DUE TO TECHNICAL ERROR, FIRST THOUGHTS WAS LATE PUBLISHING.
The bin Laden killing, one year later – how quickly things change … Republicans cry foul that Obama campaign is using the death as a reelection weapon … Foreign policy vs. the economy (it’s still the economy) … Is Obama the Warrior in Chief? … Another veep tryout – this time it’s Romney with New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte. … Gingrich to drop out Wednesday.
Believe it or not, tomorrow marks a year since Osama bin Laden was killed. We wrote then: “While it’s doubtful that Osama bin Laden’s death will have as long of a political impact [as 9/11] -- especially in this fast-changing, short-term memory media landscape -- it will surely shape the contours of next year’s presidential race. … Last night changes everything (for now), but we also know how quickly it can dissipate.” And dissipate it did. The president’s bump – for something that was as big a singular accomplishment that any president could have -- was short-lived, because of the economy and the debt-ceiling fight. It’s a reminder of just how important the economy is that the bump was never as big as it would have been under normal circumstances. (By the way, NBC’s Rock Center went inside the decision making of the killing of bin Laden. Brian Williams previewed his interview with the president on Meet the Press. The full show, with interviews of others that were in the room) airs Wednesday at 9:00 pm ET.
Caption: NBC's Domenico Montanaro discusses the politics of the one year anniversary of the Osama Bin Laden raid, and New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte gets a look as a possible vice president for Mitt Romney.
*** Playing politics: Republicans are crying foul at the Obama campaign’s touting of the killing (and using it in a campaign video charging that Mitt Romney might not have made the same call. There are two lines of attack: (1) Republicans are trying to minimize the accomplishment, saying anyone would have done it; and (2) They say he’s politicizing everything, including foreign policy. Ed Gillespie, an adviser to the Romney campaign and former Bush adviser said on Meet the Press: “This is one of the reasons President Obama has become one of the most divisive presidents in American history. He took something that was a unifying event … and he’s managed to turn it into a divisive, partisan, political attack. … I think most Americans will see it as a sign of a desperate campaign.” It’s fascinating to watch Democrats try to demagogue foreign policy, the way Republicans do and have done over the years (see Cheney, Dick in 2004). Republicans usually find themselves almost overreacting when Democrats go over the top in their foreign policy attacks. Count on some REALLY heated cable and Twitter rhetoric this week on this topic as the run-up to the bin Laden anniversary kicks in.

Saul Loeb / AFP - Getty Images
President Barack Obama speaks to troops at Third Infantry Division Headquarters at Fort Stewart in Hinesville, Georgia, on April 27, 2012, prior to Obama signing an Executive Order to protect them from deceptive targeting by educational institutions.
*** Warrior in Chief? The Romney campaign has pushed the issue of foreign policy, trying to paint Obama as weak and appeasing (especially when it comes to Iran). The GOP would have liked to paint the picture of Obama as a feckless, weak president, lacking strength. But despite the rhetoric, Obama’s foreign policy has been incredibly muscular. In fact, Peter Bergen of the New America Foundation in the New York Times Sunday Review provocatively casts President Obama as the “Warrior in chief,” ticking off several of Obama’s foreign-policy raids, killings, and use of drones. The death of bin Laden undercut any hopes Republicans had of being able to paint Obama as Jimmy Carter. And he makes the point of this disconnect: “Despite countervailing evidence, most conservatives view the president as some kind of peacenik. From both the right and left, there has been a continuing, dramatic cognitive disconnect between Mr. Obama’s record and the public perception of his leadership….” Make no mistake, had it failed, that’s exactly how he would have been portrayed. Bergen writes that if Romney runs a risk when criticizing Obama on foreign policy. If he tries to portray him as “a typical, weak-on-national-security Democrat,” then “he will very likely trap himself into calling for a war with Iran, which many Americans oppose.”
*** McCain as top foreign-policy attack dog: Taking the lead on the attack, though, is Sen. John McCain, Obama’s 2008 opponent (who also believes Obama hasn’t had courage to act in Syria). McCain, now a Romney surrogate, said Obama’s “diminishing the memory of September 11th,” and accused him of “doing a shameless end-zone dance.” It’s a fine line. McCain clearly doesn’t mind playing this role. He says things Romney couldn’t get away with and it’s something that’s quite beneficial to Romney. If Romney said what McCain did, Romney might get ridiculed. It’s an interesting role that McCain is willing to play. It could be a preview of the role McCain might play going forward in the campaign -- traditional role of VP, but on foreign policy. McCain doesn’t mind going personal with Obama, as he’s demonstrated since 2008. You can try to explain away McCain’s motives all you want, but it could be oddly effective for Romney.
USA Today's Susan Page, The Washington Post's Dan Balz, and The Chicago Tribune's Clarence Page discuss the Romney campaign's accusation that President Obama is politicizing the death of Osama Bin Laden.
*** STILL THE ECONOMY: But for all the talk of foreign policy and how much credit Obama deserves or whether or how he should be touting it, the most important issue this election – as it was a year ago -- remains the economy. It should be like a flashing red sign – IT’S THE ECONOMY, IT’S THE ECONOMY. Jobs will get a fresh look Friday when the latest report comes out. The unemployment rate has been essentially flat for three months. Even though the rate has come down from a high of 10.0%, if the rate continues to appear not to drop very much or the trajectory seems flat, that is going to be a problem for the incumbent president. Watch the trajectory; it will tell you the whole ballgame.
*** Another veep tryout: Today’s another veep tryout with Romney and New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte at 10:50 am ET. Though she’s been a senator for just two years, Ayotte served as New Hampshire’s attorney general (she was appointed by Republican Craig Benson in 2003 and RE-appointed by a Democratic governor). The Republican Party’s problems with women have been well documented over the last few months. If Romney is going to pick a woman, the most serious candidate is likely Ayotte. That is, aside from Condoleezza Rice if she wants it, and there’s no indication she does. But the shadow of Palin still looms large over the GOP pick, and the Romney team may be more risk averse because of it. But as GOP 12’s Heinze wrote last week: “Sarah Palin didn't prove that picking a woman doesn't help with women. Palin was simply the wrong woman.” (By the way, over the weekend, NBC’s Alex Moe reported that Newt Gingrich would officially drop out Wednesday.)
*** Obama fundraises with Clinton: There were a couple striking things at the fundraiser with President Clinton this weekend at the home of Terry McAuliffe: (1) How little Romney was mentioned. After a weekend and week of going after Romney personally, last night was more in line with where the Obama campaign was when this campaign first started -- go after the entire GOP. It was more the theme of -- they want to take you back, it’s their failed economic policies on steroids, not the party of Abe Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt; it’s not their Republican Party. (2) This was not an ordinary Obama fundraiser speech. Here, he was trying to follow one of the Democratic Party’s best economic communicators. Obama knew he was on friendly turf, but not the friendliest turf, as he was trying to appeal to Clinton people. One Democratic source who is more of a member of Team Clinton than Team Obama described last night as kind of like a “first date” between Clinton and Obama; For the first time, this person could actually see the two of them starting to bond; It took a while for Clinton to get over 2008 but so far, things have gone well in this courtship. Two more Obama-Clinton fundraisers to go; New York and PROBABLY Hollywood.
*** A way to bring up Seamus: Don’t overlook the fact that the White House used the opportunity of the White House Correspondents Dinner -- when they knew they’d get lighter coverage for what they did – put a story that they’ve struggled to put into the mainstream, quietly trying to do for months, the Seamus story. It was frankly a way to get Seamus out there. Yes, Obama made fun of himself and eating dog, but they’ll take that to get the Seamus story mainlined; They’ve been trying for months.
** Waiting on Lugar’s fate: There are just eight days until the Indiana Senate primary that could see the ouster of the most senior Republican in the Senate. AP today wonders whether Richard Lugar waited too long to brand his opponent. On Friday, the 2008 GOP presidential ticket split its endorsement – John McCain endorsed Lugar; Sarah Palin endorsed his challenger and Tea Party favorite, state Treasurer Richard Mourdock. Mitt Romney said he was staying out of it. A poll aligned with Mourdock showed him up 44-39% Thursday. The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette headline: “Hundreds cheer Mourdock at city rally.” The rally was organized by Tea Party Express, which has played a big role in this race.
Countdown to Indiana Senate/Wisconsin recall primaries: 8
Countdown to Wisconsin recall election: 36
Countdown to Election Day: 190 days
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @DomenicoNBC, @brookebrower


You know, perhaps the best VP choice for Romney, strangely enough, might be John McCain, who's never mentioned as a possibility. He's been vetted. He has good creds with independent voters (even some Dems). He may not have the cred with the ultra-right, but that actually could be exactly what Romney needs. Romney has painted himself into a corner. He either owns his ultra-right stances of the last year, or he gets labeled as a flip-flopper--or worse, just a political hack who'd say--and maybe do--anything to get elected. McCain could bring some credibility to the Romney campaign. I say all this as a confirmed Democrat knowing Romney's too politically dumb and too worried about his ultra-conservative base to ever consider McCain. Just goes to show how Romney will never win the White House.
Seriously? You're talking about a man who sold out his country by choosing to put Sarah Palin within a weak heartbeat of the presidency in a pathetic attempt to salvage a losing campaign. He was more interested in winning than in the potential consequences of his cheap pander to the far right, and misguided, insulting attempt to garner the votes of women.
Or maybe as a Democrat you're just hoping Romney would be so stupid, and you may be right.
You have to love politicians. anything they can't claim as their own achievement is out of bounds. They all act like children.
From Wikipedia re: the old Homeland Security Advisory System (remember orange alerts? yellow alerts?)
"In 2009, [Tom] Ridge alleged in his book The Test of Our Times: America Under Siege...and How We Can Be Safe Again that top aides to President Bush (including defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld and attorney general John Ashcroft) pressured him to raise the alert level on the eve of the November 2004 presidential election. Ridge refused. 'After that episode, I knew I had to follow through with my plans to leave the federal government for the private sector,' he said."
This is nothing but a case of "sour grapes"! Where were wthe republicans when their leaders (Cheney, Bush, Gillespie and Mehlman etc.) were using security card to criticize Kerry in the 2004 race? What's good for the goose ---
As far as the Democrats turning the death of Bin Laden into political gain, if we had had a Republican president in office, Bin Laden probably would still be alive. But for the sake of argument say a Republican president had taken out Bin Laden, I'm sure this being an election year that they would be playing it to the hilt to show how strong their candidate was on foreign affairs. During Obama's three years in office more taliban and al queada have been taken out with drone strikes than the entire eight years that Bush was president.
WAAAAAA!!
Despite their attempts to appear "tough", Republicans are always whining about something.
"The President went to battleground states in the big plane!"
"The President is touting his accomplishments without our permission!"
"The President is going on vaaaacaaaaatioooonnnnn!"
How about ya'll just man up and admit that President Obama is doing such a great job, ya'll ain't got #@$ to complain about. We are better off than we were 3 1/2 years ago, and the best part is, President Obama did it without ANY help from the GOP.
So now they whine. Pathetic.
My friend, if you think whining is relegated to just one party you are misinformed.
So now you are whining about my whining about the GOP whining?
Good grief.
lol
P.S. Please save me the "both sides" analysis. The point of the article was the GOP "critique" of the way the President is running his campaign. How it is "news" that the "don't approve" beats me. I'm thinking that the President is a grown up who can run his campaign how he sees fit - so far he seems to be doing a pretty good job . . . if he weren't, we wouldn't see so much weeping and gnashing of the teeth! :o)
No, I'm saying that I have never seen a politician not whine whether he had a D, R or I next to his/her name. Whining is in the DNA of every politician.
With the GOP you can be sure that it's white whine.
Another racist comment by a lib!
I was talking about the white whine that goes well when eating crow.
The one time that Obama could praise Bush's ten year interrogation policies instead of blame him for everything else. Instead, Obama has to make a big deal about Bin Laden because that's all he has. His record is horrible. He has nothing else to run on. Actually, a kindergartner could have made the decision to kill Bin Laden. If they found him, then duh, kill him.
Which Bush didn't do when they knew where he was. Are you calling Bush less than a kindergardener?
Bleary-eyed--Well, W was reading "My Pet Goat" for nearly seven minutes after he was told that planes had been flown into the Twin Towers. Probably trying to figure out the book's plot line . . . .
We pinpointed Osama through years of interrogation and following up on leads but it is this one accomplishment that Democrats are hanging their hat on. Good luck with that.
Meanwhile, back on planet earth, the Iranians are as close as ever at developing a Nuclear bomb, North Korea agrees to a treaty then breaks it a few weeks later essentially thumbing their nose at the U.S., Northern African violence is at an all time high, Syria is creating genocide and Russia can't wait for Obama to get re-elected because they know what a "push over" he is.
Bottom line: Obama got Osama. bush didnt! Bush and Repubs collapsed the economy, Obama and the DEMS save it. end of story!
I'm just curious Tom, what in the economy was saved to this point? We have a flat unemployment rate, our third annual summer of recovery, and now our deficit spending now outpaces our GDP. Printing more money will devalue our currency in the global economy. Respectfully, that is not peaches and cream in my world.
TExasT---
1) The DEMs saved the economy from a full blown depression!! You know it---I know it!!
2) Unemployment is gradually coming down but remember, right after the Great GOP Recession which lost 8M jobs, economists were nearly unanimous in saying that it might take a decade to get those jobs back... IF AT ALL!
3) With nation in crisis, all the Republicans could think of was screwing new president and the country! They were NOT concerned with helping the economy, or unemployment, or creating jobs, returning the country to some stability!! NO!!! They were most concerned about making Obama a 1 term president even BEFORE the inauguration.
4) If Bush had NOT left Obama with a $1.3T deficit BEFORE he was even sworn in, we wouldnt be in such bad shape! The last 3 GOP presidents left their DEM successors with a record deficit! THEN the GOP walked away from $4T in cuts in order to protect the bush tax cuts and corporate loopholes for the wealthy/corporate elite.
We're TIRED of that crap and we want out country back!! All the GOP's been doing is holding the country back because they've yet to finish their plan to create a debt crisis so they can privatize SS and Medicare.
All you need to know about GOP politicies is to look at who benefits from their legislation and proposals. From all appearances right now, Nov. jsut might be worse for the GOP than 2008 was. And THAT will be good for the country!
Oh, please. Obama has the cojones to do what Dubya failed at. If this was a Republican running for re-election, the death of BinLaden would be prominent in every single campaign ad, boasting of the candidate's strength in fighting the "war on terror." Quit whining, GOP, and suck it up.
Kudos for getting UBL, no one is denying that, but that was a year ago. Today, and going into the election, there is only one thought:
"It's the economy stupid."
Elephant tears.
The president will be judged on his economic performance in the fall. Giving the order to kill Bin Laden was a good thing, but it won't be enough on its own.
No - saving the economy after the Bush train wreck should be enough on its own.
wonder what the economy would look like if bush had remained in office? he dropped it in Obamas lap and ran like hell, and what have the republicans done since beside sit on their ass?
now they need to go after the worst terrorists, bush is in texas and cheney is in wyoming. Just thought I'd help you out with the locations, go get em boys!!
But if Bush had gotten Bin Laden he would have mounted his head on a pole and paraded it down Pennsylvania Avenue.
thats what they need to do to bush.
What a joke. This is an issue? For one thing Obama did nothing but issue an order. Big Whoop. The brave men and women in the armed forces got the a hole. Does anyone think for a second Obama was not thinking of the failed hostage rescue that was about the last nail in Carter's coffin?
If I was Obama I would play this up too. Whit his dismal record on most everything and his inability to not be in 'campaign mode' 24x7 of course he is going use this. The GOP needs to learn to chill and let Obama look like the idiot he is. They should have pumped up this moment with him.
I want to thank the men and women of our armed forces and the countless people who were underground collecting intel at their peril. They are still out there - their lives on the line while Obama and the GOP whine.
He's the Commander in Chief. What did you expect him to do - get on the helicopter & ride in with Team 6? Of course it was the military that carried out the order. The point is, if Bush had been President when this happened (or any Republican), the GOP would've been all over how "safe" they're making us. It's a difference of style and behavior, not the chain of command.
As for "only accomplishment" - Ended DADT. Passed Health Care Reform. Enforced equal pay for women. Withdrew US Troops from Iraq. Ended blackout of media reporting of war casualties and the return of US soldiers killed in action. Ordered the Pentagon to cover travel costs for military families wishing to be present when the body of their loved one is returned. Federal support for stem-cell research. Funded new body armor and Mine Resistant Ambush Vehicles for our troops. Eliminated co-payments for veterans who are catastrophically disabled. Just to name a few.
Both Parties-your thanking the military for following Obama? kind of confused arent you?
What was it then, when Bush'es handlers paraded him around on that aircraft carrier? The gop is SO transparent it isn't funny. They politisize everything. The big difference between them and the Dems, is that all they really care about is there rich buddies like Koch, and god help anyone that forgets that.
Gregor - and the dems are the answer. Think Pelosi and Reid. I mean really? Pelosi is so full of crap and yet is transparent. Our Gov is falling apart.
After spending trillions we have a feeble economy and mountains of debt. I was born in 1956 and remember those Carter years. Same feeling today.
BPAC u Know, I agree with you on that point-Both parties are corrupt. The big problem I have is that the gop is willing to actively destroy the middle class. They want to subsidize big business to the point where there will be no middle class. At least the Dems seem to realize you have to let the masses make a living. Also, the Dems don't trot around behind a smokescreen of religion, and moral superiority. That whole gop routine makes me want to gag. This country is now a democracy in name only. In reality it is an oligarchy.
Of course Obama can list this as one of his accomplishments. The GOP crying foul is hypocrisy in general, and about this (remember the threat level being raised over and over leading up to the 2004 election?) it is laughable that they would complain. Everyone knows the Republicans just accuse other people of the exact nature of their own behavior to deflect attention. They are losers, culturally if not politically (yet). I'd be pretty happy if they captured Zawahiri next.
Hey President Wasn't Me, "It's the Economy Stupid!"
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ open the link and check out the facts on National debt, unemployment, underemployment, poverty and much, much more. Dismal.
Blame others, deflect responsibility,and ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK! The Founders and generations of military Defenders are so proud of you and your party. Work hard and pay your taxes so nearly 50% will need to do neither. Thank you very little. One and Done!
The Bush tax cuts caused the 'nearly 50% who don't pay fed inc tax'.
And why are you changing the subject?
Totally delusional. Who's the President? When did he take office? When is he actually responsible for the countries economy?
You're completely ignoring the fact that the Reagan and Bush tax cuts created a structural deficit that is impossible to overcome. If we eliminated the ENTIRE discretionary, non-military budget we'd STILL BE RUNNING A DEFICIT.
That's what happens when you pretend tax cuts pay for themselves. May Art Laffer be remembered forever as the villain he is.
You mean the Obama Tax Cuts? The bill to extend them was passed and signed into law on Mr Obama's watch.
And it would have been less than half as large if Republicans hadn't been willing to stop unemployment benefits for millions in order to make sure the wealthy elites received over 60% of the benefits.
Conservatives worked really hard to do this. Why aren't they proud enough of their own work to claim this budget buster?
As someone who is supposed to be the leader of the greatest nation in the world, you liberals and Obama apologizers certainly paint him as nothing but a victim and a weak willed moron incapable or unwilling to accept authority and accountability.
Victim? Hardly;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/22/AR2010122203663.html
And the only thing Republicans got was extension of a tax break for the wealthy elites for which they claim no credit. Who's billing themselves as a victim here?
WE ARE BETTER OFF !!!!! ; no more crawling around in the desert for BUSH'S WMD lies. we are better off then we were doing the BANKRUPT AMERICA '' BUSH '' YEARS. we are better off , and more happy as a people with hope for equality, in a selfesh republican conservative tea party cry baby country. we are better off , because we don't believe in stealing from struggling americans , to give to the lavish living 1%ers !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA , & OUR '' USAMA BIN LADEN '' CAPTURER AND CHIEF !!!!!!!!!
Your are correct sir - I'm laughing!
ISN'T IT GREAT TO SING THE NEWS ????? ; now go home and spread the good news !!!!!!!
Show pictures of the slain bin Laden??
Heavens no that will incite a bad response from the enemy.
Make the murder a campaign slogan - well its been a year, things have changed.
Nothing New - see, that's why getting him was not all that big a deal. Worse now we just take out people with drones instead of snagging them for the intel they know.
60 Minute's piece last night should scare the poop out of everyone. Obama will not keep 'em up late nor pour water on their faces.
Besides it matters not with an economy the is clearly unable to recover.
Republicans are cry-babies. If the Bush administration had killed Bin-Laden we would never hear the end of what a great feat this was. If the Obama family was friends with the Bin-Laden family we'd never hear the end of how he's actually a Muslim, either (the Bush family has long ties with the Bin Ladens). I know many church-goers who are fanatically republican, and when I ask them where Jesus would be if he was here today, they start quoting scriptures. I tell them he would be in the ghettos and barrios of our country, helping and ministering to the poor, sick, and under privileged. Being a republican and a Christian doesn't jive, I'm sorry. Having the alleged "God-given right to carry a gun" doesn't jive either. Now Iran is "evil" because they allegedly are trying to build what we've had (and used), what Israel has, India, Pakistan, etc. Watch out if they want to take us into a war with them. You want jobs? They'll be hiring big-time then - for the armed services.
Oh please!!!! They used bin Laden to put fear into the hearts of every single American while Bush was in office. Every minute of every day was about bin Laden back them. Now on the one year anniversray of his death President Obama can't talk about it.
Had the Republican President been the one to kill bib Laben we would never hear the end of it.
Mission Accomplished!!