White House: Clinton and Obama on same page regarding Bush tax cuts

In the past 24 hours, Republicans have seized on what they called supportive statements by top Democrats -- former President Bill Clinton and former Obama White House economic adviser Larry Summers -- for extending the so-called Bush tax cuts.

One example of this: “Even Bill Clinton came out for it, before he was against it, and then, you know, Larry Summers, the president's former economic adviser this morning came out in favor of this,” House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said during a press conference.

Another example: Sen. John Thune (R-SD) said on the Senate floor he would make “the same argument actually that former president Bill Clinton has been making and that is we need to extend these tax rates.”

But White House Press Secretary Jay Carney today pushed backed on the GOP effort, saying that there is no gap between their views on this and President Obama's.

“There is no daylight between President Clinton and President Obama” on extending the tax cuts for the middle class but not for the wealthy, Carney told reporters aboard Air Force One as the president traveled to California for campaign events.

And when asked about the earlier reports suggesting Summers favored their extension, Carney simply said, “I don’t think that’s what Summers meant.”

In fact, the transcript agrees with Carney, according to the Wall Street Journal, which corrected its original report of Summers' statement on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." Summers never once mentioned the tax cuts.

MSNBC’s BRZEZINSKI: Larry Summers, let’s start with you. You heard Bill Clinton talking about the tax cuts. We had terrible unemployment numbers coming out last week. What would you advise the president to do at this point?

SUMMERS: Look, the real risk to this economy is on the side of slowdowns. Certainly not on the side of overheating. And that means we’ve got to make sure that we don’t take the gasoline out of the tank at the end of this year. That’s got to be the top priority. We’ve got to make sure that what we keep providing support to the economy. The areas where we have done that, like support for the auto industry, we haven’t had great results but much better results. In the areas where we aren’t able to do what we wanted to do, areas like preserving jobs for teachers, areas like construction and investment and maintenance of the country’s infrastructure, you look at the employment report, and we’ve really got terrible results. So the key priority has got to be for the short run making sure that there’s the energy to keep the economy growing, because we’re not going to do anything about the deficit unless we do that.

As for Clinton, he appeared to suggest -- in an interview yesterday with CNBC -- that all the Bush tax cuts should be extended temporarily, though he stated he opposes their permanent extension.

"I think what it means is they will have extend-- they will probably have to put everything off until early next year. That's probably the best thing to do right now," Clinton said. "But the Republicans don't want to do that unless he agrees to extend the tax cuts permanently, including for upper income people. And I don't think the president should do that. That's going to-- that's what they're fighting about."

But Clinton then added, "I don't have any problem with extending all of it now, including the current spending level."

Clinton's office later issued a statement, clarifying that he opposes extending the tax cuts for the wealthy. "[O]n extending the Bush tax cuts, as President Clinton has said many times before, he supported extending all of the cuts in 2010 as part of the budget agreement, but does not believe the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans should be extended again. In the interview, he simply said that he doubted that a long-term agreement on spending cuts and revenues would be reached until after the election."

Also aboard Air Force One, Carney responded to criticism from conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh that President Obama’s public appearances with celebrity supporters make him “the male Kim Kardashian.”

Referring to one of Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s top –- and most provocative –- surrogates, Carney said, “Two words: Donald Trump. Next question.”

He also noted that while Obama may have many high-profile backers, his campaign also relies on small-dollar contributions. 

“The fundamental difference is President Obama has vast numbers of small donors who support his campaign. That is not the case for the Republican nominee,” Carney said.

NBC’s Frank Thorp and Kelly O’Donnell contributed reporting.

Discuss this post

Sure. Everybody knows that Bill Clinton is prone to gaffes, I artful with language, and has difficulty speaking "off prompter".

The fact that he once gave his entire State of the Union speech from memory because the wrong speech had been loaded into his TelePrompTer means nothing.

The fact that he so carefully parses his words that the meaning of "is" is open means nothing.

The fact that the man is a political genius means absolutely nothing.

Let's just all listen to Carney.

But for heaven's sake, former president Clinton- keep talking. There are plenty of people eating this up.

  • 9 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 1:57 PM EDT


no joe, no bo, nj

Sure. Everybody knows that Bill Clinton is prone to gaffes,

I believe you meant to say Mitt is more prone to gaffes. Clinton did what he had to do under less restrictive conditions when he was President. President Obama does not have that luxury under a treasonous Congress.


Watch your inuendoes .


  • 7 votes
#2.1 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:05 PM EDT

I believe you meant to say Mitt is more prone to gaffes.

Hi Beverly.

NitWit Mitt, is prone to more mistakes/gaffes than any other person running for the presidency (except Bush).

When the debates begin it will be clear to everyone that Obama is not only the clear choice for us, but the only hope for us to have a successful nation again.

  • 6 votes
#2.2 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:09 PM EDT

Right now 45% of the country solidly say that Obama is not their choice so when you say "US", I take that you are speaking of your small circle of friends.

Gee Soldier, with your numbers, that still leaves me in the majority of the public opinion. If you are on the side that believes that Romney is the best candidate, it is you that is in with a smaller circle of friends.

So, again I will happily and proudly say that I will be supporting president Obama for reelection and that I feel that most of the U.S. feels the same!

  • 5 votes
#2.4 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:30 PM EDT

Mitt = money worshipping sleazeball who gets guidance from a charlatan named Joseph Smith who convinced a lot of gullible people that they should pray to the invisible beings of planet Mongo and marry multiple ladies in prarie dresses.

  • 2 votes
#2.6 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:52 PM EDT

I believe you meant to say Mitt is more prone to gaffes. Clinton did what he had to do under less restrictive conditions when he was President. President Obama does not have that luxury under a treasonous Congress.

Wow Bev, can you really be so dim??? Seriously folks, go back and read post #2 and then Bev's retort #2.1. It's hilarious.

    #2.7 - Thu Jun 7, 2012 12:00 AM EDT
    Reply

    “The fundamental difference is President Obama has vast numbers of small donors who support his campaign. That is not the case for the Republican nominee,” Carney said.

    That is the bottom line.

    The republicans are supported by a select few such as the Koch's/Trumps and other extremely wealthy concerns who will spend as much as possible to get what is good for them while allowing the middle class and the needy to fend for themselves.

    Obama and the democrats support the interests of the average U.S. person. Romney and the GNOP/TP will only legislate on behalf of the wealthiest people that supported them.

    • 6 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:06 PM EDT

    Sorry Soldier, but you are wrong again. I have been living happily and have no reason to believe that anything will change for me in the future.

    It sounds more to me that YOU might be unhappy if you feel that politicians don't care about you. But then again, you are probably looking to closely at the GNOP which has and will always give a person that impression!

    • 5 votes
    #3.2 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:34 PM EDT
    Reply

    Have yiu folks ever listen to the President speaking without the TELE?

    UHHHHHHHHHHHHH, Let me make one thing perfecty clear,

    UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, I will not hesitate to UHHHHHHHHHH,

    I will not run if I do not get elected in November, UHHHHHHHHH.

    Please, please listen and you will hear what my 18 year old and my 17 year old have told me. Please just listen. It is frustrating as hell.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:44 PM EDT

    Don't you mean "Concerned Citizen"?

    • 3 votes
    #4.1 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 2:53 PM EDT

    Concern Citizen - have you listened to Mitt try to talk with and without a teleprompter? Not pretty by any standards. He can't get a complete sentence out no matter how hard he tries. And, heaven forbid you'd actually ask him an even slightly difficult question. He's completely lost!

    Obama will wipe the floor with him in the debates!

    Obama/Biden 2012

    • 4 votes
    #4.2 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 3:23 PM EDT
    Reply

    I've seen Kim K on TV, also Donald Trump. Kim is a good looking loser. The Donald is just an egotistic morally corrupt looser.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#5 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 3:10 PM EDT

    Semantics, a slow news day, media looking for conflict, and the dog team trots out to howl at thin air. Doggie, doggie, your Boehner is gone nuts.

      Reply#6 - Wed Jun 6, 2012 6:57 PM EDT

      Plainly, you are a man who's "gotten higher education." Judging by the sophistication of your humor, you've also spent several decades as a businessman and teacher.

      Semantics? Clinton knows all about the meaning of is. And he knows exactly what he's doing in regard to outting Obama as a farce. Just like I outted you, Assininity, as a trolling liar.

        #6.1 - Thu Jun 7, 2012 12:05 AM EDT
        Reply
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.