Romney's search for a VP appears to narrow

 

Mitt Romney’s search for a running mate appears to have narrowed, as clues to whom Romney might select as his No. 2 begin to pile up in the media.

A campaign that prides itself on discipline had, to date, exacted tight control over the process of vetting candidates to serve at the former Massachusetts governor’s No. 2, a fact that Romney bragged on Tuesday.

"I get a kick out of some of the speculation that goes on," Romney told Sean Hannity of Fox News in an interview to air this evening. "I'm not going to comment on the process of course, but I can tell you this: only Beth Myers and I know who is being vetted."

That comment came amid new reports on Tuesday that Marco Rubio, the popular Florida Republican senator, had not been asked – yet, at least – to submit the materials typically associated with vetting a vice presidential candidate.

Sen. Marco Rubio, (R-FL), discusses the housing market in Florida; how the US can profit from free trade agreements in Latin America and why the nation needs to update its immigration laws.

ABC News initially reported that Rubio wasn’t being vetted, and the Washington Post followed up with indications that Rubio hadn’t made it past an initial review by Romney’s high command.

Romney’s quip to Fox served as a knowing acknowledgement, though, of what members of the media have encountered in their search for details on the veepstakes: News is fleeting, largely because the Romney campaign’s high command keeps details on lockdown.

Even some of the most plugged in advisers to Romneyworld profess genuine ignorance of the vetting process.

Myers, Romney’s former chief of staff as governor, is leading the search for a prospective vice president. She might lack some of the skills of political figures previously tasked with her job – John McCain had power lawyer A.B. Culvahouse lead his vetting in 2008 – but Myers is described as a figure whom Romney holds in high esteem. She was selected precisely because it would mean no leaks, and because she understands Romney and his desire for an experienced vice presidential candidate who won’t overshadow the top of the ticket.

Other broad contours of the process have emerged, too. A New York Times story earlier this week floated the idea that Romney could introduce his choice in July, well before the Republican convention in August. Most presidential nominees traditionally reveal their choice of a running mate shortly before their nominating convention.

Larry Downing / Reuters

GOP candidate Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign event at the Bavarian Inn Lodge in Frankenmuth, Mich.

The Times also included a kicker paragraph that suggested that the Romney campaign might be wary of selecting Chris Christie, since the bombastic New Jersey governor might threaten to overshadow Romney.

One informal Romney adviser suggested that a candidate who’s seen his stock improve is former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, in part because Pawlenty would do anything but overshadow Romney. A runner-up in the 2008 veepstakes, Pawlenty is said to be especially appealing to Ann Romney, who’s built a rapport with Pawlenty’s wife, Mary.

Ohio Sen. Rob Portman and Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan are also generally perceived as short-listers for Romney. Each of them, along with Pawlenty, joined Romney for portions of his swing-state bus tour over the last five days.

Officially, most of the Republicans thought to be candidates for the vice presidency have also declined to comment on the process.

"I won't discuss the vice presidential process, out of respect for Gov. Romney," Rubio said Tuesday on CNBC. "I know he is going to make a great choice."

That means that, until the pick is made known, observers are more likely to learn about the process through candidate attrition. Case in point: Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels agreed to become the next president of Purdue University, removing his name from the list of candidates, though he wasn’t ever seen as Romney’s likely running mate.

MSNBC's Alex Wagner and the NOW panel discuss the progress of the Romney bus tour and a new report that says that Marco Rubio has not been vetted for Mitt Romney's running mate.

The few-and-far-between details stand in contrast to the McCain campaign in 2008, which had basically broadcast publicly that the Arizona Republican wished to select his friend, the independent Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, as his running mate. With the exception of McCain’s ultimate selection of Sarah Palin as his vice presidential nominee, much about the Republican’s campaign wasn’t secret.

The Romney campaign seems determined to learn from McCain’s mistakes, maybe even to a fault. The process of vetting a vice presidential candidate can be political in its own right; look no further than a top Rubio advocate’s pushback to BuzzFeed about the Florida senator’s supposed exclusion from Romney’s short list.

But in leaking few details about their search, the Romney campaign also loses out on an opportunity to show they’ve at least made an effort to seek out various candidates whose mere consideration might be needed to placate certain corners of the party.

In particular, few women except for New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte – a freshman lawmaker from New England with only scant federal experience – are thought to be under consideration by Romney.

"I think, unfortunately, Palin poisoned the well on that," said one informal Romney adviser, fretting that any woman selected as VP would draw inevitable comparisons to the former Alaska governor. "I would guess if I were inside the Romney mind that they're worried that any woman chosen will be subjected to a higher level of scrutiny. "

But beyond Rubio, there are virtually no candidates for the vice presidential slot who would represent any diversity on the Republican ticket, a dicey proposition given Romney’s political deficits with women and Latino voters, as well as his opponent this fall: the nation’s first black president.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 7 8 9

Nothing against Romney personally-I 'm just sick and tired of another millionaire on an ego-trip who wants control of the levers of power for his Wall St friends..and his own family. This Texan Independent is going to vote for someone else !His choice of VP is irrelevent-the American people aere sick of the GOP !

  • 2 votes
Reply#205 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:41 AM EDT

Here is some news. People will vote for anyone who is not named Obama. He is out. My gawd, Putin just eat his lunch. This man has no idea what the heck he is doing. We need him out before he does even more damage.

    #205.1 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:10 AM EDT

    You think Romney knows what he's doing? Puh-leeze!! He's an elitist empty suit without a platform who expects to win simply because he "isn't Obama." The pathetic thing is that people will actually vote for him. Obama has been constrained by a do-nothing, obstructionist Congress (read House of Representatives) for almost half of his presidency. How the h*ll is supposed to have gotten anything done?! I'd still give him an "A" on foreign policy. And from what I'm hearing out of Romney's pie-hole around foreign policy, I'd give him a "Z."

    • 1 vote
    #205.2 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:52 PM EDT

    So p*ssed off thinks that limp wrist Willard is going to be able to strong arm Putin. ARE YOU FOR REAL?? Maybe Romney can learn to say gosh or gee whiz in Russian, that will impress them. Just because you don't like Obama doesn't mean Romney is better. This place will be a wasteland after 4 years of a Romney economy, but hey at least the rich will be even richer.

      #205.3 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:48 PM EDT
      Reply

      While I was watching TV, I switched to the Daily Show and watched Hanoi Hannity discredit our president with an edited tape on his immigration position. At least Stewart played the whole tape, and we were able to see that Obama did what he said he could legally do. Fox foreign owned media has done a terrible disservice to our country and edited tapes are only one reason why Fox is not allowed to broadcast in Canada.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#206 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:44 AM EDT

      Wrong. Fox News is not illegal in Canada. Fox is a standard channel offered by many cable companies, available on-Air from broadcasters transmitted from the states to many Canadians, and of course available on satellite or internet delivery.

      • 1 vote
      #206.1 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:07 AM EDT

      MSDNC fans have to try their best to divert attention away from NBC because NBC is working on making a name for themselves of manipulators of taped information to suit their purposes.

        #206.2 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:49 AM EDT

        Chris - Are you trying to be cute with the Hanoi Hannity? You do realize that has absolutely no relevance to what is happening today? It was Hanoi Jane Fonda from back in the 60s. BTW, she is a big Obama supporter just like all the other so called Holly Wood elite.

          #206.3 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:58 AM EDT

          Keep spouting Ricky! You look dumber (if that is possible) with every post.

            #206.4 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:30 AM EDT

            Say What?-809562

            Your opinion and $2 just might get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

              #206.5 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 12:45 PM EDT

              Fox is not illegal in Canada is just isn't referred to as news. They categorize it as it should be, right wing hack entertainment.

                #206.6 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:50 PM EDT
                Reply

                What the news media does and how they manipulate America. The one man CNN left out of the debates: He actually made sense. Goes to show who the real manipulators of the American vote are.

                http://www.ontheissues.org/Gary_Johnson.htm

                  Reply#207 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:00 AM EDT

                  It would be great seeing Rubio run around to all the spainish speaking stations and point out that everything Obama does is only good enough till after the election.

                    Reply#208 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:31 PM EDT

                    IT IS A SHAM ANYWAY, WHO CARES WHO THE VP NOMINEE IS?

                    Romney ONLY got selected because the STUPID voters only get their news from the LIBERAL media. If the Liberals get their news from the liberal media and decide based on that who to nominate from their camp that makes sense. When those that CLAIM to be conservative make their political decisions based on what the LIBERAL media tells them it isn't ignorance, it is retardation, and that is what happened for Romney. The LIBERAL media poisoned everyone to any candidate that might actually have a chance at beating Barry in the upcoming election, and so we get stuck with Romney, a guy that has in the past been anything put a Conservative Republican, always going towards the Liberal or Moderate ideals in his actual activities. Even if Romney does get elected (he won't), he is almost as Liberal as Barry is.

                    Of course this is how the Democratic Party keeps control when unemployment is so high and the Liberals now want more illegal aliens to come here and take even more jobs away from Americans. ROME IS BURNING AND NERO IS PLAYING GOLF.

                      Reply#209 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

                      And I'm sure all you watch is Fox "news" and listen to AM radio. So you are just as STUPID as anyone else who gets their news from a BIASED source. The biggest trick Fox "news" ever pulled was to make their sheep think that any other news outlet is the liberal media. It's pure genius. The GOP lemmings eat it up like filet mignon.

                        #209.1 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:39 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        Who was the genius who called our president by his middle name? Jason right? Hussien is unfortunately a popular name-that his parents gave him and its unwise to equate a middle name given at birth and ASSUME it equates a persons religion. When you ASSUME you end up making an A$$ of yourself.

                        As for Romney- he does not impress me much at all. I do not like the types of people he associates with. He is untrustworthy period.

                        I will say I do not always agree with OBAMA and his policies-but I agree more than disagree. My vote is going to the policies that I agree with. Go Obama 2012!

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#210 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 4:11 PM EDT

                        "John McCain had power lawyer A.B. Culvahouse lead his vetting in 2008" Sounds like they probably ignored everything that guy had to say. Either that or old A.B. is an idiot.

                          Reply#211 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:34 PM EDT

                          Now Paw-Paw for VP. Can the GOPhers get any more ridiculous? First the pubbie establishment force Romoney down the cornservatives throats. Now Romoney chooses Paw-Paw(or soon will) as his running mate. Wasn't Paw-Paw the first candudate thrown under the bus by the puggies as not cornservative enough. Unbelieveable! Prepare to swallow again cornservatudes.

                            Reply#212 - Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:49 AM EDT

                            Romney does what is best for him , always.
                            Veterans, military retirees; note that Romney PROMOTED THE DRAFT, then skipped out to France for extraordinary lenth of time when church missionary tours were limited. When Romney came home, he sided with his dad that the whole Viet Nam War was a scam and that he was against the war. His early flip flops, he is good at.
                            Promoting the draft, while Americans were dieing, he skipped out, then says he wishes he could have participated. Pro church, Anti Americam.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#213 - Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:48 AM EDT

                            I voted for Obama last election. Here is my opinion. Obama has his herd, Romney has his. In order to win you need to appeal to the independents. I think Romney should pick someone like Rand Paul in hopes of grabbing middle voters that supported his father. It might be enough to win. My problem with other choices is that the Republicans have moved away from true conservatism fiscally just as much as Dems have. Both parties are about big money backers. So the choice lately has been either support big social spending, or support big defense spending and Wars. Neither party gets "small" business, and that is the element that is suffering enough. Just as an outsider, I think Rubio appears smart, Ryan comes across well. Everyone sorta likes Christy but you just know he will say something wrong. No matter who wins, I hope the country can come together and heal, all this media bashiing of Americans of different beliefs will only divide us..

                              Reply#214 - Thu Jun 28, 2012 5:58 PM EDT

                              Thank you Martin. For a while I thought I was pretty much alone, camped out here in the middle. What I have found is that both sides lie. A lot. The hard part is to try to figure out what they are lying about, and why. Then try to see which side comes closer to what you want to have happen. It sucks, but it's all we have right now. I was a Romney Supporter in 2008 because of his health care reform in Mass. So guess what! Now I have to support Obama if I want to keep it. How crazy is that?

                                #214.1 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 1:00 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                Romney will pick Hillary Clinton as his VP in a spirit of bipartisan cooperation.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#215 - Mon Jul 2, 2012 3:54 PM EDT
                                Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 7 8 9
                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.