VIDEO: First Read Minute: Let's do lunch, and a campaign reality check

NBC's Mark Murray and Domenico Montanaro discuss President Obama and Mitt Romney's lunch at The White House today and how Romney adviser Stuart Stevens may not be as ready to bury the hatchet as the former candidate appears to be.

Discuss this post

All this chatter about the Republicon's "re-packaging" their "brand" should be a reminder that you can wrap a box of rocks up in pretty paper & a bow, but at the end of the day, you're still stuck with a box of rocks...

Can anyone say "re-gift"? lol

  • 23 votes
#1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:25 AM EST

This Stuart Stevens seem to have a problem with our President. He cannot Man up and say Romney was not the choice that Americans wanted as President, Why is it always Republicans looking for other reasons they lost instead of actually coming to the conclusion that going back to 1950 and working for the 2%ers is what Americans dont want, and they also dont want the Christian Conservatives to tell them how to have sex and controll womens health rights

  • 23 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:47 AM EST

'Tis the season of re-gifting, Feisty. Seems to me that every day the GOP regifts the Democrats with the future votes of minorities, Latinos and women.

  • 18 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:50 AM EST

Reminds me of a can of haggis that gets passed back and forth every Christmas in my family for the past 10 years or so. No one in the family bothers to unwrap it any more.

Haggis is a savoury pudding containing sheep's pluck (heart, liver and lungs); minced with onion, oatmeal, suet, spices, and salt, mixed with stock, and traditionally encased in the animal's stomach and simmered for approximately three hours.

Yum!

  • 13 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:54 AM EST

Has anyone seen Joe "Gaffe" Biden lately??

Now that the electionis over it looks like Barry had the good sense to lock him up again in the WH attic, where all crazy uncle's belong.

  • 6 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:55 AM EST

Feisty, I think the lipstick on a pig analogy fits the GOP better.

  • 15 votes
#1.5 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:56 AM EST

Will Mitt be wearing his Magical Underwear? I hope Queen Ann goes along for the luncheon, as Michelle greets her as the 1st Lady that should really steam lil Annie

Psst I heard a Rumor that the Wonk little Paulie has been quiet ever since his African American Girlfriend of 4 years in College was found out about, His good old Buddy's at the GOP look at him in a different way

  • 10 votes
#1.6 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:00 PM EST

Joe in Albany

Has anyone seen Joe "Gaffe" Biden lately??

Joe was last seen shopping at the new Costco (the store that pays a decent wage) in DC . Other than that he maybe studying up on the constitutionality of being the tipping vote for restructuring the filibuster rules in the Senate.

  • 12 votes
#1.7 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:08 PM EST

Psst I heard a Rumor that the Wonk little Paulie has been quiet ever since his African American Girlfriend of 4 years in College was found out about,

That job as driving the Oscar Mayer Weinermobile must have been really exciting.

  • 11 votes
#1.8 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:08 PM EST

It never seems to occur to Republicans that elections are about choosing people who we want to work for us, not about choosing a new BOSS.

Romney tried to tell us he was entitled to be President, by virtue of his father's career, and Romney's own position in the Church and in the business world. Obama, on the other hand, asked for a second term, to complete the job he started, of helping the middle class recover from the recession, and build a more secure future.

Get the diff, Stu?

  • 15 votes
#1.9 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:12 PM EST

My problem with Stued Sh!t is that he says he thinks the Democratic party and those on the left have been filled with self loathing over the last few years. Really? Could have fooled me. I think Stued Sh!t is a small little man who, like the rest of his party, is completely lost as to how on earth they could have lost the election. The whole party definitely has an ego problem, among their many other issues that many of them seem to refuse to acknowledge, or really even see for that matter.

Exactly the diff, Amy!

  • 13 votes
#1.10 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:32 PM EST

So why did the Democrats win the Presidency? The answer is quite simple.

There are now 47 million families that get free food and cash aid, and they credit the Democrats for 'giving' them that largess. At $550 per month average, that's about $300 Billion per year in 'freebies'.

These families are typically also the ones that get an average of about $440 Billion per year in free health care (Medicaid - that figure comes from Obama's 2013 Budget projections).

That amounts to a total of about $740 Billion per year in 'free benefits' that these 47 million families get each year, which amounts to about 70% of the $1.1 Trillion Deficit.

These people have become dependent upon the government, so they naturally will continue to vote for the Democrats. A cynic might suggest that the Democrats are 'buying votes with taxpayer funds', but of course that would be considered 'heartless towards those in need', or even 'racist'.

In addition, the Democrats keep promising 'Amnesty' for the 11 million illegal immigrants in this country, so the 12 million Hispanics that vote will naturally want to vote overwhelmingly in favor of the Democrats who promise to let their friends and relatives stay here and be eligible to work (competing with legal American workers), as well as getting welfare benefits. Ironically, the Democrats don't actually want to 'pass' Amnesty, because it would remove a valuable campaign tactic that they use over and over.

Since Obama got about 65 million of the 126 million votes in this last election, but won by only about 4 million votes, this huge group of roughly 50 million that has become 'dependent' on the government will form a formidable voting block that will ensure the Democrats maintain power well into the future. So how many of the roughly 50 million families that have become dependent on the government voted for the Democrats for purely selfish reasons (Don't touch my benefits)? If only 4 million of the 50 million voted for continued 'free benefits' from the Democrats, that was enough to ensure a Democratic victory. According to exit polls, Obama won this group by almost 11 million votes.

Ironically, even though these policies by the Democrats will drag down future economic growth, ensure high unemployment, and make everyone 'poorer' - witness the $5,000 (10%) drop in average family income over the last 4 years, this actually helps the Democrats win even more votes because it creates even more people that will become 'dependent on the government'.

All of this comes at a great cost (witness the $740 Billion per year spent on welfare and Medicaid above) and the huge cost to taxpayers of the massively growing Debt (which Obama's Budget projects to increase to $20.379 TRILLION within less than 4 years - even if he gets his 'tax increase on the wealthy'). The Debt was only $9.986 Trillion at the end of fiscal 2008. But the 50 million that get welfare and free medical care don't really care about that, because they know that 'someone else will have to pay for that' (those who actually pay income taxes).

And of course the Democrats will continue to 'play to their base' by claiming 'the rich don't pay their fair share', and the Republicans are 'heartless and racist' for calling for 'entitlement reform'.

We are well on our way to the ruin that Greece brought upon itself by promising benefits that we can't afford.

  • 4 votes
#1.11 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:33 PM EST

Off topic but the elder George H.W. Bush is in the hospital for bronchitis. Not a huge fan but I still wish him a speedy recovery. After all, he has "adopted" Bill Cinton as his son!

Roy Wilson - your post - at best - is totally ignorant. Even Republican leaders are saying blame like yours is totally wrong and is NOT the reason Mitt lost. Give it up! You put out an inferior product and you paid with less votes.

  • 14 votes
#1.12 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:36 PM EST

I know you're going to hate me, Albany Joe, but it's "crazy uncles", not "crazy uncle's". Really have a lot of trouble with the plural vs. the possessive, doncha?

Roy Wilson,

There are now 47 million families that get free food and cash aid, and they credit the Democrats for 'giving' them that largess. At $550 per month average, that's about $300 Billion per year in 'freebies'.

You know how stupid you sound, right? In my work I come into contact with a fair number of people who receive "freebies". And you know what? The greater majority of them vote Republican. This is why so many of us on the Left talk about all the people who vote against their self-interest. If even half of that group voted Democrat this last election, the President would have garnered upward of 53% of the popular vote.

  • 13 votes
#1.13 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:36 PM EST

Since everyone seems to think that the tax rates under Clinton were 'fair', we should just let them expire as scheduled on January 1, 2013. Then the 'rich' will be forced to 'pay their fair share' again, and we'll cut the Deficit by an estimated $4 Trillion over 10 years.

What could be simpler - and the beauty of this approach is that the President and Congress just have to do what they seem to do best - NOTHING. The tax changes are automatic. The Republicans should just allow ALL of the tax cuts to expire - along with the Obama approved 'cuts in spending' that take effect on January 1, 2013.

  • 3 votes
#1.14 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:42 PM EST

Hey Roy boy, when you copy and paste an article on here, it is usual to also post the source from which you lazily took it from. Oh, and SS is correct in every word responded to you.

  • 12 votes
#1.15 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:45 PM EST

Roy - I'm sure if you keep repeating the GNOP lies you will eventually believe them....even though the rest of us don't.....

Mitt is at the White House today asking Pres. Obama where his "Freebies" are!

Please Mythe - remember not to ask where the cookies where baked!

  • 10 votes
#1.16 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:45 PM EST

I know you're going to hate me, Albany Joe, but it's "crazy uncles", not "crazy uncle's". Really have a lot of trouble with the plural vs. the possessive, doncha?

________________________________________

Hook, line and sinker.

Actually Jack-off, I did that intentionally to see if you were stupid enough to take the bait.

You were.

Moron.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 5 votes
#1.17 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:46 PM EST

Paul, I think we are too late. Roy, like so many of his party, already do. Let's remember, this is the party that does not govern their party with facts. Facts? We don't need no stinkin facts! Oh, yeah, and deficits don't matter..........when THEY are in the wheelhouse.

Please Mythe - remember not to ask where the cookies where baked! I hope the SS does a thorough body screening of him so he isn't hiding any little spy cameras on his person. He may have promised Ann to get as much footage of the inside private areas as possible!

  • 9 votes
#1.18 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:50 PM EST

ROY WILSON-336103

So why did the Democrats win the Presidency? The answer is quite simple.

You need to ask the financial wizards who brought the economy to its knees ... the companies who off-shored manufacturing ... the WalMarts that don't pay a living wage ... the people who put profits ahead of country ... the politicians who put wars on credit cards. The poor did none of this and don't want to be where they are and then being blamed for it.

You remind me of a Lenny Bruce line ... "When rich people are depicted having sex it is called eortic, but when poor people have sex it is called pornography."

  • 11 votes
#1.19 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:52 PM EST

I did that intentionally to see if you were stupid enough to take the bait.

Never in a million years--you're just not bright enough to think that far ahead. But you get a "B" for good effort.

  • 8 votes
#1.20 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:56 PM EST

Thurston and Lovey (I sure hope) being asked to temporarily visit the island they were already voted off of is entertaining.

It's funny how those that go along with the vision of America that would lead us ever more into a class-based society are exactly the ones with no class at all...

The self proclaimed royalty and their faux-religiostic willing serfs. Too funny that those maroons have become the minority now even when you stick them into one gunny-sack together. There is hope for America. Provided by Americans. And "those people" represent neither of those things.

  • 9 votes
#1.21 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:09 PM EST

I'd like to see Republicans walk away from this higher tax stuff. We will get blamed for going over the cliff anyway, it is the Progressive way.

Let Obama sort out this for himself and for his party, then let it be his legacy for history.

  • 4 votes
#1.22 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:14 PM EST

1funnygirl

Whatever the GOP chooses to do or not will be part of the legacy. Theirs and America's.

  • 7 votes
#1.23 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:19 PM EST

AlaskaGirl - me thinks the "Magic Underwear" may be tapped....where is Agent 99 when you need her?

UGH! Checkin' the privates....but only Commanders do that - and what does the Mythe know about commanding the troops.....unless he is on a "Mission" to France!

  • 6 votes
#1.24 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:22 PM EST

Post #1.11 (Roy Wilson). Let's assume that everything about your stats are accurate. My question is a simple one for you or anyone else about those stats.

What should the government do?

Is it your idea that the country should try to eliminate the deficit at the expense of the needy? Should the government simply let those in need starve? Should we close all of the shelters and let the homeless live on the streets? Should we end Medicaid and let people across the country die because they can't afford insurance? Would that then garner votes for the republicans? Is that your wish?

  • 8 votes
#1.25 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:28 PM EST

Roy, regarding the "food stamp" issue, need to have a sit down with Walmart execs. regarding their employees low pay which makes them eligible for food stamp assistance--said employees have been counseled to seek assistance and are encouraged to do so--pretty sad, billions in revenue and they stiff their employees and palm them off on the American taxpayer. I do not have a problem with helping hungry people but I do have a problem with employers like Walmart that deliberately slap down the help.

Meanwhile, I am still waiting for my gift, have any idea where it might be? Nah, just kidding, we have been most fortunate in not having to seek assistance from the sate or federal government, and we do no begrudge help to the least of ours.

BC, I think I'll pass on the Haggis, uggghhhh!

  • 10 votes
#1.26 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:31 PM EST

Roy:

Instead of writing yet another right wing screed about all of the evils of welfare, why don't you go line by line on the welfare budget and tell us what you'd cut and justify it that way?

Otherwise all you are doing is saying you are going to cut SSI/RSDI in its entirety and indicating that the blind and disabled shouldn't even receive the $674/month they receive right now, which, for many of them is their only source of income. Are you suggesting that there should be nothing available for someone whose arm has been ripped off by an industrial machine and that they should just get by on their own? Private disability has a termination date, Roy. It's usually about 2 years. Are you saying that the armless guy should have adapted well enough in 24 months that there should be no public disability for him? Are you suggesting that there should be no unemployment insurance available at all for those who have lost a job should just starve?

And if that IS what you are advocating, then what is your alternative? Are you seriously suggesting a person with severe Down's Syndrome go out and work? For who? Doing what? The private sector is not huge on hiring people employers will automatically consider to be unproductive. All of the programs you targeted are means tested. That means the disability has been determined by people who do nothing but determine disability.

Look all I am asking is that you define what, out of all of this, you are advocating we get rid of and what we don't. Otherwise, all you are doing is shouting at clouds.

When you shout at clouds, it's pretty hard to take you seriously.

  • 11 votes
#1.27 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:33 PM EST

So.....Paul S., at 1.24, tell me..... what does Hussein know about commanding the troops?

  • 2 votes
#1.28 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:38 PM EST

skyparrot
Haggis, uggghhhh!

I used to say that about fresh oysters until someone slapped a bottle of ice-cold vodka next to my plate.

  • 3 votes
#1.29 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:38 PM EST

1FunnyGirl:

You do realize that until 1986, people on both sides of the aisle understood their obligation to actually govern the nation, right?

And that because of that, taxes went both UP and down depending on the nation's need at whatever point in history it stood and didn't just endlessly travel downward the way that today's rank and file right wingers seem to believe they should? Governance requires seriously thinking. Trading away your authority to govern from the very beginning doesn't show that.

The question is never whether you can justify the policy you advocate to the other side. As much talk as there is about 'compromise,' that's not an issue. Both sides in this debate understand that in reality, the easiest way to get to where we need to go is to raise revenue by about 4.5% and lower expenditures by about 3.7% in a sustainable way.

The question is whether you have the ability to explain the necessity of doing so to your own rank and file. That is what we haven't seen from your side since you started listening to Limbaugh and allowing people like Norquist to tell you that the way we lived 13 years ago is 'socialism.'

  • 4 votes
#1.30 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:43 PM EST

If there is ONE AMUSING fact about the republicanCrimeCartel, It Is their Arrogant Stupidity. Their Campaign Hack Stu Stevens Still demonstrates what this republicanAristocratSociopathParty REALLY Consists of. Just like the Self Entitled Plantation and Slave Owners of the AnteBellum South, Whose Controlling Idiots led the Confederacy into War against the Mighty North and Assured Self Demolition. Even General Robert E. Lee transferred ALL of his wealth into NORTHERN Corporate and War Bonds BEFORE he accepted his appoinment as general of the ConfedFarcy. And, on the Dawn of the South's Surrender, Lee went to Richmond in 1864 to ask the "confederate congress" for more support as he was losing the war to Northern General U.S. Grant. When Lee got to Richmond to see his "congress" he was in total shock at what he saw and heard. Lee simply said "I've been up to see the congress and All they can do is eat peanuts and chew tobacco" this same redundant idiocy is the trademark of this republican party of Stupids who arrogantly said: "If ANYTHING, Our One Mission is to make this President, sic President Obama, a one term president". Now Stu(Pid) Stevens is talking in Harvard, of ALL Places! with his same bigotted Crapola; Oooh!! and for a Fee!, of course. How smart can Harvard be to pay for this MORON'S RACIST Drivel????? And, AND!!, AND!!! mr. stupid is hinting that It, the DumbParty, is becoming a "repackaged" political entity with "new" values!!!??!! Give It Up Stupid, You Can't Polish A Turd....

And Prez O, Even though You ARE the Steward of America, the Seat Of Capitalism and The CENTER of "Free Market Capitalism", WE Do NOT appreciate You inviting, Lunching with the enemy, His AssHoliness MittTaxPittanceRommel, and Otherwise SOILING the White House with this Sociopath's Presence to assuage your need to be accepted by a Sociopathic Criminal Club aka the republicanCrimeCartel.

  • 2 votes
#1.31 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:44 PM EST

BC, vodka, ah, give me enough and I might try it, now oysters oooooohhhhhhhhhhh, sans tar balls, could eat e'm by the dozens even without the vodka. Sam Adams or Louisiana's Abita Beer, oooohhhhhh!

  • 1 vote
#1.32 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:47 PM EST

Oscar - maybe you should ask Osama Bin Laden....oh....you can't...he is swimmin' with the fishies!

  • 6 votes
#1.33 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:57 PM EST

Ah ha ha ha, Paul S, you got me!!! Ah ha ha ha - not. "Mythe" would have done the same thing in regards to OBL. EXCEPT, he would have done it immediately, not after several requests, like Hussein!

Hussein giving the "ok" for OBL is NOTHING. He does not know how to command. Wellllll......wait.......I take that back........his way to command is to say "stand down" while Americans are being slaughtered in Benghazi. How sad.

    #1.34 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:21 PM EST

    Oscar - Myth - with all his GB foreign policy experts - would have said Bin Laden wasn't worth the effort to go after.....look at how "judiciously" Bush went after bin Laden.......Those are the foreign policy advisors Mythe had......Make War - Not Peace - forget who your enemies are......THAT's their motto.....

    • 3 votes
    #1.35 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:32 PM EST

    TO: Oscar Rules who wrote:

    "... "Mythe" would have done the same thing in regards to OBL. EXCEPT, he would have done it immediately..."

    Well then why didn't Bush "do it immediately"? Was it because he grew up with OBL?

    We don't expect for hate speech Republicans to ever give anybody credit for a job well done.

    The only thing Republicans know how do is try to steal credit for other people's work, and deny all the crap that Republicans mess up like taking a perfectly health economy and turning it into the 2nd Great Depression.

    • 3 votes
    #1.36 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:49 PM EST
    Reply

    President Obama speaking to Malibu Mitt:

    Well Mitt, I guess that 47% you talked about being MOOCHERS, "Voted For You" !

    LMAO!

    You Betcha!

    Occupy SoggyBottom!

    • 17 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:26 AM EST

    Stu has only himself to blame. He surrounded himself with ideologues who only looked at their paid for rosy numbers. Good luck getting the same job in 2016. Sorry Stu, but you have to fall on the sword that you carried into your Mythical Mittical Battle.

    • 16 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:33 AM EST

    You're right Feisty. The GNOP will continue to refuse to acknowledge that it is their ideology that America has a problem with.

    As Mitt has been trying to reform his image by going to see the latest "Twilight" movie and riding roller coasters at Magic Mountain, it seems apparent that he will be the GNOP choice once again in 2016 to make another run for the White House.

    • 14 votes
    Reply#4 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:35 AM EST

    Using rounded numbers, I figure that the 48%'ers that voted for Romney are likely a fairly clean split between 0% that actually thought Romney was worthy and 48% that haven't out-lived the racist leanings of their forefathers. It sounds harsh, condemning the full result to racism, and to their credit I should point out that they did make up a butt-load of lies to try to avoid facing it.

    Many aren't even self-aware enough to know that they're racially motivated, but just look at them when the dog-whistles blow! It's not something a person (or politician) can actually hide.

    BTW... If you've said "don't play the race card" to someone more than three times in the past four years, you could be a red-neck.

    In other news: The pigment-challenged John Boehner recently lost his long-term membership at his prestigious Golf Club after a scuffle ensued when he was mistaken for his caddie and asked to "fetch" something.

    • 7 votes
    #4.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:30 PM EST

    Romney's 48% definitely George Wallace time warpers and their spawn, hate, at times, is a generational malady. The only cure genetic therapy.

    Boehner's tan get in the way of being mistaken for not being on the lighter side of membership, aw, so sorry.

    • 2 votes
    #4.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:54 PM EST
    Reply

    The GOP actually did do the best they could with what they had to work with in Romney. I mean c'mon. It would be hard for any uber rich, well-known, white, church-going, well-funded and well-grounded guy to go up against a skinny black man with a dream of hope and change.

    Ouch. Poor Stu. Talk about an epic failure.

    I'm surprised Romney's wing-man isn't taking more heat for the beating he took.

    • 13 votes
    Reply#5 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:43 AM EST

    Jeb Bush correctly diagnosed the problem with the Romney campaign, in an interview I saw, even before Mitt lost. Bush articulated exactly what I saw wrong with the Romney campaign, aside from policy positions: it was all about the candidate and not about the voters.

    It's as if the Republicans were trying to immitate Obama's appeal, without understanding what it is that Obama does that makes him so appealing. Basicaly, Obama focuses on other people. The Republicans, except Christie, don't seem to be able to do that, maybe because they really do have contempt for anyone making less than $50,000, which includes school teachers, CNAs, young people, craftpeople, artisans, ministers, and, basically, the folks who keep this country running.

    • 17 votes
    Reply#6 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:58 AM EST

    Amy, terrific comment on why Mitt lost.

    • 10 votes
    #6.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:10 PM EST

    How can you expect to imitate Obama's appeal when you are running a man who appears to have no blood running through his veins to a heart that seems not to exist? Although I am not a fan of Christie's, at least one can tell that the man does indeed have a heart and he does care about the people in his state, and not just because of the devastation of Sandy, although that did move up his approval ratings, but he stepped up as a human being, not the governor, and he fought daily and side by side with people in an effort to ease their burdens. And, wow, what did that get him from his own party? Alot of grief. How dare the governor hug the "enemy".

    • 8 votes
    #6.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:38 PM EST

    Amy & Alaska Girl---I used to think that the Republicans put out their talking points to keep their base in line but that the party bosses knew the real story. Now I'm starting to think that they believe the stuff they spew on Fox and this is why they are tripped up. They are unable to see any other point of view except their own. This is why they can't fathom how so many of us support the President. They try to demonize us for it but we are regular people and they just can't get it.

    • 10 votes
    #6.3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:54 PM EST

    For the most part, the entertainment talkers on Fox, and Rush, do not provide an alternate point of view for their audience, and when they do get someone on Fox that calls out their bull@!$%#, such as the man(cannot remember his name, but was just a day or so ago) who was chastising them about Benghazi, they cut him off faster than you can blink an eye and then lied later and said after the comments the man apologized. The man of course said he did not apologize, why should he apologize for giving his truthful opinion? Oh, they were all up in a tizzy on that one!

    • 6 votes
    #6.4 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:27 PM EST

    Hi guys, yeah, that was Tom Ricks who pointed out that Fox basically acted as an operative of the Republican Party by trying to hype this story. Some Republicans are desperately hanging on to the hype and trying to use it as an attack against Rice and the Democratic Party in general - but it looks like phony partisan nonsense to me.

    • 2 votes
    #6.5 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:04 PM EST
    Reply

    Well this is pretty damn funny, per DailyKos:

    WOW - Sen Harry Reid on Boehner: "I don't understand his brain"
    @jamiedupree via TweetDeck

    • 6 votes
    Reply#7 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:52 PM EST

    Reid being a Mormon doesn't drink alcohol so he isn't able to comprehend the amount of pickling that has gone on in Boehner's brain!

    • 9 votes
    #7.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:59 PM EST

    When Boehner blows his nose he doesn't use a kleenex, he blows into a glass to capture a pint for afternoon cocktails.

    • 4 votes
    #7.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:30 PM EST

    If brains were dynamite, Hussein wouldn't have enough to blow his nose.

    • 1 vote
    #7.3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:41 PM EST

    AlaskaGirl-759554

    When Boehner blows his nose he doesn't use a kleenex, he blows into a glass to capture a pint for afternoon cocktails.

    Hmmm ... extra sauce for Haggis.

      #7.4 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:42 PM EST

      BC, oysters, with Sam Adams or Abita Beer, ooohhhh.

      Like the new Avatar, new to me.

        #7.5 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:11 PM EST
        Reply

        Roy Wilson 336 doesn't seem to agree with the majority of voters. We can be glad his party did not win. A large part of the problem with Greece is that they did not collect the taxes that should have been paid by law. Tax crime was a way of life there as people with villas and pools declared incomes of $75000 and no one "noticed". USA is still the largest and richest economy and we do have the means to move forward if we see to it that all are participating in the pain as well as the pleasure. Why should any company that makes a profit of any size legally be able to pay NO tax? Why should millionaires be able to hide and shelter all their income?

        • 7 votes
        Reply#8 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:08 PM EST

        opajack: "Roy Wilson 336 doesn't seem to agree with the majority of voters" So, in your mind, Roy Wilson doesn't count? What about the majority of voters that didn't agree with 0bamacare???

        There IS one point I agree with you, though: "Why should any company that makes a profit of any size legally be able to pay NO tax?" So, tell me, why did Hussein's buddy at GE pay NO taxes????

        • 1 vote
        #8.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:45 PM EST
        Reply

        The utter refusal of the Republicans to address the reality underlying their electoral defeat speaks volumes about the future.

        I'm looking forward to a generation (at least) of increasing Democratic margins in most federal elections. The key will be to get senior citizens to vote Democratic in two years. Then the House will be Dem as well.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#9 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:56 PM EST

        Sooo....., Fancy This Too, let's say ALL the Republicans, admitted defeat......what then?

        • 1 vote
        #9.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:59 PM EST
        Reply

        Republican party incapable of meaningful change, truly believe they are in the beginning of a slow painful slide into oblivion. Sane Americans recognize them for what they are, the stature of the Eisenhower's is long gone and we are tortured with the likes of the Romneys, Boehners, McConnells, Cantors, Blunts, Bachmanns, etal. No hope. 2014 election cycle looms and despite the gerrymandering, the Party of No is going to go down. Whoo Hoo.

          Reply#10 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:03 PM EST

          Mr Country Club just doesn't have any good news in the cards, ever. He's like a boring Monopoly game. Draw a card, bad news. Very limited answers, all canned behind GOP closed doors, nothing with even a semblance of cooperation with the Democratic majority in this country. He lives a life of two-martini lunches, an occasional check stuffed in his breast pocket from the "money' in this country, and sometimes a little "trim" on the side. The worst excuse for an American I've seen in a long time. They didn't pick him as leader because he's smart. He's just a store-front who can make a neat, business-like presentation of the GOP's agenda and come off like he's very sincere. He works for Big Money, and that's all. Wall Street, Health care Industry, Big Oil, etc. Their party spent 3/4 of a billion dollars to get their man elected, and failed! Send him home and find someone with a spine to do the job.

            Reply#11 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:04 PM EST

            Obama won by over 4 1/2 million votes.Stuart Stevens should see his shrink! He's obviously having a severe case of 47 percentitis delusions and needs to be put back on his meds.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#12 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:36 PM EST

            Most Americans came to the conclusion that "Romulian Romney" is out too lunch. He is "Out Too Lunch" on economic policy, economic policies, social issues, cultural changes, and Foreign Policy. One wonders if "Romulian Romney" thought that the President used "Food Stamps" to buy their lunch?? Did the GOP/Tea Begger "Flip-Flopper" wanted too change their lunch menu? Did "Romulian Romney" want to 'outsource' the lunch help? Maybe he thought that all the cooks in the White House Kitchen are terrorists? Did the GOP "Speculator" expect an African Menu for lunch? This GOP/RNC Clown is a joke America, and he still will be "Out too Lunch."

              Reply#13 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:21 PM EST

              I never knew that Obozo was a member of that dating site company called "Let's do lunch!"

              Hmmmm..........makes me wonder about him..........could he be........?

                Reply#14 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:13 PM EST

                romancaesar.........

                Virtually all of your comments are adolescent drivel. Since actual adolescents rarely contribute here on Newsvine, you are likely a chronological adult whose maturity has arrested.

                Today, for example, you used the terms "Obozo", and "Democrap" repeatedly. You also engaged in mock Ebonics.

                Then there is this series of comments from you earlier in this week:

                romancaesar Quote......

                ......EndQuote

                Would you be comfortable making such comments without anonymity? Most (adults) would not. It is likely you would not either.

                Please reconsider your online (mis)behavior. It is actually possible to make a point without causing one's self to appear foolish and banal.

                  #14.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:40 AM EST
                  Reply

                  They say it that way to pose as the party of the rich. This despite all those very wealthy Democrats out there.

                  The Republicans have painted themselves into such a small but profitable corner that there is no way for them to get out. They can't adjust their policy positions, those policy positions are their stock in trade. They have made their own doom because they can't be anything else besides the no tax party without looking like they completely caved because they were on about it to such extremes.

                  Even John McCain, who was once someone else, became one of those once he began to run for President. It's the donors and the base, its the message. That's why they have to pose once more as the party of the rich like this and say that it's just the poor, what they are saying is 'We're the party of the rich'.

                  There really are no more rich Republicans than Democrats. Some of you would be astonished.

                    Reply#15 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:49 PM EST
                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.