that .0001% of the population is the majority. The madness never stops.

".....theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods ....."

Learn how to read. It doesn't how much of the product/monies are (re)-distributed by the government.

ZMan -

I guess the GM bailout, and the cell phone give aways came from private sources

Actually both ideas started under GW Bush, that infamous Republican Socialist (and evil rich white man).

You are the one with the reading comprehension problems. Socialism would be if the government OWNED the cellphone manufacturers and the cell phone stores, not merely using government funds to purchase cellphones.

Quit your crying and get on with life. GM is still majority owned by regular stock holders. No one is redistributing anything except Republicans trickling money to billionaires and oil companies. If you can't stand on facts, just keep standing on the bull@!$%#.

ZMan2012

............I guess the GM bailout, and the cell phone give aways came from private sources, then.

GM paid its loan back with interest. Cell phones are donated.and stated under Bush

Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?

A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.

The president has no direct impact on the program, and one could hardly call these devices "Obama Phones," as the e-mail author does. This specific program, SafeLink, started under President George Bush, with grants from an independent company created under President Bill Clinton, which was a legacy of an act passed under President Franklin Roosevelt, which was influenced by an agreement reached between telecommunications companies and the administration of President Woodrow Wilson.

http://factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/\

Learn something!!!! A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

If I volunteer to buy poor ZMan a cell phone, will he stop posting all this malarkey?

Heck, Z - you can have mine. I bought it myself, though. What does that make me?

The world according to Republicans/Conservatives: The U.S. was created in January 2009, which coincidentally coincides with president Obama's inauguration as the president of the U.S.

What a bunch of Malarkey!

Hillary 2016 ONWARD!

ZMAN2012 - and the cell phone give aways came from private sources - I don't know if you're a liar or if you're truly that damned stupid. The cell phone giveaways was done by the FCC which has been giving free phones to the poor since 1996. It changed to cell phones when they became so popular and easy to get. They realize that everyone should have access to phones in case of an emergency. It is NOT Obama's program - idiot!

JoAnne in PA - you bought your own phone? It makes you like the majority of Americans who can afford to buy their own phones. But, ZMAN is - of course - convinced that everyone has their hand out for freebies because they LOVE not having money. Let's remember, Republicans are too dense to understand the concept of poverty!

Where did zman go?

JoAnne, that's funny. I'm a leftie liberal who bought my own computer with my own money, guess that means my computer and I are both socialists; worse, I live on a socialist-paved street with a socialist street light at the end of my capitalist and personally paid for paved driveway. The city streetlight, by the way, sits on my privately owned land, so it is half socialist and half capitalist!

Z-man like his fellow GOPers have long lost the meaning of socialist and communist because they label anyone the disagree with and any idea they don't like as being one or the other--then threaten to secede from the USA. "Out, damn spot."

Zman,

You have been drinking too much tea and listing to the bat crap crazies. Perhaps you may want to get a job and get off the welfare.

Seeking -

Yeah, I bought my own, but before you get too impressed with my new conservative principles of paying my own way, I should add that it's one of those cheap trac fones that doesn't do much of anything and to be honest, I don't think I've used it twice in the last three months. If it would make ZMan happy, I'd say I was waiting for the government to re-charge it for me, but truth is, I'm not nearly as good a socialist as I am a Luddite. I'm still trying to figure out how I ended up on this dang board to begin with!

JoAnne - LOL!!!!

Remember too, that those phones don't have unlimited minutes on them. Basically they are for emergencies and to keep track of kids in the streets where there are plenty of creeps willing to do them harm. To hear some of our right wing friends they want people to believe that there are several million welfare queens sitting around talking on the phone all day. If they believe that they have never been in a household like that. Unfortunately I have sister-in-law that has made some poor choices in her life and has required public assistance. She has a job but it doesn't pay enough to fill the needs of her and her kids. She has one of those phones and because of it her son's life was saved. So righties before you go about spewing your lies and hate experience or see for yourself how those you love to condemn live and get their real beliefs about being on the government dole. Most don't like it.

The crappy economy brought on by two unfunded and unnecessary wars coupled with American jobs being sent off shore finds many people out of work and forced to live on welfare. They hate it and want to get back to work. So instead of looking down your noses at those less fortunate than yourselves why not work to get them good paying jobs so they can get back to work being productive, paying taxes (so the rich won't have to take up the slack) and bring America back to the top as we once were.

Dick Armey

TNSEVOL, exactly.

That's the amount it took for FreedomWorks to get rid of him. He supposedly no longer meets their criteria for a tea party extremist.

AlaskaGirl, that was funny. $8 mil. Wow.

Liberals called Freedom Works and the others like it "astro turf" for a reason.

AlaskaGirl, that's funny and from what I heard, true. Not sure if it was Mother Jones or one of the others that did the digging and reported what they found, it cost $8 million to convince Dick Armey to leave.

@Jody:

It turned astro turd.

Fancy - clearly you're more comfortable with FAUX news!

Larry - it will do no good. After reading it, you'd have to explain it over and over and over......

What posters have lost track of is how the word, malarky, and those economic/social concepts have become part of the American conversation. Our language contains words and ideas that immigrants have brought from all over the world - to me, that is so cool. Words have a lot of power. We should always be careful about how we use them.

A little Socialism is good for you.

So Ken, you prefer corporate Fascism?

Just asking.

I can't speak for Ken but I can confirm I do. I would much rather my income came from a corporation than a government check in the mail. Once you graduate the 12th grade and get a job you might understand that Adler. But until then... Good luck with the GPA !!!!!

Stevie boy, I am probably old enough to by your grandfather or father. I have a Masters degree so never assume anything pal. Many you condemn that are on welfare would also rather have a paycheck than a government check but with their jobs having been sent over seas they are stuck. But narrow minded greedy don't seem to understand such things do they, Steve?

Steve - your post shows your total lack of understanding of even the basics of what is going on in the government. But, it clearly shows you spout the Republican talking points like a good, uneducated child. Now, come back when you can have an adult conversation and actually form some coherent opinions about something!

I would expect a comment like that from the left.. Only an intelligent liberal like you or Joe Biden truly understands the problems... lol....

Still enjoying your 66% income tax increase in Illinois though huh? You know the one that did nothing to reduce the defecit there but I am sure you are convinced it will work "this time"

Maybe if I put it in caps you and Joe will get it this time.

DESPITE TAX HIKE DEFECITS STILL LOOM

http://progressillinois.com/posts/content/2011/02/07/report-despite-tax-hike-deficits-still-loom-state

Steve said: All those folks that know nothing for themselves but simply repeat the malarky of the democraps

This is just like the right wing nut jobs getting their talking points from Rush Limbaugh and his ilk. Some of us know reality and some of us don't. Then again when one lives a life aloof and distant from the real world (see Romney) they easily show disdain for and trully ignorance of the reality of life outside their gated community and glass highrises of corporations.

i've noticed fiesty and seeking only call names and really give no help to their party. making your childish remarks does not help people see your point of view.hey seeking is my punctuation getting better? I'm starting to think fiesty and seeking and alaska girl are the same person and she pats herself on the back through this way. wow that would be sick

lol.

NH_Shellback - no, that photo is of Mitt Romney - with you at this side and little Steve-26... by both of you. Clearly you need glasses!

and clearly you could use a good dose of IQ. You been sniffin Feisty's hiney a little too long and the aromatic odor of liberal theory has you believing gold smells like malarky.

SeekingSanity - See you are still giving up that love for Joe. How many mentally retarded "love children" have you an "Ol' Stupid" produced now?

Malarkey, also known as Mumbo Jumbo, Hokus Pokus, Feldergarb, Bologna, Horse Puckey, and of course Phooey

You forgot a couple F4E.. Obama, Biden, Reid, Pelosi. or you could just say.. The liberal dream team..

GWB ??? Really?? That comment was a perfect example of liberal waste....

Actually, Spencer, we should relish the fact that Limbaugh and the other hate mongers are on the air. We do have free speech and their rantings, repeated several times in this year's campaigns, may well have resulted in a loss for the very people such hate mongers support. Besides it is fun to feed the trolls.

spencer

we need fox to correct the spin msnbc puts on the air. obama seems to think the un is a good thing. most of the ideas he has is the same as the un. the un agenda 21 that is already being implemented in the usa is against any private property if you don't believe me look it up. it's not a dem or repub thing its both that would like complete controll. it scares me how people only listen to what the news offers and does no research to see what is really going on. now i'm trying to figure out what brought on my rant about the un

He must have meant  "I Will Not Rest Until Everyone Every Illegal Alien Can Find a Job". After all he did grant millions of illegals the ability to get work permits so they could compete for jobs against 23 million unemployed and under-employed American workers.

gustifer - 98% of American knows that "Ol' Stupid" Joe is the Village Idiot of the Democrat Party.

He's such a man of the people, he doesn't have to speak English, when talking directly to those under his spell.

What about the English language is American?

I'll wait...still nothing? That's right! Get over yourself.