After strong Iowa showing, Santorum camp looks ahead to SC

CHARLESTON, S.C. – As Rick Santorum’s supporters celebrated his strong Iowa showing, they were also making preparations for a push through South Carolina that will begin even before the New Hampshire primary vote.

Andrew Burton / Getty Images

U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum addresses a crowd in Iowa on Jan 3.

Santorum’s South Carolina fans, some of whom were gathered at his relatively well-appointed campaign headquarters to watch the caucus returns, will be able to see him in the Palmetto State on the afternoon of Sunday, Jan. 8th, when he stops in Greenville just two days before the New Hampshire vote.


His campaign also added another South Carolina staffer: political consultant Andrew Boucher, a former executive director of the New Hampshire Republican primary – a ramping-up of staff that suggests Santorum will seek to capitalize on his Iowa momentum here, a state that has picked every Republican presidential candidate since 1980.

Recommended: 11 things you might not now about Santorum

Santorum’s supporters, about 15 of whom remained at the headquarters as the final votes trickled in, were ecstatic about his neck-and-neck finish with Mitt Romney – but some of them said they weren’t surprised he did so well.

“I knew this was going to happen,” Kathy Hughes, a retired teacher from Mt. Pleasant, said. “So many people were saying, ‘why are you supporting him? Santorum can’t win!’ But I knew.”

She added that the phones at Santorum’s headquarters here had been ringing non-stop over the past few days. The phone did buzz a few times into the wee hours of Wednesday morning; the last call, Hughes said, came from a voter in Peoria, Illinois who was trying to get in touch with one of Santorum’s early-state headquarters.

Joan Peters, a member of the Charleston Tea Party board from Moncks Corner, said she supported Santorum’s decision not to skip New Hampshire and come directly to South Carolina as Michele Bachmann is doing and Rick Perry was going to do before he announced he’d first return to Austin to reassess his campaign.

“He’s probably not going to win because Mitt Romney’s got New Hampshire pretty sewn up, but he’ll do well and then he’ll come down to South Carolina and the money’s going to start coming in,” Peters said. “People now realize what we’ve always realized, which is that he’s a credible candidate and he can win.”

More on NBC Politics: 

  • Three major storylines from the entrance polls
  • Perry to 'reassess' campaign
  • NBC's Andrew Rafferty: Much has changed for Santorum
  •  

    Discuss this post

    Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7

    hey would a TelePrompTer help Perry out..he can borrow the one in the white house if that's OK with you tea trash

    • 2 votes
    Reply#105 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 6:44 PM EST

    My dog could beat Obama, he's the worst President we have ever had and all you have to do is look at the state of the economy to know I'm right. Liberals had their chance and they blew it, as usual.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#106 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 6:56 PM EST

    Ok Mr. Teabagger, please explain to me, using facts (no Fixed Nooze or by-bull references) on how Obama ruined the economy. Also please indicate what exactly happened to the largest surplus in history under President Clinton, and how it was squandered. Further, explain what the "party of no" has done to aid in President Obama turning around the economy.

    • 2 votes
    #106.1 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:02 PM EST

    Randy-I'm no teabagger but our unemployment rate was 4.6% the month before Democrats took over both Houses of Congress (2007) and I blame Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi as much as I do Bush for the state of our economy when he left office. When he left, he gave everything to the Democrats but they have failed to fix anything and Obama has added as much to our debt in 3 years as Bush did in 8. You can slice it and dice it anyway you want but Obama has been a failure and you can't blame the Republicans forever.

    • 2 votes
    #106.2 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:11 PM EST

    What did you expect when America elected a less-than-one-term Freshman U.S. Senator who was never even qualified to hold that office, much less POTUS, never held a real job in the private sector, nor was ever a decision maker, nor an executive of ANY SORT, in the private or even public sector in his entire life?

    B. Hussein Obama was a "Community Organizer" for goodness sakes, there are small business owners with more executive experience than that Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing Kook Democrat waste of skin in the White House now.

    Elections DO HAVE CONSEQUENCES and we are all paying 100X worse than when former President George W. Bush was in office, because the U.S. Economy, U.S. Joblessness and skyrocketing U.S. National Debt and skyrocketing U.S. Budget Deficit is higher than all of the other U.S. Presidents in American history...combined!!! This "Community Organizer" hasn't a da*ned clue what the h*ll he's doing and only knows how to pit one American versus another.

    And go on lavish, separate-from-his-wife/children thus costing that much more, expensive U.S. Taxpayer-financed vacations and golf outings, when he's not busy standing up for and publically supporting the Ground Zero Islamic Mosque construction, calling Police Officers stupid. (See Cambridge, Mass Police Dept in whom B. Hussein Obama called them "stupid" for arresting his Left wing Kooky Goon Buddy, Henry Louis Gates Jr.), or bowing way down to Saudi Arabian Sultans and Japanese Emperors.

    Yeah, America really messed up electing someone who has no business being a County Dog Catcher, much less the Leader of the Free World. However, one good thing about American Presidential Elections is they come back every four years and on Nov. 6th, 2012, a great majority of the American electorate who love this country will vote out the worst mistake ever called President in American History. Guaranteed!! I can't wait!!

    • 2 votes
    #106.3 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:26 PM EST
    Reply

    Santorum did well in Iowa precisely because he didn't really try. The more voters learn about him and his toxic point of view, the worse he will do. The same thing applied to Michelle Bachmann. She surged when she was an unknown and then fell away as people learned how hateful and ignorant she really was.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#107 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 6:58 PM EST

    Thank goodness Santorum lacks the staying power, resources and message to get the republican nod. He is scary and if elected, would be a step backwards for America, a long step. Romney will get the nomination but he is such an arrogant putz who hasn't worked a day in his life and can't identify with the middle class. Face it white people, America will forever be a mixture of many ethnicities, thank goodness. And no matter how long you try to preserve a white majority, it will not last. The Hispanic population is growing rapidly and will wants its say in American politics. It's just a part of the evolution of this country. Don't be scared.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#108 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:12 PM EST

    Santorum - Yet in another on the long list of right-wing whack jobs that thinks the country must conform to his ideology in order to succeed.

    Need a few examples you say: Birth control should be ban is among my favorite but not bad to consider his views on "governing" women's rights, gay rights and the list goes on.

    Amazing how someone claiming to be so conservative and against healthcare reform so strongly supported and voted in favor for the sham of a part-D drug plan - UNFUNDED I might add.

    No thanks, think we have seen enough of the WHACKO bunch and best the GOP wake up to this fact before the it is too late.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#109 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:24 PM EST

    Birth control should be ban is among my favorite

    That isn't what he said at all. In fact he said specifically that he wouldn't ban it.

    • 1 vote
    #109.1 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 10:30 PM EST

    Oom - You BEST take another look at a few Fox interviews as it is EXACTLY what he said.

      #109.2 - Thu Jan 5, 2012 10:53 AM EST

      No. Perhaps you need to improve your reading comprehension. He said that individual states should be allowed to ban it (something that would never happen) and he said that he personally opposes it, but that he would NOT make it illegal even if he were in a position to do so.

      By way of analogy, I personally despise pitbulls and the imbeciles who own them. I think cities and states should have the right to ban them within their borders. However, if I were governor, I doubt I would actually ban them. See the difference?

        #109.3 - Fri Jan 6, 2012 4:05 PM EST

        Oom - You twist the context of what he said very well but seeing that you either refuse to acknowledge or recognize his statements here is a little help.

        "It's not enough to oppose abortion, even to protect the life of the mother or survivors of rape or incest..."

        In reference to a question on contraception "It's not okay. It's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."

        "One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country." And also, "Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that's okay, contraception is okay. It's not okay. It's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."

        Santorum is nothing but another nut case that thinks the country must conform to his ideology or be damned - An extremely dangerous and unhealthy position in a democracy.

          #109.4 - Sat Jan 7, 2012 1:15 PM EST

          ap...If your last sentence had started with the name Obama, it would have made perfect sense....

          • 1 vote
          #109.5 - Sat Jan 7, 2012 2:02 PM EST

          In reference to a question on contraception "It's not okay. It's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."'

          So what? That isn't saying it should be banned. I personally oppose adultery, but I don't think it should be a criminal offense. Santorum doens't like birth control, so what? He isnt' going to propose a federal law against condoms.

            #109.6 - Sat Jan 7, 2012 3:54 PM EST

            J.A. Sorry but that is the reality of things.

            Oom - That may be how you feel but it again is not what Santorum is saying. He has been very specific of the fact on what actions he feels appropriate and you will not find anything in a direct quote from him that can support you conclusion that "He isn't going to...".

              #109.7 - Sat Jan 7, 2012 4:07 PM EST

              reading comprehension. He did say he personally wouldn't do this. What part of that don't you understand? I agree he should keep his mouth shut, since he isn't running for Pope.

                #109.8 - Sat Jan 7, 2012 4:33 PM EST

                Oom - Find the full quote of what you reference. We do agree on his big mouth.

                  #109.9 - Sat Jan 7, 2012 4:36 PM EST
                  Reply

                  Aren't ya glad you're not a T-bagger stepford wife........a breeding machine that feeds the ego's of self-righteous husbands with tiny p***ks?

                  A resounding NO to Santorum or any other Repulican extremist with radical positions

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#110 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:35 PM EST

                  Do you know Mrs. Santorum personally, Justina? Apparently she wanted doctors to stop the birth of her baby (the one that died) and was disappointed that they didn't or couldn't. She is undoubtably a sincere Catholic and for all we know, she is the one who "coverted" her husband to his present POV on life issues. (Lots of Catholic men really don't care.) I find it both maddening and ignorant when women such as yourself have such blatent disrepect for other women who've committed the crime of disagreeing with the feminist party line. She is not a "breeding machine" but a human being. Try it sometime.

                    #110.1 - Fri Jan 6, 2012 4:12 PM EST
                    Reply

                    These Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left Wing, Democrat Kooks who post on these threads, think that the American people will just do what THEY WISH we all would do and that's simply "ignore" B. Hussein Obama's THREE YEARS OF FAILURE AS POTUS, INCREASE OF AMERICAN JOBLESSNESS AND SPENDING MORE U.S. TAXPAYER MONEY AND DRIVING UP THE FEDERAL BUDGET DEFICIT AND U.S. NATIONAL DEBT, MORE THAN ALMOST ALL THE OTHER U.S. PRESIDENTS BEFORE HIM...COMBINED!!!

                    Now if the U.S. Economy were going great and if the U.S. Unemployment Rate was like 5%, if the U.S. Housing Market was turned around and home values were no longer upside down with their mortgages and home foreclosures were way down and if American workers' salaries were way up and health care and health insurance costs were way down, we all know these Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left Wing, Democrat Kooks would be singing Obama's praises and telling about all his positive accomplishments as POTUS and how B. Hussein Obama saved the American people from former President Bush's horrible "inherited" economy. THEY WOULDN'T BE GIVING FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH THE CREDIT FOR OBAMA'S NOW THREE YEARS IN OFFICE IF THE ABOVE POSITIVE THINGS WERE HAPPENING WITH REGARDS TO THE U.S. ECONOMY, WOULD THEY?

                    So if they wouldn't be giving former President Bush credit if the CURRENT U.S. Economy were going great with all the above things I mentioned, why wouldn't they be giving B. Hussein Obama the credit for making the U.S. Economy WORSE THAN EVER, with his failed policies and presidency IN THREE YEARS...hhmm??!!

                    They foolishly and ignorantly think that THEY ARE in the majority thinking of the American Electorate and that the American Voters next Nov. 6th, 2012 will simply "ignore" B. Hussein Obama's entire FOUR YEAR TERM AS POTUS and just "blame Bush" to re-elect him. Ha!!!

                    I knew there was a lot of recreational drug use amongst the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left Wing, Democrat Kooks, I just didn't know it was so widespread!!! Anyway, all the more wailing they'll be doing when on Election Night 2012, B. Hussein Obama will be on Int'l TV giving his Concession Speech to the new REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT-ELECT. I can't wait and it can't come soon enough.

                    I'm so tired of this Inexperienced and Unqualified, Socialist/Marxist "Community Organizer" being in the White House and not having a d**ned clue as to what the h*ll he's doing and taking all of his multi-week family vacations b/c he likes to be President, but doesn't like the governing part. What an abject failure the B. Hussein Obama presidency has been. He needs to and will be sent back to Chicago come Election Night 2012.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#111 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:51 PM EST

                    Well Johny, you best be ready for an additional 4 years of Obama because the nut cases being offered up by the Republican Party do not make the cut for the American People.

                    Your comments are as irrational as those coming from the right end of GOP candidates that continue to refuse and acknowledge the reality of what got the country into the economic mess we must still continue to dig out of.

                    Attempts in rewriting history is just not going to work any longer.

                    • 1 vote
                    #111.1 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:07 PM EST

                    Romney will be the candidate and he is hardly a "nut case".

                      #111.2 - Fri Jan 6, 2012 4:15 PM EST
                      Reply

                      If B. Hussein Obama couldn't handle the job of being POTUS, then he should've never run for it in the first place. I mean this is the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, "Community Organizer" who promised that he would cut the U.S. Federal Deficit IN HALF by the end of his first term (He's doubled it in less than THREE YEARS) as POTUS.

                      He promised that his Obamacare, socialized medicine scheme, would decrease the cost of health care and health insurance once passed and since its passage, the cost of health care and health insurance has gone nothing, but UP.

                      B. Hussein Obama also promised he would close down GITMO, which he never did and won't ever do.
                      He also promised that if the U.S. Economy didn't turn around in three years, from him taking office as POTUS, then his presidency would likely be a "one term deal." (See YouTube) Not only has the U.S. Economy NOT TURNED AROUND, but it's gotten exponentially worse since this no-good, inexperienced, unqualified, Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, "Community Organizer" took office.

                      Now what IS REALISTIC, is instead of making excuses and apologies for "poor ole Barack," why not hold him ACCOUNTABLE for his THREE YEARS OF ABJECT FAILURE AS POTUS??!! If you Left wing, Nut Job Kooks were so wise and knowledgeable in the "truths of life" why would you let this Left wing skunk hold the most powerful office in the world, much less the United States of America, a minute longer than you had, as an American voter, with his FAILED performance on the U.S. Economy as POTUS, so far by voting for him?

                      Neither the Republican party, nor Fox News, nor Rush Limbaugh, nor Sean Hannity, nor Ann Coulter, nor etc. made those promises of JOBS, ECONOMIC PROSPERITY FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS AND HEALTHCARE COSTS BEING REDUCED FOR ALL, B. Hussein Obama made ALL those promises back in 2008.

                      And when B. Hussein Obama made those promises, he never promised the American people, "blame Bush" strategies, he never promised the American people excuses for the U.S. Economy and Joblessness not improving under his non-leadership, he never promised the American people that he would simply demonize and dehumanize his political opponents and/or allow his political cronies to do so, like Jimmy Hoffa Jr., without speaking out against that. He promised the American people Jobs, Jobs, Jobs and at least an improvement in the U.S. Economy, Housing Market and declining property values, that we'd already see AFTER THREE YEARS in the White House. The reason we don't see any improvement in the U.S. Economy is simple, his policies don't work!!

                      Admit it already. B. Hussein Obama is one of the worst U.S. Presidents in the history of this nation and certainly in most of our lifetimes. This guy makes Jimmy Carter looks like a good, sound, fiscal conservative, for goodness sakes. STOP MAKING EXCUSES, HOLD B. HUSSEIN OBAMA RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OWN PRESIDENCY. IF THE U.S. ECONOMY WAS GOING REALLY GOOD RIGHT NOW, AND JOB CREATION WAS WAY UP, WOULD YOU BE GIVING FORMER PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH THE CREDIT FOR IT? OR WOULD YOU BE GIVING B. HUSSEIN OBAMA THE CREDIT FOR IT?

                      SO IF YOU WOULD GIVE OBAMA THE CREDIT IF THE U.S. ECONOMY WERE GOING GREAT RIGHT NOW AFTER HIS THREE YEARS AS POTUS, THEN YOU SHOULD ALSO GIVE HIM THE BLAME FOR THE U.S. ECONOMY REMAINING AWFUL RIGHT NOW AND EVEN BECOMING EXPONENTIALLY WORSE UNDER HIS NON-LEADERSHIP..PERIOD...END OF STORY.

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#112 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:52 PM EST

                      I got some news for you Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat Kooks, NOBODY OWES YOU JACK S**T, INCLUDING A JOB!!! It's people like you that put people like our Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, "Community Organizer" President in office in 2008.

                      Stop complaining and being so envious of people who are smarter, work harder and are far more economically successful than you and start working just as hard or harder to make the wealth that they have, if you're so "angry" about them having wealth.

                      And since when does being wealthy in America automatically equal being a crook, as you Left Wing Kooks say? And when does being poor automatically equal being honest & loveable as you say? You all's talking points are coming straight out of the Communist Manifesto pals and the sad part about that is, a lot of no-good, lazy, jealous, and envious Americans like you, just want to simply re-distribute wealth that you've never earned, nor ever deserved. All just to get back at "rich whitey." People who believe as you do are called THE DEMOCRAT PARTY (& their robot minions).

                      If you're tired of being poor and worthless, GO OUT AND START BUSTING YOUR BUTT AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT. DON'T EXPECT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT OR WORSE THE U.S. TAXPAYERS, TO DO IT FOR YOU, YOU MARXIST, SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST SCHLEPS!!!

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#113 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:53 PM EST

                      I would like to know if any of the Left wing, Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat Kooks who post and/or read on this blog, please give us (by posting your) HONEST ASSESSMENT of B. Hussein Obama's, the great "Community-Organizer-in-Chief" job performance on the U.S. Economy since becoming POTUS in January 2009?
                      Simple as that, can you give an honest grading of B. Hussein Obama's job performance on the U.S. Economy?

                      Can any of you scared, cowardly Socialist Democrats do just that?

                      I can in one word. FAILURE, F - GRADE and imo, I don't believe an F - Graded POTUS deserves re-election to another four year term in the White House. With your grade, does B. Hussein Obama deserve re-election? Yes or No?

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#114 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:54 PM EST

                      My fellow Conservative Republicans, WE CANNOT ALLOW the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrats change the subject from B. Hussein Obama's entire THREE YEARS OF FAILURE AS POTUS, nor let our great country forget on Nov. 6th, 2012. We also CANNOT ALLOW the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrats to make the 2012 General Elections to be about the GOP Nominee, instead of B. Hussein Obama's Presidential Term of FAILURE while in office.

                      We have to continue to remind the American Electorate of the current state of the U.S. Economy and joblessness and remind the voters that Obama has been in office THREE YEARS and soon to be FOUR YEARS and nothing has improved during this term in the White House. We have to tell the American electorate any way that we can, that B. Hussein Obama hates this country and does not want it to rebound economically, succeed, nor be a leader in the world for freedom, democracy, capitalism, free markets and the private sector being stronger than the federal government where the people have all the power, instead of the feds whom are there to serve us.

                      We have to NOT ALLOW the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrats to "change the subject" or try to distract the American electorate from focusing ON OBAMA's MISERABLE RECORD OF FAILURE WITH REGARDS TO THE U.S. ECONOMY AND JOBLESSNESS. We must force them to do what they already know themselves they cannot do and that's to DEFEND B. HUSSEIN OBAMA'S MISERABLE RECORD AS POTUS.

                      We also must not allow them to just "blame Bush" and then quickly change the subject to attack the GOP Nominee, the GOP party, Conservatism, Christianity, American Traditionalism, Our Philosophy on the "Truths of Life" and ANY prior administration's record. MAKE THEM DEFEND OBAMA'S RECORD AND B. HUSSEIN OBAMA'S RECORD ALONE.

                      They've even graded B. Hussein Obama themselves on this very thread when I asked them and the best grade they could give him was a "C" (a horrible grade from his own robot followers and one they knew they couldn't give any higher to, as they would look like the foolish, lying, robot followers that they are) and yet still posted their ridiculous beliefs that a "C" Graded POTUS is worth re-electing, even in a horrible U.S. Economy and skyrocketing U.S. Unemployment rate. Thus making those posters "rambling defenses" of B. Hussein Obama look foolish and biased as they truly are. Make these Left Wing, Leftist, Liberal, Socialist Marxist, Democrat Kooks defend this CLOWN & "Community Organizer" President and they'll be stumbling over their foolish a**es trying to defend what they know to be a FAILURE of an inexperienced and unqualified POTUS.

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#115 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 7:55 PM EST

                      Yeah, Obama has kept his promises to fix the American Economy & improve joblessness (NOT!!) and to run a much more transparent and honest (Chicago-style, pay-for-play, actually) method of governing. So, let's not forget, in order to pass Obamacare, after B. Hussein Obama promised that those healthcare bill debates would be televised live on C-SPAN (HA!! WHAT A LIE THAT WAS!!), he implemented shady, backroom deals like the Cornhusker Kickback with Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat Senator Ben Nelson, the Louisiana Purchase with Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat Senator Mary Landrieu and the Florida Gator-aid Deal with Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat Senator Bill Nelson (which at the time, B. Hussein Obama was pressured, by the American people, to back out of). In addition to that, here's some other slimy, shady happenings that occurred with the passage of Obamacare...Chicago-style, pay-for-play politics at its finest!!

                      Scott Matheson, brother of Congressman Jim Matheson (D, Utah), was suddenly nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Obediently, Congressman Matheson went from a "no" vote on Obamacare to "Undecided."

                      A new hospital in Connecticut for morally-challenged Senator Chris Dodd

                      Roughly ten billion U.S. Taxpayer dollars in community health centers to buy off Vermont's Bernie Sanders

                      A threat to take away Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman's committee chairmanship unless he fell into line with regards to Obamacare

                      The above are just a few of the slimy tactics, bribes, kickbacks and payoffs, that B. Hussein Obama pulled on the unwitting American people who have never polled as a majority FOR Obamacare, but have to have it completely repealed!! NOT TO MENTION THAT THE SUPER-MAJORITY, DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED U.S. CONGRESS AND PRESIDENT EXEMPTED THEMSELVES AND ONLY A FEW LIBERAL AFL/CIO LEFTIST, LIBERAL, SOCIALIST, MARXIST, DEMOCRAT LABOR UNIONS FROM HAVING TO PARTICIPATE IN OBAMACARE AT ALL, WHILE THE REST OF US, U.S. CITIZENS ARE FEDERAL GOV'T MANDATED TO!!!

                      I always knew that Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrats love to accuse others of what they themselves are 100X more guilty of, but the nerve & audacity of a lot of you Left Wing, Socialist, Marxist Kooks to accuse the GOP of being nefarious, unethical, corporatists would be so LAUGHABLE, if it wasn't such a downright, bold-faced lie!!!

                      B. Hussein Obama and his Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat party, and left wing kooky robot followers who post on these PMS-NBC Threads are the most unethical, most nefarious, most notoriously foul and corrupt LIARS in U.S. Political History!!! However, your lies and distortions WON'T WORK on Nov. 6th, 2012. I promise you that!!!

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#116 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:00 PM EST

                      I love (NOT) how you Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing, Democrat Kooks so foolishly and FALSELY mis-quote the Bible, mis-quote Christianity and Judaism and harshly judge people of faith, except the sworn enemy of the United States of America, the people of Radical Islamo-Fascism.

                      For those people, you Socialist/Marxist, Left wing Kooks will bend over backwards trying to ensure they have an Islamic Mosque at Ground Zero, NY and B. Hussein Obama will bow down, way low to the Sultan of Saudi Arabia and shamelessly give his first official TV Interview as POTUS to an Arab TV Station in the Middle East, with an Arab audience, NOT ONE FROM HIS OWN COUNTRY IN WHICH HE LEADS.

                      If he's not a Muslim in his heart, B. Hussein Obama does a helluva job in impersonating one or at the least, a very strong advocate and apologist for the people of Radical Islamo-Fascism.

                      Nobody listens to your pathetic attempts at demonizing and dehumanizing Christians, nor Christianity. We feel sorry for and pray for you. You are truly lost and need Jesus Christ in your lives as your personal saviors. So sad, tragic and such religious intolerance, it's disgusting.

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#117 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:02 PM EST

                      Does anybody on here realize that Santorum is in sync with the papacy? Are we getting ready to see prophecy fulfilled before our very eyes? Get your Bibles out and read Revelatoin 13 and 14.

                        Reply#118 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:13 PM EST

                        I love America more than any Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing Kook Democrat would or does. I know I would never be a faithful servant of a "church" for TWENTY YEARS whose Pastor (Jeremiah Wright) preaches blatant hate of other races and glorifies genocidal racists like Nation of Islam Leader - Louis Farrakhan and goes with that blinded-by-color nut to visit the "late-great" now former Leader of Libya, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

                        A hate-filled Pastor who stated "God D*mn America" right from his pulpit and even had the audacity to blame America for the 9/11 Attacks "America's Chickens coming home to roost!!" just a few days afterwards. Then for B. Hussein Obama to go to Saudi Arabia before their Sultan and also to Japan before their Emperor and bow way down low to those un-elected monarchs is a slap in the face to freedom, democracy and the American way.

                        Don't you dare try to call us out, nor anyway else to the right of you, who is rightfully calling that Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing Kook Democrat POTUS we have now, un-American, when B. Hussein Obama, the public supporter and even encourager of the Ground Zero Islamic Mosque is called what he truly is, ya Communist!!!

                        • 2 votes
                        #118.1 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:23 PM EST

                        For crying out loud, that's what they said about JFK in 1960. It's 2013. A candidate's religion shouldn't be an issue, be he/she a Catholic, Mormon, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or agnostic.

                          #118.2 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 10:37 PM EST
                          Reply

                          B. Hussein Obama's, the great "Community-Organizer-in-Chief" 2012 Presidential Campaign strategy:

                          "Please ignore my entire 1st four-year term as POTUS, since that was a miserable failure and I did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to strengthen the U.S. economy, lower the U.S. unemployment rate, help the toxic housing market with underwater mortgages and increase property values, nor anything to stop record home foreclosure rates, nor stop a record number of people from being on welfare, food stamps and medicaid. But hey, I did let gays, lesbians, and transgender, sexually deviant, mentally deranged people openly serve in our U.S. Military without care what that would do to morale and/or National Security!!!"

                          "RE-ELECT ME INSPITE OF MY ABJECT FAILURE OF A PRESIDENCY IN A GENERATION (OR AT LEAST SINCE JIMMY CARTER) AND IN-SPITE OF MY AND MY PARTY'S LEFTIST, LIBERAL, SOCIALIST, MARXIST, DEMOCRAT POLICIES, NOT BECAUSE OF THEM!!"

                          (Psst, don't worry, the PMS-NBC News Channel and National Public Radio, will get my followers and "commrades" to fall for my horsesh*t "tax the rich," "help the poor," "redestribute the wealth" and "hope & change" mantras once again. Hee-hee-hee-hee, such foolish, robot followers we have!!!)

                          Ha!!!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#119 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:14 PM EST

                          If a person wants to be a homosexual, a polygamist, or someone who practices beastiality, they have a right to, but just don't expect the rest of the over 99% of the American people (or even 99% of the world) to somehow think your sexually deviant, repulsive, disgusting and revolting behavior to think "it's okay to be gay" or to try and teach our children in schools that it's somehow natural (as it's not and never occurs in the animal kingdom, b/c animals don't have the intelligence to choose such behavior that is such an affront to nature, as only human beings do) or even that gays, bi-sexuals and transgendered (and they like to call heterosexuals sexually confused, by saying they're "homophobic" ha!!) should be recognized by the state, when a good majority of those people have been tied to pedophilia.

                          No, you haven't been through what African-Americans have been through in this nation's history, i.e. slavery, Jim Crow laws, drinking from different water fountains, going to different public bathrooms, eating at different restaurants, sitting in the backs of public buses, nor going to different schools as children and all other types of segregation and discrimination.

                          Constitutional Rights are based on the individuals, not Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing, Democrat Kooky, "freaks of nature" and dregs of humanity GROUPS and certainly NOT BASED ON SEXUAL ACTIVITY. Ever looked up where the word Sodomy comes from? If you haven't, you really should. You might learn something for once.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#120 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:15 PM EST

                          To all you Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, Left wing Kooks who post on these PMS-NBC threads. I've got some bad news for you and your "Community-Organizer-in-Chief" (President in name only):

                          Your PMS-NBC and National Public Radio "talking points" of divisive politics and class warfare are not only nothing but lies and worn out, tired excuses for your Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing, Democrat Kooky beliefs, but are also not supported by a majority of the American Electorate. Sorry, but your Democrat Party's class warfare and divisive politics are just not reasonating with the great majority of the American voters.

                          WE WANT THE JOBS THAT OBAMA & THE LEFTIST, LIBERAL, SOCIALIST, MARXIST, DEMOCRAT, LEFT WING KOOKS PROMISED US IN 2008 & A VAST MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NOT SIMPLY "IGNORE" AND "BLAME BUSH" FOR OBAMA'S ENTIRE FOUR YEAR TERM IN OFFICE COME NOV. 2012...PERIOD...END OF STORY!!! So sorry for your luck.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#121 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:16 PM EST

                          Despite B. Hussein Obama-Endorsed 'Occupy' Protesters, Socialism is Looked Upon as Negative by 60% of Americans. AND ONLY LOOKED UPON POSITIVE BY 31% OF AMERICANS. Aha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!

                          According to the Pew Research Center, not even the B. Hussein Obama-endorsed 'Occupy' protesters can change the fact that Americans look upon Socialism as negative and Capitalism positive. Even with all of B. Hussein Obama's rhetoric and railing against Capitalism, he loses the battle.

                          Socialism was looked upon negative by 60% and favorable by only 31% (that 31% is you Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, Left wing Kooks who post on these PMS-NBC threads). Meanwhile, Capitalism had a 50% positive rating and a 40% negative one.

                          The recent Occupy Wall Street protests have focused public attention on what organizers see as the excesses of America's free market system, but perceptions of Capitalism – and even of Socialism – have changed little since early 2010 despite the recent tumult.

                          The American public's take on Capitalism remains mixed, with just slightly more saying they have a positive (50%) than a negative (40%) reaction to the term. That's largely unchanged from a 52% to 37% balance of opinion in April 2010.

                          As stated at Weasel Zippers, looks like Newsweek was wrong, we are all not Socialists now. Imagine that, Newsweek was wrong again. Ha!!!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#122 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:21 PM EST

                          If we're not socialist/communist ??

                          Why is obama hanging out with all these people;

                          This next election is not about the differences between Republican and Democrat's basic philosophies.

                          It is the differences between communist and Democratic ideology's!

                          All of his life obama has been mentored and supported by these people:

                          George Soros: Jew that hates jews and the U.S.A.

                          Anthony Van Jones: socialist/communist Hates the U.S.A.

                          Valarie Jarrett: Communist

                          Vernon Jarrett: Communist, Valarie Jarrett's father-in-law

                          Frank Marshall Davis: Communist obama mentor

                          Cass Sunstein: Socialist/Communist obamma tsar

                          Rev Wright "God Damn America"

                          Bill Ayres: Socialist/Communist, Weather Underground

                          Bernadine Van Dohrn Socialist/Communist, Weather Underground

                          Tony Rezco: Chicago crook

                          Andy Stern: SEIU

                          Dick Trumpka: UAW

                          Lil Jimmy Hoffa: That son of a bitch!

                          Acorn: Criminal enterprise big obama supporters

                          Black Panthers: Guardians of the Poll

                          Then there is:

                          Solyndra

                          Tonopha

                          Light Squared

                          Fast and Furious: BTW, obama Officer Terry's parents deserve answers.

                          obama your book has an ugly cover.

                          U.S.A./Capitalism, obamazuela, or Cuba --- You choose in 2012!!!!

                          • 2 votes
                          #122.1 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:27 PM EST
                          Reply

                          B. Hussein Obama has NEVER held a real private sector job in his life, nor has he ever been a decision maker (except to choose which socks he's gonna wear in the morning), nor has he ever been an executive in his life.

                          B. Hussein Obama is the most unqualified, inexperienced, Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat President in American History. America CANNOT AFFORD four more years of B. Hussein Obama. He's the worst President ever and hasn't a d*mned clue on how to govern a society as sophisticated and as complicated as the United States of America. All he knows how to do is "community organize" one group of Americans versus another, based on class, socio-economic status, ethnicity, color, religion and political affiliation. He's horrible, awful and WILL BE DEFEATED on Nov. 6th, 2012. That is a guarantee!!!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#123 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:27 PM EST

                          Americans see B. Hussein Obama as the Farthest Presidential Candidate from Them Ideologically Including All Republicans.

                          B. Hussein Obama, the most out of touch candidate for American ideology.

                          According to a recent Gallup poll, which should cause yet more concern for President B. Hussein Obama for the 2012 elections - Americans see Obama as the farthest candidate from them ideologically than any of the current GOP 2012 primary candidates. Should this really come as a surprise as B. Hussein Obama is the most Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing, Kook and polarizing U.S. President ever elected?!

                          Although many Americans are not not sure of some of the Republican candidates, they have had THREE YEARS to figure out exactly what Obama's ideology is. 57% consider Obama very liberal/liberal, while 15% polled (who were smoking crack when asked) stating that Obama was very conservative/conservative. If Obama has not yet convinced America that he is not "very liberal" at this point, it is a lost cause. America knows exactly what B. Hussein Obama is and stands for, there is no fooling the American voting public like in 2008.

                          What should further trouble Obama is that Independents consider B. Hussein Obama the farthest away from their ideology as well. However, just how out of touch are Democrats with the main stream of society? They think B. Hussein Obama is spot on with their ideology. Ha!!!

                          This is coupled with other polling data showing Obama loses a hypothetical match up with Mitt Romney 45% to 39%.

                          B. Hussein Obama's job approval rating is also back down to 41% approval – 50% disapproval as per Gallup. See ya at the polls on November 6th, 2012!!! Can you say, B. Hussein Obama Concession Speech to the new Republican President-Elect on Election Night??!! Hee-hee-hee!!!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#124 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:28 PM EST

                          Aha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!! Oh yeah, B. Hussein Obama will wipe the floor with any of the GOP Contenders in the Nov. 6th, 2012 General Election (NOT!).

                          Robert Reich Predicts Hillary Clinton Will Replace Biden as VEEP on 2012 Obama Re-election Ticket

                          B. Hussein Obama's political shell game - Robert Reich predicts Left wing Kook & has-been U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will be in and Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, Left wing Kook Vice President Joe Biden will be out as Veep on B. Hussein Obama's 2012 Presidential re-election ticket.

                          This is certainly not something that we have not heard rumored or speculated before. However, according to Reich he has no inside information to come to this conclusion, only a hunch. Reich states that B. Hussein Obama needs to stir the passions and enthusiasms of a dis-illusioned Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, Left wing Kooky base and an increasing poor U.S. economy & poor American jobless rate.

                          In other words Reich is saying that B. Hussein Obama needs to create a diversion (distraction from his abject failure of a presidency) and play a political shell game so that "We the People" will pay more attention to a change rather than the failed "Hope & Change," manure that B. Hussein Obama promised in 2008, but has never delivered on.

                          Let alone a continued poor U.S. economy that has millions of Americans STILL out of work. B. Hussein Obama obviously cannot run on his record (a record of failure & recession), so Reich wants B. Hussein Obama to play political diversion games. How nice. Reich then goes on to say that this would set up Hillary Clinton to be the 2016 Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing Kook, Democrat Presidential candidate.

                          Of course this presumes that an Obama/Cinton ticket would win on Nov. 6th, 2012. But would it work for America?

                          One, does Hillary Clinton really want to put all her political eggs in Obama's basket and run on the horribly wretched Obama U.S. economy and Socialist/Marxist Obamacare?

                          Two
                          , could Obama and Hillary Clinton really get along, along with adding BJ Clinton to the mix? Talk about the political "Odd Couple."

                          Three, does anyone really think that Left wing Kook VP Joe Biden is the reason why Obama's job approval numbers are so low? Biden has done everything for this Socialist/Marxist President including selling his soul and acting the fool, even more so than usual.

                          Four, imagine the political ads against Obama/Clinton taken from their 2008 primary battles.

                          Five, does Obama have the ability, humility and personality to accept that HE is the problem and Hillary Clinton is his Savior? Hardly, many have already suggested B. Hussein Obama not run for a second term for the betterment of the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat party. However, that was never an option for Obama's ego. B. Hussein Obama has continually shot down the notion that Clinton and Biden would swap jobs. If he makes such a flip-flop now, it would show just how politically weak "The One," truly is. Also, he would be, if re-elected, a neutered U.S. President and everyone would know who would really wears the "pant suits" in the Oval Office. Ha!! I love it!!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#125 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:28 PM EST

                          What has B. Hussein Obama accomplished in his THREE YEARS in the White House to improve the U.S. Economy & American Joblessness, other than drive up the U.S. Federal Debt & the U.S. Deficit to more than all of the other U.S. Presidents before him...combined?! Gee, it really takes a "Community Organizer" brain to spend tens of billions and even a few TRILLION dollars of OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY!!! But that's the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left Wing Kook Democrat party way, isn't it?!

                          What about the Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing Kook Democrats who've controlled the U.S. Senate since January 2007? How's all the "Hopey Changey" horse manure working for 99% of un-employed Americans and for 99% of U.S. Small Business Owners? What was that? A living hell you say? Aaah, I rest my case ladies & gentlemen.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#126 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:29 PM EST

                          the federal debt was $10T or so before obama, since it is now about $15T, your claim that he has driven it up more than all presidents combined is false. No surprise from you that you post nonsense.

                          when you have facts (you know, actual facts, not fox talking points), come back and play again. :)

                          • 1 vote
                          #126.1 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:47 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Hope & Change for the Youth? A Meager 55% of Americans Between Ages 16 and 29 Have Jobs. Ha!! How's that Hopey Changey stuff working out for ya, huh??!!

                          The American youth has lost that "Luvin’ Feeling" For B. Hussein Obama and his Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democrat, Left wing Kooky Democrat Party.

                          A question to the youth of America that supported and campaigned for Barack Obama in 2008, hows that “Hopey, Changey” stuff working out for ya? In 2008 the youth of America blindly followed the promises, rhetoric and bumper sticker slogans of B. Hussein Obama propelling him into office and actually believing that “we are the ones that you all have been waiting for.”

                          From 2008 to present day, the American youth has learned an inconvenient truth, B. Hussein Obama’s promise of hope, change and jobs was Horse Manure. Plain & Simple. They were repaid for their actions with no jobs to be found. Talk about a buzz kill for any B. Hussein Obama 2012 re-election effort.

                          The American youth will most likely stay home when it comes to B. Hussein Obama’s re-election and on election day. Presently, only 55% of Americans between the ages of 16 and 29 have jobs. As stated by Weasel Zippers, the economic train wreck rolls on.

                          In 2008, the youth vote helped sweep B. Hussein Obama into office. Americans 18-29 spread the word on social media, energized fundraising and went to the polls.

                          In 2012, the youth vote is moving on and throwing those omnipresent “Hopey Changey” bumper stickers and T-Shirts in garbage bins.

                          Not because of apathy. Not because another candidate generates more enthusiasm. Not because of his character. Not because they think voting is pointless. The 18-29 vote is up for grabs in 2012 because the American youth can’t afford cars to put bumper stickers on and those T-Shirts are worn out from too many days sitting on the couch unemployed.

                          Obama used these kids naivety in 2008 and since has done little to nothing to help the energetic, grass roots, American youth. Not only are barely 50% employed, earlier this year, Americans’ student loan debt surpassed credit card debt for the first time ever. Not to mention the continued increase in debt will be the responsibility you today’s and tomorrow's American youth. So what do the millennials say? HELL NO TO OBAMA!!! According to a recent Pew Research Center poll, only 49% of millennial voters approve of B. Hussein Obama, down a whopping 23 points from February 2009.

                          But while 18-to-29 year-old Americans are reliable Democrats, their enthusiasm for B. Hussein Obama and presidential politics has waned, setting the stage for an uphill struggle to turn out the vote.

                          Forty-nine percent of millennial voters approve of Obama, according to the Pew Research Center, down 23 points from February 2009. They are also the least interested in or engaged with the current campaign, the study found.

                          Only 17 percent of millennials said they are following election news closely, while just 13 percent said they’ve given a lot of thought to the candidates, a 15 point drop from the same period four years ago. Hee-hee-hee!!!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#127 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:30 PM EST

                          Nothing is wrong with our Constitutional form of government, nor with our separation of powers. The American people are just not being led right now and haven't been for the LAST THREE YEARS because we have a less-than-one-term U.S. Senator, America-hating, "Community Organizer" in the White House, who has no idea how to lead, because he's never been a decision-maker, nor an executive in his entire life, either in the public or private sector!!

                          At least former awful, Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Left wing Kook Democrat President Jimmy Carter was an executive of the state of Georgia as Governor before becoming POTUS. B. Hussein Obama has less experience as a leader, manager and executive decision-maker than most small business owners in this country. He's a joke and the most awful, inexperienced, and unqualified POTUS in American history...YUCK!!!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#128 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:31 PM EST

                          america hating! leftist! liberal! socialist! marxist! lol, anyone can post nonsense like you, without even thinking..just type nonsense fox talking points. :)

                          • 1 vote
                          #128.1 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:48 PM EST
                          Reply

                          This is much ado about nothing. If you look at an Iowa map that shows the voting by county, you see that all of Santorum's support was in the rural counties while Romney won the urban areas. This shows that Santorum is only popular among the far right fundamentalists, of which rural Iowa has many. There are many fewer jesus freaks in New Hampshire and Santorum, like Huckabee four years ago, will have little to cheer on primary night. I predict that Romney and Houseman will battle for first while Santorum will finish third or maybe fourth behind Paul. And he will be lucky to get more than ten percent of the vote.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#129 - Wed Jan 4, 2012 8:31 PM EST
                          Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7
                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.