The pro-Mitt Romney Super PAC has paid $803,000 to a small polling firm that is owned by the senior partners of a prominent Republican consulting company that does the polling for the Romney presidential campaign, according to the campaign finance reports.
The overlap between the two polling firms, located right door to each other in Alexandria, Va., is the latest example of the close and sometimes hidden connections between the presidential campaigns and the theoretically independent Super PACs that are backing the candidates.
It is also a closeness that includes the news media: Under an entirely separate arrangement, the nationally known firm doing the polling for the Romney campaign, Public Opinion Strategies, also conducts half the polling for the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll overseen by Public Opinion partner Bill McInturff and Democratic pollster Peter Hart.
The latest filing by the pro-Romney super pac, Restore Our Future, show five payments totaling $449,000 last month for “survey research” to a company called NMB Research, listed at 206 N. Fayette Street, in Alexandria. This is on top of five previous payments to the same firm of $354.500.
Virginia corporate records show that NMB Research was incorporated as a Limited Liability Corporation or LLC, but they provide no information about who the owners or partners are. But one clue is the N. Fayette street address. It’s the building next door to Public Opinion Strategies, one of whose senior partners is Neil Newhouse, the chief pollster for the Romney presidential campaign.
An NBC researcher who visited the address found a sign instructing that all mail and packages for the offices of NMB Research be delivered next door at 214 N. Fayette, the street address of Public Opinion Strategies.
Federal election laws bar campaign and so-called “independent expenditure” groups such as super pacs – which are unfettered by limits on campaign contributions-- from “coordinating” their operations, including sharing their polling results.
But the Romney presidential campaign, the Romney Super PAC, and Public Opinion Strategies all dispute that any “coordination” or sharing of polling data is taking place.
“Our campaign follows both the letter and the spirit of the law,” said campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul.
“We do our own polling and it’s exclusively for us,” said Charles Spies, counsel for Restore Our Future.
Public Opinion Strategies partner McInturff confirmed that he and Newhouse are both partners in NMB Research—an entirely permissible arrangement, he said, so long as the two polling entities do not share the data they collect for their respective clients.
“Like many firms on both sides of the aisle, we recognize the strict federal election laws that apply to our business, which includes work for candidates, political parties and independent expenditure/issue advocacy groups,” McInturff said in an email. “The FEC [Federal Election Commission] rules specifically permit firms such as ours to establish internal firewalls designed to keep our candidate work walled off from the services performed for other types of clients such as independent expenditure groups. In order to follow the law, we have implemented the appropriate FEC firewalls to keep our work for candidates and independent expenditure/issue advocacy groups separate and compliant.”
Fred Wertheimer, who heads a campaign watchdog group that has been urging the Justice Department to investigate “coordination” between the presidential campaigns and super pacs, acknowledged that FEC regulations do “probably” permit the NMB arrangement as described by McInturff.
But, he said, this only shows “the absurdity” of FEC regulations—and the interconnections between the presidential campaigns and Super PACs (which, because they can take unlimited amounts from wealthy donors and corporations, have been financing most of the negative attack ads during the GOP presidential contest.)
"This is an example of common consultants being used by both the campaign and Super PAC,” Wertheimer said. “It’s clearly an example of coordinated activities.”
As for Public Opinion Strategies’ statement that there is a firewall between the two polling firms, Wertheimer said: “There is no such thing as a firewall. How do you know what is going on within an organization? There is no monitor or enforcement. “
The close ties between NMB Research and Public Opinion Strategies is hardly the only example of the blurry lines among consultants working for the campaigns and the Super PACs.
According to its latest report, Restore Our Future has now paid a total of $456,750 for survey research to another Alexandria consulting firm, Target Point Consulting, that has also been getting payments from the Romney presidential campaign. (Like Public Opinion Strategies, its founder recently told the New York Times that his firm has a “firewall” between those working for the Super PAC. Restore Our Future has also paid $1.9 million to Podium Capital Group, a Beverly, Ma. LLC, set up last year by Steve Roach, a former Romney presidential campaign fundraiser, who now performs the same services for the Romney Super PAC.
But consultant firms serving two masters in this campaign isn’t unique to Romney, either. The latest report filed by Priorities USA Action, the Super PAC backing President Obama, showed $28,000 to Peter D. Hart Research Associates. That’s for the services of veteran Democratic pollster Geoffrey Garin, president of Peter Hart Research, whose founder Peter Hart oversees—along with McInturff—the NBC News Wall Street Journal poll.


What was Romney's comment in one of the debates regarding PAC attack ads on Gingrich? "You know I can't coordinate with the PAC - I haven't even seen the ad..." Then he went on to paraphrase the ad's points...almost verbatim.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...
Romney wouldn't know the truth if it bit him in the rear end.
Romney is spinning his opinion so fast, the truth can't get sight of him, let alone lay a fang on him.
Mr. Isikoff,
This story would be so much more fascinating and politically honest had I read any research done by NBC "researchers" on the Obama Super PAC's; Priorities USA Action, PAC +, Obama Super Pac and more.
I sure hope you aren't honestly trying to convince voters that Romney is playing devil while Obama is polishing his halo...lol...
....because that will only work on First Read
Michael1969
So are you saying that:
1) you have proof that there is no sign instructing that all mail and packages for the offices of NMB Research be delivered next door at 214 N. Fayette, the street address of Public Opinion Strategies and that the NBC researcher lied?
and
2) that you have proof that the NBC researchers are somehow linked to the Obama Super PAC's; Priorities USA Action, PAC +, Obama Super Pac and more (taken from your quote)?
Other than that, accept the fact that this is just another example of Romney lying, and cheating to get nominated.
The sad part is, he is not even doing this to beat Obama - he is doing it to beat members of his own party. SAD!
Wow. What a story. I've got an even juicier one- I shop, in the very same grocery store, as the Democratic Mayor of the next town!
Now, it's well KNOWN that I am not a democratic supporter- so imagine the scandal that would erupt if it became known that we stood in the same check-out lane- And I led her go ahead of me!
Meanwhile, no mention of this
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/03/jim-yong-kim-wikipedia-page-scrubbed-118445.html
Here's a little hint- instead of expending precious space and energy on "create-a-controversies", simply avail yourselves of the opportunities laid at your feet by this inept, corrupt administration.
You could do an "in depth" on Pbama's insistence that Solyndra is not his fault.
Or the Navy being for Ed to pay $16 a gallon for diesel from one of his big dollar donor's companies- rather than the $4 a gallon it should cost.
Or his interference with a free press, (that would be YOU. You should really check out your own Constitutional protections sometime. You might be amazed).
Fisker Automotive? You so thoroughly missed the boat on that one, a poster here thought it was a scissors company.
Siga? You know, where Perelman got billions for a "new" smallpox vaccine- that can't be tested because it is unethical, so we have no idea whether or not it even works.
There's lots of stuff out there that is real, and has plenty of fact behind it.
Solyndra
After months of investigations into Solyndra and other Department of Energy loans failed to produce a smoking gun, one Republican lawmaker let slip why House Republicans have kept up the charge.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) conceded that Republicans' ongoing probes of the program -- from which the bankrupt California-based solar company Solyndra and others benefited -- are largely a play to win votes in November.
“Ultimately, we'll stop it on Election Day, hopefully.”
Deliberately denying facts does not make them go away.
There have been plenty of smoking guns- including the re-writing of the original law to benefit Obama's donors at the expense of the taxpayers, Spinner's involvement in getting the loan approved, the pushing back of the layoff announcement- at the beast of the White House- until after the mid term elections, to name just three.
Why no prosecutions? Very simply- we have no Special Prosecutor law. Holder is not going to go there.
There is a direct correlation between this and what happened in Florida- but at least the Chief of Police was forced to step down for not arresting the shooter in that horrifying case.
By your logic, because the shooter was not arrested, there was no crime.
The overwhelming majority of people disagree with that logic.
I will say it once again …
No Joe wants to talk corruption but ignores the Bush Administration actions here is just one:
In 2002 Halliburton was awarded a 7 billion dollar contract for which only Halliburton was allowed to bid. The very same company headed from 1995 to 2000 by Dick Cheney.
Add it up No Joe, how many BILLIONS has the Obama Administration passed out to his cronies?
BTW - Vice President Dick Cheney’s stock options in Halliburton rose from $241,498 in 2004 to over $8 million in 2005, an increase of more than 3,000 percent, as Halliburton continues to rake in billions of dollars from no-bid/no audit government contracts.
$7 billion compared to $500 million … Wow !!
blow joe,
2 points:
1) Darryll Issa was not only hanging out with the lobbyist from Solyndra but he was featured on the invitation to that fundraiser in Washington for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign co-hosted by Alex Mistri of the Glover Park Group, a lobbyist for Solyndra.
2) The Republicans could not find ANY ties that indicated ANYTHING improper other than what we already knew: loan guarantees signed off by the Obama administration to a company that failed.
P.S. please take off one of joe's votes - I meant to reply and clicked on "vote" instead.
Dennis--You assume the haters are motivated by truth and facts? LOL
Do these Republican have no shame left?
Job1- I usually like your comments. But this one? Dumb question! Thought that was settled months ago.
Just what would you expect? this is a mere pitance to him pocket change if you will.the poor slobs in the Republican Party will vote for him because they have no choice
What they say simply doesn’t mean anything as that is just the con. What they do really matters and their history clearly tells what they do.
These are just some of the deceptions, without elaboration, assuming their stubborn and arrogant focus on benefit for “the few” (1%) while insultingly taking the majority (99%) for granted will be remembered. Remember: the multiple tax cuts heavily weighted for the wealthy; Global Warming stated as not a problem; private accounts recommended for Social Security; the actual minimized/ignored warnings before 9/11 while concentrating on Iraq; trumped up justification for attacking Iraq; abandoned effort in Afghanistan; Afghanistan presented as secure; the false coalition with America paying 95%+; Iraqi oil money never paying for the war as was proposed; executive pressures put on the intelligence community to create justification; including the authorized departure from Geneva Convention rules; frequent misrepresentations to manipulate public opinion; no bid contracts ($100B’s) to favored vendors; responsibility for port security offered to Dubai Ports; the always excusing the growing deficit and unfavorable trade deficit; the apathetic reaction to the hurricane Katrina aftermath; blocking bringing less costly American drugs back into the US; vengefully exposing the CIA agent's identity; squelching the “wiretapping without court order” story; falsely raising the security threat level before 2004 election; the excessive deregulation and the lack of any responsible oversight, favoring the few and resulting in unchecked greed, gross dishonesty and criminal self-indulgence eventually bringing down the financial industry; encouraging the exportation of American jobs and taxes; the sociopathic GWBush falsely presented as a “born again Christian”; ... and then after Bush-Cheney: the Republican’s continual belligerent concentration on their political ambitions; stubbornly obstructing and faulting all efforts to address problems; irresponsibly withholding any bipartisan cooperation; implementing, directing and financing the Tea Party movement with their constant screams for “more”; the ‘Swift-boat” propaganda and the manipulation of the Christian block, all aimed to deceptively excite and sway public opinion; their insultingly offering several “puppet” candidates ready to perform as their “strings are pulled”; Cheney’s, Rove’s, Norquist’s, SuperPacs and other groups, using “the few’s” unlimited funds to first, coerce and intimidate their own to insure strict unity, and second, to con the people and manipulate public opinion ... on and on, without any conscience, with complete disregard for responsibility and always aimed to just benefit “the few”, their supporters and controllers, while insultingly just taking the people for granted.
It is said the current Republican / Tea Party is owned and controlled by “the money” and that they are now incapable of honestly and responsibly governing; the last twelve years have clearly substantiated that. To get the Grande Ole Party back, once again with a sincere concern for the people, the stranglehold “the money” has on them has to be broken. The only way to accomplish that is to firmly and totally reject their “puppet” politicians.