Expanding on our election autopsy report in First Thoughts this morning about the white vote, since 1976, Democrats have never won white voters. Jimmy Carter, a Southerner, came the closest in 1976, winning 48% of it.
Since then, Democrats have ranged from 34% (Walter Mondale in 1984) to 44% (Bill Clinton in 1996).
Obama, in his first election, won 43% of the white vote, the second-highest number for a Democrat since Carter. His 39% in 2012 puts him further down the list of Democrats in the last 10 elections, but only slightly below the average 40.6% share for Democrats through the years.
But more significant: the white vote has become less important. The percentage whites make up of the electorate has steadily declined, from a high of 89% in 1976 to a low of 72% in 2012.
WHITE VOTE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
2012: 72% of electorate, Romney 59, Obama 39
2008: 74% of electorate, McCain 55, Obama 43
2004: 77% of electorate, Bush 58, Kerry 41
2000: 81% of electorate, Bush 55, Gore 42
1996: 83% of electorate, Dole 46, Clinton 44 (Perot 9)
1992: 87% of electorate, Bush 41, Clinton 39 (Perot 21)
1988: 85% of electorate, Bush 60, Dukakis 40
1984: 86% of electorate, Reagan 66, Mondale 34
1980: 88% of electorate, Reagan 56, Carter 36 (Anderson 8)
1976: 89% of electorate, Ford 52, Carter 48
AVERAGE DEMOCRATIC WHITE VOTE SHARE: 40.6%
TOP DEMOCRATIC WHITE-VOTE GETTERS IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
1. Carter (1976) - 48%
2. Clinton (1996) - 44
3. Obama (2008) - 43
4. Gore - 42
5. Kerry - 41
6. Dukakis - 40
7. Clinton(1992) – 39
7. Obama (2012) – 39
9. Carter (1980) – 36
10. Mondale – 34
SOURCE: Exit polls/Roper Center, University of Connecticut


Oh NOES!
One thing of significance which is missing and that is; none of the other Democrats were black!
I told my husband in 2008 that I believed a majority of this country had moved away from racists and bigots, do you have any idea how many times I've had to tell him I was wrong?
When was the last time 30+ states signed petitions for secession after their party lost to a black man for the second time?
And the WRNJ posters are getting fewer and fewer because of it! Love the phrase "election autopsy!" No wonder the GOP is falling all over themselves. They delivered a corpse of a candidate on election night.
Layton-3733410
Too bad that the death certificate states "Hurricane Sandy" and "Obama's free gifts" as the causes of death.
Feisty:
So Presidents Obama and Clinton had the same percentage of "white voters" in their re-election elections.
In any case, both are/were committed to looking out for ALL Americans.
................................................
As for "gifts": Romney's denigration of the fabled 47% was a gift. How bigoted can you get?
Good to see that many Republicans have renounced Romney's disgraceful words.
Wonder what you would have to say if 90+% of whites had voted for "The White Guy"?
Why are Identity Politics so important to Democrats?
The truth is the Democratic Party has the market cornered on bigotry. You folks can't seem to ever, and I mean ever, get past the color of a person's skin.
White Collar Auto
100% of whites voted for a white guy untill the 2008 election so what is your point?
How is this on par? Obama lost 4 percentage points and received far less than recent candidates and below the average and thats considered "on par". Sorry Backhouse but Obama didnt get the same as Clinton in his reelection. Did you notice that Clinton's percentage went up in his reelection and one of those people was me. This is nonsense. Of course race plays a factor in voting look at the black vote. Why not break this down by economics rather than race and see what happens? Why is that such a bad thing to state? The role of government should be a discussion because of the polarization caused by both candidates. We should talk about income inequality and we are having a national discussion about what a "fair share" of tax paid by wealthy. On the other side we should have a discussion about the role of government assistance and the problems of having 50% of the taxpayers in this country not funding any revenue into the federal income tax coffers. We need to have a discussion on the role of government assistance in how it impacts self reliance and income mobility. Why is that such a dirty topic to you Obama supporters?
What does this have to do with the price of fish?
The white vote will continue to lose significance as our demographic numbers trend toward 'minority' voters. Those voters with African, Asian and Hispanic roots will soon be the majority in the U.S.
Which political party understands and accepts that? Which political party has policies and plans to educate and assimilate immigrants and the poor, to help them become productive, employed members of our society and to become the next generation of American leaders?
This is one of the most important issues we face. We must be prepared for this future, all of us, no matter what our race, religion or ethnicity.
Here we go again...another 4 years of "white vs. black vs. rich vs. poor et all". What a divided Nation we've become with more yet to be.
Pathetic.
way to avoid the question.
you answered the question and its the continued erosion of the American melting pot. Wonder whats going to happen if democrats pander too hard for the hispanics or too hard for blacks or asians or gays. eventually some of these 'grievance' groups will take offense to eachother, just a matter of time. It will come back and bite them in their rear
People do not dislike Obama because of his color. Republicans hate the Dems, Dems hate the repubs. Color is not an issue. It is the platform that person stands for in their eyes.
These are directly related to each other. Unfortunately, income inequality is exactly what the right want, so discussions on solving it will never be entertained.
What are you saying then, WCA? Why did 39% of white voters re-elect Obama? Was our decision to vote for Obama based on the color of his skin?
Get real.
Now that the election is over, yes, let's have that conversation. The GOP would have made an ugly, divisive issue out of it, as Romney proved in his '47%' comment.
Perhaps when the GOPTP can give a justified explanation as to why CEOs merit a 250% pay raise, while the working class merits a reduction in pay, then we can have a rational discussion on the rich vs. the poor. It is a case they can't make, but will try like hell to legislate, which the GOPTP found just wasn't to the liking of the majority of Americans.
Yep another 4 years of "I disagree" Racist!!!
Obama won the election because Romney was promising JOBS to people that do not want to WORK........
But, he was beyond par for the message he had and the personal appeal (Without insults to all the other groups) ! Instead Romney said the 47% didn't matter and he didn't care about them. Then his ads. trying to win them back and offer something, but his message had no specifics! Then O'Reilly saying it was the media's fault and then Romney again with his "Obama bought the voters!" What a sick and disgusting party. I'm glad I left it in the 80's.
Romney lost the election because he was a world class liar and flip-flopper.
It was on display for anyone with Google and half a brain to see.
But I guess that leaves out people like Steve and all the rwnj's trying to make up excuses. What free gifts did Obama give out? I want to know. I'm a supporter and I didn't get any gifts. I want one of those mythical Obama phones.
Steve - your post is nonsense which even the heads of the Republican party are now refuting. Many of us who work hard and make a good income voted for President Obama. And, of those receiving government assistance, probably 95% would love to work if they could find jobs.
To continue to post the nonsense you are shows you learned absolutely nothing during the election. You just continue to spout lies and idiotcy!
It just shows you that if Republicans don't get more people under their tent, then they won't be winning Presidential elections.
Also, the autopsy didn't say anything about how out of touch Romney was with the middle class.
"Of course race plays a factor in voting look at the black vote."
@Kirk-2957282, Sorry to disappoint you but blacks have been voting for non black democratic candidates at high percentage rates for years. Al Gore got 90% of the black vote and last time I checked he was a white guy. Clinton was supported by blacks at around 82 to 83 percent. People keep assuming that black people voted for Obama because he is black. If you think that black people would have voted for a black republican with the same policies as Romney/GOP then you really are naive. The GOP started off by calling the first black President the "food stamp President". This was highly offensive to most black people. I won't even get into all the questions about his birth/citizenship, transcript, etc... Romney was such a bad candidate that he got less black votes than McCain. Hell McCain/Palin/Tea Party had rallies that had people walking around with toy gorillas with nooses around the neck. Why would many black voters ever vote Republican after seeing that?
Steve . . .
Really? I'm sure all of the Democratic posters on these boards reviewed Mitt's website and so-called plans. We never saw where he was promising ANYTHING nor did the rest of the country. Perhaps you can show us all whatever it is you got that little fact from. The fact of the matter is Mitt was a very poor candidate and he lost because he had NOTHING to offer.
Oh and if you RWNJs continue to spew that the Democratic party is made up of people that don't work and just want handouts, I'd so suggest you look into all of your red states - that's where your welfare "queens" reside.
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-08-18/politics/30039546_1_blue-states-federal-taxes-red-states
The Progressive agenda, this says it all:
Obama was re-elected in 2012, and the United States is finished. The following is in simple language that everyone can understand. Not the gibberish that our government keeps telling people. Please read this carefully and make sure you keep this message going. This needs to be emailed to everyone in the USA.
Barack Hussein Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos—thereby destroying capitalism andour country from within.
Look at his Czars - anti-business - anti-American. As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Barack Hussein Obama isfollowing the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the systemwith government spending and entitlement demands.
Add up the clues below. Taken individually they’re alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government.
Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.
UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE.
The health care bill had very little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama doesn’t care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national debt.
What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a depression?
CAP AND TRADE.
Like health care legislation having nothing to do withhealth care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government controlof the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama’s biggest contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which ownsNBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants. They will kickback hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses help Obama “spread the wealth around.”
MAKE PUERTO RICO A STATE.
Why? Who’s asking for a 51st state? Who’s asking for millions of new welfare recipients and governmententitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But this has been Barack Hussein Obama’s plan all along. His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.
LEGALIZE 12 MILLION ILLEGAL MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS.
Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be countedon to support big government. Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, andeventually Social Security.
STIMULUS AND BAILOUTS.
Where did all that money go? It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions—including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees couldkeep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues). All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect theirbloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America. The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.
RAISE TAXES ON SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS, HIGH-INCOME EARNERS, AND JOBCREATORS.
Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Barack Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition. With the acts outlined above, Barack Hussein Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming thesystem.
Add it up and you’ve got the perfect Marxist scheme—all devised bymy Columbia University college classmate Barack Hussein Obama using the Cloward and Piven Plan.
Barack Hussein Obama was my college classmate (Columbia University, class of ‘83). He is a devout Muslim, do not be fooled.
OBAMA’S COLLEGE CLASSMATE SPEAKS OUT, By Wayne Allyn Root, June 6th, 2010
those who work for a living are now outnumbered by those who vote for a living
OK, 1976, President Jimmy Carter won 48% of the white vote. Unless I missed it in FR's "autopsy", what happened in 1980 was Ronald Reagan and the "southern strategy". Reagan began the "welfare queen" chatter, began the white victimization strategy--it's affirmative action that cost a job or a slot at college, it's those evil unions which caused jobs to be outsourced overseas, it's those other people that are driving down wages, etc.--none of which is true or ever was true. It was all a political strategy. American demographics were already shifting in 1976. The southern strategy worked fairly well for the GOP for years but now, as Bush 43 recognized in 2004, Romney and other republicans discovered in 2008, and again in 2012, banking on the white vote isn't necessarily going to put them in the win column.
And then there's 1funnygirl spouting nonsense; and Caesar proving that Reagan and the GOP have been successful with their base in painting all those "others" as lazy, no goods who never work which is the biggest lie of all.
"Election Autopsy"........How then do Republicans intend to win the WH? Texas I strongly believe could be in play as early as 2016, yes 2016 and that's the killer right there. It's really getting rough out there.
Oh my, desperate - copying an opinion article from 2010 from a self-avowed conservative Obama hater, someone who never met or ever knew of Obama while at Columbia. Tell us again, how would this person claim to know he was a Muslim?
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/overwhelm.asp
1funnygirl
Yikes, such doom and gloom .... you might become, shudder, like Canada: peaceful, free, healthy, educated and economically sound.
1funny -
Wayne Allyn Root - posterboy for what is so WRONG with the GOP!
http://rootforamerica.com/
Wayne Allyn Root - wanna be Kardashian ... apparently he'll do just about ANYTHING for his 15 minutes ...
notsofunnygirl (and clearly not intelligent) so you post the rantings and ravings of a libertarian who is a Fox news contributor. Wow! Great credentials there and certainly the person EVERYONE with integrity would quote! NOT!
bcwc and Layton - oooooh be careful. Remember notsofunny works for the military and has already threatened me!!!
Got that knock on your door yet, notsofunny? Tick tock!
So even if unemployment is in the 20's% like every arm chair economist thinks - that still leave 3/4 left that works. I know math is hard for you
Can someone point me in the direction to find President Obama's plans for his second term that is any different than his first term plan than never materialized.
Also is there any plans for a budget at anytime during his presidency?
Funny Girl, you listen to Glen Beck. Enough said.
Mike with your 'I can go degree to degree with you all day', explain how they (GOV) account for unemployment again? So how many are on Gov assistance in comparison to UE? Come on I know you can do it.
Besides it wasnt my quote, but the message itself is telling. Enjoy your 'I love me wall'.
He claimed he went to Columbia with Obama. Did he ?? He never seen Obama ?? So he lied that he went to Columbia with Obama . Probably he himself never went there. Besides if he had went and never met him did he meet every student that was in that college.
The great thing about this last election is that liberals won. So now what? Liberals haven't shown they have any answers to the nations problems, and after jacking up taxes, borrowing, and spending even more this country will be on the brink of financial collapse within 4 years. The stage is set for the end of liberalism in this country. Of course the country is going to pay a heavy price to wake people up, as nothing Obama has proposed will keep the national debt under 20 trillion by the end of his second term. Unless all of Washington stops taking stupid pills, the entire nation is in for a rough four more years.
It really is time to take a polls of Obama supporters to find out what percentage think that raising taxes on the top earners is going to wipe out the deficit. Maybe Obama supporters haven't noticed that no Democrat controlled Congress has put forth a balanced federal budget in over 40 years. The Republican controlled Congress gave Clinton his balanced budget for part of his term. Likewise no Republican president has signed a balanced budget in almost 50 years. So it is really funny that now liberals feel the Democrats are poised to do something they haven't done for over 40 years.
The Republican obsessiveness with the "white" vote is their downfall, not to mention the rhetoric about "welfare queens", they have totally dis-regarded the other people that make up the citizenry of this Country, and their Ethnic Heritage. They have put the blinders on, unwilling to recognise the changing face of the electorate of this Nation, and until they come to the realization that the demographics ARE changing, they are in trouble. And until Republicans as a whole, stop lumping ALL Democrats into the "takers" category, this country will REMAIN divided !!........ BTW, Layton & Feisty, LOVE the new Avatars !! I'm a cat lover myself !
mojotech ...
I'm not going to go through the list of all of the President's accomplishments. All of the posters here have spent the past year doing just that. You can Google can't you? As to your second question regarding plans for his second term ... here's a little article from the Journal ... you should accept it as a source since your poster girl Peggy works there.
I know that the majority of Americans are not racists but the election of a black President just emboldened and pissed off the ones that are.
In 2016 or by 2020 at the latest when TX becomes a swing state along with AZ the Electoral Map becomes a serious problem for Republicans as Democrats will only need to carry 12 states to win.
CA@55 + TX@38 + NY@29 + FL@29 + PA@20 + IL@20 + OH@18 + MI@16 + NJ@14 + VA@13 + MA@12 + WI@10 = 274
That does not even include the other 12 reliable "Blue" States that are another 70 Electoral Votes or the other 46 Electoral Votes from the remaining Swing States.
Total Electoral Votes in play for Democrats = 390 (49 more than this year)
The road to 270 for Democrats will become much easier and with many more options than for Republicans.
Do tell us Caesar, exactly who was president when the republicans crashed our economy?
Do tell us what republican party has voted against jobs for Americans every chance they got?
Then after the republicans crashed our economy and then voted against jobs for years, Caesar would have you blame anyone but the republicans who actually caused the recession and high unemployment.
Grow up and quit hating and lying to us. Election is over and you lost and all your repeated lies don't do anything to impress the rest of us with brains.
What the republicans don't want you to know is that all the free stuff the republicans talk about is usually called freedom. You know the freedom to decide about your own body and health care, the freedom to vote and the freedom to decide for yourself who you want to marry. Yes that is the free stuff the republicans are trying to take away from the people, your freedom.
I want one more freedom, the freedom from being lied to by the republicans who would divide our country so they can regain power for their rich 1% campaign donors.
1funnygirl
then pack your bags and move wherever Mr. Offshoring Pioneer Romney tells you to go...
Seeking Sanity--you dont have to call everyone stupid on here anymore the election is over. Just prove them wrong with your brain. Try it and you might find something nice about yourself. Or maybe not but at least try.
Reddev--no they arent connected. Income inequality is not connected to tax policy. If you havent noticed that most taxes on the wealthy (not the superwealthy but the working professionals) either get passed on in terms of increased fees to their clients or they reduce consumption and retain the same net take home pay. In addition, the CBO based on common sense no less, showed that income inequality is due to the education gap, immigration and government entitlement programs transfering wealth from our young workers to our wealthy seniors. You cant use the CEO example because it makes no sense. If a CEO got a larger pay increase, maybe he increased the revenue or net profits to the company thereby increasing the net worth or value of the company many times more thna his salary enriching you in your 401k plan. You act like a CEO making money offends you. Does it bother you that Albert Pujols signed a big contract or that someone else got a big basketball deal and then was a bust? It happens and the anamolies you guys like to point out are not what rules and policy should be based on.
Kaybeetoys and others who point out that the GOP has done everything to offend minorities in their political posturing, speech and actions. I agree that in many instances thats true and I agree that AFrican Americans have been voting democrat for a while before Obama. What I dont get is that there is a difference between political pandering and speech and actual policies. It seems to me that its actual democratic policies that prevent education reform and retain the education gap for african americans and latinos. Its democratic policies that allow greater and greater illegal immigration depressing wages and preventing income mobility for the middle class. Its democratic policies that dont incent or foster family units that have created the environment for 70% of african american babies to be born to single mothers ensuring them a life of poverty and generational welfare. Its democrat economic policies that have eliminated self reliance and personal accountability for the choices one makes in life thereby preventing upward economic mobility. How have african americans fared over the last 4 years in terms of poverty rates and unemployment and how have whites done? Obama might talk a big game but his policies have benefited whites more. How has Obama leveled the playing field except to promise to take away from one to give to another?
The GOP lost more then this Election, they lost the respect of the American People, this party is finish !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course the Country is divided. Republicans are the party of "The Exploiters", or, "Takers". Democrats represent, and are, the party of "The Exploitee's", or "Prey". Race and ethnicity of non whites historically are, in one way or another, for most, "prey". "Whites", on the other hand, majority of 'em, are those who think "takers" hold the right to do so, and either commit themselves to that task, or, support other whites who do, even when many of these whites are themselves being preyed upon by the very takers they support. Keeps their race strong and pure.
Blacks have been voting for non-black democrats at a 90% rate for years, unless they run against a black candidate (hillary 15% + or - and Obama 85% + or -). Two dems one black one white one un-proven and inexperienced, the other the wife of a former president who was called the first black president and they voted based on what?
Race.
The GOP Tea Loonies resemble the likes of Russ Limbaugh !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kirk-2957282
it is if you are talking about take-home pay. Income is not taxed based on the earned amount because deductions alone are not equal for all: people who have no children, no spouses, no mortgage, etc. will always take home less than those who do.
Now, if you take into account the fact that "regular" people don't have access to loopholes, deferrals, offshore accounts, offshore addreses, etc., you will see that take-home pay is not fair to the rest of us who don't have the capabilities of manipulating our incomes.
To dispute your claim I will refer to one person: Mitt Romney. In order to pay HIGHER tax rate, Mr. Romney had his accountants manipulate his charitable deduction so that he would not claim what's allowable by law. Why, do you ask? If he paid less than what he already showed (after his maniulation of #'s), his claim that the rich are overtaxed would have been disputed by his own taxes.
But I can guarantee you that Romney's accountants are working on fixing that overpayment already.
It's time for the Tea Loonies to go on a hunting trip with Dick Cheney, problem solved !!!!!!!!
obama won for two reasons – he received the majority of the black vote (there goes the “they don’t vote on skin color” idea) and because he pulled in psychologists and a ton of data to tell him how best to reach you. He told you want you wanted to hear in a very methodical way. Hispanics wanted to be told that their family members who are here illegally would be allowed to stay, the young women wanted to hear that they could get free birth control and access to abortions, those who have CHOSEN not to work wanted to hear that they would not lose their ability to collect benefits, the greedy wanted to hear that it was not only acceptable to bash those with more but that it is ok to covet what they have, etc. obama is very charismatic but that only means he can talk a good line of bs. He can also lie with the best of them.
take your own advice first. 'we won you lost' how grown up of you
again who has had predominate control of the purse strings since? why is it we're six years in and still nothing? Why is it that you guys blame bush and republicans yet do nothing to start the healing process? Why is it that democrats want one party rule?
Also health care isnt free even in Europe.
I want another Freedom too RAF, the freedom of not being told what to do by pompous libs who are intolerant to any view out of their own. I want the freedom of being successful and not being demonized by it. I want the freedom of not bearing the burden of the takers, the freedom to choose to help someone who wants help.
Bayliee--that is just nonsense. Romney didnt manipulate anything and regular people dont pay any income tax that need loopholes, deferrals and such. Romney is like Warren Buffet and there are very few people that make that kind of money and taxing them more is not going to change things. I dont have any issue with that. But lets set the record straight. Having money offshore doesnt reduce your taxes. Individuals are taxed on worldwide income. Second, so what if he had money offshore. Should it bother Germany that a rich resident has money with Chase or Bank of America? That is just stupid. Last, Romney's low rate was because much of his money was made as an investor and thus taxed at capital gains rates because those earnings were already taxed inside the corporation. We have a two level of tax system which is why we tax dividends and capital gains at lower rates. Charitable contributions are deducted by regular people too Bayliee. But if you want to get rid of all loopholes, deductions such as the mortgage deduction and child care credits and make it fair, simple and progressive but fair to everyone I think thats what Romney wanted to do.
But my original point doesnt apply to the super wealthy. It applies to the working wealthy. Sorry but a doctor making 300,000 a year will pay more in tax alot more by the way. He will either pass those rates on to his patients or consume less which will really just be a job killer and hurt everyone. Its not like the doctor isnt already paying his fair share.
Patriotic American--your right 49% and 60 million votes. The GOP party is gone, history never to be seen again.
Seeking Sanity,
What a blow-hard you are. Now I'm making threats to you. Listen old girl, one last time. I do not work for the military.
You preface yourself as a person who knows what is right and wrong in the world, but your liberal progressive statements show your ignorance. Time and time again.
So miss wonderful, just how intelligent are you? I happen to speak my native language, Russian, Pashto and Dari, in addition to reading each language. Other than liberal bull$sh!t, how intelligent are you.
All you do old lady, is be critical of thinking other than the liberal bent.And deary, you can thicky-tock all you want - you are nothing more than a blithering idiot. Your choice for Prez. won, but you and your liberal thinkers continue to want to place everyone in a demographic. Why, so your progressive minds can channel and attack someone?
For those other liberal thinkers on the site, I can care less what your beliefs lie. The climate shifted to the left, as cycles will. When your group is done butchering the economy, the cycle will again change. It happened after the four terms of FDR, the years of Nixon, the years of the Bushes and Billy-Bob Clinton and it will after Obama.
But unfortunately for the nation, we may be going over the cliff with the Obama policies. I laugh when I hear him state he has a mandate from the people - those 50% who voted for him. Don't forget the other 48% and the 2% who didn't. A 50% rate isn't a mandate.
But Sanity, keep running off at the mouth with your progressive statements. You are a joke of a human and always will be. Go out and sell some real-estate and build up your wealth so you too may share in higher taxes.
Anybody but me tired of reading the same old right wing crap day after day? Get something new and this time make it true. The girl poster is and idiot because we have seen what she posted word for word so many times I can recite the whole thing from memory and have pointed out the right wing blog that posted that crap. Doint the same thing over and over and thinking you will impress someone with it may also be a definition of gross stupidity.
1funngirl . . .
Nor do we care about your beliefs or your opinions. Quoting FOX contributors, definitely shows how much you "think" for yourself.
Steve-
"Romney was promising JOBS to people that do not want to WORK"
Tax cuts for millionaires does not equal "promising Jobs". There is no evidence that cutting taxes on millionaires produces jobs. That is a GOP fantasy.
and then there are those who cut and paste the impressions of those left-leaning web sites, and that is alright to do. If that racists and bigot Bev from Chicago didn't have her liberal sites to quote, she'd be as lost as you, who sits and is critical of leaning other than Progressive.
layton, you do make me laugh. almost as much as the corporate leader, seeking sanity, who is a great BS'er without merit.
A Duke grad huh, Seeking. Let's hear of the neighborhood and the important spots around campus to determine if you really are or not. I suggest you are nothing more than an windbag. How about proving me wrong?
1funnygirl, ... nope, given your copy and past post, I would say you're the one running off at the mouth, because 3/4 of your post has been debunked on a variety of fact checking sites. I would highly suggest for you to double check your facts prior to posting, of course you can always list your sources... Somehow I doubt you can come up with the the independent sources that fact checked.
It is also clear that you made up your mind prior as to how others are, so then what is your point other than being a drunk and calling others drunk??? A joker calling another a joker, a thief trying to incriminate others????
You do know that your reaction is that of a typical TeaPaty... accuse and personal attacks??? what a joke... Can you say Jill Kelly? Funny? nope... a joke perhaps.
Feisty, I believe petitions have been file in all 50 states. In additoin, the city Austin filled secession petition from the State of Texas to join United States of America.
Democrats are immature, republicans are stupid and independents are gutless.
Democracy failed for the athenians. So far, the constitution has enabled us to keep limping along.
I signed the secession petition and bought a bumper sticker, not that I think that state government is better by nature but better because it is smaller. The best government is the littlest one.
Just something true to throw out, PEW says that FOX news is the least biased. You can look it up unless you are too stupid to google, "PEW FOX news."
Bravo, 1funnygirl. Seeking is the epitome of liberal progressive "thinkers". They dont realize that taxing the wealthy wont get us out of this mess. The only way out is cuts, cuts to everything from social welfare to the military, and Im in the military. Cut it like a barber shop. If the wealthy needs more skin in the game, then so does everyone else.
turd (how appropriate) -
Fact checking sites such as: moveon.org, factcheck.org and snopes? All progressive windbag websites. Post something from a site that isnt biased and we will see how "educated" you really are.
Raff,
The only resource for those spending progressives, is more taxes to pay for the spending.
Now the Left likes to quote the CBO often, and didn't the CBO just put a price tag on the ObamaCare program of $2.7T or so? Now how many of those evil rich people and their earnings will reduce this number? And this is in addition to the already number of $T's this administration has rung up.
Now Seeking Sanity is proud of her Duke education.....perhaps Sanity, you can elighten us all as to what steps are necessary to reduce government waste, the deficit, reckless spending and the like.
How 'bout it Seeking? Let us hear your enlightened thoughts.
IWonder ...
I don't need to google it. I truly believe it. They make up their OWN facts and figures so it doesn't qualify AS news. For the weather snippets, hey they're probably spot on. I do enjoy Fox Sports.
HA crickets
Why is it that when its from FOX news, its biased bull$hit, but when its from MSDNC, its gospel from God? Could you liberals be any more hypocritical?
blackcatwhitecat (#1.28) You might however wish to notice that the budget deficit of the Canadian federal government for fiscal year 2012-1013 is 26 billion dollars as opposed to the 1.4 TRILLION dollars of the Obama budget (that doesn't actually exist because the Democratic Senate hasn't passed one). The conservative party in Canada also has a defined plan to balance their budget by 2016. Canada also has a population approximately one tenth the size of the US population.
Stop comparing apples and washing machines.
joemike in Ikarus' (Blackcatwhitecat's) defense, he lives in the UK. of course if you compare the budgets of say Russia or say Indonesia or Pakistan (comparative populaces) we might get apples and oranges. see for accurate comparisons I would suspect you would also need comparable economies.
Yep layton, I do believe you need to google it.
No thanks, IWonder. PEW was such a great poll for the Republicans this past election. I beg to differ and shall pass.
well Layton believe MSNBC is purely objective with fine journalism. Look at FR for example
Kirk-2957282
The most striking part of the announcement is that Romney chose to forego $1.75 million in charitable deductions available to him in 2011 in order to ensure that his tax rate would be at least 13 percent
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-22/mitt-is-overpaying-his-taxes-for-now.html
so the only other explanation (if Romney did not manipulate) is that he is stupid and incompetent. Are you saying Romney is stupid and incompetent??????
If you are so enamored by smaller governments, why not pack up and move to a country with a small government, like Afghanistan, Yemen, Oman or any other number of countries controlled by terrorists. Surely, that would make you happy.
Caesar, you don't know squat about what I believe so don't speak for me. I did answer the question in a post below for someone that wasn't, well, you!
LRedDevPS
rich vs. poor et all". What a divided Nation we've become
Sorry you're "poor"....maybe the Hostess Company could have helped you...Oops, they're gone in the Obama twilight years. More to come.
Layton - that poll is hysterical. Nothing about fair and balanced. It is a poll on negative vs. positive stories on the candidates. You will likely be shocked and fall off your stool to find that Fox ran fewer negative stories about Romney vs. NBC. IWonder (tsk, tsk) how anyone could fail to see the hilarity of that poll, or fail to see how the horribly run Romney campaign generated negative publicity.
Oh, so now Obama caused Hostess to close. Really, it had nothing to do with the miserably failed policies of management - you know, those guys paid to run the company? I think you are better off blaming Bush - even the GOP now blame Bush.
Democrats point it out...clearly Republicans practice it.
Raff: interesting response. I did not suggest those sites. So why are you whinning like a wimp and avoiding coming up with facts and fact check sites?
If you suggesting that those are Democrat biased fact check sites, then please use or list Republican fact check sites? Wait.... is that a retorical question???? LOL
LIAR, LIAR PANTS ON FIRE... still the same-o-same Republican MO, divert and make personal attacks... LOL
African-Americans account for 12.6 % of the population. Were it not for the number of white voters voting for the President he wouldn't have won.
You really learned nothing from defeat. Good luck in 2016...ROFLMAO!
like i said libs, eventually youre going to have to start acting on things instead of blaming everything under the sun.
thats interesting considering how you continually speak for everyone outside your liberal dystopia. Seriously you hate Fox because it falls outside of the MSNBC world of thinking. talk about making up facts.
here are some fun info on FOX and its relationship with its viewers;
A study by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of Maryland School of Public Affairs, as published in the Winter 03-04 issue of the Political Science Quarterly, reported that poll-based findings indicated that viewers of Fox News, the Fox Broadcasting Company and local Fox affiliates were more likely than viewers of other news networks to hold three purported misperceptions:
In response, Fox News frequent guest Ann Coulter characterized the PIPA findings as "misperceptions of pointless liberal factoids" and called it a "hoax poll." Bill O'Reilly called the study "absolute crap." Roger Ailes referred to the study as "an old push poll." James Taranto, editor of OpinionJournal.com, the Wall Street Journal's online editorial page, called the poll "pure propaganda." PIPA issued a clarification on October 17, 2003, stating that "The findings were not meant to and cannot be used as a basis for making broad judgments about the general accuracy of the reporting of various networks or the general accuracy of the beliefs of those who get their news from those networks. Only a substantially more comprehensive study could undertake such broad research questions," and that the results of the poll show correlation, but do not prove causation.
"do not prove causation": In another words... PIPA is suggesting that the FOX viewers are either more stupid or more gulliable. I don't think it is good in either case.
LOL...
Funnygirl, when you cite Glenn Beck on anything, including the price of gas, you give yourself away as a crazy conspiracy theorist.
Glenn Beck's schtick--for which he is very well paid, and that's the entire reason he does it-- involves inciting the gullible with dire warnings of impending doom. He's got an entertaining sideshow, but no one with any sense takes him seriously.
Put down that koolaid, girl. Or whatever it is. Get an education and learn to think for yourself. For gawd's sake, turn off Glenn Beck! He'll rot your brain faster than crystal meth.
Funnygirl
Worth repeating.....
Been following all the Benghazi 'kerfuffle', and still haven't heard anyone address this:
So what, if it came out on the day it happened, it turned out to be terrorists vs. protesters?
Forget Rice. Forget the # of deaths- they would be the same, regardless of who did it.
I'm serrious- What different path would the white house have taken in the hours/days immediately following the incident had it been known it was terrorists or if it had been protesters? Once you have the answer to that, then I want to know how differently you would expect Mitt, McCain or anyone else to have carried on had THEY been in the driver's seat??
All I seem to hear on the 'downstream' media is- Obama downplayed the SOURCE of the attack so as to somehow gain a' political advertizing advantage'. It seems to be thier only focus and (not-so-realistic) concern.
Fill me in, folks.....
"Put down that koolaid, girl. Or whatever it is. Get an education and learn to think for yourself. For gawd's sake, turn off Glenn Beck! He'll rot your brain faster than crystal meth."
I was thinking more along the lines of Purple Haze or Windowpane, but Meth would seem to explain it as well. Thing is, Dems would rather have folks know HOW to think, instead of WHAT to think. So, therefore, to folks like FG, getting an education is somehow the work 'subversives', or even....Oh, I don't know....could it be......SATAN ????
Kirk, there are limits on what government policy can do. No government policy can re-make the social landscape in a free country where individuals have 95% of the responsibility for how their lives turn out. I'm surprised that you don't understand and accept that, as it's a cornerstone of Republican ideology.
Drive-by...I think you laid it all out very clearly. Nothing to add.
Funnygirl
Worth repeating.....
~Mahatma Gandhi,
Ever notice how everything is always about "Race" with the Obama Corporate Media Sponsors and never about his "deeds"?
Forget the fact Obama has his own acknowledged "Personal" Kill List.......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7W0PONlcI8
Forget the fact Obama Demanded the Power of Indefinite Detention of American Citizens without Trial.......
http://www.infowars.com/federal-court-rules-in-favour-of-indefinite-detention-of-us-citizens/
Forget the fact that Obama then even denied that he had demanded this Power....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DNDHbT44cY
Forget the fact that Obama has increased the National Debt more that all other Presidents Combined without benefiting anyone but the Banksters on Wall Street.....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/17/neil-barofsky-obama-wall-street-reforms_n_1973280.html
Just remain focused on the fact that Obama is "Half Black" and call anyone who disagrees with him for ANY reason a "Racist"!
The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness. ...This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.~Plato
I agree with Gandhi, MUW...and so do other Americans who refused to be swayed by the lies and greed of the Republican candidate for president, Willard M. Romney.
Hmm...sounds like Plato was talking about the George W. Bush/ Dick Cheney administration.
Obama is not evil and he is not a tyrant. Go back to sleep, MUW.
what if is always a fun game it lib land eh Buzz? What if there wasnt high unemployment? What if there was world Peace? What if we all had large mansions and living wages of 30 bucks an hour. Yeah 'Buzz' What IF.
No he is Obama the Merciful. Speaking of sleep, would seem our KBtoys is in dreamland.
Obama's a heck of a lot more merciful than that axe-man the GOP wanted to foist on us! Don't pretend otherwise.
Well yes, in a manner of speaking. It's a dream come true for Obama to have FOUR MORE YEARS!!!!!
"...what if is always a fun game it lib land eh Buzz? What if there wasnt high unemployment? What if there was world Peace? What if we all had large mansions and living wages of 30 bucks an hour. Yeah 'Buzz' What IF...."
As God is my witness, CA, I had no idea you were one of the people that were running the Mitt Romeny campaign. I really had no idea.
My apologies, pal.
mmmmmMMMMMMmmmm.....Barack HUSSEIN Obama.......
(share that with your friends over at the DownSteam media outlet EIB, wouldja? You will? Thanks so much, CA - yer a peach!)
Fiesty Redhead
It's not about racist's, bigots or black's, it's about FREE STUFF and Obama used this, as YOU well know, to win reelection.
Prepare yourself for the time when your friend will say, I TRIED TO TELLYOU.
Caesar, what exactly is the point you're trying to get to? Don't understand where you are going with all your whinning?... No one lied... They did not identify the problem as quick as you would have liked. It happened on foreign soil, and our intell is not confirmed. DO YOU PREFER TO BE LIED TO? SUCH AS WMD IS IN THE HOUSE? OR URANIUM IS IN THE HOUSE? SHOOT FIRST AND QUESTION LATER?
?simply tossing things about and hope something sticks...?
"...Again, what is your point?... like I said, you and the rest of the wing nuts are simply tossing things about and hope something sticks... SHAMESLESS AND GUTLESS...."
Shhhhssss.....'thturd'...... (he thinks he's Senator McCain...)
kkwilson, no we don't know what free stuff you and Mitt are referring to. Would you care to explain it, since you put it out there?
Now Kaybee we have already had the discussion about listening to "Delusional Toys"! As I said before Obamney or Romba it makes no difference....They are both owned by Wall Street!
Psst though I did notice you did address any of "Facts" I posted links about "Obama's Lies and other Deviant Behavior instead you merely spewed silly nonsense.
Psst Richard Nixon also was Re-Elected for a second term and then within 18 months resigned rather than face be Impeached. Do I believe "Barry" will resign? Absolutely Not....
Richard Nixon at least had Honor to Resign which is more than anyone can say about Wall Streets latest "Obomination"!
Impeach Obama over Benghazi-Gate, 8 New Not Wars, & NDAA 2012!
A 'No' uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a 'Yes' merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble. ~Mahatma Gandhi
We are all minorities. Let us get along.
So did 100% of blacks.
When was the last time 30+ states signed petitions for secession after their party lost to a black man for the second time?
omfg you dumb bitch, I am so sick of being called racist because I didn't vote for obama again. I swear to @!$%#ing god you dumb @!$%#ing liberals can't get the @!$%# over that he sucks as a president and some of us just plain don't like him. Not because of his skin, because he SUCKS as a president.
You all are the most racist @!$%#ing people I know, YOU are the ones that can't get past skin color. His skin color was never a problem for me, but obviously is for you.
Go play in traffic.
Th turd
Food stamps, housing subsidies, free health insurance etc., and for you it would be free preparation H.
I keep checking my mailbox every day, but no free stuff! When did you get yours, kkk?
kkk, your friend is trying to tell you that everything is going to be O.K. Chill out and relax before you make yourself crazy.
Amen to that, brother! (or sister?)
Whoa...somebody isn't happy.
Please explain how Obama's skin color is a 'problem' for all of us white people who voted for him, twice.
"Impeach Obama over Benghazi-Gate, 8 New Not Wars, & NDAA 2012!".... ROFLMAO
AlexM, no one called you a racist because you didn't vote for President Obama. They called you a racist, becuase of your racist comments and prejudice statements... Why can't you defend your position base on facts other than resort to claiming reverse racism... WEAK! WEAK! in case you didn't hear me the 1st time.
kkwilson . . .
Please tell me what Mitt's FREE STUFF is exactly? The President presented an agenda for the country. Mitt Romney cried in his proverbial "beer." There is no free stuff. Everything comes with a cost. For all of you thinking that Medicaid is easy breezy to get, I would so suggest that you get a job helping people get entitlements. It's not an easy thing to do. Nor is disability. There are rules and people do follow and enforce them.
Read a little! Get to know your neighbors! Stop speaking stupid FOX talking points!
Sheesh!!!
kkwilson: All 3 items you have listed are state programs. None are provided our Federal Government, and definitely not determined by the President of United States. You have a problem with them, talk to your state legislators.
like I wrote earlier, check your facts before you share your ignorance with the world... You would think Fart smell good if Rush, Beck or Fox told you so.
i know a guy who was a former KKK member and he said that Obama is secretly very popular among the KKK, Neo-Nazi and Skinhead organizations because most of them are on food-stamps.
they would trash him publicly but they privately voted for him.
kinda like the Irish in Boston pretending to be Republicans but they all vote Democrat to keep their jobs.
You would think Fart smell good......
Whoa there I think we have a "Nasty" little ignorant thturd floating by....A President Obama supporter no doubt!
The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppose. Frederick Douglass
@ bayllie
you are correct
The Republicans lost cause they tried to win over the electorate with dumbass, ridiculous, non-sensical talking points like these and the American public was too smart to buy it.
That is what you meant, correct?
AlexM, no one called you a racist because you didn't vote for President Obama. They called you a racist, becuase of your racist comments and prejudice statements... Why can't you defend your position base on facts other than resort to claiming reverse racism... WEAK! WEAK! in case you didn't hear me the 1st time.
You obviously haven't read my posts. I have posted here many times why I don't like obama and didn't vote for him this last time. I also have NEVER made any racist comment towards or about obama. It must be the mental disease called liberalism that is causing you to toss out unmitigated trash like the above. If you have read my posts then it means YOU don't have any facts to counter act my claims. So you, just like every other @!$%#ing liberal have to resort to racist claims. Much like your tag, you have @!$%# for brains.
It's kind of ironic. I, like many americans, thought it was a proud day when I helped vote obama in the first time. I thought that maybe this meant we were passed the majority of the race issues. It was my ignorance though because I'm not a liberal, never have been. I didn't fully understand how the liberals use race as an excuse. Obama, holder, rice, jarrett, sharpton, biden, and mainly the citizens have shown me the truth. Liberals hide behind race, they use it as an excuse for everything. It has stumped me through these last four years why some things were blown out of proportion. Why the liberal MSM touted articles like they did and do. Why liberals reacted the way they did and do. They are using racism as an excuse to behave poorly, to skirt responsibility, and to get what they want. If this weren't true, then liberals would NOT bring it up as much as they do, they would honestly believe that all people are equal.
So I challenge you all here, stop posting racist accusations to those that didn't vote for obama. Try and find out if there are real reasons some of us didn't vote for obama this second round. If some moron says it's because of his race, then by all means call the idiot out. But don't put all of us on the level of racist @!$%#s, because the high majority of us aren't racist by any means and it's extremely insulting and false.
Obama won because the so called Christians are not what they say they are, the spirit of God is not in them. It does not make any difference what color your skin is. Almost eighty percent of Americans claim to be Christian, if that were true Obama could not have won. Most of these people call themselves Christian because it is expediant and some times to their advantage. Most of the Churches today are nothing but clubhouses where people can catch up on the latest gossip, and most of the ministers do not preach nothing but love and riches. Our nation is turning from God, the One True God Of The Bible, at breakneck speed. Never has Bible truth been so rejected in America! Never have "professing" Christians been so shallow, weak, driven by worldly desires, and led so easily by deceptive leaders! How can a true Christian vote for those who stand against Biblical truth and not be held accountable by God??? To knowingly vote for a candidate who approves of abortion, and even worse, partial birth abortion, approves of sodomite marriages, approves of embryonic stem cell research, and stands against Israel, makes that voter "partaker of his evil deeds!!! 1 Timothy 5:22 "Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither be partaker of other men's sins: keep thyself pure."It is a fact of history that when nations are Godly, they are great. America was at its best when it was truly a God-fearing nation, and the more ungodly we become, the weaker we have become.
Jerry
That is one of the most irrational, unsupportable arguments I have ever read on any subject.
DrowningGrover
that exactly
Alex/ You spout hatred of people who have a different view of the duty of our elected Representatives continually,without understanding their views. You seem to be the typical right wing person who is responsible for the decline of your Republican Party.Both party majorities are made up of centrist's.who are unhappy with the minority move to the left or right of center. Writing of your Republican Party. They had a valued and influential Liberal wing who could and did work with the Democrats to better the standards of living of all Americans but you of the far right have attempted to make of the word Liberals a word to silence your moderates. Unfortunately the moderates of your party have been silenced to the point of even leaving your party,to it's determent . I have,many times suggested, to people of your views That you look up the meaning of the word Liberals in a political context but I realise that your type enjoy your hatred of people that you either do not understand or fear. That is why I attribute your political party's decline to people such as you.
Face it, given all your hot air, bull, misdirection, gimicks, and denials.... President Obama won the election because;
President Obama was re-elected despite of being black. Remember, Mitt/Ryan team aren't even able to win their own states and their birth states... So, please stop trying to make this other than a poorly managed campaign by Mitt and the Republicans.
Now, I know you jackasses out there are still whinning about how crappy President has done so far. Well if that is the case, then it further proves how much more crappier your candidates were! FACE it, you still don't get it!
Now, the GOP is parading Rubio around nationally? because he is Latino??? You tell me, who is trying to make this a race issue...
Jerry, If Obama won because of Christians are not what they are then what are the Christians in America? Are you suggesting that they should vote for Mormon and not vote for fellow Christian? Are you suggesting that Christians should be voting politically base upon their religion instead of political belief?
Alex/ You spout hatred of people who have a different view of the duty of our elected Representatives continually,without understanding their views. You seem to be the typical right wing person who is responsible for the decline of your Republican Party.
I spout disrespect (not hatred, get it right ya goon) at people such as yourself, Fiesty, Beverly, thturd, and the other far left idiots that have absolutely zero respect for people who don't think as they do. Also, it is not my republican party. If the republican party had an ounce of sense, we wouldn't be debating like this. I'm an independent who votes for which ever candidate I feel closest fits my beliefs, what I think our country needs, and what my family needs. Four years ago it was obama, this year, regrettably it was romney since I wasn't going to throw my vote away again on obama.
President Obama was re-elected despite of being black.
Just can't let the race thing go, can ya. You're almost close to Beverly/Fiesty in being the racist face of the left.
Now, I know you jackasses out there are still whinning about how crappy President has done so far. Well if that is the case, then it further proves how much more crappier your candidates were! FACE it, you still don't get it!
I don't whine, I state facts. If you don't believe me then maybe you should read before you post. Romney being our candidate was the product of the RNC and liberal MSM. He wasn't my choice when the republican debates opened up, but the rest got railroaded out. Regrettably, the average voter doesn't have much choice in who our candidates are. Even once they get on stage, the RNC/DNC and media pretty much dictate who is it's going to be in the end. The voters end up with the left overs (very obvious in this election with both parties).
I do get it, and all I'm able to do is vent and toss my vote out there since when it comes down to it, we matter very little.
Republicans failed to grasp the needs of average Americans
You really crack me up with your complete ignorance. Your president is already in the process of @!$%#ing the middle class up the ass. His obvious plan for next year is to push it deeper in.
And since you're such a polite individual, I really hope you don't have any ky.
Jerry, sorry, I sounded like a bumbling idiot. Please allow me to rephrase...
According to your statement, if Obama won because of Christians are not what they are then in your opinion what are the Christians in America? Are you suggesting that they should vote for Mormon and not fellow Christian? It is clear that you believe Christian faith has superiority than other belief. Given that, how can you justify nominating a Mormon faith candidate over a Christian candidate?
What exactly are you suggesting? Is this a candidate issue or American voters issue?
AlexM, clearly you're not comfortable talking about race. If you have not figured out, talking about race is not racism. However, what you previously posted were clearly prejudicial and racism. Why can't I let it go, becuase I want to clarify to others what are acceptable and what are not acceptable. So pelase stop being so vein, even if the post was directed to you. The post was to you, but directed to others so that they understand the difference.
I have long gave up on changing other's opinion, but to widen people's perspective is much more important to me. As for your sexual suggestion? WOW, do you seriously think you offend me? Look, the difference between you and I, you got bent over unwillingly and took it for 4 and now another 4... and the bottom line, you are going to like it...
Not my cadidate??? ROFLMAO, so all this grand standing including your other posts??? Who do you think you're bull$hitten??? Mitt is not my candidate...... LOL......Obama is My president? not your president? LOL... you're such a Benedict Arnold!!! Now you throw your own under the bus..... You're killing me... AlexM, you're killing me.... ROFLMAO
Until those of color want it to be an issue. The race card is dropped every time a black person demonstrates ineptitude. Blacks seem to think that they are picked on because of their color. They refuse to believe that somebody has expressed dislike for a black person because they lack the ability to perform whatever function they are supposed to be doing. Blacks as a populace should take exception to others suggesting that being black and being inept are synonymous.
Take for example, jesse jackson jr. Were people trying to get him out of office because he was black or because he wasn't doing the job he was being paid to do? Sometimes people deserve exactly what they ask for - a politician who won't do his job because he has personal issues but still draws a paycheck and still gets re-elected by a 3-to-1 margin. Basically the electorate stated "we don't care how badly he F's us over, we'd still rather get F'd over by an absentee politician than a white guy." Take for example all of the corruption and nepotism in the Detroit area yet they still want to elect convicted criminals to be their leaders and cry racism becasuse the whites leave them to their choices.
oh please. corruption and ineptitude knows no race and still exists everywhere. for every black guy someone wants to point out, i could point out a hundred white guys when it comes to corruption and ineptitude. the iraq war, anyone? wall street and our banks?
The White House announced the federal government will spend $6 billion over four years for a "sustainable energy future" plan with Asian countries that involves loaning tax dollars to other countries to increase their purchasing power for U.S. technology, services and equipment.
"Recognizing that energy and the environment are among the most pressing issues confronting our region, President Obama, in partnership with Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei and President of the Republic of Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, today proposed the U.S.-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership for a Sustainable Energy Future," the White House announced Tuesday as Obama visits Asian Pacific countries.
The initiative comes after the Obama administration has been criticized for spending billions to subsidize U.S.-based green energy companies that went on to declare bankruptcy, including Solyndra, Ener1, A123, Beacon Power and other failed renewable energy ventures.
47 % of Americans living on food stamps. Obama is borrowing from China,Japan, Canada just to meet our responsibilities. I am so friggin glad obama loves giving away my tax dollars since we have so much money to spare. I do not suppose he would be willing to donate a million of his dollars to asian countries for clean energy. Man, he just never amazes me enough. We are in deep shi* people. He has not even started his second term and he is giving away six billion of our tax dollars. One billion dollars is a 6'x6' pallet stacked 5' high of 100.00 bills, and he is giving away 6 of them, unfriggin real. How can you liberal democratic idiots justify that.
Jerry, again with your BS.... do you even fact check or use common sense?
Our current population is over 314 million, at your figure of 47%, then it woul place 147.6 million Americans on food stamps. Last check, I believe around 47.1 millions of Americans are on Food Stamp. That means there is a difference of 100.5 million difference. So a few options;
There are differences between bankrupcy as well... I would get into that as well. Look them up before you're embarrased again. It is not that hard. Look things up before you repeat them??? Don't you owe your children that at the very least?
it looks like President Obama got almost as many white voters in 2008 as the 1st "black" president, William Jefferson Clinton according to the TOP DEMOCRATIC WHITE-VOTE GETTERS IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS list
With the percentage of white voters decreasing, Republicans are going to need to change their focus if they want to be competitive.
Mayberry R.F.D.
From the article above:
Looks like America is changing. I guess after 200 years, you could say we are entering our adolescent stage.
Yep, there are more people of color, more gays and lesbians, more people who don’t look like, well you know, “normal” people in America more than ever before.
It was bound to happen at some point. After all, there are more people of “color” on the planet than “whites”. Guess we didn’t close down our border’s fast enough!!!
Looks like some folks are going to have to adapt and just accept it for what it is.
Time marches on.
People of color marrying “whites”, and gays and lesbians wanting equal rights themselves. Yes, I tell you. We’ve all gone mad!!!
Sorry Opie, There’s no going back to Mayberry now. Which is funny since it was filmed in California, you know, the place where all the wacko Liberals are.
As the saying goes, “This Ain't Your Father’s Oldsmobile”.
Come to think of it, they don’t even make Oldsmobile’s anymore.
Salud
There is a white problem, I as a white woman would never vote for a republican ever again.
I value being a first class citizen while the republicans want to make women property of the state, with the right wing wackos church in charge of my reproductive rights.
Sorry if I don't agree with the republicans family plan, that is where a republican man finds a woman he wants to have children with and rapes her, the republicans promise to force her to carry your child and most states give the rapist visitation. And this is what the republicans call freedom.
If you value your true freedom, then remember to vote for democrats as they don't think a woman deserves life in prison for aborting a rapist's child.
Every election counts, vote democrats if you want to retain your freedom of choice.
Time for the Tea Loonies in Congress to start packing up for 2014, these Clowns did enough damage to our Country !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Patriotic American U.S.A.
Not to be confused with Téa Leoni, the American actress.
LOL.
Salud, American!!!
Hey Tomas, Thanks but I'm talking about the Tea ReTarded Looney kids in Congress, Salute !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back in West Texas in the 1950's, Democrats were the premiere party. In some places, you were lucky to find a tiny room with a card table setup to register as a Republican. After LBJ pushed the Great Society and civil rights, that all changed. LBJ, a fierce Texas Democrat, prophetically foretold that it would happen, but he thought the sacrifice was too important for the good of Texas and the good of the entire nation not to make. Poverty in Texas was horrific in his district at the time. He really had no choice to be true to his own sense of justice.
Wheather white, black, brown, red or yellow (or pink with purple polka dots for that matter) people tend to vote for candidates that think like them. Why would one vote for someone who doesn't agree with them to a certain degree. No two people will totally agree on every issue but surely there are more issues each voter agrees with one candidate on than the other. Simply put people voted for the people they felt best exemplified their own opinions. Trying to break it down into demographics seems silly. I am a white male who is retired from a long career and who served in our armed forces. I don't happen to agree with most of the planks in the Republican platform but there are also some on the Democratic party's planks I don't agree with either. I vote for Democrats (hasn't always been that way) not really because of party title but by what the current party and it's leadership are pushing in their agenda.
I have voted for Republicans in the past and may do so again if one comes along who I believe is better than the Democratic opponent. I may do as I have done before and vote 3rd party. I am one of the folks that voted for John Anderson as I knew how Reagan screwed up California but wasn't about to vote for the Democratic candidate either.
shhhhhhh...they still haven't figured that out.
I have no hatred for any race, any religion or any sex; therefore, I give very little assistance very seldomly. I believe in humanity toward my fellow man.
Yeah roosterboy, I voted for lbj. I apologise to all, for all the damage he did. I don't know whether he and I were fools or that he was a horrible man. I hope he was just a fool, it is heartbreaking to think that he could have had that much hatred for humanity.
IWonder, grip your snuggie and your tinfoil hat. Say hello to Santy Claus for me, you big lug. LBJ appreciated your vote. Now man up, and stand for what LBJ what stood for. He saw horrific poverty in Texas and he did something about it. Yes, he turned the Democratic party inside out, and he did the right thing. I hope that inspires you.
I have a hypothesis for this past election. The GOP seemed really intent on isolating people who vote. Or at least their crassness was self-inflicted. Whether it was Mitt Romney and his 47% comment, Murdoch and his "rape is God's will" comment, or Akin and his "legitimate rape" comment, these things are guaranteed to isolate people who vote.
Unfortunately, many in the GOP don't seem to have learned the lesson. They blame the electorate for their losses and call them a bunch of moochers. That isn't going to win them any extra votes and reasonable folk will think they're just a bunch of loud-mouthed a-holes.
A business wouldn't be so stupid as to write off people whom they assume are going to competitors. They'd try to win them over.
Exactly...so why was Romney considered such a great businessman? He was a destroyer, not a builder. Destruction is easy.
IWonder ...
Why? Why do you not volunteer? Give your time? Work in your community to lend your personal experience? I've coached for city leagues, volunteered at sorting food at the local food bank ... why don't you?
We are a democracy and we all need to work together to insure that the next generation has the skills they need to get ahead. I've been a Girl Scout leader and also led my Girl Scout Division's Day Camps. I brought in people from all walks of life to educate those girls. They appreciated it. And I know this because I run into my Scouts now and then and they are thankful for the education they received and the opportunities they had. They are all beautiful young women pursuing great careers and enjoying their lives.
We LEARN from each other. Stop shutting doors and calling foul, GOP, start trying to educate and move forward!
Sorry if I don't agree with the republicans family plan, that is where a republican man finds a woman he wants to have children with and rapes her, the republicans promise to force her to carry your child and most states give the rapist visitation. And this is what the republicans call freedom.
I don't know what's happened in your life, but obviously something very bad. What you describe definitely isn't a republican issue though, it isn't even a political issue. You need to place the blame directly at the feet of the man that harmed you, that's where the blame belongs. I'm sorry you've had hard times, and wish you a better future.
Alex/ I believe that that comment was because of the view,on that subject,of one of the leaders of the Republican party. I would imagine that most woman ,subjected to that crime would now seek justice from our law enforcers.In the past that was often not given but most of us of either gender ,expect and demand that it is so. For a so-called leader of either party to suggest that rape is of God's will is not only antiquated but disgusting . I can see that anyone would be in disagreement of that remark and coming from a political figure ?Shocking!
@Listoire,
I did see that in the news a while back and all I could do was shake my head in disgust. I don't see much of a political future for that individual thank God.
But, just because one individual from a party says it, doesn't mean it's the belief of the party in general. We could fill hard drives with the stupidity from politicians in both parties.
I will say my favorites were the calendars put out with all of Bush Jr's gaffes, some pretty good ones in there :)
I've often wondered what an election would look like if polling (at least pre-election) was illegal. What if candidates had no idea of who was thinking what and where they were. History, I'm certain would still have them gravitate to the traditional "battleground states", but it would arguably be nice to not be told every 15 - 20 minutes what 'suburban white woman, specifically those with 17 toes, average 8 different nail polishes per week and love doing yoga' are allegedly thinking.
For the media to always act as though they only report the news vs drive it is rather silly on its face.
I say start a movement. Ban all polling and handicap the 24 media cycle from telling people what they think and who they are going to vote for.
Well, Allen...it might look like a dictatorship where there is no freedom of speech or freedom of the press. Like Obama said, democracy can be noisy, messy and complicated.
It's very quiet in North Korea.
I think the First Amendment would like to have a word with you.
Remember, Romney's internals had him up in the swing states.................
Actually Allen, Congress tried to do that already. But as the above posters pointed out and the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United, it is unconstitutional to bar the media (companies) from being involved in the election process. I wonder if any of the above posters realize that they've just tacitly agreed with the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling.
Anilof, I disagree. There's a difference between freedom of the press, freedom of speech, the right to take election polls to determine what people think, and Citizens United which deemed corporations equal to people. Corporations are not people, they are businesses selling products and pushing policies beneficial to them and only them. They already had a voice in elections, they could donate their personal money, form PACs, political action committees. My guess is that at least one of those SCOTUS justices who ruled corporations as the equivalent of people wishes he had his vote back as we watched the attempt to "BUY" this election. One millionaire backed Newt Gingrich, one backed Rick Santorum, others back the other wacky ones; all those millionaires kept those unqualified candidates in the GOP primary race far longer than at any other time--that's Citizens United.
I do not buy the political pundit chatter that claims Citizens United had little to no impact on the 2012 elections. Do not mistake failed candidates such as Romney or Mourdock or Akin as proof that money doesn't matter. It does.
The GOP is no-longer a viable national party because of the Tea Loonies !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LBJ turned the Democratic party inside out, for the good of the country. It's time for a Republican to turn the Republican party inside out, for the good of the country, too.
Patriotic American - I whole-heartedly agree with you. Hopefully however, the GOP can resurrect itself in time to keep the progressive loonies from spending every last fake dollar the government can print to give themselves rewards for having won the election.
President Obama believes in a balanced approach (as do I) but has only concretely described the taxing portion of the scale, not the cutting portion. Is there any point at which progressives believe that annual trillion dollar deficits will become unsustainable, or do they believe the gravy train to be cosmically self renewing?
This has to be the most cynical thing I've read in a long time. Nobody forces you to consume media. Nobody tells you how to vote. And the media artificially made this race much closer than it really was, so that trashes your argument right there.
During the debt ceiling debate, Obama was willing to give the GOP almost everything they wanted if they'd just raise taxes as well. The GOP wouldn't do it and made repeated symbolic attempts to pass it so they could blame the Democrats for being obstructionist.
First the Author writes a WEAK POLLED (polls are like noses, everyone has one) article TITLED about WHITES VOTING and the SAME DAY one about CHRISTIANS VOTING
I think he has an agenda...and a biased one at that...
TYPICAL NBC INFOTAINMENT CRAP...
Like those numbers are real and legit from some poll...
THIS IS THE MEDIA SPEWING HATEFUL RHETORIC TO GET AD DOLLARS AND NOTHING MORE and the author is part of the MEDIA CIRCUS in America
Same day... huh?
Maybe you should check dates prior to hastily posting your your hate filled rhetoric.
The Christian thread was posted last FRIDAY!
You look like another eager, ill-informed, bitter, fool!
PS: If you find this author and site so distasteful, will you remind us again who is FORCING you to participate?
It's not our fault NewsforDumbFux shut down their litter-box!
Shosyn
yet, it makes us way smarter just for getting our info from MSNBC instead of Fox News because reading/watching Fox News makes you less informed than someone not watching news at all (aka living in a cave)
so I will stick to MSNBC, thank you.
Shosyn . ..
Well, if you've got better polls that are real and legit ... hey, I'm sure we'd all LOVE to see them. Please do link and cite your sources!
@bayllie
Amen!
I say let Texas be it's own Country - then we won't have to provide them any Federal Aid - they will have to pay all the import taxes. All their citizens will have to fend for themselves - no Social Security, No Medicaid or Medicare, No Public Education, No FEMA when Tornadoes or Hurricanes Hit, No National Guard or Border Security, No Military Bases to help local economies, No Roads, Railroads or Airports(FAA), No Farm Aid, No Grants for Research and Development, No Postal Service. I sure I am leaving a ton out. They will have to set up their own Trade agreements with the USA and other countries like Mexico. If Mexico invades, then they are on their own to defend themselves.
They will have to find a way to pay for all of it by themselves - any other States in more than welcome to join them. Just remember what beign apart of the USA is ALL about.
No they can't have Texass, let them self deport to Mexico if they don't like it here...
Self-Educated - Austin has already asked to secede from Texas if Texas secedes from the US. Doesn't want anything to do with the good old boys!
Shosyn-
Project and mirror much?
I guess you didn't get the memo. These Karl Rove tactics are as obsolete as home milk delivery.
Karl Rove is obsolete. Matter of fact, after this election, I'd say Karl is a washed-up has-been.
But you keep blogging the BS in his honor, Sho.
You won't mind if from now on, none of us on FR give you any credibility.
Salud
Wonder how much Texas could rake in on tolls on east-west interstates and railroads?
People here think I am a conservative and missed the whole point of my post in their ever quest to hate their fellow American and point and say this and that. Let me say this in retort....FOX is as bad as NBC is as bad as MSN is as bad as ABC, CBS, REUTERS, CNN and the list goes ON AND ON...(don't forget about print media alone)
...it is all infotainment CRAP ...... and your part of it...so am I, so is the author and NBC, CNN, ABC, FOX, et al... Murdoch, the koch brothers... ALL....the media in America does NOT report factual news in any shape....it burns and pillages American minds for PROFIT.
I am just trying my best to help people see through the very divided behavior that is running rampant in America..in both parties. It is caused by the very poor informational services for pure profit.
Walter Cronkite is rolling over in his grave thinking about responsible journalism.
We are ALL AMERICANS, 47% or 53%, race, religion or sexual orientation... ALL AMERICANS
Shosyn, Could not have said it better. Many years ago the mainstream media gave up reporting the news in favor of creating it. Since many Americans raised on this media tripe believe you can learn all you need to know about very complex subjects in a 15 second sound bite, they suck up the twisted, lying, "commentary" of these self-aggrandizing pundits and believe it to be true. Apparently they subscribe to the notion that if MY news station says it, then it must be true because only THEIR news station lies. Given the critical thinking skill of most Americans, we are doomed as a nation.
Shosyn,
I believe most that post on these boards actually do go out and read many different sources for their news and continue to back that information up with links to their sources. Regarding what the media has done with news, well, they're selling something and us as the "buyers" will align with those outlets that present news in a fashion we like to hear. Personally, I really like Rachel Maddow and her ability to break down a topic.
As for NBC, they post articles, and we all respond to them yay or nay (hopefully with civility), and they take the time to moderate the boards so that we can. Whether you like their articles or not, here you are posting on them and people are responding to your posts.
But when a poster does nothing BUT post refuted talking points from FOX news, it grows old rather quickly.
Seeking #4.7, The "W" Ranch wants to secede from Texas, that would be a good flushing !!!!!!!!!!
ummm clearly you have no understanding of how statistical analysis works but once the census and poll data is collected, it's a matter of clicking an extra button to cross tab all of the results and test multiple hypothesis' at once. who cares what day the conclusion came out on. it doesn't invalidate the results just because the results were all cross tab'ed together.
And the answer is;
------------------------------------------------------
When he signed the act he was euphoric, but late that very night I found him in a melancholy mood as he lay in bed reading the bulldog edition of the Washington Post with headlines celebrating the day. I asked him what was troubling him. "I think we just delivered the South to the Republican party for a long time to come," he said.
A third party coming up the middle? Nah, not going to happen ... anyway, I have a date with part two of Dustmonia on PBS tonight.
dangerfield - and yet President Obama took both Virginia and Florida. And, he took NC the first time around. I think the south is actually getting smarter. Will be very difficult to get a Republican - whose entire agenda is based on hatred and ignorance - past them in the future!
Who is Lyndon Johnson.
(looked like nobody else would play along)
WCA-
Dixiecrats and other cats for 100 dollars Alex!
And it was jeopardy(!) in the former Confederate states for the democratic party from that day forward...
So, in some minds hatred and ignorance run rampant in almost half of the electorate. Yeah, I agree that Romney comment really was stupid wasn't it? Anyone willing to toss half of the country under the bus based on their opposing beliefs does the country and their fellows a real disservice. That's the kind of rhetoric we can all do without.
bcwc
have been watching New York PBS documentary via Amazon prime the past few days...will get to the dust bowl this weekend...
Having watched Part I on PBS last night, I plan to watch Part II of Ken Burn's "The Dust Bowl" tonight. Great reminder of a manmade environmental disaster that didn't have to happen. We might keep "The Dust Bowl" in mind as we watch mountain tops blown off to make it easier to get the coal while rivers are clogged with the debris; as we watch "fracking" make it possible to ignite water at the kitchen sink; as we ponder Keystone XL pipeline and oil sands with the potential to pollute a huge water aquifer which provides drinking water to millions.
What is LBJ after he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
I worked for the re-elect President Obama campaign here in SC and was confident that he would win. I have tried to keep my comments civil to my pub "friends" on these newsvines. They continue to insult, demean, degrade and lie about the president and his family. I guess being a "good loser" has become extinct, just like the pub party will if they dont grow up and see our country for what it really is....diverse, progressive, intelligent, intent on preserving the right to vote, with full and equal rights for women including making their own reproductive decisions, with the majority refusing to let extremists legislate from their own brand and interpretation of the Bible.
That being said, I also felt confident that Mitt Romney would be a dim memory by Thanksgiving, and hoped that Karl Rove would completely disappear. Unfortunately, Mitt can't seem to stop yakking (lieing) yet. As my friends, neighbors and family gather around our table this Thursday, and continue our tradition of each person offering a prayer of thanks for our blessings, mine will be that our country was saved by savvy americans from the misogynistic, white, entitled, soulless, non-compassionate, 1%er who is completely disconnected from the reality of most americans' lives and has no business in the White House.
Good bye, Mitt and Ann. I would wish you good luck, but you don't need it.
Great post, Julia. Happy Thanksgiving!
Tx! Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours!
Julia: Great post! Please enjoy your Thanksgiving, but you will enjoy it even more by leaving politics out of the discussion.
Julia, well said; having helped on the Obama campaign in Iowa, thanks for your efforts in SC. Happy Thanksgiving!
Julia, being a good loser is just about as extinct on this blog as being a good winner. I don't mean you, yours was a well stated and reasonable post. The level of hate however, being vented by the extreme left is no less nor strident than that portrayed by the extreme right. The only thing I have learned by following many, many posts on Newsvine since the election is that our elected officials are not the only problem. President Obama cannot bring together a nation that does not want to be brought together and if Newsvine is any indication, the people have moved further apart since the election not closer.
Jody....tx to you too!
joemike.....I know what you mean. I was shocked at the level of mean-spiritedness encountered in these posts since September. I even learned some new words here that I've never heard before, and I'm no angel! My only hope has always been that these vines represent a SMALL percentage of americans. I admit I've gotten sucked into the negativity myself, esp. late at nite. Even had to take breaks from chatting after getting beat up (ok ok I'm sensitive).
Anyway, happy turkey day to you and yours. We all gotta pray we get over ourselves and join together for the good of the whole country.
Exito....uve got a point! Politics at the thanksgiving table??? omg.....
As a Native American, I love the fact that white voters are on the decline; after a history of white Europeans invading our homeland, branding us as savages, stealing land, and driving us onto reservations it does my heart good to see the tables turning. Just maybe some real justice will find its way onto the scene and all Americans will finally be treated as equals. With Thanksgiving coming up, people should remember that had it not been for the Native Americans showing mercy to the white invaders, Europeans would never have survived that first winter; history shows clearly how that mercy was repaid. American history books should be rewritten to tell the truth.
Very true NCAN, I had a history book from 1847, and the stories in that history book were very different from the History Books of the last 50 years...
LOL...if only you understood history. One group of settlers not surviving would hardly have driven off European settlers. Besides I love it how Indians like to attempt to convince people they lived in harmony with neighboring tribes.
there were attrocities against the native populace, you'll get no argument there.
NCAN....I've done tons of reading about Native American history and I'm always stunned by the cruelty of the first Europeans......and yes, it's difficult to get to the "truth" about your people's history. It is a huge black mark and tragedy in our still - young culture. I am so happy that it SEEMS like the days of white superiority, dominance and control are coming to an end.
Interesting thing about the "native Americans" is that many of the tribes owned slaves. They also continued to own slaves even after the Emancipation Proclimation was ratified. They were not always the victims that they would like everyone to believe they were.
NCAN, nice post. I've done a lot of reading about the subject; it's true, the real history was glossed over for far too long before more honest books were written whether that history pertains to Native Americans or Africans kidnapped and brought here as slaves. The truth is often too horrific and ugly to absorb let alone admit until much, much later.
NCAN,I'm of Native American heritage and I do not hold a grudge as you can't change history.Nobody was nice to each other back in the day when people were invading countries and discovering natural resources on lands that they did not rightfully own.My boyfriends parents were interned in the concentration camps,that is what I refer to them as,because they are Japanese Americans.They also hold no bitterness against what happened in the past.And by the way,the census back in the day labeled Native Americans,drum roll please,as white.We can't as Americans keep this racism going or we will never strive towards greatness as a country.The media keeps on stirring the pot for lack of better stories to report.
My ancestors were split between both sides. Some native american, some european. Some indian fighters, some indians. It's too late to hold grudges in my family. It would be a family fight.
Obama is your president now, so all you Repugnants and Tampon Baggers can quit your whining and belly aching, we don't need any crybabies in our country, so pull up your diapers, put that pacifier in your mouth and wipe those tears away on your blankie, if you don't like it self deport yourself, because that secede notion not going to work......
You use the same post over and over again - idiot
hoodie boy whats is this we crap were all americans in the same country so why dont you get a civil finger on your keyboard and quit being a D#$k
Hmmm...On par with other Democrats. So much for the "Racist Republicans hate Mr. Obama simply because he is black" argument.
Could it be that (Heaven forbid) a large section of the electorate simply disagrees with Mr. Obama's Government-centric view of America?
Good point.
As a liberal I refuse to buy into that if you didn't vote for him you are a raciest nonsense; some folks didn't vote for him because he is black, we know that but the vast majority who didn't vote for him didn't do so because of his politics.
CdB -
Do you also contend that a large percentage of blacks voted for Obama because he IS black? Reverse racism at its finest.
Obama is also of white heritage.I'm white and didn't vote for him because he didn't do his job.
justacleaninglady ....
But you voted for Romney ... why? You voted for your Congressperson ... why? What pray tell was the President's job that he did NOT do? Has he moved this country forward ... yes. Is the DOW up? Yes. Is housing rebounding ... yes. Is the economy recovering ... yes. What job are you talking about?
Layton
Stupidity never ceases to amaze me.
kkwilson ....
And common sense is NOT common.
;-)
oh, please
Black, Blue, Pink, Brown, who gives a crap about color. Why does it always come to that! a voter is a voter as long as politicians moke it a race issue in their campains, the country as a whole will suffer. To hell with getting the black, white, latino vote. How about just getting american votes and fix this country as a whole.
No offense, but that's a pretty naive view. In reality, demographics matter. Different kinds of Americans have different interests, priorities and agendas. As demographics change, so do political agendas and interests. When you say "fix this country as a whole", how do you do that without knowing what voters want? Black voters, gay voters, women voters, may have different opinions on how we "fix this country as a whole", from the Civil Rights Act of 1965 to recent marriage equality laws.
Changing demographics are not at all new. In fact, it is part of what makes the United States great.
To Diogeness: no in the liberal world dissent is not encouraged, if you disagree with their position you are labeled: racist, bigot, as having homophobia, you are a sexist etc... This is all done so we will pipe down and go along to get along. Not me, a healthy exchange of ideas is critical to the success of a country. We lost, I am over it, now we turn our attention to 2014 and the midterms with people who (hopefully) can more successfully articulate what conservatism is about.
The libs think they had a mandate and can't figure out why some people are unhappy. Can you just imagine the posts if they had lost.
Celtic....I would happily listen to pub "leadership" discuss conservatism in a healthy, intelligent, and sane way.
No bible stuff tho......can't legislate through the bible.
Well if 49 million people voted against you, then you are right not everyone is happy- this was not a Reagan era crushing, Obama won by a 2-3% victory with a God awful candidateon our side. If Democrats had lost- well imagine"Occupy Wall Street" across the country. You had Liberals like Michael Moore and Moveon.org calling for violence is Obama lost-
Poor baby, pulling out the violence card - tell me again, Celtic cry baby, how many bombings have been perpetrated by the right? Let's start with abortion clinic bombings and murders and then count up.
Obama beat Romney by more electoral votes than Bush beat Kerry yet all I heard out of you people for years was how Bush had a mandate.
Either it is/was a mandate or its not.
First of all what is a violence card?" that is a new one .No one is crying,JA that is the job of Democrats. Second, ok How many murders and rapes took place with Occupy Wall Street? The weather Underground, and your boy Bill Ayers? How many buildings did he blow up? LA riots, etc.. 2.- abortion clinics - several twisted people- you can count on one hand- not the MASSES of lefties who riot at the drop of a hat. Which Republican made the threat of violence in they lost? We did not have Black Panther Party members "monitoring elections"
celtic, "We did not have black panther party members monitoring elections".
Ok, and romney campaing had his so called "concern citizens" poll watchers at most the poll placing in the battle ground states, so what's your point. Look, there is nothing your sorry a$$ can do about the election. Obama won and its over.
While you are at it celtic, how many people died in the right wing republican lied to war in Iraq? How many building did we blow up for a lie, and how many innocent people died for that lie?
The threat of sucession is a threat of violence. Unless you don't think the civil war killed anyone?
I guess it is too much to expect for the republicans to act like grown-ups and to quit repeating lies they have heard. Just where are these masses of lefties who riot at the drop of a hat?
It is not like republicans care about Americans or they would not have voted against jobs for our returning veterans. But the republicans always have a good lie to tell while they vote against America and jobs.
Mr Know it all about everyone- I don't support either war. My son is a Marine in Afghanistan right now so save your holier than thou anti war working class hero BS ok? he puts his life on the line for sorry fu*%ks like you and Jason , so we can freely elect anyone includiing Mr. Obama., and write on blogs like this. Where did I mention secession? Jesus Christ get a grip. Please show me one of the "lies" that I posted... I will wait. Not care about American? really? Listen I have enough money to leave this country any time, I love my country and all the people here.
Celtic - both sides participate in calls to violence. Take your oppressed crybaby routine somewhere else. You people complain about divisiveness, yet you can't even see your own shortcomings. Liberals, the only advocates of violence - indeed, take off your rose colored glasses.
I am neither a crybaby nor oppressed- who are "you people"? We, and I suppose you mean Republicans? have many shortcomings as do most people. I see them clearly , that is why I hope for a new fresh candidate who can explain conservative ideas and values and why they are better than Democrats who seem to think that if they raise my tax rate from 36% to 39% everything will be ok.
Wow what a traitor to your son you are celtic. You are defending the party that wouldn't even vote for jobs for returning veterans like your son.
Now you want us to believe you are in the top 2% and your taxes are going to be raised? Everything is not going to okay, but we are headed in the right direction. Maybe now we can afford to put Americans back to work, being the republicans didn't vote for jobs because they couldn't ask the rich to sacrifice even one thin dime.
You do know that almost half of the deficit that republicans love to complain about is because of the tax cuts. But of course how can raising taxes, creating jobs and lowering the deficit be any good for America?
As long as conservative values include forcing women to carry rapist children for the religious right wing wackos with threats of life imprisonment for the women, I wouldn't vote for them no matter how they explain their ideas.
Let's not forget what a great job the republicans did with our economy and what we are recovering from.
says the poster with a communism eluded avatar and supporter of 'occupy'. Tell me how Doc Occupy, the modern day Guy Fawkes is a patriot? Spare us your sanctimonius diatribe.
im a veteran and I dont feel entitled to a job ever. why should I. why should anyone.
eventually you lefties are going to have to act on fixing the country instead of complaing of its the 'repubs' fault.
America first you can go fu*# yourselve. My son is going to Law School after the Marines. How dare you say something like that. Is it any wonder that many on the right truly hate people like you. Go to hell.
dont take offense to Real Americans First. Like i said look at the avatar and that should pretty much sum up one of the resident FR commies that scurry around. The good Old Doc and Father of the Occupy movement was just arrested for possession of chemicals in bomb making. Their little mascot (you've seen the stupid masks) Guy Fawkes was a person in England that tried to blow up Parliment in the 17th century see Gunpowder Plot. Quite the patriot I assure you.
Thanks Brother
why is the media the only ones that care,what color a person is? I find that interesting.
It is NOT just the media.....I live in SC and worked for the re-elect campaign......believe me, racism is alive and well here......
I live in SC also Julia and yea racism is alive well and it cuts BOTH ways! believe me!
celtic1--I hear that!
Because they are not the only ones that care.
all the racists are uber quick to point out how racist the OTHER races are, but never their own.....ever notice that???? I have, repeatedly.....
Very interesting data! If Republicans, and especially the Tea Party folks do not pay attention to it and behave differently in the next Congress, they will soon become extinct.
waltD--news flash there will never be another Republican Prez and it's not because of this. This coming from a person that did not vote for Obama either time. Remember you heard it here first. The libs will have victory for the rest of elections. Most of us know why!
plisthink90- please enlighten us. I think you're definitely wrong but I'm sure you have some really solid thinking to back up this claim!
really isn't hard to figure out. Watch future elections, like I said, you heard it here first! You libs, be happy, you guys won!
plsthink90 - in other words, you're embarrassed to post your meaning?
in other words, I have said plenty on here and it is like beating a dead horse. You guys can learn the hard way. I don't follow any certain party, nor do I get sucked into all the lies and BS from politicians. I do hard core research and pick the best for the country, not my own needs. I work hard and hate to see what is going on. But, hey, waive your victory flag and be proud!
Seeking ... I actually went and looked at plsthink90's bio - wanted to see if it was Concern in disguise. Such similar "wait and see" "big surprise coming" type of ludicrous BS!
plsthink90 - So you're just like the rest of us who are hardworking and actually do research prior to voting? I AM proud that the country voted the best man into office - too bad you can't see that and have to pretend he won for other reasons!
Layton - plsthink90, Kirk, jim -all post the same "facts" and nonsense - then put everyone else down who doesn't agree with them. And, they seem soooooo much more desperate since Obama kicked Romney's tushie!
You guys hold down the fort - meetings this afternoon!
you have your opinion, I have mine. Not sure what the problem is, but I am going to work now, so have fun on here. It is always entertaining to say the least. Oh, I am not desperate. I knew who would win the election and not a surprise to me.
Race had little to do with the votes of most whites who voted for Obama. The idea of gifts to the electorate, and all the other GOP rhetoric also had little effect. For rational voters there was no choice but Obama. Until the Republicans abolish their anti-science rhetoric they will never get our vote.
That and the republican anti woman laws designed to make women into second class citizens.
I know what war on women as republicans in Ohio voted to defund Planned Parenthood. Women don't need health care and doctors, they just need republican men to tell them what to do.
(sarcasm font needed HERE)
The problem with this analysis is:
- Despite the spin of the article, the statistics do prove Obama got LESS THAN AVERAGE white vote. And he got historic black support.
- Hispanic growth in population cannot be explained by birth rate and legal immigration. What has happened is that illegal citizenship benefit thieves have popped out anchor babies and that has turned into weeds in the population. These weeds are conned by Democrats into thinking that the Democrats care more about them than Republicans. However, in real world application, all hispanics have become are additional residents on the Democrat plantation where blacks reside thinking they can't help themselves - meanwhile Democrats have ruined black families and excuses black males from assuming responsibility for their sexual flings.
- Unlike black voters who did in fact use racism to support Obama over a white man, few whites actually didn't vote for Obama because of his race. Blacks have ignored that under Obama, they have faired worse than any other demographic group in this recession. Obama has made their situation worse than it was under Bush.
Nice try, NBC - the fact is that there is a racial bias in the election and it is purely black racism against a white candidate when given a chance to show they didn't have the intolerance.
laser - so blacks who voted for President Obama had to do it for racial reasons? I'm white and voted for him because he was clearly the best person running. My guess is the majority of blacks, hispanics and asians voted for him for the exact same reasons.
Your post lacks and credibility and is so drenched in hatred of anyone who isn't white. Perhaps you should step back and examine the real reason the Republican party is quickly becoming extinct!
Yes, white people are good and virtuous while Blacks are mostly racist and Hispanics are just criminal leaches.
It's amazing that someone with this point of view has the nerve to use the words "racial bias" aimed at anyone other than himself.
seeking--do I have to spell this out for you?? It is already EXTINCT!! WELL DONE!
plsthink90 - no the Republican party can come back if they actually try living in the 21st Century instead of the 18th. And, if the GOP does become extinct, a more moderate conservative party will take it's place. Again, your point?
all I can say is you guys will soon find out what I am talking about. I get tired of going back and forth with you libs.So, on that note you might want to do some really, really, good research into your own party of fun. You may be surprised.
Obama only got 2% more black votes then Kerry.
laser wrote: meanwhile Democrats have ruined black families and excuses black males from assuming responsibility for their sexual flings.
Me: How do democrats excuse responsibilities? Are you saying black males wouldn't be having sexual flings if it weren't for welfare and food stamps? Are you saying there are no occurances of the same behaviour amongst white males? Are you saying there are no red state whites that have kids, but aren't married, and are living off of welfare and food stamps?
Herman Cain, as I remember had sexual flings and it was the republican party defending him by running the women down. Too sad, the republicans never let the truth get in the way of a good lie.
Can't forget Newt's reason for cheating on his wife, was because he was so patriotic and easily excitable, once again, not his fault.
Do you remember if Cain and Gingrich were republicans and why they weren't assuming responsibility for their sexual flings?
This what Democracy looks like:
A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
3. From courage to liberty;
4. From liberty to abundance;
5. From abundance to complacency;
6. From complacency to apathy;
7. From apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage.
- Alexander Fraser Tytler
WOOHOO! We beat the 200 year mark!!!!
That's the point right?
Yeah, so now it's time for full on Marxism?
I don't think so, there are many many Americans who believe we are a Nation in decline, that our children will not live as well as we do. We think a country with a 16 trillion dollar debt (headed for 20) with 50 million at the poverty level , with 23 million unemployed, many more under employed, with 8% unemplyoment rate which seems to be acceptable enough to re-elect a President where this had never happened before(above 7.2) We see a country that ho-hums 1.5 million abortions a year, who think Jersey Shore and Honey Boo is entertainment - and a generation whose only interest is "getting mine"- and with racial divisions SO deep we are starting to look like a Balkan State, Yes we think we are in Delcine. History show us that countries always come apart from the inside out, before an enemy overtakes them from without. Other than that, have a nice day.
According to the GOP "Deficits don't matter". Strange that they became fiscal hawks in Jan 2009.
Well by God dont you think someone at some point needs to?
Only you and those who think like you see the glass half-empty, the rest of us see the glass as half-full. We also recognize that the reason that got us to a 16 trillion dollar deficit, 23 million unemployed, 8% unemployment, 50 million below poverty, etc., etc., is directly related to the job that congress HAS NOT done since 2010.
As to your social/moral/religious reference to 1.5 million abortions; ROE v WADE is the law in the United States of America. This is still a FREE country, and you are FREE to leave it anytime you choose.
I made NO religious reference you did , don't try and pin me in. That was your reference. As for Abortions , I only recounted the number (40 million since Roe v Wade) just because 5 people say it is ok does not make it right. To me its a shame that many lives are snuffed out before birth, who knows what great next leader could have come? MLK Kennedy, Bill Gates, but we wont ever know will we? Oh, and guess what ?40 million taxes payers- not here. You are an idiot why would I leave my country? because I disagree with you.? The great tolerance of Liberals on full display
Were you making the same point back in 2001 & 2003 when Bush pushed through these tax cuts and the CBO scoring indicated that they would create a deficit?
Were you making the same point when the Medicare Part "D" bill was pushed through during the Bush administration?
Were you making the same point when the Iraq War was fought using the Chinese credit card?
The point I and others continue to make regarding the new found FISCAL CONSERVATISM of republicans and their supporters is that the vast majority of you all were eerily silent when VP Cheney made his infamous "deficits don't matter" comment, but now we need deep cuts to programs and entitlements in order to achieve debt and deficit reduction.
By God somebody at some point needed to point this out!
Yes, Bush was an idiot who spent money like a drunk sailor on shore leave. He never meet a spending bill he did not like. I did, in fact write my Congressman, my Senator and yes the White House- that we were on a path to debts that we would never pay.. of course nothing happended, lip service.
Typical republican response. You made NO REFERENCE TO RELIGION? How uneducated are you really?
The premise that a fetus within a mother's womb is a person is based upon religious doctrine; hence the religious tie.
I may be a liberal but I do posses the ability to think critically and understand the FACTS upon which my stances are based. You on the other hand have proven that you don't. I suggest you research the basis of opposition to abortion before you embarrass yourself further.
Oh and it should be the decision of a woman and her doctor as to whether an abortion is performed, not left to the whims of a legislative body at the state level. You may PERSONALLY find abortion abhorrent, and that's your choice; but you DO NOT have any right to legislate YOUR CHOICE upon the entire American population. If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.
As to what prospective fate may have awaited the aborted fetus, I can make an equivalent case for every last one of the soldiers who died in Iraq and Afghanistan; the broken families left behind because of their death; the children who will grow up not knowing their parent because of it.
Your very disjointed and all over the map on your argument. The fact that a fetus in a mother's womb is basic science -it is a life. This has been going on for millions of years before ole Jesus was walking around the Mideast. Religion has nothing to do with the fact of life being created,reproduction etc..That is just evolution . It is the taking of a human life that ones religion or in your case the lack of one that it comes into play. I do find it abhorrent,but please show me where I said that I Mr. Celtic can legislate to the entire American populous- wow I wish I had that kind of power. The Supreme has ruled I do not agree but not one hell of a lot I can do now is there? Iraq , Afghanistan how about ANY war- that is not Germain to this discussion.
When you have one party that claims to believe in right to life and then starts wars based on lies where over 4000 innocent American die, it becomes very Germain to this discussion. I don't remember the republicans fighting for their right to life as they rushed to war based on lies.
If a woman is raped, she has every right to terminate a pregnancy. Of course the republicans want to force you to carry that child even if the raped mother is still a child herself.
Celtic you do have rights, you can choose not to have an abortion if you are raped and get pregnant. That is known as freedom of choice. You just don't have the right to decide about my body and my health.
Remember to vote for a democrat if you want to retain true freedom of choice.
Iraq was a lie, no argument from me. It was horrible if I was in charge Bush and Cheney would be on trial- now how do you like that?!! The % of women who become pregnant through rape is small- but no less HORRIBLE, I never said I would stop YOUR right to terminate a pregnancy, becuase of rape. that is a personal decision , also if your life is in danager then by means.
Well, voting for a republican is voting to take my rights away. You did hear the republicans platform didn't you? No exceptions even in the case of rape.
If you were a woman or when true freedom becomes a priority you will then be voting for a democrat.
I was only 5 when I was raped by a 16 year old babysitter and didn't get pregnant due to my age. The rape itself has caused untold damage to my life, and I can't even imagine had I been a few years older, how horrible it would have been to force me to carry the rapist child for 9 months, reliving the rape everyday.
So I guess I take the republican platform of no exceptions even in the case of rape as very personal. Me and many other women who believe in real freedom will never vote for a republican.
I am truly sorry, that is a horrible tragedy. Let's just agree to disagree, I wish you well and I do respect your passion.
The media really don't have much to write about since the election is over. I beleive that the general polulation supported Obama.
Race has a lot to do with why some vote for him and why some would but the majority of educated American who cared about there fellow country man voted for Obama.
I'm just wondering has anyone heard from Mitt? Usually a candiate who has lost stay out of the media for a week or so then their on every talk show that would have them. I hope he doen't become a pest like McCain. He so sad....
Not every voter thinks deeply about politics, ideology, or policy. Some people vote for one or another candidate according to the last impression they'd formed from some political ad. How else does one explain how the Gallup poll goes up and down every day?
I also think it's difficult to unseat an incumbent. I was shocked when Bush won his second term. One person who told me they voted for Bush said he was giving Bush another chance to "finish what he started." The pundits tried to spin that win into a mandate for W. It wasn't a mandate, it was people not wanting to throw out an incumbent. He ended up one of the least popular Presidents ever.
This election was so significant in the fact that just because your white doesn't mean that your going to be elected. No longer can a politician run on just color alone (maybe in the beet-red south), now anyone that wants to be an elected official has to bring forth a viable and realistic program that will benefit all of us Americans. And that my good folks is what elections are all about. No more of this B.S. about racist and hate spewing rhetoric. It's all about the betterment of this great nation. And for those reasons I commend the American people for re-electing this President. Now after saying all of that. I will hold his feet to the fire as I will hold anyone who choses to run and then get elected to any position that requires that individual to do what's best for us all.
Hurray for the USofA...
What this also says is that only 60% of white americans were willing to vote for the Mittster. More voters are colorblind, and even without "gifts" are voting on issues.
I get really tired of all the nonsense from Democrats claiming that white voters who did not vote for Obama did so because he is black. Democrats are always quick to point to skin color, gender, sexual orientation etc. sooner that anyone which makes me believe their divide and conquer strategy, which worked this time, will ultimately ruin this country as we will no longer have a country of Americans but a country of hyphenated Americans or divisive groups who feel their first alliegence is to their race, gender, sexual orientation etc. As for the common Democrat claim that white voters who did not vote for Obama "merely" because he is black or half black, that is offensive to me as it is another way of saying that those voter's political view or perspecive is not valid. It is a typical Democrat move that when they cannot argue a cause on substance, they attack the person thus the the name calling and racist tags. I am sure there are some republican voters that let race be the decisive factor in their choice but when you have over 95% of the black vote going to Obama then that tells me the vast majority of them voted on race alone which is racist and hypocrasy of the highest order plus the fact that the only people who cannot discuss issues of race in this country are white people due to years of victimization programming from the left and others lest they risk being called a racist and with it, their immediate discreditation if they even hint at racial issues. The moral my Democrat friends is I would not be so quick to bandy around the accusation when many of you folks voted for your candidate based solely on race. In fact, it could be argued that white voters are more inclusive than other voting groups who voted for Obama because he is black as a very large percentage of white Democratic voters voted for Obama. If all of the white voters voted for the republican candidate in the same numbers the black voters voted for Obama, Obama would have lost.
Obama only got 2% more black votes then Kerry.
Western Justice ...
Cork it already with your rant about Democrats. Many of us have stated time and time again, our race and our reason for voting. I'm white. I voted for the President because he was and is the best man for the job.
PERIOD.
Any time a woman or a Black woman is questioned on credentials.....Immediately you are Racist or Sexist, as I witnessed today about Ambassador Rice. Although I think she should be questioned only due to her actions after Bengazie. I find it insulting to her professionally that the the Race and Sexist card is used.
Ms Rice is a RHODES scholar...she can certainly fend for herself wiith out the Democrats using those low life slants. Yes it happened today.Its a fact..you cant defend these low life actions by the Left.
Western Justice Why do you think the South voted solid red? Why do you think this President has caught more hell than any two or three other presidents who have done a poorer job than he has? Why so much hate and anger directed towaed him?
I'd say because he has divided this country like NO other president. He passed Obamacare without any GOP support which divided the country. Name one other President that has done that!
prog.1, Just maybe because they are historically for states rights over big federal government. Get a freaking life and enough of this racist sh!t.
ozzieyo1-7277359 . . .
HA! Please see my post above. Those so-called state's rights RED states are the biggest takers of government haqndouts!
Abe Lincoln comes to mind. Remember that civil war thingy over states rights?
Yes the Affordable Care Act did not get any republican votes, but that was the republican agenda against cooperation. I support the Affordable Care Act. President Obama has done nothing to divide this country. He has been honest, fair and tried to work with republicans for the good of all Americans. The GOP wants subsidies for oil companies and cuts to Head Start. The GOP wants tax cuts for millionaires, but cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. When what makes republicans like you happy is for republican politicians to talk hatefully against our President what does that say about you? Seems it is you who want the vitriol and the venom from these republicans. Republican politicians decided in the most anti-American way that they would oppose whatever President Obama wanted to do to help the country and that is what they have done. We were not going to allow them to get away with making President Obama a one term president because of their wickedness and spiteful attitude. You republicans have divided this country with every lie and deceitful accusation you and others continue to spew.
...duh...retardation is colorblind...there is no bias...c'mon man...keep race out of it sheeple...remember what Einstein said...a retard is someone who does the same thing and expects a different result...hey notice how the markets went up when our douche bag leaves the country...stay out moron...every time you open your big pie hole here, bad stuff happens...
Almost every racist comment on any of these sites was made by Romney supporters and many of them were very ugly. Do you think these people voted for Obama?
No ,I disagree. Every time someone disagrees with Obama they are racist, EVERY TIME!!
Mitt left the country? Yahoo!!!!!!
Red said : I told my husband in 2008 that I believed a majority of this country had moved away from racists and bigots, do you have any idea how many times I've had to tell him I was wrong?
I believe you are wrong. 98% of Blacks and 78% of Hispanics voted against the white man. Yes Yes , VERY RACIST!!
Oreo You cannot compare Blacks and Hispanics to white people when it comes to politics.
Yes, and if the republican party puts forth another candidate who spouts the same type of divisive language that Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Michelle Bachmann used during the republican primary and general election campaigns the Blacks, Hispanics, and women of this country will vote for the democrat candidate again, regardless of what race either candidate is.
At the end of the day it's about policies, not skin color for most voters. Those who vote based upon race exist in both parties and are a reflection of the ignorance that still exists in America regarding people of color.
I wonder just how much of a true oreo you are? I know the original cookies are black on the outside and white on the inside. Does that describe you too? Or maybe you're the newer version that has yellow cookie w/white cream filling? Or are you one of the special brands that has a different filling? Oreo's come in many varieties too!
It is the dmocratic party and the media that is keeping racism alive and well today. They are also dividing this country. This country has been more divided in the last 4 years than I can remember. Obama, helped to fuel this when he got involved the the black professor and others, blaming police and white people before hed any of the facts in front of him. He should not have gotten involved in the first place. Take an honest look at his mentors. It is almost impossible for him not to be a racist. Even though the democrats and the media say it is a lie, Obama apologized to the world for America, showing that he does not believe in our policies and constitution. Gets his supreme court judges in office ( Obama care was approved by one justice.... how can something be so vague that it causes a split decision among our supreme court that was sworn to uphold the constitution and one judge (who happens to have been put in to ffice by you know who) makes the deciding ruling. Our country is going to hell.
The GOP needs to sit back and agree to everything Obama wants to do until it gets to the point that the Americans who voted for him realizes that we are in a collision course. All it takes is a little common sense to see we are headed in the wrong direction.
Yes destroy the middle class worker, poor, elderly on Social Security, and sick!!! So the Rich don't have to pay taxes!!
The rich use to pay 70% tax!!!
America’s problems started August 1971!!
These are things Republicans don't want you to remember!!
With inflation unresolved by August 1971, and an election year looming, Nixon convened a summit of his economic advisers at Camp David. Nixon then announced temporary wage and price controls, allowed the dollar to float against other currencies, and ended the convertibility of the dollar into gold. This meant our money was now worthless!!! Inflationary dollars!!
The first signs of impending trouble are the exploding budget deficits themselves. They began, of course, under the parlous economic stewardship of Ronald Reagan. Reagan cut the marginal tax rate on the wealthiest of Americans from 70% to 38%. He promised it would spur an orgy of investment and rocket the economy to new levels of production and prosperity. Instead, his supply side economics did the exact opposite. It produced the deepest recession since the Great Depression.
During Reagan's administration, the unemployment rate declined from 7.5% to 5.4%, with the rate reaching highs of 10.8% in 1982 and 10.4% in 1983. Reagan also earned the nickname "the Teflon President", in that public perceptions of him were not tarnished by the controversies that arose during his administration.
Bush blew through Clinton's surplus in his first year. The 2004 deficit reached $415 billion, a record. Still, its real size is masked by the fact that Bush has shifted $150 billion from the Social Security trust fund in order to make the shortfall look smaller. It's like pretending you're richer when you move money from one pocket to another. Both sums have to be repaid, so the real amount borrowed is the $415 billion nominal deficit plus the $150 billion from Social Security or $565,000,000,000 billion.
And Carter save the dollar and did the dirty work in between two sh..bag Republican administrations. Had it not been for carter, America would have had moved to total failure. Unfortunately Reagan ensured that we headed there anyway. PEOPLE - KNOW your history. Monetary policy, deficit spending, the downward spiral from what Reagan created. He was a poor leader and not a great communicator. He set the standard for cheating America out of its wealth. And all while Carter remains chastised.
If we had followed Carter's vision, America would be strong, the ship safe in deep water, the world following our lead.
Proof is where we are today. At war, poisoned our EU friends, poor, frozen credit, and a much larger division between rich and poor, and a divided America where individualism is greater than the whole.