This whole group of clowns are poison with a hint of uranium. I wouldn't light a match within the same building from all the hot air these Whackadoodles gas out.

Can you base your words on fact? Where has Ron Paul condoned segregation?

K-727

Can you base your words on fact? Where has Ron Paul condoned segregation?

K-727,

Can you get your head out of Ron Paul's A-hole?

It's racist for Ron Paul to say the Civil War should have been avoided by buying the slave that way no lives would been lost.
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/273452/20111228/ron-paul-2012-civil-war-lincoln-gop.htm

Is that equal justice camouflaged in fiscal conservatism? I think not. From my perspective it is another of Ron Paul's witch's brew for covert, isolatative, kooky, old, lying homophobic, segregationist (racist).

Ron Paul is a kook because his racism is inflicting a deleterious affect on our future; our youth ; amongst his other crazy stances such as his wheel barrow theory of using coins instead of money.

Ron Paul is a racism is inflicting a deleterious affect on our future; our youth ; amongst his other crazy stances such as his wheel barrow theory of using coins instead of money.

Paul told CNBC this morning that reduction of interest rates on dollars drawn off the swap lines amount to U.S. taxpayers buying Greek debt.

That’s not true, of course: the dollar-Euro swaps have fixed maturities ranging from 7 to 84 days, and the Europeans pay the Fed interest when they swap the Euros and give us dollars back. But why let a few facts get in the way of ideology.

Go ahead push your coins on a wheel barrow to the banks.LOL

Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2011/11/30/fed-keeps-trying-to-save-europes-banks-ron-paul-frowns/#ixzz1j7zPmUQm

How do you explain Dr Paul's speech @ the John Birch Society?

Ron Paul At the 50th Anniversary of JBS
Sep 28, 2011

http://www.jbs.org/birchtube/viewvideo/1007/constitution/ron-paul-at-the-50th-anniversary-of-jbs

Or Ron Paul Endorsed By Former KKK Grand Wizard

January 03, 2012

http://www.bilerico.com/2012/01/ron_paul_endorsed_by_former_kkk_leader.php

How about Ron Paul, pictured with Don Black, director of the white nationalist website Stormfront, and his son, Derick?

http://blog.reidreport.com/2011/12/should-glenn-greenwald-have-to-own-the-ron-paul-blue-plate-special/
==================================================

Do you need more proof?

I didn't read your post after you felt it necessary to use foul words to describe what you need to say; that shows immaturity, to say the least. Spew your rant. No one reads what you have to say.

Beverly:

You loathe that he has those youngsters on the Republican side. lol.....this is good. You need to stop fabricating and putting words into Paul's mouth.

A lot of whites (Democrat and Republican) that grew up in the pre Civil Rights era feel the same way. They may not say it out loud but they have it inside. There are a lot on here that you co-sign everyday with from that era.

If Byrd can say n*(()r on the Senate floor in this day and age; why does Paul have to answer for things he said many moons ago? I live pretty close to his district and those people love him both black and white. Al "I need a Perm" Sharpton says BS all of the time and you all just lap it up.

The American people are well aware this win was bought ...not earned ..that's why it will hold little or no real relevance ...You are witnessing the buying of a country ..This will not give the people jobs or be better for the people ...This is about the wealthy buying our country for their own profits ...Once the Romney generals are in place ..look out ...it will be Bain Capital all over again.. but on a massive scale !

America be ready to grab your ankles once again .. you have no idea what this religious cult member has the in mind for America !..This is about his profit not the people !

Beverly, it is obvious that you are for the extreme left wing. I am not going to attack your views and left slant, you are entitled to them. But to characterize Ron Paul as a racist is simply false and irresponsible. He believes, to his core, in liberty. He believes in small government and the Constitution. He does oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but he opposes it because it violated personal property rights. He does not oppose the equal treatment of black people and has condemned Jim Crow laws. As for the rest of your post - you are presenting him as guilty by alleged association with unsavory characters... Do you apply that same argument to Obama? Obama, after all, is associated with Bill Ayers (a convicted domestic terrorist). Obama was a follower of Jeremiah Wright (an anti-American, "pastor"). Obama is a an admitted criminal himself - he wrote about his illegal drug use in his book. If you are consistent, you must condemn Obama if you are willing to condemn Ron Paul for the "evidence" you have given.

No it isn't false to characterize Ron paul as a racist, because he is one. Guess he'd have to carry a sign and a sheet to convince you. Wake up and grow up. Wildly claiming racism with the President you love to hate doesn't make your argument any stronger by the way...it just shows how readily you swallow the nonsense of your puppet masters.

rallyforreason,

You can't talk to these "Obama zombies". They are so drunk on the kool aid. It's like Herman Cain said ....they want to live on the "Democrat Plantation."

These Liberal kool aid drinkers have so much hate for anyone who touts "personal responsibility" or wants the govt. ( the nanny state ) out of their lives.

Ron Paul is a libertarian and has nothing but disdain for the "Nanny state" , so the Obama zombies hate him.

@LEONA - Touche

Obama zombies should love Ron Paul because he is going to make it possible for Obama to win. Ron Paul supporters will not support Romney. Without them Romney is toast. Oh yeah. in the middle, Ron Paul is not a republican.

D-Nice,

You couldn't be more wrong.

Ron Paul loathes BIG GOVT. and Obama is the poster boy for BIG GOVT.

We are $15 trillion in debt and Obama's answer to our debt is........."let's raise taxes."

Obama's toast.

Ron Paul would be a LOT better than Obama, at least Paul is smart enough to understand that an expanding federal goverment is the road to universal poverty and loss of individual freedom (just look at the real life examples of Greece, Italy and Spain), it amazes me that many young people in this country are begining to see that the socialist promise is false, it gives me confidence in the future that so many can throw off their liberal leaning educations and think for themselves.

As for Romney, he is even better that Ron Paul. Romeny has experience making hard decisions and fixing things that are broken, and our Federal Government is extremely broken.

As for the cult comments, they are no different that racist comments. They come from the same place in the mind and the heart.

www.whatspointreligion.com if you have an interest in reading a book that will make you think and completely destroy the notion of mormons (Church of Jesus Christ) being a cult.

He might be a tea drinker , lot of people do ,, your man had his chance ,, just not a good President ,,, great speeches though

oldworker Brad,

Don't forget, Obama has had over 800 speeches....."spread the wealth"......bla bla bla bla"......"millionaires and billioniares"....bla bla bla ....."jobs were saved or created"....bla bla bla......."corporate jets".....bla bla bla.......

LOL

Any of the repbulicans are smart enough to look across the pond and see what is actually happening in Europe and understand that Obama policy will make us exactly what they are, bankrupt and full of civil unrest.

The fact that Obama, (and those like you who continue to support him dispite knowing exactly what he is trying to do), still in spite of all the evidence wants desperately to make us just like Greece simply defies all logic. What is it that creates this desire for self-destruction and the creation of a rulling class of government bureaucrats?

Stop subjugating the US to Europe. Nothing that happens there has to happen here or are we still subjects of the Royal family?

There's more to it than that. Hell, they could say 'hell no' at the Convention...

Actually I'm sure there will be some kind of commotion, maybe some guns, shouting, flag burning, clown cars, keystone cops, elephants... I could go on and on. The material provided is priceless.

This is just a question that has been floating around in my mind. And it is the same for both parties.

That question has bothered me many times, too. Don't you think they should rotate the states? I'd love the primaries to start in California once. That would shake everyone up! I have to admit; I do not know why this tradition or law makes the primaries begin in the states they do.

I couldn't agree anymore phine......tradition wins out

Minnesota should be the first state :)....lol

K727

It is just tradition. I would think a large state with a diverse population would be a better indicator for a party. But that is common sense - which I don't see breaking out soon.

Actually, the Party decides the order and when. this is why the national party threat to the Iowa party had so much weight with the precinct bosses.

Santorum just stated over on fox he is staying in, the Grinch is still in Perry is staying in also... The mess isn't over yet..

phine,

The small states do not add much to the delegate count. It will be the big states and Super Tuesday that will shoot up the delegate count for Romney.Romney got 5 delegates, Paul, 3 and Huntsman 2 for all their work.

but Gingrich, Perry and even Paul have money from Pacs and that money will be spent.

What hasn't dawned on their pickled brains yet is that this hunt for the right state to give them credibility in remaining in the race for the brass ring is that regional "successes" do not translate to national appeal. Romney still has 65% voting against him. Ron Paul still has 75% voting against him. The majority of their party are rejecting the field. If Republicans can't hold their noses long enough to cast that vote, they should have zero expectations the rest of registered voters would.

gramma -- 4 years ago after the democrat primary in new hampshire which was won by clinton a stunning 64% voted against obama.

the majority of the democrat party in new hampshire rejected obama.

these facts render your post meaningless.

this is just another post from someone that has blinders to protect against hearing or seeing something negative about the president.

Agreed. Its a sad situation. The media needs to back off. Telling us our vote no longer counts after two states? Telling us who won before the majority of us go to vote? Telling candidates they don't have a chance after one state votes? Two states? The media prediction race puts as bad a spin on the situation as the candidates do when confronted with their 'according to the media' demise.

We need to get back to the popular vote and dump the electoral college process. We need to dump this two-party system and allow an Independent Party an equal position along with a fourth party candidate in-tune with the majority influence, and not just money influence, a place at the table.

And this idea - certainly not logic, that we would allow 'anybody' to be president simply because we don't like the current president is about as dumb as dumb can be. Election and campaign reform must happen before it does us all in. This circus the GOP has presented this primary truly reflects the state of politics in this country.

Once again, the Koch brothers are laughing all the way to the bank.

Why do you think two states decide everything, there will be a lot more votes counted before a decision is made. The first ones have influence to be sure, but they don't decide the nominee, I think it is rare that the winners of the Iowa Caucas have become the party nominee, New Hampshire has a slightly better record, but not much and as far as I am concerned having a motto of LIVE FREE OR DIE gives that state the right to be among the first to throughly evaluate a nominee for the Republican party. That is the proper way to view the role of the Federal Government, and a candidate who can't get through that filter doesn't deserve the opportunity to be president.

I would like to see the order of primaries decided by the voter participation in the last election: the more eligible people vote(by percentage), the sooner your primary. Then maybe states would encourage voting, rather than trying to make it harder for people to vote because they're afraid that they'll vote for the wrong guy.

Rob,

Jeb is advising Rubio to stay out of this one. And he and Rubio are close. Just thought I would share that with you. At least, that is the scuttlebutt here in Florida

Romney/McDonnell 2012

Bob,

That one might be a go for the GOP. I believe McDonnell would agree.

phine, not having a Ruben's cube in the race is music to my ears.

Rubio should take Jeb's advice.

Romney-Nikki Haley

Boyd ("Romney-Nikki Haley"), I'm sure Nikki is looking for a new gig - she isn't very popular in her state.

Obama has expanded the poor people base. It's his only remaining constituency.

Mitt will get the rest handily

Yeah, those rich people just love him. Good thing they're only the 1%.

Why would you like someone who has promised he isn't going to give you much. Just an equal opportunity and the freedom to take your best shot.

Boyd, some people go to the best schools and have their choice of good jobs when they graduate, thanks to their dad's pull. Others go to third-rate schools, often working when they should be studying and sometimes too hungry to concentrate in class. And when they graduate they have to compete against thousands of other graduates for low-level jobs. Is that what you call "equal opportunity"?

Exactly what I would say the conservatives live for, class and income envy.

k-727... Really?? I don't recall the right blaming any income group for our slow recovery. However obama and company sure likes blaming the wealthy and corporations. Talk about buying votes, who wouldn't (in this day and age) want someone else to pay the bill?

american,

Oh ,I can remember lots of repulicans like Scott Walker blamng the working class, teachers, unions for the bad economy. So give up your right to promised pension, take more days without pay because then this econmony will start gorwing.

Talk about deflecting blame to the 99%.

Romney the poster child of the 1% who think it is the workers fault and more cuts are the answer and of course NO NEW TAXES.

We wouln't have to even discuss "new" taxes if corporations actually paid the existing ones.

gramma -- you mean corporations like GE run by obama's chief business consultant??

obama is just plain incapable of understanding the incongruity between his words and actions.

just the other day his chief of staff (formerly with JPMC) was replaced by a new guy (formerly Citi). aren't these the same business that he has railed against for the last few years?

why do you put up with his nonsense?

Also Star, when Walker got together with a business 'brain trust' in WI on what was the primary factor inhibiting job creation, Walker spewed during an interview that it was because 'business could not compete with unemployment compensation'. That was the best this 'brain trust' could come up with.

So Scooter Walker passed legislation in WI establishing a one-week wait period before benefits would kick in to help 'business' compete and to save the state money. What a guy.

RECALL WALKER!!

The class warfare has been going on for decades, aided by reaganomics/trickle down. The right is just pissed that people are noticing. And man, nobody projects like a teapub.

say -- you talk about republicans and romney and wealthy but have you considered what obama did just this week? he replaced daley (former JPMC executive) as his chief of staff with lew (former Citigroup executive).

not that long ago lew was doing this as reported by CBS -- ... As chief operating officer of Citigroup Alternative Investments, he helped run the company's proprietary trading business (aka casino). Among the unit's job-creating strategies, one was to bet against the housing market, which other parts of the banking giant had helped inflate.
The Citi division ultimately lost billions. As for Lew, he naturally made big bucks during his three-year stint at Citi, including a roughly $950,000 bonus in 2009 -- after the company's federal bailout. Not all one-percenters are created equal, of course.

so you are ok with obama appointing someone from wall street that received nearly a million dollar bonus after the taxpayers bailed out Citi?

Good one. As an indie, I can give kudos to the right and left...even though it seems the GOP has moved to far to the right for me. The Dems don't do it for me either. The GOP doesn't want to compromise to balance the budget ,making the Dems the more sane choice.

At least Romney is buing the election with PRIVATE MONEY, not using promises of giving away taxpayer money to buy votes like Obama does. Imagine that promising people money that he knows he has to take away from someone else in order to get elected. I can't think of anything more disgusting than to promise people something that isn't yours to promise in order to gain the power to confiscate money from those that have earned it. After all there aren't as many of them they are only the 1% and don't have as many votes as the 99% who you can buy off with the promise of expanded government freebies. You people who think you have the right to someone elses money because some political parasite like Obama can take it away from them and give it to you need to rethink your values and turn your lives around

wow. the kool aid is strong today.

How much have you had, leona? Feeling bloated?

lib50,

now that you mention the word "bloated"....it reminds me of our govt. and the bloated DEBT ( $15 trillion) and it's going up on Obama's watch. He spent close to $5 trillion all by himself.

Romney for jobs.........Obama for debt.

Progressive,

You are calling me a liar?? That's laughable.

Whenever a liberal is name calling, his/her facts are NOT there. Sad to say but You are acting desperate ( not to mention rude). Think again if you think you are scaring me away. haha

If Romney says he created jobs, and we know he helped start companies like Staples and Sports Authority, who are YOU to doubt it?

You don't want your "kool aid" spreading to get any interference, so you have to call everyone a liar who disagrees with your own false rhetoric.

Sad but true.

BTW, if Wall Street is so loathed by people like you, explain to me why Obama is in their pocket all the time.

P=F11,

It is spelled Romulan. Huge Star Trek fan and I've noticed you doing the Romulian thing on several occasions. Way off topic but I like Star Trek and not Mitt. I hate the comparison between the two.

Obama (for the 99%) or Romney (for the oligarchs)?

lib50,

I hope the "99%" arent looking for jobs from Obama. He stopped 1000 NON Union Boeing jobs from going to S.Carolina.

Obama is stopping the Keystone pipeline.

ROMNEY for JOBS.........Obama for DEBT.

Oh, Leona, you have to stop with the Fox talking points. Republican presidents are the ones with the debt problems. And jobs? Wrong again.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/07/the-chart-that-should-accompany-all-discussions-of-the-debt-ceiling/242484/

http://jimcgreevy.com/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/06/22/103828/steele-bush-created-jobs/

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2012_01/job_growth_picks_up_steam_unem034558.php

lib50,

haha........Ummmmm, did I miss something? I thought we have a Democrat President (Obama) right now.......am I wrong?

We have $15 trillion DEBT ( $5 trillion on Obama's watch alone)

We have 8.6% unemployment ( 17% REAL unemployment ), on Obama's watch.

Obama's answer to DEBT is....."raise taxes".

Leona, did you take econ in school? Do you understand recessions/depressions? Do you really think anybody would have a magic wand and make it ok? Did you even read my links?

The ECONOMISTS answer to DEBT is raise revenue AND cut spending - but the spending cuts should be done when the country is more stable and out of the recession.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0822/US-should-raise-taxes-to-help-fix-deficits-say-business-economists

Corporations are run by people. Corporations provide employment that doesn't cost me any money. Corporations don't have the power to take my money away from me or throw me in jail. Government is run by people, these people have the power to take my money away from me and to throw me in jail and can only provide Jobs to people by taking money from someone else in order to pay them. LONG LIVE CORPORATIONS. Please Please Please help Obama and his Czars, and bureaucrats and expanded power and authority have a short political tenure.

Boyd,

you got a great message, it sounds good to me.

Has anyone thought that Obama and his Czars and government bureaucrats have an AGENDA!!! Has anyone realized that their agenda does not end up with us being free and prosperous people? USSR, pre-capitalist China and all the experience in the EU especially with Greece, Spain and Italy should be sufficient by now to convince anyone who is capable of rational thought that givning a political parasite like Obama increased power and authority is a really really bad idea.

Obama is a multi-millionaire. Not quite as rich as Romeny, but if you are going to preach "hate the rich" you have to include Obama as one of the rich people you need to hate. I don't know about you but I was not able to take my family all around the world on vacations this year. Obama seems to have no problem doing that, but then it's ok because he got his money by being a government parasite, he didn't actually earn it in the private sector.

the "Obama Zombies" think that govt. money comes out of thin air, they don't get it.

Govt. money comes from US, the tax payers.

Then, the Democrats in Washington get their greedy ( criminal "insider trading" ) hands on it and become rich , just like Pelosi & Gore.....the list goes on.

To add insult to injury, the Democrats don't even pay their da$% taxes !! ( Rangel & Geitner, etc.).

Democrat = Hypocrite.

elo,

If I may.......the answer is simple.

Corporations and the "wealthy" are using their own money ( whether you believe in Capitalism or not).

The govt. "fat cats", like Pelosi, Reid & Obama, in Washington, are using OUR MONEY.

After they collect OUR tax dollars, they decide what to do with it. (i.e. Solyndra and other "green" money pits, Union bail outs, etc.) What do we get from those losses???? Answer: NOTHING.

I forgot add that Bain doesn't pay taxes. But also receives federal aid