Obama signs order to curb education abuse of vets

 

FORT STEWART, GA -- President Obama traveled to an Army base here on Friday to sign an executive order intended to curb predatory practices by colleges -- many of them for-profit institutions -- seeking to attract members of the military and veterans.

“As some of your comrades have discovered, sometimes you’re dealing with folks who aren’t interested in helping you. They’re interested in getting the money,” the president said, noting that some colleges lie, for example, about having credit transfer and work placement programs. “They don’t care about you, they care about the cash.”

Obama added that he’s “heard the stories” from veterans who sign up for information on a college’s website and are then bombarded with emails, phone calls and even on-base visits from recruiters. He said that some schools have been known to solicit Marines with brain injuries who can’t even remember the classes they were signed up for.

“They’re trying to swindle and hoodwink you. And today at Fort Stewart we’re going to put an end to it,” Obama said to approximately 10,300 soldiers in a large field here.

The executive order require colleges to provide more information to about their programs including the percentage of military members and veterans who complete courses and degrees, as well as access to the “Know Before You Owe” financial aid form drafted by the Consumer Financial Protection bureau and the Department of Defense.

“We’ve got to make sure you’ve got every tool you need to make an informed decision when it comes to picking a school,” Obama said.

The administration says that eight of the top ten educational institutions collecting the most post-9/11 GI Bill benefits between 2009 and 2011 were for-profit schools, six of which had bachelor student withdrawal rates above 50 percent. The White House’s hope is that military members’ access to more information about these schools’ outcomes will help them avoid going to colleges that have bad records of graduation and degree completion.

The executive order would also direct the Defense Department to set rules for which education recruiters can visit military installations to limit the access of “bad actors” to potential recruits. And the Veterans Administration will seek a trademark for the term “GI Bill” so that it can crack down on deceptive websites made to look like they are affiliated with the military.

Pending legislation in Congress would accomplish similar and in some cases more extensive goals than the executive order; Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA)’s GI Bill Consumer Awareness Act of 2012 would for example require schools to disclose more information than the executive order does, like transferability of credits earned, the number of veterans enrolled and job placement rates.

And while the White House does require schools to provide academic and financial counseling, Murray’s bill would also specifically require schools to have at least one employee with expertise in military and veterans’ education benefits as well as to provide tutoring, career counseling and referrals to veterans centers.

In response to the president’s speech, the Republican National Committee released a statement criticizing his wider post-9/11 G.I. bill that took effect in August 2009.

“President Obama’s new G.I. Bill has failed to deliver on its promises to veterans and today’s event doesn’t address veterans losing their homes and the thousands of claims that remain unprocessed. Our veterans deserve the best and the President’s G.I. Bill has broken his promise to take care of veterans once they return from protecting freedom on the battlefield.”

Before the president and first lady Michelle Obama spoke, they toured the Warrior’s Walk, a tree-lined area featuring markers for fallen service members, where they placed presidential coins and folded American flags on the markers of two young fallen soldiers.

Fort Jackson is home to the U.S. Army’s 3rd Infantry Division, which has deployed numerous times to Iraq and currently has elements in Afghanistan.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

Republicans & Veterans? They still think of it as "Welfare Entitlements to slash"

July 2011 ---- 6 Billion in cuts

Republicans have attempted to cut veterans compensation and other disability benefits 3 times this year. First, Michelle Bachmann (MN) suggested disabled veterans had it too good. She thought disability pay should be reduced by $4 billion. Later, Paul Ryan (WI) suggestion gutting VA Healthcare by $6 billion, which would have cut 1.3 million veterans out of the program.

http://www.disabledveterans.org/2011/07/18/obama-republicans-seek-23-billion-disability-pay-cut/

March 2012 -- 11 Billion in cuts

Looking at the recently released GOP budget, written by Rep. Paul Ryan, it's hard to see how they do. In fact, looking at the nearly 100 page document, the word "veteran" doesn't appear once. Not once.

But, without saying the word "veteran," the budget tells us a lot about what they think about veterans. The budget calls for across the board spending freezes and cuts. If enacted, the Ryan GOP budget would cut $11 billion from veterans spending, or 13 percent from what President Obama proposes in his own plan.

It's unconscionable that they'd do this at a time when so many Iraq veterans have just come home and rely on veterans care. Over 45,000 US troopswere woundedin Iraq and Afghanistan, and more will come who will rely on VA services, on top of veterans of other wars and eras who depend on the VA. But, this shortsightedness isn't new.

Back in 2005, President Bush underfunded the Department of Veterans Affairs by about a billion dollars, despite its need. The result? Secretary Jim Nicholson was forced to crawl before Congress and plead with it to pass emergency supplemental spending, just so it could keep the doors open. After that debacle, I have to admit, I never thought Republicans would do the same thing again, if for no other reason than that it just looks bad politically, leaving aside the horrible effect it would have on veterans in need.

http://www.vetvoice.com/diary/4935/gop-budget-doesnt-even-say-the-word-veteran

    Reply#27 - Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:38 AM EDT

    Here's a little help for our nice friends the "Republicans",,, You get tired of the left calling you out for not knowing "Jack Schitt"?

    Now you have something to respond with so you don't get all upset & get your false patriot waving panties in a wad;

    http://www.toilette-humor.com/toilet_humor/schitt_family.shtml

      Reply#28 - Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:57 AM EDT

      Its really too bad some of the above respondants don't take their time to actually read other posts. "One drop of water does not make a flood" Wake up everyone! Get off your high horse and look at the bigger picture. Of all the persons in the Senate, White House and the rest of Congress, NOT one of them think about the rest of us Americans. Vote EVERYONE out and re-elect people who actually care. Everyone elected to serve should start out being paid Minimun wage. Then, and only then, will we have the fund levels back to where they belong. Vote responsibly this Nov. so we don't have an economic crash the likes that we have seen elsewhere.

        Reply#29 - Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:49 PM EDT
        Prospero Tempestovia FacebookDeleted

        "Curbing abuse of vets." This type of behavior is a national tragedy, but so is abusing anyone else who plunks down their $$ to some of these miserable, greedy, cut-throat for-profit universities and/or trade schools. They prey on Americans every day of their existence and offer very little, if any, value-added benefit in return. There are exceptions, but very few. They should be run out of town and closed down for business. Just another example of the uncontrolled Republican right-wing approach to free enterprise in America; BUYER BEWARE; even if you put your life on the line to protect the freedoms and rights of these same greedy bastards. They don't give a damn and don't care if we know it. Their day will come.

          Reply#31 - Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:09 AM EDT
          Jump to discussion page: 1 2
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.