Santorum says ailing daughter 'had a big smile on her face'

LUVERNE, MN -- Those thinking Rick Santorum would never be able to recapture what his campaign had in the Hawkeye State were wrong, at least for a night, when the Iowa caucus victor made a stop here in a town just ten miles north of the state that catapulted his candidacy.

Santorum held his first campaign event in a part of Minnesota just north of Lyon County Iowa, the northwest most part of Iowa with a large contingent of evangelical voters and an area where caucus returns were overwhelmingly in his favor.


Even the originally scheduled venue, a Pizza Ranch restaurant , was reminiscent of his Iowa campaign.  He held more than 30 town halls at the restaurants located throughout the state.  Monday's town hall ended up being moved to a theater next door to accommodate the 300 person crowd, though he stopped by after to grab a bite.

"I figured, lets start bordering Lyon County as a point of strength...and make this the focal point, the starting point, for our campaign across Minnesota," said Santorum.

It was the former Pennsylvania senators first day back on the trail since his 3-year-old daughter was admitted to a Virginia hospital after developing pneumonia in both lungs.  Bella Santorum suffers from the genetic disorder Trisomy 18 and has battled the life threatening illness all of her life.  She is still in the hospital but has shown major improvements.

"I was with her last night in the hospital bed, laid with her and slept with her last night," said Santorum.  "She woke up this morning and had a big smile on her face and I thought, 'OK, dad can go back to work now.'"

He canceled campaign events in Florida on Sunday, and chose to continue his campaign with a stop in Missouri on Monday before heading to Minnesota.  He will watch Florida returns in from his Nevada headquarters.

"I don't know what's going to happen in Florida tomorrow, but it's only one race," he said. "Everyone says, 'Oh it's over then.'  It will not be. This race is going to go on a long time, and it needs to go on a long time."

Attempting to win over voters ahead of the Minnesota's Feb. 7 caucus, Santorum painted himself as the true social conservative in the race.

He talked about protecting anti-abortion rights and the importance of family -- points that have played less of a role in his stump speech since leaving Iowa.  Abandoning Florida the day before the primary shows he is focusing outside the expensive where he struggled to compete with his better funded GOP rivals and where recent polls have him a distant third.

"This is one of those races that we shouldn't make rash decisions just because someone has the most money.  Let me assure you, no matter how much more money Gov. Romney has than either Newt or I have, he's not going to have near the money President Obama's going to have.  So if you think that we're going to win this race because Gov. Romney will have more money to beat up Barack Obama, then Barack Obama will have to beat him up, you're wrong," said Santorum. "Having the most money isnt going to win this race.  having the best candidate with the best ideas"

It is caucus states like Minnesota, Colorado and Nevada were the presidential hopeful is now focusing in the hopes of being able to pick up delegates without having to outright win a state.  His message is that the baggage and records of his competitors will be a distraction in a head-to-head matchup with President Obama.

The general election "can't be about someone who is an undisciplined politician who is coming up with a new idea every ten seconds, most of which don't make any sense. Or someone who is a recent conservative in order to be able to win an election as is in both of their cases, on the major issues of the day,"

the GOP hopeful told the crowd.  Santorum has previously taken swipes at former Speaker Newt Gingrich for proposing a permanent U.S. base on the moon, Mitt Romney for never having won an election while running as a conservative.

The Santorum campaign will split time between Colorado and Nevada over the early part of this week.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

....and she was holding a kitten,....and a baby chimp wearing a lil' hat.

Does this make you ready to vote for Rick Santorum yet ? Does it ? Huh ? Huh ?

He's so nice and family like,...isn't he,...isn't he ? C'mon,...

These guys will use anything to get elected. It's nauseating.

  • 10 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:21 AM EST

Ha. funny stuff Serf. Agreed it's all a show (that's everyone, D/I/R, let's be honest), but coming from a dad with 3 kids I don't think he's playing that angle too much, clearly his daughter is one sick girl who has a life long battle on her hands. That being said, other than VP I can't see Rick making a dent in the Mitt machine - but I guess these guys will keep going until the gobs of $$ run out.

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:30 AM EST

Why are you being such an ass. Santorum took time off the campaign trail to be with his sick daughter in the hospital. To me this shows that he has his priorities straight and knows what really matters in life. His daughter has a genetic disorder and will never get better. In fact, she has lived a lot longer than many children with this disorder do. His taking time to be with her was no campaign stunt, it was a father spending time with his sick child. I hope that you never have to go through what he is going through, knowing that his daughter is going to die at a very young age. Thankfully it seems she is doing better so Santorum has returned to the campaign. He has never once brought up his daughter or tried to use her illness to boost his campaign. The media is making a far bigger deal about him taking time to be with her then Santorum is. In fact he has not said a word about her illness publicly. In the current political climate where politicians try and use everything they can to try and get votes, it is refreshing to see that Santorum is not using his daughter to try and get sympathy votes. If you want to blame anyone for the focus on this, blame the media not the candidate. As for me, just hope that his daughter continues to improve and that he gets to spend more time with her.

  • 12 votes
#1.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:44 AM EST

I agree with you, as a parent who has lost two children, one 35, and the other 29, I can empathize with him. I just wouldnt ever vote for him.I do wish him and his daughter all the best. If there were a god, I would even pray for her.

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:53 AM EST

I don't empathize with him at all. I empathize with Bella, who unfortunately has a complete narcissist for a father. Oh great, she's out of the woods so he can go back to the campaign trail. Um, she has a birth defect that could kill her any day. She is not "out of the woods." Santorum talks about family values as if he is the only one who can fix all our social ills, but he is not the only person who can save America. He is, however, the only father his daughter has. At 3, my father was the center of my universe. I cannot imagine how it would have felt if I was seriously sick in the hospital and he wasn't there with me. My best friend had a lifelong and eventually fatal illness - when she was young, her parents basically worked at their jobs and took care of her - it's a full-time schedule. He could make a living close to home, but he chooses instead to chase after a political office he has no hope of winning, while his youngest child is afflicted with a life-threatening illness. I have no empathy for this man, because he appears to have very little of his own (either for his own child or for others, as evidenced by his politics). But my heart breaks for Bella.

  • 9 votes
#1.4 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:40 AM EST
Comment author avatarvfeinsteinExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

With every utterance out of that gaping hole in the middle of his punk-ass face, Frothy Mixture of Fecal Matter and Anal Lube offends and disgusts me. Frothy Mixture of Fecal Matter and Anal Lube should just go away. He has as much chance of being the teabagging Greedy Old Party's nominee than I have of being the next Queen of England.

  • 3 votes
#1.5 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:03 AM EST

No... it's human, and it has swayed this voter to Santorum. As another person on this forum commented, he's has his priorities straight.

  • 2 votes
#1.6 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:58 AM EST

Ignorant comments by Serfdom.

    #1.7 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:22 AM EST

    Like I said, he will milk his daughter's illness for sympathy votes.

    The man has no shame and giving credit to god when the doctors and modern meds kept her alive.

    This is just how effed up religion and religious zealots are in their twisted heads.

    Doctors save kids, God take the credit.

    ]

    • 3 votes
    #1.8 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:23 AM EST

    His priorities straight???? What???? He doesn't even have the decency to be embarrassed to be conducting a "symbolic" hopeless Presidential campaign while his seriously ill toddler fights for the life she has left? He wants dad of the year credit for rushing to her hospital bed for a day and then leaving his wife and kids to go continue his finger wagging campaign judging the 'family values' of the rest of the nation? Good grief...if this were one of the far right's FEMALE politicians, the Republican party would be leading the charge to crucify her as worst parent of the year!

    • 2 votes
    #1.9 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:43 AM EST

    serfbum101...Go PHUQUE yourself!

    • 1 vote
    #1.10 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:35 PM EST

    Sorry, serf. . .you are a complete idiot! No. . .and INcomplete idiot!

    • 1 vote
    #1.11 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:50 PM EST

    Santorum says ailing daughter 'had a big smile on her face'

    Saintorum caught in a LIE if I ever heard one.

    When little kids are sick, they are not smiling whatsoever. They are in pain, nothing to laugh about, especially for a 3 yo with doctors and nurses probing at them and sticking them.

    Maybe the smile was all about the 3 yo not being stuck with her bigoted dad and mom and was surrounded by people that can think outside of religion.

    • 1 vote
    #1.12 - Thu Feb 2, 2012 11:30 AM EST
    Reply

    This Independent likes Rick. Toned down quite a lot and certainly seems the most level-headed of the remaining repub candidates. Will be interesting to see if he makes VP to balance out Romney? Sad Mitt is foregone conclusion to win primary but will take him over Newt any day. Mitt/Rick ticket would at least be interesting race IMHO.

    • 5 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:25 AM EST

    Yeah, forget the part about banning contraceptives, that evolution is a lie and creationism must be taught in science classes, that homosexuality is a mental disease and kind of like being black except it's a choice, that education is evil because it makes people less religious, that Palestinians don't exist; only Isrealis exist, that the State has the right to prohibit an individual's passions (sex), that he "wants to go to war with China, oh and no abortions no exceptions not even rape or incest and that allowing rape victims to get abortions will encourage rapists (yaknow, because they care whether or not their victims get pregnant).

    Totally level-headed... not in any way extreme Christian Right....

    • 13 votes
    #2.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:40 AM EST

    JCNation: Rick s the conservative in the race. Sadly, he will not get either the nomination or VP. Chris Christie will be Mitt's VP pick. Haven't you noticed how hard he is boosting Romney? Balamce is not what Mitt is after.

    • 1 vote
    #2.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:48 AM EST

    Christie is not second-banana material....

    • 1 vote
    #2.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:20 AM EST

    Shuklak -

    forget the part about banning contraceptives

    Santorum voted for every bill that funded programs distributing said contraceptives. He even explained why he doesn't like them. "Their availability will increase multiple partners (not a very healthy practice - physically or emotionally) and pre-marital sex. I think the reason he voted for them is because although he feels his way is better and would wish that you would agree, not making contraception available would be even worse.

    that evolution is a lie

    Never said that!

    creationism must be taught in science classes,

    Do you not understand that science is theory? Why not be open minded to other theories? Don't you understand the biggest education problem is the lack of critical thinking. If you don't present both sides, then you cannot exercise critical thinking - can you?

    homosexuality is a mental disease

    I'm sorry, but that concept came from the early days of psychology - which the churches did not subscribe to. There are some protestants that hold this concept, but as a whole, almost all denominations hold homosexuality is a sin. Santorum is a catholic. I think when the Gay community calls it their "choice of a Lifestyle" - they actually hit exactly what it is. I chose to date my wife who is of the opposite sex, and made choices to stay with her overtime and decided she was attractive, . . . .

    Santorum's actual position - he thinks marriage should be left to between a man and a woman because of the natural procreation. We should honor those that do things right. As for the gays and lesbians, continue to petition your legislators to get the definition changed and as the majority sees that change should be made - so be it.

    kind of like being black . . .education is evil because it makes people less religious, that Palestinians don't exist; only Isrealis exist,

    doesn't this show you have some agenda other than seeking the truth?

    wants to go to war with China,

    wow this is really far out of the real of reality

    no abortions no exceptions not even rape or incest and that allowing rape victims to get abortions will encourage rapists

    Okay, you got a little closer to reality here. Although, Santorum's belief is there should be no abortions, he has always been supportive of abortion in the cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. He experienced this dilemma himself when his wife had to take an anti-biotic for a deadly infection from having their child operated on while still in the womb. The medicine caused her to go into labor that the doctors medically were afraid to stop. Since the child was only 20 weeks, they lost the child.

    He did author the partial birth abortion legislation. It is not just because he is against abortion, but because us going to great lengths to save babies at 24 weeks makes no sense to partially deliver another that age or older - just to kill it, especially because far too many survive the initial death blows. did you know their is a partial birth survivor out on the speaking circuit? Yeah, they tried several ways to kill her before they had mercy on her.

    As far as

    • 2 votes
    #2.4 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:39 AM EST

    Fed - I wouldn't throw in the towel yet. The two at the top are hurting the party (like the leadership doesn't shoot itself in the foot constantly).

    I like many other people wasn't even remotely considering Santorum. I've spent hours chasing down every positive and negative lead on the others, but just before Iowa, being unsatisified with the known contenders and seeing Santorums poll numbers improve looked at him real hard.

    People who know me, know it is hard to drag a recommendation out of me. I'm too used to having people turn out to be a George Bush.

    Of all those who put their hat's in the ring, Santorum stands head and shoulders above all of them. He would truly be a president for all the people, not just his, or his parties own beliefs.

    • 4 votes
    #2.5 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:47 AM EST

    So, DB Akron does your wife know you are gay but that you....."chose to date my wife who is of the opposite sex, and made choices to stay with her overtime and decided she was attractive, . . . ."? You are implying that you are at least equally attracted to both men and women.

    • 2 votes
    #2.6 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:44 AM EST

    I'm sorry, but that concept came from the early days of psychology - which the churches did not subscribe to. There are some protestants that hold this concept, but as a whole, almost all denominations hold homosexuality is a sin. Santorum is a catholic. I think when the Gay community calls it their "choice of a Lifestyle" - they actually hit exactly what it is. I chose to date my wife who is of the opposite sex, and made choices to stay with her overtime and decided she was attractive, . . . .

    If you don't mind a personal question, DB...how old were you when you 'made the choice' to be a heterosexual? Did you ponder being gay instead?

    I don't mind saying that I was born heterosexual. I have gay friends who have told me they were gay when they were four years old, before they even knew what sexuality was.

    Homosexuality is not well understood in terms of cause, but it is clear that it is not a chosen orientation. It is inborn and it is not evil. If one believes in a loving god who created all of us and loves all of us, then why do some wish to demonize gays?

    • 3 votes
    #2.7 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:14 AM EST

    DB: wow, how could you have this much wrong in just one post??? Amazing!

    Judaism for one does not hold "homosexuality" to be a sin, and neither do several other mainstream denominations of the live and let live variety. What you (and your ilk) do not understand is that the US Supreme Court has already long ago held that women were included in the US Constitution's right to privacy clause. That means that you, Santorum, your church, simply do not get to order the government to make the decision for women in any case before that zygote or fetus can live without her. The point is not where Santorum draw the line...the point is that he thinks its his line to draw. Same issue with homosexuality. It's just none of your damn business and sure as hell, not governments'. That's not a far left position, that's mainstream in the USA where we simply do not embrace official state relgions and their dogma. Santorum was rejected by his OWN constituents as an extremist long ago. There is no chance in hell he's going to win one single state, let alone be the Republican nominee (although he has almost as many Democrats rooting for that to be the case as does Gingrich.)

    • 2 votes
    #2.8 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:52 AM EST
    Reply

    Be President, or be with my sick daughter...no contest. Why is this guy even running?

    • 8 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:31 AM EST

    The media likes the Trisome-18 angle. What happened to his daughter was she got pnuemonia in both lungs. They also like to promote that she was not expected to live more than one year. The reality is that Trisome-18 recipients frequently live well into her teens.

    I think he is fine to run for president, and also has stated she is part of his motivation for running. The HCL has several boards that will affect who gets treated and with what course of treatment people will get.

    • 1 vote
    #3.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:51 AM EST

    Wrong again Akron, you're really on a roll. The reality is there are only a handful of those diagnosed with Trisome-18 who've ever made it to ten years of age. He's an abommination as both a father and as a political leader and every day away from his family and this little girl proves his self-delusional "calling".

    • 2 votes
    #3.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:58 AM EST
    Reply

    A little harsh, serfdom101, but I was thinking that it seemed like he was using his daughter for sympathy a bit.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:35 AM EST

    Rick is a bafoon, with a lot of money backing him.

    • 8 votes
    Reply#5 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:45 AM EST

    Are you kidding me? How pathetic that a candidate for the US Presidency would use his daughter like that!! If he would use his own daughter's life-threatening illness to get votes, what will he do for our country? I am embarrassed to say the I come from the great state of Pennsylvania with a candidate like that!

    • 7 votes
    Reply#6 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:50 AM EST

    Rick has stated that she is one of the reasons he is running. Kids and adults with special needs are the first ones to lose care when governments make cost effective care decisions. How pathetic is your cynical though patterns, no down cultivated by the sources you read.

    • 1 vote
    #6.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:59 AM EST

    Yeah: right ...who couldn't identify with a great dad like this, leaving his critically disabled child to run a symbolic campaign to lecture others how to live....How pathetic...You'd be the first to lambast one of your women candidates if she did this, admit it.

    • 1 vote
    #6.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:00 PM EST

    Rick has stated that she is one of the reasons he is running. Kids and adults with special needs are the first ones to lose care when governments make cost effective care decisions.

    This man will say and do whatever to get elected. His daughter is covered and paid for by the taxpayers money. He doesn't have to worry about her medical care bills like the rest of the people do. If he really felt that way, then why haven't anyone of us ever seen him fight for the people with disabilities. He doesn't give a rats-az about people with disabilities. He's only using them to try and collect votes.

    He's a pathetic loser using his daughters illness to get sympathy votes now.

    I will never vote for this man. I will vote for Obama or Ron Paul before voting for any of these jerks.

    Santorum is for Santorum just as Gingrich is for Gingrich and Romney is for Romney, and they all represent the 1%ers, not the people.

    REVOLUTION 2012

    • 4 votes
    #6.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:18 PM EST
    Reply

    thank the good lord , the little girl is doing better !!!!!!!!!!!!!! politics latter ; i'm a grandpa fellows , skin ain't as thick as it used to be.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#7 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:55 AM EST

    Rep/greedy:

    I agree. He's not a qualified candidate, but I will not criticize him for doing the right thing for his kids. Damn sight better than that Walsh guy from Illinois. If I owed my kids >$100K I'd hide. Walsh thinks he can run the government.

    So, Mr. Santorum, I hope your daughter is well and recovers soon. Good luck to her.

    • 6 votes
    #7.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:02 AM EST

    biweeler -

    He's not a qualified candidate

    Funny you should say the, he meets the constitutional requirements. Not only that but many of the accomplishments Gingrich has - were written by Santorum

    Welfare reform

    Partial Birth abortion

    work on freddie and fannie problems before anyone admitted there was a problem.

    BTW what did Obama do

    voted for Tarp - Santorum didn't

    agreed with Reid, Pelosie, and Dodd - no problem at Freddie and Fannie.

      #7.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:05 AM EST

      DB:

      He's a theocrat. His views are inconsistent with the Constitutional separation of church and state. He would impose Catholic values on the nation.

      And for that, I deem him unqualified.

      • 4 votes
      #7.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:27 AM EST
      Reply

      Gee, wouldn't it be nice for everyone who had sick children to get the kind of hospital care Rick's daughter was able to receive.

      • 13 votes
      Reply#8 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:04 AM EST

      you bet! and rick has a group policy which means no one can be denided, unlike other children with birth defects whose parent has been denided coverage for their child?

      we need single payer which is just the way medicare operates!

      if you are 65, you are in one large group and you cannot be denided!!! that's why it came into existence, for so many seniors were being denided!

      and, no matter what you hear, it works great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • 4 votes
      #8.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:15 AM EST

      Actually, if we had socialized medicine (single payer, whatever you want to call it), Rick's daughter would probably have been refused treatment because prognosis for children with her disease/disorder is not good. As has been pointed out earlier, very few children with Trisome-18 live past the age of 10, and the treatment is ongoing, and expensive, just to get them to that point.

      You can deny it all you want, and think that "no matter what you hear, it works great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", everywhere that it is implemented there are rationing boards who decide who gets treatment for such diseases, and if she were approved for treatment, there are also lines and waiting lists. If she had a flare-up with her condition, but it fell in between scheduled visits (which probably wouldn't be more than twice a year), she'd end up waiting in the ER with everyone else, being seen in the order in which they arrive, and she may die while waiting. Chronic conditions are not treated as emergencies in socialized medicine.

      Not to mention, with socialized medicine, the ER becomes everyone's primary care physician. If you come down with the flu, can't get to work, and your job requires a Dr.'s note to excuse you for the few days you're off, what are you going to do? Don't say "get a flu shot" because it doesn't cover all viruses. You gonna wait in line to see a doctor in 3 months? or 6 months? just to see a doctor during office hours? By that time you won't be sick anymore, and your employer will probably want your note before then. So? I guess you're going to the ER to wait with everyone else, even though they can't do anything for you except to tell you "Yep, you've got the flu! Go home and drink plenty of fluids. Here's your note."

      Guess what, we already have that sort of thing going on in California, and a lot of other places in the country because there are a lot of people in the country illegally, and can't get insurance legally, even under Obamacare. There already is assistance for the poor who can't afford it, it's called Medicaid and Medicare (for those who are older), so don't call me heartless.

      SINGLE PAYER DOESN'T WORK! SOCIALISM DOESN'T WORK! NEVER HAS! NEVER WILL!

        #8.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:49 PM EST
        Reply

        This is politics 101, create or use a diversion to change the subject .This guy is not what America needs .He and his wife are the problem .Crazy religious cult members who believe if your don't do as we say " YOUR GOING TO HELL". My response blow it out your azzzzzz!

        On yeah ...Hope your daughter is doing well .

        • 7 votes
        Reply#9 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:14 AM EST

        Crazy religious cult members

        Your assertion is henious.

        First, Catholics make up 25% of the Unites States population - and they are accepted as christian by most denominations.

        your don't do as we say " YOUR GOING TO HELL".

        So, what if they are right? Did you know that a large portion of current christians said the same thing you just did?

          #9.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:15 AM EST

          Either way they are crazy religious cult members. They steal lie and rape cheat etc . I wouldn't trust a cult member .

          • 2 votes
          #9.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:31 AM EST

          Catholics are not a cult... far from it. And persons who steal, rape and cheat can be of any affiliation. A person has to make right choices, and the key is that it is a choice. As a Catholic and Christian, I hope through Prayer and my faith in God, I will gain the wisdom and guidance to avoid my human imperfections and become a better person.

          • 2 votes
          #9.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:18 AM EST

          Your so into the cult lifestyle you don't even realize its happening .lol .. good luck with that Johnny.I wish you well .

          • 3 votes
          #9.4 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:49 AM EST

          John:

          And persons who steal, rape and cheat can be of any affiliation.

          True.

          But what your post fails to address is the denial, the coverup, the dishonesty, and the tragedy of the sins visited upon the children. The moral authority of the Catholic church has been vaporized by their failure to report criminal conduct by their agents, and their subsequent efforts to evade all responsibility.

          Would you care to defend their multiple transfers of child molesters to different parishes where they abused more children?

          • 4 votes
          #9.5 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:49 AM EST

          Amen to that bilweeler

          • 2 votes
          #9.6 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:54 AM EST

          InPS and bilweeler-

          You two sound like racists. The only difference is that instead of hating blacks, or jews, or arabs, or asians, or whites, or hispanics (did I miss anyone?), because at some point you had issue with the bad acts of a few (yes, I know people who are like that, who actually base their racism on personal interaction or what they see in the news, not on simple irrationality trained into them by their parents), you hate all Catholics because of the bad acts of some of their leadership.

          I don't think anyone would defend the child molesters, or those in the hierarchy that covered it up. You, however, are lumping all Catholics in with those guys. I have issues with Catholics over their beliefs, but I don't think they belong to a cult. I realize you both probably think all Christians are some kind of cult. Maybe you put all religious people into the same category- I don't know. Fight it all you want, but the majority of people in this nation are Christians, and the majority of people in the world believe in some kind of religion or another. If anything, atheism is more of a cult than most religions, by definition.

            #9.7 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:02 PM EST

            xp:

            You two sound like racists.

            Oh yeah. The "race card." Just as information, Catholicism is not a race, and Catholics come in ALL races. So your logic is missing an important element.

            You, however, are lumping all Catholics in with those guys.

            You made that up. I said nothing at all about Catholics in my post at 9.5. I referred only to the Catholic church, and how it has squandered all its moral authority. I guess that was a difficult concept to you, but most people can recognize corrupt/bankrupt leadership without assigning blame to those who are subjected to that leadership.

            Sorry to hear you couldn't discern my point. But frankly, when you start out by calling your opponent a racist, you have already lost the argument.

            • 2 votes
            #9.8 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:19 PM EST
            Reply

            Glad that Bella has a smile on her face Rick. Now put a smile on everyone elses face and go back home AND STAY THERE! You are a narrow minded xenophobic bible thumping bigot and you don't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning the nomination much less the general election.

            • 12 votes
            Reply#10 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:14 AM EST

            Yeah, it would be. It would also be nice if we could back off the rabid partisanship long enough to celebrate this child's return to relative good health. I was hoping liberals were mature and sensitive enough not to turn 3 year olds into political targets. We've all got loved ones!

            • 1 vote
            #10.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:30 AM EST

            Auntie:

            I was hoping liberals were mature and sensitive enough not to turn 3 year olds into political targets

            You got your wish. #7.1.

            • 1 vote
            #10.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:39 AM EST

            Oilman

            Santorum isn't a protestant, he's catholic. Isn't that supposed to be a priest holding a crucifix and throwing holy water on you instead?

              #10.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:17 AM EST
              Reply

              A genetic disorder? or evolution in action? or doesn't the intelligent designer have a plan?

              • 5 votes
              Reply#11 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:14 AM EST

              This is media spin, folks - and as much as I like MSNBC, it's all about their ratings. Less than 20% of the article's content is about Santorum's daughter, but that's what got the headline...pretty pathetic if you ask me. And what's worse, sympathetic stories like this will endear Santorum to some voters which allows him to spread his narrow-minded values even further.

              • 7 votes
              Reply#12 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:43 AM EST

              Being a father and grandfather, I am glad to hear that his daughter is doing better.

              And as you state Ursula, this is media spin at it's best (worst?). The huge amount of money being thrown around gives all the news outlets reason for sensationalizing every story out there. Just can't wait to see the follow-up articles about what a wonderful, loving, man he is. Forget the fact that he is running for chief theocrat in charge of the bedroon police.

              • 4 votes
              #12.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:11 AM EST

              Except MSNBC is a liberal media. They would not back Santorum.

                #12.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:22 AM EST
                Reply

                It is such a shame that instead of voting based on who is the best candidate for the office (Rick Santorum) people vote for who they think can win and there in lies the heart of the problem in our country that regardless of who is elected nothing will fundamentally change. We refuse to do what is right without concern for the consequences, instead we do what is right for us.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#13 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:06 AM EST

                The 'best candidate for office" lost his last election by 18 percentage points. Worst drubbing ever for a sitting senator. Did Pennsylvania refuse to do what's right or did they finally figure this knuckle dragging turd out?

                • 3 votes
                #13.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:00 AM EST
                Reply

                When she woke up, she channelled Jesus Christ and said God wants YOU to be president daddy! Give me a break. How much do people have to hate life to like Santorum.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#14 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:12 AM EST
                Alf77Deleted

                Rick Santorum's daughter has a chronic, life-threatening genetic disorder that will require her to receive continuous, life-long care. I wish her the best of luck.

                I hope that she is receiving the medical care that she needs; medical care that people like Rick Santorum wants to deny to tens of millions of other people with chronic pre-existing medical conditions.

                I also wouldn't be surprised to find that she is already covered by some government program that Santorum is against or that Santorum is still receiving healthcare benefits as a result of his former political rolls. That is how this man "rolls".

                • 4 votes
                Reply#16 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:39 AM EST

                I wouldn't vote for him if I was paid to. period

                • 3 votes
                Reply#17 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:42 AM EST

                This is a man who wants to outlaw birth control. Can you believe that? It's a tribute to American fascism that so many people actually voted for this guy. If you actually want to live in an unfree country move to Iran instead of trying mess up America by voting for this a-hole.

                • 4 votes
                Reply#18 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:50 AM EST

                Good... then maybe people would be more responsible when engaging in sexual relationships. Plus, he never said anything about banning birth control, only banning public funding of contraceptives. Which I whole heartedly agree.

                • 1 vote
                #18.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:30 AM EST

                John, do you really think the man/woman with 8 kids by 8 different people is going to step back and say "Well, wait I couldn't get my birth control, so maybe we shouldn't..."? No.

                • 1 vote
                #18.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:37 AM EST
                Reply

                He talked about protecting anti-abortion rights..

                He talked about protecting someone's right to take away the rights of others? What?

                Go home, Ricky. Your child needs you. The rest of us don't.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#19 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:59 AM EST

                Now some people are just making stuff up. He is extremely pro-life, and does not advocate abortion in any case. I like his stance. I also believe that life begins at conception and should not be terminated. As awful as rape is, an innocent life should not bear the criminal acts of another. If the rape victim does not want the child, she can give it to a family who does. As far as the life of the mother is concerned. That is already protected. The mother's life supercedes the infant's.

                • 1 vote
                #19.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:40 AM EST

                John:

                Now some people are just making stuff up.

                Like what, exactly?

                Or did you mean to say that people are just saying stuff I don't agree with? There's a difference...

                • 2 votes
                #19.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:42 AM EST

                What if the life of the mother is threatened, John? What if the baby has a severe genetic problem?

                Interesting that Rick Santorum himself aborted a baby because the life of his wife was threatened. I guess for him, it's ok.

                • 2 votes
                #19.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:44 AM EST

                Here's an example of people making stuff up. The baby came early. They couldn't save it. Lots different from having an abortion where they wanted to kill the baby. The whole event was precipitated by an in-utero operation which was to help save the child. Mrs. Santorum got an infection and had to take an anti-biotic which induced labor. If she hadn't taken the medicine both she and the child would've died.

                Think before you post. Or do liberals lack the ability to think critically?

                (I know I'm going to get attacked for that comment, but really? Reading so many of these posts in which people just spew hatred, or stupidity, makes me wonder about the intelligence of some people. Emotions seem to rule, and name calling and fabrication are what come out. THINK, PEOPLE!)

                  #19.4 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:16 PM EST

                  xp:

                  Or do liberals lack the ability to think critically?

                  Another deflection, same as playing the race card in #9.7.

                  You don't argue with your opponents. That would take too much work. You just insult them and move on.

                  I know I'm going to get attacked for that comment, but really?

                  You knew you were throwing grenades and would get called on it. Happy to oblige.

                  • 2 votes
                  #19.5 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:24 PM EST
                  Reply

                  Prayers are being said for this daughter...but did he ever take a moment to propose a bill that would help millions of people who cannot afford hospital care for their loved ones?

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#20 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:06 AM EST

                  To be clear, I don't like Rick Santorum. I also empathize with him, his family, and his daughter. I hope she is out of the hospital soon. No child should have to go through all of this.

                  That said, I lost a pregnancy and the fetus was deemed to have Trisomy 18. I hate to say it, but I was relieved. Not all parents are cut out for that; while I'm not proud to say it, I'm one of them. I find it surprising that Mr. Santorum, knowing how difficult it is on the parent and the child, would fight for legislation to force me to bring that child into the world, had my body not taken care of things for me. His religion should have no bearing on that decision for me.

                  He needs to drop out and spend what precious time he has left with his daughter at home. He will not get elected. He wants to force too many things on Americans.

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#21 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:08 AM EST

                  RealityChck

                  To be clear, I don't like Rick Santorum. I also empathize with him, his family, and his daughter. I hope she is out of the hospital soon. No child should have to go through all of this.

                  That said, I lost a pregnancy and the fetus was deemed to have Trisomy 18. I hate to say it, but I was relieved. Not all parents are cut out for that; while I'm not proud to say it, I'm one of them. I find it surprising that Mr. Santorum, knowing how difficult it is on the parent and the child, would fight for legislation to force me to bring that child into the world, had my body not taken care of things for me. His religion should have no bearing on that decision for me.

                  He needs to drop out and spend what precious time he has left with his daughter at home. He will not get elected. He wants to force too many things on Americans.

                  You have both my sympathy for your loss and my admiration for your honesty and common sense.

                  • 1 vote
                  #21.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:18 AM EST

                  It's not a religious belief; it's a constitutional right. Your situation sounds like you lost the baby because of natural abortion. I believe God won't give us anything we cannot handle. But religion aside, abortion takes away a fetus' right to life because of a stupid loophole. It is illegal according to our laws. If you don't think that's true, what happens to a mother who aborts her own child? That's right she is arrested for killing that child.

                  • 1 vote
                  #21.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:54 AM EST

                  John:

                  It is illegal according to our laws.

                  Your refusal to recognize Roe v. Wade as law is demonstrably wrong. Abortion is legal. You don't like it...and I get that.

                  But don't make up things like abortion is "illegal." It diminishes your credibility and deflects the discussion from the relevant facts.

                  • 3 votes
                  #21.3 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:00 PM EST

                  I have women in my own family who have experienced miscarriages, and for what it is worth, my heart goes out to you for your loss. I, for one, do not think that there is enough recognition and support for women who have experienced this kind of loss.

                  Now, on the issue of abortion, regardless of one's stance on the issue, they cannot deny the real trauma that the majority of women experience (and men as well) after having had an abortion. There is real suffering there, and I think they too are victims, even if they were there "by choice." The fact of the matter is, oftentimes many women are not presented with an alternative; the medical establishment in many cases simply takes it for granted that really, there is no other choice.

                  This is not something that has simply come into society out of the blue, however; this kind of development has been coming for quite some time now. One needs only to look into the history of the American Birth Control League to see that this issue is not quite as old as we think it is, and at its heart is a philosophical notion of "value," inherently relative, and imputed by others from the outside. In practical terms, this problem has been in the forefront of American political life since the 1840s, and the issue of abortion is simply another facet of a broader philosophical direction that has been dominant in the Western world for hundreds of years.

                  So, it is not simply a question of "religion" versus "science," or "faith" versus "reason" (dicotomies which themselves have a history). Rather, it is a philosophical question, one that everyone (whether they know it or not) has weighed in on at one time or another.

                    #21.4 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:34 PM EST
                    Reply

                    I'm voting for Rick Santorum.

                      Reply#22 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:25 AM EST

                      ...not for long, Lou7777777...not for long.

                      • 1 vote
                      #22.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:42 AM EST

                      Lou:

                      I'm voting for Rick Santorum.

                      If you really like the idea of a theocracy, maybe you should consider Iran. Or Saudi Arabia.

                      • 2 votes
                      #22.2 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:04 PM EST
                      Reply

                      Go Santorum... Don't listen to the haters

                        Reply#24 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:36 PM EST

                        I think the problem that the "mainstream" media has in understanding Rick Santorum is the same that many of us modern Americans have, especially those of us who were born and raised in the latter half of the 20th century. Although I am sure that Santorum's religious beliefs inform how he lives his live and how he thinks, I think many of his positions on moral issues come from an understanding of human nature that is in accordance with the whole of nature, rather than something outside or apart from it. This understanding forms his positions on the purpose of law and its relationship to nature, interpreted by authentic reason, such that he does not see law as a vehicle for imposing the will of an individual, a group of individuals, or even society as a whole upon nature itself.

                        So, I think the main difficulty many might have with him is that he doesn't see human nature as many of us modern Americans do: as something fluid and malleable, something that we can simply impose our will upon and bend it according to our whims, whether we would wish to do so for an apparent good or for ill. This view of nature (particuarly human nature) as something "malleable" is one that we have all inherited, and so we are tempted to accept it uncritically, without embarking on an honest investigation of where the idea came from and what the implications of such an idea might have.

                        For this reason, I think that the problem many people have with Santorum and his positions is not primarily a "religious" problem, but a philosophical one. This problem transcends easy political labels such as "liberal" or "conservative," as well as knee-jerk emotional epithets such as "communist left-wing extremist" or "christofascistic right-wing religious nutjob" that many on comment threads prefer to throw at one another.

                        I think it is incumbent upon all of us to take an intellectually honest look at our own philosophies and ideas, which until now may have gone uncritically accepted or unchallenged, to see what they are, where they came from, and whether or not, on their own terms, they are worth subscribing to. This kind of rational investagation is something that we all have to do ourselves, something that we aren't going to get from the sources of information to which we are normally exposed on a weekly, daily, or (with some) hourly basis.

                        • 3 votes
                        Reply#25 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:50 PM EST

                        Thank you for your measured and thoughtful post. I wish more people in the world were like you, and actually took the time to think about things instead of just having a knee-jerk reaction according to their gut.

                          #25.1 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:25 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Seriously, he stayed home with his daughter. What is the deal. I hope any of us would have done that. He is in the public eye, fat chance he could have kept that secret and as far as insurance...I work, don't make a lot of money, but my kids would have gotten just as good of care. It is always something to point fingers at these guys, yet we NEVER pointed fingers at the numb nut we have in office now. Had we, he would have never gotten in and we would not be discussing this now.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#26 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:58 PM EST

                          Voted this a-hole out of Pennsylvania politics after he lied and cheated Pennsylvania taxpayers by funding his home schooled kids in Virginia, after he started his K-street breakfast and was caught in that scandal only to say he would stop it and just started it back up again after the heat was off, he and his wife participated in an abortion and the wife justified it by saying her kids would be without a mother but they would deny other women the same procedure to save their lives, accused Obama of being snobby when Obama wished that children could be college or job ready when he has a college degree (which doesn't help him understand anything), wants less gov't when it comes to business but wants gov't money for family causes and spying in your bedroom. Sanctimonious Santorum is a hypocrite and just trotted out his terminally ill daughter for votes. She has an incurable disease. Frothy needs to go away. He just doesn't get it, especially when he was fired before. He's a train wreck

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#27 - Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:11 PM EST
                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.