@HoosYer- Yes, I admit that I WAS a confused voter but one word changed everything for me. BENGHAZI! I am not confused anymore.......didn't want to change my user name like most of you do on these posts, especially those paid TROLLS for Obama.

Benghazi is important to a great many people, including our active duty Military who is going 20 to 1 against Obama.

How come they won't come out with their investigation until after the election? It takes almost 2 months?

How do you think the emails got leaked? By someone that works for Obama that is disgusted with what he did.

But you continue to believe it's a non issue.

We have a better chance with Romney putting this country back together than we will ever have with Obama.

How do you know active duty is going 20 to 1 against the president.

Please provide evidence of this, specifics, stats, something other than your mouth..

Did you talk to every single military active duty person across the country and did they tell you they were against the president. NO, you did not talk to millions of active duty members.

The press has done a great deal to try to shield Obama from it and certainly the Obama administration has done plenty to deflect it.

The majority of the military and a great many Americans have this in our minds plenty and i am sure it will show in Tuesday's vote.

Yes they want many people to vote twice so Obama stands a chance.

Tuesday is going to be a surprise for a lot of people.

Momma Dukes,

You will be the first one suprise after Romney is defeated and all your hatred for our president is gonna have to last 4 more years. Hope you got plenty of tissue tomorrow night.

He spent his entire presidency either campaigning or going on TV shows like he's a rock star.

His priorities have always been screwed up.

Same ad was in my paper The Virginian Pilot yesterday.

Ok idiots, do 500 generals speak for MILLIONS of other military folks.

Yes about as classy as it is when hecklers have disrupted R/R, and the posters on FR thought that was hysterical.

OH but that was ok because those people were Obama supporters?

Well they have a perfect example of no class, it's the family living lavishly on taxpayer expense while telling us we have to tighten our belts.

I still want someone to tell me why they have to take separate planes? Cuz maybe they really can't stand each other?

Actually republicans have decided that Democrats should not have the right to vote..........you know the whole voter suppression thing?

We all know it was the Republicans who sent that letter to Republican voters in Florida telling them they couldn't vote?

There is shenanagins on both sides, which is why I support having to present an ID to vote.

You need ID for most other things in life but to try to waive that rule for voting? Doesn't make any sense and I am very surprised how everyone is trying to fight it.

Actually republicans have decided that Democrats should not have the right to vote..........you know the whole voter suppression thing?

It's not voter suppression, it's voter ID.

What's the matter Democrats can't carry IDs?

To..johnny"""

No it's voter suppression ..The need for a voter ID nonsense has been debunked as BS in study after study ..a long time ago ...republicans just don't want blacks .. minorities to vote and we all know why

Amunaka- and why is that? We are all listening

To..one""""

You live in a bubble...I mean repubs ain't even trying to hide that fact ...

Well we've all heard the story's about ACORN busing blacks for cigarettes and crack to different polling places to vote as Mickey Mouse and Mary Poppins over and over again... we know the Black Panthers terrorized and prevented white people from voting all over the country back in 2008 .. we know illegal immigrants came flooding across the border just to vote for Obama ..we know the dead rose up from their graves to vote on a straight democratic ticket..

( well all according to fox news anyway)

But nobody ever talks about or mentions the E. voting and vote counting machines .. who owns the company's that make the machines .. where are they made..who makes the software that goes into them...who has control over the machines from state to state....how many documented problems have they had with these machines in the past..how easy are they to hack into ..how easily could they flip an election without leaving a paper trail.... and how would anybody ever even know...

wonder why do we never hear about those things

Do you mean they are using Karl Rove's plan to steal the election twice and keep a half brain like He Who Must Not Be Named in power for 8 years?

VObamademort?

Bill, you do realize Romney and Ryan have "adopted" Obama's "hope and change" argument without ANY accompanying details to speak of? That would pretty much make Romney and Ryan an empty bag of goods according to your own logic right?

And that assumption is based on what actions (as compared to Obamas)? Just because a flawed, totally unprepared and corrupt politically correct individual propelled into an office he could not govern does not mean these mean these men of talent will not deliver.

Perhaps Mitt should have "delivered" some details behind his tax plan?

Ed, either you are not listening, you can't read, or you just are ignoring the facts. Romney has given many more facts and details about his plans than what Obama has. All I hear from Obama is more of the same agenda. An agenda that didn't work for four years. If you want 4 more years of lies, deceit, and corruption, then vote for Obama and you will get what you deserve. Personally, I want what is best for America....and Obama is not the answer. In fact he is the oxi-moron to what is best for America.

Exactly.

To..Proud""

Pretty pathetic repubs doing a happy dance over four dead Americans in Benghazi ...thinking they got their 9/11 moment ...in the last gasp of desperation in their hate for Obama ...good luck with all that ...

they are hardly doing a happy dance! they are the only ones that seem to care about what happened and trying to find the truth since all we got from the administration is lies!

To ..tlb""""

Right ...

Yes, but he had to find a way to buy their votes somehow!

Reagan? Republican short memories should be studied as a new pathology.

I lost all respect for President Obama when he gave 2 million work visas to illegal aliens. No US President can pick and choose which laws should be enforced. We should enforce all US immigration

******************************************************

EITHER YOU are under 30, or stupid, or both

Ronald Reagan On Immigration: "I Believe In The Idea Of Amnesty"

Doug Mataconis · Thursday, September 8, 2011 · 22 Comments

Following up on the clip from a 1980 Reagan/Bush debate that Alex Knapp posted last night, here's more of Ronald Reagan on immigration from the second 1984 Presidential Debate with Walter Mondale:

Two years later, Congress passed and Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act, which included a provision that granted amnesty to any illegal immigrant who had entered the United States prior to January 1, 1982 and resided here continuously.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/ronald-reagan-on-immigration-i-believe-in-the-idea-of-amnesty/

Dan, we aren't electing Reagan. We are talking about now and the future of this country. I personally don't care what Reagon did in the past, be it for the economy or for citizenship, or even how great of a president he was. I'm more interested in what Obama or Romney is going to get this country out of the mess that it is in. The only think I see is that this country is in worst shape than it was 4 years ago.

We are 6 trillion dollars more in debt. The unemployment rate is higher now than it was 4 years ago. Race relations are the worst they have been in the past 40 years. The middle class is disappearing at a rapid rate. Twice as many people are on food stamps than 4 years ago.

To me Obama is not the answer for the future of this country. Romney might not be either. But one thing I know is that he cannot be any worst than Obama has been, because Obama has hit the bottom of the well.

We have how many millions of people out of work and he wants to give them amnesty so they can take more american jobs how on earth does that make sense!

Dan: Just stop. These types are not interested in facts. They form their point and look for things to support it. If they find facts opposed to their point, they don't change their minds, they just ignore the facts. #goniners

Harry, you sound semi-intelligent, so here goes..

Obama may not be perfect, but he has endured MORE OBSTRUCTIONISM that any other POTUS in our nations history..

How is he supposed to do his job when that is happening?

Things that the GOP ACTUALLY STOOD FOR, THEIR IDEAS, when adopted by Obama, they became toxic and evil.

NO MATTER WHAT

IE: the debt ceiling..

The GOP holding the country hostage when the same GOP voted to raise it under Bush 12 times

The closest we had come to that type of obstruction was when Newt did the same thing, ONCE, and let the country shut down..

HE THEN LOST HIS JOB for it

DID ANY REPUBLICAN lose their job after holding the country hostage with Obama?

Harry YOU claimed you lost respect for Obama when he gave VISAs, NOT AMNESTY, but then in a rebuttal you say that what Reagan did was in the past, and that doesnt matter..

WELL IT DOES MATTER, it matters to the point of what Im trying to have you understand and that is Obama endures the obstruction, and yes, RACISM, that he has had to for 4 yeras..

I dont care who is POTUS, with that against you, you will NOT be able to do the job you were elected to do..

AND YET, HE HAS MANAGED to do well anyway

OH and as for the 6 trillion, how about GW not only spending the surplus, but putting us into A TEN TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT?

Forgetting about that little fact

RACE RELATIONS ARE WORSE, YES, Obama being elected made the WASPs of this country lose their minds

AS FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS, do some reading my friend, GW's presidency did that..

yeah yeah, he isnt being elected, but we will feel him for generations to come

I know Cappy, i cant help myself

AND YES, GO NINERS!!!!!

The reason I love to hate liberals;

When they disrupt/protest (as is their / our rights) they see themselves as activists.

When others protest against their values they see them as criminals.

Hypocritical, politically correct fools seeing style over substance.

BTW, I'm pro-choice.

The reason I love to hate conservatives;

They rely on voter suppression to win elections.

as compared to voting fraud? Neither is right if that is happening on either side.

How do you know they are Taliban type terrorists? Did you see their training camp in Alabama or something?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA @

BillJ318

as compared to voting fraud? Neither is right if that is happening on either side.

**********************************************************

NEWS FLASH:

Virginia voter fraud case expands to focus on GOP
firm

The investigation into the arrest of a man on
charges of dumping voter registration forms last month in Harrisonburg, Va., has
widened, with state officials probing whether a company tied to top Republican
leaders had engaged in voter registration fraud in the key battleground state,
according to two persons close to the case.

A former employee of Strategic Allied Consulting, a contractor for the
Republican Party of Virginia, had been scheduled to appear last Tuesday before a
grand jury after he was charged with tossing completed registration forms into
a recycling bin. But state prosecutors canceled Colin Small’s grand jury
testimony to gather more information, with their focus expanding to the firm
that had employed Small, which is led by longtime GOP operative Nathan Sproul.

**********************************

Hans von Spakovsky, a prominent alarmist about election fraud in America, has posted an essay at the National Review taking issue with my piece about him in the current issue, “The Voter-Fraud Myth.” In essence, von Spakovsky asserts that the peril posed by voters illegally impersonating others at the polls is real, and that to suggest otherwise is a “false narrative” advanced by the “blind” political left.

Von Spakovsky, a legal scholar at the conservative Heritage Foundation who will serve this coming Tuesday as an election official in Fairfax County, Virginia—the swing state’s most populous and most liberal county—is worth paying attention to if only because he represents the most vocal element of what may become a bitter, partisan fight over the election returns, should the margins of victory be exceptionally close.

Von Spakovsky is right, of course, that America has a woefully antiquated system of elections, and a history pockmarked by bipartisan fraud. All of this was made clear in the New Yorker piece. But what he and other such fearmongers are stubbornly wrong about, and won’t acknowledge no matter how much evidence piles up, is that there is virtually no modern record of individual voters trying to steal elections by impersonating others at the polls. It is this phantom threat that has fuelled the push for voter-I.D. laws over the past few years. As I wrote in the piece, a nationwide study of legal records undertaken by the reporting consortium News21 found a grand total of only seven convictions for this type of voter fraud since 2000.

Presumably, if The New Yorker were wrong in finding this kind of fraud to be negligible, von Spakovsky would have documented many cases of it. Instead, in his response, he blurs the subject by citing other kinds of recent election fraud. This pivot is a tactic that critics have described as a form of political bait and switch. For instance, von Spakovsky provides an example of a woman in Maryland double-voting in Florida, where she owns a second home. He also cites the case of an Arkansas legislator who, along with several accomplices, bribed and cajoled those casting absentee ballots. And he describes sloppy voter-registration rolls in Florida, where, he says, two hundred “non-citizens” were discovered registered to vote. (How many actually did vote, however, he doesn’t say.) He also tosses in several cases where the allegations have yet to be adjudicated, and an oddball case or two, such as residency infractions in a town with only seventy registered voters and some fifty thousand out-of-town workers. All of this is marginally interesting, and supports what I wrote: “Nearly all scholars of America’s system of locally run elections acknowledge chronic problems, including administrative incompetence, sloppy registration rolls, unreliable machinery, vote buying, and absentee-ballot fraud.”

But where are the examples of individual voters trying to illegally influence election outcomes by casting ballots in other peoples’ names? If they exist, he and the proponents of strict voter-I.D. laws still have yet to provide them. This is why many Democrats suspect that the real motivation for the strict I.D. laws is voter suppression. (My piece quotes one Pennsylvania Republican asserting that such a law would “allow Governor Romney to win the state.”)

Instead, von Spakovsky returns in his rebuttal to a few arguments that he pushed hard when I interviewed him, but which, as I discovered when I did more reporting, didn’t pan out. Von Spakovsky told me that the Georgia Secretary of State had covered up potential evidence of zombie votes, and then refused to turn over the records. When I checked his allegation out, both the former Secretary of State and her former spokesman vehemently denied his allegation. They also said such records are only kept for a couple of years, making it impossible to know what they might have shown. Once again the evidence of impersonation voter fraud dissolved into a speculative mirage

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/11/notes-on-voter-fraud.html#ixzz2BMrmKioz