First Thoughts: Why Florida differed from South Carolina

Five reasons why Florida’s outcome differed from South Carolina’s: 1) Money and the debates mattered… 2) Going negative against Gingrich works… 3) Momentum hasn’t carried from one contest to the next… 4) Florida’s less conservative electorate… 5) Geography and urban density… But a potential warning sign for Romney: Gingrich still held the core of the GOP… Another warning sign: 38% said they wanted another GOP candidate to run for the nomination… Breaking down the ad spending so far in Nevada… Romney Super PAC rakes in nearly $18 million in six months… And Dems win OR-1 special.

*** Why Florida differed from South Carolina: What a difference 11 days made in this presidential race between New Hampshire and South Carolina, and what a difference 10 days made between South Carolina and Florida… After Newt Gingrich pummeled Mitt Romney by double digits in South Carolina, Romney returned the favor last night, beating Gingrich by 14 points in Florida, 46%-32%. In fact, the contest -- just one month in -- looks like a fight right out of "Rocky," with Apollo Creed/Clubber Lang/Ivan Drago easily winning one round and then Rocky Balboa storming back in the next. But there are five reasons why the outcome in Florida was different than South Carolina. The first reason: Money and the debates mattered. In South Carolina, Romney and the top pro-Romney Super PAC Restore Our Future outspent Gingrich and his allies by a nearly 2-to-1 margin ($4.4 million vs. $2.4 million). But in Florida, the margin was 4-to-1 ($15.9 million vs. $4 million). As for the debates, Gingrich -- unlike in South Carolina -- had two poor performances and Romney had two strong ones. Among Florida voters who said the debates were important to their vote, Romney won those folks, 42%-34%.

*** Going negative against Gingrich works: A second -- and related -- reason why last night’s outcome was different: Going negative against Gingrich works. We saw that first in Iowa, where Restore Our Future pounded Gingrich with negative TV ads, knocking down the former House speaker from first in the polls there to a fourth-place finish. But when the race moved to South Carolina, Romney and his allies took their foot off the gas, which paved the way for Gingrich’s upset there. And Team Romney has learned that lesson. Yesterday, for example, it held a conference call with Nevada supporters to once again deliver an anti-Gingrich message. It is worth noting that Romney and his campaign have done a superb job pummeling the GOP rivals who have emerged as a threat (first Rick Perry, then Gingrich). How effective was the negative ad campaign? Republicans (not ALL VOTERS) but JUST Florida Republicans gave Gingrich a 40% unfavorable rating. Stunning.

*** Momentum hasn’t carried from one contest to the next: Third, there has been no momentum from one GOP contest to the next. Yes, there have been temporary spikes in the polls, but consider: Rick Santorum was unable to parlay his Iowa performance into a strong showing in New Hampshire; Romney’s decisive victory in New Hampshire was followed by his decisive defeat in South Carolina; and Gingrich’s double-digit South Carolina win was followed by his double-digit loss in Florida. However, that no-momentum streak is likely to be broken this week in Nevada, where Romney is the clear favorite. And what if he sweeps February? None of the February contests INDIVIDUALLY carries the weight of the individual January contests. But, collectively, if Romney can put together a package of four, five or even six victories, it would add to the inevitability momentum. The states in February aren't chumps by any measure: Nevada, Maine Colorado, Minnesota, Arizona and Michigan are all on SOME presidential battleground maps. (Yes, we include Maine because the ONE Congressional District, thanks to redistricting is going to be in play even if WHOLE state is not).

*** A less conservative electorate: A fourth lesson from last night: The electorate in Florida was much different than in South Carolina. Yes, Florida resembles South Carolina more than it does New Hampshire, but chew on these exit-poll numbers: Four in 10 Florida GOP voters described themselves as evangelical Christians, and Gingrich narrowly won those folks, 38%-36%. But in South Carolina, nearly two-thirds were evangelicals, and Gingrich won them, 45%-21%. Also, a plurality in Florida viewed themselves as “somewhat conservative,” and Romney easily won over that segment, 52%-32%. But in South Carolina, a plurality viewed themselves as “very conservative,” and Newt easily won them, 48%-19%. Bottom line: Florida -- despite being a closed primary -- had a less conservative electorate than South Carolina did.

*** Geography and urban density: And a fifth reason why Florida wasn’t South Carolina: geography and urban density. Get this: Romney won almost a majority of his entire vote margin from just five counties -- Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Pinellas (St. Pete) and Hillsborough (Tampa). Of those five counties, Romney nabbed about 118,000 votes of his about 241,000 vote margin, or 49%. Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach alone accounted for about 31% of his total margin. Bottom line: Tactically, Romney and his campaign ran a perfect race – winning with all of their strengths (money, organization, somewhat conservatives/moderates, and urban voters).

*** A potential warning sign for Romney: Gingrich still held the core base of the GOP: All that said, Gingrich still held the core base of the party, and that remains a potential warning sign for Romney. Among “very conservative voters” -- 33% of the electorate (compared with 36% in South Carolina) -- Gingrich won there, 41%-30%. Among evangelical voters Gingrich won, 38%-36%. And finally, 41% said that Romney isn’t conservative enough, and Gingrich beats him among those folks, 58%-12%. What’s more, while Romney did very well in Florida’s urban counties, Gingrich overperformed in the rural ones, particularly in the Panhandle. And those Panhandle counties look a lot more like the Southern states Gingrich will hope to win on Super Tuesday on March 6 and the following week on March 13.

*** Another warning sign for Romney: Nearly 4 in 10 GOPers want someone else to run: And this also has to worry Romney and his team a bit, too: 38% of Florida Republican primary voters said they’d like to see someone else run for the GOP nomination, versus 58% who said they’re satisfied with the field. It’s a striking number, because these are Republicans who TURNED OUT and voted. (Imagine how the Republican electorate as a WHOLE feels.) On the one hand, this signals that Republicans are enthusiastic about defeating Obama even if they’re not necessarily enthusiastic about their own field. On the other hand, these appear to be folks who want someone else other than Mitt Romney (however, Romney and Gingrich essentially split this dissatisfied vote). And these two numbers stuck out as well: 40% of last night’s voters had a unfavorable view of Gingrich, while 41% said that Romney isn’t conservative enough.

*** Ad spending breakdown in Nevada: As we now head to Nevada, here’s the ad spending breakdown there, according to Smart Media Group Delta: Restore Our Future $637,000, Romney $372,000, and Paul $350,000. Rick Santorum targeted Gingrich in his speech last night, and he has a TV ad up in Nevada that hits Gingrich, likening him to President Obama and Nancy Pelosi. “He doesn’t just talk a good conservative game,” an announcer says, “he lives it.” It’s unclear, however, if there is any money behind this Santorum ad.

*** Romney’s Super PAC rakes in nearly $18 million in six months: NBC’s Michael Isikoff reports that

top Wall Street moguls from big hedge fund and private equity firms -- including principals from Bain Capital -- topped the list of donors that pumped more than $17.9 million into the pro-Romney Super PAC Restore Our Future during the last six months of last year.  But while the filing by Restore Our Future shows its formidable fundraising prowess – considerably more than the pro-Obama Priorities USA Action’s $1.2 million -- it will do little to alleviate criticism that Romney is too closely tied to Wall Street and other corporate interests, Isikoff adds. Restore Our Future collected seven  $1 million donations, including one from Paul Singer, the billionaire and secretive head of the Elliott Management hedge fund, and two others from hedge fund kingpins Julian Robertson of Tiger Management and Robert Mercer of Renaissance Technologies.

*** Dems win OR-1 special: Also last night, Democrats won the special congressional election to fill the seat vacated by disgraced Dem Rep. David Wu (D-OR). Analysis from the Rothenberg Political Report’s Nathan Gonzales: “It looks like former state senator Suzanne Bonamici (D) defeated businessman Rob Cornilles (R) by roughly the same margin as a year ago when Rep. David Wu (D) defeated Cornilles by 13 points, 55 percent to 42 percent... But despite the partisan nature of the district, Democrats didn’t take anything for granted and believed that a loss would have been devastating to the national narrative about the fight for the House. In total, Democrats outspent Republicans on television about 4-to-1." The thinking for the Democrats: The risk of losing this special was just too great not to OVERpay for a victory. Losing would have hit the party HARD nationally on the fundraising front as Democrats continue to try and make the case the House is in play.

*** On the trail, per NBC’s Adam Perez: The day after the Florida primary, Paul visits Las Vegas NV (he celebrates his 55th wedding anniversary with his wife, Carol)… Santorum stumps in Colorado, rallying in Denver, Lakewood, Woodland Park, and Colorado Springs… Romney hosts a grassroots rally in Eagan, MN and then heads to Las Vegas, NV …And Gingrich also hits Nevada, campaigning in Reno and Carson City. 

Countdown to Nevada caucuses: 3 days
Countdown to Super Tuesday: 34 days
Countdown to Election Day: 279 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @DomenicoNBC, @brookebrower

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 7

Allow Billionaires and Corporations to Directly Fund Campaigns

Top Republicans are coalescing around the idea that current campaign finance laws — which still prohibit corporations and wealthy individuals from giving unlimited money directly to campaigns — are actually too restrictive. The GOP’s standard response to the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling has solidified: allow for unlimited contributions directly to candidates while requiring immediate disclosure.

Mitt Romney: “We’d be a lot wiser to say you can give what you’d like to a campaign. They must report it immediately.” (12/21/2011) Tim Pawlenty: “The better position is to allow full and free speech in whatever form, but have instant disclosure.” (1/21/2012)

Republicans seem to be all in for letting corporations and the very rich buy elections.

  • 65 votes
#1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:09 AM EST

Well, well, well, last night we got to see the consequences of Citizens United up close and personal!

Willard managed to buy a victory for the bargain price of a cool $16 MILLION dollars OR $320,000 per delegate.

What a deal! Especially for Willard who personally makes $57K per day!

"I'm a tough guy, really I am", says Willard. "I have lots of money and I know how to use"

Raining millions of dollars down onto the State of FL finally allowed Willard the knock-out punch he's been desperately seeking.

The good news is the GNOP blood-bath is far from over… they have already started feeding each other to the lions! lol

I have plenty of *popcorn* to take us well into the spring! ;o)

  • 59 votes
#1.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:09 AM EST

Shoot... when one man can prop the Newster up with a cash injection what would anyone expect...

I said it last year that the GOP was going to open the largest warchest ever and man was I right, they are going to hold no bars when it comes to their attempts to defeat President Obama. They can't stand the notion of him being there for 8 years... black people rescuing the nation, the noive of it!!

  • 50 votes
#1.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:12 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Looks like Barry’s incompetent AG is going to get bitch-slapped by Congress for his Justice Depts inept handling of the investigation into their illegal Mexican Mafia gun-running operation. Yeah, yeah, I already know that FR lefty liberals will blame it all on Issa, and the MSM will bend over backwards to ignore Barry’s AG’s misdeeds, but, the truth shall set you free: Holder is an incompetent moron and Barry needs to fire him.

From Politico:

Issa threatens Holder with contempt
By: Tim Mak
January 31, 2012 05:48 PM EST

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) threatened Tuesday to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress if the Justice Department did not provide certain documents in response to the committee’s subpoena.

In a letter to Holder, Issa wrote that “this committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress” if Holder and the DOJ didn’t produce documents they demanded relating to the Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal.

Holder has until Thursday, Feb. 9. to comply, according to Issa.

Issa accused the Justice Department of trying to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public” by withholding documents.

“Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up,” he said in a four-page letter.

The California Republican pointed to a document that the DOJ released last Friday, which indicated that Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer had promoted gun-walking to Mexico on the same day that Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich wrote to Congress denying that the DOJ had allowed guns to walk.

“It is inconceivable that the Department just became aware of this highly damaging document,” writes Issa, pointing out that the Oversight Committee had originally issued a subpoena on Oct. 12, 2011.

  • 21 votes
#1.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:21 AM EST

Republicans seem to be all in for letting corporations and the very rich buy elections.

________________________________________

And how is that different than Dems letting unions and very rich Hollywood elites and George Soros types buy elections??

  • 35 votes
#1.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:25 AM EST

This is what Mitt Romney said:

"I'm not concerned about the very poor... We will hear from the Democrat party, the plight of the poor... You can focus on the very poor, that's not my focus..."

Q: Then why did he hand a wad of cash over to a woman in front of all the cameras?

I guess having a President of the United States who doesn't care if a poor person eats, has a place to live or can get medical care is okay.

Most of these poor people are children. And what he is saying basically is – I don't care if they live or die.

Andrew Sullivan on Romney's speech last night:

This speech is most dishonest, manipulative, disgusting series of lies I've heard in a very long time.

Charles Pierce:

It was how Romney delivered the speech that was so revelatory. This is a rich kid who likes flogging The Help. There were just enough ****-eating, country-club grins as he delivered his rancid material to show you what the guy must have been like in those golden moments when he realized that there was more dough in wrecking a company than in investing in it.

**************

Despicable man Romney is. Despicable human being. He hates all that made America great. And for all his money, he hasn't given one thing back.

Not one museum, not one school, not one hospital, not one fixed bridge or road.

Nothing.

He just hide his money. Wealth is supposed to be used to build America, not sit back and watch as the poor are ignored.

  • 51 votes
#1.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:26 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

BTW, I was Hillaryously entertained yesterday by the sight of some of FR’s most hardcore lefty liberals fawning over former RNC Chairman Michael Steele’s “conversion” since he became a “born again” MSDNC talking head. Even FR’s Roller Derby team captain, the Nasty Redhead, was right there with the first post on First Thoughts praising him. Seems that since he went to work for MSDNC, he is now speaking the lefty liberal “truth” in the eyes of the FR hardcore lefty liberals. Michael Steele is just bright enough to know who signs his MSDNC paycheck and is simply giving them what they want to hear, and the hardcore FR lefty liberals are all swallowing it, hook, line, and sinker.

P.T. Barnum got it right when he said “there’s a sucker born every minute”

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 30 votes
#1.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:26 AM EST

betty, I bet Illinois could use that 57k a day to pay off your debt, but guess what, this is America and you get to keep what you earn here. You want to spread the wealth go live in Europe, look at well it is working out for them. Bend over here come higher taxes at ya.

  • 18 votes
#1.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:27 AM EST

Gingrich was a totally EASY TARGET !!

Gingrich was like a smorgasbord of negativity to choose from.

That strategy will not work against Obama whose numbers are now rising rapidly in the polls.

.

  • 41 votes
#1.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:29 AM EST

"Government is not broken, it is bought"

Romney SuperPac money (from today's Daily Rundown) $17.9 million last quarter

Seven people donated $1,000,000 and 60 gave > $100,000 each

1/3 from Big Wall Street groups...hedge funds, private equity, etc

  • 22 votes
#1.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:30 AM EST

Well, it's getting even more interesting. Willard's Group were predicting a 20-30% margin of victory over the Grinch. What did they get? 14%. Not the knockout punch they predicted and hoped for.

All this did was "tick off" the Grinch, the T-Party, the Evangelicals and a lot of Independants. Not a good sign Willard.

Will The Grinch drop out? Never. He'll continue to fight on, dragging Willard further into the mud until he has to go up against President Obama. Willard will be so bloodied and bruise by then that our President will rip him to shreds. I love it.

Obama in 2012.

  • 43 votes
#1.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:30 AM EST

Dennis, Feisty, good points. Reading the thinking of Romney and the amount he spent in Florida is discouraging that's for certain but it should be no surprise since his goal at Bain was not to improve profitable companies but to drain them dry and leave them to die; he took the same approach to Gingrich.

Albany Joe, it's different because WE know who gives the money because you just named them. Who is giving the money to Mitt Romney? We can assume but we do not know who. The only reason we know who gave $5 M to Newt is because it slipped out.

  • 32 votes
#1.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:30 AM EST

Dennis,

"Mitt Romney: “We’d be a lot wiser to say you can give what you’d like to a campaign. They must report it immediately.” (12/21/2011) Tim Pawlenty: “The better position is to allow full and free speech in whatever form, but have instant disclosure.” (1/21/2012)"

Well ,Romney has shaken the Florida dirt off his leather loafers and will be in MN this afternoon with his NBFF Tim Pawlenty.

Mr Pawlwnety can talk about campaign contributions, free speech all he wants.

I hope in his introduction of Romney this afternoon, He reminds the "grass roots" that Romney's weathly donors gave their max of $2500. each to help reduce Pawlenty's $435,000 campaign debt to a more managable $103,000.

Maybe,Romney will be bring more check for his NBFF this afternoon.

Big money Romney donors include Spencer Zwick, venutre captial fund creator and friend of Tagg Romney; R. White and Steven Barnes executives at Bain; and Renee and Gary Morse owners of the Villages in Florida; Mel Sembler ,Floirda shopping tycoon; J.Willaard MarriottJr.;pharmaceutical heir Robert Johnson.

Watch to see if Bachmann, who is over $400,000 in debt suddenly finds the light and endorses Romney.

Money cannot buy you love, but it can buy you a clear field and future loyality.

  • 22 votes
#1.12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:33 AM EST
Comment author avatarFeisty Redhead Roselle, ILExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Even FR’s Roller Derby team captain, the Nasty Redhead,

Seems I struck a nerve with the idiot from Albany.

Enough so, that he's been stweing about it for an entire day! lol

Here's the deal, Michael Steele denouncing Reince Priebus's despicable comments was the right thing to do!

Since you, Joey, have zero experience 'doing what's right', it comes as no suprise you wouldn't comprehend...

  • 44 votes
#1.13 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:34 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Well, well, well, last night we got to see the consequences of Citizens United up close and personal!

___________________________________________________

This leftuous indignation about big money in a Presidential campaigns from worshipers of the only Presidential candidate in history to go back on his word to accept public financing because he found out he could raise hundreds of millions more without the limits imposed by accepting public financing is nothing short of hypocritically Hillaryous!!!!!

These leftuously indignant Barry-worshipers also see no problem with supporting the first ever $1 billion Presidential campaign to buy the White House for them.

LMAO!!!!

  • 22 votes
#1.14 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:38 AM EST
Comment author avatarBeverly in ChicagoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Joe in Albany

Like the NYT states- This report debunks many unsubstantiated conspiracy theories,” Representative Elijah E. Cummings, Democrat of Maryland said. Here read the link.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/us/politics/operation-fast-and-furious-report-by-democrats-clears-obama-administration.html?_r=2

Why do you think no other news outlet besides FOX NOISE & its ECHO CHAMBER report on it? I'll tell you why; it's bullsh!t and a waste of time. The focus is J-O-B-S, the economy, and civil rights not bullsh!t!!!


AG Holder is not going any where. He just opened more than 100 voting rights discrimination across the country last year.

You &Fox Noise are about as nutty as this one Grover Norquist...

Norquist: Republicans Will Impeach Obama If He Doesn’t Extend Bush Tax Cuts

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/01/29/414010/norquist-republicans-will-impeach-obama-if-he-doesnt-extend-bush-tax-cuts/

Your wet dreams are symptomatic of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

Grow up!!!!


  • 28 votes
#1.15 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:42 AM EST

Joe,

“And how is that different than Dems letting unions and very rich Hollywood elites and George Soros types buy elections??”

They are under the same rules today as the rich and corporations are today so that would change if the laws are changed – something to consider – be careful what you wish for.

You name Soros while the Koch brothers are each richer than Soros and combined have nearly 3 times the wealth of George Soros.

  • 32 votes
#1.16 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:43 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Seems I struck a nerve with the idiot from Albany.

________________________________________

Nasty, the only nerve you struck with me is the one in my funny bone. I know I can always count on you for that.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 16 votes
#1.17 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:43 AM EST

@Joe in Albany

Issa is a first class Ahole who doesn't care about America or it's citizens. His only goal is to find dirt on the President and give it to right wing hacks.

That being said, the Repuglitards are going to loose big in 2012. They will loose the temporary majority they had in the house. They might even loose a few seats in the Senate.

I don't want a president who think uber rich people like him, the 1% of 1%, should pay taxes at lower rate than middle class.

  • 36 votes
#1.18 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:45 AM EST

Pat Boston, well said and thanks for posting the comments from journalists. I could not listen to Romney's speech after the first few minutes. It disgusted me to hear one lie after another. I walked out of the room. The man is not just robotic in his demeanor, he is inhuman, devoid of compassion, and is contemptuous of "the least among us".

  • 32 votes
#1.19 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:48 AM EST
Comment author avatarJoe in AlbanyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Albany Joe, it's different because WE know who gives the money because you just named them.

________________________________________________

Jody, ALL you really need to know after Citizens United is that the people giving money to the side you despise are all evil Republicans, and you already know that. What does adding a name to that really accomplish. Maybe an OWS clown car visit to their homes??

  • 12 votes
#1.20 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:49 AM EST

Going negative against Gingrich works.

and he has given his opponents plenty of ammo.

Republicans seem to be all in for letting corporations and the very rich buy elections.

There is nothing unusual about that. Hell, they've been doing that for years.

The GOP "Being a Corporate Shill is Hard Work".

Obama/Biden 2012

  • 25 votes
#1.21 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:49 AM EST

@Joe in Albany

These leftuously indignant Barry-worshipers also see no problem with supporting the first ever $1 billion Presidential campaign to buy the White House for them.

The difference is, his Billion came from hundreds of thousands of middle class people. Romney's Billion (if he can even get that much money) will come from a dozen or so people who want to buy the government.

Romney = corporate welfare queen who should be investigated for hiding money in offshore accounts.

  • 30 votes
#1.22 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:50 AM EST

Joe in Albany

Well, well, well, last night we got to see the consequences of Citizens United up close and personal!

___________________________________________________

We sure did. We got a chance to see Newtie go from sweet to sour on Citizens United amongst Newts numerous whines about his losing.

  • 20 votes
#1.23 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:52 AM EST

Well, well, well, last night we got to see the consequences of Citizens United up close and personal!

Can't wait to see MSNBC counting out all the millions Obama will spend out of his *Billion* on negative ads in all *57* states.

Not. We all know that will never happen.

  • 12 votes
#1.24 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:52 AM EST

I'm sure our revolutionarires didn't fight and die just so the rich could buy these government positions in order to give themselves and political lackeys all kinds of taxpayer gimmes!

The citizens will eventually bankrupt themselves and destroy this once great nation of the many who fought hard over a very long period (150 years) to chip away at the very chains that once bound them to government oppression through slavery, inservitude and suffrage! Blacks are no longer slaves because they fought long and hard for their basic rights of citizenship. Women can now vote because they too fought hard for their basic rights of citizenship. ALL men and women regardless of race, color, sex or creed can earn a decent days wage for an honest days work instead of toiling for long hours in mills, mines, fields or sweatshops under very harsh conditions because those in the Union fought long and hard for your labor rights.

Sadly, the People have forgetten the inherent DANGERS of Governments that have never been in the business of giving rights, but taking them away, little by little, and before everyone knows it, there will be nothing left to take. BIG SIgh

  • 13 votes
#1.25 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:53 AM EST

Money is buying elections...... How sad!

  • 11 votes
#1.26 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:56 AM EST

I think the democrats mantra should constantly be - "Republicans Lie"....say it loud and say it often!

  • 18 votes
#1.27 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:56 AM EST
Comment author avatarBill, Fairfax VAExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Despicable man Romney is. Despicable human being. He hates all that made America great. And for all his money, he hasn't given one thing back.

Not one museum, not one school, not one hospital, not one fixed bridge or road.

What a pile of absolutely vile, thoroughly uninformed rubbish. The FACTS are that in 2011 Romney paid over $3,000,000 in federal income taxes and donated over $4,000,000 to charity. His adjusted gross income that year was about $21,000,000 so that means Romney forked over 35% of his income to federal taxes and charities.

And I daresay some of those dollars were used to fix a road here and there.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-01/romney-tax-returns-show-7-million-in-donations-over-2-years.html

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/01/24/us/politics/2011-romney-tax-returns.html

  • 15 votes
#1.28 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:56 AM EST
  1. Come on MSNBC commentators (especially Chris Matthews) and others:
  2. There's good reason why the negative ads work against "Family Abandoning" Gingrich
  3. and more good reasons why they work on "Ethics Violations" Gingrich.
  4. It's not like you can say this against Romney now is it???
  5. When they say there's a lot of Blingrich baggage they ain't kiddin...

P.S. Newtie seems to have delusions of grandeur similar to Muammar Gaddafi especially in his last days. I think we'll pass...

  • 10 votes
#1.29 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:02 AM EST

I don't want a president who think uber rich people like him, the 1% of 1%, should pay taxes at lower rate than middle class.

Only the 1%, the RWNJs and the rubes (a.ka. Tea Bags) want that.

  • 14 votes
#1.30 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:02 AM EST

Actually that arrogant, fart-faced, philanderer is an EASY target for negative ads, and the really neat thing about it all is that Newt has spent a LIFETIME demonstrating his complete unworthiness for office. When he was expelled from the House he should have gone and stayed gone.

No FLATUS for POTUS.

  • 14 votes
#1.31 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:03 AM EST

Now Pat----Mitt Romney has given something---he gave his children $100 million trust funds.

P.S. What a nice story that Tom Brady and his wife reached out to our Sidney Crosby with his recovery from injuries. Very classy.

  • 16 votes
#1.32 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:05 AM EST

Bill in Fairfax:

"The FACTS are that in 2011 Romney paid over $3,000,000 in federal income taxes and donated over $4,000,000 to charity."

I do not consider a $4 million dollar tithe to the Mormon Church as charity. Having grown up in a heavily Mormon area, I know that Mormons only help other Mormons, and that ain't charity folks!

  • 23 votes
#1.33 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:06 AM EST

Lesson learned, 300,000 registered Florida Republican voters who voted in 2008 decided to vote against Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich and their childish behavior by not showing up to vote. 1,949,498 votes in 2008 vs 1,642,160 votes in 2012 with a little over 1% not counted yet. Keep up the good work and make sure to spread the love to all of the other remaining swing states.

  • 11 votes
#1.34 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:12 AM EST

Bill in Fairfax -- Knowing you are a fiscal conservative I find it hard to believe you would support Romney. He talks about building up Defense to levels we have never seen. He talks about additional tax cuts that will add a trillion to the deficit. And on and on. His 58 or 59 point plan is bland at best. Nothing new. What say you?

  • 14 votes
#1.35 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:12 AM EST
Comment author avatarno joe, no bo, njExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

If I'd lived to be a hundred, I would never have believed that McCarthyism in all it's vile glory would be resurrected by a political party, yet, here it is.

Character assassination, accusations of undermining the American way of life, vague accusations of "crimes"- all under the heading of "protecting America".

How and why did we get here? Well, we have a political party headed by a man many saw as transformational- without thinking, for a moment, what that transformation would look like. We have a political party teetering on the edge of extinction, or, at least, irrelevance, due entirely to its takeover by radicals uninterested in the Constitution or principals that made this nation great. A party tacitly encouraging mobs to riot, burn flags, take over private property, and generally engage in unlawful and/or anti-social activities- all in the name of preserving one incompetent fool.

The vilification of the producers in this country will soon be called by another name- Obamaism will be held in the same "esteem" as McCarthyism.

The difference? McCarthy was no hypocrite. He did not bring Bills of Attainder against alleged Communists, while at the same time accepting their backing and friendship. Obama? Vilifies "the rich", threatens their livelihoods, uses straw man arguments to convict them of crimes, all the while holding the very richest of the rich as his closest contributors- and paying them off, ten fold, with taxpayer monies.

I am aghast at what has been done to my country. There are few on this board who will seriously consider the question- but it must be asked-

Have you no decency?

  • 12 votes
#1.36 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:17 AM EST

I'm sorry, did the Democrats think their candidates don't buy their offices too?

Is the memory of John Corzine still causing PTSD?

Yeah, we all know Republicans (hey, remember mayor Bloomberg? Right next door, now pretending to be an Independent...) purchase their votes. So do your Democrats. But selective memory is always used by the radicals of either side.

Try remembering SuperPACs. Try remembering that they are being funded by both sides. Try remembering that either way, your voice is drowned out by it, and even drowned out by your favorite cult political party..

  • 10 votes
#1.37 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:22 AM EST

There goes No Joe declaring once again that this is her country and not OUR country.

  • 24 votes
#1.38 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:25 AM EST

Romney can't stand the 99%ers by consistently espousing his 'let them eat cake' attitude and his acknowledgement that the rich 1% are doing very well thank you - now leave them alone.

Newt the historian consistently recreates history as he is consistently labeled 'pants on fire' for what he spews, not to mention his cheating past.

Leading GOP candidates = False Christians

  • 13 votes
#1.39 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:27 AM EST

Mitt Romney bastard spawn of wall street buys another victory, politics American style.

  • 8 votes
#1.40 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:28 AM EST

If I'd lived to be a hundred,

Thankfully for us, YOU won't!

Have you no decency?

We've been asking you the same question for years... best to tidy up your own back yard before worrying about others honey.

One more time Donna - this isn't YOUR country is belongs to all of us, whether you like it or not!

  • 27 votes
#1.41 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:29 AM EST

NoJo,

"The vilification of the producers in this country" You are "aghast".

No one is vilifying anyone except you.

Just following the money....

  • 16 votes
#1.42 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:30 AM EST

Derek: " Try remembering that they are being funded by both sides."

Yes, that's the point. It is bad for all of us, so all of us should be united against it. Why aren't we? If we ever attacked problems instead of each other, we could accomplish anything.

As long as money is power and a tiny number of people keep ending up with more of it, we will never get our democracy back.

  • 12 votes
#1.43 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:31 AM EST

I see betty aka fiesty has another name to use welfare queen, like one is not enough

  • 3 votes
#1.44 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:37 AM EST

This is the beginning of the end of the "Teaparty" and their radical agenda. The Republican Party will rally behind Romney. When mitt gets in the petty religious right will pay!!

  • 7 votes
#1.45 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:40 AM EST

Bill in Fairfax, you left out a very important part -- most of Romney's so-called "charity" is actually a "Tithe", which is 10% (before taxes) mandated by the Mormon church if you're to remain a member.

Churches, especially the Mormon/LDS lacks transparency as they are not legally obligated to disclose "how" it's charitable contributions are spent, yet want to retain the benefit of not paying taxes on them..want their cake and eat it all too! It's "estimated" that the LDS Church is worth 80 to 100 BILLION, yes that's a Billion with a B! I''m absolutely positive the intent of our framers was not to give tax breaks to churches so they could HORDE their contriutions, but were very actively engaged on their communities for the purpose of conducting CHARITABLE WORK! Same goes for Catholic, Christian and all other so-called religious entities that preach one thing, but do the complete opposite.

I'm pretty sure the "real Jesus" would be pretty ticked off by it...lol

  • 16 votes
#1.46 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:40 AM EST

no joe, no bo, nj

What an amusing post. If you really believe what you wrote, you are absolutely delusional. But I suspect you just ginned up this argument to cast the Republican Party as some kind of victim.

The truth is, it's the Republicans who contributed two words to our political lexicon: swiftboating (as in waging a smear campaign) and push polling (to use phony polling question to spread misinformation.)

The two names most associated with dirty tricks in campaigns are Republicans Karl Rove and Lee Atwater. Of course, the term "dirty tricks," as it applies to politics, originated with the Richard Nixon (R) era.

Oh, and Senator McCarthy, whose red scare tactics were the source of McCarthyism, was a Republican. Gosh, Republicans have really contributed to our political lexicon, haven't they?

  • 24 votes
#1.47 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:43 AM EST

Dennis,

Seriously, it kills me that you're an Ohio St fan, because I really do constantly agree with you, and I'm a Wolverine. Apparently, there's hope for the middle east. I mean if we can agree, they can.

Furthermore, no Joe, it's not okay that it costs 1 Billion to run for president, and no, this problem didn't start with Citizen's United. It started with the concept that money is speech, and no, I don't want non-profits like the NRA, labor unions, or comic book type characters (i.e. Koch Bro's and Soros) buying the office either.

If you believe money equals speech, than you believe we should be an oligarchy, here's why...

If corporations are people, to me it seems as if the court's doubling down on personhood. The individual owners/operators have their rights as people, as well as benefit from the corporations personhood. They're granted a second helping of freedom of speech and a gigantic second helping of the right to a fair say in our elections and the ability to petition government. Which basically throws out the whole concept of "endowment by a creator" and "all men being equal". It's in complete contrast to what the laws/rights of our nation are supposedly based on.

If money is speech, how do you reconcile that certain people have more access to it??? . It is supposedly part of our humanity that we are all equal under the law, but money as speech kills that idea. It increases the protection and the access to law and government of wealthier people. Money isn't given to us, by lieu of our humanity, it's earned, stolen, inherited, yada, yada, yada and the nature of the free market will always mean that we have the wealthy and the poor. If money equals speach, the poor will never have a voice, making them unequal under our laws and in our civil rights.

There's nothing sentient or free thinking about a corporation. There's nothing inherently "God Given" about money. Those are earned, not bestowed. They're puppets on the hands of their masters. Masters who already have equality and protection under the law.

If we're "endowed by our creator" and humans create corporations and money, are we than Gods capable of endowing people/things with rights?

There's too many contradictions. If corporations are people and money is speech, how can we own them? Wouldn't that be in conflict with the 13th Amendment?

Finally, let's slap some term limits on ALL elected officials, and end the gerrymandering. Than we will see a return to democrasy.

  • 26 votes
#1.48 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:43 AM EST

One way to protest against the Citizens United ruling would be to turn the channel every time an ad comes on. Do not answer calls from campaigns during election season. Throw away any paper ads that may come in the mail or left on your door. When politicians, individuals and businesses realize they money is going to waste maybe they will stop funding the pacs.

  • 10 votes
#1.49 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:44 AM EST

Haven't seen vitriol like this since the last Presidential election. Only difference is for Mitt Romney substitute Sarah Palin or Hillary Clinton.

The difference is, his Billion came from hundreds of thousands of middle class people. Romney's Billion (if he can even get that much money) will come from a dozen or so people who want to buy the government.

Wrong. Most of his money came from (gasp) Wall Street.

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cid=N00009638

I don't want a president who think uber rich people like him, the 1% of 1%, should pay taxes at lower rate than middle class.

And what is the current President doing about it? Even if Warren Buffet pays 30% that is still less than his secretary's current 35% rate.

  • 5 votes
#1.50 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:45 AM EST

Larry In Portland

"I do not consider a $4 million dollars to the Mormon Church as charity. Having grown up in a heavily Mormon area, I know that Mormons only help other Mormons, and that ain't charity folks!"

The NAACP only helps black people

La Raza only helps hispanics

CAIR only supports Muslims

PETA only helps animals

What is the point, one focus group is better than another?

All animals are equal, just some are more equal than others.

  • 9 votes
#1.51 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:46 AM EST

One way to protest against the Citizens United ruling would be to turn the channel every time an ad comes on. Do not answer calls from campaigns during election season.

OMG That's exactly what Scalia said!

“I don’t care who is doing the speech — the more the merrier… People are not stupid. If they don’t like it, they’ll shut it off.”

  • 3 votes
#1.52 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:47 AM EST

The Bush neocon Party of Hate & Death ... 'nuff said ...

  • 6 votes
#1.53 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:48 AM EST

Despicable man Romney is. Despicable human being. He hates all that made America great. And for all his money, he hasn't given one thing back.

Not one museum, not one school, not one hospital, not one fixed bridge or road.

What a pile of absolutely vile, thoroughly uninformed rubbish. The FACTS are that in 2011 Romney paid over $3,000,000 in federal income taxes and donated over $4,000,000 to charity. His adjusted gross income that year was about $21,000,000 so that means Romney forked over 35% of his income to federal taxes and charities.

Yes, Fairfax Bill, Romney did give large amounts to the Mormon church and to his private foundation. BTW, Romney gave a huge percentage of those contributions in stock. Yes, he gets a full deduction of the market value, while avoiding any of the capital gains tax on the gains. I guess even 15% tax was too much for him to pay.

That's how the rich get richer....on our dime.

  • 10 votes
#1.54 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:51 AM EST

I do not know why people waste time arguing over this or that political candidate. They all are in it for THEMSELVES and could care less if you eat or have medical care. They are taken care of for life, now they just have to make sure all their cronies are taken care of and that their bank accounts are so overinflated that they could live off for the next 200 years just in case cryogenics works.

Mitt is not being very Mormon, they are usually so syruppy nice that they make me gag.

  • 4 votes
#1.55 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:51 AM EST

By the way, the whole "money is speech" thing was invoked by Hillary Clinton in her campaign during the primaries. She also was referring back to something one of the founding fathers had said (can't remember which) when she said it. I winced. It never became an issue, but let's remember, this was still right before the big crash. I don't think the popular opinion these days really is that those with more money should ethically have a bigger voice. We all just recognize that it is so, and if anything, those who have less need more of a voice. At least that's what I gather from the Tea Partiers and OWS crowds.

  • 3 votes
#1.56 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:51 AM EST

Anyone who would vote for Mitt Romney for President just because our current president is black is really unAmerican, Mitt Romney belongs to a cult, Mormon Cult, He will kill Social Security, Medicaid, He will go to War while his 5 adult male children refuse to join the military, no sense letting the top 1% join while the other 98% can do the fighting and dying, If he could he would charge us for the air that we breathe, Mitt is WRONG for America

  • 14 votes
#1.57 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:51 AM EST

And McCarthy was just "stopping the spread of communism".

Some of you are true believers- you actually believe, because of a victim mentality, that if others have achieved more than you have, they must have stolen it from you in some nefarious way. The person who works, goes to school nights, sacrifices, builds a company, and becomes rich, is no different in your mind than a drug dealer.

You're dangerous- such thinking is, in fact, unAmerican.

Others of you do NOT think, at all. You follow what you are being told, because you are told by those on "your" side. If, for example, you are told that Mr. doe is evil, does not share his wealth, has evil designs on his community- you do no research, other than from sources that originated the claim. You simply follow along.

You are even more dangerous, and more unAmerican. Innocent until proven guilty has been turned on its head- now, people are guilty, and there is no way to "prove" their innocence.

You throw away American principals of justice in the name of some greater good- but what good remains when the nation and its principals are destroyed at the alter of one man?

So, likewise, has the media compromised its principals and ethics. In the name of preserving the person for whom they jettisoned them in the first place, they repeat talking points as if they were news, promulgate falsehoods, (the republican "establishment" wants Romney. Well, fine, but who are they, and do none of you recognize that there are primaries being voted in, not by the "establishment", but by people?), and neglect to report important news that is deleterious to the ends of their idol.

Want an example? This is a political site- where is the article on yesterday's CBO report? With its trillion dollar debt projection, its nine percent unemployment projection, its shrinking GDP projection? Is that not germane to the election? Of course not- as it will not further the aim of getting Obama re elected.

You are all so committed to preserving the Obama dystopia that you have no qualms about destroying the country in furtherance of that aim.

I ask again- have you no decency?

  • 7 votes
#1.58 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:51 AM EST

florida is very well known for its voter fraud ,right behind illinois.thats why ron paul didnt put much money into florida

  • 4 votes
#1.59 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:55 AM EST

Wake up Now!:

"The NAACP only helps black people

La Raza only helps hispanics

CAIR only supports Muslims

PETA only helps animals

What is the point, one focus group is better than another?"

Careful Wake up, your racism is showing. I give to the Oregon Food Bank. That is REAL charity. Who do you make your contributions to?

  • 5 votes
#1.60 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:55 AM EST

I always find it funny, when Americans accuse other Americans of being UNAmerican. The most basic tenet of America, is that it is an open market place for ideas and expressions. Ergo, the only truly UNAmerican thing you can do, is tell someone their ideas are UNAmerican.

I'm sure you buff your flag pin till it gleams before going to bed at night, NoJo, but neither does that make you more patriotic, nor does it give your ideas anymore value, than the guy who burns the flag.

Derek,

I think you're right about public opinion believing money doesn't equal speech, the problem is that SCOTUS ruled that it does. Time for a 28th Amendment if you ask me. Let's check that bull.

  • 18 votes
#1.61 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:03 AM EST

Larry in Portland,

You know neither my race nor religion. NEWSFLASH, No one is scared of being called a racist any more, you have over used the default term to include everyone. All I did was point out your fallacy of your argument. I have logic on my side, and you are revealing YOURSELF.

You left out my quote from the Animal Farm

  • 1 vote
#1.62 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:03 AM EST

Amy, you are a CHAMP! Let's just assume that nojo has NO sense of irony,...and as we proved yesterday a complete LACK of comprehension to hypocrisy.

I'd say someone woke up with the Rovian Manifesto and would like to pin it on the Democrats. Sadly, it ain't happenin'.

And THIS parrot, asking about decency? I think my sides are splitting from the LAUGH ATTACK that caused coming from her lying, cheating, despicable finger tips.

Seems someone was asking her that very question as she published a 'diary' she KNEW was intended to be private.

Really, hypocrite is too good a word for her. Vile begins to cover it.

To coin a line from one of my favorite all time movies,"...(sic-decency) I do not think the word means what you think it means..."

  • 15 votes
#1.63 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:05 AM EST

No joe: How and why did we get here? Well, we have a political party headed by a man many saw as transformational- without thinking, for a moment, what that transformation would look like. We have a political party teetering on the edge of extinction, or, at least, irrelevance, due entirely to its takeover by radicals uninterested in the Constitution or principals that made this nation great. A party tacitly encouraging mobs to riot, burn flags, take over private property, and generally engage in unlawful and/or anti-social activities- all in the name of preserving one incompetent fool.

The vilification of the producers in this country will soon be called by another name- Obamaism will be held in the same "esteem" as McCarthyism.

At first, I thought this was about Republicans, but I see again it's the imagination of the right-wingers. This is a real stretch, even for a Republican. lmao

  • 13 votes
#1.64 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:05 AM EST

no joe, - clearly you should look in the mirror when you ask "have you no decency?" My guess is the answer would have to be no. You've written posts that smack of lies and misdirection - at best. You see the facts through your own right wing slant which has no concept of accuracy or truth. And, you have the nerve to ask "have you no decency?" What a joke!

  • 16 votes
#1.65 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:06 AM EST

Its First Read. Its the place where the radicals from the left and the right refuse to actually acknowledge that both are pro-American.

If they weren't pro-American, nobody would care so much as to lose their minds. But that logic seems to escape the most vehement attackers here.

  • 3 votes
#1.66 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:08 AM EST

Derek, you're a Facist, theocratic, despot, be quiet. Just joking!!!! :)

  • 4 votes
#1.67 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:09 AM EST

Alan -- What really pisses me about turning the channel or not answering my phone is the fact I'm forced to!! Scalia likes the idea of these pacs and their lies I don't!!!!! Big difference.

Sarah -- Great posts!

  • 7 votes
#1.68 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:11 AM EST

no joe, no bo, nj

McCarthyism is ALL Republican, not Democrat. Tea Party activities are the closest thing to McCarthyism I've seen!! Making it hard for people to vote who you think will vote the "wrong" way is about as anti-american as you can get!! Tea Party Congress not compromising and not working together is about the most treasonous thing I can think of from members of congress to the american people!!!!

Have you no decency? And how did you get so freakin confused????

  • 14 votes
#1.69 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:16 AM EST

...and in other breaking news

"Democrats in the House clear Democratic Administration"

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/us/politics/operation-fast-and-furious-report-by-democrats-clears-obama-administration.html?_r=2

The only thing this reminds me of were sycophants from the Republican party who supported Bush even when they knew he was wrong. As I said how is this Administration and it's sycophants different.

  • 3 votes
#1.70 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:17 AM EST

Character assassination, accusations of undermining the American way of life, vague accusations of "crimes"- all under the heading of "protecting America".

The most spot-on perfect description of the GOP/TP that I have ever seen. Thanks NJBJ. It's time you have finally seen YOUR party for what it is .. extreme McCarthyism.

  • 13 votes
#1.71 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:24 AM EST

Alan, NJ

That article is nothing but a smear campaign against Arizona, which the President is suing. The guns were bought in California and Texas as well, and last time I checked, the ATF was a Federal agency.

Why is it that Eric Holder pleading the fifth?

  • 3 votes
#1.72 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:25 AM EST

@Sarah: Apparently, I am crazy for crazy!

  • 3 votes
#1.73 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:25 AM EST

Establishment!!!! Both sides of it poking the others eye out while no more innocent than the accused!!!

  • 3 votes
#1.74 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:26 AM EST

Wake up now!:

"I have logic on my side, and you are revealing YOURSELF.

You left out my quote from the Animal Farm"

Wow, seems I have struck a nerve there, eh Wake up? Logic? Really? Comparing animals to humans? Someone needs to wake up and it ain't me.

  • 2 votes
#1.75 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:26 AM EST

NoJo: If I'd lived to be a hundred, I would never have believed that McCarthyism in all it's vile glory would be resurrected by a political party, yet, here it is...

You are obviously talking about the Republicans.

Takeover by radiacals, anti-social activities, contributions from the richest of the rich, McCarthyism... Yep, you're talking about the Republicans.

Have YOU no decency?

  • 9 votes
#1.76 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:28 AM EST

Larry in Portland,

No one has ever accused you of being well read. Google it "Animal Farm"

  • 1 vote
#1.77 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:30 AM EST

McCarthy was a Republican!!!! And Nixon was his aid!!! Good grief. NoJoBlowJo re-writing history - does he really think we're that stupid????

  • 6 votes
#1.78 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:32 AM EST

I do not consider a $4 million dollar tithe to the Mormon Church as charity.

most of Romney's so-called "charity" is actually a "Tithe"

So contributing to the church of one's choice is somehow not charity? Silly me, who knew?

BTW, Romney gave a huge percentage of those contributions in stock. Yes, he gets a full deduction of the market value, while avoiding any of the capital gains tax on the gains.

And the lucky recipient of that stock gets the full benefits of those gains, which is kind of sort of the point of donating to charity in the first place, eh? And BTW, all Americans are eligible to deduct their charitable contributions, so I guess many of us are in that tax avoidance game to one extent or another. Damn that evil tax code,.

  • 5 votes
#1.79 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:37 AM EST

Derek,

I enjoy my crazy smothered in a thick sauce of stupid. I like my "scallops" that way too. Hee hee hee.

  • 2 votes
#1.80 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:38 AM EST

Wake up now!:

No one has ever accused you of being well read. Google it "Animal Farm"

George Orwell wrote fiction. Let's deal in facts. I give to the Oregon Food Bank. Who do you make your charitable contributions to? You do give, don't you?

  • 3 votes
#1.81 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:43 AM EST

And the lucky recipient of that stock gets the full benefits of those gains, which is kind of sort of the point of donating to charity in the first place, eh? And BTW, all Americans are eligible to deduct their charitable contributions, so I guess many of us are in that tax avoidance game to one extent or another. Damn that evil tax code,.

Except most of us don't own enough stock to give away to charity. We give used clothing, toys, electronics, etc. that doesn't grow in value. We get a deduction for the depreciated value, not the appreciated value.

The fact is, if Romney sold the stock first, and then gave the cash proceeds to charity, he'd pay 15% capital gains tax. Instead, he avoids the tax, plus he gets the full deduction. The charity ends up with the same either way. Maybe that's the reason no Republican wants to do away with the charitable deduction, and not for the guise of being so "charitable". Is that "kinda-sorta" the idea Bill?

  • 5 votes
#1.82 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:46 AM EST

The vilification of the producers in this country will soon be called by another name- Obamaism will be held in the same "esteem" as McCarthyism.

Until I got to this sentence I thought you were talking about the GOP!

No Jo that rambling load of BS is just that. If you believe that then I suggest you seek professional help.

  • 9 votes
#1.83 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:48 AM EST

Sarah, great post at 1.48!

  • 4 votes
#1.84 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:51 AM EST

Bill in Fairfax -- Charity shouldn't be looked at or done with an eye to what deductions one would benefit from. Kinda negates what charity is all about......being generous to those less fortunate. Not because it puts more money back in your pocket!

  • 3 votes
#1.85 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:15 PM EST

most floridians are not from florida originally .. they come from all over the east coast ... their brains have not been burned by the KKK .. for most of their lives ... unlike SC where the average voter is a few % points under the average intelligence levels

  • 1 vote
#1.86 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:15 PM EST

Until I got to this sentence I thought you were talking about the GOP!

Devie - the utter contempt displayed and voiced by the NJBJs, Newts, and Romney's of the country towards the American working public is astounding. Notice in her rambling post that she gives all the glory to producers (code for 1%), but the actual workers that make it possible aren't worth the few dollars you throw at them to do the actual production. In the GOP/TP world, if you haven't achieved the goal of millionaire, you are a loser living off government handouts. It is a sad pathetic view of the world - a world where only greedy egomaniacs need apply.

  • 9 votes
#1.87 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:21 PM EST

You extremist-leftists are going to get a huge surprise this fall, when victory doesn't come as easy as you seem to think it will. 64.2% of all Americans polled think the country is still heading in the wrong direction, and more people still disapprove of Obama's job performance by a "score" of 47.6% to 46.8%. (47.6% is a very high negative number for an incumbant President.)

You can point to congress and say their disapproval number is at 82.4%. But, you forget the Democratic Party holds one of the two houses of congress. So, they are part of that disapproval number too.

Obama is going to have to answer for things such as Solyndra, and Siga.....and he's going to have to explain why his economic policies have failed. (Something his own supporters can't do.)

Can't wait to see your faces, and hear your caterwauling when the polls show Obama and Romney neck and neck going into the final week of October.

DEMOCRATS FOR ROMNEY 2012!

  • 3 votes
#1.88 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:21 PM EST

Is this new ... "Negative" has worked for years ... how do you think we had Bush for 8!!!!!!!

""Fear" is right up there with negative ... remember ... Bush & Cheney kept us alive for years!!!!! Just not those that they sent to their death!!!!

  • 3 votes
#1.89 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:23 PM EST

Bill, your lame attempt at trying to convert a Tithe to charity is rather pathetic. A Tithe is a donation to a church to conduct its religious teaching. Charity is the act of helping another. I provide "charitable donations" directly to non-profit organizations who's sole purpose is to help others who cannot afford medical care, like St. Jude's; fire prevention and ambulance services like my local volunteer fire department does; and training dogs for our disabled veterans, etc.

Unles you can open up his church's books and show me their accounting ledger that directly shows "Romney's Tithe's" were all spent on charitable work detailing what it was used for; how the money was spent; and how many it helped---I will call it the COST OF MORMON MEMBERSHIP!

FYI -- My Uncle was a pastor and did little to no charity work for his community, only for his parishoners who suffered a casualty like fire or economic loss like a job, which mostly came from "extra tithes" donated by his small congregation. Most Tithes collected by churches go to salaries where the leaders usually live pretty large; cost of maintaining the church(es), occassionally helping out their members (or wards in mormon terms), or trying to convert more members.

At one time churches were the only charitable organization of local communities and society, hence the "tax free status", but those days are long gone.

  • 7 votes
#1.90 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:25 PM EST

64.2% of all Americans polled think the country is still heading in the wrong direction

This question is so misleading. It says nothing about in comparison to... or in the context of... or who holds the lion share of responisbility for... or who would turn it around...

Just saying, it's way to general to mean much.

  • 7 votes
#1.91 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:29 PM EST

and he's going to have to explain why his economic policies have failed

Obama's economic policies have not failed. If they had, we would be in a depression, the stock market would be at all time lows, and unemployment would be at historical highs.

  • 7 votes
#1.92 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:31 PM EST

Could the high “wrong direction” have anything to
do with the Congress that has 13% approval rating?

  • 7 votes
#1.93 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:34 PM EST

If you are standing in someones way ... how can you complain about them not reaching their destination!

The GOP (which includes the Tea Party lock stock and barrel) have been obstructionists through all of the Clinton years and even more so with (black) Obama!

  • 6 votes
#1.94 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:50 PM EST

I love that Feisty's comment above got collapsed, for calling Joe an idiot I guess - yet his post calling her the nasty redhead, did not? Obviously the fantasy the right-wingers have that only their posts get collapsed for no reason is just that, fantasy.

Bill Fairfax VA: do you really think the Mormon church builds roads? I think any entity that will "help" people out only IF they listen to your preaching, is not charitable at all. That's called extortion of faith. When the Mormons and Witnesses come to my door, I point to my no soliciting sign. They try to say they aren't trying to sell me anything, and I say "but you're soliciting my faith." I'm just not too keen on their brand of "giving."

Larry, Derek, Sarah, Amy B. - love your posts, also Pat Boston MA, Dennis, Columbus OH, and Feisty as always. And LouisJ - like your posts, and LOVE your avatar, LOL

NO JO: are you insane, or just stupid? Way to talk smack about McCarthyism - which hailed from your party. And Obama wanting the rich to pay appropriate taxes is somehow "vilifying" them and "threatening their livelihoods"? You are full of irony: making poor people pay those higher taxes isn't a threat to their livelihoods, I guess?

Your wrote: “you actually believe, because of a victim mentality, that if others have achieved more than you have, they must have stolen it from you in some nefarious way. The person who works, goes to school nights, sacrifices, builds a company, and becomes rich, is no different in your mind than a drug dealer.”

Well.....where do I even begin. First, nobody thinks that people who work hard don't deserve what they earn. But why shouldn't they pay fair taxes, like the rest of us that work hard but earn less? If we can afford that tax rate, people who earn quadruple what we do certainly can. And do you really think people like Romney sacrificed and went to night school to succeed? LMAO YEAH RIGHT. And while your side "vilifies" the OWS crowd and calls them "entitled"......that's ironic. We have 1%ers on one hand, with multiple houses, tropical vacations, hotel rooms that cost $10K a night, fast cars, designer clothes, plastic surgery.....and on the other hand, OWS types who want.....what? Oh yeah, a roof over their heads and the ability to take care of their family without constant struggle. Of course we think we're entitled to have an opportunity to LIVE a normal, simple life. What makes the 1%ers think they're entitled to EVERYTHING they can get their hands on? That's entitlement. I for one couldn't sleep at night, having more money than I can spend in a lifetime, while there are starving, homeless children on the streets of my town. I would feel too selfish and "entitled." But I guess you get over that, when you have money to comfort you.

  • 8 votes
#1.95 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:12 PM EST

You extremist-leftists are going to get a huge surprise this fall, when victory doesn't come as easy as you seem to think it will. 64.2% of all Americans polled think the country is still heading in the wrong direction, and more people still disapprove of Obama's job performance by a "score" of 47.6% to 46.8%. (47.6% is a very high negative number for an incumbant President.)

And yet, 6 months ago it was the Republicans saying it was going to be a slam-dunk. Who would of thunk the Republicans could screw that up?

  • 4 votes
#1.96 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:32 PM EST

Pretty clear that REAL Republicans are NoT endorsing fringe politics ...

Mitt Romney is showing us how much it costs to be 'acceptable' to Republicans ...

NewTEA Gingrich may have created his own crater - no need to go to the moon ...

The Anybody But Obama crowd are still searching for Mr. Anybody - is Ron Paul next? ...

Using 'free speech' means - quantity beats quality ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------

According to Republicans - TransCanada would be a bigger job creator than Mitt Romney ...

The Republicans do not create jobs - SuperPACs create jobs ...

To Republicans - money talks - demographics only endorse the message ...

'New' Republicans are proud they know there are 50 states - no child left behind is a success ...

Biggest 'New' Republican accomplishment is having a birth certificate - taking credit for someone else's labor ...

Since Republicans cannot find a 'good' candidate - they are running on an 'everybody else sucks' platform ...

  • 3 votes
#1.97 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:54 PM EST

Pat Boston MA.

Andrew Sullivan on Romney's speech last night:

This speech is most dishonest, manipulative, disgusting series of lies I've heard in a very long time.

That's a tough call. IMO, Gingrich took the blue ribbon for the most lies told in the shortest amount of time last night in his speech. Further on Romney:

Pat Boston MA.

And for all his money, he hasn't given one thing back.

Not one museum, not one school, not one hospital, not one fixed bridge or road.

That is one problem with the Mormon church. Most members contribute to charity through the church only, charity that goes primarily to members only. The exception is disaster assistance (including foreign aid--there are members around the world), for example after Hurricane Katrina. But without a doubt, prior presidents with wealth had far more compassion and concern about the well being of all Americans. And many charitable efforts and programs have been started and conducted by First Ladies (or leaders in other countries, like Princess Diana, for example).

There is so much about the Mormon faith and culture that is fine as practiced among themselves, but disconcerting to me in regard to the office of the President and leader of the free world. It's interesting how conservatives are attracted to candidates like themselves (hockey mom, Joe the Plumber, etc.) and yet will get behind someone like Romney who is so far removed from the "everymann" as to be unthinkable.

Back to the main topic... Gingrich won the "south" in Florida. Romney will have a hard time winning a general election if he can't carry the south. No Republican can win without the south. No doubt Romney hopes Evangelicals will hold their noses and vote him out of irrational hatred for the president.

Here's a far better solution: Obama/Biden - 2012!

  • 5 votes
#1.98 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 2:36 PM EST

64.2% of all Americans polled think the country is still heading in the wrong direction

That includes progressives and people like me who think the country is heading in the wrong direction because of the Do Nothing obstrucitonist Teapublicans in congress. You better look at a lot more poll results than that.

Most Americans are concerned about income inequality, and everything related to that. They want the rich to pay their fair share in taxes. They want programs for the working class such as Social Security and Medicare to be preserved and strengthened. They want labor rights protected too.

They are tired of costly wars. They want a balanced approach to the deficit, which includes revenue via fair taxation of the rich and corporations--ending loopholes and subsidies. They want the health care system fixed, financial reforms to end "too big to fail" and protections for consumers and our environment and food. They are for civil/individual rights, women's rights, the right to privacy, etc.

Tell us what part of the Teapublican platform has majority support? Tell us how the approval ratings are going for Gingrich, or Romney? Heck, most of the GOP governors who rode the hate wave into power in 2010, tell us how there approval ratings are going?

  • 4 votes
#1.99 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 3:00 PM EST

Actually, Bill Fairfax,...

Many of us would consider that $4,000,000 to the Mormons a POLITICAL contribution that should have NO Tax Deductibility.

But hey,...I think all Religious Institutions that participate actively OR passively in the political process should be TAXED!

I guess I am PROGRESSIVE thataway.

  • 6 votes
#1.100 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 3:35 PM EST

Agreed Clara - and especially the Mormon church after what they did in California with Prop 8. An extreme example of religion entering the political arena for personal gain.

http://californiansagainsthate.blogspot.com/2009/02/mormongate.html

  • 3 votes
#1.101 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:53 PM EST
Reply

x

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:09 AM EST

Betty, most logical statement you have made in a long time.

  • 10 votes
#2.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:21 AM EST

@Buck Naked Sr

That's a cross, the cross on which Romney would be hung in November.

  • 14 votes
#2.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:46 AM EST

Dude, advocating the lynching of a Presedential candidate is not only racist, it's against the law.

Mitt just had SS appointed to him.

Maybe they should give you a call.

  • 11 votes
#2.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:52 AM EST

White Collar Auto

Dude, advocating the lynching of a Presedential candidate is not only racist, it's against the law.

Mitt just had SS appointed to him.

Maybe they should give you a call.

Stiff Collar

What happened did you fall on your head getting out of bed this morning?



  • 11 votes
#2.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:58 AM EST

Sorry, Bev, as usual I have no idea what you are talking about.

So, you're Ok with discussing hanging Romney?

Cause I'm pretty sure you have, in the past, made comments about racist folk who wanted to do nothing more than lynch our President.

Neither should be acceptable, right?

  • 4 votes
#2.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:03 AM EST

Feisty, saying 'x' will still get you collapsed by a certain element here.... lol

  • 8 votes
#2.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:09 AM EST

Feisty, saying 'x' will still get you collapsed by a certain element....

Shhhh... I'm conducting a little experiment! ;o)

  • 16 votes
#2.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:11 AM EST

WOW! That was the most intelligent statement you have ever said you entire time posting here. Now 25 more letters and then we can teach you actual words...

  • 7 votes
#2.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:15 AM EST

oh intersting betty redhead is now a multiple user on this site a violation of hte COH let's see how much honor MSNBC/FR has. About as much as who is in the WH I bet

  • 3 votes
#2.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:42 AM EST

Romney stated that he is "not concerned about the very poor."

Wow...if the president of the United States is not concerned about the very poor, how will America reduce its poverty level? How will this country economically, politically and socially uplift those that are trapped on the lowest financial rung? How will we avoid people slipping into poverty?

Romney just gave ALL Americans another reason NOT to vote for him in 2012.

  • 4 votes
#2.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:14 PM EST

Buck, What the hell are you talking about? The only rereg double poster around here is you.

BTW Don't bother with anymore threatening emails. I don't scare all that easy.

  • 4 votes
#2.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:24 PM EST
Reply

Enter Mitt Kardashian

  • 16 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:10 AM EST

louisJ

Enter Mitt Kardashian

LOL, how'd like that singing Mitt did? These crazy right wing nut jobs criticize the President for every thing he does; then turn around and copy him. Lawd have mercy, even Newtie tried to get in on the act by saying he won't sing because he is not the Entertainer in Chief. Wanna bet?

Newt wishes to be the CIC and he is an evil variation of the devil singing. Sing Newt. Sing I'll fly away. We will love seeing your bruised BIG headed ego take off to the moon (metaphorically after President Obama sends you a silly milli meter longer like Aretha Franklin sings in her one of her songs.

FYI: The President is good for the economy his singing Al Green shoot up ring tone sales.

Nobody but Obama/Biden 2012

  • 8 votes
#3.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:15 AM EST
Comment author avatarBeverly in ChicagoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Joe in Albany


Nasty, the only nerve you struck with me is the one in my funny bone. I know I can always count on you for that.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yea, very funny Joee, since you did not mention your Viagra.

  • 6 votes
#3.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:46 AM EST

White Collar Auto

Sorry, Bev, as usual I have no idea what you are talking about.

So, you're Ok with discussing hanging Romney?

Cause I'm pretty sure you have, in the past, made comments about racist folk who wanted to do nothing more than lynch our President.

Look Collar,

I'm not surprised you don't get it since there was no mention of racism in the statement. Just like your average right wing nut job you see things that are'nt real

Neither should be acceptable, right?

  • 3 votes
#3.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:11 AM EST

Excuse me everyone ,

But I just have 4 stupid questions for today :

Why someone who is reportedly worth between 180-200 million USD ( Romney), and pays about 3,000,000.00 in taxes in one year, has the urge to be the next President of the United States earning about $ 145,000.00 a year?

The Presidential salary does not even come close to cover ( Romney's ) tax bill, even after cheating his way down to the 15 % bracket.

Is there anything else that we THE PEOPLE don't know about it?

Hasn't he made enough money through out his political career and connections and power deals yet?

Can anybody clearly see how important for Wall Street is the Presidency of the United States yet, or does anyone needs more clarification on the subject?

  • 7 votes
#3.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:45 AM EST

It's about power for his rich backers, not him. Clearly, this man is a puppet.

  • 4 votes
#3.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:58 AM EST

I would like to know why we have not seen the rest of Mitt Romney's tax returns. He is said to have given John McCain's campaign 23 years worth of returns---I'd settle for half.

  • 5 votes
#3.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:40 PM EST

yah he hemmed and hawed and delayed - to release TWO years of returns.

  • 2 votes
#3.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:28 PM EST

Barack Obama is about to enbark on another billion dollar campaign and you lefties are worried about the fraction of that the republican will raise. You sound worried and you should be. Obama is aabout to waste a billion dollars and lose anyway..

    #3.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 7:03 PM EST
    Reply

    The media ♥ Newt Gingrich

    By Dana Milbank, Published: January 31

    Dear Newt:

    These are difficult times for you, no doubt, and we understand that people sometimes say things they don’t really mean. We hope that explains your cruel comment about us here in Orlando this week.

    “All of our friends in the news media,” you said, “are very excited and eager to end this race as early as possible.” In our hurry to crown Mitt Romney as the Republican presidential nominee, you seem to think, we’re trying to use your wipe-out in the Florida primary to declare an end to your campaign.

    Newt, these are hurtful words. I speak for many colleagues when I say that we in the news media are great fans of your candidacy: of the 200 people in the room for your “Victory Party” when polls closed Tuesday night, about 185 of them were journalists. And no wonder: You’re the only thing saving us from a long spring of despair, the only person who can, by extending the presidential race, drive up our audience and bring us the revenues we so desperately need.

    You give us exactly what political journalists crave. Sure, some of us are ideologically biased, but we are far more biased in favor of conflict — and that's why we’re all in the tank for you. We’ve loved you since you created the modern era of politics-as-blood-sport in the House two decades ago. When a preacher opened an event for you this week with a prayer that God “embolden” you, only our journalistic detachment prevented us from shouting out: “Amen.”

    How do we love you, Newt Gingrich? Let us count the ways.

    We love that, in an age of disciplined pols, you are different: You travel with suit jackets in multiple sizes to keep pace with your yo-yoing waistline. You’re always late — sometimes spectacularly so. Romney follows a written, minute-by-minute schedule, complete with weather forecasts; often your top aides don’t know where you’re going.

    Given the financial state of our industry, we share your zeal for lost causes: the defiant signs your supporters waved at your “concession” speech Tuesday night warning “46 STATES TO GO,” and your insistence earlier in the day that you would fight on for “eight months. . .unless Romney drops out earlier.” It takes a special man to boast that he is “where Ronald Reagan was in 1976” – the year he lost. Your quest is echoed even in the name of the company that books your campaign flights: Moby Dick Airways.

    We love, as well, your versatility: that you oppose the embryonic stem-cell research and the health-care mandate you once favored. We were tickled when you condemned us this week for having a “horse-race mentality” — nine hours after you were in a bar with us discussing the horse race.

    We have a special place in our hearts for a man who describes himself as “a really important guy who really knows a lot.” We enjoyed that, when you were told your moon colony idea was grandiose, you embraced “the charge that I am grandiose” and compared yourself to Abraham Lincoln and the Wright Brothers. We feel spoiled by your many attempts to liken yourself to Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton and the Roosevelts — both of them.

    There is so much more. We love your feigned umbrage and your wild superlatives. We admire the way you frequently send us to Google to test your veracity — like when you said this week that George Soros had labeled you with words he had not actually used.

    We don’t even mind your constant attacks on us, such as your threat this week that you would boycott debates moderated by journalists. We know you don’t mean that, and, just as CNN’s John King helped you to win the South Carolina primary, we’re happy to be your foils.

    We felt discomfort for you when Fox News, playing on a big screen at your Victory Party, projected Romney’s win at 8 p.m. sharp. We felt pain when we heard that your concession speech might have to be delayed because there weren’t enough supporters to fill the seats behind you. We felt anguish when we learned that some of the “supporters” on the floor were in fact onlookers from a hardware convention.

    But when you emerged after 9 p.m. Tuesday to give your speech, you spoke directly to “the elite media” about your intentions: “I just want to reassure them tonight: We are going to contest every place, and we are going to win, and we will be in Tampa as the nominee in August.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-medias-codependent-relationship-with-newt-gingrich/2012/01/31/gIQArTADgQ_story.html?hpid=z8

    __________________________________________________________

    Once you accept the former Speaker’s words and actions for what they are and always have been which is bombastically rhetorical in the theater of the absurd that Republican/T.P. politics has become the entertainment value alone makes his quest worthwhile.

    At least his lies and innuendos are creative and delivered with a certain twinkling of his eye that says that he doesn’t expect you to believe them just go along with them long enough to stir up some mess and make things interesting.

    • 24 votes
    Reply#4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:12 AM EST

    I think Newton meant to say "45 States To Go"...you know, since he didn't get the signatures needed to appear on the Virginia ballot.

    OOPS!!!

    • 19 votes
    #4.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:19 AM EST

    IR, Dana Milbank nailed that one. Enjoyed your added thoughts, too, that last sentence describes old Newt to a T.

    Da Noid, it should be interesting to see the Virginia vote since only Romney and Ron Paul are on the ballot. Just think, the VA GOP can easily pick Ron Paul as the anyone but Mitt.

    • 12 votes
    #4.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:54 AM EST

    "Sure, some of us are ideologically biased"

    No kidding, Milibank....you partisan hack!

    • 3 votes
    #4.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:58 AM EST

    I am not usually a fan of Milbank; but this piece is HYSTERICAL! And yes, DaNoid, excellent point - although the signs were theoretically from the supporters? Right? We know they aren't informed enough to know the difference.

    Can't help but wonder if the signs were actually 'poached' from the Romney camp by the very journalists themselves? LOL

    Oh sweet spring, let the contest continue until WELL past August. And let Gingrich split the ticket as the Tea Party 'alternative'!

    • 14 votes
    #4.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:00 AM EST

    Just what is Newt's problem? Is he schizophrenic, bi-polar, suffering from ADD or SADD(sexual attention deficit disorder)? Go Newt, you little megalomaniac! ;-)

    Obama/Biden 2012

    • 11 votes
    #4.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:04 AM EST

    I watched Newt's speech, thinking he would talk to the base about why a moderate won't beat President Obama and to rally around him. Instead I got a schedule of what he would do his first day in office---between the swearing in and going to the inaugural balls. I have to say my first thought was that Callista would be busy having her hair and makeup done.

    • 13 votes
    #4.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:11 AM EST

    Just what is Newt's problem?

    Newt reminds me right now of Daffy Duck in the old cartoon Ali Baba Bunny when he finds the treasure and wants it all to himself:

    (beating Bugs back into the tunnel) "It’s mine, you understand! Mine! All mine! Get in there! Down! Down! Down! Go! Go! Go! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mwahahahaha!"

    He's Newt! He's the self-proclaimed heir to "The Reagan Movement"! He's entitled to be President, isn't he?

    • 6 votes
    #4.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:26 AM EST

    Independent Redneck Va.

    The media ♥ Newt Gingrich


    Newt, these are hurtful words. I speak for many colleagues when I say that we in the news media are great fans of your candidacy: of the 200 people in the room for your “Victory Party” when polls closed Tuesday night, about 185 of them were journalists.

    Thanks for the link IR.

    It only substantiates Newt-ron lives and speaks in a parallel universe.

    I say we dedicate Roy Ayers' - You Send Me to Newt-on

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7qVPFEaFX8

    • 3 votes
    #4.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:52 AM EST

    Clara KCMO

    I am not usually a fan of Milbank; but this piece is HYSTERICAL!

    Neither am I . However I noticed since he has come back to MSNBC he has changed his tune.

    Clara check your e-mail box I sent you a note.

    • 4 votes
    #4.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:02 AM EST

    bev you ready for some more taxes to pay your states deficit? get ready here it comes

    • 1 vote
    #4.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:22 AM EST

    Ahhhh IR - just love you! That piece written by Dana Millbank (not my favorite) was great!

    After listening to Romeny's speech last night, it occurred to me that he sure isn't worried about Newt - all that bashing on OUR president. Remarkable amount of lies - I have researched about 20% of it so far. But no sense bringing them up. I have been posting here for over 5 years now and bottom-line no one will ever change their way of thinking. It is the same stuff over and over again.

    Obama/Biden 2012

    • 8 votes
    #4.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:23 AM EST
    Reply

    Florida, Florida, Florida. Romney won. Is anyone actually surprised? Chuck Todd's numbers analysis was quite interesting last night. Romney spent his money and his time focused on those areas in which he could win, the more moderate ones. That's not unusual except that means he did not try very hard to win the hearts and minds of the conservative base which is what most republican candidates try to do first. Gingrich and Santorum won the base. One other interesting point is that 4 out of 10 Floridians expressed the desire for someone else to run and 4 out of 10 wanted the candidates to be more conservative--my guess is those 4 in 10 are mostly the same people.

    What did the rest of us learn so far in this GOP race for the nomination? We learned that 4 in 10 Floridians express the same dissatisfaction with the slate of candidates as was expressed in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. We learned that Floridians also think "electability" is the most important factor--never mind that in IA, SC, voters had a different idea about who was most "electable. We learned nothing from Romney and Gingrich regarding HOW they plan to accomplish all the things they promise; they still speak in generalities but apparently that's good enough for GOP voters because they aren't pressing the candidates for specifics. We learned that the GOP candidates support anything President Obama is against and are against anything that President Obama supports. It seems the GOP voters think that way, too. We learned that Mitt Romney should never sing. We learned that Newt Gingrich says President Obama singing about a few chords of a song extremely well earns the designation of "entertainer in chief" ignoring Romney and Cain's "entertainer" status. We learned that Gingrich continues his dog whistle blowing despite his surrogates saying otherwise. We learned that Mitt Romney is a nasty and mean man who will stop at nothing to win the GOP nomination. We learned Romney spent 50% more on ads, around 90% negative, than all the GOP candidates spent combined in 2008. We learned that Newt Gingrich remains the mean and nasty man he was while in Washington DC despite his claims of "redemption". We learned that Newt Gingrich hates Mitt Romney and vice versa. We learned that Mitt Romney should beware because Newt Gingrich will not go quietly into the night.

    What I learned from watching many months of GOP candidates criss-crossing Iowa prior to the Caucus, and the three primaries since Iowa is that the Republican Party has been consumed with hatred for one man, President Barack Obama. I learned that the GOP which speaks constantly of religious faith, its importance, its values and moral teachings critical to the well being of the Nation are nothing but hypocritical liars. It is one thing to disagree on political policy and ideology and to campaign against those differences, it is another to commit sin in the process. The Bible I grew up with speaks of lies and hate toward one another as being sins; I assume the GOP's Bible teaches the same.

    Not only have I learned that the GOP candidates are consumed with hate for President Obama but I have also learned that a disturbingly huge number of GOP voters who claim to be evangelicals and Christians of various faiths are consumed with hatred for our President. What a sad state of affairs for any political party and for this country when blind hatred consumes those who claim to be righteous and are anything but.

    • 30 votes
    #5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:13 AM EST

    Keen analysis.

    And to add to one particularly interesting statement you made Jody, Romney spent his money and his time focused on those areas in which he could win, the more moderate ones.

    This is all representative of how Ramney would run the country. Pointless spending while lining his own pockets. I'm sure President Obama will point all of this out come debate time.

    I can only see it now; TEA Drinkers get together in Jethros Home and at the end of the debate when Ramney is destroyed by the President, they'll wittingly say, "Shoot! Ju see that thar, he sho did git that Socialist Mooslim Keynayshian UnAmerican Marxist Chicagee Gangsta and he got him good!! Giggidy..." SMH.

    • 14 votes
    #5.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:23 AM EST

    I learned that the GOP which speaks constantly of religious faith, its importance, its values and moral teachings critical to the well being of the Nation are nothing but hypocritical liars.

    I know! Three quarters of the Republican GOP voters in South Carolina are evangelicals and Gingrich handily won their support? It really makes you wonder, do the churches in SC double as swingers' clubs?

    • 20 votes
    #5.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:25 AM EST

    Jody, Don't confuse Republican hatred for Obama's anti business policies and rhetoric for hating the office of President. In 2008 a horrible leader accidentally got elected. Unlike every other President, Obama was unable to bridge the gap of communication and cooperation with the other side of the isle. He's not going to suddenly become a better leader if he accidentally gets re-elected in 2012. Even the poverty lobby will be better off with a president that encourages them to use the great power of American capitalism to a better life. Obama has taken enough of our wealth and redistributed it unearned to the Auto Unions and Government workers.........

    • 7 votes
    #5.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:29 AM EST

    Bravo, Jody--thanks for putting into words what I've been thinking and couldn't express. I am ashamed at what I hear coming from the Republicans. Trying to find a ray of sunshine in all the hatred, they are doing more to galvanize the Democratic base than any Democrat could do.

    • 20 votes
    #5.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:30 AM EST

    UAW--I would like to take your words at face value and think that our differences are over qualifications and performance and maybe yours are. But what about the birthers, the people who call the President Muslim as if that were evil, the people who yell at him during the SOTU address, someone like Jan Brewer wagging her finger at him as if he were a 2 year old, and on and on---those folks are not differing on policy. This is blind hatred. I have an idea why.

    • 20 votes
    #5.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:33 AM EST

    Great analysis Jody. The GOP/TP's only consistent message is one of hate and fear. If you have lost your job, it is because a Muslim, Kenyan born black man is the president. Notice how many posters here continue to slyly push the birther issue? The coded Food Stamp president message is just another ruse, used by Newt extensively, to openly tout racism.

    The GOP/TP should just openly proclaim they are the party of hate and fear. They hate anyone unlike them, and they fear anyone unlike them. Fortunately, backward minds think alike, and those backward folk all belong to one party, the GOP/TP.

    • 17 votes
    #5.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:35 AM EST

    Not only have I learned that the GOP candidates are consumed with hate for President Obama but I have also learned that a disturbingly huge number of GOP voters who claim to be evangelicals and Christians of various faiths are consumed with hatred for our President.

    Jody, Romney can have them. We don't want them.

    • 20 votes
    #5.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:36 AM EST

    In 2008 a horrible leader accidentally got elected.

    There was nothing accidental about the results of that election. It was clear proof that America was sick of the economic and social disasters wrought upon the American public by 8 years of tyrannical rule by Bush/Cheney.

    • 16 votes
    #5.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:43 AM EST

    So true Jody. Many folks on the right have never heard of fact checks and they believe all of the lies that the right wing talking heads have to say about the President. It’s so sad that many of these folks are left in the dark and let others do their thinking and lay out the views for them.

    Also, I wonder how long Mitt can keep up his record primary campaign spending, because he is going to need a boat load of money to fight the President?

    • 14 votes
    #5.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:44 AM EST

    Hate in the base of any party will stir up the vote. And in the GOP base, while their is an overwhelming amout of hate for our president, there seems to be that same dislike for Mr. Romney. Will he be able to entice them to him and actually get out their vote. That is what remains to be seen.

    • 9 votes
    #5.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:48 AM EST

    The hatred for our president is what frightens me. No matter what GOP/TPer is nominated, the republican voters will be out in droves to vote for him. You can read all the polls you want about the percent of repub voters wanting someone else - it won't matter at the end of the day. While at the same time, the dems and indy's who are disappointed in President Obama because he didn't turn the mess around in 3 years will stay home and whine.

    Get one thing straight, facts do not matter - hatred for President Obama is the only thing that does.

    • 11 votes
    #5.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:58 AM EST

    Steeler, have you seen how the Obama administration has treated Arizona on immigration? Jan Brewer shaking her finger at him like he is a 2 year old pretty much sums up the treatment you get when you disrespect the States laws. There is no doubt that Obama battles some racial issues from certain members of politics and society. Of course he also benefits from racial issues such as the near 100% approval of blacks.. I wish Obama could have done a better job encouraging certain minority members of the population to go after the American dream the way the Asians have excelled in our capitalistic society. I really beleive the country needs a better example than Obama has given us.

    • 4 votes
    #5.12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:08 AM EST

    Thanks everyone. It seemed a perfect time to say it.

    UAW, please note, I did not say ALL republicans, I said "disturbingly huge number". Sorry but no matter how you try to spin it, UAW, the GOPTP signs depicting President Obama as a witch doctor, as the Joker, as Hitler to mention the nicer ones; the constant "he's not one of us", the total disrespect shown by voters as well as elected leaders and presidential wannabees, the birthers, those who call him a terrorist, those who claim he is a Muslim where religious freedom is our right, the "you lie" disrespect, the Gingrich subtle racist dog whistles, Brewer wagging her finger in our President's face is hatred and disrespect at a level I have never seen in politics. Your attempt to claim that it is his business policies GOPers hate flies empty in the face of the facts--Obama has cut taxes for small businesses 16 times, Wall Street is booming, he has eliminated many outdated and ineffective regulations, he has signed fewer regulations into law than did George W. Bush, he has made health insurance carriers responsible to provide the health care citizens pay to receive....and the list goes on. Maybe you feel the need to defend your party, that's fine, but it might be better if you and other conservatives face the reality and get the facts before offering the excuses.

    • 14 votes
    #5.13 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:14 AM EST

    UAW---Jan Brewer has every right to disagree with the President over any issue. But whether she is right or wrong, she owed the office if not the man more respect than she showed him.

    African-Americans have traditionally given over 90% of their support to any Democrat candidate---as is their right. So their support for him is supposed to counter the racism of others? It does not work that way for me. What is right is right.

    • 9 votes
    #5.14 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:25 AM EST

    Jody it's not because Obama is black. It's because he is a poor leader that so many people have no respect for him as president. Collin Powell had the respect of the Republicans and it wasnt because he was black it was due to his leadership. I think even Collin would admit now that he was caught up in the euphoria of the "first mixed race" president in 2008 and wished there had been a better leader to choose from.....

    • 4 votes
    #5.15 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:26 AM EST

    Well, well, well, .....look at all the self righteous posts referring to the hatred of our poor President. Liberals act as if you they incapable of spewing the same negative vitriol. This President will turn up venom when it is required ....mark my words. Then you all will fall mysteriously silent on the subject. Do not act so surprised you all know full well that politics is dirty business. You and your beloved leader are no different.

    • 1 vote
    #5.16 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:38 AM EST

    UAW, it is the job of the U.S. Government to investigate and fight discrimination in any form and that applies to the State of Arizona. President Obama treated Jan Brewer with respect when she visited the White House, she said so herself; don't forget, he did not have to meet with her at all but he did and he listened. When laws are written to specifically single out one segment of the population, it is discriminatory and in violation of the Constitution. It does not matter if the law was supposed to target illegals if the law ends up targeting US citizens in the process. If AZ law had required only white people to prove their citizenship and no one else, the DOJ would call that for what it is as well. President Obama has deported more illegals in his three years than Bush did in eight years, Obama has added more border security than Bush, has investigated and fined more businesses for hiring illegals in his 3 years than Bush did in 8....the facts do not support your argument or perhaps I should say, the facts do not support the excuses you make.

    • 11 votes
    #5.17 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:39 AM EST

    Jody, You know politics is about perception. People look at Obama's family living here illegally and see them gaming our system. This is probably the biggest reason people have such little respect for his policy on immigration. The strength of the US economy has more to do with how Joe citizen perceives his lot in life. Obama's first three years in office were basically a non stop barrage of rhetoric about how it's someone elses fault for Joe Citizens lot in life. Increasingly more working Americans realize taxing some one else more is not going to better them. (and 90% of Americans work and always will regardless of who is in office)

    • 1 vote
    #5.18 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:54 AM EST

    UAW, if it had nothing to do with his being black, why the depiction of him as a witch doctor, why refer to him as "Kenyan", why question his religion, why question his birth certificate when none before him was questioned, why question his grades at Harvard when no one questioned the grades of those before him, why suggest that the only reason he was accepted at Harvard was because he was a minority? You may not think he is a good leader but the facts tell us otherwise. You remind me of a family friend of my Mom who said she didn't like President Obama and quickly added...it's not because he's black which suggests it was. She could have said, I disagree with him because I'm a conservative or I don't like that he loaned the auto industry money, or whatever but no, all she could muster was "it's not because he's black".

    You might also listen to what President Obama says about all Americans working hard, achieving the American Dream and adding that achieving the dream means a more level playing field, a hand up in the form of student loans, etc. He doesn't speak in terms of favoring one segment of the population over another, he speaks about ALL, speaks about us as united and working together. Too bad conservatives can't hear that message because he's a democrat and they don't like him. For 30 years the policies have favored those who already have and left the rest stagnant or struggling just to keep afloat, that's not the American Dream I remember and I doubt it's the one you remember either.

    • 10 votes
    #5.19 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:59 AM EST

    Jody, I think Obama's best chance for reelection is to play the race card. I also beleive the Republican's best chance to beat Obama is with someone like a Mitt Romney who may not have 100% of the support of conservatives. But I think they will still vote for Romney because he is a better leader than Obama has been. Obama reminds me of people who get promoted into positions and have no skill for that position.

    Frankly, I would be ok if Obama got re-elected as long as he does not have a liberal majority in the House. Gridlock is simply the best choice for America right now. I will be just fine if it continues for another 4 years....

    • 1 vote
    #5.20 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:18 AM EST

    UAW: Gridlock is simply the best choice for America right now. I will be just fine if it continues for another 4 years..

    Seriously?!

    That's the future you want?!

    Wow.

    • 5 votes
    #5.21 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:48 AM EST

    UAW, if President Obama had no skill for the position, he sure has managed to get a great deal done despite the gridlock of the GOP. Now, it is obvious that you and I will never agree but I appreciate the civil discussion today. I think President Obama was and is the right choice for this country. I believe he has achieved many things which others could not, and has helped this country emerge from the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression without any help from republicans. I am saddened that republicans refuse to acknowledge his achievements or even his ability and intelligence. I believe he tries every single day to do the right thing. I appreciate that he reached out to republicans in Congress repeatedly despite having his hand slapped every time. I respect that HE tried to keep his campaign promise to bring both sides together to work for a common purpose. Common purpose is not in the modern GOP's DNA. I do not believe President Obama is perfect, I sometimes disagree but I believe he is a terrific leader who makes tough decisions daily, one who has done his best to keep the promises he made during the campaign; he has kept many and some have been thwarted by the GOP with the help of some democrats.

    I do not believe that continued gridlock in Congress will accomplish anything except more misery for the people and a greater loss to democracy. The country will decline unless gridlock ceases and once again politicians put aside politics after elections and work together to achieve success for the good of all. Compromise means both sides giving and both sides receiving; compromise is how this country came to be; compromise is what wrote our Constitution. There is no reason that republicans cannot find room to compromise; democrats have compromised often the past three years sometimes disappointing liberals in the process. I find it despicable that the GOP which previously supported a policy now says NO simply because it is President Obama proposing it. That's not government, that's not for the good of the country, that's party first. This country has huge problems and in order to solve them, it requires putting aside politics, putting aside partisan differences and finding the common purpose this country once had. Have a good day.

    • 7 votes
    #5.22 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:04 PM EST

    Still amazed at how people hate Obama more that love our Country...but have brainwashed themselves to believe that "hating Obama is loving our country" (wow, just wow). Their actions say they hate Obama more than they love God, for God is not motivated by hate. CINOs - Christian In Name Only - The GOP Evangelical Christian right have forgotten ALL of the Christian principles they say they stand for and believe:

    "Love your enemies" -

    "They will know we are Christian by our love"

    "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs."

    No, of course, love does not mean you have to agree with all of ANY presidents policies or even vote for him/her, however, there is a level of respect and decency for him as a person and as the sitting President. There are Evangelical Christians who are actually praying for Mr. Obama's "death, his wife to be husbandless, his daughters to be fatherless" Psalm 109 (even on bumber stickers). This is way beyond, "I just don't like his policies"...this is pure hatred and is personal. No justification. Hypocrisy at its worst.

    May God's Love, Bless and Protect our Potus, First Lady and First Daughters. God Bless America!

    • 4 votes
    #5.23 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:14 PM EST

    Jody, you are my hero today. Paris, also a great addition, it is always sadly ironic how people will spout hateful words while calling themselves "good Christians."

    • 2 votes
    #5.24 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:04 PM EST
    Reply

    Florida turned out the way it did because Mitt Romney can raise a a ton of money thanks to his rich friends and a super-PAC, and that he can spend so much of the money littering the airwaves with negative attacks that he can destroy a weak opponent. Romney spent the Florida campaign tearing down Newt Gingrich, not building up his own record. Newt Gingrich has the power of the Tea Party and has captured the rage of the conservati­­ve base. He may not be able to defeat Mitt in the end, but he has no reason to drop out when right-wing voters are cheering his rhetoric and are still eager to attack Mitt. http://www.sunstateactivist.org

    • 11 votes
    Reply#6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:14 AM EST

    For every dollar they spend against each other, means one less dollar spent trashing the President. Go Newt go and go Mitt go.

    • 12 votes
    #6.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:25 AM EST

    Job1: I wish that were true, Newt's big gambling backer spent less than 1% of 1% of his income in giving Newt 10 million dollars.

    The 1% has become so wealthy under the Repubs that they can go on forever. All we have is our vote and we better work darn hard to make sure it's not stolen like they have stolen everything else.

    • 6 votes
    #6.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:03 AM EST

    Good morning weemee. A very good point. Thanks!

    • 1 vote
    #6.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:20 AM EST

    Matt, well said, so true. Weemee, ditto what Job1 said.

    • 1 vote
    #6.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:16 AM EST

    I wonder if Obama will run on his record or fling mud? Hmmm.

      #6.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 7:05 PM EST
      Reply

      Were another State closer to getting a better leader in the White House.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:15 AM EST

      What you are closer to is another State closer to the implosion of the Republican party. The only substance these so called presidential candidates have is outdoing each other in name calling (cheater, liar). They never offer policy debates. It makes Obama look brilliant. It makes the Republican party look empty.

      • 7 votes
      #7.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:06 AM EST

      Obama has no chance of ever looking brilliant, the only people who think that are stupid liberal democrats, who by the way think that if you can put two sentences together you are brilliant. The people who vote for him are like zombies, obama obama obama, they were the extras in the movie the mummy, imohtep, imohtep, imohtep. Get a life do some studying, quit relying on people such as Dana Millbank or any other of the left wing zealots in the media.

      • 3 votes
      #7.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:41 AM EST

      Don .. thanks for proving my point that the GOP/TP is only good at name calling and horrible at policy debating. Any policy issues in your post? NOPE. Name calling, YES.

      • 6 votes
      #7.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:48 AM EST
      Reply

      Yesterday, I pointed out the fact that the Republican talking point about “Obamacare” cutting Medicare benefits
      by $500 billion was a lie, and that a large portion of that figure cuts a government subsidy to insurance companies to adminster the Medicare Advantage program. http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/PHY-275946/Medicare-Advantage-Overpayments-May-Top-3B

      Today, I would like to point out that the Republican budget proposed by GOP wonderkid Paul Ryan proposes the EXACT SAME CUTS! Hello? Is this thing on?

      These folks really do think that we are all stupid.

      “The health care bill tries to identify ways to save money, and so the $500
      billion figure comes from the difference over 10 years between anticipated
      Medicare spending (what is known as “the baseline”) and the changes the law
      makes to reduce spending. (
      Look at slide 15 of this nifty tutorial on the law’s impact on Medicare
      by the Kaiser Family Foundation to see a chart of the year by year savings.)

      The savings actually are wrung from health-care providers, not Medicare beneficiaries. These spending reductions presumably would be a good thing, since virtually everyone agrees that Medicare spending is out of control. In the House Republican budget, lawmakers
      repealed the Obama health care law but retained all but $10 billion of the
      nearly $500 billion in Medicare savings, suggesting the actual policies enacted
      to achieve these spending reductions were not that objectionable to GOP
      lawmakers
      . . .

      The health care bill, as mentioned, actually puts Medicare on a more solid financial footing. Also, the
      health care law improved some benefits for seniors, such as making preventive care free and closing a gap in prescription drug coverage known as the “doughnut hole” — improvements that the House Republican bill actually would repeal.

      Indeed, the savings achieved from Medicare couldn’t have been so damaging if Bachmann had in effect voted for them when she approved the House Republican budget. . .”

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/fact-checking-the-gop-debate-500-billion-in-cuts-to-medicare/2011/06/14/AGsnGAVH_blog.html

      • 24 votes
      Reply#8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:16 AM EST

      Good morning Nash,

      Great research and point!

      • 12 votes
      #8.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:19 AM EST

      Nash, can see this point being made in a debate and in ads. Great post!

      • 10 votes
      #8.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:41 AM EST

      Nashville,

      Keep these posts coming.

      "The savings actually are wrung from health-care providers, not Medicare beneficiaries."

      I heard that the HCA provided for a pilot project for a number of hospitals to lower their readmission of Medicare patients by keeping them longer on their first admission . In the long run this provides savings rather than the cost of a revolving door of re admissions..

      Yor posts adds to the evidence that the GOP real agenda is to stop this president at any cost, including denying they agree with HCA law that provides for savings in Medicare program.

      • 14 votes
      #8.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:53 AM EST

      Nashville, amazing hypocrisy; oppose it because President Obama supports it and then propse the same thing. It's obvious, the GOP counts on their voters to be uninformed and lacking the ability to connect the dots; too bad so many of them oblige.

      • 10 votes
      #8.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:33 AM EST
      Reply

      Dear GOP,

      Citizens United is still a great decision, right? Right?

      Liberal super PACs exploit loophole to keep donors unknown

      As super PAC filings pour into the Federal Election Committee (FEC) on Tuesday, it's clear that the people filing them are savvy about getting around disclosure requirements. Several left-leaning super PACs have raised a
      significant amount of money without listing the individual names of any of their donors.

      This is the new norm, now that the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision allows unlimited contributions from unions and corporations, as well as individuals, as long as they do not coordinate with the candidate they support. They have collectively spent more than $44 million during Campaign 2012, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

      For example, the AFL-CIO super PAC received $2.2 million from the AFL-CIO; the super PAC provided no breakdown of who gave the original money to the union. The union's super PAC also got $500,000 from each of the following unions: American Federation of Teachers, Unite Here Tip State and Local Fund, and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

      The America Votes Action Fund, a liberal D.C.-based organization, contributed more than $500,000 to the effort to recall two conservative Wisconsin senators who voted alongside Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's controversial union-busting and budget-cutting measures. Of the fund's 21 contributors, the Teamsters' political action committee, DRIVE, donated $400,000.

      The Citizens for Strength and Security super PAC, founded by a former aide to former presidential candidate John Edwards, collected its $71,945 in donations almost entirely from its own nonprofit, called Citizens for Strength and Security. The super PAC did not return calls about the names of individuals who
      contributed to the nonprofit.

      Mostyn Law Firm, a Texas-based firm specializing in insurance litigation, exclusively donated $125,000 to Texans for America's Future, an anti-Rick Perry super PAC, listing just the name of the law firm.

      Political scholar Norm Ornstein from the American Enterprise Institute told CBS News that he thinks disclosure of donations should be mandatory and he expressed frustration with the Supreme Court for handing down the Citizens United decision.

      "The thing that needs to change the most is the Supreme Court," Ornstein said. "If I could do one thing, it would be to raise a generous retirement package for Justice Kennedy, but if we can't change the Supreme Court, we need at the minimum a truly robust regime of disclosure."

      www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57369245-503544/liberal-super-pacs-exploit-loophole-to-keep-donors-unknown/?tag=contentMain;contentBody

      • 11 votes
      Reply#9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:17 AM EST

      This will be one heck of a fight between Newt and Mitt as we more forward into other states. Newt will most likely win Republican votes from the small cities and Mitt will win the bigger cities.

      Now break it down to the general election, and the President would most likely carry the larger cities across the nation and Newt or Mitt the smaller cities across the nation.

      • 10 votes
      Reply#10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:17 AM EST

      most likely those with a care for this country's future will vote for the REP nominee.

      signed DEM Florida voter

      • 2 votes
      #10.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:23 AM EST

      Sure Job1, Bastions of Democratic rule like Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Atlanta and LA.

      All shining examples of what the Democrat agenda has in store for the country.

      • 4 votes
      #10.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:29 AM EST

      I will be doing my best to make sure that President Obama wins re-election, because he is the only choice to lead our nation.

      • 5 votes
      #10.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:23 AM EST

      He is the only choice to ruin this nation, if you morons get him reelected then you will have to live with a much weaker nation.

      • 1 vote
      #10.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:44 AM EST

      We will be just fine with the Presidents leadership. He has saved us from some really bad Republican policy.

      • 7 votes
      #10.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:55 AM EST
      Reply

      Dear Mr. Presidential Candidate.

      Here are some questions from middle America, the people we hope you will remember this November.

      What are you for, Mr. Candidate? We all hear ad naseum who and what party you are against, but tell us what you are for.

      You say you want to cut the deficit. Wonderful! We agree! But how? Are you interested in cutting programs the other side is for and keeping the programs your side is for, or are you willing to look at everybody? We really want to know.

      You say you want to do something about taxes. Wonderful! We agree! But, are they tax cuts, tax increases, taxes on companies, tax breaks for companies? We really want to know.

      You say you want a safer world. Wonderful! We agree! But, to be safer does that mean we are the world's policeman? Are you going to send our young people off to die again? Will you be insisting that if we do, we send all of children, not a very few (less than 1% of our population)? Will you insist that all Americans be involved? We really want to know.

      Do you a vision for America? Maybe exploration of space, or under the seas? Are you interested in science and technology - and investment in it? We really want to know.

      Tell us, here in middle America, what you are for. We know what you are against. Maybe, then, you will get our vote.

      Signed,

      Middle America

      PS We would like those same questions answered by the people running for both houses of Congress.

      • 10 votes
      #11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:23 AM EST

      they are for a strong America

      • 1 vote
      #11.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:24 AM EST

      Morning phine. Thanks. Enjoy the Peace and quiet, at least until the General Election. Should be safe to answer your phone and go to your mailbox now, well, at least until Memorial Day......

      • 3 votes
      #11.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:33 AM EST

      Wonderful. I agree. Tell me how, Buck.

      WCA,

      First morning in a while the TV has been on. Of course it was on Mike & Mike, but it was on!

      • 2 votes
      #11.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:34 AM EST

      Phine ... that would be a wonderful thing to hear honest answers to those questions from everyone in politics. Unfortunately, so many of our representatives subscribe to the Miss Piggy thought process which she shared in a recent interview ... "Yeah, if they take what I say seriously, they've got a real big problem".

      • 5 votes
      #11.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:37 AM EST

      It is Diogenes looking for that one honest person, TOG.

      • 1 vote
      #11.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:41 AM EST

      His lamp is going to need an awful lot of oil............

      • 4 votes
      #11.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:48 AM EST

      Domestic or foreign oil? LOL

      • 1 vote
      #11.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:49 AM EST

      And I believe Diogenes had about as much luck as Sisyphus trying to push that rock up a mountain.

      • 1 vote
      #11.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:54 AM EST

      Hee hee hee! We have our Greek going this morning!

      • 1 vote
      #11.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:56 AM EST

      Always loved mythology. The gods playing with the humans makes me think of the politicians (and their super-pacs) playing with us (the voters).

      • 3 votes
      #11.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:02 AM EST

      TOG,

      What a great analogy! And so very apt! Here's one for you, SCOTUS decision on Citizens United was the opening of Pandora's box. Can it be closed? And what will remain?

      • 1 vote
      #11.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:06 AM EST

      So true, Phine. What does Romney stand for? Does anybody out there know. He's being sold and no one knows what's in the package. It's quite clear what Obama stands for, it was outlined in his State-of the-Union speech.

      how can we be expected to vote for Romney that empty suit.

        #11.12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:09 AM EST

        Well weemee, you can't know what Romney stands for if this is the only place you get your information.

        BTW phine didn't say anything about Romney specifically. You don't think that Citizen's United will in anyway benefit the Democrats this election? How else does one raise a Billion dollars?

        Making comments like does anybody know, only shows you as an uniformed voter.

        If you want to know go to his website or listen to his speeches.

        Neither of which I bet you have ever done.

        • 2 votes
        #11.13 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:13 AM EST

        Here is what the average middle American, who is not a political junkie, wants to know. They want a fact sheet that I am for A, B, C. I am against (not the person or party) D, E, F. No 30 second ads, no mailers, to be truthful, no pandering speeches - FROM EITHER SIDE! Just give them the plain facts. Suprisingly, they are capable of making an intelligent choice.

        WCA,

        Sadly, most voters won't take the time to go to the various candidates web sites. I think this is why voter turn out is usually low in comparision to other countries. Americans feel they are lied to so much by our political leaders that it is a waste of time.

        • 1 vote
        #11.14 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:16 AM EST

        The box was closed with one thing remaining inside ... Hope. Wadda ya think Phine? Any chance that the box will ever be reopened?

        • 1 vote
        #11.15 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:16 AM EST

        Phine/TOG

        It will be a Herculean effort to overturn Citizens United.

        • 2 votes
        #11.16 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:19 AM EST

        When a person’s vision of greatness is their own self, everything becomes subservient to their ego and all is diminished within their mind’s eye to maintain their place upon the pedestal. Some would build, others would destroy. Most will cast their ineptness at the feet of those who serve and those who are nonbelievers. The great unwashed political junkies below will live their lives vicariously through either their love or their hatred for that person. In-depth studies of polls show that only 10% of voters are truly independent and the psychology of the time will write the direction and level of discourse. Politics is not the art of truth, it is the art of manipulating perceptions and whatever brush works best, it is the one that will be used.

        • 5 votes
        #11.17 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:22 AM EST

        Red,

        That deserves a rim shot! Pa Da Dum! Good line!

        TOG,

        We can only "hope"!

        Ideology,

        I believe even the Romans used the art of manipulation for the vote. It is an art form that has stood the test of time.

        • 2 votes
        #11.18 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:24 AM EST

        Red ... I bow to your greatness! Good one.

        Ideology ... "Politics is not the art of truth, it is the art of manipulating perceptions" - what a great line! I always tried to train my employees to look at things in perspective as opposed to with perception.

        Hate to leave but it's time to get lunch set up for the old-timers in the building (still can't used to being the "youngster" volunteer at age 63). Y'all hold the fort.

        • 1 vote
        #11.19 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:41 AM EST

        whale blubber killed from all the oil spills in the oceans

        • 1 vote
        #11.20 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:08 AM EST

        Buck Naked Sr.: "whale blubber killed from all the oil spills in the oceans"

        And yet your party is all about deregulating more? And that will help us have less oil spills I suppose?

          #11.21 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:03 PM EST

          Unfortunately Phine I don't think most average American's want those answers they seem to prefer the "reality show" type bickering that is going on already. Those of us who DO want the answers go looking for ourselves and don't count on 30 second sound bites.

          I'd also like to add Happy Anniversary Dr. and Mrs. Paul! 55 years is quite an accomplishment! Bless you both!

            #11.22 - Thu Feb 2, 2012 2:27 PM EST

            youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_tNynEx_MRU#!

            Too cute!

            This is what family values is truly about.

              #11.23 - Thu Feb 2, 2012 2:32 PM EST
              Reply

              Hey, First Read moderators, I have a question for the next "Inside The Boiler Room" segment...

              Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney clearly do not like each other. Given the blatantly obvious acrimony that now exists between the two campaigns, is there any possibility that the supporters of the loser of this nomination sit on their hands in November?

              • 10 votes
              #12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:23 AM EST

              yes, a deal will be worked out by then

              • 1 vote
              #12.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:25 AM EST

              I'll answer that Da Noid. Doesn't sound like either sides "supporters" really cares that much. 38% of Republicans wish they had another choice. Whoever wins the nomination is limping into the general with a dissaffected base. How jaded are Republicans, nominating a candidate even they don't particularly like?

              • 9 votes
              #12.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:29 AM EST

              Again with the lack of Historical perspective. It was just 4 years ago when Hillary Clinton supporters VOWED they would never vote for Obama.

              Then they came out in droves and voted for Obama.

              You guys really don't get that Conservatives do something very well. They vote.

              And they won't vote for Obama.

              Amy, no offense, but you ability to do an "analysis" of the GOP is most likely subject at best. When you use comments like "doesn't sound like" it just magnifies the fact that you get your information from a particular slant and renders it rather useless.

              • 5 votes
              #12.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:36 AM EST

              WCA,

              Problem I see for Romney, though, is the fact that some of the conservatives I talk to will stay home rather than vote for him. (This comes from my little "focus" group. BTW, the county they live in, went for Newt)

              • 6 votes
              #12.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:38 AM EST

              phine, they said the same thing about Clinton/Obama at this point.

              When faced in November with the prospect of 4 more years of Obama or a Republican President, they will vote.

              If they are real Conservatives, just like real Liberals, they will not sit home, they will vote.

              • 4 votes
              #12.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:42 AM EST

              WCA,

              You need to meet the "good old boys". They have always voted. They are firm believers in God, country, SEC football and NASCAR. But they are so very disgusted with the entire GOP field this time they are very serious in the thought of sitting this one out. They are the definition of the GOP conservative voter. And I believe them.

              • 4 votes
              #12.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:45 AM EST

              Good enough, update me in November.

              • 3 votes
              #12.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:48 AM EST

              WCA,

              The difference between Clinton-Obama in 2008 and Gingrich-Romney in 2012 is that the rift between Clinton and Obama was never even close to the rift that exists between Gingrich and Romney. Gingrich and Romney DO NOT LIKE each other. While Clinton and Obama were able to keep their rivalry professional, with Gingrich and Romney this is personal.

              • 7 votes
              #12.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:03 AM EST

              Da Noid,

              What I am seeing and hearing from my little corner of the world is not only a deep dislike and distrust for Romney, but for the entire GOP field this time. I am a fascinated observer here in all this and wonder how all this will end up playing at the GOP convention.

              • 1 vote
              #12.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:11 AM EST

              I thought that Hillarity (with her sense of entitlement) brought the Primary process to new lows. But it now appears that Gingrich (another fart-faced politician with a sense of entitlement) will seek even lower lows.

              Did he dodge any bullets in Bosnia? Oh, right, that was when he was trolling for hookers in D.C.

              • 3 votes
              #12.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:16 AM EST

              No Noid, it's not different.

              Only in a slanted viewers eyes.

              You all seem to keep making the mistake of comparing Clinton/Obama the candidates with Romney/Gingrich the candidates.

              I am comparing the VOTERS. It doesn't matter how much the candidates hate each other. The voters will acquiesce to either for the purpose of electing a Republican President.

              Just as Clinton voters gave in and voted for Obama.

              • 1 vote
              #12.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:31 AM EST

              No chance, we all want this idiot Hussein out of office, we would vote for Jeffery Dahmer over this fool in office.

                #12.12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:46 AM EST

                In other words, White Collar, Republicans are willing to vote for anybody, regardless of their off shore accounts or philandering ways, for the highest office in the land, as long as there is an R after the name. I get it.

                And that is why you are losing the Independents.

                • 8 votes
                #12.13 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:55 AM EST

                duval county did not, way more population in jax than st johns, november is when it counts, heck I have REP neighbors that did not vote on Tues, they are waiting for November to pull the switch against Obama.

                • 1 vote
                #12.14 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:11 AM EST

                Yes Amy, just like Democrats were willing to vote for anybody, despite their terrorist friends, racist Ministers and brutal lack of experience.

                But not again, and that is why Obama will lose.

                  #12.15 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:48 AM EST

                  WCA, you claim to be talking about the voters. Yet you keep coming back to references to the candidates.

                  Clinton is Obama's Secretary of State. Could you ever see Gingrich in Romney's cabinet? Or Romney in Gingrich's? THAT'S the point.

                    #12.16 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:05 PM EST

                    Felden I only keep coming back to the candidates because you all keep coming back to the candidates.

                    You all keep missing the point.

                    Who cares if the other candidate is in the cabinet.

                    Will that effect anyones vote?

                      #12.17 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:48 PM EST

                      WCA, "Yes Amy, just like Democrats were willing to vote for anybody"

                      .....but Sarah Palin. That was the difference, LOL.

                      • 1 vote
                      #12.18 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:15 PM EST
                      Reply

                      Did anyone else feel that Newt's concession speech was a thinly veiled threat to make a 3rd party run if he doesn't get the nomination?

                      • 13 votes
                      Reply#13 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:23 AM EST

                      Did anyone else feel that Newt's concession speech was a thinly veiled threat to make a 3rd party run if he doesn't get the nomination?

                      TOG,

                      I caught that as well...

                      • 14 votes
                      #13.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:26 AM EST

                      did you catch the debt clock for Illinois today? wow

                      • 3 votes
                      #13.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:32 AM EST

                      What party would that be ?? The Career Politician Party of America. Wishful thinking on your part. (Hoping he will split the votes). Sorry... Stick a fork in Newt ...he's done. Time to focus in removing the this POTUS.

                      • 1 vote
                      #13.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:37 AM EST

                      PValdes ... "Wishful thinking on your part. (Hoping he will split the votes)."

                      You got all that out of a simple observation? Wow, you must be some kind of super psychic.

                      • 1 vote
                      #13.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:47 AM EST

                      Remember, this is Newton we're talking about. He did not invent the politics of beating your adversary to a bloody pulp but he has gained a zen-like mastery of them.

                      He speaks as one who feels that the Presidency is his entitlement. Do I see a "third-party" run? Not as a high probability but I also wouldn't put it past him.

                      • 6 votes
                      #13.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:51 AM EST

                      TOG ...it's called reading between the lines. I could be wrong though ...I have been before. I can admit it.

                        #13.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:41 AM EST

                        PValdes ... dang, I was hoping for the "psychic" thing. Planning a casino trip and was hoping to invite you along. And I do agree with your "Newt is toast" comment, but I don't think you can put anything Newt might do off the table. It doesn't have to make sense to anyone else as long as it makes sense to Newt's ego.

                        • 2 votes
                        #13.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:50 AM EST
                        Reply

                        ********************==================================

                        ********************==================================

                        ********************==================================

                        ********************==================================

                        ====================================================

                        ====================================================

                        ====================================================

                        OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                        • 14 votes
                        Reply#14 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:26 AM EST

                        Pat just made the best case for Obama/biden in 2012....

                        Better than the moonbat spam from far left blogs that passes for political discussion in here....

                        • 2 votes
                        #14.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:01 AM EST
                        Reply

                        Wouldn't it be ironic if all of the spending during the Republican primary stimulated the economy so much that the improvement sealed President Obama's reelection?

                        • 15 votes
                        Reply#15 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:32 AM EST

                        I was seriously thinking the same thing. Look at all that extra cash flowing through the system in Florida. Thank you Republican Presidential Wannabees for stimulating the economies wherever you go!

                        Romney at laundry mats and Gingrich at restaurants.

                        Obama/Biden 2012

                        • 8 votes
                        #15.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:26 AM EST

                        It would be nice but the money goes to the corporations owning the TV stations and radios and newspapers. I see that trickling to the executives' pockets--and we know who they support.

                        • 4 votes
                        #15.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:58 AM EST

                        well the ad dollars do go to the top; but the staff and the wives eat, stay and you know, that Calista loves her some shopping,...

                          #15.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 3:57 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Wouldn't it be ironic if all of the spending during the Republican primary stimulated the economy so much that the improvement sealed President Obama's reelection?

                          • 5 votes
                          Reply#16 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:32 AM EST

                          lol. I like a little irony with my lunch. Thanks!

                            #16.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:06 PM EST
                            Reply

                            Romney -- "A competitive race does not divide us, it prepares us" That's true Mitt! So get ready to lose in November.

                            • 11 votes
                            #17 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:34 AM EST

                            Romney = The John Kerry of the GOP.

                            • 2 votes
                            #17.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:37 AM EST

                            Obama = Jimmy Carter on steroids

                            • 3 votes
                            #17.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:42 AM EST

                            Good one Cheryl...

                              #17.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:54 AM EST

                              ahh, so the Kenyan, Marxists Socialist is now a Juicer, too?

                              there is no bottom to the depths the righties will crawl to undermine our President.

                              (lolololololol at the idea that anyone on the Republican Presidential Primary Ballot could even come close to electable in a national contest against the sitting President lolololololol)

                              Good luck with that, pubbies.

                              • 8 votes
                              #17.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:29 AM EST

                              Clara ...luck will not be part of the equation.

                              • 1 vote
                              #17.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:42 AM EST

                              uh, eat the end of barrel one does all by yourself

                              • 1 vote
                              #17.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:13 AM EST

                              I agree Feisty. I'm making it a point right now to call the US Secret Service in order to get this racist a-hole a little visit.

                              • 5 votes
                              #17.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:15 AM EST

                              whoa don.........dude ....be careful. You really should not say things like that ...

                              • 2 votes
                              #17.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:17 AM EST

                              I understand that this board of late has devolved into a name calling haven with very few posts of value. However, what have we come to if people like don talia spout their venom on this board? The status of political commentary on FR aside, what has become of us? Post 17.6 is criminal, hate speech

                              Don Talia - Have you no decency? Have you no shame?

                              • 5 votes
                              #17.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:38 AM EST

                              don, I think someone's knocking on your door. Buh bye......

                              • 5 votes
                              #17.12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:53 AM EST

                              Yellowdog - Mark D - in answer to your question about Don Talia - I doubt he has any decency or shame..as we see most republicans, starting from the top, don't have those qualities......

                              • 2 votes
                              #17.13 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:15 PM EST

                              but it is ok for obama to sign the ndaa and kill and toucher american citizen with no trials.(if u have 7 or more days of food,u are an terroist)

                              thats ok by u obama nazi cult.

                              and to run operation fast and furious,guns to mexico and drugs back into the us

                              also to have tsa molest kids and adults over staged events like 9-11

                              if u people havent firuged it out yet jimmy carter in 1979 created alqada by the cia,there the magic chess piece u put any where in the world to invade another country.

                              • 2 votes
                              #17.14 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:51 PM EST

                              puppet person,

                              You are just another example of the people who don't perform fact checks. Please look at the record of Mr. W. Bush. and stop blaming President Obama for the failures of Mr. Bush.

                              Facts are facts.

                              • 2 votes
                              #17.15 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:06 PM EST

                              i dont know how much they pay u to disinfo facts job1.but u are really awful at your job.i think u need to give someoff that money back.cause u stink there at your job kid.why dont u check some real news sites and see jed bush and the first bush and OBAMA HAVING dinner at the white house talking about the florida election.

                              • 1 vote
                              #17.16 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:23 PM EST

                              whats the matter there kid.dont want to fight back againt someone that has facts.dont want to talk about obama cia background or his 1890 mass.social ss number or that he is in contempt of court in georgia right now.just the tip of the iceberg.and by the way- go back and tell your bosses that the divide and conquer crap(i dont like obama destroying what our forefathers build and obama is black so i must be raciest cause i dont like obama actions)doesnt fly anymore cause people wokeup to that trick

                              • 1 vote
                              #17.17 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 2:00 PM EST

                              wow....

                                #17.18 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:38 PM EST

                                JLS

                                I think "Yikes" is a better word. looks like someone has pulled the puppet's strings!

                                  #17.19 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 7:41 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  The difference between South Carolina and Florida ?

                                  Different class of hillbillies.

                                  • 12 votes
                                  Reply#18 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:37 AM EST

                                  Typical filth. Note that you couldn't actually come up with anything intelligent to say, but instead felt the need to denigrate people because of where they live, without knowing anything about them at all.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #18.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:42 AM EST

                                  Is that rite ....well git redy dien ....Us "hillbillies" ain't votin fur that joke ya'll call a Prezidint a'gain....No sir eee...

                                  You're an idiot....but you just keep being one. Thanks

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:49 AM EST

                                  @ Cheryl....I expected nothing less from this vine today...... They are afraid.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:52 AM EST

                                  and Cheryl's dig about Obama on steroids is nothing but HIGH road, right?

                                  you hypocrites never disappoint!

                                  • 11 votes
                                  #18.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:30 AM EST
                                  Comment author avatardon taliancichExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                  Clara your president is a moron, if you support him then you are a moron also, good luck getting Hussein reelected, lol.

                                    #18.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:51 AM EST

                                    Same ol' liberal condescension and elitism we see from Obama and his groupies every day.

                                    So now that it looks like Mitt is headed for the nomination, I fully expect all you anti-Christian liberals to start bashing away at Romney's religion. Will I be wrong to expect that? Of course not. The very same people who will stick up for Muslims no matter what, will start telling us that Mormonism is a "cult" and that Mitt is not qualified for the White House because of his religion. Just you watch.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #18.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:54 AM EST

                                    Oh yeah we are shaking in our boots, with the bottom of the barrel candidates, the GOP has put forth! Who's afraid, the GOP/baggers, watching the blood bath, with all the clawing, tearing and trying to rip out each others throats. But if it makes you feel better. LMAO

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #18.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:04 AM EST

                                    We aren't one bit afraid of Newt or Mitt. I mean come on, the President is sharp, clean, fair, smart and a great American success story. Where as Newt and Mitt, well not such a good story.

                                    Obama / Biden 2012

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #18.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:10 AM EST

                                    JOB1 ....he is a sharp dresser(if you like that Malcolm X look) and does a great Al Green impression .....but that's about it

                                      #18.9 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:28 AM EST

                                      WTF?

                                      Obama doesn't even wear glasses!

                                      The people sounding desparate here are the ones critiquing style and not substance. You can't really prop Mittens up on substance because he simply has no CORE. You go to the mat for him today on Abortion and he'll 'break your heart tomorrow'.

                                      He is THAT transparent. This isn't complicated - It's his BIRTHRIGHT to be the nominee and therefore BUY the Presidency.

                                      Again, good LUCK with that; because it damn sure won't be SKILL or REAL.

                                      • 5 votes
                                      #18.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:34 AM EST

                                      Mitt is not qualified for the White House because of his religion

                                      You may be too young to remember when Democrats supported Mo Udall, a Mormon, for President....and his religion never became an issue in the Democratic primary.

                                      PS. Harry Reid - also Mormon.

                                      • 6 votes
                                      #18.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:36 AM EST

                                      President Obama's message is always positive. Despite all efforts to the contrary, he has remained positive, upbeat, optimistic, and hopeful. His message is consistently about unity, helping the country, and working together. Trusting each other for the better of the whole, like our soldiers have to trust and rely on each other to survive. Despite all efforts by Republicans to the contrary, he has persevered, has accomplished a lot, has tried to compromise, and has done so with grace and a smile on his face.

                                      Meanwhile, the Republicans have been negative, hateful, contrary, obstinate, have refused to cooperate on even the most basic levels, and have launched a focused effort to work against their own President. It's a wonder that more Republicans across this nation aren't disgusted with their own party's behavior. It's one thing to have different views, it is quite another to be vicious and spiteful.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #18.12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:48 PM EST
                                      Reply

                                      It's hard for anybody to build momentum when nobody likes any of the options. What we've seen all year is somebody surging to the front of the pack and earning the spotlight only to drop back when its harsh brightness exposes their flaws. Seriously, how weak does a field have to be for Newton Leroy Gingrich to be in the semifinals? This weak, apparently.

                                      • 6 votes
                                      Reply#19 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:46 AM EST

                                      I like to refer to Romney as the DOUBLE B candidate. He is trying to Bully and Buy his way to the White House.

                                      • 6 votes
                                      Reply#20 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:52 AM EST

                                      Hussein ran the most negative ads in the history of elections in 2008, now you want to condemn the other side for doing the same, laughable.

                                        #20.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:53 AM EST
                                        Reply

                                        Does anyone have a clue as to what Romney stands for? Seriously, what are his plans, what are his goals besides getting Obama out of office. He's all surfaces and money, but what does that mean?

                                        • 6 votes
                                        Reply#21 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:53 AM EST

                                        He stands for fixing a broken America and it's economy...

                                        He stands for bringing jobs back to this country ....

                                        He stands for a productive America.......

                                        He stands for protecting us from those who would harm us ....

                                        He stands for everything this country used to be ......

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #21.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:00 AM EST

                                        wemee - obviously he will be for it but then against it but against being for it and for being against it....or maybe he will be against it but then for it but for being against it but also being for being against being for it......

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #21.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:13 AM EST

                                        You mean like Hussein shutting Guantanamo Bay and then leaving it open, maybe he was for and then against it, maybe he is too busy studying about all 57 states.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #21.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:56 AM EST

                                        PValdes - nice and vague, just the way we don't like it. Next time, I guess candidates could just act like beauty pageant contestants and say "I'm for ending hunger and world peace" and that'll win you over?

                                        LMAO

                                          #21.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:52 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          Obama is going to run the most negative campaign in the history of politics, based on the fact he has done nothing positive while president. Just look at his ignorant supporters on this site, who continually blast Romney because obama has been a failure. It is good that Romney can also go negative and match obama, because if both sides can get their message across Romney will win.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          Reply#22 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:54 AM EST

                                          Big fan of Osama bin Laden, are you, Jeff? Personally, I kind of count his execution, eleven years after carrying out attacks on our country, as, you know, a positive thing.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #22.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:32 AM EST
                                          Reply

                                          Why does Florida differ from South Carolina? Easy, because Florida's population, especially in the big cities, is mostly transplanted yankees. The panhandle and upper middle parts of the state are the only strongholds left, where there is a majority of southerners, and they went for Gingrich. The yankees, even second generation, voted more liberally and went for Romney. I don't care which one wins, as long as they also win in November.

                                          • 3 votes
                                          Reply#23 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:54 AM EST

                                          None of this matters because Obama IS going to win in Nov. It's gonna happen.

                                          • 8 votes
                                          #24 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:54 AM EST

                                          The I4 corridor independents voted for Obama. This year, they went big for Romney. Obama is losing the female vote as moms all over America are waking up to the fact that their kids own the govenment 50K each AS OF TODAY.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #24.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:56 AM EST

                                          @ 3rd ......ding ding ding ....we have a winner !

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #24.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:02 AM EST

                                          Try to spin it in your direction if you want, but when it comes down to it Obama WILL win. He is leading in just about every poll and hasnt started campaigning yet. The republicans will get their man and then Obama will start hammering on that person and will pull away. Plan on there being a republican spoiler in there as well ensuring an Obama win. The republican candidates hate each other and will destoy each other if they cant have the presidecy to themselves, thus handing Obama the win.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #24.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:10 AM EST

                                          Just remember this, even if you don't believe it: If he wins reelection, he may be the last and preside over the break up of this nation. He is the most divisive president since the Civil war.

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #24.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:20 AM EST

                                          danangel, just keep smokin what you are smokin and let the big people talk.

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #24.5 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:25 AM EST

                                          My kids own the government for $50k - where do I sign up?

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #24.6 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:26 AM EST

                                          royalstar05 As I said above, I am not trying to convince anyone, I just want you to remember you heard it here. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it, especially those who deny and revise it. I hope I am wrong about this time, but throughout human history: as soon as a civilization believes it can't happen, that is when it does.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #24.7 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:46 AM EST

                                          Excuse me Mr. or Mrs 3rd,

                                          You do understand that Florida is a closed primary state, don't you? These were people who had to declare Republican. As analysts pointed out, central Florida is more moderate (which can be defined as a little smarter) and given the choice between Obama and Romney it's unlikely they will not see through the vitriol that is so effective with the righties. Obama has very real positive results to talk about, unlike the Republican negative messages we're all getting rather sick of.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #24.8 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:49 AM EST

                                          Hey. Since everybody's making predictions. What do you think the chances are that there will be violence and riots if Obama loses in November? I think it's almost assured, especially if it's a really CLOSE loss. I'm wondering if this is why gun sales are UP everywhere.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #24.10 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:06 AM EST

                                          Geez don, what are you trying to say here? I hope you dont have any guns. I will keep a lookout in the papers for your name. There sure are some loons out there.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #24.11 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:08 AM EST

                                          Don will be going to jail soon.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #24.12 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:20 AM EST

                                          Guns to protect themselves from the outraged and pissed off Obama groupies. Remember; to you people, Obama is the King, and if he is NOT re-elected, it means that your "king" has been deposed. Liberals sense of entitlement at the expense of others extends to Obama's presidency. He is entitled to be there according to you people, and anybody who doesn't agree is a villian.

                                          Trust me. When he loses in November, there will be violence. There is a recent history of riots and poutrage among large parts of the Democrat base when things don't go to their liking.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #24.13 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:28 AM EST

                                          Is it really necessary to go there, Damage? And they call Democrats "divisive."

                                          • 5 votes
                                          #24.14 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 11:40 AM EST

                                          Can we get Don off this board?

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #24.15 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:13 PM EST

                                          Dont worry about Damage, Amy. He is just a hater. Scare tactics just like the jugheads that run his party. Its all they have so let them use it. We Dems know better.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #24.16 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 12:44 PM EST

                                          Right, you dems know better. Let me see if I can recall just a few democratic scare tactics....The world is coming to and end quickly if we don't send all our money to Al Gore and the Democrats so that they can stop global warming---Republicans want dirty air and dirty water----Romney wan'ts to hurt poor people.

                                          Give me a break. Romney donated 20% of his income to charity (look at his tax returns). Private charity unlike government run programs actually give money to the poor. Government programs are run by the bureaucrats for the bureaucrats and for those who game the system and commit fraud.

                                          If Obama socialist policies are so wonderful why are the socialist countries in Europe on the verge of financial collapse---hint once you liberals confiscate the wealth from the one perecenters there is no more money to invest and create a middle class--even China understands this better than Obama and encourages the one percenters to invest there instead of demonizing them and trying to confiscate their money.

                                          If you could actually bring your self to leave your fantasy land and look around at the real world and what is happening there, you could no longer support Obama and the policies that have a crystal clear end point, they end at Greece. Doing the exact same things that produced Greece and the financial collapse of other EU countries and expecting something different to happen here is not very intelligent.

                                          Romney, just like Obama, is one of the one percenters. He is just a lot more successful than Obama and he earned his money by actually earning it, not by being a politician or a community organizer. Sorry but a community organizer isn't going to have a clue how to fix our broken government and repay this $16 trillion dollar Debt (A third of which was created by Obama). Obama wants to continue down his merry socialist program spending road while we end up like Greece, or Spain or Italy, with 20% unemployment and riots in the streets. I am completely amazed that you people have no ability to see and understand the real world.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #24.17 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 2:30 PM EST

                                          Boyd, get off the one hitter. When you called Obama a socialist you lost your republican thug credability.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #24.18 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:47 PM EST

                                          Boyd: "Romney donated 20% of his income to charity" - to the MORMON CHURCH. That's classified for taxes as a charity, but I wouldn't define it as one practically speaking. Mormons helping other mormons or people who will listen to mormons preach, doesn't qualify as "giving" in my book. As I said above, I call that extortion of faith.

                                          "once you liberals confiscate the wealth from the one perecenters there is no more money to invest and create a middle class" who said anything about confiscating the wealth? Nobody wants to pull a Robin Hood here. I'm sorry, but 70% of millions (after 30% paid in taxes) is quite acceptable - I know I'd be thrilled to have 70% of Romney's income. That's plenty of money to invest.

                                            #24.19 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 7:03 PM EST

                                            The biggest reason for the voting difference is that the average IQ in Florida is 20 points higher than in South Carolina.

                                              #24.20 - Thu Feb 2, 2012 7:18 AM EST

                                              Boyd, it is amazing that a nut-job like you thinks you do understand the world. You obviously don't even understand what socialism is. What you call socialism has been practiced in this country for more than 80 years. Apparently you gained this wisdon in your job at McDonald's as a fry cook.

                                                #24.21 - Thu Feb 2, 2012 7:27 AM EST
                                                Reply

                                                OK to sum it up the differences...........

                                                1. Romney spent a boat load of money in Florida to get his message out.
                                                2. Gingrich is THE soft target (Sta-Puff Marshmallow man) for negative ads with his lifetime achievements in ethics.
                                                3. Gingrich obliged Romney by falling flat on his pudgy face in the debates thereby removing any doubt about his vaunted intelleckshual capacity.
                                                4. South Carolina is an insular society of secessionist white Jesus freaks who fear blacks and are still fighting the civil war.
                                                5. Florida is not "Southern" in the same sense as SC. It's heavily populated with Yankee snowbirds and cuban immigrants as well as transplants from around the country. They can't hear Gingrich's dog whistle.
                                                6. There is no momentum in this Republican primary because it's not a Republican primary. The GOP has fractured into a bunch of equally nasty and vocal fringe elements along with the traditional social and fiscal conservative base. I'm not sure what to call it but it's no longer the GOP and it's not the Tea Party. I'll just call it sick.

                                                PS - Another classy move by Gingrich refusing to offer Romney any congratulation last night. Instead he acted (predictably) like a five year old brat and sulked about his ass whipping.

                                                • 11 votes
                                                Reply#25 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:55 AM EST

                                                I guess you forgot all that was said during the Democrat primay of Obama, Biden and Hillary. Get real. Both side do it.

                                                *The presidency doesn't lend itself to on the job training*. Joe Biden Presidential canidate.

                                                And Joe was correct.

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #25.1 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 9:59 AM EST

                                                Nope, just the repugnantcans, HEY, thats a new name for em!!! They been doing it sense the days of tricky dick(nixon). But it's getting old....

                                                  #25.2 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 10:50 AM EST

                                                  I was about to reply to this meaningless "article" by National Bs Company but see that so many non working class have bought into it, I decline. I do not do a battle of wits with the unarmed.

                                                    #25.3 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 1:08 PM EST

                                                    Mike-2594304

                                                    I was about to reply to this meaningless "article" by National Bs Company but see that so many non working class have bought into it, I decline. I do not do a battle of wits with the unarmed.

                                                    Good strategy Mike. An unarmed person would kick yer butt. Better to find yourself a blind deaf quadriplegic unemployed gay black Mormon living on food stamps who supports a woman's right to be in control of her own body. I'll bet you and Jesus might have a decent chance under those circumstances.

                                                      #25.4 - Wed Feb 1, 2012 2:03 PM EST
                                                      Reply
                                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 7
                                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.