DUE TO TECHNICAL ERROR, FIRST THOUGHTS WAS LATE PUBLISHING.
The bin Laden killing, one year later – how quickly things change … Republicans cry foul that Obama campaign is using the death as a reelection weapon … Foreign policy vs. the economy (it’s still the economy) … Is Obama the Warrior in Chief? … Another veep tryout – this time it’s Romney with New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte. … Gingrich to drop out Wednesday.
Believe it or not, tomorrow marks a year since Osama bin Laden was killed. We wrote then: “While it’s doubtful that Osama bin Laden’s death will have as long of a political impact [as 9/11] -- especially in this fast-changing, short-term memory media landscape -- it will surely shape the contours of next year’s presidential race. … Last night changes everything (for now), but we also know how quickly it can dissipate.” And dissipate it did. The president’s bump – for something that was as big a singular accomplishment that any president could have -- was short-lived, because of the economy and the debt-ceiling fight. It’s a reminder of just how important the economy is that the bump was never as big as it would have been under normal circumstances. (By the way, NBC’s Rock Center went inside the decision making of the killing of bin Laden. Brian Williams previewed his interview with the president on Meet the Press. The full show, with interviews of others that were in the room) airs Wednesday at 9:00 pm ET.
Caption: NBC's Domenico Montanaro discusses the politics of the one year anniversary of the Osama Bin Laden raid, and New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte gets a look as a possible vice president for Mitt Romney.
*** Playing politics: Republicans are crying foul at the Obama campaign’s touting of the killing (and using it in a campaign video charging that Mitt Romney might not have made the same call. There are two lines of attack: (1) Republicans are trying to minimize the accomplishment, saying anyone would have done it; and (2) They say he’s politicizing everything, including foreign policy. Ed Gillespie, an adviser to the Romney campaign and former Bush adviser said on Meet the Press: “This is one of the reasons President Obama has become one of the most divisive presidents in American history. He took something that was a unifying event … and he’s managed to turn it into a divisive, partisan, political attack. … I think most Americans will see it as a sign of a desperate campaign.” It’s fascinating to watch Democrats try to demagogue foreign policy, the way Republicans do and have done over the years (see Cheney, Dick in 2004). Republicans usually find themselves almost overreacting when Democrats go over the top in their foreign policy attacks. Count on some REALLY heated cable and Twitter rhetoric this week on this topic as the run-up to the bin Laden anniversary kicks in.

Saul Loeb / AFP - Getty Images
President Barack Obama speaks to troops at Third Infantry Division Headquarters at Fort Stewart in Hinesville, Georgia, on April 27, 2012, prior to Obama signing an Executive Order to protect them from deceptive targeting by educational institutions.
*** Warrior in Chief? The Romney campaign has pushed the issue of foreign policy, trying to paint Obama as weak and appeasing (especially when it comes to Iran). The GOP would have liked to paint the picture of Obama as a feckless, weak president, lacking strength. But despite the rhetoric, Obama’s foreign policy has been incredibly muscular. In fact, Peter Bergen of the New America Foundation in the New York Times Sunday Review provocatively casts President Obama as the “Warrior in chief,” ticking off several of Obama’s foreign-policy raids, killings, and use of drones. The death of bin Laden undercut any hopes Republicans had of being able to paint Obama as Jimmy Carter. And he makes the point of this disconnect: “Despite countervailing evidence, most conservatives view the president as some kind of peacenik. From both the right and left, there has been a continuing, dramatic cognitive disconnect between Mr. Obama’s record and the public perception of his leadership….” Make no mistake, had it failed, that’s exactly how he would have been portrayed. Bergen writes that if Romney runs a risk when criticizing Obama on foreign policy. If he tries to portray him as “a typical, weak-on-national-security Democrat,” then “he will very likely trap himself into calling for a war with Iran, which many Americans oppose.”
*** McCain as top foreign-policy attack dog: Taking the lead on the attack, though, is Sen. John McCain, Obama’s 2008 opponent (who also believes Obama hasn’t had courage to act in Syria). McCain, now a Romney surrogate, said Obama’s “diminishing the memory of September 11th,” and accused him of “doing a shameless end-zone dance.” It’s a fine line. McCain clearly doesn’t mind playing this role. He says things Romney couldn’t get away with and it’s something that’s quite beneficial to Romney. If Romney said what McCain did, Romney might get ridiculed. It’s an interesting role that McCain is willing to play. It could be a preview of the role McCain might play going forward in the campaign -- traditional role of VP, but on foreign policy. McCain doesn’t mind going personal with Obama, as he’s demonstrated since 2008. You can try to explain away McCain’s motives all you want, but it could be oddly effective for Romney.
USA Today's Susan Page, The Washington Post's Dan Balz, and The Chicago Tribune's Clarence Page discuss the Romney campaign's accusation that President Obama is politicizing the death of Osama Bin Laden.
*** STILL THE ECONOMY: But for all the talk of foreign policy and how much credit Obama deserves or whether or how he should be touting it, the most important issue this election – as it was a year ago -- remains the economy. It should be like a flashing red sign – IT’S THE ECONOMY, IT’S THE ECONOMY. Jobs will get a fresh look Friday when the latest report comes out. The unemployment rate has been essentially flat for three months. Even though the rate has come down from a high of 10.0%, if the rate continues to appear not to drop very much or the trajectory seems flat, that is going to be a problem for the incumbent president. Watch the trajectory; it will tell you the whole ballgame.
*** Another veep tryout: Today’s another veep tryout with Romney and New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte at 10:50 am ET. Though she’s been a senator for just two years, Ayotte served as New Hampshire’s attorney general (she was appointed by Republican Craig Benson in 2003 and RE-appointed by a Democratic governor). The Republican Party’s problems with women have been well documented over the last few months. If Romney is going to pick a woman, the most serious candidate is likely Ayotte. That is, aside from Condoleezza Rice if she wants it, and there’s no indication she does. But the shadow of Palin still looms large over the GOP pick, and the Romney team may be more risk averse because of it. But as GOP 12’s Heinze wrote last week: “Sarah Palin didn't prove that picking a woman doesn't help with women. Palin was simply the wrong woman.” (By the way, over the weekend, NBC’s Alex Moe reported that Newt Gingrich would officially drop out Wednesday.)
*** Obama fundraises with Clinton: There were a couple striking things at the fundraiser with President Clinton this weekend at the home of Terry McAuliffe: (1) How little Romney was mentioned. After a weekend and week of going after Romney personally, last night was more in line with where the Obama campaign was when this campaign first started -- go after the entire GOP. It was more the theme of -- they want to take you back, it’s their failed economic policies on steroids, not the party of Abe Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt; it’s not their Republican Party. (2) This was not an ordinary Obama fundraiser speech. Here, he was trying to follow one of the Democratic Party’s best economic communicators. Obama knew he was on friendly turf, but not the friendliest turf, as he was trying to appeal to Clinton people. One Democratic source who is more of a member of Team Clinton than Team Obama described last night as kind of like a “first date” between Clinton and Obama; For the first time, this person could actually see the two of them starting to bond; It took a while for Clinton to get over 2008 but so far, things have gone well in this courtship. Two more Obama-Clinton fundraisers to go; New York and PROBABLY Hollywood.
*** A way to bring up Seamus: Don’t overlook the fact that the White House used the opportunity of the White House Correspondents Dinner -- when they knew they’d get lighter coverage for what they did – put a story that they’ve struggled to put into the mainstream, quietly trying to do for months, the Seamus story. It was frankly a way to get Seamus out there. Yes, Obama made fun of himself and eating dog, but they’ll take that to get the Seamus story mainlined; They’ve been trying for months.
** Waiting on Lugar’s fate: There are just eight days until the Indiana Senate primary that could see the ouster of the most senior Republican in the Senate. AP today wonders whether Richard Lugar waited too long to brand his opponent. On Friday, the 2008 GOP presidential ticket split its endorsement – John McCain endorsed Lugar; Sarah Palin endorsed his challenger and Tea Party favorite, state Treasurer Richard Mourdock. Mitt Romney said he was staying out of it. A poll aligned with Mourdock showed him up 44-39% Thursday. The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette headline: “Hundreds cheer Mourdock at city rally.” The rally was organized by Tea Party Express, which has played a big role in this race.
Countdown to Indiana Senate/Wisconsin recall primaries: 8
Countdown to Wisconsin recall election: 36
Countdown to Election Day: 190 days
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @DomenicoNBC, @brookebrower


I hope Mr. Obama is looking for a new V.P. candidate this year. Who is on the short list?
Goober from the Andy Griffith show. He's better than Biden!
he could get bin laden to do the job .
Election Mathematics:
For every Ed Gillespie or John McCain clone advising Mr. Romney, add 3-5 percentage points to President Obama's reelection margin of victory.
So? Does anyone care that the repubs are whining again?
So does anyone care if the Democrats can't keep their word, or trust.
Barry was a bystander .... the military, George W's military, is who got him!!
If it's still George W's military, it must be George W's economy, right?
No one got him, he died of natural causes years ago .
Please. "George Bush's military" would still be rooting around in the wrong country looking for Bin Laden. It was only after they changed course -- under the direct orders of President Obama -- that they found Bin Laden. It was Obama's planning, decisions and directions that led to finding Bin Laden (and of course, the GOP criticized and opposed his plan).
It was obama's imagination that he got osama .
Bush's military. That's really funny. Bush attacks Afghanistan because bin Laden is there. Bin Laden doesn't like all the noise so he packs up a moves to Pakistan laughing his azz off at how stupid Bush is.
obama said to kill, bush had this all set up with the cia before he left office, navy seals are the hero's not obama, the general sitting there said shoot, then obama said shoot. he has to give the direct order, why isn't he proud of our service men in general? doesn't he care that our men and women are being killed for this country and he keeps knocking down the constitution, without the constitution we are not united, obama wants this country to split, a war within our borders. watch and see folks. he has already got blacks against the white's
The credit goes not to bush or obama or the Seal Team . Because it's pure BS . All of it , other then the seals went for a Heli ride .
President Obama's holdover Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, was one of the advisers who was against giving the order.
It wasn't Obama or the navy seals. The credit goes to the company that made the bullets.
26% of the population believes what the ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) organization tells them. You can find 10% of them on these sites making outlandish comments - like parrots repeating the lies. The other 16% still have their heads under a pillow and don't understand American Laws or American People.
American People will Stand Together and Unite against ALEC without the 26%'s help. They will look back at it and 'say' that they knew all along what ALEC was doing to undermine our Democracy....but, deep inside they will know that they were duped and followed the enemy instead of their Country. Before you all follow Romney, educate yourself as to the fact that he is the "crown" of ALEC and remember that WE the People of this United States will fight for our Country and our Democracy and the takedown of ALEC. Join the rest of us - if you are a republican...for pete's sake...get your party back!!
But its fine to politicize Obama's birth certificate?? or if he's Christian or Muslim???
Wait, are you saying that Bin Laden found Obama's real birth record, and THAT IS WHY the President had him taken out? That would mean Bin Laden accomplished, what the Trumpster idot, couldn't?
lol I almost miss the good ole' birther days! Those were some hilarious times!!!
When Osama died, Obama stated he didnt wanted to brag "spike the football", i guess that wasnt an election year.
Sounds like Obama has the wrong job. With all of his moxie and elite military expertise he should be running the CIA.
That night be a better fit because he sure is a sh*tty President.
Obama keep beating his chest abt bin laden, this will only bring more hardships on peace loving people. Impeach obama.
Ahhhh....ANOTHER Constitutional expert that spouts that darling word from RIGHTWINGNUTOPIA, "impeach Obama" they say...hmmmmm..."for what" comes the comment from the FOLKS that KNOW THE LAW.
HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS is usually the requirement for IMPEACHMENT, but a lot of snorky wingnutters seem to have their own ideas about what the "IMPEACHMENT" criteria should be....hence the odd ideas that if someone farts in the wrong direction, then the Congress needs to IMPEACH the President....odd isn't it??
lol....reminds me of when Gingrich tried to have Clinton impeached for a BJ. What a hypocrite....3rd wife and he dumped the other 2 when they got sick. He was screwing around on his wife during this impeachment try, lol.
Politicians don't politicize things. The GOP should check its facts.
So maybe if he hand landed on an aircraft carrier to stand in front of a Mission Accomplished banner the Republicans would have found it acceptable...
Or any of the other things ever done or uttered by a Republican since the party was founded.
For the last year I have heard obama saying things like " I've been busy with the economy and getting bin laden and such" . It almost makes one laugh if it wasn't so pathetic to hear your president groveling for something to get praised for. He has failed in every program he backed so he fights for every little ray of hope he can think of. He's a comedy central President. Pleaselook at his record and vote what makes sense for America. Obama has been out of his league since he was nominated.
lebster,
I would say that over two years of consecutive monthly private sector job growth....saving the auto industry....and killing the most wanted terrorist in our nations history is something you could hang your hat on. Especially considering where this country was economically.
He's been busy IMAGINING he got osama .
POTUS Obama releases $192,000,000 to Palestinians in Israel, declaring doing so is "important to our security.' emphasis mine
That's nothing compared to the BILLIONS we give Israel!
Obama: If I have a father, he would look like Osama.
TRAITOR!!!
Bin Laden: what utter Republican nonsense. The President issued the order to kill Bin Laden--DESPITE absolutely certain Republican criticism of him, regardless of what he does. And if the risky mission failed? Republicans surely would have criticized him for being "ineffective, blundering, and not really understanding Americans." Actually, the President understood quite well what Americans wanted--Bin Laden dead. And that the President would do it again. regardless of what the Republicans have said.
The Republicans think they've hit a home run with this twisted "polarization" argument--which everyone knows is really polarization the GOP has created between them and women, Hispanics, and African-Americans, for example. Like "class warfare" (with the rich as victims): outside the country club, maybe it's just another shot in the dark ending up in the rough.
To criticize Obama on Bin Laden?? Worst of all for the GOP--that's the best they've got. They are fooling no one.
Yes they are. They are fooling the fools who support them.
Hell yes the President is playing politics. The Republicans dis everything Obama does. The latest is that he is a "Celebrity" slow jaming the news and playing golf instead of taking care of business. Then they are shocked, shocked I tell you that he trots out his real achievements to counter their propaganda. Bush wasn't interested in getting Bin Laden, and Romney questioned whether we should be spending money to get him. Its like when a Harry Truman backer yelled" Give 'em hell Harry" Truman said "I just tell the truth and they think its hell"
Seeing that CIA intel gathering on Bin Laden dates back 20 years, that puts the start of gathering right around the Reagan years. The program was on the Smithsonian Channel last night.
Yep, you did it, Mr. Obama. You gave people healthcare that don't have a job, & gas prices are so high that we can't afford to drive to look for a job, there's no end to foreclosures thanks to your party's low income housing dumb ass legislation.
I blame Bush that Bin Laden was killed during your term!!
the liar-in chief did make the decision to get ubl..
the only decision he has made since his presidency..
why didn't he tout the aca on the 1st and 2nd anniversary?
it's the economy, stupid..
do something and don't blame the republicans and bush..
it,s the ninth inning and you're at bat..
Seeing that CIA intel gathering on Bin Laden dates back 20 years, that puts the start of gathering right around the Reagan years. The program was on the Smithsonian Channel last night.
Yep, you did it, Mr. Obama. You gave people healthcare that don't have a job, & gas prices are so high that we can't afford to drive to look for a job, there's no end to foreclosures thanks to your party's low income housing dumb ass legislation.
I blame Bush that Bin Laden was killed during your term!!!
The president has nothing to do with the price of gasoline.
And you really have to stretch to give credit to Bush for killing Bin Laden, considering Obama completely changed the orders which led to finding him (and was openly criticized by the GOP for it!). Under Bush's plan, we would still be rooting around in the wrong country looking for Bin Laden.
Well, Laker....do you also give Bush credit for finding WMD's....that were never found?
I think it is awesome the President Obama got Bin Laden. I would also be interested in knowing where the intelligence came from that found him.
We should give credit where credit is due. We should also give President Obama Credit for having the fore site to not close GITMO and stop other things that helped in his effort to get the bad guys.
Just a note that the GOP wouldn't let Obama close GITMO. They would not authorize the funding for a new building nor would they "accept" the inmates into any state for incarceration. Unless he has a magic wand????? (and could make the Republican ALEC members disappear, lol)
Awwwww, the GOP is hurt. That mean old Obama is such a NASTY man. The poor babies need to go to FOX and have a good cry. Boehner can lead them. I understand he's their best sobber.
everyone knows that if a republican president had been in office when bin laden was killed, he never would mention it during re-election.
Wow! Let’s cool the rhetoric for a moment. O--o--k
Now, what really intrigues me is listening to and reading
the commentaries by media personnel about the views, motives, abilities, accomplishments, etc., of the current politicians in the US, especially those now running for political offices.
These media "know-alls" then tell you how the American People are going to
respond at the poles.
But what really is troublesome, looking on from outside the US, is this:
How can a candidate (or his/her surrogate) for office say something about an opponent that is patently false (and known to be so by the general public), and then you say "oh this is going to cause the opponent to lose support among the voters?
What are you saying?? Are you saying that the American People are
simple-minded, cannot think for themselves?? Gosh!! This happens over and over again.
It seems so bad that it seems that if a president (especially the present one) sneezes, his ratings at the polls slips.
Why do the people seem to be blown about by every wind of opinion?
Well, are the pollsters "cooking-up" the poll results or are the people fooling
them all?
It's just Obama didn't do a thing - The Navy Seals and CIA. And one more thing he said he wouldn't do and did anyway was use it in this way. Like when Hilary was going to take the 3am phone call. He always sys one thing and does another. I voted for him last time but he hasn't recommended a budget, we are more in debt now than ever, His healthcare turned into a joke we can't pay for, Nope can't say I am better off now than 4 years ago -
The problem is the news to a large extent. The organization called ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) now has over 300 global corporations and 2000+ republican politicians as members. The corps draft laws that benefit their companies, they Vote on them-with the politicians-pass them, they boilerplate template them to every Republican ALEC governor where they are immediately implemented. There are 21 states now that are under ALEC control and when we say things are not better...WE mean living in the ALEC states. Until the information on ALEC reaches the rest of the Americans, they will believe the ALEC fed information (Fox, clear channel, etc-members) and be distracted from what ALEC is really doing. Once ALEC gets their "crown" Romney, they will have total control of the United States. Don't fret yet....word is spreading and getting exposure on MSNBC and even republicans are starting to drop out of the party. Americans, once awake, will take back our Country and we will Unite as only Americans can!!
It's rather humorous that because we are at the one year anniversary of capturing Obama .... the Dems are jumping off the page. It must be sad when all you have to hang your hat on is your "military" capturing a war criminal. It's funny because that is about the only positive thing that Barry has done in his whole first term!!! What a joke this guy is??
Odd isn't it? --- Republicans have "No Military Hat" to hang on their lack of accomplishments
And they certainly can't put a hat on Romney who said "OBL wasn't worth the expense"
They committed the gravest military strategic catastrophes in our nation's history & haven't learned on GD thing
Correction, first, it was bin Laden, not Obama, nice try though. Second, bin Laden wasn't captured, he was killed. Eliminated. I think you're just upset that your party's incompetence couldn't accomplish that goal in 7 years, and President Obama did it in 2. That's certainly not all he can hang his hat on, but Republican obstructionists have done all they can to keep this country from thriving in the name of politics. Soon, every American will have access to healthcare, the auto industry is thriving in America, the economy is recovering, the Iraq war is over, Afghanistan is winding down. The president has plenty to hang his hat on. If you choose not to see it, that's on you, and it says a lot about who you are, just another Republican that places stupid ideologies over the welfare of their fellow Americans.
What alternatives does Romney offer? So far, I've heard none.
It's a damn good thing Obama is winning in every single swing state, this country cannot afford the regression Republicans offer.
He's your president till January 20th, 2017, better get used to it.
Prediction for November 6th;
Obama: 347 electoral votes
Romney: 191
Under the radar journalism 101. With the one year anniversary of Bin Laden death, Obama releases $192 Million to Palestinians in Israel, saying "it is in our security interest" to give them the funds which were put on hold by congress.
It isn't under the radar when it's been mentioned in posts seventeen times here in a story that isn't about Israel or the Palestinians.
greenbear,,,, OMG, Fox News didn't tell you that that helps Arab Christians in Palestine did they?
That figures,,,, Fox News is just the news conservatives want to hear,,, They never tell you the truth about anything because truth isn't a conservative agenda
IH and Jim
The topic is the President and the death of a major terrorist. My point is the President and a middle east people known for their terrorist element...and we give money which adds to their funds for more terrorism. Before and after Yaser Arafat, who were the voices of Palestinian Christians that have tried to promote peace with Israel. Within any Moslem dominant society, the Christian and Jewish voice is muted at best. I do not have t.v. and actually rely on msnbc.com for my news.