One of the more fascinating developments in the last two weeks on Capitol Hill has been the degree to which House Speaker John Boehner has gone after President Obama and helped to try and frame Obama's general election matchup against Mitt Romney.

Alex Wong / Getty Images
House Speaker John Boehner hastily arranged a late afternoon press conference on Wednesday to announce that the GOP would take up a student loans interest rate extension bill on Friday that would be paid for by stripping $6 billion from monies used to fund Obama's health care law.
After endorsing Romney on April 17, Boehner started the attack the very next day, accusing Obama of being "AWOL" for the last 6 months and on a "constant campaign." Boehner pushed Obama on his handling of the economy, asking, "Where's he been, what are his ideas?” and was critical of the president for “failing to lead.”
On Wednesday, Boehner went after Obama for his recent trips to the Iowa, Colorado and North Carolina saying they were "campaign theatrics."
The Republican speaker took his criticism a step further Thursday morning, when he criticized Obama for using taxpayer funds for "campaign speeches" before launching into a blistering assault saying the president was falling short by not leading on jobs legislation, student loan interest rates, gas prices, the national drug shortage -- all the while going around the country drumming up "fake issues."
"This is the biggest job in the world and I've never seen a president make it smaller," Boehner said. "The president keeps attempting to invent these fake fights because he doesn't have a record of success or a positive agenda for our country."
He continued, "It's as simple as this, the emperor has no clothes. They can't talk about their record on jobs because their policies have made the economy worse. They can't talk about their record on spending because the president's policies have added 5 trillion dollars to the national debt. And they can't talk about their record on gas prices because gas prices have more than doubled on the president's watch."
NBC News today asked Boehner if he was in contact with the Romney campaign and coordinating these types of attacks. He said it had "been awhile” since he spoke to team Romney and that he "made it a habit not to talk to the candidate or the campaigns during this process." When pressed if he was in fact doing Romney’s bidding, Boehner answered, "I'm doing my own."
While Boehner may not be frequently speaking with Romney’s Boston-based campaign, he significantly assisted Romney this week by announcing he was putting a GOP version of student loan legislation on the floor. This past Tuesday. Romney stated that he supported extending student loan rates at 3.4 percent, but wasn't specific on how he’d pay for it.
Even though this issue had rarely been mentioned by House Republicans recently, Boehner hastily arranged a late afternoon press conference on Wednesday to announce that the GOP would take up a student loans interest rate extension bill on Friday that would be paid for by stripping $6 billion from monies used to fund Obama's health care law. Romney was then free to support Boehner's bill and a Republican option that made the student loan issue deficit neutral.
A GOP aide speaking on the condition of anonymity told NBC News that, last week, one of Romney’s policy aides gave the House GOP leadership a “heads up” that the campaign was going to support the extension of student loans at 3.4 percent. Upon hearing this news, the House GOP formulated a plan that would pay for an extension of the loans that wouldn’t add to the debt and inevitably gave Romney something to back that was a GOP alternative.
One GOP House member told NBC News that Boehner being Romney’s “attack dog” would be positive for the party: “He’s certainly easier to understand than Romney and makes the case against the president in a more defined way. It’ll help us.”
While the presidential race begins to heat up, this week could be remembered for when House Speaker John Boehner ratcheted up the rhetoric went into his own “campaign."


Birds of a feather & all... lol
Boehner the booze hound playing wingman for Willard the waffle...
How precious?
Better yet - where are the J-O-B-S you promised us tan man?
“He’s certainly easier to understand than Romney and makes the case against the president in a more defined way. It’ll help us.”
Wow.......not exactly a resounding comment about Romney versus Obama!
Weeper for President?.........Yikes
Wow, Romney and Boehner as BFF's! We can expect Romney to take on a more oompa loompa-like complexion, and to drink a lot more.
Romney on the other hand would be seen with a dog carrier on the roof of his Mercedes while he weaved to and fro down the highway with a brown goo streaming down his back window.
Mittens couldn't hang with the Weeper!
Mittens reportedly has never had a drink of any alcoholic beverage.
Golf? Don't know if Mittens plays that game, or any game!
Speaker Boehner, along with all the other GOP/Norquist income inequality advocates, voted for multi-millionaire (R-WI) Ryan's Budget.
The devastating Ryan Budget includes: taking health insurance away from more than 50 million Americans to pay for a $3 trillion tax cut to the top 1%.
Ryan's Budget is a trojan horse designed to impose a radical vision on our country.
Romney supports it. Boehner and his party voted for it.
Sorry! I meant that Boehner would be weaving down the road with the dog carrier!
Wow. How scary is it that the GOP thinks Boner is a better speaker than their candidate for president?
Romney might as well go back home and play with his car elevator.
Makes sense to me that Boehner would go all in for Mitt. If the President is re-elected and the House goes back to the Dems, Boehner will be out of his Speakership (not that he has done anything with it but he gets extra money for the job and he gets to turn down invitations to State Dinners).
Fisting Redhead, He can't show you yet...wait until he is elected in Nov. By the way, as a wannabe advocate for the down and trodden, I can't wait to see your argument for Micheel spending $460,000 of taxpayer money for her vacation to Spain (just came out after 2 years of fighting to release by White House). I know, you will fall back on your "why are we talking about trivial things like this" response, but you have really honed in on Romney's dog issue. At least he doesn't eat them like the President does!
Wow Bob, yet another AKA? www.dogsagainstromney.com
Why are most of the Bob's that post here so stupid. All of the First Lady's went on vacation and all pay there own way. That is a fact.
Read former First Lady Laura Bush's book and she will give you the facts.
Wayne..pretty good. But they usually have there heads out of the window anyway. Still say it's better than eating them like Obama wrote in his book. Bo must start shaking every time he comes back into the White House (after a vacation or golf outing).
chilled
Romney plays one game - make-believe game - and he is really good at it. He assumes the role of a human being...oh, wait, what am I saying? He sucks at it....
Robert Draper's Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives
Really? STFU Boehner.
Also, take Romney's advice and congratulate the president for his success. That's right, he can sing, he is funny, he is charismatic, he rocks! -- The "politics of envy?"
Can you imagine being Romney and having to chose your "friends" so carefully. Boehner, the one man, one mouthed super PAC on steroids, will throw one-liners out until election day. And you can bet that every one-liner will be a false "talking point" negative on Obama... NEVER an idea or a positive on Romney.
The only thing these people have to run with is to bad-mouth Obama. Romney doesn't dare recall his record. Boehner doesn't dare reminisce about the good ole House days. Romney won't be able to open his mouth without offending his base and creating yet another flip or flop.
They've run on unworkable sound bytes for so long, they won't be able to articulate a serious position without stepping on their lips. Poor Romney...
LMarcT -- It's just that their "strategery" is starting to backfire. More and more people are getting a clue after watching the debt ceiling debacle and GOP/TP "poison pills" to block extension of the payroll tax cut.
The president is calling them out every time they try the old Swift-boat lies. Yeah, go President Obama! I hope the Dems and surrogates and media join him in this effort.
The important thing will be to do this at the state and local levels as well. We can't afford a Teapublican Senate, even with reelection of the president. The gridlock has been bad enough in regard to the economy, but the blocking of nominations, etc. is something the nation can't afford for another four years.
I keep harping on Robert Draper's Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives, but the four-hour meeting Luntz directed with the GOP after the president's inauguration is a Big f@#$%g Deal. It's really the beginning of all the other crap like ALEC.
Reports are now coming out by a author that has written a book detailing a meeting in 2009 that laid out the plans to bankrupt the country in order to get back control of the government and finish the job started by Karl Rove, George Bush, and Dick Cheney.
It is said by the author that the meeting was attended by 7 Republican Congressmen and 5 Republican Senators including, Kyle, Sessions, Cantor, Ryan and others. Itis also being reported that this meeting was organized by the T party and their elected representitives.
This story is about to go on the air tommorow or Monday.
Stay tuned you are about to see the undoing of the Republican Party
Given the unprecedented failure of Boehner as Speaker, repeatedly being unable to deliver HIS OWN CAUCUS on promised votes he thought he had nailed down, this oughta be good.
How can you go wrong pairing the worst Speaker of the House in anyone's memory with the worst general election Presidential candidate in decades?
@ bayllie
One game Willard plays really well is 'hide & seek' with his tax filings!
Bohener has always been jealous of Obama being the President. At times, he has felt that he was more "important" or "charismatic" than Obama. Bohener hates Obama and he would be the best ally of any of the bozos that have applied for the job.
He can start crying now, because President Obama will be reelected.
I'm surprised Boehner was able to make a statement without his TEA party leader's consent.
Norquist might be o.k. with the statement's content but upset that Boehner didn't seek permission first.
I mean, what good is pledging allegience to Norquist if you defy him?
(note: If you're going to tell me Norquist isn't the TEA party leader, read this: http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-political-commentary/2011/07/grover-norquist-and-a-radical-tea-party-agenda-what-more-do-you-need-to-know/)
Norquist tells Bohener and all of the spineless people in the GOP -Including Paul Ryan- what to do, and they obey or else..
I am not sure if Mitt Romney has signed a pledge too, but it is probably the passport to be a "member of the elite" in the GOP
The "elite"of a bunch of corrupted self-serving clowns
Why is the Speaker of the House complaining about the POTUS not being involved in Legislating? Isn't that the Speakers job? Isn't the POTUS supposed to enforce the laws passed by the Legislature? Also, isn't it the VP's job to be the surrogate for the WH to Congress? Can someone explain how it is the fault of the Executive branch that the Legislative branch cannot do their job? Please? Anyone?
Backhouse said,
"The devastating Ryan Budget includes: taking health insurance away from more than 50 million Americans to pay for a $3 trillion tax cut to the top 1%."
Where is this provision in the Ryan budget? I can't find it... you know why I can't find it... because this is a flat out LIE!!
You statement shows that you are have no idea what you are talking about and that you have been fooled by the very people you support ...
In the real world that is called a SUCKER!!
That would be a better avatar then backhouse!!
That reminded me of the new book "The Republican Brain", by Chris Mooney:
I have come to feel that arguing back and forth with people like Bob is a waste of time. Reason and facts do not matter to some people.
What makes sense to me is to add some action to our lives in the form of volunteering to help re-elect the president.
There are independents and apathetic Democrats out there who need to see the value in getting to the polls to vote for the future of our country. There are Ron Paul supporters who are ready to throw their votes away. We need to take action, now!
Please don't wait until September. The Romney attack machine will do a lot of damage if we don't get out there now to kindly and gently persuade the persuadable.
Leave people like Bob to their delusions. Some day, they might wake up from their conservative coma and thank us, but we can't wait for that.
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
The time is now.
It is as simple as that. The media cannot continue to ignore these obvious facts about our current state.
Obama can obfuscate about war on women, student loan rates, and what not, but....
it is the ECONOMY, stupid! Nothing else matters.
Unemployment too high.
Debt too high.
Gas prices too high.
American morale is too low.
Romney/ (Christie or Ryan or Rubio) in 2012 - Our future is now!
"Apparently, I'm supposed to be more angry about what Mitt Romney does with his money, than what Barack Obama does with MINE."
chilled
I didn't think Romney was good at anything but you proved me wrong!
Rational AmeriCAN
If the economy is so important to the Republicans, why is their #1 goal making Prez Obama a one term president? Now, you are going to tell me that becuase he is not doing anything to help the economy blah, blah, blah but the problem is that the Republican secret meeting was the day of the inauguration so unless they are psychic, they never cared about the economy because if they did, their little, secret meeting would have been about economy!
So...how did you feel about what George W. Bush did with the surplus he inherited from Clinton?
What would you have expected any president to do with the mess Dubbya made and then left behind for Obama to deal with?
The Iraq war had to be paid for somehow.
Bush's tax cuts for the "job creators" (who STILL aren't creating many jobs, despite the continuance of their tax break) had to be paid for somehow.
It doesn't grow on trees.
kaybeetoys,
You are trying to argue with a person who does not want to address the fact that it took us 8 years to bring this country's economy to its knees while she/he has these unreasonable expectations of anyone being able to turn this freigh train in 3.5 years. I don't get that.
What is easier: maxing out your credit card or paying it down while the balance keeps growing due to high interest? On top of that the spending and the paying off was done by two different people.
Because he is lousy at running the economy. Simple as that. High gas prices, high unemployment, high debt, failed green policies, lousy fiduciary responsibility (Michelle's Spain trip cost half a million bucks and for what?).
I hope this helps you understand.
BTW - that quote, "It's the Economy" - is from Bill Clinton!
kaybeetoys
Are you propagating the myth of a surplus from Clinton to Bush? Really?
If we had a surplus (that was not done with political accounting tricks) then why has our federal debt increased every year of Clinton's presidency? I will find and post the link from the Federal Government for the umpteenth time if you like.
Baylie (you wrote)
Obama maxed out the card and stopped paying the bill. Have you no shame at all?
Please go to this link and watch the numbers whirl:
www.usdebtclock.org
and then come back to me with how great Obama is.
---------------
Aren't those Obama's tax cuts now? He signed them into law. Bush's tax cuts expired.
Rationa (not so much)
I spelled it out for you and you chose to ignore it but that doesn't surprise me. How did the Republicans know on the day of Obama's inauguration what kind of a president he was going to be. The answer: they did not care about the economy, the people, the debt, the deficit. All they cared about is getting the presidency back at all costs.
Also, if you feel that Obama is so lousy at running the country, what f*ck to you think of Bush who took a healthy country (based on the past 40 years) and flipped it upside down???????
The $hit hit the fan in 2008 - before Obama was even the president ELECT!
sorry dude, but the borrowing started in January 2001. This was in combination of killing a balanced budget and totally finishing stealing what was left in the Social Security to hide the real spending.
What bills did Obama stop paying????
yes, he did because that was the only way he could get unemployment benefits extended and get benefits for the 9/11 Responders. Remember those who ran into burning towers? The Republicans didn't give flyin' crap about them. They only agreed to the benfits to get their precious taxbreaks for the rich passed.
You spelled it out, huh?
Please justify the lousy economic growth 2.2%.
Please justify the lousy unemployment and underemployment numbers.
Please justify the doubling of the gas price and the negative impact on the poorest Americans. Green energy did that.
Please justify another giveaway to college students? They have earning power from their college degrees Bayllie!
The national parks service puts signs up saying "Do not feed the animals because they will become dependent and will not fend for themselves." Obama has upped food stamps to unprecedented levels! The Dept of Interior minds the park service and it is a cabinet position for Obama. Why not take the advice?
uaw-779887 -- Interesting.
Republicans did not think they were going to lose in 2008, certainly not by a landslide. At the inaguration when they looked out at the huge crowd on the mall, cheering, with tears in their eyes, they were terrified. They were terrified of majority rule that was not theirs, terrified of democracy.
The psychological profile in kaybeetoys post #1.24 above helps to explain why the right-wing references Second Amendment Rights instead of this:
Even now, after complete failure to create the jobspromised before the 2010 election, what are the Teapublicans doing? They are doubling-down on the old, failed GOP/Bush-era policies that caused the Great Depression in the first place. They are doubling-down on hate and fear. They are doubling-down on "strategery" and machinations instead of meritorious persuasion.
Even here in FR Rational AmeriCAN has to post three times in a row because that's the way the right-wing makes their case -- "...to kind of catapult the propaganda."
The GOP/TP never gives "pensive and introspective" thought to anything, least of all taking responsibility for the great damage they have done to this nation. No, instead they will conspire on ways to continue their Tyranny of the Minority.
Correction -- the above post saved before I could edit further -- I meant the Great Recession...carry on...
No lie, check your facts.
Feel free to check the links. Those can save you from calling someone a lier when they aren't.
Could we at least wait until the new president's boxes are unpacked before stating that your number one goal is to make him a one term president?
Remember, Mitt would have let 10s of thousands go unemployed with just the auto industry alone. How's that make Romney an expert on the economy?
And all that to get $10 in tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations for every dollar in deficit reduction...with all of it to come from vague, unspecified sources through other action that is to come later. The Ryan budget is a charade, the Wizard of Oz brought to real life.
@ Bosslimo
So you mean to tell me that the Democrats don't expressly have the goal to unseat the Republicans? Your feigned shock is disingenuous.
Simple, companies are private entities that have a right to succeed and to fail. GM should have been allowed to go into normal bankruptcy proceedings (not bailed out by the government). Simply put, what makes GM not run their company recklessly and expect another bailout? You Democrats can't have it both ways, either corporations are evil or benevolent, which is it? If heavily union, is the company benevolent? The GM bailout was a payoff to Obama's union backers. Period. GM should have failed. Period.
A disingenuous claim if I've ever heard such a thing. NEVER BEFORE...not in any decade, not from any political party have we seen such disgraceful behavior. NEVER BEFORE has a political party been willing to tank the entire economy, destroy the entire government of this great nation for political gain.
And your straw man, pretend world in which Liberals and Democrats believe private enterprise is evil is a part of that thin tissue of lies, expertly sold by charlatans. Failure of General Motors and Chrysler would have meant the loss of many, many thousands of jobs, plunging us well and truly into a second Great Depression. Republican trickle down economics already created the biggest econmic disaster in 80 years...why wouldn't you demand still more failure?
GM and Chrylser are tiny companies in the grand scheme John B.
Perhaps if you did some research you'd know that.
GM is #2 on the Fortune 500.
Perhaps if you did some research you'd know that.
GM is top 5 on the Fortune 500.
Perhaps if you did some research you'd know that.
Sorry for repost...Exxon/Mobil and WalMart are 1 & 2 and have been for 10 years...Newsvine software wouldn't let me edit.
Otis is about to be booted out and he knows it .So he has to suck up to the new guy In hopes ole Mitzi will buy him his position ..i mean have him voted in !
Will The Weeper be able to take his 'giant gavel' with him as a momento of what could've/would've been.....except for the TeaPeople!
"Apparently, I'm supposed to be more angry about what Mitt Romney does with his money, than what Barack Obama does with MINE."
you are a f@#!ng idot !!!! plain and simple
I can't wait until the campaigner in chief is out.
Romney 2012
You might as well settle your hash for another four years, sonny.
President Obama ain't goin' nowhere anytime soon!
Boehner being Romney's mouthpiece will be a HUGE bonus... for Obama.
Romney is the next president of the United States of America.
November 6th of the year of our Lord 2012 is the end of an unmitigated error in American judgement.
BTW - I did not know kaybeetoys was a 75 year old grandmother (sonny comment). You should fear Obamacares death panels gamgam.
I am not a '75-year old grandmother', sonny, but I have respect for those women and would never think to use grandmothers in an insulting manner.
More GOP War on Women from you?
If you still buy that 'Obama death panel' B.S. then you must still be wet behind the ears.
Looky here whippersnapper kaybeetoys,
More lesbo hatred of men from you?
But you would think to use "sonny" to demean anyone you can, right?
Should we act surprised?
Obama/Biden 2012!
I am glad this man is out there spouting his idioc. He is one of the most unpopular leaders in congress. Having him out ther for Romney will only help President Obama.
Wayne: As a righty, I have to say this is a very funny statement. Laughed my head off when I read it.
Big whoop! And with allies like Boner who needs Jan Brewer, Ted Nugent and Donald Trump! Winners, all.
Cool; then you folks ok with the cost of $179,000 per hour at tax-payer expense, then, right? Of course you are, since some of you live on here - no other life other than Mommy's basement? - you're not a tax-payer, and therefore, don't care. Taxes? What are taxes?
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/boehner-clais-obama-made-presidency-smaller/
The same mouthpiece who couldn't be bothered with showing up to vote - twice - (27% voting record as senator) in 2007 for students NOW thinks he should help - with over a trillion dollars of student loans. (For those of you on entitlements) In all truth a job for these students would be the best bet, but that doesn't loom on their horizons with 50% of new grads not finding a job. No jobs.
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/04/as-senator-obama-missed-votes-on-student-loan-bill-121386.html
27% voting record. You voted for a party name.
arslp
Those jobs you're touting, would that be all the minimum wage jobs college students have already? And students must work part time. Can you live off of a part time minimum wage job?
The only reason people are living in a parent's basement other than being under age is because republican status quo put them there during the Great Recession brought to your neighborhood compliments of Bush and Co.
The knee-jerk reaction to blatant truth- claim that everyone opposed to your politics must be leechers on the left.
Guess what? People actually vote for their better good.
Calling college students parent leechers won't help you win an election either.
I'm still waiting for conservative 'luminaries' like Santorum, Palin and Glenn Beck to jump on the Romney bandwagon.
Maybe they're afraid he'll make them ride in a roof-top carrier? :)
Come on, John Bonehead, we, the 99% American People, sure as hell don't want ETCH-A-SKETCH, he's nothing but a corrupt Republican corporate political puppet! Don't tell us you're one too! HOW DISGUSTING! Hey, 99% Americans, listen up!
Vote STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC, the lives you save WILL be YOURS & your CHILDREN!
TR..keep it up buddy, we will be cutting off your unemployment when he gets elected if you don't tone it down...where will you be then?
Bob
good grief Bob - don't flatter yourself by saying "we" ...
your threats are worth nothing just like the threats of the "we" you talk about!
why don't you get ahold of your "we" and provide those new jobs you promised in Nov 2010?
b dumb..no can do Osama already spent all the money "we" didn't have
Who cares what that drunkard windbag has to say
The sooner drunky Baboon gets shown the door the better off this country will be
Why would you need money Bob
You on the right said "extend the Bush tax cuts and the hiring will go through the roof'
Well, they were extended!
btw - his name isn't "Osama"....but you know that - you just can't help showing your ignorance!
as a refresher - "Osama" was killed - something the last President couldn't accomplish in 7 years!
b dumb -Oh, your're right on 1 point it's "Hussein", not Osama. The latter bombed people to death using sucide bombers, ours just uses fellow democrats to strangle us with more Government and debt.
b dune
But it looks like the Intell of the Bush Admin. - waterboarding, etc. - aided greatly in that act.
http://www.dennyburk.com/intel-used-to-find-bin-laden-came-from-waterboarding/
While you're talking about extending the Bush tax cuts, are you trying to hold that one act - passed by who?????? - as THE pivotal point of this tanking economy?
You people actually believe the "Bad old rich" rhetoric that comes from the White House.... Do you actually think it's going to help this economy to continue to raise taxes? Sure you do; you don't pay any..... You deserve to have the rich pay the taxes, right? After all, you're entitled.....
If U R not rich, why would u complain about the rich paying more taxes, I'm not sure what's the big deal about paying more taxes I only make 60,000 yr. I don't mind paying a lil more for the good of the country.
This is exactly what America needs a new President who can work with both the house and senate. November can't get here soon enough.The liberal media is going to have a tougher time getting Obama elected with his abysmal record. The American people didn't like his direction in 2010 and they aren't going to like it for another 4 years. Vote for change in 2012!
....this message was sent to you by the home office of the GOP!
This message sponsored by reality.
Give it to Conservatives, they play the Big Lie technique to perfection. One of the big stories is how Republicans were meeting even before Inauguration Day to present a unified front of obstruction, and Conservatives continue claiming it's the President who refuses to work with Republicans.
To quote your great leader's response. "This is what elections are for" before Obama was elected it's true alot of American's knew his leadership would lead to more American's living in poverty. Obama's blame someone else leadership hasnt helped this country at all.....
I'm trying to understand, when the President came into office the country was still losing about 700,000 jobs a month. Republicans did not want to put money in the economy did not do anything to support job growth. The economy has been adding jobs for more than two years. What IS THE PROBLEM WITH U PPL?
Nice deflection, UAW. You didn't even attempt to answer the issue I raised...that Republicans had an organized effort to paralyze Congress and the executive branch even before inauguration day.
What's surprising about Boehner's efforts in behalf of Romney? His Speaker's job is on the line in this election and he's in real danger of losing it. Helping Romney (even if Mitt loses) helps House Republicans.
Fisting Redhead, you don't need to respond to my earlier post. Michelle just posted a letter to the editor of the NYT which everyone can read. I am a little surprised that she is this open as some Republicans might jump on this and try to twist it into something bad:
Published NYT 4/26/12
Dear American Taxpayer
For only the second time in my adult life, I am notashamed of my country. I want to thank the hardworking American people for paying $460 thousand dollars for my vacation in Spain . My daughter Sasha, several long-time family friends, my personal staff and various guests had a wonderful time.
Honestly, you just haven't lived until you have stayed in a $2,500.00 per night private 3-story villa at a 5-Star luxury hotel.
Thank you also for the use of Air Force Two
and the 70 Secret Service personnel who tagged along to be sure we were safe and cared for at all times. By the way, if you happen to be visiting the Costa del Sol I highly recommend the Buenaventura Plaza restaurantin Marbella ; great lobster with rice and oysters! I'm ashamed to admit the lobsters we ate in Martha's Vineyard were not quite as tasty,
but what can you do if you're not in Europe , you have to just grin and bear it? Air Force Two (which costs $11,351 per hour to operate
according to Government Accounting Office reports) only used 47,500 gallons of jet fuel for this trip and carbon emissions were a mere 1,031 tons of CO2. These are only rough estimates, but I am worth it! That's quite a carbon footprint as my good friend Al Gore would say, so we must ask the American citizens to drive smaller, more fuel efficient cars and drive less too, so we can lessen our combined carbon footprint. I know times are hard and millions of you are strugglingto put food on the table and trying to make ends meet. So I do appreciate your sacrifices and do hope you find work soon.
I was really exhausted after Barack took our familyon a luxury vacation in Maine a few weeks ago. I just had to get away for a few days.
Cordially,
Michelle Obama
P.SS. Thank you, too, for that vacation trip to India from which we just returned! Martha's Vineyard; it was fabulous.
And thanks for that second smaller jet that took our dog Bo to Martha's Vineyard so we and the children could have him with us while we were away from the White House for eleven days. After all, we couldn't take him on Air Force One because he might pee on some wires or something.
P.SSS. Oh, I almost forgot to say thanks also for our two-week trip to Hawaii at Christmas. That 7,000 square foot house was great!
P.SSSS don't forget my ski trip to Vail this winter and when the girls and I were in Africa with my mom. All this while Barack golf’s and campaigns to keep my trips coming for the next 4 years!
Love Ya! Remember, we all have to share the pain of these economic times equally!
Oh yeah Fisty..this is just satire (after all you note this on your pieces).
Bob,
I got one for you:
A Letter from Rick Santorum
Introducing SantorumCare™
NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – Today, former Senator Rick Santorum issued the following letter to the American people.
Dear American People:
When I think about government-mandated healthcare, I have the same response that any mature adult would have: it makes me want to throw up.
That’s why, on my first day as President, I will repeal ObamaCare. Well, actually, on my very first day I’m going to repeal the Renaissance. And also the theory of evolution. But I will definitely get rid of ObamaCare by Day Three, Four at the latest.
You see, ObamaCare runs counter to my well-documented position on personal freedom: I believe in the rights of the unborn child, until it’s born and wants a checkup.
What will take the place of ObamaCare? As your President, I will institute SantorumCare™, a healthcare plan that will cover absolutely no medical procedures whatsoever except one: exorcism.
For many years, possession by the devil has been America’s number one health problem, far more serious than those posed by cigarette manufacturers who have funneled millions to my PACs. You don’t have to take Rick Santorum’s word for it that America is in the grips of a devil-possession epidemic: just watch any episode of “Jersey Shore.”
You’re probably saying to yourself, “Government-mandated exorcisms are a great idea, Rick. But how will we find the devil babies to exorcise?” Good question, and I have a good answer: on my first day as President, I will order mandatory transvaginal ultrasounds for every woman in America.
These ultrasounds will be a prerequisite to getting a driver’s license at the DMV, where there’s plenty of downtime for such a procedure. Additionally, they can be easily and safely performed by TSA employees on the airport security line. If an ultrasound turns up any telltale signs of a devil baby (e.g. horns or tail) we’ll schedule the woman for her government-mandated exorcism there and then.
I hope after reviewing SantorumCare™, you’ll agree that it’s the best healthcare plan out there for you and your family. But just in case you’re not sold yet, maybe this will seal the deal: leeches are 100% covered.
Vote for me,
Rick
Bob, here is another one:
Poll: Given Choice Between Romney and Santorum, Most Voters Choose Suicide
Survey Spells Trouble for GOP, Pollster Says
COLUMBUS, OH (The Borowitz Report) – With just hours until Super Tuesday, a new survey of likely voters indicates that in a match-up between former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, a majority would choose suicide over either candidate.
The poll, conducted by the University of Minnesota’s Opinion Research Institute, shows Mr. Romney drawing 21%, Mr. Santorum 18%, and various forms of suicide 61%.
“Throwing yourself in front of a speeding city bus” was the most popular means of suicide at 22%, with “jumping off the roof of a really tall building or bridge” coming in second at 17%.
According to pollster Davis Logsdon, the surging popularity of suicide bodes ill for both Gov. Romney and Sen. Santorum as presidential candidates in 2012.
“It’s still early, but even at this stage of the game the prospect of one of those two being nominated shouldn’t be making voters want to kill themselves in these numbers,” Mr. Logsdon said.
Reached on the campaign trail in Columbus, Mr. Romney pointed out that while he did not do as well as suicide, he still polled higher than Sen. Santorum, adding, “That’s better than a sharp stick in the eye.”
But Mr. Logsdon was quick to throw cold water on Mr. Romney’s upbeat assessment: “In a head-to-head match-up, a sharp stick in the eye beats Romney by a two-to-one margin.”
Elsewhere, exit polls in Russia showed that Vladimir Putin did particularly well among voters who described themselves as “not wanting to be imprisoned.”
one more...but I can keep going if you want me to..
A Clarification from Mitt Romney
About Poor People
LA JOLLA, CA (The Borowitz Report) – Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney today released the following letter to the American people:
Dear American People:
Yesterday, comments I made about poor people made me look terrible. This always seems to happen when I say what I really believe.
The fact is, I do care about poor people. That’s because I’m poor myself, when you compare me to Mark Zuckerberg.
According to most projections, Facebook’s IPO should net Mr. Zuckerberg a personal fortune of $28 billion. I couldn’t make a pile of dough-re-mi like that even if I fired people twenty-four hours a day.
Now, let’s take a look at Mitt Romney’s net worth: a measly $200 million. Now do you see why I consider myself poor? Compared to Mark Zuckerberg, Mitt Romney is practically a crack whore.
Now, I’m not going to sit here and envy a rich person like Mark Zuckerberg. That’s exactly what President Obama wants poor people like me to do. Mark Zuckerberg made his money fair and square, by creating useful products like imaginary sheep and angry birds. Say what you will about Facebook, it has totally revolutionized the way we waste our lives.
The fact is, if you’re poor in America, you should do what Mark Zuckerberg did: create a social network. I’ve just started my own, called TwoFaceBook. With TwoFaceBook, your profile doesn’t stay the same for more than two seconds.
In closing, there’s one more reason I don’t worry about poor people. They have Groupons.
Vote for me,
Mitt Romney
*waves to Bayllie*
Got to ♥ those Borowitz Reports! lmao
No one does satire like Andy!
Little Boob is so far out of his league - he doesn't even qualify for 'rookie' status!
Fisting Redhead, yes carrot top, when it comes to writing fiction, you take all the awards...Now Bayllie, he's pretty good!
Bayllie, which candidate actually gave cash to a person in danger of losing her electric service because she was out of work?
Here's a hint- it wasn't Obama.
Which candidate gave that same person a job?
Here's another hint- it wasn't Obama.
In fact, it was Romney- and it turns out that it was not the first time he pulled cash from his pocket to help someone in need.
Got anything- anything at all- on Obama ever doing that?
I don't think so. Why? Because it would lead the news for months on end, that's why.
So, I'm pretty sure it never happened. What we have here is another situation where Obama talks- and talks- and talks- but there is no action.
Romney, on the other hand, walks the walk. You see the difference?
No. Of course not.
The rest of us do.
Fires thousands helps one hahahaha what a great guy lol
bayllie:
So, Santorum cost American taxpayers nothing in tax dollars....there's a clever piece about Santorum and Romney.....and Romney made remarks that.......Oh my God, NO!!!!! Poor, entitled people...... OMG.... they took offense.
Well, you've missed the point. Nothing in these little articles that you copied - (congratulations on those dexterity skills) do not imply any monies that cost the American taxpayer like the Obamas. Obama has never created a job with one penny of his own money. Not now; not ever.
Did you really not get the point, or were you just in too big a hurry to copy the cute stuff somebody else did? I'm sure it's intoxicating to get little "Waves" but think, for Pete's sake, ok? Oh, that's right, this is the Democratic board, and I'm probably personna non grata. Oh well......
mtramaley:
Fires thousands? So, that must mean he had hired them in the first place, right? How many jobs has Obama given out of his businesses?
Had your own business? I have. Very, very small, with one employee. Guess what? This rich/poor dichotomy that is coming out of the White House is crap. How many of you actually think the occupier of the White House cares whether you have a job? Actually, if not, then you're dependent on........yep, that's right. Keep ticking off the rich; those who provide jobs..... Raise taxes, institute more reforms... and more reforms...and more mandates....
Can't pass Crap & Trade? Appoint Lisa Jackson - "Utility bills have to sky-rocket" pass it through the back door. You see, Obama doesn't know about business or private enterprise - because he's never done anything but suck off the government teat his whole life.
arslp
Lets not mention any facts, just throw out rhetoric and hope people buy it?
So, the money the president earned at Harvard for 12 years was paid by the government? I guess Bush wrote an Executive Order for that?
The rich is providing jobs?
http://www.businessinsider.com/15-charts-about-wealth-and-inequality-in-america-2010-4#ixzz1tDRT12hO
To the rest of the world outside of yours, it looks like the wealthy are getting filthy rich with less workers and cutting the existing workers' pay.
arslp
you missed the point; my copy and paste was directly aimed at Bob's silly "letter."The point was that I could match his not only with 1 but many. By the way, they are not articles (which you seem to be taking very seriously); they are called satire. They are as true as Bob's "letter" from the First Lady.
Neither did Romney
no joe,
I would be more impressed with Romney if actually cared about little people. Donations to charity (which are a tax deduction by the way) don't equal to the fact that as governor of Mass he raised fees on every day citizens - by $432 million. Romney concocted or boosted 88 fees. Romney charged more for marriage licenses, gun & car registrations, a used-car sales tax, gasoline deliveries, real-estate transfers and many more.
Romney even proposed creating a fee for blind people and proposed raising fees for state schools.
All that plus the fact that under Romney, Mass went from 10th place to 47th place in job growth. He will also proudly tell you that he cut taxes (which he is lying about) for corporations. All Romney did was made it harder for Mass residents so maybe that is why he occassionally helps someone who gets their electric cut off. Guilty conscious????
Feisty,
Apparently I should have added a disclaimer that it is satire because I confused the heck out of poor arslp. He/She got mad! I thought it would be obvious.
mtramaley
you summed it ip so much better than I did.
The same people that complain about Romney's supposed tax increases fail to acknowledge the president who has spent more in 3 years than any other president in history. Strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.
http://www.npr.org/2011/01/25/133211508/the-weekly-standard-obama-vs-bush-on-debt
bayllie,
only grandiosity would cause you to think that a cut and paste job done on an msnbc message board would cause even a ripple in the pond, but if it entertains you... go ahead. Reality doesn't seem to be the forte of Obama supporters anyway.
bayllie,
Topic maintenance.....
Let's try again. Romney employed people from private enterprise (perhaps that's the confusion you're experiencing). Obama teaching at Chicago Law School, (not Harvard - do facts mean anything to liberals?) was the product of an Affirmative Action education which placed Obama in a seat that someone else better qualified had to vacate because they were not a minority. As stated earlier, he has never, until book writing, made any money (other than the Rezko deal) via any other venue other than the government teat.
arslp
How do you know a better qualified person vacated their position to let a minority in?
Who was this person? What made him/her a more qualified person?
You apparently know first hand or you wouldn't be posting it, right?
Under your line of thinking, Romney achieving his 1% status off the dismantling of business, casting workers into unemployment, and selling them for scrap is better than a community organizer that advocates for the common man.
arslp is waiting breathlessly for Mittens to rebuild the American economy by buying Canada at a bargain price, laying off all the government workers, and selling it to Germany for a big profit.
It sad to think that some American will vote for a candidate that his own party really don’t have confidents in or like. I really don’t consider Romney has a waffler, more of a man that has NO stand on ANYTHING. He will say anything and agree with any group at any given time if it suits him. Then we have cry baby Boehner, who if he did his job and quit worrying about what Obama is doing the country and the congress would be in better shape. (I’ve never seen a man cry so much in my life, if someone ran up behind him and screamed “BOO” the man would piss in his pants and cry all over the place.
Peace,
Just what exactly has Romney said to make you think he's a "Waffler"? What statements has he made to make you say that?
You want to know which statements Obama has made that make me know he's a liar?
http://obamalies.net/list-of-lies
Remember, no new taxes? Rubes have fallen for the war on the rich. Who in this nation is going to give jobs? Bad, mean rich people. Sympathy for women? My eye. Let's keep them on welfare, oppressed, dependent on government handouts, and they're ours, silly little sheep.
arslp
Thank you for posting a right-wing website. But there are two sides to every story.
Memo to Mr. Romney:
Get yourself another ally on Capitol Hill because come January, one way or another, John Boehner will not be Speaker of the House.
The solution to solving the country's problems is compromise. Entitlement programs will need to be cut...Democrats compromise. Spending on Defense controlled...Republicans compromise.Immigration reform,tax reform...they all require compromise. Unfortunately, the rhetoric of political extremists....see Tea Party...makes it impossible to come up with solutions....only more hot air.
The Speaker John A. Boehner has a 77% Disapproval rating
Why should I listen to anything that drunken Wizard-Of-Oz cowardly Lion has to say?
wow...did you think of that all by yourself?
I bet you're a barrel of laughs at parties right?
Don't get puked on by Drunkard of the House Boner
ahright?
And yet recent polls have Speaker John Boehner as the most popular of all congressional leaders...the least liked...the wicked witch of the west, Nancy Pelosi
You got some back up for that?
Feisty maybe John of AZ is like John Kyle of 'It's not intended to be a factual statement' infamy!
Just say stuff, make stuff up, just lie and hope it goes unchallenged. lol
Here ya go...Don't choke on it.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_favorability_ratings
Choke on it? Hardly, I'm doubled over in laughter!
Ahhh - yessss - the right leaning Rasmussen - why am I not surprised? How about a neutral source if you can locate one Johnny boy?
See us loony liberals can dispute sources just like you & your ilk do...
lmfao@ YOU loser!
Just because you don't like it doesn't make it false except in your convoluted mind.
BTW where was Bev today? Missed the big laughs.
Oh dear - the Chief of Spelling police @!$%#ed up...again!
Go troll someone else honey - I find YOU boring and ill prepared!
Sitting in the shadows while tossing the occasional insult from the cheap seats says all I need to know about ya!
Shame you have NO core...
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL
What are you talking about? There are no spelling errors. Are you losing what little is left of your mind?
Trolling you is no fun and I would never do that. I need a challenge and you do not pose any at all with your inane comments. Once again you deflect from the facts. You Miss F are a LOSER!!
Hilarious! Tad bit Marie Antoinette, with a little Cliff Clavin thrown in.
arslp
Yes Miss F is a bit of a drama queen. She is also a huge "O" supporter and a paid MSNDC blogger with very little common sense. It's always fun to tweek her clown nose.
President Obama Over 68,000,000 votes accross the country in 2008
Boehner about 100,000 votes in his district in 2010
This is not 2008 and a lot of those voters don't like the "change". I must have missed the point where Obama was running against Boehner.
Job 1 actually it was 142,731 votes for Boehner in 2010 or 66% of the vote.
In fact, Boehner has averaged just under 70% of the vote in all of his Congressional elections since 1990.
Do you understand the difference between National and Local elections?
You need to spend less time in class doodling in your Trapper Keeper and pay more attention to your American Government teacher. (Is your AG teacher your Driver's Ed teacher too?)
Job1 only knows tetalking points from MSLD. Don't expect him to be rational.
Job1, Your logic is exactly why Romney needs to win. Case in point.
Ballyee,
Those are great posts...umm the" Borrowitz Report"...that is a well regarded journalistic source. I bet you also take quotes from the Onion and Mad magazine and take them at face value. Does your Mom know you are on her computer?
You started it. Now man up and accept that you had your a$$ handed to you.
There are three things that Mittens need "not" do to if he even wants a remote chance at winning the election.
1. Don't butt heads with the big boys over foreign policy. He's way out of his league.
2. Don't buddy up with a group of people (Congress), who have a 9% favorable rating amongst the voters.
3. Don't uh...WTF.. Its irrelevent anyway. Hes gonna get his ass kicked
This is like the little boy who called wolf...Boehner has whined about the most trivial
things since Obama sworn in, who is going to listen to him even if a complaint is legit? Does he believe the American public thinks their tax dollars are going to good use paying congress members doing nothing. When polls are taken showing the country going in the wrong direction, the next question should be...Is congress doing anything to make the country stronger ?
The only way these republicans do anything or say anything other than "no" is if Obama goes on the road and drums up support from the voters in their districts. Maybe if the republicans had a single, solitary ounce of statesmanship Obama wouldn't have to embarrass them just to get them to shuffle their feet on every single little issue. Given that he has been at the helm of the least popular congress ever, Boehner should probably just shut his mouth and hang his head in shame.
Accept voter fraud; voter intimidation..........................NO
Accept Calderone in unison with the standing president to admonish Jan Brewer when she is attempting to maintain federal law.............NO
Accept Healthcare takeover (partisan)..........................NO
Accept a president who apologizes for this country.........NO
Accept that 53% pay no taxes, and tax more those who work hard, make a good living, and increase entitlements..........................NO
Accept that Cap & Trade is being ushered in the back door by Lisa Jackson and the EPA....................................................................NO
Accept the POTUS' aunt, uncle and other family members are here illegally - on the tax payers dime; put up with uncle's DUI's..............NO
Looks like those who don't accept the above are the party of "KNOW".
arslp, are you related to Boner? or are you actually that braindead?
jazzlily,
Boner? Cute. What are you, twelve?
you forgot to mention teleprompters, arslp.
Better go back for another load of empty Conservative talking points...
...or you could even try to prove any of the above. But that isn't what you'll do, is it?
Boehner has put 15 bipartisan job bills on the desk of Demo Senate Reids Desk.
Reid refuse to put them on the floor of the Senate.
Obama has been on major Campaign or on vacation the majority of his tour. Totally ignoring the major issues.
JOBS, ECONOMY and DEFICIT
EPA Official: EPAs "philosophy" is to "crucify" and "make examples" of US energy producers
Go to YouTubePlay video
In a Senate speech, Senator Inhofe will draw attention to a little known video from 2010, which shows a top EPA official, Region VI Administrator Al Armendariz, using the vivid metaphor of crucifixion…
00:01:49
Added on 4/25/12
76,353 views
EPA official apologizes for call to 'crucify' oil companies, senator investigating
Published April 26, 2012
FoxNews.com
A top EPA official has apologized for comparing his agency's enforcement strategy to Roman crucifixion -- as Republican Sen. James Inhofe launched an investigation and told Fox News the comments are part of a campaign of "threats" and "intimidation."
Al Armendariz, the EPA administrator in the Region 6 Dallas office, made the remarks at a local Texas government meeting in 2010. He relayed to the audience what he described as a "crude" analogy he once told his staff about his "philosophy of enforcement."
"It was kind of like how the Romans used to, you know, conquer villages in the Mediterranean,"he said. "They'd go in to a little Turkish town somewhere, they'd find the first five guys they saw, and they'd crucify them.
"And then, you know, that town was really easy to manage for the next few years," he said.
Armendariz went on to say that "you make examples out of people who are in this case not complying with the law ... and you hit them as hard as you can" -- to act as a "deterrent" to others.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Thursday that the remarks did not reflect President Obama's view.
"What he said is clearly not representative of either this president's belief in the way that we should approach these matters or in the way that he has approached these matters -- either from this office here in the White House or at the EPA," Carney said.
Armendariz also issued a statement apologizing after Inhofe slammed the comments on the Senate floor, and fired off a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson highlighting them.
"I apologize to those I have offended and regret my poor choice of words," Armendariz said. "It was an offensive and inaccurate way to portray our efforts to address potential violations of our nation's environmental laws. I am and have always been committed to fair and vigorous enforcement of those laws."
Inhofe, though, said he's launching an investigation. On Fox News on Thursday, the senator said the remarks are "all a part of Obama's war on domestic energy," particularly on a process known as hydraulic fracturing -- which is used to extract oil and natural gas from rock.
Inhofe noted that the EPA, following Armendariz' comments, went after natural gas firms in three states and tried to link hydraulic fracturing to water contamination.
"You read his whole statement, and it's pretty revealing," Inhofe said. "And I think when he comes out and apologizes for using the word crucify he's still getting his message across there -- intimidation, threats."
The EPA is defending its enforcement strategy.
Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for enforcement and compliance assurance, said in a statement that "strong, fair and effective enforcement" is "critical to protecting public health" and making sure everyone is playing by the same rules.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/26/epa-official-apologizes-for-call-to-crucify-oil-companies-senator-investigating/#ixzz1tB5fkd7f
Congress steering US economy toward a 'fiscal cliff'
I would say this is all on Democrats, the Republican tried hard to work on it last year…Is this MSNBC trying to blame Republican???
Jason Reed / Reuters
Watch that fiscal cliff. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke departs a news conference following the monthly two-day meeting at the Federal Reserve in Washington, April 25, 2012.
By John W. Schoen, Senior Producer
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke calls it the “fiscal cliff.” It might be better thought of as the next economic Armageddon.
Unless Congress acts to soften the blow, economists are warning that a looming year-end collision of massive, “automatic” cuts in federal spending and the expiration of sweeping Bush-era tax cuts could crush an already weak U.S. economic recovery.
And unlike the central bank’s response to the Panic of 2008, the Fed would be powerless to offset the catastrophic impact on the economy and financial markets.
"There is absolutely no chance that the Federal Reserve would be able to have the ability whatsoever to offset that effect on the economy," Bernanke told reporters Wednesday, following a two-day meeting of the Fed's policy-making committee.
The risk of a potential economic train wreck stems from a series of contentious political decisions that Congress has been ducking for years, postponing a long list of tough choices until the end of the year, until after the national elections.
Send us your story ideas
Follow me on Facebook
Follow me on Twitter
Now, unless a compromise is reached, sharp cuts in federal spending will remove hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. economy, virtually overnight. At the same time, American consumers will see a massive increase in taxes that will sharply curb their spending power, taking another big bite out of the economy.
While it was ducking those big decisions, Congress has also punted on a series of smaller budget measures that will have to be decided by next year. Taken together, they add up to some big numbers.
The lists includes two long-running budget items that have become a popular perennial target of political horse trading. One is the now-annual "fix" to scheduled cuts in Medicare payments that would reduce spending on doctors' fees by as much as 30 percent. The other is a so-called "patch" required to prevent the Alternative Minimum Tax from hitting an ever-wider swath of middle class households.
Wage earners are also set to lose the payroll tax cut that expires at the end of this year. An extension of long-term unemployment benefits is also set to expire, which would further slash the amount of money flowing through the economy.
Economists and budget analysts have offered up various estimates on just how badly the economy would be damaged if Congress fails to act in time. The combination of the tax increases and spending cuts would amount to more than $6.8 trillion over 10 years, according tothe Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a non-partisan think-tank whose board includes former members of Congress and budget directors.
The Congressional Budget Office predicted earlier this year that the full impact of those tax hikes and spending cuts would remove about 3.5 percent of gross domestic product, more than wiping out the current recovery. That would send the unemployment rate, which stood at 8.2 percent in March, to 8.9 percent by year-end and 9.2 percent at the end of 2013.
Some economists argue the hit to GDP could be even greater. Morgan Stanley economist David Greenlaw figures the hit from the fiscal cliff would amount to more like 5 percent of GDP in 2013.
Others, like Deutsche Bank economist Joseph LaVorgna, think those estimates are overblown, though his assessment assumes Congress gets its act together and steers away from the cliff at the last minute.
But there's widespread agreement that if lawmakers ultimately pull a "Thelma and Louise," the economic impact of these tax and spending changes would be devastating if they hit all at once.
As Congress quibbles bitterly over how to cut the federal deficit, lawmakers generally agree that failing to do so would have dire long-term consequences. But, as Bernanke told the House Oversight Committee in March, balancing the budget abruptly would be even worse.
"It is important to achieve sustainability over a longer period," he told the panel. "One day is a pretty short time frame."
Perhaps even more worrisome than the scheduled "cliff" in federal taxing and spending is the timetable lawmakers face to prevent the worst-case scenarios from playing out. Given the potential changes in party leadership for both Congress and the White House, chances appear slim to none that any decisions will be made until after the November elections. That leaves Congress and the White House roughly eight weeks - punctuated by the Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's Eve holidays - to prevent the economy from falling off the cliff both sides have created.
The deadline could be even tougher to meet if, as some are warning, the government runs out of borrowing authority in the middle of that eight-week window.
Though the exact timing is difficult to predict, the next expiration of the current debt ceiling will likely spark another round of brinksmanship reminiscent of last August, when Congress and the White House narrowly quelleda rebellion by House Republicans bent on forcing the U.S. Treasury to default on its debt. That compromise produced the "automatic" $1.2 trillion spending cuts set for early next year.
"Finding a clever way to kick the can down the road again is becoming a bigger and bigger challenge," Princeton University economist Alan Blinder wrote in a recent Wall Street Journal OpEd. "And Congress has barely coped with previous such challenges."
What do you think of the "fiscal cliff"?Let us know on Facebook.
Obama, Democrats, and EPA are the biggest killers of US success in this nation today.
alienjon-
While your on the subject of quoting fiction from "Fux News", why don't you really bore us, and read a couple of chapters from "War and Peace".....
What a lot of long winded, cut and paste, bull@!$%#!
Obama/Biden 2012
While your quoting dumbasss, put a sock in it while adults can actually talk.
Fox has shown ABC, CBS, and NBC all lying and full of crap. They later even came out admited it on Trayvon case.
alienjon-819068. Obviously, you were not around from 2000 to 2008.
ATC
i was around in 2000 and 2008
Bush got us into 2 wars.
E
Obama administration announces 'War on Terror' is over; so can we ...
Obama administration announces 'War on Terror' is over; so can we fire the TSA and repeal the Patriot Act now?
www.naturalnews.com/035666_war_on_terror_Al_Qaida_Obama.html
ven though Obama says
May not know this but Obama has got us into Lybia, Uganda, Central Africa, Congo, etc. plus Obama invokes Holocaust to ratchet up
war threats on Iran, Syria
The Whole Republican party should try out for comedy central, They are a joke!!!!!