Wanna talk about the Middle East, huh? Qadaffi's out - with no loss of American lives! Assad's on the way out - with no loss of American lives! Bin Laden's taking the dirt nap - with no loss of American lives!

NEXT!!!!!!!!

maxx power What really is pathetic is how the republican party has not worked with the President. "Our only goal is to make this a one term President" is not doing anything to fix the problems in this country.

Beyond pathetic maxx!

OBAMA-BIDEN 2012

really! pathetic? the man, romney, speaks but doesnt know what he said. he is prince john creating more taxes for the labor class and less for his cronnies. he is not an american, but an allien from super rich land. his presidency would be worst than all the wars put together, and speaking of wars i dont want any and he wants plenty. NO THANKS!

Oh yes. The last Republican administration runs up the largest deficit and causes the deepest recession in our lifetimes, then refuses to cooperate with the current administration on any possible solutions. Yes it's pathetic alright. Maxx, how stupid do you think we are?

Auntie,

I noticed you didn't want to talk about jobs, debt... hmmm wonder way???

BTW "Qaddafi" never a threat to the U.S... Egypt is a mess, Iran is just about to have nukes, Afghanistan is a disaster... oh and Obama did his job when he capped bi laden... even after calling it off three other times, oh, yeah, he did his job... whoopie!! That's what a CIC is supposed to do... kill the enemy!!

Smitty,

It was more important for Obama to pass Obamacare and Dudd/Fwank then it was to get this country back to work... that's what is pathietic... BTW he didn't need the repubs to do it either!!

Like I said, Pathetic!!

Well Maxx, you wonder "way" all you want. You forgot to mention Iraq, Saddam was no threat to us either. Just a vow Jr. made in '99. That turned into a REAL war with lots of American, and civilian casualties. The reason jobs and debt are still issues is because conservatives want to keep them that way. By refusing to vote on a bill or to reach any kind of compromise is a sign of how much action they are willing to take to fix the problem.

Maxx

Ever see the photo of Oblumbles in the SITUATION ROOM when Bin Laden was greased? He looks like the kid from the deli who delivered sandwiches to everyone and was allowed to stay if he was quiet, didn't touch anything and didn't bother any of the adults in the room. LOFLMAO

Trouble is Duped from 3rd World Wisconsin,is that"

l. liberals like you make any prosperous State into a 3rd world country because you want to redistribute the hard earned fruits of the labor of productive citizens to Democrats and other welfare lazy asses.

2. You libs don't understand that by stopping something bad.... that's good. Just because responsible conservatives in Congress won't allow Harry the jerk pass a bill that only favors the welfare scum and hurts the Country in general.... that's not a bad thing!!! Kind of like when your mom didn't allow you to play hop scotch on the train tracks...(although I wish she hadn't been so strict in your case)

Maxx Power

"I noticed you didn't want to talk about jobs, debt... hmmm wonder way???"

GAME ON!! How many straight months of job growth have we had? Where's the stock market? Home values? Nobody seemed to want to talk about debt when the jug-eared tube steak from Texas was president!

"BTW "Qaddafi" never a threat to the U.S... "

How many Americans were on Pan Am Flight 103?

NEXT!!!!!!!!

Maxx Power

I noticed you didn't want to talk about jobs, debt... hmmm wonder way???

Let's talk about jobs:

2008 - 2.6 million jobs LOST

2012 - 1,842,011 jobs GAINED

2011 - 1,061,012 jobs GAINED

Romney's record? 47th out of 50 in job growth.

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth

want to talk about debt?

Bush inherited a balanced budget, with no deficit but still ran up a deficit, adding about $3.5 trillion to the national debt over two terms. Bush also left the Bush tax cuts that were never offset with spending cuts or other revenue gains, which meant they'd add to the debt indefinitely unless repealed. Bush also passed the costly Medicare prescription drug benefit, without coming up with funds or spending cuts to cover the cost of that either, adding more than $100 billion per year to the debt. Bush also left us with two unpaid wars that were finally put on the books by Obama (about $1.4 trillion). Bush also finished off what was left of Social Security which was also put on the books. Bush also left us with an enourmous Bush mortgage interest that keeps adding up: 1.4 trillion - Incremental interest due to higher debt balances

Interest Expense on the Debt Outstanding

In FY2012, as of the end of June 2012, the Treasury Department has spent $376 Billion of your money on interest payments to the holders of the National Debt.

2011 - $454,393,280,417.03

2010 - $413,954,825,362.17

2009 - $383,071,060,815.42

Bush also left us with high unemployment, lost wages and other effects of the 2007-2009 recession that have eliminated about $1.5 trillion off government tax revenue, effectively forcing Washington to borrow that amount to keep operating at a consistent level.

So tell me, how did Bush manage to f*ck up the good thing and leave the biggest $hit for Obama who you so love to blame for 100% of this Bush f*ck up. I know, you will tell me how it's time to stop blaming Bush and I will tel you, until you can prove to me that Obama's clock got zeroed out on January 20, 2009, Bush will be blamed for this mess.

BTW, Who is the smallest government spender since Eisenhower? Would you believe it's Obama?

bob-2579213

l. liberals like you make any prosperous State into a 3rd world country because you want to redistribute the hard earned fruits of the labor of productive citizens to Democrats and other welfare lazy asses.

prove it! Give me some hard evidence that supports your statement. Other than that, STFU!

hey, bobblehead. Walker is turning this state into a 3rd world country. Kill education, Kill public service. Kill the American dream. If you think the fact he has lots of money makes him too smart to listen to the rest of us, you as thick as he is. NOBODY wants to redistribute any ones hard earned fruits of labor. I want to redistribute the exorbitant money the lawmakers are pocketing so people who actually work for a living can afford to live. How many of the proposed legislation have you read? How do you know what's good or bad? Especially in my state.

I personally read at least an overview of most of the "BAD" bills submitted for votes. From the conservative view, the bad part is that they don't have more pork barrel ad-dons to help the rich.

"RomneyHood" PRICELESS!!!

Dope in the model State of Wisconsin

How's that recall going for ya? Did they clean up the State Capital after all you liberal and union pigs $hit all over it? Guess the union slobs that did clean up got paid time and a half, right?

Lord....Please tell me.... why did you give liberals big bleeding hearts and absolutely zero brains????

come back after your 10th b'day, my grandkids will tear you a new one.

Ballie said,

Let's talk about jobs:

2008 - 2.6 million jobs LOST

2012 - 1,842,011 jobs GAINED

2011 - 1,061,012 jobs GAINED

Romney's record? 47th out of 50 in job growth.

Might want to read this and then tell us how great the job market is!!

CNSNews.com) – Twenty-eight months after Congress passed President Obama’s signature economic stimulus law, and nearly one year after he declared the summer of 2010 to be “Recovery Summer,” 1.9 million fewer people are employed.

In February 2009, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that 141.7 million people were employed. By the end of May 2011 – the last month for which data are available – that number had fallen to 139.8 million, a difference of 1.9 million.

While the number of people with jobs has increased slightly from its low point during the recession – 137.9 million in December 2009 – those 1.9 million jobs have been lost despite $800 billion in stimulus spending.

This does not mean that the economy is not creating jobs, but rather that it is not creating jobs fast enough to keep up with a combination of layoffs and people entering the job market for the first time.

Obama administration is a disaster and everybody knows it!!

Ballie,

You really have NO idea what you are talking about do you... the article above just proves it!!

Thanks for playing...BOOM... ROASTED!!

How? by hitting me with their pink purses?

That's all it would take.

Ballie here's more information for your reading pleasure!!

August 3, 2012

(CNSNews.com) - There were 195,000 fewer people employed in the United States in July than in June, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as the national unemployment rate ticked up from 8.2 percent to 8.3 percent.

Meanwhile, 150,000 people simply dropped out of the labor force during the month and did not seek to find a job.

In June, according to BLS, there had been 142,415,000 people employed in the United States. In July, that dropped to 142,220,000--a decline of 195,000.

Similarly, in June, there were 155,163,000 people in the civilian labor force in the United States. To be counted in the civilian labor force, person must be 16 years old or older, not be in the military, prison or a mental institution, and either have a job or have actively looked for a job in the past four weeks.

In July, the number of people in the civilian labor force was 155,013,000--a decline of 150,000 from June.

When Romney releases ten years of reported taxes then we will all see just how unfair the tax structure is in this country which leans towards helping the richest and dumps on the middle class...

Romney-Hood, perfect!

President Obama has shown himself to be, president of all the peoplee and not just the top two percent...

Romney-Hood He, He. He. I love it....

Robin Hood in reverse. Used since 1995 by the libs. Priceless drivel.

You forgot the electric car company in Finland. Still in business but, talk about "off-shoring".

Democrats controlled the Senate and the House during the last two years of the Bush administration, held the Presidency and controlled all of Congress for two years of the Obama administration and now control the Presidency and the Senate. There has been ample time and control for the Democrats to do something fiscally responsible. Yet, our nation is in terrible financial condition. The federal debt has grown to over $16 trillion and annual deficits exceed $1 trillion by far. However, the Democrats did narrowly pass Obamacare which will add another trillion in costs in the near term. If interest rates tick up, which they will, each 1% increase in rate will cost us $160 billion in additional interest costs. Even Hilliary Clinton has stated that our massive debt places us in a much weaker position in the world.

Think about this as Obama tours the nation on Air Force One campaigning about minor issues and trying to divide Americans with class warfare. His fiscal irresponsibility has put us in grave danger and to give him another chance to lead our country would be disastrous. Remember, Obama did prepare a budget, however, it was voted down in the Senate 99-0 and in the House 414-0 with not even one Democrat voting for it. Obama has us on the path to become Greece. He has no budget. He has no plans. He has no ideas. He is totally irresponsibile fiscally.

If Ghadafi was no threat to the US than why did your god Ronnie Reagan go after him? I thought elephants weren't supposed to forget. All I see from elephants these days is elephant poo and no one to clean it up. Keep you muck rakes handy, you're going to need them.

The feeble-minded rightwingers, hahaha. The Tax policy Center reviews Romney's plan--as best they can without more details--and giving it all the benefits of the doubt conclude that Romney wants to give himself even larger tax cuts, and to do it middle class families on average will pay $2,000 more in taxes. Put this into a sound bite and you get Romneyhood, which is Robin Hood in reverse. Nothing desperate there, just genius.

And why are Romney's tax returns so important? Transparency and vetting is important for ALL candidates, especially for POTUS, Commander in Chief, and leader of the free world. Heck, companies will run credit checks on candidates before hiring folks in every day jobs, not to mention getting a mortgage or even approval for a cabinet position.

In particular it is important to see Romney's tax returns. First and foremost because Romney's economic plan, specifically his tax policy is extrinsically linked to how he pays his own taxes. How much would he benefit from his own plan? Voters have a right to know before they go to the polls.

Romney in particular needs to be thoroughly vetted in the area of tax returns, in part due to his vast wealth--setting a historic record--but more importantly because of Romney's track record of NEVER releasing tax returns when he ran for the Senate and then ran for Governor. When he ran for governor, ALL his opponents released many years of tax returns, and Romney still refused to release his -- And instead had the temerity to complain that his opponent's spouse needed to release returns. WTF?

And during these prior campaigns Romney was caught lying about where he filed his taxes in order to cheat on eligibility to run for governor. When he got busted for filing in Utah (where he saved a bunch on $$$) instead of Massachusetts, at first he lied saying he did not know this had happened. Then he was busted for trying to pay taxes in Massachusetts retroactively to avoid getting caught in the first place. There still is no proof that he paid the Massachusetts taxes. Regardless he did such a poor job as governor that he wouldn't have been reelected, and Massachusetts will overwhelming reject Romney in the 2012 election. WTF!?

Aside from transferring the Bahama's trust corp. into Ann's name the day before he was sworn in, and taking the hard drives when he left as governor, Romney blatantly and repeatedly LIED about filing taxes in Massachusetts. We see the same pattern now, with his adamant "It’s untrue, dishonest, and inaccurate. It’s wrong" thou-dost-protest-too-much denial. We see the uncomfortable hehehe laugh when cornered about his finances, and the LIE that he doesn't know if he ever paid less than a 13.9% tax rate, and the second LIE that he will be happy to check and get back with the media.

Of course Romney always does this when on video to deflect, then NEVER gets back with the press reverting to his stance that his finances are private. And he's doing it again, right now. Well of course, because he knows all the other years that he paid less than a 13.9% tax rate, and in fact there may be a year or more when he paid zero taxes. How would that look?

People who defend release of only two recent, sanitized returns ("flukes") with the 2010 still missing important information, and the 2011 being held until as close to the election as possible -- These folks are a delusional minority. Even Ed Rollins and other Republicans say these two years are not sufficient.

Those who parrot Romney's lame excuse the McCain released only two years are not being intellectually honest. McCain's financials have been out for all the years he has been in the Senate, and McCain does not have a portfolio like Romney's and more importantly had not already been caught in lies about his taxes.

Too late. The majority of voters already know Romney is not trustworthy on many levels. Whether extreme flip-flopping, being vague on positions, and just general secrecy, the man is not presidential material. That Romney would be so arrogant to think he could get away with not releasing his tax returns is an insult to the intelligence of the American people.

Romney is so greedy and tight he wouldn't pay taxes starting in 2002 when he knew he would start running for president, or even by 2007 when he did run for president. This in itself tells one a lot about Romney, and his sense of entitlement and belief that he doesn't have to play by the same rules as everyone else. I question Romney's mental stability--not just the bullying, impersonating a cop, not liking to be touched, lack of social skills--the man is not "right in the head."

Romney -- He's not in it for you.

Maxx Power

This does not mean that the economy is not creating jobs, but rather that it is not creating jobs fast enough to keep up with a combination of layoffs and people entering the job market for the first time.

Obama administration is a disaster and everybody knows it!!

Ballie,

You really have NO idea what you are talking about do you... the article above just proves it!!

Thanks for playing...BOOM... ROASTED!!

we all know that the jobs are not created fast enough, you are not telling me something I don't already know. But what you fail to answer is how the alternative RomneyHood is going to do it when he FAILED at the teeny-weeny Massachusetts.

Your Romney can't even put Massachusetts on his resume, or the Olympics, or Bain....so again, let's talk about jobs.

By the way, how is your Republican JOBS!JOBS!JOBS! coming along? Show me one thing that the Republicans have done since Jan of 2010 that created jobs? Vaginal probing bills?

Tell me, why are the Republicans blocking:

S. 3364 (Bring Jobs Home Act ) A bill to provide an incentive for businesses to bring jobs back to America.

or

S. 3816 (Creating American Jobs and Ending Offshoring Act ) A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create American jobs and to prevent the offshoring of such jobs overseas.

libsux

Romney Hood, rob from the poor and give to the rich? Are you
kidding me – where do you lobbies get this trash? But you really believe it?

Study: Romney tax plan would result in cuts for rich, higher burden for others. Romney's plan to overhaul the tax code would produce cuts for the richest 5 percent of Americans — and bigger bills for everybody else.

The study was conducted by researchers at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center - which Romney called "nonpartisan" before his usual, daily flip flop.

bayllie - Suggest you once again (as I have caught you doing this several times) check facts before you spew. When Romney went into office. Mass. was 50th in job creation. 47th came at the end of his time in office. Where I went to school, that is called "i-m-p-r-o-v-e-m-e-n-t". Get it?

And the false equivalencies from rightwingers have been mind-bending as well. Really? "You people" think attacking the president for conspiracy theories like his birth certificate compares to Romney releasing 8-10 years of his tax returns, which are always released by candidates? Or that college transcripts, which are never released by candidates compares to releasing tax returns? Seriously!? Or Eric Fuhrman equating Harry Reid's claim that he has a source who told him Romney has not paid his fair share of taxes is the same as McCarthyism? WTF!?

Sweet Jeebus the rightwing has gone off a cliff. They are completely insane, ignorant, and lacking any Rule of Reason.

This sounds like the old "Workers of the world unite" argument. Of course even Red China has rejected the idea. Maybe the President thinks that we should model our economy after North Korea.

How about those in government steeling from those not in government. The President promised to cut the federal deficit in half by the end of his first term. To do that the 2012 federal deficit cannot exceed 229.27 billion dollars yet the President's own White House is predicting that the deficit will exceed 1.3 trillion dollars. I estimate that this additional 1 trillion plus dollars will end up costing the tax payers more than 9 trillion to repay over the next 170 years. High government salaries and benefits, boondoggles, and waste is where a lot of it is going. I hope that everyone is enjoying riding on those high speed trains that those shovel ready jobs that we have borrowed money to pay for, have provided. What the unemployed needs is better infrastructure that they can use to get to jobs that they do not have. The President is the federal government's chief executive officer and is ultimately responsible for federal spending. I want the President to explain to the people how he is going to keep his promise regarding the deficit. I want the President, as chief executive officer to provide a plan for paying back all of this money that the federal government owes. I think that the tax payers have a right to know what all this money that the federal government has been borrowing is going to end up costing them. Rather than predict what his opponent might do, I want the President to tell us what he is going to do to keep his promised regarding the economy.

Talk to the Hand

bayllie - Suggest you once again (as I have caught you doing this several times) check facts before you spew. When Romney went into office. Mass. was 50th in job creation. 47th came at the end of his time in office. Where I went to school, that is called "i-m-p-r-o-v-e-m-e-n-t". Get it?

You're too funny. I don't claim that Romney didn't improve his unemployment by 0.9% but I am claiming that overall, his record sucked:

The Massachusetts jobs growth over that period, a pitiful 0.9 percent, badly lagged other high-skill, high-wage, knowledge economy states like New York (2.7 percent), California (4.7 percent) and North Carolina (7.6 percent).
MAss suffered the second-largest labor force decline in the nation: Only Louisiana, which was ravaged by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, saw a bigger decline in its labor force than Massachusetts during Romney’s tenure as governor.

46 states did better than Mass

Romney is like a high school kid who improved his grade from F average to D- average but claims that if he gets into college he will get an A average.

BTW, Romney's predecessor - Cellucci - was also a Republican and as you nicely point out, his ranking sucked.

But moron, 49 did better than the state before that. And all you libs claim it takes more than four years to clean up the mess you inherit. You are just too funny and too easy.

And at 4.9%, what company in their right mind would move there to have no labor pool to draw from?

I'll wait.

Talk to the Hand

But moron, 49 did better than the state before that.

so you are happy with being 47th? By comparison, Massachusetts ranked 37th in job growth under Swift, and it ranked 10th in Patrick’s first term (which was right after Romney!). Again, Romney's rank is right next to post-Katrina Luisiana. THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE PROUD OF???? Befor and after Romney looks 1000% better!

BTW, between July 2002 and July 2006, 222,000 more residents left Massachusetts for other states than came to it. That decline largely explains the state’s decreasing unemployment rate.

And all you libs claim it takes more than four years to clean up the mess you inherit. You are just too funny and too easy.

I will ask you again, if Romney could not clean up the mess in a teeny weeny Massachusetts BEFORE the financial meltdown, why is he being critical of President Obama who inherited Financial meltdown and a $hit for economy???

When Obama took office, the collapsing U.S. economy had contracted by a shocking 8.9 percent the previous quarter. 820,000 Americans lost their jobs that month; all told 2.2 million jobs disappeared in the 3 months before the February 2009 passage of the stimulus.

So please explain to me how is Romney's 2003-2007 Mass economy compares to what we witnessed in Fall 2008/Spring 2009?

And at 4.9%, what company in their right mind would move there to have no labor pool to draw from?

that's your excuse? That companies wouldn't move to Mass so it's not Romnye's fault?

So tell me, knowing what you know, why are the Republicans blocking bills that would bring jobs to USA:

S. 3364 (Bring Jobs Home Act ) A bill to provide an incentive for businesses to bring jobs back to America.

or

S. 3816 (Creating American Jobs and Ending Offshoring Act ) A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create American jobs and to prevent the offshoring of such jobs overseas.

Why would companies move to the US when they can get a nice fat tax break for offshoring their jobs to China and India???

Another question which you righties refuse to answer: If Romney did so great in Mass, why is he refusing to talk about his "stellar" job growth record? Is Romney bashful or does he know that talking about being 47th out of 50 states is just embarrassing?

BTW, calling someone a moron is not an accomplishment- any 1st-grader can do that. Proving your claim with hard facts is. So please prove to me how Romney is just bragging about his record as Governor of Mass, and please prove to me how being 47th out of 50 is good.

I'll wait.

Smitty-4183671 -- Agreed. Even more funny was Team Romney's "Obamabaloney." The reverse Romney Hood makes a clear point based on fact, but the baloney silliness is what? Another false equivalency based on nothing that just makes Romney look childish.

Oh please. Reid is presiding over a split Senate. The majority in the House is Republican and they have done more harm than good - imperiling our national credit rating with their debt ceiling dramatics, conducting witch hunts of Muslims in government and harassing the Attorney General to get in the news.

Hey Amy.... who imperiled our Credit rating??? the Party that wants and wanted to put a stop to the crazy spending or the one who spent money that would have had a better use if it was put into toilet paper??? Wow are you libs STUPID!!!!

Bob, that phony debt fight was about funding the existing debt, much of which was incurred through a useless war in Iraq, tax cuts, and Medicare changes. You know, the stuff they don't talk about on Fox.

RTFS

How much debt have the Presidents accumulated Washington to Bush Jr and how much has the Hope Dope accumulated in his one and hopefully only term??

Numbers don't lie lib although libs lie about numbers all the time!!

How many bills has the House pass?

You mean the bills that screw over the America people, in which Harry Reid blocked.

Job

What would that scrawny skinny nerd know about "screwing"????

Bob you keep repeating numbers don't lie and you are unable to give us your facts and your numbers that authenticate your facts, Baylle, challanged you with facts and real numbers plus source but you have not bothered to disprove yet throwing stupid verbiage all over the place. Can you disprove Baylle? Are you this numb and dumb?

Unac Boston - Bob is unable to post anything of real value. He resorts to calling our President childish names because the GOP is running absolutely NOTHING of value in Mitt. So, Bob throws out his indignation - backed by nothing - his no facts and thinks we should all be impressed.

But, there is absolutely NOTHING impressive about the GOP and their rogues gallery of misfits.

Obama/Biden 2012

Seeking Sanity

So you keep on doing the same thing, moron and you'll get the same results...voting for a commie and you'll get communism.

Wow are libs dumb

Unac - Here is a fact for you. The number of people employed int the US dropped by over 195,000 from June to July.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. Look it up.

Bob, and when you vote for corporate Fascism you get Corporate FASCISM. (2 can play that silly little game)

Bob

They actually are stupid.

Bobxxxxxxxx (paid shill)

Hey Amy.... who imperiled our Credit rating??? the Party that wants and wanted to put a stop to the crazy spending or the one who spent money that would have had a better use if it was put into toilet paper??? Wow are you libs STUPID!!!!

Which United States political party wants and wanted to put a stop to the crazy spending?

FROM: www.chadwickresearch.com/blog/2010/10/29/government-spending-as-a-proportion-of-gdp/

Spending may be going up, even in real terms, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the government is taking over the economy, socialism, and all that fun stuff the Tea Partiers like to crow about. Now, I don’t claim that this is a unique insight; government spending as a proportion of GDP is a fairly common measurement in comparative political economic analysis. As a note, measuring spending as a proportion of GDP also helps control for the effects of inflation, since both nominal GDP and federal spending will track inflation at more or less the same rate. snip

This view presents some very interesting information for trendwatchers, in part because it doesn’t show government spending spiraling out of control. In fact, it shows that most government spending is growing more or less in line with the economy as a whole. The most volatile part of current government spending is the defense budget. The FRED data shows that non-defense federal spending has been fairly steady at 2%-3% of GDP. Defense spending registers as larger (often substantially larger) than non-defense spending, and state-and-local-governments are responsible for almost 2/3 of total government spending.

Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush 2 increased government spending AND government jobs more than any Democrats in US history.

..."If I can't turn this economy around in 3 years, this Administration is going to be a one term deal"....

Barack Hussine Oblumbles

What was he talking about turning the economy to Tommy? To a completely communistic one??

It took FDR more than 4 years to dig us out of the Hoover Mess. So, our President needs more time to clean up the Bush mess.

Obama – Biden 2012 - Still Cleaning Up Bush’s Mess!!!

FDR prolonged the depression and set this Country on the path to socialism like no one before or since, with the exception of President Oblumbles.

Bob,

Since you are a Romney Fan, please tell me how many jobs did Mitt Romney create as Gov of Mass? Please tell me where he stands on any issue? I will be waiting for your answer!!

I want the exact numbers of jobs and your sources. If you can not find please tell me how many jobs he create at Bain Capital?

Insanity right? Like giving the wealthy "job creators" more tax cuts, because that's worked so well in increasing employment. BTW - overseas jobs don't count. Or how about repealing Dodd/Frank, so the financial markets can go back to those happy days of less regulation, we can have another meltdown, and they can walk away with big profits and the protections of another Bush-era bailout.

RTFS

Your team is playing in the superbowl and after the first half, is down 35 -0. Your quarterback has thrown 6 interceptions and ran the wrong way for a touchdown for the opposing team. In addition, every time he went into the huddle in the first half, instead of calling a play, he announced...."PRESENT".

Here's the question: Do you start him in the second half, or tell him to take in a round of golf or another vacation??

Lord..... why did you make life so hard......simply by making all liberals so friggen stupid????

Lord...PLEASE give bob-2579213 a heart and some brains. And please Lord....give him courage to admit when he is wrong.

So Bob, like your candidate, you've got nothing. Go play in the kiddie pool now, where the name calling and wild statements devoid of fact are socially acceptable at least.

FRTS

Did you and Diane know that when Joe Biden went for his brain transplant, the brain surgeons diagnosed it as an "implant"operation?

So you don't mind the government controlling a woman's uterus but let them dare mess even one iota with your money and your greedy little squeal comes out. Typical.

I own lots of guns Bob. I hunt. I don't personally know a dem that doesn't. That argument is as good as your.."oh yeah, well..shut up"

Doppey from Wisconsin, FRTS, BJ1 and any other lib out there....Tell me

WHY WAS PRESIDENT Oblumbler selling assault weapons to Mexican drug lords, gang members and criminals? Was he just trying to "even the playing field" with law abiding American citizen gun owners in the border States?

Well Bob, you got us there. Probably because it's been an American tradition since the 60's to give guns to people we don't like to help them remove people we don't like even more. Same as sending money. Obama didn't start it, and if conservatives would do SOMETHING, ANYTHING, someone might vote to stop it some day.

So Tell me Dean Wormer, why did the Obama Administration sell guns to the Mexican criminals??? Were the Dumbocraps that hard up for campaign funds? Why didn't all those morons in Hollywood chip in??? LOFLMAO!!

America....Stop the Gun Violence and Slaughter on our streets! Stop the Gunrunners in Washington D.C. Vote "NOBAMA" in November!! (Hell in the process, we might even get a Vice President whos I.Q. number is greater than his neck size!)

you must be Blutto, or is it Flounder?

Actually Neidermer would be closer to me, lol

Yeah, and WE ALL know what a great character Neidermer was!

Still waiting Bob!!

Since you are a Romney Fan, please tell me how many jobs did Mitt Romney create as Gov of Mass? Please tell me where he stands on any issue? I will be waiting for your answer!!

I want the exact numbers of jobs and your sources. If you can not find please tell me how many jobs he create at Bain Capital?

Well Tommy

I can think of two definite jobs three definite jobs that were created by the last two Democratic Presidents!

President Bill, the draft dodger Clinton created a job for another American citizen by in 1967-68 that had to take his place when he draft-dodged his military duty. Another job he created was in the oval office and there is proof of that on a blue dress somewhere.

Lastly, President Oblumbles created an opening in some village in Delaware for its "idiot" positon when he named Joe Biteme as his vice president.

Bob,

So this is your answer!! Just say you do not know or you do not have a clue!! This is your state of mind, and until you prove to me that you have a brain please do not challenge me again!!

Go back to watching cartoons on Fox News. Debate me!! Like taking candy from a baby!!!

I agree,debating you has been like taking candy from a baby. It's also like trying to reason with one too. Whine much libby? Better get your crying towels ready for November!! LOL

I guess we would have to see George Soros, and Resko's tax returns to see Oblumbels filings for the last ten years, right Rob?

Bobby boy,

Neither is running for POTUS. While you're at it let's see Al Capone's ols returns too.

Nice try

blearybrained

Why was the Obama Administration running guns? I thought Barack was afraid of things that go boom?

Wasn't he going to outlaw war too? Why can't we all just get along????

Bob, I thought you posted that you were going back to work

Mom

... I'm sorry but this is a liberal site and there are only 3 liberal brain cells floating between all the Obamie posters here at any one time. That is why it takes them so long to reply to any question and it's the reason the Democratic Party is considering an I.Q. tax.... trying to take advantage of the number difference between the average Democratic and Republican intelligence levels. Though greatly outnumbered by registered democratic voters(dead and alive), the intelligence levels wouldmake Conservative and Republican voters pay ten times the amount of taxes than the Democrats.

Remember.... the Democratic Party chose an ass as their party mascot because they thought it best represented their average intelligence profile.

bob-2579213

Mom

... I'm sorry but this is a liberal site and there are only 3 liberal brain cells floating between all the Obamie posters here at any one time.

And yet, here you are. Shedding more heat than light and not contributing anything to the brain cell pool.

College transcripts Obama paid 4 million to cover up. How come? What is there to hide about college transcripts that would be so damaging? That needs to be cleared up. End of story.

College transcripts.

Tommy

...."it not know"???

are you running out of your medications??

Are you really Joe Biden??? (Our first semi-functioning moron Vice President)

Kinda hard for all of the tea party to take that position, when the Kochs fund most of them.