White House press secretary changes tune on Super PACs

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says the president won't condemn a controversial Priorities USA ad because it has no control over outside groups.

Deflecting continued questions about a controversial ad from a Democratic-aligned super PAC, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney insisted Friday that a candidates’ campaign is powerless over third-party ads.

But he took the opposite view in May when he urged Mitt Romney’s campaign to renounce a Republican donor who had considered running ads on the president’s ties to the controversial pastor Jeremiah Wright.

During Friday’s White House briefing Carney was asked whether the president agrees with an ad by pro-Obama Super PAC Priorities USA, run by former White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton, which links the shuttering of GST Steelworks, a company bought by Romney’s private equity group Bain Capital, with the death of a former GST employee’s wife six years later.

As he and campaign spokespeople have in the past few days, Carney maintained that the Obama camp has no say over outside groups’ ads.

“We do not control third-party ads,” Carney said, adding later, “I do not have any role in third-party groups that produce these ads.”

But Carney held a different view on campaigns’ responsibilities to mediate outside groups when, in May, Republican bundler Joe Ricketts was revealed to have considered investing in ads highlighting then-Sen. Obama’s ties to Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his fiery former pastor.

In a briefing on May 17th, Carney suggested the Romney campaign should denounce the potential ad campaign, drafted by Republican consultant Fred Davis, but never actually implemented.

“And I think there are moments when you have to stand up and say that that's not the right way to go. And I would point to numerous comments that echo that, not just from Democrats and political observers, but by Republicans today,” he said of Davis’ proposal.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 7

Super Pacs are just fine when they claim a republican killed some guy's wife, but they're not so fine when they discuss policy. Is that what you mean Mr Obama?

  • 70 votes
#1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:51 PM EDT

"Deflecting continued questions about a controversial ad from a Democratic-aligned super PAC, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney..... So much for Mr. transparency O-Bummer - Lie, Lie ,Lie....

  • 64 votes
#1.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:04 PM EDT

The Romney campaign should run this as on a loop with the facts playing over it.

The tag line should be "Is this the President you want to vote for".

  • 44 votes
#1.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:14 PM EDT

Super Pacs are NEVER FINE when they lie, distort, miquote.

This whole Supoer Pac $$$$$ debacle was a huge Supreme Court mistake.

The lies are easily called out on FACT CHECK...an ANYONE trying to pretend that they
didn't see them"

as their excuse

is being a jerk.

Signed,

Annoyed INDEPENDENDENT

Annoyes at that damn PAC put out such STUPID AD AND TOOK forever to denounce it.

START TELLING THE TRUTH....Bias and excuses only turn off the voters.

  • 26 votes
#1.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:15 PM EDT

Quaint, just quaint.

Let's be realistic here- both parties have "friends" in the PACs and organizing committees. They share "ideas" and deligate who's going to take what shots. The official campaign keeps their hands clean while the surrogates get their hands dirty. The PACs are instructed to make the most vitriolic allogations, many knowing that they are taking a topic completely out of context/outright lies/unsubstantiated allegations, etc. So the campaign lets the bombs be dropped and then claims: 1. To not have known anything about the claims, 2. Had nothing to do with them, and 3. Can't control what someone else says.

You see the same things with elected politicians being used as media hit men right now. How many times recently have you thought "did he just say that?" or "what a complete load"? It's clearly a setup organized by the party as a means to protect/promote their candidate.

Unfortunately the politicians like to huddle with pollsters and focus groups that have taught them that Americans don't like to figure things out for themselves anymore, that bulletpoints and phrases are more appealing to them, that they don't read beyond one paragraph, and they'll believe anything if you say it enough.

The real problem is that once the ads go out there's little concern with correcting them. We've heard recently of many PAC ads being reviewed for accuracy and finding that what was claimed wasn't true, that the peole posing in the ads didn't agree with the position but were paid to say it, that they are partisan and just went along with what the PAC wanted them to say. Once the word is out people decide and don't turn back.

RI Mom- We don't see eye to eye a lot, but I agree with you on this one. I'd just assume ads be limited to simple facts and not the gross misrepresentations and lies spread. Look, he's rolling your grandmother off a cliff- he's bad. Yuck!

  • 8 votes
#1.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:19 PM EDT

1.4

Then BOTH PARTIES need to stop abusing our freedom of speech.

That PAC MONEY is freakin' HUGE.

Spend it wisely...not LIE-sly.

  • 13 votes
#1.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:22 PM EDT

Wow, Carney just said (see article)that the President of the US, the most powerful man on earth, is powerless to get a PAC working on behalf his campaign to stop or pull a simple little ad. I guess he's pretty damned powerless, at that! Maybe that's why he can't seem to get anything done.......

  • 52 votes
#1.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:24 PM EDT
Comment author avatarSeekingSanityExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

spider - ditto Romney - and the rest of the GOP! Is that why the Republicans can't get anything done? Oh no, that's right, they don't WANT to!

Obama/Biden 2012

  • 19 votes
#1.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:31 PM EDT
Comment author avatarmeltdownNationExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Carney's as big a dipsh!t as his boss is. The entire administration is filled with fuk ups.

  • 29 votes
#1.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:43 PM EDT

they claim a republican killed some guy's wife

That entire thing backfired, much like everything Obama has touched in the last 4 years.

  • 44 votes
#1.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:45 PM EDT

As he and campaign spokespeople have in the past few days, Carney maintained that the Obama camp has no say over outside groups’ ads.

wink, wink.

Who knows, it may be true, the Obama camp sure hasn't had a clue over the last 4 years.

  • 31 votes
#1.10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:50 PM EDT
Comment author avatarSeekingSanityExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

meltdown - you're confusing President Obama with the do nothing GOP!

The last 4 years, huh? Our President has been President for 3 years 7 months. Why doesn't it surprise me you don't have a clue????

Obama/Biden 2012

  • 18 votes
#1.11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:51 PM EDT

Here's a novel idea. If Obama is as great as he thinks he is, why doesn't he just run on his record. Ya right, sling the mud. Hypocrites!

  • 35 votes
#1.12 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:51 PM EDT

why doesn't he just run on his record

43 straight months of 8% or greater unemployment.

Great Job Obama.

  • 34 votes
#1.13 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:01 PM EDT

“We do not control third-party ads,” Carney said, adding later, “I do not have any role in third-party groups that produce these ads.”

Obama's finger print are all over. Third party groups run adds in coordination with Obama's campaign headquarters. The lie blaming Romney for the death of the wife of an steel worker ( Joe the liar) presumable lay out for Bain , even her wife got health insurance working for another company is Romney fault, this fat lie start at the Obama camps.

  • 32 votes
#1.14 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:12 PM EDT

If obama ran on his record it would be a short campaign. Could have saved allot of time and money. Park the bus and put the helicopter back in the garage. Just bring the teleprompters to the house and set them up. He could even run his own ad campaign. Sound something like this, "I...umm..." leans back and whispers to someone offstage, "hey, what did I do again?"

  • 36 votes
#1.15 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:16 PM EDT
Comment author avatarnotliborconExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Hey ghost... Obama is running on his record and because Mitt IS a twit, non-transparent (taxes, tenure as MA gov, Bain tenure, etc.) and a carbon copy of THE worst president in US history (aka GWB #43). Prove to me that Mittens isn't GWB 2.0 and I will consider him for dog catcher of the year.

SuperPACs and campaigns CANNOT coordinate... The request by Mittens was a blatant attempt to say "Ha, look Obama is coordinating with his superPAC."
Obama is too smart for those type of 3rd grade tricks.

  • 10 votes
#1.16 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:33 PM EDT
Comment author avatarNiteOwlettExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Denouncing versus not denouncing. That is the question. If we agree with a SuperPac, we don't denounce. There is nothing to denounce in the SuperPac's contention regarding Bain.

I think Romney needs to clarify his role at Bain by releasing his tax returns that cover his earnings during that period, and put the rumors to rest. If he made hundreds of millions on their activity during that period, I doubt he did nothing to control their actions.

This was not about causing this man's wife to die, it was about him losing his job and what happened afterwards. If you don't want to hear real life situations, cause and effect, then continue to support the Republican's because they certainly do not live in the real world.

  • 13 votes
#1.17 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:45 PM EDT
Comment author avatarTruePatriot-445959Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Shame on everyone, especially FR/NBC. I don't want to hear about anything except Romney releasing at least 8 years tax returns. Stop enabling this shyster by adding nontroversy distractions!

Romney, release at least 8 years tax returns NOW or pack up and get out!

ghost67 -- If you and the rest of your rightwing ilk had finished high school that would save a lot of space and time in this forum.

  • 15 votes
#1.18 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:57 PM EDT

With all those one-line posts, is someone having a meltdown? Get back on your meds -- that might help.

  • 9 votes
#1.19 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:09 PM EDT

Sounds like neo Birthers asking for tax returns. Good distraction from our lousy economy. OMG= Obama Must Go

  • 23 votes
#1.20 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:19 PM EDT

Super Pacs are also fine when they say the President gutted social security when all the fact check organizations have said that is blatantly false.

Romney's Super Pacs are lying too.

I don't hear Romney denouncing his lying Super Pacs.

  • 9 votes
#1.21 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:36 PM EDT

Interesting, Kerry released 2 years, McCain released 2 years returns, now all of a sudden the jealous and failures among us want to deconstruct tax policy?

Mitt didn't make the tax law.

As for the hypocrite in chief:

"President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama had a combined income of $789,674 in 2011 but paid a lower tax rate than the president's secretary, who made less than $100,000, the White House confirmed Friday.

The Obamas paid an effective rate of 20.5 percent. White House aides would not reveal presidential secretary Anita Breckenridge’s tax rate but confirmed it was higher than the first family's rate. Breckenridge earned $95,000 last year."

Now why is this important? It's not. These cowards will never make meaningful tax changes, as the current tax code is 73,608 pages long, and filled with payoffs for both parties donors.

What is important is $5 trillion in new debt, with additional debt building at more than $1 trillion a year, a president that spends more time golfing than with Congressional leaders doing his job. He has a jobs counsel that never meets, record levels of food stamp recipients, 100 million Americans now on some form of government support, record levels of permanent unemployment, 1,000,000 fewer Americans working than when Obama was elected, no plan to "get out of the ditch" except to tax the rich ($80 billion at best per year, more likely $40 billion after these folks adjust) and spend like identity thieves.

  • 20 votes
#1.22 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:41 PM EDT

eric: you make a good point. I think both sides of the isle can agree that ANY Super Pac are wrong for our electorial system. PS: Owebama never denounced his Super pacs either.

  • 5 votes
#1.23 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:43 PM EDT

True Patriot-

Romney, release at least 8 years tax returns NOW or pack up and get out!

So you think that he must do something that is not required by law? You are informed enough to understand that he has met every legal qualification to be running for president? Is it the fact that you need some dirt on this guy? So far all I have seen is the Obama campaign attacking Bain?

  • 15 votes
#1.24 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:55 PM EDT
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I don't want to hear about anything except Romney releasing at least 8 years tax returns.

Until Willard shows us the money, looks like Harry Reid is right...

Hell, even McCain who has seen them, won't come to Willard's defense!

  • 14 votes
#1.25 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:57 PM EDT

Tax Return Liberals are just like the birthers.

  • 16 votes
#1.26 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:59 PM EDT
Comment author avatarSeekingSanityExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

billybob - hardly. Tax returns have been shown by EVERY presidential candidate. No other President has EVER been asked for his birth certificate! Moron!

Mister Wonderful - not true. Both McCain and Kerry show their returns yearly as Senators. So their releasing 2 years was not the same since their returns are scrutinized all the time. Plus, Romney has yet to release even one full year. Try again!

  • 9 votes
#1.27 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:01 PM EDT
Comment author avatarRepublicansForObama-6186389Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Hah! Hah! you pathetic Republicans and you crazy Right-wing Wacko Teabaggers!

You're No match for Obama!

You might as well Stay Home this November 2012.

Why? I'm glad you asked.

In case you haven't notice:

You're Not just LOSING.

You've ALREADY LOST.

All Hail Obama! Ruler, Master, and Overlord of all you Republicans and Teabaggers for the Next Four (yes!4) very-very long Years.

Chicago style-street Politics will Always Win over a Liar and a Tax-Cheat.

Obama's Kung-fu is Superior. Romney's kun-fu Stinks.

What do you Expect from a Tax-Cheat and a Liar?

And those hideous and horrific Character Flaws and Character Defects are only the "Tip of the Iceberg" of Mitt Romney's Lack of Character.

Ain't Life grand?

  • 6 votes
#1.28 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:02 PM EDT

[Interesting, Kerry released 2 years, McCain released 2 years returns...]

I believe their tax returns were a matter of public record because they were (are) Senators at the time of their presidential run, whereas Romneys "tax documents", as Governor, are not.

Epic FAIL.

  • 9 votes
#1.29 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:23 PM EDT
Comment author avatarmguy-478Restored

I am against all super pacs... ALL OF THEM.

But naturally, the hypocrite Republicans support their super pacs while complaining when the other team does the same thing.

If Obama is as great as he thinks he is, why doesn't he just run on his record

Like creating an environment where the stock market goes from 800 to 13,000+

If YOU were too stupid to take advantage of that, then the ONLY person to blame is yourself. You are obviously a failure, and you are trying to blame Obama for the shortcomings in your personal life. I have more than doubled my stock portfolio in the last 4 years, greatly increasing my wealth.

Obama is not the reason you are a failure, YOU ARE.

  • 6 votes
#1.30 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:24 PM EDT

Romney has yet to release even one full year.

More misinformation...Romney has released the 2 full years that are permitted by law. Please feel free to back up your statement...

  • 10 votes
#1.31 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:26 PM EDT

Hope and Change is now Mope and Blame

  • 17 votes
#1.32 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:31 PM EDT

Romney released ONE year, 2010 and an estimate of 2011, not the final return.

Cal20: Why wouldn't you want to see Mitt's tax returns. Don't you care about knowing these important details about YOUR candidate. You know the Democrats wouldn't let this slip by with their candidate, and if P. Obama didn't already release his and he made the same excuse, you people.....you people would go bananas.

  • 10 votes
#1.33 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:31 PM EDT
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Romney has released the 2 full years that are permitted by law.

REALLY?

You will be able to prove that with credible sources....correct?

Romney has released a partial return for 2010 and nothing for 2011!

The only one spreading disinformation around here Marky is YOU... until you prove otherwise...

  • 10 votes
#1.34 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:35 PM EDT
Comment author avatarSailcat-2064101Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Does anyone else think it's shamelessly pathetic for the right wingers on this site to conjure up reasons out of thin air as to why it isn't completely insane to want to vote for Romney Hood? Listen up, teabaggers: Romney is in the hole and with your help he'll continue to dig it deeper until his inevitable loss in November. Keep up the good work.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_college_map.html

President Obama in November! He is our only rational choice!

  • 9 votes
#1.35 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:09 PM EDT

Polls show 63% of Americans want Romney to release more tax returns.

The two year precedence is a lame excuse and a LIE. Kerry and McCain provided financials all the time they have been in the Senate. If we factor President Obama's time in the Senate, he released 12 years information, not just 8 years.

MisterWonderful, Mark L-464288, etc. -- Are you really that gullible? If Romney isn't willing to be open with the American people, why should they want him in the White House? He can't pass GO until he does this most basic and traditional act of transparency.

It's not going to go away, and I for one will continue to be outraged if/until Romney comes clean. His track record regarding his taxes and that this is the only thing he has convictions about should have YOU concerned too.

  • 9 votes
#1.36 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:23 PM EDT

It just occurred to me to ask how many of our teabaggy friends have actually donated money out of their own pockets for the election of their favorite loser, Etch-A-Sketch? Are they depending on the bottomless pockets of the Koch Bros. to do the job or have they actually put their money where their big mouths are? Answer honestly, boys and girls. Lying only makes your untenable position that much more pitiful. It doesn't matter, really, because your asinine remarks and insane political philosophy has caused me to conclude you are cheap and selfish as well as bitter and hard-hearted.

As for me, I have kicked in to the Obama campaign. When he strides to the podium to acknowledge his reelection, I want to know my vote as well as my hard-earned cash helped him on his way to victory.

President Obama by default in November! America is having an election and the GOP has decided not to show up!

  • 8 votes
#1.37 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:52 PM EDT

All you CONS posting on here did you guys hear that Romney wants a truce and that Business record and Taxes should be off limits???

jajajajajajajaja!!!! He ran in the Primaries with hes business record but now he wants Obama to stop using it against him???

I have heard many of you baggers on here call our president a coward because of this and that... But this takes the whole cake.......

  • 8 votes
#1.38 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:08 PM EDT

The White House needs to change their policy tune. Regulating jobs out of the country isn't cutting it. For the most part let's agree the other side of the pond has become more attractive than here to do many jobs.

Clinton delivered a U6 unemployment rate of 7.3% to Bush. Despite 911, Bush held U6 to 8.4% until midterm elections 2006. With a Democratic majority U6 fell apart over the last 2 years of Bush II, steadily increasing to 16.9% under Obama in November 2010 when Republicans regained the House in a landside. Since the 2010 midterms the U6 incline has leveled out and recently subsided to 15% due to Republican restraints, a good thing.

  • 11 votes
#1.39 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:14 PM EDT

mguy-478

I am against all super pacs... ALL OF THEM.

But naturally, the hypocrite Republicans support their super pacs while complaining when the other team does the same thing.

Liber-tards forgot very soon that Obama was the first to flip-flop about an agreement with McCain about to receive public founds, opening the door to big donors and unlimited campaign spending.

June 2008 Hussein Obama II, rejected public funding for the fall presidential campaign yesterday, a dramatic blow to 1970s good-government reform that has been overwhelmed by an explosion of private money.

John McCain confirmed later yesterday that he will take $84.1 million in taxpayer funding for the general election, and accused Obama of reneging on a pledge to do the same. "He has completely reversed himself ( FLIP-FLOP) and gone back, not on his word to me, but the commitment he made to the American people," McCain told reporters.

Obama's decision to become the first major-party candidate to opt out of public financing for the general election frees him to continue his record-shattering, Internet-driven fund-raising until November - and probably to outspend McCain by a vast amount. But it opens the Democrat to accusations of an about-face on past statements that he would take the public grant and limit spending to that amount if the Republican nominee agreed to do likewise.

  • 6 votes
#1.40 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:26 PM EDT
Comment author avataralex caliExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

scott-579755

The White House needs to change their policy tune. Regulating jobs out of the country isn't cutting it. For the most part let's agree the other side of the pond has become more attractive than here to do many jobs.

Clinton delivered a U6 unemployment rate of 7.3% to Bush. Despite 911, Bush held U6 to 8.4% until midterm elections 2006. With a Democratic majority U6 fell apart over the last 2 years of Bush II, steadily increasing to 16.9% under Obama in November 2010 when Republicans regained the House in a landside. Since the 2010 midterms the U6 incline has leveled out and recently subsided to 15% due to Republican restraints, a good thing.

You cant be serious!!!!! Ok so the last 2 years of Bush don't count because he had a Democratic congress? Tells us what legislation the democrats passed that contributed to the Unemployment? Or for that matter what they blocked that would have created millions of jobs.

You LIE!!! To yourself... Why don't you show us what the U6 looked 2 months after he left??? Off course you wont this will destroy your twisted logic.

  • 6 votes
#1.41 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:30 PM EDT

redvirginia

Liber-tards forgot very soon that Obama was the first to flip-flop about an agreement with McCain about to receive public founds, opening the door to big donors and unlimited campaign spending.

June 2008 Hussein Obama II, rejected public funding for the fall presidential campaign yesterday, a dramatic blow to 1970s good-government reform that has been overwhelmed by an explosion of private money.

John McCain confirmed later yesterday that he will take $84.1 million in taxpayer funding for the general election, and accused Obama of reneging on a pledge to do the same. "He has completely reversed himself ( FLIP-FLOP) and gone back, not on his word to me, but the commitment he made to the American people," McCain told reporters.

Obama's decision to become the first major-party candidate to opt out of public financing for the general election frees him to continue his record-shattering, Internet-driven fund-raising until November - and probably to outspend McCain by a vast amount. But it opens the Democrat to accusations of an about-face on past statements that he would take the public grant and limit spending to that amount if the Republican nominee agreed to do likewise.

Can you post a link to this? I want to get all the facts.

Anyways this sounds exactly to what happened today with Romney.

In 2008 McCain wants Obama to agree to spending only a certain amount because he knew he was going to get outspent by a factor of 10 and takes hes offer to the American people like a scared coward.

Now today we find out that Romney wants he business record and taxes of the campaign because he knows it will only destroy him more before the election. And after our President doesn't agree he will go crying to the American people and tell them that the president didn't take hes offer????

Im beginning to see a pattern here.

  • 6 votes
#1.42 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:39 PM EDT

True

It's not going to go away, and I for one will continue to be outraged if/until Romney comes clean. His track record regarding his taxes and that this is the only thing he has convictions about should have YOU concerned too.

As far it concerns to me you can keep on braying everything what you want. Romney is not in fault and the accusations of Dirty Harry are false until he present the evidence supporting his accusations. Liber-tards want to change the juridical system, declaring the accused guilty without presenting evidences for its accusation.

  • 3 votes
#1.43 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:53 PM EDT

Well, well, well, now we have good ole "Flip-Flop" Carney. All the Oblameo White House seems to be able to do is flip-flop on issues and walk back their comments.

THIS is an issue! All you Democrats have suddenly developed Taxheimers--short-term memory loss that allows only one thought at a time to occupy your tiny brains--and can't remember anything except that one thought. Please explain how the messiah and his merry henchmen have to walk back a major statement about appropriate campaign techniques.

Waiting.......

  • 7 votes
#1.44 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:01 PM EDT

redvirginia As far it concerns to me you can keep on braying everything what you want. Romney is not in fault and the accusations of Dirty Harry are false until he present the evidence supporting his accusations. Liber-tards want to change the juridical system, declaring the accused guilty without presenting evidences for its accusation.

Lets say Reid does reveal hes source and hes source tells us that he knows personally that Romney did not pay hes taxes for ten years will he then show them to us???

  • 5 votes
#1.45 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:04 PM EDT

Bob in KC-545426

Well, well, well, now we have good ole "Flip-Flop" Carney. All the Oblameo White House seems to be able to do is flip-flop on issues and walk back their comments.

THIS is an issue! All you Democrats have suddenly developed Taxheimers--short-term memory loss that allows only one thought at a time to occupy your tiny brains--and can't remember anything except that one thought. Please explain how the messiah and his merry henchmen have to walk back a major statement about appropriate campaign techniques.

Waiting.......

Wait according to Citizens United law Obama cant coordinate with the SuperPacs. Now baggers are saying that he can and he did???

It seems to me that all the Democrats did was expose Citizens United for what it is a big joke.

  • 5 votes
#1.46 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:06 PM EDT

SCOTUS has failed us as a nation.

Swiftboat on steroids.... get used to it people, and learn how to do your own research.

  • 2 votes
#1.47 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:12 PM EDT

I needed a break so I pulled over to this bar to take a leak and relax with a quick beer. It was fairly crowded. I ordered a Blue Moon at $5.00, I had my newspaper and started to read and sip my beer. The bar was a horseshoe shape and I could see a women across from me with sipping from a martini glass, she had an empty one in front of her. Indifferent, I read my paper.

Next, I know she is on the stool next to me and asks me if I'm a Cancer, I said "no" and went back to my paper. She ordered another martini and then asked why is your eye patched (I wear a patch over my left eye). Thinking I could blow her off, I gave her the ridiculous answer that I lost my eye fighting pirates in Somalia and went back to reading my paper and sipping my beer.

She caught the bar tender, who was admittedly scarce, and asked for a back up. Then she said, you know we are sending an aircraft carrier over there to wipe them out. I ignored her and continued with my paper. Yea, she added "Obama's sending one". I replied that I thought it was going to the Strait of Hormuz. Oh, she said "we need one there too". Now I am getting really tired but don't want to abandon my $5.00 beer. I curtly replied that we maintain two carriers at the Strait of Hormuz and none off of Somalia which is in Africa.

I thought we were done, I went back to my paper and my beer, only in 5 or 10 seconds to get a blast "So, you are one of those f**king conservatives". All I wanted to do was read the paper and sip my beer but the crowded bar didn't give me any safe place to hide. I ignored her. She came again with: "You're nothing but an idiot, and you should pull your fly up" (it wasn't down).

I replied "Are you denying that Somalia is in Africa?" and got "Do you think Kansas is in France - get off of the toilet".

I then heard a beep. She pulled a laptop from the floor next to her and said "I got to handle this". Thank God!! "They just called, hot story coming in, can't talk". Thank God. "Got number one again" and she proceeded to hit keys. "Got to get my votes in".

I left, half of my Blue Moon still in the glass. As I did she was ordering another martini.

  • 1 vote
#1.48 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:13 AM EDT

I guess the right has forgotten Romney's own words about his superpacs: "My goodness! I couldn't tell them what to do, I'd go to the Big House."

Tit for tat.

  • 1 vote
#1.49 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:43 AM EDT

Super Pacs are just fine when they claim a republican killed some guy's wife, but they're not so fine when they discuss policy. Is that what you mean Mr Obama?

Are you talking about the ad where they guy's wife died of cancer?

The ad that isn't playing on ANY station, anywhere, in the country? The only people who are playing it are the Republicans, who discuss it in the context of "How terrible it would be if only everyone had healthcare."

  • 1 vote
#1.50 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:04 PM EDT

"In 1981... he traveled to Pakistan -- a trip that enhanced his foreign policy qualifications, he maintained in a private speech at a San Francisco fundraiser last month. Obama spent 'about three weeks' in Pakistan..."

Wow, this would sure give me all I'd need to be versed in FOREIGN POLICY

Was this part of a Choom Gang trip?

    #1.51 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:32 PM EDT

    notliborcon

    "Obama is running on his record" - if he ran on his record, he'd lose his job.

    "SuperPACs and campaigns CANNOT coordinate... The request by Mittens was a blatant attempt to say "Ha, look Obama is coordinating with his superPAC."

    Really? Why don't you listen to the taped conversation between the man in the video and an Obama aide. And take a look back at some of Obama's early commercials that HE endorsed and you'll see the same man. They not only knew the man's background, they knew how irrational he was and yet he has, for all intents and purposes, endorsed the man's irrational accusation. If he didn't agree, he would have gone on record denouncing it.

    One of the reasons I support Romney is that he has class and he doesn't stoop to Obama's level. That speaks volumes about his character.

      #1.52 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:15 PM EDT
      Reply

      You just have to love the false equivalency argument FR keep trying to push! lol

      • 20 votes
      #2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

      Please explain the difference.

      • 4 votes
      #2.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:07 PM EDT

      You know something Betty if all these Yahoo's were as smart as they think they are they would be decrying how the Super Pac's were used to get them a candidate as pitiful as Ol' Willard instead of who or what they really wanted.

      • 16 votes
      #2.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:09 PM EDT

      Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

      I love it when you use Bull Sh!t phrases like "false equivalency".

      Just shows how much you DON'T know and how BIASED you and your little band of libs are.

      • 22 votes
      #2.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:09 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      You know something Betty if all these Yahoo's were as smart

      Floyd,

      You just can't fix stupid! ;o)

      • 17 votes
      #2.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:13 PM EDT

      Truer words were never spoken my Dear

      • 11 votes
      #2.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:17 PM EDT

      Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

      You just can't fix stupid! ;o) - My point EXACTLY!!! When will you all learn that??

      Nice to Jay sweating it out on the podium.

      • 11 votes
      #2.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:20 PM EDT

      You prove that on a daily basis.

      • 5 votes
      #2.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:20 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarMr.SkippyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Fisty Rodehard,

      Obama and his gang have just been exposed as lying sacks of feces and Spike Lee is making excuses for Obamas failure. You are nothing but a useful idiot to the Dems. After the election you can drop "useful".

      • 17 votes
      #2.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:23 PM EDT

      A lie

      is a

      lie

      is a

      lie

      (D) or (R) or (I)...

      no excuses...just don't do it.

      • 14 votes
      #2.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:26 PM EDT

      Feisty - check your e-mail!

      • 8 votes
      #2.10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:29 PM EDT

      Well Betty you seem to have brought out the best the Yahoo's have to offer this afternoon. Don't you'll boys ever get tired of showing your ignorance or was that just the way you were born and had a relapse to your childhood.

      • 10 votes
      #2.11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:29 PM EDT

      Feisty - you DO attract the Republican mental midgets, don't you? I think they are in such awe they just have to follow after you!

      If you had pigtails, they'd be pulling them!!! :-)

      • 15 votes
      #2.12 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:33 PM EDT

      Well Betty you seem to have brought out the best the Yahoo's have to offer this afternoon

      Floyd & Seeking,

      They're like moths to a flame! lol They just cannot resist!

      At least I keep them busy focusing on me instead of peddling their propaganda! ;o)

      • 13 votes
      #2.13 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:33 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarMr.SkippyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Fisty,

      I think it is more like flies to sh1t.......

      • 6 votes
      #2.14 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:36 PM EDT

      Yeh looks like we've got a couple of the "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance baffle them with Bullsh!t (or Bluster)" Yahoo school of thought this afternoon. You'll boys really kiss your mama's with those mouths?

      • 10 votes
      #2.15 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:39 PM EDT

      Mr. Skippy - we're talking Feisty here - not you I think it is more like flies to sh1t.......

      Feisty - you need some of those bug zappers!

      • 5 votes
      #2.16 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:53 PM EDT

      you need some of those bug zappers!

      A good old fashion fly swatter works wonder! ;o)

      • 5 votes
      #2.17 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:01 PM EDT
      Comment author avatardont mess with texsasExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      feisty has to wear long skirts to hide the no pest strips

      • 6 votes
      #2.18 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:01 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      feisty has to wear long skirts to hide the no pest strips

      Sorry honey, I think you have me confused the the DumbFux bimbos who have to wear them to hide their tails!

      • 8 votes
      #2.19 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:04 PM EDT

      so how do you hide your horns???

      • 5 votes
      #2.20 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:05 PM EDT

      Middlin' is that you old son. See your still out picking on Girls. What's the matter big guy you and the teams get your a$$es waxed somewhere and now your going to take it out on the rest of us by showing your a$$.

      • 6 votes
      #2.21 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:21 PM EDT

      "This is an ad by an entity that's not controlled by campaign. I certainly don't know the specifics of this man's case," campaign adviser Robert Gibbs said on MSNBC"

      More lies from Obama camps

      Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter appeared on CNN Wednesday morning to say, among other things, that "I don't know the facts" about the case of Joe Soptic, a steelworker who appeared in a controversial ad for the pro-Obama super-PAC Priorities USA. In the ad, Soptic, recounts how his wife died of cancer after he lost his health insurance when his plant was shuttered after a takeover by Bain Capital and other companies working with the private equity firm.

      Cutter said she didn't know when Soptic's wife fell ill, or about his health insurance.

      Yet in May of this year, Cutter herself hosted a conference call in which Soptic detailed his case to reporters. During the call, as he did in the ad, Soptic explained how his wife fell ill after he lost his job, and how he lost his health insurance. The call took place as Soptic began appearing in Obama campaign ads, and was featured in a profile on the Obama campaign website.

      • 11 votes
      #2.22 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:38 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarJean-3392470Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Feisty redhead, Roselle ---you are so right, you can't fix stupid--and you know this because they have told you you can't be fixed?

      • 7 votes
      #2.23 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:49 PM EDT

      Best post of the day at #2.22.... Stephanie Cutter, Deputy Campaign Manager for Obama is caught on tape with a BIG WHOPPER of a lie !

      Pretty bad when her own words PROVE she is a liar .... and she is Obama's Deputy Campaign Manager ....... Surprise ! Surprise !! Surprise !!!

      Golllleee ! Where is Gomer Pyle when you really need him ?

      • 12 votes
      #2.24 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:53 PM EDT

      Jean - no she knows because she was told YOU can't be fixed - ever!

      • 7 votes
      #2.25 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:56 PM EDT

      In the 2008 Presidential Election the Republicans had their Joe the Plumber

      In the 2012 Presidential Election the Democrats have their own Joe the Septic Tank

      Why do I get the feeling something smells crappy here?

      • 4 votes
      #2.26 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:27 PM EDT

      Feisty,

      For once I have to agree with you, calling somebody a murderer is not the same as talking about the same as a change to the welfare system.

      • 3 votes
      #2.27 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:33 PM EDT

      All politicians are hypocrites. That includes our current president. The end always seems to justify the means. I don't expect anything from anyone who runs for president, except a bit of decency and honesty. Obama's "Hope and Change" mantra back in 2008 rings really hollow right now.

      • 1 vote
      #2.28 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:40 PM EDT

      Saying Stephanie Cutter SHOULD have known something, doesn't prove anything. Is that the sound of desperation we are hearing from the old Bushbots?

      • 4 votes
      #2.29 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:44 PM EDT

      Flip-Flop Jay! Go, baby, go! How many feet can fit in that wide mouth of Oblameo's? I hope those feet really stink!

      • 4 votes
      #2.30 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:05 PM EDT

      I would believe Jay Carney if this was the only lie that came out of the Obama camp. But the fact is that Obama's campaign is full of outright lies. I think he takes his cue from Clinton who addressed the American People as President of the United States saying "I never had sex with that woman". Personally I don't care if Clinton did or did not. It just grossly repulsed that a President would come before the American people and outright lie. He, like Obama, did not have to lie, all he had to do was keep his mouth shut. I will not support a liar for the position of President. In 2008 Obama promised
      transparency. That was the first lie in the spectrum.

      • 1 vote
      #2.31 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:37 AM EDT
      Reply

      Jay Carney, Obama, his campaign and administration are a complete joke. When they are caught in a lie, they lie again. When a comment goes the toher way on them, they deflect and take the 5th. Stephanie Cutter is an A#1 Example of it. Caught on a recorded conference call and she lies again. These people have no backbone. They are running the country into the ground and laughing about it. Hopefully some reasonable Americans will have the guts to remove Obama from office in November. That is what we need to do. Another 4 years of Obama and the country will never be the same.

      • 21 votes
      Reply#3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:08 PM EDT

      People RESPECT you more when you tell the truth.

      Waiting to see if the MIS-INFORMATION ad sticks is hypocritical.

      Jay Carney...you goofed.

      • 16 votes
      #3.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:21 PM EDT

      What misinformation?

      • 1 vote
      #3.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:45 PM EDT

      Deflect! Deflect!

      • 1 vote
      #3.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:47 PM EDT

      I wouldn't be surprised if this was done on purpose to show what a complete joke SuperPacs really are.

      Our president is going to try and make all Americans see that the campaign does not have control over what a superpac does. And that Citizens united is a bad thing for our country.

      He has been against citizens united since the day it became a law. Remember Alito in the state of the union address? "thats not true"

      Off course this ad wasn't created by Obama and since he cant coordinate with a a superPac why are people blaming him?

      It defies everything the law stands for??? The law states that candidates cant coordinate with a super pac but here you guys are blaming the President?

      • 6 votes
      #3.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:04 PM EDT

      The joke in America are the ruthless, arrogant and useless republicans who created terrible problems and have no solutions. But they have lots of name calling and attacks when President Obama got in there and fixed things. He saves the American car industry with republicans yelling against it. He was successful with the Recovery Act that created three million jobs. He was successful with the Affordable Care Act that will improve health care and make it accessible to so many more Americans. President Obama was serious about getting Osama bin Laden and when the Navy Seals went it was on the President's order. We have a leader we can trust and who does the best he can in the government with the hateful republicans he has to deal with. So all the GOP stooges can do is vote against the Affordable Care Act over 33 times like the stooges they are. More health care insurance for more people in the country is good news and people lucky enough to have Democratic governors are getting the Exchanges set up so that the uninsured can pick insurance to meet their needs. America really needs intelligent and decent people in the government. We don't need stooges that bay at the moon to please simple minded Faux watching lame brains or the evil spouted by the Faux pucks constantly.

      • 2 votes
      #3.5 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:48 AM EDT
      Reply

      Can you say "double" standard. The hall mark of the Obama Administration.

      • 18 votes
      #4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:10 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Can you say "double" standard.

      Sorry Tony - if it were not for double standards you right wing nitwits wouldn't have any!

      • 17 votes
      #4.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:14 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarSeekingSanityExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Feisty - the GOP is just one huge Double Standard! How pitiable a once proud party has fallen so low!

      Obama/Biden 2012

      • 15 votes
      #4.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:20 PM EDT

      Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

      Just admit the lie by the Obama team and move on. Why can't you do that??

      Hey Betty it's about time for you to abandon this thread. Nothing but pain for you here.

      • 18 votes
      #4.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:22 PM EDT

      REB - and you'll admit that most of the GOP ads are all lies, right? We're waiting......

      • 14 votes
      #4.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:34 PM EDT

      Guess how you can tell when Cutter or Carney are lying? Their lips are moving!!! HA! What a bunch of airbags!

      • 14 votes
      #4.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:35 PM EDT

      It seems the partisans on the right, recognize their own game and appear to be a tad upset that the Dems are playing hardball.

      We all remember how the right and their Pacs vilified John Kerry in 2004 also Max Cleland, both decorated war veterans who were so disrespected by the GOP it was disgusting.

      For those campaigns and all the others that the Dems endured the Republican Party's dirty tricks I'm glad to see someone in our party has the gumption to stand up and punch back.

      Whine away GOP, what kind of cheese would you prefer, we have a nice goat cheese you might like.

      • 16 votes
      #4.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:40 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Hey Betty it's about time for you to abandon this thread.

      If it's all the same to you cup-cake, I WILL be the one to decide when I want to leave... not YOU!

      we have a nice goat cheese you might like.

      Gingerbread Mamma,

      These clowns are addicted to NACHO cheese! ;o)

      • 7 votes
      #4.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:02 PM EDT
      alexandr1Deleted

      SeekingSanity

      No - why should I when they aren't?

      • 2 votes
      #4.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:46 PM EDT

      REB - yeah - go on spouting THAT lie! We all know better!

      • 3 votes
      #4.10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:57 PM EDT

      SeekingSanity

      That all you got??

      As I told Betty, this is a losing thread for you guys. Just shut up and take the crap you so richly deserve. You will live to fight another day!!

      • 4 votes
      #4.11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:18 PM EDT

      They never admit when they are wrong.... but will flail away like 2 year old twins in a bathtub ! Funny, mine were much cuter with the soap bubbles in their hair! LOL !!

      • 7 votes
      #4.12 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:23 PM EDT

      jim-1455434

      Right you are Jim.

      They just don't know when to shut up and take their lumps. Keeping it going just proves what dopes they are. You can't defend the indefensible.

      • 4 votes
      #4.13 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:34 PM EDT

      REB - yep and you and jim always back the indefensible GOP! Go figure!

      • 6 votes
      #4.14 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:48 PM EDT

      SeekingSanity

      You really can't be that petty to want to continue. If this were a prize fight they would have stopped it about 20 posts ago.

      I will let you have the last word after this however since I am sure you want it and I really don't care to continue beating the stuffing out of you. It is no fun and now you are boring me with your stupidity.

      • 3 votes
      #4.15 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:54 PM EDT

      They just don't know when to shut up and take their lumps.

      WTF are you talking about?

      Get back to us when your feet land back on the ground!

      No one is taking any "lumps" around here... except you & the rest of your ilk who wallow in the cess-pool!

      PS: Why are you so obsessed with us leaving? Like I told you, I'll be the one to decide when I'm finished handing you your ass!

      • 4 votes
      #4.16 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:55 PM EDT

      Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

      I'm really shaking as if you every could. Keep dreaming. You have nothing going for you but name calling and Bull Sh!t.

      • 3 votes
      #4.17 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

      I'm really shaking as if you every could.

      Shame you morons like YOU never know when to quit! lol

      Although, if nothing else you sure are good for some *giggles*!

      Thank You!

      • 3 votes
      #4.18 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:17 PM EDT

      Can we not at least agree that double standards exist in both parties? The Republicans certainly don't have a monopoly on this issue.

      • 1 vote
      #4.19 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:49 PM EDT

      Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

      You say "Morons like me??" "Thank You"? For What?? Calling you out as the leader of a pack of bullies and Bull Sh!t artists that you, Bev and the rest of the Libs R Us gang are?? If that is the case then you cupcake are very welcome.

      You never offer anything to support anything you say and all you do is try to divide this board on every thread just like your hero Obama tries to divide the country every day with his "executive orders" to subvert the oversight and legislative responsibility of Congress. First on immigration and next on welfare reform. God knows what his next usurpment of power will be.

      Both of you are not worth the time I am taking to call you out but somebody has to do it so it might as well be me.

      Go leave your pile of crap on somebody else's doorstep.

      NO MORE FOR 44!!!!!

      • 3 votes
      #4.20 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:54 PM EDT

      Reb, use ignore author for those clowns. They are narrow-minded with no intention of discussing anything rationally, and you won't waste your time reading their frothing at the mouth rants. Trust me, you'll be much happier.

        #4.21 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:29 PM EDT
        Reply

        Actually there is no difference, either both candidates have the means and responsbility to pull them or neither do. Thanks so much to the supreme court for this very bad decision - not what we need right now in an already deeply divided nation. The very best thing we could ever do would be do do away with big money in all elections and limit the campaign time to 3 months, not 2 years!

        • 11 votes
        Reply#5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:10 PM EDT

        Actually there is no difference, either both candidates have the means and responsbility to pull them or neither do.

        The difference is that in May Jay Carney called on the Romney campaign to denounce the Rickets plan for a commercial featuring Rev Wright. Now, when called upon to do the same on a 3rd party ad he refuses. It's not that he has the power to pull the ad it's the fact that he won't accept that it crossed a line, and by refusing is condoning the ad.

        • 13 votes
        #5.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:17 PM EDT

        Stephanie Cutter has been caught red-handed in a big lie that ties her to smear campaign tactics. Spin it all you want ..... she works for Obama !

        • 5 votes
        #5.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:58 PM EDT

        Saying she should have known something is not lying. She had no control on the content of the SuperPac ads.

        • 2 votes
        #5.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:55 PM EDT

        There's stupid and then there's retarded. The Oblameo just crossed the line with this one. The constant thread from Oblameo and all his merry henchmen, including the trolls who post their impassioned defenses of the messiah and rabid attacks against anyone trying to reason with them, is that OBLAMEO HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONTROL OVER HIMSELF OR ANYONE AROUND HIM. Oblameo has now had stuck his foot deeply into his mouth by two of his most public henchmen and the only way Flip-Flop Carney can figure out to remove the foot is to......wait for it!......FLIP-FLOP!!!!!

        • 2 votes
        #5.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:13 PM EDT
        Reply

        No secret today.
        Ryan, Romney and their Republican colleagues OPENLY advocate taking funds from the poor, disabled, elderly, retired and sick ~ for the express purpose of shifting $billions to the very wealthy in the form of tax breaks.

        Under Mitt Romney's tax plan.
        The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center found that Romney's TAX BREAKS FOR MILLIONAIRES would cost us around $86 billion yearly.
        But for 95% of Americans who earn less than $200,000 - taxes would be increased.

        Under Paul Ryan's plan, austerity for who?
        Rep. Ryan (R-WI) also proposes tax cuts heavily skewed to large corporations and the very wealthy:
        The Tax Policy Center finds that Ryan's additional tax cuts = $4.6Trillion.
        Additionally, both Ryan and Romney want to extend the Bush tax cuts = $5.4 trillion.
        TOTAL cost of Ryan's proposal in tax cuts alone = $10 trillion.

        While crying about "perils of debt", Paul Ryan gives giant tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations. And like Romney = without conscience, he gouges basic programs like Medicaid, food stamps and Pell Grants to pay for them. The Ryan plan, endoresed by Mitt Romney, puts an even bigger burden on low and middle income earners via lethal blows to Medicare.

        RomneyRyan's self-interest extends to giving themselves and their rich friends more $millions with which to buy up our elections, subvert our democracy ~ and install a government that reflects their 'vision' for us of more work for less pay, no safety nets, no environmental protections, no voice and no recourse for ordinary Americans.

        • 9 votes
        Reply#6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:11 PM EDT

        I wonder how much money were going to lose when all the rich fat cats move out of the country?

        • 5 votes
        #6.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:23 PM EDT

        With all their tax breaks and off shore accounts we won't be losing much. They take all of their tax breaks and move it overseas. How is that helping our country?

        • 8 votes
        #6.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:26 PM EDT

        Your numbers are wrong and have already been refuted by numerous fact check organizations and think tanks on both sides.

        • 6 votes
        #6.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:33 PM EDT

        Whoever you are DAL, you need to lay off the crack pipe or bath salts or something. Talk about delusional!

        • 5 votes
        #6.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:59 PM EDT

        Seattle........................and you have a very obnoxious name. Prove your own figures, post a link.

        • 4 votes
        #6.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:52 PM EDT

        He has not posted any figures to prove Nitey ! Take your meds and go back to sleep.

        • 1 vote
        #6.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:00 PM EDT

        NiteOwlett - you're absolutely right. Seattle has done nothing but say the figures are wrong - hardly proof by anyone's standards! Oh wait - Republicans have NO standards so they'll go with Seattle!

        Obama/Biden 2012

        • 6 votes
        #6.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:11 PM EDT

        Nice distortion SeekingSanity, you are becoming quite a pro at that ! The NiteOwl made a foolish post and you jump in there to rescue her .... desperately trying to change the meaning of her post in the process.

        Again, Seattle Libtard posted NO NUMBERS in post #6.3, so NiteOwl's request for him to prove those numbers (that he did not post) only reveals an inadequate and ridiculous reply. I would expect you to support inadequacy ,,, it is all the Democratic Party has under Obama's failed leadership the past 3.6 years.

        • 6 votes
        #6.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:19 PM EDT

        The truth of this whole blog is that if the T/Publicans get into the congress and white house, us 99% will lose.

        Obama and democrat control to stimulate our economy 2012

        • 5 votes
        #6.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:16 PM EDT

        ....an assumption was made that if these figures are wrong, WHAT ARE THE CORRECT ONE'S????!!!!

        • 5 votes
        #6.10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:21 PM EDT

        And this whole line relates to Flip-Flop Jay how? You Dems are getting really pathetic tonight. One of your boys screwed up bigtime and all you can do is whine, cry, deflect, and wiggle. Admit it! Jane screwed up bigtime!!!!!

        • 2 votes
        #6.11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:16 PM EDT

        What troubles me about that Tax Policy Center Report is they sure do a lot of ASSUMING.

        Modeling Assumptions
        We make the following assumptions:
         Any reductions in revenue due to the lower corporate rate would be offset by reducing
        corporate tax preferences. As a result, we examine only changes to the individual income tax,
        alternative minimum tax, payroll tax, and estate tax. We ignore the effect of the proposal to
        reduce the corporate rate to 25 percent.
         The plan would not reduce tax expenditures that aim to promote saving and investment. That
        is consistent with Governor Romney’s plan (and statements made by proponents of similar
        plans).
        4
        These provisions include preferential rates on capital gains and dividends; exemptionof income accrued in qualified retirement and other tax-favored accounts (e.g., traditional
        and Roth IRAs and 401(k)s and education and health saving accounts); exemption of interest
        on state and local bonds; the exclusion of capital gains on home sales; the step-up in basis of assets bequeathed to heirs; and the Saver’s Credit. We exclude these provisions because most plans that have proposed large reductions in individual rates have also proposed to retain or
        even expand tax incentives for saving and investment.

         The tax expenditure for imputed rent on owner-occupied homes and certain smaller hard-to-eliminate exclusions from income cannot or will not be eliminated. This group includes provisions that many would not identify as tax breaks, that have rarely or never been identified by policymakers as “on the table”, or that would be difficult to administer in practice.
        The largest of these provisions are the tax exclusion for “imputed rent,” (the value of the housing services that homeowners obtain from living in their own homes) and the exemption from tax on the increase in the value of life insurance policies as people age. Smaller provisions include the exclusion from taxable income of combat pay, veterans’
        benefits, and benefits for low-income families; previous reform proposals have excluded
        most of these smaller items. Moreover, because they are small, and because many primarily benefit lower- and middle-income households, including them would not meaningfully affect the results.

        And the list of ASSUMPTIONS continues on and on.

        http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/1001628-Base-Broadening-Tax-Reform.pdf

          #6.12 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:50 PM EDT
          Reply

          Simple solution - as neither add has run, just pull them both - then maybe those making outlandish and untrue adds will stop. Since neither has run this could be much a do about nothing.

          • 10 votes
          Reply#7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:12 PM EDT
          Comment author avatar'TR' Rose IIExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

          The corrupt Republican corporate MONARCHY is busy knit-picking because they don't have a leg to stand on. If it wasn't for their own SUPER POOP money, FLIP/FLOP, TRUTH TWISTER, exlax ETCH-A-SKETCH wouldn't have ANYBODY for him except some WANNABE VP political puppets! Only 75% of the corporates stand by him as their political puppet, the other 25% don't want any part of this LOSER, they're embarrassed!

          • 9 votes
          Reply#8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:12 PM EDT

          What a jackass.

          • 4 votes
          #8.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:52 PM EDT
          Comment author avatarSeekingSanityExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

          Mr. Skippy - What a jackass. We all agree - Romney IS a jackass!

          • 6 votes
          #8.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:55 PM EDT

          Are you a third grader?

          • 3 votes
          #8.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:05 PM EDT
          Comment author avatarSeekingSanityExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

          Mr. Skippy - my guess is you're still in kindergarten, right?

          Wouldn't it be funny if I was a 3rd grader? I'm still heads above you!!!!

          • 3 votes
          #8.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:19 PM EDT

          TR,

          If you call somebody a murderer and they object, that is nitpicking to you.

          If that is the case what would be a serious lie. Would it be calling somebody a tax cheat by an unnamed source, or an outsourcer because factcheck.org said that was not true. Please let us know your standards.

          • 3 votes
          #8.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:26 PM EDT

          Mit signed the federal papers saying he was the head of Bain, yet he tells the voters he had nothing to do with it. Did he lie to the government, there for a fellon, or did he lie to us the voters? He lied some how. Come on right wingers, explain which group he lied to. Is that who you want as President?

          Obama2012

          • 4 votes
          #8.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:21 PM EDT

          OK Goodder, here are the FACTS as reported by the NYT, and other sources and posted all over the internet, but people like you either are too stupid to understand or too stubborn to admit there's nothing there and move on. You just earned the ignore author button also.

          “It’s a disconnect between the ownership interest and managerial functions,” said Harvey L. Pitt, who served as S.E.C. chairman under President George W. Bush. “When Bain takes positions in public companies, they’re required to show anyone who has an ownership interest that could be the effective equivalent of control. So Romney has to be shown on those filings. If they didn’t show them on those filings, they would have broken the law. But it has nothing to do with who’s actually running Bain Capital.”

          Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left, although his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period. And financial disclosures filed with the Massachusetts ethics commission show that he drew at least $100,000 in 2001 from Bain Capital Inc. — effectively his own till — as a “former executive” and from other Bain entities as a passive general partner.

          An offering memorandum to investors in Bain’s seventh private equity fund that was circulated in June 2000 also suggests that Mr. Romney was no longer actively involved in managing firm investments at the time. The memorandum, first published by Fortune, provides background on the “senior private equity investment professionals of Bain Capital.” Eighteen managers are listed; Mr. Romney is not among them.

          On another filing with Massachusetts officials, Bain Capital listed all of Bain’s directors and officers for 2001. The form lists Michael F. Goss as “president, managing director and chief financial officer,” along with seventeen other managing directors. Mr. Romney is not among them, suggesting that while he still owned Bain’s management company, he was not an officer of the company.

            #8.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:45 PM EDT
            Reply

            Super PACs and citizens united will fully unravel our political system. That may be a good thing with the way we are going. For corporations to fund advertising above and beyond anything a person could manage, and then the Super PACs, which might allow a person to contribute to a larger group and counteract the citizens united issue, however, any attempt to sway or influence the super PAC's by the candidates means even denouncing them on public TV could put the candidate in a situation of violating the separation between the candidate and the super PAC.

            I really don't think they thought this through when they voted to create super PAC's and approve citizens united.

            • 7 votes
            Reply#9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:12 PM EDT

            They blatantly lie, they even don't try to cover the fact that they're lying. True Chicago style politics believing that everyone is as stupid as their base. Luckily we're not.

            • 12 votes
            Reply#10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:12 PM EDT

            Dotties girl - you're clearly talking about Romney's ads. True Karl Rove style politics - all lies and distortions. It's all Karl knows. And, when you have a nothing candidate like Romney - it's all you've got to work with!

            Oh, and you are the stupid base - for the GOP!

            Obama/Biden 2012

            • 10 votes
            #10.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:22 PM EDT

            We don't think everyone is stupid. We think the GOP is stupid.

            • 7 votes
            #10.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:24 PM EDT

            mark - we KNOW the GOP and its followers are stupid!

            • 6 votes
            #10.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:35 PM EDT

            I wonder what Flip-Flop Jay would think of you people? Is name-calling really the only thing you have to use to defend him and his incompetent boss?

            • 2 votes
            #10.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:18 PM EDT
            Reply

            RandyCon,,,,,,the real joke are people like you who are not based in reality,,,,the reality is that the republican party has over the last 40 years killed this great nation with their policies that bring down the middle class, the real nation builders, and cater to the rich, greedy people and corporations, that have done everything in their power to gut our economy for their own gain.

            DO NOT VOTE REPUBLICAN, unless they take back their party from the extremist right-wingers.

            • 8 votes
            Reply#11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:17 PM EDT

            Campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters on Wednesday "we don't have any knowledge of the story of the family." Psaki reversed without explanation on Thursday. "No one is denying that he was in ... one of our campaign ads," she said, also acknowledging he participated in a campaign conference call in May.

            Psaki, pressed for the second day in a row about the ad, also complained the media are trying to hold the super PAC ad to the same standard as a recent Romney campaign ad. That ad came under bipartisan criticism for claiming Obama wants to gut welfare reform.

            So, let me see if I understand this. If negative ads are ran against bho, EVERY media outlet colletively howls in indignation, as well as every single silly liberal in America. However, if the almight bho runs negative ads against his opponent (it really doesn't matter who, think back nearly four years...), then that's all well and good, even if his handlers have to backpedal like they are riding the Tour de France in reverse. Hmmm, is it just me, or does this smack of hypocracy??? Honestly, I really shouldn't expect much out of the current inhabitant of the w.h., but really??? I guess desperate times require desperate measures...

            • 9 votes
            Reply#12 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:17 PM EDT

            Yes that is about right. Except the GOP will start with Ann Coulter spewing fire while her heads rotates around a few times on the Hannity Show. She is so enraged that anyone would bring up how good the health care Romney created for Massachusetts is doing. That was so terrible because the GOP of Rush, Ann and Eric are all against improved health care for anyone. They like having people being excluded for pre-existing conditions and they sure don't care about babies and young mothers. No it is right wing dogma to the end whether it is terrible, horrible and unAmerican that they don't care about other Americans having better access to health care insurance.

            • 1 vote
            #12.1 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:23 AM EDT
            Reply

            We don't think everyone is stupid. Only the GOP!!!

            • 8 votes
            Reply#13 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:22 PM EDT

            Mr Carney," You want me to practice what I preach?" "The nerve!!"

            • 6 votes
            Reply#14 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:24 PM EDT

            I can't believe the Republicans are complaining. They have done nothing but lie to the American public. I believe Republicans are void of empathy.

            • 6 votes
            Reply#15 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:27 PM EDT

            The Republicans are telling you the truth about the economy. It sucks. Obama has done nothing and will do nothing. His only solution is to spend tax dollars to hire more UNION workers so they can buy things.

            • 7 votes
            #15.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:42 PM EDT

            D Bennett - well - if you say so -NOT. The GOP couldn't tell the truth if their lives depended on it. The GOP sucks and doesn't give a damn about the US - just winning offices. Can we say Charlie Sheen???? He is the poster child for the GOP!

            Obama/Biden 2012

            • 7 votes
            #15.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:46 PM EDT

            SS

            Your a big dumb A

            • 5 votes
            #15.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:56 PM EDT

            rukidding - oh my! I'm supposed to be offended by you I guess? No, see I like my men smart and you don't fit the bill. When it comes to dopes like you - you're not offensive - just stupid and eager to show it!

            • 6 votes
            #15.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:08 PM EDT

            D Bennet shows how little you know . about any history. Creating jobs is how we've gotten out of rescessions for 60+ years. Giving the super rich tax breaks does not help. That's what we've been doing for 12 yrs and has done nothing because they don't hire people they don't need! the money gets stached away in foreign accounts where it only does the holder any good.

            • 4 votes
            #15.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:06 PM EDT

            rukidding7, No need in trying to get in a pissing war with SpeekingInsanity ...... you will never win ! She is full of it !

            Too bad about Stephanie Cutter making a TOTAL LIAR out of herself over this latest $hitbomb from the Democrats ! Too bad that bomb blew up ....... and now Ms. Cutter has $hit all over herself ! She works for Obama.... any surprise ?

            • 4 votes
            #15.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:07 PM EDT

            jim - and you clearly know full of it since it is your middle name!

            And, as usual - more sh*t from you!

            • 4 votes
            #15.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:13 PM EDT

            Is that the best 'ya got there libbie ? Have you got the Obama cheerleader outfit on with the pom poms ??

            • 2 votes
            #15.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:26 PM EDT

            jim - yep, I do!

            • 3 votes
            #15.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:33 PM EDT

            And Democrats tell the truth? Where is all the trasnsparency Owebama promised? And Mitt never killed anyone. And stop detracting from the failed economy.

            • 3 votes
            #15.10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:48 PM EDT

            1nottru: empathy to a liberal is like giving alcohol to a drunk, a conservative would use tough love to help him/her quit drinking. There are over 100,000,000 Americans on welfare costing $900 Billion in 2010 (Wikipedia). Our National debt is closing on our GDP and you want empathy to solve these problems?

              #15.11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:08 PM EDT

              Tough love......STOP EATING.

              • 2 votes
              #15.12 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:57 PM EDT
              Reply

              I cannot believe the Republicans are complaining about the commercial. It clearly uses the word "opinion" Republicans lie everyday. They don't understand the work EMPATHY.

              • 4 votes
              Reply#16 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:30 PM EDT

              Republicans are complaining about Obama's Campaign lying blatantly and nobody calling them out. Claiming not to know who this guy is after having him in their own commercial is astounding. The Dems think Americans are ignorant, and that if they keep lying nobody will care.

              • 5 votes
              #16.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:46 PM EDT
              Reply

              Powerless, riiiiiiight (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).

              The guys on both side of the aisle are full of it.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#17 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:34 PM EDT

              It seems to me that people are getting confused as to which ads are from the campaign and which ones are from Super PACs. The ones which say they are endorsed by the candidate, are from the candidates. If the ad doesn't say that, the candidate cannot say anything regarding a Super PAC ad, regardless of content. To do so could be seen as coordination and the candidate could face fines or charges. This is the problem with Super PAC's.

              • 5 votes
              Reply#18 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:40 PM EDT

              I think I have to disagree with the White House here. It's not "coordinating" to speak out against a SuperPAC ad after it's been produced. There is enough wrong with the facts, that the White House can condemn it.

              Having said that, it's disingenuous for Romney to feign outrage, when the Romney campaign itself is literally lying in ads right now. I don't see them pulling their own welfare without work lies or Obama taking away vets voting rights lies.

              It should be pointed out that this ad has not even been released on any television station. It's only been on the internet, and reported by TV news.

              • 3 votes
              #18.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:15 PM EDT

              Perhaps. But the campaigns know full well what is being aired and can disavow at any time.

              • 1 vote
              #18.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:55 PM EDT
              Reply

              “We do not control third-party ads,” Carney said, adding later

              You don't? You do a good job of running NBC though.

              • 6 votes
              Reply#19 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:46 PM EDT

              They are not 3rd part ads, they're Democratic party ads, or a better name might be Sleazebagsmearcamp.com.

              • 5 votes
              #19.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:03 PM EDT

              imnotlost - you've clearly confused them with the GOP ads the:

              Doesn'tgetanysleazierthanRomney.com ads!

              • 4 votes
              #19.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:10 PM EDT

              Hey Sanity, Haven't you heard? I put on another post today, guess you didn't see it, Scumbama camp was forced to admit (except Carney) that they actually knew about that (big lie) Bain Capital ad about the man's wife dying, in fact they approved it going on the air. How's that for sleaze?

              • 7 votes
              #19.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:22 PM EDT

              imnotlost- They did NOT approve the ad and you're lying as usual. Obama's campaign DOES NOT approve PAC ads. Get a life and a clue!

              Obama/Biden 2012

              • 4 votes
              #19.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:36 PM EDT

              Stephanie Cutter knew it was a lie and then she LIED about knowledge of such. She works for Obama.

              • 3 votes
              #19.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:10 PM EDT

              Well Sanity, I'm not going to do your home work for you. You are probably better at researching on the net than I am, so go for it. Like Jim at #19.5 said, Cutter has admitted that she knew it and did nothing to stop it being released which is the same as approving. I'm going to give you a couple websites to look at to show how dirty your Scumbama pals are and how CNN (Oh no! Not CNN) has come out debunking the creeps.

              http://www.theblaze.com/stories/robert-gibbs-answer-when-confronted-on-romney-killed-my-wife-ad-we-just-dont-know-the-specifics/

              http://www.city-data.com/forum/elections/1660149-cnn-obamas-romney-killed-my-wife-2.html

              Read it thoroughly, and enjoy.

              • 2 votes
              #19.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:52 PM EDT
              Reply

              I see Feisty and Sanity are having Newsvine sex again.

              • 6 votes
              Reply#20 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:50 PM EDT

              girls do love... girls. ;)

              • 5 votes
              #20.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:51 PM EDT

              imnotlost - oh poor boy. You have Newsvine sex? I guess it's all you can get.

              Pretty sure both Feisty and I can do MUCH better!

              • 4 votes
              #20.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:56 PM EDT

              Are they girls? They are definately no ladies!

              • 5 votes
              #20.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:59 PM EDT

              "Pretty sure both Feisty and I can do MUCH better!"

              Hey, let's leave animals out of it!

              • 4 votes
              #20.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:00 PM EDT
              Comment author avatarMike-306915Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

              LOL... I was thinking the same thing...

              The leftards on this forum don't only high-five themselves after every post (ridiculous enough), it's gotten to the point where they're stroking each other off...

              Sure 'nuff, no one else will...

              FACT is, the Super-Pac BS, is BS...on both sides. But a liberal, would never-ever- admit to any impropriety from "their side"...despite having decried it ad-nauseum when the "other side" did the same...

              Democrat= Hypocrite....

              • 8 votes
              #20.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:03 PM EDT

              I see the mental midgets are at it again - Mike & Mr. Skippy. You both know so much about playing with animals, I guess that's all that will have you. No surprise there! Pitiable little boys who can't get a girl to even look at them!

              • 5 votes
              #20.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:12 PM EDT

              write to wh

                #20.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:35 PM EDT

                Hey Seeking... I don't normally comment on drivel like this, but the guys are right on this one. I've been reading down to this point and it is getting pretty sad. Try sticking to content. And I'm no spelling bee champ, but don't claim to be smarter or better than anyone on here either, so I have this question for you... What in the hell is "Pitiable"? You've used the word twice now, and I thought the first time it may have been a typo, but twice is making wonder if it is really a word? I've been around girls like you and feisty before, for about a minute... then walked out the door laughing and shaking my head, in pure amazement at how someone so clueless could think they know so damn much.

                • 1 vote
                #20.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:18 PM EDT

                Dougieb43 - use your dictionary. Pitiable - deserving or arousing pity; contemptibly poor or small. Got it now?

                I probably wouldn't be using the word clueless if I were you - couldn't find pitiable in the dictionary huh?

                Can you spell C L U E L E S S????

                Oh, and trust me - the girls were glad you walked out!

                • 4 votes
                #20.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:35 PM EDT

                It is pitiable to think there are so many people blinded by the rightwing. They shoot themselves in the foot and smile.

                • 3 votes
                #20.10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:25 PM EDT
                Reply

                The good news for the intelligent few, Obama's reign is almost over.

                • 9 votes
                Reply#21 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:53 PM EDT

                meltdownNation - you clearly don't know anything about intelligence - and it shows!

                Obama/Biden 2012

                • 4 votes
                #21.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:57 PM EDT

                Looks like President Obama will be reelected. We see that even the most hateful ways the GOP is working to suppress the Democratic vote and every rotten tactic they come up with shows they won't win. But they are sure trying to cheat.

                • 1 vote
                #21.2 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:28 AM EDT
                Reply

                How Ironic! The NBC liars calling out the White House liars.

                • 8 votes
                Reply#22 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:54 PM EDT

                lolllll

                Someone at NBC just had their last day today.

                • 4 votes
                #22.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:59 PM EDT
                Reply

                i have the start to a solution to these pacs: any employer that show a business address of k street in DC, and all of its employees, should be the subject of a list that is published for all to review and scrutinize as a matter of public record, as these people deal with our elected officials INHERENTLY in their "business" model. members of opposing parties/pacs will likely come just short of complete self destruction trying to expose the others and the colossal levels of corruption, illegal contributions, etc they are ALL involved in. the benefit is that it will become painfully obvious to anyone that actually gives a sh*t about this country of the detrimental effect these organizations have on the political process and the well being of our country in general, and hopefully this will be enough to dismantle this gaggle of garbage.

                PACS ARE THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM...just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't happening.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#23 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:59 PM EDT

                sebrad - hopefully it will force the Supreme Court to reverse their Citizens United decision. They had to know what they were unleashing with that ruling. What a joke!

                • 4 votes
                #23.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:13 PM EDT

                It was a pitiable decision.

                • 2 votes
                #23.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:26 PM EDT
                Reply

                What I knew in 2008 that Obama is not a second coming of Christ, people are finding out now.

                What I knew then that Obama can mesmerize you with church style rhetoric without any relevant substance but he has not in depth knowledge on any issue, other know it now.

                What I knew then Obama is for winning at any cost and use any tools and degrading of others like Hillary in 2008 in persuit of his dream, others know it now.

                I knew red and Blue was rhetoric and Obama had no know how or understanding of what it means to red.blue and black/white working to gather as Americans. He does not know what American is. He thinks American is Government helping and it is not hard work , thriftiness and self reliance values that made America the most powerful nation.

                Not trying to be racist but his view of Government comes from Black Experience,,that is being exploited, discriminated by white people and given money to wipe out the sins. He forgets the history and believes that in Government dispensation and Government is the prime mover of change. He know history well but have no understanding of rise of White people over last three hundred years and their trial and tribulations.

                I am not white.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#24 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:00 PM EDT

                Racism from any source is disgusting and vile.

                • 2 votes
                #24.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:12 PM EDT

                GODGRAVITON - how sad for you that you might have thought any of those things in 2008. You are clearly one of the few.

                The sane ones of us saw a man who loves this country and would work to bring it back to the great country it was before Bush! And, he is working to do just that.

                We DID not see a GOP party that would say "to hell with the country" - anything to make President Obama a one-term President. We did not see the treason of the far right. We are now realizing that it exists and we will fight to keep it from taking over.

                Your assessment of President Obama is so far from the truth it is sickening. And, you definitely are white! My guess is a skinhead!

                Obama/Biden 2012

                • 4 votes
                #24.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:17 PM EDT

                Racism like Louie Farrakhan, Rev Wright, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson?

                • 3 votes
                #24.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:18 PM EDT

                To my critics:

                I do not love Bush or Republicans either, if that is comfort.

                I live in Chicago for decades. I have seen this dude. I have never seen him make a common cause of North side of Chicago or white people or other races.

                He was not a great Senator in Illinois.

                I am minority too. Any one who looks at me and make a statement against my take on issue, I never considered them racist. It is just an issue they differ.

                If in this country we cannot criticise someone in power without invoking racism or sexism or homophobia then we have loss the Essenes of democracy, the ability to discourse on merit of issues and holding responsible who do not perform the job once elected that they promised.

                I believe we should always be on tail of elected Representatives so that they know we are vigilant. I am sorry you feel about me what you feel. My record among blacks, hundreds of them, is in good standing. They know my take over decades and we know each other well.

                Is Sec Rice is to criticise Obama will she be racist or if she is to criticise Romney will she be racist?

                  #24.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:45 PM EDT

                  GODGRAVITON - I also live in Chicago and disagree with you on your assessment of President Obama now and as a Senator. You don't seem to have an accurate assessment of him at all.

                  Sec Rice should not open her mouth with the fiasco she made of her job. She was nothing more than a "yes" person to everything Bush and Cheney did - legal or not. She knew we were at risk of being attacked by our own planes (admitted it) and did nothing about it to "avoid panic." How'd that work out?

                  She knew the mental tubing in Iraq could never deliver WMD's but lied about it. She is no one to talk about ANYONE! She's not racist - just evil.

                  Obama/Biden 2012

                  • 4 votes
                  #24.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:53 PM EDT

                  GODGRAVITON- You must remember, you are comenting to a liberal... the "most understanding" kind of people in the WORLD. Your personal experience (which I enjoyed reading by the way) is not what they want to hear. They will call you names!

                  Seeking- Again, please. Condi Rice (class act, and one you should be proud of by the way... being black AND a woman) versus Hillary Clinton representin' with a "classy" bump-n-grind white girl dance (after the drinking pics in Columbia mind you). No contest. Not even from the same planet when it comes to someone I want as Sec. of State.

                  • 1 vote
                  #24.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:38 PM EDT

                  Sanity:

                  So you are not racist on Rice.

                  Why did not you list Onbama's accomplishment or his primary races against decent congressman and decent woman?

                  OK, What are Mr.Obama accomplishment in Illinois. He list campaign reform on which he shook hands with Senator McCain in Senate to to take federal financing and then switch once money start pouring in. He touts his community organizing in which he just gave a name as a UOFC Prof and Harvard alumni. Nothing. He never mentions it. In the Senate, how Mr Obama Vote, Madam sec. "Obama passes" Other senator wait and wait and obama cannot decide.

                  But I will be happy if you list his accomplishment in Chicago or In Illinois or in US Senate. He was chairman of one committee in US Sen. He never held a single meeting. He has zero record of holding a session and acting chairman on any business.

                  I never seen him North Side nor he has espouse any legal or community organizing substantive theory to solve problem. Murders goes on, Drug goes on, Blacks are thrown in prisons while Obama is AWOL.

                  No one can indicate any achievement that mean helluva beans. I published major articles on black America during those times and got overwhelming response from black people. Like that Flat Earth authors says achievements in White House has been sub par, that do not move ball fair distance.

                  Thank you for not being racist

                  • 1 vote
                  #24.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:43 PM EDT

                  GODGRAVITON - You ARE aware President Obama is not going to show up on the northside or anywhere else in Chicago regularly, right? He's the President - so specific cities are not going to get his attention. That is why we have a Mayor and a Governor. Each has their own job to do.

                  You truly are missing how things work. Please get a clue. Obviously you're not from the US and have recently moved here. That's clear.

                  And, you need to do some homework on what has been accomplished and how much farther we have to go. You should also know that the GOP has obstructed this President from day one. But that doesn't fit in with your goals so you don't need to acknowledge the true facts.

                  And, as a white woman who is a strong supporter of President Obama I am far from racist.

                  • 3 votes
                  #24.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:55 PM EDT

                  ....are you purple, Godgraviton ?

                    #24.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:29 PM EDT
                    Reply

                    Were these same news media in Mitt's press person face asking him about the republican PAC's ads and that Ricketts person? It is amazing how when the repubs whine and cry how the media jumps to their defense and tries to smooth away their hurt.

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#25 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:12 PM EDT
                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 7
                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.