2012: 'So you like me now'?

After his narrow victory in Iowa, Romney makes the cover of Time magazine: “So You Like Me Now?

The Washington Post: “Fresh off the slimmest of victories in the Iowa caucuses, Mitt Romney landed here Wednesday and immediately faced intense attacks from Republican presidential rivals who vowed to challenge him more aggressively. Newt Gingrich held a news conference in Concord to say that Romney is a liberal and a political chameleon, willing to change positions to suit his needs.”

Romney has a new TV ad airing in South Carolina that plays up the NRLB-Boeing flap in the Palmetto State (though the matter has now been resolved).

BACHMANN: She’s out. “Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann suspended her presidential campaign today, after a dismal finish in last night’s Iowa caucuses,” the Boston Globe writes. “Last night the people of Iowa spoke with a very clear voice, and so I have decided to stand aside,” she said.

The New York Post in a rough headline: “Dud Michele quits.”

“Michele Bachmann's decision to end her presidential campaign leaves the Minnesota Republican with another big one: whether to seek a fourth term in the U.S. House or direct her newfound political celebrity elsewhere,” AP writes. “Bachmann would be heavily favored to keep her seat in the Republican-leaning 6th District unless it's significantly reshaped by redistricting early this year. But after months in the national spotlight of the presidential race, she could determine she'd be more influential in a different role. ‘I don't think she'll run for re-election,’ Kent Kaiser, a Minnesota GOP operative who supports Mitt Romney for president but remains a Bachmann fan, wrote in an email to The Associated Press. She could try instead for an appointment in a new Republican administration, he wrote, or consider a potentially lucrative spot on the speaking circuit.”

The Minnesota Star-Tribune also notes Bachmann “gave no indication of what's in store for her future -- or whether she even plans to stay in politics.” More: “The question that remains is whether the 55-year-old Bachmann, a party maverick who has built up a national brand through her campaign, is ready to return to Washington lawmaking as one of 435 House members. A founder of the Tea Party Caucus, Bachmann has developed a reputation for occasionally hijacking the message of Republican Party leaders in the House, where she is thought to have little chance of upward mobility. As she demonstrated in earlier protests against President Obama's health care legislation in Washington, her true power base lies outside Congress, not within it.”

SANTORUM: Now that Santorum is the anti-Romney front runner, the scrutiny is coming. NBC’s Michael Isikoff finds that a wealthy Wyoming financier is the principal backer of a pro-Santorum Super PAC Restore Our Future, which spent more than half-a-million dollars in Iowa on ads for the former Pennsylvania senator, and it figures to play prominently in South Carolina and other contests. Here’s his report and interview with Foster Friess.

Bloomberg digs through his financial disclosure and notes, “Since his 2006 re-election defeat, the former Pennsylvania lawmaker has gone from being one of the poorer members of the U.S. Senate to earning $1.3 million between January 2010 and August 2011.”

First Read noted back in November, as scrutiny was coming Newt Gingrich’s way on his payments from Freddie Mac, that Rick Santorum was also “not a lobbyist”: “A review of the financial disclosure form for Rick Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania, shows he made $65,000 for “legislative policy consulting services" from American Continental Group, a government affairs and consulting firm -- a.k.a. a lobbying firm -- in Washington in 2010 up until Aug. 2 of this year when he filed his form. Santorum lists that he began working for them as a consultant in July 2009 and lists them as a "present" employer.”

PERRY: The Texas Tribune asks: “After Poor Iowa Showing, Why is Perry Still Running?”

“GOP contender Rick Perry seemed to change course Wednesday on his decision to bail from the race — announcing on Twitter that he was headed to South Carolina,” the New York Daily News notes.

ROMNEY: “Mitt Romney, able to seize the offensive in Iowa’s Republican presidential contest, turned overnight into a front-runner on the defensive as rivals stepped up attacks on the former Massachusetts governor in advance of New Hampshire’s pivotal Jan. 10 primary,” Bloomberg writes.

The Boston Globe similarly writes, “A shrunken field of Republican candidates yesterday launched a hectic one-week dash to win over New Hampshire’s famously fickle voters. Front-runner Mitt Romney, who holds a wide lead in statewide polls, came under assault from four remaining competitors as a flip-flopping moderate, presenting a new test of whether he can survive sustained scrutiny of his record.”

The New York Daily News: “Fresh off his paper-thin win in Iowa, GOP front-runner Mitt Romney swept into New Hampshire on Wednesday with a giant bull’s-eye on his back. Romney did his best to stay under the radar in the long leadup to Iowa as a rotating cast of candidates surged ahead in the polls and then flamed out. But no more.”

Joshua Green at Bloomberg notes, as NBC’s Garrett Haake did, that Romney declared he would win Iowa. “Less than 24 hours before the Iowa caucuses got under way, Mitt Romney, paragon of discipline, stood among empty oil drums and rusting tools in a Marion asphalt plant and let himself get a little carried away,” Green writes. “ ‘We’re going to win this thing!’ he declared to a cheering throng. His staff scrambled to tamp down this impromptu bit of expectations-setting. But his elation was understandable. The growing crowds validated his last-minute decision to compete all out in a state that four years earlier had spurned him, and he sensed a big win coming. And while his eight-vote squeaker didn’t provide the decisive margin he would have preferred, Romney still looks to have a clear path to the Republican nomination.”

“A political action committee called Restore Our Future, which supports Republican front-runner Mitt Romney, ran more than $1.2 million of negative ads in Iowa, mostly aimed at Gingrich. The PAC made at least one false statement and several misleading ones over the course of five of its last commercials,” Bloomberg notes.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Due to technical difficulty, we were unable to get in several other clips earlier. Those have been added in now.

Discuss this post

86% of the American people still aren't feeling it ! ...its a trust issue !

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 9:16 AM EST

Unless Romney suffers a setback in either New Hampshire or South Carolina, it's difficult to see how he can be stopped from gaining the Republican nomination.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 9:18 AM EST

Willard will win NH (his back yard) but lose SC (Newton's back yard)...either Gingrich or Santorum wins South Carolina because they don't like Romney's moderate leanings and they won't vote for a Mormon in the primaries.

  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 9:34 AM EST

I posted this in another article but it fits here also...

Whole new ballgame now...

Dr Paul said it after the counting was over, "three candidates, and only two that can go the distance"

He picked up Three NH newspapers today.... The game starts quickly now!

CONCORD, NH – The Littleton Courier, Berlin Reporter, and Coos County Democrat all announced today their endorsements of 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul.

The endorsements come on the heels of the 12-term Congressman from Texas’s strong top-three finish in the Iowa Caucus giving one of two viable tickets out of the Hawkeye State.

“Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has been in the lead for months,” wrote the editors, “but voters still seem desperate for an alternative — there’s always another candidate pulling stronger or almost as strong numbers in the polls. Voters have lost faith in Obama, but they are not sold on Romney to replace him.”

Congressman Ron Paul, however, “has never voted to raise a tax and voted against all of the bailouts that have riled up Tea Partiers and Occupy Wall Streeters alike,” they continued. “His prediction that the United States can no longer afford the economic cost of our overseas commitments makes many Republicans uncomfortable, possibly by the very truth of the assertion. For decades he has been that rare sort of politician who speaks what he believes to be the truth and doesn’t flutter in the wind of public opinion. That could not be said of Obama or Romney.

“Powerful leaders like Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan change the political landscape,” the editors concluded. “This is what Ron Paul would do for our country and why we support him.”

This has got to stick in Mitts craw, he's been slopping for those endorsements for weeks.....

  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 9:47 AM EST

Ron Paul is nothing but a loon. How many years has he been a congressman? Please list all the bills that he has written over those years that have become law. Surely, there are dozens....

  • 1 vote
#2.3 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:59 AM EST

Oh. and with L Ron Paul being such a principled libertarian I'm sure he has never accepted any earmarks for his district, right?

Wrong.

Let's just stop wasting time. It's Romney against Obama. CASE CLOSED!!!

Go get 'em Mitt - It's time to talk about all the damage Obama has caused and how Mitt will get us back on track. We need a problem solver not a figure pointer in the White House! And certainly not a racist loon like L Ron Paul.

    #2.4 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:04 AM EST

    Rob in ma-3189632

    Let's just stop wasting time. It's Romney against Obama. CASE CLOSED!!!

    Hardly, word on Dr Paul's site is saying he got the lion's share of the delegates!

    Besides there are one or two more primaries and caucuses to deal with first. It's interesting that even the media is sayin that he not doing too well and the grinch stayed in just to dice and slice...

    Psst: his target? MITTS!

    Have a nice day!

    • 1 vote
    #2.5 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:40 AM EST
    Reply

    3/4 of Iowa caucus voters choose someone else. And those were Republicans! If Republicans didn't like Romney, what makes anyone think Independents will like him any better?

    • 5 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 9:23 AM EST

    Amy,

    true enough, Mr Romney doesnt excite the conservative base.

    And true enough, in this liberal wasteland of First read, Obama wins the moonbat vote handily.

    But wouldnt you know it, the flawed Romney still is beating the failure of a President you blindly support by 6 points, already, in the latest Rasmussen poll. Including independents.

    In the critical swing states, Obama is doing even worse.

    • 2 votes
    #3.1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:33 AM EST
    Reply

    Off subject, but where has Pat Buchanan gone? I haven't seen him in months but that in itself has been a blessing.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:00 AM EST

    He is writing a book.

      #4.1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:37 AM EST
      Reply

      Lets be honest (something the tea people GOP republicans don't understand) the tea people GOP republicans don't like Romney, they only vote for him because he has an R next to his name. It's the old adage they'll cut off their nose to spit their face.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#5 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:24 AM EST

      Didn't conservatives go along with McCain last time, because they were told he was more electable than Huckabee? And how did that work out for them? It must really stink to be asked to compromise your principles at the behest of the establishment twice in a row.

      • 1 vote
      #5.1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:36 AM EST

      McCain was not liked by most conservatives and that still hold today. A lot of people just stayed at home instead of voting for him. He won the primary due to OPEN primary states and a lot of Independents and liberals voted in those along with the media's help.

      • 1 vote
      #5.2 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:42 AM EST
      Reply

      First mistake is to lend credence to a liberal rag like Time magazine.

      Second mistake is to place too much emphasis on Iowa. We have to wait till after super Tuesday before making assured predictions.

      Obama shelved in 2012.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#6 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:48 AM EST

      There appears to be something in the wind and it may blow Romney aside. Let's not forget the invitations sent out for a meeting in Texas of Republican elites to find consensus on some presidential candidate, as reported by Jonathan Martin for Politico. The fact that it's to be held in Texas, combined with Perry's weird shift not only in his decision but in his demeanor the morning after the Iowa caucuses suggests some possible plan to reinvigorate his campaign. We know that the Republican elites know Paul and Gingrich can't win. We can infer that these same elites probably recognize that Santorum's way too conservative and even sometimes nutty positions and actions make him unelectable. We know that Republican elites don't like or trust Romney and that Romney can't seem to attract the more conservative Tea Party folks or break through the 25% ceiling in the polls. We know that Huntsman is viewed as too liberal by the Repub elites. That leaves Perry, unless Christy or Daniels could be persuaded to change their minds about campaigning, and Christy's already committed to Romney. That leaves Perry . . . again. Watch out, Mitt, your days may be numbered.

        Reply#7 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:30 AM EST

        Stick to your mindless Obama worship...

        You moonbats havent a clue about the Republican field or race. But that doesnt prevent a lot of electrons from being wasted on idiotic diatribes.

        • 2 votes
        #7.1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:38 AM EST
        Reply

        Republicans are still lost. Just can not get their act together. No direction other than bashing the president. Ugly and dishonorable. Truly a pathetic display that we all have no doubt will continue without end.

          Reply#8 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:32 AM EST

          Actually, it's the gop bosses that want the rhetoric aimed anywhere else other than Mitts, and since they do not want to deal with Dr Paul that leaves the president.

          It's a weak strategy that will probably FAIL!!

          • 1 vote
          #8.1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:45 AM EST
          Reply

          After his narrow victory in Iowa, Romney makes the cover of Time magazine: “So You Like Me Now"?

          Time magazine hasnt put up a worshipful cover of Obama with a halo around his head in weeks now....c'mon, Time, do your part for the Obama team! Do you want us to confuse Time with real journalism?

          • 1 vote
          Reply#9 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 11:36 AM EST

          iowa cacus is very flawed especially in republican voting values. anyone can vote? thats right no id no registrations to check, just pay your money and vote????

          and then time salutes mitt as king??? EGADS!

          if there is any story it's santrums rise and lack of money? come on time get your corporate nose and money out of the election!

            Reply#10 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 3:01 PM EST

            and of course - no chance of voter fraud at all? NOT!

              #10.1 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 3:10 PM EST
              Reply

              No, Mr. Romney. No, we do not.

              To be fair, I realize that Time is putting these words into your mouth, or at least next to your face. Your arrogant, smug, smarmy, duplicitous face. I think I'm going to go buy a copy of this issue just so that I can punch it. Good marketing idea, Time.

                Reply#11 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 8:52 PM EST
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.