Biden names names; says GOP 'dead wrong' on auto bailout

TOLEDO, Ohio -- In the White House's most aggressive singling out of its Republican rivals to date, Vice President Joe Biden slammed Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum by name during his first public campaign event of the 2012 cycle.

Addressing more than 500 union members and supporters at United Auto Workers Local 12 here, Biden touted the administration's backing of the auto industry bailout, saying that the GOP presidential candidates were "dead wrong" in their opposition to the measure.

"Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich," he said. "These guys have a fundamentally different economic philosophy than we do."

He specifically noted Romney's 2008 op-ed entitled "Let Detroit go bankrupt" -- greeted with raucous boos -- as well as Gingrich's labeling of the bailout as a "mistake," and Santorum's statement that the measure catered to Obama's political interests.

"Look, I want to tell you what's real bankruptcy," the vice president said. "The economic theories of Gingrich, Santorum, and Romney. They are bankrupt."

Biden dismissed as inaccurate the Republican sentiment that, without government intervention, the private sector would have stepped in to the void to aid the ailing automotive sector. With a particular tweak at Romney, Biden noted that Bain Capital -- the company that Romney once led -- declined an offer from the President's Auto Task Force to invest in GM's European operations.

In contrast, he said the president showed his "spine of steel" by backing the financial rescue of an "iconic industry America invented."

In his characteristic booming voice, Biden stated at the beginning of his remarks, "We bet on American ingenuity; we bet on you; and we won!"

The top surrogate's utterance of the candidates' names is a departure from the president's own rhetoric. The White House has largely avoided specific mention of any of the candidates, even as the DNC maintains a sharp focus on delegate-frontrunner Romney.

The vice president also argued that Democrats represent economic fairness in comparison to what he described as crony-embracing Republicans.

"Stated simply, we're about promoting the private sector," he said. "They're about protecting the privileged sector."

Biden was introduced by Rep. Marcy Kaptur, who just defeated fellow Democrat Dennis Kucinich in a redistricting-fueled primary contest. The event had a notably political feel, with chants of, "Four more years!" and, "Go, Joe, go!" reverberating from the sign-wielding crowd.

This was not Biden's first visit to UAW Local 12; he visited the same venue in October 2010 to stump for then-Gov. Ted Strickland.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4

Fun with Numbers: GM’s Phony ‘Payback’ of Taxpayer Loans

http://pjmedia.com/blog/fun-with-numbers-gm-payback-of-taxpayer-loans/

Last week, Government/General Motors Chairman Ed Whitacre went to the pages of the Wall Street Journal
to crow about how well the company is supposedly doing. In “The GM Bailout:
Paid in Full,” he told readers the following:

We’re paying back — in full, with interest, years ahead of
schedule — loans made
to help fund the new GM. Our ability to pay back these loans less than a year
after emerging from bankruptcy is a sign that our plan for building a new GM is
working.

Whitacre then took
to the airwaves
to announce the payoff as a done deal, saying we
“have repaid” the loans.

There are two “little” problems with Whitacre’s
presentation. First, the “Bailout Paid in Full” headline in the Journal
doesn’t pass the truth test no matter how far you try to stretch it. As Forbes
magazine’s Jerry Flint reminded readers:

That still leaves $43 billion. GM can say they paid us back
because of the $50 billion in total support, only $7 billion was counted as a loan and
the rest was traded for equity in the company that emerged from bankruptcy. But
that is really an accounting trick so that GM doesn’t have to pay interest on
that money.

That’s a great point. The government poured tens of billions
into GM in return for a 61% ownership stake. Unless and until GM goes
public and the government cashes out its shares for at least the $43 billion
cited plus at least 5% for each year of delay to account for the time value of
money, taxpayers will be getting the short end of the stick.

What’s more, the funds for GM’s loan “repayment” did not
come from cash generated by operations. In fact, the company’s latest available
financial information
indicates that from September 30 (Page 2 at link) to December 31 (Page 123 at link) it burned through
$2.4 billion in cash and equivalents, while its working capital (current assets
minus current liabilities) fell by $2.75 billion. TARP Inspector General Neil
Barofsky has asserted, as paraphrased by Fox News, that GM “only repaid the
bailout money by dipping into a separate pot of bailout money.” Good luck
finding that critical piece of information anywhere else in the establishment press.

The situation isn’t any better at GM’s fellow bailout
recipient Chrysler — nor is the press coverage.

Chrysler lost $3.8 billion during the 205 days after it
emerged from bankruptcy last year. It lost another $197 million in the first
quarter of 2010. Here was the Associated Press’s headline about those
contemporaneous announcements: “Chrysler Posts $197M Loss But Cash Balance
Grows.”

  • 2 votes
Reply#28 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:10 AM EDT

Great post, Honestjo. Too bad the liberal media won't report any of it.

  • 1 vote
#28.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:16 PM EDT
Reply

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/gm-paying-employee-4000-performance-bonuses-before-they-pay-back-our-tax-dollars-that-they-borrowe/question-1515135/

GM paying employee $4,000 performance bonuses BEFORE they pay back our tax dollars that they borrowed.

GM to pay more than $400 million in worker bonuses

DETROIT – Less than two years after entering bankruptcy, General Motors will extend millions of dollars in bonuses to most of its 48,000 hourly workers as a reward for the company's rapid turnaround after it was rescued by the government.

The payments, disclosed Monday in company documents, are similar to bonuses announced last week for white-collar employees. The bonuses to 76,000 American workers will probably total more than $400 million — an amount that suggests executives have increasing confidence in the automaker's comeback.

In the four years leading up to its 2009 bankruptcy, GM piled up more than $80 billion in losses and was burdened by enormous debt and costly labor contracts.

  • 1 vote
Reply#29 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:14 AM EDT

Obama Car Czar: We never said taxpayers would get GM bailout money back

http://www.therightscoop.com/obama-car-czar-we-never-said-taxpayers-would-get-gm-bailout-money-back/

Steven Rattner, Obama’s Car Czar, was asked by CNBC if the taxpayers would get paid back by GM. He replied:

No, but we never said the taxpayer was gonna get paid back. We put 82 billion into the car industry as a whole. We will get back all but 14 billion plus or minus of it. But in return for that we saved 2 million jobs in the Midwest and two great American companies. You compare that to the $875 billion dollar stimulus program or the trillions of dollars of QE1,2,3.

I think the tax payers got a good deal.

i think the tax payers got a good screwing!!!!!!!!!

  • 1 vote
Reply#30 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:18 AM EDT

Oh come on honestjo. I mean, 82,000,000,000 divided by 2,000,000 is only $41,000 per job saved... And I'm sure those folks are pulling in at least $20K each. I mean, hell, it only cost $21,000 each if you look at it that way. Of course, if we did that for the 20% who're out of work, we'd bankrupt our country, but any democrat worth his salt could show how that's good for the economy.

  • 1 vote
#30.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:20 PM EDT
Reply
    Reply#31 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:24 AM EDT

    FACT CHECK

    http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/sunday-replay-2/

    the government still owns 61 percent of GM, an equity stake of $40 billion-plus. (The government has just a 9.9 percent stake in Chrysler.) Shelby said that a full payback from the auto companies "will never happen, not all of it." And the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office agrees with that. The CBO estimated in March that the automaker bailout will ultimately cost the government close to $34 billion.

    The Alabama senator is also correct in saying the automakers paid back the money with Troubled Asset Relief Program money. But it’s not a matter of robbing Paul to pay Paul; GM simply gave back the TARP money it had been lent, and which had been held in escrow by the government should GM need it. An April report from the special inspector general noted that the Treasury Department poured lots of money into GM — $49.5 billion in total. Most of that was converted into an ownership stake in the form of common and preferred stock owned by the government. But a total of $7.1 billion was a straight loan, which GM took on as debt.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#32 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:32 AM EDT

    More hoping the US auto industry and America will fail from the Teabaggers. What a surprise.

    • 1 vote
    #32.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:44 AM EDT

    no! we are just tired of obama and the unions screwing tax payers.

      #32.2 - Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:22 AM EDT
      Reply

      It's all over but the waiting to celebrate !! This Texas Independent is going to vote, for the first time, for POTUS Barack Obama, and hope it is God's will !

      • 2 votes
      Reply#33 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:48 AM EDT

      I'm happy for you...

        #33.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:21 PM EDT
        Reply

        Dam right its over... Oblabma is not fit to scrub a toilet let alone hold a title... Biggest MORON to ever hit the planet... three worse ever in modern times 1. Tie Hitler-Stalin 2. obama Hitler and stalin were just evil.. obama is evil and a dumb @$$....PATHETIC

        • 1 vote
        Reply#34 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:10 AM EDT

        Hitler and Stalin were nowhere near as bad as obama!

          Reply#35 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:11 AM EDT

          If you consider obama the baby killer world wide yes I guess eventually he will have had his hand in killing more babies then any human being on the face of the planet.. Yeah hands dripping in blood... How's that "Executive order" working for you now STUPAK??? Freaking Idiot..

          obama is already slicing up babies on the fed dollar in the USA ... murdering BASTARD!

          • 1 vote
          #35.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:07 AM EDT
          Reply

          Green Technology is an economic disaster

          Goodnight Sunshine

          Germany is cutting solar-power subsidies because they are expensive and
          inefficient

          http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/project_syndicate/2012/02/why_germany_is_phasing_out_its_solar_power_subsidies_.html

          Spain's Green Disaster a Lesson for America

          http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/finance/2011/November/Spains-Green-Disaster-a-Lesson-for-America/

          • 1 vote
          Reply#36 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:43 AM EDT

          No question that the Republicans are for feathering the nest of their rich benifactors, but for Joe to say that the Obama administration is tough on the bankers, who caused our collapse, is absolutely untrue. Banks have been making more money under Obama than ever before and paying record bonuses, and they have been limiting the money lent into the American economy. Obama has insulated criminals in the banking system from prosecution ever since he got the power to do so in 2009. Mitch McConnell is a shill but so is Joe Biden. A pox on both of their houses.

            Reply#37 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:45 AM EDT

            Those "Evil, Rich People" – are Democrats

            http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-841520.htm

            From the, "you never hear about that from the media" file – Those "Evil, Rich
            People" that Democrats are always wailing about are actually – Democrats.

            In fact, the Top 4 on the list: Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Larry Ellison,
            Christy Walton are all Democrats. Together, they are worth $150 Billion
            Dollars.

            An analysis of the Top 20 Richest People in America (from Forbes Top 100)
            reveals that a full 60% are actually Democrats. Furthermore, if you eliminate
            the duplication caused by people from the same family being included in that
            Top 20 list (Wal-Mart & Koch) that ratio widens even further to:

            25% Republican / 75% Democrat.

            (The purpose of this analysis is not who makes the most money, but where they
            contribute / by party affiliation. Obviously, people from the same family would
            tend to contribute to the same party.)

            Analyzing the data takes us even further. Not only are there more Democrats in
            the Top 20 list, but those Democrats are a lot more stingy with their money.
            Republicans coughed up $5.2 million while Democrats squirted out only $2.1
            Million.

            Of course, there is no reason not to assume that the money they contribute to
            Special Interest groups wouldn't match (or closely match) those of their chosen
            candidates. So when you add in the money from these groups you end up with
            Republican Contributions at $10 million while Democrats contributed only $6
            million.

            Lest we not forget, Democrats outweigh Republicans. Not only in terms of the
            number of uber-millionaires, but also with their net worth. In this Top 20
            group, Democrats have a combined net worth of $263.1 billion dollars while the
            Republicans have a combined net worth of only $143.9 billion dollars – almost
            half that of Democrats.

            So the next time you hear some Liberal Freak try the "Evil Rich People"
            rhetoric, remind them and everyone around you that it is the Democrats who are
            those "Evil Rich People", not the Republicans. Then stand back and watch their
            head spin.

            • 1 vote
            #37.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:55 AM EDT

            It's not rich democrats crying don't raise our taxes it's the republicon ones, you know the "job crematers". At the expense of working people.

            • 1 vote
            #37.2 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:41 AM EDT

            Yes, LittleGirl, you're right. It's the repubs who don't want to raise taxes. The democraps just want to bankrupt us by shutting down private enterprise, and giving it all to the welfare state. That would be your state, wouldn't it?

            • 1 vote
            #37.3 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:23 PM EDT
            Reply
            • 1 vote
            Reply#38 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:55 AM EDT

            http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/2010/07/green-energy-failure-windmills-solar-panels-and-hydro-project-cant-reliably-provide-power-for-87-people/

            Green Energy Failure: Windmills, Solar Panels and Hydro Project
            Can’t Reliably Provide Power For 87 People

            Posted
            on July 5, 2010 by steve

            The tiny island of Eigg off the coast of Scotland made a big
            push for ‘green energy’ recently. They designed their system to provide 95% of
            the electrical needs for the 87 residents of their island. This should be
            fairly straightforward, since the residents of the island are not big users of
            electricity to start with. They only received regular electrical service in February
            2008
            .

            The new ‘green energy’ system the residents of Eigg installed
            was designed to provide a meager 5kW (max.) of power per household. Via the Daily Mail:

            Right now, however, their award-winning and highly complex
            eco-energy system, which allows each household access
            to a maximum of 5kW of energy at a time (enough to power a washing machine,
            a small heater or a kettle, but not all at once)
            , is lying largely idle.

            So the wind turbines are still and silent. The hydro turbines in
            the rivers and dams are quiet. And toasted teacakes and hot tea are off the
            menu at the Eigg Tearooms.

            So what on earth’s going on? Have the Eigg eco-innovators been
            victims of some act of jealous vandalism? Has their award- winning electricity
            system blown a fuse?

            Er, no. It turns out that when the good people of Eigg put their
            faith in strong winds and pounding rain to provide all their electricity needs,
            they overlooked one possibility – a spell of lovely weather.

            Go figure, no rain or wind and the solar panels
            are not cutting it. Of course this is not a big deal to the residents of Eigg,
            but imagine how chaotic this would be in a large US City.

            We’ve never taken electricity for granted,’ says Maggie, 61, has
            lived on Eigg for 34 years and has a daughter and granddaughter living nearby.

            ‘Until a couple of years ago, I was supplied by a tiny
            hydroelectric generator that produced a maximum of 1kW of power. Which powered
            my lights, TV and computer, but not a washing machine, electric kettle, toaster
            or anything like that. And I was one of the lucky ones.’

            A few of her neighbours had no running water and others relied
            on their own generator which had to be turned on every morning by hand.

            ‘So if you got up for a pee in the middle of the night, you had
            to take a torch with you or fumble about in the dark,’ she adds.

            ‘And the noise was terrible. If you walked round in the evening,
            you’d hear a terrible thumping of generators.

            If green energy can’t reliably provide power for 87 residents
            (who are not big consumers of electricity) how do supporters of ‘green energy’
            propose we are going to power large US cities using windmills
            and solar panels?

            • 1 vote
            Reply#39 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:10 AM EDT

            Did Joe Biden ever graduate from high school?

            • 1 vote
            Reply#40 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:01 AM EDT

            HOW... did Joe Biden graduate high school????

            • 1 vote
            #40.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:03 AM EDT

            Biden attended the Archmere Academy in Claymont, where he was a standout halfback/wide receiver on the high school football team; he helped lead a perennially losing team to an undefeated season in his senior year.

            Biden attended the University of Delaware in Newark.

            • 3 votes
            #40.2 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:06 AM EDT

            He must have been pushed thru school because of age then because he's the dumbest demodope since the Hope Dope himself, Barack Hussine Obumbler.

            • 1 vote
            #40.3 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:09 AM EDT
            Reply

            Honest Jo

            I think you're one of the founding members of the Flat Earth Society the President was talking about yesterday. Seriously, how many posts do you have at this point? All the links you so amply supply...what a joke. Let me be honest with you jo.....No matter how many times you comment here, there's one thing I can guarantee you. President Obama and Vice President Biden will be re-elected in November. You can book the farm on it, jo. The GOP is going down the tubes, and they either can't or won't stop the slide. For the next 8 months, the Vice President will keep on naming names to remind everyone of the clear choice the voters have. OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

            • 2 votes
            Reply#41 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:01 AM EDT

            Obama/Biden2012= Dumb and Dumber

            • 2 votes
            #41.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:05 AM EDT

            Oooohh Bob, you're so clever. Get lost.

            • 2 votes
            #41.2 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:07 AM EDT

            Dee.... I don't know if it's a question of me being so clever.....or you liberals being so stupid.

            What do you think?.....if you can think that is.

            • 1 vote
            #41.3 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:11 AM EDT

            Bob...believe me, there's no question whether or not you're clever. You're not. And here's what I think....you, and people who think (and I use the term loosely) like you need to pull your heads out of the sand. Move towards the light, Bob, and it'll all become so much better for you. OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

            • 3 votes
            #41.4 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:17 AM EDT

            actually no. i am a Christian and it tells us in the Bible (written thousands of years ago) that the earth is round.

              #41.5 - Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:27 AM EDT
              Reply

              The GOP mantra "Just let em die!" (tea bag audience applause). The same attitude was given to the US auto industry.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#42 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:03 AM EDT

              I'm in favor of it if the 'let em's are all liberals.

                #42.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:06 AM EDT
                Reply

                Dee.....how's that 'green energy' working out for you? How's "Solyndra" stock doing??? How much did President HOPE DOPE lose for the American Taxpayers on that one??? Maybe Eric Holder should be investigating the White House for fraud???

                • 1 vote
                Reply#43 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:14 AM EDT

                Bob....poor, misguided Bob. Is that all you got? Solyndra? Hahahaha. Your party's going down because they've alienated the middle class, latinos, blacks, and women all over the country. How's that working out for you?

                • 2 votes
                #43.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:21 AM EDT

                What's the matter Bob? Not serving free coffee at the Mayberry McDonald's this morning?

                • 2 votes
                #43.2 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:27 AM EDT
                Reply

                Bob-If you believe all uninsured Americans and people in the US auto industry are all "liberals", then you're a bigger idiot than your posts lead me to believe.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#44 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:17 AM EDT

                Thanks honest jo

                I don't think people realize that not only political campaigners hire bloggers so do corporations and lobbyists

                Not all people here are sharing there thoughts with you.

                Some are here earning a paycheck.

                Maybe you?

                  Reply#45 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:21 PM EDT

                  The only person dumber than Obama is Joe.

                  Let's take GM. So the product name, the designs, the state of the art assembly plants the dealerships would all have just boards up and closed?

                  Of course not , the company would most likely have ran under bankruptcy, most of the airlines have went through this process, and reorganized. Of course re-organization would have meant belt tightening for the union folk. Can't have that.

                  So what we get is that oh so special treatment that Obama's political allies seem to get.

                  Want a bailout, here you go, secured creditors be damned, want a health care waiver sure here you go, catholic church pound salt

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#46 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:47 PM EDT

                  And the republicans just want to "let them die"?

                  How about just follow the same rules that the rest of us have to follow. If you spend more than you take in for long periods in time you end up bankrupt. No one owes you a bailout.

                    Reply#47 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:55 PM EDT

                    Yes, the repubs have alienated all of the government consumers. Good.

                      Reply#48 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:57 PM EDT

                      Biden dismissed as inaccurate the Republican sentiment that, without government intervention, the private sector would have stepped in to the void to aid the ailing automotive sector.

                      Hey Joe, we'll never know if that was accurate or inaccurate because you guys prevented the bankruptcy process from doing what it was created for, allow a company to reorganize by modifying and restructuring some unfavorable agreements and contracts and emerge from bankruptcy better able to compete in the market place. All of this without taxpayer help. If that didn't work, then, and only then, could taxpayer dollars been placed at risk.

                      Instead Joe and his pals played bankruptcy judge, deciding who would take the hits and who would be treated favorably. After the dust settled, the organization to which these 500 audience members Joe addressed belonged got everything and the secured creditors got the shaft. Go figure. It's almost a certainty that if bankruptcy had been allowed to proceed among those unfavorable agreements and contracts that would have be modified would have been the union contracts and Joe and his guys couldn't let that happened.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#49 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:52 PM EDT

                      Oh come on now dude,,, That's like saying "It's terrible because we will never know if the window broke because we stopped it from breaking"

                      Bottom line is ----- American Families kept their jobs, GM survived, tax payers got money back & is a major player in our economic recovery

                      OBAMA - BIDEN 2012 ---- TAKING AMERICA FORWARD

                        #49.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:19 PM EDT

                        FACT
                        CHECK

                        http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/sunday-replay-2/

                        the
                        government still owns 61 percent of GM, an equity stake of $40 billion-plus.
                        (The government has just a 9.9 percent stake in Chrysler.) Shelby said that a
                        full payback from the auto companies "will never happen, not all of
                        it." And the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office agrees with that. The
                        CBO estimated
                        in March that the automaker bailout will ultimately cost the government close
                        to $34 billion.

                        The Alabama senator is also correct in
                        saying the automakers paid back the money with Troubled Asset Relief Program
                        money. But it’s not a matter of robbing Paul to pay Paul; GM simply gave back
                        the TARP money it had been lent, and which had been held in escrow by the
                        government should GM need it. An April report
                        from the special inspector general noted that the Treasury Department poured
                        lots of money into GM — $49.5 billion in
                        total
                        . Most of that was converted into an ownership stake in the
                        form of common and preferred stock owned by the government. But a total of $7.1
                        billion was a straight loan, which GM took on as debt.

                          #49.2 - Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:30 AM EDT
                          Reply

                          GM has paid the US back? What's 43 Billion between freinds. Between 1992 and 1998 16 auto assembly plants were built in Mexico by Ford, GM, Chrysler, Nissan and Toyota. The reason they were built is to move to a non-union workforce. Today those plants employ 143,000 auto workers.

                          Ford didn't need a bailout because they took a hard line in negotiating with the UAW and made a deal which lowered their costs. The management at GM was so busy puffing up their bonuses that they took a different tack...they folded up like a row of cheap lawn chairs, let the UAW drive their operating costs through the rooof and then went to Obarry and asked for a handout to reward their poor management practices and miserable managers with yet larger bonuses. Next time we'll just let them collapse as Obarry just bought a bunch of union votes and America gets crappy Government Motors cars that break and catch fire. GM should have ben allowed to go the way of the Dodo...into extinction.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#50 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:48 PM EDT

                          Can anyone truthfully say that it was wrong to bail out the auto industry? It was easy to say before the bailout happened, but nearly impossible to say NOW. The GOP just can't admit that they were wrong about it. In other words, they can't tell the truth about the matter. Since they are hiding the truth on purpose, can we believe in them? Nah, I think not. Then we have "The Donald...talking like he knows it all. Hey, if he knew it all, then why did he file bankruptcy twice???? Yeah, right. He's should revive the know-nothing party, but with a different platform! Blow hard, know-nothing. That's our Donald.

                            Reply#51 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:36 PM EDT

                            I can...

                            What did we accomplish? Is GM productive? Where are their plants today? Name the countries where the workers are located. How much money did we spend (and not get back) to get them to where they're now only burning through a couple of billion a year? Read Honest Jo's posting below (I copied it to make it easy for you), and try to address the issues he raises. I'd love to see your reply.

                            Fun with Numbers: GM’s Phony ‘Payback’ of Taxpayer Loans

                            http://pjmedia.com/blog/fun-with-numbers-gm-payback-of-taxpayer-loans/

                            Last week, Government/General Motors Chairman Ed Whitacre went to the pages of the Wall Street Journal
                            to crow about how well the company is supposedly doing. In “The GM Bailout:
                            Paid in Full,” he told readers the following:

                            We’re paying back — in full, with interest, years ahead of
                            schedule — loans made
                            to help fund the new GM. Our ability to pay back these loans less than a year
                            after emerging from bankruptcy is a sign that our plan for building a new GM is
                            working.

                            Whitacre then took
                            to the airwaves
                            to announce the payoff as a done deal, saying we
                            “have repaid” the loans.

                            There are two “little” problems with Whitacre’s
                            presentation. First, the “Bailout Paid in Full” headline in the Journal
                            doesn’t pass the truth test no matter how far you try to stretch it. As Forbes
                            magazine’s Jerry Flint reminded readers:

                            That still leaves $43 billion. GM can say they paid us back
                            because of the $50 billion in total support, only $7 billion was counted as a loan and
                            the rest was traded for equity in the company that emerged from bankruptcy. But
                            that is really an accounting trick so that GM doesn’t have to pay interest on
                            that money.

                            That’s a great point. The government poured tens of billions
                            into GM in return for a 61% ownership stake. Unless and until GM goes
                            public and the government cashes out its shares for at least the $43 billion
                            cited plus at least 5% for each year of delay to account for the time value of
                            money, taxpayers will be getting the short end of the stick.

                            What’s more, the funds for GM’s loan “repayment” did not
                            come from cash generated by operations. In fact, the company’s latest available
                            financial information
                            indicates that from September 30 (Page 2 at link) to December 31 (Page 123 at link) it burned through
                            $2.4 billion in cash and equivalents, while its working capital (current assets
                            minus current liabilities) fell by $2.75 billion. TARP Inspector General Neil
                            Barofsky has asserted, as paraphrased by Fox News, that GM “only repaid the
                            bailout money by dipping into a separate pot of bailout money.” Good luck
                            finding that critical piece of information anywhere else in the establishment press.

                            The situation isn’t any better at GM’s fellow bailout
                            recipient Chrysler — nor is the press coverage.

                            Chrysler lost $3.8 billion during the 205 days after it
                            emerged from bankruptcy last year. It lost another $197 million in the first
                            quarter of 2010. Here was the Associated Press’s headline about those
                            contemporaneous announcements: “Chrysler Posts $197M Loss But Cash Balance
                            Grows.”

                            • 1 vote
                            #51.1 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:25 PM EDT

                            Here's my reply again ,"More hoping America will fail from teabaggers" that's all you guys got. Shameful.

                              #51.2 - Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:41 PM EDT

                              GM and Chrystler aren't any better off than Solyndra. the government is keeping them going with taxpayer money and lies.

                                #51.3 - Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:32 AM EDT
                                Reply

                                Rudolph Murdock & Fox news...they distort, you decide

                                  Reply#52 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:37 PM EDT
                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.