SALEM, N.H. -- Rick Santorum said today if he were president and covert operations, funding revolutionaries, and stricter sanctions didn’t work in shutting down Iran’s nuclear facility, he would “take it out.”
“More needs to be done to stop Iran now,” Santorum stressed, adding, “We’re going to take it out for you” with a “tactical strike.”
He continued, “We have to take this facility out, so we don’t have” an all-out war with Iran.
Santorum’s saber rattling toward Iran is common on the campaign trail. He often says that President Obama has not done enough to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon and that more needs to be done. But his remarks today, in response to a questioner who asked what he would do to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, went a step further.
First of all, Santorum said, “Iran’s already declared war against us.”
If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, he contended, events like the terrorist attacks on 9/11 would become “a routine occurrence.”


HUH?
I see Little Rick found McCain's old 8-track of greatest hits;
Bomb... Bomb... Bomb.... Iran...
These chicken hawks will not be happy until they start World Was III!
No matter which right wing chowder head eventually wins the nomination, they are going to have a tough road ahead competing with President Obama on foreign policy!
McCain aide Mark Salter responded on Facebook, saying, "For pure, blind stupidity, nobody beats Santorum. In my 20 years in the Senate, I never met a dumber member, which he reminded me of today,"
Santorum's, "Let's kill all the brown people in Iran," spiel is just another example of Santorum showing, in all his frothy stickiness, that McCain's aide Mark Salter knows what he is talking about.
Salter???? lol..... Just a disgruntled McCain hack. Salter doesn't know what he is talking about. That is a personal opinion and maybe Santorum has the same about him.
BTW: Link me to where Santorum ever said "Lets kill all brown people".....
If Salter thinks he is so damn smart, why isn't he a U.S. Senator? I think I'll go to his FB page.
Look- Saddam had control of his country, and one thing he did NOT do was put up with any crap from Iran.
I know we are not supposet to mention his name anymore, but....THANKS a LOT, George!!
Pro-life killers and chicken hawk warriors...Makes perfect sense to a right-wing, chest-thumping punk.
How can one be "pro life" yet after birth be so "pro death"? Never have understood that. Seems a bit, you know, hypocritical if you ask me.
PUT THIS jacka$$ Santorum right in the middle of the $hit. why is it the biggest war mongers have never seen any action themselves and have no intention of allowing their children to be in the middle of it...
Just keep the Drones flying for freedom.
Obama at least can be trusted with this stuff....
Santorum is the right guy. If it does't fit, you must.....oh, wrong quote
But I always thought Santorum was ANTI-union.
@ Herman Cain -- If it doesn't fit, you must not sit. Or was that quit?
I get so confused.
Santorum is just another war monger - to the left and to the right, war is on their lips. But Obama says the same thing. So does Congress. Any presidential candidate, running or seated, who is stating they will take us into a war with Iran is out of their mind! Don't think party - think peace!
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/01/why-ron-paul-is-right-and-president-obama-is-wrong-about-iran.html
Ron Paul 2012
nisl
....
"Santorum's, "Let's kill all the brown people in Iran," spiel is...."
Iranians are mainly Caucasians.
Hey Feisty,
from 1980...
Vince Vance & The Valiants
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7028457539873894744
Video was added later by the uploader but this actually made it to the top 40 during Reagan's run to the White House..... It's been redone a couple of times, Weird Al did a rendition of the theme and there was one done locally a few years back I'm looking for my old DVD with it....
It's been a common theme for over 30 years. (McCain stole it in the last election cycle)
Gee, another Couch Potato Warrior, like Cheney and Limp Ba Ha.
Santorum and the other Republican hawks has miscalculated. Their aggressive rhetoric on foreign policy and relentless bashing of the president's record underestimates the support Obama has on foreign policy and the complete disgust among the public with any talk of more neo-con military adventures that will hit America hard in the pocketbook and with the lives of our soldiers. This aggressive agenda is out of touch with both reality and the sentiment of most voters.
Agree, mattpfl..
The American people are weary of wars and unilateral invasions. Our brave troops sent to their deaths for nothing more than----war mongering and of course for the profiteers to make even more money!
I hope that people remember the cost and human tragedy of war...Santorum sounds like...well, we all know who. To preach the 'be afraid' mantra will not work!
The thing is the American people do not fight wars. .01% of the population is serving. That is who fight the war.
ITM,TX I would take issue with that statement to this extent, while the American people do not actually fight they do deal with the consequences of war which can be substantial. I think it would be better to include all americans can pay the price for war in many ways. War should always be a last resort but a final result as well.
AH HA!!! So the liberals can now do a goose pile on Santorum. Newsflash: Obama has sent troops to Medigo in Israel under the cover of darkness. The sole purpose of these troops is to set up a base of operations for any activity in Iran.
How do I know this? Hmmmmm... My nephew was sent there before New Years day. Currently the troop count is close to 2000. Just enough personnel to set up a base. They are currently sending over Patriot Missles and Foxfire missles.
So do you think Santorum is alone in his desire to stomp on Iran?
Absolutely predictable. The more "right to life" they claim to be, the more they love them some war.
Sitting down with the leaders of Iran has worked out really well so far.
I pose this question. Is it in America's interest that Iran gets the bomb? If not how do we stop them?
And I agree that Iraq was mistake and that we should have left Afghanistan by now. Unfortunately IMHO Iran is a real and credible threat.
The only life they care about is the 'unborn', not the 'born'.
War is good, since in all probability, it's not going to be their loved one in harms way!
That's right, chilled. I keep forgetting that part. It is once they are real live actual PEOPLE that they don't care about them!
Alan, it is in no ones interest to have Iran with a bomb. It is a good question though, how do we stop them. No easy answer either. Consider if we make an air strike against Iran, will they declare war, more than likely, but how do they accomplish that. They have nothing that can hit us directly so who do they reach out and touch if not us. Do they close the straight, now they have multiple arab countries against them as well as us. It is very easy to say just bomb them but what happens after that is a question to you
There will be consequences, Lebanon and Gaza come to mind. There is also the likelihood of terrorist attacks in Bahrain and other facilities in the Middle east maybe Europe and Africa. But if the result is that they don't get the bomb then it is worth it. Unfortunately it is one of those "Things could be worse but we'll never know" answers.
I don't see the logic of jumping on Santorum for this because I think the next Administration of any party will bomb Iran. If it is the Obama Administration then some of the posters here will be all for it and that is why they're hypocrites. I hope it doesn't come to that but I don't see a peaceful alternative.
Alan, most likely you are correct but should another country and people pay for our actions. Again we go to well it won't hurt me or mine. As for them not getting the bomb due to this type of action by us I do not think we can stop that only delay it further. I suppose a country closer to Iran could take direct action but it would probably take a bomb to stop a bomb and things would get worse in a hurry. I think Santorium over stepped the talk on this one without much thought or experience in this area. This could be dangerous in itself.
Alan-
Iran is a real and credible threat.
------------------------------------------------------
To what? Not to us. Not to Israel. To who?
Any clue how many "loose nukes" there are floating around right now?
Pakistan nukes not safe, says former minister Qureshihttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Pakistan-nukes-not-safe-says-former-minister-Qureshi/articleshow/10905774.cms
---------------------------------------
North Korea is a far greater threat and HAS both nukes and a delivery system, what should we do???
Pakistan has loads of nukes a HISTORY of proliferation, and deteriorating relations with the US what to do?
"In 2004, the Pakistani metallurgist A.Q. Khan, a key figure in Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, confessed to heading an international black market ring involved in selling nuclear weapons technology. In particular, Khan had been selling gas centrifuge technology to North Korea, Iran, and Libya. Khan denied complicity by the Pakistani government or Army, but this has been called into question by journalists and IAEA officials, and was later contradicted by statements from Khan himself"
Here's a list of known NUCLEAR Nations;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons
Which ones should we target? The truth is that in the over SIXTY years since the Manhattan Project, only one nation has been reckless enough to actually DETONATE a nuke and we don't have to worry about them.
There are far greater threats to the USA militarily, to be concerned about from nations who have possessed the bomb for decades, to worry about or threaten isolated, non-nuclear Iran is just campaign bluster for the faithful from a pandering candidate on the campaign trail...
The "threat" (to the USA) of Iran developing a nuke, is the last gasp of the dying Neo-Con school of thought. They are a danger to themselves and their neighbors, but not because of their suspected weapons program.
Oh, and the Israelis will deal with that threat if it comes to the point of confrontation, while we're still pulling out our saber to rattle...
Ohz NOZ!!! Someone set up us the bomb!
If this military only had as many drones flying over the terrain as they have calling themselves citizens and covering the terrain on foot, they'd have scouted us out a new galaxy by now and could tell us what aliens are reading in their newspapers line by line.
The only country that has demonstrated proven inability to be trusted with a nuclear weapon is the United States of America. If a second nation adds itself to the list, I'll review and revise.
Until then, I'll continue to refuse a vote for any of these moronic suits that have decided that supporting bullies on the other side of the planet who have no regard for U.N. mandates and who accessorize refugee tents with tank treads is important enough to let their own people and country circle the bowl.
This is like the Twilight Zone at this point. Britain was calling the entirety of the US population a bunch of idiots on the front page of its newspapers the day after Bush was reelected. Yet they slavishly follow the next President, who does nothing but continue Bush's crazy train. The Americant people spend most of the last 12 years WHINING about how bad it all is and then call anyone who questions the suits responsible "Conspiracy Theorists" and would rather give up their liver than allow anyone to talk them out of voting for the same DRECK again.
You will get the government you deserve. You always have. While that's taking place, can we get Santorum, Romney and that other MEPS lobby pacifist together in a cage with a ball bat and ONE Iranian of their government's choosing? Winner walks out, or climbs over. Come on. John L. style. I've got $100 (or $13.22 adjusted) on the Iranian.
So, we start WW111. Will any of the children of the proponents of such a war be enlisted? Or, will they be here, at home, making a difference on the political trail? (sarcasm)
Huntsman has two sons in the Navy. But I notice he isn't calling for a war with Iran. Interesting.
He is pretty much in the same position as Santorum.
Not really a party issue as I think this is pretty much the Administration's position as well. I doubt this time around that President Obama will say he's willing to meet the leaders of Iran anywhere, anytime. They pretty much rebuffed his overtures.
No, I doubt you'll see any relatives of Mr. Santorum in his proposed crusade in Iran.
Alan,
I think the difference is (at least IMO) that Huntsman understands and knows the area AND has a vested interest. Santorum just strikes me as trying to play tough to appeal to the base. Get my drift?
Notice that someone like Santorum, with no family to put in harm's way, is really eager to prove his manhood by wanting to send other people's loved ones to war? Is it in the drinking water of the right? Or is it something Freud would have to address?
Look; when we take that oath and join the military, we know that we are putting our lives in harms way. Every soldier knows this. The military is not for everybody. If you can't get with the program, find yourself another occupation.
The problem is it is alright for ACTIVE DUTY soldiers to grind but when the Natl Guard and Reservist are called up...oooohhhhhh hell we got to MAUCH "AL Sharpton voice".
Don't play with me, itm, my husband did his time. As a Navy wife, so did I. And the military just goes where it is told, the pols in Washington are the ones who decide when and where. Since they are the ones that make that decision, they need to have more "skin" in the game. Might make them stop playing with the lives of our young people.
ITM, I am glad you served for us and you are also correct the military is not for everyone. As for the National Guard they were created for homeland protection, if they are deployed to other countries then who is here to protect the homeland. They have a function as well as the Army, Navy and Airforce, Marines too. As for reserves the name says it all, if they are active reserve then they are just that when needed, but we should not waste our military on half measures, war should be a final result and that being the total elimination of an enemy not building nations or police actions those are not the purpose of a military.
"Sanitarium Santorum" belongs back in the "Poltical Sanitarium" from where he came from. Is he off his medications?? Again!! This "Socially Sadistic" individual want to spill more American blood! For what?? This Cognitively Disabled individual is very dumb and dangerous on Foreigh Policy. Our Nation can not afford to fight another war!! The illegal "Bush War" in Iraq has caused massive damage to the strength of our military. The thousands of wounded Military Veterans coming home for Two Wars is going to be expensive enough! Another war America!! Really??? These Two Wars. Both started by "Brainless Bush" have crippled our economy! Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! This GOP Clown has got to go!!
What "Sanitarium Santorum" is not understanding the "Nuclear Reaction" this would cause around the world. The Russians would go crazy and Putin would definately defend the oil interests of Iran. The reaction of the United Nations would be very negative for the United States. The only nation that would support the United States would be the British. China would also take any American First Strike as a direct threat to the oil production of Iran. In the United Nations the Chinese and the Russians would politically gang up on America on many levels. The other thing that would occur is that the Chinese, and especially the Russians would bring their Navies into the Gulf. What does America think will happen when the Navies of the US, China, and Russia enter the Gulf???? Then let us add the "Wild Card Navy." That would be the British Navy. What does America think could go wrong with this very nuclear situation?? Does Ameica think it would go down peacefully??? Which Navy would fire first to secure the oil supply of the world for itself??? The Russians would think America. The Chinese would Russia. The United States would think both Russia and China. What countries would form alliances over America striking first at Iran??
Psycho warmonger.
Progressive=Forward11: The President has already made the deals to sell Russia and China more OIL SHALE (can you believe we're able to export oil shale and oil and yet the gas prices go up cray ain't it) so we have them covered and plus we sold Saudi Arabia more air striker plains (84 billion) and they already said if Iran tries to close the straight we'll step up and pump more!!! So to be honest Iran is being boxed in either they're going to give up on trying to develop nuclear weapons or totally oppress they're people and cause another uprising. So it's up to them, as my man Clint Eastwood said "Go ahead make my day!!!!
I cannot imagine how Santorum can reconcile his position of being Pro-life and bombing a nuclear site.
Does his GOD not have a problem with those two extremes. I think he speaketh with forked tongue.
Vote Santorum for a contraceptive free America. God knows if we could just get rid of the contraceptives, America would be perfect.
What concerns me more is why insurance companies are allowed to decide who lives or dies in this country.Why are they allowed to ruin peoples lives?
What does that have to do with Santorum, i.e., the subject of this discussion?
While Curerate is off topic, I don't believe that his is a factual statement. I have a number of relatives who are quite ill and have living wills telling Drs & Hospitals what they want done (i.e., no CPR, tube feedings etc). Insurance companies only pay the bills. Unless your referring to Insurance companies denying tests or hospitalization - that's a whole different story - either you have insurance or you don't.
what a numskull - I guess he thinks that most American citizens like to send their children off to war - I was taking an interested look at Santorum, till now - he's lost my interest.
so well said
Let's all pray for peace - and pray that Santorum doesn't get near the codes.
You better pray that Santorum doesn't get near your bedroom either. He has strict rules about what should and shouldn't happen there.
i do think we should do somthing but only with the help of all countries !! and that includes russia and china otherwise we should not !!!
tell me please !! where were we when pakistan got there nukes ? the country that was hiding our worst enemy !! and we our worried about iran ? what a joke !!!
What concerns me more is why insurance companies are allowed to decide who lives or die in this country. Why are they allowed to ruin peoples lives?
Most people cling to the past and the old ways of war. The whole world has changed and both Russia and China's economies are much more entwined with ours and the rest of the world. I'd suggest we discuss what would happen to their economies of the strait was closed by Iran. Can you imagine what would happen to China if they had very little gas or oil! I think the day has to come where all 3 of us have to band together to keep these rogue nations under control so their wild actions don't destroy our economies. Both Russia and China need to side with us and under no uncertain terms inform Iran to let inspectors in or all 3 go in to destroy such.
Let's see, Santorium wants start more wars, kill more humans, waste more $trillions, Ron Paul wants to end wars and enjoy some peace....
boy this is a toughie who should I vote for....
What a moron. A christian Fundamentalist like this nut job would be as bad as the Ayatollahs in Iran. Only this nut would have more weapons.
Say goodnight rick.
Goodnight Rick.
My deams though would come true if little Ricky boy won the nomination. Oh boy, but wouldn't that be a hoot?
Obama in 2012, if only because guys like Rick are taken seriously by too many folks.
Sweater Vest Man needs an appropriate nickname. I think SansScrotum fits the bill quite well.
These religious bigots are all very simple-minded...they live in a binary, black and white world. And the real world is gray...solutions to problems are almost always somewhere in the middle. But God tells them they don't have a 3rd, or middle ground choice..they must choose between black and white. And that they will be courageous christians, muslims, jews, etc., and rewarded by God, if they stand their uncompromising ground. That's why they are SO FLIPPIN' DANGEROUS!!
xscharm, well, I suppose you could go for Perry, who wants to go back into Iraq and restart a previous war. I love watching him talk...the way he screws up his face when he's not sure of what he's going to say next. All he really need to put the final touches on his persona is a big red nose and big floppy red shoes.
If Santorum wants war, let him. But first expel him from the U.S., pack him a lunch and give him a club. Air drop him over Iran and wish him good luck.