“Day by day, event by event, Michigan's critical primary on Tuesday is crystallizing the dramatic differences between Romney and Santorum” the AP’s Hunt writes. “The contrasts are both stylistic and substantive, and they illustrate why Romney, a multimillionaire business executive and a Mormon, is suddenly struggling in the presidential primary in the state where he was born and raised as he runs against Santorum, a strict Catholic who wears sweater vests and highlights his background as the senator from another suffering manufacturing state, Pennsylvania.”
“Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum furiously dueled Sunday ahead of a watershed contest in Romney’s home state that will reshape the contours of the Republican Party’s quest to unseat President Obama,” the New York Daily News writes. (By the way, check out the photo in the story of Romney at Daytona with a car behind him that says “Rick Santorum” on it.)
And despite religious voters’ crucial role in Republican primaries, “Romney hasn't appeared at or held a public event at a church since he announced his bid for president in June, though he has attended Sunday services -- joining a Mormon congregation in West Des Moines the weekend before the Iowa caucuses, for example. He focuses on his general economic message instead.”
“Before previous contests he’s lost, Romney’s handlers have tried to lower expectations. But he sounded more confident Sunday of turning back Santorum’s challenge in Michigan, where Romney grew up, son of a GOP political icon,” the Daily News continues.
“Gentlemen, start your engines. GOP rivals Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum are neck-and-neck coming into tomorrow’s primary in Michigan, yet spent yesterday courting conservative voters at the washed-out Daytona 500 in Florida,” the New York Post writes.
No apologies… (Where’s Jon Huntsman when you need him…) “After two US military advisers were killed inside Afghanistan’s Interior Ministry, and others have been wounded in demonstrations over the apparently unintentional burning of Korans by Americans, the top contenders in the Republican presidential race continue to say President Obama was wrong to apologize for the burning,” the Boston Globe writes.
Mitt Romney on Fox News Sunday: “I think for a lot of people, this sticks in their throat. The idea that we’re there, having lost thousands of individuals to casualty and death -- we’ve made an enormous contribution there to help the people there achieve freedom. For us to be apologizing at a time like this is something that is very difficult for the American people to countenance.”
On Meet the Press, Santorum said Karzai should apologize for Afghani overreaction.
Roll Call’s Drucker: “As the volatile Republican primary drags on, party operatives are growing concerned that their presidential nominee could be woefully unprepared to wage a national campaign against President Barack Obama.”
To that point, The Hill’s Joseph writes, “Republicans are weighing a change to the party’s presidential primary rules amid fears this year’s prolonged nomination process is hurting the GOP’s chances of retaking the White House.”
ROMNEY: The Boston Globe: “[A] loss for Romney in his native state would be a crippling blow, with only a week to recover before Super Tuesday’s 11-state blitz on March 6.”
The Hill’s headline: “Michigan tipping point: Primary becomes referendum on Romney.” From the story: “The most important contest of the Republican nomination battle is just 24 hours away, with the fight for Michigan seen as pivotal in determining the party’s nominee.”
Romney again said people could vote for someone else… “Two days after Romney told Michigan voters that he drives a Mustang and a Chevy pick-up truck and his wife drives ‘a couple of Cadillacs,’ Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace asked Romney if he understands why voters see him as out of touch,” the Boston Globe writes. “Romney responded that he and Ann have cars in California and in Boston – both places where the Romneys have homes. ‘If people think there’s something wrong with being successful in America, then they’d better vote for the other guy,’ Romney said. ‘Because I’ve been extraordinarily successful, and I want to use that success and that know-how to help the American people.’”
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer endorsed Romney on Meet the Press.
SANTORUM: “Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, who has made his conservative stance on religious and social issues one of the centerpieces of his Republican presidential campaign, today questioned the idea of a complete separation of church and state,” the Boston Globe says. “Santorum stood by comments he made last year when he said after reading President John F. Kennedy’s famous 1960 speech about the separation of church and state, ‘I almost threw up.’”
The New York Daily News: “Rick Santorum: JFK's promise to keep Pope out of politics 'makes me want to throw up.’” Here’s what he said: “I don’t believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute. To say that people of faith have no role in the public square? You bet that makes me want to throw up.”
Here’s this damning headline on a Thomas DeFrank column: “Rick Santorum is not suitable to take on Obama.” From the column: “There’s much to admire about Santorum, starting with faith and family. He’s been indefatigable on the campaign trail, persevering as critics mocked his prospects and flourishing on a shoestring budget as bigger names blew themselves out of contention. He’s smart, resourceful and committed, with a compelling personal story as well.” But: “Santorum exhibited the oratorical indiscipline well known to reporters who cover his campaign events. His rambling is reminiscent of Hubert Humphrey and Jack Kemp, among others, who couldn’t stop gabbing, to their detriment as candidates. … Unless an incumbent is so detested anyone else is preferable, voters need to be sure the alternative is capable of being President. Santorum seems more suited as an undersecretary of commerce, not leader of the free world.”
Santorum defended calling President Obama a “snob” for wanting everyone to go to college, but also seemed to backtrack a bit on “Meet the Press”: "What I've said is I want everyone to have the opportunity to go to college, or whatever other higher training skills," he said. "But it doesn't mean you have to go to a four-year college degree... I think everyone should have the opportunity. It's about what's best for you."
Santorum had said: "President Obama once said he wants everybody in America to go to college. What a snob. … I understand why [Obama] wants you to go to college. He wants to remake you in his image."
But he still leads in Ohio. Political Wire: “A new Quinnipiac poll in Ohio shows Rick Santorum leading the GOP presidential field with 36% of likely Republican primary voters, followed by Mitt Romney at 29%, Newt Gingrich at 17% and Ron Paul at 11%.”


I don't really agree with this, but I think Romney will lose Michigan because of Dems voting for Santorum in the primary. They may tip the scales to the Rickster, hoping to weaken Romney.
Of course, I know if the tables were turned, the GOP would engage in any and all possible mischief to beat Obama...
From what I've seen, the Democrats just aren't that tactical. Some are, but not en masse. They still seem completely shocked, shocked I say, that a Republican social issues guy is going to talk about social issues. So for every Democrat voting for Santorum thinking he'd be easier to beat, I'd guess two are voting against him to make a contraception point. Just my guess; could be completely wrong.
The thing is I'm not sure Santorum is the easier candidate for the Democrats to beat. The people incensed about Santorum's social positions are most likely Obama voters anyway.
The biggest thing a presidential candidate can have (or not have) is trust. That's not my opinion. That's political analyst conventional wisdom. Who seems more trustworthy between Santorum and Romney? The second biggest thing is an ability to connect with voters. Again, which wins here? After those, you get into who has experience, who is avoiding the bigger gaffe's, who offers a positive vision, etc.
Think of it this way. Romney has the money, has more than five years of organization built, has the establishment support... and yet can't even close the deal with his own party. Why? They don't trust him (for good reason, in my view), and can't connect with him. He's even had the benefit of multiple opponents, which would make it easier for him to split the votes that don't like him. It still isn't enough, at least not yet. If there was one prominent opponent from the start, Romney wouldn't even be seen as top tier right now. And then you get into the quality of his opponents. All those advantages, and he is struggling to beat this field of candidates?
Resume is pretty good. Beyond that, Romney is a notably poor candidate.
Presidential races are generally won by the Moderates/Independants. Generally, Democrats vote Democrat. Republicans vote Republican.
I don't see the middle being swayed by a candidate who is a pro-life (even in the cases of rape), anti-contraception, ultrareligious nominee who does not believe in the separation of church and state.
Santorum is too far to the right to pull in the middle/independants.
Rick Santorum is his own worst enemy. His problem is that he's an intellectual at heart, but an irrational fundamentalist at brain.
He really thinks he has brilliant insight into every issue he speaks about and that it's just everybody else who is too dumb to understand him. The reality is that his logic is so superficial and so muddled even at that level that anybody who tries to parse his arguments immediately realizes that they make no sense. That's not snobbery; it's called thinking, and so Santorum has to do whatever he can to encourage people not to think.
You can say the same about all the tea people GOP Koch republican candidates Nathan. They try to dumb down their electorate, but their showing just how dumb they are.
I just don't get the same level of cognitive dissonance from the other candidates, though. Romney and Gingrich spout alot of the same nonsense, but my impression is that they both know when they're spouting nonsense and they just do it for the politics. Paul is the most similar to Santorum in this regard, in that he shows a naive intellectualism common to libertarian thinking, then taints it with a very pro-religious conservatism stance on social issues.
As far as the others, Bachmann is about the most legitimate, unabashed anti-intellectual I've ever seen. Perry's just clueless and says whatever his lobbyist handlers tell him to. Cain was more in line with Romney and Gingrich. And Huntsman tried to take the intellectual position, never comfortable with total outright pandering to the base.
Santorum's the only one with such a massive conflict between who he is and who he sees himself as. That's why he keeps getting into trouble with these long, drawn out discussions of positions that are, on their face, absurd. He thinks he's delivering deep, intellectual thought and wisdom when he's really just spreading manure (or is it santorum?).
Nathan
My observation is that Ricky Sanctimonium semi-hypnotizes himself when he starts speaking, much like the preacher on the Sunday morning TV. He fixes a few "bullet points" in his mind then goes on autopilot while his deep recesses produce a stream of thoughtless rambling.
Methinks he reveals much more of his inner secret thoughts than is politically wise.
I'm still rooting for him to win MI. This show is too good to end now.
Nathan, I agree with everything you say except that Santorum is not an intellectual. He would like to think that he is, but in reality, he is just damned dumb.
A new Quinnipiac poll in Ohio shows Rick Santorum leading the GOP presidential field with 36% of likely Republican primary voters
It's so interesting that support for Santorum barely registered in the Maine caucus results - that race came down to Romney vs Ron Paul. I guess I have to ask, what is wrong with Republican primary voters in Ohio? Are they mostly high school dropouts? Afraid their daughters will have casual sex if contraceptives are available to them? What gives with these people?
There truly are two Americas. Just get your remote out and go back and forth between CNN and Fox and the disconnect is almost surreal. So yes there are a lot of Conservative republican primary voters who are afraid that their daughters will have casual sex if they have contraceptives available to them. It has not occurred to them that perhaps if they parented their children and taught them about sex and contraception and responsibility, and self respect that they need not fear the availability of birth control. These people get all of their information from Fox news, Rush, Hannity, Savage, Beck, Etc. They believe what these sources tell them to believe. It is scary.
There are many Americas, I think. A friend of mine lives in Charleston, SC. Was absolutely convinced the polls were wrong and that Romney would win that primary. Turns out Charleston was the only part of the state he won.
We all tend to think the people we see represent more than they perhaps might. We're all blind men, arguing about what an elephant looks like.
Also from my perspective, there is little point in one part of America trying to put another part of America down. We're all pretty amusingly silly in our own ways.
The Catholic bishops were just plain stupid to get sucked into Ricky Sanctimonium's attack on reproductive rights. Now Ricky is mugging them by endorsing himself as the Pope's spokesman in America.
His religious rantings are a direct attack on the US constitution which should disqualify him from public office.
Many things are "Tipping Down" for "Romulian Romney," and "Sanitarium Santorum." Both of these very "Cognitively Disabled" GOP/RNC Clowns have IQ Scores 'tipping' down. Economically, the GOP/RNC Clowns have NO "Fair" Economic Plan suggested for America. All scores so far for the GOP/RNC are continuing to 'tip' down. That is fact!