Romney ratchets up his assault on newest threat Santorum

BOISE, Idaho -- Drawing yet another line in his battle for the Republican nomination, Mitt Romney urged voters here to take a closer look at Rick Santorum's Senate record, which he said would disqualify former Pennsylvania senator as not a true fiscal conservative.

"You have to look at people’s records as well as their words. And I know that Senator Santorum is getting his moment in the spotlight now, which is a good thing. I hope people take a very close look at his record. Because he was in Congress for about 20 years, and during that time the size of the federal government doubled during his time in office," Romney said. "And by the way, he voted to raise the debt ceiling five different times without compensating cuts. And he’s a big proponent of earmarks. He voted for billions of dollars of earmarks including the bridge to nowhere" in Alaska.

"If you want a fiscal conservative, you can’t vote for Rick Santorum, cause he’s not, he’s not a deficit hawk. He says he’s not a deficit hawk. I am. I'm a fiscal conservative. I’ll balance the budget," Romney said.

Romney's assault on Santorum on Friday at a large and energetic rally outside Boise was the first time he has mentioned Santorum on the stump since the day after the former senator swept contests in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri to emerge as the latest challenger to Romney's frontrunner status. A Detroit News poll yesterday showed Santorum leading Romney in Michigan, the former Massachusetts governor's home state, by four points, and the Romney campaign has engaged accordingly.

In recent days campaigning in Michigan and Ohio, Romney held his fire on Santorum, focusing on attacking "union bosses" and defending his stance on the 2009 auto bailouts. Meanwhile, Romney surrogates engaged in a media campaign against the former senator, holding conference calls with reporters each of the last three days to label Santorum in a variety of ways, including a "pundit" and a "nice guy" who simply "couldn't say no" to Washington spending. 

Romney's campaign and the super PAC backing him, Restore our Future, have also more than doubled the ad spending of Santorum and his allies in Michigan, spending $3.9 million there to Santorum's $1.5 million, according to NBC ad tracking sources.

On Friday, Santorum scored a victory against Romney in Ohio just before Romney's event in Boise was set to begin. Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine, a delegate in Ohio, switched his endorsement from Romney to Santorum, declaring "To be elected president, you have to do more than tear down your opponents."

Romney's campaign, which has racked up endorsements from local and national figures across the country, waved off the defection, in part by downplaying the importance of endorsements in the first place. Former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu told reporters on a conference call, "The most important thing you can get from an endorser is their organization. And frankly, as I understand it, attorney generals don't have that much of a political organization,"

Senior Romney adviser Eric Fehrnstrom noted that DeWine had supported former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty before switching support to Romney when Pawlenty ended his candidacy. Fehrnstrom looked to shrug off the switch, tweeting: "Mike DeWine makes his third endorsement in six months -- Pawlenty, Romney, and now Santorum. I think that's a record."

Asked by NBC after the Boise event for comment on DeWine's change of heart, Romney did not respond, and aides led him to his car, saying he had a flight to catch.

Discuss this post

Don't you mean 'hatchet' up the attacks?

You know the one, Mittens would like to plant between Santorum's shoulder blades?

In the meantime Willard will have to settle on his 'Lizzy Borden' Super PAC's to do his dirty deeds...

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:34 PM EST

I have a hard time between Mitt and Rick deciding just which one would be worse for the country.

Do we want to return to the glorious Bush days of war and high deficits with low taxes for the rich with Mitt or are we ready to go back to the 1890's with men in charge, as if women did not have the vote, of women's health and bodies with Rick?

For the love of America,

Obama/Biden 2012

  • 9 votes
Reply#2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:53 PM EST

With Santorum, at least you know what you're getting, warts and all. With Romney, I wonder if even Romney knows.

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:57 PM EST
Reply

Of course Romney is increasing the attacks on whoever stands between him and what he wants. That's all he is; a mud-slinging piece of... work.

  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:55 PM EST

I really had to do a double take when I saw Mitt slamming unions in of all places Detroit! Dumb Dumb Dumb.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:05 PM EST

Not necessarily. First, those union members are predominantly blue collar, and Romney might be thinking most (of the Republicans among them) will go for Santorum anyway. Republicans tend not to like unions. Republicans who live in union-dominated areas really don't like unions. Romney may be playing this best he can, given the votes he's likely to and possibly could attract anyway.

In fact, it could be a trap for Santorum. Romney disses unions. Santorum, between that and the Romney anti-auto industry thing, sees that opportunity and might try to play for those votes. And suddenly, to a lot of Republicans in the state party, Santorum doesn't look like the conservative alternative anymore. He would look more like a Democrat.

  • 3 votes
#4.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:18 PM EST

Remember the underlying question of this whole nominating race. Is Romney really a conservative? If enough Republicans decide he is, he wins the nomination.

In that sense, he'll give up a few votes here and there to get to the right of his main competition of the moment.

  • 2 votes
#4.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:21 PM EST

Paul, being from Mi I can say that when you slam the union in Detroit you slam the auto industry. The unions made concessions and workers are proud to have played a part in the recovery of the auto industy. It's not just the union....many non union jobs depend on the auto industy and the ability of the union to negotiate with them. It's not just a few votes.

  • 2 votes
#4.3 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 6:20 AM EST
Reply

Hey Sununu, it's "attorneys general". You should know that.

    Reply#5 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:13 PM EST

    I was at the Rally today in Boise and I have to say that after seeing Romney I can't wait to vote! I loved what he had to say and so did the rest of the crowd. This article makes it sound like all he did was focus on bashing Santorum but the majority of his speech was about the differences between himself and Obama. Romney for President in 2012 and yes I'm still wearing my Romney sticker and I'm proud of it!

    • 1 vote
    Reply#7 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:30 PM EST

    I can't wait to vote!

    Thank you Sara for once again proving there is NO cure for being stuck on stupid!

    • 8 votes
    #7.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:36 PM EST

    Sara,

    Thank you for your insight into the Romney rally. NBC and their affiliates will never give a positive review of any Republican rally. All you hear from the left wing nuts are stupid remarks that make no sense except to their own crowd. They will never vote for any Republican anyway so I don't see why they are so concerned about the republican primaries. See the little short fat red head has to try and put in a dig instead of pulling her head out of her rear end.

    Don't hear anything from NBC/MSNBC about the CBO saying unemployment will remain above 8% into 2014, remember when Obama promised the unemployment would not exceed 8% if his stimulus was passed.

    BTW, I really like the Boise, Jerome and southern Idaho area. Have relatives living in Idaho.

    • 1 vote
    #7.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:47 PM EST

    Seriously now, all you hear Romney doing is making a lot of campaign promises which is exactly what you dissed Obama for. So why is Romney any different? He will still have a Congress to work with to try and get any of his promises to completion. Why do you think he will be any more successful than any other President?

    • 1 vote
    #7.3 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:34 AM EST
    Reply
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.