IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was disrupted by more than a dozen protesters as he started to give an address on brain science on Wednesday afternoon at the University of Iowa.
"Mic check. Mr. Gingrich, we are here to protest your speech today." the protesters yelled inside the 250-seat auditorium that had standing room only.
"I appreciate that 95 percent percent of you, maybe even 99 percent of you wanted to actually have an intelligent discussion and are not going to be drowned out by the 1% who try to impose there will by trying to make noise," Gingrich fired back after listening politely and delaying his speech for roughly five minutes.
The speaker was criticized by two of his GOP rivals today -- Mitt Romney and Ron Paul -- and was asked to address these criticisms by the press in light of Gingrich's call to run a positive campaign.
"I think a brain science initiative is the way of helping human beings… I'll let him decide if it's zany," Gingrich said in response to Romney having called Gingrich "zany" in an interview earlier in the day with the New York Times.
"They should run their campaign the way they want to. I'm going to run my campaign the way I want to. My campaign's going to focus on positive ideas and positive solutions and I'm frankly taking the gamble that the American people care about actually solving our country's problems, not just watching politicians beat each other up," Gingrich responded.
Speaker Gingrich called Ron Paul a "formidable candidate" who he takes "very seriously" and said he wants to continue to run a "positive" campaign despite Paul laughing at his proposal to not go negative.
"The question is," the speaker told the press on his competitors going negative, "after we're done with the first wave of negativity, do people start shrugging it off and saying it says more about the person who runs the ad than it does about Newt Gingrich."
Gingrich met with a group of 30 scientists following his speech here at the university to discuss his strategies for saving money in the brain science field.
He continues finishes his two-day swing of Iowa tomorrow when he participates in the final GOP debate before the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses.


How DARE they! lol
WHOA!
Color me impressed!
Newt talking 'brain science' to a TeaPeople group?
Now, that's funny!
Really Feisty - you are impressed?
Huh. it's almost like you fail to grasp that Iowa, in its entirety has a population of about 3 million.
Whereas your great city, and very densely packed progressive paradise has about 2.7.
Like I said earlier - po-dunk.
@Chilled - that made me chuckle too, until I read this line. Of course, it is only about the money.
Gingrich wants everyone to run "clean" campaigns purely because he stands to lose the most if his GOP colleagues dredge up dirt. Newt is a walking time bomb of old crimes, old scandals, and old enemies.
Monkey Nuts,
Perhaps you have never been to Iowa City but the Iowa City Metropolitan Area has 150,000 people and the University of Iowa. Math is not my long suit but I am fairly sure 250 people would be .0016th of the resident population. A turn out of 250 is good for a grade school basketball game but poor for the Iowa City East Youth Football. On a Saturday or Sunday morning in less time than this appearance more than 250 people go through the Naples Ave Dunkin Donuts.
jkh
go to hell
Lead the way - we'll be right behind you. Honest.
You can love Gingrich or hate him for whatever reason you like...doesn't matter to me. But the guy is as sharp as a saber...I loved how he tossed out the "99%" and "1%" tags on the folks in the room.
TO: sammed who wrote:
You first.
The dependent upon providers is the name of the game. Those who have, majority vs those who want what they have no intention of working for it.That is the 99$ who are really 25%.
"I appreciate that 95 percent percent of you, maybe even 99 percent of you wanted to actually have an intelligent discussion and are not going to be drowned out by the 1% who try to impose there will by trying to make noise,"
What a great comeback to the loud and obnoxious nuts whose whole purpose is to disrupt intelligent discourse.
I'm real impressed Feisty. More than a whole dozen. That's 12, right!!
Of course, if the conservatives got into a liberal speech and protested, they would be labeled political terrorists. Your hypocrisy is a joke.
...and Obama hides under his pillow.
Obama is hiding? Gingrich is the one who is desperately trying to avoid a head-on collision with our President!
Gingrich vs. Obama
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_gingrich_vs_obama-1453.html
I have started my own countdown clock for when the President caves on the Payroll tax/Keystone bill.
T - minus 6 days.
No one actually doubts that he'll, ummm, compromise, do they?
I don't even think he wants it stopped. he's just pandering to the environmentalists in his base.
Tough sell - to be against more and cheaper oil and job production.
Should be interesting to see what the senate does. Many dems are all in for more oil and jobs. Manchin, Tester, Nelson.
Spanky-, that oil is Canada`s oil, oil is a commodity and it will be sold to you as per world market prices. If you don`t like that then we will sell it to China. Is not capitalism just great!
I kind of like the idea of building state-of-the-art refining facilities in the Pacific Northwest. The pipeline will have less impact, since it will be shorter. The facilities will create permanent jobs, in addition to the construction jobs, and our refining capabilities will be more reliable. I realize the Pacific Northwest has a risk of earthquake, but we've already seen what can happen to the Gulf Coast.
Let us not forget that the pipeline is only being delayed due to the concern that the proposed route was over an important aquifer in Nebraska . . . at the request of the Republican/TP Inc. party Nebraska Governor. The delay is to simply plan a slightly different route through Nebraska to prevent a potential disaster that could pollute the drinking water that Nebraskans depend upon. It takes a while to carefully plan those things so that they are done right, thus the delay until 2013. Again, as requested by the Republican/TP Inc. party Nebraska Governor.
The facts will set you free.
Here's where he is caught between a rock and a hard place.
Not just any jobs.
UNION jobs.
White Collar:
Canadian union jobs.
Spanky:
Republican run Nebraska has stopped the pipeline, not Obama.
If President Obama "caves" on the Keystone Pipe Line, it will be because, again, the American Middle Class and Poor will be held hostage.
If he doesn't "cave" then only the Middle Class and the Poor will suffer, not the TP/Republican Rich House and their lord and master, Grover Norquist.
. But, one of these days there will be no middle class only the poor and no money to pour into the Corporate Welfare.
If he doesn't "cave" then he will be called down for that also. Regarding Union Jobs they are still the only jobs that pay enough to make the payments that are due for the union families. I would think that everyone would be organizing at this point in time. Do you really think that Americans will continue to take this greed of your House Representatives and their bowing down to Norquist.
Norquist will not become the first dictator of America no matter what he thinks.
And, this bill to help the Middle and Poor Classes should not have had any other items attached to it.
I hope Cantor, Boehner, McConnell and the others will soon feel the burn of the American voters.
-+
hahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhaha hahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahaha*takes breath* hahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhaha
I had to edit this because I started to laugh again.
hahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahhaha
k fin
nice comeback rechid. almost like u had something to say.
The minute I heard that David Gregory was launching MSNBC politics, I knew it was going to be made up of the usual NBC bias for Obama. The good thing is we can tell who they are most scared of by who they try to tear down the most.
Feisty Impressed Roselle, IL
What doth "You have to start added a disclaimer ideo!" mean? Thou shalt not type while laughing!
What if? Ron Paul wins Iowa...what if?
The same thing as if Mike Huckbee won Iowa, that's "what if"?
A lot of what ifs, What if Obama aka Soetoro released his real birth certificate?
What if you teabaggers finally found a real issue to discuss instead of teleprompters, 57 states, and birth certificates? Someone finally might have to take you seriously...or not.
TO: Kurt's comments who wrote:
Carnival Barker.
Well SAilcat,
How about a unconstitutional Socialist take over of our health care
How about putting a section in the defense bill to hold AMERICAN CITIZENS indefinitely in total contrast to our bill of rights
How about traveling the world appoligizing for America
How about spending billions on "shovel ready jobs" to pay back union supporters and whining when he can't do it again
How about the largest increase in the national debt in history
How about spending millions on telling people they shouldn't drink soda or eat salt when the FDA can't keep contaminated food our of our supply chain
How about trying to make former working people welfare mentallity voters for him by keeping them on ever continued unemployment instead of allowing jobs to be created.
How about starting more wars after getting elected by saying he would end the two we were i
How about all the czars he brought from Chicago, many with criminal and communist histories
I could go on and on but how about those for starters.
he won't.
Finally Newt is 100% correct on Brain Science. Correcting brain chemicals can cure numerous diseases-mental and physical. It can be quite inexpensive by comparison. It is a facinating new field.
elaine, the correct terminology is Neuroscience and it is not new.
Hmmm, just what chemicals are you referring to Elaine? The ones being billed to Medicaid even when patients don't need them because the drug company reps push the docs for numbers? The 188.5 TONS of unused drugs collected this year by the DEA so they don't end up in our water supply? (National Take Back Initiative)
Or whatever the drug companies choose to push having made their contributions to Gingrich's campaign in exchange for this speech? So now there is a "lobbyist" who is an "historian" speaking on "brain science". Amazing. How much is his fee for this business/self interest speaking engagement?
My ex-wife was on Prozac. She actually needed it. She went off of it once, and turned into the . . . well,, let's just say that it was not a pretty picture.
Yes, Elaine, you are correct, it is a fascinating field. It is kind of interesting that people who are supposedly very intelligent people (i.e. Newt . . . is it me, or does anyone else think of an animal from a story like The Hobbit, or some other fantasy tale, when you see, hear, write or say 'Newt'?) would say 'brain science', instead of 'neuroscience', though.
How about Monty Python.....
"She's a witch. She turned me into a Newt!"
"You don't look like a Newt."
"I got better."
Nice, JC! Thanks, that works, too.
Newt.
Hand, slap Talk.
JUST like the socialist communist democrats ,they don't have any record of success so they disrupt name call , ETC ,The constitutional Democrats are leaving the party
NEWT is actively looking and involving LEADING the American people , in finding solutions for vast number of serious problems facing our country , IN this campaign we are watching a true leader at work , and when you get past the news media propaganda lies , you find that most of the allegations against Newt are just that LIES ,
NEWT is the only candidate leading the American people finding and providing solutions
THE NEWT obama debates are going to make history World history as the Greatest debates of all time NEWT with the American peoples solutions obama with Failed leadership Failed policies
So, Darrel, are you saying that Newt was not fined $300,000.00 for ethics violations while he was serving as Speaker of the House? Are you saying that Newt did not resign 3 days after winning his election in 1998 due pressure from his fellow Republican/TP Inc. party members? Are you saying that he did not have an extra-marital affair while trying to impeach President Clinton for getting a BJ?
Is that what you mean by ". . . you find that most of the allegations against Newt are just that LIES."
If you substituted the word TRUTH for the word LIES in Darrel's rant, it would make much more sense.
Point of fact, Newt was convicted of providing false information to the committee that was investigating his ethics violations. He was penalized $300,000.00 to help pay for the investigations into his conduct. He was also forced out of his office by his own party because he represented a huge liability.
Newt is, therefore, a liar and a cheat. No lie.
Wow, just wow.
Could you tell us which facts are actually lies, or do we have to guess?
Oh, guess. It'll be more fun. I'll guess his name's not really Darrel.
Anyone want to place a wager on whether or not those debates would ever actually take place?
Hey Chuck Todd...how's that middle finger?
They say he flipped the bird to an off camera person. FRH, maybe?
So?
"Are you saying that he did not have an extra-marital affair while trying to impeach President Clinton for getting a BJ?"
Why do you guys keep getting this wrong? He was impeached for lying to a grand jury....and you want to question Newt's intelligence by using the words "brain science" instead of neuroscience?
BTW have you attended any of the occupy Houston rallies? I haven't seen any of these jackasses around Jefferson & Main St. I guess many of them are still hanging out in Jame Bute park?
Gringich and the word "clen"should never go together. Everything he has done all through his political career is the exact opposite of clean. Common newt, only dogs jump from one woman to the other to the other to the other, ok?
Are you calling President Clinton a dog?
Are the protesters "occupy" goofballs that had bus fare to Iowa? I can't imagine the good folks in Iowa acting so rudely but I can picture the clueless "occupy" people right in there running their mouths and ruining the evening for everyone like spoiled brats. If the Tea Party sent a contingent to an Obama speech I could not imagine them heckling. Therein lies the difference. The liberals are nothing but spoiled children that need a good spanking after having their mouths washed out with soap. The "Occupy" people are truly the 1 per cent - the one per cent that doesn't get it.
Do you remember the townhall meetings that were disrupted by TP'ers who refused to allow a discussion of the Healthcare bill?
As you age, memory is the second thing to go. I forget what's first.
The real 1% er's are the "Occupy" movement smufs. I find it funny that if you asked what they are protesting, and everyone of them has a different answer. And NOT ONE of them has a bit of common sense.
I think we "get it" better than you do. We are against having a government controlled by the wealthy 1%. This is a democracy! But the wealthy have the ablility to donate unlimited sums of money to the candidate of their choice. We may all just have one vote but they can vote with their money and they have a lot more of it than you or I. We are against financial institutions that are deemed to big to fail that take the entire world's economy down because they were irresponsible and fraudelent. These banks were giving away loans no questions asked and then betting that they would fail! You know what I am glad the protestors interrupted his speech. The only way things are going to change is if we are rude. We cannot just sit idly back and watch the country fall into ruin out of the fear of being labeled rude. We are not spoiled. We are not just children. We are Americans and we have just as much a right as Gingrich does to speak our minds. Research what is going on in congress and in the business world and you might just find you agree with OWS. But not if you keep listening to the unrelentless smear campaign against them. Brought to you by the 1% of course.
I agree...Good Post.
Most informed people agree as well.
The ruling class writes the laws in their favor by purchasing politicians "called campaing donations" - why else would you see country club prisons as seen as the type Maddof is in...he ruined peoples lives just like a crack dealer ruins peoples lives.
Why do they get preferencial treatment.
Or the gulf oil spill where BP and Haliburton choose to recklessly select bypassing know safety procedures all in the name of higher profits if their gamble paid off. Until we as Americans insist and change that all are held accountable under the same rules they will continue to purposely screw the weaker class.
If hard jail sentences were immenint for all involved in that fiaso do you think they would have let the Risk Management group accept the risks...because it's cheaper to pay repairations and cleanup than to do it right. Maybe the risk of spending time (10-20 years for all involved?) in jail with Bubba as your roomate would change that instead of going to a dorm room with a fence around it...eating better meals than 50% of Americans.
There is a fight going on and the Republican ruling class has been at it secretly for the last 20 years....problem is we didn't know it, problem is the government condoned it and wrote laws making it legal to do so.
Im 50 years old, an Ex-Republican have been striving to get to that 1% class all my life....Trust me they won't let you in.
I was at an airport when a frazzled looking man came to the checkin counter. He said he was delayed because no buses were stopping to pick him up in the airport long-term parking, so now he was in danger of missing his flight. The airport employee told him to get in line. The man said, but I'm going to miss my flight because the airport bus didn't stop and now I'm late. The airport employee told him to get in line. That was when the man started shouting, "Help, Help. I'm going to miss my flight and no one will help me." The airport employee started to panic and got on the phone. Shortly, a manager type came up and got him through.
The point of the story is - Occupy needs to be loud or no one will pay attention.
Yelling and screaming and causing disrupitons during a public forum where the speaker wants an inellogent debate? IS THIS A RERUN OF THE THE PARTY when democrats were trying to talk about health care? NO?!?! I could have swore it was. Looks exactly the same1 Funny, it was OK then.
Change is not pretty nor easily come by.
I could give a damn if they re offended at some protesters voicing their opinion; and the arrogance of Newt makes me want to puke.
Congress has already passed a known segment of the Defense Bill to hold Americans indefinately under the guise of National Security without due process....whose to say in the future these disruptions will not "deemed" a National Security Issue. Thank god President Obama has theatened to veto this travesty of the American way.
Go ahead a lay down your rights.
I support these people and the OWS with all my heart.
Please Republicans. Nominate Ron Paul and you might even get my vote. Any of those other knuckleheads and forget it.
Ron Paul is the only Stand-up Republican in the feild, forcing the Fed with Bernie Sanders into their first ever audit.....
Slamming Bush last week on 911 and the Iraq war; and I quote when he was aked by a local reporters about the war
Ron Paul said "I was completely disgusted with the absolute Glee the Bush administration had when we were attacked on 911, because now he had the reason they wanted to attack Iraq".
I commend him for saying the truth.
Mark my words....even if he is the polls popular vate in the primaries ...He will not get the nomination.
To bad because even though some of his foreign policy is squirely he does seem to be a statesman and understand the inequality thats being forced upon the majority of America.
I despise people who refer to themselves in the third person. Newt does it regularly. I despise Newt. I would just like to point out that it is one of the approximately 49 reasons I despise Newt. It's #23 - egomaniac.
(Joking about the list but not about despising him).
IF NOTHING CHANGES, NOTHING CHANGES, AND IF LEADER IS NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION HE/SHE IS
PART OF THE PROBLEM!
Partisan politics is nonsense. Competent candidates exist in both parties. S&P and the Simpson Bowles commission, appointed by Obama, confirmed the present mode of operation is unsustainable, yet the administration refuses to acknowledge the problem and take corrective action. We must demand Obama submit a proposal to cut expenses, and increases revenue (through job creation), or we need to elect someone that has the experience and initiative to do so.
The GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO STOP INSULTING OUR INTELLIGENCE AND MAKE THE APPROPRIATE DECISIONS!
David...Who in the sideshow would you recommend? Newt is only in i for the$ and the ego stroke, Bachmann and Perry are not smart enough. Pollenti and Ron Paul are a sick joke. Then you have Mitt. Good luck to us all if he should be the new flavor of the month. Huntsman is the only choice ...but we are to blind to see it. So for my vote Obama in 2012...but with a lot less Rep/baggers.
David,
Simpson Bowles also stated that increases in revenue should come through the elimination of some Bush era tax cuts.
Newt wants clean campaigns.What is that a joke.What would he know about an honest politician.Or an honest husband.Or an honest lobbyist.Or an honest anything for that matter.
Watch the posts / blogs / and 'comments' from the left - the 'progressives' will tell you wh they fear - and they fear ANYONE who will hold the current Presdient to explain his reord for the past three years. All they have is name-calling and distraction, and that will not be enough - Romney will likely be the nominee of the Republican party, but - at this point - my cat is more qualified a leader than the current President, and could probably beat him in NOVEMBER 2012!! Let's end the Obamunist nightmare, and revive the American dream!
I agree, your cat would have a better chance than Newt, or Romney.
Going down in 2012 - the Obama era ends and America wins (and my cat will be happy once again). I guess we need these periodic times of whimsey like the Carter disaster to get right once again with the American dream.
Appears these Protestors advicate the "freedom" to disrupt free speech rather the freedom of speech. They need to move to North Korea where they would feel more at home
Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that they apparently have no editing standards for articles on MSNBC. I mean "95 percent percent" and "impose there will" in one paragraph is a bit much. How about at least making a meager attempt to maintain some journalistic pride.....
At msnbc lol ...hell there to busy getting thrills up there legs ....
MSNBC would have to hire some journalists first...they don't have any right now; just asst spokesmen for the WH and DNC!!!!
Quick 'Real' and 'Sono' - Since you're so good at being against - 5 reason to vote for President Obama in 2012 - based on his policies:
I'll spot you the first one - 1) If you are a public sector employee, he will institute 'stimulus 2 through 5 to artificially prop up your job and pension. 2) - go! (you're turn)
Hey all you posters who are so good at name calling and telling us what you are AGAINST. Can you give 5 legitimate reason to vote FOR President Obama based on his actual policies and record?
I'll spot you the first:
1) If you vote FOR Presdient Obama, your healthcare insurance will be paid for by the working people of America.
2) - GO - your turn .....
........................crickets chirping.....................
Well Newt is smart enough to know he has 10x more dirt, baggage, flip-flopping and unethical dealings to be used against him than any other candidate, it would be suicide for him to engage in that sort of campaign.
Which is what Obama is counting on running a negative campaign citing all Newt's past transgressions.....otherwise if he had to run on his record as POTUS there wouldn't be much to tout.
With all Newt's dirt, remember, he IS the only one up there who has forced a balanced federal budget! Hell, the current crop of Dems on the Hill haven't even passed a budget - balanced or not - in almost 3 yrs! If you all remember during the whole Clinton debacle...all the Dems kept saying that they didn't care what he did in his personal life, it has nothing to do with them and it has nothing to do with his job! Short memory you Jackarses (ya know, YOUR MASCOT) have!!!!