Congress to make history -- but for the wrong reason

According to a recent Gallup poll, only 18% of Americans say they approve of the work this Congress has done -- so it's more than likely it won’t go down as one of the more popular congressional bodies. 

J. Scott Applewhite / AP

Construction continues on the viewing stands for President Barack Obama's January's Inauguration Day ceremonies, early Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

But with only weeks to go before it concludes, the 112th Congress (2011-2012) is on track to make another type of history. 

By passing just 196 bills into law so far, it is in the running to become the least productive Congress since the 1940s.

In fact, that amount is 710 fewer public laws than was produced by the 80th Congress (from 1947-48), which first earned the moniker "Do-Nothing" Congress.

The lack of legislation passed by Congress in recent years has become frustrating to many lawmakers. Outgoing Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) decided not to run for re-election because of the congressional gridlock, partisan politics, and lack of work being done on Capitol Hill. 

Rep.-elect Ann Kirkpatrick, D-Ariz., and Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis., talk about the possibility of a bipartisan deal to avoid the fiscal cliff.

“As I have long said, what motivates me is producing results for those who have entrusted me to be their voice and their champion, and I am filled with that same sense of responsibility today as I was on my first day in the Maine House of Representatives. I do find it frustrating, however, that an atmosphere of polarization and ‘my way or the highway’ ideologies has become pervasive in campaigns and in our governing institutions,” Snowe said in a statement announcing her retirement last February. 

The U.S. House Clerk’s office keeps official records of all congressional activity dating as far back as 1947. During those 65 years and 33 different Congresses, more than 20,000 public laws have been passed.

The 104th Congress (1995-1996) currently holds the record low for passing the fewest pieces of legislation since 1947 -- just 333 bills were passed into law during that two-year span.

A non-partisan group determined to fix the sky-rocketing national debt went to Capitol Hill Wednesday, meeting with both Republican and Democratic leaders. David Cote, chairman and CEO of Honeywell, was among the leaders and he recapped the meeting to NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

The 107th Congress (2001-2002) is next, passing only 377 new laws during its time in Washington.

To avoid earning the distinction as the least productive Congress since 1947, 138 bills must move through the House and Senate before the end of this Congress next month.

And with just 11 scheduled voting days left before the House’s target adjournment date for the year -- and with all eyes fixed on the looming fiscal cliff -- time is running out.

The number of bills passed into law by Congress since 1947:
80th: 906
81st: 921
82nd: 594
83rd: 781
84th: 1,028
85th: 936
86th: 800
87th: 885
88th: 666
89th: 810
90th: 640
91st: 695
92nd: 607
93rd: 649
94th: 588
95th: 634
96th: 613
97th: 473
98th: 623
99th: 664
100th: 713
101st: 650
102nd: 590
103rd: 465
104th: 333
105th: 394
106th: 580
107th: 377
108th: 498
109th: 482
110th: 460
111th: 383
112th: 196 (so far)   

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 8 9 10

And Obama is blaming the Republicans for the fiscal cliff. He says they will be responsible for the "middle class" getting higher taxes because they won't support raising taxes on a few that will do nothing to help the budget. Why is no one telling us that it is Obama who will be responsible for the tax increase because he absolutely must punish the wealthy for being wealthy. Class warfare at it's finest. If taxes go up, it wil be solely the result of Obama's do as I say or I'll bury you mentality. He will cause misery for the very people he pretends to care about because he is unwilling to compromise on anything. Go ahead libs, tell me anything your Community Organizer has compromised on.

  • 1 vote
Reply#243 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:33 PM EST

If you don't like the fact that hardly any bills were passed by this Congress blame both parties. The Hous passed a budget every year Republicians have been in control, yet the Senate (controlled by democrats) never allow the bills to come up for debate or a vote. Same with many jobs bills passed by the House. You democrats may not like any of the bills passed by Republicans in the House, but at least they passed legislation. The Senate has sat on its colective democrat ass for 2 years & done nothing.

    Reply#244 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:43 PM EST

    *cough* who elects congress members *cough* remember when SOPA and PIPA where up for vote and the amount of people that wrote their representitives and told them to stop. WRITE YOUR REPRESENTITIVES! Demand the people we elected do their job! I dont care if you agree with legislation or not but make them vote. put our representitives on record as voting yes or no for legislation so we can vote them out if they do not follow our wishes. stop the fillibuster stall tactic, VOTE and show your true colors. the people that voted for republicans want them to vote NO, not just sit their and prevent government from working. Democrats want government to function at a time when the U.S. is facing some of the biggest challenges it has in 80 years. write your representitives please, become part of the process, dont just cry about it, get involved and hold people accountable.

      Reply#245 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:54 PM EST

      If, as you say, Democrats want government to function, please explain why Harry Reid will not allow any Republican bill to come up for a vote in the Senate. Democrats do NOT want government to function. They only want to try to make Republicans look bad, and buy the votes of the masses with the hard-earned money of the taxpayer. So far they're doing a good job of it. Remember, even Robin Hood had to stop when there was no money left to steal.

      • 1 vote
      #245.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:28 PM EST
      Reply

      On another topic, but related to politics... It is no wonder so many people are misinformed or confused about what is actually going on with th eeconomy, when you read how the news is reported online.

      I just read two articles about the economy, and if you read the headlines, they both paint a rosy or promising picture that makes it seem like things are improving, but when you read the articles in full, you realize that it is totally the opposite.

      For example, the headline of one reads GDP up 2.7% in Third quarter, but then in reading the article, it shows that housing figures were downgraded, consumer spending has lowered, thereby making the headline a bit a porkie pie as my English friends are fond of saying.

      Next headline....Jobless claims fall for second straight week. Headline looks promising. In reading the article, it goes on to mention that the prior weeks numbers were actually adjusted upward (which will no doubt happen to this weeks figures) and goes on to mention that the four week moving average increased by 7,500.

      When you have news stories that put forth this kind of information, it is clear to see why so many are confused as to what is really going on.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#246 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:28 PM EST

      These stories are written by liberals for the consumption of the blind liberal masses. Like farmers feeding pork to pigs.

      • 1 vote
      #246.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:31 PM EST
      Reply

      "Least productive," "Do nothing 2," yes it all fits due to gross incompetence and ineptness on the part of John Boehner and Mitch McConnell.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#247 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:44 PM EST

      Harry Reid is the Senate majority leader, and he is the one that decides what is brough to the floor for a vote. Reid has shelved things that the House has sent to the Senate because Reid knows he doesnt have the support to get these bills passed.

      Instead of acting like a leader and working to see what can be done, he shelves the bill and then tries to place blame elsewhere.

      It is nothing more than a failure of leadership.

      • 1 vote
      #247.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:56 PM EST

      But don't stop with Harry. He's only doing his master's bidding.

      • 1 vote
      #247.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:32 PM EST

      Reid does bring them to the floor only to have them filibustered. Thus they aren't even able to be brought up for a vote.

        #247.3 - Sun Dec 2, 2012 12:45 PM EST
        Reply

        If we hate Congress so much why do we keep voting the same idiots back in to office? Are we that dependant on name recognition and completely lack independent thought?

          Reply#248 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:55 PM EST

          Its more of a matter of who is running, and in many places the incumbents are so entrenched, they run unopposed.

          Again.. Easiest sollution.... term limits.

            #248.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:06 PM EST
            Reply

            We need to cut off their salaries just like in any other business. If you don't do your job, you will not get paid and they should lose all of their benifits. Fire them all and start over. We will never miss any of them!

              Reply#249 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:04 PM EST

              Mullett

              Here is one better... Serve ONE term... lifetime pension and healthcare at the taxpayers expense, and they are EXEMPT from Obamacare.

                #249.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:15 PM EST
                Reply

                There's 535 people that hold our future in their hands.

                They are all being influenced by lobbyists and special interest groups who do not hold the same values as the tax paying public.

                Obviously we need to break that connection (ok it's a wish)

                We should hold their salaries and perks dependent on the economy, social welfare of the constituents, gdp as well as the unemployment numbers tied directly to their pay...If were doing @!$%#ty so are they.

                If were dooing great well they get paid good.

                Sounds tooo simple.

                  Reply#250 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:20 PM EST

                  That would be an interesting concept.

                  Contingent compensation. Screw the country up.... we the people screw your pay.... Help the country. We the people reward you for your effortc.

                  • 1 vote
                  #250.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:26 PM EST
                  Reply

                  You'd think being the worst (congress, movie, commericial, product) ever, would make one want to improve their reputation!

                  If I was the worst employee at my office, I'd expect the ax to fall.

                  Those people unwilling to work well with others, should be fired!

                    Reply#251 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:49 PM EST

                    Congress and past Presidents did little about illegal immigration, with the result we have now around 12.5 million, give or take a few million, of illegal immigrants. For the most part, states are stuck with medical care, education, transportation, infrastructure costs, etc and many states are close to broke. Congress failed to pass a budget the past 4 years. BOTH parties raided Social Security by paying other things with the money, while leaving worthless I.O.U.s. "Affordable" Health Care (Act) is not affordable, and will result in fewer doctors taking Medicare patients, and by taking 716 billion out of the program, medical care delivery will suffer, and patients will suffer. The law is grossly flawed and never should have seen the light of day. The real problems are the stupid voters who keep putting these guys and gals in office. Many of the legislative mistakes can be fixed, IF we find some people with a brain and willing to work a solution, but stupid, well, that is between difficult and impossible to fix.

                      Reply#252 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:45 PM EST

                      Congress is not by themselves, Obama will go down in history for all the wrong reasons

                        Reply#253 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:05 PM EST

                        Just like the Eagles?

                          #253.1 - Sun Dec 2, 2012 12:46 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Does it really matter what Congress does? Those bills need to be passed by the Senate, don't they? And Saint Harry is sitting on his thumb.

                            Reply#254 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:11 PM EST

                            Gridlock is good if it keeps Congress from passing laws that further raise taxes and limit freedom. The only time it is bad is when they can't keep tax cuts from expiring. I am all for a congress that can't do more damage to our country than it already has.

                              Reply#255 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:31 PM EST

                              The Congress only needs to pass ONE bill per year. A bill that limits and reduces the size, scope, and power of the Federal government down to it's bare Constitutional minimum. Also, perhaps a second bill, that requires every government worker, including Congress and the President, to live by the same laws they all pass....so if they pass an insane Health care law, they have to have that SAME coverage........not that public employee unions want that cheap coverage, since it's not the cadillac coverage they have now of course. We don't need a government as large as we have. There is fraud, deceit, bloated spending and waste in every department. For 100 years, we've had nothing but lazy presidents and congresses who refuse to analyze the budget with a fine tooth comb and eliminate the waste before they ask for more money. This Congress, both the GOP House, the Demo Senate, along with this Demo President are just as lazy if not more so than any in history.

                                Reply#256 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:19 AM EST

                                Since Congress and government generally make things worse, this is something to be proud of

                                  Reply#257 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:27 AM EST

                                  In business, if you do nothing, you don't get paid, and usually are shown the door.

                                  Throw all of these 'do nothing' congressman out onto the street. Our founding fathers never envisioned career politicians. They don't deserve any of the perks that they have created for themselves.

                                  I'll give odds of about 310 million to 535 that we can find plenty of people happy and willing to 'work' for less than these jokers even take home, not counting their obscene perks. And only for a 2 year term, with no chance of ever getting re-elected.

                                    Reply#258 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:57 AM EST

                                    What are they thinking? What we need is more bills passed, with more pork that grants more entitlements, that will cost us more tax dollars, that will raise the deficit even more... Cmon congress !! Do the Democratic thing !

                                      Reply#259 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:58 AM EST

                                      The less laws, the better ! more things change, the more messed up this country becomes. Look at homeland security to attest.

                                        Reply#260 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:01 PM EST

                                        And the Dem Senate doesn't want to have anything to do with bills sent to it from the house......Sounds like the word compromise was ripped from DC's dictionary.

                                          Reply#261 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:02 PM EST

                                          I agree with PC Paladin. Number of bills passed is a very poor metric. Fewer but smarter bills could actually do more good and create less harm.

                                            Reply#262 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:50 PM EST

                                            To all the LIbs out there. Every time a law is passed some of our freedom goes away with it. We have been a country since 1776. How many more laws do you think we need? the Congress should be a part time job not A CAREER. A Congress that does less means that they are intruding into our lives less. That would be a positive.

                                              Reply#264 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 3:52 PM EST

                                              Why do so many seem to think that MORE LAWS are somehow a good thing? Perhaps fewer laws that are better thought-out would be an improvement over a poorly-considered law that has to be tinkered with a half-dozen times to get rid of the unintended consequences.

                                              What does this flood of laws really, truly do for us? It makes lawyers wealthier, since they're the only ones who understand them...since they're also the ones who write them. As a group, not necessarily as individuals. A gang of lawyers write up documents only other lawyers can understand, but make all the rest of us subject to them regardless - and when we complain, we're told ignorance if the law is no excuse. We don't all have sixty and seventy hours a week to spend reading everything DC puts out, so as far as I'm concerned, the LESS they do, the BETTER. I don't care what side of the aisle they sit on, nobody in Congress is out to help you and me, they're out to keep the lawyers in effective control of this nation. Does anyone thing that a sovereign nation can be effectively governed by a group of people who can have an hours-long discussion of what the meaning of the word "is" might be? Or is it better to have people who realize that 22 laws that say the same doggone thing in slightly different ways are not a benefit to the nation, but rather a problem that should be addressed before some otherwise law-abiding citizen finds himself or herself facing years in jail for obeying the law from 3 years ago without realizing another law from 2 years ago effectively reversed the first law.

                                                Reply#265 - Tue Dec 4, 2012 4:12 PM EST
                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 8 9 10
                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.