*** UPDATED WITH AUDIO *** AND AT 4:30 WITH A STATEMENT FROM THE MICHIGAN GOP AND SANTORUM'S CAMPAIGN.
The Detroit Free Press today reported that the Michigan Republican Party voted last night to award the state's two at-large delegates to the statewide winner -- i.e, Mitt Romney -- instead of dividing them up proportionally.
That move, according the paper, would give Romney a 16-14 edge in delegates instead of the 15-15 tie between Romney and Santorum.
As a result of this move, NBC has since changed the delegate count, 16-14.
In response to criticism that the Michigan GOP changed its rules to benefit native son Mitt Romney, Michigan GOP committeeman Saul Anuzis -- a Romney supporter -- said the winner-take-all aspect for the at-large delegates was always agreed upon, and any misunderstanding was due to an error in the party's memo.
"Regrettably, there was an error in the memo drafted and sent to the respective campaigns," Anuzis said. "There were questions raised at the time the memo was drafted as to whether the legal language used was accomplishing the goal of the committee and we were advised that it was, but now it is clear that the memo did not properly communicate the intent of the committee. The email traffic surrounding the drafting of the memo in early February makes explicitly clear what the intent of the committee was."
But in an interview with NBC News three weeks ago -- on Feb. 8 -- Michigan GOP Chair Robert Schostak clearly stated that Michigan's at-large delegates would be awarded PROPORTIONALLY.
HERE'S THE AUDIO OF THE INTERVIEW.
Schostak said:
"We start off with, after the penalty, 30 voting delegates. Okay? Each district-congressional district - you can win individually. So you have 14 districts you can win two delegates. That takes you to 28. Okay? The two at-large that remain, provided the individual candidate won at least 15 percent of the statewide vote - okay so with four candidates that's likely to happen. Then they get awarded proportionally, those delegates, and then rounded to the nearest decimal point so there won't be any half delegates or quarter delegates."
(Emphasis is ours.)
The Michigan Republican Party has been rife with internal disagreements over the years, so it's not surprising that it doesn't even agree how its delegates should be awarded.
*** UPDATE *** Here is a new statement to NBC News from the party's communications director taking blame for not explaining "more clearly" and laying out the math.
Matt Frendewey, director of communications, Michigan Republican Party:
"It is unfortunate if I did not explain this more clearly. When the RNC indicated it would penalize our total delegates and award us only 30 delegates, the credentials committee met on Feb. 4 and interpreted the penalty by voting unanimously to send Michigan’s full delegation. Within congressional districts, designate two out of the three delegates as the RNC recognized delegates and two out of the 14 at-large as RNC recognized delegates.
"The at-large delegates are still awarded proportionally to candidates that achieve the 15 percent threshold, the two RNC recognized delegates are assigned to the candidate that wins the most votes. Michigan’s results, without the RNC penalty, 28-Romney/28-Santorum. If the RNC upholds its penalty, 16-Romney, 14-Santorum."
That is of no consolation to the Santorum campaign.
Per NBC's Andrew Rafferty, here's the response from Santorum national political director Hogan Gidley:
"There’s just no way this is happening. We’ve all heard rumors that Mitt Romney was furious that he spent a fortune in his home state, had all the political establishment connections and could only tie Rick Santorum. But we never thought the Romney campaign would try to rig the outcome of an election by changing the rules after the vote. This kind of back room dealing political thuggery just cannot and should not happen in America."


Just an observation. I crack up as the media on CNN/Fox/MSNBC have said many times Romney just can't break the 23-24% in these primaries. Then when he did, they said absolutly nothing. Now they are saying Romney just can't break the 39-41%. Now, every state is a Romney MUST do this and that State. Why is it never a Santorum must do this or that or the Newt do this or that? Bias is very much in play. Not surprised. The media just wants it to go longer for they have something to report about. It's not reporting the news any more it is these news clowns trying to invent the news with their biased slant. I laugh when these gals on CNN tell me that they feel it is this way. I could care less what they personally think about any issue in the news. Just report the news. I never saw CNN break down the demographics of Arizona like they did Michigan. They don't like it when the exit polls say that Romney got a larger % of the Tea Party and Most conservative voters catagories. It ruins their narrative. Anybody else notice this?
what's up??? is this Florida 2000 all over again. All we need is a BUSH involved, so where's dumb ass W's brother Jeb. he should be in the picture again
Jeese, the last thing we need is the Bush Crime Family again. What a farking disaster they are.
So how many primaries have Republicans rigged so far?
Is it 3 or 4?
All of them in one way or another...
It's clear Romney is the chosen one.Just wonder what the clowns will do to get him in the white house.Another president elected by the Supreme Court
jacksonhole- Just want to point out, that 30-40% of 30% of registered republican voters, isn't a lot to brag about. How come such a low turn out?
Are you surprised? If you are, you have had your head buried in the sand for the whole five years he's been running for POTUS.
LL
Why did you show the worst possible image of Romney? On the day of reckoning, MSNBC will be held accountable. You will be asked - why did you support the Obamanation?
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL
#2.13 - Thu Mar 1,
YOU FREAKIN' HYPOCRITE. The only reason you voted for Barack Obama is just that reason. You are a Michael Stivic liberal and that is why you attack conservatives with such gusto. You just can't stand it because down, way down deep you are just as much a racist and a bigot to the nth degree If you had any shame at all you would pull a paper bag over your head and go sit in the corner for the rest of your life. Your very last line proves my point because he had no qualifications as president. He barely had experience in government.
Rich, we all are racist, and human, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,but we don't make a point of showing it, and being proud..........like you..........
Bob-1920561
Actually you show your racism on a daily basis. I believe my dark skinned friends and neighbors are perfectly capable of taking care of themselves. For some strange reason those like you seemed to think that our black friends cannot survive without your help.
And don't bother sending me any more emails because I won't answer them.
Anyone is equally capable when the deck isn't stacked against them at the start. This country spent the vast part of its existence ensuring that certain races, sexualities, and genders didn't have the same abilities and rights that others do. In many cases this is still the truth. Remove the barriers and treat people equally and your point might have some validity.
Rick is saying, "he see's it in me, so I can flaunt it myself, and that is my personal freedom". Thanks, Coracii, well said........
I don't understand why all these liberals care about the republican primaries. They all say that Obama will win anyway. I wonder what they are afraid of?
You mistake amusement at watching the circus for fear.
Welcome to Michigan politics. It's as bad as Chicago politics here. I have been complaining for years about the cronyism in the state GOP. Now, they pull an Obama!
The next thing they may try is the "winner take all" approach like Arizona and Florida has now....That sure is equal representation of All,,,,,,,not,,,,,,, it is giving all the votes and power to the elite (Chicago style)Republican delegates. Republicans are taking the power brokers right up to the State level, and convention, and their constituents don't even know it.
Boy they can not even be honest and not cheat each other in their own races. What are they going to try to do in Nov?
They already passed laws to make it harder for people to vote; the groups that will be hardest hit are majorities, students and elderly. And let us not forget how they just reworked the district maps, placing all the top white rich districts in the hands of the republicans. So you can tell who they will be working for when they are in the White House.
If one of these guys gets into the White House who really will be President of this country, the one elected or their billion pack backers.