Gary Johnson to run as Libertarian

Jim Cole / AP, file

Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson in Concord, New Hampshire, in October.

EXETER, N.H. -- Former two-term New Mexico governor and GOP hopeful Gary Johnson is dropping out of the Republican nomination race to run as a Libertarian candidate, NBC News has confirmed.

Johnson's campaign spokesman Joe Hunter cited Johnson's lack of exposure within the Republican party as a main reason for his decision to seek the Libertarian nomination.


Johnson appeared in only two of more than a dozen nationally televised debates and had trouble getting his shoestring campaign off the ground in early states. He will make an official announcement next Wednesday at a press conference in Santa Fe.

"His exclusion from the debates and lack of acknowledgement from the Republican establishment has been very frustrating," Hunter told NBC News. "His commitment since day one to get his message out."

Johnson's decision has been anticipated since he paused his New Hampshire-centric campaign several weeks ago.

His strategy shift notably began when Johnson nearly missed the registration deadline for New Hampshire's primary in October.

Johnson completed the filing with just hours to spare after a campaign staff mistake and a last-minute red-eye flight from Arizona to Manchester.

Several staff members left the campaign shortly afterward and Johnson quickly stopped canvassing in New Hampshire thereafter.

Johnson is known for his support for legalizing marijuana. He also supports abortion rights.

As New Mexico governor, he often worked with the Libertarian party to advance his agenda so this move is not entirely out of his comfort zone.

"Going back to his governor days, he has been comfortable with the Libertarian label," Hunter said.

The Libertarian party national convention will be held in Las Vegas next spring.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

Evidently Mr. Johnson does not feel he has a home in today's republican party. He's far from alone. The tax and spend republicans of today have probably alienated enough of their voters to assure President Obama an easy 2nd term. Millions more enjoying health care for the first time won't hurt his chances either.

The thing the republicans are going to hammer on from now till Nov 8th is trying to pin any negative aspect of life in America on Obama. You even see some of the RWNJ's engaging in revisionist history by blaming the financial crash on Obama in a vain attempt to exploit people with convenient amnesia.

That tactic should work for their crowd of sycophants with limited abilities of reality perception, but it doesn't wash with mainstream voters.

This Gary Johnson guy is emblematic of the crisis the GOP has reached: Where do normal republican voters find a home?

I mean how can you elect a GOP candidate that proudly advocates the assassination of President Obama? http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/43377. Why isn't he in jail? Is he waiting for someone to act on his deranged suggestion?

Gary Johnson is a call for moderation. A plea for sanity. Sanity is tough to come by in today's GOP though.

  • 2 votes
Reply#27 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:35 AM EST

Did you READ the article you posted?? LMFAO!

On Monday morning a story whipped through the liberal blogosphere (and unfortunately one generally conservative news source) that had the left gleefully attacking the Tea Party Movement. They were thrilled, you see, to find a Tea Partier advocating for the assassination of President Obama and his entire family. Only they didn’t. Find such a Tea Partier, I mean.

Keith DeHavelle outlined this great example of how the left wing blogs glommed onto this story of an idiot that wrote on his Facebook page that Obama and his family should be assassinated and then assigned it to a “Tea Party darling” when in truth neither the nut in question nor any part of the story itself is connected in any way to a Tea Party group or Tea Party sentiment.

First TWO Paragraphs of the article! *shakes head* and I'm not even a tea party supporter GOPisextinct!

    #27.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:31 PM EST
    Reply

    Have a Happy Genetically Modified Christmas from all of us here at Monsanto. And remember if it's got corn, soy, sugar, wheat, alfalfa, or cotton in it (99% of all products in the store) then it's got Roundup Weed Killer (agent orange) built right into it's genetic code. So think of us this holiday season, each bite you take makes us richer and you much much sicker, oh and that strange body odor your over-weight, nearly androgenous family is exuding is thanks to our GMO's also, and while your giving thanks to God ($$$) before your feast dont let dad forget to thank us here at Monsanto for his very own set of MOOBS (man boobs) courtesy of the Bovine Growth Hormone we have forced into nearly all dairy products.

    "GMO's, making population control profitable!"

    • 3 votes
    Reply#28 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:38 AM EST

    So the GOP candidate stands to lose the .000000000001% of the vote that this clown will get.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#29 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:05 AM EST

    That is correct. On top of the 11 points that GOP candidate is already behind. LOL Every little bit counts.

      #29.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:36 AM EST

      In a poll that favored dems by 12 pecent in terms of composition. Just the media's attempt to affect the outcome. It won't work this time.

      • 1 vote
      #29.2 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:37 PM EST
      Reply

      The gop is beginning to split apart. I can see it. Mr grover, the rushbo, fox news on side while the more honest, public servant types will be on the other. Those who rail against gop actions such as blowing up the wtc on 911 & crashing a jet into the pentagon, invasion of iraq, etc.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#30 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:29 AM EST

      Those who rail against gop actions such as blowing up the wtc on 911 & crashing a jet into the pentagon, invasion of iraq, etc.

      Yeah. I found these actions a little over the top too Marshal, but it shows the lengths these people will go to.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#31 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:31 AM EST

      The bought and paid for mainstream Media is trying to form public opinion for their own purpose.

      In 2008, at this time in the election process, Clinton led Obama by 17% points and Rudy Guiliani or Mike Huckabee was the leader of the Republican Candidates.

      Let the people speak!

      For true change, vote Ron Paul, 2012! End the Fed, bring our troops home, protect US Borders, follow the US Constitution!

      • 3 votes
      Reply#32 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:32 AM EST

      News Flash Mt. Mike. Huckabee won Iowa. the GOP spoke. How'd that work out for ya? LOL

        #32.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:39 AM EST

        @Shellie-657180

        Keep believing the polls and mainstream media - you need a nanny to take care of you?

        The people will speak in this crooked two party, bought and paid for, political system. You reap what you sow, how is it working out for you? The last election worked out for me. I cashed all my investments out, and I now live in Alaska, on the grid, at the end of the road! Moose and no humans, not bad!

        • 3 votes
        #32.2 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:40 AM EST

        You meant off the grid, I assume. I envy you.

        • 1 vote
        #32.3 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:31 PM EST
        Reply

        once Dr. Ron Paul jumps to the Libertarian Party the GOP is done! No doubt a 2nd term for the POTUS once that happens..

        • 1 vote
        Reply#33 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:34 AM EST

        I can't in good conscience vote for Obama, whom I consider to be one of the worst Presidents of the past 100 years for his abject failures of leadership, his profoundly idiotic team of half-wit advisers, and his inability to remember, let alone drive toward, what he claims to stand for. I won't vote for any of the current Republican candidates, whom I consider to be fundamentally corrupt, deeply cynical, and utterly devoted to the total destruction of both the American economy and American values of liberty and justice.

        Johnson looks like a good alternative to me despite that he can't possibly win. At least I wouldn't have to vomit in my mouth as I am punching the (likely hacked) voting machine.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#34 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:38 AM EST

        Well Jack, first you have to have a good conscience.

        • 1 vote
        #34.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:41 AM EST

        Keep trolling Shellie, you do Obama good!

          #34.2 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 11:59 AM EST

          "Lil" gw bush-league wa BY FAR the worst President ever, followed by the Alzheimer's idiot, Ronald Reagan, then that lying crook and Dick, Nixon. Republicans have a monopoly on the WORST Presidents ever; if Lincoln had not been a Republican they would. Republicans are the embodiment of WORST!

          • 1 vote
          #34.3 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:37 PM EST
          Reply

          Who gives a @!$%#!

            Reply#35 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:54 AM EST

            All these one-issue idiots running are going to hand the election to Obama. We can't afford to have him for 4 more years...his policies are destructive. He is playing political games and so are Pelosi-Reid....baiting the GOP.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#36 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 11:48 AM EST

            I think you are lying.

            • 1 vote
            #36.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:38 PM EST
            Reply

            Really! Even running as a libertarian Johnson wouldn't pull too many votes from Ron Paul for the exact reasons that Paul is running in the GOP. Exposure, Votes & $. The GOP hates Obama soo much that they would rather vote for Ron Paul than split votes to a libertarian ticket. Americans that vote are not all stupid & if they are Ron Paul supporters they are gifted in that they realize he is needed to save our liberties.

            • 4 votes
            Reply#37 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 11:54 AM EST

            Crystal5

            you hit the nail right on the head thank you

            • 1 vote
            #37.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:47 PM EST
            Reply

            Ho hum this is of no consequence whatsoever as is quite honestly Ron Paul. He has some good ideas some not so good but he will never occupy the Oval Office. The only purpose Mr Paul can serve is to take away votes in the general from the Republicans.

              Reply#38 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:16 PM EST

              Ray- 402

              Ho hum thats BULL.

              • 1 vote
              #38.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 PM EST
              Reply

              Gary Johnson running for President as Libertarian.

              SPOILER ALERT!!!

              Literally.

              Obama+Biden 2012

              • 1 vote
              Reply#39 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:23 PM EST

              The whole idea of voting is that it allows us to choose someone that we feel represents what we want. I don't know about you, but I'm not basing my vote on what someone's chance is of actually winning. Candidates earn my vote, they don't get it just because they have a better chance of winning.

              Gary has proven himself by campainging based on what his supporters want, not what he thinks will get him the job. I give him respect for standing by his beliefs even when others have stated his ideas are political suicide. I'm tired of hearing candidates tell us one thing then roll over once in office. He may not stand a chance, but at least he stays true to his beliefs.

              They are applying for a job. If I told a potential employer all the things I was capable of, what I planned on doing once given the job, then didn't deliver, they'd fire me in a second. For once I'd like to see someone be realistic when they ran for office. Tell me what you believe, show me what you have planned and follow through. Don't waste my time bashing the other "applicants". I don't care what party you represent. I want someone who represents the people, not the party. The two party system is outdated and ruining the foundation of democracy.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#40 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:45 PM EST

              Gary Johnson doesn't support prohibition. He's got my vote.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#41 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:52 PM EST

              Wow, the Establishment is really concerned about Ron Paul. I like that. It means he is indeed a real threat to the influential groups in D.C.

              Now these crooks try to throw another guy into the Presidential run and probably pump him up via media propaganda to make him competitive vs. Paul.

              What a bunch of losers ...

              RON PAUL will win!!! America will get back to its high values !!!

              • 2 votes
              Reply#43 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:17 PM EST

              I wonder if Gary Johnson is being 'brought in' to try to spoil Ron Paul's success (since he's the most 'libertarian' of the candidates out there).

                Reply#44 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:22 PM EST

                As a poster pointed out, under the current system,
                "The real nightmare of a third (or more) party candidate is if they do well and no candidate reaches the minimum electoral votes, so the election is determined by Congress instead of the voters."

                The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

                Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. There would no longer be a handful of 'battleground' states where voters and policies are more important than those of the voters in more than 3/4ths of the states that will just be 'spectators' and ignored.

                When the bill is enacted by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes– enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538), all the electoral votes from the enacting states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and DC.

                The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for President. Historically, virtually all of the major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have come about by state legislative action.

                In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). Support for a national popular vote is strong among Republicans, Democrats, and Independent voters, as well as every demographic group in virtually every state surveyed in recent polls in closely divided Battleground states: CO – 68%, FL – 78%, IA 75%, MI – 73%, MO – 70%, NH – 69%, NV – 72%, NM– 76%, NC – 74%, OH – 70%, PA – 78%, VA – 74%, and WI – 71%; in Small states (3 to 5 electoral votes): AK – 70%, DC – 76%, DE – 75%, ID – 77%, ME – 77%, MT – 72%, NE 74%, NH – 69%, NV – 72%, NM – 76%, OK – 81%, RI – 74%, SD – 71%, UT – 70%, VT – 75%, WV – 81%, and WY – 69%; in Southern and Border states: AR – 80%,, KY- 80%, MS – 77%, MO – 70%, NC – 74%, OK – 81%, SC – 71%, TN – 83%, VA – 74%, and WV – 81%; and in other states polled: CA – 70%, CT – 74%, MA – 73%, MN – 75%, NY – 79%, OR – 76%, and WA – 77%. Americans believe that the candidate who receives the most votes should win.

                The bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers in 21 small, medium-small, medium, and large states. The bill has been enacted by 9 jurisdictions possessing 132 electoral votes - 49% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.

                NationalPopularVote

                  Reply#45 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:28 PM EST

                  He is being paid by the Gaseous Old Pharts to run as a third party. There will be even more entries also sponsored by the Gaseous Old Pharts. That way when the Greatest President in my lifetime beats the pants off of whom ever wins the Gaseous Old Pharts contest they will sqeal like the little piggies that they are that it is the third, fourth, and fifth parties fault.

                  The Gaseous Old Pharts could run Gingrich, Paul and Romney on their ticket and they still could not beat President Obama. Because the American People recognize that he is the only one in Washington that truly cares about the whole country, not just the one percent

                    Reply#46 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:03 PM EST

                    Yeah right! Legalize Marijuana so that instead of smoking 50g/month illegaly because that is all they can afford, our children will be able to smoke 300 g/month if it becomes an over-the counter treats!!!

                    Stop madness. FREEDOOM is only for a society who can use it responsibly

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#47 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:32 PM EST

                    The Libertarian party national convention will be held in Las Vegas next spring.

                    Nevada or New Mexico? The number of people that knew he was running probably equals the number that knew there was a Las Vegas, New Mexico.

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#48 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:55 PM EST

                    That's funny - a virtual nobody has coopted Ron Paul's place on the Libertarian ticket....

                      Reply#49 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:34 PM EST

                      Yes it is. Plenty of talking heads this past weekend were speculating that if Ron Paul did well in Iowa and was disrespected by the GOP establishment he would go Libertine....erm Libertarian.

                        #49.1 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:51 PM EST
                        Reply

                        This guy is a good fiscal conservative and could probably figure out a way to pay down the national debt. As the governor of NM he used veto powers more than any public official in history. A true small government politician. He believes in placing greater powers in the hands of state governments to handle things such as education,healthcare services, environmental pollution issues, and welfare programs. Removing the feds from things they are good at messing up. He tends toward military non-interventionism.

                        He possesses a number of flawed ideas despite the strong positives;

                        Gary Johnson:......... believes that drug use is not a crime but a health issue;

                        that we should open up the US-Mexican border to allow the free flow of people back and forth;

                        to remove any and all barriers to free trade(more jobs can go bye-bye)

                        he's pro-choice and anti-capital punishmnent;

                        He does not believe in the defense of traditional marriage;

                        Info on Gary from On The Issues.org.

                          Reply#50 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:59 PM EST

                          The Founding Fathers were libertarians at heart.

                            Reply#51 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:53 PM EST

                            Ron Paul has as much of a chance of winning the Presidency as I have of winning the lottery! And that's not right: only a third party can make the changes necessary for America.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#52 - Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:30 PM EST

                            Though I disagree with Ron Paul on many issues, I can respect the fact that he isn't bought and sold by corporations like the GOP and Dems are. Right or wrong, he makes a stand for his beliefs and doesn't pander.

                            We DEFINITELY need a third party in this country that is about the people's business.

                              #52.1 - Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:27 AM EST

                              type in

                              us political parties

                              and take your pick

                                #52.2 - Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:06 AM EST
                                Reply
                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.