E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSSCONCORD, N.H. – Riding Saturday night’s momentum from their first appearance at a rally together, President Barack Obama and former President Bill Clinton took to the small Granite State capital to make their case for the former’s second term.
Introducing the president, Clinton reminded the crowd how good New Hampshire had been to him when he first ran for president, leaving unsaid that the state also voted for his wife Hillary in the 2008 Democratic primary.
“Twenty years and nine months ago, New Hampshire began the chance for me to become president,” Clinton told the 14,000 people gathered in a park near the statehouse here.
But, he added, he was much more enthusiastic about campaigning for Obama now than he was for himself.
“Maybe because I have done this work. Maybe because I know how hard it is,” he said.
"Twenty years and nine months ago, New Hampshire began the chance for me to become president," former President Bill Clinton told 14,000 gathered in Concord before introducing President Barack Obama. Clinton said he was more enthusiastic for Obama than he was for himself.
And Clinton also played the role of aggressive surrogate for the more reserved president, reviving the “Romnesia” attack line that Obama had deployed in the weeks leading up to the tone-changing Hurricane Sandy.
“As President Obama has told us there’s this great public health epidemic, this virus, sweeping across America causing a condition known as Romnesia,” Clinton said, “and the virus is so rampant that anybody’s vulnerable to gettin’ a little of it.”
For his part, Obama sought to draw a parallel between Clinton’s economic policies, popular around the country in retrospect, and his own.
“Just as we did when Bill Clinton was president, we gotta ask the wealthiest to pay a little bit more so we can reduce the deficit and still invest in the things we need to grow,” he said.
And Obama also gave an unusually detailed plug for some of the state’s down-ballot candidates, a nod to the Democrats’ fight to regain the House, as well as add more governors to the party roster.
“If you want to break the gridlock in Congress, you’ll vote for leaders who feel the same way whether they’re Democrats or Republicans or independents – folks like John Lynch, folks like Jeanne Shaheen, you’ll vote for candidates like Annie Custer, Carol Shea-Porter. You’ll make Maggie Hassan the next governor of New Hampshire,” he said.
Amanda Henneberg, spokeswoman for GOP nominee Mitt Romney's campaign, responded to Obama in a written statement: "With no rationale for re-election, President Obama has resorted to false, discredited attacks and a cynical closing message urging voters to choose ‘revenge.’ The people of New Hampshire, along with the rest of America, will choose Governor Romney’s optimistic vision for our country’s future and will vote for real change so he can get our country back on the right track."
The president continued his frenetic campaign pace, hopping on a plane to Florida after his New Hampshire stop.
Leave a Comment:
New Hampshire does have a long democratic history, but they are smart. They've seen what Obama has done and failed to do. They know about his vote for revenge comment. They know Obama's promise of being bipartisan sounded great but was not even attempted. There is really a good chance New Hampshire will vote Romney.
fisher,
You live in an alternate reality. You wrote: "They know about his vote for revenge comment." Do you understand English, fish? Here's what Obama said: "Obama told supporters on Friday that they shouldn't boo at the mention of Romney, they should get out and vote. "Voting is the best revenge," he said in Springfield, Ohio."
Your increasingly desperate deceiver in chief deliberately ignores the first part of what Obama said (people at the rally shouldn't boo Romney) and he focuses exclusively on the second clause, over and over again. "Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, a Republican, dismissed controversy on Saturday over the president's comments that people should vote for "revenge," saying the statement seemed reasonable and that GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney should leave it alone. "I don't think Obama's comments were unreasonable when he said, 'Don't boo, vote, you know, voting is the best revenge,'" Sanford told Fox News' Gregg Jarrett."
You really think that the people of New Hampshire are as stupid as most Republicans so as to be conned and misled yet again by Romney's deceit?
You wrote: "They know Obama's promise of being bipartisan sounded great but was not even attempted." Bipartisanship requires cooperation by two parties, not merely one. Obama attempted bipartisanship during the healthcare reform debate by endorsing a 6-member committee made up equally of Dems and Repubs .It wasn't Obama or Democrats who were willing to starve food stamp recipients to ensure that the top 2% kept their Bush tax cuts or refused to approve an increase in the nation's debt ceiling to ensure that their darlings, the investor class, didn't have to pay more taxes despite earning trillions during Obama's Presidency. Republican ideologues mocked bipartisanship by labeling Obama a Socialist, Stalinist, reincarnation of Adolf Hitler, and attempted to marginalize and demonize him as not being a natural-born citizen and drew images of him as the second coming of Hitler or the Devil. Democrats took no pledge to not raise taxes even when average Americans have been suffering. It was Obama who attempted bipartisanship over and over again during the last almost 4 years, trying to reach across the aisle to improve the lot of average Americans, and it was your party that invoked filibusters more times than any party in any Congress in history to ensure governmental gridlock, the worst example of obstructionism in our nation's history, to defeat Obama's initiatives. You can try to disavow the Party of No's continual unwillingness to compromise on anything, but obstructionism is not some version of bipartisanship. Tell us, fisher, exactly of instances in which Repubs attempted bipartisan solutions to America's problems?
The people of New Hampshire are wise enough to know that your self-delusion is not rooted in reality but instead on deliberate indifference to the truth borne of sheer partisanship.
The President said that he would bring the nation together. That did not work.
The President said that he could work with the opposition party by reaching across the isle. That did not work.
The President said that his administration would be free from lobbyists. That did not work.
The President said that his administration would be the most transparent ever. That did not work.
The President said that he would fix the economy within three years. That did not work.
The President said that his health care bill would lower health care costs. That did not work.
The President said that he would not raise taxes on 95% of Americans in any way. That did not work.
The President said that his stimulus spending bill would solve our employment problem. That did not work.
The President said that he would cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. That did not work.
I see a pattern here. The President said that if he could not fix the economy within three year that he did not deserve a second term. The President also said:
The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies.
And the cost of our debt is one of the fastest growing expenses in the Federal budget. This rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy, robbing our cities and States of critical investments in infrastructure like bridges, ports, and levees; robbing our families and our children of critical investments in education and health care reform; robbing our seniors of the retirement and health security they have counted on.
Every dollar we pay in interest is a dollar that is not going to investment in America’s priorities. Instead,interest payments are a significant tax on all Americans–a debt tax that Washington doesn’t want to talk about. If Washington were serious about honest tax relief in this country, we would see an effort to reduce our national debt by returning to responsible fiscal policies.
Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that “the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.
~ Senator B. H. Obama, March 2006
Redskins lose to Carolina. Stick a fork in Obama.
Both candidates were drawing large crowds as they dropped in and out of the most competitive states. Obama and Clinton drew 24,000 people to an outdoor rally in Bristow, Va., on a cold Saturday night.
Romney drew 10,000 in Cincinnati. Wow what a comparison
at Zilly,
That still does not tell you much. I am totally disappointed in Obama and am voting for Romney/Ryan. Yet, I would stand out in the cold to hear Clinton (not that it would change my mind and I would try to make sure I left before Obama started spouting off).
The size of Obama's lead in the new Marquette survey is a departure from other recentpublic polls, which have found results ranging from a deadlocked race to a 6-point Obama lead. Some Democrats said hey believed that while Obama is ahead, his margin is smaller than the latest MU poll shows.
But the survey does fit into a broader polling pattern in key respects. Obama has led or been tied with Romney in every public poll in Wisconsin since late August. And the president's level of support has remained fairly consistent, ranging from 48 percent to 51 percent in surveys by six different pollsters this month, including Marquette's.
Rove had Wis. as a toss up not
“MODERATE MITT” HYPOCRACY—INDEED!
THE ADS Romney is running in the closing days of this campaign says it
all: there is indeed no “moderate Mitt”—just like everything we already know
about this man, it is a sham. Now he is
playing up racist sentiments about welfare, and about the auto-industry—all
patently false and discredited by the media.
The extremist, wicked soul Mitt who wants to win with negatives and
division and racism is back, you might begin to think that the KKK is
contracted to run his campaign. This guy
is a phony. Remember that during the
recent Presidential debates, Romney tried to present himself as a
moderate. He said he is a compromiser
who was able to work with Democrats as Mass. Governor. Folks:
Look at the action, NOT WORDS! Action
tells you everything you need to know about a man. Romney couldn’t even see the value of
Christie, a Republican Governor, working with the President to fix ravages of the
storm. Another glaring case in point: Romney
cut an ad, his only ad., for extremist candidate Mourdock of Indiana, a man who
openly rejected the notion of compromise and specifically said he would NOT compromise
with Democrats if elected. Romney says
in his endorsement that this is the kind of person he would like to see in the
Senate. That says it all. To add insult
to injury, a day after receiving Romney’s ad. endorsement, Mourdock came up
with his latest bombshell: that rape is God’s will. This is the man Romney is supporting? Romney still supports him and wouldn’t ask
Mourdock to pull his endorsement ad.
Amazing time in America! WHY are
WOMEN or any moderate tolerating this sham of a candidate? It is even more insult for any one to call this
man a “bishop” of any religion! Where is
the moral restraint? Where is the moral core?
Where is truthfulness and compassion for
others. Romney is just a selfish individualist
who thinks only about himself and his kind!!! And this guy wants to be President?
>> A woman in a hot air balloon realized she was lost. She lowered her >> altitude and spotted a man in a boat below. She shouted to him, >> >> "Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him >> an hour ago, but I don't know where I am." >> >> The man consulted his portable GPS and replied, "You're in a hot >> air balloon, approximately 30 feet above ground elevation of 2,346 feet >> above sea level. You are at 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and >> 100 degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude. >> >> She rolled her eyes and said, "You must be a Republican. >> >> "I am," replied the man. "How did you know?" >> >> "Well," answered the balloonist, "everything you told me is >> technically correct. But I have no idea what to do with your information, >> and I'm still lost. Frankly, you've not been much help to me." >> >> The man smiled and responded, "You must be an Obama-Democrat." >> >> "I am," replied the balloonist. "How did you know?" >> >> "Well," said the man, "you don't know where you are -- or where you >> are going. You've risen to where you are, due to a large quantity of hot >> air. You made a promise you have no idea how to keep, and you expect me >> to solve your problem. You're in exactly the same position you were in >> before we met, but somehow, now it's my fault." >> >> P R I C E L E S S !!
So if Obama is doing so great and is such a wonderful fantastic president, why can't he run on his record and not have to have Bill (who was my fav president) out in front so Obama can hide behind him.
I am sick to death of this election and all the lies. All I can do is go out and vote which I will .. Romney/Ryan 2012. In my opinion a vote for a Obama is a vote to destroy America (Chavez, Castro, and Putin cannot all be wrong and they say --- Vote Obama 2012).
If the above seems really cynical, that is because it is. I voted for hope and change in 2008 and basically think we got shafted. If Hillary had been nominated in 2008, I am 100% sure we would not be in the situation we are now. Obama was historic and full of promise but turned out to be an incompetent, spendthrift, narcissist.
Everything seems really close but there is really no way to know until all the cards are on the table and revealed November 7th (or November 6th if we do not have endless recounts).
LOL "democratic history" the state motto is 'Live free or die', the democratic/liberal party's motto is, 'you need government to tell you how to live.'
Not seeing why anyone in NH would vote democrat, except for all the MA liberals moving up their and ruining a perfectly beautiful state.
People in Mass. know what Romney is all about That is why they would vote democrat. Open your eyes.
.
People in MA are too stupid to open their eyes, they dont even know why they are democrats, they are just a bunch of sheep.
Im in NH and I am voting Obama/Biden we need our rights and freedoms.
VoTe Vote Vote
In other words, you have always and only voted democrat, and you have no idea why.
Barry is crying like a rat eating onion saying "just give me another 4 years"!. This moron is only going to get his walking papers to head back to the streets in Chicago! He can take the other idiot BFD Biden with him as he heads out the door.
He has 4 years and screwed it up like nobody else in history! If you can't do the job then it is time to go. So hit the road jack and don't you come back no more! Have your idiot Axlehead shave his ugly face and mustache because he is going to lose it. He should also shave the rest of his bald fat head while he is at it!
You demorats and liberal nuts are going down in just two days! Say good night Irene!
Welfare in 2011: $60,000 Per Household
Taxpayers last year spent $1 trillion on welfare programs for households below the poverty line — enough to give each low-income household a check for $60,000.
According to a report from the Senate Budget Committee’s Republican staff and ranking member Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the federal government spent $746 billion on welfare in the 2011 fiscal year, and states paid out $254 billion in matching funds.
The federal total was up from $563 billion in fiscal year 2008, the last year of George W. Bush’s presidency, and up from $692 billion in fiscal 2009.
The federal welfare spending cited in the report does not include programs such as Medicare and Social Security, which are not means-tested and directed toward lower-income Americans, and does not include programs for veterans.
The Congressional Research Service reported that federal spending on health benefits for people with low income totaled $339 billion in fiscal 2011, with $295 billion spent on Medicaid.
The second largest category, Cash Aid, totaled $145 billion.
Federal taxpayers shelled out $101 billion for food assistance, including $80 billion for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps). That’s double what they spent in 2008.
The total also includes $2 billion for Nutritional Assistance for Puerto Rico.
Taxpayers also spent $41.4 billion on Pell Grants, $46 billion on Housing and Development, $7.5 billion on Head Start, and $5 billion on Energy Assistance.
According to the Census Bureau, last year 16.8 million U.S. households were below the poverty line of $23,000 per year for a family of four. If all households received an equal share of the $1 trillion in welfare spending, they would each get $59,523.
And if only the federal share of welfare spending is considered, without state matching funds, each low-income household would still receive $44,404 — nearly double the federal poverty line of $23,000.
The Sunday before the election, and he has to protect New Hampshire, and wheel out Bill Clinton to boot! Can you say Desperate LOL
Updated for 8:00pm EST on Sunday, November 4, 2012:
*** Updated RCP averaged polling numbers plus new FiveThirtyEight projections across the board.
Obama's leads have been strengthening in Ohio, Iowa, and Nevada over the weekend while weakening in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan; Romney has stabilized his position in both Florida and North Carolina.
Curiously, polling in Colorado, New Hampshire, and Virginia has been strangely absent over the past two days.
Mischief alert: Quite a bit of suspect outlier polling favorable to Romney being floated out in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan today in the face of multiple polling which confirms strong Obama leads in each of these states. The Karl Rove axiom of 'shape perceptions to alter outcomes,' perhaps?
---------------------------------------------------------
With less than 28 hours to go in the 2012 presidential campaign, Real Clear Politics (RCP) continues to report that Obama leads in eight of their 11 toss-up states with Romney leading in three.
In descending order of 'percentage of lead' in favor of Obama, followed in ascending order of 'percentage of lead' in favor of Romney, here are the published averaged numbers from RCP as of 8:00pm EST together with the most recent FiveThirtyEight election night probabilities of victory for either candidate:
In WISCONSIN, with 10 electoral votes, Obama's lead fell this morning to 4.2%, down from 5.0% on Saturday. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama a 94.3% chance of victory here, up by 1.0% from Friday and by an astounding 8.6% since Tuesday.
*** Advisory: It should be noted that RCP's average in Wisconsin has been influenced by an outlier poll from the right-leaning Rassmussen which has the race at a dead heat when four other current polls have Obama leading by 8.0%, 7.0%, 3.0%, and 3.0%. In fact, the 7.0% Obama lead was affirmed recently by another Right-leaning poll (WeAskAmerica) which is wholly funded by the conservative Illinois Manufacturing Association.
In PENNSYLVANIA, with 20 electoral votes, Obama's lead fell this morning to 3.9%, down from 4.1% on Saturday. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama a 97.9% chance of victory here, up by 1.8% from Friday and by a significant 3.8% since Tuesday.
*** Advisory: It should be noted that RCP's average in Pennsylvania also has been influenced this weekend by the release of an outlier poll from the conservative Pittsburgh Tribune-Review which has the race at a dead heat when two other findings have Obama's lead at 3.0% and 6.0%.
In MICHIGAN, with 16 electoral votes, Obama's lead fell this morning to 3.8%, down from 4.0% on Saturday. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama a 98.6% chance of victory here, up 0.2% from Friday and by 0.5% since Tuesday.
*** Advisory: It should be noted that RCP's average here has been influenced by yet another outlier poll, one released by Baydoun/Foster (D), a self-described Democrat-leaning voter analytics consulting firm based in Michigan, which has Romney up by 1.0% when four other polls have Obama leading by 6.0%, 6.0%, 5.0%, and 3.0%. In fact, the 5.0% finding for Obama was published late last week by Rasmussen, another Right-leaning poll. The irony is that Baydoun/Foster has consistently produced polling results which favor Republican candidates up and down the ticket in Michigan and their results, by and large, remain highly suspect.
In IOWA, with 6 electoral votes, Obama's lead rose this evening to 3.0%, up from 2.0% on Saturday morning. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama an 80.7% chance of victory here, down by 2.4% from Friday but up and by a substantial 6.8% since Tuesday.
In OHIO, with 18 electoral votes, Obama's lead held today at 2.8%, up from 2.6% on Friday. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama an 86.0% chance of victory here, up by 5.3% from Friday and by an astronomical 12.7% since Tuesday.
In NEVADA, with 6 electoral votes, Obama's lead held today at 2.8%, up from 2.4% on Friday.
FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama an 90.1% chance of victory here, up by 2.9% from Friday and by an astonishing 10.4% since Tuesday.
In NEW HAMPSHIRE, with 4 electoral votes, Obama's lead held today at 1.5%, down from 1.8% on Friday. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama an 79.4% chance of victory here, up by 0.7% from Friday and by an astounding 9.1% since Tuesday.
In COLORADO, with 9 electoral votes, Obama's lead held today at 0.6%, down from 0.9% on Friday. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Obama a 69.3% chance of victory here, up by 3.6% from Friday and by an astronomical 13.9% since Tuesday.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In VIRGINIA, with 13 electoral votes, Romney's lead held today at 0.3%, down from 0.5% on Friday. Interestingly, FiveThirtyEight increased Obama's chance of victory here (and not Romney's) to 70.7%, up by a substantial 5.9% from Friday.
In FLORIDA, with 29 electoral votes, Romney's lead held today at 1.4%, up from 1.2% on Friday. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Romney a 55.0% chance of victory here, up by 0.2% from Friday.
*** Advisory: It should be noted that RCP's average in Florida does appear to have been hyper-inflated by two recent outlier findings in favor of Romney, the first a 6.0% margin yesterday from the right-leaning Mason-Dixon Group with localized results for only the two cities of Tampa Bay (site of the 2012 RNC) and Miami (Marco Rubio stronghold), the second a 3.0% margin from Gravis Marketing, a polling firm funded in large part by BAIN Capital, and an appreciably older finding by The Sunshine State News, an ultra-conservative website/blog which had Romney leading by 5.0% on October 24. Minus the influences of these extreme outliers, Romney's true lead is likely well under 1.0% and quite possibly closer to that of dead heat.
In NORTH CAROLINA, with 15 electoral votes, Romney's lead continued to hold at 3.8%. FiveThirtyEight currently gives Romney a 79.7% chance of victory here, down 0.2% from Friday.
So...
In order for Obama to win re-election the least complex route would be through maintaining his current lead in the five toss-up states where his existing margins are widest (Wisconsin at 4.2%, Pennsylvania at 3.9%, Michigan at 3.8%, Iowa at 3.0%, and Ohio at 2.8%. Doing so would bring his electoral vote total on Election Day to 271. In this scenario, Obama could still surpass 270 while failing to hold Nevada, New Hampshire, and Colorado.
However, should Obama fail to hold the strategic prize of a hotly-contested Ohio, the loss could effectively be neutralized by any of the following combination of wins from states where FiveThirtyEight is currently forecasting Obama victories:
Path #1: Obama loses Ohio but holds the remaining three states where he presently leads, Nevada, New Hampshire, and Colorado resulting in 272 electoral votes.
Path #2: Obama loses Ohio but steals Virginia while also taking only one state from among Nevada, New Hampshire, or Colorado resulting in 272, 270, or 275 electoral votes, respectively.
Interestingly, with Romney's lead having diminished significantly in Florida over the past two weeks and with Hurricane Sandy forcefully highlighting the stark contrast between the candidates regarding the value and necessity if not the mere existence of FEMA in a state which has perhaps the greatest dependence on federal storm relief efforts in the nation, a 3rd path has now emerged which could provide for some interesting election night television:
Path #3: Obama comes from behind to win Florida. This scenario would require only that Obama win the three states in which his present leads are widest (Wisconsin at 4.2%, Pennsylvania at 3.9%, and Michigan at 3.8%), resulting in 276 electoral votes.
For Romney to unseat Obama, he not only would have to hold the three states in which he presently leads, North Carolina, Florida, and Virginia bringing his electoral vote total to 248, but also steal victories in at least one of the following possible combinations from states currently leaning Obama, listed in descending order of likelihood based on the reverse engineering of current FiveThirtyEight numbers for election night chances of victory:
Path A: Romney steals both Ohio and Colorado resulting in 275 electoral votes (least unlikely outcome).
Path B: Romney steals both Ohio and New Hampshire resulting in 270 electoral votes.
Path C: Romney steals both Pennsylvania and Colorado resulting in 277 electoral votes.
Path D: Romney steals both Pennsylvania and New Hampshire resulting in 272 electoral votes (most unlikely).
Working against two of these scenarios (Paths A and B) are rising averaged polling numbers over the past two days for Obama in Ohio; however, in that same forty-eight hour period Romney has succeeded in reducing Obama's averaged leads in Pennsylvania, Colorado, and New Hampshire. Perhaps somewhat mystifyingly, the Romney campaign continues to make pronouncements alluding to their having embraced the "Pennsylvania Strategy" included in Paths 3 and 4 above, the two paths which have the least likely chance of success.
So, is this a bold strategic maneuver on the part of Eric Fehrnstrom or a feint designed to counter Obama's anticipated re-allocation of campaign resources to a quantifiably softening political landscape in Florida? If it's the latter, a review of the published travel schedules for the President and key Democrat surrogates for tomorrow, with the one exception of Bill Clinton, does not suggest the Obama campaign is taking the bait.
In any event, should Romney fail to steal either Ohio or Pennsylvania he could overcome this shortfall by capturing the four other states in which Obama's current leads are smallest (Colorado at 0.6%, New Hampshire at 1.5%, Nevada at 2.8%, and Iowa at 3.0%) resulting in an electoral vote total of 273.
FiveThirtyEight this morning estimates the chance of Election Day victory for each candidate as follows: Obama 85.5% (up significantly from Friday morning's 80.9%) and Romney 14.5% (down by a similar margin from Friday's 19.1%).
FiveThirtyEight now also projects that on Election Day the final electoral tally will be as follows: Obama 306 (up 7 from Wednesday's 299) and Romney 232 (down 7 from Wednesday's 239).
Lastly, although it makes no difference in terms of the final result which can only be determined by the Electoral College, FiveThirtyEight currently predicts a national popular vote distribution on Election Day as follows: Obama 50.5% (up from Thursday's 50.4%) and Romney 48.5% (down from Thursday's 48.6%).
With only 28 hours of campaigning left, and with Friday's published October jobs report playing to predictably mixed reviews (economy adding more jobs than expected; unemployment rate ticking up one tenth of one percent to 7.9%), holdout voters may now be left to nothing more than the proverbial 'feel in their gut' as Tuesday approaches.
Predictions: Look for craziness down in Florida on Election Day and an unwillingness on the part of the Ohio Secretary of State, Jon Husted, to call the election in his state in a timely manner. In spite of these obstacles, Obama wins the White House with an electoral vote total of 332 to Romney's 206, taking Virginia and Florida along the way.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/04/1154799/-500-reasons-to-vote-against-Mitt-Romney-and-for-Barack-Obama?showAll=yes
500 Reasons to vote against Mitt Romney - (sources included)
Find out if your favorite reason is listed!
I used to be a Democratic Senatorial District Delegate and this trickle up poverty isn't what I signed on for. Obama is no Clinton. What Bill Clinton had Barack Obama couldn't even borrow to get. Clinton had true bi-partisanship; Obama couldn't bribe a vote from legislators, even in the Democratic Senate! We don't need another 4 years of this. We don't need a do-over president; we need a do-er. The bottom line is, who can make America make more money. Obama couldn't make a profit in a lemonade stand; he'd give away all the product and earnings and have too much overhead. I want a real businessman to turn our suffering economy into a surplus economy. I want someone who has proven success, and can demonstrate it in his own life. I want the same opportunities for my kids that my folks had for me, I want my kid to be able to find work when he graduates in four years. That's not going to happen under Obama. Just look at his record. Are college graduates able to find work? No. Obama's gotta go.
Elect Romney!
RR’12
GOP. ROMNEY, RYAN, Beohner, Eastmood- Spagheti cowboy, the four Horesemen,
WAR Start with Raegan senile- LOOT the US Traesury
WAr Bushes CANNOT FIND OSAMA - LOOT US TREASURY TRILLIONS dollar WAR
Romney allocate TWO TRILLIONS to be Looted by GOP.
LET US TEA PARTY to ARMAGEDON.
The four horesemen of APOCALYPSE.
EVICT COlored President from WHITE HOUSE.
EVICT OSAMA BIN LADEN Killer.
McCAIN/PALIN, ROMNEY/RYAN can only see RuSSIA ENEYMY number ONE.
GOP friend of Al QUEDA, CAN SEE OSAMA so GIOP can loot the US TREASURY by scaring us for 9/11/ WAR.
Romney is now scaring US for IRAN newcular Bomb.
LET US TEA PARTY to HItler 1000yeras KINGDOM with WWIII.
GOP Romney, Ryan, Boehner, Mitchconnel, Four horesemen the ARMAGEDON.
WAR - LOOT US traesury - Ronald semile Reagan attack Grenada
WAR - Loot US gtraesury BUSHES CAN NOT FIND OSAMA BIN LAden - Kowtow to Middle East ARAB KINGS.
WAR - Romney allocate TWO TRILLIONS to be looted so ROMNEY can be the first TRILLIONIARE.
LET US TEA PARTY to ARMAGEDON.
California, Obama / Mitt, November contest would likely give the California winner prize to Obama but how would a 3 way Obama, Mitt & Ron write in vote count end up? RP votes in 2008 were counted.
The Goldman Sacs / Fed reserve / GMO food-fuel twins might create a fun contest with the Texas Dr. Ron Paul & Judge Napolitano.
Auit the fed, support HR 459 Paul & S 202 Paul
Is this game about D R or other? maybe it is about saving the republic. Maybe Obama and Mitt are the underdogs.
The very fact that Obama wont address the Libya,Benghazi cover-up, and by his own words saying there's no need to talk about it before the election (like that is an answer) is proof that he is dirty,And his followers don't even want to know the truth of a set-up,murder and cover-up of a ambassador that dared to disagree with him and his policy's
The official story surrounding the events of September 11, 2012 in Benghazi, Libya which left four Americans dead, has now officially fallen apart.
After numerous flips and flops by the Obama administration, which originally attempted to paint the incident as a Muslim outcry over an anti-Islamic video, whistle blowers throughout the U.S. government, including within the White House, the State Department, national intelligence agencies and the U.S.military have made available stunning details that suggest not only did operational commanders have live visual and audio communications from drones overhead and intelligence assets on the ground, but that some commanders within the military were prepared to go-it-alone after being told to "stand down."
Africom commanding officer U.S. General Carter Ham, after being ordered to essentially surrender control of the situation to alleged Al Queda terrorists and let Americans on the ground die, made the unilateral decision to ignore orders from the Secretary of Defense and activated special operations teams at his disposal for immediate deployment to the area.(if the general had not intervened' there would be 34 dead Americans and not just 4---And now Obama has the U.S. General Arrested for Activating Special Forces Teams; Ignoring Libya Stand-Down Order. (Obama does not like the real light to be shined on him,HuH!)
Dr McCoy say's,
"Richard Nixon in China!!! Good God man!!! you'd think in these times Romney would resign by the the third year of his term!!!.
Mr spock say's,
That would be the logical choice Dr McCoy.
Romney say's Ryan has the budget but i don't know what's in it.
Damn, just how many federal disasters does Romney plan on having on Federal land, Federal cuts or other.
Not around these reservations you're not Romney!