Herman Cain 'enthusiastically' endorses Newt Gingrich for president

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. -- Former presidential candidate Herman Cain, who last week endorsed "the American people," announced his support on Saturday of another entity -- this time a Republican hoping to win the White House.

"I hereby officially and enthusiastically endorse Newt Gingrich for president of the United States," Cain said at a GOP fundraiser.

Speaking to supporters on the day he left the race last month, the former head of Godfather's Pizza said he would be making an endorsement. But at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in South Carolina last week, he announced that his official endorsement would be of "we the people."


While Cain publicly promoted his endorsement last week, the one he made Saturday night came with little warning. The announcement was a surprise to Gingrich staff, and the traveling press who most frequently cover the former House speaker were not in attendance after boycotting the price the campaign was charging for chartered flights.

Gingrich vows to go 'all the way to the convention'

"There are many reasons, but one of the biggest reasons is that I know that Speaker Gingrich is a patriot. Speaker Gingrich is not afraid of bold ideas, and I also know that Speaker Gingrich is running for president and going through this sausage grinder," said Cain. "I know what this sausage grinder is all about. I know that he is going through this sausage grinder because he cares about the future of the United States of America."

Cain abandoned his presidential bid amongst accusations from women claiming he sexually harassed them while heading the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s. Describing the accusations as false attacks from the media and rivals, Cain's campaign sought to slog through the scandal. That was until a Georgia woman went public claiming to have had an affair with the former businessman for more than a decade.

On Dec. 2, Cain returned to his Atlanta home to meet with his wife and discuss the future of his candidacy. The next day he suspended his campaign.

Romney uses 'history,' surrogates against Gingrich

Gingrich is now in an uphill battle to compete in the Sunshine State with the better funded Mitt Romney.

Cain becomes the second former presidential candidate to endorse Gingrich. Texas Gov. Rick Perry dropped out and announced his support just two days before Gingrich's decisive South Carolina primary victory.

Gingrich signaled that there might be room in his administration for Cain, and that Cain’s 9-9-9 economic plan would be on the table. Gingrich called Cain "a great asset."

Cain will be campaigning with Gingrich in Florida on Monday. 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 16

Birds of a feather?

  • 80 votes
#1 - Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:59 PM EST
Comment author avatarRealAmericansFirstExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

President Newt? Really?

President Mitt? Nah.

Obama/Biden 2012

  • 87 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:12 AM EST

I wonder if Mrs. Cain admires Callista the home wrecker as much as Herman does Newton?

  • 87 votes
#1.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:49 AM EST

Is Herman Cain endorsing him for president, or is he endorsing his open marriage policy?

  • 113 votes
#1.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:52 AM EST

Really?? Really Hermie???

What happened to "The people"... I thought you endorsed them last week.

I guess your endorsement went to the highest bidder!!! Trust me Newtie boy lied to you about that Defense gig you want so bad (Mr U becki becki-beki-stan)

  • 42 votes
#1.4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:53 AM EST

Oh Newt, how lucky can you get? Cain and Perry, endorsements from dumb and dumber. Wow, you're a lucky fellow.

  • 85 votes
#1.5 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:53 AM EST

Great Headline for NY Daily News.....

Pizzaman endorses Moonie.

(don't forget Cain said he wanted to be Sec of Defence :-(

  • 34 votes
#1.6 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:58 AM EST

When there are this many jokes to be made, one has to wonder if these candidates have any legitimacy.

  • 55 votes
#1.7 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:06 AM EST

Yes, but how does this endorsement compare to the Christine O'Donnell endorsement of Romney?

  • 28 votes
#1.8 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:12 AM EST

stupid is...as stupid does

  • 29 votes
#1.9 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:23 AM EST

Wait, just caught a line in the article. The traveling press that goes with Gingrich was boycotting him because he charges too much for their charter plane price?

  • 27 votes
#1.10 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:26 AM EST

Where is the news? This horse race of jack-asz mules bores me. Lady Liberty is dancing nude for coins.

  • 15 votes
#1.11 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:32 AM EST

Just ran in to say that cain is less relavent than ann coulter.at least she's crazy and one can get a chuckle hither and yon.

  • 14 votes
#1.12 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:33 AM EST

Just found an article that says the Gingrich campaign was going to charge the embeds $3000/seat on a charter from Orlando to West Palm. Press is mad. Campaign is mad. Only a reporter from Bloomberg and one from a French tv station went with him.

  • 21 votes
#1.13 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:37 AM EST

Newt can't seem to keep his charter planes out of the news. First, he is hit with allegations of using them for personal gain, but charging them to his campaign. Now he is being boycotted for over charging.

The scariest part of Newt is his single super-pac contributor, Sheldon Adelson. This is a man with the influence and money to make a single call to get laws changed. How far back to they go? What has Newt done to scratch his back in the past? These are the questions we need investigated.

  • 49 votes
#1.14 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:43 AM EST

Red,

To me that is the bigger story! There is something going on here. The press boycotting? This could get nasty.

And you are right about his Vegas contributor. I bet you will see someone start digging deep into that soon! (Getting the press mad at you is NOT a good idea)

  • 30 votes
#1.15 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:50 AM EST

Up with Chris Hayes reported about the influence this man had over Tom Delay, and I found this article in which he is under investigation.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-sunlight-foundation/sheldon-adelson-newt_b_1234805.html

Happy reading!! Chris Hayes link is here:

http://upwithchrishayes.msnbc.msn.com/

  • 16 votes
#1.16 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:59 AM EST

(Getting the press mad at you is NOT a good idea)

Oh, and Phine, you are right. As much as Newt loves to lambaste the press, he does need them carry his message forward.

Too much MI-5 tonight must have gotten my inner 'spook' looking around for conspiracies.

  • 5 votes
#1.17 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:04 AM EST

Wow , this is great news...How long will it be before we have 999 pizza on the moon..??

  • 34 votes
#1.18 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:08 AM EST

Birds of a feather?

Flock to other women's houses together!

  • 28 votes
#1.19 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:29 AM EST

Flock to other women's houses together!

They have both Flocked their share.

  • 25 votes
#1.20 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:39 AM EST

OH My God! one penultimate panty pursuer endorses another!

The grinch is learning from Daddy? or better yet, I wonder what herman's price is $9.99?

No matter what hermie does, it isn't going to get the Cain Train back on the racks, OOPs wait a minute, I meant tracks....

Just too funny....

From joke to very bad joke in one endorsement...

  • 15 votes
#1.21 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:41 AM EST

WHAT A JOKE....Abott and Costello amd the Ringling Brothers not only are Racist there a bunch of stinking SLOBS the next debate we ought 2 send in the SEALS and wipe them all OUT

  • 14 votes
#1.22 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:57 AM EST

This race gets loonier every day. Does anyone in believe anyone in the republican field has a chance?

  • 24 votes
#1.23 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:21 AM EST

Herman Cain proved himself to be a complete clown.

His endorsement of Newt Gingrich is added proof that Gingrich is totally unfit for the Oval Office.

  • 30 votes
#1.24 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:09 AM EST

I thought that both Cain and Gingrich were part of the "moral majority" crowd.

Their history of "womanizing" has revealed them to be opportunists and ideological phonies.

  • 25 votes
#1.25 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:18 AM EST

People are still donating for and because of cain? really? so much for the party of high morals and family values congrats you are frauds LOL.

  • 16 votes
#1.26 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:26 AM EST

Birds of a feather was my first thought also - but I checked with the Audubon Society and they complained I wasn't being PC.

  • 12 votes
#1.27 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:28 AM EST

........ and I also know that Speaker Gingrich is running for president and going through this sausage grinder

Did he say "sausage grinder".......LOL

  • 16 votes
#1.28 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:15 AM EST

An idiot endorsing a charlatan. Quite a combination!

  • 16 votes
#1.29 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:54 AM EST
Comment author avatarKornfedExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

You libs do realize who the hero of your party is, right? ....and your still going there eh? Fools

  • 10 votes
#1.30 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:14 AM EST

The media is 3/4 of the issue in this race. Thats why I read several different takes on each story to get a median read. One must also consider the source and writer. Nothing from far right or the far left can be believed.

  • 3 votes
#1.31 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:26 AM EST

Well come November after resident Obama is reelected, Newt and Pizza Man can go out whoreing around together.

  • 10 votes
#1.32 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:28 AM EST

The fact that you can even compare "our hero" to Cain and Gingrich, Kornfed, tells us all how deluded you are. Oh yeah, we're going there. Caingrich makes it so easy for us.

  • 20 votes
#1.33 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:29 AM EST

Kornfed your the fool for being here anyway. This is not fox news. Gooo away and seek life else where!

  • 13 votes
#1.34 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:32 AM EST

Yes, kornfed, you talk it up real big. You may be eating korn, but you've been smoking something else.

  • 14 votes
#1.35 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:34 AM EST

PhinePhancy:

And you are right about his Vegas contributor. I bet you will see someone start digging deep into that soon! (Getting the press mad at you is NOT a good idea)

You are right Phine. Gas Bag Gingrich's connection with Adelson runs deeper than most suspect. I know for a fact that Adelson has made his fleet of private aircraft available to Gas Bag at times. I would want to know if Gas Bag is charging for rides that Adelson may have provided to Gas Bag for nothing.

  • 8 votes
#1.36 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:38 AM EST

Kornfed ... your title speaks volumes ............

  • 12 votes
#1.37 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:40 AM EST

When you think of it ... lady wise ... Vegas is a perfect fit for both of these .............

  • 5 votes
#1.38 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:47 AM EST

Thats all you got eh guys? Defend the party, attack its foe...Nothing but sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

  • 6 votes
#1.39 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:47 AM EST

And up pops Kornfed. the right wing attack dog, without teeth or anything of substance to say. Talk about Fools!

  • 16 votes
#1.40 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:47 AM EST

And up pops Kornfed. the right wing attack dog, without teeth or anything of substance to say. Talk about Fools!

Way to add the meat to the potatoes Mike!

  • 3 votes
#1.41 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:50 AM EST

With all of this attention ... Kornfed is running around in a circle like a little dog when his master comes home!

Don't pee on the rug boy .....

  • 12 votes
#1.42 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:56 AM EST

With all of this attention ... Kornfed is running around in a circle like a little dog when his master comes home! Don't pee on the rug boy .....

Dont project your feelings onto me haha. You might get some attention too newscover, if you thought for yourself! Come on man, drop your predispositions and just think logically! Its liberating!

And it's folks like Kornfed that brought us Bush ... and Iraq ... and economical ruin

I thought Bush was terrible! There, I said it. I'm telling you, its nice to think for yourself!

  • 2 votes
#1.43 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:02 AM EST

Kornfed ... walking around with a red ball on the tip of your nose is a dead giveaway ....

  • 9 votes
#1.44 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:06 AM EST

Clever!

    #1.45 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:11 AM EST

    Kornfed ... no ... you're the cleaver one ... joining this discussion by calling people fools ....

    Try idiot ..........

    • 3 votes
    #1.46 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:14 AM EST

    Kornfed ... no ... you're the cleaver one ... joining this discussion by calling people fools ....

    Try idiot ..........

    ...and yet look who tosses out the personal attacks. At least I didnt go there

      #1.47 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:20 AM EST

      Kornfed ... are you sick ... calling people fools is not going there!!!!!

      AND ... to put it so you can comprehend ...

      Your oppion is worth almost as much as a hound dog's turd turning white in a kornfield!

      • 6 votes
      #1.48 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:24 AM EST

      Kornfed ... are you sick ... calling people fools is not going there!!!!!

      Mine was more of a general attack. Watch your conduct! I dont have to explain the rules to you now do I?

        #1.49 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:27 AM EST

        I don't see anything wrong with Cain's endorsement. Someone has put this in perspective,"Birds of the feather, flock together". Mac Daddy's like Newt and Cain are on the same page. Another thing, Newt has the IQ advantage over Cain . But both of them are experts at the art and science of using 'FEAR, as a Tool'.

        Perry was way in over his head, I am so glad someone got to him and convinced him to get out. I only said this for the benefit of the good people in Texas. Perry gave the impression that all folks from Texas was short on common sense.

        • 4 votes
        #1.50 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:31 AM EST

        Kornfed ... be damned with the rules ... folks like you make me sick!!!!!

        Hate for a man "my president" who is only trying to get us out of a mess that is beyond description!!! And all the while idiots like you throwing stones at him!!!!

        You and fools like you drag this country down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • 11 votes
        #1.51 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:32 AM EST

        ..........

        • 2 votes
        #1.52 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:32 AM EST

        You and fools like you drag this country down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Now that was closer to a general attack...keep at it, you will get there!

        • 5 votes
        #1.53 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:35 AM EST
        dadelDeleted

        Dominos on the moon, outstanding!! What kind of deficit will that entail???

        • 1 vote
        #1.55 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:51 AM EST

        Cain supports Newt??? No surprise there. They share the same zipper.

        G.O.P. now stands for the "Grand Old Penis."

        • 8 votes
        #1.56 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:00 AM EST

        Since Herman Cain was the hand picked candidate of the Koch brothers this is a fascinating development. The Kochs clearly have a serious aversion to Mittens. What will this mean going forward, since the Brothers Grim are so integral to the Tea Party and in fact the entire wingnut wing of the Conservative Movement?

        • 7 votes
        #1.57 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:08 AM EST

        999 endorsement for the Crook, two peas in a pot and goose bumps for the Lady's !

        Palin's endorsement is the kiss of death !

        Perry's endorsement is for the Rocks !

        • 3 votes
        #1.58 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:42 AM EST

        Thats all you got eh guys? Defend the party, attack its foe...Nothing but sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

        ...and what have you offered by way of argument, kornfed, except fairly juvenile one-liners, more suitable to a bumper sticker?

        Take a good look at the "slate" of GOP candidates remaining after a little less than a year of open campaigning:

        1. Newt Gingrich: a plausible liar, who was censured by his fellow Republicans in 1998 for ethics violations, will mouth any inanity with equal assurance, and couldn't even manage his campaign efficiently enough to get on the ballot in Virginia, a major red state.
        2. Mitt Romney: a political chameleon, who will never be able double-talk his way out of supporting the very same health care reform in Massachusetts that he attacks for the nation as a whole.
        3. Rick Santorum: whose grasp of the issues rivals Sarah Palin and has only survived because the Tea Party section of the GOP cannot stomach Mitt Romney, doesn't trust Gingrich, and finally realized the Cain, Perry and Bachmann were all idiots.
        4. Ron Paul: who runs every 4 years, and like a broken clock, is right about two times every day.

        What does GOP stand for anyway, Goofy Old Politicians?

        With unemployment falling, the stock market rising, the war in Iraq over and Osama bin Laden setting new records for the dead mans float somewhere in the Indian Ocean, none of these clowns is going to beat Obama in November.

        Four more years, baby!!!

        • 19 votes
        #1.59 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:49 AM EST

        Cain would endorse the KKK if he thought he would benefit from it.

        • 17 votes
        #1.60 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:52 AM EST

        Newt's Moon colony "PALIN & BACHMANN"

        Cain & Newt - Two Peckers in a Pot.

        Miss Plastic face = Full Moon ?

        • 6 votes
        #1.61 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:27 PM EST

        Hmm. The TeaParty seems to be getting punked.

        Is that all they got?

        • 4 votes
        #1.62 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:39 PM EST

        999 = Zero for Newt...

        • 3 votes
        #1.63 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:50 PM EST

        Newt & Cain are all about family values, "When Pigs Fly"

        • 8 votes
        #1.64 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:58 PM EST

        Dawgs of a feather,...

        • 2 votes
        #1.65 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:09 PM EST

        Herman Cain 'enthusiastically' endorses Newt Gingrich for president

        Of course he would support Gingrich. It's sleaze supporting sleaze.

        Cain a womanizer, Gingrich looking for threesomes and then some. These two preach morals and religion to the people, and then behind their closed doors, they are doing what they tell the rest of us is immoral and sinful.

        • 3 votes
        #1.66 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:47 PM EST

        Romney paid Cain to endorse Gingrich.

        .

        • 4 votes
        #1.67 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:13 PM EST

        Arieus

        Herman Cain 'enthusiastically' endorses Newt Gingrich for president

        Of course he would support Gingrich. It's sleaze supporting sleaze.

        Cain a womanizer, Gingrich looking for threesomes and then some.

        HA! Priceless! Leftists moaning about the adultery of a candidate while forgetting ALL ABOUT their last favorite liberal, BILL CLINTON, possibly the biggest adulterous horndog to occupy the White House.

        These two preach morals and religion to the people, and then behind their closed doors, they are doing what they tell the rest of us is immoral and sinful.

        You mean, just like all you leftist trolls posting petty insults about conservatives and how your morals are suddenly so high, even after ignoring (and defending) Clinton's antics which were the same kind of womanizing as Cain and Gingrich, as well as ignoring all of Obama's anti-American associations with domestic terrorists, black racists, America-hating communists.

        Quite entertaining!

        • 1 vote
        #1.68 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:16 PM EST

        Once Romney wins the Republican nomination, the conservative excitement dies.

        I predict we see even fewer right-wing bloggers here than we have now.

        The conservative bloogers active at this time, deliver mostly angry, blind swats at progressive ideology, which is picking up pace (at their chragrin), but this ideology is indeed the future for this great country.

        I don't see many rational conservative posts these days. The advanced conservative bloggers have left -- those of you who have been here for awhile know which bloggers I am talking about.

        After it becomes Obama vs Romney, the tired, angry, old, white, racist, biggoted, antii-poor, anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-anything-but me, evangelical base of the GNOP becomes despondent and disengages.

        Since that is the base of the GNOP, once the base falls, the rest crash to their demise.

          #1.69 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:25 PM EST

          To dman: I was thinking about making a post/comment, but after reading yours......I do not need to say ANYTHING.....You have said it all! hahahaha

          I am also glad that you didn't say anything bad about Ron Paul. He is so steady, but no one in his own party really likes him......he is the best they have!

          • 1 vote
          #1.70 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:28 PM EST

          Slimy celebrity loser endorsing slimy celebrity loser...

          It's all about lovin them some book deals and lobbying contracts. F the suckers that supported or voted for them... (add to this list "Leatherface" Brewer, "Once you've had black" Palin, and, of course, The Donald)

          • 2 votes
          #1.71 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:29 PM EST

          Lostintime

          HA! Priceless! Leftists moaning about the adultery of a candidate while forgetting ALL ABOUT their last favorite liberal, BILL CLINTON, possibly the biggest adulterous horndog to occupy the White House.

          I'm not a liberal, nor conservative. More moderate and it depends on the issue. The only label that fits me is "Christian".

          If you quit drinking the Magic Mushroom TEA long enough to think about it:

          1) Clinton isn't running.

          2) When he was running he never ran on the family values platform. Jesus was the hardest on the religious hypocrites.

          3) We have had several Presidents who played around, again these clowns run on Family Values, but don't have any.

          4) It is a matter of trust. When someone runs on family values, but doesn't live those values what you see is a lie.

          • 3 votes
          #1.72 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:39 PM EST

          birds of a feather flock together!!!!

          • 2 votes
          #1.73 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:53 PM EST

          I am also glad that you didn't say anything bad about Ron Paul. He is so steady, but no one in his own party really likes him......he is the best they have!

          Pamela - I have to confess I did not throw a couple of small stones in his direction. Saying he is mostly wrong, is not correct. What would be most accurate to say is that I don't agree with many of his positions, and in many cases, I disagree very strongly.

          But I agree, in and of himself, he seems a good egg, and he always speaks his true views directly and without reservation. It is too bad more politician cannot do the same (on both sides), but most of them don't know what they actually believe, not until their policy advisers tell them.

          Ahhh, politics. What can you say except that watching it is not for the faint of heart.

            #1.74 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:43 AM EST

            You attack Gingrich for being twice divorced and for marrying the woman he had an affair with. A fact that he freely acknowledges and apologizes for. An action that took place close to a decade and a half ago. Yet you call HIM a hypocrite. You attack him for recieving an official reprimand but fail to acknowledge that the charges againts him were PROVEN false in the 3 years following. You talk down to anyone with an alternate opinion thus proving you have the intelectual prowess of a gnat. You as a community collapse alternate opinions, belittle anyone who disagrees with you, and in general simply make fools of yourself at every given opportunity. And you wonder why there is so much animosity towards you from the right.

            Try applying the same brush to Obama that you do to Republicans and maybe you'll be taken seriously. Obama has driven the national debt almost 4 trillion dollars in his time in office. He involved us in a war in Lybia and refused to get Congressional approval on the basis that "there are no troops on the ground so we are simply there in support of our NATO allies". Nevermind the bombs we were dropping on liveing people, he says it's not a war so we'll just support him while he betrays the Constitution. The main reason for the housing crisis was the Democrat's Community Reinvestment Act but all the blame goes to Bush for no other reason than you are partisan shills. Did Bush's idiotic policies hasten the fall, no doubt, but it was the mandatory lending to people who could not afford it or who could afford it but had bad spending habits that ultimatly caused the collapse.

            Perhaps it's time that you endorsed a plan to teach all of our children civics and economics so that they can raise themselves up from the Hell that the Democratic establishment has foisted on them in an attempt to "level the playing field". Perhaps it's time you understood some basics of human nature. People rise to the level of expectation you place on them. Stop telling minorities that it's ok to drop out of school and to destroy their communities because the Republican boogyman hates them and start seeing PEOPLE when you look at them. People with just as much potential and inteligence as any of you liberal white elitists. People who can and will be a constructive part of the solution as soon as you stop lying to them to keep them holed up in fear away from your communities.

            Of course you want them to live on welfare in the inner city because then you don't have to fear they will take your job, date your daughter or get a bigger house than you. It's not enough you have to keep up with the Jonses, the Republicans expect you to keep up with the Martinezs, the Chans, and the M'butus too. And you just want to keep them where they belong, in the inner city on welfare and looking to you for the scraps you don't want anymore. God forbid you tell them that an education is the only way to get a real life for themselves. God forbid you look a little black child in the face and tell them they can aspire to be a Doctor without shame of being called an Uncle Tom or an Oreo. God forbid you take a stand against the perception that literacy and hard work are white traits as opposed to HUMAN traits. God forbid you actually want an integrated and functioning society where the only thing that matters is the content of your character. because if people were really judged by the content of their character most of you wouldn't get a single person to pay attention to you.

            I'm sure that you will collapse this because it effectivly points out how racist and ignorant the Democratic Party is but you'll only be proving my point. You are fear mongers who prey on the weak in order to create a nice segregated society where you have no real fear that your beautiful aryan daughter will pump out a few mixed race kids with the Black man she loves who replaced you at the law office and outbid you on that house you wanted. I however live for the day that is everybodies reality. Integration and a return to American Exceptionalism. I long for a Republican America, the Base's America, an America where the sole defining characteristic of a person is how hard they are willing to work at excelling and achieving their goals. An America where the Government isn't always trying to rejigger the economy to keep the rich rich and the poor poor. An America where our kids can play together in peace because the Government isn't in the business of race-baiting in orderto divert attention from it's own inadequacies. So go ahead and collapse this thread. I'll still be right and you'll still be a racist elitist who hides thier hate for everyone who is not like you behind a veneer of compassionite paternalism.

            • 1 vote
            #1.75 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:09 AM EST

            EMT

            I really don't have time to answer this, maybe someone else will explain to you how Bush hid the charges for his wars so that Obama took the financial hit.

            Maybe someone will explain to you how the debt began it's climb due to Reagan and his Voodoo Economics.

            What gets me is your comment:

            You as a community collapse alternate opinions, belittle anyone who disagrees with you, and in general simply make fools of yourself at every given opportunity.

            Previous to your comment I only see 2 comments that were collapsed. A comment that ended with "Obama/Biden 2012" was collapsed and a comment obviously used to inflame was collapsed. The only other comment collapsed on this page has nothing of value to bring just some profanity.

            I'm not going through the entire topic but I think you overstepped your bounds on that one.

            You attack Gingrich for being twice divorced and for marrying the woman he had an affair with. A fact that he freely acknowledges and apologizes for. An action that took place close to a decade and a half ago. Yet you call HIM a hypocrite.

            It is a pattern of behavior.

            At 19 he married his High School teacher. Began an affair (maybe more?) with a younger (9yr) woman. When wife #1 was in the hospital recovering from cancer surgery he visited her with a divorce discussion. Nice guy. There are also reports on him being a deadbeat dad.

            Then he married his mistress and began an affair (more?) with an even younger Callista, all while he was going after Bill Clinton for his affair......Do you maybe see a little hypocrisy there?

            He divorced his second wife when she was Diagnosed with MS.......Do you see a pattern here?

            I am not a Democrat nor a Republican. I am conservative on many things, liberal on others.

            Newt is a sleaze bag and I would like to think this nation can do better.

            Is this reallllly the best the GOP can do?

            • 3 votes
            #1.76 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:40 AM EST

            Wow! If I didn't already have a Steamer Trunk-load of reasons (aka: baggage) for not voting for Newt Gingrich, Cain's endorsement alone would be enough! When rats begin swimming TOWARD a sinking ship, it is further evidence that there are no alternatives for them but to swim-in-circles until they eventually sink. Which doesn't bode too well for all the other rats, come November!

            ;-)

            • 1 vote
            #1.77 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:48 PM EST
            Reply

            Oh, what a joke Cain made himself to be. Gingrich and Romney are both bought and paid for, both are in this race for themselves ONLY. There's only one man of principle running for president and Gingrich is absolutely NOT it.

            I don't even have to say his name. Everyone already knows who alone in this race has proven integrity.

            • 16 votes
            #2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:00 AM EST

            There's only one man of principle running for president and Gingrich is absolutely NOT it. I don't even have to say his name.

            Sorry, Huntsman dropped out.

            • 30 votes
            #2.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:10 AM EST

            Romney has every bit as much integrity as Ron Paul. He is faithful to his country, he is faithful to his church and he is faithful to his wife. He is also the most generous by far of any presidential candidate. Thats based on percentages, not actual dollars, which is even more impressive.

            • 10 votes
            #2.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:12 AM EST

            No need for the Democrats to try to discredit the Republican candidates this time around.

            They're doing well enough with the friendly fire and self-inflicted wounds.

            • 40 votes
            #2.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:15 AM EST

            Romney has every bit as much integrity as Ron Paul.

            Yep, and they are both for the HUGE corporations, screw the little guy.

            • 26 votes
            #2.4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:22 AM EST

            RHINO40 - Mitt Romney is arrogant, aloof, transparently phony (as in open-neck dress shirts and denim pants), ad nauseum.

            There is not, and has not been, a credible GOPer in the primaries.

            • 22 votes
            #2.5 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:28 AM EST

            Obama? hahhahahaaaaaaa

            • 6 votes
            #2.6 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:32 AM EST

            Mitt Romney has my vote, but besides that I'd take Rick Santorum over Gingrich any day. Anybody but Newt, PLEASE!!! Even Ron Paul is better than Newt (but still a little out in left field).

            • 5 votes
            #2.7 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:55 AM EST

            I agree with this statement. I can vote for any of the GOP, except Newt. Since I can't bring myself to vote for Obama, I probably will not vote if Newton somehow manages to win the nomination.

            • 2 votes
            #2.8 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:21 AM EST

            Yea Obama 2012

            • 21 votes
            #2.9 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:30 AM EST

            ABOTT AND COSTELLO the entire bunch is so out of touch....its mind boggling...I Pray this election is not rigged like when Bush stole his election and we're still paying 4 it....not only are they Racist they are Stinking SLOBS

            • 12 votes
            #2.10 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:42 AM EST

            Wow! Look what we will have for Secretary of Defense if Newt wins. These two really deserve to build a colony in the moon...There is not enough room in this earth that can sustain their inflated egos!

            • 6 votes
            #2.11 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:02 AM EST

            Sorry, but ONLY the candidate you're calling "out in left field" has solutions that will fix our current problems and the guts to get them implemented. The rest are more of the same old crap we've seen since the mid 1950's. A slow deterioration of quality of life for the average citizen.

            Here's a thought. Vote for the honest man who really is doing his sincere best to help us all.

            • 1 vote
            #2.12 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:12 AM EST

            Khurley, your thought, "Vote for the honest man who really is doing his sincere best to help us all." This is most certainly what we all want (I assume since we are talking about Republican candidates that is also what you are talking about) -- if only that person would step forward and convince us of this wonderful attribute he/she would be elected in a heartbeat.

            Do you have a specific person in mind?

              #2.13 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:17 AM EST

              Khurley

              Sorry, but ONLY the candidate you're calling "out in left field" has solutions that will fix our current problems and the guts to get them implemented. The rest are more of the same old crap we've seen since the mid 1950's. A slow deterioration of quality of life for the average citizen.

              Ron Paul is not in Left field; he beat Newt to the Moon. He is Waaaaayyyyyyy out there.

              His solutions will destroy this nation. Not a slow deterioration, a quick and rapid death for the average citizen.

              Monopolies destroyed free trade and squashed competition.

              Our government passed anti trust legislation to put an end to those monopolies. Paul would like to put an end to the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Act of 1914. He wants to bring back monopolies.

              From page 13 of his book;

              Freedom Under Siege
              The U.S. Constitution After 200 Years
              by Ron Paul

              WRITTEN by Ron Paul, not a ghost writer:

              During the twentieth century, America has gone through a transition that has radically changed the political system established by the Founding Fathers. Although many seeds of statism were sown in the nineteenth century, they have matured in the twentieth century.
              The trends in legislation in this century are clearly anti-free-market, starting with the Sherman Antitrust Act passed in 1890 to the strong federal control over trade with the Clayton Act of 1914. With the establishment of the FTC to current-day regulations, this century has certainly witnessed a loss of confidence in a truly free market. Even the term "laissez faire" is universally shunned by all politicians who fear that in championing capitalism, support will be lost.

              As a side note Paul thinks it is perfectly OK for Cain to demand sexual favors from women he employs. Paul doesn't think people should have the right to sue for sexual harassment. In fact Paul says the employer should have the right to fire you for any reason INCLUDING if you won't put out.

              From page 25 of his book:

              Employee rights are said to be valid when employers pressure employees into sexual activity. Why don't they quit once the so-called harassment starts? Obviously the morals of the harasser cannot be defended, but how can the harassee escape some responsibility for the problem? Seeking protection under civil rights legislation is hardly acceptable. If force was clearly used, that is another story, but pressure and submission is hardly an example of a violation of one's employment rights.

              The concept of equal pay for equal work is not only an impossible task, it can only be accomplished with the total rejection of the idea of the voluntary contract. By what right does the government assume the power to tell an airline it must hire unattractive women if it does not want to? The idea that a businessman must hire anyone and is prevented from firing anyone for any reason he chooses and in the name of rights is a clear indication that the basic concept of a free society has been lost.

              Paul isn't for individual rights he is for Corporate rights - BIG CORPORATIONS.

              With Paul the average man gets screwed - Literally.

              Just a bunch of peas in a pod.

              • 6 votes
              #2.15 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:26 AM EST

              This clownshow of candidates for the GOP makes sense to me, in a twisted sort of way. With all the baggage of the GOP, tanking the economy, wars started with lies not even being put on the books, insisting on tax cuts for the rich in the middle of a recession even though their rates are already at historical lows, all the while wanting to gut safety nets for the millions who need them more than ever, making Mr. Obama a one term president as the single most important item on the agenda with all the problems we face (and therefore tanking the country for the last three years on purpose to make him look bad), blatant racist comments from the right, taking a pledge with a lobbyist while ignoring the pledge to the American people they took when accepting a job of Congressman, the list goes on and on. What's the answer? Put a bunch of idiots and a$$holes with baggage on the ticket and keep the public talking about their personal failings instead of why no one should EVER vote GOP again. The only innovative and smart idea the GOP has come up with in years. Now you know why sheep like Kornfed think like they do.

              • 3 votes
              #2.16 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:59 AM EST

              Eric

              One of the few that understands and views GOP clearly.

              Emil

                #2.17 - Thu Feb 2, 2012 3:04 PM EST

                Joregon and eric...outstanding posts!

                  #2.18 - Fri Feb 3, 2012 8:32 AM EST
                  Reply

                  One guy who can't keep it zipped endorsing another with the same issue. OK then!

                  Actually, the guy who deserves real credit for smarts is President Obama. Turning the DOJ loose on Wall Street during the election year is bound to hurt Romney. His finances are going to be scrutinized with a microscope. He's afraid to release his taxes because he knows he's in trouble. Funny that he closed an account in the very Swiss bank that handed over names to the IRS for tax evasion, and that he closed it not long after that went public.

                  He's already having to amend his disclosure forms. Is he going to fire the guys running his finances for screwing up the disclosure info????

                  I can see the GOP going up in smoke this year. They are backing the wrong horse. What's worse, they have no one better.

                  • 30 votes
                  Reply#3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:04 AM EST

                  Silly zealot. When the "leftist, liberal, marxist, democrat moralphobes" start telling you who you should marry, sleep with, what god to worship, and how "family values" should be defined, you'll have a point. You really don't want to get into a contest listing hypocritical, right wing, religious family values GOPers, do ya? Do you want to list just the adulterers, or should be also include the homophobes caught with their pants down with men? And a sub-list of the GOPhers with hookers? And, BTW, Clinton and Edwards were there first? Now that's funny!

                  • 10 votes
                  #3.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:22 AM EST

                  Obama hurting Wall Streethurts the US economy and jobs. All this talk about the. If bad corporations and banks...just who do you think drives our economy? The Occupy whiners? What do they contribute? Now Obama wants to raise taxes on capital gains...that will hurt investment, which we desperately need. Mitt has the experience with Romneycare to know what works and what doesn't. Just wait till the rest of Obamacare comes through. When you find yourself on Medicaid sitting in a clinic, it will be too late.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:33 AM EST

                  The post at 3.1 demonstrates what is wrong with the fringe right wing. Even if you want to discount that poor soul using words that he/she doesn't understand, you are left with cognitive dissonance. It doesn't matter who does the cheating, the fact that the cheating was done tells you all you need to know about the candidate from EITHER party.

                  The truth of the matter is that the Republican Party did not care if Clinton was having an affair, they were determined to impeach him. Did he lie...sure? So riddle me this...how does Newtie or Cain have an affair without lying? You are lying to your wife, your children and your God.

                  As to living a Godly lifestyle...Jesus was a liberal. Actually, the man who wrote the Pledge of Allegiance, Frances Bellamy, gave a sermon on how Jesus was a Socialist. He was a Baptist minister who was a Christian Socialist. So every time you say the Pledge, Hagerstown, you are saying a Socialist Pledge. Isn't irony great?

                  Jesus' ministry was about taking care of the least among us. Not enriching ourselves, particularly at the expense of the poor. It was the money lenders Jesus ran out of the temple, not the homeless.

                  Trust me, He would not join the Republican Party.

                  • 17 votes
                  #3.4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:46 AM EST

                  Newday,

                  I agree, and comment 3.2 represents the same thing on the liberal side.

                  What they all fail to realize is that it is about service, not being served. One of these days they might get a clue...

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.5 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:34 AM EST

                  ..service and not being served.... I like that Egilman.

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.6 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:51 AM EST

                  Hey Jennifer,

                  The government bailed out Wall Street to the tune of billions of dollars, and now they are back paying themselves huge bonuses. So, where are the jobs? Get a clue.

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.7 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:55 AM EST

                  Aha, the re-reg rears his head yet again. Hagerstown14 aka Johny Bee . Reread the user agreement and COH Johny Bee . Don't register multiple accounts. See you on the ban list, real soon. ;-)

                  Johny Bee -- suspended for a week #16.1 - Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:31 PM PST¹Ïº

                  http://johnybe.newsvine.com/_more/users/comments?year=2012&month=1&filterBy=a

                  http://hagerstown14.newsvine.com/_more/users/comments

                  • 3 votes
                  #3.8 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:18 AM EST

                  The GOP doesn't have any horses to back. They only have the back ends of horses.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.9 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:39 AM EST

                  newdayDAWNING...RETURNED

                  The post at 3.1 demonstrates what is wrong with the fringe right wing. Even if you want to discount that poor soul using words that he/she doesn't understand, you are left with cognitive dissonance.

                  How do you know that the poster doesn't understand those words?

                  Are you expecting someone to carefully list the specific differences of each one when the modern day application of these by political leftists is more like a hodge-podge of them all?

                  Nope, I think it is clear what the meaning was, and you know it too.

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.10 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:31 PM EST

                  Easy peasy, timey: No one who watches Barack Obama's Presidency applies any term to him other than "centrist, slightly to the left." He is no radical, and only the very disingenuous partisan would say that he is.

                  Got it, because I can't make it much simpler.

                  • 6 votes
                  #3.11 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:25 PM EST
                  Reply

                  "I endorse him for the simple reason he asked for an open marriage. I wasn't normal enough to do that and had to limit myself to hanky-panky business." - the real quote the media forgot to report

                  • 12 votes
                  Reply#4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:04 AM EST

                  And this would be an asset to Gingrich, how???

                  • 12 votes
                  Reply#5 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:04 AM EST

                  An endorsement from Hermain Cain is the kiss of death!

                  • 3 votes
                  #5.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:58 AM EST
                  Reply

                  Go Gingrigh!!!!!!!! Turn the Republican party on their heads!!!!!!!! I can't wait to hear your..........Congradulation speech................To Pres. Obama, as he wins his second term!!!!

                  • 33 votes
                  Reply#6 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:05 AM EST

                  Obama probably used his campaign funds to pay Gingrich to stay in the race.

                  (No, I don't have proof, but it just fits somehow.....)

                  • 8 votes
                  #6.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:58 AM EST

                  Read this with Herman Cains Voice in your head........"I don't have facts to back this up, But......."

                  Yes, the Obama Admin is funding the Rep. Primaries!!!! I mean, Really, how else would you explain the fact that EVERY REPUBLICAN says that Obama is the absolute worst Pres. in history, but, they couldn't come up with any real Republican to oppose him! Obama is the worst, but Romney and Gingrich is that best they can do?????? Obama is so bad that anyone can beat him?????? Obama will be a one term Pres.???????? Perry was to be the savior, Daniels was to be the savior, Bush was to be the savior!! Christie was the savior!!! Oh wait, All those guys said NO to run against him. That means that they don't care how bad Obama is, they have better things to do. REALLY?????? If you think he is soooooo bad, wouldn't you put everything aside and run against him?? Wouldn't you???? So, If you don't run against Obama, you must not be a real American to save this country from " the first black American president".

                  • 1 vote
                  #6.2 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:40 AM EST
                  Reply

                  Florida wants an adult for president, and no one has a better record of adultery than Newt Gingrich! Unless it's Herman Cain of course.

                  • 25 votes
                  Reply#7 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:08 AM EST

                  Well, they already screwed around on their wives, it only makes sense they would help each other try to screw the American people.

                  • 30 votes
                  Reply#8 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:09 AM EST

                  What he said:

                  "I know that he is going through this sausage grinder because he cares about the future of the United States of America."

                  The truth:

                  "I know that he is going through this sausage grinder because he cares about the future of Newt Gingrich."

                  • 15 votes
                  Reply#9 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:15 AM EST

                  He had to get something in there about grinding his sausage. At least they have that in common.

                  • 19 votes
                  #9.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:23 AM EST

                  lol....and you were right"birds of a feather" I hope Gingrich gets the nom. They are closing ranks against Romney and doing the Dems a big favor. Obama can beat them all, but gingrich will lose in a huge landslide. It would cost a lot more to have romney as the candidate. He'd be harder to beat but Obama would still beat him. That is a foregone conclusion.

                  • 12 votes
                  #9.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:17 AM EST

                  Newt to Herman...

                  I get embarassed when I'm hanging with my friends.
                  They like to razz me, I don't know why.
                  They get me a Happy Meal and super-size my fry.
                  And there's nothing I can do,
                  I only got a 3 inch tool.

                  Herman's response....

                  And when I'm comming outta the pool,
                  I only got a 1 inch tool.

                    #9.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:49 AM EST

                    With these two guys, I doubt there's much sausage to grind.

                    • 1 vote
                    #9.4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:56 AM EST

                    I wonder how much Newt paid him............

                      #9.5 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:46 AM EST
                      Reply

                      Dear MSNBC, Your spam detector mistakes me for someone who gives a @!$%#.

                      • 6 votes
                      Reply#10 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:16 AM EST

                      Hell yeah! Go Newt!!!! Show Obama and these Liberals @!$%#heads how its done!!

                      • 6 votes
                      Reply#11 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:20 AM EST

                      Tom193 - are you really serious with this comment, or are you simply baiting? I hope it's the latter, or our country is worse off than I thought.

                      Newt Gingrich is a vile, depraved, self-absorbed, disgusting person who was driven in shame from D.C. - and his Party - by his own Party!

                      Supporters of Mr. Gingrich either 1) have no morals, or 2) have very short memories!

                      • 18 votes
                      #11.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:35 AM EST

                      Actually, when you think about it, maybe Cain and Newt have already swapped wives.

                      • 9 votes
                      #11.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:25 AM EST
                      Comment author avatarTom193Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                      @saft- Oh, and this president is any better? You people look at morals and all this crap that doesnt even matter in a presidency. We voted in some monkey who thinks we should redistrivute peoples money so they can sit on their lazy asses and collect welfare but i have no morals?! go screw yourself you @!$%#!! You dont know the real Newt! And whatever Newts done is nothing compared to the idiot we got now!!

                      @dp- wow...just, wow....

                      • 4 votes
                      #11.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:35 AM EST

                      Amazing how many people accuse the president of redistribution, who themselves have nothing to redistribute, or the intellect to understand what the phrase means and how the true meaning completely eliminates the possibility that any American could possibly be redistributing. At least a few can spell the word correctly.

                      • 5 votes
                      #11.4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:03 AM EST

                      We voted in some monkey who thinks we should redistrivute peoples money

                      What does "redistrivute" mean?

                      Tom193 - The tax code hasn't changed under the Obama presidency, or had you not noticed?

                      People do not know the "the real Newt"? That is hilarious. We do know he is a man who was censured for ethic violations by a Republican House of Representatives. We know that while squawking about the evil of Democratic ties to Freddie Mac, he himself received hundreds of thousands of dollars a year as... "an historian", never a lobbyist.
                      We know this gigantic intellect never managed to get his name of the ballot for the Republican Primary Election in Virginia.

                      I think we do know Newt. We just are not impressed.

                      • 5 votes
                      #11.5 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:28 AM EST

                      Yes Tom, your morals are in question and so is your memory...

                      See you in November

                      • 2 votes
                      #11.6 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:19 AM EST

                      So what? he was still never a lobbyist you idiot. And go and see how much Obama has catered to EPA lobbyists! Yeah thats right, the EPA bitches....Global warming, ha! what a joke...

                        #11.7 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:49 AM EST
                        Reply

                        Heaven Help Us! I thought Mr. Cain went away. Apparently, he is such a hooker for for publicity - his ego is so huge - he needed to partner with Mr. Gingrich.

                        Birds of a Feather DO Flock Together: One c**k hound to another!

                        • 15 votes
                        Reply#12 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:23 AM EST

                        herman jump om stage, and calista could not jump back far enough, no hugs all around, they had a surrogate hugger on the stage, i just laugh so hard when i seen that, hermain can be his endorser, but dont get to close to my trophy wife, priceless.

                          #12.1 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:54 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Maybe Newt will ask Herman to be his running mate . . . Gingrich-Cain for Prez. Give me a break! I am not surprised that the questionable adulterer Cain would support the known adulterer Gingrich. They can protecte each others' back. Sad day for America if Gingrich gets the nomination.

                          • 10 votes
                          Reply#13 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:25 AM EST

                          Gingrich-Cain on the Ticket? What a wonderful early Christmas gift that would be for the country!

                          • 7 votes
                          #13.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:31 AM EST

                          gritch will use him, but never run with him.The anti black sentiment today is an albatross around any candidate's neck.All gopers are highly aware of this liability.

                          • 2 votes
                          #13.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:52 AM EST
                          Reply

                          adulterers unite!

                          • 9 votes
                          Reply#14 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:25 AM EST

                          Another use for AA..................Adulterers Anonymous

                            #14.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:40 AM EST
                            Reply

                            Well this should about seal Newt "I am not a Salamander" Gingrich's bid. Silly Sarah and Pimp Herman both on his side. Who's next? Homie the Clown?

                            • 7 votes
                            Reply#15 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:27 AM EST

                            Don't forget the Perry endorsement.

                            • 4 votes
                            #15.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:28 AM EST

                            Your right we cannot leave out Mr Propeller Beanie, HEY!

                            We can strap him to the front of the train so at least they have some forward momentum while they are looking for the racks,,, Sorry I meant tracks (I hate it when it does that!)

                            • 1 vote
                            #15.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:54 AM EST
                            Reply

                            Newt can't be happy about this, to start the cheating talk again.

                            • 5 votes
                            Reply#16 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:28 AM EST

                            Just one philanderer endorsing another philanderer, speaks volumes about Newt. If Newt wants to distance himself from that part of his past, he should denounce the endorsement.

                            • 3 votes
                            Reply#17 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:28 AM EST

                            What a pair of grossly underqualified, egotistical, swingin' dicks!

                            • 13 votes
                            Reply#18 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:28 AM EST

                            Yeah they alt to go shove their sausages up each others ass and go Fu%k themselves, lol.

                              #18.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:15 AM EST
                              Reply

                              So a guy we had never heard of 4 months ago endorses a guy we hoped we had heard the last of when he left Congress in shame....

                              • 24 votes
                              Reply#19 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:32 AM EST

                              Now Newts really screwed. Romney is having a party.

                              • 7 votes
                              Reply#20 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:33 AM EST

                              Cain endorsing Newt is like Bill Clinton endorsing Anthony Wiener.

                              • 9 votes
                              Reply#21 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:38 AM EST

                              LOL. Excellent analogy!

                                #21.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:44 AM EST
                                Reply

                                So Palin and Cain, two major political posers, have endorsed the Newt. Excellent.

                                The longer Gingrich stays in the race, the more dirt he and Romney will dig up about eat other, convincing even more moderates and independents that neither is worthy of becoming POTUS.

                                • 13 votes
                                Reply#22 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:40 AM EST

                                HEELO EARTH TO SCIENCE..We already know that. On to 2016..Go Elizabeth Warren ir Hillary

                                • 5 votes
                                #22.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:36 AM EST

                                Kevin-747617

                                Not, not, not, not Hillarity . . . we know all about that clan, and she'll remain far far too devisive for any hope of party unity. Better she disappears at the end of Obama's first term and stays GONE along with Slick Willie, and they both take their delusions of entitlement with them.

                                • 2 votes
                                #22.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:49 AM EST

                                Herman Cain to Newt Gingrich - "Hey Newt... if that campaign thing doesn't work out.... I've got this idea for a Pizza Whore House in Nevada... You in???"

                                  #22.3 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:44 AM EST
                                  Reply

                                  Wow, you couldn't make this stuff up...one adulterer endorsing another. Hey, all you Gingrich supporters...what do you think? Will this turn the tide for for the moral vacuum? I know, I know, anybody is better than Obama, lol. You go repubilcans.. to the losers corner. Have fun justifying this one.

                                  • 18 votes
                                  Reply#23 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:41 AM EST

                                  Talk about a moral vacuum! This election is crazy enough. And if Newt does get elected not only will he be President, but the First Lady will be a woman who knowingly carried on an affair with a married man..whose wife was diagnosed with MS...after dumping his first wife.....

                                  • 7 votes
                                  #23.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:49 AM EST

                                  Ugh. President Newt, and his wife, the first vapid, grinning, homewrecking tramp. Yipes.

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #23.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:27 AM EST

                                  Republicans and the ?moral majority? and Newt/Cain and their affairs!!.................This is much much better than "Survivor" because you can't make this stuff up because they are going for a lot more that only 1 million............they want it all.

                                    #23.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:47 AM EST
                                    Reply

                                    Jesus, the dumbest "candidate" now endorses the lyingest. Ouch.

                                    • 11 votes
                                    Reply#24 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:41 AM EST

                                    Cain didn't endorse Obama!!

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #24.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:28 AM EST

                                    Oh cliff, that was pathetic. You haters are really a sad lot.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #24.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:03 AM EST
                                    Reply

                                    Gingrich/Cain....the adulterer ticket!

                                    Do you think the Evangelicals would consider voting for two adulterers in order to keep the Mormon out of the White House? I just have to wonder what it would take to make the Evangelicals vote for Romney...would it be an increase in the number of adulterers or larger sins?

                                    No disrespect intended...just curious.

                                    • 12 votes
                                    Reply#25 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:42 AM EST

                                    Yea, the Evangelicals are really between the rock and a hard spot. I wouldn't be surprised to see many of them decide to sit this one out, unless they can dig up a more "representative" candidate before the convention.

                                      #25.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:05 AM EST

                                      The Evangelicals are strange people...and you cant predict what they will do..they claim to follow Jesus the King of Peace but the ones I know fully endorse torture and never met a war they didnt like..

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #25.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:28 AM EST

                                      Evangelicals will vote for anyone who tells them what they want to hear. They don't think for themselves but rather like to be told what to think.

                                        #25.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:13 PM EST
                                        Reply
                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 16
                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.