Obama agenda: Historic visit

The AP: “In his first trip abroad since the summer heat of the re-election campaign, President Barack Obama will seek to reinforce American influence in Southeast Asia in spite of the large shadow cast by China. He [was] the first U.S. president to visit Myanmar, an appreciation for its steps toward democratization, as well as Cambodia.” It’s Obama’s fourth trip to Asia. “The Asia trip underscores Obama’s efforts to establish the United States as an Asia-Pacific power, a worldview defined by 21st century geopolitics but also by Obama’s personal identity as America’s first Pacific president.”

Reuters: “Barack Obama became the first American president to visit Myanmar on Monday, using a six-hour trip to balance U.S. praise for the government's progress in shaking off military rule with pressure to complete the process of democratic reform.”

Say uncle… “Arizona Sen. John McCain said on Sunday he wants U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to publicly announce she was wrong in saying the attack in Libya was sparked by spontaneous protests to an anti-Islam Internet video,” Politico writes, adding, “If Rice came back on ‘Face the Nation’ and acknowledged she was wrong, McCain said, it would help her case in the Senate if President Barack Obama does nominate her to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”

And this: "I wish the president wouldn't get mad me," McCain said. "I wish he would spend our time together in finding out what happened, what caused it."

National Journal’s Michael Hirsch: “[T]here are other issues with Rice’s record, both as U.N. ambassador and earlier as a senior Clinton administration official, that are all but certain to come out at any confirmation hearing, many of them concerning her performance in Africa. Critics say that since her failure to advocate an intervention in the terrible genocide in Rwanda in 1994 — Bill Clinton later said his administration's unwillingness to act was the worst mistake of his presidency — she has conducted a dubious and naïve policy of looking the other way at allies who commit atrocities, reflecting to some degree the stark and emotionless realpolitik sometimes associated with Obama, who is traveling this week to another formerly isolated dictatorship: Burma.”

“In the last three weeks, public interest in global warming has undergone a remarkable revival. Already, environmentalists are renewing calls on Obama to reject a controversial Canadian oil pipeline and to put strict greenhouse gas emission standards in place,” The Boston Globe writes. “But energy and environmental analysts warn that idealistic calls to action may end up hurting climate change policy efforts: With Republicans controlling the House and Democrats the Senate, and the nation facing a hard economic path, they argue any gains need to be made through consensus from both sides of the aisle.”

Discuss this post

"...dubious and naïve policy of looking the other way..."

Who, pray tell, are the diplomatic masterminds who are making this judgement? Would it be those same sages who counselled against a NATO response to Serb atrocities in Bosnia and elsewhere?

Is this damning evaluation coming from the red-shirt Bismarcks and Pop Warner Talleyrands who thought that attempting to diplomatically isolate France would force them to endorse, and participate in, our war of aggression against Iraq?

Would that be the same gang of geniuses who predicted that our troops entering Baghdad would be greeted with flowers? Was this learned opinion handed down from the Olympian heights by the same guys who decided to stay in Afghanistan?

You get the idea- I hope. The Republican Party, and indeed much of the existing Washington structure, has zero credibility when it comes to foreign relations. I can't think of one, single opportunity since the fall of Saigon that they haven't completely botched, nor a crisis that they haven't made worse. Rebuttals are welcome- but think before you type. There's this new "Interwebs" thingy that makes fact-checking easy and quick. Hours of political fun for the whole family!

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:39 AM EST

FoxTrot, this is also the SAME group of people that literally embraced the Saudi's in spite of their record of atrocities and human trafficking.

http://www.gvnet.com/humantrafficking/SaudiArabia.htm

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:59 AM EST

You're absolutely right about that, Matthew, and our complicity in this, by remaining silent, is our national shame.

As usual, it was Winston Churchill who said it best: "The Kingdom of Heaven runs on right and wrong. The kingdoms of men run on oil."

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:21 AM EST

Susan Rice has actual diplomatic successes under her belt - getting the Arab states to overthrow Qaddafy, for example. The problem with Republicans is, they wouldn't recognize diplomatic success, if they saw it. Republicans think foreign policy is imaginary - like global warming.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:34 PM EST

So Amy you are saying the "Arab Spring" was a success? Might want to ask Israel about that!!

Susan Rice was given the talking points to talk the talk with and she did like a good little solider now we find out the talking points were not accurate and you just want to sweep it under the rug? Why are we even talking about her? The prez has her six!! The"come after me" comment ended it, right?

Global Warming is real... who new?? ... got any REAL data to back that up or maybe you could ask that "Wile E. Foxtrotsky super genuis" to check it on his "super checker website" and post for the world to see??

BTW do you live in Washington state by chance?? Because that's some good sh-t you smoking!!

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:03 PM EST
Reply

McCain, just shut up and go away. You are simply an angry, irrelevant old man and no one cares what you think about anything.

  • 6 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:44 AM EST

This just about sums up my feelings of John McCain. A buffoon who would replace George W. Bush with more George W. Bush but under the assumed name of John McCain. May he rest in peace. Because the rest of us cannot as long as he is a Senator.

  • 5 votes
#2.1 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:49 AM EST
Reply

This from the guy whose poor judgement led to a VP nomination for Sarah Palin, probably the least qualified candidate in US history.

Yeah, we're really interested in what you think about which women qualifiy for high-ranking government positions. Time for you to go home - pick one, any one - and reflect on your own poor choices.

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:54 AM EST

McCain thinks Obama is mad at him? That's called projecting, Sen. McCain. Obama has too much on his plate to waste time being mad at McCain.

If McCain were President he'd spend all his time being mad at people, that's his style: creating feuds and playing games, he is notoriously thinskinned.

  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:30 PM EST
Reply

I wonder what would happen to McCain if he stopped being invited on the Sunday talk shows. I know I would enjoy it.

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:03 PM EST

The Republicans are considering a remake of Sarah Palin for 2016.........sit tight, America..........we may be, just in time for the ............2 FOR 1 SPECIAL.............Sarah Palin & Michele Bachmann!!!!

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:30 PM EST
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.