NBC's Mark Murray and Domenico Montanaro discuss the list of potential Republicans Mitt Romney could pick as his running mate if he wins the GOP nomination.
Thanks to Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL and Bob-1887910 for their questions!
Video edited by NBC's Matt Loffman.
TRANSCRIPT:
MARK MURRAY: Welcome to the latest edition of Inside the Boiler Room, I’m joined by my esteemed colleague Domenico Montanaro. Domenico, we actually haven’t done this since Iowa and New Hampshire—
DOMENICO MONTANARO: I know—
MARK MURRAY: --the first Inside the Boiler Room in a while. And since then, Mitt Romney in a lot of respects looks like he is going to be the clear frontrunner in clenching the Republican nomination. And relating we have two questions one from Feisty Redhead Roselle and also from Bob and they pretty much ask about the same thing. Feisty asks, “Given the fact that it looks like Romney has the nomination sewn up, who do you think are the top contenders and what strengths would they bring to a Romney ticket?” and Bob asked essentially, “What actions would Romney take to make peace with the conservative wing on making a vice presidential pick?”
DOMENICO MONTANARO: Well, I guess you can combine them because you figure, well- maybe there is a way he could make a pick for VP that could help bring over some of those Tea Party supporters who might lack some on the enthusiasm that Romney would want and the obvious person that comes to mind, it is kind of a Sarah Palin pick that John McCain made, is Chris Christie, Chris Christie of New Jersey. You know he may be more socially moderate than the party likes which may be a reason that Romney doesn’t ultimately pick him but the energy, the enthusiasm, the ability to speak plainly. That is something that Romney lacks and has a hard time with, and Chris Christie would automatically give him a little bit of juice.
MARK MURRAY: I agree, and certainly if he and Christie have a very good rapport on the campaign trail, Christie has been campaigning for Romney in Iowa and New Hampshire, that could be a pick. I do think there is a very big top three. You have Christie, you have Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and Florida Senator Marco Rubio and I think that all three of those guys would end up giving Mitt Romney a little bit more juice with the Tea Party, a little more enthusiasm with the base.
DOMENICO MONTANARO: Yeah, they bring separate things. So Christie brings energy and enthusiasm with the base, Rubio- some people hope he will carry Florida because of being Hispanic, speaking Spanish, large growing block. And McDonnell is kind of the safe choice. You know, high approval rating, popular in the state, smart guy, socially conservative --but with a moderate tone. So those are the things they bring to the table. There are some dark horses we can quickly run through. Tim Pawlenty, he was the runner-up in 2008, he has done everything he can for Mitt Romney so he is someone who could be on that list. I doubt this next one but Jon Huntsman, some people have talked about—
MARK MURRAY: --No, you saw that tepid response. I doubt…
DOMENICO MONTANARO: I doubt that is going to happen. We haven’t mentioned a woman, so let’s mention one. Susana Martinez, in New Mexico, popular governor, Hispanic- that would be very diverse look for a ticket for a party that is criticized for being too white, too male. Brian Sandoval, Governor in Nevada, also popular Hispanic. Rob Portman, John Thune, maybe Nikki Haley, maybe Mitch Daniels but now we are going pretty far down the list—
MARK MURRAY: --I think we pretty much have the whole field. What is going to be fascinating is that if Romney essentially gets this nomination we could have a veepstakes that could last six, seven months. But it is important to note that a vice presidential pick has rarely gone on to decisively help someone in a presidential contest. The last time that a veep pick made an huge impact was 1960 with LBJ helped JFK win in Texas but often times more than not a vice presidential pick can actually hurt you rather than helping you.
DOMENICO MONTANARO: That’s right, that is why a safe pick is often the better pick.
MARK MURRAY: Thanks guys for the question!


What? Romney the winner? Long way to go. Romney has four whole delegates after NH. Media telling the libs who it's going to be. And these two guys are dripping from the ears they are so wet.
The main stream media has been calling the republican race for Romney since the very beginning. They won't let up because they know that Romney doesn't stand a chance against Obama. If Romney gets the nomination, the republicans should just give it up, eh?
Why do you think MSNBC is so hot on Romney? It's because they have already made their choice in the general election. They want Obama to continue his destructive path. Now I know what the liberals will say, they will say: What destruction? All you do Brianb is blame Obama and are a racist to boot.
I really don't care what hard core liberals think of me. I don't post to suit their needs. They have their agenda and it doesn't effect my opinion of Obama in the least. I've witnessed the destruction set forth in this nation through the last 3 years... Liberals think all is good because their wishes are being met. They have an anchor to continually complain about conservatives and republicans... and wow do they complain.
If Romney just announced a real rightie like Christie or Rubio as VP, then game would be over with clowns such as Blingrich, Paul, Santorum. I predit this strategy coming soon especially since slimey gooballs like Newt keep popping up their ugly fat pig heads...
brian-there is nothing destructive about steady job growth, and GNP increasingeach quarter.GM has regained Its position as the nbr One car company in the world .I believe Romneys solution was let them go bankrupt. Conservatives did not support the american revolution nor did they support western expansion. if it was up to conservatives we would still be british subjects. The fereralist papers written by Hamilton and Adams were such a diaster they asked a liberal to re-write the constitution . THe conservatives were afraid to upset the british (THE job creators ) Thank G-d for liberals like Jefferson,madison,monroe, Sam Adams ( the real tea party ) patrick Henry, Jackson, Polk (the conservatives tried to impeach him for seizing California ) Learn your History, this country has a strong history of liberal politics that made this country what is today. Obama continues this great tradition. What is destructive are the lies the right says to achieve their destructive Agenda. We do not have to look back to far to see this, just look at the Last president who without doubt ranks as one of the most destrutive Presidents ever
Talkto the Hand: relax! Take a breath...No one is MANDATING Romney...you'd just have to be woefully naive to believe he isn't so far out ahead in fundraising and organization that the rest of the field, dividing up the far right vote, could eventually win in states with anything but far right constituencies.
gsiegel, great post. Theodore Roosevelt and his cousin Franklin Roosevelt (both 1%ers by the way) were also liberals who ended child labor and who helped end the Great Depression making sure everyone got a new deal. Most of the government programs of the New Deal era became privately owned companies that still put thousands of people to work.
So Brian, if the media (let us say FOX) were to only praise the other candidates and not report anything about the FRONT RUNNER that would be okay? Just as long as they cover your guy with all the love and kisses the media is fair but dare they say anything against your candidate and wellll that means they are somehow biased? Plllleeeeeaaaase give us a break. Two-year-olds are peevish in that way. Are you a two-year-old?
Romney is not and will not be the nominee.
Today he is not even the frontrunner except in the minds of liberals, especially those that believe Obama can not be beat.
Whoever the nominee is will force questions about Obama to be answered. It will not be McCain Two. He will have to defend his record starting with the time he said Republicans have to sit in the back of the bus.
Mark, Domenico: I don't know that I'd agree with your reasoning about Christie's inside track here...New Jersey?? How does that help with suspicions that the NE moderate Romney is out of touch with the Southern base particularly? Or is your argument that the strength of the tea mix counts more than geography these days?
Old fat guy: anyone can understand your dilemna...THIS is your nominee? I'll bet $10,000.00 though that your going to have to live with this one until he's another footnote in history...
Hand,
No reason to be insulting to our hosts. And it is just speculation (which is fun to do). Relax.
WOOT!
Thanks guys for answering my question!
Interesting you mentioned Susan Martinez - she was totally off my radar!
Come to think of it... so was Sarah Palin! lol
PS: Grimey - I'm gaining on ya! ☺
Congrats on having your question selected, Feisty (even if you have to share the credit with bob).
Looks to me like Mark & Domenico still see Mitt as the front runner, even after this past week. I don't see Christie as conservative enough to be picked.
Thanks Steeler Fan!
Speaking of bob lots of #'s - where is the little guy today?
Hope he didn't 'bitch' himself to death last night! ☺
He sure was on a 'roll' with his MSNBC bashing...
We taped that Inside the Boiler segment earlier this week -- before the latest round of Newt-mentum. Even if Romney loses SC, I think it's a safe bet he's going to be the nominee. But stranger things have happened -- just look at yesterday!!!
@Mark ... When was the last time two Governors were on the same ticket? My Canadian brain is hitting a wall on this.
Thanks for answering Feisty's question, and mine.
Good analysis. The only prominent name that is seemingly on the radar not mentioned was Condy Rice.....
And good point, even though Sarah Palin dominated the headlines, usually the VP pick is not such a huge deal
Mark---yesterday has to have been one of the most crazy days of your career---topped off by the debate.
Thanks for keeping us all up-to-date on the goings on!
Feisty, thanks for asking about my doings last night.
It gives me the opportunity to brag that I won my sports club racquetball Touranment last night, Intermediate Division!
Long time playoff contender, but never won the finals before.
Good omen that the Patriots will win Sunday!
From what I could find it was Thomas Dewey (47th Governor of New York) and Earl Warren (30th Governor of California) in 1948 against Truman
Greg in NY ... thanks!
Feisty...Still got a long way to go to catch up!! ;-)
And besides, I had a really, really super good question this week, that they surely would have picked...but I decided to throw you a bone and let you have this one!! ;-)
And sorry Bob...but GO RAVENS!!!!!
Congrats to you both on getting a good question selected!
@Bob - Congrats on your win & sharing the winning question 'ticket' with me! ;o)
@Grimey - Always the gentlemen aren't you? ;op
GO NINERS!
Congrats, Bob, on your victory. This is a difficult choice for me, but I'll be rooting for your Patriots on Sunday.
Feisty---we have to part company here---since my husband grew up in NYC I'm rooting for the Giants!
Condy Rice has totally dropped off the political radar, as far as I'm aware. I wouldn't think she'd be a top pick for VP.
The VP pick can be a huge deal...depending on how huge the person is (Christie) or how unqualified (Palin). We need to have a healthy, qualified, vetted person in that position.
Another reason why it matters a great deal who the person is who is chosen to be a VP running mate:
Biden is the 47th Vice President of the United States. Of the 45 previous Vice Presidents, nine have succeeded to the Presidency. That means the historical odds for the VP to assume the responsibilities of the President are nearly 20%.
It is truly a position that is too important to ignore.
Bob
Congrats as well on your tournament win. I will have to adjust my mental image of you, I hadn't pictured you as that fit :)
Thank you. I lost 50 pounds a few years ago, so your previous image was until recently, correct !
Feisty and Bob-numbers, congratulations on getting your question picked, and I look forward to the transcript so I can learn what the answer is!
It's so funny, does it seem like Democrats are following this circus more closely than Republicans? My Republican co-worker just shrugged her shoulders when I asked who she wanted to be her nominee.
Amy,
I think it's more a case of the GNOP having commitment issues... ;o)
I know I would, if these were the candidates I had to chose from. lol
Thanks Amy.
The answer is "Bob McDonnell " !!
Bob,
Everyone knows that … he has been running everywhere saying “pick me, pick me” because he is term limited and needs a job soon.
If he is so high on the list then why isn’t he, once again, giving the Republican response to the SOTU Address? Didn’t he do a good job last time?
BTW who will be giving the Tea Party response ???
Nobody But Obama !!
NBO
Herman Cain
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/205237-herman-cain-to-deliver-tea-party-state-of-the-union-response
Sad news to report for music fans. Etta James has died. I loved her style, she will be missed.
Absolutely phine. I especially loved her "At Last" hit!
Watching President and Mrs. Obama dance to that song during the inaugural balls was enchanting!
I second that Phinephancy--- I saw her twice in concert, what a voice!
Good one Fiesty!
It will not be Rubio or Cristie. It will be though a Governor from the South or Southwest. GOP Governors from the North are not very popular of late. McDonnel or Martinez are the strongest in my view.
ideologyspoilstheview, I agree with you. What is the point of having two politicians from the northeast for a national campaign? It doesn't make sense for Romney to pick Christie.
Pat, I asked this question above- When was the last time two Governors were on the same ticket? Do you know the answer?
I find it interesting that with the exception of Rubio, who's barely been in the Senate a full year, all the possible names Mark and Domenico mentioned are either current or former governors. Just wondering:
a) With Romney being a former governor himself, where's the foreign policy experience on any of these potential tickets? (sorry, but the Cayman Islands don't count)
b) What does this say about the current House and Senate Republicans that none of them seem to be in the running? - and -
c) After the Palin debacle, you'd think going with a "safe" pick this time would be the obvious strategy, so McDonnell would seem to be the front-runner - Virginia's a key state, and it would lock up the "good hair" vote. But does the party that's so often accused of being pale, male and stale really want to double down on that?
Like I said, just wondrin'.......
Edit - Ideology, looks like we crossed in the mail - but at least great minds think alike!
"What does this say about the current House and Senate Republicans that none of them seem to be in the running"
Marco Rubio is a Senate Republican, is he not?
Rubio's political mentor is Jeb Bush. Jeb has advised Rubio, as of this time, not to accept a VP spot.
In the first sentence
Name some others...
Okay, I'm back - looks like the last time two governors were a ticket at all was the infamous "Dewey Defeats Truman!" election when Thomas Dewey (New York) and Earl Warren (California) lost to Harry Truman (newspaper headlines notwithstanding) in 1948. Last time it was a winning ticket looks to be Woodrow Wilson (New Jersey) and Thomas Marshall (Indiana) in 1912. Hey, in researching this, the 1948 convention sounds like it was a lot of fun:
"The 1948 Republican National Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It was the first
presidential convention to be shown on national television. As the convention opened Dewey was
believed to have a large lead in the delegate count. His major opponents – Taft, Stassen, and Senator Vandenberg – met in Taft's hotel suite to plan a "stop-Dewey" movement. However, a key obstacle soon developed when the three men refused to unite behind a single candidate to oppose Dewey. Instead, all three men simply agreed to try to hold their own delegates in the hopes of preventing Dewey from obtaining a majority. This proved to be futile, as Dewey's efficient campaign team methodically gathered the remaining delegates they needed to win the nomination. After the second round of balloting, Dewey was only 33 votes short of victory. Taft then called Stassen and urged him to withdraw from the race and endorse him as Dewey's main opponent. When Stassen refused, Taft wrote a concession speech and had it read at the start of the third ballot; Dewey was then nominated by acclamation. Dewey then chose popular Governor Earl Warren (and future Chief Justice) of California as his running mate."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1948
Anyone else see any "deja vu all over again" in there?
P.S. - Thanks, Greg - beat me to it!
While Rubio is liked, he doesn't have the moxie, or the experience to fill the VP slot. He is well aware of this and since he's young, he knows he has time. He has said he won't accept the nomination so I don't know why his name is always brought up. Who would make an excellent VP is Allen West.
"In the first sentence
Name some others..."
John Thune.....Paul Ryan.... Kelly Ayotte...Rob Portman....
Give up yet? there are plenty of rising stars in the GOP
Surprised nobody is suggesting Senator Jim DeMint to be the VP for Romney. He isn't endorsing anyone in 2012, but he did endorse Romney in 2008.
Just a little common sense to throw into the mix. Think. What is it that the choice of the VP candidate brings to the table? Support from a part of the country the presidential candidate is lacking is one, and two, to be an "attack dog" for the ticket. Using that, now think of some names.
In the case of Christie, it's not what he brings to the table that is of issue...
If he wants a future in national politics, it's about what food he leaves on the table.
Do we know what the Mormon Church's position on women in leadership roles is? Some of Michele Bachmann's aides claimed certain evangelical pastors questioned the godliness of having a woman in that role. That could rule out Nikki Haley or Susan Martinez, if the Mormon Church isn't down with a female head-of-state.
Amy, what a flat out bigoted ignorant comment. C'mon, get out of the gutter.
Yes, Bob, Amy showing her usual hate and ignorance. You forgot though she has a partner right above n kaybeetoys. If you two want anybody to take you seriously, then talk about issues instead of throwing around vicious, vile remarks.
Of course, if you want to talk about a candidate's church, shall we discuss Obama's attendance at Trinity and his close association with the hate-filled Rev Wright?
shall we discuss Obama's attendance at Trinity
I thought we already had, ad nauseum? You mean, it's not OK to ask if Mitt Romney, who is a bishop in the Church of the Latter Day Saints, a position only men can hold, might have a problem choosing a female for Vice President?
Just curious, Why is it considered bigotry to point out the prejudices of a religion?
Would I be a bigot to point out that women are largely treated unequally in the Islamic world? Or that blacks (until 1978) and women (currently) can't be leaders of a congregation in the Mormon faith? I'd say those are facts rather than bigotry on my part.
People should be treated as equals, but ideas are not equal and religion is an idea.
I pay attention to facts, dirt, and I do my best to base my opinions on careful consideration of all sides of an issue.
The religious affiliation of a candidate is completely unimportant to me personally.
I do, however, take issue with both Gingrich for using phony religiosity as a political tool and with those who are suckered into his hypocrisy. Who is making religion a big issue in this contest? It's religious conservatives.
Which vicious, vile remarks are you referring to?
Christie will work for donuts !
Krispy Kreme or Dunkin?
YES !
A bit off topic but I am wondering if there is any talk about President Obama choosing a different running mate? VP Biden comes from a small state--if the election is close, would a VP running mate from a larger state be of more help to the President?
We are thinking " Hillary" but he is thinking JOE !
Most voters in PA, especially eastern PA, think of Joe as one of their own.
I have been really impressed with the job that VP Biden has done. I think he has become a valued counselor to the President and his political instincts are great, too. And Dr. Biden has been a great "Second Lady" with her work for military families.
Yeah, Joe Biden has been gaffe-tastic! the latest: he just said, when kowtowing and trolling for Millionaire campaign contributions in San fran , that he hoped the Giants win the Super Bowl...oops, he mixed up the team names...
But his best speeches are the ones that are truthful:
"When Barack Obama and I were literally sitting in a desk in a high rise in Chicago beginning to plan how we would try to get this economy out of a ditch, literally, the first guy I called was Jon Corzine. Not a joke. Not a joke. Because first of all, he's the smartest guy that I know in terms of the economy and on finance, I really mean this."
-Joe Biden
I particularly enjoyed Joe Biden telling a crowd in San Fran the other day that "the Giants are going to the Superbowl"
speaking of Biden, remember this??
"Responding to a question at a town hall-style meeting at Nashua Community College, Mr. Biden said, 'Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me.'
He added, “She’s qualified to be president. I mean that sincerely, she’s first rate.”
Ooopppsssss, Hillary got thrown under the Bus by the Dems when she was the ONLY Dem who could actually do the job of VP or President. Instead they chose Obummer and Dumber. LOL
And it's gonna be RUBIO. No matter what Jeb wants.....
Rubio is not well known among Hispanics outside of FL and he is of Cuban decent which is of little help with other Hispanics and could be a hindrance. His distorted story about his ancestry will not help either … he needs time for that to blow over, be forgotten.
Also at his age he should look at 2016 or 2020 for a run at President – that is his goal, to be the first Cuban-American President and very few VP’s ever get elected to President.
"very few VP’s ever get elected to President"
Um, sure, whatever you say, Dennis.....(another educated liberal genius)
In our lifetimes....Nixon, Ford, HW Bush ....others came close...Gore, Humphrey, Mondale
Ford was never elected ... lost his bid for President
It took Nixon how many years after he was VP ??
Close ... are we playing horseshoes ??
Anybody check Rubio's long form birth certificate?
Hi Dennis,
I was thinking the same thing, VPs don't usually get elected President. In my seventy one years I believe Bush 1 was the only VP to be elected immediately after the term of the President ended.
Truman became President upon the death of FDR, and was reelected. Johnson became President upon the assassination of JFK and was reelected.
Nixon ran and lost to JFK, also ran for Governor of CA and lost, then ran for President and won.
GO 49ERS,
uh Bob...before you go making fun of anyone else's "genius"...remember that Ford wasn't elected...Agnew had resigned, then Nixon...that's how he wound up the 'accidental' President, remember? And close only counts in horsehoes, not presidential races...Rob's "very few" statement stands.
Dennis -
Couldn't agree more - around here, Biden was often referred to as our "third Senator" and he's extremely popular in this neck of the woods. I think that had a lot to do with Obama picking him in the first place, and I know from my phone banking and canvassing in 2008 that it very much helped him carry Pennsylvania.
Independent in Illinois - If the "small state" thing didn't matter in 2008, it definitely won't matter now. To follow up on what Steeler Fan said, I think the Obamas and the Bidens genuinely like each other a lot, the four of them make a great team, and even Joe's verbal gaffes aside (come on, Rob, that Giants-49ers one was really funny!), there is absolutely no need for the President to make that kind of move.
Obama/Biden 2012
Too bad Biden himself said Hillary "might have been a better pick" than him. LOL
.....the gaffe machine has entertained us much.
He may be entertaining to those who love the punchlines...but anyone watching the baseball knows how vital Biden has been to getting things done on the Hill.
Good question, Feisty!
My question: shouldn't a running mate be able to run?
And shouldn't Christie be considered two people, just going by size?
I don't think Christie could pass the physical that would be required of any candidate to back up the most powerful person on Earth.
If he wants to pick up the banner, he first needs to put down the fork.
More hate and ignorance from kaybee
Weight descrimination is as bad as any other. Christy may be over weight but so are millions of other people. I am more interested in what is in his brain and what comes out of his mouth than that he enjoys food perhaps a little too much.
Judge not, lest you be judged.
dis·crim·i·nat·ing/disˈkriməˌnātiNG/
Adjective: (of a person) Having or showing refined taste or good judgment.
Perhaps Christie should be more discriminating in what he eats?
What is the point of having eyes and a brain if we don't use them?
This is what Dr. Nancy Sniderman had to say about Christie's weight issue on The Today Show:
Obesity is a serious health issue in this country. Heart disease, Diabetes and cancer are all linked to obesity. Everyone pays for people like Christie in higher health care costs and higher insurance premiums. Governor Christie's weight and the health of America is a serious issue, and we ignore it at our peril.
I'm not going to follow down the road with the politically correct sheep who say we mustn't discuss it. Nothing is going to improve if we don't talk about it. Christie has to answer for his weight just as Ted Kennedy had to answer for his alcoholism
Joanne in PA:
I thought Mr Biden was a good choice as VP in 2008 and, yes, the small state issue didn't matter that much. Actually, VP Biden probably has been an extremely helpful member of the administration, given his foreign policy knowledge and years of work in Congress. But I am thinking the election this November will be a much closer race, because this time around one would think the Republicans will be savy enough to nominate a more acceptable candidate ( as opposed to Ms Palin) for VP.
Indy in Illi -
Couldn't agree with you more. And yes, you'd think the GOP would have learned a lot from the Palin experience. Well, at least you would think that, and I would think that.....but will they? We shall see. Have a good weekend, and if you've got any extra snow out there, could you send some this way? :)
Off topic to you folks in the northern climes. A lot of people down here have generators as back up for power outages due to storms (hurricanes, etc.). Do a lot of people up there have the same?
IMHO any change of the VP on the ticket would be seen as desperation.
I am guessing not as much. I happen to have a generator if needed, but it is typically only needed in the event of an ice storm which isn't as frequent in occurrence.
Just wondered. I know ours is used to keep the fridge going and fans. Cooking can be done on a grill.
Phine...
I think generators down here are relatively new...it took those long power outages after Frances, Jeanne, and Wilma to make people realize they were a good idea!
I have a lot of family up north and I don't think any of them have a generator.
Does Congressman Paul Ryan deserve consideration? His was the first name to pop into my head when I read the topic of this post.
Ryan is a superstar. He should consider a Senate or Governorship run at some point...
Phine:
Our area (near St. Louis, MO) is prone to ice storms in winter and high winds, tornados, etc in summer so our generator has come in very handy. Family business office is connected to our home, so we have to protect computers that contain important info. During the rash of storms last year, stores in STL were selling portable generators faster than they could stock them. Let's hope they won't be needed that often this year!
. They won't let up because they know that Romney doesn't stand a chance against Obama. If Romney gets the nomination, the republicans should just give it up, eh?
^ Yeah, yeah, the GOP liberal-media card, that old song and dance.
But what is the alternative - - Gingrich?
Ok fine, go ahead and nominate the Newt-bomb. When it blows up in your face, don't blame the liberal media.
Blame brain dead GOP voters.
Ummmmm...........you can blame "brain dead" (your words) Dem voters for considering another 4 more years of following Obama down the road to more debt ($15 trillion and going up) and 17% REAL unemployment.
The "brain dead" part ended with the last day in office of the worst President in modern history (that'd be GW...the guy who racked up all of the debt your just now getting around to being upset about and took this nation to the brink of financial ruin with two off the books wars, unpaid for tax cuts, and spending like there was no tomorrow). Oh forgot, for R's, GW is "he whose name we must not speak".
AP,
now, now, now....
Everyone knows that Jimmy Carter is universally considered the WORST President ever, but that's only because Obama hasn't retired yet.
Feisty and Bob, Congratulations Have a good weekend.
It is way too early to even ask this type of question! A better question is this. Why will "Romulian Romney" not release his past tax returns??? This question is much more prudent! The poltical results for the "Romulian" could be economically devastating for him.
Progressive,
It's only "economically devastating" for Romney, to your liberal lemming minds who have been taught to HATE wealth of any kind.
Sad but true.
All the latest revelations and yet FR has predicted the outcome even before the voters vote? Suppose Gingrich or God forbid either Paul or Santorum get the nod? Who would be the VP choice? Lets wait until there is actually a nominee before we speculate on Veep. I know you want the scoop and all that but you'll look kind of foolish if voters don't select Romney won't you?
If it DOES happen to be Romney and he selects another moderate he loses the extremists. If he picks an extremist (like McCain did) he loses the moderates. The Paul people will still be Paul people no matter what and will split the Republican vote. If Santorum or Gingrich are the party's choice the moderates will not vote for either of them, the selection of a moderate VP might help a little but probably wouldn't be enough and only the extremists would vote for those two clowns. I don't think the Republicans are stupid enough to select Dr. Ron Paul. I know their leadership and the extremists who run the party aren't very bright but they can't be that stupid can they?
let's see, we Repubs aren't "very bright " and we are "extremists" according to you.....
Here's just one of the Republican job plans = PIPELINE
Here's the Democrats job plan = PIPE DREAM
the Republican plan to reduce debt = lower tax rates and get rid of loopholes.
the Democrats plan to reduce debt = raise taxes.
LOL
baldeagle: "I know their leadership and the extremists who run the party (GOP) aren't very bright but they can't be that stupid can they?"
We know one thing, the GOP isn't as stupid as the Dems who are following the " Liberals of OZ " down the yellow brick road to more debt ( $15 trillion and going up) and Unemployment ( 17% REAL unemployment.)
The Dems are on the yellow brick road with Dorothy Pelosi, Tin man Obama, Lion Reid and Scarecrow Biden.
What we know is that the man behind the curtain (Romney) isn't even fooling his own party..whine all ya like about just waking up to debt and unemployment...some of us remember that fellow GW and his evil cowardly lion, Cheney. Not all of us just woke up from the same long sleep you've been in.
AP,
"follow the yellow brick road, follow the yellow brick road, follow, follow, follow follow, follow the yellow brick road"
to more debt and higher unemployment.......
Go Liberals of Oz (NOT) ! LOL
I think he has to ask Chris Christie to run on the ticket. I think it may be the only way Romney can beat Obama. I think Newt has come on strong but I don't think he can beat Obama no matter who is on the ticket with him. Too much baggage and Callista. Enough said.
I kinda think its too soon to even predict. There is no clear leader in the pack. And to even mention the likes of a palin......is the kiss of death guaranteed.
Anyone but Christie, having to see that lard bucket for four years turns my stomach.
dembarb,
Wow, that's not very nice.
DO YOU FEEL THE SAME way about Oprah ? Does she "turn (your) stomach too?"
Oprah just interviewed Christie and agrees with him that it isn't easy to have a weight problem.
She seems to like Christie a lot too. That woman has class, unlike some of you liberal name callers.
I wouldn't think Christie...and any of the potential 2016 candidates for the Presidential candidacy nomination. Besides NJ is loosely in the Northeast and would add nothing to the ticket. The primary purpose of a Vice President may be, for voters, someone to take the President's place in an emergency, but for the Presidential candidate, the VP's primary purpose is to help win the election - i.e. must help win over an important part of the Party base, must help in an important region not represented by the Presidential candidate, and must be able to campaign well.
For Romney that means someone from the South, from a key swing state, with campaign skills. That would probably be Rubio, Senator from Florida, IF he can stay clean and remain untouched by scandal. He's Hispanic, from a key swing state, with Tea Party support, and young enough to be able to look beyond 2016, to 2020, following two Romney terms.
Wouldn't it be nice, though, if Obama was actually WORKING??