Feisty, your excitement is merely a mask to hide your desperation (and it's fun to watch). It's funny because the most recent poll, yesterday from CBS, has Romney beating Obama by 2% points if the election were held today. Ouch, huh? That, and the fact that almost ALL major poll outlets STILL show that a majority of American citizens DISAPPROVE of the job Obama has done as president. That HAS to feel great, less than a year from election day, eh? LOL!! Carry on with your drivel!

There is no desperation. And WOW 2 WHOLE PECENTAGE POINTS!!! That is a rounding error my friend. Keep dreaming.

Oh I'm sorry, I thought you understood how polls worked. See, 2% points is actually a pretty decent number within national polls concerning a presidential election. I don't need to dream, the data is right there for me to look at. It appears that it is YOU who is unable to deal with the current reality...

What video?

I hope they get this voter ID thing instituted before the general.

I do too - first order of business is prosecuting O'Keefe (who is already on parole) & his minions to the FULLEST extent of the law!

However, in highlighting the non-problem of voter fraud in New Hampshire and elsewhere, O’Keefe’s agents appear to have committed voter fraud themselves. Section 659:34 of the New Hampshire code defines voter fraud as when a person (highlights are ours):

In addition, O’Keefe’s group may have run afoul of New Hampshire’s law against hidden recording devices. Granite State law requires both parties to consent when recording devices are used, a fact that even O’Keefe’s own website notes. However, the video gives no indication that poll workers were aware they were being filmed.

One section of footage not released by O’Keefe, however, was when a surrogate was caught at the polls trying to impersonate a dead voter. The Boston Herald notes that the man “disappeared before police could corral him.”

Setting aside the legality of O’Keefe’s stunt, it is important to note that virtually no one – outside of O’Keefe’s agents – actually commits voter fraud. A seminal Brennan Center study on the matter, entitled “The Truth About Voter Fraud“, found that people were far more likely to be stuck by lightning than ever impersonate another voter at the polls. The study examined possible voter fraud in New Hampshire during the 2004 election, but was unable to find evidence for anything close to widespread fraud. Even if four questionable incidences proved true – one involved a “domestic violence victim, who voted from an old address in order to avoid disclosing her current domicile – it would amount to an overall fraud rate of 0.0006%.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/01/11/402756/james-o-keefe-voter-fraud/

there are people who should not have guns and there are people who should not have cameras ... the pen is mightier than the sword and when used to lie more harmful.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/11/video-nh-poll-workers-shown-handing-out-ballots-in-dead-peoples-names/

The occurrence of actual voter fraud in the US is smaller than the number of people killed by lightning strikes.

Force the spending of millions of taxpayer dollars to fix another non-problem. Brilliant

Rob, I wouldn't drink his koolaid even with your lips.

Watch the video and judge for yourself....

Check out Feisty hatin' on the guy exposing the problems.

No one commits voter fraud? They busted a bunch of Dems in Georgi just a month ago. 24% of the voter registration in Wisconsin bad.

Ah, but Feisty can point to a study. Yeah, that dispositive these days.

Man, seems like just yesterday Time had a big old cover story/photo on whistle blowers.

Guess they are righteous when they shine the light on Big Corps or the GOP shenanigans, but not when they expose dems and government corruption.

But Feisty is made at the people seeking ballots for dead people and not the people passing them out.

But somehow I suspect that Feisty would fault the liquor store owner who sold alcohol or cigarettes to minors without ID.

But I did just want the video. Astounding. Kinda takes away the argument that ID should not be absolutely required.

Force the spending of millions of taxpayer dollars to fix another non-problem. Brilliant

Leave it to the right wing idiots to fix something that isn't BROKEN in the first place!

It always has been & always will be about disenfranchising those who tend to vote Democratic!

All the spinning & twisting in the wind isn't going to change a thing!

Raaab - Daily Caller? Really? lol

The only walking dead person was O'Keefe.

Just take a minute to think about all the research that would be required to figure out who died, where they lived, in which precinct they are registered to vote, etc. Then there is the risk that one of the volunteers will know the deceased … busted

Then understand the tens-of-thousands would be needed to change the outcome of an election.

Why not give us a link to Tiger Beat or the National Enquirer (which happens to be the NJ nit wits FAVORITE news source)....

Drop the bone Raab - no one is picking up the crap you are laying down! K?

How about Gallop? Do you trust Gallop? Do you trust the American people?

A recent Gallop poll asked who was the best President EVER?

1. Ronald Reagan 2. Abe Lincoln

That has to sting a bit, huh?

BY the by, it was the national enquirer that broke the biggest political story of the past 25 years with John Edwards.

And think progress broke what? Wind?

Satisfaction moving from No.1 to No. 5 stings also ... that kind of polling is time sensitive.

Link?

can't post them ... did a 'best rock song' search

Hey Feisty,

Wasn't it the National Inquirer that brought down ya boy John Edwards, his affair, his love child, all while his wife was dying of cancer during the 2008 Democrat election circus? LOL!!

And in the greater Chicago area, the fraud is not confined to the poorer neighborhoods, or even a specific ethnic group....it prevades everything. "Vote early and often" is a phrase that I grew up with. Rewards for supporting the "machine" have been plentiful-all you have to do is look to all the Chicago pols who now find themselves in Washington DC or downstate. All of them trained in guerilla voter tactics dating back to the days when organized crime was viewed as running the city. Nothing much has changed, just the players as time goes by and the old guard dies out only to be replaced by those that they have won over with all the perks that come from being a political insider. The system perpetuates itself. Often wonder what would really happen in Chicago, in an aldermanic or mayoral election if all the ballots cast had to match up with real, viable, people who actually have the right to vote.

Rob, I'll give you this you are open about your hate and open about the fact that other than here you spend all of your time on right wing hate sites. Bet you dollars to donuts that O'Keefe goes to jail over this one. Of course he insists he did nothing wrong, but he did.

As for John Edwards, he brought himself down. He's an idiot with a zipper problem.

Here's the poll link about popular presidents. As usual Rob has forgotten some contextual information

Rest assured lisa - it is NOT you!

Apologies if I offended you...

I appreciate your voice from the center!

My bad for the plural!

Feisty, Thanks for your answer. I like to think I am mostly center. On some issues I am to the right and some left. I try to base my beliefs on life experience not on what others tell me to think. It's not always an easy place to be these days.

lisa,

It is always the best place to be … just maybe not the most popular.

Feisty, You didn't offend me. I like having civil conversations on the problems of this nation. Have a nice evening

Dennis, Columbus,Ohio, Thanks for your response. You are right about it not being the most popular. It's interesting that people in the center will probably decide the next election. Maybe then we can get back to reaching out to each other as Americans. I sure hope so.

Have a nice evening

You too GF - that clock is ticking down! Only wish I was able tol be there!

Know I will in spirit! {{{hugs}}}

I like having civil conversations about the problems of this nation..................

Lisa: Sharp jabs and smug meaningless comments are civil conversation? You must be on the same wine as Feisty.

imnotlost. I don't think any of my comments could be considered sharp jabs and smug meaningless comments. But please let me know if you disagree.

Lisa: Wasn't actually talking about you (directly) . Review some of the comments of the company you keep.

imnotlost, Even though Feisty and I often disagree about policy we have managed to keep our comments to each other very civil. I think that's a good thing.

Lisa: You are one lonely person. Everyone else who disagrees with her gets slammed with snide remarks, volatile hate speech, meaningless gibberish, and other outbursts that make some question her state of mind. I know, I've been there, done that, and I'm still seeing it. Join her chat group, she'll welcome you, after all she did call you GF. That's her fav byword to those in her nest.

imnotlost, I think Frank "Grimey" Grimes is also treated pretty fairly.

Lisa: I've read some of Grimey's stuff, and believe him to be at best center left with no axe to grind so he's safe from the wrath of Feisty and the gang. He was on a forum with Mark Murray last week that tilted left.

Do you know Mark Murray? Feisty does.

BTW Being in the center during a political conversation will make more enemies, people don't trust what you say.

imnotlost, No I don't know Mark Murray and I do know that Feisty does. I don't understand why being in the center or being reasonable makes me untrustworthy. When I grew up we talked politics at the kitchen table and we did so in a dignified manner. I wish there was more of that civilty in todays politics. I truly believe that we would be better off as a society.

I agree, I see Feisty all over the message board on nearly a daily basis. She rarely actually argues or debates substantive points in any kind of intellectual or philosophical manner. She merely uses sarcasm and insults to denigrate anyone who disagrees with her point of view. She represents the very far delusional left that permeates the Democrat Party. Citizens such as her give the Democrat Party a bad name. I have seen Feisty degrade herself to the point of merely cursing out other posters, using language like a$$hole (but actually spelling it out) and making comments about the size of other posters' genitalia...for no reason other than being disagreed with. And of course, never any repercussions from the moderators (since she is a liberal). Only conservative posters who cross the line get reprimanded by the MSNBC moderators... Either way, Feisty gives us all a nice look at the dense pseudo-intellectuals that exist on the far left...

Roanoke1: Thanks. Stay on top of it.

Lisa: Mark works for MSNBC. He and Feisty are good friends. Some other snoopers have showed me that he was a welcome visitor to a "protected" chat room on News Vine, whose members were Feisty and gang. There was a "hacking" last year. Before the infiltration was discovered there was a lot of information obtained. I'm convinced the NV Code of Honor was broken to pieces, and a truck load of complaints have been sent to NV moderators but it goes on. They have since shut down the chat room and moved on to another site, but it's only a matter of time, I'm told.

Do a little research, see what you come up with.

I must say that I have wondered if Feisty wasn't an automated response as it is uncanny how often she has the very first opinion expressed on every piece of news reported. Either that, or she has not other life and is never off line (haven't been able to determine which) By the time I read the "First read", I am usually coming in on page three or four or later in a discussion and have to backtrack through the other posts to figure out if there are points that I agree with or points that haven't been covered or points that simply have nothing to do with the news article seed.

Sue: She's "in bed" with MSNBC for sure. As of now it's not clear how far above Mark Murray this thing goes but someone has to be protecting her. Her avatar alone is a violation of the Code of Honor. It represents a personal attack on every conservative commenter on the forum. Also check out Frank-669022. Elephant with a Nazi swastika. News Vine has made it very clear that they will ban anyone who calls another poster a Nazi, but everytime he makes a comment with that avatar he's calling us Nazis. Many of us have griped, but no action or response. It's frustrating, but we won't give up. We have 10 months till the election.

BTW At the bottom of many articles like this one there is a place to sign up for early emails. MSNBC will automatically send you fore-notice of articles they will be posting soon. This is how Feisty, and others beat you to the punch. They roll out of bed early, check their emails, select the ones they like, get their comment ready in advance, then when the headline hits the homepage they pounce, usually before most of us even think about turning on our computers. I don't subscribe because it's insane, but it's easy to sign up if you'd like to try it. Hope I've explained it well enough for you.

Sue: She's "in bed" with MSNBC for sure. As of now it's not clear how far above Mark Murray this thing goes but someone has to be protecting her. Her avatar alone is a violation of the Code of Honor. It represents a personal attack on every conservative commenter on the forum. Also check out Frank-669022. Elephant with a Nazi swastika. News Vine has made it very clear that they will ban anyone who calls another poster a Nazi, but everytime he makes a comment with that avatar he's calling us Nazis. Many of us have griped, but no action or response. It's frustrating, but we won't give up. We have 10 months till the election.

BTW At the bottom of many articles like this one there is a place to sign up for early emails. MSNBC will automatically send you fore-notice of articles they will be posting soon. This is how Feisty, and others beat you to the punch. They roll out of bed early, check their emails, select the ones they like, get their comment ready in advance, then when the headline hits the homepage they pounce, usually before most of us even think about turning on our computers. I don't subscribe because it's insane, but it's easy to sign up if you'd like to try it. Hope I've explained it well enough for you.

You got a saddle on that fence dangerfield? ... asked with a smile

afterthought ... should all balance out when the votes are counted.