Ohio primary wrangling shakes up 2012 calendar

After months of wrangling over the front end of the GOP primary calendar, partisan fighting in Ohio is still shaking up the middle and late months of the 2012 schedule.
 
The situation in Ohio couldn't be more confusing. The Buckeye State was slated to have two separate primaries, with its presidential primary held in June. The split primary would cost the state an extra $15 million. Lawmakers sought to consolidate the contests, but partisan disagreement over the state's redistricting plan held up a bill unifying the primaries on one date.
 
Earlier this week, the logjam broke. The Ohio House and Senate passed House Bill 369, moving the state's presidential primary to March 6 (Super Tuesday). The bill now goes to Governor John Kasich's desk.
 
Observers may remember less than two weeks ago when lots of buzz surrounded whether or not Newt Gingrich would meet Ohio's December 7 filing deadline. It was ultimately a moot point because even if Ohio lawmakers did nothing to consolidate the primary date, a separate law would have kicked in reopening filing.
 
The story of Gingrich getting on the ballot did, however, raise questions about his campaign organization. On December 7, Gingrich had not filed up to four hours before the state's 4:00 p.m. deadline, but his campaign did ultimately make the cutoff. Interestingly, according to the Ohio Secretary of State's office, there were only three other candidates who did properly file by that date to get on either party's primary ballot: Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, and Barack Obama. Ron Paul, who is pretty well organized in the Buckeye state according to a GOP source in Ohio, did not file before the seemingly meaningless December 7 deadline.
 
If Governor Kasich signs HB 369, the new filing deadline will be on December 30, 67 days before the March 6 primary. All of the candidates will have to re-file to get on the ballot, but unlike the previous filing requirements, it would be easier to get on the ballot the second go-round. Under the new law a candidate can get on Ohio's ballot if he or she has raised at least $5,000 in at least 20 states. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Buddy Roemer has raised over $200,000. It's unclear how many states the money comes from, but perhaps there will less scrambling leading up to the next Ohio filing deadline.
 
Ohio, with its 63 delegates, is a significant addition to Super Tuesday. Combined with the fact that a separate fight in Texas may bump the Lone Star State and its 155 delegates to April, Super Tuesday could look much different than we thought come March.

Discuss this post

Forget Ohio, how about Wisconsin?

WASHINGTON -- In just one month, Democrats have collected more than a half-million signatures from Wisconsinites hoping to kick Gov. Scott Walker (R) out of office, putting them well on their way to hit the threshold to trigger a recall election in 2012, with time to spare.

Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Mike Tate announced the news in a press conference conference on Thursday, saying that the party still planned to collect more than 700,000 signatures before the Jan. 17 deadline, when recall organizers must turn their petitions into the Government Accountability Office, which oversees state elections. They must have 540,208 valid signatures in order to trigger a recall race.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/15/scott-walker-recall-democrats-target-signatures_n_1150931.html?ref=politics

Buh Bye Scooter!

  • 11 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:49 PM EST

It's winter in Wisconsin ... Wisconsinites become Canadians in the winter. Scotty going walkies.

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:24 PM EST

Gingrich just made the deadline. Lawd, have mercy. What a putz!!! How has Newt changed? Any one who thinks Newt is reconciled has to crazy.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:39 PM EST
Reply

Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL


Buh Bye Scooter!

Feisty,

No matter how much that weasel runs over to FOX NOISE for help he is going down.


  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:50 PM EST

No matter how much that weasel runs over to FOX NOISE for help he is going down.

Copy that GF! That would be the freakin cross-eyed weasel!

Ring! Ring! I think that's the Kock Brothers calling him now! ;o)

  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:00 PM EST

Wisconsin is the poster child of the GOP's failed political ambitions. It's going to haunt the news for throughout the election. It may be as much of a negative image for the Republicans as Gingrich.

Speaking of Newt, if I were on Obama's campaign staff I would be cheering for Newt to win the nomination. Gingrich is walking in a mine field of his own making and it is only a matter of time before he steps in it, big time!

  • 6 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:39 PM EST

What a shame that in Wisconsin they tried getting expenditures under control, rather than running deficits like so many other states. What is so terribly wrong with those state employees paying a small share of there health care and retirement like millions of us who did not work for any government entity did all of our working careers. Public employees do not work for starvation wages. Go ahead, recall the Governor, rewrite the laws so your state goes bankrupt and then everyone in the state will have to suffer. I paid for my retirement and my healthcare (and it was not cheap) so why should public workers get so much of a better deal. Fairness is not evil.

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:00 PM EST

States are not allowed to run deficits like the fed...When they say they have a deficit thet mean in the future if they don't cut they would " theoreticaly" have a deficit not actually operating under a deficit

  • 1 vote
#5.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:06 AM EST

So how informed are you consumer?

  • 3 votes
#5.2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:06 AM EST

So sw philly,

How come California has a multi-billion dollar deficit? And I will be glad when all this recall talk is a moot point. The unions will have to spend their rank and file's hard earned union dues to keep their sacred cows!

  • 1 vote
#5.3 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:17 AM EST

Washington is running a 2 billion dollar deficit...... Talking about raising taxes to fix it also, not going over well with the citizens and the unions are up in arms over cuts to their bennies..... Talk about a liberal government being between a rock and a hard place...

  • 2 votes
#5.4 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:03 AM EST

The unions in Wisconsin had already capitulated and agreed to pay more towards pension and healthcare, but Walker went ahead with his plans to kill collective bargaining anyway. The additional tax breaks that went with the union busting were always part of the Koch/Walker plan and any concessions by the unions were not going to change it. The plan was set in stone when Walker was elected.

You are anything BUT informed.

  • 1 vote
#5.5 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:43 PM EST

Collective bargaining for public unions is nothing more than fleecing the public out of hard earned tax payer dollars. Unions were established back in the day to have a voice for the workers against management. Here, collective bargaining for public employees is nothing more than an easy way to bilk the public out of tax dollars. I sincerely hope this recall effort falls flat on its face. The ONLY people that this benefits are public employees. The rest of the public is getting raked over the coals.

    #5.6 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:55 PM EST
    Reply
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.