Missouri Republican: 'Legitimate rape' rarely causes pregnancy

In a statement and a Tweet, conservative congressman Todd Akin says he "misspoke" during a local TV interview in which he made comments about "legitimate rape" and abortion. NBC's Kelly O'Donnell reports.

 

Updated 8:55 p.m. — A Republican Senate nominee found himself in hot water on Sunday for suggesting that instances of "legitimate rape" rarely results in pregnancy. 

Rep. Todd Akin, a Republican who's locked in a hard-fought campaign in Missouri to unseat Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, was answering a question regarding his position on abortion rights in instances when a woman is a victim of rape. 

"People always want to make it into one of those things — well, how do you slice this particularly tough ethical question," Akin said in an interview on KTVI-TV, video of which was circulated by the Democratic super PAC American Bridge. 

Todd Akin on the The Jaco Report

August 19, 2012

“First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said. 

Regarding his opinion on whether to allow for an abortion in such instances, Akin added: “But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something. I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.”

Akin's comments had an almost immediate impact on Missouri's Senate race. McCaskill wrote on Twitter:

In a statement, Akin said that he had misspoken. 

"In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it's clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year," he said.

Akin emerged earlier this month from a tough three-way primary in Missouri, where he rallied social conservatives behind his candidacy. Democrats actually spent during that primary to help Akin win, viewing the six-term congressman as a less formidable challenger in the general election. 

McCaskill, who was first elected in 2006, has become a top target for Republicans this fall, given President Barack Obama's unpopularity in the state and successive statewide victories for the GOP. 

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's campaign issued a statement disagreeing with Akin. 

"Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin’s statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape," said Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul.

Republicans need a net gain of four seats this fall in order to take over the Senate in the next Congress, and Democrats must defend 23 seats this fall. But unexpected Republican retirements and races that have become more competitive than expected have boosted Democratic hopes of maintaining their majority. 

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 78

What a 'tool'... And complete fool... You go Claire... You've got this one...

  • 566 votes
#1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:00 PM EDT
Comment author avatarRon IndianaRestored

Todd Akin is a total dumba$$. He didn't misspeak, he just doesn't know better. Another example of ideology getting in the way of reality.

  • 595 votes
#1.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:32 PM EDT

Tool is right. And igorant. And inhumane. And undeserving of anyone's vote.

  • 505 votes
#1.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:33 PM EDT
Comment author avatarSeven2SevenExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The current Republican crew knows alot about Rape but not in this case. I guess stealing from seniors and giving millionaires a 13% tax bracket is not rape unless they also get pregnant..........

  • 486 votes
#1.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:34 PM EDT
Comment author avatarBigAl Las VegasExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Can you believe this Republican pig! He's just another example of right wing ignorance.

VOTE DEMOCRAT !!!!!!!!!!

  • 400 votes
#1.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:36 PM EDT

And Bachmann supports this guy. Wonderful. I think we can stick a fork in this one. I hope she gets thrown out of the House soon. Who votes for these people? Never mind. Don't think I want to know...
http://www.akin.org/endorsements/cong-michele-bachmann-mn-6

  • 428 votes
#1.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:39 PM EDT
Comment author avatarExit0Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Anyone who would vote for that POS does not have the IQ of my cat's behind.

Obama/Biden 2012 & the 'Hill' in '16

  • 388 votes
#1.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:44 PM EDT
Comment author avatarRoger Z.Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Republican candidates say the most idiotic things sometimes....... Opps, I mean all the time ! This guy is no exception. What this guy said is nothing compared to Mitt Romney.

  • 315 votes
#1.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:46 PM EDT
  • You just can't fix stupid and this clown is living proof of it.
  • 498 votes
#1.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:47 PM EDT

First of all there is no such thing as "legitimate rape" because all rape is illegal. At least it was last I checked, but then who knows with all the anti-abortion legislation morons like this have been passing.

Repeated rape known as incest not only results in pregnancy, but can result in pregnancy multiple times -- pregnancy of a minor who's life would be forever altered, and incest that also can result in in deformity. Someone send this moron a copy of the movie "Precious."

  • 478 votes
#1.9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:48 PM EDT

Too bad there isn't a law against STUPID!

  • 380 votes
#1.10 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:50 PM EDT

WOW, is there such a thing as 'legi rape.'

What kind of party is the GOP?

  • 387 votes
#1.11 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:50 PM EDT

Who's going to be next to tell us there's no Republican war against women?

  • 498 votes
#1.12 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:51 PM EDT

What Todd Akin needs is 'the rapist,' I mean, 'therapist'. Adkin is sick.

  • 235 votes
#1.13 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:52 PM EDT

"The GOP rarely causes intelligent statements in public." ... that would have been more likely to be true than what Todd Akin said.

@NFIL: trust me; you don't want to meet Bachmann's supporters; they even frighten her.

  • 212 votes
#1.14 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:56 PM EDT

Perhaps if he were a legitimate human being, he wouldn't have said this.

  • 324 votes
#1.15 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:57 PM EDT

Looks like we have another Santorum on our hands, guess all the teawackos are losers !!!!

Santorum says, Rape victims should think of the babies conceived during their assault as gifts from God !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 369 votes
#1.16 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:59 PM EDT

I won't even comment about his assinine remark about "legitmate rape", but I WOULD love for him to provide the name of the Dr. who told him "a woman's body kind of shuts down" and prevents a pregnancy... that would be a new one for the books.

  • 459 votes
#1.17 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:01 PM EDT
Comment author avatarEdna453Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

What a stupid thing to say. And to make matters worse that means Claire McCaskill isn't going to go away. Surely they can find a quick replacement.

  • 30 votes
#1.18 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:03 PM EDT
Comment author avataroy-vay!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

His statement was awkward but factually correct. He was annoyed that the moderator was using an extreme case as a test case for most abortions. Many abortion proponents tend to use exceptional cases as gotchas when they know full well the scenario at hand doesn't apply to most cases.

His response was not politically correct but it was accurate. Unfortunately,most people will focus on the parts that evokes the most emotion and jump to conclusions rather than listen.

There is no sane person would would disagree that most rapes don't result in pregnancy, because it is an accurate statement.

  • 37 votes
#1.19 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:04 PM EDT
Comment author avatartomG8Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The guy is telling the truth! Only republicans are mature enough to talk about the real issues. Democrat liberals live in fantasy land. Liberals cant stand to hear cold mean facts. They're even starting to believe in mermaids and unicorn existenses now.

Women lie about rape all the time. Legitimate arguments are only made by conservatives.

  • 28 votes
#1.20 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:04 PM EDT
Comment author avatarpeteMTExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

May be so, but sadly, enough Americans hate Obama that they'll vote Republican regardless of what any of these idiots say.

Baby Jesus demands it!

  • 110 votes
#1.21 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:08 PM EDT

EVERY SINGLE TIME I think a Republican can't possibly utter something more idiotic, more misinformed or something that's just plain WRONG, one comes along to convince me otherwise.

  • 389 votes
#1.22 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:09 PM EDT

WOW is this guy REALLY this stupid???

First they had to change the term RAPE to "sexual assault", "sexual battery", so the puritanical A-holes don't have to envision the ACT. Now Republican/Teapublicans want to make RAPE "legitimate" in some way so they can FORCIBLY make a woman carry a RAPISTS baby??? WTF???

I would think a woman has to be brain dead to vote for ANY Republican or Teapublican because it looks like they really do want to set women back 100 years...No make that 2000 years.

Also, WHEN did women's bodies evolve the ability to self destruct a rapists semen or "shut down" conception??? Is this a philosophy brought on by religious beliefs or just stupidity???

  • 377 votes
#1.23 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:10 PM EDT

What would his view be if it was one of his relatives.

  • 159 votes
#1.24 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:10 PM EDT

tomG8 typed:

The guy is telling the truth! Only republicans are mature enough to talk about the real issues. Democrat liberals live in fantasy land. Liberals cant stand to hear cold mean facts. They're even starting to believe in mermaids and unicorn existenses now.

To you sir I can only say this... PLEASE do not reproduce. And see a doctor, SOON. If you're on medication now, it isn't working. If you're not, you need to be.

  • 354 votes
#1.25 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:11 PM EDT

Pray tell oy-vay...what is a 'legitimate rape?"

Then, go retake biology, and find out how conception happens. The stork really doesn't come to mommy's and daddy's house you know.

Then mind your own business. The great party of "get the Federal Government off our backs" ought to start that with the most intimate decisions that families make.

  • 265 votes
#1.26 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:11 PM EDT

It doesn't matter if "most rapes don't result in pregnancy." Rapes between men will never result in pregnancy. Don't play the odds in this matter. As an obstetrician, there is no mechanism for the "body to shut itself down" to avoid a pregnancy if the woman has ovulated recently. The coward, Akin, didn't answer the question: IF the woman becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest, or if her life is in danger if the pregnancy is not terminated, would he support the woman's right to an abortion, if she chose it? Answer Mr. Akin. Simply answer, yes or no. That's easy enough for a non-thinker.

  • 315 votes
#1.28 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:13 PM EDT
Comment author avatarLinda Peterson-1986959Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

A child that is created during an act of violence is still a child. I am the product of probably date rape. My birth mother respected the fact that I was a human child and gave me up in adoption to a loving childless couple. She worried for years if she had done the right thing. I had the opportunity to meet her 35 years later and will be eternally grateful for her sacrifice and love.

  • 55 votes
#1.29 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:14 PM EDT

The second I saw this "headline," I knew this jerk HAD to be a Republican. Boot him out of office. He's too stupid to represent anyone.

(I bet the "community" will "collapse" this comment......." Can't stand the truth sometimes.........)

  • 235 votes
#1.30 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:15 PM EDT

I'm sure this fool has never gotten pregnant whenever he gets raped.

You see, people? This is why you have to stop voting for idiot Republicans.

  • 184 votes
#1.31 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:18 PM EDT

So.. besides being a complete idiot, this guy wants to "punish the rapist, not the child". Why, then, is he so willing to punish the RAPE VICTIM by making her carry the child to term??? No wonder the GOP is in so much trouble, they cannot see the entire picture.

Why does the GOP (or anyone else, for that matter) think they have the right to decide whether or not a woman can have an abortion? This is a very private matter between the woman and her doctor. Sorry guys, but you have zero say until you carry the child. Just because you get a woman pregnant does not give you the right to decide whether the pregnancy continues or is terminated.

  • 239 votes
#1.32 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:19 PM EDT

Linda Peterson,

I find your life experience very uplifting for any woman who herself "chooses" to go forward with a pregnancy that was a result of a rape. But not for a minute is that choice up to the government to control. I'm hopeful we agree on this much.

  • 228 votes
#1.34 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:21 PM EDT
Comment author avatarBrianb-999431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

You can't tell me that First Read doesn't play to the liberals the exact tune they love listening to. Let's call this the liberal feed station... liberals come here to feed, rant and rave. Maybe in essence, First Read is doing us all a favor... allowing liberals to get the anger out of their system by typing in their favorite hate speeches about republicans and conservatives. After all, an angry liberal can do some pretty nasty things to society... their families and anyone that gets in their way.

Stories like this one play right into liberals hands. How many stories about democrats making fools out of them self air on this board... not many, if any at all. The biggest mistake Akin made was playing into the hand of the interviewer. For that, I call him stupid.

I didn't realize First Read was trying to emulate the Huffington Post.

  • 21 votes
#1.35 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:23 PM EDT

“First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

And exactly what "ways" are those, Akin?

Cripes, what a bunch of morons.

  • 165 votes
#1.36 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:23 PM EDT

Brianb999431,

"I didn't realize First Read was trying to emulate the Huffington Post."

Quite the complement. First read sais "thank you."

  • 51 votes
#1.37 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:25 PM EDT

Why do these idiots think the government has no business regulating Wall Street, but it should be able to tell a woman when to have a child?

  • 247 votes
#1.38 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:26 PM EDT
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

If these tea baggers had their way, they would bring "The Hand-Maids Tale" to fruition!

  • 148 votes
#1.39 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:26 PM EDT

Yep, I did too Jean321. Well, since it said, Missouri Republican in the first 2 words of the headline. ;-)

  • 21 votes
#1.40 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:27 PM EDT

This is likely to reshape the political math a little and modify a certain Republican's career plans a little.

  • 88 votes
#1.41 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:28 PM EDT

Lady Cat - What would his view be if it was one of his relatives.

Rich girls don't get "abortions" - they go on "vacation to Europe".

  • 179 votes
#1.42 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:28 PM EDT

Brianb-999431

You can't tell me that First Read doesn't play to the liberals the exact tune they love listening to. Let's call this the liberal feed station... liberals come here to feed, rant and rave

So just what are you doing here Brianb? Feed somewhere else and just come here to crap what you ate? Tell us where you're munching at.

  • 94 votes
#1.43 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:30 PM EDT

Feed somewhere else and just come here to crap what you ate?

It might be a good idea if BB, quit eating pencils!

WAAAYYY too much fiber in the mess he leaves here! ☺

  • 81 votes
#1.44 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:32 PM EDT

@Julkie -- who said "Rich girls don't get "abortions" - they go on "vacation to Europe -- This is absolutely true and is absolutely central to every GOPiggy initiative. The laws they want do not affect the wealthy - except to make them more wealthy.

And btw, all, "Legitimate rape" is a true and fundamental Republickan concept - and it rarely results in pregnancy. It's when a republickan governor sticks a plastic tube into a woman.

  • 110 votes
#1.45 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:32 PM EDT
Comment author avatarLinda Peterson-1986959Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Anna Banana, You are correct, it is not up to government, is is up to God.

  • 12 votes
#1.46 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:32 PM EDT

Sounds like Akin has been drinking Rick Santorum's kool aid again; you know, "All children are a gift from God" even if conception was the result of rape.

Perhaps some women want to keep a child conceived from a rape, and that is their right. It is also the right of a rape victim to terminate any resulting pregnancy. To suggest that either of those choices is better or more appropriate than the other is complete and utter nonsense.

Linda Peterson: There is no such thing as God. Religion is a very profitable business that caters to those who need to believe in fairy tales.

  • 132 votes
#1.47 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:33 PM EDT

Akins is a product of legitimate rape. His uncle daddy knew his sister was a legitimate mate so Akins could have a legitimate mommy aunt and keep the gene pool in the family. This guy gives a whole new meaning to the phrase of being from the "Show Me State." Show me someone from MO that has an IQ greater than 85 and I will show you someone who moved in from another state. My gosh where do these people come from? We have this lunatic Bachman, a product of Oral Roberts University, and now this nitwit. Is there something in the air and/or water in MO and OK the begets these Bible Thumping kooks? In my life span of over a half century I have never seen such lunatics until the Evangelicals started coming out from the dark corners and from under decayed wood piles.

I wonder if it is the legitimate rape that has been going on for the past 60 plus years among these Bible Beaters that has brought in this new crop of nut jobs. I cannot get over such an ignorant and stupid statement. Just totally unreal including the nut job from PA too. Now we have a Moron from a cult church wanting to be president. Our country and way of life will be destroyed by these products of legitimate rapes. I wonder who Romney's grandmother was a product of out of his grandpa's concubine. Was she his grandpa's daughter too? Simply amazing to much too believe.

  • 83 votes
#1.48 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:35 PM EDT

Why is it that the right wing only wants the government sticking its nose in people's business when it's between a woman's legs?

  • 158 votes
#1.49 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:36 PM EDT

Brianb.......comes to this blog every day and whines that he is not the only one able to comment.

Brianb ......whines that after this republican clown made the craziest statement ever.....that democrats all agree that this crazy idiot is Crazy and that these Democrats have the nerve to make a comment against CRAZY.

Brianb fails to notice even repubs are agreeing this guy is nuts......yet he thinks no one should speak out against what Brianb thinks...........The BrianB blog site.....NOT!

  • 87 votes
#1.50 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:37 PM EDT

BrianB,

Liberals may come here to make somewhat intelligent conversation while you come her to troll. Are you a paid blogger?

The Republican Party is all about taking away rights, the right to choose, the right to marry, the right to vote.

  • 153 votes
#1.51 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:38 PM EDT

This is another clumsy attempt by an anti-choice person to weasel around the rape or incest clause. If abortion is murder as they claim there can be no exceptions for conceptions resulting from rape or incest. But they don't generally have the courage to admit they would require a victim of rape or incest to carry a fetus full term, nor do they volunteer to adopt such children or pay for the woman's medical care, lost wages, etc.

They define hypocrite.

  • 131 votes
#1.52 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:38 PM EDT
Comment author avatarBob Vieira-6609709Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Don't no why yall gettin in a tizzy over this here comment by our deeply respected republican representative. There are times when rape is classified as being legitimate and this can be backed by some scientist. I don't no which one but them there sign tists are out thar.

I no this dude called billy who got busted for slapping his girlfriend around for cheating on him with her brother. Well golly, billy got thrown in the local jail down by the ol bar at the corner there..He was there for 8 years and got what you so call "raped" many times by them there big old buck uh hum...well good old willy never got pregnant..His defense mechanisms were working..He ain't go no babies..So you fancy pancy, smart nosed democratic people can kiss my dumb white a** !!!!

  • 30 votes
#1.53 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:39 PM EDT

@Linda Peterson

Isn't it a wonderful thing that your mother had a CHOICE? I may not agree with abortion, but I will fight tooth and nail for the rights of a woman to CHOOSE what to do with her OWN body. I don't have to live with the choice she has to make, she does.

  • 149 votes
#1.54 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:40 PM EDT

And when he said he "misspoke," what did he mean? Did he mean that he lied? Did he mean that he misunderstood the facts? Did he mean that he's too ignorant to know the difference? Or did he mean that he had intended to say, "I am too indifferent to women to give a crap." Just wondering.

  • 158 votes
#1.55 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:46 PM EDT

It is sickening that this aspiring senator Todd Akin is giving rape and incest such a ringing endorsement. The sickos will take his line to mean that no child will result from their act and that they will have more chances of getting away with the act.

  • 71 votes
#1.56 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:50 PM EDT

What doctor gave him this nugget of nonsense about a rape victim's body going into auto-shutdown to prevent a pregnancy? Moreau?

This guy is living proof of what happens when people do belly-flops in the gene pool.

  • 120 votes
#1.57 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:52 PM EDT

Intellect - 1949393 -- As far as Romney goes - you'll have to do a lot of searching to find his direct line of descent in the Mormon church seeing as how one of his male ancestors in direct line to him had 11 wives. I know this for a fact because she is also a 5th or 6th great aunt to me. And thank God I am not directly related to him.

  • 66 votes
#1.58 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:53 PM EDT

Love the "apology"

Especially the part where he starts blaming the people he insulted for being offended, then completely changing the subject.

  • 72 votes
#1.59 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:56 PM EDT

We are all giving a lot of credence to the concept of "legitimate rape". Doesn't this beg the question, just what is illegitimate rape?

  • 53 votes
#1.60 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:57 PM EDT

Only republicans are mature enough to talk about the real issues.

I think this person "misspoke" as well. The real sentence should read "Only republicans are immature enough to distort the real issues". This guy's statement is as ridiculous as Akin's.

And what's with this "misspoke" crap? You said it, live with it! Did you not have control of your mouth and vocal cords when you said it? Oh, I know...it's your brain that's out of control...but I guess Akin can be forgiven for losing control of something so tiny...

  • 71 votes
#1.61 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:57 PM EDT
Comment author avatarmike-2130882Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Dang, you liberals hear only what you want to hear and ignore the rest. The term "legitimate rape" in context was used to describe: That in "times of ACTUAL rape (switch the term actual for legitimate) the female body has ways to shut the whole thing down." (speaking of the reproductive process). He used the term legitimate because in his statement he was pointing out something that was contigent on an actual violent act as opposed to how the female body responds at other times. It had nothing to do with anything other than clarifying the situation he was speaking about.

What do you call a woman who has been raped, gets pregnant, keeps the child raising him or her to be a happy, productive and valuable member of society? I call her a woman of deep charachter. One must show character to have character. Our society has come so far from any kind of even remotely good values that it is disturbing. Abortion does not help our society, it keeps people from learning personal responsibility, accepting the consequences of thier actions and from teaching thier own children about these things. since the 60's millions of people have died as the result of permissive sexual attitudes, by disease, abortion, higher crime resulting from broken homes and unwed mothers. Traditional values do NOT result in such consequences.

Pull real hard, maybe your heads will pop out of your a@@es.

  • 7 votes
#1.62 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:58 PM EDT

Wow. I don't often say this on here or in real life, but that guy is an idiot. No, the body doesn't "shut down" and prevent pregnancy, and no, it isn't his business how a rape victim or any other woman chooses to deal with her personal life and her body. And oy-vay, you are just plain wrong, as are you, tom.

Linda, I'm sorry your birth mother was raped. That she chose to carry you and put you up for adoption, or whether she felt she could keep you and raise you, or whether she felt she just couldn't have a child from that rapist and that rape, depended on many factors. It was her personal struggle to decide what to do, and it often doesn't turn out as rosy as the story you are describing.

Her CHOICE wasn't the same as another woman's might be, and because it worked out for you doesn't mean every child conceived during a rape has a mother equipped and able to carry a child from that situation. I know a woman who was conceived during a brutal rape, and she was beaten and had to be removed from the home because her mother just plain couldn't deal with seeing her and husband hated her for being proof that her mother was raped. I am seriously happy that your story is a happy one, but I work with survivors of sexual assault and have seen young college women come in devastated from acquaintance or date rape. The ones who did get pregnant were absolutely unprepared to carry a child or, for that matter, make it through a day at that point. The mere idea that these women who were already victimized and feeling at that time they had no control over their lives, would be forced once again to have the child of the man who raped them is sickening to me. The choice and help, yes, but forced? NO.

Perhaps those who have gone through this might have at least some common sense and compassion on this topic. Amazing to me that once again men think they can make women do whatever THEY feel is best for them. Disgusting.

  • 124 votes
#1.63 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:59 PM EDT

"In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it's clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year,"

Translation: "I cannot think and speak at the same time".

It's an affliction that is shared by the preponderance of the Rabid Right.

  • 94 votes
#1.64 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:01 PM EDT

Do either of Governor Romney or Congressman Ryan agree with republican Akin's "medical" opinion? MSM needs to ask them.

  • 43 votes
#1.65 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:01 PM EDT

Old, wealthy, powerful, white men defining rape...Any women, any female, your daughter, your sister, your girlfriend, your wife, your mother, any male who would rather be a female or any female who would rather be a male or anybody who knows and loves a women...would NEVER, EVER, EVER vote republikan. These people are patently misogynistic.

  • 105 votes
#1.66 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:02 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJS in SDExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

This guy is a complete idiot. He did not mis-speak, he just does not have a clue. I would also like to know what doctor he is getting his information from so that I can be sure that no one I care about ever goes to the idiot for treatment.

That said, I have a very serious problem with this statement about the actions of the Democratic party.

Democrats actually spent during that primary to help Akin win, viewing the six-term congressman as a less formidable challenger in the general election.

This is blatant tampering with the election process. The Democrats have no business interfering in the Republican party nominating process. Actions such as this should be illegal as it taints the entire process. It also may be a violation of campaign finance regulations and should be investigated by the FEC.

  • 17 votes
#1.67 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:03 PM EDT
Comment author avatarOkicize Wicasa Yata PiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The more i think about the word legitimate the more it makes sense.

  • 1 vote
#1.68 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:04 PM EDT

Bob Vieira:: Since you think that azzhole is your deeply respective republican representative, maybe you can get him to explain what he means by "legitimate rape". RAPE is illegal. If it is between two consenting adults who consent to it, then it is not rape.

And the kind of "rape" he got in jail doesn't fit the true definition of rape. Besides, you don't get pregnant when you have anal sex-- there is NO defense mechanism working. Whether it is between a man and a woman or two men.

You surely are from Missouri! There is no one dumber!!

  • 32 votes
#1.69 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

Why does the Republican party have so many ignorant morons representing them?

  • 81 votes
#1.70 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

He is alone in his sick thoughts, apart from what Republicans truly are for. He is an embarrassment to our party.

Ah, but he is in your party. As your buddy, GW Bush once proclaimed, "you're either with us, or against us!"

  • 66 votes
#1.71 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

Mike:

Are you serious; abortion "keeps people from learning personal responsibility"??? Wow, talk about closed minded. So you would PUNISH THE VICTIM of a rape crime (let's be clear, only women can get pregnant) by making HER carry the child to term? What a guy. And if YOUR DAUGHTER were the victim in this type of crime, would you punish her in that manner, as well?

And what punishment would you mete out to the rapist? NOTHING compares to the changes a woman's body goes through in carrying a child to term. Those changes cannot be reversed or ignored. Could you at least get educated on the subject before you post such gibberish?

  • 100 votes
#1.72 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:06 PM EDT

typical, this isn't about birth control. it's about pr!ck control.

  • 50 votes
#1.73 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:08 PM EDT

In a perfect world, there would be no abortion.... and no rape, poverty, incest, religious intolerance, or medical problems.

  • 37 votes
#1.74 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:14 PM EDT

Remember the song "I'm my own grandpa"? In this case, I believe it!

  • 30 votes
#1.75 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:14 PM EDT

Doug, I don't know about Ryan, but Romney will agree with him, today. He'll then disagree tomorrow. Tuesday he will need to think about it some more.

  • 71 votes
#1.76 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:17 PM EDT

[Liberals may come here to make somewhat intelligent conversation while you come her to troll. Are you a paid blogger?]

Holy crap! You mean Brianb found a freaking job? Good...maybe that delusional hypocrite will stop bleeding the system dry. I'm tired of supporting this lowlife.

  • 46 votes
#1.77 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:23 PM EDT

The press didin't cover the local LA meeting that Repuplicans in Washington frequent:

"Hey ya'll, my names Todd Aiken, and I'm a compulsive liar. I have ZERO days lie free."

Next up: Hi, my names Paul Ryan, and I'm a compulsive liar. I have ZERO days lie free."

  • 48 votes
#1.78 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:24 PM EDT

They are Republicans plain and simple little or no education

  • 52 votes
#1.79 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:25 PM EDT

News Flash ! Th female body just shuts down unwanted pregnancies ! Abortions are just necessary for women who want to keep that pregnancy. This guy is unreal !

  • 44 votes
#1.80 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:26 PM EDT

"if it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down"

Can you believe what the die hard Conservatives believe? The sad thing is there are plenty of uninformed and weak minded people who accept their rhetoric and ignore their record while denying exactly how the Conservative policies are affecting their own lives and limiting their freedom to choose for themselves! What's worse is that they turn out in huge numbers and vote!

  • 63 votes
#1.81 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:27 PM EDT

Why does the Republican party have so many ignorant morons representing them?

Because Republicans still believe in the Good Ol' Boy network. In their minds, white males are the only ones qualified to make decisions.

  • 72 votes
#1.82 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:27 PM EDT

Republicans have become stupid. Clearly and obviously stupid. We need to replace them with something with a little more brains and common sense. Funny, but any elephant would do.

  • 43 votes
#1.83 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:30 PM EDT

This is another clumsy attempt by an anti-choice person to weasel around the rape or incest clause. If abortion is murder as they claim there can be no exceptions for conceptions resulting from rape or incest. But they don't generally have the courage to admit they would require a victim of rape or incest to carry a fetus full term, nor do they volunteer to adopt such children or pay for the woman's medical care, lost wages, etc.

They define hypocrite.

I agree and would like to know what he would think if a 13 year old girl got pregnant from incest or rape is she supposed to give up her life at such a young age and carry the child to term? I know it is very rare that this particular case would come up but there are instances where abortion is more than justified and should be an uncontested right of any woman who has become prgnant due to rape. I think this guys comment is one of the dumbest things i have ever heard come out of a supposedly educated mans mouth what a shame it is to see that people like this are trying to make decisions for the better of our country.

  • 57 votes
#1.84 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:31 PM EDT

Strange he'd quote statistics's about the chance a woman getting raped would have of getting pregnant when the question was what about those who did. Obviously the ones not getting pregnant aren't relevant.

Even stranger is that the party that's so concerned about the unborn have so little for those that are. They'd force poor women to have babies they can't afford then vote for cutting funding for food stamps, medicaid and school nutrition programs crying about self reliance. I've yet to see a newborn that was capable of self reliance but that's just me.

Usually when I point this illogical logic to right wingers they talk about if the parent had just used birth control or abstained she wouldn't get pregnant I like to point out it wouldn't be the ones prevented by birth control or abstinance that are denied food from these program cuts but real live babies and children.

  • 63 votes
#1.85 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:32 PM EDT
Comment author avatarahofiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I love how all the liberals on here keep saying things like "legitimate rape? what's a 'legitimate rape'? All rape is illegal. Guess what people, legitimate has more than one meaning. Legitimate can mean allowed by the law, or it can mean the real deal, as opposed to a fake. e.g. Although Tom thought he had the actual Declaration of independence, it was a copy and not legitimate. or Although she believed the painting to be an original, she called in an expert to determine if it was a legitimate Da Vinci.

P.S. I do not know if the definition of legitimate as meaning the real deal would be found in your dictionary, however, it has been very widely used in spoken English for at least the past decade, so Akin's use of the word was appropriate.

  • 4 votes
#1.86 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:34 PM EDT
Comment author avatarNewMalthusExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

More BS from the left wingers at MSNBC, trying to create an issue where they have none.. See the following language, used in the same manner as by Mr. Atkin.

People v. La Porte, 103 Mich. App. 444 (Mich. App. 1981)

"5. Defendant failed to cite any case law or policy considerations in support of his allegation of error by the trial court in allowing the physician who examined complainant to testify to his opinion that she was a legitimate rape victim and thus failed to preserve his position for appellate review."

People v. Smith, 425 Mich. 98 (Mich. 1986) fyi thats Michigan Supreme Court.

"E.g., People v LaPorte, 103 Mich App 444; 303 NW2d 222 (1981), the case involving Gerald Wells' alleged accomplice. While the Court held that the defendant had failed to preserve the error for review, it went on to discuss the alleged error in the examining physician's testimony that he thought complainant was a "legitimate rape victim," id., p 451, opining that the testimony was admissible."

  • 3 votes
#1.87 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:37 PM EDT

More BS from the left wingers at MSNBC, trying to create an issue where they have none.

More denial from the reich wingers when one of them blurts out the truth about their real agenda of controlling women's bodies.

  • 71 votes
#1.88 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:42 PM EDT

He is clearly ignorant. There is no such thing as legitimate rape what the hell is wrong with that idiot. Pregnancy can result at any time if the person woman has no form of contraception. How can he be so damn stupid as say something like that and then try to excuse himself. He said what he meant and meant what he said. I wonder how he would feel if that would have happened to a female in his family. I am sure he would be signing a different tune. Ignorance breeds ignorance and that is how repubs are.

  • 43 votes
#1.89 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:43 PM EDT

I'm sure he'll still "rally" the Tea Party conservatives... but no one else.

  • 31 votes
#1.90 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:47 PM EDT

This guy almost sounds as bright as dubya and then you wonder who votes for these people? How about the hard right trying to say he's right in how he used the word?????? PLEASE, cut me a break already.

  • 37 votes
#1.91 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:48 PM EDT

Intellect-1949393

No need to pile on. I am embarrassed enough that I was born and raised in the same state that this a-hole is trying to represent, but please don't lump everyone from Missouri in the same vein. I have a Masters degree in Engineering from a highly respected University, so, contrary to popular opinion, some of us in Missouri do have intelligence.

What is really frustrating is all of the money from out of state that is allowed to be spent to influence the elections in Missouri. US Chamber of Commerce keeps pouring money at this election to endorse the "job creators"...they just don't want the stupid to know the jobs they want to create are in India, China, Central and South America.

Vote Democrat. The job you save may be your own.

  • 60 votes
#1.92 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:52 PM EDT

I'm surprised - When did he earn an MD degree? How did he get elected? Seriously stupid. Legitimate rape. What does that mean? If rape can be legitimate, what is illegitimate rape? Stupid, stupid, stupid. From a humanist perspective - should we really punish a woman who was raped with having to give birth to the rapist's child? From an evolutionist perspective - Do we really want those rapist genes transmitted to future generations?

@NewMalthus - you could have a legitimate complaint or an illegitimate complaint. That text just means that the rape victim is a rape victim and not someone who cried rape. Learn proper english - your argument is illegitimate.

Men should not make legislation concerning women's bodies. They should focus on their own issues. That goes especially for politicians who have no medical expertise.

  • 38 votes
#1.93 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:57 PM EDT

If the word 'rape' is used to describe sth, that sth is no longer 'legitimate;' I wonder why common sense is so hard ... at least for this Repugnant (RepubliCan't).

  • 24 votes
#1.94 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:00 PM EDT

Sounds like it's time for "Pussy Riot".

  • 31 votes
#1.95 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:01 PM EDT

Mike: Wow, just Wow...so the female body responds to a violent act one way, and to non violent acts another way. I as a female, just love it when men think they know more about the female body than females do.

I agree with the poster above, this has more to do with men learning to keep it in their pants and not treating women like second class citizens than dealing with the actual violent act.

So in your male mind, males don't have any responsibility in any of this. It is left up to the woman to deal with the violent act, deal with a possible consequence of that act(pregnancy), and then raise that child or give the child up for adoption. What a male chauvinistic attitude.

  • 65 votes
#1.96 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:03 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJohn Doe-2241225Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Democrats say similar trash all the time. No one's creating national news articles about them tough. Biased reporting, that's simply all it comes down to.

  • 2 votes
#1.97 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:05 PM EDT

If we had a law against stupid we would have anyone in politics.

  • 9 votes
#1.98 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:07 PM EDT
Comment author avatarAl-524682Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I am a retired police officer. We had women who reported sexual assaults that were false accusations. They did it for revenge, blackmail, or a fail to pay (prostitution). So if you keep this in mind you have a legitimate reporting of an offense and an illegitimate reporting of an offense. Most actually occurred and they should have cut off his love muscle for doing it. One other note, juries that mostly had women on them were more likely to acquit the guy or gave him a lighter sentence than juries of men. The reason women didn't want to hammer some guy was they felt sorry for him or didn't believe the woman who was assaulted, especially if she didn't show visible signs of physical attack. So you women making the most noise on here need to cool it, since women are the ones who won't slam the guys who do this serious crime.

  • 4 votes
#1.99 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:15 PM EDT

"Why does the Republican party have so many ignorant morons representing them?"

I suspect these people are a product of too much fundamentalist Christian indoctrination, that has heavily distorted their economic and political views into an unreality that's far separated from everyone else. Combine that with their Ayn Randian vision of a world where only heroes with a case of arrested adolescence succeeds, you'll have selfish, ignorant narcissists that arrogantly believe they have all the answers.

  • 45 votes
#1.100 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:18 PM EDT

Using this mans logic, looks like a woman's body would help her throw off the sperm effects of an illegitimate rape more than a legitimate rape, since the sperm from the illegitimate rapist is illegitimate, and the sperm from the legitimate rapist is, or has to be legitimate, since the rapist is a legitimate rapist. Whomever the Doctors were who told Him this may indeed have the whole thing "Ass backwards". Republicans! They are all so considerate and thoughty, with a wealth of knowledge!

  • 33 votes
#1.101 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:20 PM EDT

Missouri Republican: 'Legitimate rape' rarely causes pregnancy

OMFG, this man is a complete azzhole. I wonder how many women and little girls he raped to come up with this conclusion of his. He's another politician that needs to be tossed out to the curb on his stupid azz.

Obama 2012

Lets all vote out each and every one of these goddamn repukians asap.

  • 45 votes
#1.102 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:24 PM EDT

From an earlier poster: "What do you call a woman who has been raped, gets pregnant, keeps the child raising him or her to be a happy, productive and valuable member of society?"

I'd call that woman PRO-CHOICE. For her, bearing a child was her CHOICE. She made the CHOICE to keep her child.

People, it's not a pro or con abortion matter, that's a small part of the real issue, PRO-CHOICE. The abortion matter is at every election, used as a distraction on the larger issue of CHOICE. And brought to you compliments of the radical right-wing evangelistas, mainly republicans and now the repub/tparty. It's usually accompanied with the LGBT issue, but that appears to be over and done, tho there's still time.

All this legislating, positioning, transvaginating - all distractions on the real issue of CHOICE. The repub/tparty is doing their divide and conquer strategy, using abortion. That's not what women are about. WE are for CHOICE, plain and simple.

P.S. Stay away from Aiken's medical advisors!

  • 50 votes
#1.103 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:26 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJimSpenceExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Julkie

Why is it that the right wing only wants the government sticking its nose in people's business when it's between a woman's legs?

Hmmmm, I'm curious.

Correct me if I'm wrong. By your statement I assume you're of the belief that government should stay our of our bedrooms and a womans vagina/womb. Right?

If so, why do you support the government mandating that insurance companies pay for contraceptives?

BTW, even though I'm Pro-Life--except in cases of rape, incest or imminent danger to the mother--I don't support what Representative Akin said.

  • 2 votes
#1.104 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:28 PM EDT

these are the same people, who are making our laws, scary sh..t.

  • 34 votes
#1.105 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:33 PM EDT

Scarier than crazy, sex-crazed old Todd (who truly deserves time in jail with an amorous cellmate named Junior) is bottomless GOP treasure trove, the machine that keeps selling desperate and ignorant Americans the idea that the same greedy corporate monsters who caused this mess are going to save us.

Even scarier: As H. L. Mencken put it, no one ever went broke underestimating the stupidity of the American people.

Do not trust any institution that wants to direct traffic in your underpants. There is no more extreme and basic form of control.

And boys, if you want a comparison, imagine a government that wanted to take away not just all your guns, but all your Viagra and other "male enhancement" drugs. Would you like that? No sirree, you would not. So leave the girls alone. We will sort out our own issues, thank you very much.

  • 39 votes
#1.106 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:37 PM EDT

Thank you NBC News for using this opportunity to 'SHOW ME' another synonym for J*CK*SS.

Jackie K...thank you for posting a succinct but eloquent comment. I was arrested once in San Diego for beating the cr*p out of the perpetrator of a date rape on a good friend of the family. She arrived at our door about 1:30 in the morning bruised and bloody. I was released with no charges when the report came from the hospital, the three hours in holding was worth it. The hospital as standard practice voided any possible consequences. The mental scars are the worst part, and having to endure a pregnancy would have caused irreparable emotional trauma.

  • 38 votes
#1.107 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:37 PM EDT

I find it approaching the definition of treason for anyone with one ounce of intelligence, Republican or Democrat or Human being to vote for this terminally stupid jack ass.

  • 39 votes
#1.108 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:39 PM EDT

My opinion of the average Missourian just dropped considerable. Either their educational system has failed miserably and not offered Sex Ed. Courses to their republican politicians or the republican party has become too dense to be considered for any office. Stupid Akin. Vote the Intelligent party! DEMOCRASTs not the party of the rich and stupid!

  • 28 votes
#1.109 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:39 PM EDT

I hope this man does not have daughters, a wife or sisters. If he does, I feel sorry for them. It is the choice of the woman or girl to decide what to do with her body. If she is forced to have the child, and can't afford it, will this politician take care of it? He seems to like blaming the victim. It is none of his business. Focus on jobs and the economy.

  • 36 votes
#1.110 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:40 PM EDT

Jim Spence,

Because we are Americans and we don't want stupid republicans to be elected to run this country with no brains! If you are married ask your wife what she things of the statement!

  • 22 votes
#1.111 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:42 PM EDT

Arieus; my thoughts exactly, maybe they need to investigate his past and see if he raped a classmate back in hs, or a girl while he was in college. If he did, and she got pregnant he probably denied it was his, claimed the girl had been sexually active recently, etc. etc. You know if he did get someone pregnant that way he denied responsibility for the baby's cares.

  • 19 votes
#1.112 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:43 PM EDT

People of Missouri. I know you've had an awful drought, and you're all pretty damn aggravated, but You don't need the likes of this man. Damn Missouri, you've given this nation "Harry Truman", "Stuart Symington", "Thomas Hart Benton" and the list goes on. You are known as the "Show Me" state. Well, "Todd Akin" has shown you. You shouldn't need anything else. The man belongs more in an "Asylum" than the Senate.

  • 37 votes
#1.113 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:45 PM EDT

Umm, New, the part about "legitimate rape victim" doesn't mean "legitimate rape". Now I am laughing. Is this the basis of anyone's argument??? That part just means that it is his opinion that she was the victim of a rape and the sexual act wasn't consensual. Are you serious that you thought that mean "legitimate rape victim"? It was "victim of a rape" and not a question of what type of rape she suffered..lol.

  • 2 votes
#1.114 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:45 PM EDT

Todd Akin, sounds like the typical republican, giving men free reign to become a rapist who goes around impregnating women by rape and then threatens them with prison time if they abort the baby. Can't get much more evil than that. Republicans, never hold the male responsible for legal nor illegal, conception. They think women can conceive all by themselves, and they, (the elected republican male officials) have total control of the womens bodies.

  • 28 votes
#1.115 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:48 PM EDT

Per the article title:

Legitimate rape rarely causes pregnancy.

My, my..........Only a complete " Idiot " would say something like that!

  • 33 votes
#1.116 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:48 PM EDT

Glad to see Feisty Red fighting in the trenches with us, once a while. Many here miss your leadership.

  • 16 votes
#1.117 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:49 PM EDT

Our founding fathers would spit on the GOP Tea Wackos !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 39 votes
#1.118 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:57 PM EDT

Another ignorant Republican Pig, looking to smack women down.

Is anyone surprised? He's actually saying what most republicans are thinking.

  • 37 votes
#1.119 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:58 PM EDT

Al 524682,

Glad to hear you are a retired cop because with your comment "you women need to cool it!" I'm glad you have no power to decide who is a victim and who is not anymore.

  • 26 votes
#1.120 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:01 PM EDT

when he says "legitimate" rape what he's really saying is another old white pig-man thing... that is code for "if she ain't askin' for it"

Another cherished notion with this these porkers-- it's okay to force a woman to have sex because a: she really means "yes" or b: look what she's a wearin'

  • 32 votes
#1.121 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:01 PM EDT

Sorry Linda but it's the WOMAN'S decision. There IS no 'god'.

  • 18 votes
#1.122 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:02 PM EDT

I am a die hard Republican but I have to say this is one of the dumbest, most insensitive things I have hear recently. I am sure someone will try to spin as it was taken out of context such as Obama with his “you didn’t build it” or Biden’s “putting you back in chains” statement. All three got caught saying something stupid but Representative Akin was over the top. Legitimate Rape as opposed to what? Anyone voting for guy has to be nuts and I am sorry to have to say that but it is the truth in my opinion!

  • 26 votes
#1.123 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:02 PM EDT

I suspect these people are a product of too much fundamentalist Christian indoctrination

Of course they are! Christian cult nonsense and BuyBull-Home-Schooling screws more people up than drugs and alcohol combined!

  • 26 votes
#1.124 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:03 PM EDT

Mark! One difference -- maybe what Biden said was politically incorrect, but at least he was being honest.

Your guy was just being a typical republican IDIOT.

  • 25 votes
#1.125 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:09 PM EDT

TP/GOP are clueless. Now it's their responsibility to prove they do not have a war on women or a war on a woman's right to make decisions regarding their own bodies.

  • 26 votes
#1.126 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:11 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJimSpenceExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

clwyd-2621393

Jim Spence,

Because we are Americans and we don't want stupid republicans to be elected to run this country with no brains! If you are married ask your wife what she things of the statement!

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Nice try.

I told you I don't agree with the statement but you avoided the point of my post.

Or should I say there is no arguable answer other than you Liberals are hypocrites. You don't want government in the bedroom,vagina, womb or any other part of your body, but it's OK for it to demand insurance companies pay for contraceptives, which I believe are a significant part of what happens in the bedroom.

Romney/Ryan 2012 for real Americans

    #1.127 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:15 PM EDT

    It's sad that tax payers pay for losers like Todd Akin !!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 27 votes
    #1.128 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:15 PM EDT

    JimSpence #1.104~~Neither the government, nor the insurance provider is FORCING anyone to use contraceptives. The republican teapartiers are denying women the availability of contraceptives, which they (the women) have already paid for, as in their premium payment, just as viagra, ED meds and all prescription drugs are paid in the premiums that men have paid. BTW, I am pro-choice all the way, for every woman, and that does not mean I am pro-abortion, I am not. Leave the women alone, stay out of our bodies,we are very intelligent, with lots of experiences and we don't need any man telling us what to do, or what not to do. I am curious as to how the spouses of these controling republicans, continue letting them control, their bodies.

    • 43 votes
    #1.129 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:17 PM EDT

    Legitimate Rape??? Yet another oxymoron is born.


    • 24 votes
    #1.130 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:17 PM EDT

    Jim Spence,

    You didn't get why I didn't respond to your statement. Yes, because I agree with the fact that insaurance companies should pay for it ( It is a lot cheaper than paying for an unwanted child and a lot more Christian) and that this Akin is retarded republican and probably a teabugger!

    • 24 votes
    #1.131 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:21 PM EDT

    Maybe Todd was reading Ayn Rands book !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Maybe Todd got his info from Rudy Giuliani !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Maybe Todd got most of his info from Santorum !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 19 votes
    #1.132 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:23 PM EDT

    Lowlifes of the world can find a home in the republican party. Ignorance rules and is the only prerequisite!

    • 27 votes
    #1.133 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:23 PM EDT
    Comment author avatarSow your seeds, not mine!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    And you fools get all of this from 38 seconds of edited video........what morons.

    The downfall of the USA will rest solely on your shoulders.....

      #1.134 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:24 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarJimSpenceExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      GREATGRAN101-6569953

      I never said the insurance provider or government is forcing anyone to use a contraceptive.

      The Obama “contraceptive mandate” in the ACA requires all insurance providers cover the full range of FDA-approved drugs and devices and pay for it.

      So the government is demanding that contraceptives be available at no cost, not used, but you Liberals demand government stay out of your bedroom, vagina, womb, etc.

      You don't want government telling you what to do because of your intelligence and experience, yet you demand they force someone to provide contraception.

      No matter how you spin this, it's hypocrisy. You either want the government out of your body or you want it in your body. You can't have it both ways.

      Romney/Ryan 2012 for real Americans

      • 2 votes
      #1.135 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:41 PM EDT

      He opened his mouth and shot himself in the head.

      • 17 votes
      #1.136 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:46 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarJimSpenceExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      clwyd-2621393

      Jim Spence,

      You didn't get why I didn't respond to your statement. Yes, because I agree with the fact that insaurance companies should pay for it ( It is a lot cheaper than paying for an unwanted child and a lot more Christian) and that this Akin is retarded republican and probably a teabugger

      So Liberals are hypocrites.

      Romney/Ryan 2012 for real Americans

      • 2 votes
      #1.137 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:47 PM EDT

      I wish politicians would stop focusing abortion legality for pregnancy due to rape. No matter HOW a woman becomes pregnant, it is HER decision whether to carry the fetus to term - period.

      Abortion may be the best choice for a pregnant girl or woman. You don't get to define WHEN she has that choice.

      • 21 votes
      #1.138 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:56 PM EDT

      tjohn:

      Its called "Political Paralyze." A dreaded disease that affects the gray matter between the ears. Unfortunately there is no known cure.

      • 3 votes
      #1.139 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:58 PM EDT

      ... well, how do you slice this particularly tough ethical question?" -Rep. Todd Akin, a Republican.

      Apparently, you don't leave the task up to the dullest knife in the whole damn kitchen.

      • 18 votes
      #1.140 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:58 PM EDT

      Are there any sane and/or educated teabaggers? The crazier you are, the more likely you are to win a republican nomination.

      • 12 votes
      #1.141 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:59 PM EDT

      you know reading most of the comments I see one thing standing out. The two party system should be eliminated. So many here have one thing on their agneda. Slam the other party. This candidate,( I don't know him) didn't say what he really meant to say. I came out wrong and he knows that. We still know he opposes abortion. However he should not be judged by this as EVERY other candidate has at some point made a stupid comment. Their isn't a president to date that hasn't put his foot in his mouth a few times , republican and Democrat.

      I say we drop the 2 party thing and no one but the candidates declare if they are Liberal or conservative. We as the voter could look at each candidate without the steriotype of a party affiliation and vote for the person not the party. We then would have a government that would serve the people.

      Get you heads past the headlines and serch for the real truths that each candidate has donenot what he/she says they will do.

      • 1 vote
      #1.142 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:03 PM EDT

      Anna Banana, You are correct, it is not up to government, is is up to God.

      Fairy tales do not make decisions. We live in a world populated by human beings, who must make decisions. Relying on mythology has never, and will never work.

      It is a shame that you relieve yourself of responsibility by passing the buck to an imaginary being. That shows a complete lack of courage.

      • 12 votes
      #1.143 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:04 PM EDT

      JimSpence

      Your comments just keep amazing me, or perhaps it is the lack of information you really have when you make comments

      you don' want government in the bedroom............but it's OK for government to demand Ins. companies pay for contraceptives

      But I suppose it's not OK for the government to demand that drugs effecting the reproductive organs of Males be mandated? You are obviously under the impression that females only take contraceptives as a form of birth control. There are a whole host of medical problems that are treated by 2nd generation contraceptives, even Acne not to mention the #2 reason is actually menometrorhagia in women to prevent anemia. You are narrow minded. Do you believe the government should mandate your insurance company to pay for male reproductive organ issues like BPH? What about Viagra, Flomax, Cialis, Avodart, Cardura, Proscar?

      • 22 votes
      #1.144 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:05 PM EDT

      Jim Spence,

      Yes, Romney and Ryan for really dumb Americans! Akin included.

      • 16 votes
      #1.145 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:06 PM EDT

      Frogmorton

      For starters I think I made it pretty clear he is my man and if he had been he no longer would be. As far as the truth you can't possibly believe that the Republican agenda includes incorporating slavery or putting any ethnic group in chains, that's just nonsense. I personally believe all three of the individuals I mentioned said something stupid and unfortunately tried to tap dance around their comments claiming them to be something they were not, nothing more nothing less. I don't try to make excuses for anyone Republicans included when they become vile. I wish we could all do that.

      • 1 vote
      #1.146 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:12 PM EDT

      I suppose we could let his wife and daughter ( if he has any) get raped and see how he feels. Let him watch.

      • 9 votes
      #1.147 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:16 PM EDT

      Just WHO are these "real Americans" you keep referencing in your asinine posts Jim Spence? We are all REAL AMERICANS if we're citizens of this country who give a crap about our CIVIL RIGHTS being stripped by radical idealogues like you. Please read the Constitution.

      • 17 votes
      #1.148 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:19 PM EDT

      What the hell is "legitimate" rape is my question.

      • 11 votes
      #1.149 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:26 PM EDT

      Jim Spence ..so........how closely are you related to Akin?

      • 7 votes
      #1.150 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:29 PM EDT

      "Is Todd a Birther" ??????????????

      I would like to see his College Transcripts, Birth Certificate, ID Card and Tax Returns !!!!!!!!!!

      • 13 votes
      #1.151 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:32 PM EDT
      Comment author avatar-usa1967-Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      OK, OK, liberals, it sounded really stupid and i will give you that. BUT, anyone with a brain knows that he meant a "real" forcible rape and not a "date rape" or a "second thoughts" rape. A rape is never "okay" regardles of the type of rape but no matter how stupid the comment was, you are taking him out of context and you all know it unless you are just plain stupid. But, fan the flames and hope your libbie candidate wins, that's what you are all about anyway.

      • 4 votes
      #1.152 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:38 PM EDT

      LorraineH

      I’m glad you brought all those medications and disorders up.

      You see BPH, ED, menometrorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, acne and the myriad of medical DISEASES, DYSFUNCTIONS AND DISORDERS are what medications are for!

      I have no problem for medications to be used to correct illness. Contraception is NOT AN ILLNESS. Neither is pregnancy. Contraception is a luxury. There are many methods of contraception ranging from abstinence to sterilization.

      Your argument is desperate. BPH can lead to urinary retention and bladder infections. ED is a dysfunction that can arise at any age, most commonly after 40, that Viagra, Cialis and others can help conception, not contraception.

      Contraception is a choice, all the other things you mentioned are not.

      Nice try though.

      • 2 votes
      #1.153 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:45 PM EDT

      Brianb and jim are confused.....because women always REJECT Brian and Jim on having sex, they think the women's bodies are shutting down. Well.....It's really just plain ol rejection boys!

      • 13 votes
      #1.154 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:48 PM EDT

      That in "times of ACTUAL rape (switch the term actual for legitimate) the female body has ways to shut the whole thing down." (speaking of the reproductive process).

      and any idiot that actually believes such utter BS has no place making decisions regarding reproduction, health or much of anything else

      • 13 votes
      #1.155 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

      Besides the whole "legitamate rape" thing, what he said was SCIENTIFICALLY wrong. A woman's body has no mechanism for stoping pregnancy just because a woman was forcibly raped. Not only is the guy a total knuckle dragger, he's also completely ignorant of anything approaching science. I don't know what kind of doctor or scientists he has been talking to, but they should not be allowed to practice or teach.

      • 20 votes
      #1.156 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:05 PM EDT

      JimSpence

      Contraception is a luxury

      Jim....please, please, please get an IQ test before you vote. Your statement is about as absurd as Mr. Akin and I would love an answer now to starsailings question: How closely are you related to Akin?

      • 19 votes
      #1.157 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:06 PM EDT

      The real question is whether social engineering in our society is a violation of the constitution. Which I believe it is. The religious right has no more claim to morals than the liberals.

      The basic fact of the matter, which defies most, is that those that are elected to represent us all are hired to balance a budget. That is their one sole job. Not to socially engineer our society. They only go down this path because they fail to do do their job, and in the end be able to justify their job worth by saying that they did this or that.

      My question to them is, "Did you do your Job"?

      @!$%# them all! I don't need you to tell me how to live, or to tell anyone else how to live theirs. Do your @!$%#ing jobs.

      • 8 votes
      #1.158 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

      of course there is no "war on women" by the republicans, once women return to their rightful place in the home, barefoot and pregnant, everything will be just fine. and if it has to be legislated that women stay at home barefoot and pegnant, your friendly far-right republican will see to it that it is done for freedom and god and america!

      • 20 votes
      #1.159 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:09 PM EDT

      So, essentially this guy is saying that any woman who gets pregnant after a rape was not "legitimately" raped? This is truly frightening! Here is one of the many reasons (Romney, Ryan, etc.) why it's so important to get out there and vote. We CANNOT afford to be apathetic. We CANNOT let people like this anywhere near public office!

      Obama/Biden 2012

      • 21 votes
      #1.160 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:12 PM EDT

      If people like this guy (GOP) win the presidency, Senate and House you can be certain that they will nominate and place 2-3 Supreme Court Justices on the bench with exactly the same Neanderthal religious ideology and the US will look more like it's being run by the Taliban than civilized people. If you want to see what a Romney/Ryan win will eventually look like just look to the way women are treated in the Middle East. Scary, really.

      • 15 votes
      #1.161 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:15 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarKornfedExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Stupid comment by this guy...still doesn't make O'bama any more desirable.

      • 5 votes
      #1.162 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:17 PM EDT

      So now these GOP idiots are trying to sell the "fact" that if a rape victim becomes pregnant it is because she unconsciously wanted her rapists child? If that moronic idea was even possible there would be no unwanted pregnancies ever. A woman could just will the egg to dodge the sperm. Ladies get your passports. They can effect abortion law here but Canada is just a stones throw away. These jerks just may abortion make all but impossible if not illegal in the US. Rep. Todd Akin never heard of a rapist using a condom to avoid leaving behind any DNA evidence? Oh I forgot that DNA mumbo jumbo is just more of that hokum science like that there global worming nonsense. (sarcasm)

      • 13 votes
      #1.163 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:17 PM EDT

      since the 60's millions of people have died as the result of permissive sexual attitudes

      Ummm...Leave It To Beaver went off the air 50 years ago, stop trying to pretend a show from the 1950s should serve as a model for 21st Century life!

      And these idiots who say "in times of ACTUAL rape (switch the term actual for legitimate) the female body has ways to shut the whole thing down" are way off base. Suppose a woman is at the height of her cycle when she's raped? It's very unlikely that she could just "shut down" the biological processes...which is why some women do get pregnant via rape. All you clowns are trying to do is justify your completely mistaken belief by saying that not all women get pregnant from rapes, and hence all women can prevent getting pregnant because of some mystery "mechanism" to shut down part of their bodies. Where do you get your information, from Rush Limbaugh? Glenn Beck?

      By the same token, people who believe this drivel -- and it is drivel, absolutely zero proof has been offered -- must also have a similar mechanism. This shuts down their ability to poop...because they are obviously full of it!

      • 16 votes
      #1.164 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:18 PM EDT

      i think what this clearly inarticulate wretch meant was a rape that is a violent criminal thing, as opposed to a rape that is not violent or aggressive but because of it's legal definition is rape. his contention is that the violence and aggression triggers some kind of biochemical response in the female body that reduces likelyhood fertilization. i'm sure this is a myth perpetrated by abortion foes to help them reject the choice of abortion for rape pregnancy. he clearly has no appreciation for the torment that can be experienced by carrying a rapists child to term. the uncertain and debatable rights of a fetus of rape, for him, clearly trump the very real and undeniable torment of the rape victim. what an idiot.

      this is one of the main reasons i rejected a concrete, conservative christianity. i kept finding myself having to distort reality to fit into those rigid beliefs. you weren't free to try understand the world around you as it really was, but had to always pin it into the framework of the dogma. the fitting just got harder and harder. this guy is sadly twisting the world and the lives of others into his limited concept of reality. thankfully he's now toast.

      • 10 votes
      #1.165 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:23 PM EDT

      mygirl, #1.136 - Patriotic American U.S.A. would love that one !

      • 2 votes
      #1.166 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:27 PM EDT

      Memo to Republican party: Minimum requirement for Congress is a 3-digit IQ. Stop sending us your dumb, your stupid, your idiotic masses.

      • 20 votes
      #1.167 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:34 PM EDT

      LorraineH

      Absent medical illness, will not taking a birth control pill cause you any pain, dysfunction or kill you?

      You know the answer is no. The only other use of contraceptives, other than for medical reasons, is for recreational sex, period! As such it is a luxury in that respect, not a necessity.

      If you want to play, you got to pay.

      I know personal responsibility is not a virtue you Liberals are indoctrinated with. You live in that mythical world of fairness surrounded by the delusion of social and economic justice for the collective. You worship at the altar of the monolithic bureaucracy called government and you submit your dependence to the "Life of Julia".

      You can argue this any way you want, you know I'm right. Once again, you Liberals react emotionally rather than logically to things you think should be given to you by someone else because you think it's fair or it’s owed to you.

      Grow up. Become responsible, ambitious and independent. It's much better than walking around all your life with your hand out. Your self-pity makes you look more insignificant than you already are.

      Romney/Ryan 2012 for real Americans

      • 1 vote
      #1.168 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:37 PM EDT

      First and foremost this man is stupid not the Republican party but the man. Second if a woman's body could just shut down and not ovulate so she did not have an unwanted pregnancy by rape or any other method there would be no need for abortion. I also would like to ask Mr. Akin if he would want his wife or daughter to carry a product of rape to term and then either give it up or keep it and how is he going to get the rapist to support this child from prison? The gentleman should just say he is too stupid to help run our country and get out of the race because I sure his comments cost him some votes.

      • 5 votes
      #1.169 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:52 PM EDT

      Avenger - Nice ideal(not idea). It wouldn't matter what candidates say they were, conservative or liberal. Their opponents will always try to label them as extreme (fill in the blank) or un-American. "Get your heads past the headlines and search for the real truths that each candidate has done and not what he/she says they will do." Say what! Where exactly will we find "the truth" on their Internet page. Sure for a sitting politician has cast votes, they have a paper trail. A challenger has no paper trail and is running against the office holders record. But in actuality, the challenger can only say what they would do. If the office holder gets grief for a cast vote, they could always say they were wrong and wouldn't do it again. All around the world their are political parties and the USA can do without them? Only in a utopia my friend and that doesn't exists in this world.

        #1.170 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:54 PM EDT

        "OBAMA Shows to be everything Romney is not, A Leader"

        • 13 votes
        #1.171 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:54 PM EDT

        On a more serious note... the White House has taken the leash off sleepy Joe Biden... he's returning to the campaign trail next week! Woohoo... as a conservative, this looks pretty good to me! Go get 'em Joe, lmao!

        • 5 votes
        #1.172 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:10 AM EDT

        Maybe Todd was talking about himself, the dude is desperate !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • 4 votes
        #1.173 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:20 AM EDT

        Akin, thank you for saying, "If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down".

        Akin you're WRONG, but, there are ways to shut down candidates that don't release legitimate tax returns.

        • 14 votes
        #1.175 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:37 AM EDT

        The GOP losted my Vote !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • 7 votes
        #1.176 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:41 AM EDT

        JIM SPENCE: If you want to play, you got to pay.

        1) MEN CANNOT GET PREGNANT. 2) MEN COMMIT ALL RAPE. Therefore you find it "logical" that when men "play," women should pay?

        Sorry, this lawyer sees no logic whatsoever in your argument. Your thesis is essentially untenable because, "If you want to play you got to pay" applies only to one side of the equation: women, yet men are aggressors without consequence.

        Actual logic can be found in the following premise:

        1) Only women can conceive and bear offspring,

        2) women cannot commit rape in any way that produces offspring, THEREFORE

        whether or not a child is to be conceived and born is appropriately a decision only for women.

        Logical people do not expect their logic to be augmented in any way by insisting,

        You can argue this any way you want, you know I'm right.

        That statement is pathologically lacking in logic of any sort.

        My guess is this Congressman, who still has fairly good looks, was a real player in his day--may be one even now, as many powerful men tend to be.

        Maybe he's convinced himself the girls he's forced all "really wanted it" because, you know, that's how penises think.

        Maybe if you quit thinking with your penis brain, you could learn how syllogism works.


        • 20 votes
        #1.177 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:47 AM EDT

        @ Gemini618 #1.122

        Sorry Linda but it's the WOMAN'S decision. There IS no 'god'.

        And You can prove there is no 'God'. One atheist to another, I'd sure like to see your "PROOF".

        To all you dope smoking liberal hippies, please learn to read. This article is much ado about nothing. And all your comments just go to show how really inept, you people really are. If you are upset about anything, it should be his comment about:

        If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

        This is news to me, and I have found nothing to substantiate it, but neither have I found anything to disprove it. Maybe someone can find research on this topic and clue us in. (maybe a few of you are right and this guy is an idiot)

        Does anyone in this room remember the "Duke Lacrosse Case" in which three Duke players were accused in 2006 of rape and other crimes they did not commit. I would not classify Crystal Mangum as a "Legitimate" rape victim.

        Of course certain woman lie about being raped, and for many reasons. I believe he was merely trying to define a narrow segment of the Abortion debate, that of actual rape cases. He obviously believes that a woman should not be able to get an abortion, by either being raped or lying about being raped.

        but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.”

        I would tend to disagree, as I believe any illegal act negates all following results. If a woman is "legitimately" raped and not lying about it, then yes, I believe she should get an abortion if she so desires. (I am not about to sentence a woman to 9 months of morning sickness and the other woes that come from pregnancy, if she had no choice in the matter)

        Other wise, I am going to have to agree with Jim Spence

        If you want to play, you got to pay.

        'The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.'-Ronald Reagan

        • 1 vote
        #1.178 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:55 AM EDT

        Dee Turner

        Take a pill Matlock. "If you want to play, you got to pay" is in reference to using contraceptives for any other use than medical. If you want to use a birth control pill for recreational sex, by all means do it, I have no problem with that, just pay for it yourself.

        A contraceptive is a method or device to prevent pregnancy. As I mentioned, from abstinence to sterilization and everything in between, there are multiple methods of prevention. If there is no medical need it is purely a want, not a need. It is a luxury. As such, a responsible person should use and pay for whatever method they choose. If you can't afford it, don't do it.

        Just because someone who drinks beer wants but can't afford Courvoisier doesn't mean you or I should pay for it.

        When you "want" to do something you are responsible for its cost, or you pay the consequences. We must reject the idea that anytime someone "wants" something society is responsible for providing it.

        It's time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his/her actions. If someone wants to use Viagra to enhance his sexual performance, and he doesn't have a medical condition that would prevent that, he is responsible to pay for it. If someone needs Viagra, due to a medical condition (juvenile diabetes for example), to father a child with his wife, there should be methods to help obtain it. It is a need, not a want.

        My posts all referred to recreational sex, not rape, incest or any other forced intervention. I hope you read your briefs better than you do these posts.

        Nice try though.

        Romney/Ryan 2012 for real Americans

        • 2 votes
        #1.179 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:37 AM EDT

        i'm not seeing abortion being up for debate...ever. so who cares about their views? it's moot.

          #1.180 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:39 AM EDT

          Well, I don't have to watch the movie Precious because I lived both the incest and the pregnancy. I'd say pretty much everything shut down as a result of my abuse-emotions, social development, even some physical feelings-but I still got pregnant. And I hate to tell you guys, but the abortion was traumatic as well. That's the dark underbelly no one ever talks about. (There were later rapes that did not make me pregnant, but obviously rape can make you pregnant.) Thankfully, there has been tremendous healing and forgiveness in my life through God's grace. The abuse brought me shame and pain, but the God I believe in is not about shame-instead he brought me love and forgiveness. So many things have been restored, even my sense of smell, which I didn't realize I had lost. I wish healing for any who suffer due to rape, incest, or abortion. Some women are no doubt relieved after having an abortion, but I know that some are not-I was not the only one in my group to need and to undergo tremendous healing.

          • 4 votes
          #1.181 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:04 AM EDT

          2) MEN COMMIT ALL RAPE

          sorry dee, not true, women do rape men. its rare, but well-documented

          • 4 votes
          #1.182 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:04 AM EDT

          I suppose we could let his wife and daughter ( if he has any) get raped and see how he feels. Let him watch.

          You are PROMOTING rape of someone's wife and daughter? Do you think you are the better person?

          • 3 votes
          #1.183 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:18 AM EDT

          Between Romney for President and this insensitive Republican... You had to know this had to be a comment from coming from fairly high in he GOP.

          These guys must have a whole warehouse of Stepford wives - ready, willing and able to obey anything thing these idiots decide to say on any given day.

          They also mus be takeing stupid classes to even this crap. Please don't let it pass - as a slip of the lip. In case after case, they have tried to remove or purchase a get out of jail free card for thier sons or themselves for the same crimes against women.

          • 2 votes
          #1.184 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:06 AM EDT

          I understand the term "legitimate". It was stupid of him to use the word. Could have just said his wrongfully held position that rapes do not result in pregnancy. It would be so convenient for us if we could "shut down" our biological processes to avoid unwanted, unneeded, poorly timed pregnancies. Then we would not need birth control. Spence--it is not just for recreational sex. That is what viagra is for. Sex is important within a marriage, not always just to make a child. Do you only have sex when you want a child? I personally am antiabortion, but I would not tell another adult that they cannot have this done in a safe, clean environment. Too many unplanned children also has negative effect on family finances and our public finances.

          • 4 votes
          #1.185 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:29 AM EDT

          JimSpence, you said:

          Absent medical illness, will not taking a birth control pill cause you any pain, dysfunction or kill you?

          Yes. My cramps were always more severe when I was not on the pill. Painful, in fact. Also, though I am absent any current medical illness, an unwanted pregnancy would cause me to gain weight, and most likely have a second bout of gestational diabetes, thereby increasing the likelihood of my developing type 2 diabetes down the road. I would consider that significant dysfunction. And finally, pregnancy can kill you, in any number of ways. (Well, not YOU, but it could kill ME. Or any other woman who got pregnant.) So, although none of this may mean anything to you personally, since it's all purely hypothetical to a person who cannot biologically bear children, the answers to your questions are "yes, yes, and yes."

          You know the answer is no. The only other use of contraceptives, other than for medical reasons, is for recreational sex, period! As such it is a luxury in that respect, not a necessity.

          Actually, that answer was yes. But on to your next statement about recreational sex, period. Yes, contraceptives do allow for recreational sex without fear of pregnancy. It seems the "recreational" part is what you object to, since you don't think insurance should cover Viagra for a man who isn't trying to impregnate someone. At least in that, you are fair. But the point is, in terms of insurance, THEY weren't being as fair as YOU. Viagra is covered. Viagra, which ONLY affects the ability to have sex, recreational or otherwise, was covered, but birth control pills, with their many non-sex-related uses, were not. This was discriminatory.

          Let's face it, this whole hullaballoo over insurance covering birth control, was because some religions don't approve of birth control, and they don't approve of extramarital sex, and they were trying to discourage these things by removing the option from women's insurance. (The insurers included birth control as part of their standard services elsewhere, it was removed at the request of the religious-affiliated institutions, to keep women in line with their beliefs.) The problem is, this had the effect of interfering with women's basic, routine healthcare, and they weren't doing any such thing to men. It was discrimination, plain and simple.

          Also, when I pay my insurance premiums, and my insurance covers birth control, how exactly do you figure that YOU are paying for it? You are not.

          • 17 votes
          #1.186 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:51 AM EDT

          What's funny is that hardly anyone has commented on the SCARIER aspect of this whole thing: that which was left unsaid. Because there's the legitimate (REAL, violent, probably at the hands of a total stranger) rape, and then there are all those lesser, not-really-rape kinds of rape. Like when a girl goes out with a guy, and things get a little out of hand, and by the time she says "no," why it's too late, the little tease! Or the kind that happens when she has too much to drink and passes out. she must have wanted it, or she wouldn't have gotten so drunk that she couldn't fight back. Oooooor, you know, when she's dressed in a certain way that makes it obvious that she's open to sexual advances from anyone...

          • 9 votes
          #1.187 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:04 AM EDT

          @Jim Spence- You damn skippy the health insurance companies should be made to pay for contraceptives just like she said. Hell, they pay for every other prescription drug that is on the market so they should cover contraceptives. I support clwdy. She is right. They should not just cover mens performance drugs for impotency, and mens drugs for health, they should cover womens contracetpives as well as our other drugs for our health. So you damn straight we feel that way. And no the government should not be regulating our personal decisions and our personal rights. They shouldn't be deciding who we can and cant marry and what we can and cant do with our bodies. You damn skippy.

          And no men should not be allowed to tell us what we can and can't do with our bodies. And yes the hell we can have it both ways. Why in the hell not?! We have it both ways now and it needs to remain that way. There is absolutely no way in hell a man should ever be allowed to make a decision for a woman concerning her body. Im glad Obama made the insurances companies cover contraceptives, these are peopl'se private health insurance companies and since we the people pay them they should cover everything we need them to cover. They should not be allowed to decide what they want to cover since we can't decide our premiums and what we want to pay and/or if we want to pay. They need and want our money and we need and want our contraceptives. So you damn skippy we agree with the government forcing health insurance companies to pay for contraceptives.

          So I second that motion by Clwdy. I fully agree. And I am so happy our President is Pro-choice. But then again almost all democrats are. And thats why I love them so much. And this is why they will always get my vote. And for all the ones making the comments about Christians-Not all of us are the same so please don't group us all together. It isn't fair because you have alot of Christians who feel the same way I feel. People desrve the right to chose their own life and what they want to do with it. That is between them and the Lord. Our Heavenly Father realized this and thats exactly why he gave us freewill. The right to chose for ourselves. Jesus never forced his ways and his beliefs on anybody and it is so unfortunate that He is represented by religious azzholes whom we call republicans.

          They are hellbent on taking our rights way and I dont get it. Because if they truly represented Christ they would realize that everyone deserves the right to choose for themselves and should not be forced to do anything that they do not want to do. They wouldn't condemn people to hell and they would be for trying to help out the people who cant do for themselves and they would have way more compassion than what they show and have. So me personally, I dont think they are real Christians at all. I think they are wolves posing in sheep clothing. They are aints posing as saints. They are demons posing as Christians. They are a brood of vipers. This is their real identity. I see right through them. Just like another poster said, They are just using these issues to deflect from the real issues at hand. Just like their ring leader Bush who introduced all these religious issues because he didn't have anything legit to build his campaign on. And I still cant believe people voted his dumbazz in office based off these petty issues. Republicans never deal with real issues so why would anyone expect any different from this one.

          • 7 votes
          #1.188 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:34 AM EDT

          Someone has already mentioned it, but it is ridiculous that there is all sorts of money coming into Missouri that simply want Republicans to get more control over Congress. These same people don't like campaign finance reform that would say money for a candidate needs to come from the constituency they represent, not outside manipulators that sponsor nitwits like Akin.

          We need to make a list including Bachman, and all others that have shown support for this nut.

          Leaving a decision up to God is synonymous with leaving a decision up to those WHO THINK they're God or have a special hot line to God.

          No one has mentioned about punishing the child of rape by making them live unwanted and unloved.

          • 4 votes
          #1.189 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:28 AM EDT

          Everyone in this thread who is exploiting this idiot's comments as a means to label the entire GOP or Tea Party as people who believe the same thing as this nut job are just as guilty of stupidity.

          And after reading these threads, that's roughly 90% of you.

          You want to hate this guy with such passion as to allow your prejudice to be justified simply because it appeals to your ideology?

          You cannot call this man a pig unless you climb yourselves out of the pen.

          Shame on you.

          And you know what's really sad? You're so caught up in riotous group-think and emotional hijacking of the issue that you can't even recognize it.

          I get it. We all get it. You have a strong belief and stance on certain issues. But to dehumanize 50% of the population of this country who disagree with you... to be that intolerant... makes you inhuman.

          This guy is a member of the GOP. That means he checked a box on a voter registration card. Does that mean everyone who supports the Occupy Wall Street protest movement is the kind of person that would take a crap on a police car just because one idiot did?

          Let me ask you this a different way. When you cast stones at an entire party representing a large percentage of the American public, does it help bring people together or add to the forces that tear this country apart?

          And why do you feel motivated to tear this country apart? And what is holding you back from moving past the petty divisiveness and become an agent of constructive growth?

          • 3 votes
          #1.190 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:31 AM EDT

          JS in SD

          Democrats actually spent during that primary to help Akin win, viewing the six-term congressman as a less formidable challenger in the general election.

          This is blatant tampering with the election process. The Democrats have no business interfering in the Republican party nominating process. Actions such as this should be illegal as it taints the entire process. It also may be a violation of campaign finance regulations and should be investigated by the FEC.

          There were maybe 6 candidates on the Republican primary ticket. Three were considered viable to the point of our local paper doing a little bio on them. Democrats ran negative ads on all three, but harder on the top two. When asked, the Democrats were pretty open that they would rather run against Akin, and they were very open with the fact that they spent more against the other two as a result.

          Not an FEC violation. Not illegal or immoral, unless you require equal spending against all 6 candidates.

          Clair McCaskill is rated dead center in terms of left or right... she's what we used to call a moderate. You know... the ones that worked across the aisle and got things done? Now we are all purely blue and red... dark red.

          • 1 vote
          #1.191 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:34 AM EDT

          FFS, this guy is a moron.. Rape is rape no matter how pretty you want to paint it with different words.

          KennySherrill- I had two clients that were 10 years old when they conceived their first children, guess who did it? Yes, if you guess biological father you are correct. When we got the cases we asked if they wanted to terminate or place for adoption but guess what, the grandmas were both republicans, both Christians, and both seen new incest babies as potential welfare checks. Yes, both grandparents are receiving welfare checks now..

          Can you imagine saying I am 18 and my mom is 28, and my daddy is my grandpa. Puts a whole new spin on it. I always wondered if a 10 year old even capable of making a choice to place a baby up for adoption, keeping, or aborting it. I look at my 11 year old and think not..

          • 8 votes
          #1.192 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:36 AM EDT

          Well, as far as I can see, you are all missing the point here.

          Examine his statement closely:

          “First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

          Ergo - if she was raped, she wouldn't have ended up pregnant. And the corollary - if she is pregnant, then it couldn't have been rape!

          Oh, defense lawyers would have a ball with this. Except for the minor fact that it just isn't true! Look closely; what this statement does is turn the victim of rape into the criminal. If a woman is raped and she ends up pregnant, then it couldn't have been rape! She must have been a willing participant and therefore is falsely accusing her rapist!

          Is this man Muslim? This smells so much like the Muslim Imans that insist women must go covered from head to toe because the sight of them might incite some man into rape. It is not the man's duty to avoid committing rape; it is a woman's duty to avoid inciting rape!

          I hope they throw this idiot out on his ass!

          • 12 votes
          #1.193 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:44 AM EDT

          Romney at a press conference: "Yes, I agree with Congressman Akin's comments about legitimate rape not causing any pregnancies."

          (Aide whispers in Romney's ear.) Romney then follows up: "I completely disagree with Congressman Akin's statement!"

          Reporter: "Governor, didn't you just say you agreed with him?"

          Romney: "I never said that!"

          • 6 votes
          #1.194 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:44 AM EDT

          WOW, is there such a thing as 'legi rape.'

          What kind of party is the GOP?

          The kind of party where 30 RepubliCON senators vote against Al Franken's bill that denies funding to Government contractors who deny their employees’ rights to seek justice in court when they have been raped by co-workers.

          So yeah this really isn't surprising.

          • 3 votes
          #1.195 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:45 AM EDT

          vglance

          When you cast stones at an entire party representing a large percentage of the American public, does it help bring people together or add to the forces that tear this country apart?

          And why do you feel motivated to tear this country apart? And what is holding you back from moving past the petty divisiveness and become an agent of constructive growth?

          I somewhat agree. The reason I say "somewhat" is that the GOP has been infiltrated by extremists that do not represent that roughly 50% you speak of. These extremists are the loudest and seem to hold power over all the rest. They do not compromise. They make these stupid statements. They hold to extreme "values" and are willing to destroy ANYTHING to force their ways on others.

          We tried compromising. We tried going across the aisle. What we got was hostage taking, absolute pledged positions, and a complete legislative shut-down... with the heart of the GOP afraid to make a move toward cooperation or compromise for fear of reprisal by the Tea Party financiers.

          So we are here. We don't like it either. But when people like Akin say stupid things, we will jump on them, point out their stupidity, and point out that the GOP must believe the same because otherwise they would not allow these absolute extremes within their ranks.

          • 1 vote
          #1.196 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:47 AM EDT

          The guy is telling the truth! Only republicans are mature enough to talk about the real issues. Democrat liberals live in fantasy land. Liberals cant stand to hear cold mean facts. They're even starting to believe in mermaids and unicorn existenses now.

          Women lie about rape all the time. Legitimate arguments are only made by conservatives.

          This is one reason why clinics that provide abortions can be a good thing. -_-

          • 4 votes
          #1.197 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:52 AM EDT

          Sounds like something Joe Biden might say at a campaign rally. Lucky for him another idiot politician said it...

          I generally am pro abortion and support same sex marriages among democrats, a perfect solution to thin out the liberal crowd over a couple of generations!

          • 2 votes
          #1.198 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:11 AM EDT

          Jim Spence said:

          It's time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his/her actions. If someone wants to use Viagra to enhance his sexual performance, and he doesn't have a medical condition that would prevent that, he is responsible to pay for it. If someone needs Viagra, due to a medical condition (juvenile diabetes for example), to father a child with his wife, there should be methods to help obtain it. It is a need, not a want.

          You don't need to father a child on your wife. The days are long past when every married couple NEEDED to have children to mind the farm, etc.

          Now, as regards contraception... Say a woman's been told by her doctor that if she gets pregnant, it will be at great risk to herself. She therefore NEEDS contraception to stay healthy but still be able to enjoy life with her husband.

          I got my tubes tied after my second child--hubby and I both decided we didn't want anymore, but since I was the one staying home with the kids and he was the only one working, it made more sense for me to get fixed than for him to have a vasectomy. And even after that I still need birth control pills for biological reasons that have nothing to do with keeping from having kids. without them I turn into a Jekyll-and Hyde personality.

          • 4 votes
          #1.199 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:26 AM EDT

          If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

          First, what is a 'legitimate rape'? Is this idiot trying to distinguish between a forceable rape and a date rape? Is he trying to insinuate that some rapes are 'better' than others? His statement makes my blood boil! What a pig! Vote him out, now!!!

          Second, what a stupid idea that a woman's body can somehow, automatically reject the sperm of a man who forceably rapes her (but maybe not if it's date rape?) Where did he go to school? He's as ignorant about sex as a five year old. Akin needs to crawl back into the hole in the ground he crawled out of.

          If the women of his district think he has the intelligence, common sense, or humanity to represent them, they better pray they don't get raped. Akin is a dinosaur and his bones belong in a museum.

          VOTE HIM OUT, NOW.

          • 4 votes
          #1.200 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:56 AM EDT

          Another ignorant Bible-thumper in public office. What about separation between Church and State?

          • 9 votes
          #1.201 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:00 AM EDT

          “First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down,"

          In case any of you are wondering "Just what "Doctors" did this dimwit ask?"

          Dr. Mengele

          Dr. Moreau

          Dr. Phibes

          Dr. Frankenstein

          and, since he's a republican,

          Dr. Do-little

          • 2 votes
          #1.202 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:19 AM EDT

          Jim Spence,

          Are you playing with a full deck? "If you play you've got to pay" and fella, you are coming a cross as if you need to pay for the error of your ways. Take a contra and try to fit it over your head!

          • 4 votes
          #1.203 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:30 AM EDT

          How much do you want to bet that NBC leaves this story up all day again hehe. Follow up stories to come later. But still, this happened too early for it to be a game changer. It will be back to Romney's tax returns, with the usual class warfare and racism theme that the Dems will have to rely on. Oh, and the Mexican vote! What a substantive race this will be!

            #1.204 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:52 AM EDT

            Colormepurple

            "Also, WHEN did women's bodies evolve the ability to self destruct a rapists semen or "shut down" conception??? Is this a philosophy brought on by religious beliefs or just stupidity???"

            Home schooling might have something to do with it.

            • 4 votes
            #1.205 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:07 AM EDT

            Rape has legal definitions, but it is never legitimate even in a marriage. No means no. Killing a man or woman is legal only if there is a conviction for a capital crime. I never heard of rape as a sentence for a crime.

            Akin did not misspeak, the evil little smirk on his face indicated he enjoyed saying the rape remark. If Akin is elected he will figuratively rape and plunder his his poor constituents, like Romney, and Ryan, will rape, and plunder the middle class, the poor, the elderly, and the disabled, the nation if elected.

            • 5 votes
            #1.206 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:13 AM EDT

            Just when you think there can not be another idiot running for political office.. POP ...POP.... up comes another one... but the really idiotic thing is that other morons that believe him..... and they ALL ARE FROM THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT OR REPUBLICANS. Something really sick about these people.

            • 3 votes
            #1.207 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:15 AM EDT

            Akin did not misspeak, the evil little smirk on his face indicated he enjoyed saying the rape remark. If Akin is elected he will figuratively rape and plunder his his poor constituents, like Romney, and Ryan, will rape, and plunder the middle class, the poor, the elderly, and the disabled, the nation if elected

            Oh, I think Akin signed his death warrant on this one. The Republican establishment will drop him like a hot potato as well.

            • 2 votes
            #1.208 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:18 AM EDT

            Hey, this is great news for us ladies! All we have to do is automatically shut down our reproductive equipment whenever we don't want to conceive. Who knew it was so easy??

            It also explains why El Rushbo was never able to impregnate any of his four wives: they all shut him down. They must not be as crazy as I had always thought.

            Or maybe that suitcase full of Viagra he smuggled in from the Dominican Republic was counterfeit.

            Paul Ryan co-sponsored a bill with this nutjob Akin to distinguish rape as 'forcible or non-forcible'. The GOP seems bent on political suicide.

            • 4 votes
            #1.209 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:27 AM EDT

            I bet if you check U.S. Rep Todd Akins record it will show voting down sex education courses for teens in high school. Rush Limbaugh to much sex with Todd Akins took sex Ed together in high school and cheated of each other.

            • 3 votes
            #1.210 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:32 AM EDT

            One doctor who spouted the same nonsense a few years back was the late Dr. Fay Boozman of Arkansas. He was male, by the way, and an opthamologist, not that I think either description is particularly enlightening in terms of this type of comment. That he was a Republican politician seems to be, at least slightly, more to the point. Sadly, like every other locale, Arkansas has its share of nut jobs -- past and present.

            • 1 vote
            #1.211 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 AM EDT

            This guy is a rightwingwhackadoodle, inbred, braindead, phucked in the head, moron.

            The entire country should have a say as to whether or not this person is allowed to be in our Congress. He needs a psychological evaluation, NOW!

            • 4 votes
            #1.212 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:47 AM EDT

            Todd Akin: I had sex with a woman last night in the back seat of my car. It wasn't rape. She said she didn't want to-- she said she was a virgin... she said I was older than her dad-- but after several glasses of wine, she kind of seemed to waver a little. I knew she really wanted it. It wasn't rape. I had music playing on the radio and I lit a scented candle! I know she liked it because she kept screaming.

            It wasn't rape. I know she can't get pregnant because it was her first time.

            LOL

            • 2 votes
            #1.213 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:49 AM EDT

            Females of certain mammalian species, notably rabbits (there may be others but I'm not sure of those at the moment) and other animals that live in colonies can spontaneously reabsorb a fetus into their bodies if the time isn't 'right'--the colony is overcrowded, they are in the middle of migration, etc. and therefore prevent production of offspring at a time when it would be dangerous to the collective colony to do so. It is scientific fact, and it has been documented in nonfiction and in fiction such as Richard Adams' book 'Watership Down'.

            In the novel quoted above it anthropomorphizes rabbit colonies and relationships, ascribing to the rabbits in the story human characteristics. One female rabbit is raped and her body reabsorbs the fetus. However, important note; this is FICTION and the story is about RABBITS.

            Dear Representative Akin;

            I don't know where you you got the information that a human female is capable of shutting down reproductive processes in instances of rape, but the information itself is erroneous and flawed. While trauma, stress, emotional issues arising from financial and economic instability from an unwanted pregnancy MAY cause a miscarriage, it is not common and does not happen often. One needs only to look at the women in the deportation camps in Germany of the 30's to see the numbers of female internees who became pregnant due to rape by the camp guards, which are well-documented. You need only to look up cases of young children, as young as nine or ten, who give birth to the children of their molesters, to see the reality.

            We women would like to invite you to sit down and talk to us. Get to know us. Visit a battered women's shelter, talk to rape crisis counselors, look at the statistics. Please feel free to bring whatever medical professional advised you so that he/they too can be informed of the reality of rapes resulting in births.

            Thank you.

            • 6 votes
            #1.214 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:06 AM EDT

            I don't want to paint all members of a group with the same paintbrush, and I do know some registered republicans who are intelligent and well-informed about issues, but when I hear stuff like this, I wonder.

            There's this Republican Representative Akin saying that women rarely get pregnant when raped because their bodies can prevent it.

            And there's the Republican Representative Steve King in Iowa who said earlier this month that if it's legal to take your kids to see a boxing or wrestling match, then it should be legal to take your kids to see a dogfight or cockfight.

            Can we all wake up here? If you want to represent us, whether Republican, Democrat, Independent, Tea Party, whatever you want to label yourself--- then do your research and understand the issues plaguing your constituency. The US is not a pure democracy, where a majority's decision should apply to everyone--we're a republic, and that means laws passed for the people to follow should be fair for ALL the people.

            • 4 votes
            #1.215 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:18 AM EDT

            Legitmate rape ?? something new here i learned, did he get HPV Bachman variety vaccine recently from her? That explain. Republican is a party for Stupidicus Ignoramus type fsuch as Akins, Bachman, Perry, Romney. Too bad Biden is a Democrat? Is Akins talking about a non discharging foreign object i.e. broomstick entering a cavity (his)? I'm lost.

            • 2 votes
            #1.216 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:19 AM EDT

            TO ALL LIBERALS: It's starting to sound to me like solving the GOP problem is as simple as giving every one of those dumb sons of bitches a microphone. Let em broadcast their idiocy to the world..

            • 3 votes
            #1.217 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:25 AM EDT

            And that just about sums up the GOP for you, ladies and gentlemen.

            • 2 votes
            #1.218 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:27 AM EDT

            ElectroFreak - The problem is repubbie-taliban just eats this crap up and keep coming back for more and more. Beyond pathetic and medieval thinking.

            • 1 vote
            #1.219 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:48 AM EDT
            Comment author avatarfoolishness aboundsExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

            Republicans/Conservatives are wasting their time interacting with the Liberals that infest this site.

            It's obvious that this guy was referring to "legitimate" INSTANCES of rape.

            Of course, the Left-wing Loons on here KNOW this, although they are far too DISHONEST to admit it. Democrats have become such filthy, sleazy, lying, SCUM that any rational discourse with them is impossible.

            As for the part about a woman's body "shutting down during rape", again it is obvious that he is referring to things such as the FACT that, if a woman is aroused, her secretions make it easier for sperm to travel to its destination or the FACT that, if a woman orgasms, her muscular contractions draw the fluids closer to her womb, thus increasing the chances of pregnancy.

            Again, the Leftists (should) KNOW this stuff. But they would rather lie, obfuscate, and demonize anyone that doesn't agree with them.

            It starts at the very top of the Democratic Party with slimeballs like the Liar-in-Chief and dishonest trash like Reid and Pelosi and filters down to all of the rest of the turds in the Liberal cesspool.

            YA SEE, LEFTIES, THE "TRICKLE-DOWN THEORY" DOES WORK!!!

            • 1 vote
            #1.220 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:56 AM EDT

            Did anybody else do a facepalm when this "genius" said that?

            Who needs negative ads when the politicians do their own foot bullets!

            Also: I am sure Teabaggers and Birthers are going to stand by this idiot's "science", further embarrassing themselves and showing their lack of intelligence!

            • 3 votes
            #1.221 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:00 AM EDT

            foolishness abounds -

            It certainly does!

            • 4 votes
            #1.222 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:04 AM EDT

            BIG AL - VOTE DEMOCRAT !!!!!!!!!!

            Thats right Big Al. Let's just vote democrat because they call themselves a democrat. Sounds like you are the same type of brainiac that has gotten our country into this bipartisan mess it is in now. Let's keep voting idiots like Nancy Pelosi into office because she wears a red bandana. That is almost as smart as voting this loose lipped Republican retard into office just because he is GOP.

            SanAndres - And that just about sums up the GOP for you

            Just as much as John Edwards sums up the democrats? Keep your profiling going bud, it seems to be working extremely well in our government

            • 1 vote
            #1.223 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:08 AM EDT

            Dear foolishness abounds:

            Your name is a perfect description of yourself. LOLing at your rage and believing the RepubliKKKans are Jesus and FAUX News is the Bible.

            Consider your post reported and invoking Rule #14 for your fail trolling.

            • 5 votes
            #1.224 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:08 AM EDT

            Foolishness about - So I guess a woman, who gets raped, should be hoping she gets a gift from God(baby by rape). She should just lie back and enjoy! Hopefully she remembers to remove the aspirin from between her knees. Just the usual twisted think of the pubbie-taliban, man up ladies! You, foolishness, know your beneath contempt, don't you. Rational discourse, when are you going to try that!

            • 4 votes
            #1.225 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:27 AM EDT

            foolishness abounds said;

            As for the part about a woman's body "shutting down during rape", again it is obvious that he is referring to things such as the FACT that, if a woman is aroused, her secretions make it easier for sperm to travel to its destination

            A woman's body is always wet inside. It's always secreting. A woman does not have to be aroused for her body to produce moisture. Additionally there are various bacterium that increase scretions.

            or the FACT that, if a woman orgasms, her muscular contractions draw the fluids closer to her womb, thus increasing the chances of pregnancy.

            Women who are raped have orgasms too. An orgasm is a muscular contraction, a purely physical response to the placement of male organs inside a female and has nothing to do whatsoever with whether a woman 'wants it' or not, consents or not. The myth that a woman has orgasms only when she wants it and if she has one during rape that means she secretly 'wanted it' is the reason why so many women don't report rape when it happens and blame themselves for the attack.

            • 3 votes
            #1.226 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:30 AM EDT

            Politicians who put their foot in their mouth like this guy, "rarely win elections".!!!

            • 1 vote
            #1.227 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:30 AM EDT

            Second if a woman's body could just shut down and not ovulate so she did not have an unwanted pregnancy by rape or any other method there would be no need for abortion

            If that were true there would also be no need for another right-wing bogeyman, contraceptives! A woman could just turn her body off whenever she didn't want to get pregnant, and turn it back on when she wanted a baby.

            Now all you horny right-wingers...no, there is no switch to get a woman to want to have sex with you, like you seem to think she can switch her body off to avoid pregnancy. Convincing her to have sex with you is all on you. I know, you're disappointed...you actually thought there might be a way for you to actually have sex, and I just threw water on it...

            • 6 votes
            #1.228 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:31 AM EDT

            Spence, what he was trying to tell you is that sometimes women take contraception for reasons other than getting pregnant. I was 14 years old... a virgin (remained a virgin until I married at 25) and my doctor put me on birth control because I was having horribly painful periods... blood clots... cysts, etc. So women sometimes take birth control for reasons other than not getting pregnant...and they should be able to have that covered by their insurance. So don't just look at men's health and medical issues.... have a bit of a heart and compassion...and some intelligence and see how women might need birth control for reasons other than getting pregnant.

            • 3 votes
            #1.229 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:52 AM EDT

            Aiken,

            a fertilized egg is not a human being, it is not life. look at the definition in Roe v. Wade for the legal definition of when life begins.

            • 5 votes
            #1.230 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:07 PM EDT

            If a fertilized egg isn't life, than neither is protazoa or bacteria...

            That said: The man is an idiot. He didn't talk to any "doctors" unless they're vets and they were talking about starving female rabbits.

            • 4 votes
            #1.231 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:38 PM EDT

            Did Mr Atkins ever give consideration to the fact that by banning abortions for rape victims he allows the rape victim to be victimized again by the rapist as most states have laws pertaining to the legal rights of the father? In essence, the rapist, after being 'punished', (if he is ever caught and brought to justice,) will have visitation and possibly custody rights over that child, forcing his victim--the mother of the child--to have to deal with her rapist until the child is at least 18 years old. Not to mention the psychological harm it might cause a child to grow up knowing his father, whom he will probably have visitation with, raped his mother.

            I suppose Mr Atkins thinks most women are "asking to be raped" because they dressed provocatively or perhaps they smiled at a guy.

            • 6 votes
            #1.232 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:46 PM EDT

            The ironic thing is that this interview was on a Fox affiliate. He probably thought he'd get some "soft lobs".

            • 2 votes
            #1.233 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:54 PM EDT

            foolishness abounds

            Republicans/Conservatives are wasting their time interacting with the Liberals that infest this site.

            It's obvious that this guy was referring to "legitimate" INSTANCES of rape.


            I won't bother going into the irony of your name.

            Just please tell us WTF you're talking about with "legitimate INSTANCES of rape". Are you saying that if a woman 'claims' she was raped, but it was actually consensual on her part, she's more likely to get pregnant than if her rapist forcibly attacked her?

            Because that is utter bunk and if you believe that, it demonstrates that you know as little about human reproduction as that idiot Akins.

            My advice to you: USE CONDOMS. EVERY TIME.

            Todd Akins doesn't have the intelligence to represent a fishbowl full of guppies. We need representatives in government who know what the hell they're talking about, and since he clearly doesn't, he needs to sit down and STFU.

            Same goes for you.

            • 5 votes
            #1.234 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:13 PM EDT

            @ Kathy-467503 #1.200 and to several others.

            If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

            First, what is a 'legitimate rape'? Is this idiot trying to distinguish between a forceable rape and a date rape? Is he trying to insinuate that some rapes are 'better' than others? His statement makes my blood boil! What a pig! Vote him out, now!!!

            Second, what a stupid idea that a woman's body can somehow, automatically reject the sperm of a man who forceably rapes her (but maybe not if it's date rape?) Where did he go to school? He's as ignorant about sex as a five year old. Akin needs to crawl back into the hole in the ground he crawled out of.

            If the women of his district think he has the intelligence, common sense, or humanity to represent them, they better pray they don't get raped. Akin is a dinosaur and his bones belong in a museum.

            VOTE HIM OUT, NOW.

            First of all, his is only a nominee, and not the incumbent to be voted out, please read the article. as per my post at #1.178 And the fact that this makes your "blood boil" tells me this is an entirely emotional response from you, which is, what, I am guessing, this author wanted. Given that the link to this story read "'Legitimate Rape' doesn't cause pregnancy" only to change to "rarely causes" tells me this author was going for the emotional response. Judging by the comments above, I would say with the exception of maybe 4 or 5 commentators, everyone fell, hook, line and sinker for this hullabaloo.

            OY-VAY comment @ #1.19 seems to get it, and put it into perspective.

            His statement was awkward but factually correct. He was annoyed that the moderator was using an extreme case as a test case for most abortions. Many abortion proponents tend to use exceptional cases as gotchas when they know full well the scenario at hand doesn't apply to most cases.

            His response was not politically correct but it was accurate. Unfortunately,most people will focus on the parts that evokes the most emotion and jump to conclusions rather than listen.

            There is no sane person would would disagree that most rapes don't result in pregnancy, because it is an accurate statement

            According to the National Crime Victimization Survey of 2007 the were about 250K sexual assaults. The DOJ estimates 300,000 women are actually raped each year.

            The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year. {.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8765248} and (if you use these numbers you get an estimated 642020 rapes per year) so, somebody is off some where in their numbers.

            OK so we have between 250K and 640K women assaulted each year, with an estimated 5% pregnancies, doesn't seem that rare to me, but you decide.

            “First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

            He is merely reiterating what some doctors told him, and perhaps he has been misinformed. I would suggest you find some data to substantiate your claim and prove him wrong. I was unable to find anything to either refute or substantiate his claim, so I can not say either way.

            Again reading from my post at 1.178, Do you remember the Duke Lacrosse team, and the FALSE accusations made by Crystal Mangum? As I read this, and this is my interpretation, only. "A legitimate rape is one in which an actual rape occurred and was not fabricated by the woman in question. One should ask the author of the article to clarify Mr. Akins statement, but I think that would jeopardize this authors agenda, and the ambush tactics used in modern media.

            And to all you commie, low life disgusting, scum bag, miserable miscreants, to think that, or to insinuate that, conservatives or Republicans are in FAVOR of the rape of women as posted in several of the comments above is so utterly offensive and completely reprehensible. If I could find you, I would. And I would sue you for libel, if I didn't beat the stupid out of you first. I can not think of enough words to describe foul odor that surrounds your very presence, that stench that is liberal ideology.

            AND JUST SO YOU KNOW - If it were up to me ALL CONVICTED rapists would be physically castrated, unfortunately, it seems, to most of you liberals, that is cruel and unusual punishment. So we imprison them, for a while and release them to go impregnate some other woman. And we are back talking about the same problem.

              #1.235 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:22 PM EDT

              To the voters of Akin's district: What The Fongonus is the matter with you folks? Akins is sporting one of the world's worst combovers...!!! That's one of the first signs of impaired reasoning.

              Comments like Akins made could be the "tip of the iceberg" for the conservative Christian Republican agenda.

              Please remember that Romney and Ryan are part of that, as you consider the upcoming election...

              • 5 votes
              #1.236 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:25 PM EDT

              If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

              ......Yes my body does have a way.... it's called BIRTH CONTROL!!!!

              A lot of conservative supporters on this thread are interpreting "legitimate" to mean a true accusation and not a lie. This only exemplifies how you people live in denial when it comes to the ignorance that this party should be held accountable for.

              Read the sentence again. Specifically the part about the female body shutting "that thing" down. If Akin is referring to a woman lying about rape then where the hell does her body come into this???? If she were lying then her body wouldn't have to shut anything down.

              The opposers of Akin on this thread are reading that line 100% within context and much more accurately than you. He is implying that I, as a woman, have some magical switch that blocks semen from reaching my eggs in the case where intercourse is forced... Are you kidding me?????

              Meanwhile, Mitt Romney is trying to do away with most birth control citing that life begins at conception, when most forms of birth control prevent the egg from simply attaching to the uterus wall, BEFORE sex even occurs. How is that "conception"?????

              Face it, these are 2 men that have no clue what they are talking about when it comes to the female body. There isn't a single PROVEN study that shows a woman's body works in the ways they described.

              Either they are making this $hit up as they go along - hoping that YOU, the constituents, eat up their bull $hit without question (which seems to be working) - OR someone actually had the nerve to teach them these fables in school or at home.

              It is making me seriously question the education system in the southern states, if that is the type of crap their kids are learning. It's one thing to question Darwin, but it is completely unacceptable to get basic human anatomy all wrong!

              • 2 votes
              #1.237 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:50 PM EDT

              JackieK: I agree. Look at Sharia law - a man rapes a woman and she gets stoned to death or she has to marry him. It's beginning to sound like the Republican platform.

              • 3 votes
              #1.238 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:51 PM EDT

              JimSpence: What I don't understand is that the so-called "Christian" Republicans are so against abortion AND contraception, yet they still want to make cuts to social programs. These same people are also supposed to be charitable to those less fortunate (from the Bible) yet they don't donate to charities that DO anything to help people. (They Tithe to the church, but that just is to pay the bills not help anyone.) Many republicans have 6 or more children - but they can afford them because most were already from upper middle class or wealthy families. Any poor woman who is denied contraception and her choice, should choose any Republican and put HIS name on the birth certificate, and then drop off the kid.

              • 2 votes
              #1.239 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:52 PM EDT

              uaw-779887 - Most of them have education - they just didn't pay attention in class. Too busy sneaking peeks at porn in class. Or else they went to Oral Roberts University that doesn't believe in science.

              • 1 vote
              #1.240 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:54 PM EDT

              He is merely reiterating what some doctors told him, and perhaps he has been misinformed. I would suggest you find some data to substantiate your claim and prove him wrong. I was unable to find anything to either refute or substantiate his claim, so I can not say either way.

              Name the physician(s) who gave Akin the ridiculous information that a woman is less likely to get pregnant after a rape because 'the female body has ways to shut that whole thing down.' The onus is on Todd Akin to prove his ludicrous claim, not on the millions of women who know a little bit more about their own bodies, thank you very much, than this cretin.

              Dumb Farm Boy.

              • 1 vote
              #1.241 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:54 PM EDT

              Kornfed, I disagree with most of your posts, that Akin is toast by what he said, is probably the one area we agree on.

                #1.242 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:55 PM EDT

                alex droogs: the problem with comparing the statement "shaking a family tree and sometimes nuts fall out" is that when you refer to the republican party, it's more like a bowl of granola: What aren't fruits and nuts are flakes.

                • 2 votes
                #1.243 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:56 PM EDT

                Why is it that when Comstock was asked about this, All she could come up with was,"We need to Get Women back to work. No Sh6T Tupid. There is also a LARGER Percentage of MEN out of Work. Are the rEPUBS stooping to Lower Blows to get Peoples Mind off what They really Stand for. Maybe some of You Repubs need to Open Your Mind and Ears, before trying to Holler Kill on anything the Democrats have came up With. Seems to Me, I would rather have Someone Who CARES about the Entire Workforce, and get the Jobs coming Back to the US, and have a Good Economic Plan. BTW, ALL the GOVT, needs to keep their Hands Out Of Medicare and PAY Back what was taken. Then there wouldn't be a Problem with it.. Comstock, you need to just Keep Running your Flapper without KNOWLEDGE of what's going on, Because EVIDENTLY, YOU HAVE NO CLUE.

                • 1 vote
                #1.244 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:51 PM EDT

                JimSpence:

                "Absent medical illness, will not taking a birth control pill cause you any pain, dysfunction or kill you?"

                Will not taking Viagra or Cialis kill you if you are no longer able to naturally achieve a firm erection? I assure you that a vast number of insurance companies say no and won't cover your Viagra. I know because I work for a Urology practice, so don't try to argue it isn't true. Many union plans in fact exclude the treatment of erectile dysfunction from coverage.

                "If you want to use a birth control pill for recreational sex, by all means do it, I have no problem with that, just pay for it yourself."

                Is it not the same that I'm paying for those insurance premiums that cover the contraceptive. Either way, I'm still paying for it. Furthermore, most insurance companies, that don't have exclusions forced on them by their clients, pay for contraceptives because it makes financial sense. Contraceptives are vastly less expensive than pregnancy.

                • 1 vote
                #1.245 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:59 PM EDT

                @ kaybeetoys #1.241

                Name the physician(s) who gave Akin the ridiculous information that a woman is less likely to get pregnant after a rape because 'the female body has ways to shut that whole thing down.' The onus is on Todd Akin to prove his ludicrous claim, not on the millions of women who know a little bit more about their own bodies, thank you very much, than this cretin.

                Dumb Farm Boy.

                kaybeetoys, are you just stupid, or did you fail 3rd grade reading? What part of:

                I was unable to find anything to either refute or substantiate his claim, so I can not say either way.

                do you not understand? I WAS UNABLE TO FIND ANY DATA FOR OR AGAINST HIS ARGUMENT, THUS I WAS UNABLE TO FIND THE DOCTORS NAMES, WHO GAVE HIM THIS DATA. I was merely pointing out that this man believes, based on information from other supposed reliable sources, that the female reproductive mechanism responds to external stimuli, such as stress. (I also pointed out that he may have been misinformed.)

                Woman athletes have been known to quit ovulating(or at least quit menstruating) during intense workouts, granted this is over a long time frame. Perhaps, just perhaps, some women have a similar response to short term stimuli, but again, I could not find any research on the topic. And I think you might be surprised at how little most women actually know about their own bodies, I know I was.

                However, I did find this

                Only 11.7% of these victims received immediate medical attention after the assault, and 47.1% received no medical attention related to the rape. A total 32.4% of these victims did not discover they were pregnant until they had already entered the second trimester; 32.2% opted to keep the infant whereas 50% underwent abortion and 5.9% placed the infant for adoption; an additional 11.8% had spontaneous abortion. {w.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8765248}

                And given that 15% of the normal population has miscarriages (spontaneous abortion) one might conclude the opposite of the aforementioned self protection mechanisms for women.

                When dealing with these numbers one should always consider who did the study and how the data was collected, "How to lie with Statistics", by Darrell Huff, WW Norton. 1954 is a wonderful book on the ways data is manipulated to get a desired result.

                  #1.246 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:07 PM EDT

                  Foolishness Abounds:

                  it is obvious that he is referring to things such as the FACT that, if a woman is aroused, her secretions make it easier for sperm to travel to its destination or the FACT that, if a woman orgasms, her muscular contractions draw the fluids closer to her womb, thus increasing the chances of pregnancy.

                  Your assertion that female orgasm somehow has a significant impact on the success of conception is absolutely false. The impact, if any, isn’t so significant as to inhibit conception from rape. The fact is that the biological usefulness of the female orgasm is still unknown and different studies have come up with varying answers.

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.247 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:28 PM EDT

                  I suppose Mr Atkins thinks most women are "asking to be raped" because they dressed provocatively or perhaps they smiled at a guy.

                  In which case he probably thinks that women should cover their faces...no, wait, that would be like a burqa, and everyone knows that all Muslims are terrorists!

                  Todd Akins doesn't have the intelligence to represent a fishbowl full of guppies

                  Hey, wait a minute! That's an insult! I've had lots of nice guppies, and they wouldn't want him either!

                  • 3 votes
                  #1.248 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

                  Ryan and Akin co-sponsored a bill that wouldn't allow abortions for some kinds of rape. They used different words, but one of them was called, "grooming." What a sick bunch and a sick party!

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.249 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:55 PM EDT

                  mike-2130882

                  "The term "legitimate rape" in context was used to describe: ........ He used the term legitimate because in his statement he was pointing out something that was contigent on an actual violent act as opposed to how the female body responds at other times......"

                  And how, pray-tell, does the female body respond at other times vs. a violent act, Mike? Sounds like you are wearing your rectum as a hat these days as well, if you believe there is an actual difference in regards to fertility!!!

                  JimSpence

                  You see BPH, ED, menometrorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, acne and the myriad of medical DISEASES, DYSFUNCTIONS AND DISORDERS are what medications are for!

                  I have no problem for medications to be used to correct illness.

                  .... And how do you suggest women who need it for illness pay for it then? Do I now need to inform my employer that my cycle is irregular or that I get debilitating cramps, or have a number of other illnesses that up until this point were absolutely none of his business? How many other rights and morals should we do away with just so you can save a clump of splitting cells?

                  foolishness abounds

                  As for the part about a woman's body "shutting down during rape", again it is obvious that he is referring to things such as the FACT that, if a woman is aroused, her secretions make it easier for sperm to travel to its destination or the FACT that, if a woman orgasms, her muscular contractions draw the fluids closer to her womb, thus increasing the chances of pregnancy.

                  Newsflash - this debate is about PREVENTING pregnancy. And your theory doesn't work that way!

                  Either pass whatever it is that you are smoking or pass the citation showing any of what you said is proven fact. Better yet, show me the part where lack of orgasm absolutely prevents pregnancy. I hope you have a lot of spare time in the next few years, cause you are gonna be here awhile.

                  History & population completely disprove that statement, my friend. If conception was solely determined by a woman's arousal we would have died out long ago. How many young girls forced into an arranged marriage throughout history do you actually think were aroused by their husbands? And no matter what your wife is telling you, trust me, she's faking it! That however doesn't mean you can never have children.

                  The only thing female secretion helps with is friction. That's it. It doesn't open a magic door in the vagina that lets all the sperm in. And the little tadpoles can still find their way to an egg without an orgasm. Any man who's ever wanted a second child with his wife should be thankful that your "facts" are all screwed up. Lack of arousal cannot prevent pregnancy.

                  Please go back to sophomore biology before you really embarass yourself!

                  • 3 votes
                  #1.250 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:36 PM EDT

                  ram762581 Re: Post # 1.63, I am so very impressed with the sensitivity and expertise you bring to this discussion. You are uniquely qualified to speak to victims of rape and abuse who must have felt denigrated by Akin's reprehensible comments. Thank you for being willing to share and educate those with a lesser degree of experience and understanding. Those you work with are fortunate to reap the benefits of your delicate awareness and support.

                  • 3 votes
                  #1.251 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:50 PM EDT

                  Women who are raped have orgasms too. An orgasm is a muscular contraction, a purely physical response to the placement of male organs inside a female and has nothing to do whatsoever with whether a woman 'wants it' or not, consents or not. The myth that a woman has orgasms only when she wants it and if she has one during rape that means she secretly 'wanted it' is the reason why so many women don't report rape when it happens and blame themselves for the attack.

                  Thank you for pointing this out, Amanda. Many survivors of sexual abuse live with shame over this for years. It is, in fact, possible to be traumatized and frightened and to have an orgasm at the same time because your physical body is having a physical response to a physical stimulus involving horomones, blood flow, muscle contractions, etc. It is not always dependent on whether you wanted the stimulus in the first place. While this is true for women and men, it is especially true for children who usually have limited understanding if any about what is happening with their bodies sexually; and it can really torment them later if they remember confusing physical feelings. This is yet another dark underbelly that is rarely if ever discussed and that more people REALLY need to know about.

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.252 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:36 PM EDT

                  How bad is the Ryan-Akin anti-abortion bill?

                  By Greg Sargent

                  The national battle over Todd Akin's comments about "legitimate rape" has shed light on a"personhood" bill, co-sponsored by Akin and Paul Ryan, called the Sanctity of Life Act. Much of the chatter today has focused on whether Ryan opposes abortion in cases of rape. The Romney campaign confirmed today that Ryan does personally oppose it, while clarifying that a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose it.

                  (Wow! A complete Flip-Flop in the same sentence! The last one above. That's gotta be a new Romney Flip-Flop Speed Record!)

                  http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/how-bad-is-the-ryan-akin-anti-abortion-bill/2012/08/20/c7e37e04-eafe-11e1-9ddc-340d5efb1e9c_blog.html

                  • This is PROOF POSITIVE that The GOP Mullahs are trying to IMPOSE a form of pseudo-Christian Sharia Law on all of America. Think about that. That is what The GOP gang is really up to.

                  BTW, That bill would be HR 212

                  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr212ih/pdf/BILLS-112hr212ih.pdf

                  • 4 votes
                  #1.253 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:38 AM EDT

                  the only species that I have heard of capable of "shutting down their reproductive system during rape" were certain species of Ducks. apparently, duck sex is pretty vicious

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.254 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:27 AM EDT

                  First - There is no such thing as 'legitimate' or 'illegitimate' rape. That's just idiotic?!?!?

                  That being said: guys, not EVERYONE that's opposed to abortion is a Women hater, or a crazy Christian, or is anti-choice, or is whatever other label you want to throw out to marginalize their opinion. Sometimes, a person who is opposed to abortion is just that - opposed to killing unborn babies.

                  Sometimes, it doesn't have anything to do with religion, or with wanting to impose 'male-ness' on Women, or any chauvinistic need to remove a Woman's right to her body or her procreation. Sometimes, it's just as simple as knowing that unborn babies are babies, and that killing babies is wrong.

                  So, you can label me sexest (not true) or a Woman hater (not true) or a bigot (not true) or a Christo-Nazi (not true) or whatever other label you feel will eliminate my opinion.... but honestly, for me... I just don't think we should be killing babies. That's it. :)

                    #1.255 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:42 AM EDT

                    One thing is very clear in this. Akin didn't "misspeak" in saying something he didn't believe. He "misspoke" in saying something that's meant to be kept INSIDE the anti-abortion movement and not distributed among the lager society. This is a COMMON belief within the Christian Conservative wing of the GOP. http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/08/rep-todd-akin-wrong-not-alone

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.256 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:21 AM EDT

                    Sometimes, it doesn't have anything to do with religion, or with wanting to impose 'male-ness' on Women, or any chauvinistic need to remove a Woman's right to her body or her procreation. Sometimes, it's just as simple as knowing that unborn babies are babies, and that killing babies is wrong.

                    You'll have to look far and wide for anyone who disagrees that killing babies is wrong. However, a fetus is not a baby until it has developed to the stage where it can survive independently outside the body of its mother.

                    With all due respect, Todd, you have the right to your view but not the right to impose your view on any woman. If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. Don't impregnate a woman unless you are totally willing to bear responsibility for that baby.

                    Motherhood is a sacred obligation to bear and raise another helpless human being. A man can, and all too often does, walk away from the woman he has impregnated and the child that belongs equally to him.

                    A woman risks her very life (look at the statistics on maternal morbidity around the world and in this country in the not-so-distant past) to bring another human being into this world. Many women have suffered life-long health problems from child bearing.

                    The planet is already overpopulated. Children are starving, abused and exploited.

                    If you are concerned with babies in need or babies at risk, go to your community homeless shelter, battered woman's shelter, welfare office, orphanage, etc. and help those babies who desperately need your help. When there is not another baby on this earth in need, then maybe you can concern yourself with the unborn fetus. Or you could mind your own business.

                    • 3 votes
                    #1.257 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:17 PM EDT

                    I WAS UNABLE TO FIND ANY DATA FOR OR AGAINST HIS ARGUMENT, THUS I WAS UNABLE TO FIND THE DOCTORS NAMES, WHO GAVE HIM THIS DATA. I was merely pointing out that this man believes, based on information from other supposed reliable sources, that the female reproductive mechanism responds to external stimuli, such as stress. (I also pointed out that he may have been misinformed.)

                    I'm guessing you haven't found a unicorn or a Sasquatch either? I have better things to do with my time than look for non-existent data based on junk science.

                    Woman athletes have been known to quit ovulating(or at least quit menstruating) during intense workouts, granted this is over a long time frame. Perhaps, just perhaps, some women have a similar response to short term stimuli, but again, I could not find any research on the topic. And I think you might be surprised at how little most women actually know about their own bodies, I know I was.

                    It's a well-known fact that when a woman's body mass index drops to a low level, wherein her body does not have the necessary fat composition to support a pregnancy (usually seen in women who are underweight due to anorexia) her menstrual cycle will shut down. This has absolutely nothing to do with acute physical trauma, such as that suffered during a rape.

                    • 3 votes
                    #1.258 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:09 PM EDT

                    @ kaybeetoys #1.258

                    Just like a dope smoking hippy liberal. CHANGE THE SUBJECT!, so now I am supposed to be looking for unicorns and big foots? Really?! And that sounds like a typical liberal, "I don't have time to find actual proof" to back up my misguided, irrational, irresponsible allegations or life style.
                    And if you actually read my posts, in their entirety, you would understand that I am neither acknowledging this as true or false. And this post was for everyone in the room, I was hoping someone had heard something either pro or con on the topic.

                    "the necessary fat composition to support a pregnancy (usually seen in women who are underweight due to anorexia) her menstrual cycle will shut down. This has absolutely nothing to do with acute physical trauma, such as that suffered during a rape."

                    But has anyone studied this? and can you prove that it, "has absolutely nothing to do with acute physical trauma"

                    You see in my posts, I admit I don't know. I don't know if Akin was correct and there are actually doctors out there that have studied this and found this to be true. I don't know if there are doctors out there with an agenda, who told Akin this, even though they know it isn't true. I don't know if Akin just lied about it. You will notice that I said, "Perhaps, some women have a similar response to short term stimuli," meaning I don't know for sure, but that it could be possible.

                    And you might want to re-read my posts at 178 and 246;

                    And given that 15% of the normal population has miscarriages (spontaneous abortion) one might conclude the opposite of the aforementioned self protection mechanisms for women.

                    You see, I do, do some research. And that research does cast doubt upon Akin's Claims, but it is not definitive doubt.

                      #1.259 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:44 PM EDT

                      Thank You Kay Bee Toys! I couldn't have said either one these statements any better myself. Thank you for saying exactly what was on my mind to Todd and to Dumb Farm Boy. Also thanks for adressing Foolishness Abounds because he had seriously pissed me off. He sounds just idiotic as Todd Atkins. Thank you so much.

                      Now for the ones who wants to insult liberals, we seem to have many more intellgent members belonging to our party than to your ridiculous religious right wing nut conservative party. And for the comments about Obama putting this country in the mess thats it in, you all know damn well that is a complete fabrication of the facts. You all know he inherited this @!$%#ty economy from our @!$%#ty previous commander in chief. Your beloved azzhole of a president George W. Bush who started all this bullcrap.

                      And to jim spence again- How does my paying for my private health insurance copmany who covers my contraeptives come out of your pocket? Please explain that to me. Because last time I checked every single American that has private health insurance has to pay them monthly. They do not have a choice. So how in the hell are you paying for somebody else's insurance to cover their contraceptives? You are not. You are just another conservative azzhole who dont think women should be allowed to obtain birth control to prevent prgenancy. Thats all to it. Your argument is not susbstantial at all. Thats exactly why men who feel like you should not be in office making decisions for the entire country. Men like you should not be in congress and definitely should not be president.

                      Women will literally be thrown back into the dark ages if Romney-Ryan is elected. They sure have proven that to be a fact.

                      • 3 votes
                      #1.260 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:04 PM EDT

                      You see in my posts, I admit I don't know. I don't know if Akin was correct and there are actually doctors out there that have studied this and found this to be true. I don't know if there are doctors out there with an agenda, who told Akin this, even though they know it isn't true. I don't know if Akin just lied about it.

                      Well, my dear Dumb Farm Boy, I DO know. I didn't have to do any research to know that what Todd Akin said about women having some sort of mechanism that prevents them from getting pregnant if they are raped was complete and utter nonsense. Just plain stupidity. Not even worth discussing as potentially true.

                      Some things we know without having to look them up. I'm sure you know plenty of things I don't know. I'm sure you know lots of things to be factual without having to do research.

                      If you know something to be factual, and you are certain of it, then say so. Speak up. But don't waste anybody's time with some crazy, stupid theory and expect those who do know the truth to go look for proof. That would be akin (pun fully intended) to me telling you that the moon is made of green cheese, and expecting you to prove it isn't.

                      Thanks for the shoutout, sweetcancer. This rape/forced childbearing issue has gotten me seriously pissed off. On the up side, it hurts Romney and that is a good thing. :)

                      • 2 votes
                      #1.261 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:20 PM EDT

                      DumbFarmBoy, I don't know about the research either. I'm prolife, but I do know this: unless Akin has solid, peer-reviewed proof of what he said, then he should not be saying it. You can't justify someone saying politically charged things like that without solid research evidence. Saying that "it's unknown" is no excuse. Besides, I'm pretty sure what he said is an old wives tale. ( Re the last sentence in particular: I'm not a politician on a national stage, so I can give my opinion, making it clear that it's just my opinion.)

                      • 1 vote
                      #1.262 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:32 PM EDT

                      OK, Kaybee, (and you too sweetcancer)you win, my brain hurts. I can not speak to you logically or any other way, you must be utterly correct because you said so.

                      If you know something to be factual, and you are certain of it, then say so. But don't waste anybody's time with some crazy, stupid theory and expect those who do know the truth to go look for proof.

                      There is no such thing as man made global warming.

                      Negros are not equal to white men.

                      Women are not equal to Men.

                      Northern Europeans are the most evolved of all the races and ethnicities and are therefore superior (Hitler was correct).

                      There is a God. Nope, wait There is no God.

                      Islam is a religion of Hate.

                      Judaism is a religion of greed.

                      Jesus was gay.

                      City people are stupid.

                      Do you want me to go on? I can make a compelling and logically argument for each of these statements of fact, because I know it to be factual, not that I believe them ideologically, though. But I doubt you, or many others of your ilk will understand that statement.

                      And you can say with absolute certainty, based on your vast worldly knowledge, that in ALL women, there is no hormonal shift caused by extreme stress that may interrupt the normal menstrual cycle.

                      Well, that's good enough for me, If you take my word for it and agree with the above statements, I'll take your word for yours.

                      @ sweetcancer #1.260

                      Now for the ones who wants to insult liberals, we seem to have many more intellgent members belonging to our party than to your ridiculous religious right wing nut conservative party. And for the comments about Obama putting this country in the mess thats it in, you all know damn well that is a complete fabrication of the facts. You all know he inherited this @!$%#ty economy from our @!$%#ty previous commander in chief. Your beloved azzhole of a president George W. Bush who started all this bullcrap.

                      And to jim spence again- How does my paying for my private health insurance copmany who covers my contraeptives come out of your pocket? Please explain that to me. Because last time I checked every single American that has private health insurance has to pay them monthly. They do not have a choice. So how in the hell are you paying for somebody else's insurance to cover their contraceptives? You are not. You are just another conservative azzhole who dont think women should be allowed to obtain birth control to prevent prgenancy. Thats all to it. Your argument is not susbstantial at all. Thats exactly why men who feel like you should not be in office making decisions for the entire country. Men like you should not be in congress and definitely should not be president.

                      Women will literally be thrown back into the dark ages if Romney-Ryan is elected. They sure have proven that to be a fact.

                      First of all, Obama added 47% to the National debt in 3.5 years. (that's just over 5 million-million Dollars or almost $17,000 for every American Citizen). It took Bush 8 years to add $7 trillion. and Obama may be well over 6 by Jan.

                      And it still amazes me how many of you truly ignorant and stupid are still out there, but it shouldn't. (With out the truly stupid, Democrats couldn't get elected.

                      It was the multitude of "Fair Lending Acts", all sponsored by Democrats, NOT BUSH (although I have read conflicting reports on what he did or didn't do to stop it) that eventually led to the housing crash of 2009. (not saying there weren't more than a few Republicans that jumped on that band wagon)

                      That's not what crashed the housing and financial markets. It was the deregulation of those markets and the final removal of Glass-Steagall in 1999. (From TReed)

                      The Glass–Steagall Act were repealed through the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999 by President Bill Clinton

                      The Economic Melt Down of 2008

                      It all started with the Carter Administration and the peoples “right” to own a home. What he meant was “The right of the minorities to own a home”, or more accurately legislation that lead to the “Fairness in Lending Act”. They had good intentions, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

                      We have been led to believe that Bush is responsible for the recession, and he is partially.

                      Here is what you don’t know. The bank ‘bailout’ is a misnomer. The government was committed to backing all those toxic loans. As part of the “Fairness in Lending Act”, HUD and the FHA was contracted to create federally backed home loans for the poor. (Free Ice Cream from the Democrats) Enter the creation of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. However, like any government program it was soon corrupted, witness Country Wide Home Loans.

                      All this was done under the watchful eyes of Chris Dodd and Barney Franks. In an effort to create “affordable housing” they lowered the standards. Mortgage agents and real estate speculators began to take advantage of the loose oversight, making bogus loan applications, bundling them together and selling them off. The Government CAUSED this recession, somebody in the media prove me wrong. (I know the time line isn’t exact, but given the limited space, the gist is correct)

                      And you have to believe me, because as Kaybee says, "Some things we know without having to look them up". (But I actually did look up all this stuff, and I talked to mortgage brokers, bank owners and Presidents, and they all said the same thing. "The Fed asked (extorted) them to create "Loan Products" for certain 'classes' of people) Don't believe me, go ask someone who owns a bank or a mortgage company.

                      How does my paying for my private health insurance company who covers my contraceptives come out of your pocket? Please explain that to me. Because last time I checked every single American that has private health insurance has to pay them monthly.

                      Because the premiums you pay are less than the cost of the Prescription, so the insurance company takes money from others to cover the difference, but that is a mute point. ;-) (Everybody pays into the kitty, to pay for what ever eventuality, some are more or less self inflicted (Skate boarders, Jack-Ass the movie types, etc) and others are not (cancer, illness and accident)

                      I think the relevant point is, with the activation of the ACA, millions of people will be put into TAXPAYER subsidies pools, and then what? Do we violate a Catholic's Constitutional Right of Freedom of Religion and force them to subsidies (pay) for someone else's birth control? (would it be any different to force a Conscientious Objector to fight in a war?)

                      I'm an Atheist, so this doesn't matter to me, but my mom is Catholic and it matters to her. What does matter to me, is the drug addicts...self inflicted bodily damage, strokes, heart attacks, etc, my dollars going to keep these worthless vermin alive, after they mess themselves up through illegal activity, that bothers me.

                      As I stated earlier, any illegal act negates the results.

                      And PLEASE, turn on your spell checker, Thanks.

                        #1.263 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:34 PM EDT

                        @ seen to much #1.262

                        DumbFarmBoy, I don't know about the research either. I'm prolife, but I do know this: unless Akin has solid, peer-reviewed proof of what he said, then he should not be saying it. You can't justify someone saying politically charged things like that without solid research evidence. Saying that "it's unknown" is no excuse. Besides, I'm pretty sure what he said is an old wives tale. ( Re the last sentence in particular: I'm not a politician on a national stage, so I can give my opinion, making it clear that it's just my opinion.)

                        Oh, I agree whole heartedly, about the peer-reviewed proof and he shouldn't be saying these things if he can't back them up. And that was my point to some of these other folks in here. I have had numerous experiences that have run contrary to the known wisdom, which is why I mentioned the things I did. And I have been misinformed before too, and repeated the false information, much to my chagrin. Which is why I also mention to everyone to look it up themselves.

                        Case in point, "Saddam gassed the Kurds in Iraq, killing several thousand." Well he did and he didn't, it seems he gassed the Iranians who had invaded that region and the Kurds were collateral damage. At least in one instance according to one report, which was the instance the MSM used to say "Saddam gassed the Kurds".

                        It seems the more we delve into the information age, the less we actually informed.

                          #1.264 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:09 PM EDT

                          OK, Kaybee, (and you too sweetcancer)you win, my brain hurts. I can not speak to you logically or any other way, you must be utterly correct because you said so.

                          Thanks, DFB...I accept your surrender. :)

                          And you can say with absolute certainty, based on your vast worldly knowledge, that in ALL women, there is no hormonal shift caused by extreme stress that may interrupt the normal menstrual cycle.

                          OK...now don't try to change the subject, Farm Boy! No one said that. In fact, I concur that extreme stress can and does interrupt the menstrual cycle.

                          Akin wasn't talking about the menstrual cycle, which is generally considered to be a 28-day (more or less) period that begins at the first day of menstruation. Ovulation, which usually occurs about mid-cycle when the egg is released from the ovary and begins to move through the fallopian tube into the uterus, might also be affected by extreme stress.

                          Calculation Using An ovulation Calendar - The first day of a period is considered as day 1. Usually on day 14, the egg is released and is waiting for the sperm to fertilize it. The egg has a lifespan of just 12 to 24 hours whereas a sperm can last for about 72 hours in a woman. Sex on day 12 and day 16 is important as it is the time that the woman has the highest chances for pregnancy.

                          Disabled World - Disability News for all the Family: http://www.disabled-world.com/artman/publish/mostfertile.shtml#ixzz24Op2MmE5

                          Akin said that 'women who are legitimately raped have a way to shut that whole thing down'. That is complete and utter nonsense, as women cannot consciously ovulate or stop ovulation from happening. Women cannot will conception to occur, or will conception not to occur. There are no mechanisms, either physical or psychological, to will the sperm of a rapist to die.

                          While the shock, pain and terror of a man forcibly brutalizing a woman by raping her might throw her cycle off by a day or two, it is not enough to prevent pregnancy in every case.

                          More than 32,000 American women are impregnated annually, on average, by rape. Many, but not all women who go to the emergency room after a rape are given a prescription (the 'morning after pill') to help prevent them from becoming pregnant. Otherwise, the number of rape victims who end up pregnant would be much higher.

                          Free advice, DFB: don't try to tell a woman that you know more about the female reproductive system than she does. It's highly likely that if she's over the age of 15, she knows waaaay more than you do. Educate yourself, young man, and take responsibility for your procreation and birth control. I'm sure you already do that, right?

                          • 2 votes
                          #1.265 - Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:44 PM EDT

                          Freedom of Religion has absolutely nothing to do with what insurance buys. Ludicrous to even suggest such a thing, I can't even believe that is considered a legitimate argument. You're freedom to believe whatever you like does not trump a woman's ability to get a prescription. Freedom of Religion merely means you can choose not to buy them yourself. Hell a conscientious objector doesn't get to mandate his tax dollars don't go towards supporting a war, does he? Ridiculous comparison. And completely off topic for someone accusing others of changing it.

                          Also mentioning Gramm-Leach-Billey, then immediately blaming Clinton without acknowledging that each of the Congressmen was Republican, or even altering your early statement that the Fair Lending Acts were to blame is almost too much hypocrisy to handle.

                          No one FORCED banks to lend money to the unqualified. Financial institutions did so wholeheartedly once they found a way to privatize the risk involved (basically the repackaging and sale of debt). Where's the blame for the private sector who took rules intended to level the playing field and punish discriminatory lending and basically used them as an excuse to print money? Or who promoted the legislation that allowed them to grow too big to fail (except when they did and dragged the rest of us down with them).

                          • 3 votes
                          #1.266 - Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:34 AM EDT

                          There is no such thing as man made global warming.

                          Negros are not equal to white men.

                          Women are not equal to Men.

                          Northern Europeans are the most evolved of all the races and ethnicities and are therefore superior (Hitler was correct).

                          There is a God. Nope, wait There is no God.

                          Islam is a religion of Hate.

                          Judaism is a religion of greed.

                          Jesus was gay.

                          City people are stupid.

                          you forgot this one:

                          farm boys have sex with sheep

                          • 3 votes
                          #1.267 - Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:11 AM EDT
                          Reply

                          Well I guess that makes the child legitimate. So if the poor lass does not get preggies the rapist did not commit a crime? Oh, frig it, I am not going to waste time figuring out a nitwits logic.

                          NO MORE REPUB MORONS 2012.

                          • 98 votes
                          #2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:05 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarno joe, no bo, njExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Do you understand that sperm live for 72 hours?

                          Do you understand that a rapist would have to be awfully lucky to impregnate someone who had just ovulated?

                          Do you understand that rape disrupts ovulation?

                          Do you understand that RAPE is stressful?

                          Talk about not considering science.

                          Are there women who are impregnated because of rape? YES.

                          Is it RARE? YES- again.

                          The number of abortions in this country has very little connection to the number of rapes in this country.

                          As a matter of fact- most abortions are performed as a form of birth control. And that is disgusting.

                          Don't bother talking to me about the life of the mother- I have a thirty year old son I was told to abort- because neither he nor I would survive the pregnancy.

                          Have an almost three year old princess from that child, to boot.

                          • 17 votes
                          #2.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:47 PM EDT

                          Do YOU understand no jo, that not everything revolves around you and yours, a great many of us just simply don't care what YOU decided, AND THAT OTHER WOMEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO THEIR OWN DECISIONS!

                          • 110 votes
                          #2.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:54 PM EDT

                          You are defending this idiot?

                          • 55 votes
                          #2.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:55 PM EDT

                          NoJo

                          I have a theory year old son

                          I am so sorry for you. As to most abortions being performed as a form of birth control, I would if I were you, I would duck and run. However, you have once again come face to face with why the Republican's will lose this election. Women voters. Stand with your sisters for once in your life NoJo, even your heroine Ayn Rand would have been appalled.

                          • 67 votes
                          #2.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:56 PM EDT

                          you are absolutely right newday

                          no jo what you do with your body is your business and no one elses..the same also applies for everyone else. What other people do with their bodies is their business...not yours or anyone elses.

                          • 80 votes
                          #2.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:58 PM EDT

                          Exactly, bcwc: God I feel sorry for her granddaughter.

                          • 38 votes
                          #2.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:00 PM EDT

                          No Jo u blo*

                          The very thought that you reproduced is pure fear.

                          Obama/Biden 2012

                          • 43 votes
                          #2.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:01 PM EDT

                          Ms. nojo - tell your story to the 10 year old girl in Kansas.

                          • 52 votes
                          #2.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:03 PM EDT

                          I'm sure you have legitimate point you're trying to make here, and I'd love to hear it. I just think you should go back and look at what you have typed up here and ask yourself, "Is it readable?"

                          • 9 votes
                          #2.9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:05 PM EDT
                          Comment author avataroy-vay!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Most of the posters here are being judgmental and close-minded. The name-calling and denigration most people display here is why it's hard to have substantive dialogues about sensitive issues.

                          Why can't people argue facts without getting personal and emotional?!

                          • 9 votes
                          #2.10 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:06 PM EDT

                          Thanks, elaine: there is NOTHING that makes me angrier than people denigrating women who are simply trying to make the best decisions they can make for themselves and their families under the most TRYING of circumstances.

                          • 54 votes
                          #2.11 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:06 PM EDT

                          no joe, no bo, nj, you wrote, Do you understand that rape disrupts ovulation?

                          Defend your statement and give us a genuine scientific reference devoid of religious right nonsense.

                          • 69 votes
                          #2.12 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:07 PM EDT

                          GOP pick - Legitimate rape rarely causes pregnancy, Todd - one way to find out ( "Bendover" )

                          America is getting sick and tired of losers like Todd Akin !!!!!!!!!!!!

                          • 46 votes
                          #2.13 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:10 PM EDT

                          Because enough Americans vote based on emotion rather than logic or reason or facts or rational discussion.

                          Remember, infant Jesus demands that we go bankrupt as a nation to save the zygotes.

                          Sweet, innocent zygotes!

                          Won't someone please think of the breakfast sandwiches?

                          • 17 votes
                          #2.14 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:10 PM EDT

                          You are defending this idiot?

                          YUP!

                          JAYSUS Snookie-Joe!

                          I didn't believe it was possible for you to become any more unhinged than you already are!

                          What a pathetic example of a woman you are!

                          SEEK HELP Donna!

                          PS: Who the hell gets to determine "legitimacy" this moron?

                          • 36 votes
                          #2.15 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:12 PM EDT

                          Snooki Joe:

                          I want to see any proof that "As a matter of fact- most abortions are performed as a form of birth control." That's a direct quote from your post.

                          I want proof or a retraction. The statistics say that is absolutely false.

                          Do what you will with your own body. Let others do with theirs what they decide. After all, when the day or reckoning comes, you won't be held responsible for their decisions, will you?

                          • 51 votes
                          #2.16 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:16 PM EDT

                          Ms. no jo and Rep. Akin - your "medical knowledge" is sadly lacking. Stress can actually INDUCE ovulation. Pregnancies from rape are more than twice as common as pregnancies from single consentual, unprotected intercourse.

                          Source: http ://www .biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1477-7827-8-53.pdf

                          • 58 votes
                          #2.17 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:17 PM EDT

                          At least he spewed off his uninformed idiocy PRIOR to the election and not after. Please candidates talk directly into the cameras so we know exactly where your brains are and what you stand for.

                          A womans body will normally shut that kind of thing down during a "legitimate rape".......

                          Glad the whole country is informed about your unbelievable misinformation.

                          • 48 votes
                          #2.18 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:18 PM EDT

                          Patriotic American, U.S.A. wrote:

                          "America is getting sick and tired of losers like Todd Akin !!!!!!!!!!!!"

                          Patriotic American, you couldn't be more wrong. This idiot Akins won. HE WON his election. Dismiss these fools at your peril. They present a greater threat to this country than any other enemy on the planet. You cannot overestimate the power of stupidity.

                          Vote G.O.P.! Suicide by Republican.

                          • 37 votes
                          #2.19 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:21 PM EDT

                          I live in the South, and I am amazed by the stupidity of this guy. I think some of my body systems just shut down.

                          • 43 votes
                          #2.20 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:21 PM EDT

                          oy-vay! - non-judgmental?????? substantive?????? Aren't you and your type judging what is best for a woman and her body passing judgment? Get out of there. There is no academic information to support your medical contentions regarding this matter. It is theorized that 30-50% of all conceptions are lost spontaneously. Pregnancy occurs more often than you know. By the way, what is an "illegitimate rape", Mr. Akin? This fool/politician wants a vote? He thinks he misspoke?

                          • 33 votes
                          #2.21 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:25 PM EDT

                          Feisty,

                          this moron is running to be a Senator for the party of NO.

                          But I guess when I woman says NO , it must be determined if it is legitimate?!?

                          Then this crazy man starts talking about women's bodies that know when the "little sperm" should be shut out or not.

                          Does this guy believe in home schooling by the way??? It sounds like that is where he learned Biology 101

                          • 34 votes
                          #2.22 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:26 PM EDT

                          @no jo

                          The sad fact is that 1 in 5 women are RAPED or sexually assaulted in this country. Oh they may not show up in your statistics because they may have been date raped or got themselves drunk and were raped or maybe even daddy took advantage of his daughter and they were too embarrassed, or from a good religious family to mention the rape.

                          And trust me, as a person who has found a newborn in a dumpster, there are many babies conceived that are never reported to anyone.

                          • 37 votes
                          #2.23 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:28 PM EDT

                          Have an almost three year old princess from that child, to boot.

                          Once again, Donna has to pimp out her grand-kid!

                          She has NO shame!

                          It sounds like that is where he learned Biology 101

                          Northstar,

                          Right beside Snookie-Joe!

                          These freaks scare the crap out of me!

                          • 38 votes
                          #2.24 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:29 PM EDT

                          "I live in the South, and I am amazed by the stupidity of this guy. I think some of my body systems just shut down." LOL, thanks Starderup - my ears keep trying to flap themselves shut over the idiocies pronounced as "fact" by modern-day Know-Nothings. Clearly they missed Biology 101.

                          • 26 votes
                          #2.25 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:40 PM EDT

                          Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

                          Have an almost three year old princess from that child, to boot.

                          The comma after child is a typo. Nojo would kick anything be it a dead horse, a can of worms or not.

                          • 17 votes
                          #2.26 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:46 PM EDT

                          Nojo would kick anything be it a dead horse, a can of worms or not.

                          After 4+ years reading the ramblings out of the nut job from NJ, I really thought I had seen it all when it comes to her delusions, hatred & pathological lying...

                          She NEVER fails to surprise me! ☺

                          • 26 votes
                          #2.27 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:52 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarBrianb-999431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Liberals, the compassionate ones... until it comes to abortion... Liberals have chosen as one of their top fights ever, to defend the slaughter of babies in the womb. Liberals have chosen the most innocent form of human life to want to destroy... and they justify it by calling it the mothers right to choose.

                          I say the baby has lost it's right to life through the liberals insistence in defending such a horrible act as legalized murder.

                          Don't give me the excuse that a baby in the womb isn't life because you know it is... no matter what you say about the viability of the child... No mother has ever given birth to a Chevy truck.

                          • 6 votes
                          #2.28 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:00 PM EDT

                          Amen to the anti nojo comments. It's bad enough to read the daily idiotic crap she spews about politics but to try and rationalize and defend the disgusting comments above from Rep Akin . . .GAH!!!! Bad enough I had to watch probe boy this morning and then see this later in the day. Hey GOP'rs you don't know SQUAT about women and you're definitely driving more and more to the polls to vote for Obama.

                          If you don't drink, the GOP party may just drive you to do so!!!

                          4 more for 44!

                          • 28 votes
                          #2.29 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:03 PM EDT

                          no joe - Don't bother talking to me about the life of the mother- I have a thirty year old son I was told to abort- because neither he nor I would survive the pregnancy.

                          Well, obviously - because if you had DIED you wouldn't be able to come on here and tell us all what a lousy decision you made, now would you?

                          • 20 votes
                          #2.30 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:07 PM EDT

                          brianb - I say the baby has lost it's right to life through the liberals insistence in defending such a horrible act as legalized murder.

                          How many of those precious babies have you saved from a life of foster homes? How many are tossed out to fend for themselves every day because they hit the magic age of 18? Why are they so precious only until the moment they're born?

                          • 35 votes
                          #2.31 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:10 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Liberals, the compassionate ones... until it comes to abortion...

                          BB,

                          I have NO idea how many times WE have to tell you this... but... I'll try again!

                          When YOU can get pregnant, YOU can have a seat at the adult table for a discussion!

                          Until then, take your hormonally imbalanced whiny bitch ass and GO STFU!

                          I realize it's toasts your shriveled nuts that YOU have NO control over what a woman does with HER body, but we're worn out from your incessant drivel!

                          Go poke NJNB!

                          I'm sure the old broad would appreciate some action... since her hubby stays away as much as possible!

                          • 32 votes
                          #2.32 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:11 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarmike-2130882Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          David Walker. Don't be dense. If most abortions weren't being done as birth control, they would be being done because of rape or actual health concerns. This is not the case. The VAST majority of abortions are from women who have sex, accidentally get pregnant and decide not to embrace personal responsibility or the consequences of thier actions.

                          If abortion is so good, why aren't women having 'Abortion Parties" after? You know what women are doing after they kill thier child growing in thier womb, thier own flesh and blood? They are crying, sobbing, dying on the inside. Women who have abortions have higher suicide rates, higher instances of depression and a slew of other emotional and or sexual issues.

                          Talk to the hand dude. I am no saint. I have been there in the abortion clinic at 23-24 yrs old with my girlfriend. It is not a happy time. Nor is it right, wholesome, pleasant, loving, healthy or wise.

                          • 6 votes
                          #2.33 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:14 PM EDT

                          If abortion is so good, why aren't women having 'Abortion Parties" after?

                          What part of PRO-CHOICE do you not comprehend?

                          If it was a "good" choice as you say, it would be called PRO-ABORTION!

                          The choice is between, a woman, her doctor & her higher being, I realize, not being able to control our reproductive rights renders you'll impotent...

                          Sorry, but it's just not my problem!

                          • 33 votes
                          #2.34 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:18 PM EDT

                          Liberals, the compassionate ones... until it comes to abortion...

                          I wouldn't go there if I were you, which I'm not and am glad. You see, you guys have no problems sending our military on jaunts all over the planet where innocent children are killed and/or maimed beyond recognition by the tens of thousands. NO outpouring of sympathy comes out of your mouths on that. Only, war is hell, caught in a crossfire, collateral damage, yada yada yada. So don't play the sympathy card now.

                          • 27 votes
                          #2.35 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:21 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarmike-2130882Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          When the demand for abortion drops to near zero because of people embracing personal responsibility and being chaste by wisdom or good upbringing, then our society will be ready to discuss this matter objectively. Until then, abortion remains a destructive force to our society and to ourselves.

                          • 5 votes
                          #2.36 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:24 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarBrianb-999431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          RealAmericansFirst said: How many of those precious babies have you saved from a life of foster homes? How many are tossed out to fend for themselves every day because they hit the magic age of 18? Why are they so precious only until the moment they're born?

                          This is convoluted logic. Why don't you ask me how many of these aborted babies I helped create? Have you lost your sense of perspective? I am one person responsible for the actions I take. I don't create unwanted babies... so why don't you ask those people that act irresponsibly what they are doing to prevent a murder of an unwanted baby. There are hundreds of methods to prevent pregancy but you want to know what I am doing about the acts of those that refuse to take care of the problem themselves.

                          Your response speaks volumes about your logic... you simply have none. You'd much rather go after someone who views abortion as murder and try to pin me on what I've done to help the situation in this country... I take a stand against abortion. Your solution is to fight for it and close your already blind eyes to the child in the womb that gets hacked to pieces at the mothers convenience.

                          • 4 votes
                          #2.37 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:24 PM EDT

                          Mike ...

                          If most abortions weren't being done as birth control

                          WTH???? You seriously think women take having an abortion "lightly" and they want to party afterwards????? It's a gut-wrenching decision that they have to make and I for one as a born-again Christian, progressive, liberal democrat know quite a few women who have made that choice and guess what ... IT WAS THEIR CHOICE! Not one of them felt it was party-worthy. Go crawl back under your rock. I so hope you have NOT reproduced!

                          Feisty,

                          The choice is between, a woman, her doctor & her higher being, I realize, not being able to control our reproductive rights renders you'll impotent...

                          EXACTLY!!!!!

                          • 32 votes
                          #2.38 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:24 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarOkicize Wicasa Yata PiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          Well NO JO i guess you see now. You provided proof that the doctors are not always right and what did you get for presenting that fact. Attacked that's what. You can't reason with child killers and murderers. They have no reason that's why it's so easy for them. Your Grand-daughter is blessed to have some one like you in her life. if it was up to things like Newdaydawning she wouldn't exist. Baby killer supporting redhead and cat man are pretty bad to. I am neither dem or repub but the more i listen to the sinning heathen ideas if the dems the more i lean away from them. Support of baby killers,fairies and fence jumpers. I don't and won't support any of that. As for the abortion arguments with choice how about this choice. Before you choose to get screwed take a few seconds off from lusting like a slut and use something to prevent that unwanted baby. Or is your mind so caught up in lust that you can't think right at that time? Thirty years ago i could identify with the democrats but over the last ten to fifteen years they seem to have turned to the party of evil,twisted and sick.

                          • 1 vote
                          #2.39 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:25 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarBrianb-999431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          tonybeeerm said: I wouldn't go there if I were you, which I'm not and am glad. You see, you guys have no problems sending our military on jaunts all over the planet where innocent children are killed and/or maimed beyond recognition by the tens of thousands. NO outpouring of sympathy comes out of your mouths on that. Only, war is hell, caught in a crossfire, collateral damage, yada yada yada. So don't play the sympathy card now.

                          How do you know I don't have a problem with sending our military on jaunts all over the planet? Is this your only reaction to what I said? Tell you what tonybeeerm... find any place I've ever written that I enjoy war... or the results of it? You are deflecting your already liberal ideals into a conversation that has no place for it. Yes, I did say deflect... because abortion in this country has nothing to do with war, or our troops.

                            #2.40 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:31 PM EDT

                            brianb - So I guess the answer is "0", right? You'll scream your head off for all those babies to be born, but you wash your hands of all "responsibility" the moment afterwards.

                            why don't you ask those people that act irresponsibly what they are doing to prevent a murder of an unwanted baby.

                            You mean like all those girls who got "illegitimately" raped? ('cause of course if they were "legitimately raped" they wouldn't have gotten pregnant) Let's go ask them together, shall we?

                            • 20 votes
                            #2.41 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:32 PM EDT

                            EXACTLY!!!!!

                            Layton,

                            Nothing enrages me more than the party of pale, male & stale dictating to me & my daughter what my reproductive rights are!

                            Then you have someone like impotent little Brian B who preaches from the roof-tops small government & personal responsibility!

                            Give it a effin rest...

                            You're making asses out of yourselves!

                            PS: Anyone know where our resident nut job from NJ scurried off to? Come on Donna, pull up your Depends and be a big girl for once in your miserable existence!

                            How do you know I don't have a problem with sending our military on jaunts all over the planet?

                            Why the HELL can YOU not stay on topic for once? You suck worse at the fancy prancing than the glue mare owned by the pampered princess!

                            • 24 votes
                            #2.42 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:34 PM EDT

                            Brianb and NoJo sticking up for that scumbag Akin...doesn't surprise me one bit...it sickens me, but I'm not surprised.

                            • 19 votes
                            #2.43 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:36 PM EDT

                            No Jo: The question was about women that did get pregnant after rape not the chances of it happening. If I type slower will you begin to understand?

                            • 16 votes
                            #2.44 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:36 PM EDT

                            Well Brian, we Liberals have a pretty good welfare system to care for that bastard when it pops out- something you Conservatives like to call "Socialism". Also, God FORBID if it comes out gay or transgender. Your compassion seems to end in the delivery room.

                            • 25 votes
                            #2.45 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:40 PM EDT

                            OWYP - your words are rife with denigration and hatred for others. That's the same thing you accuse others of.

                            What part of rape don't you understand? The person being raped DOESN'T choose it! The person being raped doesn't say "Oh, let's wait a moment while I help you with this condom - ok, now let me lie back and you go ahead." Your re-invention of rape into "choosing to get screwed" and "lusting like a slut" is morally and ethically indefensible.

                            • 29 votes
                            #2.46 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:40 PM EDT

                            The party that wants to protect the unborn and cut or eliminate food stamps, medicaid and school nutrition programs. It's a shame they weren't as concerned with children outside the womb as they are those within. I guess having millions sick and starving as long as they're born is the sign of compassion.

                            • 24 votes
                            #2.47 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:45 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarmike-2130882Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            I didn't say that abortion was something to "party" about. I was pointing out the fact that abortion is NOT something to party about, but if it was such a good thing, a party would be a perfectly fine thing to do in that situation, almost like a baby shower, but a non-baby shower. Good and moral things are things that people can celebrate and be proud of doing for the most part. They are heroic actions, not fear based and selfish.

                            • 1 vote
                            #2.48 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:45 PM EDT

                            Feisty,

                            No KIDDING! I can understand their political stupidness but to try and justify this??? OMG!!!

                            And Matthew . . .

                            EXCELLENT POST!!!!!!! I'd vote it up more if I could!!!!

                            Mike ... nice try on the back-pedal, but your words are out there and you don't know SQUAT about what goes through a woman's mind when she is making that decision. So CORK it already!

                            • 17 votes
                            #2.49 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:46 PM EDT

                            What a joke these republicans have become. Wasted more blood and treasure the last decade than fathomable. Not to mention our precious time. UNBELIEVABLE. Not an honorable bone in their collective bodies. Obviously. Without a doubt, the most destructive thing this country and our freedom has witnessed in decades. And the idiots call themselves americans. BS

                            • 18 votes
                            #2.50 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:49 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarahofiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            Feisty Redhead Roselle: Abortion is actually not about what you do with your body, it's about what you do with your child's body. The fetus is not part of the woman's body. It is IN the woman's body, but it IS NOT the woman's body. Obviously you missed Biology 101.

                            Incidentally, what evidence do you have of brianb's potency or lack thereof? In fact, what evidence do you have of his size? (Reference: "impotent little Brian B") An ad hominem argument is the last resort of someone who knows they are wrong, but still has delusions of grandeur.

                            • 1 vote
                            #2.51 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:54 PM EDT

                            No KIDDING! I can understand their political stupidness but to try and justify this??? OMG!!!

                            Layton,

                            If you ever want to rile up the Feisty Redhead, a good place to start would be with these freakin hypocrites!

                            If it were NOT for double standards, these douche-bags wouldn't have ANY!

                            I am in NO mood to re-litigate women's rights!

                            Feisty Redhead Roselle: Abortion is actually not about what you do with your body, it's about what you do with your child's body

                            Go sit in your church pew on Sunday morning for some much needed comfort!

                            Like I said, SUCKS to be you & not be in control of what I DO or don't with MY body!

                            As for Brian, you have to be a newbie around these parts! LMFAO@U!

                            • 19 votes
                            #2.52 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:55 PM EDT

                            Tood Akin is sick, he needs some help from 'the rapist', I mean, 'therapist.'

                            • 14 votes
                            #2.53 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:56 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarrainman-2112589Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            Akin is a retard no doubt, but I will still vote for him ( I live in MO). Why? Because he has no influence on this issue. It is a moot point. His personal opposistion to abortion in cases of rape has no chance of being adopted. Whereas Claire McCasket has proven she will disregard the will of the people, her vote for Obamacare which the people of MO overwhelmingly opposed has already negatively impacted people who entrusted her to represent them.

                            • 1 vote
                            #2.54 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:59 PM EDT

                            ahofi - I said this further down but I'll repeat the gist of it now for you.

                            A fetus is NOT an independent life until it is viable, therefore it is NOT a "child's body". Until it is viable it is a dependent organism with the potential for independent life. If the fetus was already an independent organism, then spontaneous miscarriages would result in viable life every time, regardless of gestation stage. That doesn't happen, it's not murder, it's not a baby.

                            • 24 votes
                            #2.55 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:02 PM EDT

                            rainman - That is the stupidest reson I ever heard for voting for somebody: 'He's impotent and doesn't have a chance of getting what he believes in passed.'

                            A vote for this clown is a vote for his idiotic beliefs, and you might just be surprised how much he gets passed if you put him in.

                            If your reasoning weren't so flawed it would be interesting to hear what "negative impacts" you think "Obamacare" has had on the good people of Missouri. Since 98% of the law doesn't take effect for two more years, and the parts that have are overwhelmingly voted "positive" in polls.

                            • 20 votes
                            #2.56 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:03 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarahofiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            Sigh... apparently, Matthew and Feisty not only missed Biology 101, but also logic.

                            Feisty: Once again with the ad hominem arguments. If you look up the term, you should be able to figure out that ad hominem proves absolutely nothing and that you are merely pointlessly spewing muck.

                            Matthew: It is not only possible for an organism to be dependent on another organism, but still a different organism, it happens every day. The fetus, being genetically separate from the mother, is a distinct organism, regardless of dependency. Therefore, the fetus is its own body, rather than the mother's body.

                            • 2 votes
                            #2.57 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:10 PM EDT

                            ahofi - by calling it a "child's body" you are defining it as "human." It's not a human until it is independently viable.

                            I could have a tick with it's head embedded in my arm and it would be a separate organism that is "dependent on me". I could have a toe fungus that is "dependent on me." Neither of those are human either.

                            • 17 votes
                            #2.58 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:12 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarBrianb-999431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            Dumfux said:

                            BB,

                            I have NO idea how many times WE have to tell you this... but... I'll try again!

                            When YOU can get pregnant, YOU can have a seat at the adult table for a discussion!

                            Until then, take your hormonally imbalanced whiny bitch ass and GO STFU!

                            I realize it's toasts your shriveled nuts that YOU have NO control over what a woman does with HER body, but we're worn out from your incessant drivel!

                            Go poke NJNB!

                            I'm sure the old broad would appreciate some action... since her hubby stays away as much as possible!

                            All I can say about you is how could a gay male be so interested in what I have to say about anything. I keep on trying to tell you that you need not waste your time in me. I am not gay nor am I interested in any of your hits on me. I know the liberal lifestyle invokes a lot of anger towards anyone not accepting your ideals as fact or reality... maybe you should try getting a new life... go straight! You might like it.

                            • 2 votes
                            #2.59 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:17 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarahofiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            Well, if by "human" you mean "member of the species homo sapiens" then actually, it is. However, if by human you mean "person," that point is arguable.

                            Incidentally, "child" could be replaced with "fetus" or "organism dependent on a woman's body" and my point to Feisty would still be valid.

                            • 1 vote
                            #2.60 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:17 PM EDT

                            Feisty: Once again with the ad hominem arguments.

                            How about this, stop with your bull@!$%# arguments on ad hominum attacks and give US a reason to believe YOUR bull@!$%#?

                            Are YOU up to it, little spinner... minnow?

                            • 16 votes
                            #2.61 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:20 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarBrianb-999431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            Well Brian, we Liberals have a pretty good welfare system to care for that bastard when it pops out- something you Conservatives like to call "Socialism". Also, God FORBID if it comes out gay or transgender. Your compassion seems to end in the delivery room.

                            Actually we call it redistribution of wealth. Why don't you compassionate liberals try education? Try to teach the right ways and the wrong ways of doing things instead of homogenizing right from wrong into something it's not?

                            • 2 votes
                            #2.62 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:21 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarBrianb-999431Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            With a name like Rainman you are calling someone else a retard? Life as we know it is about to end... sheesh!

                            • 2 votes
                            #2.63 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:25 PM EDT
                            Comment author avatarahofiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            The reason for believing my so-called bull@!$%# can be derived from your "bull@!$%#". Therefore, if you haven't figured it out already, I won't waste my time trying to explain it to you.

                              #2.64 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:26 PM EDT

                              ahofi - I completely agree that a 12 week old currently humanly gestating fetus has the dna associated with homo sapiens. So does a spontaneously miscarried 12 week old fetus. Since neither is independently viable (nor can be independently viable at 12 weeks), neither has achieved "personhood."

                              Since personhood is not acheived, the fetus is not human.

                              And as an FYI, I did not miss Biology, Logic, or Ethics in my studies. Nor did I miss Cultural Studies, Economics, Statistics, Poltical Analysis, or Legal Studies (as they pertain to my degrees).

                              • 20 votes
                              #2.65 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:28 PM EDT

                              Yes, of course, "life as we know it" is always about to end.

                              Remember when the John Birch society claimed that the civil rights movement was a plot by the communists to institute "one world order"?

                              Same old Koch family, same old crap.

                              • 19 votes
                              #2.66 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:29 PM EDT

                              I won't waste my time trying to explain it to you.

                              Nighties... panty-waste! ;o)

                              • 14 votes
                              #2.67 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:33 PM EDT

                              [All I can say about you is how could a gay male...]

                              Huh...now that's no surprise...Brian's comments have denigrated to insulting gays...typical when a teabagger has his ass handed to him on a public forum.

                              Hey Brian, get a job, freeloader!

                              • 17 votes
                              #2.68 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:37 PM EDT

                              No kidding Mickey. Love the hypocrisy from poor Brianb: when the fetus is in the womb, it is a holy being that nothing much touch, and the mother must be held hostage to Brianb's little delusion that all fetuses are really 10 year old children just waiting to emerge.

                              Once they HAVE emerged, any service that a woman or child in crisis might need is "redistribution of wealth" and that same holy being that he venerated when it was in the womb is now a parasite sucking away at his "wealth". Doesn't get much more stupid than that.

                              Okicize whomever: people like you who refer to women as "sluts" and don't know that women don't get themselves pregnant have serious emotional health issues, as do all anti choice nutcases.

                              Get help fast!

                              • 16 votes
                              #2.69 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:47 PM EDT
                              Comment author avatarahofiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                              Matthew: So you were using "human" to mean "person". You could have just come out and said that. I realize that I was wrong to extend my assertion of your intelligence and education from Feisty to you. For that I apologize. However, my point about Feisty's comment is still valid, even given that I agree that the fetus is not "human". It was not my original intent to contest whether or not the fetus has achieved personhood at 12 weeks. I only intended to point out that the argument "A woman has the right to choose an abortion because she has the right to choose what to do with her own body" is based on a false premise; namely, an abortion is performed on a part of the woman's body. That is simply not true. An abortion is performed on an organism (independently viable or not, human or not) that is not part of a woman's body. I'm not even arguing for or against abortion at this point, I am simply pointing out an incorrect assumption and trying to rectify the situation.

                              • 1 vote
                              #2.70 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:49 PM EDT

                              I read Akin's statement to my wife to get a woman's point of view. She exploded and even though she is a republican said that "The party has gone to the dogs!" I, being a democrat, have thought that for two illegal wars and longer.

                              • 15 votes
                              #2.71 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:56 PM EDT

                              The Tea Party and the rest of the Republicans are falling off the cliff. They are showing to be EXTREMISTS.

                              This moron has said the ultimate "insult"to women that saying that rape is ever "legitimate"and that women should not get pregnant if THEY DO NOT WISH TO???

                              Are our schools in the Red States reallyTHAT BAD???? THAT A REPRESENTATIVE DOES NOT KNOW THE basics of sex education????

                              Shall we send a 6th grader to TEACH HIM HOW WOMEN GET PREGNANT? what an imbecile!!!!!

                              • 10 votes
                              #2.72 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:15 PM EDT

                              Feisty: You're the best, girl! Love your common sense and humor. Missed you, glad to be reading you again. Keep it up. And Matthew, Pigotry, Rainman and all the rest of you freedom loving, CHOICE winners.

                              • 13 votes
                              #2.73 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:17 PM EDT

                              ahofi - in my thought process I DID come out and say it. To me human(ity) and personhood are effectively synonyms. Clearly this may not have been communicated well. My apologies for my part in that misunderstanding.

                              Now, as to what a woman can do with her HER body . . . are you genuinely claiming that a woman does not have the right to separate herself (her body) from another organism that is connected to her own body? In your own words " An abortion is performed on an organism (independently viable or not, human or not) that is not part of a woman's body."

                              I would think that, if anything, your statement could be used to strengthen the position that abortion (i.e. - the removal of a separate, internally connected organism) could be construed as a woman reclaiming her own self and her own body.

                              • 10 votes
                              #2.74 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:25 PM EDT

                              Did Todd Akin get his info from Ryan's Mom !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                              • 9 votes
                              #2.75 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:28 PM EDT

                              Matthew, that is why I pointed out that I am not arguing for or against abortion by saying that. And yes, given that one does not view the fetus as human, one could argue that the woman is reclaiming her own self and her own body, in the case of rape. However, given that one does view the fetus as human (in either your sense of the word, or as a member of the species,) it would still be morally wrong to take the life of the fetus.

                              Unfortunately, both sides of the debate are arguing from positions (the fetus is human vs. the fetus is not human) that need to be reconciled before any one person on either side could sway any one person on the other side with reasoned argument. Too often one sees arguments that are based on a premise that the other side already does not accept, and so even presenting said argument before addressing the issue of the truth or falsehood of its premises is pointless. For example, if I am against abortion because I believe that the fetus is a separate human from its mother, then using arguments such as "A woman has a right to do what she wants with her own body " without first convincing me that the fetus is not a separate organism from the mother is not just pointless, it is stupid.

                              You think that my statement could be used to strengthen your position that abortion is a woman's right because you are coupling my statement with other premises that I and others may not hold to be true. Sure, a pro-choice person could construe my statement as helpful to their argument, and so could a pro-life person. However, both would be wrong, since their other separate, contradicting assumptions are the main thrust of each argument, and therefore my statement only lends strength to the position that has already gained the advantage by asserting their assessment of the fetus's status as a human or non-human.

                                #2.76 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:58 PM EDT

                                ahofi - it's definitely an emotional slippery slope. All we have to do is look at the over three dozen pages on this to prove that.

                                I'll stand by my conviction that this is a case of a woman reclaiming her own body from the internally connected, yet separate organism by severing that connection. If that separate organism is not a person (i.e. - an independently viable human organism), it is not murder.

                                I'll also say that the use of hormones or "morning after pills" to prevent or resolve pregnancy is a woman asserting a physical claim over what happens to her own body. Therefore this also is an individual and private decision and well within her legal rights.

                                Since Roe v. Wade is currently the law (in spite of the best efforts of many), I'll suggest that the pro-choice folks still have "already gained the advantage" of the "assessment of the fetus's status as a human or non-human." Therefore, I'll accept your previous statement as being supportive of my convictions. Thank you.

                                • 3 votes
                                #2.77 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:13 PM EDT

                                Being from Missouri, I'm not surprised from Aiken's remarks. I'll even be less surprised still though when he beats out Claire in November in the election. Only Stl and KC can help her win the election after being the passing vote for ACA.

                                  #2.78 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:30 PM EDT

                                  BrinB....according to ahofi...next time you are wacking off.......you are killing your children by the millions1. Better go to church with ahofi and repent while abstaining from sex the rest of your life......!!!!

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #2.79 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:42 PM EDT

                                  rainman-

                                  Because he has no influence on this issue. It is a moot point.

                                  He would have real influence in issues (the law) in which women's rights and the separation of church and state are concerned.

                                  Either way, by voting for him, you endorse his stupidity.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #2.80 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:51 PM EDT

                                  Rumors that Todd is Nuts !

                                  The world is laughing at this retard !

                                  • 4 votes
                                  #2.81 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:33 PM EDT

                                  ahofi, have you ever heard of an umbilical cord or a placenta? A fetus is most certainly a part of a woman's body. Let's talk about Bio 101 some more, shall we?

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #2.82 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:52 PM EDT

                                  First off, Starsailing, I never said anything of the sort. If you intend to not sound like a total idiot, please at least represent my statements factually.

                                  Now, for the only other reasonable person I have encountered on this thread, Matthew: The Roe v. Wade decision did not address the issue of personhood. It only addressed when the state's vested interest in the fetus could be considered "compelling", which, incidentally, was at the end of the first trimester. It wasn't until Casey v. Planned Parenthood that late-term abortions were legal. The justices of the Roe v. Wade decision, because of a lack of scientific knowledge, did not even understand the fetus to be living. Therefore pro-choice people don't actually have the advantage in personhood vs. nonpersonhood, they have the advantage in a lack of understanding in a decision made 40 years ago.

                                    #2.83 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:00 AM EDT

                                    The GOP Teabaggers couldn't polish Obama's shoes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                    • 4 votes
                                    #2.84 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:00 AM EDT

                                    Wow! I tuned in to this "electronic-riot" a bit late, what did I miss?

                                    I take it that some Republican congressman opened his yap and his right wing world view ran into twenty-first century reality. I'll try and be gentle and hopefully not make things worse.

                                    The problem the Santorum, Ryan, and Catholic religious concept of human life ran into was that they believe a new life begins at conception. This is not quite right and may seem to be a quibble, but life just is, it does not begin anew at conception. Life began in mystery hundreds of million or even several billion years ago on earth. That is why NASA just spent over 2 billion dollars on Curiosity, to see if life once existed on Mars. A conception may start a new life cycle but it is not a new life.

                                    Second, and I tread lightly here, they seem to believe that humans come equipped with both a soul and persona at conception. Certainly, a zygote has the potential to become a fully functioning human being but those develops as the pregnancy comes to term.

                                    And finally, the idea that a human being has a human soul, (to differentiate it from a chimpanzee soul for example,) runs smack into evolution. If you believe that, somewhere back in antiquity someone's parents and siblings were soulless, or had an apelike soul, else we live in a creationist world and all the evidence of our connection with the greater earthly zoo was faked.

                                    That said, the right wing's efforts to saddle the American experience with the concept of person-hood and all its logical consequences is as deeply flawed as prohibition was nearly a century ago. They would be wise to let it go.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #2.85 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:02 AM EDT

                                    ahofi: If you want to define a fetus as a person, you must then decide at what point a fetus becomes a person. Next--and actually a whole lot more important-- is: HOW DOES A CRIMINAL PROSECUTOR PROVE IT TO DEFINE A CRIME HAS OCCURRED? Clearly you haven't considered this, but as a career felony prosecutor, I assure you prosecution of a any such definition quickly turns into a hot mess. I'll explain.

                                    Currently, the law draws its distinction at the point of viability. A fetus cannot be sustained outside the womb before 26 weeks. Most abortions occur before 16 weeks, in line with Roe v. Wade--10 weeks before viability even with all modern medicine can offer.

                                    If that distinction is too late for you, at what point would you consider a fetus to be a person? But please note: our laws cannot legislate morality, although many insist on trying!.

                                    Murder is immoral, but laws cannot parse well when it comes to death with dignity, for example. Ethics is a subject painted in shades of gray. By contrast, criminal legislation draws bright lines--black and white--to illuminate human behavior. Thus, our criminal laws do not define morality; they broadly define the lowest acceptable forms of human behavior.

                                    Society refuses to accept murder as acceptable behavior. We're at a tipping point with regard to assisted suicide, however, and seem to be moving towards accepting an individual's right to die as (s)he sees fit as death draws near.

                                    Paul Ryan believes--solely as a matter of religious faith--that personhood begins at the moment of conception. Our laws cannot define that. Neither a woman nor her physician knows exactly when conception takes place. They can guesstimate within two or three days--but that's an unknowable laws can't adequately resolve. Criminal law, you see, mandates proof beyond reasonable doubt as to every element of a crime.

                                    Several states have drafted legislation that assumes personhood from the previous ovulation--a timeline that includes two weeks of actual NON-EXISTENCE as a person with full constitutional rights!

                                    A few states are even trying to say viable sperm that haven't even penetrated an egg should have full human rights. Just think what a nightmare law must make of that--why, every time you masturbated to ejaculation, you could be charged with thousands of murders! The idea is utterly preposterous.

                                    Is it a person when an egg injected with a viable sperm first separates to become a zygote? And just how does law determine THAT? A prosecutor would somehow be required to provide evidence of that exact moment on film--also beyond the pale. You might try to require every woman to have her uterus filmed during each moment of ovulation--extremely oppressive, as all women who menstruate and have had sex would have to be hooked up to a machine for several days each month. What healthcare corporation would pay for that? What society would even consider it?

                                    You get the drift. Once you're willing to lose the notion of viability which, contrary to your posts, is most definitely the bright line addressed in Roe v. Wade, you begin to deal in nonsense--because laws can only address broader issues.

                                    For that reason, Justice Blackmun, writing the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade, settled on viability as the only available bright line law could address in this regard.

                                    The intervening years have not changed anything. So your concern with defining exactly when a fetus becomes a person has really already been decided in the only realistic manner law can address.

                                    Better minds than yours have tried.

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #2.86 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:55 AM EDT

                                    As a further thought: you might want to argue that if we accept zygotes as fully human, we know one when we see a pregnant woman--after all, nobody can be "a little pregnant," right? WRONG.

                                    A woman can be several months pregnant but lack sufficient hormones to carry to term. As a career woman, I didn't marry 'til 40 and children weren't part of my life plan, but then I fell in love with a guy who wanted two girls. I did it!--at 41 & 43. I had to get pregnant five times in two years. During one of those pregnancies, later to become a miscarriage, my hormone levels were only in the 700s, not the 70,000s and higher needed to do the rest of the job.

                                    This further complicates the notion that any fetus should have the full constitutional rights of a fully realized human being.

                                    • 4 votes
                                    #2.87 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:05 AM EDT

                                    The only way to solve this problem is either cut it off or sew it up.

                                      #2.88 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:42 AM EDT

                                      Republicans believe some of the craziest things. Paul Ryan says that medical care cost are so high because people do not pay more out of their pockets This is the truth; it's in his budget plan. He said that people make unnecessary trips to see a doctor because there are no copays or copays are to small.

                                      When a visit to the doctor's office or a diagnostic test cost them a mere $10 or $20 co-payment out of pocket -- or there is no charge at all -- cost has little impact on their decision to see a doctor.

                                      Ladies and gentlemen this is par for course in republicans mind. The only thing that matters to them is money and controlling everyone and everything except them, republicans!!!!

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #2.89 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:45 AM EDT

                                      Canadians don't pay anything in the way of a copay for their doctor visits. And they get much more bang for their buck in healthcare than we do. Their plan covers everyone with a much small portion of their GDP going for it. Our leaves out 10's of millions of people with a much larger chunk of GDP going toward it. Republicans with sponsors getting rich off of that inefficiency are keeping us where we are. People avoiding doctor visits because of cost are largely doomed to letting their problem getting larger and more expensive later on.

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #2.90 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:45 AM EDT

                                      Ahofi- where do you think they perform an abortion since its not performed on the womans or in the womans body exactly? Im waiting. Seriously. Because last I checked the woman carries the fetus in her uterus which is inside her body. So how do they not perform the abortion on or in the woman's body? So again, since the woman carries the fetus inside of her she has the right to decide if she wants to carry the fetus full term. Yes she does. They have to go inside the woman in order to get the fetus or baby out so how is your point even logical. Because the fetus damn sho aint developing on the outside of her body and furthermore she can feel everything that they are doing to the fetus BECAUSE IT IS INSIDEOF HER BODY. So save that for somebody else who doesn't know any better. DO you seriously think she can't feel that? That they are just performing that on the child and not the mother?! Are seriously that damn deluded? What the hell? If this was this case then it would be no reason for them to give women anesthesia when they are about to perform an abortion.

                                      As I stated before if you are going to argue and disagree please do so with intellignce. Not stupidity. The fetus is not independent of the woman. So please drop that crap somewhere else. The fetus in its developing stages cannot survive outside the womb on its own, so yes it is dependent on the woman's body. Thus giving a woman the right to choose to do as she pleases. IT IS HER BODY!" I had to reiterate that fact. The baby grows inside of the woman. She can feel it growing inside of her. Thus cause growing pains. And as it grows more and more and gets closer to its delivery it presses down on her cervix whch casuses contractions. And this is also why a woman has the right to choose whether she wants to carry the fetus full term. So how again are they not performing abortions on women's bodies? Please tell me. Inquiring minds really want to know.

                                      • 2 votes
                                      #2.91 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:03 AM EDT

                                      I meant bladder. As the baby grows it pushes downward putting pressure on the baldder which casues contractions. My computer was messing up again which caused to me to run out of time to put the correct statement in place of the incorrect one. My bad people. I was really trying my best to get to my comment on time to correct it. I hate it when my laptop does that.

                                        #2.92 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:10 AM EDT

                                        ahofi - you are attempting to change your directly stated intent of your argument from the purely physical perspective to the personhood discussion.

                                        Your comment that the justicess in Roe v. Wade "because of a lack of scientific knowledge, did not even understand the fetus to be living" is false. They were fully aware that a fetus has a heartbeat and that no fetus instantly goes from non-living to living at birth. Viability was discussed and was indeed a criticial deciding point.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #2.93 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:24 AM EDT

                                        So, if she gets pregnant...that means she wanted it. I learn something new everyday.

                                        • 4 votes
                                        #2.94 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:01 AM EDT

                                        It sounds like this politician is speaking from experience.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #2.95 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:35 AM EDT

                                        Okay, I would like to make a personal request: Please do not horribly misrepresent this comment as so many have done with my previous ones. I guess I should reply to sweetcancer first.

                                        Sweetcancer: If you hadn't noticed already, I am not actually making any claim about whether or not abortion should be legalized. I also never claimed that an abortion was not performed in a woman's body. (Unless it was a typo, but I don't think I ever switched i for o in my previous posts.) I did claim that abortions are not performed ON a woman's body, they are actually performed on the fetus's body. I also never claimed that the fetus was independently viable, (although it can be at 24 or so weeks.) I also made it very clear that I understand that the fetus is dependent on the woman's body. However, there is a difference between dependency and sameness. I argued that the fetus is not part of the woman's body, despite being in it and dependent upon it. Similarly, parasites and viruses are often dependent upon their hosts, yet they are not actually a part of the host's body. Therefore, by killing said parasites or viruses, you are killing something other than part of the woman. In a similar way, by killing the fetus (yes, it's alive by the way) you are not killing part of the woman, you are killing a separate organism, the fetus. The fallacy you committed in your comment is commonly called a "straw-man argument" where you misrepresent the other person's argument and attack your construct because it is more convenient to do so than to attack the person's actual argument.

                                        P.S. Actually, look up "partial birth abortions". The actual killing does take place outside the mother. I also read an article by a retired physician who told about cases where labor was induced, the baby was actually born, and then just left to die. I think it was officially called a heterotomy or some such word but I cannot find the article right now to check.

                                        Matthew: Actually, yes the point of my last comment was to disagree with a point you made about Roe v. Wade, not to continue the previous line of thought. I INTENDED to start a new line of conversation. If my statement about the knowledge of the justices' awareness that the fetus is alive is false, then they did a damn good job of making it seem true. I read the opinion just before writing that. Yes, viability was discussed, and indeed a deciding point... and it lead to the federal legality of first trimester abortions only. During the second or third trimester, states had the option to prescribe abortions entirely except in cases pertaining to the death of the mother. It was not until Casey v. Planned Parenthood that abortion on demand was legalized up until the moment of birth.

                                        Deborah: Since I was not actually making a case for or against fetal personhood, the entirety of both of your comments are irrelevant to me.

                                          #2.96 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:41 PM EDT

                                          @Fiesty...Your wit is only exceeded by your logic and intellect. Have enjoyed your posts for a long time. Don't think I'd want to be anywhere in your state if I made you mad, but you are an asset to every thread for which you post. Thanks!

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #2.97 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:31 PM EDT

                                          @Ahofi- I fully stand behind my comments. If you were referring to partial birth abortions than you should have said that. And just like i said it is inisde of the womans body and it is a part of her body. I am not retracting my statement. Because like i said i feel the statement was false and idiotic. Now if you are referring to late term abortions, which i dont agree with, then you should say so and in that case I agree to a certain extent. And furthermore I have done my research on abortions so I know fully well what I am talking about. And because of that I stand behind what I said earlier. I do not agree with your logic. It is still in her body and it is still apart of her body. And they are doing that to the woman as well because she can feel it. So I support my above statement.

                                          And to Jim Spence- You do not pay anybody's elses health insurance premiums but your own so you can take your comments and shove them up your ass. And even if a woman decides to get birth control to prevent pregnancy she is well within her rights to do so. Also it is none of your damn business what our PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES COVERS AND DAMN SURE IIS NONE OF YOUR BSUINESS AS TO WHAT WE DO WITH OUR BODIES AND WHY WE WANT TO USE BIRTH CONTROL. WE PAY FOR THAT EVERY SINGLE MONTH AND IT DOES NOT COME OUT OF YOUR POCKET. SO PLEASE SIT DOWN AND SHUT THE HELL UP. ITS CALLED PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE MEANING EACH CITIZEN PAYS FOR THEIR OWN OUT OF THEIR OWN POCKET. So save you bull@!$%# argument for someone else who's an indiot just like you. Who in the hell do you think you are to tell my insurance company, since I pay my premiums, what the hell they can and cannot cover?" Yall better that shut that @!$%# up!

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #2.98 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:34 AM EDT

                                          If you do not agree with my logic, please provide some other line of reasoning that shows that I am incorrect and the fetus is part of the woman's body. If you cannot do so, then you are merely asserting your statement as fact, and I have no reason to believe you. Once again, I don't disagree that the fetus is in the woman's body, however, it does not follow logically that since the fetus is in the woman's body it is a part of the woman's body. Also, although I was not referring to late term abortions specifically, I was merely noting as an interesting aside that abortions can and are performed outside the woman's body.

                                            #2.99 - Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:06 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            Rep. Todd Akin

                                            "The rapist didn't get you pregnant, you did!"

                                            If you are a dumb@!$%# vote for me, Todd.

                                            • 45 votes
                                            #3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:10 PM EDT
                                            Comment author avataroy-vay!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                            He did say that. That's how you FELT about what he said. You're not listening or you're only reading into things that are not there.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #3.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:07 PM EDT

                                            oy-vay!

                                            Nice name some Satire or Sarcasm there? My comment was. Is that how you FEEL? Oy vays mere!

                                            • 12 votes
                                            #3.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:16 PM EDT

                                            oy-vay! - What he actually said was bad enough, don't you think?

                                            Can't believe there are still trolls on here defending this BS.

                                            • 14 votes
                                            #3.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:04 PM EDT
                                            Comment author avatarmike-2130882Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                            He didn't say anything besides that womens bodies when they are actually raped tend to shut down the reproductive process. He was clarifying something contingent on a violent act. He spoke rightly. It is all of you who read into his statements because you are bloodthirsty fools who want to kill babies.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #3.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:18 PM EDT

                                            mike - Too bad it's all ignorant BS and NOT TRUE!

                                            Despite what the GOP seems to think, you can't just make sh$t up and start passing laws based on your warped, made-up crap.

                                            Same thing with "voter fraud" - there's no evidence whatsoever that people show up in person and vote illegally, but there's plenty of evidence they do it by absentee ballot. Now, wonder why absentee ballots aren't addressed by the "oh-so-necessary" voter fraud laws the GOP is making up?

                                            • 22 votes
                                            #3.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:22 PM EDT
                                            Comment author avatarOkicize Wicasa Yata PiExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                            I applaud you Mike. However with these others you can't reason with one of them. I can just see the fury on ol redheads face. Veins popping out,eyes watering and bloodshot can even imagine fangs growing. It's their body i agree and i don't care what they do with it. Cut their wrists,throat,shoot their self,jump off a cliff, shove a red hot poker up their ass.I don't care. However that baby is a person and has it's body and life as well. Plus the person that helped to make it has a investment in it also. As you said there are many ways to prevent that these days. Some people are just to stupid to use them.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #3.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:57 PM EDT

                                            If he'd said he was against all abortions for any reason this article wouldn't have even been written. But, if when asked if women who DO get pregnant after rape should be allowed to get an abortion he started spewing statistics about the chances of that happening. That wasn't the question. No matter how far to the right you tilt you should be able to understand that.

                                            • 17 votes
                                            #3.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:08 PM EDT

                                            Hey, Oki, - I'll ask you the same question I asked brianb:

                                            How many of those "precious" babies have you saved from a life in foster care? Why do you only have a responsibility to look out for them until they're born?

                                            • 16 votes
                                            #3.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:09 PM EDT

                                            Mike ...

                                            He didn't say anything besides that womens bodies when they are actually raped tend to shut down the reproductive process

                                            That is SUCH BS!!!!! I would so love any man on this post to STFU and turn their keyboard over to the women in their lives. Bodies don't shut down because they've been raped!!!! WTH are you reading/smoking/drinking/snorting?????

                                            • 18 votes
                                            #3.9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:09 PM EDT

                                            Mike: There is no such thing as "shutting down" when raped. Sorry, but there is no medical evidence for that. Mutual sexual intercourse or rape, the same sperm and egg are involved, and has the same chances of implanting. It's a sexual act period.....one violent and the other mutual agreed.

                                            Until Men start getting legislated regarding their bodies exclusively, sit down and be quiet. You are not female, so stop legislating my body. When men starting getting denied prostrate surgery because of moral reasoning, then you may start to complain.

                                            • 19 votes
                                            #3.10 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:27 PM EDT

                                            When is rape ever "legitimate"???? These stupid people of THE GOP are definitely taking us to the dark ages.

                                            THE GOP: THE NEW TALIBAN

                                            • 18 votes
                                            #3.11 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:12 PM EDT

                                            The GOP Teabaggers suffers from stupidity, the party of disgrace !!!!!!!!!!!

                                            • 11 votes
                                            #3.12 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:39 PM EDT

                                            Republicans leave a chill in the air. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWRK0Prfpv8

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #3.13 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:16 AM EDT

                                            Maybe Todd needs help, I feel sorry for the guy !!!!!!!

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #3.14 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:25 AM EDT

                                            Ice is forming on the tips of my wings. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrGuVa-4BVE

                                              #3.15 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:03 AM EDT

                                              Christian church attendance in this country is dropping. I used to think this was rather depressing. But now I find comfort in knowing that controlling nitwit preachers are preaching more and more to empty pews.

                                              • 5 votes
                                              #3.16 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:49 AM EDT

                                              It sounds like he is speaking from experience.

                                                #3.17 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:34 AM EDT

                                                Okicize said;

                                                Plus the person that helped to make it has a investment in it also.

                                                If the person who helped 'make' the baby is a child molester or rapist, they should have NO say.The person they molested should NEVER have to face their molester again.

                                                As you said there are many ways to prevent that these days. Some people are just to stupid to use them.

                                                Tell that to the rapist. Unless, of course, that's their goal. There was a case where a male wanted to get a particular woman pregnant. He stalked her for a year, timing when she went to the doctor, picked through her trash so he knew when she had her period, and deliberately timed his attacks of her for when he thought she would ovulate. And...she got pregnant.

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #3.18 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:54 AM EDT

                                                O.W.Y.P. Even if a baby is self aware in the womb, the babies right to survive DOES NOT super cede the right of the mother to have a healthy life. If the baby is the result of rape, rape is an act of violence, of course the woman, or girl as case may be, has to right to not have to carry that baby to term, what ever point the pregnancy is at. If the victim chooses to deliver the baby that is her right too. I dislike abortion as a rule. That being said I stand by a woman's right to choose for herself when to have an abortion if she must.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #3.19 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:39 PM EDT

                                                Thank you Wade, Tampa Florida. My sentiments exactly. EVERY WOMAN DESRVES THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

                                                These AZZHOLES CONSERVATIVES piss me off with that BULL@!$%# like they can get pregnant! I CANNOT STAND MEN who think that women should not have the RIGHT to CHOOSE or FEEL THEY have the RIGHT to DECIDE WHAT'S BEST FOR a WOMAN. AS I stated before REPUBLICANS are NOTHING but SEXIST azz RACIST azz WHITE MEN who only belive in the WHITE MAN'S RIGHT to CHOOSE to do as HE PLEASES. THEY just want to CONTROL WOMEN and MINORITIES. THEY WANT to LIMIT OUR RIGHTS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE so THEY CAN do WHATEVER THEY HELL THEY WANT TO and not be held accountable. THEY don't want ANYBODY ELSE having ANY SAY SO in THEIR own PRIVATE LIVES. THEY want to have to control over EVERYBODY LIVES in EVERY ASPECT. THIS is exactly why it is so IDIOTIC for a WOMAN, a MINORITY, or a GAY person to vote these azzholes in office.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #3.20 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:11 PM EDT
                                                Reply
                                                Comment author avatarIn Palm Springs Ca-6558379Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                This is the BS the GOP tries to pull on woman ! I wouldn't trust any of these crackers in our government ! This is an insult to woman in the USA ! Vote these "BUMS "out ! This is what Romney & Ryan are all about !

                                                • 66 votes
                                                #4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:17 PM EDT
                                                Comment author avatarmousetrapExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                you realize c******s is a racist term. Its the white version of the N word

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #4.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:31 PM EDT

                                                mousetrap

                                                crackers also = bonkers just as gay = happy, words have a lot of meanings but you must be feeling a little downtrodden by all those 'reverse racists' screwing up your life. Shucks something bit your ass.

                                                • 26 votes
                                                #4.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:39 PM EDT

                                                exactly

                                                • 11 votes
                                                #4.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:43 PM EDT

                                                In Palm Springs Ca-6558379 post 4.0

                                                Oh come on their not all "Crackers" just look at right wing jerks like Marco Rubio, Herman Kain and Michell Bachmann. Although the Repukelicans are 99% white men they still keep a few spots open for women and minorities so they can pretend to be a main steam political party................

                                                • 24 votes
                                                #4.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:45 PM EDT

                                                Where I come from "crackers" is a racist terms against white. I am always amazed at the number of offensive comments people make against southerners, usually involving ignorance, incest, etc. Do you realize that when you classify millions of people as all the same, it's bigotry? Why is it okay when it's against southerners, particularly poor southerners? I grew up as one and I was raised to be exactly the opposite. Apparently, many didn't get the same education about treating people as individuals, not as stereotypes of a race, religion, sex, etc. And yes, the guy is an idiot.

                                                • 13 votes
                                                #4.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:57 PM EDT

                                                I look at it this way..we all bleed red..color is irrelavant!

                                                • 8 votes
                                                #4.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:02 PM EDT
                                                Comment author avataroy-vay!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                Wow, Palm Springs makes a racist remark about white people and gets lots of high fives!!

                                                Says a lot about the hate-mongering on this post. You all can continue on with your irrational, name-calling hate-fest.

                                                Since there doesn't seem room or a desire for rational, level-headed discussion, there's no point in talking when people judge rather than listen. Later for this....

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #4.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:10 PM EDT

                                                Janet-333165 - I agree with you to a point. However, as a Midwesterner who retired to the mountains of VA and the beaches of South Carolina, there is some validity to the stereotypes. HOWEVER, there are also many, many wonderful, caring, educated and even progressive folks in the south. I just wish more of them would stand up (as we're trying to do here in AZ, where I am now) to ignorance, such as what this politician has said.

                                                I would also say that there's an inherent difference between the "C" word and the "N" word. "C" seems to refer to behavior of people who live a certain area, and "N" is a derogatory term for a race of people. My take, anyway.

                                                • 12 votes
                                                #4.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:11 PM EDT

                                                Exactly thank you Deborah .....the word cracker to me means crazy ..bonkers ...a social misfit scary people etc And i am white .It wasn't ment as racist at all ..

                                                • 12 votes
                                                #4.9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:19 PM EDT

                                                Oy-vay has left the discussion? Well all I can say is Yippie-oy-vay.

                                                • 10 votes
                                                #4.10 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:23 PM EDT

                                                I read that the term "cracker" originates from the early Florida cattle herders, and the "cracking" sound of the bull whips that they used. Somewhat related to this, I have been told that the puppy I got from the pound a few months ago looks like a variation of a "cur" mix, called a "Florida Cracker Cur". Nobody better insult my puppy. He loves everybody.

                                                • 5 votes
                                                #4.11 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:26 PM EDT
                                                Comment author avatarRamzeeExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                I think a lot of people are taking this differently and wrong in my opinion. What I believe he was saying was referring to an actual rape case. A lot of women will claim to have been raped just so that they can abort the pregnancy or because they're with someone they believe they shouldn't be with. I don't think he's saying some cases of an actual rape are more legitimate than others, he's saying in the case where a women does get raped and then becomes pregnant the honest number for that percentage is very miniscule when it comes to cases of abortion. If people from each side would stop with the hate toward the other and actually listen to people they'd realize, republican, democrat, left, right, progressive, conservative, christian, atheist, etc it's more important to listen to the people speaking than to their affiliations. I don't know anything about this guy or what he's about, but from that clip I don't believe saying he's spouting conservative nonsense is a reasonable response.

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #4.12 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:30 PM EDT

                                                ;-)

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #4.13 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:32 PM EDT

                                                These are the politicians who don't want the healthcare opportunities offered by President Obama's healthcare act such as free birth control for women. So, let me get this right. GOP: "You girls can't become pregnant from a LEGITIMATE rape because your body has the ability to recognize a "legitimate" rape and shut down conception." "So we don't want to approve of your getting an abortion should you become pregnant, and, by the way, we don't want you to have birth control that you can't pay for." Did I get that right? If it weren't so serious and elemental an issue, I would say put this guy on stage in a comedy club. Seriously, he sounds like a Saturday Night Live parody.

                                                • 11 votes
                                                #4.14 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:39 PM EDT

                                                @COinFL

                                                Your definition of a cracker is exactly right. Haven't heard of a cracker cur but I do know cur's are sweet dogs.

                                                My in-law was born and raised in Florida and thinks highly of the term cracker. He defines it as a person that can make a life for himself outside society's norms while still being true to himself.

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #4.15 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:02 PM EDT

                                                This according to Webster's Dictionary :

                                                a usually disparaging : a poor usually Southern white

                                                b capitalized : a native or resident of Florida or Georgia —used as a nickname

                                                I seem to recall there was a minor league baseball team named the Atlanta Crackers. I've always understood it was because Georgia was famous for harvesting peanuts and the term "cracker" was in reference to someone associated with that. Seem harmless enough to me, but people are more sensitive these days.

                                                • 5 votes
                                                #4.16 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:39 PM EDT

                                                Just want to remind you all, please volunteer to get people registered. There are many people who don't have transportation to get the photo ID from a driver's license facility. In WI, their repub/tparty gov. Walker closed the DMVs as a cost saving measure in the heavily minority populated city, and cut the hours of the DMVs on the bus line, making it more difficult to register. Then there's the disabled with their wheelchairs and walkers and our senior citizens. It might also be a good idea to ask if the resident in the nursing homes are covered to vote freely. I understand there were a few cases where the manager of a nursing home filled in their vote - I haven't verified this, just heard it from a party. Every vote counts, especially with the tricks the repub/tparty are playing. Voter fraud, my arse!

                                                Sorry to be off topic. Yes, WE can.

                                                • 6 votes
                                                #4.17 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:44 PM EDT

                                                The GOP TeaWackos play a dirty game, They should all go to jail for Sabotaging our Country !!!

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #4.18 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:49 PM EDT

                                                @Ramzee- Since no one else is going to address your naive idiotic comment I'm going to do so myself. And what you said didn't make it any better either. THERE IS NO WAY A WOMANS BODY CAN SHUT DOWN SPERM AND STOP PREGRANCY. AND ANOTHER THING PREGNANCIES RESULTING FROM RAPES ARE JUST AS COMMON AS PREGNANCIES RESULTING FROM CONSENTUAL SEX. So your explanation was just as idiotic as his statement. THEY OCCUR A WHOLE LOT. THEY ARE VERY COMMON. AGAIN-IF YOU ARE GOING TO ARGUE AND DISAGREE PLEASE DO SO WITH INTELLIGENCE. Stupidity is really racking my nerves.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #4.19 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:43 AM EDT
                                                Reply

                                                Religious fundamentalists spouting absurd pseudoscience again. The party needs to dump that baggage so it can join the rest of us in the 21st century, but they won't. It's up to all rational Americans, religious and otherwise, to use the vote to make them irrelevant.

                                                • 55 votes
                                                #5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:27 PM EDT

                                                They're already irrelevant. They just don't know it yet.

                                                • 35 votes
                                                #5.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:37 PM EDT

                                                The Republican Party is a dying animal lashing out with anger and hatred. American voters need to send this disgusting excuse of a political party to it's grave ASAP.

                                                • 47 votes
                                                #5.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:52 PM EDT

                                                Most rapes DO NOT result in pregnancy.

                                                Do your homework, use your brain and turn your ideology filter off so you can actually see and hear what's going on before you spout your pseudoscientific nonsense!

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #5.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:12 PM EDT

                                                oy-vay!

                                                Most rapes DO NOT result in pregnancy.

                                                Most acts of loving coitus do not result in pregnancy.

                                                • 30 votes
                                                #5.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:26 PM EDT
                                                Comment author avataroy-vay!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                Doesn't make the statement I made any less true. FAIL- big time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #5.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:28 PM EDT

                                                Oh, yes, why don't we, oy-vay? Let's do our homework by all means:

                                                About 5% of rapes result in pregnancy, according to this study from the American Journal of Obsetrics and Gynecology:

                                                http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937896701412

                                                Here's a study from the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, discussing pregnancies resulting from rape as a public health issue:

                                                http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379700002439

                                                And here's a paper done by two researchers at St. Lawrence University, discussing whether per-incident rape-related pregnancies occur at a higher rate than per-incident consensual sex-related pregnancies. (Spoiler: they do. Maybe because rapists often don't use birth control)

                                                http://www.springerlink.com/content/wp5cnp43k6byxj4d/

                                                My homework leads me to conclude that a woman sure can get pregnant from rape. I might add that if even one woman ever got pregnant from rape, I would want her to be able to get an abortion. Nobody should have to bear a rapist's baby if they don't want to. The argument that most rapes don't result in pregnancy seems absolutely meaningless to me. Some rapes do result in pregnancy. Those rape victims, of all people, should be able to choose what they want to do with their own bodies.

                                                That Adkins guy is woefully misinformed. Awful to think he could actually become a senator, making decisions about women's health issues.

                                                So. Where are your citations, oy-vay?

                                                • 41 votes
                                                #5.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:49 PM EDT

                                                Enlighten us all, then, oy-vay! Akin said, "If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," and that's what I'm objecting to (putting aside for now the highly insulting implication that women would start feigning rape left and right to get access to abortions). That's the absurd pseudoscience I'm calling out.

                                                What biological functions kick in when women are raped to prevent pregnancy? Claims like this have been around for decades, but I've never seen them validated by a reputable medical source. If you have such a source, I would honestly love to see it. If you want to change my mind, it'll take facts, so please do present them.

                                                • 27 votes
                                                #5.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:52 PM EDT

                                                oy-vay! What are your credentials? Where do you get your data? It's very likely true that most acts of sexual intercourse, whether consensual or not, do not result in pregnancy, but many, many do; it is NOT rare. Therefore, how do you propose to frame a law that does not take into account those situations, however common, which have resulted in pregnancy from a non-consensual act? Let's hear from you, oy-vay - would you save a mother's life or not if she were pregnant and needed a termination to survive the high risk of death or serious morbidity? Please remember, oh-vay, that serious psychological impairment can be quite devastating to a woman and her family. Remember?

                                                • 17 votes
                                                #5.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:56 PM EDT

                                                oy-vay, Please go back to school and learn about BIOLOGY and HUMAN SEXUALITY. I want to think that you're about 14 and homeschooled based on what you've written on this topic.

                                                • 20 votes
                                                #5.9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:58 PM EDT

                                                Akin and his supporters are the politicians who don't want the healthcare opportunities offered by President Obama's healthcare act such as free birth control for women. So, let me get this right. GOP: "You girls can't become pregnant from a LEGITIMATE rape because your body has the ability to recognize a "legitimate" rape and shut down conception." "So we don't want to approve of your getting an abortion should you become pregnant, and, by the way, we don't want you to have birth control that you can't pay for." Did I get that right? If it weren't so serious and elemental an issue, I would say put this guy on stage in a comedy club. Seriously, he sounds like a Saturday Night Live parody.

                                                • 15 votes
                                                #5.10 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:01 PM EDT

                                                Just like EVERYTHING ELSE that has to do with Science, the GOP is going backwards. It is embarrasing for this moron to be making those kind of comments.

                                                Pray for rain, Dinosaurs were roaming with people, like the Flinstones, Global warming is a hoax, never mind that we are having the worst drought in decades, etc.

                                                They continue with their Neadertheal positions, thinking that the ignorant bulk of the GOP will be served by GOD in all aspects of their life, and it is a SIN to think that women have the right to an abortion if they get RAPED.

                                                Are you going to vote for these animals???

                                                • 14 votes
                                                #5.11 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:20 PM EDT

                                                Well repubs almost made santorum their number one stooge. Santorum said sex was only for married couples and to produce children. No sex for anyone else, would outlaw birth control, Planned parenthood etc.........One step away from Romney.......Repubs think this is 1912 not 2012!

                                                • 6 votes
                                                #5.12 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:55 PM EDT

                                                The statement by Akin is really what a lot of these ignorant people believe.... it is just the expounding on the belief that if the woman does not enjoy the sex then she will not get pregnant thing.. LOL Perhaps if folks should check the would find that these folks only believe in abstainance and that that is perhaps what they teach as pregnancy prevention and perhaps even for prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. LOL

                                                Recently read a report of a pregnant teen who was diagnosed with leukemia when she was 9 weeks pregnant. Because the needed chemotherapy would kill the fetus cancer treatment was withheld for 20 odd days. The chemotherapy was give at that time but the girl miscarried and the docs could not stop the bleeding so she as well as the fetus died.

                                                This happened recently in the Dominican republic if I am not mistaken where under no circumstances can the woman/girl have an abortion even if to save the mother's life.

                                                Now we have an example of the outcome of these hellishly ignorant laws that these religiousity T'repcondino folks are trying to pass/foist on the masses in this country.

                                                These religiousity folks probably believe that the fetus is more important than the mother because the mother is is simply a powerless host i.e. baby making machine who exists to replenish the earth with man kind. If the host has a female fetus well that will be accepted too, because they will be needed to continue their procreating process.

                                                Perhaps that is why the t'recons keep introducing these laws in the US, with the various anti- reproductive choice / anti- (evolved) female laws that these folks try to push through at the federal level and definately at the state level.

                                                How is it that the fetus could not or did not survive outside the host, you know that uterus with arms, legs, teats and a vacuuous brain?

                                                Talk about the old 'serfs up' thing for the serferation and a serferated T'nation. LOL

                                                Like someone noted if you are rich and preggers then.... you go on vacation in Europe....into a spa to lose weight.... LOL Some perhaps don't even bother to travel that far either... Nothing like weight loss via surgery, you know like maybe a little lipo suction, a little blepheroplasty er lids lift, chin lift, tits up, trout mouth, a weave and a wax... You know the usual...LOL

                                                • 4 votes
                                                #5.13 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:18 PM EDT

                                                Todd took one giant step for man kind "GOP" Schizophrenic !!!!!!!!!!!

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #5.14 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:08 AM EDT

                                                @ DRK,

                                                Thanks for the links. I asked elsewhere how the rate of pregnancies resulting from rape compared to the rate resulting from consensual sexual encounters. Higher, huh? So, rape DOESN'T shut down a woman's reproductive organs. Imagine that!

                                                • 6 votes
                                                #5.15 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:14 AM EDT

                                                Sandy, Maybe todd needs a Laxative !!!!!!!!!!!

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #5.16 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:32 AM EDT

                                                Oh, HELL, no, I won't vote for anyone with this misunderstanding of my biology.

                                                • 5 votes
                                                #5.17 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:43 AM EDT

                                                Since the act of rape does not provide the victim with the choice to use contraception, it is not surprising that rape would result in higher pregnancy rates than consensual sex.

                                                • 6 votes
                                                #5.18 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:52 AM EDT

                                                he must have been refuring to the way rep. have raped the country in the last 10 years

                                                • 3 votes
                                                #5.19 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:13 AM EDT

                                                Okay, so this guy is a nut. But the really scary misognyistic comment is the use of "legitimate rape". What he's implying with this is scary: that women who are truly, legitimately raped (violated against their will) won't get pregnant. Of course, the flip side of that statement must be that the ones who DO get pregnant weren't really legitimately raped. They must have wanted it; they must be immoral, lose women if they got pregnant.

                                                THIS is why these crazies don't want to allow abortion for rape. It's their view that "rape victims" aren't really vicitms; something about them caused them to ask for it -- the way they dressed, acted, whatever -- and they deserve to be PUNISHED for their immorality.

                                                Sick, sick sick.

                                                • 6 votes
                                                #5.20 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:31 AM EDT

                                                You might want to take a closer look at the "study" being cited.

                                                The so-called "researchers" started by disregarding a few possible variables such as:

                                                The fact that women are more likely to REPORT a rape if it results in conception.

                                                The fact that women (especially underaged girls) sometimes say they were raped when their pregnancy was really the result of consensual sex.

                                                The fact that, by far, the largest percentage of rape victims are younger women in their most fertile years.

                                                To totally disregard the influence these things would have on a study of this subject has to invalidate any of the claimed conclusions.

                                                  #5.21 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:47 AM EDT
                                                  Reply

                                                  Yeah, but for sure, there are legions out there ready to defend this prick's logic. Makes me wonder about the future of this country.

                                                  • 35 votes
                                                  #6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:31 PM EDT

                                                  Thats because no one sat down and told them the translation of these morons double talking. if they were told what these idiotic republicans were actually saying they may finally come back to reality. This 'tool" is a prime example of an overdressed, double talking, no thinking, idiot! I no the answer but I cant help it..I got to ask..do republicans even think (or listen to themselves) about what they are gonna say before putting their foot in their mouths upto their hip bones???

                                                  You cant get pregnant from a legitimate rape????

                                                  legitimate rapes??? are you kidding me??

                                                  • 29 votes
                                                  #6.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:38 PM EDT

                                                  God. We fought these battles in the 1960's. We marched, we educated, we tried to put these neanderthal IDIOTS on notice that women were not going to be treated like not too bright THIRD class citizens any more!

                                                  What is it going to take Republicans, for you at long last to understand that we are not going BACKWARDS! I'll march again, I'll fight those battles again.

                                                  And YOU Republicans will LOSE BIG. We vote, we stand together for our daughters and granddaughters.

                                                  • 55 votes
                                                  #6.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:50 PM EDT

                                                  charlie-295522 post 6.0

                                                  Not to worry Charlie; I suspect anybody stupid enough to defend this guy in public is a toothless moron with a fifth grade education.

                                                  • 18 votes
                                                  #6.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:57 PM EDT
                                                  Comment author avataroy-vay!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                  Let me guess- you hate when people judge others and stereotype people, right?

                                                  The intolerance of the left would be funny if it wasn't so dangerous.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #6.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:13 PM EDT

                                                  In today's world, it is more important than ever to get out and vote. Make sure this guy goes nowhere near the government.

                                                  • 20 votes
                                                  #6.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:39 PM EDT

                                                  oy-vay...I've got one thing to say about your comment: You have a lot of gall trying to speak of intolerance. Legitimate BRAINS do NOT...do N O T try to justify this supposed misstatement. (Believe me, this is how he thinks, no mistake there.) You, and those who think like this are the dangerous ones!!!

                                                  • 23 votes
                                                  #6.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:45 PM EDT

                                                  The intolerance of the left would be funny if it wasn't so dangerous.

                                                  Well, us on the left do seem to have an intolerance for rapists and idiots. I think you may be one of them oy-vay ... choose your own category.

                                                  • 18 votes
                                                  #6.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:06 PM EDT

                                                  is a toothless moron with a fifth grade education.

                                                  I need to add: That never made it to 6th grade to get Sex Ed, or his parents did not allow him to attend the classes, for fear that he may get "perverted"

                                                  • 10 votes
                                                  #6.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:24 PM EDT

                                                  Layton... Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

                                                  • 7 votes
                                                  #6.9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:51 PM EDT

                                                  This whole brouhaha about women and their reproductive rights in the Republican party boils down to a single financial issue: older white men suspect women are filling jobs that by the natural order of things (you know, white guys are supposed to rule the world, as they have for 2,000 years), should be their jobs!

                                                  Up to 2009, women were 54% of the work force. Today, women are the clear majority in colleges and universities across the nation. But there's a clear conspiracy to regulate women back to "barefoot and pregnant" in order to KEEP THEM OUT OF THE WORKPLACE.

                                                  Since 2009, 80% of jobs created have gone to men.

                                                  Out of single men, men with children, and women with children, women with children are least likely to be hired. On the contrary, single women are most likely to be hired, often to be sexually harassed! This speaks to the sexuality of hiring personnel.

                                                  lifeinc.today.msnbc.msn.com/_.../13320111-moms-are-bearing-the-b...

                                                  So let's not be conned into thinking this is a moral issue of any sort. The facts speak far louder than the moral bigots trying to ram the corporate agenda down our throats.

                                                  America is not going broke--America is being robbed. Let's stick to the single most critical issue of this election: about 120 men are trying to deregulate everything in order to continue to extract wealth from this nation. Over 21-31 TRILLION dollars--and probably a lot more--has been removed from our economy and is being stored in offshore accounts to avoid taxation. This is an amount greater than our annual national economy.

                                                  abcnews.go.com/.../super-rich-hide-21-trillion-in-secret-tax-havens-s...

                                                  www.democracynow.org/.../31/exhaustive_study_finds_global_elite_

                                                  www.alternet.org/.../study-global-elite-hiding-32-trillion-offshore-ac...

                                                  Romney is one of these guys--which is why he will die before allowing his tax returns to see light of day. He and Ryan, a 1% wannabe, will be puppets dancing to their masters' tunes when the campaign chits are called in. Imagine how many of America's most vulnerable could have been cared for with the 500 BILLION paid out so far in this presidential campaign.

                                                  Understand that Ryan's budget proposal essentially means we cannot feed America's poor children because we must feed our private defense contractors!

                                                  Right now, corporations are withholding two TRILLION instead of hiring, solely to get our president out of office so they can continue deregulating to rip us all off some more.

                                                  www.nypost.com/p/.../hoarding_cash_Yzfk2c8aK1wAPrZCRdEVnJ

                                                  Save America--4 more for 44, and let's give the president a Blue Congress so he can actually get something done!! REMOVE THE OBSTRUCTIONIST HOUSE THAT REFUSES TO VOTE ON THE PRESIDENT'S JOBS BILL!

                                                  Obama/Biden/and a Blue Congress! 2012

                                                  • 7 votes
                                                  #6.10 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:52 AM EDT

                                                  This same abortion discussion happened right around 40 years ago. I don't know how many times it's happened since. Akin's brand of brainlessness was present back then and still is going on now. I am so sick of hearing this debate again. I would agree profoundly that we get on with getting off of oil, making solid jobs from home grown energy of all kinds, stop fighting wars to defend our unnecessary middle east meddling, etc. It is SOOOO time to move on.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #6.11 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:57 AM EDT

                                                  Everyone is ready to riot in the streets over the words of an idiot, but the TSA can sexually assault you and your kids in the airport and nobody cares.

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #6.12 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:59 AM EDT

                                                  Isn't that the truth

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #6.13 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:23 AM EDT

                                                  Akin should be Fired for what he had said. "Legitimate"? What is his GOPitifool Problem speak before you think? FIRE HIS ASS, he has no respect for women & does not care if a woman carries the burden

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #6.14 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:02 AM EDT

                                                  “First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down," Akin said.

                                                  You sir are a dimwit.. There is nothing legitimate about rape first of all, and second of all please show me where in Biology it states that women can "shut their bodies down" if they don't want a baby.. ARE YOU HIGH CONGRESSMAN AKIN??? If this was the case there would be no abortion or a need for birth control pills.. You Sir are a 1st class A-hole..

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  #6.15 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:00 AM EDT
                                                  Reply

                                                  Hows redneck fruitcup !

                                                  • 8 votes
                                                  Reply#7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:31 PM EDT

                                                  Is he plain stupid or a pathetic ignoramus, perhaps he can define what "legitimate rape"is or is he refering a man raping another man which of course can not get pregnant. One wonder how he was elected.

                                                  • 10 votes
                                                  #7.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:31 PM EDT

                                                  @Mine....Please don't insult us rednecks...It's rude. What he said was beyond stupid...it was ignorant and even a little scary. Even his apology was inaccurate....Not all rapist are violent because they don't have to be. They groom their victims and pick carefully...those that respect authority and/or are troubled and in need of attention. Rednecks aren't as stupid as you would like to believe. I'm from cowboy country and many of my friends are very wise men and women.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #7.2 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:41 PM EDT
                                                  Reply

                                                  WTF is a 'legitimate rape'. Is this man a Neanderthal or just another representative of the Aryan Nation.

                                                  • 42 votes
                                                  Reply#8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:31 PM EDT

                                                  No, he's a card carrying member of the GOP!

                                                  • 40 votes
                                                  #8.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:36 PM EDT

                                                  I think that qualifies him for membership in both organizations.

                                                  • 25 votes
                                                  #8.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:40 PM EDT

                                                  The same party that brought us vaginal ultrasound probes. Hey, we can avert our eyes as it goes in, so it's ok.
                                                  Is the GOP still claiming that they are not waging a war on women? If there is such a thing as reincarnation I hope all these men come back as women in their next lives. See how they like their own policies.

                                                  As for GOP women ... completely beyond my ability to rationalize - and I'm pretty darned good at rationalizing stuff.

                                                  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/29/us/virginia-senate-passes-revised-ultrasound-bill.html?pagewanted=all
                                                  http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/15/1074671/-PA-Gov-Tom-Corbett-Just-close-your-eyes-and-enjoy-a-mandatory-ultrasound

                                                  • 39 votes
                                                  #8.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:48 PM EDT

                                                  NFIL-
                                                  Corbett's words were the first thing that crossed my mind, too. Th is just another example of conservative Magical thinking like tax cuts for the rich will trickle down, simply showing a woman the ultrasound blob will make her have a change of heart, praying hard enough will make you a heterosexual, etc.
                                                  This mindset is very, very scary.

                                                  • 22 votes
                                                  #8.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:03 PM EDT

                                                  coffeelover,

                                                  Scary is right.

                                                  But this yahoo wants to be a Senator, not a wacko preacher, or dimwit radio talk show host.

                                                  Hope the good people of Missouri are listening.

                                                  • 20 votes
                                                  #8.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:35 PM EDT

                                                  Neanderthal or just another representative of the Aryan Nation

                                                  In other words: A Tea Party Republican...

                                                  • 11 votes
                                                  #8.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:28 PM EDT

                                                  WTF is a 'legitimate rape'.

                                                  Remember this?: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/01/republican-plan-redefine-rape-abortion

                                                  You didn't think they'd actually given up on this, did you? In the socially conservative Republican mind, "legitimate rape" excludes:

                                                  • Incest
                                                  • Statutory Rape
                                                  • Date rape
                                                  • Instances of rape where the woman was drugged
                                                  • Intoxicated women
                                                  • Women who ever dress sexy, because they must have been asking for it
                                                  • If a woman just says no, but doesn't fight back hard enough, because she must secretly want it
                                                  • Abusive husbands forcing themselves on their wives
                                                  • Blackmail or coercion
                                                  • Any woman who wants an abortion, because they're just a bunch of liars

                                                  Because it isn't bad enough that a rapist literally takes away a woman's liberty and choice in the act; the government then has to step in to make sure she can never have any say in what happens to her afterwards.

                                                  • 12 votes
                                                  #8.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:35 PM EDT

                                                  When do we start getting background music on MSNBC political comment threads to set the mood? When can we push a button at the bottom of our comment box that makes a noise - a boom, a laugh, a gun going off, screaming...? When can we get points that go towards MSN awards, like a teeshirt that says "I Made the News on MSNBC". On with the show.

                                                    #8.8 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:18 AM EDT
                                                    Reply

                                                    This man is a bona fide idiot. And I'm a Republican!

                                                    • 51 votes
                                                    Reply#9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:32 PM EDT

                                                    +1.

                                                    • 13 votes
                                                    #9.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:33 PM EDT

                                                    JanPage,

                                                    Unfortunately, there is a big chunk of your party who actually believe such things.

                                                    • 38 votes
                                                    #9.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:37 PM EDT

                                                    JKLD - That's probably the same chunk that lives on welfare and doesn't realize it. That same chunk votes GOP to get that "Socialist" out of office. You could try and explain it to them but...

                                                    • 26 votes
                                                    #9.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:53 PM EDT

                                                    Exactly NFIL; those are the people shouting keep government out of my Medicare/Medicaid. The same morons who said they are moving to Canada after Supreme Court upheld Healthcare Reform.

                                                    • 21 votes
                                                    #9.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:28 PM EDT

                                                    We fought a war in 1812 to keep those morons out. The rest of you all are welcome to come up and split a case of 24.

                                                    • 8 votes
                                                    #9.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:38 PM EDT

                                                    JanPage... Your party has been highjacked.

                                                    • 5 votes
                                                    #9.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:54 PM EDT

                                                    Time to switch parties.

                                                    • 4 votes
                                                    #9.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:26 PM EDT

                                                    This is way to cool all the righties are defending rape. This is a new low for you guys. It really shows who you are.

                                                    • 4 votes
                                                    #9.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:52 PM EDT

                                                    Tomorrow's Pressing Political Debate of the Day: Nails or Hair? Can't wait.

                                                      #9.9 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:00 AM EDT

                                                      there is no doubt in my mind that most republicans think the same, therefore whenever I see the commercial being played about republicans out to hurt women it now takes on a new meaning. And any woman who votes for someone in the republican party deserves what she gets.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #9.10 - Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:40 PM EDT

                                                      I dont understand how a woman can be a republican either. I definitely dont understand my race, black women, being republicans knowing exactly what they stand for. However we do have female idiots or religious fanactics that agree with these @!$%#s. And you cannot tell these women anything for the life of me. They believe all the bull@!$%# that these racist ass sexist ass republicans spew out no matter how sexually, or racially demeaning it is, or how untrue it is. Then when they cut out all these rights and government programs they are going to be looking sick and wishing like hell they had never voted these @!$%#s in office. I mean you cant tell them anything about their beloved republican party because they're just so holy and so righteous and so pure. You cant tell them that they tried their best to do away with affirmative action, and did everything in their power to fight the democrats on passing that bill which bans discrimination of pay between men and women who are performing the exact same job with the same level of experience and educationm which is all facts. You can show them the evidence and it doesnt matter because they are still going to vote republican because they dont believe in abortion and homosexuals having equal rights as all the rest of us who are heterosexual. And that is their sole basis for voting for @!$%#s like Bush, Santorum, and Romney-Ryan. And I think it is truly sad and so unfair for the rest of us.

                                                      Because of religious fanactis like these, Bush got a second term in office and the whole damn country had to suffer. And it sincerely pisses me off when I have to suffer because of other peoples ignorance and strict ass religious beliefs. Their decsions affect the whole entire nation. And they know this @!$%# and still remain republican and vote and for them. And the two reasons I listed above are the only reason they voted for them or they vote for them, and this enrages me even more. I mean it seriously enrages me. I cannot stand to meet black women who are republican. I can say this because I am a black woman myself. I sit there and i just look at them like "have you lost your everloving mind?" How in the world can you vote for a party that doesn't even want you to have the right to speak to freely, let alone vote? I mean how? I dont understand for the life of me, how it is evenly remotely possible for a woman, especially a black woman, to be a republican knowing all they stand for. I already dont unsderstand how women period can be republicans, but I definintely don't understand black women being republicans. I mean I really don't get that at all. A party that does not believe in you having rights as a woman and as black. I mean seriously.

                                                      • 2 votes
                                                      #9.11 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:03 AM EDT
                                                      Reply

                                                      "legitimate rape", an oxymoron if I ever heard one! Insulting

                                                      • 38 votes
                                                      #10 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:32 PM EDT
                                                      Comment author avatarDON9876543Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                      He only meant the woman was actually raped and not saying she was to get an abortion. MSNBC is just pulling words out of context.

                                                      • 3 votes
                                                      #10.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:36 PM EDT

                                                      Apparently DON987... is just as maroonic as this politician. Sheesh.

                                                      • 30 votes
                                                      #10.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:42 PM EDT

                                                      Dont try to hang this on MSNBC...we know what he means. For the record you can get an abortion without having to have been raped Don...you dont need anyones permission.

                                                      • 34 votes
                                                      #10.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:44 PM EDT
                                                      Comment author avatarDON9876543Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                      If all you know how to do is call names , I will be just using the "ignore this author " feature if you have nothing intelligent tom say.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #10.4 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:45 PM EDT

                                                      Sorry DON9876543, the video speaks for itself. Any attempt to defend this as something else is pure delusion.

                                                      • 37 votes
                                                      #10.5 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:50 PM EDT

                                                      To DON9876543

                                                      Give that the clip of the show posted with the article shows that Rep. Todd Akin did in deed use those very words, it's obvious that MSNBC didn't have to do anything his words to make them absurd and insulting. He did that all on his own.

                                                      • 42 votes
                                                      #10.6 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:51 PM EDT

                                                      Don: I don't care HOW he meant it this is INSULTING to women no matter how YOU want to rationalize it.

                                                      • 43 votes
                                                      #10.7 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:52 PM EDT
                                                      Comment author avatarDON9876543Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                      DG, they tried to imply he meant something did not by not letting him explain. MSNBC would no way do this to a Democrat.

                                                      I agree its a poor choice of words, but just making the point he did not mean what you are interpreting.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #10.8 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:53 PM EDT
                                                      Comment author avatarDON9876543Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                      Elaine, he specifically said he was answering a question on whether to allow abortion on the case of rape.

                                                      • 3 votes
                                                      #10.9 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:55 PM EDT

                                                      BS Don. He said what he said. The Republicans own this, and don't try and spin it that it is NBC's fault.

                                                      • 41 votes
                                                      #10.10 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:57 PM EDT

                                                      Pretty weak argument, Don... Sounds like my 6 year old when she is trying to get out of trouble..

                                                      • 21 votes
                                                      #10.11 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:12 PM EDT
                                                      Comment author avataroy-vay!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                      As a conservative, I DO own this!!! It is a proven fact that most rapes don't result in pregnancy.

                                                      The fact that this man used the word 'legitimate' is a distraction from the facts on the matter. Call all the names you want, it doesn't change what's true.

                                                      The tape clearly shows he's responding to the moderators attempt to use the ultra rare instance of rape as a blanket case for all abortion.

                                                      It is common knowledge that the vast majority of abortions are for birth control. You know it. We all know it.

                                                      Less than 1% of rapes result in pregnancies. Of these, some women do opt for abortion. Of those who opt for abortion, they constitute even less than 1% of ALL ABORTIONS. Hence, the scenario is not representative of most abortion situations.

                                                      Perhaps if we all owned up to the facts, we would a more civil and rational discussion.

                                                      • 2 votes
                                                      #10.12 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:21 PM EDT

                                                      elaine-442221, 10.3:

                                                      Not yet you don't, but just wait and see what happens if the Repulsicans maintain and gain more control in Washington DC this fall............

                                                      • 11 votes
                                                      #10.13 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:24 PM EDT

                                                      I see 2 Atkin supporters here; Don and oy-vay.

                                                      My thoughts about GOP these days? Oy-vay. Even Goldwater and Reagan would be called liberals if they are still alive.

                                                      • 17 votes
                                                      #10.14 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:35 PM EDT

                                                      oy,vay,

                                                      Your spinning intrepretation is not working.

                                                      the guy is an idiot. He used the word" legitimate" as a adjective to the noun RAPE.

                                                      go back and watch the video.

                                                      Ask any woman you know if this makes any sense?

                                                      • 18 votes
                                                      #10.15 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:41 PM EDT

                                                      oy-vay:

                                                      RESULTS:

                                                      The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year. Among 34 cases of rape-related pregnancy, the majority occurred among adolescents and resulted from assault by a known, often related perpetrator. Only 11.7% of these victims received immediate medical attention after the assault, and 47.1% received no medical attention related to the rape. A total 32.4% of these victims did not discover they were pregnant until they had already entered the second trimester; 32.2% opted to keep the infant whereas 50% underwent abortion and 5.9% placed the infant for adoption; an additional 11.8% had spontaneous abortion.

                                                      CONCLUSIONS:

                                                      Rape-related pregnancy occurs with significant frequency. It is a cause of many unwanted pregnancies and is closely linked with family and domestic violence. As we address the epidemic of unintended pregnancies in the United States, greater attention and effort should be aimed at preventing and identifying unwanted pregnancies that result from sexual victimization.

                                                      ""

                                                      • 33 votes
                                                      #10.16 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:48 PM EDT

                                                      Oy-vay! ; If even One thing you have said was true you wouldn't look so ignorant. MSNBC didn't do this to you, nobody here did this to you, your pulling "Facts" out of your a$$ in an attempt to rationalize what this idiot said did this to you. I can only hope you don't procreate.

                                                      • 23 votes
                                                      #10.17 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:51 PM EDT

                                                      Floretta, do you have a source for that? I'd really like to read it. Possibly we could all print it out and send it to oy-vay ... maybe then IT would understand that facts actually do matter!

                                                      • 9 votes
                                                      #10.18 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:08 PM EDT

                                                      Oy,vay, your numbers are so far off that it can be safely assumed you know virtually nothing regarding the issue of rape and pregnancy. That is giving you the benefit of the doubt, because the other option would be that you know fully that your numbers are off and you simply engage in dishonesty through your narcissistic desire to control that which is absolutely none of your business.

                                                      The fact is, it doesn't matter how many rapes result in pregnancy. What matters is that it is a woman's right to decide what she wants to do in regard to that pregnancy or any pregnancy. You have no right, nor any superior status that would allow you to make that decision for anyone.

                                                      A woman who has been raped has been brutally victimized emotionally, physically, and psychologically. And you would condone victimizing her again and again and again while forcing her to carry a pregnancy to term and give birth. How inhuman are you?

                                                      And don't you dare start spouting all these "rights of the unborn" at me. Women who have been raped by strangers, women who have been drugged and raped, women who have been raped by someone they know, young girls who are victimized again and again by a family member...all are living, breathing, sentinent beings who live with their trauma day in and day out. THEIR RIGHTS are the only rights up for discussion. How dare you even suggest that their rights are to subjugated to an embryo.

                                                      • 20 votes
                                                      #10.19 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:26 PM EDT

                                                      Oy-Vay: The problem is the question never was what chance is there that someone raped gets pregnant it was whether women who do get pregnant after being raped should have the right to get an abortion. People dance around to avoid answering.

                                                      • 8 votes
                                                      #10.20 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:49 PM EDT

                                                      Larry... Lighen up on Oy-Vay. It's very likely he doesn't even know any women.

                                                      • 5 votes
                                                      #10.21 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:00 PM EDT

                                                      Sam: You're right. Sorry.

                                                      • 5 votes
                                                      #10.22 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:26 PM EDT
                                                      Reply
                                                      Comment author avatarDisgustedConservativeExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                      Ahhh! The always dependeble MSNBC and the rest of the liberal media.

                                                      Nice catch on this idiot. Where's your story on Joe "hair plug" Biden's comments to African-Americans "puttin' them back in chains?"!!!

                                                      Cripes, you SUCK!

                                                      • 3 votes
                                                      Reply#11 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:32 PM EDT

                                                      It is the REPUBLICANS putting the African-American back in chains. Remember their motto, "Remember your place, Boy!"

                                                      • 15 votes
                                                      #11.1 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:41 PM EDT

                                                      That was last week.

                                                      This clown gave the media license to move on.

                                                      • 11 votes
                                                      #11.2 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:45 PM EDT
                                                      Comment author avatarDisgustedConservativeExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                      Chuck, Chuck, settle-down there dude.

                                                      The first Republican president gave the slaves their freedom.

                                                      Little piece of history for the emotionally-charged and uninformed...

                                                      • 5 votes
                                                      #11.3 - Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:45 PM EDT